PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
j2
Global Communications, Inc.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited,
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
138,784 |
|
|
$ |
154,220 |
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
54,297 |
|
Accounts
receivable,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net
of allowances of $2,849 and $1,378, respectively
|
|
|
15,129 |
|
|
|
15,365 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4,287 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
159,985 |
|
|
|
230,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
investments
|
|
|
11,068 |
|
|
|
21,241 |
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,235 |
|
|
|
23,511 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
67,257 |
|
|
|
39,452 |
|
Other
purchased intangibles, net
|
|
|
33,837 |
|
|
|
29,220 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
|
6,113 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
300,720 |
|
|
$ |
350,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
22,768 |
|
|
$ |
17,516 |
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
14,018 |
|
|
|
14,708 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
40,601 |
|
|
|
36,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
income tax liability
|
|
|
34,310 |
|
|
|
30,863 |
|
Other
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
74,941 |
|
|
|
67,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
225,779 |
|
|
|
282,614 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
300,720 |
|
|
$ |
350,409 |
|
See
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
j2
Global Communications, Inc.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited,
in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriber
|
|
$ |
59,537 |
|
|
$ |
52,613 |
|
|
$ |
116,752 |
|
|
$ |
102,906 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
5,215 |
|
|
|
|
60,677 |
|
|
|
53,980 |
|
|
|
119,325 |
|
|
|
108,121 |
|
Cost
of revenues (including share-based compensation of $212 and $387
for the three and six months of 2008, respectively, and
$140 and $322 for the three and six months of 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
11,725 |
|
|
|
10,232 |
|
|
|
23,356 |
|
|
|
21,222 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
48,952 |
|
|
|
43,748 |
|
|
|
95,969 |
|
|
|
86,899 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing (including share-based compensation of $328
and $666 for the three and six months of 2008, respectively,
and $264 and $542 for the three and six months
of 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
9,672 |
|
|
|
20,799 |
|
|
|
18,452 |
|
Research,
development and engineering (including share-based compensation
of $191 and $405 for the three and six months of
2008, respectively, and $184 and $357 for the three and
six months of 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
5,689 |
|
General
and administrative (including share-based compensation
of $1,243 and $2,543 for the three and six
months of 2008, respectively, and $1,114 and $2,211 for
the three and six months of 2007,
respectively)
|
|
|
11,292 |
|
|
|
8,950 |
|
|
|
22,449 |
|
|
|
18,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
24,888 |
|
|
|
21,598 |
|
|
|
49,406 |
|
|
|
42,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
earnings
|
|
|
24,064 |
|
|
|
22,150 |
|
|
|
46,563 |
|
|
|
43,983 |
|
Interest
and other income, net
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
Earnings
before income taxes
|
|
|
24,627 |
|
|
|
24,548 |
|
|
|
48,454 |
|
|
|
48,106 |
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
7,897 |
|
|
|
7,470 |
|
|
|
14,930 |
|
|
|
14,589 |
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$ |
16,730 |
|
|
$ |
17,078 |
|
|
$ |
33,524 |
|
|
$ |
33,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
44,142,748 |
|
|
|
49,108,309 |
|
|
|
45,700,933 |
|
|
|
48,966,111 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
45,688,869 |
|
|
|
51,007,561 |
|
|
|
47,026,104 |
|
|
|
50,844,416 |
|
See
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
j2
Global Communications, Inc.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited,
in thousands)
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$ |
33,524 |
|
|
$ |
33,517 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
|
3,549 |
|
Tax
benefit of vested restricted stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Tax
benefit of stock option exercises
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
(2,943 |
) |
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
Loss
on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Decrease
(increase) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
(Decrease)
increase in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
(3,061 |
) |
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
2,663 |
|
Accrued
income tax liability
|
|
|
3,067 |
|
|
|
9,373 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
51,251 |
|
|
|
49,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
purchases of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(34,575 |
) |
Sales
of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
36,170 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Redemptions/Sales
of held-to-maturity investments
|
|
|
27,883 |
|
|
|
5,656 |
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,265 |
) |
|
|
(3,035 |
) |
Acquisition
of businesses, net of cash received
|
|
|
(33,278 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
Purchases
of intangible assets
|
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
|
|
(3,066 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
27,846 |
|
|
|
(35,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases
of common stock
|
|
|
(97,336 |
) |
|
|
(10,184 |
) |
Repurchase
of restricted stock
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Issuance
of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
4,672 |
|
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
Repayment
of long-term debt
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(95,890 |
) |
|
|
(2,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(15,436 |
) |
|
|
12,542 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
154,220 |
|
|
|
95,605 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
138,784 |
|
|
$ |
108,147 |
|
See
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis
of Presentation
j2 Global
Communications, Inc. (“j2 Global”, “our”, “us” or “we”) is a Delaware
corporation founded in 1995. By leveraging the power of the Internet, we provide
outsourced, value-added messaging and communications services to individuals and
businesses throughout the world. We offer fax, voicemail, email and call
handling services and bundled suites of certain of these services. We market our
services principally under the brand names eFax®, eFax BroadcastTM, eFax Corporate®, eFax DeveloperTM, Fax.comTM, jBlast®, RapidFAXTM, Send2Fax®, jConnect®, Onebox®, eVoice®, eVoice ReceptionistTM, Onebox ReceptionistTM,
Phone People®, YAC® and
Electric Mail®.
The
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of j2 Global and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited
and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) including those for interim
financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
note disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected in
these interim financial statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to
the prior years to conform to current presentations. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related
notes for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2008.
The
results of operations for this interim period are not necessarily indicative of
the operating results for the full year or for any future period.
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
including judgments about investment classifications, and the reported amounts
of net revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis,
management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue
recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts and the valuation of deferred
income taxes, income tax contingencies, non-income tax contingencies,
share-based compensation expense, long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill.
These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other factors
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, provides a framework for measuring fair
value and expands the disclosures required for fair value measurements. SFAS 157
applies to all accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements;
it does not require any new fair value measurements. For fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, companies are required to implement SFAS 157 for
financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any other assets and
liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial
statements. The FASB provided a one-year deferral for the implementation of SFAS
157 for other nonfinancial assets and liabilities. We adopted SFAS 157 on
January 1, 2008.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(“SFAS 159”).
SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets
and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159 requires an entity to report unrealized
gains and losses on eligible items which the entity has elected to use the fair
value option in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. As permitted by
SFAS 159, we have elected not to use the fair value option to measure our
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities under SFAS 159 and will
continue to report them under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities (“SFAS 115”). We have made this election
because the nature of our financial assets and liabilities are not of such
complexity that they would benefit from a change in valuation to fair
value.
We
account for our short and long-term investments in debt securities in accordance
with SFAS 115 and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. These investments
are comprised primarily of readily marketable corporate debt securities, debt
instruments of the U.S. government and its agencies and auction rate debt and
preferred securities. We determine the appropriate classification of our
investments at the time of acquisition and reevaluate such determination at each
balance sheet date. Held-to-maturity securities are those investments that we
have the ability and intent to hold until maturity. Held-to-maturity securities
are recorded at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at
fair value, with unrealized gains or losses recorded as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity until
realized.
We
account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(“SFAS 109”), which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be
recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences
between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS 109 also
requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is
more likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Our valuation allowance is reviewed quarterly based upon the facts and
circumstances known at the time. In assessing this valuation allowance, we
review historical and future expected operating results and other factors to
determine whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are
realizable. We had approximately $8.9 million in net deferred tax assets as of
June 30, 2008. Based on our review, we concluded that these net deferred tax
assets do not require valuation allowances as of June 30, 2008. The net deferred
tax assets should be realized through future operating results and the reversal
of temporary differences.
Effective
January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes— an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48
provides guidance on the minimum threshold that an uncertain tax benefit is
required to meet before it can be recognized in the financial statements and
applies to all tax positions taken by a company. FIN 48 contains a two-step
approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in
accordance with SFAS 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for
recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it
is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step
is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely
of being realized upon settlement. If it is not more likely than not that the
benefit will be sustained on its technical merits, no benefit will be recorded.
Uncertain tax positions that relate only to timing of when an item is included
on a tax return are considered to have met the recognition threshold. We
recognized accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits
in income tax expense on our consolidated statement of operations (see Note 6 –
“Income Taxes”).
In
February 2008, j2 Global’s Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase
program (“the Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to five million shares
of our common stock through the end of December 2010. We account for these
repurchases under this program using the cost method as treasury stock under
Stockholders’ Equity. On July 9, 2008, the Program was completed. For additional
information see Note 7 Stockholders’ Equity of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Part II - Item 2. (b). Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
2. Investments
The
following table summarizes our short and long-term investments designated as
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity classified by the contractual maturity
date of the security (in thousands):
|
|
As
of
June
30, 2008
|
|
|
As
of
December
31, 2007
|
|
Due
within 1 year
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
54,297 |
|
Due
within more than 1 year but less than 5 years
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,949 |
|
Due
within more than 5 years but less than 10 years
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
Due
10 years or after
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investments
|
|
$ |
11,129 |
|
|
$ |
75,538 |
|
At
June 30, 2008, auction rate debt and preferred securities totaled $11.1 million.
As of June 30, 2008, the auction rate debt securities have stated maturities
through 2037. The auction rate preferred securities have no stated maturity
dates. These securities have interest rates that reset periodically at
established intervals of 90 days or less. Each of these auction rate securities
have encountered multiple failed auctions over the past several months, which
means that these securities are illiquid unless and until a future auction is
successful. If the issuer’s credit rating deteriorates before a successful
auction occurs, we may be required to adjust the carrying value of the
investment through an impairment charge. During the fourth quarter of 2007, as a
result of such failed auctions, we reclassified short-term available-for-sale
investments of $11.4 million to long-term held-to-maturity investments and
recognized an unrealized loss of $0.3 million in accumulated other comprehensive
income/(loss). This unrealized loss is amortized over the remaining lives of the
held-to-maturity investments. As we have the ability and intent to hold these
auction rate debt securities until maturity, we do not anticipate the lack of
liquidity on these investments to affect our ability to operate our business as
usual. There have been no significant changes in the maturity dates and average
interest rates for our investment portfolio and debt obligations subsequent to
June 30, 2008. At June 30, 2008, our long-term held-to-maturity securities are
carried at amortized cost, with the unrealized gains and losses reported as a
component of stockholders’ equity,
On a
quarterly basis, we assess whether an other-than-temporary impairment loss on an
investment has occurred due to declines in fair value or other market
conditions. There were no other-than-temporary impairment losses in the quarter
ended June 30, 2008. There were no restrictions on cash and cash equivalents or
investments as of June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, the current fair value and
book value of auction rate securities were approximately $9.5 million and $11.1
million, respectively.
3. Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee
Insurance Contracts—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60 (“SFAS
163”). SFAS 163 requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim
liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence
that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. SFAS
163 also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for
premium revenue and claim liabilities. SFAS 163 also requires expanded
disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS 163 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after
December 15, 2008. As we are not involved in financial guarantee insurance (and
reinsurance) contracts, we do not expect SFAS 163 to have a material impact on
our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used
in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the U.S. (the GAAP
hierarchy). SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not
expect SFAS 162 to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should
be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” FSP 142-3 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the
potential impact of FSP 142-3 on our consolidated financial position and results
of operations.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about a
company’s derivative and hedging activities. These enhanced disclosures must
discuss (a) how and why a company uses derivative instruments (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB
Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations; and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS 161 is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with
earlier adoption allowed. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS 161.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS
141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquiror of a business (a) recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures in its financial
statements the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase; and (c) determines what information to disclose to enable
users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. We do not expect SFAS 141(R) to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS
160”). SFAS 160 requires that the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by
parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled and presented in
the consolidated balance sheets within equity, but separate from the parent’s
equity. In addition, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the
parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. SFAS 160 also
requires that changes in the parent’s ownership interest be accounted for as
equity transactions if a subsidiary is deconsolidated and any retained
noncontrolling equity investment be measured at fair value. It also requires,
that disclosures clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent and noncontrolling owners. The provisions of SFAS 160 are
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing
the potential impact of SFAS 160 on our consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
4. Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net
tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination.
Intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions of entities accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting are recorded at the estimated fair value
of the assets acquired. Identifiable intangible assets are comprised of
purchased customer relationships, trademarks and trade names, developed
technologies and other intangible assets. Identifiable intangible assets are
amortized using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging
from two to twenty years.
The
changes in carrying amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Balance
as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Balance
as of
|
|
|
|
January
1, 2008
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
June
30, 2008
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
39,452 |
|
|
$ |
27,589 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
67,257 |
|
Intangible
assets with indefinite lives
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Intangible
assets subject to amortization
|
|
|
26,836 |
|
|
|
7,173 |
|
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
31,337 |
|
|
|
$ |
68,672 |
|
|
$ |
34,878 |
|
|
$ |
(2,736 |
) |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
101,094 |
|
Intangible
assets with indefinite lives relate primarily to a trade name. As of June 30,
2008, intangible assets subject to amortization relate primarily to the
following (in thousands):
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Patents
|
8.7
years
|
|
$ |
22,352 |
|
|
$ |
7,049 |
|
|
$ |
15,303 |
|
Technology
|
2.1
years
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
Customer
relationships
|
4.8
years
|
|
|
8,351 |
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
|
|
5,179 |
|
Trade
name
|
13.7
years
|
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
8,493 |
|
Total
|
|
|
$ |
46,218 |
|
|
$ |
14,881 |
|
|
$ |
31,337 |
|
Amortization
expense, included in general and administrative expense, during the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 approximated $1.4 million and $0.9 million,
respectively. Amortization expense, included in general and administrative
expense, during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 approximated
$2.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated
to approximate $5.5 million, $5.2 million, $4.4 million, $2.7 million and $2.3
million for fiscal years 2008 through 2012, respectively, and $13.9 million
thereafter through the duration of the amortization period.
5. Litigation
In
February 2004 and July 2005, we filed two lawsuits against Venali in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California for infringement of
several of our U.S. patents. On December 27, 2006, Venali filed various
counterclaims against us, which relate in substantial part to the patent
infringement claims by us against Venali. All of the counterclaims have all been
dismissed, except those alleging antitrust violations based on our procurement
and enforcement of our patents. On May 11, 2007, the court entered a claim
construction order regarding the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. Since
that time, the parties have engaged in extensive discovery. On December 7, 2007,
Venali filed a motion for partial summary judgment of non-infringement. A
hearing on the motion was held on July 21, 2008. Trial is currently scheduled
for December 2008.
On
December 12, 2006, Venali filed suit against us in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent
Number 7,114,004 (the “ ’004 Patent”). Venali is seeking damages in the amount
of lost profits or a reasonable royalty, a permanent injunction against
continued infringement, treble damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and costs. On
March 6, 2007, we filed an answer to the complaint
denying liability. On May 17, 2007, we filed a request with the U.S. Patent
& Trademark Office for reexamination of the ’004 Patent, which request was
granted on July 27, 2007. On August 13, 2007, we moved to stay the action
pending the reexamination. On August 20, 2007, the court granted the motion and
stayed the action pending reexamination of the patent.
In
January 2006, we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the
Central District of California against Protus asserting causes of action for
violation of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, trespass to
chattels, and unfair business practices as a result of Protus sending “junk
faxes” to us and our customers. We are seeking statutory and treble damages,
attorneys fees, interest and costs, as well as a permanent injunction against
Protus continuing its junk fax sending practices. In September 2007, Protus
filed a counterclaim against us asserting the same causes of action as those
asserted against it, as well as claims for false advertising, trade libel,
tortious interference with prospective economic advantage and defamation. Protus
is seeking statutory and treble damages,
attorneys
fees, interest and costs, as well as a permanent injunction against us sending
any more junk faxes. The parties are engaged in extensive discovery. Trial is
currently set for September 29, 2009.
On May 9,
2007, Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. (“Bear Creek”) filed suit against us in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging
infringement of U.S. Patent Number 6,985,494. Bear Creek is seeking damages in
at least the amount of a reasonable royalty, a permanent injunction against
continued infringement, treble damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and costs. On
June 29, 2007, we filed an answer to the complaint denying liability, asserting
affirmative defenses, and asserting counterclaims of non-infringement and
invalidity. On September 21, 2007, Bear Creek filed its reply to our
counterclaims, denying each one. On February 11, 2008 we filed a request
for reexamination of the ‘494 patent. On February 28, 2008, the Court
stayed the case during the pendency of the reexamination proceedings. On April
18, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted the
reexamination request.
On
October 11, 2007, Integrated Global Concepts, Inc. (“IGC”) filed a lawsuit
against us, certain of our current and former officers and/or directors, one of
our affiliates, and several other parties in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia. The suit purports to allege violations of
antitrust law, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”)
and various related statutory and common law claims arising out of our
procurement and enforcement of our patents and our acquisition of certain
companies. IGC’s claims relate in substantial part to a patent infringement
action by our affiliate against IGC. The suit seeks damages, including treble
and punitive damages, an injunction against further violations, divestiture of
certain assets, attorneys’ fees and costs. On April 23, 2008, the court ordered
IGC to replead its counterclaims. IGC filed amended counterclaims on May 13,
2008. The amended counterclaims allege violations of Section 2 of the Sherman
Act and breach of contract, and seek the same relief as the original
counterclaim. On June 13, 2008, we moved to dismiss the amended counterclaims.
The motion remains pending.
On June
29, 2007, a purported class action was filed by Justin Lynch as the named
plaintiff in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California alleging that we have attempted to monopolize and/or monopolized the
market for Internet facsimile services to home and small offices in violation of
Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The claims relate in substantial part to the
patent infringement actions by us against various companies. The suit seeks
treble damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs. On August 24,
2007, we filed an answer to the complaint denying liability. The case is
stayed.
We do not
believe, based on current knowledge, that any of the foregoing legal proceedings
or claims is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. However, depending on the amount and the
timing, an unfavorable resolution of some or all of these matters could
materially affect our business, financial position, results of operations or
cash flows in a particular period.
6.
Income Taxes
Our tax
provision for interim periods is determined using an estimate of our annual
effective tax rate. Each quarter we update our annual estimate and make a
cumulative adjustment to reflect any changes. Our annual effective tax rate is
normally lower than the 35% U.S. federal statutory rate and applicable
apportioned state tax rates primarily due to anticipated earnings of our
subsidiaries located in non-U.S. jurisdiction with lower effective tax rates
than in the U.S. We do not provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed
operating earnings of our foreign operations since we intend to reinvest them in
our foreign jurisdictions.
Cash paid
for income taxes was $13.6 million and $2.6 for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Accrued income tax liabilities were $34.3 million
at June 30, 2008 and $30.9 million at December 31, 2007.
We are
currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the 2005 tax
year. It is possible that this audit may conclude in the next 12 months and that
the unrecognized tax benefits we have recorded in relation to the 2005 tax year
may change compared to the liabilities recorded for the period. However, it is
not possible to estimate the amount, if any, of such change. In connection with
the audit for the 2005 tax year, the IRS may audit the 2004 and 2006 tax years.
Pursuant to the IRS request, we have extended the statute of limitations for the
2004 through 2006 tax years to December 31, 2009.
7. Stockholders’
Equity
Common
Stock Repurchase Program
In
February 2008, j2 Global’s Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase
program (“the Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to five million shares
of our common stock through the end of December 2010. During the three months
ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased 3,534,189 shares at an aggregated cost of
approximately $75.9 million (including commission fees of $70,700). During the
three months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 1,001,227 shares at an
aggregated cost of approximately $21.4 million (including commission fees of
$20,000). As of June 30, 2008, there were 464,584 shares of common stock
available for repurchase under this program. On July 9, 2008, the Program was
completed.
8. Stock Options and Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
Our
equity-based compensation plans include our Second Amended and Restated 1997
Stock Option Plan, 2007 Stock Plan and 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Each
plan is described below.
The
Second Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “1997 Plan”) terminated
in 2007. As of June 30, 2008, 4,512,810 shares underlying options and 393,644
shares of restricted stock were outstanding and continued to be governed under
the 1997 Plan.
The 2007
Stock Plan (the “2007 Plan”), provides for the granting of incentive stock
options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, restricted stock units and other share-based awards. Four million five
hundred thousand shares of common stock are authorized to be used for 2007 Plan
purposes. Options under the 2007 Plan may be granted at exercise prices
determined by the Board of Directors, provided that the exercise prices shall
not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant
for incentive stock options and not less than 85% of the fair market value of
our common stock on the date of grant for non-statutory stock
options.
All stock
option grants are approved by “outside directors” within the meaning of Internal
Revenue Code Section 162m.
Stock
Options
The
following table represents stock option activity for the six months ended June
30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
(in years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
4,383,174 |
|
|
$ |
11.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
324,453 |
|
|
|
22.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(95,325 |
) |
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(99,492 |
) |
|
|
25.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
4,512,810 |
|
|
|
11.75 |
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
$ |
55,672,893 |
|
Exercisable
at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
2,977,171 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
51,899,065 |
|
Vested
and expected to vest at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
4,263,480 |
|
|
|
11.07 |
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
55,180,604 |
|
For the
six months ended June 30, 2008, we granted 324,453 options to purchase shares of
common stock
pursuant
to the 2007 Plan to newly hired and existing members of management. These stock
options vest 20% per year and expire 10 years from the date of
grant.
The per
share weighted-average grant-date fair values of stock options granted during
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $14.27 and $21.27,
respectively.
The
aggregate intrinsic values of options exercised during the six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 were $1.3 million and $11.6 million,
respectively.
As of
June 30, 2008, there was $22.2 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense related to non-vested share-based compensation awards. That expense is
expected to be recognized ratably over a weighted-average period of 3.8 years
(i.e., the weighted-average remaining requisite service period).
Fair Value
Disclosure
We use
the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair-value of each
option grant. The expected volatility for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is
based on historical volatility of our common stock. We elected to use the
simplified method for estimating the expected term as allowed by Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107. Under the simplified method, the expected
term is equal to the midpoint between the vesting period and the contractual
term of the stock option. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with a term equal to the expected term of the option assumed
at the date of grant. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on
historical experience.
The
weighted-average fair values of stock options granted have been estimated
utilizing the following assumptions:
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
3.2%
|
|
|
|
4.5%
|
|
Expected
term (in years)
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
64%
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
Weighted-average
volatility
|
|
|
64%
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
Share-Based Compensation
Expense
The
following table represents share-based compensation expense included in cost of
revenues and operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007 (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
Research,
development and engineering
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,974 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
|
$ |
4,001 |
|
|
$ |
3,432 |
|
Restricted
Stock
Compensation
expense resulting from restricted stock grants is measured at fair value on the
date of grant and is recognized as share-based compensation expense over a
five-year vesting period. We recognized approximately $860,000 of related
compensation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2008 related to restricted
stock awards. As of June 30, 2008, we have unrecognized share-based compensation
cost of approximately $6.9 million associated with these awards. This cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.5
years (i.e., the weighted-average remaining requisite service
period).
Restricted
stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is set forth
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Nonvested
at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
359,550 |
|
|
$ |
22.94 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
58,474 |
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(9,380 |
) |
|
|
28.17 |
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
22.45 |
|
Nonvested
at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
393,644 |
|
|
|
23.86 |
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Our 2001
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”), provides for the issuance of
a maximum of two million shares of common stock. Under the Purchase Plan,
eligible employees can have up to 15% of their earnings withheld, up to certain
maximums, to be used to purchase shares of j2 Global’s common stock at certain
plan-defined dates. The price of the common stock purchased under the Purchase
Plan for the offering periods is equal to 95% of the fair market value of the
common stock on the specified purchase date. For the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, 5,435 and 5,040 shares were purchased under the plan,
respectively. Cash received upon the issuance of common stock under the Purchase
Plan was $112,000 and $132,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
9. Earnings
Per Share
Basic
earnings per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of
common stock equivalents using the “treasury stock” method. The components of
basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows (in thousands, except share
and per share data):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic and diluted net earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$ |
16,730 |
|
|
$ |
17,078 |
|
|
$ |
33,524 |
|
|
$ |
33,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
outstanding shares of common stock
|
|
|
44,142,748 |
|
|
|
49,108,309 |
|
|
|
45,700,933 |
|
|
|
48,966,111 |
|
Dilutive
effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock options
|
|
|
1,484,759 |
|
|
|
1,771,612 |
|
|
|
1,303,771 |
|
|
|
1,761,396 |
|
Restricted
stock
|
|
|
61,362 |
|
|
|
127,640 |
|
|
|
21,400 |
|
|
|
116,909 |
|
Common
stock and common stock equivalents
|
|
|
45,688,869 |
|
|
|
51,007,561 |
|
|
|
47,026,104 |
|
|
|
50,844,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
10. Comprehensive
Income
The
components of comprehensive income were net earnings and accumulated other
comprehensive income. The change in accumulated other comprehensive income for
all periods presented resulted from foreign translation gains and losses.
Comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$ |
16,730 |
|
|
$ |
17,078 |
|
|
$ |
33,524 |
|
|
$ |
33,517 |
|
Other
comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
Amortization
of Held-to-Maturity securities loss
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
$ |
16,799 |
|
|
$ |
17,718 |
|
|
$ |
35,159 |
|
|
$ |
34,323 |
|
11. Geographic
Information
We
maintain operations in the U.S., Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and other
international territories. Geographic information about the U.S. and
international territories for the reporting periods is presented below. Such
information attributes revenues based on the location of a customer’s Direct
Inward Dial (“DID”) number for services using such a number or a customer’s
residence for other services (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
52,121 |
|
|
$ |
47,394 |
|
|
$ |
102,243 |
|
|
$ |
95,471 |
|
All
other countries
|
|
|
8,556 |
|
|
|
6,586 |
|
|
|
17,082 |
|
|
|
12,650 |
|
|
|
$ |
60,677 |
|
|
$ |
53,980 |
|
|
$ |
119,325 |
|
|
$ |
108,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
44,954 |
|
|
$ |
42,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
other countries
|
|
|
7,607 |
|
|
|
8,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,561 |
|
|
$ |
50,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Acquisition
In the
second quarter of 2008, we acquired two businesses: i) substantially all of the
digital faxing assets of Mediaburst Limited, a UK-based provider of messaging,
and ii) 100% of the outstanding shares of Phone People Holdings Corporation, a
U.S.-based provider of voice messaging services.
These
acquisitions are designed to be accretive and to provide us additional customers
in the voice market and the European digital fax market. The income
statement and balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 reflect the results of
operations of these acquired entities. Total consideration for these
transactions was approximately $33 million in cash, including acquisition
costs. Liabilities assumed consist strictly of accounts payable.
These acquisitions were not material to our financial position as of the date of
acquisition.
Asset
allocation at June 30, 2008 was as follows:
Asset
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
Life
(months)
|
|
|
Residual
Value
|
|
Trade
Names
|
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Non-Competition
Agreements
|
|
$ |
940,000 |
|
|
36
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Software
Developed
|
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
|
|
60
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Customer
Relationships
|
|
$ |
1,726,000 |
|
|
120
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
27,525,564 |
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Fixed
Assets
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
24
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
We expect
to deduct 100% of goodwill for income tax purposes over the next 15
years. There was no purchased R&D acquired or written off in
regards to these transactions.
There are
several contingent payments associated with these transactions. They
include:
(1) A
true up of actual working capital to the projected working capital at the
closing date of the transaction. Because the working capital is a
projection at the date of closing, the exact purchase price has not been
finalized. A final accounting of purchase price will occur in the
next 60 days to provide enough time for a thorough examination of subsequent
payments and potentially unrecorded liabilities.
(2) Settlement
of the hold back amount placed in a third party escrow account.
(3) Customer
conversion payments to be paid upon the successful conversion of customers to
our product platforms.
These
contingent items are expected to be settled in 12 months or
less.
Item 2.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
j2 Global
Communications, Inc. (“j2 Global”, “our”, “us” or “we”) is a Delaware
corporation founded in 1995. By leveraging the power of the Internet, we provide
outsourced, value-added messaging and communications services to individuals and
businesses throughout the world. We offer fax, voicemail, email and call
handling services and bundled suites of certain of these services. We market our
services principally under the brand names eFax®, eFax BroadcastTM, eFax Corporate®, eFax DeveloperTM, Fax.comTM, jBlast®, RapidFAXTM, Send2Fax®, jConnect®, Onebox®, eVoice®, eVoice ReceptionistTM, Onebox ReceptionistTM,
Phone People®, YAC® and
Electric Mail®.
We
deliver many of our services through our global telephony/Internet Protocol
(“IP”) network, which spans more than 3,100 cities in 45 countries across five
continents. We have created this network, and continuously seek to expand it,
through negotiating with U.S. and foreign telecommunications and co-location
providers for telephone numbers (also referred to as Direct Inward Dial numbers
or “DIDs”), Internet bandwidth and co-location space for our equipment. We
maintain and seek to grow an inventory of telephone numbers to be assigned to
new customers. Most of these numbers are “local” (as opposed to toll-free),
which enables us to provide our paying subscribers telephone numbers with a
geographic identity. In addition to growing our business internally, we have
used small acquisitions to grow our customer base, enhance our technology and
acquire skilled personnel.
Our core
services include fax, voicemail, email and call handling, as well as bundled
suites of certain of these services. These are business services that make our
customers more efficient, more mobile, more cost-effective and more secure than
traditional alternatives. We generate substantially all of our revenue from
subscribers that pay activation, subscription and usage fees. Activation and
subscription fees are referred to as “fixed” revenues, while usage fees are
referred to as “variable” revenues. We also generate revenues from patent
licensing fees, advertising and revenue share from our customers’ use of premium
rate telephone numbers. Of the nearly 11.4 million telephone numbers deployed as
of June 30, 2008, approximately 1.2 million were serving paying subscribers,
with the balance deployed to free subscribers, including those with premium rate
telephone numbers. We operate in one reportable segment: value-added messaging
and communications services, which provides for the delivery of fax, voice and
email messages and communications via the telephone and/or Internet
networks.
During
the past three years, we have derived a substantial portion of our revenues from
our DID-based services, including eFax, Onebox, Onebox Receptionist,
eVoice and eVoice
Receptionist. As a result, we believe that paying DIDs and the revenues
associated therewith are an important metric for understanding our business. It
has been and continues to be our objective to increase the number of paying DIDs
through a variety of distribution channels and marketing arrangements and by
enhancing our brand awareness. In addition, we seek to increase revenues through
a combination of stimulating use by our customers of usage-based services,
introducing new services and instituting appropriate price increases to our
fixed monthly subscription and other fees.
For the
past three years, 90% or more of our total revenues have been produced by our
DID-based services. DID-based revenues have increased to $202 million from $134
million for the three-year period ending December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2007.
The primary reason for this increase was a 92% increase in the number of paid
DIDs over this period. We expect that DID-based revenues will continue to be a
dominant driver of total revenues.
Average
monthly revenue per paying telephone number was $16.29 and $17.26 for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, average monthly revenue per paying telephone number was
$16.19 and $17.13, respectively. The decrease in average monthly revenue per
paying telephone number for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 is
primarily due to a shift in mix of new customer sign-ups to our voice, corporate
and international services that are priced lower than the current corporate
average. We anticipate that average monthly revenue per paying telephone number
will continue to decline as we continue to expend more marketing efforts in
these channels of distribution.
The
following table sets forth our key operating metrics for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except for percentages and
average revenue per paying telephone number):
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free
service telephone numbers
|
|
|
10,234 |
|
|
|
10,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paying
telephone numbers
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
active telephone numbers
|
|
|
11,397 |
|
|
|
11,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Subscriber
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
$ |
46,593 |
|
|
$ |
39,643 |
|
|
$ |
90,852 |
|
|
$ |
77,400 |
|
Variable
|
|
|
12,944 |
|
|
|
12,970 |
|
|
|
25,900 |
|
|
|
25,506 |
|
Total
subscriber revenues
|
|
$ |
59,537 |
|
|
$ |
52,613 |
|
|
$ |
116,752 |
|
|
$ |
102,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of total subscriber revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
78.3 |
% |
|
|
75.3 |
% |
|
|
77.8 |
% |
|
|
75.2 |
% |
Variable
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DID-based
|
|
$ |
57,552 |
|
|
$ |
50,929 |
|
|
$ |
112,852 |
|
|
$ |
99,613 |
|
Non-DID-based
|
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
|
3,051 |
|
|
|
6,473 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$ |
60,677 |
|
|
$ |
53,980 |
|
|
$ |
119,325 |
|
|
$ |
108,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
monthly revenue per paying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
telephone
number(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
16.29 |
|
|
$ |
17.26 |
|
|
$ |
16.19 |
|
|
$ |
17.13 |
|
(1) See
calculation of average monthly revenue per paying telephone number at the end of
Item 2. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
(2) The
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 calculation of average monthly revenue
per paying telephone number
has been adjusted to reflect a reclassification of revenues between free and
paid DIDs.
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates
In the
ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in
the preparation of our financial statements. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Our critical accounting policies are described in our 2007 Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2008. During the six months ended June
30, 2008, we updated our critical accounting policies as follows:
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, which defines fair value, provides a
framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosures required for fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to all accounting pronouncements that
require fair value measurements; it does not require any new fair value
measurements. For fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, companies will
be required to implement SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities, as well
as for any other assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a
recurring basis in financial statements. The FASB provided a one-year deferral
for the implementation of SFAS 157 for other nonfinancial assets and
liabilities. An exposure draft will be issued for comment in the near future on
this partial deferral. On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS
157.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, which permits entities to choose to
measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Furthermore,
under SFAS 159 entities shall report unrealized gains and losses on eligible
items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. As permitted by SFAS 159, we have elected not to use
the fair value option to measure our available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
securities under SFAS 159 and will continue to report them under SFAS 115
because the nature of our financial assets and liabilities are not of such
complexity that they would benefit from a change in valuation to fair
value.
Results
of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Revenues
Subscriber Revenues.
Subscriber revenues consist of both a fixed monthly or annual recurring
subscription component and a variable component which is driven by the actual
usage of our service offerings. Over the past three years the fixed portion of
our subscriber revenues has contributed an increasing percentage to our
subscriber revenues - 76%, 72% and 71% for 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Subscriber revenues were
$59.5 million and $52.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. For the six month ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, subscriber
revenues were $116.8 million and $102.9 million, respectively, This increase in
subscriber revenues was due to an increase in our paying subscribers and the
full impact in the second quarter of 2008 of a price increase to our domestic
eFax individual subscribers that was only partially completed in the second
quarter of 2007. The increase in our base of paying subscribers primarily
resulted from new subscribers coming directly to our websites, free-to-paid
subscriber upgrades, small to mid-sized corporate and enterprise sales, direct
large enterprise and government sales, international sales, cross-selling of
additional services to our existing customers acquisitions of businesses, in
each case net of cancellations.
Other Revenues. Other
revenues were $1.1 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
other revenues were $2.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively. Other revenues
consist primarily of patent licensing revenues and advertising revenues
generated by delivering email messages to our free customers on behalf of
advertisers. Other revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 has
remained relatively consistent compared to the same period in the prior year.
The decrease in other revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 resulted
primarily from approximately $2.0 million in revenues and associated earnings
from a paid up patent license fee during the first quarter of 2007.
Share-Based
Compensation
The
following table represents share-based compensation expense included in cost of
revenues and operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007 (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
Research,
development and engineering
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,974 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
|
$ |
4,001 |
|
|
$ |
3,432 |
|
Cost
of Revenues
Cost of
revenues is primarily comprised of costs associated with data and voice
transmission, telephone numbers, network operations, customer service, on-line
processing fees and equipment depreciation. Cost of revenues was $11.7 million,
or 19% of total revenues, and $10.2 million, or 19% of total revenues, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, cost of revenues was $23.4 million, or 20% of
total revenues, and $21.2 million, or 20% of total revenues, respectively. The
increase in cost of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
was primarily due to a larger subscriber base and associated service usage
partially offset by sales and value-added taxes.
Operating
Expenses
Sales and Marketing. Our
sales and marketing costs consist primarily of Internet-based advertising, sales
and marketing personnel costs and other business development-related expenses.
Our Internet-based advertising
relationships
consist primarily of fixed cost and performance-based (cost-per-impression,
cost-per-click and cost-per-acquisition) advertising relationships with an array
of online service providers. We have a disciplined return-on-investment approach
to our Internet-based advertising and marketing spend, which can cause sales and
marketing costs as a percentage of total revenues to vary from period to period.
Sales and marketing expenses were $10.6 million, or 17% of total revenues, and
$9.7 million, or 18% of total revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, sales
and marketing expenses were $20.8 million, or 17% of total revenues, and $18.5
million, or 17% of total revenues, respectively. The increase in sales and
marketing expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was
primarily due to increased international marketing and additional marketing in
new brands and voice services.
Research, Development and
Engineering. Our research, development and engineering costs consist
primarily of personnel-related expenses. Research, development and engineering
costs were $3.0 million, or 5% of total revenues, and $3.0 million, or 6% of
total revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, research, development and
engineering costs were $6.2 million, or 5% of total revenues, and $5.7 million,
or 5% of total revenues, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2008,
research, development and engineering costs remained consistent compared to the
same period in the prior year. The increase in research, development and
engineering costs for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in the prior year was primarily due to an increase in personnel
costs.
General and Administrative.
Our general and administrative costs consist primarily of personnel-related
expenses, depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expense, bad
debt expense and insurance costs. General and administrative costs were $11.3
million, or 19% of total revenues, and $9.0 million, or 17% of total revenues,
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, general and administrative costs were $22.4
million, or 19% of total revenues, and $18.8 million, or 17% of total revenues,
respectively. General and administrative costs for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 have increased compared to the same period in the prior year
primarily due to legal expenses, bad debt expense, share-based compensation
expense and depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization was a
result of a new data center facility in the fourth quarter of 2007 and
additional acquisitions.
Non-Operating
Income and Expenses
Interest and Other Income,
Net. Our interest and other income, net, is generated primarily from
interest earned on cash, cash equivalents and short- and long-term investments.
Interest and other income, net, was $0.6 million and $2.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $1.9 million and $4.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
decrease in interest and other income, net, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 was primarily due to falling interest rates and a decrease in
investment balances.
Income
Taxes
Our
effective tax rate is based on pre-tax income, statutory tax rates, tax
regulations and different tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which we
operate. Income tax expense amounted to approximately $7.9 million and $7.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Income
tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $14.9 million
and $14.6 million, respectively. Our effective tax rate was approximately 30.8%
and 30.3% for the six months ended June 30 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase is primarily due to decreases in tax-exempt interest income and the
expiration of the federal research & development credit as of December 31,
2007.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Investments
At June
30, 2008, we had cash and investments of $150.0 million compared to cash and
investments of $229.8 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease in cash and
investments resulted primarily from business acquisitions and repurchases of
common stock partially offset by cash provided by operations in the first
quarter of 2008. At June 30, 2008, cash and investments consisted of cash and
cash equivalents of $138.8 million, short-term
investments
of $61,000 and long-term investments of $11.1 million. We typically invest
primarily in readily marketable corporate debt securities, debt instruments of
the U.S. government and its agencies, certificates of deposits and auction rate
debt. For financial statement presentation, we classify our investments
primarily as held-to-maturity and, thus, they are reported as short and
long-term based upon their maturity dates. Short-term investments mature within
one year of the date of the financial statements and long-term investments
mature one year or more from the date of the financial statements. We retain a
substantial portion of our cash in foreign jurisdictions for future
reinvestment.
We
currently anticipate that our existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investment balances and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to
meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures, and
investment requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Cash
Flows
Our
primary sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations, together
with cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Net cash provided by
operating activities was $51.3 million and $49.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our operating cash flows resulted
primarily from cash received from our subscribers and timing of cash payments we
made to third parties for their services, offset by lower accrued income tax
liability. Our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were $138.8
million at June 30, 2008.
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities was approximately $27.8 million and
$(35.1) million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash provided by investing
activities was primarily attributable to the sales of available-for-sale
investments and net redemptions and sales of held-to-maturity investments,
partially offset by acquisition of businesses. For the six months ended June 30,
2007, net cash used in investing activities was primarily attributable to net
purchases of investments, purchases of intangible assets and purchases of
property and equipment.
Net cash
used in financing activities was approximately $95.9 million and $2.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used in financing activities was primarily
attributable to the repurchase of our common stock, partially offset by proceeds
from the exercise of stock options. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net
cash used in financing activities was primarily comprised of the repurchase of
our common stock partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options
and excess tax benefits resulting from stock option exercises.
Stock
Repurchase Program
In
February 2008, j2 Global’s Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase
program (“the Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to five million shares
of our common stock through the end of December 2010. During the three months
ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased 3,534,189 shares at an aggregated cost of
approximately $75.9 million (including commission fees of $70,700). During the
three months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 1,001,227 shares at an
aggregated cost of approximately $21.4 million (including commission fees of
$20,000). As of June 30, 2008, there were 464,584 shares of common stock
available for repurchase under this program. On July 9, 2008, the Program was
completed.
Calculation
of Average Monthly Revenue per Paying Telephone Number:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands except average monthly revenue per paying telephone
number)
|
|
|
|
|
|
DID-based
revenues
|
|
$ |
57,552 |
|
|
$ |
50,929 |
|
|
$ |
112,852 |
|
|
$ |
99,613 |
|
Less
other revenues
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
4,709 |
|
|
|
3,059 |
|
Total
paying telephone number revenues
|
|
$ |
55,272 |
|
|
$ |
49,267 |
|
|
$ |
108,143 |
|
|
$ |
96,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
paying telephone number monthly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenue
(total divided by number of months)
|
|
$ |
18,424 |
|
|
$ |
16,422 |
|
|
$ |
18,024 |
|
|
$ |
16,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of paying telephone numbers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
of period
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
End
of period
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
of period
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
monthly revenue per paying telephone number(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
16.29 |
|
|
$ |
17.26 |
|
|
$ |
16.19 |
|
|
$ |
17.13 |
|
(1) Due to
rounding, individual numbers may not add.
(2) The
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 average monthly revenue per paying
telephone number
has been adjusted to reflect a reclassification of revenues between free and
paid DIDs.
Forward-Looking
Information
In addition to historical
information, the foregoing Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The
actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including but not
limited to those discussed below, the risk factors discussed in Part
II, Item 1A - “Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part
I, Item 1A - “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (together, the “Risk Factors”), and the factors discussed in
the section in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q entitled “Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s
opinions only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to revise or
publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking
statements. Readers should carefully review the Risk Factors and the risk
factors set forth in other documents we file from time to time with the
SEC.
Some
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
our ability to:
o
|
Sustain
growth or profitability;
|
o
|
Continue
to maintain, expand and retain our customer
base;
|
o
|
Compete
with other similar providers with regard to price, service and
functionality;
|
o
|
Cost-effectively
procure and retain large quantities of telephone numbers in desired
locations in the United States and
abroad;
|
o
|
Achieve
business and financial objectives in light of burdensome
telecommunications or Internet regulation or higher-than-expected tax
rates or exposure to additional income tax
liabilities;
|
o
|
Successfully
manage our cost structure, including but not limited to our
telecommunication- and personnel-related
expenses;
|
o
|
Successfully
adapt to technological changes in the messaging, communications and
document management industries;
|
o
|
Successfully
protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing upon the
proprietary rights of others;
|
o
|
Adequately
manage growth in terms of managerial and operational
resources;
|
o
|
Maintain
and upgrade our systems and infrastructure to deliver acceptable levels of
service quality and security of customer data and
messages;
|
o
|
Not
incur unanticipated tax liabilities and accurately estimate the
assumptions underlying our effective worldwide tax
rate;
|
o
|
Introduce
new services and achieve acceptable levels of returns-on-investment for
those new services;
|
and
o
|
Recruit
and retain key personnel.
|
In
addition, our financial results could be materially impacted by risks associated
with new accounting pronouncements.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
The
following discussion of the market risks we face contains forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties.
Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the
forward-looking statements.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our
exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our
investment portfolio. We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings,
types and maturities. The primary objectives of our investment activities are to
preserve our principal while at the same time maximizing yields without
significantly increasing risk. To achieve these objectives, we maintain our
portfolio of cash equivalents and investments in a mix of tax-exempt and taxable
instruments that meet high credit quality standards, as specified in our
investment policy. Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant
interest rate risk due to the short maturities of these instruments. As of June
30, 2008, the carrying value of our cash and cash equivalents approximated fair
value. Our return on these investments is subject to interest rate fluctuations.
None of our investments is held for trading purposes.
Our short
and long-term investments are typically comprised primarily of readily
marketable corporate debt securities, debt instruments of the U.S. government
and its agencies, auction rate debt, preferred securities and certificates of
deposits. Investments in fixed rate interest earning instruments carry a degree
of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value
adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates. Our interest income is
sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. and foreign countries’
interest rates. Our future investment income may fall short of expectations due
to changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2008, we had investments in cash
and cash equivalents of approximately $138.8 million. As of June 30, 2008, we
had investments in debt securities with effective maturities greater than one
year of approximately $11.1 million. Such investments had a weighted average
yield of approximately 4.9%. We intend to maintain large cash balances in highly
liquid demand deposits to avoid risk and provide flexibility. Based on our cash
and cash equivalents and short and long-term investment holdings as of June 30,
2008, an immediate 100 basis point decline in interest rates would decrease our
annual interest income by approximately $1.5 million.
Foreign
Currency Risk
We
conduct business in certain foreign markets, primarily in Canada and the
European Union. Our primary exposure to foreign currency risk relates to
investment in foreign subsidiaries that transact business in a functional
currency other than the U.S. Dollar, primarily the Canadian Dollar, Euro and
British Pound Sterling. However, the exposure is mitigated by our practice of
retaining those profits in the international operations in order to grow that
business.
As we
increase our operations in international markets we become increasingly exposed
to changes in currency exchange rates. The economic impact of currency exchange
rate movements is often linked to variability in real growth, inflation,
interest rates, governmental actions and other factors. These changes, if
material, could cause us to adjust our financing and operating
strategies.
As
currency exchange rates change, translation of the income statements of the
international businesses into U.S. Dollars affects year-over-year comparability
of operating results. Our objective in managing foreign exchange risk is to
minimize the potential exposure to changes that exchange rates might have on
earnings, cash flows and financial position. We have not hedged translation
risks because we have generally invested cash flows from international
operations in U.S. Dollars. However, we periodically review our currency
exchange risks and may hedge against them in the future
Foreign
exchange gains and losses were not material to our earnings for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. For that period, translation adjustments amounted to
approximately $1.7 million. As of June 30, 2008, cumulative translation
adjustments included in other comprehensive income amounted to approximately
$4.3 million.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We do not
have derivative financial instruments for hedging, speculative or trading
purposes.
Item 4. Controls and
Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
j2
Global’s management, with the participation of our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of j2 Global’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have concluded that j2 Global’s disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our
management to allow their timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
(b)
Changes in Internal Controls
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
Overview of Patent
Litigation
As part
of our continuing effort to prevent the unauthorized use of our intellectual
property, we have initiated litigation against the following two companies,
among others, for infringing our patents relating to Internet fax and other
messaging technologies: Venali, Inc. (“Venali”) and Protus IP Solutions, Inc.
(“Protus”). Venali and Protus have each filed counterclaims against us, which
are described in more detail below.
Overview of Legal
Proceedings Against Us
From time
to time, we are involved in litigation and other disputes or regulatory
inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Many of these
actions are filed in response to patent actions filed by us against the
plaintiffs. The number and significance of these disputes and inquiries has
increased as our business expands and j2 Global grows larger. Any claims or
regulatory actions against us, whether meritorious or not, could be
time-consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant amounts of
management time and result in the diversion of significant operational
resources.
In
February 2004 and July 2005, we filed two lawsuits against Venali in the United
States District Court for the Central District of California for infringement of
several of our U.S. patents. On December 27, 2006, Venali filed various
counterclaims against us, which relate in substantial part to the patent
infringement claims by us against Venali. All of the counterclaims have all been
dismissed, except those alleging antitrust violations based on our procurement
and enforcement of our patents. On May 11, 2007, the court entered a claim
construction order regarding the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. Since
that time, the parties have engaged in extensive discovery. On December 7, 2007,
Venali filed a motion for partial summary judgment of non-infringement. A
hearing on the motion was held on July 21, 2008. Trial is currently scheduled
for December 2008.
On
December 12, 2006, Venali filed suit against us in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent
Number 7,114,004 (the “ ’004 Patent”). Venali is seeking damages in the amount
of lost profits or a reasonable royalty, a permanent injunction against
continued infringement, treble damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and costs. On
March 6, 2007, we filed an answer to the complaint denying liability. On May 17,
2007, we filed a request with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office for
reexamination of the ’004 Patent, which request was granted on July 27, 2007. On
August 13, 2007, we moved to stay the action pending the reexamination. On
August 20, 2007, the court granted the motion and stayed the action pending
reexamination of the patent.
In
January 2006, we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the
Central District of California against Protus asserting causes of action for
violation of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, trespass to
chattels, and unfair business practices as a result of Protus sending “junk
faxes” to us and our customers. We are seeking statutory and treble damages,
attorneys fees, interest and costs, as well as a permanent injunction against
Protus continuing its junk fax sending practices. In September 2007, Protus
filed a counterclaim against us asserting the same causes of action as those
asserted against it, as well as claims for false advertising, trade libel,
tortious interference with prospective economic advantage and defamation. Protus
is seeking statutory and treble damages, attorneys fees, interest and
costs, as well as a permanent injunction against us sending any more junk faxes.
The parties are engaged in extensive discovery. Trial is currently set for
September 29, 2009.
On May 9,
2007, Bear Creek Technologies, Inc. (“Bear Creek”) filed suit against us in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging
infringement of U.S. Patent Number 6,985,494. Bear Creek is seeking damages in
at least the amount of a reasonable royalty, a permanent injunction against
continued infringement, treble damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and costs. On
June 29, 2007, we filed an answer to the complaint denying liability, asserting
affirmative defenses, and asserting counterclaims of non-infringement and
invalidity. On September 21, 2007, Bear Creek filed its reply to our
counterclaims, denying each one. On February 11, 2008 we filed a request
for reexamination of the ‘494 patent. On February 28, 2008, the Court stayed the
case
during the pendency of the reexamination proceedings. On April 18, 2008,
the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted the reexamination
request.
On
October 11, 2007, Integrated Global Concepts, Inc. (“IGC”) filed a lawsuit
against us, certain of our current and former officers and/or directors, one of
our affiliates, and several other parties in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia. The suit purports to allege violations of
antitrust law, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”)
and various related statutory and common law claims arising out of our
procurement and enforcement of our patents and our acquisition of certain
companies. IGC’s claims relate in substantial part to a patent infringement
action by our affiliate against IGC. The suit seeks damages, including treble
and punitive damages, an injunction against further violations, divestiture of
certain assets, attorneys’ fees and costs. On April 23, 2008, the court ordered
IGC to replead its counterclaims. IGC filed amended counterclaims on May 13,
2008. The amended counterclaims allege violations of Section 2 of the Sherman
Act and breach of contract, and seek the same relief as the original
counterclaim. On June 13, 2008, we moved to dismiss the amended counterclaims.
The motion remains pending.
On June
29, 2007, a purported class action was filed by Justin Lynch as the named
plaintiff in the United States District Court for the Central District of
California alleging that we have attempted to monopolize and/or monopolized the
market for Internet facsimile services to home and small offices in violation of
Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The claims relate in substantial part to the
patent infringement actions by us against various companies. The suit seeks
treble damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs. On August 24,
2007, we filed an answer to the complaint denying liability. The case is
stayed.
We do not
believe, based on current knowledge, that any of the foregoing legal proceedings
or claims is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. However, depending on the amount and the
timing, an unfavorable resolution of some or all of these matters could
materially affect our business, financial position, results of operations or
cash flows in a particular period.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
In
addition to the other information set forth in this report, before deciding to
invest in j2 Global or to maintain or increase your investment, you should
carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “10-K
Risk Factors”). If any of these risks occur, our business, prospects, financial
condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially adversely
affected. The 10-K Risk Factors are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial
also may impair our business operations. There have been no material changes
from the 10-K Risk Factors.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities
We did
not sell any unregistered equity securities during the six months ended June 30,
2008.
(b) Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
In
February 2008, j2 Global’s Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase
program (“the Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to five million shares
of our common stock through the end of December 2010. During the three months
ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased 3,534,189 shares at an aggregated cost of
approximately $75.9 million (including commission fees of $70,700). During the
three months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 1,001,227 shares at an
aggregated cost of approximately $21.4 million (including commission fees of
$20,000). As of June 30, 2008, there were 464,584 shares of common stock
available for repurchase under this program.
The
following table details the repurchases that were made under the program during
the three months ended March 31, 2008:
Period
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share (1)
|
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced
Program
|
|
|
Maximum
Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the
Program
|
|
April
1, 2008 - April 30, 2008
|
|
|
746,589 |
|
|
$ |
21.28 |
|
|
|
4,280,778 |
|
|
|
719,222 |
|
May
1, 2008 - May 31, 2008
|
|
|
180,772 |
|
|
$ |
21.06 |
|
|
|
4,461,550 |
|
|
|
538,450 |
|
June
1, 2008 - June 30, 2008
|
|
|
73,866 |
|
|
$ |
23.18 |
|
|
|
4,535,416 |
|
|
|
464,584 |
|
(1)
Average price per share excludes commissions.