As filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2009
Registration
No. 333-153743
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
post-effective
amendment No. 1 to Form S-3
Registration
Statement under The Securities Act of 1933
LIGHTPATH
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware
(State
or other
jurisdiction
of
incorporation)
|
|
3674
(Primary
Standard
Industrial
Classification
Code
Number)
|
|
86-0708398
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
2603
Challenger Tech Court, Suite 100
Orlando,
Florida 32826
Telephone:
(407) 382-4003
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s
Principal Executive Offices)
J. JAMES
GAYNOR, PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
LightPath
Technologies, Inc.
2603
Challenger Tech Court, Suite 100, Orlando, Florida 32826
Telephone: (407)
382-4003
(Name,
address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent
for service)
COPIES
TO:
JEFFREY
E. DECKER, ESQUIRE
Baker &
Hostetler LLP
200 South
Orange Avenue, Suite 2300
Orlando,
Florida 32801
Telephone: (407)
649-4017
Approximate Date of Commencement of
Proposed Sale to the Public: As soon as practicable after the
registration statement becomes effective.
If the
only securities being registered on this Form are being offered pursuant to
dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box:
¨
If any of
the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or
continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933,
other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box: x
If this
Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to
Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering:
¨
______________________
If this
Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the
Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering: ¨
______________________
If this Form is a registration
statement pursuant to General Instruction I.D. or a post-effective amendment
thereto that shall become effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 426(e) under the Securities Act, check the following box. ¨
If this Form is a post-effective
amendment to a registration statement filed pursuant to General Instruction I.D.
filed to register additional securities or additional classes of securities
pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box.
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
The registrant hereby amends this
registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its
effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become
effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until
the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title
of Each
Class
of Securities
To
be Registered
|
|
Amount to be
Registered
|
|
|
Proposed
Maximum Offering
Price
Per Share(1)
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price
|
|
|
Amount
of
Registration Fee
|
|
Class
A Common Stock, $.01 par value, previously issued or issuable upon
exercise of warrants or conversion of debentures (2)
|
|
|
561,480 |
(3) |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
342,502.80
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
(1) Estimated
pursuant to Rule 457(c) solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee based upon the average of the high and low prices for LightPath’s Class A
Common Stock as reported on The Nasdaq Stock Market on March 9,
2009.
(2) To
be offered by selling stockholders.
(3) Pursuant
to Rule 429 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the prospectus
contained herein also relates to and will be used in connection with the offer
and sale of securities covered by Registration Statement No. 333-153743, filed
by the Registrant on September 30, 2008, as amended by Pre-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Form S-3, filed on October 14, 2008. A total of 3,428,264 shares of
Common Stock are being carried forward from the prior registration statement on
which filing fees of $177 were paid.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
On September 30, 2008, LightPath
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 333-153743), as amended by a Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form
S-3, filed on October 14, 2008 (the “Original S-3”), registering 3,428,264
shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common
Stock”), which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) on October 16, 2008. The Company is filing this
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (the “Amendment”) solely for the
purpose of registering 561,480 additional shares of Common Stock.
On August 1, 2008, the Company executed
a Securities Purchase Agreement with twenty-four institutional and private
investors with respect to a private placement of 8% Senior Secured Convertible
Debentures (the “Debentures”). Pursuant to the terms of the
Debentures, interest on the Debentures could be paid in cash or Common
Stock.
On December 31, 2008, the Company and
the Debenture holders executed the First Amendment to the
Debentures. The amendment was entered into in connection with a
conversion (the “Conversion”) by each Debenture holder of 25% of the principal
amount of the Debentures held by such holder into shares of Common
Stock. The material terms of the amendment are as
follows:
(a) The interest conversion rate for
the Debentures was modified to allow interest to be paid in Common Stock when
the current stock price is below $1.40 per share;
(b) Accrued interest on the unconverted
and outstanding principal amount of each Debenture for the period from October
1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 (the “Accrued Interest”) was paid on December
31, 2008 through the issuance of Common Stock, and following the Conversion all
interest that would have accrued on the unconverted principal amount of each
Debenture from January 1, 2009 through the stated maturity date of the Debenture
would be prepaid (the “Prepaid Interest”) through the issuance of Common Stock;
and
(c) The limitation that the market
price of the Common Stock be at least $1.40 before the Company could pay
interest in Common Stock was eliminated such that the Company could make all
interest payments in Common Stock, including the Accrued Interest and the
Prepaid Interest.
Based
upon the amendment, each of the Debenture holders consummated the Conversion as
of December 31, 2008, at a conversion price per common share of
$1.54. The Company issued a total of 475,496 shares of Common Stock
in connection with the Conversion. In addition, the
Company issued to the Debenture holders 76,079 shares of Common Stock in payment
of the Accrued Interest and 589,613 shares of Common Stock in payment of the
Prepaid Interest. Finally, in consideration of the Conversion, the
Company issued to the Debenture holders warrants to purchase up to 369,999
shares of Common Stock. The warrants are exercisable for a period of
five years beginning on December 31, 2008, and are exercisable at a price of
$0.87 per share. Due to the Conversion, and issuances of Common Stock
thereto, the Company must register additional securities in order to meet the
material terms of the amendment.
PROSPECTUS
|
LightPath
Technologies, Inc.
2603
Challenger Tech Court, Suite 100,
Orlando,
Florida 32826
(407)
382-4003
3,989,744
Shares of Class A
|
This
prospectus is part of a registration statement that relates to a public offering
of up to 3,989,744 shares of our Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value (the
“common stock”), that were previously issued to our stockholders or are issuable
upon the exercise of warrants held by certain of our stockholders (collectively,
the “selling stockholders”). Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq
Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), on the Nasdaq Capital Market, under the symbol
LPTH. The average of the high and low trade prices of the common
shares as reported by Nasdaq on March 9, 2009, was $0.61 per common
share.
Shares:
|
The
selling stockholders may offer and sell these shares of common stock from
time to time through public or private transactions, on or off Nasdaq, at
prevailing market prices, or at privately negotiated prices. There is no
underwriter with respect to this offering and each selling stockholder
will determine the time of sale of shares made pursuant to this
prospectus.
|
Proceeds:
|
We
will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of these
shares. We will receive proceeds from the exercise of the
warrants if such warrants are
exercised.
|
Costs:
|
We
will pay the costs relating to the registration of the shares of common
stock offered by this prospectus. The selling stockholders will
be responsible for any brokerage commissions, discounts or other expenses
relating to the sale of the shares.
|
The
information contained in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. These securities may not be publicly sold until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities, and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, in
any jurisdiction in which the offer or sale is not permitted.
You
should carefully consider the risk factors beginning on page 4 of this
prospectus before purchasing any of the shares offered by this
prospectus.
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission
has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this
prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
|
The
date of this Prospectus is ______________, 2009.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Prospectus
Summary
|
|
3
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
4
|
The
Company
|
|
21
|
Our
Markets and Recent History
|
|
22
|
Use
of Proceeds
|
|
23
|
Determination
of Offering Price
|
|
25
|
Selling
Stockholders
|
|
25
|
Plan
of Distribution
|
|
28
|
Legal
Matters
|
|
30
|
Experts
|
|
30
|
Where
You Can Find More Information
|
|
30
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
|
|
32
|
You
should rely only upon the information contained or incorporated by reference in
this prospectus and in any accompanying prospectus supplement. We
have not, and the selling stockholders have not, authorized any other person to
provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with
different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it.
The
shares of common stock are not being offered in any jurisdiction where the offer
is not permitted.
You
should not assume that the information in this prospectus or any prospectus
supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of this
prospectus.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
Company
Overview
LightPath
Technologies, Inc. (“LightPath” or “Company” or “we”) manufactures optical
components and higher level assemblies including precision molded glass aspheric
optics, isolators, proprietary high performance fiber-optic collimators, GRADIUM
glass lenses and other optical materials used to produce products that
manipulate light, and designs, develops, manufactures and distributes optical
components and assemblies utilizing advanced optical manufacturing processes.
Our products are incorporated into a variety of applications by our customers in
many industries, including defense products, medical devices, barcode scanners,
optical data storage, hybrid fiber coax (datacom and telecom), machine vision
and sensors among others. All the products that we produce enable lasers and
imaging devices to do their jobs.
Overview
of Offering
This prospectus relates to a public
offering of up to 3,989,744 shares of our common stock that were previously
issued to the selling stockholders or are issuable upon the exercise of warrants
held by the selling stockholders or upon the conversion of debentures held by
the selling stockholders.
In connection with a Securities
Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008, we issued 8% senior convertible
debentures which are currently convertible into a total of 1,901,954 shares of
our common stock and warrants for the purchase of a total of 950,978 shares of
our common stock, to the selling stockholders, plus warrants for the purchase of
a total of 190,195 shares of common stock to First Montauk Securities Corp., the
placement agent for the offering of the debentures to the selling stockholders,
and its affiliates. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five
years beginning on August 1, 2008 with 65% of the warrants, exercisable for
618,135 shares, priced at $1.68 per share and the remaining 35% of the warrants
priced at $1.89 per share. If the selling stockholders exercise in
full their respective warrants, we estimate that our net proceeds will be
$1,667,540.
Pursuant to the terms of the
debentures, interest on the debentures was to be payable quarterly commencing on
October 1, 2008 until their maturity on August 1, 2011, and those payments could
be paid in cash or our common stock. On August 1, 2008, we prepaid
the interest due on October 1, 2008 by issuing 27,893 shares of common stock in
payment of such interest. Selling stockholders who participated in
our July 2007 common stock private placement equity were offered an incentive to
invest in the debenture offering. Four selling stockholders from the
2007 offering participated in the debenture offering and as a result such
selling stockholders were issued an aggregate of 73,228 shares of our common
stock.
On December 31, 2008, the Company and
the debenture holders executed the First Amendment to 8% Senior Secured
Convertible Debentures Due August 1, 2011. The amendment was entered
into in connection with a conversion (the “Conversion”) by each debenture holder
of 25% of the principal amount of the debentures held by such holder into shares
of Company’s common stock. The material terms of the amendment are as
follows:
(a) The interest conversion
rate for the debentures was modified to allow interest to be paid in common
stock when the current stock price is below $1.40 per share;
(b) Accrued interest on the
unconverted and outstanding principal amount of each debenture for the period
from October 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 (the “Accrued Interest”) was paid
on December 31, 2008 through the issuance of common stock, and following the
Conversion all interest that would have accrued on the unconverted principal
amount of each debenture from January 1, 2009 through the stated maturity date
of the debenture would be prepaid (the “Prepaid Interest”) through the issuance
of common stock; and
(c) The limitation that the
market price of the common stock be at least $1.40 before the Company could pay
interest in common stock was eliminated such that the Company could make all
interest payments in common stock, including Accrued Interest and the Prepaid
Interest.
Based upon the amendment, each of the
debenture holders consummated the Conversion as of December 31, 2008, at a
conversion price per common share of $1.54. The Company issued a
total of 475,496 shares of common stock in connection with the
Conversion. In addition, the Company issued to the debenture holders
76,079 shares of common stock in payment of the Accrued Interest and 589,613
shares of common stock in payment of the Prepaid Interest. Finally,
in consideration of the Conversion, the Company issued to the Debenture holders
warrants to purchase up to 369,999 shares of common stock. The
warrants are exercisable for a period of five years beginning on December 31,
2008, and are exercisable at a price of $0.87 per share.
The selling stockholders may offer and
sell these shares of common stock from time to time through public or private
transactions, on or off Nasdaq, at prevailing market prices, or at privately
negotiated prices. There is no underwriter with respect to this
offering, and each selling stockholder will determine the time of sale of shares
of common stock made pursuant to this prospectus. We will not receive
any of the proceeds from the sale of these shares of common stock. We
will receive proceeds from the exercise of the warrants if such warrants are
exercised. We will pay the costs and fees of registering the shares
of common stock offered by this prospectus, which we estimate to be
approximately $342,894, but the selling stockholders will pay any brokerage
commissions, discounts or other expenses relating to the sale of the
shares.
RISK
FACTORS
Before
purchasing the shares offered by this prospectus, you should carefully consider
the risks described below, in addition to the other information presented in
this prospectus or incorporated by reference into this prospectus. If
any of the following risks actually occur, they could seriously harm our
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to
decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Related To Our Business and Financial Results
Our independent auditors have
expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. In their report dated September 26, 2008, our
independent auditors stated that our consolidated financial statements for the
years ending June 30, 2008 and 2007 were prepared assuming that we would
continue as a going concern, and that they have substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors’ doubts are
based on our incurring net losses and deficits in cash flows from operations and
the significant reduction in revenue we experienced in fiscal
2008. The Company reported net losses of $3.4 million, $3.5 million
and $5.6 million for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Because of the current operating loss of $1.8 million
for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as well as recurring operating losses
during fiscal years 2008 and 2007 of $5.5 million and $2.6 million,
respectively, and cash used in operations for the six months ended December 31,
2008 of $2.1 million as well as cash used in operations during fiscal years 2008
and 2007 of $3.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively, there is substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As of
December 31, 2008, we had an accumulated deficit of $200.5
million. We experienced a decline in revenue from our
telecommunications customers of $4.9 million during fiscal 2008 compared to
2007. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on
attaining profitable operations through achieving revenue growth
targets. We expect margin improvements based on production
efficiencies and reductions in product costs as a result of the recent shift of
our manufacturing operations to Shanghai, as well as by continued reductions in
other operating costs. We have reduced our workforce at our facility
in Orlando, Florida and the costs for medical insurance for our employees, and
we have procured more favorable prices for certain of our
materials. We have also redesigned certain of our product lines and
increased sales prices for certain items. Some of the margin
improvement that we anticipate will be generated from such actions will be
offset by marginal increases in selling, administrative and new product
development expenditures. There is no assurance, however, that we
will be able to achieve the necessary sales growth and gross margin improvements
to sustain operations. Factors which could adversely affect cash
balances in future quarters include, but are not limited to, a decline in
revenue or a lack of anticipated sales growth, increased material costs,
increased labor costs, planned production efficiency improvements not being
realized, increases in property, casualty, benefit and liability insurance
premiums and increases in other discretionary spending, particularly sales and
marketing related.
We Have Substantial Cash
Requirements and May Need Additional Financing To Fund Our
Operations. We believe the Company has sufficient cash to fund
operations for the next twelve months. While we continue to take
actions to reduce cash used in operations, there can be no assurance that we
will generate sufficient cash to fund our future operations and growth
strategies beyond the next twelve months. We may need to obtain
additional external financing in the future. We do not have any commitments from
others to provide additional financing in the future, and there can be no
assurance that any such additional financing will be available if needed or, if
available will be on terms favorable to us. In the event any such financing is
not obtained, our operations will be materially adversely affected and we could
be forced to cease or substantially reduce operations. Any additional equity
financing may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt financings, if available,
may involve substantial restrictive covenants or require the pledging of
substantially all of our assets.
Our cash used in operations for fiscal
2008 was $3.4 million compared to $1.9 million used in fiscal
2007. Our cash used in operations for the six months ended December
31, 2008 was $2.1 million compared to $2.3 million used in the same period in
fiscal 2008. Factors which could increase cash used in future
quarters include, but are not limited to, a decline in revenue or lack of
anticipated sales growth, collectability issues with regard to accounts
receivable, increased material costs, planned production of efficiency
improvements not being realized, increased labor costs, increased health
insurance and benefits costs and increases in discretionary spending,
particularly sales and marketing related.
Should we find it necessary to raise
more capital, we may find that such funds are either not available or are
available only on terms that are unattractive in terms of cost, dilution of
existing stockholders’ interests, or both. In the event that we find it
necessary to raise additional funds to sustain operations and we are unable to
do so, we may need to take actions such as additional restructuring of
operations to reduce costs, or discontinuing operations altogether. Should that
occur, the sale value of our assets, especially inventory, property and
equipment, intellectual property and other intangible assets may be such that
significant adjustments to our consolidated financial statements would be
required.
We Received Notice from Nasdaq
Regarding Our Compliance with Marketplace Rules. On October 3,
2008, we received a notification from The Nasdaq Listing Qualifications of The
Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC that we do not comply with Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(3),
which requires us to have a minimum of $2,500,000 in stockholders’ equity or
$35,000,000 market value of listed securities or $500,000 of net income from
continuing operations for the most recently completed fiscal year or two of the
three most recently completed fiscal years. In the notification
letter from Nasdaq, Staff noted the following: (i) based on our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, our
stockholders’ equity was $2,159,761; (ii) as of October 2, 2008, Nasdaq Staff
determined that the market value of our listed securities was $7,357,696; and
(iii) we have reported net losses from continuing operations of $(5,467,769),
$(2,614,629) and $(3,368,881), in its annual filings for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
On October 24, 2008, the Company
submitted a specific plan to achieve stockholders’ equity in excess of
$2,500,000 and, thereby, regaining compliance with Marketplace Rule
4310(c)(3). Staff reviewed the Company’s eligibility for continued
listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market.
On November 14, 2008 we received a
notification letter from Nasdaq stating that based on our Form 10-Q dated
November 12, 2008, which demonstrated shareholder equity of $2,802,008 as of
September 30, 2008, Staff has determined that the Company complies with the
Rules and this matter was closed. Shareholders’ equity was $2.6
million at December 31, 2008.
Since We Have Been Unable to Pursue
Our Joint Venture with CDGM, Our Business Growth May be Slower or Remain Flat.
Our future success depends to a significant degree on our ability to
transition a substantial portion of our business to high volume, lower cost
productions. The rate at which we had planned on accomplishing this
transition was, in turn, dependent on our ability to successfully launch our
joint venture with CDGM. The joint venture has been
terminated. Implementation of our business transition will take
substantially longer, will require substantially greater investment of capital,
time and other resources that may not be available to us, and may involve a
significantly higher degree of risk of failure. Because we were
unable to pursue our business strategy as previously planned, our results of
operations, financial performance, and ability to continue to operate our
business could be materially adversely affected.
We Have A History Of Losses And If
We Continue To Incur Losses Our Business May Fail. We have incurred net
losses of $5.5 million, $2.6 million, $3.4 million, $3.5 million and $5.6
million for fiscal 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We
incurred a net loss of $2.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2008
and as of December 31, 2008, we had an accumulated deficit of $200.5 million. We
expect to continue to incur significant sales and marketing, administrative and
product development expenses, and, as a result, we will need to generate
increased revenues to achieve profitability. Even if we achieve profitability,
given the competition in our optical markets, we may not be able to sustain or
increase profitability thereafter on a quarterly or annual basis. As a result,
we will need to generate significantly higher revenues while containing costs
and operating expenses if we are to achieve profitability.
Because Of Our Dependence On A Few
Key Customers, The Loss of Any Key Customer Could Cause A Significant Decline In
Our Revenues. In fiscal 2008, sales to two customers, Santur and
ThorLabs, accounted for approximately 9% and 8% of our net revenue,
respectively, and our top ten customers accounted for approximately 43% of our
revenues. In fiscal 2007 sales to two customers, Santur and
T-Networks comprised more than 10% of our annual sales, with sales to Santur at
14% and sales to T-Networks at 12%. Part of our continuing strategy in fiscal
2008 was to gain key customer relationships of more significance and impact to
generate higher revenues at lower costs. This strategy has met with
some success and therefore we believe our operating results will continue to be
notably dependent on sales to a relatively small number of significant
customers. The loss of any of these customers, or a significant reduction in
sales to any such customers, would adversely affect our revenues.
Order Cancellations And Extensions
Of Product Shipment Dates By Customers Can Hinder Our Ability To Achieve
Profitability. Our sales are generally made pursuant to purchase orders
that are subject to cancellation, modification or rescheduling without
significant penalties to our customers. In recent years, we have experienced
material order cancellations and significant extensions of product shipment
dates by some of our customers. If current customers stop placing orders, or
unexpectedly reduce orders, we may not be able to replace these orders with
orders from new customers and our ability to achieve profitability will be
adversely affected. The majority of our current customers do not have any
minimum purchase obligations, and they may stop placing orders with us at any
time, regardless of any forecast they may have previously provided.
Our New Market Penetration Efforts
Are Progressing But May Not Prove Successful. Our efforts to diversify
our sales to high volume, low cost optical applications and other new market and
product opportunities in multiple industries are progressing, however, our
current line of products has not generated sufficient revenues to sustain our
operations. While we believe our existing products are commercially viable, we
anticipate the need to educate the optical components markets in order to
generate market demand and market feedback may require us to further refine
these products. Expansion of our product lines and sales into new
markets will require significant investment in equipment, facilities and
materials. There can be no assurance that any proposed products will
be successfully developed, demonstrate desirable optical performance, be capable
of being produced in commercial quantities at reasonable costs or be
successfully marketed.
Some Of Our Products Have Not Been
Demonstrated To Be Commercially Successful. Although our optical lens
products have been accepted commercially, the benefits of the GRADIUM glass line
are not widely known and must be introduced, as we can afford, in markets that
we believe would benefit from the performance characteristics of GRADIUM. Many
prospective customers will need to make substantial expenditures in order to
redesign products to incorporate our GRADIUM lenses. There can be no assurances
that potential customers will view the benefits of our products as sufficient to
warrant such design expenditures.
Our collimator products have not yet
achieved broad commercial acceptance; our isolator production capability and
sales, while encouraging at this point, are only five years old; and some of our
molded aspheres applications are new. There can be no assurance that any of
these will be commercially viable products or produce significant revenues.
Further, there is no assurance that any products currently existing or to be
developed in the future will attain sufficient market acceptance to generate
significant additional revenues that are necessary for our success. We must also
satisfy industry-standard Telcordia testing on telecommunication products to
meet customer requirements, as well as satisfy prospective customers that we
will be able to meet their demand for quantities of products, since we may be
the sole supplier and licensor. We do not have lengthy experience as a
manufacturer for all our product lines and have limited financial resources. We
may be unable to accomplish any one or more of the foregoing to the extent
necessary to develop commercially successful market acceptance of our
products.
Our Past Operating History May
Hinder Our Ability To Accurately Forecast Revenues And Expenses. Although
over 20 years old, LightPath has only generated significant revenues (higher
than $5 million per year) since fiscal 2000. Through fiscal 1996, our primary
activities were basic research and development of glass material properties.
Because of this highly variable operating experience we have in the past and may
in the future be unable to accurately forecast our revenues from sales of our
products. Many of our expenses are fixed in the short term, and we may not be
able to quickly reduce spending if our revenue is lower than we project. New
product introductions will also result in increased operating expenses in
advance of generating revenues, if any. Therefore, net losses in a given quarter
could be greater than expected. Failure to accurately forecast our revenues and
future operating expenses could cause quarterly fluctuations in our operating
results, including cash flows, and may result in further volatility of or a
decline in our stock price.
If We Are Unable To Develop And
Successfully Introduce New And Enhanced Products That Meet The Needs Of Our
Customers, Our Business May Fail. Our future success depends, in part, on
our ability to anticipate our customers’ needs and develop products that address
those needs. Introduction of new products and product enhancements will require
that we effectively transfer production processes from research and development
to manufacturing and coordinate our efforts with the efforts of our suppliers to
rapidly achieve efficient volume production. If we fail to effectively transfer
production processes, develop product enhancements or introduce new products
that meet the needs of our customers as scheduled, our net revenues may
decline.
Our Sales, Gross Margins, And Market
Share May Be Reduced Because of Increased Competition. Competition in
optical markets in which we compete is intense. Many of our competitors are
large public and private companies that have longer operating histories and
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than
we have. As a result, these competitors are able to devote greater resources
than we can to the development, promotion, sale and support of their products.
In addition, the market capitalization and cash reserves of several of our
competitors are much larger than ours, and, as a result, these competitors are
much better positioned than we are to acquire other companies in order to gain
new technologies or products that may displace our product lines. Such
acquisitions could give our competitors further advantages. For example, if our
competitors acquire any of our significant customers, these customers may reduce
the amount of products they purchase from us. Alternatively, some of our
competitors may spin-out new companies in the optical component and module
market. These companies may compete more aggressively than their former parent
companies due to their greater dependence on our markets. In addition, many of
our potential competitors have significantly more established sales and customer
support organizations, much greater name recognition, more extensive customer
bases, more developed distribution channels and broader product offerings than
we have. These companies can leverage their customer bases and broader product
offerings and adopt aggressive pricing policies to gain market share. Additional
competitors may enter the market, and we are likely to compete with new
companies in the future. We expect to encounter potential customers that, due to
existing relationships with our competitors, are committed to the products
offered by these competitors. As a result of the foregoing factors, we expect
that competitive pressures may result in price reductions, reduced margins and
loss of market share.
We compete with manufacturers of
conventional spherical lens products and aspherical lens products, producers of
optical quality glass and other developers of gradient lens technology as well
as telecom product manufacturers. In both the optical lens and communications
markets, we are competing against, among others, established international
companies, especially in Asia. Many of these companies also are primary
customers for optical and communication components, and therefore have
significant control over certain markets for our products. We are also aware of
other companies that are attempting to develop radial gradient lens technology.
There may also be others of which we are not aware that are attempting to
develop axial gradient lens technology similar to our technology. There can be
no assurance that existing or new competitors will not develop technologies that
are superior to or more commercially acceptable than our existing and planned
technologies and products.
To maintain or improve our gross
margins, we must continue to reduce the manufacturing cost of our products. We
continue to take actions that we anticipate will reduce the manufacturing cost
of our products, including obtaining additional sources for raw materials to
reduce our materials costs, establishing manufacturing capabilities in low cost
regions to reduce the labor costs of our production operations and improving our
processes and engaging in more competitive sourcing in order to reduce our
overhead expenses. We believe these actions will allow us to make continued
improvements in our profitability and cash requirements.
We Anticipate Further Reductions in
the Average Selling Prices Of Our Products and Therefore Must Increase Our Sales
Volumes, Reduce Our Costs and/or Introduce Higher Margin Products To Reach And
Maintain Financial Stability. We have experienced decreases in the
average selling prices of some of our products over the last seven years,
including most of our passive component products. We anticipate that as products
in the optical component and module market become more commodity-like, the
average selling prices of our products will decrease in response to competitive
pricing pressures, new product introductions by us, our competitors or other
factors. If we are unable to offset this anticipated decrease in our average
selling prices by increasing our sales volumes or product mix, our net revenues
and gross margins will decline, increasing the projected cash needed to fund
operations. To address these competitive pressures, we must develop and
introduce new products and product enhancements with higher margins. If we
cannot maintain or improve our gross margins, our financial position may be
harmed and our stock price may decline.
Because Of Our Limited Product
Offerings, Our Ability To Generate Additional Revenues May Be Adversely
Affected. We derive a substantial portion of our net revenues from a
limited number of products. We expect that net revenues from a limited number of
products will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total net
revenues. Demand for these and other optical market products had declined
materially in recent years. Continued and expanding market acceptance of these
products is critical to our future success. There can be no assurance
that once the communication industry and general economic conditions improve,
our current or new products will achieve market acceptance at the rate at which
we expect, or at all, which could adversely affect our results of
operations.
If We Do Not Expand Our Sales and
Marketing Organization, Our Revenues May Not Increase. The sale of our
products requires long and involved efforts targeted at several key departments
within our prospective customers’ organizations. Sales of our products require
the prolonged efforts of sales, and sometimes executive, personnel, as well as
specialized systems and applications engineers working together. Currently, our
sales and marketing organization is somewhat limited. We believe we will need to
increase our sales force in order to increase market awareness and sales of our
products. Competition for qualified individuals remains, and we might
not be able to hire the kind and number of sales and marketing personnel and
applications engineers we need. If we are unable to expand our sales operations,
particularly in China, we may not be able to increase market awareness or sales
of our products, which would prevent us from increasing our
revenues
If We Are Unable To Make Sales In A
Fragmented Market Our Revenues May Not Increase. The markets for optical
lenses and laser components are highly fragmented. Consequently, we will need to
identify and successfully target particular market segments in which we believe
we will have the most success. These efforts will require a substantial, but
unknown, amount of effort and resources. The fragmented nature of the optical
products market may impede our ability to achieve commercial acceptance for our
products. In addition, our success will depend in great part on our ability to
develop and implement a successful marketing and sales program. There can be no
assurance that any marketing and sales efforts undertaken by us will be
successful or will result in any significant product sales.
Our Products Have Long And Variable
Sales Cycles Which Reduce Our Ability To Accurately Forecast Revenues.
The timing of our revenue is difficult to predict because of the length and
variability of the sales and implementation cycles for our products. We do not
recognize revenue until a product has been shipped to a customer, all
significant vendor obligations have been performed and collection is considered
probable. Customers may view the purchase of our products as a significant and
strategic decision. As a result, customers typically expend significant effort
in evaluating, testing and qualifying our products and our manufacturing
process. This is particularly the case with our defense application
market. This customer evaluation and qualification process frequently
results in a lengthy initial sales cycle (often up to one year). While our
customers are evaluating our products and before they place an order with us, we
may incur substantial sales, marketing and product development expenses to
customize our products to the customer’s needs. We may also expend significant
management efforts, increase manufacturing capacity and order long lead-time
components or materials prior to receiving an order. Even after this evaluation
process, a potential customer may not purchase our products. Because of the
evolving nature of the optical markets, we cannot predict the length of these
sales and development cycles. These long sales cycles may cause our revenues and
operating results to vary significantly and unexpectedly from quarter to
quarter, which could continue to cause volatility in our stock
price.
Litigation May Adversely Impact
Operating Results. In July 2007, we raised gross proceeds of
approximately $3,200,00 by way of the sale of newly issued common stock and
warrants to certain institutional and private investors. On September
24, 2007, we received a letter from Harborview Master Fund, an investor that
purchased $500,000 of common stock issued in the offering demanding rescission
of its investment and reimbursement of the investor for its expenses incurred in
connection with the transaction. The demand was based on the
investor’s allegations that we failed to disclose facts material to the investor
in making its investment decision (for example, alleged omissions relating to
the termination of the employment of Kenneth J. Brizel, our then Chief Executive
Officer, and our financial condition), and breached certain representations and
warranties set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement executed with respect
to the transaction. We believe there is no merit to the investor’s
claims and responded to the investor rejecting the demand.
On October 24, 2007, we were served
with a complaint filed by the investor against the Company, Mr. Brizel, and Mr.
Ripp, our Chairman, in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (the “Federal Action”). In the complaint, the
investor was seeking, among other things, rescission of its purchase and the
return of its $500,000 investment, as well as reimbursement of its expenses
incurred in connection with its investment. On January 31, 2008,
after we filed a motion to dismiss the original complaint, the investor filed an
amended complaint making substantially the same allegations and seeking the same
relief. On January 30, 2009 the Federal Action was
dismissed.
On March 9, 2009 we were served with a
complaint filed by the same investor who filed the Federal Action against the
Company in the New York State Supreme Court of New York County. In
the complaint, the investor is seeking relief similar to that sought in the
Federal Action. We believe there is no merit to the investor’s claims
and intend to vigorously defend against this litigation.
We may from time to time become
involved in lawsuits and legal proceedings. Litigation is expensive and is
subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in any such matter
could adversely impact our operating results or financial condition.
Additionally, any litigation to which we are subject could also require
significant involvement of our senior management and may divert management’s
attention from our business and operations
Sales, Political, Currency And Other
Risks Associated With Our International Sales And Supply Could Negatively Impact
Our Business. For fiscal 2008, approximately 31% of our net revenues were
from sales to international customers; and, in fiscal 2007, approximately 22% of
our net revenues were from sales to international customers. Our international
sales will be limited if we cannot establish and/or maintain relationships with
international distributors, establish foreign operations, expand international
sales, and develop relationships with international service providers.
Additionally, our international sales may be adversely affected if international
economies weaken. We are subject to risks including the following:
|
·
|
greater
difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection
periods;
|
|
·
|
the
impact of recessions in economies outside the United
States;
|
|
·
|
unexpected
changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
·
|
unexpected
changes in foreign demand in response to exchange rate
fluctuations;
|
|
·
|
certification
requirements;
|
|
·
|
reduced
protection for intellectual property rights in some
countries;
|
|
·
|
potentially
adverse tax consequences; and
|
|
·
|
political
and economic instability.
|
In order to expand our international
production capacity and sales, we formed in November 2005 LightPath Optical
Instrumentation (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary,
located in Jiading, People’s Republic of China. This manufacturing
facility increased overall production capacity and has enabled us to compete for
larger production volumes of optical components and assemblies, and strengthen
partnerships within the Asia/Pacific region. It has also provided a
launching point to drive our sales expansion in the Asia/Pacific
region.
While we expect our international
revenues to be denominated predominantly in U.S. dollars, in the future a
portion of our international revenues and expenses may be denominated in foreign
currencies. Accordingly, we could experience the risks of fluctuating currencies
and corresponding exchange rates.
We also source certain raw materials
from outside the United States. Some of those materials, priced in non-dollar
currencies, have risen in price due to the recent decline of the U.S. dollar
against non-dollar-pegged currencies, especially the Euro. This lowers our
margins and reduces our ability to reach positive cash flow and
profitability.
Our Business Has Been Subject To
Fluctuations In Quarterly Results And Continued Fluctuations Could Negatively
Impact Our Stock Price. The market price of our common stock could be
subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarterly variations in operating
results. Revenues and results of operations are difficult to predict and may
fluctuate substantially from quarter to quarter. For example, as a result of
revenues associated with any of our key customers, any cancellation or delay in
shipment of orders from a key customer could result in significant fluctuations
in quarterly results. Quarterly results have also been and may continue to be
affected by asset write-downs associated with communications market weakness,
our headquarters and plant consolidations and other matters, including negative
cash flow.
We May Issue Additional Securities
With Rights Superior To Those Of The Common Stock, Which Could Materially Limit
The Ownership Rights Of Stockholders. We may offer additional debt or
equity securities in private and/or public offerings in order to raise working
capital or to refinance our debt. Our board of directors has the right to
determine the terms and rights of any debt securities and preferred stock
without obtaining the approval of the stockholders. It is possible that any debt
securities or preferred stock that we sell would have terms and rights superior
to those of the common stock and may be convertible into common stock. Any sale
of securities could adversely affect the interests or voting rights of the
holders of common stock, result in substantial dilution to existing
stockholders, or adversely affect the market price of our common stock. We have
no present plans to issue any convertible preferred stock or any other preferred
stock.
Investors Will Incur Immediate
Dilution And May Experience Further Dilution. The
offering price of our common stock will be substantially higher than the pro
forma net tangible book value per share of the outstanding common stock
immediately after the offering. If you purchase convertible
debentures in this offering, you are likely to incur immediate and substantial
dilution in the pro forma net tangible book value per share of the common stock
from the price you pay for the debentures. Additionally, we have a
substantial number of outstanding options and warrants to acquire shares of
common stock and have made restricted stock grants that are not fully
vested. As of March 9, 2009, a total of 2,994,610 shares have been
reserved for issuance upon exercise of options, restricted stock units, and
warrants that we have granted, including the warrants issued with this offering.
A total of 626,317 shares are available for additional grants in our Amended and
Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan. Additionally, as of March 9, 2009, a total of
310,400 shares have been granted and are outstanding under restricted stock
awards. These shares vest and are issuable at various dates through November
2011. None of these options and warrants are “in the money” as of
March 9, 2009. “In the money” generally means that the current market
price of the common stock is above the exercise price of the shares subject to
the warrant or option. The issuance of common stock upon the exercise
of these options and warrants could adversely affect the market price of the
common stock or result in substantial dilution to our existing
stockholders.
Our Stock Price Has Been, And May
Continue To Be, Subject To Large Price Swings, Which We Are Not Able To
Control. Broad market fluctuations or fluctuations in our operations may
adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The market for our common
stock is volatile, the bid-ask spread is often large and the trading volume and
activity can be low and sporadic. The trading price of our common stock has been
and will continue to be subject to:
|
·
|
volatility
in the trading markets generally and in our particular market
segment;
|
|
·
|
limited
trading of our common stock;
|
|
·
|
significant
fluctuations in response to quarterly variations in operating
results;
|
|
·
|
announcements
regarding our business or the business of our customers or
competitors;
|
|
·
|
changes
in prices of our competitors’ products and
services;
|
|
·
|
changes
in product mix;
|
|
·
|
changes
in revenue and revenue growth rates;
and
|
|
·
|
other
events or factors.
|
Statements of or changes in opinions,
ratings or earnings estimates made by brokerage firms or industry analysts
relating to the markets in which we operate or expect to operate could have an
adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the stock
market as a whole, as well as our particular market segment, have from time to
time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations which have particularly
affected the market price for the securities of many companies and which often
have appeared unrelated to the operating performance of these companies.
Although our shares are publicly traded on Nasdaq, the trading market for our
shares can be limited. During fiscal 2008, Nasdaq-reported trading volume for
our shares averaged 7,779 shares per trading day. We cannot forecast or control
any material increase in the trading volume for our shares. A lack of an active
trading market for our shares could negatively impact stockholders’ ability to
sell their shares when they desire and the price, which they could
obtain.
The Fact That We Do Not Expect To
Pay Dividends May Lead To A Decreased Price For Our Stock. Our board of
directors has never declared a dividend on our common stock. We are currently
prohibited from declaring dividends without the prior written consent of the
holders of at least 80% in principal amount of the then outstanding debentures
issued on August 1, 2008. We do not anticipate paying dividends on
our common stock in the foreseeable future. Due to U.S. tax law changes in 2003,
dividends may be more valuable on an after-tax basis as a component of
investment return, potentially diminishing the appeal of holding our common
stock. It is anticipated that our earnings, if any, will be reinvested in sales
growth activities for our business.
Our Management And Principal
Stockholders Control A Substantial Amount Of Our Stock And May, Therefore,
Influence Our Affairs. If our management and a few principal stockholders
act in concert, disposition of matters submitted to stockholders or the election
of our entire board of directors may be hindered. We estimate that management,
including directors, and our principal stockholders (stockholders owning more
than 5% of our common stock) beneficially owned approximately 31.4% of all
options, restricted stock units and warrants and common stock
outstanding as of March 9, 2009.
Our Charter Documents And Delaware
Law May Inhibit A Takeover. In certain circumstances, the fact that
corporate devices are in place that will inhibit or discourage takeover attempts
could reduce the market value of our common stock. Our Certificate of
Incorporation, Bylaws and certain other agreements contain certain provisions
that may discourage other persons from attempting to acquire control of us.
These provisions include, but are not limited to:
|
·
|
staggered-terms
of service for our board of
directors;
|
|
·
|
the
authorization of the board of directors to issue shares of undesignated
preferred stock in one or more series without the specific approval of the
stockholders;
|
|
·
|
the
fact that in 1998 we adopted a stockholder rights plan and declared a
dividend distribution of a right to purchase one share of Series D
Participating Preferred Stock for each outstanding share of Class A common
stock. The description and terms of such rights are set forth in a Rights
Agreement dated as of May 1, 1998 between LightPath and Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (copy of the Rights
Agreement and related documents are filed as Exhibit 1 to the Form 8-A for
Registration of Certain Classes of Securities Pursuant to Section 12(b) or
(g) of the Exchange Act, filed on April 28, 1998). The Right
Agreement was amended on February 28, 2008 to extend the termination date
through February 28, 2018;
|
|
·
|
the
establishment of advance notice requirements for director nominations and
actions to be taken at annual meetings;
and
|
|
·
|
the
fact that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by our
Chairman, President or upon the request of a majority of our board of
directors.
|
All of
these provisions, as well as the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law (to which we are subject), could impede a merger,
consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us or discourage
a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to
obtain control of us.
Outstanding Warrants, Stock Options
And Restricted Stock Agreements May Inhibit Our Ability To Accomplish Future
Financings And Adversely Affect Our Stock Price. The existence of our
outstanding warrants, options and restricted stock and the potential for sales
of significant amounts of previously unregistered shares of our common stock in
the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely
affect the terms on which we can obtain additional financing or the prevailing
market price of our common stock. As of March 9, 2009, there were issued and
outstanding:
|
·
|
6,676,453
shares of our common stock;
|
|
·
|
warrants
issued in private placement and other transactions pursuant to which
245,156 shares of out common stock are issuable, at a weighted average
exercise price of approximately $10.12 per
share;
|
|
·
|
warrants
issued to the selling shareholders pursuant to which 219,000 shares of our
common stock are issuable at an exercise price of $7.41 per
share;
|
|
·
|
warrants
issued to the selling shareholders pursuant to which 320,000 shares of our
common stock are issuable at a weighted average exercise price of
approximately $4.77 per share;
|
|
·
|
warrants
issued to the selling shareholders pursuant to which 1,511,168 shares of
our common stock are issuable at a weighted average exercise price of
approximately $1.53 per share;
|
|
·
|
convertible
debentures which can convert into 1,426,466
shares;
|
|
·
|
outstanding
options under our Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan to purchase
an aggregate of 388,886 shares of our common stock, with an average
exercise price of approximately $8.09 per share;
and
|
|
·
|
restricted
stock award grants for 310,400 shares of our common stock that have been
granted of which 168,730 have
vested.
|
In
addition, 626,317 shares of our common stock were reserved as of March 9, 2009,
for issuance pursuant to future grants to be made under our Amended and Restated
Omnibus Incentive Plan.
For the life of such options and
warrants, the holders will have the opportunity to profit from a rise in the
price of the underlying common stock, with a resulting dilution in the interest
of other holders of common stock upon exercise or conversion. Further, the
option and warrant holders can be expected to exercise their options and
warrants at a time when we would, in all likelihood, be able to obtain
additional capital by an offering of our unissued common stock on terms more
favorable than those originally provided by such options or warrants. Of the
total number of shares of common stock currently issued and outstanding, there
are likely a small number of unregistered shares outstanding, other than those
held by the selling stockholders, and some of those shares may be freely traded
or may be traded under certain volume and other restrictions set forth in Rule
144 promulgated under the Securities Act.
The eligibility of the foregoing shares
to be sold to the public, whether pursuant to an effective registration
statement, Rule 144 or an exemption from the registration requirements may have
a material adverse effect on the market value and trading price of our common
stock, the scope or extent of which effect we cannot predict.
We Have Agreed To Certain
Limitations Upon Potential Liability Of Our Directors, Which Could Prevent
Recovery Of Monetary Damages. Our Certificate of Incorporation provides
that directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to the Company
or its stockholders for a breach of fiduciary duty as a director, subject to
limited exceptions. Although such limitation of liability does not affect the
availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission, the
presence of these provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation could prevent
the recovery of monetary damages by the Company or its
stockholders.
We May Have Difficulty Obtaining
Director And Officer Liability Insurance In Acceptable Amounts For Acceptable
Rates. We carry insurance protecting our officers and directors and us
against claims relating to the conduct of our business (“D&O insurance”).
D&O insurance covers the costs incurred by companies and their management to
defend against and resolve claims relating to management conduct and results of
operations, such as securities class action claims. These claims are extremely
expensive to defend against and resolve. Therefore we purchase and maintain
D&O insurance to cover some of these costs. We pay significant premiums to
acquire and maintain D&O insurance, which is provided by third-party
insurers, and we agree to underwrite a portion of such exposures under the terms
of these insurance coverages. In recent years the premiums we have paid for
D&O insurance had increased substantially. During fiscal 2008 and 2007 we
were able to renew our D&O insurance for a reduction in premium over the
previous year. We cannot assure that, in the future, we will be able
to obtain what we adjudge to be sufficient director and officer liability
insurance coverage at acceptable rates and with acceptable deductibles and other
limitations. We have received quotes for renewal coverage which are less than
the prior year. The current coverage expires February 22,
2010. We may be unable to pay for or we may choose not to seek as
much coverage as we adjudge to be sufficient. Failure or inability to obtain
such insurance, or the election to accept less than we adjudge sufficient or
none at all, could materially harm our financial condition in the event that we
are required to defend against and resolve any future securities class actions
or other claims made against us or our management arising from the conduct of
our operations. Further, obtaining such insurance in an inadequate amount or
obtaining none at all may impair our future ability to retain and recruit
qualified officers and directors.
Business Interruptions Could
Adversely Affect Our Business. We manufacture our products at
manufacturing facilities located in Orlando, Florida and Shanghai,
China. Our revenues are dependent upon the continued operation of
these facilities. The Orlando facility is subject to a lease that expires in
December 2014, and the Shanghai facility is subject to a lease that expires in
November 2011. Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, hurricane
winds and rain, earthquakes, electric power loss, telecommunications failure and
other events beyond our control. We do not have a detailed disaster recovery
plan for either facility, and we do not have a backup facility, other than the
other facility, or contractual arrangements with any other manufacturers in the
event of a casualty to or destruction of any facility or if any facility ceases
to be available to us for any other reason. If we are required to
rebuild or relocate either of our manufacturing facilities, a substantial
investment in improvements and equipment would be necessary. We carry only a
limited amount of business interruption insurance, which may not sufficiently
compensate us for losses that may occur. Our facilities may be subject to
electrical blackouts as a consequence of a shortage of available electrical
power. We currently do not have backup generators or alternate sources of power
in the event of a blackout. If blackouts interrupt our power supply, we would be
temporarily unable to continue operations at such facility. Any losses or
damages incurred by us as a result of blackouts, rebuilding, relocation or other
business interruptions, including the aforementioned, could result in a
significant delay or reduction in manufacturing and production capabilities,
impair our reputation, harm our ability to retain existing customers and to
obtain new customers, and could result in reduced sales, lost revenue, and/or
loss of market share, any of which could substantially harm our business and the
results of operations.
As an example of this type of risk, we
experienced an electric power outage at our Orlando facility caused by the storm
named “Hurricane Charley” from the evening of August 13, 2004 to the morning of
August 17, 2004. During this period, we were without the use of our production
capacity and lost approximately six shifts of production.
Our Business Depends, In Part, Upon
The Efforts Of Third Parties, Which We Can Not Control. Part of our
strategy for the research, development and commercialization of certain products
entails entering into various arrangements with corporate partners, OEMs,
licensees and others in order to generate product sales, license fees, royalties
and other funds adequate for product development or to enhance commercial
prospects. We may also rely on our collaborative partners to conduct research
efforts, product testing and to manufacture and market certain of our products.
Although we believe that parties to any such arrangements would have an economic
motivation to succeed in performing their contractual responsibilities, the
amount and timing of resources to be devoted to these activities may not be
within our control. There can also be no assurance that we will be successful in
establishing any such collaborative arrangements or that, if established, the
parties to such arrangements will assist us in commercializing products. We have
a non-exclusive agreement with a catalog company to distribute certain of our
products. We have agreements with nine foreign distributors to create markets
for GRADIUM and our other products in their respective countries. There can be
no assurance, however, that these parties, or any future partners, will perform
their obligations as expected or that any revenue will be derived from such
arrangements.
Future Acquisitions To Add To Our
Product, Process Or Management Capabilities May Fail To Produce The Desired
Benefits And Will Likely Be Dilutive To Existing Stockholders. We
anticipate that in the future, as part of our business strategy, we may find
strategic acquisitions of complementary companies, products or technologies to
be desirable. In the event of any such future acquisitions, we
could:
|
·
|
issue
stock that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentage
ownership;
|
|
·
|
incur
expenses related to in-process research and development and intangible
assets.
|
Any
future acquisitions also could involve numerous risks, including:
|
·
|
problems
associated with combining the acquired operations, technologies or
products;
|
|
·
|
unanticipated
costs or liabilities;
|
|
·
|
diversion
of management’s attention from our existing
business;
|
|
·
|
adverse
effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and
customers;
|
|
·
|
risks
associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior
experience; and
|
|
·
|
potential
loss of key employees, particularly those of the acquired entities.
|
We cannot assure that we will be able
to successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies or personnel
that we might acquire in the future, which may harm our business.
The Loss Of, Or Our Inability To
Hire, Key Personnel Would Reduce Our Ability To Manage Our Business
Effectively. Our future success depends upon the continued services of
our executive and non-executive officers and other key engineering, sales,
marketing, manufacturing and support personnel. Our inability to retain or
attract key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business and
results of operations. Our operations depend, to a great extent, upon the
efforts of our management. We also depend upon our ability to attract additional
members to our operations teams to support our strategy. The loss of any of
these key employees would adversely affect our business. As of March
9, 2009, we had 131 full-time equivalent employees, with 48 located in Florida
and 83 located in China. We expect to continue to hire selectively in the
manufacturing, engineering, sales and marketing and administrative functions to
the extent consistent with our business levels. Our ability to continue to
attract and retain highly skilled personnel will be a critical factor in
determining whether we will be successful. Competition for highly skilled
personnel is intense. We may not be successful in attracting, assimilating or
retaining qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs, which
could adversely impact our ability to develop and sell our
products.
Risks Related To The Optical Networking
Industry
Sales Of Some Of Our Products Depend
Upon Use Of Optical Networks To Satisfy Increased Bandwidth Requirements.
The future success of this market depends on the continuing increase in the
amount of data transmitted over communications networks, or bandwidth, and the
growth of optical networks to meet the increased demand for bandwidth. If the
internet does not continue to expand as a widespread communications medium and
commercial marketplace, the need for significantly increased bandwidth across
networks and the market for optical networking products may not continue to
develop. Future demand for our products is uncertain and will depend to some
degree on the continued growth and upgrading of optical networks. If the growth
and upgrading of optical networks does not continue, sales of some of our
products may decline, which would adversely affect our revenues.
The Optical Networking Market Is
Unpredictable And Characterized By Rapid Technological Changes And Evolving
Standards. The optical networking market is characterized by rapid
technological change, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer
requirements and evolving industry standards. It is difficult to predict this
market’s potential size or future growth rate. It has already gone through a
virulent decline. Widespread adoption of optical networks would be helpful to
our future success. Potential end-user customers who have invested substantial
resources in their existing copper lines or other systems may be reluctant or
slow to adopt a new approach, like optical networks. Our success in generating
revenues in this emerging market will depend on, among other
things:
|
·
|
maintaining
and enhancing our relationships with our
customers;
|
|
·
|
the
education of potential end-user customers and network service providers
about the benefits of optical
networks;
|
|
·
|
the
ability of our customer base to grow their businesses that depend on
optical networks; and
|
|
·
|
our
ability to accurately predict and develop our products to meet industry
standards.
|
If we are
unable to do any of the foregoing, or if we fail to address changing market
conditions, the sales of our products may decline, which would adversely impact
our revenues.
Risks Related To Manufacturing Our
Products
If We Do Not Accurately Project
Demand For Our Products, We Will Have Excess Manufacturing Capacity Or
Insufficient Manufacturing Capacity Which Can Adversely Affect Our Financial
Results. We currently manufacture our products in our facility located in
Orlando, Florida, and in our manufacturing facility located in Jiading, which is
near Shanghai in the People’s Republic of China, which is owned by LightPath
Optical Instrumentation (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, our wholly owned subsidiary. Based
on uncertainty in global economic conditions and particularly in our
telecommunication market based products, we believe lower demand for various
products will continue through fiscal 2009. We intend to continue to operate at
a “right-sized” production level during fiscal 2009 while retaining flexibility
to meet demand if it should increase in the near future.
Our Failure To Accurately Forecast
Material Requirements Could Cause Us To Incur Additional Costs, Have Excess
Inventories Or Have Insufficient Materials To Build Our Products. We
primarily use forecasts based on actual or anticipated product orders to
determine our materials requirements. It is very important that we accurately
predict both the demand for our products and the lead times required to obtain
the necessary materials. Lead times for materials that we order vary
significantly and depend on factors such as specific supplier requirements, the
size of the order, contract terms and current market demand for the materials at
a given time. If we overestimate our material requirements, we may have excess
inventory, which would increase our costs. If we underestimate our material
requirements, we may have inadequate inventory, which could interrupt our
manufacturing and delay delivery of our products to our customers. Any of these
occurrences would negatively impact our results of operations. Additionally, in
order to avoid excess material inventories we may incur cancellation charges
associated with modifying existing purchase orders with our
vendors.
If We Do Not Achieve Acceptable
Manufacturing Yields Or Sufficient Product Reliability, Our Ability To Ship
Products To Our Customers Could Be Delayed. The manufacture of our
products involves complex and precise processes. Our manufacturing costs for
several products are relatively fixed, and, thus, manufacturing yields are
critical to our results of operations. Changes in our manufacturing processes or
those of our suppliers, or the use of defective materials, could significantly
reduce our manufacturing yields and product reliability. In addition, we may
experience manufacturing delays and reduced manufacturing yields upon
introducing new products to our manufacturing lines. We may experience lower
than targeted product yields in the future which could adversely affect our
operating results.
If Our Customers Do Not Qualify Our
Manufacturing Lines For Volume Shipments, Our Operating Results Could
Suffer. Generally, customers do not purchase our products, other than
limited numbers of evaluation units, prior to qualification of the manufacturing
line for volume production. Our existing manufacturing lines, as well as each
new manufacturing line, must pass through varying levels of qualification with
our customers. Customers may require that we be registered under international
quality standards, such as ISO 9001. This customer qualification process
determines whether our manufacturing lines meet the customers’ quality,
performance and reliability standards. If there are delays in qualification of
our products, our customers may drop the product from a long-term supply
program, which would result in significant lost revenue opportunity over the
term of that program.
We Depend On Single Or Limited
Source Suppliers For Some Of The Key Materials Or Process Steps In Our Products,
Which Makes Us Susceptible To Supply Shortages, Poor Performance Or Price
Fluctuations. We currently purchase several key materials or have outside
vendors perform process steps, such as lens coatings, used in or during the
manufacture of our products from single or limited source suppliers. We may fail
to obtain required materials or services in a timely manner in the future, or
could experience further delays from evaluating and testing the products or
services of these potential alternative suppliers. The decline in demand in the
telecommunications equipment industry may have adversely impacted the financial
condition of certain of our suppliers, some of whom have limited financial
resources. We have in the past, and may in the future, be required to provide
advance payments in order to secure key materials from financially limited
suppliers. Financial or other difficulties faced by these suppliers could limit
the availability of key components or materials. Additionally, financial
difficulties could impair our ability to recover advances made to these
suppliers. Any interruption or delay in the supply of any of these materials or
services, or the inability to obtain these materials or services from alternate
sources at acceptable prices and within a reasonable amount of time, would
impair our ability to meet scheduled product deliveries to our customers and
could cause customers to cancel orders, negatively affecting our
business.
Our Products May Contain Unknown
Defects Which Would Adversely Affect Our Business. Some of our products
are designed to be deployed in large and complex optical networks. Because of
the nature of these products, they can only be fully tested for reliability when
deployed in networks for long periods of time. Our fiber optic products may
contain undetected defects when first introduced or as new versions are
released, and our customers may discover defects in our products only after they
have been fully deployed and operated under peak stress conditions. In addition,
our products often are combined with products from other vendors. As a result,
should problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of the
problem. If we are unable to fix defects or other problems, we could experience,
among other things:
|
·
|
damage
to our brand reputation;
|
|
·
|
failure
to attract new customers or achieve market
acceptance;.
|
|
·
|
diversion
of development and engineering resources;
and
|
|
·
|
legal
actions by our customers or third
parties.
|
The occurrence of any one or more of
the foregoing factors could cause our net revenues to decline or otherwise have
an adverse effect on our business.
We Face Product Liability Risks
Which Could Adversely Affect Our Business. The sale of our optical
products involves the inherent risk of product liability claims by others. We do
not currently maintain product liability insurance coverage. Product liability
insurance is expensive, subject to various coverage exclusions and may not be
obtainable on terms acceptable to us if we decide to procure such insurance in
the future. Moreover, the amount and scope of any coverage may be inadequate to
protect us in the event that a product liability claim is successfully asserted.
Should any such claim be asserted and successfully litigated by an adverse
party, there could be a material adverse effect to our financial position and
results of operations.
Risks
Related To Our Intellectual Property
If We Are Unable To Protect And
Enforce Our Intellectual Property Rights, We May Be Unable To Compete
Effectively. We believe that our patents and other intellectual property
rights are important to our success and our competitive position, and we rely on
a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and
restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. Although
we have devoted substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our
intellectual property rights, the actions taken by us may be inadequate to
prevent imitation or improper use of our products by others or to prevent others
from claiming violations of their intellectual property rights by
us.
In addition, we cannot assure that our
patent applications will be approved, that any patents that we may be issued
will protect our intellectual property or that third parties will not challenge
any issued patents. Other parties may independently develop similar or competing
technology or design around any patents that may be issued to us. We also rely
on confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions with our employees,
consultants and corporate partners to protect our proprietary rights, but we
cannot assure the compliance by such parties with their confidentiality
obligations, which could be very time consuming and expensive to
enforce.
It may be necessary to litigate to
enforce our patents, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights, to
protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity of and scope of the
proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or
invalidity. Such litigation can be time consuming, distracting to management,
expensive and difficult to predict. Our failure to protect or enforce our
intellectual property could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, prospects and results of operation.
We Do Not Have Patent Protection For
Our Formulas And Processes, And A Loss Of Ownership Of Any Of Our Formulas And
Processes Would Negatively Impact Our Business. We believe that we own
our formulas and processes. However, we have not sought, and do not intend to
seek, patent protection for all of our formulas and processes. Instead, we rely
on the complexity of our formulas and processes, trade secrecy laws, and
employee confidentiality agreements. However, we cannot assure you that other
companies will not acquire our confidential information or trade secrets or will
not independently develop equivalent or superior products or technology and
obtain patent or similar rights. Although we believe that our formulas and
processes have been independently developed and do not infringe the patents or
rights of others, a variety of components of our processes could infringe
existing or future patents, in which event we may be required to modify our
processes or obtain a license. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do
so in a timely manner or upon acceptable terms and conditions and the failure to
do either of the foregoing would negatively affect our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We May Become Involved In
Intellectual Property Disputes And Litigation Which Could Adversely Affect Our
Business. We anticipate based on the size and sophistication of our
competitors and the history of rapid technological advances in our industry,
that several competitors may have patent applications in progress in the United
States or in foreign countries that, if issued, could relate to products similar
to ours. If such patents were to be issued, the patent holders or licensees may
assert infringement claims against us or claim that we have violated other
intellectual property rights. These claims and any resulting lawsuits, if
successful, could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidate
our proprietary rights. The lawsuits, regardless of their merits, could be
time-consuming and expensive to resolve and would divert management time and
attention. Any potential intellectual property litigation could also force us to
do one or more of the following, any of which could harm our
business:
|
·
|
stop
selling, incorporating or using our products that use the disputed
intellectual property;
|
|
·
|
obtain
from third parties a license to sell or use the disputed technology, which
license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all;
or
|
|
·
|
redesign
our products that use the disputed intellectual
property.
|
Necessary Licenses Of Third-Party
Technology May Not Be Available To Us Or May Be Very Expensive. From time
to time we may be required to license technology from third parties to develop
new products or product enhancements. We can provide no assurance that
third-party licenses will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms,
or at all. The inability to obtain any third-party license required to develop
new products and product enhancements could require us to obtain substitute
technology of lower quality or performance standards or at greater cost, either
of which could seriously harm our ability to manufacture and sell our
products.
On February 11, 2004, the University of
Florida Research Foundation, Inc. (“UF”) notified us that we were in default
under the terms of the Amended and Restated License Agreement (“UF Agreement”)
for failure to pay certain back royalties and in April 2004 notified us that
they had terminated the UF Agreement. UF claims that we owe $83,000 in unpaid
royalties. While we dispute the amount owed and have previously engaged in
discussions with UF about the matter, we do not believe that the termination of
the UF Agreement has materially adversely affected our business since the
licensed technology had never generated annual sales in excess of 3% of our
total revenues from a single customer who had previously notified us that they
were ceasing purchase of the product. UF has not made any efforts since mid 2004
to collect the amounts UF alleges that we owe them.
THE
COMPANY
We
manufacture optical components and higher level assemblies including precision
molded glass aspheric optics, isolators, proprietary fiber-optic collimators,
GRADIUM glass lenses and other optical materials used to produce products that
manipulate light. We design, develop, manufacture and distribute optical
components and assemblies utilizing advanced optical manufacturing processes.
Our products are incorporated into a variety of applications by our customers in
many industries, including defense products, medical devices, barcode scanners,
optical data storage, hybrid fiber coax (datacom and telecom), machine vision
and sensors among others. All the products that we produce enable lasers and
imaging devices to do their jobs. These products include the
following:
|
•
|
Molded glass aspheres
are used in various high performance optical
applications
|
|
•
|
Isolators prevent the
back-reflection of optical signals that can degrade optical transmitter
and amplifier performance whenever light must enter or exit a fiberoptic
cable (“fiber”)
|
|
•
|
Collimators are
assemblies that are used to straighten and make parallel diverging light
as it exits a fiber.
|
|
•
|
GRADIUM extends the
performance of a spherically polished glass lens technology improving
optical performance, approaching aspheric performance at a fraction of the
price.
|
LightPath
was incorporated under Delaware law in June 1992 as the successor to LightPath
Technologies Limited Partnership, a New Mexico limited partnership, formed in
1989, and its predecessor, Integrated Solar Technologies Corporation, a New
Mexico corporation, organized in 1985. We completed our initial public offering
on February 22, 1996. From our inception in 1985 until June 1996, we were
classified for financial reporting purposes as a “development stage enterprise”
that engaged in basic research and development with an initial objective to
improve solar energy technology. Through the years, we realized that our early
discoveries had much broader application, and we expanded our focus to imaging
optics applications. By 1997, our operational focus began to shift to product
development and sales of GRADIUM® glass
lenses.
During
fiscal 1998, sales of lenses to the traditional optics market continued with
increases in sales of lenses used in the YAG laser market, catalog and
distributor sales and lenses used in the semiconductor wafer inspection markets.
During this time, we reorganized internally and realigned our marketing efforts
with the purpose of expanding our focus to include markets such as
optoelectronics, photonics and solar due to the number of potential customer
inquiries into the ability of GRADIUM glass to solve optoelectronic problems,
specifically in the areas of fiber telecommunications in addition to the
traditional optics market. In fiscal 1998, we began to explore the development
of products and a strategy to enter the telecom optical components market. This
strategy was built around automated production of telecom components using laser
fusion and fiber attachment techniques we developed. In designing our
optoelectronic devices, we focused on automation of the manufacturing process.
Although many other manufacturers in this industry rely on low labor cost
offshore production to control costs, we believe that automation of the
manufacturing process can yield similar cost savings over the long term. Our
patented laser fusion and fiber attachment techniques are highly automated, and
we believe these techniques provided improved quality and flexibility to
increase manufacturing capacity in response to growth in demand. Our automation
theme was expanded with our fiscal 2000 acquisition of Horizon Photonics, Inc.
(“Horizon”), a California corporation originally founded in July 1997, where we
acquired the use of robotic systems in manufacturing isolators.
Horizon
utilized automated production platforms to manufacture passive optical
components for the telecommunications and data communications markets. We
acquired all of the outstanding shares of Horizon for approximately 175,000
shares of our Class A Common Stock and $1 million in cash (an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $40.2 million, based on the then-market price of our
common stock). Horizon manufactured isolator products in Walnut, California,
prior to May 2003, when the site was consolidated with the facilities in
Orlando, Florida. Horizon was dissolved during fiscal 2004.
In
September 2000, we acquired Geltech, Inc. (“Geltech”), a Delaware corporation
originally founded in May 1985. Geltech is a manufacturer of precision molded
aspheric optics, which have broad applicability to numerous market segments such
as medical devices, barcode scanners, optical data storage, machine vision,
sensors, and environmental monitoring. Precision molded aspheric optics are also
used in the active telecom components market to provide a highly efficient means
to couple laser diodes to fibers or waveguides. We acquired all of the
outstanding shares of Geltech for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$28.5 million, comprised of 102,842 shares of our Class A common stock (valued
at $27.5 million based on the then-market price of our common stock) and
approximately $1 million in acquisition costs. We manufacture these products at
our facility in Orlando, Florida. During fiscal 2002, we expanded the
manufacturing facility. During fiscal 2003, in order to reduce costs, we
relocated our corporate headquarters to Orlando and reorganized our
manufacturing facility there to accommodate all of the production previously
performed in Albuquerque, New Mexico for GRADIUM glass lenses and collimators as
well as the isolator product line from Walnut, California.
OUR
MARKETS AND RECENT HISTORY
Our commercial market focus prior to
fiscal 2002 was primarily serving telecom equipment makers. During fiscal 2001,
this market, including the optical components segment of the market in which we
participated, slowed dramatically. As service providers rapidly cut
their capital spending budgets, inventories of hardware systems, subsystems, and
components grew quickly due to a lag in vendors adjusting their build rates to
the downturn in demand. The resultant reduction in demand for telecom components
generally continued throughout fiscal 2008 and into fiscal 2009.
In June 2002, we announced plans for
fiscal 2003 to consolidate all production and corporate headquarters in Florida.
During fiscal 2003 we consolidated all manufacturing to Orlando, Florida. We
believe the aspheric lens product line, in particular, has broad applicability
to market segments beyond telecom. We have segmented “communications” markets to
include: datacom, telecom, hybrid-fiber coax and wireless communications
applications in order to better target product/application niches. In addition,
we are aggressively pursuing new opportunities in the application areas of
medical devices, barcode scanners, optical data storage, machine vision,
sensors, and environmental monitoring. With the consolidation of all our product
lines in Florida by the end of fiscal 2003 and the reduction in demand for
telecom components we have operated one business segment since fiscal
2005.
In
November 2005, we announced the formation of LightPath Optical Instrumentation
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd, a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary, located in
Jiading, in People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). Our manufacturing
operations are housed in a 17,000 square foot facility located in the Jiading
Industrial Zone near Shanghai. The facility increased overall
production capacity and has enabled us to compete for larger production volumes
of optical components and assemblies, and strengthened partnerships within the
Asia/Pacific region. It has also provided a launching point to drive our sales
expansion in the Asia/Pacific region. Our Shanghai operations produce
over 95% of our molded optics for sales world wide. We continue to invest in
capacity of this facility as we expand our sales into the China region. Through
the investment in marketing and sales from the Shanghai location we anticipate
future growth opportunities in aspheric lens applications and further
penetration into the Asian markets with all LightPath products.
Our
principal offices are located at 2603 Challenger Tech Court, Suite 100, Orlando,
Florida 32826. Our telephone number is (407) 382-4003.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
The
selling stockholders will receive all of the proceeds from the sale of their
common stock offered by this prospectus. We will not receive any of
the proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock by the selling
stockholders. We will, however, receive the exercise price of the
warrants to the extent exercised by certain selling stockholders. If
the selling stockholders exercise in full their respective warrants covering an
aggregate of 1,320,977
shares of common stock, we estimate that our net proceeds will be
$1,989,439.20:
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Shares
Underlying
Warrants
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Net Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berg
& Berg Enterprises, LLC
|
|
|
211,039 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
354,545.52 |
|
|
|
|
113,636 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
214,772.04 |
|
|
|
|
126,323 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
109,901.01 |
|
The
Bart Marcy Trust
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
Terry
Brenneman
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
Steven
R.J. & Cynthia Brueck Revocable Trust UTA 3/14/1991
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
8,863.68 |
|
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
5,369.49 |
|
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
2,747.46 |
|
Crescent
International Ltd.
|
|
|
63,312 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
106,364.16 |
|
|
|
|
34,091 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
64,431.99 |
|
|
|
|
37,897 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
32,970.39 |
|
J.
James Gaynor
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
8,863.68 |
|
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
5,369.49 |
|
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
2,747.46 |
|
Mark
Grinbaum
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
Noel
D. Ischy
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
Elvin
Javier
|
|
|
55,925 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
93,954.00 |
|
|
|
|
30,114 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
56,915.46 |
|
|
|
|
33,476 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
29,124.12 |
|
Evelyn
K. Kossak
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
Louis
Leeburg
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
8,863.68 |
|
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
5,369.49 |
|
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
2,747.46 |
|
Gerald
M. Lukasik
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
James
Magos
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1,772.40 |
|
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
1,073.52 |
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
549.84 |
|
Thomas
F. O’Neill
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
Robert
Ripp
|
|
|
52,760 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
88,636.80 |
|
|
|
|
28,409 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
53,693.01 |
|
|
|
|
31,581 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
27,475.47 |
|
Ami
Silberman / Karin Johnsgard
|
|
|
21,104 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
35,454.72 |
|
|
|
|
11,364 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
21,477.96 |
|
|
|
|
12,632 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
10,989.84 |
|
Gary
Silverman
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
8,863.68 |
|
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
5,369.49 |
|
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
2,747.46 |
|
Richard
H. Straeter
|
|
|
5,276 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
8,863.68 |
|
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
5,369.49 |
|
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
2,747.46 |
|
Brett
A. Moyer
|
|
|
10,552 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
17,727.36 |
|
|
|
|
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
10,738.98 |
|
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
5,494.92 |
|
Shadow
Capital LLC
|
|
|
52,760 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
88,636.80 |
|
|
|
|
28,409 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
53,693.01 |
|
|
|
|
31,581 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
27,475.47 |
|
Cranshire
Capital LP
|
|
|
21,104 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
35,454.72 |
|
|
|
|
11,364 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
21,477.96 |
|
|
|
|
12,632 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
10,989.84 |
|
Judith
Glaser
|
|
|
15,828 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
26,591.04 |
|
|
|
|
8,523 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
16,108.47 |
|
|
|
|
9,474 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
8,242.38 |
|
Moe
Houdiagui
|
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
6,736.80 |
|
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
4,080.51 |
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
2,088.00 |
|
Speros
Dedes
|
|
|
8,442 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
14,182.56 |
|
|
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
8,590.05 |
|
|
|
|
5,053 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
4,396.11 |
|
Totals:
|
|
|
1,320,977 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1,989,439.20 |
|
We intend
to use any proceeds from warrant exercises for working capital and other general
corporate purposes.
DETERMINATION
OF OFFERING PRICE
The price
of the shares of common stock offered for sale by the selling stockholders
pursuant to the terms of the offering described in this prospectus will be at
prevailing market prices, or at privately negotiated prices. Factors
which are relevant to the determination of the offering price may include, but
are not limited to, the market price for the shares, consideration of the amount
of common stock offered for sale relative to the total number of shares of
common stock outstanding, the trading history of our outstanding securities, our
financial prospects, and the trading price of other companies similar to us in
terms of size, operating characteristics, industry and other similar
factors.
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain
information provided to us by the selling stockholders with respect to the
beneficial ownership of our common stock by the selling stockholders, as of
March 9, 2009. The following table assumes that the selling stockholders sell
all of their shares; however, we are unable to determine the exact number of
shares that will actually be sold. The percentage of shares beneficially owned
prior to the offering is based on 6,676,453 shares outstanding at March 9, 2009,
determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and the information is not
necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such
rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has
sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the
individual has the right to acquire within sixty days of March 9, 2009, through
the exercise of any warrants or other right.
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Number
of
Shares
of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned Prior to
Offering
|
|
|
Percentage
of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned Prior to
Offering
|
|
|
Number
of
Shares
of
Common Stock
Offered for Sale
Hereunder (1)
|
|
|
Number
of
Shares
Of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Assuming Sale
of All Shares
Offered
Hereunder
|
|
|
Percentage of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Assuming Sale
of
All Shares
Offered
Hereunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berg
& Berg Enterprises, LLC
|
|
|
1,205,349 |
(2) |
|
|
18.05 |
% |
|
|
1,337,146 |
|
|
|
806,214 |
|
|
|
12.08 |
% |
The
Bart Marcy Trust
|
|
|
156,858 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
% |
Terry
Brenneman
|
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven
R.J. & Cynthia Brueck Revocable Trust UTA 3/14/1991
(3)
|
|
|
82,979 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
49,550 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Crescent
International Ltd.
|
|
|
333,055 |
(4) |
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
454,401 |
|
|
|
125,236 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
J.
James Gaynor (5)
|
|
|
113,429 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
% |
Mark
Grinbaum
|
|
|
73,515 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
73,515 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Noel
D. Ischy
|
|
|
96,858 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Elvin
Javier
|
|
|
333,055 |
(6) |
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
354,345 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Evelyn
K. Kossak
|
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Louis
Leeburg (7)
|
|
|
87,412 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
53,983 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gerald
M. Lukasik
|
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
66,858 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James
Magos (8)
|
|
|
70,301 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
6,687 |
|
|
|
63,614 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas
F. O’Neill
|
|
|
73,515 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
73,515 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert
Ripp (9)
|
|
|
345,448 |
(10) |
|
|
5.17 |
% |
|
|
334,288 |
|
|
|
380,820 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
Ami
Silberman / Karin Johnsgard
|
|
|
133,715 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
|
133,715 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gary
Silverman (11)
|
|
|
105,291 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
71,862 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
% |
Richard
H. Straeter
|
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Brett
A. Moyer
|
|
|
89,765 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
73,515 |
|
|
|
16,250 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Shadow
Capital LLC
|
|
|
602,350 |
(12) |
|
|
9.02 |
% |
|
|
334,288 |
|
|
|
502,565 |
|
|
|
7.53 |
% |
Cranshire
Capital LP
|
|
|
160,715 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
133,715 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Judith
Glaser
|
|
|
100,286 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
100,286 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Moe
Houdiagui
|
|
|
25,407 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
25,407 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Speros
Dedes
|
|
|
53,486 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
53,486 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
4,214,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,989,744 |
|
|
|
2,161,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
*
Indicates less than one percent (1%)
(1) Except
as set forth in footnotes (2), (4), (6), (10), and (12) below, with respect to
each of the selling stockholders the number of shares of common stock offered by
sale pursuant to this prospectus equals their pro rata amount of: (i) the
1,901,954 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of debentures issued
to such selling stockholders, (ii) the 950,978 shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of warrants issued to such selling stockholders, (iii) the 27,893
shares of common stock issued to such selling stockholders in lieu of an
interest payment due on October 1, 2008, (iv) with respect to Crescent
International Ltd., Mark Grinbaum, Thomas F. O’Neill and Brett A. Moyer, the
73,228 shares of common stock issued as an incentive to invest in the debenture
offering; (v) the 665,692 shares of common stock issued in satisfaction of the
Company’s quarterly interest payment obligations after October 1, 2008 through
maturity; and (vi) the 369,999 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
warrants issued in consideration of the partial conversion of the
debentures.
(2) Does
not include 925,324 shares of Class A common stock with respect to which Berg
& Berg Enterprises, LLC (“BBE”) may have the right to acquire in the
future. Specifically, BBE holds a debenture issued by the Company
with a current principal amount of $750,000, which would be convertible into
487,013 shares of Class A common stock. BBE also holds warrants which
would be exercisable for an aggregate of 438,311 shares of Class A common
stock. However, neither BBE nor the Company is able to effect any
additional conversion of the debenture or any exercise of the warrants to the
extent that after giving effect to such issuance after conversion or exercise,
as the case may be, BBE would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number
of shares of Class A common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to
the issuance of shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of the debenture or
warrants. Given that BBE currently holds in excess of 4.99% of the
issued and outstanding share of Class A common stock, the debenture cannot be
converted and the warrants cannot be exercised.
(3) Dr.
Steven Brueck is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and serves
on the Board’s Audit Committee and Technical Advisory Board.
(4) Does
not include 246,582 shares of Class A common stock with respect to which
Crescent International Ltd. (“Crescent”) may have the right to acquire in the
future. Specifically, Cresent holds a debenture issued by the Company
with a current principal amount of $225,000, which would be convertible into
146,103 shares of Class A common stock. Crescent also holds warrants
which would be exercisable for an aggregate of 135,300 shares of Class A common
stock. However, neither Crescent nor the Company is able to effect
any additional conversion of the debenture or any exercise of the warrants to
the extent that after giving effect to such issuance after conversion or
exercise, as the case may be, Crescent would beneficially own in excess of 4.99%
of the number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding immediately after
giving effect to the issuance of shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of
the debenture or warrants. Given that Crescent currently holds only
4.47% of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock, Crescent may
convert its debenture or exercise its warrants, as the case may be, only to the
extent that, after giving effect to such issuance after conversion or exercise,
Crescent’s beneficial ownership of Class A common stock does not exceed 333,055
shares in the aggregate.
(5) J.
James Gaynor is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as well as
a member of the Board of Directors.
(6) Does
not include 21,290 shares of Class A common stock with respect to which Elvin
Javier (“Javier”) may have the right to acquire in the
future. Specifically, Javier holds a debenture issued by the Company
with a current principal amount of $198,750, which would be convertible into
129,058 shares of Class A common stock. Javier also holds warrants
which would be exercisable for an aggregate of 119,515 shares of Class A common
stock. However, neither Javier nor the Company is able to effect any
additional conversion of the debenture or any exercise of the warrants to the
extent that after giving effect to such issuance after conversion or exercise,
as the case may be, Javier would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the
number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding immediately after giving
effect to the issuance of shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of the
debenture or warrants. Given that Javier currently holds only 1.58%
of the issued and outstanding shares of Class A common stock, Javier may convert
his debenture or exercise his warrants, as the case may be, only to the extent
that, after giving effect to such issuance after conversion or exercise,
Javier’s beneficial ownership of Class A common stock does not exceed 333,055
shares in the aggregate.
(7) Louis
Leeburg is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and serves on the
Audit Committee and the Finance Committee.
(8) James
Magos was a Corporate Vice President of the Company until his resignation,
effective September 2, 2008.
(9) Robert
Ripp is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and serves on the
Compensation Committee and the Finance Committee.
(10) Does
not include 234,503 shares of Class A common stock with respect to which Robert
Ripp (“Ripp”) may have the right to acquire in the
future. Specifically, Ripp holds a debenture issued by the Company
with a current principal amount of $187,500, which would be convertible into
121,753 shares of Class A common stock. Ripp also holds warrants
which would be exercisable for an aggregate of 112,750 shares of Class A common
stock. However, neither Ripp nor the Company is able to effect any
additional conversion of the debenture or any exercise of the warrants to the
extent that after giving effect to such issuance after conversion or exercise,
as the case may be, Ripp would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number
of shares of Class A common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to
the issuance of shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of the debenture or
warrants. Given that Ripp currently holds in excess of 4.99% of the
issued and outstanding share of Class A common stock, the debenture cannot be
converted and the warrants cannot be exercised.
(11) Gary
Silverman is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and serves on
the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee.
(12) Does
not include 234,503 shares of Class A common stock with respect to which Shadow
Capital LLC (“Shadow”) may have the right to acquire in the
future. Specifically, Shadow holds a debenture issued by the Company
with a current principal amount of $187,500, which would be convertible into
121,753 shares of Class A common stock. Shadow also holds warrants
which would be exercisable for an aggregate of 112,750 shares of Class A common
stock. However, neither Shadow nor the Company is able to effect any
additional conversion of the debenture or any exercise of the warrants to the
extent that after giving effect to such issuance after conversion or exercise,
as the case may be, Shadow would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the
number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding immediately after giving
effect to the issuance of shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of the
debenture or warrants. Given that Shadow currently holds in excess of
4.99% of the issued and outstanding share of Class A common stock, the debenture
cannot be converted and the warrants cannot be exercised.
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
Each selling stockholder of the common
stock and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from
time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on the Nasdaq
Capital Market or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which
the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be
at fixed or negotiated prices. A selling stockholder may use any one
or more of the following methods when selling shares:
|
·
|
ordinary
brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer
solicits purchasers;
|
|
·
|
block
trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent
but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to
facilitate the transaction;
|
|
·
|
purchases
by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its
account;
|
|
·
|
an
exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable
exchange;
|
|
·
|
privately
negotiated transactions;
|
|
·
|
settlement
of short sales entered into after the effective date of the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a
part;
|
|
·
|
broker-dealers
may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified number of such
shares at a stipulated price per
share;
|
|
·
|
through
the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions,
whether through an options exchange or
otherwise;
|
|
·
|
a
combination of any such methods of sale;
or
|
|
·
|
any
other method permitted pursuant to applicable
law.
|
The
selling stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities
Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.
Broker-dealers engaged by the selling
stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in
sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the
selling stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser
of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set
forth in a supplement to this prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction
not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with NASDR Rule
2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in
compliance with NASDR IM-2440.
In connection with the sale of the
common stock or interests therein, the selling stockholders may enter into
hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which
may in turn engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging
the positions they assume. The selling stockholders may also sell
shares of the common stock short (subject to the terms of the purchase agreement
by and between the Company and such selling stockholder) and deliver these
securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge the common
stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The
selling stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with
broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more
derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other
financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such
broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this
prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such
transaction).
The selling stockholders and any
broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed
to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with
such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such
broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by
them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the
Securities Act. Each selling stockholder has informed the Company
that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly
or indirectly, with any person to distribute the common stock. In no event shall
any broker-dealer receive fees, commissions and markups which, in the aggregate,
would exceed eight percent (8%).
We are required to pay certain fees and
expenses incurred by the Company incident to the registration of the
shares. We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against
certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
Because selling stockholders may be
deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, they will
be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act
including Rule 172 thereunder. In addition, any securities covered by this
prospectus which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act
may be sold under Rule 144 rather than under this prospectus. There
is no underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with the proposed
sale of the resale shares by the selling stockholders.
We agreed to keep this prospectus
effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the shares may be resold by
the selling stockholders without registration and without regard to any volume
limitations by reason of Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act or any other rule
of similar effect or (ii) all of the shares have been sold pursuant to this
prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar
effect. The resale shares will be sold only through registered or
licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws.
In addition, in certain states, the resale shares may not be sold unless they
have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an
exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is
complied with.
Under applicable rules and regulations
under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale
shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to
the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation
M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the
Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may
limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of the common stock by the
Selling Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of this
prospectus available to the Selling Stockholders and have informed them of the
need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the
time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities
Act).
First Montauk Securities Corp., the
placement agent for the offering of the convertible debentures to the selling
stockholders, received in consideration for such services, among other things,
warrants for the purchase of a total of 190,195 shares of common
stock. All of such warrants, other than warrants to purchase 23,774
shares were issued to certain of First Montauk’s employees as designated by
First Montauk. In compliance with FINRA Rule 2710(g)(1), First
Montauk and such employees agreed to a prohibition on their ability to exercise
the warrants for a period of six months following the effective date of the
registration statement to which this prospectus is a part.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Baker &
Hostetler LLP, Orlando, Florida, has rendered an opinion that the shares of
common stock offered hereby are legally issued, fully paid and
non-assessable.
EXPERTS
The
financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the two years
in the period ended June 20, 2008 incorporated by reference in this Prospectus
have been so incorporated in reliance on the report of Cross, Fernandez
& Riley, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
incorporated herein by reference, given upon the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
·
|
Government
Filings. We file annual, quarterly and special reports
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
document that we file at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-732-0330 for further information on the Public Reference
Room. Our SEC filings are also available to you free of charge
at the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.
|
·
|
Stock
Market. Our shares of common stock are traded on Nasdaq
under the symbol LPTH.
|
·
|
Information
Incorporated by Reference. The SEC allows us to
“incorporate by reference” the information we file with them, which means
that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to
those documents. The information incorporated by reference is
considered to be part of this prospectus, and information that we file
later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede previously
filed information, including information contained in this
document.
|
We
incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any future filings we
will make with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act until this offering has been completed:
|
·
|
Our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 (filed on
September 29, 2008 and as amended on January 26, 2009), which contains
audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year for which
such statements have been filed.
|
|
·
|
Our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2008 (filed on November 12, 2008).
|
|
·
|
Our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31,
2008 (filed on February 12, 2009).
|
|
·
|
Our
definitive proxy statement related to our 2008 annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on October 30, 2008, filed September 29,
2008.
|
|
·
|
The
description of our common stock, which is contained in our registration
statement filed on Form 8-A, dated January 13,
1996.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 4,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 6,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 8,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 25,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 8,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 11,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 17,
2008.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6,
2009.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26,
2009.
|
|
·
|
Our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12,
2009.
|
You may
request free copies of these filings by writing, telephoning or contacting us at
the following:
Investor
Relations Department
LightPath
Technologies, Inc.
2603
Challenger Tech Court, Suite 100
Orlando,
Florida 32826
(407)
382-4003
email:
invrel@lightpath.com
We will
provide without charge to anyone who receives a prospectus, upon written or oral
request, a copy of any and all of the information that has been incorporated by
reference in this prospectus (not including exhibits to the information that is
incorporated by reference unless the exhibits are themselves specifically
incorporated by reference in that information). Such a request should
be directed to LightPath Technologies, Inc., 2603 Challenger Tech Court, Suite
100, Orlando, Florida 32826, Attention: Investor Relations, or if by telephone,
(407) 382-4003.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus and the documents
incorporated by reference in this prospectus contain forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current
expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs
and certain assumptions made by us. Words such as “anticipates,”
“expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and variations
of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance
and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results could differ
materially from those expressed or forecasted in any forward-looking statements
as a result of a variety of factors, including those set forth in “Risk Factors”
above and elsewhere in, or incorporated by reference into, this
prospectus. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes
available or other events occur in the future.
PART
II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item
14. Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
The
expenses relating to the registration, sale and distribution of the shares,
including sales commissions, are payable by the Registrant. All of
the amounts shown are estimated except the SEC and Nasdaq registration
fees.
SEC
Registration Fee
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
Nasdaq
Listing of Additional Shares Fee
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
Legal
Fees and Expenses (including Blue Sky)
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Accounting
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Brokerage
Commissions, Discounts, Other Placement Agent Expenses
|
|
|
270,070 |
|
Printing
and Miscellaneous Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
342,894 |
|
*
Estimated
Item
15. Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
Section
145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) makes provision for the
indemnification of officers and directors of corporations in terms sufficiently
broad to indemnify the officers and directors of the Registrant under certain
circumstances from liabilities (including reimbursement of expenses incurred)
arising under the Securities Act. Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL
permits a corporation to provide in its Certificate of Incorporation that a
director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to the corporation or
its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a
director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of
loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not
in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) in respect of certain unlawful dividend payments or stock redemptions
or repurchases, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit.
As permitted by the DGCL, the
Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Charter”) provides
that the personal liability of each member of the Registrant’s Board of
Directors to the Registrant or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director is eliminated. The effect of this
provision in the Charter is to eliminate the rights of the Registrant and its
stockholders (through stockholders’ derivative suits on behalf of the
Registrant) to recover monetary damages against a director for breach of
fiduciary duty as a director thereof (including breaches resulting from
negligent or grossly negligent behavior) except in the situations described in
clauses (i)-(iv), inclusive, above. Specifically, Article TENTH of
the Charter provides as follows:
TENTH: No
director of the corporation shall be personally liable to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director;
provided, however, that the foregoing clause shall not apply to any liability of
a director (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to
the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not
in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) for any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit, or (iv) under Section 174 of the
DGCL. This Article shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a
director for any act or omission occurring prior to the time this Article became
effective.
In addition, Article VII of the
Registrant’s Bylaws provides, in summary, that the Registrant is required to
indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any person made or
threatened to be made a party or involved in a lawsuit, action or proceeding by
reason that such person is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of the
Registrant. Indemnification is against all liability and loss
suffered and expenses reasonably incurred. Unless required by law, no
such indemnification is required by the Registrant of any person initiating such
suit, action or proceeding without board authorization. Expenses are
payable in advance if the indemnified party agrees to repay the amount if he is
ultimately found to not be entitled to indemnification.
The Bylaws further provide that the
indemnification rights provided for in the Bylaws shall not be deemed exclusive
of any other rights to the indemnified party under any bylaw, agreement, vote of
stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
Insofar as indemnification for
liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, we have been informed that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable.
The Registrant provides indemnity
insurance pursuant to which officers and directors are indemnified or insured
against liability or loss under certain circumstances, which may include
liability or related loss under the Securities Act and the Exchange
Act.
Item
16. Exhibits.
The
Exhibits to this registration statement are listed in the Index to Exhibits on
page 35.
Item
17. Undertakings.
The
undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
(a) (1) To
file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:
(i) To
include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of
1933;
(ii) To
reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date
of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment
thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the Registration
Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered
would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or
high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the
aggregate, the changes in the volume and price represent no more than a 20%
change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of
Registration Fee” table in this Registration Statement;
(iii) To
include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not
previously disclosed in this Registration Statement or any material change to
such information in the Registration Statement;
Provided, however, that
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) of this section do not apply if the
information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those
paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed with or furnished to the
Commission by the Registrant pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in this
Registration Statement.
(2) That,
for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
(3) To
remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the
securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering.
(b) The
undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the Registrant’s
annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit
plan’s annual report pursuant to section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be
deemed to be new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(c) Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may
be permitted to directors, officers, and controlling persons of the Registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the Registrant in the
successful defense of any such action, suit, or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer, or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
(d) The
Registrant hereby undertakes that (1) for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the
form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon
Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant
pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act of
1933 shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it
was declared effective, and (2) for the purpose of determining any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that
it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for
filing on Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 and has duly caused
this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized in the City of Orlando, State of Florida, on this 9th
day of March, 2009.
LIGHTPATH
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ J. James Gaynor
|
|
J.
James Gaynor
|
|
President
& Chief Executive
Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the
following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/J. James Gaynor
|
|
President
& Chief Executive Officer
|
|
March
9, 2009
|
J.
JAMES GAYNOR
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Dorothy M. Cipolla
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
March
9, 2009
|
DOROTHY
M. CIPOLLA
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer and
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert Ripp
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and
|
|
March
10, 2009
|
ROBERT
RIPP
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Sohail Khan
|
|
Director
|
|
March
9, 2009
|
SOHAIL
KHAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Dr. Steven Brueck
|
|
Director
|
|
March
9, 2009
|
DR.
STEVEN R. J. BRUECK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Louis Leeburg
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2009
|
LOUIS
LEEBURG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Gary Silverman
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2009
|
GARY
SILVERMAN
|
|
|
|
|
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
|
*
4.1
|
|
Rights
Agreement dated as of May 1, 1998, between LightPath Technologies, Inc.,
and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (Filed as Exhibit 1 to
Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed April 28, 1998, and incorporated
herein by this reference.)
|
|
|
|
*4.2
|
|
First
Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of February 25, 2008 between
LightPath Technologies, Inc., and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company (Filed as Exhibit 2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
on Form 8-A filed February 25, 2008, and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|
|
|
|
*
4.3
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008, among LightPath
Technologies, Inc., and the selling stockholders signatory thereto (Filed
as Exhibit 4.6 to Form 8-K/A filed August 6, 2008, and incorporated herein
by this reference.)
|
|
|
|
*
4.4
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008, among LightPath Technologies,
Inc., and the selling stockholders signatory thereto (Filed as Exhibit 4.2
to Form 8-K/A filed August 6, 2008, and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|
|
|
|
*4.5
|
|
Security
Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008, among LightPath Technologies, Inc.,
and the selling stockholders signatory thereto (Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to
Form 8-K/A filed August 6, 2008, and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|
|
|
|
*4.6
|
|
Subsidiary
Guarantee dated as of August 1, 2008, by Geltech Inc., and LightPath
Optical Instrumentation (Shanghai), Ltd., in favor of the selling
stockholders signatory thereto (Filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K/A filed
August 6, 2008, and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|
|
|
|
*4.7
|
|
Form
of 8% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of August 1, 2008,
issued by LightPath Technologies, Inc., to certain selling stockholders
(Filed as Exhibit 4.5 to Form 8-K/A filed August 6, 2008, and incorporated
herein by this reference.)
|
|
|
|
*4.8
|
|
Form
of First Amendment to 8% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture
Due August 1, 2011, dated as of December 31, 2008, between LightPath
Technologies, Inc. and debenture holders (Filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Form 8-K
filed January 6, 2009, and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|
|
|
|
*4.9
|
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of August 1, 2008, issued by
LightPath Technologies, Inc., to certain selling stockholders (Filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K/A filed August 6, 2008, and incorporated herein by
this reference.)
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion
of Baker & Hostetler LLP, regarding legality of shares being offered.
(Filed
herewith.)
|
|
|
|
*23.1
|
|
Consent
of Baker & Hostetler LLP, regarding legality of shares being
offered. (Filed as Exhibit 5.1 to Form S-3 filed September 30,
2008, and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|
*23.2
|
|
Consent
of Cross, Fernandez and Riley, LLP (Filed as Exhibit 23.2 to Form S-3
filed September 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
Consent
of Baker & Hostetler LLP (Contained in its opinion filed
as Exhibit 5.1.)
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
Consent
of Cross, Fernandez and Riley, LLP (Filed
herewith.)
|
|
|
|
*24.1
|
|
Powers
of Attorney (Filed as Exhibit 24.1 to Form S-3 filed September 30, 2008,
and incorporated herein by this
reference.)
|