10-KSB

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB

[x] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

[] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from n/a to n/a

Commission file number: 333-90031

Northstar Electronics, Inc.
Name of small business issuer in its charter

Delaware #33-0803434
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization IRS Employer Identification No.

Suite # 1455- 409 Granville Street,
Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada V6C 1T2
Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code


Issuer’s telephone number (604) 685-0364

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act
None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act
100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001 each

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act [ ]

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. (1) [x] Yes [ ] No (2) [x] Yes [ ] No

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [x]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]
State issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $1,629,594

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Note – If determining whether a person is an affiliate will involve an unreasonable effort and expense, the issuer may calculate the aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates on the basis of reasonable assumptions, if the assumptions are stated.

Aggregate market value of voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of February 28, 2006: $1,350,000 approximately

Aggregate market value of non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of February 28, 2006: Not Applicable

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.
Outstanding shares of common stock as of February 28, 2006: 17,205,715
Outstanding shares of preferred stock as of February 28, 2006: Nil

Documents incorporated by reference: None

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Northstar Electronics, Inc.
Index
Risk Factors
Part I
Item 1. Description of Business
Item 2. Description of Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholders Matters
Item 6. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
Item 7. Financial Statements
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Item 8A Controls and Procedures
Part III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Item 10. Executive Compensation
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on form 8-K
Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services
Signatures

Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
Except for statements of historical fact, certain information contained herein constitutes ‘forward looking statements’ within the meaning of Section 27A of the securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. Forward looking statements address our current plans, intentions, beliefs and expectations and are statements of our expected future economic performance. Statements containing terms like ‘believes’, ‘does not believe’, ‘plans’, ‘expects’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘anticipates’, and other phrases of similar meaning or the negative or other variations of these words or other comparable words or phrases are considered to imply uncertainty and are forward looking statements.

Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results or achievements of the Company expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to changes in economic conditions, government regulations, contract requirements and abilities, behavior of existing and new competitor companies and other risks and uncertainties discussed in this annual report on Form 10-KSB.

We cannot guarantee our future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these forward looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward looking statements after the date of this report.

Risk Factors

Investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to other information in this annual report before purchasing our common stock.

Because we have a net loss from operations of $984,768 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and have accumulated losses of $5,154,947 from inception, we face a risk of insolvency.

We have never earned substantial operating revenue. We have been dependent on equity financing to pay operating costs and to cover operating losses.

Because we have no significant sales history and are substantially dependent on a major contractor to generate future sales, our future is uncertain if our relationship with that major contractor fails.

The auditor’s report for our December 31, 2005 consolidated financial statements includes an additional paragraph that identifies conditions which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business
The Company was incorporated May 11, 1998 as Scientific Technologies, Inc. under the laws of the State of Delaware. The name of the Company was changed to Northstar Electronics, Inc. (NEI) September 1999. Subsequently, there has been no material reclassification, merger, consolidation, purchase or sale of any significant amount of assets other than in the ordinary course of business. There have been no bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings.

The business of the Company is primarily that of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Northstar Technical Inc. (NTI) and Northstar Network Ltd. (NNL). NTI develops, manufactures and sells undersea wireless sonar communications systems and produces, under contract, defense and aerospace electronic systems. NNL was incorporated to pursue defense, aerospace and homeland security contract manufacturing opportunities.

Sonar Products and Technologies
NTI developed a wireless communications technology with undersea applications. The technology is used in underwater sensing devices to take certain measurements that are then transmitted using underwater sound waves to a receiving unit, which processes the data and displays it on a computer monitor. The technology has many potential uses in a variety of industries including offshore oil and gas, defense, marine transportation, oceanography, environmental and fishing.

Homeland Security and Military Defense
The Company expects that design and manufacture of homeland security and anti-terrorism systems will grow to become a major component of Northstar’s business over the next five years as the United States Department of Homeland Security and the United States Navy launches and ramps up its efforts to protect ports, on shore high value assets and ships from terrorists. Northstar Electronics has designed and is manufacturing sonar hardware for homeland security and military defense systems. These systems are designed to detect and track combat divers and explosive laden underwater vehicles and are intended to provide warning to naval ships, harbors and ports.

Research and Development - AQUACOMM
AQUACOMM is a multi year fully funded in-house research and development program at Northstar that was created specifically to develop new, leading edge multiple application sonar technologies and products for a variety of industries, including: defense, offshore oil and gas, commercial fishing, oceanography, marine environment and marine transportation. The Company has received funding for this project from the Canadian Federal Government’s Atlantic Innovation Fund and the National Research Council, as well as from equity investment. Scheduled to last until March 31, 2006, Northstar believes that AQUACOMM will result in the development of several new technologies during this period. To date, Northstar has expended $2,981,895 on this development program and has recovered $1,795,101.

Northstar intends to use its Venture Technology Business Model to maximize the success of AQUACOMM technologies. In this model, a technology developed through AQUACOMM will be partnered with an established company in a specific industry sector. One example could be the co-development of a military underwater communications system. Northstar would develop the “wet” end and an established defense contractor would be responsible for the “dry” end. Since the defense contractor is well established in the field, it would be the defense contractor that would undertake the product introduction, marketing and sales efforts. Another example of the type of technology that could be developed under AQUACOMM is the development of a Subsea wireless communications system for the offshore oil and gas industry. Northstar expects to develop such a system and intends to market the system through a strategic alliance with an international oil field communications company. To date, no such product or arrangement is in place.

The NETMIND System
The Company’s first underwater sonar product based on our core technology was the NETMIND system. NETMIND is both a conservation tool as well as an efficiency tool. Electronic sensors attached to a fishing trawl measure the height and width of the net opening, the water temperature, the depth of the net and the amount of fish caught plus other parameters. The sensor information is transmitted via a wireless communications link back to the ship.

NETMIND helps prevent over fishing and allows fishermen to fill and empty their nets more efficiently with a cost effective benefit on profits. This gives regulators flexibility in reducing quotas when attempting to conserve limited fishstocks.

The NETMIND Market
NETMIND was introduced to the fishing industry in late 1996. To date, approximately 240 systems have been sold in North America, Ireland, Spain, New Zealand and Russia. The targeted customers have been strategic in that they are industry leaders and government agencies. They include the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the United States, the United States Department of the Interior and the Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans and Fishery Products International in Canada. Customer feedback has shown that the NETMIND system enhances efficiency, reduces gear damage and improves catch quality.

Raw Material Sources and Availability

Raw materials for the manufacture of the NETMIND system are available from various sources. The principal suppliers are as follows:

Compass Ltd. - stainless steel chamber and end caps for sensors, mounting flanges for hull mounted hydrophone and other miscellaneous stainless steel parts
MF Composites - polyurethane, resin and hardener
Battery Specialists - battery chargers
Mercury Wire Products - tow cable for hydrophone
Electrosonic - electronic components
Future Active Inc. - electronic components
UPE - circuit boards
Enerpower - battery packs

To date, NTI has received parts, supplies and materials from these suppliers in a timely fashion and has met its production schedules. In our efforts to reduce costs, we now produce transducers and other components in house.

Major Customer Dependency – NETMIND
NTI has sold approximately 240 NETMIND systems to over 160 different customers with no dependence on one or a few major customers.
Competition – NETMIND
The system has one main competitor, Scanmar in Norway, which is a private company. The NETMIND and Scanmar systems consist of wireless acoustic sensors used underwater and both systems operate by illustrating how the fishing net is behaving while being towed. However, NETMIND sensors are fully serviceable. The electronic circuitry is contained in stainless steel cylinders within each component and is easily removed for repair by opening the end cap.
We believe that NETMIND components have a longer battery life and a more effective communication over a longer distance than its competitor. We believe the rugged design of various NETMIND components has surpassed competitor’s designs in that NETMIND’s unique sensors require very little maintenance.
While NETMIND continues to attempt to expand its market presence, we believe the Company is smaller in size and resources when compared to its competitor. As a consequence NETMIND pricing is competitive.
Distribution of the NETMIND System
NETMIND is sold directly to customers by our own sales staff and through marine electronics dealers. We have dealer representation in Canada, the United States, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland, Spain, Portugal and Denmark. We support all sales efforts with product brochures, pamphlets, and customer testimonials and with booths at trade shows in Seattle, Washington and Providence, Rhode Island. We also advertise in trade magazines, notably ‘The Navigator’ and ‘Fishing News International’. Articles on the NETMIND have appeared recently in ‘National Fisherman’, Alaskan Fisherman’s Journal’ and ‘SEA Technology’.

Technology Protection – NETMIND
Since commercializing NETMIND in 1996, NTI has made many enhancements to its system. These activities have resulted in an optimum design for which a patent application may be submitted. The technology is difficult to replicate because it consists of custom, linked, assembler language software running on custom hardware and, regardless of patent protection, it is expected it would take several years for a new player to reach parity with the present system.
The Company has obtained Canadian trademark rights to the name NETMIND effective for fifteen years from August 24, 1999. No other intellectual property related applications have been filed or prepared. In the meantime, NTI continues to develop new and innovative NETMIND products.

Need for Government Approvals – NETMIND
There are no Government approvals required for the NETMIND system in the areas it is currently sold.

Effect of Existing or Probable Government regulations – NETMIND
There is no effect on the Company’s sales arising from government regulations and the Company does not anticipate any change to this in the future.

Research and Development Expenditures – NETMIND
NTI has carried out research and development activities on NETMIND enhancements in 2005. None of these costs were borne directly by customers nor did these costs directly affect NTI’s pricing structure.

Costs and Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws – NETMIND
NTI has incurred no costs nor suffered any effects to maintain compliance with any environmental laws.


CONTRACT MANUFACTURING (CM)

NEI’s second business activity, conducted through both its subsidiary companies (NTI and NNL) is contract manufacturing where the Company assembles electronic systems under contract to the defense and aerospace industry (called ‘build to print’). We build products according to designs provided by our customers. The Company’s main customer is currently Lockheed Martin, for whom Northstar provides production engineering, sourcing and procurement of parts, assembly of parts into systems, testing and shipping. The Company has manufactured submarine control consoles under several contracts with Lockheed Martin Naval Electronics in Manassas, Virginia and is working on a $1.2M command and control console contract awarded by Lockheed to the Company in the fourth quarter of 2005 and expected to be substantially completed by the second quarter of 2006.
The Company markets its services in this area primarily through a network of contacts in the industry, attendance at trade shows and at conferences and special missions sponsored by the Department of Defense. In the past Northstar has attended defense and aerospace exhibitions in the United States and Canada and has participated in several missions to meet prime contractors involved in the Joint Strike Fighter Program in the United States.

The CM Market
NTI has focused attention on the North American military market. The United States and Canada have many programs where NTI’s services could be used. This includes programs to manufacture control consoles for submarines, helicopters and fixed wing aircraft.

NTI signed a contract with Lockheed Martin, Manassas, Virginia in 1999 to assemble, test and deliver control consoles for the Canadian Navy’s Victoria Class submarines. Since NTI successfully completed the project to the satisfaction of both Lockheed Martin and the Navy, Lockheed Martin has awarded follow-on contracts to NTI. In 2003, Lockheed Martin and NTI signed a Manufacturing License Agreement approved by the US State Department. The Agreement allows for NTI to manufacture command and control consoles for Lockheed Martin on projects they have anywhere in the world. As well, NTI is permitted to offer Lockheed Martin’s console technology directly to the Canadian Armed Forces. The current control console contract was awarded pursuant to the manufacturing license agreement.

Competition – CM
For control consoles produced for Lockheed Martin, NTI’s competition would be primarily similar sized companies as NTI in the United States, Canada or abroad. We are not aware, at this time, of any companies in particular that are direct competitors. However, we expect that, dependent upon the economic and political factors influencing Lockheed Martin, there will indeed be strong competition for future contracts. NTI’s main competitive advantages are price (our labor and overhead rates are low compared to many other jurisdictions) and quality (we have proven performance) based on the success to date of the submarine control console contract.

Marketing – CM
With respect to other Lockheed Martin divisions and with other prime contractors, we expect to use our success on the submarine console contract to showcase our expertise. The benefits of our marketing efforts are contacts made through networking in the industry and attendance at trade shows, conferences and special missions sponsored by the department of defense. In 2005, we continued to attend defense and aerospace exhibitions in Canada and the United States and we participated in several missions to meet prime contractors involved in the Joint Strike Fighter Program in the United States.

Technology Protection – CM
NTI currently owns no proprietary technology requiring protection with respect to its CM activities.

Raw Material Sources and Availability – CM
Materials and parts are available on an as needed basis from a variety of sources in the United States and Canada.

Dependence on One or a Few Major Customers – CM
NTI currently depends to a great extent on Lockheed Martin for its contracts. Lockheed Martin is comprised of many semi-autonomous divisions, which have many customers. We are dealing with four divisions, similar to dealing with four independent companies, regarding contract opportunities. We are attempting to reduce our dependency on these Lockheed Martin divisions by contacting other large prime contractors about CM opportunities with them. We expect this activity will result in NTI developing new business in addition to business with Lockheed Martin in the future.

Need for Government Approvals – CM
There are no government approvals applicable to our CM activities, except any required as part of a contract. In that event, the requirement would be passed down from the prime contractor as a part of the statement of work

Effect of Existing or Probable Government Regulations – CM
Commerce between the United States and Canada in the defense and aerospace industry is governed by some general rules and regulations. These typically require a prime contractor, such as Lockheed Martin, to obtain certain United States government clearances before providing NTI with potentially sensitive information. Similarly, a Canadian prime contractor would need Canadian government clearances to give classified information to a United States subcontractor. To date, these clearances have not caused any problems for our CM activities and we do not anticipate any in the foreseeable future.

Research and Development Expenditures – CM
NTI has incurred no expenditures in fiscal 2005 on CM research and development activities.

Costs and Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws – CM
The Company has incurred no costs or adverse effects in its compliance with any environmental laws.

SYSTEM INTEGRATION
NNL carries out multifaceted contracts that require several subcontractors to perform specialized tasks. This ability to integrate the work of several components to create one complete system is one of Northstar’s main areas of business – system integration.

As a result of its capabilities and expertise, NNL has developed a unique approach to securing and executing large defense contracts. NNL will bring together a number of Small Medium Size Enterprises (SME) affiliate companies thereby being able to present a capability to prime defense contractors. A major potential project in this area is the $2Billion Canadian Maritime Helicopter Project. Because NNL offers ‘one stop shopping’ for approximately 25 companies with a wide range of relevant expertise, it is anticipated that some contract work for various Canadian government procurements will flow to NNL. Verbal commitments have been made to NNL by contractors bidding programs in Canada to include NNL under the Industrial Regional Development Plan (IRB). To date, no contracts have been signed or awarded to the Company.

NNL has signed a memorandum of interest (MOI) with three separate Lockheed Martin companies in the United States and with four major subcontractors of Lockheed Martin, for potential work on the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program. This program is a $200Billion + multinational program led by the United States Government to design and produce the next generation fighter aircraft, in order to replace existing fleets of F-16, F-18, A-10 and Harrier aircraft worldwide. Sales are predicted to exceed 3,000 aircraft in the US and UK alone, with an additional export market of 3,000 aircraft expected.

The JSF contract is the largest defense contract ever awarded and it will continue for 35 years or longer. Northstar has developed relationships with Lockheed Martin, Harris Corporation, TRW, BAE Systems and Northrop Grumman, which the Company expects will lead to contract work on the JSF program.

In 2003, NNL as prime contractor, submitted a bid with TYCO International to provide multi mode and single mode fiber optic assemblies for the JSF. Prototype test assemblies were provided to the customer and extensive testing was carried out on them as well as on the assemblies of competing companies. As a result of the testing, the NNL cables are one of several cables selected for potential use in the program. The supply of assemblies is expected to continue for the lifetime of the JSF program with the first contract award now anticipated for 2007.

To date, Northstar has not yet been awarded any contracts related to the JSF contract.

EMPLOYEES As of December 31, 2005 the Company had a total of 22 full time employees.

PUBLIC INFORMATION
The Company electronically files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) all its reports, including, but not limited to, its annual and quarterly reports. The SEC maintains an internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports and other information regarding issuers that do file electronically. The Company maintains a web site address at www.northstarelectronics.com

Item 2. Description of Properties
The Company leases its corporate offices located at 1455 – 409 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1T2
Northstar Technical Inc. leases its offices and operations facilities at 1 Duffy Place, Unit #6,
St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 4M6
Northstar Network Ltd. leases its offices and operations facilities at 67 Majors Path, Unit #102, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1A 4Z9
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit commenced against them in 1999 by their former master distributor. The former distributor has alleged that the Company has interfered with the ability of the former distributor to sell products. The Company has filed a counter claim for monies owing by the former distributor to the Company.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No change since previous filing.
The Company has filed with the SEC an SB-1 registration statement April 20, 2000, an S-8 registration November 2000 and quarterly reports (form 10QSB) for June and September 2000 and for March, June and September 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and annual reports (form 10KSB) for December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
No change since previous filing

Item 6. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
The following discussion, comparison and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the notes related thereto. The discussion of results, causes and trends should not be construed to infer conclusions that such results, causes or trends necessarily will continue in the future.

DISCUSSION

The following table sets forth for the years indicated items included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations:

 
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
Total revenue
$1,629,594
$1,461,528
$1,641,960
$976,234
$1,176,527
Cost of goods sold
583,870
245,305
230,213
253,377
472,227
Discounts
94,066
129,111
198,950
148,425
171,830
 
677,936
374,416
429,163
401,802
644,057
Gross margin
951,658
1,087,112
1,212,797
574,432
532,470
Expenses
1,936,426
1,918,653
1,905,942
1,366,567
974,394
Net (loss)
$(984,768)
$(831,541)
$(693,145)
$(792,135)
$(441,924)
Net income (loss) per share
$(0.06)
$(0.05)
$(0.05)
$(0.08)
$(0.06)

As a result of its design engineering program expenditures, which directly impact the Company’s losses, Northstar Electronics, Inc. is building an infrastructure to position itself for significant growth. In each of its core areas of business, the Company has proven itself with an ability to deliver high quality projects on time and within budget.

The Company’s total revenues for 2005 were $1,629,594 ($1,461,528 for 2004 and $1,641,960 for 2003) and we incurred a net loss of $(984,768) [$(831,541) for 2004 and $(693,145) for 2003]. Total revenue includes sales of $957,874 and $671,720 in recovery of research and development costs (2004: $828,260 and $633,268 respectively). Although the Company’s 2005 performance did not meet management’s expectations, management remains confident that the steps taken in 2005 and over the past several years can provide the basis for substantially increased revenues and profitability over the ensuing years.

Sonar Products and Technologies
The loss is attributable in part to the Company’s expenditures on development projects to design and develop sonar products, sonar systems and leading edge sonar technologies. The development program has taken on two complementary directions, one aimed at defense and Homeland Security, the other aimed at civilian markets in offshore petroleum, environment and commercial fishing industries.

In 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 we carried out work on an underwater sonar system designed to protect ports, offshore oil platforms and ships from underwater threats, including combat divers. We designed and built the sonar and mechanical hardware components of a prototype underwater intruder detection system for a major defense contractor, which markets the system. In 2003 we received a follow-on order for additional intruder detection systems and we expect substantial production orders after testing is completed by the military. We believe that Homeland Security will form the largest part of our business over the next five years.

Our second development program is called AQUACOMM for which we received financial support from the federal government of Canada. The commercialization of products from this program has begun and includes a digital signal processing sonar receiver and associated software algorithms. The receiver supports the display of net symmetry information from the NETMIND trawl monitoring application and allows the fishing boat to optimize net towing dynamics, thereby increasing fishing efficiency.

In conjunction with the digital sonar receiver the Company has developed sensor control hardware including direct digital synthesis of sonar frequencies to support multi function sensors while lowering manufacturing costs and supporting a move of the NETMIND products into new markets not currently exploited by any similar technologies.

Results of the AQUACOMM work has positioned the Company to extend its NETMIND role on board vessels beyond its current Subsea monitoring function and allows the addition of features and capabilities to the system that would extend the NETMIND use to a vessel management role. This would include applying AQUACOMM sensing and systems design to network with and access data from other on board subsystems for analysis and display, taking advantage of the existing NETMIND bridge mounted system and adding new functionality.

NETMIND

Sales projections for NTI’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 totaled $1,050,000. Northstar fell far short of these projections and only realized total sales for the year of $560,000. The reasons for this shortfall are varied.

The 2005 commercial fishing season, a key sector in Newfoundland, began in turmoil. As a result of the provincial government’s plan to temporarily implement a Raw Materials Sharing program for the crab fishery, fishers decided to protest the plan and tie up their boats. This protest dragged on well beyond anyone’s expectations and, when the fishermen finally did put to sea, it was obvious that revenues for those involved in the fishery in Newfoundland would be substantially reduced for 2005. This naturally had a ripple effect in that less money in the fishermen’s pockets meant reduced spending capabilities.

Another key factor for low sales performance was the delay in completing some of the new technologies that were being demanded by many of our European customers. In Spain and Ireland, for instance, customers have been waiting for the completion of our Symmetry sensors and Digital Receiver and, in fact, sales have been held up as a result. We had hoped that the release of these new technologies would have occurred earlier in the year and, therefore, would have boosted sales. As a subsequent event to the year end, the Symmetry system has been successfully commercialized in the Spanish market and immediate results have been seen in the form of 3 new NetMind orders from Spain in the first quarter of 2006.

Our projections for 2005 were set, as well, in anticipation of being awarded a $400 000 Business Development program by a federal agency to assist us in developing new markets, particularly in Europe and the United States. We had initially expected this program to begin mid-winter or early spring. In fact, the award was not made until late summer of 2005, thereby negating expected revenues from opening new markets.

The devastating effects of Hurricane Katrina also negatively impacted our sales performance throughout the United States in 2005. The commercial fishing fleet in the southern and southwest Gulf of Mexico was devastated and seriously affected our plans to generate sales in that region. It is also clear that vessel owners in other regions throughout the United States were impacted by the devastation and, therefore, reluctant to spend money.

NTI has decided to target new markets for its NetMind products and to implement plans for expanding its product base to include other marine-related products. We feel that 2006 will be a much better year for the company due to the in-depth research we recently conducted. We have discovered new, untapped markets in Europe, particularly in France, and the release of our new technologies will serve to enhance sales performance in existing markets.

Swimmer Detection System (SDS) and Compact Intruder Detection System (CIDS)

The Company is a subcontractor on Lockheed Martin’s anti terrorism Swimmer Detection System (SDS). The SDS is a new technology that should provide anti terrorism protection to moored ships and harbor side assets. The SDS is a wide band high frequency sonar system designed specifically to detect and classify underwater terrorist threats. The SDS provides moored vessels and harbor side assets with 360 degree omni directional coverage and has been proven to reliably detect, classify and track underwater intruders at the longest possible ranges in the most demanding environments. Lockheed Martin’s SDS is currently under evaluation for protection of surface ships. Additionally, Lockheed Martin is marketing these units around the world for protection of naval fleets and harbors. Northstar has designed and manufactured the hardware for SDS units for trials that commenced in 2005 with two of these units having been purchased. The final trials are slated to start in July of 2006. Lockheed Martin, with contract pricing from Northstar, has also responded to Requests For Quotes (RFQ) for these units from European and Middle East countries and is hopeful of sales in this area in 2006.

The Company, in collaboration with Lockheed Martin Canada, is also involved in the design of a new Compact Intruder Detection System (CIDS). The wide band projector portion of this sonar has been designed by Northstar. Testing to date has shown that we have developed a sonar product we believe is more advanced than others currently on the market. Northstar and Lockheed Martin are considering utilizing its design in several other commercial and military sonar products.

The Company expects that homeland security and anti terrorism will become a major part of our business with the production of sonar hardware for the SDS and other systems.

Contract Manufacturing

Northstar remained active pursuing contract manufacturing opportunities during 2005. As mentioned, during the third quarter of 2005 we were awarded a US$1.2M Command and Control Console Contract by Lockheed Martin Naval Electronics and Surveillance Systems, Manassas, Virginia to perform a technology update and test command and control consoles for the Canadian Navy’s Victoria class submarines as well as the refurbishment of the Victoria class submarine’s command display. This contract is covered under the Manufacturing License Agreement we signed with Lockheed Martin in 2003. We are expecting to realize the majority of the revenue from this project by June of 2006

In 2005 the Company’s subsidiary, Northstar Network Ltd. (NNL), signed an agreement with Cathexis Innovations Inc. to manufacture Cathexis’s proprietary Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) reader, ID Blue. This device is a pen-sized scanner that reads and writes information stored on RFID tags and wirelessly transfers it to a desktop computer, laptop, PDA or Pocket PC via Bluetooth. This contract, while still at the low volume stage, has been a continuous source of revenue for NNL during 2005. With an anticipated growth in the use of RFID technology, Cathexis is optimistic for increased sales and corresponding volumes of IDBlue Pens in 2006.

Northstar Network also recently submitted quotes on the following Canadian and US Programs:

Canadian P3 (CP140) – Metal fabrication and integration for the outer wing box
Commercial Aircraft - Circuit Card assemblies for airplane cockpit displays
Commercial Aircraft – Receptacle shells
Advanced Lightweight Anti-Armor Weapons Systems (ALAWS) – Circuit cards & metal fabrication work
Joint Strike Fighter – Solenoid Assembly

These contracts are expected to be awarded during 2006.

We are attempting to expand our electronic contract manufacturing business with our current customers, as well as with customers in the offshore oil and gas, transportation and communication industriesSystems Integration

During 2002 and 2003 we carried out the development of the sonar hardware and mechanical housing for the swimmer detection system (SDS), as mentioned above. We conducted the project as a system integration in that Northstar Network was the project manager and contracted other companies to perform sub-tasks. Northstar then brought all the sub-tasks together to make and test the final system. We foresee carrying out future system integration projects on the contract work we expect on the JSF and other defense related projects. During 2004 and 2005 we continued systems integration work on the SDS to prepare for production orders. The Company continues to pursue further contract systems integration business and continues anticipating contracts in 2006.
Results of Operations

Gross margins declined to 58% for 2005 compared with 73% for 2004, 74% for 2003, 59% in 2002 and 44% in 2001. The percentage decrease from 2004 and 2003 was created by an increase in the lower margined contract sales volume included in revenue during 2005. A significant cause of any fluctuation in the gross margin percentages would be due to changes in the revenue mix where the Company is now generating revenue with significantly more direct costs attached.

As mentioned previously, in 2002 the Company successfully funded its AQUACOMM product development program. In 2005 the Company spent $816,622 on design engineering and prototype development related to the development of underwater sonar technology ($707,697 in 2004, $848,277 in 2003 and $609,299 in 2002). The Company received contract revenues of $492,810 in 2005 (2004 - $122,489, 2003 - $325,000 and 2002 -$179,269) and government incentive research and development recoveries of $671,720 (2004 - $547,338, 2003 - $626,496 and 2002 -$218,597) during the current year to offset certain of these costs. The direct result of extensive spending on design engineering and prototype development during the current year has been a loss of $(984,768) for 2005 compared to losses of $(831,541) for 2004 $(693,145) for 2003 $(792,135) in 2002 and $(441,924) in 2001.

The Company expects that design and manufacture of homeland security and anti-terrorism systems will be a major component of its business over the next five years. The Company is expecting to receive production contracts from a major US defense contractor for the sonar hardware portions of detection systems.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company used cash in operations of $(311,237) in 2005 compared to cash used by operations of $(634,218) in 2004, $(368,708) in 2003, $(589,419) during 2002 and cash used by operations of $(138,931) during 2001. In 2005, the Company was successful in raising equity financing of $87,191 compared to no equity funding during 2004. The net cash was used to fund operations.

The Company’s working capital and capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the ability of the Company to increase sales from marketing of the NETMIND system in order to generate sufficient funds to cover the current level of operating expenses. The Company further intends to create working capital from the business to be generated pursuant to the Manufacturing License Agreement with Lockheed Martin. During the most recent fiscal year the Company increased its long-term debt by $107,540 (2004 - $78,845). The Company is negotiating to secure an equity financing in the short term and is in discussions with several financing firms. The Company also expects to increase revenues in 2006 from sales of its NETMIND system and related products. Subsequent to December 31, 2005 the Company introduced its net symmetry system, the first commercial product resulting from the Aquacomm program. As well, the Company has tendered proposals and price quotations on several submarine control console manufacturing contracts, a naval anti terrorist system manufacturing contract, an anti bio terrorism sensor manufacturing contract and four other manufacturing contracts, all of which are anticipated to be awarded in 2006. The availability of sufficient future funds will depend to an extent on product sales and the obtaining of manufacturing contracts on a timely basis. Accordingly, the Company may be required to issue securities to finance any working capital requirements. There can be no assurance whether or not such future financings will be available or on satisfactory terms.

Working capital and Operations

The Aquacomm research and development program is in the final stages and the Company’s focus is now on converting the results of the program into commercial products and therefore reducing non recoverable research and development expenses for 2006. Subsequent to December 31, 2005 the Company implemented measures to reduce annual costs by approximately $450,000 for 2006, including the reduced research and development.
The Company has the remainder of the submarine command and control console contract with Lockheed Martin to complete in 2006. At December 31, 2005 the Company accounted for 57% completion of this contract and has recorded approximately $515,000 in accounts receivable, $300,000 work in progress and $230,000 in deferred revenue, accounting for the increase in accounts receivable and inventory over 2004. The Company financed its accounts receivable of $819,419 and inventory of $440,707 by a corresponding increase in accounts payable to $1,372,745, all balances at December 31, 2005. Deferred revenues consist of recovery of expenses claimed in advance, research tax credits, and contract revenue invoiced in advance.

For 2006, we have provided price quotations to Lockheed Martin for two console contracts, we have bid on a potentially long term contract to manufacture bio chemical sensors for a major company and we have bid on a defense contract to provide parts for the retrofitting of Canadian military airplanes, all expected to be awarded in 2006.

Over the next twelve months the Company will require approximately $300,000 to cover the costs associated with anticipated upcoming contracts and an additional approximately $200,000 for working capital. The Company is attempting to secure financing for working capital of $500,000 by way of private placement and is in discussions with several interested parties thereto.

Certain statements in this report and elsewhere (such as in other filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), press releases, presentations by the Company of its management and oral statements) may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," and "should," and variations of these words and similar expressions, are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Actual results may materially differ from any forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, among others, competitive pressures and constantly changing technology and market acceptance of the Company's products and services. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements, which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Item 7. Financial Statements
NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2005 and 2004 (U.S. Dollars)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
OF NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Northstar Electronics, Inc. as at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity(deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in Canada and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Northstar Electronics, Inc., as at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005 in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency and has sustained operating losses for the past three years. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

\s\ Pannell Kerr Forster
Chartered Accountants
(registered with the PCAOB as “Smythe Ratcliffe”)
Vancouver, B.C., Canada
March 16, 2006

NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31
(U.S. Dollars)


2005

2004


Assets






Current



Cash

$46,905

$57,641

Accounts receivable (note 5)

819,419

251,635

Inventory

440,707

156,086

Prepaid expenses

24,864

15,605

Total Current Assets

1,331,895

480,967

Intangible asset (note 6)

37,285

37,285

Equipment (note 6)

78,193

106,144




Total Assets

$1,447,373

$624,396




Liabilities






Current



Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$1,372,745

$409,007

Loans payable (note 7)

50,000

50,000

Deferred revenue (note 2a and 2g)

461,544

127,616

Current portion of long-term debt (note 9)

148,988

100,937

Total Current Liabilities

2,033,277

815,176





Long term debt (note 9)

447,855

454,711

Discount on long term debt (note 9)

259,107

166,655

Due to Cabot Management Limited (note 8)

89,873

88,866

Due to Director (note 8)

120,055

1,036

Total Liabilities

2,950,167

1,398,828




Contingencies and Commitment (notes 10 and 11)

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Common Stock



Authorized



100,000,000 Common shares with a par value of $0.0001 each


20,000,000 Preferred shares with a par value of $0.0001 each


Issued and outstanding



17,060,715 (15,913,805 – 2004) Common shares

1,706

1,591

Additional Paid-in Capital

3,829,439

3,531,360

Other Comprehensive Income (loss)

(178,992)

(137,204)

Accumulated Deficit

(5,154,947)

(4,170,179)

Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(1,502,794)

(774,432)




Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

$1,447,373

$624,396

NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31
(U.S. Dollars)


2005

2004

2003





Revenues (notes 2 and 4)

$1,629,594

$1,461,528

$1,641,960

Discounts

94,066

129,111

198,950





Revenues net of Discounts

1,535,528

1,332,417

1,443,010

Cost of Goods Sold

583,870

245,305

230,213





Gross Margin

951,658

1,087,112

1,212,797









Expenses




Research and development

890,510

781,151

848,277

Tax credits on research and development

(118,928)

(161,450)

(138,810)

Salaries, wages and benefits

238,552

442,831

358,970

Travel and marketing

192,068

238,728

163,143

Consulting

224,709

136,201

219,161

Rent

122,088

121,434

108,623

Professional fees

98,898

94,552

91,440

Office

93,006

86,561

45,387

Business development

55,076

68,281

82,221

Telephone, light and heat

47,086

50,217

48,820

Interest on long-term debt

47,816

14,052

18,574

Interest and bank charges

16,822

7,528

9,917

Miscellaneous

0

3,283

12,404

Amortization

28,723

35,284

37,815


1,936,426

1,918,653

1,905,942

Net Loss

(984,768)

(831,541)

(693,145)

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(41,788)

(54,831)

(107,586)

Total Comprehensive Loss

$(1,026,556)

$(886,372)

$(800,731)

Net Loss Per Share

$(0.06)

$(0.05)

$(0.05)





Weighted Average Number of Shares




Outstanding

16,371,329

15,774,802

14,446,986

NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Years Ended December 31
(U.S. Dollars)




Additional


Other


Total


Number of

Par

Paid-in


Comprehensive

Accumulated

Stockholders’


Shares

Value

Capital


Income(Loss)

Deficit

Equity (Deficit)









Balance, December 31, 2003

15,838,074

$1,584

$3,423,191

$ (82,373)

$(3,338,638)

$ 3,764

Issuance of common stock:








For services

244,394

24

97,120


0

0

97,144

On exercise of option

1,000,000

100

0


0

0

100

Cancellation of common stock:

Issued in error (note 12)

(1,000,000)

(100)

100


0

0

0

Other (note 12)

(168,663)

(17)

17


0

0

0

Stock option benefit – legal fees

0

0

10,932


0

0

10,932

Other comprehensive (loss)

0

0

0


(54,831)

0

(54,831)

Net loss

0

0

0


0

(831,541)

(831,541)









Balance, December 31, 2004

15,913,805

$1,591

$3,531,360


$(137,204)

$(4,170,179)

$(774,432)

Issuance of common stock:








For services

757,740

76

201,091


0

0

201,167

For cash

389,170

39

99,841


0

0

99,880

Finders fee:








In cash

0

0

(12,689)


0

0

(12,689)

In common stock

0

0

(7,781)


0

0

(7,781)

Stock option benefit [note 2(l)]

0

0

17,617


0

0

17,617

Other comprehensive (loss)

0

0

0


(41,788)

0

(41,788)

Net loss

0

0

0


0

(984,768)

(984,768)









Balance, December 31, 2005

17,060,715

$1,706

$3,829,439


$(178,992)

$(5,154,947)

$(1,502,794)

NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31
(U.S. Dollars)


2005

2004

2003





Operating Activities




Net loss

$(984,768)

$(831,541)

$(693,145)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash




used in operating activities




Amortization

28,723

35,284

37,815

Stock based and uncompensated services

17,617

10,932

75,644

Services paid with common stock

193,386

97,144

72,276

Changes in operating assets and liabilities




Accounts receivable

(558,690)

(6,784)

162,195

Prepaid expenses

(8,783)

(3,792)

(5,543)

Inventory

(278,980)

17,882

15,039

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

942,204

157,411

(165,703)

Deferred revenue

338,054

(110,754)

132,714





Cash Used in Operating Activities

(311,237)

(634,218)

(368,708)





Investing Activities




Acquisition of equipment

0

(13,531)

(45,810)

Proceeds on disposal of equipment

3,112

0

9,415





Cash Used in Investing Activities

3,112

(13,531)

(36,395)





Financing Activities




Issuance of common stock for cash

87,191

100

1,096,040

Loans payable (repayment)

(2,205)

(2,927)

(73,823)

Net proceeds from long-term financing

107,540

78,845

49

Advances from (repayment to) director

118,434

23,900

(132,030)





Cash Provided by Financing Activities

310,960

99,918

890,236





Effect of Foreign Currency Translation on Cash

(13,570)

(7,568)

10,217





Inflow (Outflow) of Cash

(10,735)

(555,399)

495,350

Cash, Beginning of Year

57,641

613,040

117,690





Cash, End of Year

$46,905

$57,641

$613,040





Supplemental Information




Interest paid

$47,289

$14,052

$18,574

See notes to consolidated financial statements

NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
(U.S. Dollars)

1. ORGANIZATION, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND NATURE OF OPERATION

These financial statements include the accounts of Northstar Electronics, Inc. ("the Company") and its wholly owned subsidiaries Northstar Technical Inc. ("NTI") and Northstar Network Ltd. ("NNL"). All inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated. The parent company was incorporated May 11, 1998 in the State of Delaware and had no operations other than organizational activities prior to the January 26, 2000 acquisition of 100% of the shares of Northstar Technical Inc. for the issuance of 4,901,481 shares of treasury stock with the former shareholders of the subsidiary receiving a majority of the total shares then issued and outstanding. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse take over resulting in the consolidated financial statements including the results of operations of the acquired subsidiary prior to the merger. As a result of the reverse takeover described above the liabilities of the accounting acquiree in excess of its identifiable assets were treated as a recapitalization and charged to additional paid-in capital.

The Company, through its subsidiaries, develops, produces and sells an undersea wireless communications system ("Netmind") and manufactures, under contract, defence and aerospace electronic systems. The Company also carries out research and development activities for customers on specific fixed price contract bases.

The Company's business activities are conducted principally in Canada and the financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America with all figures translated into United States dollars for reporting purposes.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During 2005 the Company incurred a comprehensive loss of $1,026,556 and at December 31, 2005 had a working capital deficiency (an excess of current liabilities over current assets) of $701,382, including $148,988 of long term debt due within one year and including $461,544 in deferred revenue which will be included in revenue in 2006. Management has undertaken initiatives for the Company to continue as a going concern. For example, the Company is negotiating to secure an equity financing in the short term and is in discussions with several financing firms. The Company also expects to increase revenues in 2006 from contract manufacturing revenues and sales of its NETMIND system and related products. The Company has tendered proposals and price quotations on an aircraft carrier anti terrorism system manufacturing contract along with other anti terrorist and military contracts anticipated to be awarded in 2006. These initiatives are in recognition that for the Company to continue as a going concern it must generate sufficient cash flow to cover its obligations and expenses. In addition, management believes these initiatives can provide the Company with a solid base for profitable operations, positive cash flows and reasonable growth. Management is unable to predict the results of its initiatives at this time. Should management be unsuccessful in its initiative to finance its operations the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is uncertain. These financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities which might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue its operations as a going concern.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Revenue recognition
Revenue from the sales of the NETMIND system is recognized on an accrual basis based on agreed terms with the customers. Sales are recorded when the systems are delivered and the customer is invoiced at the agreed terms and collection is reasonably assured. Contract manufacturing sales are recorded as each contracted unit is delivered to the contracting customer.

Revenue or loss from fixed price research and development contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion method whereby revenue or loss is recognized at the same percentage that contract costs to date is of total costs at contract completion.

Total revenue includes sales of $957,874 and $671,720 in recovery of research and development costs (2004: $828,260 and $633,268 respectively and 2003: $1,154,274 and $487,686 respectively). Recovery of research and development costs is recognized on a periodic basis as cost recovery is applied for.

(b) Inventory
Inventories of materials are valued at the lower of average cost and net realizable value. Labor components of inventories are valued at cost which is less than the agreed contract price.

(c) Research and development
Research and development costs are expensed to operations as incurred.

(d) Investment tax credits
Investment tax credit refunds arising from the incurrence of qualifying research and development expenditures are not recognized until the applicable project is approved as a qualifying research and development project by Canada Revenue Agency. The refunds are recorded as a reduction of the applicable research and development expense.

(e) Equipment
Equipment is recorded at cost less any government assistance received and is being amortized over their estimated useful lives or term of lease, whichever is shorter, using the following rates:
Computer equipment 30% Declining balance
Computer software 30% Declining balance
Furniture and equipment 20% Declining balance
Manufacturing equipment 20% Declining balance
Leasehold improvements 20% Straight-line

(f) Long-lived assets
SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale including discontinued operations. SFAS 144 requires that these long-lived assets be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or discontinued operations.

As such, these long-lived assets of the Company are reviewed when changes in circumstances require as to whether their carrying value has become impaired, pursuant to SFAS 144. Management considers assets to be impaired if the carrying value exceeds the future projected cash flows from related operations (undiscounted and without interest charges). If impairment is deemed to exist, the assets will be written down to fair value less cost to sell.

(g) Government assistance
The Company’s subsidiaries have been awarded assistance under certain Government of Canada assistance programs. Amounts received or receivable under these programs are recorded as revenue at the time the amounts are approved for payment by the government agency. Advances for expenses which the company has yet to incur are recorded as deferred revenue.

(h) Foreign currency translation
The Company's operations and activities are conducted principally in Canada; hence the Canadian dollar is the functional currency.

Amounts incurred in U.S. dollars are translated into the functional currency as follows:

(i) Monetary assets and liabilities at the rate of exchange in effect as at the balance sheet date;
(ii) Non-monetary assets and liabilities at the exchange rates prevailing at the time of the acquisition of the assets or assumption of the liabilities; and
(iii) Revenues and expenditures at rates approximating the average rate of exchange for the year.

For reporting purposes, assets and liabilities of non - U.S. subsidiaries that operate in a local currency environment are translated to U.S. dollars at year end exchange rates. Profit and loss accounts are translated at the average rates for the year. Translation adjustments are recorded as other Comprehensive income or (loss) not affecting deficit within stockholders’ equity.

(i) Other comprehensive income (loss)
The Company has other comprehensive income (loss) arising from foreign currency translation of the subsidiary companies financial statements to US funds. Accordingly, other comprehensive income (loss) is shown as a separate component of stockholders' equity (deficit).

(j) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to inventory valuation and revenue recognition, the determination of the impairment of assets and the estimation of useful lives for amortization. Financial results as determined by actual events could differ from those estimates.

(k) Net loss per share
Net loss per share calculations are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted loss per share is not shown as it is anti-dilutive

(l) Stock-Based Compensation
The Company applies the intrinsic value method of accounting as prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations, in accounting for options granted to employees. As such, compensation expense is recorded on the date of the grant when the market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. SFAS 123 “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation” establishes accounting and disclosure requirements when using the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation plans.

As allowed by SFAS 123, the Company elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above and has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123.

Had compensation expense been determined as provided in SFAS 123 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the pro-forma effect on the Company's net loss and per share amounts would have been as follows:


2005

2004

2003

Net loss, as reported

$(984,768)

$(831,541)

$(693,145)

Deduct: stock-based employee compensation expense




expense under intrinsic value method

0

0

0

Add: total stock-based compensation expense




determined under fair value based method mmethod

(40,932)

(38,552)

(54,560)




Net loss, pro-forma

$(1,025,700)

$(870,093)

$(747,705)





Net loss per share, as reported

$(0.06)

$(0.05)

$(0.05)

Deduct: stock-based employee compensation expense




expense under intrinsic value method

0

0

0




Add: total stock-based compensation expense




determined under fair value based method

(0.00)

(0.01)

(0.01)




Net loss per share, pro-forma

$(0.06)

$ (0.06)

$ (0.06)


The fair value of each option grant is calculated using the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected life (years) 5

5.79


Risk free interest rate 2.75%

3.99%


Expected volatility 93.93%

84.96%


Expected dividend yield

0.00%


The Company granted stock options to consultants and accounted for the options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model resulting in consulting expense of $10,752 recorded by the Company in 2005 (nil in 2004 and $58,610 in 2003). In addition, during 2005 $6,865 (2004 - $10,932; 2003 - $17,034) relating to stock options granted in a prior year for legal services is being expensed as professional fees over the life of the vesting period.

(m) Recent accounting pronouncements

i. In December 2004, FASB issued a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This Statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. This revised pronouncement requires that all stock options and warrants be accounted for using the Fair Value Method. This pronouncement will impact on the Company, as the Company currently accounts for all options and warrants using the Intrinsic Value Method.

ii. FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, applies at different dates to different types of enterprises and entities, and special provisions apply to enterprises that have fully or partially applied Interpretation 46 prior to issuance of Interpretation 46(R). Application of Interpretation 46 or Interpretation 46(R) is required in financial statements of public entities that have interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application by public entities (other than small business issuers) for all other types of entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. Application by small business issuers to entities other than special-purpose entities and by non-public entities is required at various dates in 2004 and 2005. There is no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

iii. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 153, “Exchanges of Non monetary Assets.” The statement is an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will have no material impact on its financial statements.

iv. In March 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 clarifies that the term “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation” as used in FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation,” refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Management does not believe the adoption of FIN 47 will have a material affect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

v. In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“SFAS No. 154”), which replaced Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principles. It requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.  The impact on the Company’s operations will depend on future accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting principles.

3. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

i. Fair values
The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and loans payable approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of long term debt net of discount for interest free loans, the significant portion of long term debt being interest free or with fixed interest rates, all approximate their fair values.

ii Interest rate risk
The Company is not exposed to significant interest rate risk due to the short term maturity of its monetary current assets and current liabilities.

iii Credit risk
The Company is exposed to credit risk with respect to its accounts receivable. The Company follows a program of credit evaluations of customers and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary. The Company maintains provisions for potential credit losses and any such losses to date have been within management’s expectations.

iv Currency risk
The Company translates the results of foreign operations into US currency using rates approximating the average exchange rate for the year. The exchange rate may vary from time to time.

4. ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

During 2005 one source accounted for 38% of the Company's revenue (45% 2004 and 35% 2003). During the year one other contract accounted for 32% of the Company’s sales revenue. The Company is completing a contract with this customer and has no further contracts in place at this time although additional orders are anticipated from this customer.

5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE



2005

2004

Trade receivables

$713,581

$126,038

Investment tax credits receivable

105,838

125,597





$819,419

$251,635


6. EQUIPMENT

Accumulated

2005

Amortization

Net

Computer equipment

$56,314

$44,561

$11,753

Computer software

75,474

62,592

12,882

Furniture and equipment

52,257

34,709

17,548

Manufacturing equipment

69,961

36,949

33,012

Leasehold improvements

10,851

7,853

2,998


$264,857

$186,664

$78,193



Accumulated



2004

Amortization

Net

Computer equipment

$52,186

$21,173

$31,013

Computer software

64,328

45,633

18,695

Furniture and equipment

49,439

29,376

20,063

Manufacturing equipment

73,940

39,812

34,128

Leasehold improvements

7,729

5,484

2,245


$247,622

$141,478

$106,144

Intangible Asset
The Company acquired the design rights and tooling for a significant component of its Netmind system at a cost of $37,285. The asset has an indefinite life and is tested for impairment annually.

NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
(U.S. Dollars)

7. LOANS PAYABLE


2005

2004

10% unsecured term loan with monthly interest payments only, due July 3, 2006.

$50,000

$50,000


$50,000

$50,000


8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
  1. The amount due to Cabot Management Limited, an associated private company related by a common shareholder and director, bears no interest, has no set terms of repayment and is subordinated to amounts due to ACOA.

  1. The amount due to a director bears no interest, has no set terms of repayment and is subordinated to amounts due to ACOA.

  2. During the year the Company was charged $51,600 (Cdn$60,000 – 2004:Cdn $60,000) for technical consulting by a company controlled by a director. The 2005 fee is included in accounts payable at December 31,2005 and is to be settled by the issuance of shares of common stock by May 31,2006.


9. LONG-TERM DEBT


2005

2004

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency ("ACOA")



Interest free loan with monthly principal repayments of $3,256 Cdn ($16,251 Cdn: 2004 - $55,323Cdn)

$13,976

$45,918

12% loan with monthly principal repayments of $1,786 Cdn plus interest ($10,710 Cdn: 2004 $32,142 Cdn)

9,211

26,678

Interest free loan repayable in 72 monthly consecutive instalments of $3,119 Cdn ($56,119 Cdn: 2004 - $93,547 Cdn)

48,262

77,644

Interest free unsecured loan repayable in monthly payments of Cdn $5,938 commencing April, 2005 ($493,350 Cdn: 2004 - $498,750 Cdn)

424,281

413,963

Interest free loan payable $867Cdn monthly ($26,624 Cdn: 2004 - $37,028 Cdn)

22,.897

30,733

Interest free unsecured loan to a maximum of $275,000 Cdn repayable in monthly payments of Cdn $4,583 commencing July, 2006 ($177,001 Cdn: 2004 - $133,687 Cdn)

152,221

110,960

Interest free unsecured loan to a maximum of $102,691 Cdn repayable in monthly payments of Cdn $1,712 commencing July, 2006 ($14,502 Cdn: 2004 - $19,768 Cdn)

12,472

16,407


Interest free unsecured loan repayable in monthly payments of Cdn $2,875 commencing August, 2007 ($172,500 Cdn: 2004 - $nil Cdn)

148,350

0

Interest free unsecured loan repayable in annually at 5% of gross annual export sales for the preceding fiscal year commencing August, 2008 ($28,234 Cdn: 2004 - $nil Cdn)

24,280

0


855,950

722,303

Less: Current portion

(148,988)

(100,937)


706,962

621,366

Discount on interest free loans payable

(259,107)

(166,655)


$447,855

$454,711

Principal repayment terms are approximately as follows:
2006

$148,988

2007

$158,957

2008

$152,604

2009

$101,539

2010

$ 90,950

Thereafter

$202,912

 

$855,950


10. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
  1. The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit commenced against them in 1999 by their former master distributor. The former distributor has alleged that the Company has interfered with the ability of the former distributor to sell products. The Company has filed a counter claim for monies owing by the former distributor to the Company.

  1. The Company is contingently liable to repay $1,795,101 in assistance received under the Atlantic Innovation Fund. The assistance is repayable annually at the rate of 5% of gross revenues from sales of products resulting from the Aquacomm research and development project. Gross revenues are to be calculated for the fiscal year immediately preceding the due date of the respective payment. Repayment is to continue until the assistance is repaid in full. To date, nil revenues from the program have been earned and nil royalties have been paid.

11. COMMITMENT

The Company is committed to minimum rental payments for property and premises aggregating $114,220 over the terms of leases expiring from 2006 to 2008. Commitments over the next three years are approximately as follows:
2006 $71,620
2007 $21,300
2008 $21,300

12. STOCK OPTIONS

The following table summarizes the Company's stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:




Weighted


Number

Exercise Price

Average


of Shares

Per Share

Exercise Price

Balance, December 31, 2003

3,136,500

$0.50 to $1.00

$0.57

Granted during year

1,195,000

$0.50

$0.50

Cancelled or expired

(1,375,000)

$0.50 to $1.00

$0.62

Exercised

0



Balance, December 31, 2004

2,956,500

$0.75 to $0.50

$0.51

Granted during year

137,500

$0.50

$0.50

Cancelled or expired

(225,000)

$0.50

$0.50

Exercised

0



Balance, December 31, 2005

2,869,000

$0.75 to $0.50

$0.52


As at December 31, 2005 and 2004 the outstanding stock options granted to directors, employees and others are as follows:


Exercise

Number of Shares

Expiry Date

Price

2005

2004

December 31, 2005

$0.50

0

120,000

January 26, 2006

$0.50

50,000

75,000

September 17, 2006

$0.50

50,000

50,000

June 25, 2007

$0.50

125,000

125,000

June 25, 2007

$0.75

175,000

175,000

July 5, 2007

$0.50

735,000

815,000

April 30, 2008

$0.50

150,000

150,000

July 8, 2008

$0.50

22,500

22,500

February 12, 2009

$0.50

640,000

640,000

October 12, 2009

$0.50

25,000

25,000

March 1, 2010

$0.50

50,000

0

December 15, 2010

$0.50

244,000

244,000

April 24, 2011

$0.50

25,000

25,000

December 4, 2011

$0.50

10,000

10,000

November 17, 2012

$0.50

25,000

25,000

December 19, 2012

$0.50

405,000

405,000

May 1, 2013

$0.50

25,000

25,000

April 7, 2014

$0.50

25,000

25,000

March 1, 2015

$0.50

87,500

0

Total outstanding and exercisable

2,869,000

2,956,500

Weighted average outstanding life of options: 3.32 years 4.04 years

Warrants
Balance, December 31, 2004 1,428,570 @ $0.50 expiring August 2010
Issued 389,170 @ $0.50 expiring *
  389,170 @ $0.75 expiring **
  100,000 @ $0.50 expiring May 2009
  100,000 @ $0.75 expiring May 2009
  100,000 @ $1.00 expiring May 2009
  100,000 @ $1.25 expiring May 2009
Balance, December 31, 2005 2,606,910

The weighted average exercise price is $0.59

* expire six months after closing bid price for the common shares of the Company has been over $0.65 per share for five consecutive trading days
** expire six months after closing bid price for the common shares of the Company has been over $1.00 per share for five consecutive trading days


NORTHSTAR ELECTRONICS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
(U.S. Dollars)


13. INCOME TAXES


The Company’s subsidiaries have operating losses which may be carried forward to apply against future year's Canadian taxable income. The tax effect has not been recorded in these consolidated financial statements. These losses expire as follows:

2006

$

211,391

Thereafter


2,120,924


$

2,332,315


Components of future income tax assets are:


2005


2004

Non-capital losses carry forwards

$

2,332,315

$2,243

2,243,588

Approximate tax rate


40%


40%



932,926


897,433

Less: Valuation allowance


(932,926)


(897,433)


$

0

$

0


Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There are no reportable disagreements on accounting or financial disclosure issues

Item 8A. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s President and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure and control procedures as referred to in the definition set forth in Rule 13a-15d of the 1934 Act as amended. Based upon that evaluation, the President and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure and control procedures are effective. There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could affect these financial statements subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

PART III

Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Name of Director Age Office
Wilson Russell, PhD 60 President and Principal Financial Officer
Robert Blair, PhD 74 Director
David Buttle, PhD 57 Director

Item 10. Executive compensation
During the year the Company paid $131,580 (2004 - $117,030, 2003 - $53,550) to Wilson Russell, the Company’s president, for his services.

Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Class Name and Address Number of Shares Percentage of Shares*
Common
Wilson Russell
4742 Collingwood Street
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6S 2B4
3,316,191 19.44%
Common David Buttle
The Well House, Burkham
Wokington, Berkshire
United Kingdom RG114P5
44,399 0.26%


Common All officers and directors as a group 3,360,590 19.70%
*Based on 17,060,715 shares of common stock issued and outstanding December 31, 2005

Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
No change since previous filing

Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
No change in exhibits since previous filing
No Form 8K was filed during the fourth quarter of 2005

Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services
During 2005 the Company’s auditors received approximately $5,000 in remuneration for audit and related (quarterly review) services. At December 31, 2005, the Company accrued an additional $32,379 in fees payable to those same auditors towards the 2005 audit fees. No other services were provided to the Company by its auditors.

During 2004 the Company’s auditors received approximately $63,620 in remuneration for audit and related (quarterly review) services. At December 31, 2004, the Company accrued an additional $35,310 in fees payable to those same auditors towards the 2004 audit fees. No other services were provided to the Company by its auditors.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

(Registrant) Northstar Electronics, Inc.
By (Signature and Title) /S/ WILSON RUSSELL
Date April 17, 2006 Wilson Russell, PhD, President, Principal Financial Officer
   
By (Signature and Title) /S/ ROBERT BLAIR
Date April 17, 2006 Robert Blair, PhD, Director
   
By (Signature and Title) /S/ DAVID BUTTLE
Date April 17, 2006 David Buttle, PhD, Director

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 W.S.C. SECTION 1350 as adopted and PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons fulfilling similar functions, each certify:
  1. That the financial information included in this Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and for the periods presented in the report; and
  2. That the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities exchange Act of 1934

Date: April 17, 2006 By: /s/ Wilson Russell
Title: President and Principal Financial Officer

302 CERTIFICATION
I, Wilson Russell, Principal Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Northstar Electronics, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 14 and 15d – 14, for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors or persons performing the equivalent functions:
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a role in the registrant's internal controls.
6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were changes in internal controls or in other factors that could affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 17, 2006 /s/ Wilson Russell________________
  Wilson Russell, President and Principal Financial Officer