SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended:
|
30 June 2004 | |
Commission file number:
|
1-10691 |
DIAGEO plc
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
England
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation)
8
Henrietta Place, London W1G 0NB, England
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |||
American Depositary Shares |
New York Stock Exchange | |||
Ordinary
shares of 28101/108 pence each |
New York Stock Exchange* | |||
9.42%
Cumulative guaranteed preferred securities, series A** |
New York Stock Exchange |
* | Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares representing such ordinary shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. | |||
** | Issued by Grand Metropolitan Delaware, LP, of which the Registrant is the sole general partner, and guaranteed as to certain payments by the Registrant. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
None | |||
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: |
None |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report: 3,057,472,410 ordinary shares of 28101/108 pence each.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.
This document comprises the annual report on Form 20-F and the annual report to shareholders for the year ended 30 June 2004 of Diageo plc (the 2004 Form 20-F). Reference is made to the cross reference to Form 20-F table on page 165 hereof (the Form 20-F Cross reference table). Only (i) the information in this document that is referenced in the Form 20-F Cross reference table, (ii) the cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements on page 19 and (iii) the Exhibits, shall be deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for any purpose, including incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-10410 and 333-14100) and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-08090, 333-08092 and 333-08092 amendment, 333-08094, 333-08096 and 333-08096 amendment, 333-08098, 333-08100, 333-08102, 333-08104, 333-08106, 333-09770, 333-11460 and 333-11462), and any other documents, including documents filed by Diageo plc pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which purport to incorporate by reference the 2004 Form 20-F. Any information herein which is not referenced in the Form 20-F Cross reference table, or the Exhibits themselves, shall not be deemed to be so incorporated by reference.
Contents
7 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
51 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
53 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
80 | ||||||||
82 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
85 | ||||||||
86 | ||||||||
86 | ||||||||
87 | ||||||||
87 | ||||||||
88 | ||||||||
90 | ||||||||
148 | ||||||||
149 | ||||||||
151 | ||||||||
152 | ||||||||
153 | ||||||||
153 | ||||||||
154 | ||||||||
155 | ||||||||
157 | ||||||||
159 | ||||||||
159 | ||||||||
160 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
164 | ||||||||
165 | ||||||||
166 | ||||||||
Exhibit 12.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 12.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 13.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 13.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 14.1 |
This is the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Diageo plc for the year ended 30 June 2004.
This document contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including factors beyond Diageos control. For more details, please refer to the cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements on page 19.
The market data contained in this document is taken from independent industry sources in the markets in which Diageo operates.
This report includes names of Diageos products, which constitute trademarks or trade names which Diageo owns or which others own and licence to Diageo for use. In this report, the term company refers to Diageo plc and the terms group and Diageo refer to the company and its consolidated subsidiaries, except as the context otherwise requires. A glossary of terms used in this report is included at the end of the document.
Diageos consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom (UK GAAP), which is the groups primary reporting framework. Unless otherwise indicated all other financial information contained in this document has been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP. The principal differences between UK and US GAAP are discussed in the operating and financial review and set out in the consolidated financial statements.
2 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Five year information
The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for Diageo for the five years ended 30 June 2004 and as at the respective year ends. The UK GAAP data for the five years ended 30 June 2004 and the US GAAP data for the four years ended 30 June 2004 have been derived from Diageos audited consolidated financial statements. The US GAAP data for the year ended 30 June 2000 has been extracted from Diageos US GAAP audited consolidated financial statements. The UK GAAP data for the two years ended 30 June 2003 have been restated following the adoption of FRS 17, UITF 38 and application note (G) to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions. In addition, the UK GAAP data for the two years ended 30 June 2001 have been restated following the adoption of UITF 38 and application note (G) to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions.
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||||
Profit and loss account data(1) | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||
UK GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
8,891 | 8,802 | 8,539 | 7,498 | 7,041 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations(2) |
| 479 | 2,361 | 4,609 | 4,230 | |||||||||||||||
Total turnover |
8,891 | 9,281 | 10,900 | 12,107 | 11,271 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items:(3)(4) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
1,911 | 1,902 | 1,670 | 1,432 | 1,280 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations(2) |
| 53 | 330 | 673 | 677 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating profit before exceptional items |
1,911 | 1,955 | 2,000 | 2,105 | 1,957 | |||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit(4) |
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (470 | ) | (228 | ) | (181 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,871 | 1,787 | 1,530 | 1,877 | 1,776 | |||||||||||||||
Other exceptional items(4) |
(58 | ) | (1,318 | ) | 750 | (4 | ) | (166 | ) | |||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,392 | 50 | 1,589 | 1,210 | 985 | |||||||||||||||
US GAAP(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
8,777 | 9,153 | 10,760 | 11,868 | 11,015 | |||||||||||||||
Gains/(losses) on disposals of businesses |
97 | 16 | 1,843 | (8 | ) | 75 | ||||||||||||||
Net income(5) |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | 758 | 798 | |||||||||||||||
Per
share data |
pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | |||||||||||||||
UK GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend per share(6) |
27.6 | 25.6 | 23.8 | 22.3 | 21.0 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45.9 | 1.6 | 47.9 | 35.8 | 29.0 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
45.9 | 1.6 | 47.9 | 35.8 | 29.0 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings before exceptional items per ordinary share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
48.2 | 47.7 | 43.1 | 41.7 | 37.2 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
48.2 | 47.7 | 43.1 | 41.7 | 37.1 | |||||||||||||||
US GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share |
56.1 | 13.9 | 77.0 | 22.4 | 23.5 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share |
56.1 | 13.9 | 77.0 | 22.4 | 23.5 | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per ADS |
224.4 | 55.6 | 308.0 | 89.6 | 94.0 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ADS |
224.4 | 55.6 | 308.0 | 89.6 | 94.0 | |||||||||||||||
3 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
As at 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data(1) | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||
UK GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net current assets/(liabilities)(7) |
44 | (1,023 | ) | (686 | ) | (512 | ) | (119 | ) | |||||||||||
Total assets |
14,090 | 15,188 | 17,545 | 16,737 | 15,943 | |||||||||||||||
Net borrowings(7) |
4,144 | 4,870 | 5,496 | 5,479 | 5,545 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders funds |
3,692 | 2,801 | 5,029 | 5,328 | 4,518 | |||||||||||||||
Called up share capital(8) |
885 | 897 | 930 | 987 | 990 | |||||||||||||||
US GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets(9) |
23,071 | 24,071 | 26,153 | 25,955 | 24,868 | |||||||||||||||
Long term obligations(7) |
3,381 | 3,149 | 3,892 | 4,029 | 3,753 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholdersequity |
10,287 | 9,344 | 11,316 | 11,880 | 11,802 | |||||||||||||||
million | million | million | million | million | ||||||||||||||||
Number of ordinary shares(8) |
3,057 | 3,100 | 3,215 | 3,411 | 3,422 | |||||||||||||||
Notes to the selected consolidated financial data
1 New UK GAAP accounting policiesThe group has adopted the reporting requirements of FRS 17 Retirement benefits in its primary financial statements from 1 July 2003. The group also complies from 1 July 2003 with the following requirements issued by the UKs Accounting Standards Board:UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts and the amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions.
FRS 17 Retirement benefits This standard replaces the use of the actuarial values for assessing pension costs in favour of a market-based approach. In order to cope with the volatility inherent in this measurement basis, the standard requires that the profit and loss account shows the relatively stable ongoing service cost, the expected return on assets and the interest on the liabilities. Differences between expected and actual returns on assets, and the impact on the liabilities of changes in the assumptions, are reflected in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts This abstract changes the presentation of an entitys own shares held in an employee share trust from requiring them to be recognised as assets to requiring them to be deducted in arriving at shareholders funds. It also has consequential changes to UITF 17 requiring that the expense to the profit and loss account should be the difference between the fair value of the shares at the date of award and the amount that an employee is required to pay for the shares (i.e. the intrinsic valueof the award).
4 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions The amendment to the standard added a new application note (G) on revenue recognition. This requires that revenue should be stated at fair value of the right to consideration. Diageo incurs certain promotional expenditure, where permitted under local law (for example, slotting fees, whereby fees are paid to retailers for prominence of display, listing or agreement not to delist Diageos products) that are not wholly independent of the invoiced product price. Such expenditure is now deducted from turnover. The change, which has no impact on operating profit, reduced turnover and operating costs by £159 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 (2002 £382 million including £217 million in respect of discontinued operations; 2001 £714 million including £632 million in respect of discontinued operations; 2000 £599 million including £523 million in respect of discontinued operations).
2 Discontinued operations Included within UK GAAP discontinued operations are the quick service restaurants business (Burger King sold 13 December 2002) and the packaged food businesses (Pillsbury sold 31 October 2001). The quick service restaurants and packaged food businesses have been included in continuing operations under US GAAP. There are no discontinued operations under US GAAP.
3 Brands and goodwill An analysis of goodwill amortisation charged to UK GAAP operating profit is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| (2 | ) | (10 | ) | (24 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||||||||
(2 | ) | (4 | ) | (12 | ) | (26 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||
4 Exceptional items An analysis of exceptional items before taxation under UK GAAP is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Exceptional items (charged)/credited to operating profit |
||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Seagram integration costs |
(40 | ) | (177 | ) | (164 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Guinness/UDV integration costs |
| (48 | ) | (48 | ) | (74 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Other integration and restructuring costs |
| | (17 | ) | (79 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||||||||||
Bass distribution rights |
| 57 | | | | |||||||||||||||
José Cuervo settlement |
| | (220 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (449 | ) | (153 | ) | (83 | ) | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | (21 | ) | (75 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||||||||
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (470 | ) | (228 | ) | (181 | ) | |||||||||||
Other exceptional items |
||||||||||||||||||||
Share of associates exceptional items |
(13 | ) | (21 | ) | (41 | ) | | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
(Losses)/gains on disposal of fixed assets |
(35 | ) | (43 | ) | (22 | ) | 19 | 5 | ||||||||||||
(Losses)/gains on disposal and termination of businesses |
(10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | 813 | (23 | ) | (168 | ) | |||||||||||
(58 | ) | (1,318 | ) | 750 | (4 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||||||||
5 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
5 Unusual items An analysis of unusual (charges)/income, excluding gains/(losses) on disposal of businesses and (losses)/gains on disposal of fixed assets, included in, and affecting the comparability of, operating income and net income under US GAAP, is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Seagram integration costs |
(40 | ) | (154 | ) | (82 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Other integration and restructuring costs |
| (48 | ) | (48 | ) | (169 | ) | (115 | ) | |||||||||||
Bass distribution rights |
| 57 | | | | |||||||||||||||
José Cuervo settlement |
| | (194 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares |
28 | (4 | ) | 166 | | | ||||||||||||||
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs |
(38 | ) | (750 | ) | (135 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
(50 | ) | (899 | ) | (293 | ) | (169 | ) | (115 | ) | |||||||||||
6 Dividends The Diageo plc board expects that Diageo will pay an interim dividend in April and a final dividend in October of each year. Approximately 40% of the total dividend in respect of any financial year is expected to be paid as an interim dividend and approximately 60% as a final dividend. The payment of any future dividends, subject to shareholder approval, will depend upon Diageos earnings, financial condition and such other factors as the Diageo plc board deems relevant.
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||
pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | ||||||||||||||||||
Per ordinary share |
Interim | 10.6 | 9.9 | 9.3 | 8.9 | 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Final | 17.0 | 15.7 | 14.5 | 13.4 | 12.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 27.6 | 25.6 | 23.8 | 22.3 | 21.0 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
Per ADS |
Interim | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.53 | ||||||||||||||||
Final | 1.24 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.72 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 2.01 | 1.67 | 1.44 | 1.29 | 1.25 | |||||||||||||||||
7 Definitions Net current assets/(liabilities) are defined as current assets less current liabilities. Net borrowings are defined as total borrowings (i.e. short term borrowings and long term borrowings plus finance lease obligations) less cash at bank and liquid resources, interest rate and foreign currency swaps and current asset investments. Long term obligations are defined as long term borrowings and capital lease obligations which fall due after more than one year.
8 Share capital The called up share capital represents the par value of ordinary shares of 28101/108 pence in issue. The number of ordinary shares represents the number of shares in issue and fully paid up at the balance sheet date. Of these, 43 million (2003 45 million; 2002 39 million; 2001 35 million; 2000 30 million) are held in employee share trusts and are deducted in arriving at shareholders funds. During the year ended 30 June 2004 the group repurchased for cancellation 43 million ordinary shares at a cost of £306 million (2003 116 million ordinary shares, cost of £852 million; 2002 198 million ordinary shares, cost of £1,658 million; 2001 18 million ordinary shares, cost of £108 million; 2000 10 million ordinary shares, cost of £54 million).
6 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
9 Burger King Under UK GAAP, the sale of Burger King was accounted for as a disposal and the results prior to disposal are presented within discontinued operations. Under US GAAP, the transaction is not accounted for as a disposal due to the size of the investment made by the buyer and Diageos continuing involvement through the guarantee provided by Diageo in respect of the acquisition finance. Under US GAAP, the results of Burger King prior to 13 December 2002 (the completion date) are presented as continuing operations in the income statement and, on the completion of the transaction, a charge for impairment has been recognised rather than a loss on disposal. Following the completion date, Diageo does not recognise profits of Burger King in its income statement but will, generally, reflect losses as an impairment charge against the assets retained on the balance sheet. In the US GAAP balance sheet, the total assets and total liabilities of Burger King at 30 June 2004 (including consideration deferred under US GAAP) classified within other long term assetsand other long term liabilities were each £1.2 billion (2003 £1.3 billion). The transaction will be accounted for as a disposal when the uncertainties related to the guarantee provided in respect of the acquisition finance have been substantially resolved and/or the buyers cumulative investment meets or exceeds minimum levels.
10 Exchange rates A substantial portion of the groups assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses is denominated in currencies other than pound sterling, principally US dollars. For a discussion of the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the companys financial condition and results of operations, see Operating and financial review Risk management.
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, information regarding the US dollar/pound sterling exchange rate, based on the noon buying rate, expressed in US dollars per £1. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||
Period end |
1.81 | 1.65 | 1.52 | 1.41 | 1.51 | |||||||||||||||
Average rate (a) |
1.75 | 1.59 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.59 | |||||||||||||||
(a) The average of the noon buying rates on the last business day of each month during the year. These rates have been provided for your convenience. They are not necessarily the rates that have been used in this document for currency translations or in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. See note 2 (i)(c) to the consolidated financial statements for the actual rates used.
The following table shows period end and average US dollar/pound sterling noon buying exchange rates by month, for the period to 31 August 2004, expressed in US dollars per £1. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
August | July | June | May | April | March | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
Period end |
1.80 | 1.82 | 1.81 | 1.83 | 1.77 | 1.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average rate |
1.82 | 1.84 | 1.83 | 1.79 | 1.80 | 1.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
7 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Business description
Overview
Diageo is one of the worlds leading beverage alcohol businesses with a portfolio of international brands. Diageo was the eleventh largest publicly quoted company in the United Kingdom in terms of market capitalisation on 10 September 2004, with a market capitalisation of approximately £21.5 billion.
Strategy
In December 2002 Diageo completed its strategic transition to a focused premium drinks company. Since announcing the planned realignment of its business focus in 2000, Diageo has exited the food business, selling Pillsbury to General Mills in October 2001 and divesting of Burger King in December 2002. Over the same period, it enhanced its premium drinks business with the purchase of parts of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses in December 2001. The completion of these transactions and the integration of the Seagram brands has strongly enhanced Diageos position in the premium drinks industry, and furthered its strategic objectives of building focus in its core business.
Market participation Diageo targets its geographical priorities in terms of major, key and venture markets. The major markets are amongst the biggest premium drinks markets in the world. They account for the majority of Diageos operating profit, and serve as the primary drivers for Diageos business. Key markets are those where Diageo has a high relative market share and they further enhance growth, while the innovative and entrepreneurial venture markets support the long term reach of Diageos business.
Product offering At the brand level, Diageo manages its brands in terms of global priority brands, local priority brands, and category brands. Acting as the main focus for the business, global priority brands are Diageos primary growth drivers across markets. At the individual market level, local priority brands are those which drive growth on a significant, yet more limited geographic scale. Category brands comprise the smaller scale brands in Diageos portfolio.
Business effectiveness Diageos size provides an opportunity for significant scale efficiencies in operations and marketing effectiveness. Strategically, Diageo is focused on using this scale to maximise cost efficiencies, and to enable the dissemination of consumer insight across its portfolio.
Premium drinks
Diageo is engaged in a broad range of activities within the beverage alcohol industry. Its operations include producing, distilling, brewing, bottling, packaging, distributing, developing and marketing a range of brands in approximately 180 territories around the world. Diageo markets a wide range of recognised beverage alcohol brands including a number of the worlds leading spirits and beer brands. The brand ranking information below, when comparing volume information with competitors, has been sourced from data published during 2004 by Impact. Market data information is taken from industry sources in the markets in which Diageo operates. Sixteen of the groups owned brands were among the top 100 premium distilled spirits brands worldwide, as ranked by Impact, in calendar year 2003.
8 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
In the year ended 30 June 2004, Diageo sold 98.2 million equivalent units of spirits (including ready to drink), 2.5 million equivalent units of wine and 21.4 million equivalent units of beer. In the year ended 30 June 2004, ready to drink products contributed 7.2 million equivalent units of total premium drinks volume of which Smirnoff Ice accounted for 5.2 million equivalent units. Volume has been measured on an equivalent units basis to nine litre cases of spirits. An equivalent unit represents one nine litre case of spirits, which is approximately 272 servings. A serving comprises 33ml of spirits, 165ml of wine, or 330ml of ready to drink or beer. Therefore, to convert volume of products other than spirits to equivalent units, the following guide has been used: beer in hectolitres divide by 0.9, wine in nine litre cases divide by five and ready to drink in nine litre cases divide by 10.
Global priority brands
Smirnoff vodka and Smirnoff ready to drink products
Johnnie Walker Scotch whiskies
Guinness stout
Baileys Original Irish Cream liqueur
JεB Scotch whisky
Captain Morgan rum
José Cuervo tequila (agency brand in North America and many European and international markets)
Tanqueray gin
Other spirits brands include:
|
Wine brands include: | Other beer brands include: | ||
Crown Royal Canadian whisky
|
Beaulieu Vineyard wine | Harp Irish lager | ||
Buchanans De Luxe whisky
|
Sterling Vineyards wine | Smithwicks ale | ||
Gordons gin and vodka
|
Blossom Hill wine | Malta non-alcoholic malt | ||
Windsor Premier whisky
|
Piat DOr wine | Red Stripe lager | ||
Bells Extra Special whisky |
||||
Dimple/Pinch whisky |
||||
Seagrams 7 Crown American whiskey |
||||
Old Parr whisky |
||||
Seagrams VO Canadian whisky |
||||
Bundaberg rum |
Diageos agency agreements vary depending on the particular brand, but tend to be for a fixed number of years. There can be no assurances that Diageo will be able to prevent termination of distribution rights or rights to manufacture under licence, or renegotiate distribution rights or rights to manufacture under licence on favourable terms when they expire. See Acquisitions and disposals/termination of businesses and distribution rights for information in respect of José Cuervo and Bass Ale in the United States and Brown-Forman brands in the United Kingdom. Diageos principal agency brand is José Cuervo in North America and many European and international markets.
Global priority brands Diageo has eight global priority brands that it markets worldwide. Diageo considers these brands to have the greatest current and future earnings potential. Each global priority brand is marketed consistently around the world, and therefore can achieve scale benefits. The group manages and invests in these brands on a global basis. In the year ended 30 June 2004, global priority brands contributed 59% of premium drinks total volume and achieved turnover of £5,148 million.
9 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Other brands Diageo manages its other brands by category, analysing them between local priority brands and category brands.
Production Diageo owns production facilities including maltings, distilleries, breweries, packaging plants, maturation warehouses, cooperages, vineyards and distribution warehouses. Production also occurs at plants owned and operated by third parties and joint ventures at a number of locations internationally.
Approximately 75% of total production (including third party production) is undertaken in five Diageo production areas, namely the United Kingdom, Baileys, Guinness, Santa Vittoria and North America centres. The majority of these production centres have several production facilities. The locations, principal activities, products, production capacity and production volume in 2004 of these principal production centres are set out in the following table: | ||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||
Production | volume in | |||||||||||
capacity* | 2004* | |||||||||||
Production centre | Location | Principal products | million | million | ||||||||
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom | Scotch whisky, gin, vodka, rum, ready to drink |
58 | 38 | ||||||||
Baileys
|
Ireland | Irish cream liqueur, vodka | 12 | 8 | ||||||||
Guinness
|
Ireland, United Kingdom | Beers, ready to drink | 13 | 10 | ||||||||
Santa Vittoria
|
Italy | Vodka, wine, rum, ready to drink |
8 | 5 | ||||||||
North America
|
United States, Canada | Vodka, gin, tequila, rum, Canadian whisky, American whiskey, flavored malt beverages, wine, ready to drink |
75 | 34 | ||||||||
Diageo is currently completing the restructuring of its production operations in Canada to reduce excess capacity following the acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, and the associated enforced sale of the Malibu brand. The facility in LaSalle, Quebec (capacity of 10 million equivalent units) is planned to close in the first half of year ending 30 June 2005.
10 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Diageos principal brewing facilities are at the St Jamess Gate brewery in Dublin and in Kilkenny, Waterford and Dundalk in the Republic of Ireland, Park Royal in London, England and in Nigeria, Kenya, Malaysia, Jamaica and Cameroon. Ireland is the main export centre for the Guinness brand. In other countries, Guinness is brewed under licence arrangements. Guinness Draught in cans and bottles, which uses an in-container system to replicate the taste of Guinness Draught, is packaged at Runcorn and Belfast in the United Kingdom.
Property, plant and equipment Diageo owns or leases land and buildings throughout the world. The principal production facilities are described above. As at 30 June 2004, Diageos land and buildings were included in the groups consolidated balance sheet under UK GAAP at a net book value of £772 million. Diageos largest individual facility, in terms of net book value of property, is St Jamess Gate brewery in Dublin. Approximately 98% by value of the groups properties were owned and approximately 2% are held under leases running for 50 years or longer. Diageos properties primarily are a variety of manufacturing, distilling, brewing, bottling and administration facilities spread across the groups worldwide operations, as well as vineyards in the United States. Approximately 58% and 19% of the book value of Diageos land and buildings comprises properties located in the United Kingdom and the United States, respectively.
Raw materials The group has a number of contracts for the forward purchasing of its raw material requirements in order to minimise the effect of raw material price fluctuations. Long term contracts are in place for the purchase of significant raw materials including glass, other packaging, tequila, neutral spirits, cream, rum and grapes. In addition, forward contracts are in place for the purchase of other raw materials including sugar and cereals to minimise the effects of short term price fluctuations.
Marketing and distribution Diageo is committed to investing in its brands. £1,039 million was spent worldwide on marketing on premium drinks brands in the year ended 30 June 2004. Marketing was focused on the eight global priority brands, which accounted for 68% of total marketing expenditure in the year ended 30 June 2004.
An analysis of turnover and operating profit before exceptional items by market for the year ended 30 June 2004 is as follows: | ||||||||
Operating profit before | ||||||||
Turnover | exceptional items | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||
North America |
2,659 | 694 | ||||||
Great Britain |
1,411 | 207 | ||||||
Ireland |
961 | 126 | ||||||
Spain |
454 | 113 | ||||||
5,485 | 1,140 | |||||||
Key markets |
2,275 | 511 | ||||||
Venture markets |
1,131 | 260 | ||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,891 | 1,911 | ||||||
11 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
North America North America is the largest market for Diageo, and the largest premium drinks market in the world. Throughout 2004, in North America, Diageo marketed its products through 14 business teams or clusters (previously five separate spirits in market companies (IMCs)), Diageo Chateau & Estates Wines (DC&E), Diageo-Guinness USA (DG-USA), a Canadian IMC and a 50% distribution joint venture with Moët Hennessy Schieffelin & Somerset (S&S). From 1 July 2004 Diageo and Moët Hennessy have agreed to restructure their joint venture arrangements in the United States. Diageo has moved the management of its brands into its existing North American operation, significantly simplifying the management of its full range of products and enhancing its interface with its distributors. These brands include Johnnie Walker, Tanqueray, Tanqueray No. TEN, Cîroc, JεB, Buchanans, Pinch, Cardhu and The Six Classic Malts of Scotland Talisker, Lagavulin, Oban, Glenkinchie, Dalwhinnie and Cragganmore. S&S will become a company dedicated to the brands of Moët Hennessy, Marnier Lapostolle and Ruffino.
Great Britain Diageo markets its products in Great Britain via three business units; Diageo GB (spirits, beer and ready to drink), Percy Fox & Co (wines) and Justerini & Brooks Retail (private client wines). Products are distributed both via independent wholesalers and directly to the major grocers, convenience and specialist stores. In the on trade (for example, licensed major bars and restaurants), products are sold through the major brewers, multiple retail groups and smaller regional independent brewers and wholesalers.
12 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Ireland Ireland, comprising the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, is an important market for Diageo. The Guinness, Smirnoff and Baileys brands are market leaders in their respective categories of long alcoholic drinks, vodka and cream liqueurs. Budweiser and Carlsberg lagers, also major products in the Diageo portfolio, are brewed and sold under licence in addition to the other local priority brands of Smithwicks ale and Harp lager. In both countries, Diageo sells and distributes directly to both the on trade and the off trade (for example, retail shops and wholesalers) through a telesales operation, extensive outlet rep callage and third party logistics providers. Diageo brews and packages a range of beers in Ireland for export to the United Kingdom, the United States and other international markets. Diageo also produces Baileys in Ireland for export to all global markets.
Spain Spain is an important Scotch whisky market for Diageo, and Diageo owns two of the top five Scotch whisky brands by volume in Spain, with JεB at number one and Johnnie Walker Red Label at number five. This is Diageos most important JεB market, contributing 47% of Diageos JεB total volume. With Cacique and Pampero, Diageo Spain leads the dark rum segment, which is the fastest growing segment in Spain. Distribution in Spain is primarily through Diageos own distribution company.
Key markets There are 15 key markets. These are markets which make a significant contribution in their own right, but still rely on Diageos global functions to support their businesses. Key markets are: Africa (excluding North Africa), Australia/New Zealand, Brazil/Paraguay, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece/Turkey, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Taiwan, Thailand, Uruguay, Venezuela and Global Duty Free.
Venture markets Venture markets comprise all other markets, including the Middle East, North Africa, Jamaica, Central America, the Caribbean and the Southern Cone, Canaries, Portugal, Belgium, Netherlands, the Nordics, Italy, Switzerland, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines and Malaysia. In these markets there is a focus on fewer brands and lean but flexible organisation structures are deployed whilst global best practices in areas such as consumer marketing, customer management and people development are applied.
Seasonal impacts Christmas provides the peak period for premium drinks sales. Historically, approximately 30% of premium drinks sales volume occurs in the last three months of each calendar year.
13 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Employees Releasing the potential of every employee is one of Diageos core strategic imperatives. The focus is on accessing the very best possible talent, from the widest possible talent pools, to provide the ideas, innovation and performance outcomes necessary to achieve the companys ambitions for itself and its stakeholders. This is achieved by placing employees in working environments which truly inspire their performance and development. Employee policies are designed to support these goals and to do so in a manner that is fair and equitable to all. These policies take account of external legislation and internal codes of conduct, as well as Diageos values as an organisation.
Diageos average number of employees during each of the three years ended 30 June 2004 was as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full time | Part time | Total | Full time | Part time | Total | Full time | Part time | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
22,548 | 1,172 | 23,720 | 23,427 | 1,134 | 24,561 | 22,841 | 1,078 | 23,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | | 8,965 | 5,429 | 14,394 | 25,734 | 12,471 | 38,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22,548 | 1,172 | 23,720 | 32,392 | 6,563 | 38,955 | 48,575 | 13,549 | 62,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competition Diageo competes on the basis of consumer loyalty, quality and price.
Research and development The overall nature of the groups business does not demand substantial expenditure on research and development. However, the group has ongoing programmes for developing new drinks products. In the year ended 30 June 2004, the groups research and development expenditure amounted to £11 million (2003 £15 million; 2002 £28 million). Research and development expenditure is written off in the year in which it is incurred.
Trademarks Diageo produces and distributes branded goods and is therefore substantially dependent on the maintenance and protection of its trademarks. All brand names mentioned in this document are trademarks. The group also holds numerous licences and trade secrets, as well as having substantial trade knowledge related to its products. The group believes that its significant trademarks are registered and/or otherwise protected (insofar as legal protections are available) in all material respects in its most important markets.
Regulations and taxes In the United States, the beverage alcohol industry is subject to strict federal and state government regulations covering virtually every aspect of its operations, including production, marketing, sales, distribution, pricing, labelling, packaging and advertising.
14 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Spirits, wine and beer are subject to national import and excise duties in many markets around the world. Most countries impose excise duties on beverage alcohol products, although the form of such taxation varies significantly from a simple application to units of alcohol by volume, to advanced systems based on imported or wholesale value of the product. Several countries impose additional import duty on distilled spirits, often discriminating between categories (such as Scotch whisky or bourbon) in the rate of such tariffs. Within the European Union, such products are subject to different rates of excise duty in each country, but within an overall European Union framework, there are minimum rates of excise duties that can be applied.
Business services Diageo has committed to re-engineer its key business activities with customers, consumers, suppliers and the processes that summarise and report financial performance. In that regard, global processes are being designed, built and implemented across a number of markets and global supply.
Associates Diageos principal associate in the premium drinks segment is Moët Hennessy. It also owns shares in a number of other associates. In the year ended 30 June 2004, premium drinks share of profits of associates before interest, exceptional items and tax was £193 million, of which Moët Hennessy accounted for £176 million.
Moët Hennessy Diageo owns 34% of Moët Hennessy, the spirits and wine subsidiary of LVMH Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton SA (LVMH). LVMH is based in France and is listed on the Paris Stock Exchange. Moët Hennessy is also based in France and is a producer and exporter of a number of brands in its main business areas of champagne and cognac. Its principal products include champagne brands, Moët & Chandon (including Dom Pérignon), Veuve Clicquot and Mercier, all of which are included in the top 10 champagne brands worldwide by volume, and Hennessy which is the top cognac brand worldwide by volume.
Acquisitions and disposals/termination of businesses and distribution rights Diageo has made a number of strategic acquisitions and disposals of brands, distribution rights and equity interests in premium drinks businesses.
Seagram On 21 December 2001, Diageo and Pernod Ricard completed the acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses from Vivendi for $8.15 billion (£5.62 billion) in cash, subject to certain debt, working capital and other adjustments. Diageos share of the purchase price after adjustments was £3.7 billion.
15 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Diageo has accounted for the transaction as an acquisition, reflecting profits and losses arising from those businesses and related assets acquired for its own use, consolidated from the acquisition date. For those businesses and assets acquired and/or held jointly pending their disposal (disposal assets), Diageo and Pernod Ricard shared the net proceeds of disposal in the proportion 60.9% and 39.1% respectively. The disposals of these businesses were substantially completed within 12 months of the original acquisition.
Other In September 2002, Diageo announced that it would relinquish its 1998 US Importation and Distribution Agreement rights for Bass Ale to Bass parent company, Interbrew, effective 30 June 2003 for a consideration of $105 million (£69 million). Under the 1998 agreement, Diageo had the right to continue selling and marketing the brand in the United States until July 2016. The consideration included $10 million as a contribution to inventory management costs during the year ended 30 June 2003, and this element of the consideration has been accounted for as operating income. The balance of the consideration, net of provisions and legal expenses, of £57 million has been accounted for as an exceptional operating item in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Other businesses
General Mills, Inc Following the disposal of Pillsbury and a subsequent sale of shares in General Mills, the group holds an equity stake of 79 million ordinary shares (21%) in General Mills. The following business description is based on publicly available information about General Mills filed with the SEC. General Mills is a global consumer foods company based in the United States. General Mills owns a number of brand names and its primary objective is to build the equity of these brands with strong consumer directed advertising and innovative merchandising. The principal businesses owned by General Mills are Big G ready-to-eat cereals, Betty Crocker dessert, baking, dinner mix and snack products, Yoplait and Colombo yoghurt and former Pillsbury brands such as Pillsburys refrigerated dough and other dough based goods, Old El Paso Mexican foods, Progresso soups, Green Giant vegetables and a foodservice business.
16 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
On 23 June 2004, Paul Walsh, CEO of Diageo plc, and John M Keenan, a Diageo plc designated representative, resigned from the General Mills board. In addition, Diageo and General Mills amended the stockholders agreement to permanently eliminate Diageos right to board representation. As a result, Diageo ceased to equity account for its share of the results of General Mills from that date and will, in the year ending 30 June 2005, only recognise the dividends received from General Mills in its profit and loss account. In the year ended 30 June 2004 dividends amounting to £50 million were received from General Mills.
Discontinued operations
Quick service restaurants Diageo completed the disposal of Burger King on 13 December 2002. See Operating and financial review Off-balance sheet arrangements. Burger King is a leading company in the worldwide quick service restaurant industry. In the year ended 30 June 2003, Burger King contributed turnover of £479 million and operating profit of £53 million to Diageo.
Packaged food Diageo completed the disposal of Pillsbury to General Mills on 31 October 2001. Pillsbury contributed turnover of £1,455 million and operating profit before exceptional items of £177 million in the year ended 30 June 2002. As a division of Diageo, Pillsbury produced and distributed leading food brands including Pillsburys refrigerated dough and other dough based goods, Old El Paso Mexican foods, Progresso soups, Green Giant vegetables and Häagen-Dazs ice cream, and, in addition, operated a foodservice business.
Recent developments
On 8 September 2004 Diageo announced that from 1 October 2004 it has created a new pan-regional organisation comprising Diageo North America, Diageo Europe and Diageo International. North America will continue to comprise the United States and Canada. The newly created Diageo Europe will cover all European countries and territories, including Russia. Diageo International will bring together Africa, Asia Pacific and the Latin American groups of markets. In addition, the company announced the following changes to its Executive Committee and management structure, effective 1 October 2004. Andrew Morgan has been appointed President, Diageo Europe; Stuart Fletcher has been appointed President, Diageo International and Nick Rose will take responsibility for Global Supply and information systems, in addition to his existing role as chief financial officer. It was also confirmed that Ian Meakins will leave the company on 31 October 2004.
Risk factors
Diageo faces competition that may reduce its market share and margins Diageo faces competition from several international companies as well as local and regional companies in the countries in which it operates. Diageo competes with drinks companies across a wide range of consumer drinking occasions. Within a number of categories, consolidation or realignment is taking place. Consolidation is also taking place amongst Diageos customers in many countries. Increased competition and unanticipated actions by competitors or customers could lead to downward pressure on prices and/or a decline in Diageos market share in any of these categories, which would adversely affect Diageos results and hinder its growth potential.
Diageo may not be able to derive the expected benefits from its strategy to focus on premium drinks or its change and cost-saving programmes designed to enhance earnings On 17 July 2000, Diageo announced the integration of its spirits, wine and beer businesses to create a premium drinks business as part of an integrated strategy to be a focused premium drinks company. In line with this strategy, Diageo acquired certain of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses on 21 December 2001. There can be no assurance that Diageos strategic focus on premium drinks will result in better opportunities for growth and improved margins.
Systems change programmes may not deliver the benefits intended and systems failures could lead to business disruption Certain change programmes have been undertaken (especially in the United States, Ireland and Great Britain) designed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of end-to-end operating, administrative and financial systems and processes. This includes moving transaction processing from a number of markets to shared service centres. There can be no certainty that these programmes will deliver the expected benefits. There is likely to be disruption caused to production processes and possibly to administrative and financial systems as further changes to such processes are effected. They could also lead to adverse customer or consumer reaction. Any failure of information systems could adversely impact Diageos ability to operate. As with all large systems, Diageos information systems could be penetrated by outside parties intent on extracting information, corrupting information or disrupting business processes. Such unauthorised access could disrupt Diageos business and/or lead to loss of assets.
Regulatory decisions and changes in the legal and regulatory environment could increase Diageos costs and liabilities or limit its business activities Diageos operations are subject to extensive regulatory requirements regarding production, product liability, distribution, marketing, labelling, advertising and labour and environmental issues. Changes in laws, regulations or governmental policy, could cause Diageo to incur material additional costs or liabilities that could adversely affect its business. In particular, governmental bodies in countries where Diageo operates may impose new labelling, product or production requirements, limitations on the advertising activities used to market beverage alcohol, restrictions on retail outlets or other restrictions on marketing and distribution. Regulatory authorities under whose laws Diageo operates may also have enforcement power that can subject the group to actions such as product recall, seizure of products or other sanctions, which could have an adverse effect on its sales or damage its reputation.
17 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
US regulatory authorities are considering possible changes to the regulation of flavored malt beverages. Discussions are taking place in respect of possible rule changes related to the alcohol content in flavored malt beverages. Revised rules could result in changes in the methods by which Diageo currently produces flavored malt beverages and therefore increase the costs of production and/or distribution of these products. In addition, possible regulatory changes could impose adverse federal tax consequences on the import and sale of flavored malt beverages. Flavored malt beverages form a component of Diageos growth strategy within the United States and it is possible that the implementation of any regulatory changes by the US authorities could have an adverse effect on Diageos future profitability.
Demand for Diageos products may be adversely affected by changes in consumer preferences and tastes Diageos portfolio includes certain of the worlds leading beverage alcohol brands as well as brands of local prominence. Maintaining Diageos competitive position depends on its continued ability to offer products that have a strong appeal to consumers. Consumer preferences may shift due to a variety of factors, including changes in demographic and social trends, changes in travel, vacation or leisure activity patterns and a downturn in economic conditions, which may reduce consumers willingness to purchase premium branded products. In addition, concerns about health effects due to negative publicity regarding alcohol consumption, negative dietary effects, regulatory action or any litigation or customer complaints against companies in the industry may have an adverse effect on Diageos profitability.
If the social acceptability of Diageos products declines, or if the litigation directed at the beverage alcohol industry were to succeed, Diageos sales volume could decrease and the business could be materially adversely affected In recent years, there has been increased social and political attention directed to the beverage alcohol industry. Diageo believes that this attention is the result of public concern over problems related to alcohol abuse, including drink driving, underage drinking and health consequences from the misuse of alcohol. If, as a result, the general social acceptability of beverage alcohol were to decline significantly, sales of Diageos products could materially decrease.
Diageos operating results may be adversely affected by increased costs or shortages of raw materials or labour or disruption to production facilities The raw materials which Diageo uses for the production of its beverage products are largely commodities that are subject to price volatility caused by changes in global supply and demand, weather conditions, agricultural uncertainty or governmental controls. If commodity price changes result in unexpected increases in raw materials cost or the cost of packaging materials, Diageo may not be able to increase its prices to offset these increased costs without suffering reduced volume, revenue and operating income. Diageo may be adversely affected by shortages of such raw materials or packaging materials.
18 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
inventory is stored primarily in Scotland, and the loss through contamination, fire or other natural disaster of all or a portion of the stock of any one of those aged product categories could result in a significant reduction in supply of those products, and consequently, Diageo would not be able to meet consumer demand for these products as it arises. In addition, there can be no assurance that insurance proceeds would cover the replacement value of Diageos maturing inventory or other assets were such assets to be lost due to contamination, fire or natural disasters or destruction resulting from negligence or the acts of third parties.
Diageos business may be adversely impacted by unfavourable economic conditions or political or other developments and risks in the countries in which it operates Diageos business is dependent on general economic conditions in the United States, Great Britain and other important markets. A significant deterioration in these conditions, including a reduction in consumer spending levels, could have a material adverse effect on Diageos business and results of operations. In addition, Diageo may be adversely affected by political and economic developments in any of the countries where Diageo has distribution networks, production facilities or marketing companies. Diageos operations are also subject to a variety of other risks and uncertainties related to trading in numerous foreign countries, including political or economic upheaval and the imposition of any import, investment or currency restrictions, including tariffs and import quotas or any restrictions on the repatriation of earnings and capital. Current examples of such potential upheaval are currency restrictions and potential further disruption to movement of goods into and out of Venezuela, affecting both imports of goods (principally Scotch whisky into Venezuela) and export of rum (Cacique, especially to Spain), unrest in the Middle East, and the impact on tourism and travel of both terrorist threats and ongoing fears of global pandemics, such as SARS. These disruptions can affect Diageos ability to import or export products and to repatriate funds, as well as affecting the levels of consumer demand (for example in duty free outlets at airports or in on trade premises in affected regions) and therefore Diageos levels of sales or profitability.
Diageos premium drinks operations may be adversely affected by failure to renegotiate distribution and manufacturing rights on favourable terms Diageos premium drinks business has a number of distribution agreements for brands owned by it or by other companies. These agreements vary depending on the particular brand, but tend to be for a fixed number of years. There can be no assurance that Diageo will be able to renegotiate distribution rights on favourable terms when they expire or that agreements will not be terminated. Failure to renew distribution agreements on favourable terms could have an adverse impact on Diageos revenues and operating income. In addition, Diageos sales may be adversely affected by any disputes with distributors of its products.
Diageo may not be able to protect its intellectual property rights Given the importance of brand recognition to its business, Diageo has invested considerable effort in protecting its intellectual property rights, including trademark registration and domain names. Diageos patents cover some of its process technology, including some aspects of its bottle marking technology. Diageo also uses security measures and agreements to protect its confidential information. However, Diageo cannot be certain that the steps it has taken will be sufficient or that third parties will not infringe on or misappropriate its intellectual property rights. Moreover, some of the countries in which Diageo operates offer less intellectual property protection than Europe or North America. Given the attractiveness of Diageos brands to consumers, it is not uncommon for counterfeit products to be manufactured. Diageo cannot be certain that the steps it takes to prevent, detect and eliminate counterfeit products will be effective in preventing material loss of profits or erosion of brand equity resulting from lower quality or even dangerous counterfeit product reaching the market. If Diageo is unable to protect its intellectual property rights against infringement or misappropriation, this could materially harm its future financial results and ability to develop its business.
Diageo remains exposed to factors affecting the US food industry While Diageos strategy is to focus on premium drinks, it remains exposed to factors affecting the US food industry through its equity interest in General Mills and its residual exposure to Burger King. Following the disposal of Pillsbury to General Mills, Diageo now holds approximately 21% of General Millsoutstanding share capital. The market value of this interest may be affected adversely by a variety of factors, including the performance of General Mills and the extent to which that performance meets investors expectations, economic conditions in the United States, including the US financial markets, and the dilution of Diageos holding as a result of future issues of shares by General Mills. On 15 October 2003, General Mills announced that it had received a formal request from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) concerning its sales practices and related accounting. General Mills stated that the SEC had advised the company that it had not reached any conclusions related to the information request. See Business description other businesses.
19 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
refinancing by Burger King on a non-guaranteed basis prior to the end of the five years. There are no assurances, however, that such refinancing will occur or that no liability will arise with respect to the financing of the Burger King disposal. Both General Mills and Burger King may also be subject to factors affecting the food industry generally, including increased competition, changes in consumer preferences and concerns over obesity and the potential for related litigation or regulation. These factors could also affect Diageos ability over time to reduce its equity interest in, or affect the price it receives for, General Mills shares. They could also result in Diageo not fully recovering the book value of its subordinated debt due from Burger King and/or having to make payments under the guarantee of Burger Kings debt.
It may be difficult to effect service of US process and enforce US legal process against the directors of Diageo Diageo is a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales. The majority of Diageos directors and officers, and some of the experts named in this document, reside outside of the United States, principally in the United Kingdom. A substantial portion of Diageos assets, and the assets of such persons are located outside of the United States. Therefore, it may not be possible to effect service of process within the United States upon Diageo or these persons in order to enforce judgements of US courts against Diageo or these persons based on the civil liability provisions of the US Federal Securities laws. There is doubt as to the enforceability in England and Wales, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgements of US courts, of civil liabilities solely based on the US Federal Securities laws.
Cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements
This document contains statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Diageo and certain of the plans and objectives of Diageo with respect to these items. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, all statements that express forecasts, expectations and projections with respect to future matters, including trends in results of operations, margins, growth rates, overall market trends, the impact of interest or exchange rates, the availability of financing to Diageo and parties or consortia who have purchased Diageos assets, actions of parties or consortia who have purchased Diageos assets, anticipated cost savings or synergy and the completion of Diageos strategic transactions, are forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including factors that are outside Diageos control.
These factors include, but are not limited to:
| increased competitive product and pricing pressures and unanticipated actions by competitors that could impact Diageos market share, increase expenses and hinder growth potential; |
| the effects of business combinations, partnerships, acquisitions or disposals, existing or future, and the ability to realise expected synergy and/or costs savings; |
| Diageos ability to complete future acquisitions and disposals; |
| legal and regulatory developments, including changes in regulations regarding consumption of, or advertising for, beverage alcohol, changes in accounting standards, taxation requirements, such as the impact of excise tax increases with respect to the premium drinks business and environmental laws; |
| developments in the alcohol advertising class actions and any similar proceedings; |
| changes in the food industry in the United States, including increased competition and changes in consumer preferences; |
| changes in consumer preferences and tastes, demographic trends or perceptions about health related issues; |
| changes in the cost of raw materials and labour costs; |
| changes in economic conditions in countries in which Diageo operates, including changes in levels of consumer spending; |
| levels of marketing, promotional and innovation expenditure by Diageo and its competitors; |
| renewal of distribution rights on favourable terms when they expire; |
| termination of existing distribution rights in respect of agency brands; |
| technological, developments that may affect the distribution of products or impede Diageos ability to protect its intellectual property rights; and |
| changes in financial and equity markets, including significant interest rate and foreign currency rate fluctuations, which may affect Diageos access to or increase the cost of financing or which may affect Diageos financial results. |
All oral and written forward-looking statements made on or after the date of this document and attributable to Diageo are expressly qualified in their entirety by the above factors and the Risk factors contained in this document for the year ended 30 June 2004 . Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Diageo speak only as of the date they are made. Diageo does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect any changes in Diageos expectations with regard thereto or any changes in events, conditions circumstances on which any such statement is based. The reader should, however, consult any additional disclosures that Diageo may make in documents it files with the SEC.
20 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Operating and financial review
Introduction
Information presented Diageos strategy is to focus on its branded drinks businesses with international potential. Diageo completed the disposal of its quick service restaurants business on 13 December 2002 and the combination of its packaged food business with General Mills on 31 October 2001. In accordance with UK GAAP, the results of the quick service restaurants and the packaged food businesses have been included within discontinued operations in the comparative periods.
Presentation of information in relation to the premium drinks business In addition to describing the significant factors impacting on the profit and loss account compared to the prior year for both of the years ended 30 June 2004 and 30 June 2003, additional information is also presented on the operating performance of the premium drinks segment.
Volume Volume has been measured on an equivalent units basis to nine litre cases of spirits. An equivalent unit represents one nine litre case of spirits, which is approximately 272 servings. A serving comprises 33ml of spirits, 165ml of wine, or 330ml of ready to drink or beer. Therefore, to convert volume of products, other than spirits, to equivalent units, the following guide has been used: beer in hectolitres divide by 0.9, wine in nine litre cases divide by 5 and ready to drink in nine litre cases divide by 10.
Non-GAAP measures Organic movement in volume, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items are measures not specifically used in the consolidated financial statements themselves (non-GAAP measures). The performance of the premium drinks segment is discussed using these measures.
21 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
In order to assist the reader of the financial statements, the comparisons of both 2004 with 2003 and 2003 with 2002 include tables which present the exchange, disposal, acquisition and organic components of the year on year movement for each of turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items.
Calculation of organic movement Where a business, brand, brand distribution right or agency agreement was disposed of, or terminated, in the current year, the group, in organic movement calculations, adjusts the results for the prior year to exclude the amount the group earned in that period that it could not have earned in the current period (i.e. the period between the date in the prior period, equivalent to the date of the disposal in the current period, and the end of the prior period). As a result, the organic movement numbers reflect only comparable trading performance. Similarly, if a business was disposed of part way through the equivalent prior period, then its contribution would also be completely excluded from that prior periods performance in the organic movement calculation, since the group recognised no contribution from that business in the current year.
Operating results 2004 compared with 2003
Summary consolidated profit and loss account | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June 2004 | Year ended 30 June 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | exceptional | Exceptional | ||||||||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | items | items | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,891 | | 8,891 | 9,281 | | 9,281 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
(6,980 | ) | (40 | ) | (7,020 | ) | (7,326 | ) | (168 | ) | (7,494 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,911 | (40 | ) | 1,871 | 1,955 | (168 | ) | 1,787 | ||||||||||||||||
Share of
associates profits |
451 | (13 | ) | 438 | 478 | (21 | ) | 457 | ||||||||||||||||
Disposal of fixed assets |
(35 | ) | (35 | ) | (43 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Disposal of businesses |
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | (1,254 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Finance charges |
(295 | ) | | (295 | ) | (315 | ) | | (315 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
2,067 | (98 | ) | 1,969 | 2,118 | (1,486 | ) | 632 | ||||||||||||||||
Taxation |
(517 | ) | 30 | (487 | ) | (543 | ) | 52 | (491 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit after taxation |
1,550 | (68 | ) | 1,482 | 1,575 | (1,434 | ) | 141 | ||||||||||||||||
Minority interests |
(90 | ) | | (90 | ) | (91 | ) | | (91 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,460 | (68 | ) | 1,392 | 1,484 | (1,434 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||||||
Turnover On a reported basis, turnover decreased by £390 million (4%) from £9,281 million (of which Burger King contributed £479 million) in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £8,891 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. For premium drinks, turnover increased by £89 million (1%). Turnover was adversely impacted by exchange rate movements of £271 million, principally arising from weakening of the US dollar. The effect of disposals and the termination of certain distribution rights, principally Bass Ale in North America and the Brown-Forman agency brands in Great Britain, reduced premium drinks turnover by £105 million.
Operating costs On a reported basis, operating costs decreased by £474 million (6%) from £7,494 million (of which Burger King costs were £426 million) in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £7,020 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. Exceptional operating costs declined from £168 million to £40 million in the year ended 30 June 2004, and exchange benefited premium drinks operating costs in the year ended 30 June 2004, before exceptional items, by £166 million. Before the impact of exchange, operating costs before exceptional items for premium drinks increased by £246 million of which excise duties accounted for £73 million and increased marketing expenditure accounted for £41 million. On a reported basis, marketing investment for premium drinks increased 1% from £1,026 million to £1,039 million. Marketing investment on global priority brands (excluding ready to drink) grew 10% to £569 million, while marketing spend on ready to drink brands declined by £28 million (14%) to £166 million.
22 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Operating profit Reported operating profit increased by £84 million from £1,787 million (of which Burger King contributed £53 million) to £1,871 million. Exceptional items charged to operating profit were £40 million in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with £168 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Exchange rate movements reduced operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2004 by £105 million (US dollar reduction of £107 million, euro benefit of £29 million, other currencies reduction of £27 million). Disposals and the termination of certain distribution rights contributed an incremental £13 million to operating profit before exceptional items in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared to the year ended 30 June 2004.
Exceptional operating costs Operating profit for the year is after £40 million of exceptional costs in respect of the integration of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, acquired in December 2001 (2003 £177 million; 2002 £164 million). Approximately £8 million of these costs were employee related, £8 million in respect of putting in place new distribution and broker agreements as part of the Next Generation Growth programme, £4 million in respect of write-downs of assets, and the balance of £20 million included legal and professional and systems costs. The majority of these costs were incurred in North America.
Post employment plans Post employment charges calculated under FRS 17 resulted in a charge to operating profit of £101 million (2003 £110 million) and other finance charges of £18 million (2003 income of £36 million). The figures for the year ended 30 June 2003 have been restated onto an FRS 17 basis.
Associates The groups share of profits of associates before exceptional items was £451 million for the year compared to £478 million last year. The 21% equity interest in General Mills contributed £258 million in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with £287 million last year. The weakness of the US dollar accounted for £25 million of this decrease. On 23 June 2004, Paul Walsh, CEO of Diageo plc, and John M. Keenan, a Diageo plc designated representative, resigned from the General Mills board. As a result, Diageo ceased to equity account for its share of the results of General Mills from that date. Diageos 34% equity interest in Moët Hennessy contributed £176 million to share of profits of associates before exceptional items (2003 £177 million).
Finance charges Finance charges decreased from £315 million to £295 million in the year ended 30 June 2004.
Non-operating exceptional items Non-operating exceptional items before taxation were a charge of £45 million in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with a charge of £1,297 million (including £1,441 million in respect of Burger King) in the year ended 30 June 2003. These charges comprise £41 million (2003 £41 million) in respect of the dilution of the investment in General Mills, following the issue of additional shares by General Mills, and a £10 million cost in respect of disposed businesses, offset by a £6 million gain arising on the disposal of fixed assets. The £10 million cost in respect of disposed businesses represents a £13 million loss on the sale of premium drinks brands, and a £26 million charge on the reassessment of the provisions required following the disposal of Burger King, offset by a credit of £29 million arising on the review of the provision held against the guarantee given by Diageo in connection with the sale of Pillsbury.
Profit before taxation After exceptional items, the profit before taxation and minority interests increased by £1,337 million from £632 million to £1,969 million in the year ended 30 June 2004.
Exchange rates Based on current exchange rates, the impact of adverse exchange rate movements on profit before exceptional items and taxation for the financial year ending 30 June 2005 is estimated to be £100 million (excluding transaction exchange on share of profits of associates).
Taxation The effective rate of taxation on profit before exceptional items for the year was 25%, compared with 25.6% for the year ended 30 June 2003, restated from the originally reported 25% following compliance with the new accounting pronouncements for post employment plans and share trusts.
23 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Dividend The directors recommend a final dividend of 17.0 pence per share, an increase of 8.3% on last years final dividend. The full dividend would therefore be 27.6 pence per share, an increase of 7.8%. Subject to approval by shareholders, the final dividend will be paid on 25 October 2004 to shareholders on the register on 17 September 2004. Payment to US ADR holders will be made 29 October 2004. A dividend re-investment plan is available in respect of the final dividend and the plan notice date is 4 October 2004.
Premium drinks The following discussion provides additional commentary on the trading performance of the premium drinks business with the equivalent period in the prior year.
The organic movement calculations for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2004 were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | Disposals | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | and | Organic | 2004 | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||||
(restated)* | Exchange | transfers | movement | Reported | movement | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,759 | (242 | ) | (71 | ) | 213 | 2,659 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
1,380 | | (8 | ) | 39 | 1,411 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
953 | 37 | (1 | ) | (28 | ) | 961 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Spain |
418 | 20 | (2 | ) | 18 | 454 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
5,510 | (185 | ) | (82 | ) | 242 | 5,485 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
2,080 | (49 | ) | 125 | 119 | 2,275 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
1,212 | (37 | ) | (148 | ) | 104 | 1,131 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,802 | (271 | ) | (105 | ) | 465 | 8,891 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,299 | (203 | ) | (65 | ) | 209 | 2,240 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
790 | | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | 780 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ireland |
638 | 25 | | (22 | ) | 641 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Spain |
316 | 15 | (2 | ) | 13 | 342 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
4,043 | (163 | ) | (72 | ) | 195 | 4,003 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
1,637 | (49 | ) | 90 | 111 | 1,789 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
956 | (29 | ) | (112 | ) | 75 | 890 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
6,636 | (241 | ) | (94 | ) | 381 | 6,682 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Excise duties |
2,166 | 2,209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,802 | 8,891 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
708 | (86 | ) | (13 | ) | 85 | 694 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
203 | | 6 | (2 | ) | 207 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
131 | 9 | | (14 | ) | 126 | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Spain |
96 | 7 | | 10 | 113 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,138 | (70 | ) | (7 | ) | 79 | 1,140 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
502 | (30 | ) | 13 | 26 | 511 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
262 | (5 | ) | (19 | ) | 22 | 260 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
1,902 | (105 | ) | (13 | ) | 127 | 1,911 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
24 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Notes
(2) The reported operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2003 has been restated following the adoption of FRS 17 Retirement benefits, and UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts. The operating profit before exceptional items has been reduced by £74 million in respect of the following markets £21 million for North America, £16 million for Great Britain, £10 million for Ireland, £3 million for Spain, £20 million for key markets and £4 million for venture markets.
(3) The exchange adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items are principally in respect of the US dollar and the euro.
(4) Disposals include the transfer of Portugal to venture markets from key markets, and Germany to key markets from venture markets, effective 1 July 2003. This adjustment represents the differential between the incremental amounts contributed by Germany compared to the amounts contributed by Portugal in the year ended 30 June 2003 £139 million for turnover, £104 million for net sales (after deducting excise duties) and £18 million for operating profit before exceptional items. In addition, disposals for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items were principally in respect of the termination of distribution rights for Bass Ale in North America and Brown-Forman agency brands in the United Kingdom, the disposals of Gilbeys Green and White Whisky in India, and the partial disposal of Don Julio in Mexico.
(5) There have been no acquisitions of subsidiaries in the last 24 months.
(6) In the calculation of operating profit before exceptional items the overheads included in disposals were only those directly attributable to the businesses disposed of, and do not result from subjective judgements of management.
(7) The organic movement percentage is the amount in the column headed organic movement in the table above expressed as a percentage of the aggregate of the first three columns. The basis of the calculation of the organic movement is explained on page 21.
Organic brand performance | ||||||||||||
Equivalent | Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
units | movement | movement | ||||||||||
million | % | % | ||||||||||
Global priority brands |
||||||||||||
Smirnoff |
24.2 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
11.7 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||
Guinness |
11.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Baileys |
6.6 | 7 | 8 | |||||||||
JεB |
6.0 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Captain Morgan |
6.0 | 12 | 18 | |||||||||
José Cuervo |
4.2 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
Tanqueray |
2.0 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
72.3 | 5 | 6 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
22.7 | | 3 | |||||||||
Category brands |
27.1 | 3 | 9 | |||||||||
Total premium drinks |
122.1 | 4 | 6 | |||||||||
25 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Additional information:
| On a reported basis total volume increased 2% from 119.3 million equivalent units to 122.1 million equivalent units | |||
| On a reported basis net sales (after deducting excise duties) increased 1% from £6,636 million to £6,682 million | |||
| Smirnoff volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 6% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 8% | |||
| Captain Morgan volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 8% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 10% |
| Volume growth of the global priority brands, excluding ready to drink, was 5%, compared to 4% in the year ended 30 June 2003. Net sales (after deducting excise duties) growth of the global priority brands, excluding ready to drink, was 6% |
Marketing investment Premium drinks marketing investment increased 1% on a reported basis from £1,026 million to £1,039 million. Organic marketing investment increased 6%, with a further 1% organic growth in promotional spend paid to customers which has been reclassified against turnover under application note (G) to FRS 5.
Analysis by individual market
The figures for 2003 have been restated to reflect the adoption of FRS 17
Retirement benefits, UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts, and the
amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions (see New
accounting standards on page 55). |
||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Operating | ||||||||||||||||
Operating | Turnover | profit* | ||||||||||||||
Turnover | profit* | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Major markets |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,659 | 694 | 2,759 | 708 | ||||||||||||
Great Britain |
1,411 | 207 | 1,380 | 203 | ||||||||||||
Ireland |
961 | 126 | 953 | 131 | ||||||||||||
Spain |
454 | 113 | 418 | 96 | ||||||||||||
5,485 | 1,140 | 5,510 | 1,138 | |||||||||||||
Key markets |
2,275 | 511 | 2,080 | 502 | ||||||||||||
Venture markets |
1,131 | 260 | 1,212 | 262 | ||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,891 | 1,911 | 8,802 | 1,902 | ||||||||||||
26 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
North America
Summary:
| Continued strong performance by Diageo in this important market |
| Continued growth in global priority brands, together with mix improvement throughout the business, delivered double-digit growth in organic net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
| Further improvement in operating margin by 1.2 percentage points |
| Share gains in four of the six spirits categories |
| Smirnoff ready to drink volume up 15%, following new product launches |
| Incremental Seagram synergy benefit of £31 million |
| Marketing investment up 9% behind priority brands |
| Distributor strategy is on track |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,659 | 2,759 | (4 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
2,240 | 2,299 | (3 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Marketing |
359 | 369 | (3 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
694 | 708 | (2 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover was down from £2,759 million to £2,659 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. Operating profit before exceptional items decreased £14 million (2%), from £708 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £694 million in the year ended 30 June 2004.
Organic performance Exchange rate movements accounted for a reduction in turnover of £242 million, principally as a result of a weakness in the US dollar which moved from £1 = $1.59 in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £1 = $1.74 in the year ended 30 June 2004. In addition, the termination of distribution rights for Bass Ale in June 2003 and Cuervo 1800 in October 2002 reduced turnover by £58 million and £8 million, respectively. Other disposals, including Kamchatka in the United States and Gibsons Whiskey in Canada, adversely affected turnover by £5 million. At constant exchange rates the turnover of brands owned or distributed throughout both periods was £213 million higher in the year ended 30 June 2004 than in the comparable period, as discussed within organic brand performance below. These factors combined to produce an overall decrease in turnover of £100 million.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Smirnoff |
3 | 12 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
6 | 11 | |||||||||
José Cuervo |
1 | 6 | |||||||||
Baileys |
6 | 9 | |||||||||
Captain Morgan |
13 | 20 | |||||||||
Tanqueray |
| 4 | |||||||||
Guinness |
5 | 5 | |||||||||
JεB |
2 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
5 | 10 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
| 4 | |||||||||
Category brands |
2 | 22 | |||||||||
Total |
3 | 10 | |||||||||
27 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Additional information:
| Smirnoff volume, excluding ready to drink, was flat and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 5% |
| Captain Morgan volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 9% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 11% |
| From 1 July 2003, terms of trade were harmonised between the former UDV and Seagram brands and freight is now billed as net sales (after deducting excise duties) for all brands. The actual freight cost is reported as cost of goods sold. This change increased reported net sales (after deducting excise duties) in the year by approximately 2 percentage points versus the prior year |
| Crown Royal, Diageos highest volume and most profitable local priority brand, grew volume 3% |
New packaging was introduced for Smirnoff, marketing investment increased and pricing was revised to enable Smirnoff to compete in the higher growth segment of premium vodka. In the short term this has led to flat volume and some share erosion for Smirnoff, excluding ready to drink. However, along with the stronger growth of Smirnoff Twist and the growth of Smirnoff ready to drink, price and mix improved. Smirnoff ready to drink volume was up 15% due to the launch of Smirnoff Twisted V and share grew 15.1 percentage points to approximately 45% of the segment.
28 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Great Britain
Summary:
| Despite good volume growth margin pressures negatively impacted net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
| Solid organic volume growth in spirits, with strong performances from Smirnoff Red and Gordons Gin |
| Diageos share of UK spirits grew from 23.6% to 24.8% in the year |
| Blossom Hill grew volume by 37%. Diageos volume share of branded wines segment is now 13.7% versus 11.4% last year |
| Guinness volume down 3% and ready to drink volume down 14% both in line with the decline in their respective segments |
| Reduced marketing spend due to fewer new product launches and lower ready to drink investment |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
5 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,411 | 1,380 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
780 | 790 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Marketing |
124 | 139 | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
207 | 203 | 2 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Reported and organic performance Turnover in Great Britain was up 2% from £1,380 million to £1,411 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. The £31 million improvement was due to an organic increase of £39 million, offset by £8 million of disposals.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Smirnoff |
11 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Guinness |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Baileys |
5 | 12 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
5 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Local priority brands |
1 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Category brands |
16 | 6 | |||||||||
Total |
6 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
In Great Britain, continued strong performance from spirits and wine, particularly Smirnoff Red up 19%, Gordons up 10% and Blossom Hill up 37%, drove 6% volume growth despite challenging trading conditions in beer and ready to drink. Share of spirits grew 1.2 percentage points to 24.8%.
29 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Guinness share in the beer category declined slightly, by 0.1 percentage points, the result of a 5% volume decline in the on trade, offset by 2% volume growth in the off trade. A price increase for Guinness Draught was implemented on 1 February 2004.
Ireland
Summary:
| The results for Ireland reflect the continued decline of the beverage alcohol market, down a further 1%, and the shift from the on trade, where Diageo has the majority of its business, to the off trade |
| Guinness volume declined 6% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) decreased by 3%, benefiting from price increases |
| Diageo implemented a major restructuring to bring in a less complex and therefore lower cost operating model in response to the changes in the beverage alcohol market |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Turnover |
961 | 953 | 1 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
641 | 638 | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Marketing |
76 | 67 | 13 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
126 | 131 | (4 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Reported performance In Ireland, turnover increased on a reported basis from £953 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £961 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. Operating profit before exceptional items was down from £131 million to £126 million.
Organic performance Although reported turnover was up £8 million, the main reason for this was the strength of the euro, which had a beneficial impact of £37 million. The weighted average exchange rate used for translation strengthened from £1 = 1.52 for the year ended 30 June 2003 to £1 = 1.45 for the year ended 30 June 2004. Market decline and brand performance reduced turnover by £28 million and disposals reduced it by £1 million.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Guinness |
(6 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Smirnoff |
(4 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||
Baileys |
(12 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||
Total global priority brands |
(6 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Local priority brands |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Category brands |
9 | | |||||||||
Total |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
30 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The beverage alcohol market in Ireland declined by a further 1% in the year, impacted by some decline in consumer confidence and an acceleration in the shift from the on to the off trade. The shift towards the off trade is largely attributed to lifestyle and demographics changes, continued price competition in the off trade and to the initial impact in the on trade of the smoking ban introduced in March 2004. The on trade declined by 6% and now represents 57% of the market volume, while the off trade grew by 7%.
Spain
Summary:
| Diageos organic volume grew by 3% and share increased by 0.6 percentage points despite further decline in the Spanish spirits market |
| Performance by brand was mixed, but overall mix improved, driven by volume growth in Johnnie Walker and Cacique as well as price increases implemented in April 2004 |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
454 | 418 | 9 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
342 | 316 | 8 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing |
68 | 64 | 6 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
113 | 96 | 18 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Reported performance Reported turnover was £454 million in the year ended 30 June 2004, up 9% against the £418 million reported in the prior year. Reported operating profit before exceptional items was up £17 million (18%) from £96 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £113 million in the current year.
Organic performance Favourable exchange rate variances due to the strength of the euro positively impacted reported turnover by £20 million. There was a £2 million adverse impact from the loss of the distribution rights for Lagunilla wines in January 2003. Organic growth of brands owned throughout this and the comparable period contributed £18 million.
31 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
JεB |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Baileys |
3 | 7 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
13 | 13 | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
2 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
2 | 1 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
12 | 16 | |||||||||
Category brands |
(6 | ) | 2 | ||||||||
Total |
3 | 4 | |||||||||
JεB volume was down in the standard scotch and local whisky category which continues to decline. However, JεB remains the number one brand with 26% share of the category. The withdrawal of JεB Twist negatively impacted mix and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were down 3% despite a 3% price increase in April.
Key markets
Summary:
| Improved performance by the global priority brands delivered improved operating profit growth in the year | |||
| Strong growth in Africa and Australia and excellent results in Latin America despite difficult economic conditions | |||
| Challenging conditions in Europe |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004* | 2003** | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
7 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,275 | 2,080 | 9 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
1,789 | 1,637 | 9 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing |
280 | 220 | 27 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
511 | 502 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
32 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
From 1 July 2003, Germany has been reported within key markets (previously within venture markets) and Portugal has been reported within venture markets (previously within key markets).
Reported performance Reported turnover in the year ended 30 June 2004 was £2,275 million, up 9% on the prior year figure of £2,080 million. Operating profit before exceptional items was up 2% at £511 million for the year ended 30 June 2004.
Organic performance Turnover in key markets was up £195 million compared with the year ended 30 June 2003. There were unfavourable exchange movements of £49 million, principally on the Venezuelan bolivar and the Nigerian naira, offset by a £119 million improvement in organic performance. In addition, the Germany/Portugal transfer noted above increased turnover by £139 million. The sale of 50% of Don Julio in January 2003 (which has since been accounted for as an associate) negatively impacted turnover by £14 million.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
6 | 8 | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
8 | 4 | |||||||||
Guinness |
11 | 20 | |||||||||
Baileys |
9 | 8 | |||||||||
JεB |
(7 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Total global priority brands |
7 | 8 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
1 | 5 | |||||||||
Category brands |
1 | 4 | |||||||||
Total |
4 | 7 | |||||||||
Overall key markets volume growth was achieved through strong performance in Africa, Latin America, Australia and global duty free. Volume growth together with price increases in Africa and Australia and overall favourable mix delivered 7% net sales (after deducting excise duties) growth.
33 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) in Africa grew 16%, benefiting primarily from price increases. Marketing investment increased 23% to support top-line growth and the launch of Guinness Extra Smooth. In South Africa, a partnership with Heineken and Namibia Breweries was formed, brandhouse, to capture the opportunity provided by the consumer trend towards trading up to premium brands.
Venture markets
Summary:
| Continued volume growth in global priority brands and mix improvement on category brands drove organic operating profit growth of 9%. | |||
| Strong performances from Johnnie Walker, Smirnoff and Baileys | |||
| Declining ready to drink segment | |||
| Strong growth in the Middle East, Americas and Caribbean and Asia (ex Philippines) | |||
| Mixed performance across Europe with significant growth achieved in Portugal, Russia and the Nordics | |||
| Underperformance in balance of Europe largely due to ready to drink segment decline | |||
| Marketing investment up sharply in strategically selected markets |
34 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004* | 2003** | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
(3 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,131 | 1,212 | (7 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
890 | 956 | (7 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Marketing |
132 | 167 | (21 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
260 | 262 | (1 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
From 1 July 2003, Portugal has been reported within venture markets (previously within key markets) and Germany has been reported within key markets (previously within venture markets).
Reported performance Reported turnover in venture markets was down £81 million (7%) in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with the year ended 30 June 2003. Reported operating profit before exceptional items declined by £2 million (1%) in the current year, compared with the £262 million reported in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance Strong organic turnover performance of the brands in venture markets, up £104 million against the prior year, was principally offset by the Germany/Portugal transfer noted above (decrease of £139 million) and adverse exchange rate movements of £37 million. In addition, the impact of disposals reduced turnover in the current year by £9 million (principally Gilbeys Green and White Whisky in India), leading to an overall decrease of £81 million compared with the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
13 | 13 | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
9 | 1 | |||||||||
Guinness |
(1 | ) | 2 | ||||||||
Baileys |
9 | 7 | |||||||||
JεB |
6 | 6 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
9 | 7 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
(17 | ) | 3 | ||||||||
Category brands |
5 | 15 | |||||||||
Total |
7 | 9 | |||||||||
Volume growth of Johnnie Walker was driven by growth of 24% in Asia venture markets through expanding brand awareness and availability and investment in proven growth drivers. Volume of Johnnie Walker in China grew 68%, albeit from a small base.
35 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Red Stripe, venture markets only local priority brand, recorded a 17% volume decline due to duty and price increases in the second half of fiscal 2003, and a tough economic environment in Jamaica. However, the brand achieved a 3% net sales (after deducting excise duties) growth due to the substantial price increases.
Operating results 2003 compared with 2002
Summary consolidated profit and loss account | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | Before | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | exceptional | Exceptional | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | items | items | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
9,281 | | 9,281 | 10,900 | | 10,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
(7,326 | ) | (168 | ) | (7,494 | ) | (8,900 | ) | (470 | ) | (9,370 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,955 | (168 | ) | 1,787 | 2,000 | (470 | ) | 1,530 | |||||||||||||||||||
Share of
associates profits |
478 | (21 | ) | 457 | 324 | (41 | ) | 283 | |||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of fixed assets |
(43 | ) | (43 | ) | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of businesses |
(1,254 | ) | (1,254 | ) | 813 | 813 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Finance charges |
(315 | ) | | (315 | ) | (295 | ) | | (295 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
2,118 | (1,486 | ) | 632 | 2,029 | 280 | 2,309 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxation |
(543 | ) | 52 | (491 | ) | (512 | ) | (121 | ) | (633 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Profit after taxation |
1,575 | (1,434 | ) | 141 | 1,517 | 159 | 1,676 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interests |
(91 | ) | | (91 | ) | (87 | ) | | (87 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,484 | (1,434 | ) | 50 | 1,430 | 159 | 1,589 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover
Overall Turnover decreased by £1,619 million (15%) from £10,900 million in the prior year to £9,281 million in the year ended 30 June 2003, following the disposals of Pillsbury in October 2001 and Burger King in December 2002, both of which are accounted for as discontinued operations and which contributed £479 million to turnover in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with £2,361 million in the prior year.
36 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Continuing operations premium drinks For continuing operations, which now represents Diageos premium drinks business, turnover increased by £263 million (3%) from £8,539 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £8,802 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. The Seagram spirits and wine businesses, which were acquired on 21 December 2001, contributed £1,214 million to turnover during the year, compared with £573 million in the six month period ended 30 June 2002. This increase attributable to the acquired Seagram business was partly offset by the impact of brands which were disposed of during the two year period ended 30 June 2003 of £327 million, principally due to Malibu (impact of £107 million), North American wine brands (£42 million) which were sold in May and April 2002 respectively, and the loss of the distribution rights of Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in Great Britain, effective August 2002 (£108 million). Turnover was also adversely impacted by the effect of exchange rate movements, primarily the US dollar, which reduced turnover by an estimated £303 million. The remaining £243 million increase in turnover reflects the underlying performance of the ongoing brand portfolio which saw volume increase by 1%.
Discontinued operations Burger King contributed £479 million to turnover in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with £1,123 million in the year ended 30 June 2002, following the disposal of Burger King in December 2002. Turnover in the year ended 30 June 2002 also included £1,238 million from Pillsbury which was sold on 31 October 2001.
Operating costs
Overall Operating costs decreased by £1,876 million (20% on a reported basis) from £9,370 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £7,494 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. This decrease was caused by the disposals of Pillsbury in October 2001, which had £1,061 million operating costs in the prior year, and Burger King in December 2002, whose operating costs fell by £565 million reflecting the reduction in the period of ownership by the group. Operating costs of premium drinks decreased by £250 million.
Continuing operations premium drinks For continuing operations, which now represents Diageos premium drinks business, operating costs decreased by £250 million (3% on a reported basis) from £7,318 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £7,068 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating exceptional costs for continuing operations decreased by £281 million from £449 million in the prior year to £168 million (these are discussed under exceptional operating costs below).
Operating profit before exceptional items
Overall Operating profit before exceptional items decreased by £45 million from £2,000 million to £1,955 million. The decrease reflects an increase attributable to premium drinks of £232 million, offset by a reduced contribution of £277 million from discontinued operations.
Continuing operations premium drinks Operating profit before exceptional items for premium drinks increased by £232 million (14%) from £1,670 million to £1,902 million. The Seagram businesses, in the six months ended 31 December 2002, contributed £211 million, but this was offset by a £73 million impact of businesses disposed of, primarily Malibu (impact of £40 million) and North American wine brands (£5 million) which were sold in May and April 2002 respectively, and the loss of the distribution rights of Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in the United Kingdom, effective August 2002 (£10 million). £132 million of the increase in operating profit before exceptional items is attributable to the organic performance of the brand portfolio, discussed in more detail below. Exchange rate movements, net of the effect of currency hedging, had an adverse impact on operating profit before exceptional items of £38 million.
Discontinued operations The results for the year included an operating profit contribution of £53 million from discontinued operations (Burger King only), compared with £330 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 (Burger King and Pillsbury).
Exceptional operating costs
Overall The operating profit for the year ended 30 June 2003 is after exceptional operating charges of £168 million compared to £470 million (including £21 million in respect of discontinued operations) for the year ended 30 June 2002. This comprised integration and restructuring costs of £225 million, offset by £57 million received on the termination of Bass distribution rights in the United States.
37 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Continuing operations premium drinks In the year ended 30 June 2003, £177 million was incurred in respect of the integration of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, acquired in December 2001 (year ended 30 June 2002 £164 million). Approximately £43 million of these costs were employee related, £7 million were in respect of write downs of tangible fixed assets, £57 million were incurred in putting in place new distributor and broker agreements as part of the Next Generation Growth programme in the United States, and the balance included consultancy and systems costs. The majority of these costs were incurred in North America and the United Kingdom. It is expected that the total programme cost of restructuring and integrating the business will be approximately $700 million (£460 million) of which $590 million (£390 million) is expected to be cash. As a result of the amount charged to the profit and loss account in the two years ended 30 June 2003, it is anticipated that approximately 2,200 jobs will be lost of which some 1,800 had been terminated by 30 June 2003. On completion of the programme it is anticipated that some 2,500 jobs will be lost and that integration synergy will reduce Diageos annual cost base by approximately £115 million in the year ending 30 June 2005. The above merger synergy represents a management estimate and, as a forward-looking statement, involves risk and uncertainty. The expected level of synergy is based on a number of assumptions, including certain expectations concerning: the integration of back offices and sales forces in subsidiary regional offices resulting in headcount reductions and rationalisation of facilities; headcount reductions in central and regional offices; and procurement savings through improvement of supplier terms.
Discontinued operations There were no exceptional operating costs in relation to discontinued operations in the year ended 30 June 2003. In the prior year, exceptional operating costs for discontinued operations comprised £21 million in relation to the restructuring of franchisee loan financing arrangements in anticipation of the disposal of the Burger King business.
Associates
The groups share of profits of associates before exceptional items was £478 million for the year compared with £324 million in the year ended 30 June 2002. The 21% equity interest in General Mills contributed £287 million (£143 million in the eight months ended 30 June 2002). Exceptional items for associates comprised £18 million for Diageos share of General Mills exceptional costs incurred on its restructuring of the acquired Pillsbury business, and £3 million in respect of restructuring within Moët Hennessy.
Finance charges
Finance charges increased by £20 million (7%) from £295 million in the prior year to £315 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. The net interest charge decreased by £54 million, from £399 million in the prior year to £345 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 as the net benefits of £76 million in respect of the disposal of businesses, of £27 million from exchange rate related movements, and of £44 million from the reduction in interest rates were offset by other factors. These factors included an increase of £14 million in the amount relating to the share of General Mills interest charge, the effect of business acquisitions, principally the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, of £60 million and the funding of the share repurchases which increased the interest charge by £43 million. Other finance income was £30 million in the year ended 30 June 2003, compared with £104 million in the prior year. This adverse movement is principally due to a lower level of finance income in respect of the groups post employment plans in the year ended 30 June 2003 (£36 million) than in the year ended 30 June 2002 (£104 million).
Non operating exceptional items
Non operating exceptional items before taxation comprise losses of £43 million on disposal of fixed assets and losses of £1,254 million on disposal of businesses in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with losses of £22 million and gains of £813 million respectively in the prior year.
Taxation
The effective rate of taxation on profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2003 was 25.6%, restated from the originally reported 25%, compared with 25.2% for the year ended 30 June 2002. The restatement was made following compliance with the accounting pronouncements for post employment plans and share trusts which Diageo adopted from 1 July 2003. After exceptional items the effective
38 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
rate of taxation was 77.7% for the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with 27.4% for the year ended 30 June 2002. The effective rate of taxation for the year ended 30 June 2003 reflected the fact that the pre tax loss on the disposal of Burger King was £1,441 million with associated tax relief of £80 million.
Premium drinks
The following discussion provides additional commentary on the trading performance of the premium drinks business with the equivalent period in the prior year.
The organic movement calculations for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2003 were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | Organic | 2003 | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Exchange | movement | Reported | movement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | Disposals | Acquisitions | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,641 | (234 | ) | (105 | ) | 444 | 13 | 2,759 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
1,418 | | (135 | ) | 17 | 80 | 1,380 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
937 | 40 | (15 | ) | 1 | (10 | ) | 953 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
368 | 20 | (11 | ) | 35 | 6 | 418 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,364 | (174 | ) | (266 | ) | 497 | 89 | 5,510 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
2,031 | (108 | ) | (30 | ) | 141 | 46 | 2,080 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
1,144 | (21 | ) | (31 | ) | 12 | 108 | 1,212 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,539 | (303 | ) | (327 | ) | 650 | 243 | 8,802 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,202 | (194 | ) | (95 | ) | 373 | 13 | 2,299 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
847 | | (84 | ) | 9 | 18 | 790 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
625 | 27 | (13 | ) | 1 | (2 | ) | 638 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
286 | 17 | (10 | ) | 26 | (3 | ) | 316 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,960 | (150 | ) | (202 | ) | 409 | 26 | 4,043 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
1,584 | (89 | ) | (27 | ) | 100 | 69 | 1,637 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
876 | (22 | ) | (26 | ) | 9 | 119 | 956 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
6,420 | (261 | ) | (255 | ) | 518 | 214 | 6,636 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Excise duties |
2,119 | 2,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,539 | 8,802 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
523 | (2 | ) | (30 | ) | 154 | 63 | 708 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
187 | | (17 | ) | 4 | 29 | 203 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
136 | 6 | (2 | ) | | (9 | ) | 131 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
90 | 1 | (2 | ) | 11 | (4 | ) | 96 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
936 | 5 | (51 | ) | 169 | 79 | 1,138 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
501 | (41 | ) | (12 | ) | 39 | 15 | 502 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
233 | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | 3 | 38 | 262 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
1,670 | (38 | ) | (73 | ) | 211 | 132 | 1,902 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
39 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Notes
(1) The reported turnover and net sales (after deducting excise duties) for the years ended 30 June 2003 and 30 June 2002 have been restated following the adoption of application note G to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions. The change reduced turnover and net sales (after deducting excise duties) by £159 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 (year ended 30 June 2002 £165 million) in respect of the following markets: £36 million for North America, £49 million for Great Britain, £6 million for Spain, £49 million for key markets and £19 million for venture markets (year ended 30 June 2002: £28 million, £49 million, £12 million, £47 million and £29 million, respectively).
(2) The reported operating profit before exceptional items for the years ended 30 June 2003 and 30 June 2002 has been restated following the adoption of FRS 17 Retirement benefits and UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts. The operating profit before exceptional items has been reduced by £74 million (year ended 30 June 2002 £96 million) in respect of the following markets: £21 million for North America, £16 million for Great Britain, £10 million for Ireland, £3 million for Spain, £20 million for key markets and £4 million for venture markets (year ended 30 June 2002: £27 million, £17 million, £15 million, £4 million, £23 million and £10 million, respectively).
(3) The exchange adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items are principally in respect of the US dollar.
(4) Disposal adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items respectively were in relation to the disposal of Malibu rum (£107 million, £93 million, £40 million); the termination of the distribution rights for Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in the United Kingdom (£113 million, £70 million, £10 million); the sale of Glen Ellen/MG Vallejo wines (£42 million, £38 million, £5 million); the transfer of distribution rights of Cuervo 1800 (£27 million, £22 million, £10 million); the sale of Croft Inns (£10 million, £10 million, £nil); the sale of Gilbeys Green and White Label whiskies in India (£9 million, £8 million, £1 million); the termination of distribution rights for Drambuie (£7 million, £4 million, £1 million); the sale of Croft and Delaforce port and sherry brands (£5 million, £4 million, £2 million); and other disposals (£7 million, £6 million, £4 million).
(5) Acquisition adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items, respectively, were in respect of the purchase of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses (£650 million, £518 million, £211 million).
(6) In the calculation of operating profit before exceptional items, the overheads included in disposals were only those directly attributable to the businesses disposed of, and do not result from subjective judgements of management.
(7) The organic movement percentage is the amount in the column headed organic movement in the table above expressed as a percentage of the aggregate of the first three columns. The basis of the calculation of the organic movement is explained on page 21.
Organic brand performance | ||||||||||||
Net | ||||||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||||||
deducting | ||||||||||||
Equivalent | Volume | excise duties) | ||||||||||
units | movement | movement | ||||||||||
Million | % | % | ||||||||||
Smirnoff |
23.0 | 6 | 8 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
10.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Guinness |
11.4 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||
Baileys |
6.2 | 10 | 13 | |||||||||
JεB |
6.0 | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||
Captain Morgan* |
2.5 | (1 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||
José Cuervo |
4.2 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||
Tanqueray |
1.9 | 3 | 7 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
66.0 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
17.1 | (1 | ) | 4 | ||||||||
Category brands |
26.8 | (3 | ) | 1 | ||||||||
109.9 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||
Acquisitions |
9.4 | |||||||||||
Total in year ended 30 June 2003 |
119.3 | |||||||||||
40 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Analysis by individual market
North America
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
15 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,759 | 2,641 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
2,299 | 2,202 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
369 | 380 | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
708 | 523 | 35 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in North America increased 4% from £2,641 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £2,759 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items increased 35% from £523 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £708 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance The increase in turnover was primarily due to the turnover derived from the Seagram brands, acquired in the joint acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses in December 2001, which contributed £444 million in the six months ended 31 December 2002. The effect of brand disposals and of exchange rate movements in the US dollar reduced turnover in the year ended 30 June 2003 by £105 million and £234 million, respectively. The disposal impact is primarily attributable to the disposal of Malibu in May 2002 (£37 million), the Glen Ellen wine business in May 2002 (£37 million) and Cuervo 1800 in September 2002 (£24 million).
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Smirnoff |
4 | (2 | ) | |||||
Johnnie Walker |
2 | 7 | ||||||
José Cuervo |
10 | 9 | ||||||
Baileys |
14 | 17 | ||||||
Tanqueray |
2 | 7 | ||||||
Guinness |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Captain Morgan |
(6 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
JεB |
(6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Total global priority brands |
4 | 2 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
1 | 4 | ||||||
Category brands |
(7 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Total |
1 | 1 | ||||||
| Smirnoff volume excluding ready to drink was up 9% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 11% | |||
| Excluding Captain Morgan Gold, volume of Captain Morgan was up 8% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 10% | |||
| Excluding ready to drink, total volume was up 3% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 5% |
Volume growth in North America was driven by the strong performance of the priority spirits brands. Global priority brand volume excluding ready to drink grew 7%. Ready to drink volume, which includes flavored malt beverages and ready to drink in the United States and ready to drink in Canada, was down 17%, representing a decline in Smirnoff ready to drink of 11% and the withdrawal of Captain Morgan Gold.
41 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Smirnoff ready to drink volume was down 11%. The launch of Smirnoff Ice Triple Black in January 2003 partially offset softness in Smirnoff Ice.
Other business performance drivers:
| At 30 June 2003, almost 80% of Diageos volume was distributed through dedicated sales teams | |||
| Ready to drink segment under pressure | |||
| Efficiencies generated savings of over 10% in media planning and buying | |||
| Share of US spirits brands increased by 0.3 percentage points to 27.3% |
Diageo North America continued to progress its strategic initiatives. In particular its Next Generation Growth programme made excellent further progress. In the second half of the year ended 30 June 2003, new distribution and brokerage agreements were reached in nine more states and additional distributors established dedicated sales forces. At 30 June 2003 distributors and brokers in 34 states and Washington DC, representing nearly 80% of Diageos volume, were supporting Diageos brands, with just under 2,000 sales personnel working in teams solely dedicated to Diageo and S&S brands.
Great Britain
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
(2 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,380 | 1,418 | (3 | ) | 6 | |||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
790 | 847 | (7 | ) | 2 | |||||||||||
Marketing |
139 | 142 | (2 | ) | | |||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
203 | 187 | 9 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in Great Britain was down 3% on a reported basis from £1,418 million in the previous year to £1,380 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items was up £16 million from £187 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £203 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
42 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Organic performance The principal reason for the decrease in turnover was the termination of the distribution rights for Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in Great Britain in August 2002 which reduced turnover by £108 million. The acquired Seagram brands contributed £17 million to turnover in the six months ended 31 December 2002. The organic increase in the year was £80 million (6%).
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Smirnoff |
7 | (1 | ) | |||||
Guinness |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Baileys |
29 | 30 | ||||||
Total global priority brands |
6 | 2 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
(3 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Category brands |
14 | 14 | ||||||
Total |
5 | 2 | ||||||
| Smirnoff volume excluding ready to drink was up 11% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 16% |
| Excluding ready to drink total volume was up 6% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 7% |
Great Britain achieved solid volume growth in the year ended 30 June 2003 and again increased share, driven by growth of the global priority spirits brands. Growth in the spirits brands offset the decline in volume in ready to drink and beer.
Other business performance drivers:
| Increased resources behind sales execution |
A comprehensive restructuring of the customer sales force drove growth in Great Britain. The new structure both increased frequency of contact with customers and generated more effective sales promotions.
43 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Ireland
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
(6 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Turnover |
953 | 937 | 2 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
638 | 625 | 2 | | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
67 | 65 | 3 | | ||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
131 | 136 | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Reported performance In Ireland, turnover increased £16 million from £937 million in the prior year to £953 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance Exchange rate movements increased turnover by £40 million, partially offset by an organic decline in turnover of £10 million. Operating profit before exceptional items was £5 million lower than the previous year at £131 million. Favourable exchange rate movements on the euro of £6 million were more than offset by the weaker performance of the brands compared to the year ended 30 June 2002.
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||||||
Net | ||||||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||||||
deducting | ||||||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||||||
movement | movement | |||||||||||
% | % | |||||||||||
Guinness |
(4 | ) | | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
(5 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Baileys |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
(4 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Local priority brands |
(5 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Category brands |
(7 | ) | 1 | |||||||||
Total |
(5 | ) | | |||||||||
Other business performance drivers:
| Continued decline in the beverage alcohol market driven by a weakening economic environment |
As previously described, the beverage alcohol market in Ireland deteriorated further as a result of declining consumer confidence, the continuing slowdown in economic growth and the excise duty increase on spirits and ready to drink which led to retail price increases of around 20%. The social aspects of drinking are a significant issue in Ireland. As part of its ongoing social responsibility programme, Diageo participated fully in the establishment of MEAS a new independent association established as part of the social responsibility programme undertaken by the industry.
44 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Spain
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
5 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
418 | 368 | 14 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
316 | 286 | 10 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Marketing |
64 | 65 | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
96 | 90 | 7 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in the Spanish market increased £50 million to £418 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with the prior year. Operating profit before exceptional items was up £6 million to £96 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance The reasons for the increase in turnover are the favourable impact of exchange rate movements in the year (£20 million) and the benefit of the acquired Seagram brands, principally Cacique, which contributed £35 million to turnover in the six months ended 31 December 2002.
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||||||
Net | ||||||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||||||
deducting | ||||||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||||||
movement | movement | |||||||||||
% | % | |||||||||||
JεB |
(3 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Baileys |
(2 | ) | 1 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
(4 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||
Smirnoff |
(8 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
(4 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Local priority brands |
25 | 16 | ||||||||||
Category brands |
3 | 13 | ||||||||||
Total |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Other business performance drivers:
| Market share gains on JεB, Baileys, Johnnie Walker Red Label and Cacique |
In the Scotch segment, Diageos brands gained share slightly with gains by JεB and Johnnie Walker Red Label partially offset by share decline in VAT69.
45 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Key markets
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
| (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,080 | 2,031 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
1,637 | 1,584 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
220 | 198 | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
502 | 501 | | 3 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance In key markets, turnover increased £49 million from £2,031 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £2,080 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items was up £1 million at £502 million for the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance Turnover was boosted by the acquired Seagram brands which contributed £141 million in the six months ended 31 December 2002, and by an organic increase of £46 million. However, unfavourable exchange variances of £108 million (principally in respect of the Venezuelan bolivar), and the impact of disposals of £30 million (principally Malibu £24 million) reduced turnover.
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Johnnie Walker |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Guinness |
9 | 29 | ||||||
JεB |
(10 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Smirnoff |
2 | 11 | ||||||
Baileys |
(2 | ) | 2 | |||||
Total global priority brands |
1 | 5 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
(3 | ) | 15 | |||||
Category brands |
(5 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Total |
(2 | ) | 5 | |||||
46 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Other business performance drivers:
| Strong performance in Africa | |||
| Strong volume growth in Australia | |||
| Continued impact of difficult economic situation in Latin America | |||
| Impact of SARS in Asia and Global Duty Free in the year ended 30 June 2003 | |||
| Competitor pricing in Portugal |
As previously noted, several of Diageos key markets are in geographies which faced the most difficult challenges in the year ended 30 June 2003. The overall profitability of the key markets in Latin America declined. This was partially offset by growth in Africa and in South Korea while other key markets broadly maintained operating profit year on year.
47 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Venture markets
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
2 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,212 | 1,144 | 6 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
956 | 876 | 9 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
167 | 138 | 21 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
262 | 233 | 12 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in venture markets increased by £68 million from £1,144 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £1,212 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items, at £262 million for the year ended 30 June 2003, was £29 million higher than in the previous year.
Organic performance The main factor for the improvement in turnover was the strong organic growth which added £108 million to turnover compared with the previous year. However, this was offset by unfavourable exchange movements of £21 million and the disposal of brands of £31 million (principally Malibu £17 million and Gilbeys Green and White Label whiskies £9 million).
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Johnnie Walker |
7 | 10 | ||||||
Smirnoff |
25 | 82 | ||||||
Guinness |
1 | 3 | ||||||
Baileys |
11 | 10 | ||||||
JεB |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Total global priority brands |
11 | 22 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
(3 | ) | 10 | |||||
Category brands |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Total |
6 | 14 | ||||||
| Smirnoff volume excluding ready to drink was up 4% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 8% |
| Excluding ready to drink, volume was up 2% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 4% |
Volume growth reflected strong growth in global priority brands. In addition, ready to drink was an important contributor to venture markets growth with further rollouts of Smirnoff Red and Black Ice as well as the full year benefit of the previous years launches.
Other business performance drivers:
| Marketing investment up 27% mainly behind ready to drink launches and longer term growth projects | |||
| Operating profit growth led by the Caribbean, Middle East, Nordics and Germany |
48 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Marketing investment grew by 27% due to investment to support ready to drink launches as well as investment to support longer term growth behind Baileys in Germany, Italy, the Caribbean and venture markets in Latin America and Johnnie Walker in Asia and the Caribbean.
Trend information
On 8 July 2004 Diageo issued a statement about current trading. The following is an extract from this statement:
Liquidity and capital resources
Cash flow A summary of the cash flow and reconciliation to movement in net borrowings for the three years ended 30 June 2004 is as follows: | ||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,871 | 1,787 | 1,530 | |||||||||
Exceptional operating costs |
40 | 168 | 470 | |||||||||
Restructuring and integration payments |
(97 | ) | (185 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortisation charge |
224 | 249 | 300 | |||||||||
Increase in working capital |
(13 | ) | (227 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||
Other items |
96 | 178 | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash inflow from operating activities |
2,121 | 1,970 | 2,008 | |||||||||
Dividends received from associates |
224 | 60 | 87 | |||||||||
Interest and dividends paid to minority interests |
(299 | ) | (355 | ) | (400 | ) | ||||||
Taxation |
(298 | ) | (105 | ) | (311 | ) | ||||||
Net sale/(purchase) of investments |
9 | (20 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||
Net capital expenditure |
(307 | ) | (341 | ) | (520 | ) | ||||||
Free cash flow |
1,450 | 1,209 | 856 | |||||||||
Acquisitions and disposals |
(34 | ) | 833 | 1,508 | ||||||||
Equity dividends paid |
(800 | ) | (767 | ) | (758 | ) | ||||||
Issue of share capital |
4 | 4 | 11 | |||||||||
Net purchase of own shares for share trusts |
(4 | ) | (65 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||
Own shares purchased for cancellation |
(306 | ) | (852 | ) | (1,658 | ) | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
371 | 227 | 267 | |||||||||
Non-cash items |
45 | 37 | (179 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in net borrowings |
726 | 626 | (17 | ) | ||||||||
49 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The primary sources of the groups liquidity over the last three fiscal years have been cash generated from operations and cash received from disposals. A portion of these funds has been used to fund acquisitions, share repurchases, to pay interest, dividends and taxes, and to fund capital expenditure.
Capital repayments The groups management is committed to enhancing shareholder value, both by investing in the businesses and brands so as to improve the return on investment and by managing the capital structure so as to reduce the cost of capital, while maintaining prudent financial ratios. See Risk management below.
Borrowings Following a board review in June 2003, the group policy with regard to the expected maturity profile of net borrowings of group financing companies is to limit the proportion of such borrowings maturing within 12 months to 50% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits, and the level of commercial paper to 30% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits. Previously group policy was to maintain the proportion of borrowings maturing within one year at below 60% of total borrowings, and to maintain the level of commercial paper at below 50% of total borrowings. In addition, it is group policy to maintain backstop facility terms from relationship banks to support commercial paper obligations.
50 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The groups net borrowings comprise the following: | ||||||||||||
As at 30 June | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Overdrafts |
(74 | ) | (83 | ) | (295 | ) | ||||||
Other borrowings due within one year |
(1,927 | ) | (3,480 | ) | (3,423 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due within one year |
(2,001 | ) | (3,563 | ) | (3,718 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due between one and three years |
(910 | ) | (919 | ) | (2,755 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due between three and five years |
(1,499 | ) | (1,267 | ) | (332 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due after more than five years |
(907 | ) | (795 | ) | (624 | ) | ||||||
Finance leases |
| (1 | ) | (28 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps |
6 | 484 | 365 | |||||||||
Gross borrowings after the impact of foreign currency swaps |
(5,311 | ) | (6,061 | ) | (7,092 | ) | ||||||
Offset by: |
||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
1,167 | 1,191 | 1,596 | |||||||||
(4,144 | ) | (4,870 | ) | (5,496 | ) | |||||||
The groups gross borrowings (after the impact of foreign currency swaps) were denominated in the following currencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | US dollar | Sterling | Euro | Other | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross borrowings |
||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
(5,311 | ) | 81 | (9 | ) | 22 | 6 | |||||||||||||
2003 |
(6,061 | ) | 80 | (9 | ) | 24 | 5 | |||||||||||||
2002 |
(7,092 | ) | 77 | | 18 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources were denominated in the following currencies (liquid resources represent amounts placed with financial institutions which require notice of withdrawals of more than 24 hours to avoid an interest penalty, and amounts placed with government agencies): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | US dollar | Sterling | Euro | Other | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
1,167 | 49 | 13 | 13 | 25 | |||||||||||||||
2003 |
1,191 | 53 | 14 | 15 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
2002 |
1,596 | 46 | 33 | 7 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
The following table summarises the groups borrowings, excluding overdrafts and interest rate and foreign currency swaps. | ||||||||||||
As at 30 June | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Global bonds |
(1,639 | ) | (1,808 | ) | (657 | ) | ||||||
Yankee bonds |
(384 | ) | (423 | ) | (788 | ) | ||||||
Zero coupon bonds |
| (712 | ) | (714 | ) | |||||||
Guaranteed notes |
(220 | ) | (242 | ) | (263 | ) | ||||||
Preferred capital securities |
(412 | ) | (455 | ) | (493 | ) | ||||||
Medium term notes |
(919 | ) | (593 | ) | (1,067 | ) | ||||||
Commercial paper |
(377 | ) | (863 | ) | (1,600 | ) | ||||||
Others |
(1,292 | ) | (1,366 | ) | (1,580 | ) | ||||||
(5,243 | ) | (6,462 | ) | (7,162 | ) | |||||||
51 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
During the year ended 30 June 2004, the group borrowed 300 million (£201 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2006, $500 million (£275 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2006, $200 million (£110 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2007, 500 million (£336 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2009, and $500 million (£275 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2011. These proceeds have been used in the ongoing cash management and funding activities of the group. During the year ended 30 June 2003, the group borrowed $1,000 million (£550 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2007, $1,000 million (£550 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2008, and $200 million (£110 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2018. During the year ended 30 June 2002, the group borrowed £500 million in the form of a guaranteed bond, ¥5,000 million (£25 million) and 100 million (£67 million) in the form of medium term notes that matured in 2002, and 300 million (£201 million) and $100 million (£55 million) in the form of medium term notes that matured in 2003.
Contractual
obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||
As at 30 June 2004 | Payments due by period | |||||||||||||||||||
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Long term debt obligations |
1,550 | 910 | 1,499 | 907 | 4,866 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
66 | 105 | 85 | 262 | 518 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
601 | 665 | 352 | 650 | 2,268 | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities and charges and creditors
greater than one year |
123 | 130 | 11 | 20 | 284 | |||||||||||||||
2,340 | 1,810 | 1,947 | 1,839 | 7,936 | ||||||||||||||||
52 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Off-balance sheet arrangements
In connection with the disposal of businesses, the group has given guarantees of third party debt which were necessary to complete the disposals on the most favourable terms. The directors are not aware of any instances of default by the borrowers at present, but the ability of the borrowers to continue to be in compliance with the guaranteed debt instruments, and in particular remaining current on payments of interest and repayments of principal, is significantly dependent on the current and future operations of those borrowers and their affiliates. Diageo has guaranteed up to $850 million (£467 million) of external borrowings of Burger King until December 2007. These loans had an original term of five years from December 2002, although Diageo and Burger King agreed to structure their arrangements to encourage refinancing by Burger King on a non-guaranteed basis prior to the end of five years. The primary covenants under the guarantee are pari passu ranking and negative pledge. See Additional information for shareholders Material contracts Agreement for the sale of Burger King Corporation for further information. In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury in October 2001, Diageo has guaranteed debt of International Multifoods Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of The JM Smucker Company as from 18 June 2004, to the amount of $200 million (£110 million), repayable in November 2009.
Risk management
The groups funding, liquidity and exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks are managed by the groups treasury department. The treasury department uses a combination of derivative and conventional financial instruments to manage these underlying treasury risks.
Currency risk The group publishes its consolidated financial statements in sterling and conducts business in many foreign currencies. As a result, it is subject to foreign currency exchange risk due to exchange rate movements which will affect the groups transaction costs, and the translation of the results and underlying net assets of its foreign subsidiaries.
53 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Interest rate risk The group has an exposure to interest rate risk and within this category of market risk, is most vulnerable to changes in US dollar, sterling and euro interest rates. To manage interest rate risk, the group manages its proportion of fixed to variable rate borrowings within limits approved by the board, primarily through issuing long term fixed rate bonds, medium term notes and floating rate commercial paper, and by utilising interest rate swaps, cross currency interest rate swaps and swaptions. The profile of fixed rate to floating rate net borrowings is maintained according to the duration measure that is equivalent to an approximate 50% fixed and 50% floating amortising profile. The number of years within the amortising profile depends on a template approved by the board. The floating element of US dollar borrowing is partly protected using interest rate collars. Following the June 2002 policy review, the level of interest rate collars will continue to reduce. Remaining interest rate collars as at 30 June 2004 will take up to approximately two years to expire. In addition, where appropriate, the group may use forward rate agreements to manage short term interest rate exposures. Swaps, swaptions, forward rate agreements and collars are accounted for as hedges. Such management serves to increase the accuracy of the business planning process. Diageo has a target range for cash interest cover (defined as operating profit before exceptional items, interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and share of associates profits, and after dividends received from associates, over net interest cash flow including minority interest dividends) of five to eight times and under the current economic environment Diageos intention is to be at the higher end of this range. The top limit may, however, be exceeded on certain occasions. The full impact of International Financial Reporting Standards on Diageos interest rate risk management policy and the extent to which Diageo will be able to continue to hedge account for interest rate derivatives are under review. The interest expense recognised in the consolidated profit and loss account may be more sensitive to changes in interest rates under International Financial Reporting Standards than under current hedge accounting.
Liquidity risk Following the June 2003 board review, the groups policy with regard to the expected maturity profile of group financing companies borrowings is to limit the proportion of such borrowings maturing within 12 months to 50% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits and the level of commercial paper to 30% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits. Previously group policy was to maintain the proportion of borrowings maturing within 12 months at below 60% of total borrowings, and to maintain the level of commercial paper at below 50% of total borrowings. In addition, it is group policy to maintain backstop facility terms from relationship banks to support commercial paper obligations.
Credit risk A large number of major international financial institutions are counterparties to the interest rate swaps, foreign exchange contracts and deposits transacted by the group. Group policy is to enter into such transactions only with counterparties with a long term credit rating of A or better. The group monitors its credit exposure to its counterparties, together with their credit ratings.
Commodity price risk The group uses commodity futures and options to hedge against price risk in certain commodities. All commodity futures and options contracts hedge a projected future purchase of raw material. Commodity futures or options are then either closed out at the time the raw material is purchased or they are exchanged with the company manufacturing the raw material to determine the contract price. Commodity contracts are held in the balance sheet at fair value but any gains and losses are deferred until the contracts are closed out or exchanged. Open contracts at 30 June 2004 and gains and losses realised in the year or deferred at the balance sheet date were not significant.
Employee share schemes Awards and option grants vesting under the various employee share schemes are generally satisfied by the transfer of existing shares. These awards and option grants are hedged through the purchase of shares or call options. Exceptions to this policy are in respect of exercises under certain GrandMet and international schemes that are satisfied by the issue of new equity.
Insurance The group purchases insurance for commercial, or where required, for legal or contractual reasons. In addition, the group retains insurable risk where external insurance is not considered an economic means of financing these losses.
Sensitivity analysis
For financial instruments held, the group has used a sensitivity analysis technique that measures the change in the fair value of the groups financial instruments from hypothetical changes in market rates.
54 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Sensitivity analysis table at 30 June 2004 | |||||||||||||
Fair value changes arising from: | |||||||||||||
1% fall | 10% | ||||||||||||
Estimated | in interest | weakening | |||||||||||
fair value | rates | in sterling | |||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||
Borrowings |
(5,463 | ) | (170 | ) | (509 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate contracts |
(5 | ) | 58 | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts: |
|||||||||||||
Transaction |
38 | | (101 | ) | |||||||||
Balance sheet translation |
19 | | (132 | ) | |||||||||
Guaranteed preferred securities |
(320 | ) | | (36 | ) | ||||||||
Written call options re General Mills shares* |
(41 | ) | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Other financial net assets |
2,077 | 7 | 238 | ||||||||||
Critical UK GAAP accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom. Diageos accounting policies are set out in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report. In applying these policies the directors are required to make estimates and subjective judgements that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and reported profit for the year. The directors base these on a combination of past experience and any other evidence that is relevant to the particular circumstance. The actual outcome could differ from those estimates. Of Diageos accounting policies, the directors consider that policies in relation to the following areas are of greater complexity and/or particularly subject to the exercise of judgement.
Brands, goodwill and other intangibles Acquired brands are held on the consolidated balance sheet at cost. Where brands are regarded as having indefinite useful economic lives, they are not amortised. Assessment of the useful economic life of an asset, or that an asset has an indefinite life, requires considerable management judgement.
Post employment benefits Diageo accounts for post employment benefits in accordance with FRS 17. Application of FRS 17 requires the exercise of judgement in relation to various assumptions including future pay rises in excess of inflation, employee and pensioner demographics and the future expected returns on assets.
55 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The net liability for post employment benefits is partly determined by the market value at the end of the year of the assets owned by the post employment plans. A 10% movement in worldwide equity values would increase/decrease the net pension liability before tax at 30 June 2004 by approximately £280 million.
Operating exceptional items Operating exceptional items are those that, in managements judgement, are material items that arise from events or transactions that fall within the ordinary activities of the group but, by virtue of their size or incidence, should be separately disclosed if the consolidated financial statements are to properly reflect the results for the period. The determination of which items should be separately disclosed as operating exceptional items requires a significant degree of judgement. Exceptional items under UK GAAP do not represent extraordinary items under US GAAP.
Financial instruments The group uses financial instruments to hedge its exposures to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Instruments accounted for as hedges are structured so as to reduce the market risk associated with the underlying transaction being hedged and are designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract. While UK GAAP includes prescriptive disclosure requirements in relation to financial instruments, it does not include a standard on hedge accounting. Nevertheless, under UK GAAP, hedging principles are generally applied whereby the cash flows on hedge instruments are matched to the underlying hedged risks, with hedging instruments held in the balance sheet at amortised cost. In the absence of detailed guidance under UK GAAP, judgement must be applied in the establishment and application of accounting policies in relation to financial instruments accounted for as hedges.
New accounting standards
The financial information included in this annual report complies, to the extent detailed below, with the following pronouncements issued by the UK Accounting Standards Board (ASB). New UK and US accounting pronouncements that will impact the UK and US GAAP information are also set out below.
United Kingdom The group has adopted the reporting requirements of FRS 17 Retirement benefits in its primary financial statements from 1 July 2003. The group also complies from 1 July 2003 with the following requirements issued by the UKs Accounting Standards Board: UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts, and the amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions.
FRS 17 Retirement benefits This standard replaces the use of the actuarial values for assessing pension costs in favour of a market-based approach. In order to cope with the volatility inherent in this measurement basis, the standard requires that the profit and loss account shows the relatively stable ongoing service cost, the expected return on assets and the interest on the liabilities. Differences between expected and actual returns on assets, and the impact on the liabilities of changes in the assumptions, are reflected in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts This abstract changes the presentation of an entitys own shares held in an employee share trust from requiring them to be recognised as assets to requiring them to be deducted in arriving at shareholders funds. It also has consequential changes to UITF 17 requiring that the expense to the profit and loss account should be the difference between the fair value of the shares at the date of award and the amount that an employee may be required to pay for the shares (i.e. the intrinsic value of the award).
FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions The amendment to the standard added a new application note (G) on revenue recognition. This requires that revenue should be stated at fair value of the right to consideration. Diageo incurs certain promotional expenditure, where permitted under local law (for example, slotting fees, whereby fees are paid to retailers for prominence of display, listing or agreement not to delist Diageos products) that are not wholly independent of the invoiced product price. Such expenditure is now deducted from turnover. The change, which has no impact on operating profit, reduced turnover and operating costs by £159 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 (year ended 30 June 2002 £382 million; year ended 30 June 2001 £714 million; year ended 30 June 2000 £599 million).
The following pronouncements have recently been issued by the ASB.
FRS 20 Share-based payments In April 2004 the ASB issued FRS 20 Share-based payments. The standard requires that share based payments should give rise to a charge in the profit and loss account that is allocated to the period of service the award relates to. The charge is measured by reference to the fair value of goods or services received or, for transactions with employees, by reference to the fair value of
56 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
the equity instrument at the date of grant. It is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. The group is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
FRS 21 Events after the balance sheet date In May 2004 the ASB issued FRS 21 Events after the balance sheet date. The standard amends the accounting treatment to be adopted by entities for events occurring between the balance sheet date and the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue. Under the standard, dividends declared after the balance sheet date will be non-adjusting post balance sheet events. The standard is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005.
United States The following US GAAP pronouncements have been recently issued.
SFAS No.132(R) Employers Disclosures About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a revised SFAS No. 132. The group has provided the additional disclosures in respect of the groups postretirement plans in note 5 and note 32 to the consolidated financial statements.
FIN 46 and FIN 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) and in December 2003 a revised interpretation was issued (FIN 46(R)) which clarified certain provisions of FIN 46 and provided for further scope exemptions. FIN 46(R) requires variable interest entities to be consolidated by the party that has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the entitys expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entitys expected residual returns or both (the primary beneficiary). A variable interest entity (VIE) has one or more of the following characteristics: (1) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support being provided; (2) the equity holders lack the ability (through voting rights or otherwise) to make decisions about an entitys activities; or (3) the equity holders lack the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or lack the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity.
EITF No. 03-6 Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.128, Earnings per Share In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 03-6. This issue addressed changes in the reporting and calculation requirements for earnings per share, providing the method to be used when a company has granted holders of any form of security rights to participate in the earnings of the company along with the participation rights of common stockholders. The group has reviewed the contractual rights granted for stock options and concluded that EITF 03-6 does not affect the groups reporting and disclosure.
FSP No. 106-2 Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 In December 2003, the United States Congress enacted into law the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). The Act established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D), and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No.106-2 Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FSP 106-2). The group is in the process of determining the impact of this issue on the business, results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Therefore, in accordance with FSP 106-2, the US GAAP accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net period postretirement benefit cost included in the consolidated financial statements do not reflect the effects of the Act. This is because the group is currently determining whether the benefits conferred by the US plans are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act.
EITF No. 03-1 The Meaning of Other Than Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments In June 2004, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 03-1. The issue includes determining the meaning of other than temporary impairment and its application to debt and equity securities within the scope of SFAS No.115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115) and equity securities that are not subject to the scope of SFAS No. 115 and not accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
57 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The Task Force reached a consensus that the application guidance in EITF 03-1 should be used to determine when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The guidance also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other than temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealised losses that have not been recognised as other than temporary impairments. These disclosure requirements became effective for periods ended prior to 30 June 2004. The recognition and measurement guidance of EITF 03-1 should be applied to other than temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after 15 June 2004. The group considers that there were no unrealised losses requiring additional disclosures at 30 June 2004 and will evaluate, as the need arises, the impact of EITF 03-1 on the business, results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards
The European Union has issued a regulation requiring most companies listed in the EU to comply with accounting standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), and adopted by the EU, in the preparation of their consolidated accounts for financial reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. The EUs objective is to improve financial reporting and enhance transparency, in order to assist the free flow of capital and improve the efficiency of the capital markets. Diageo therefore expects to have to present its consolidated financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2006 in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards and International Accounting Standards (together IFRSs).
Discussion of US GAAP differences | |||||||||||||
Diageos consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which is the groups primary reporting framework. Reconciliations between UK and US GAAP are set out in note 32 to the consolidated financial statements and this section explains the principal differences. | |||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||
Turnover UK GAAP |
8,891 | 9,281 | 10,900 | ||||||||||
US GAAP |
8,777 | 9,153 | 10,760 | ||||||||||
Effect on net income of significant differences between UK and US GAAP: |
|||||||||||||
Net income in accordance with UK GAAP |
1,392 | 50 | 1,589 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to conform with US GAAP: |
|||||||||||||
Inventories |
(37 | ) | (46 | ) | (58 | ) | |||||||
Pensions and other post employment benefits |
10 | 95 | 51 | ||||||||||
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares |
28 | (4 | ) | 166 | |||||||||
Other derivative instruments |
111 | (189 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs |
| 693 | (135 | ) | |||||||||
Disposals of businesses |
69 | (177 | ) | 1,022 | |||||||||
Other items |
(16 | ) | 25 | 92 | |||||||||
Deferred taxation |
143 | (13 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||
Net income in accordance with US GAAP |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | ||||||||||
58 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The UK GAAP turnover and net income for the years ended 30 June 2003 and 2002 have been restated to reflect the adoption of FRS 17 Retirement benefits, UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts and application note (G) to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions. See note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Turnover
UK GAAP turnover (sales in US terminology) for the year ended 30 June 2004 was £114 million (2003 £128 million; 2002 £140 million) higher than turnover under US GAAP, as the accounting treatment for joint arrangements (between the group and LVMH) is different. Under UK GAAP, the group includes in turnover its attributable share of turnover of joint arrangements, measured according to the terms of the arrangement and sales to joint arrangements by Diageo companies are eliminated on consolidation. Under US GAAP, joint arrangements have been accounted for during the year under the equity method of accounting and the groups share of sales of the joint arrangements is not included as part of group sales. Sales to joint arrangements by Diageo companies are accounted for as part of turnover.
Net income
The significant reconciling items in net income are as follows:
Inventories The fair value of the net assets under US GAAP of the Guinness Group was higher than the net assets under UK GAAP, primarily in respect of maturing whisky inventories. The fair value of the inventories at the date of acquisition (17 December 1997) was £601 million higher under US GAAP compared to UK GAAP. The increase in inventory values is unwinding over a number of years on the sale of the whisky to third parties. In the year ended 30 June 2004, £37 million (2003 £46 million; 2002 £58 million) of the fair value increase was realised.
Pension and other post employment benefits Under UK GAAP, the pension cost for the period is based on an actuarial valuation at the start of the financial period. The current service cost is charged to operating profit. The interest cost (being the unwinding of the discount on the funds liabilities for the period) and the expected return on assets for the period (calculated using the market value of assets), are charged/credited to finance charges in the profit and loss account. Any amount arising from changes in the assumptions used for the actuarial valuation at the commencement of the year and those at the end of the year and any differences between the actual return on the plans assets and the expected return on the plans assets are included in the statement of total recognised gains and losses. The surplus or deficit in post employment plans at the balance sheet date is part of the groups consolidated net assets.
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares Under the terms of the contingent value right received in connection with the disposal of Pillsbury, in the year ended 30 June 2003, Diageo received a cash payment of £173 million from General Mills. Under UK GAAP, this was recognised in the profit and loss account as an exceptional gain on the disposal of businesses. However, under US GAAP, this was recognised in the profit and loss account in the year ended 30 June 2002 as a derivative and was accordingly held at its estimated fair value with changes in this fair value included in the profit and loss account. The group received cash in settlement of the contingent value right on 1 May 2003.
Other derivative instruments The group uses derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes. Under UK GAAP, changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives and derivatives hedging forecast transactions are not recognised until realised. Changes in the fair value of derivatives hedging the translation of net assets of overseas operations are taken to the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
59 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs Under UK GAAP, the sale of Burger King was accounted for as a disposal and the results prior to the disposal date are presented within discontinued operations. Net income for the year ended 30 June 2003 reflected a pre tax charge in relation to the sale of Burger King of £1,441 million and £750 million under UK and US GAAP, respectively, representing £691 million of the total UK/US GAAP difference in net income. Under US GAAP, the transaction is not accounted for as a disposal due to the size of the investment made by the buyer and Diageos continuing involvement through the guarantee provided by Diageo in respect of the acquisition finance. However, a charge for impairment was recognised rather than a loss on disposal. The charge for impairment under US GAAP was lower than the loss on disposal under UK GAAP principally because the goodwill and brands acquired on the original acquisition of the quick service restaurants business were being amortised over 40 years up to 30 June 2001 (prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142), whereas no amortisation had been charged on the goodwill and brands under UK GAAP. By the date of disposal, Diageo had incurred additional cumulative amortisation (including related deferred tax) under US GAAP of £609 million on the goodwill and brands of Burger King. Other differences arising between UK and US GAAP, principally in respect of derivative instruments, reduced the charge under US GAAP by £82 million. In the US GAAP balance sheet, the total assets and total liabilities of Burger King at 30 June 2004 (including consideration deferred under US GAAP) classified within other long term assets and other long term liabilities were each £1.2 billion (2003 £1.3 billion). Under US GAAP, the transaction will be accounted for as a disposal when the uncertainties related to the guarantee provided in respect of the acquisition finance have been substantially resolved and/or the buyers cumulative investment meets or exceeds minimum levels.
Disposals of businesses Under UK GAAP, the group made losses on disposals of other businesses of £10 million compared with gains of £97 million under US GAAP in the year ended 30 June 2004. The principal reason for the difference was the recognition of the deferred gain established on the sale of Pillsbury. In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury in the year ended 30 June 2002, Diageo guaranteed the debt of a third party to the amount of $200 million (£110 million). Under UK GAAP, Diageo provided for the amounts which it could have paid to settle the potential liability or transfer it to a third party as a cost of the transaction. On 18 June 2004, International Multifoods Corporation was acquired by the JM Smucker Company, as a result of which the provision being carried in respect of the guarantee has been reviewed and revised. Under US GAAP, Diageo had deferred the element of the gain on disposal of Pillsbury equivalent to the amount guaranteed. As a result of the acquisition of International Multifoods Corporation by JM Smucker, the deferred gain under US GAAP has been recognised in the year ended 30 June 2004, and a provision, against the guarantee, equal to that under UK GAAP has been established.
Exceptional and extraordinary items Under UK GAAP, exceptional items are those that, in managements judgement, are material items that arise from events or transactions that fall within the ordinary activities of the group but, by virtue of their size or incidence, should be separately disclosed if the consolidated financial statements are to properly reflect the results for the period. US GAAP does not have such a category. Under US GAAP, certain of these items are treated in accordance with paragraph 26 of APB 30 as a separate component of income from continuing operations, if appropriate. The group has had no extraordinary items under either UK or US GAAP for the three years ended 30 June 2004.
60 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Directors and senior management
Age | Position (committees) | |||
Directors |
||||
Lord Blyth of Rowington |
64 | Chairman, non-executive director3* | ||
Paul S Walsh |
49 | Chief executive, executive director2* | ||
Nicholas C Rose |
46 | Chief financial officer, executive director2 | ||
Rodney F Chase |
61 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Lord Hollick of Notting Hill |
59 | Senior non-executive director1,3,4* | ||
Maria Lilja |
60 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
J Keith Oates |
62 | Non-executive director1*,3,4 | ||
William S Shanahan |
64 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
H Todd Stitzer |
52 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Jonathan R Symonds |
45 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Paul A Walker |
47 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Other members of the executive committee | ||||
Stuart R Fletcher |
47 | Market president2 | ||
James N D Grover |
46 | Global business support director2 | ||
Robert M Malcolm |
52 | President, global marketing, sales and innovation2 | ||
Ian K Meakins |
48 | Market president2 | ||
Ivan M Menezes |
45 | Market president2 | ||
Andrew Morgan |
48 | Market president2 | ||
Timothy D Proctor |
54 | General counsel2 | ||
Gareth Williams |
51 | Human resources director2 | ||
Officer |
||||
Susanne Bunn |
45 | Company secretary | ||
Key to committees:
Information in respect of the directors and senior management is set out below:
Lord (James) Blyth retired as chairman of The Boots Company PLC at the end of July 2000, having joined in 1987 as chief executive and become chairman in 1998. He was formerly group chief executive of the Plessey Company and Head of Defence Sales at the Ministry of Defence. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in January 1999 and chairman in July 2000. Lord Blyth is also a non-executive director of Anixter Inc, in the USA, and a vice chairman of Greenhill & Co, Inc.
Paul Walsh joined GrandMets brewing division in 1982 and became finance director in 1986. He held financial positions with Inter-Continental Hotels and the GrandMet Food Sector from 1987 to 1989 and was appointed division chief executive of Pillsbury in 1990, becoming chief executive officer of The Pillsbury Company in 1992. He was appointed to the GrandMet board in October 1995 and to the Diageo plc board in December 1997. He became chief operating officer of Diageo in January 2000 and chief executive in September 2000. He is also a non-executive director of Centrica plc and a Governor of Henley Management Centre and a non-executive director of FedEx Corporation, in the USA. He resigned as a non-executive director of General Mills, Inc in June 2004.
Nicholas (Nick) Rose joined GrandMet in June 1992 initially as group treasurer, and became group controller in 1995. He was appointed finance director of International Distillers & Vintners in 1996 and became finance director of United Distillers & Vintners in December 1997. He was appointed to the Diageo plc board in June 1999 and became chief financial officer in July 1999. He is also a non-executive director of Scottish Power plc and a non-executive director of Moët Hennessy SNC, in France.
Rodney Chase is deputy chairman and senior non-executive director of Tesco plc. He is also a non-executive director of Computer Sciences Corporation, in the USA, and a senior adviser to the European Advisory Council of Lehman Brothers. Mr Chase retired as deputy group chief executive of BP plc in April 2003. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in January 1999 and became senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee in October 2003. He will retire at this years AGM.
Lord (Clive) Hollick is chief executive of United Business Media plc. He joined Hambros Bank in 1967 and was appointed a director in 1973. He was appointed Managing Director of J H Vavasseur & Co in 1974 which developed into MAI plc, a major international media and financial services group which in 1996 merged with United News and Media plc. He is also a founding trustee of the Institute of Public Policy Research, chairman of Londons South Bank Centre and a non-executive director of Honeywell International Inc, in the USA. On 25 February 2004 he was appointed a non-executive director of South Bank Federation Limited and on 7 May 2004 he was appointed a non-executive director of Channel 5 Television Group Limited. Lord Hollick was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in December 2001 and succeeded Mr Chase as senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee on 2 September 2004.
61 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors and senior management |
Maria Lilja played a leading role in building Nyman & Schultz, a long-established Scandinavian travel management company, which was acquired by American Express in 1993. She served as head of American Express Europe from 1996 to 2000. She is also non-executive chairman of Mandator AB and a non-executive director of Bilia AB, Intrum Justitia AB, Observer AB and Poolia AB, all in Sweden. She was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in November 1999.
J Keith Oates is a senior adviser to Coutts Bank, Monaco. He was formerly deputy chairman of Marks and Spencer plc until 1999 and was the founder chairman of Marks & Spencer Financial Services. His previous experience includes being a BBC governor, a non-executive director of British Telecommunications plc, John Laing plc and the Financial Services Authority and chairman of Quest. He became a non-executive director of Guinness PLC in June 1995 and was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in December 1997. Mr Oates will retire after this years AGM.
William (Bill) Shanahan is president of The Colgate-Palmolive Company. He joined Colgate-Palmolive in 1965 as a sales assistant in the international sales department and subsequently held various positions within the company in general management and marketing roles. In 1983 he was appointed an officer of the corporation, in 1989 he became chief operating officer and, in 1992, was appointed president. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in May 1999.
H Todd Stitzer is chief executive of Cadbury Schweppes Public Limited Company. He joined Cadbury Schweppes in 1983 as an assistant general counsel and subsequently held a number of marketing, sales, strategy and general management posts, prior to being appointed to his current role in May 2003. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc on 23 June 2004.
Jonathan (Jon) Symonds is chief financial officer of AstraZeneca PLC. He is also a member of the Accounting Standards Board, joint Chairman of the Business Tax Forum and, since November 2003, chairman of the 100 Group of Finance Directors. Prior to joining AstraZeneca in 1997, he was a partner at KPMG. Mr Symonds was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc on 1 May 2004 and, subject to election by shareholders, it is proposed that he will succeed Mr Oates as chairman of the audit committee after this years AGM.
Paul Walker is chief executive of The Sage Group plc. He joined Sage in 1984 and was appointed Finance Director in 1987, then group chief executive in 1994. He is also a non-executive director of MyTravel Group plc. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in June 2002.
Sir Robert Wilson retired as a non-executive director at the AGM in October 2003.
Stuart Fletcher was appointed president, key markets in September 2000. He joined Guinness PLC in 1986 as deputy controller of Guinness Brewing Worldwide and was appointed controller in 1987. He previously held a number of financial positions with Procter & Gamble in the United Kingdom, both in consumer goods and industrial products, and with United Glass. In 1988 he became finance and operations director, United Distillers Japan and in 1990 chief financial officer of Schenley Inc. In 1993 he was appointed regional finance director for United Distillers Asia Pacific Region and was made acting regional managing director for United Distillers Pacific Region in January 1995. In August 1995 he became finance director of Guinness Brewing Worldwide and then served as president of Guinness Americas and Caribbean region based in the United States before becoming managing director of developing and seed markets for Guinness Limited in June 1999. He is also a non-executive director of Moët Hennessy SNC, in France.
James (Jim) Grover was appointed global business support director in February 2004. He joined GrandMet in 1993, initially as the strategic development director of GrandMet Food Sector (encompassing GrandMets worldwide packaged food and Burger King businesses), and subsequently, strategic development director of The Pillsbury Company. He was appointed group strategy director of GrandMet in March 1997 and strategy director of Diageo in December 1997. Previously he worked as a management consultant, initially with Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc and subsequently with OC&C Strategy Consultants. He was the partner responsible for their consumer goods practice at OC&C and advised a broad array of multinational food companies on a wide variety of strategic issues.
Robert (Rob) Malcolm was appointed president, global marketing, sales and innovation in September 2000. He joined United Distillers & Vintners as scotch category director in 1999 and was appointed global marketing director later that year. Previously, he held various marketing positions with Procter & Gamble in the United States from 1975 until his appointment in 1988 as vice president and general manager Personal Cleansing Products, USA and in 1992 as vice president and general manager for the Arabian Peninsula. From 1995 to 1999 he was vice president, general manager Beverages, Europe Middle East Africa.
Ian Meakins was appointed president, European major markets and global supply in September 2000. He joined United Distillers in 1991 as marketing director, White Spirits, Europe Region having worked for Procter & Gamble and Bain & Co and been a founding partner of the Kalchas Group, strategic management consultants in 1988. From 1992 he was managing director of United Distillers Boutari (then a joint venture between United Distillers and Boutari) in Greece. He was appointed United Distillers marketing director Worldwide in September 1994 before being appointed United Distillers, managing director Europe in July 1997. From December 1997, he was United Distillers & Vintners deputy managing director, Europe and then United Distillers & Vintners managing director, venture markets. In December 1999 he became global operations managing director for United Distillers & Vintners. He is also a non-executive director of mmO2 plc. Mr Meakins will leave Diageo in October 2004 to take up an appointment as chief executive of Alliance UniChem plc.
62 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors and senior management |
Ivan Menezes was appointed president and chief executive officer of Diageo North America in January 2004, having been chief operating officer, North America since July 2002. He previously served as both managing director and then president, venture markets of Guinness United Distillers & Vintners. Before these appointments, he served as global marketing director for United Distillers & Vintners in the United Kingdom from September 1998 and as group integration director for Diageo plc from May 1997. Previously he worked across a variety of sales, marketing and strategy roles with Nestlé in Asia, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc in North America and Whirlpool in Europe.
Andrew Morgan was appointed president, venture markets in July 2002. He joined United Distillers in 1987 and held various positions in Europe regions, including general manager, Greece and regional director for southern Europe. He was appointed United Distillers, managing director of International Region in January 1995 and United Distillers & Vintners regional managing director, international in 1997. He was appointed group chief information officer and president New Business Ventures for Guinness United Distillers & Vintners in September 2000 having previously been director Global Strategy and Innovation for United Distillers & Vintners.
Timothy (Tim) Proctor was appointed general counsel of Diageo in January 2000, having been director, Worldwide Human Resources, Glaxo Wellcome since 1998. Prior to this, he was senior vice president, Human Resources, General Counsel and secretary for Glaxos US operating company. He has over 20 yearsinternational legal experience, including 13 years with Merck and six years with Glaxo Wellcome.
Gareth Williams was appointed human resources director in January 1999. He joined the GrandMet Brewing Division in 1984 and moved through a number of personnel positions to become director of Management Development and Resourcing for the division in 1987. From 1990 to 1994 he held a series of human resources positions in International Distillers & VintnersNorth American spirits and wine division, before returning to the United Kingdom to become group organisation and management development director of GrandMet. In 1996 he became human resources director for International Distillers & Vintnersglobal business and in January 1998 took the same title in United Distillers & Vintners, following the merger of Guinness and GrandMet. Prior to joining GrandMet, he spent 10 years with Ford of Britain in a number of personnel and employee relations positions.
Paul Clinton left Diageo in December 2003.
Susanne Bunn was appointed company secretary of Diageo plc in March 2003. She joined the group in February 1989 as assistant secretary in the GrandMet UK Foods division and since then has held various company secretarial positions within the group. She was appointed joint deputy secretary in December 1997 and became sole deputy secretary at the end of 2000.
63 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Directors remuneration report
Dear shareholder
During recent months the remuneration committee of Diageo plc has conducted a review of the remuneration policy for our senior executives. During this review we have taken note of the comments made by shareholders prior to our last AGM. As a result of this review we are proposing to make some changes. These changes, which are outlined in this letter, are intended to ensure that we continue, within a framework of good corporate governance, to be able to attract and retain the best global talent to ensure we deliver Diageos strategy. We trust that these changes will receive your support at our Annual General Meeting in October 2004.
Summary of changes
| Annual cash bonuses will be capped at no more than 200% of base salary per annum. This is a reduction in our previous maximum annual bonus. | |||
| We will be seeking shareholder approval to increase the maximum level of annual awards under our long term performance-related share plan (the TSR plan) to 250% of base salary in order to allow us to continue to compete for top global talent. This is an increase from the current maximum award of 150% of base salary. We have changed the comparator group against which we will measure total shareholder return performance for future awards in order to better reflect the current product and geographic mix of Diageos business. | |||
| The ability to retest the earnings per share performance condition under our senior executive share option plan will be removed for future grants of share options. | |||
| Notice periods in the senior executive contracts will remain 12 months and the mitigation of payments on termination is under review. |
Summary remuneration policy
Our revised remuneration policy will be as follows:
| Our senior executive remuneration arrangements are intended to attract and retain the best global talent. | |||
| We believe that pay should vary significantly with performance over both the short and long term. | |||
| Our base salaries are set at the median of the relevant market for each role. | |||
| Annual bonuses are paid in cash after the end of each financial year and are determined by performance in the year against pre-set stretching business targets. | |||
| Our long term incentives comprise a combination of share option grants and share awards in each year, and vary with three year EPS and TSR performance respectively. | |||
| Our senior executives are required to hold shares in Diageo to participate fully in our share option and share award plans. |
Detailed changes
Annual bonuses Before the start of each financial year and in light of the strategic plan for that year, the remuneration committee will determine annual performance targets. One of these targets will be profit performance and the other measure may vary from year to year, depending upon the particular area of focus for the business. The effect of foreign exchange movements will be eliminated in assessing the performance delivered.
Senior executive share option plan (SESOP) Currently, under our share option plan, options vest on a sliding scale depending upon our earnings per share performance after grant, as follows:
| If EPS growth exceeds RPI growth by less than 12 percentage points over three years then none of the options can be exercised. | |||
| If EPS growth is at least 12 percentage points greater than that of RPI, but less than 15 percentage points, then one half of the options may be exercised. | |||
| If EPS growth exceeds RPI growth by 15 percentage points or more over three years then all of the options may be exercised. |
We intend to cancel the ability to retest whether the performance criterion has been met for future grants of options. The performance criterion itself will remain unchanged as it continues to provide a challenging level of performance expectation in the current economic environment.
64 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Share awards under the TSR plan Under this plan, senior executives are granted a conditional right to receive shares. The shares vest on a sliding scale depending on the total shareholder return performance of Diageo plc over a three year period relative to a peer group of companies.
Relative TSR performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Above upper quartile | Upper quartile to median | Median | Below median | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ranking in peer group |
1-2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10-18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of award released |
150 | 142 | 114 | 94 | 83 | 72 | 61 | 50 | Nil | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For example, if a conditional award is made at the new maximum level of 250% of salary and if Diageo achieves a median ranking of position 9, 50% of the shares will be released, i.e. 125% of salary.
This can be illustrated graphically:
In setting this level of award the remuneration committee has considered the total remuneration packages paid in the top 30 companies in the FTSE100 by market capitalisation, excluding those in the financial services sector. We believe it is appropriate to position remuneration in Diageo between the median and upper quartile of this group, given the size and complexity of Diageos business globally.
TSR plan comparator group We have also reviewed the relevance of the comparator companies against which we measure the TSR performance of Diageo. Following the re-shaping of our business, we intend to amend the comparator group, introducing more drinks companies and removing some smaller food companies, as follows:
Companies removed: | ||||||
Allied Domecq |
Colgate-Palmolive | PepsiCo | Altria (formerly Philip Morris) | |||
Anheuser-Busch |
Gillette | Pernod Ricard (new) | Campbell Soup | |||
Brown-Forman (new) |
Heineken | Procter & Gamble | Kelloggs | |||
Cadbury Schweppes (new) |
Heinz | SABMiller (new) | McDonalds | |||
Carlsberg Coca-Cola |
Interbrew (new) Nestlé |
Unilever | Yum! Brands (formerly Tricon) |
TSR plan measurement period Currently TSR performance is measured over the calendar year. We will align the measurement period with our financial year by making a half sized award in February 2005 (with the performance period for this award running from January 2005 to December 2007), and then resuming full sized awards from July 2005 (with the performance period running from July 2005 to June 2008).
Executive contracts We have noted the recent shift in corporate governance sentiment amongst UK institutional shareholders. Our contracts currently provide for a rolling 12 month notice period. Terms of executive contracts and the mitigation of compensation payable on termination are under review.
Lord Hollick of Notting Hill
Non-executive director
65 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
What this report covers
This report to shareholders for the year ended 30 June 2004 covers:
| the policy under which executive and non-executive directors were remunerated; and |
| tables of information showing details of the remuneration and share interests of all the directors. |
The report was approved by a duly appointed and authorised committee of the board of directors on 1 September 2004 and was signed on its behalf by Lord Hollick, who succeeded RF Chase as senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee on 2 September 2004. As required by The Directors Remuneration Report Regulations 2002 (the Regulations), this report will be subject to an advisory shareholder vote at the Annual General Meeting.
The remuneration committee
The remuneration committee is responsible for making recommendations to the board on remuneration policy as applied to Diageos senior executives, being the executive directors and the executive committee. It consists wholly of independent non-executive directors: RF Chase, Lord Hollick, M Lilja, JK Oates, WS Shanahan, HT Stitzer (from 23 June 2004), JR Symonds (from 1 May 2004) and PA Walker. The chairman and the chief executive may, by invitation, attend remuneration committee meetings, except when their own remuneration is discussed. No director is involved in determining his or her own remuneration. The committee met five times during the year. The meetings were fully attended, except that M Lilja, WS Shanahan and PA Walker were each unable to attend one meeting. The committee reviewed its own effectiveness through a self-assessment in December. The committees terms of reference are available at www.diageo.com and on request from the company secretary.
Advice
During the year ended 30 June 2004, Diageos human resources director and director of performance and reward were invited by the remuneration committee to provide their views and advice. The remuneration committee also appointed the following independent and expert consultants:
| Deloitte & Touche LLP who provided external market data on levels of senior executive remuneration. They also provide accountancy and tax services to Diageo, including services to support the process for assessing risk management and control systems and processes. |
| Kepler Associates who reviewed and confirmed the total shareholder return of Diageo and the peer group companies for the 2001 TSR plan, the performance cycle for which ended on 31 December 2003. They provided no other services to Diageo during the year. |
Additional remuneration survey data published by Monks Partnership, Mercer Human Resource Consulting and Towers Perrin was presented to the committee.
Remuneration philosophy
Diageos remuneration philosophy for senior executives is based on a belief in:
| performance-related compensation. It influences and supports performance and the creation of a high performing organisation; | |||
| rewarding sustainable performance. It is at the heart of Diageos corporate strategy and is vital to meeting investors goals; | |||
| measuring performance over three years. It aligns with the time cycle over which management decisions are reflected in the creation of value in this business; | |||
| a mix of base salary, cash incentives, options and shares. It provides a balanced portfolio of incentives and rewards; | |||
| paying competitive total remuneration. It helps Diageo compete for the best talent among companies with global operations and global consumers; | |||
| simplicity and transparency. |
The board of directors continues to set stretching performance targets for the business and its leaders in the context of the prevailing economic climate. To achieve these stretch targets requires exceptional business management and strategic execution to deliver performance well above sectoral norms. This approach to target setting reflects the aspirational performance environment which Diageo wishes to create.
66 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Detailed remuneration policy | |||||||||
Remuneration | Paid in order to | Delivered as | Detailed policy | ||||||
Base salary |
| reflect the value of the | | cash | | reviewed annually usually with effect from | |||
individual and their role | | monthly | 1 October | ||||||
| reflect skills and experience | | benchmarked against comparator group of relevant companies taking into account country where role based | ||||||
| set at median of relevant comparator group for each role | ||||||||
Annual performance |
| incentivise year on year | | cash | | based on overall Diageo financial | |||
bonus |
delivery of short term | | variable value | performance | |||||
performance goals | | annual payment | | at least 70% based on a profit measure | |||||
| non-pensionable | | targets set by reference to annual operating plan | ||||||
| on target performance earns no more than 100% of salary* | ||||||||
| maximum payable is 200% of salary* | ||||||||
Share options |
| incentivise three year | | market value share | | maximum annual grant of 375% of salary | |||
(Senior executive share |
real earnings growth | options | | EPS performance test operates on a | |||||
option plan) |
above a minimum | | variable value | sliding scale | |||||
threshold | | long term incentive | | no longer a retest facility* | |||||
| incentivise increasing | | discretionary annual | ||||||
Diageos share price over three to 10 years | grant | ||||||||
Share awards |
| incentivise three year | | shares | | maximum annual award is 250% of | |||
(TSR plan) |
total shareholder return | | highly variable | salary** | |||||
relative to a selected | | long term incentive | | none of the award vests for performance | |||||
peer group of | | discretionary annual | below median | ||||||
companies | award | | for outstanding performance, achieving first or second position, 150% of the award vests, i.e. a maximum of 375% of salary* | ||||||
| peer group aligned to our core business and geographical mix* | ||||||||
| performance period aligned to financial year* | ||||||||
Pension |
| to provide competitive | | deferred cash | | pension accrues at 1/30th of annual basic | |||
postretirement | | lump sum/monthly | salary subject to Inland Revenue limits | ||||||
compensation and | | normal retirement age of 62 | |||||||
benefits, that reward long term sustained performance in the business | | pension at normal retirement age will not be less than ⅔rds of basic salary in prior 12 months | |||||||
The remuneration policy delivers a mix of fixed and variable, cash and share based, short and long term performance-related remuneration. Broadly, if the incentive plan performance targets are achieved, for every £100 of remuneration earned, £29 is fixed and £71 is performance-related. £29 of the performance-related remuneration is based on annual performance and the remainder on at least three year performance. Sustained achievement of stretch performance targets can result in the incentive plans paying out at the maximum level, and delivering an additional £68 of remuneration.
Share ownership
Senior executives are required to hold shares in Diageo to participate fully in the share option and share award plans. This policy extends to the top 100 senior leaders and reflects Diageos belief that its most senior leaders should also be shareholders. The executive directors were required to hold shares equivalent to 150% of their basic salary by 1 January 2003, rising to 225% by 1 January 2005.
67 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Service contracts
The chairman has a letter of appointment for an initial five year term from 1 July 2000. As previously disclosed, this has been extended by the board to 30 June 2007. It is terminable on six months notice by either party or, if terminated by the company, by payment of six months fees in lieu of notice.
External appointments
With the specific approval of the board in each case, executive directors may accept external appointments as non-executive directors of other companies and retain any related fees paid to them.
Remuneration policy for non-executive directors
Diageos policy on non-executive directorsremuneration is that:
| within the limits set by the shareholders from time to time, remuneration should be sufficient to attract, motivate and retain world-class non-executive talent; | |||
| remuneration practice should be consistent with recognised best-practice standards for non-executive directorsremuneration; and | |||
| non-executive directors should not be granted share options by the company. |
The fees of non-executive directors are normally reviewed every two years with effect from 1 January. Fees are reviewed in the light of market practice in large UK companies and anticipated workload, tasks and liabilities. The current annual fees after the most recent review, effective from January 2003, are:
From | ||||
1 Jan 2003 | ||||
Base fee |
£ 50,000 | |||
Senior non-executive director |
£ 20,000 | |||
Chairman of audit committee |
£ 20,000 | |||
Chairman of remuneration committee |
£ 10,000 | |||
68 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Directors remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2004
Emoluments
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | Performance | incentive | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
salary | bonus | plan | benefits(b) | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chairman fees |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lord Blyth (a) |
450 | | | 47 | 497 | 485 | ||||||||||||||||||
Executive directors |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NC Rose |
472 | 736 | 3 | 44 | 1,255 | 1,107 | ||||||||||||||||||
PS Walsh |
823 | 1,311 | 3 | 42 | 2,179 | 1,929 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,295 | 2,047 | 6 | 86 | 3,434 | 3,036 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-executive directors fees |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
RF Chase |
71 | | | 1 | 72 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lord Hollick |
50 | | | 1 | 51 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
M Lilja |
62 | | | 1 | 63 | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||
JK Oates |
70 | | | 1 | 71 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||
WS Shanahan |
56 | | | 3 | 59 | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||
HT Stitzer (appointed 23 June 2004) |
1 | | | | 1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
JR Symonds (appointed 1 May 2004) |
8 | | | | 8 | | ||||||||||||||||||
PA Walker |
50 | | | 1 | 51 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sir Robert Wilson (retired 23 October 2003) |
27 | | | | 27 | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||
395 | | | 8 | 403 | 366 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,140 | 2,047 | 6 | 141 | 4,334 | 3,887 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes
(a) £150,000 of Lord Blyths remuneration must be used for monthly purchases of Diageo plc ordinary shares, which have to be retained until he retires or ceases to be a director.
(b) Other benefits include company cars, private use of chauffeur, fuel, product allowance, financial counselling, spouse travel, medical insurance and life insurance premiums.
In addition to the above emoluments, the executive directors received payments and made gains under long term incentive plans as follows:
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive | US share | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 | share option | option | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TSR Plan | exercises | exercises | SEPSOS(a) | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive directors |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NC Rose |
516 | | | 20 | 536 | 215 | ||||||||||||||||||
PS Walsh |
950 | 259 | 123 | 124 | 1,456 | 1,683 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,466 | 259 | 123 | 144 | 1,992 | 1,898 | ||||||||||||||||||
Former director The company entered into an initial two year consultancy agreement with a company owned by JMJ Keenan, who retired as a director of Diageo plc on 30 October 2001. This agreement was extended until Mr Keenan ceased to be a director of General Mills on 23 June 2004. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr Keenans company provided advice and assistance to the board for which it received £28,531 (2003 £199,846) during the year ended 30 June 2004.
69 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Long term incentive plans
TSR plan Under this plan, participants are granted a conditional right to receive shares. The rights are currently awarded with effect from 1 January each year, and vest after a three year period the performance cycle subject to achievement of two performance tests. The primary performance test is a comparison of Diageos three year total shareholder return the percentage growth in Diageos share price (assuming all dividends and capital distributions are reinvested) with the TSR of a peer group of 17 other companies. For all current performance cycles, the peer group consists of Diageo and Allied Domecq, Altria (formerly Philip Morris), Anheuser-Busch, Campbell Soup, Carlsberg, Coca-Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, Gillette, Heineken, Heinz, Kelloggs, McDonalds, Nestlé, PepsiCo, Procter & Gamble, Yum! Brands (formerly Tricon) and Unilever. In addition, the remuneration committee will not recommend the release of awards if it considers that there has not been an underlying improvement in Diageos three year financial performance, typically measured by improvements in earnings per share.
The following table shows the percentage of each award that will normally be released at the end of the performance cycle: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ranking in peer group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10-18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of award released |
150 | 142 | 114 | 94 | 83 | 72 | 61 | 50 | nil | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors interests in TSR plan awards The following table shows the directors interests in the TSR plan. Details of executive share options are shown separately below. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards made | Awards released | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interests at 30 June 2003 | during year (c) | during year | Interests at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target | Maximum | Target | Maximum | Price in | 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date of award | award (a) | award (b) | award (a) | award (b) | Number (d) | pence (e) | 2004 (f) | Performance cycle (g) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NC Rose |
23 Feb 01 | 99,303 | 148,954 | 71,696 | 720 | | Jan 01 Dec 03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 Feb 02 | 89,958 | 134,937 | 134,937 | Jan 02 Dec 04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 Feb 03 | 86,574 | 129,861 | 129,861 | Jan 03 Dec 05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 Feb 04 | 106,661 | 159,991 | 159,991 | Jan 04 Dec 06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
275,835 | 413,752 | 106,661 | 159,991 | 71,696 | 424,789 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PS Walsh |
23 Feb 01 | 182,927 | 274,390 | 132,073 | 720 | | Jan 01 Dec 03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 Feb 02 | 156,903 | 235,354 | 235,354 | Jan 02 Dec 04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21 Feb 03 | 150,564 | 225,846 | 225,846 | Jan 03 Dec 05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 Feb 04 | 186,377 | 279,565 | 279,565 | Jan 04 Dec 06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
490,394 | 735,590 | 186,377 | 279,565 | 132,073 | 740,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes
(a) This is the number of shares initially awarded. Only half this number of shares would be released for achieving position nine in the peer group and no shares would be released for achieving a position of 10 or below.
(b) This number reflects that 1.5 times the number of shares initially awarded would be released for achieving position one or two in the peer group.
(c) The market price on 20 February 2004, the award date, was 728 pence.
(d) The three year performance cycle for the 2001 TSR award ended on 31 December 2003. Diageos EPS over the performance cycle exceeded the rise in the RPI. The remuneration committee determined this represented an underlying improvement in financial performance which permitted release of the awards. The number of shares released was 72% of the initial target award based on a ranking at position seven in the peer group at the end of the performance cycle. This ranking was independently confirmed by Kepler Associates.
(e) The market price on 23 February 2004, the release date. The market price when the award was made on 23 February 2001 was 698 pence.
(f) The directors interests at 16 August 2004 are the same as at 30 June 2004.
(g) The period over which the TSR performance is measured. The remuneration committee will normally approve the release of awards in the February following the end of the performance cycle.
70 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Senior executive share option plan (SESOP) Options granted under SESOP cannot normally be exercised unless a performance condition is satisfied. The current performance condition is based on the increase in Diageos basic earnings per share before goodwill amortisation and exceptional items (EPS) and is initially applied over a three year period. If the increase in EPS is at least 15 percentage points greater than the increase in the RPI over the same period, then all the options can be exercised. If the EPS increase is at least 12 percentage points greater than that of the RPI but less than 15 percentage points, half of the options can be exercised. If all or half of the options fail the initial performance condition, the three year assessment period will be rolled forward by a year and a retest carried out at that time. However, the performance condition can only be rolled forward a maximum of three times.
Market price | Option price | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 June 2003 | Granted | Exercised | in pence | 30 June 2004 | in pence | Option period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK options |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NC Rose |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable |
11,069 | 11,069 | 402 | Jun 98 Jun 05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
136,548 | 136,548 | 518 | Dec 02 Dec 09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
242,760 | 242,760 | 587 | Sep 03 Sep 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not exercisable |
(a | ) | 234,716 | 234,716 | 687 | Sep 04 Sep 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b | ) | 3,450 | 3,450 | 489 | Dec 04 May 05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
212,450 | 212,450 | 759 | Oct 05 Oct 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18,292 | 18,292 | 615 | Mar 06 Mar 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
274,461 | 274,461 | 649 | Oct 06 Oct 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
859,285 | 274,461 | 1,133,746 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PS Walsh |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable |
470,559 | (100,000 | ) | 777 | 370,559 | 518 | Dec 02 Dec 09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
447,189 | 447,189 | 587 | Sep 03 Sep 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not exercisable |
(a | ) | 409,389 | 409,389 | 687 | Sep 04 Sep 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
370,553 | 370,553 | 759 | Oct 05 Oct 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b | ) | 3,341 | 3,341 | 505 | Dec 05 May 06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30,487 | 30,487 | 615 | Mar 06 Mar 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
479,584 | 479,584 | 649 | Oct 06 Oct 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,731,518 | 479,584 | (100,000 | ) | 2,111,102 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US options |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PS Walsh |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable |
(c | ) | 40,000 | (40,000 | ) | 734 | | 426 | Jan 99 Jan 06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes
(a) The performance conditions in respect of this SESOP grant were measured after 30 June 2004. Growth in Diageos EPS before goodwill amortisation and exceptional items (EPS), after adjusting to exclude Burger King and one-off restructuring costs, over the three years ended 30 June 2004 was 25.1% compared with an RPI increase over the same period of 7.1%. This exceeded the performance condition (RPI plus 15 percentage points) and these options will become exercisable in full in September 2004.
(b) Options granted under the savings related share option scheme.
(c) On 14 November 2003, PS Walsh exercised US options over 20,000 ordinary shares at an option price of 436 pence. The market price at the date of exercise was 767 pence. On 19 December 2003, PS Walsh exercised US options over a further 20,000 ordinary shares at an option price of 416 pence. The market price at the date of exercise was 702 pence.
71 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Pre-merger long term incentive plans
Diageos current incentive plans have replaced the previous incentive arrangements within GrandMet and Guinness, which were approved by their respective shareholders and were described in previous annual reports. Whilst awards and options granted under some of these plans (none of which are performance-related) continue to be held and exercised by Diageo executives, no further grants will be made under them.
Pension provision
Scheme details NC Rose and PS Walsh are members of the Diageo pension scheme. They accrue pension rights at the rate of one-thirtieth of basic salary per annum subject only to Inland Revenue limits. Bonus payments and other benefits are not included in pensionable pay. No actuarial reduction is applied to pensions payable from the age of 57, subject to company consent. Their pensions are guaranteed to increase in line with inflation up to a level of 5% per annum, and they have guarantees that such increases will not be lower than 3% per annum and that their pensions at normal pension age of 62 will not be less than two-thirds of basic salary in the 12 months prior to retirement. On death in service, a lump sum of four times pensionable salary is paid, along with a spouses pension of two-thirds of the members prospective pension. When an executive director dies after retirement, a spouses pension of two-thirds of the members pension is paid. The executive directors are not required to make pension contributions.
Executive directors pension benefits Details of the accrued pension to which each director is entitled had they left service on 30 June 2004 and the transfer value of those accrued pensions are shown in the following table. The accrued pensions shown represent the annual pension to which each executive director would be entitled at normal retirement age of 62. The transfer value is broadly the cost to Diageo if it had to provide the equivalent pension benefit. The transfer values shown in the following table have been calculated in accordance with the Guidance Note published by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (GN 11). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Transfer | Increase in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pensionable | Accrued | pension | Accrued | value at | transfer value | Transfer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age at | service at | pension at | accrued in | pension at | 30 June 2003 | during | value at | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 June 2004 | 30 June 2004 | 30 June 2003 | the year (a) | 30 June 2004 | (b) | the year | 30 June 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Years | Years | £000 pa | £000 pa | £000 pa | £000 | £000 | £000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NC Rose |
46 | 12 | 161 | 22 | 183 | 1,579 | 286 | 1,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PS Walsh |
49 | 22 | 506 | 50 | 556 | 5,731 | 800 | 6,531 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes
(a) Of the additional pension accrued during the year, the increases attributable to factors other than inflation were £17,000 for NC Rose and £36,000 for PS Walsh.
(b) The executive directors made no contributions in the year.
72 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Share and other interests | ||||||||||||
The beneficial interests of the directors in office at 30 June 2004 in the ordinary shares of the company are shown in the table below. |
||||||||||||
Ordinary shares | ||||||||||||
30 June | ||||||||||||
2003 | ||||||||||||
16 August | 30 June | or | ||||||||||
2004 | 2004 | appointment | ||||||||||
Chairman |
||||||||||||
Lord Blyth |
44,791 | 42,641 | 28,620 | |||||||||
Executive directors |
||||||||||||
NC Rose |
175,355 | 172,300 | 123,711 | |||||||||
PS Walsh |
672,002 | 671,947 | 591,172 | |||||||||
Non-executive directors |
||||||||||||
RF Chase |
11,779 | 11,779 | 11,355 | |||||||||
Lord Hollick |
5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||||||||
M Lilja |
4,532 | 4,532 | 1,507 | |||||||||
JK Oates |
3,313 | 3,313 | 3,208 | |||||||||
WS Shanahan |
16,591 | 16,591 | 16,000 | |||||||||
HT Stitzer (appointed 23 June 2004) |
| | | |||||||||
JR Symonds (appointed 1 May 2004) |
5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||||||||
PA Walker |
44,250 | 44,250 | 7,250 | |||||||||
Total |
982,613 | 977,353 | 792,823 | |||||||||
Notes
(a) At 30 June 2004, there were 9,536,919 shares (30 June 2003 8,316,116;16 August 2004 9,603,917) held by trusts to satisfy grants made under Diageo incentive plans and savings-related share option schemes, and 14,528 shares and 447,580 shares subject to call options (30 June 2003 16,528 and 447,580;16 August 2004 14,528 and 447,580) held by a trust to satisfy grants made under ex-GrandMet incentive plans. NC Rose and PS Walsh are among the potential beneficiaries of these trusts and are deemed to have an interest in all these shares and shares subject to call options.
(b) At 30 June 2004, WS Shanahan also had an interest in 850 9.42% cumulative guaranteed preferred securities, series A issued by Grand Metropolitan Delaware, LP (30 June 2003 850;16 August 2004 850).
Performance graph
The graph below shows the total shareholder return for Diageo and the FTSE 100 Index since 30 June 1999. The FTSE 100 Index reflects the 100 largest UK quoted companies by market capitalisation and has been chosen because it is a widely recognised performance benchmark for large UK companies. The graph shows that Diageo outperformed the FTSE 100 Index over this five year period. This is not linked to the TSR plan which measures three year TSR against a defined peer group of 17 other companies.
73 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Additional information
Emoluments and share interests of senior management The total emoluments for the year ended 30 June 2004 of the senior executives and the company secretary (together, the senior management) of Diageo plc comprising basic salary, annual performance bonus, share incentive plan and other benefits were £13,025,144. The aggregate amount of gains made by the senior management from the exercise of share options and from the vesting of awards during the year was £6,894,993 and payments under other pre-merger long term incentive plans totalled £339,747. In addition, they were granted 1,937,757 options during the year at a weighted average share price of 635 pence, exercisable by 2013. They were also initially awarded 767,249 shares under the TSR plan in February 2004, which will vest in three years subject to the performance tests described above.
At 16 August 2004, the senior management had an aggregate beneficial interest in 1,694,716 ordinary shares in the company and in the following options: | ||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||
average | ||||||||||||
exercise price | ||||||||||||
Number | in pence | Option period | ||||||||||
Options over ordinary shares |
||||||||||||
NC Rose |
1,133,746 | 657 | Jun 98 Oct 13 | |||||||||
PS Walsh |
2,111,102 | 633 | Dec 02 Oct 13 | |||||||||
Other members of the executive committee and company secretary |
5,571,168 | 598 | Apr 99 Oct 13 | |||||||||
8,816,016 | ||||||||||||
SEPSOS phantom options |
||||||||||||
PS Walsh |
30,000 | 459 | Jan 01 Jan 06 | |||||||||
Related party transactions Lord Blyth is a vice chairman of Greenhill & Co, Inc (Greenhill). Greenhill neither advised nor received any fee from Diageo during the year ended 30 June 2004. During the year ended 30 June 2003, Greenhill received fees of US$8 million (£5 million) for its advice to Diageo in respect of the disposal of Burger King. Lord Blyth did not participate in the selection of advisers, nor did he advise Greenhill in relation to this transaction.
Lord Hollick of Notting Hill
Non-executive director
74 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Corporate governance report
UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance
Diageos board and executive committee are committed to achieving the highest standards of corporate governance, corporate responsibility and risk management in directing and controlling the business. They are pleased to report that the company has complied throughout the year with the provisions of section 1 of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance issued in 1998 by the Hampel Committee and annexed to the Listing Rules by the Financial Services Authority (Combined Code). The Combined Code was substantially revised during the year, following the publication of the Higgs report and the Smith report (on audit committees). The board reviewed its corporate governance practices during the year in light of the new Code and US regulatory changes,and implemented a number of changes, which are disclosed below. The new Code applies to Diageos financial year beginning on 1 July 2004 and accordingly the board will report on compliance with the new Code next year.
The way in which the principles of good governance are applied is described below.
Board of directors
Diageos board consists of its chairman, chief executive, chief financial officer and eight non-executive directors, all of whom the board has determined are independent. The board has determined that JK Oates is independent notwithstanding the fact that, when he retires from the board after the Annual General Meeting (AGM) on 20 October 2004, he will have served slightly more than nine years as a non-executive director. This slight over-run results from the companys year end changing from 31 December to 30 June, causing the AGM to be held some five months later than when JK Oates was originally appointed to the Guinness PLC board in June 1995.
75 Diageo Annual Report 2004 Corporate governance report
Board committees
The board has established several committees, each with clearly defined terms of reference, procedures, responsibilities and powers. The terms of reference of the committees are available on www.diageo.com. They are also available on request from the company secretary.
Audit committee The audit committee is chaired by JK Oates and consists of all the independent non-executive directors. The chief financial officer, business risk director, compliance director and external auditor are normally invited to attend the meeting. The audit committee is responsible for: monitoring the integrity of the financial statements, including a review of the significant financial reporting judgements contained in them; reviewing the effectiveness of the groups internal control and risk management systems and of control over financial reporting; monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the business risk function and reviewing the business risk programme; monitoring and reviewing the groups policies and practices concerning business conduct and ethics, including whistleblowing; and overseeing the companys relationship with the external auditor, including monitoring their independence.
Audit committee report The committee met five times during the year and reported its conclusions to the full board. The meetings were fully attended, except that Lord Hollick, M Lilja, PA Walker and WS Shanahan were each unable to attend one meeting. At the end of each meeting, the committee met with the external auditor with no executive or staff member present. The committee also met on one occasion with the business risk director with no executive or staff member present.
Monitoring of external auditor During the year, the audit committee reviewed the external audit strategy and the findings of the external auditor from its review of the interim announcement and its audit of the annual financial statements. As noted above, the committee also met five times with the external auditor alone. On the basis of meetings and other information available to the directors, the audit committee is able to assess the ongoing effectiveness of the external audit. In reviewing the independence of the external auditor, the audit committee considered a number of factors. These include: the standing, experience and tenure of the external audit director; the nature and level of services provided by the external auditor; and confirmation from the external auditor that it has complied with relevant UK and US independence standards.
| accounting advice, employee benefit plan audits, and audit or other attest services required by statute or requested by management and not otherwise prohibited; | |||
| due diligence and other support relating to acquisitions and disposals; | |||
| internal control reviews; | |||
| accounting and fraud investigations; and | |||
| certain tax services, including tax compliance; tax planning and related implementation advice in relation to acquisitions, disposals and other reorganisations. |
76 Diageo Annual Report 2004 Corporate governance report
Nomination committee Chaired by Lord Blyth, this committee comprises all the independent non-executive directors. The committee is responsible for keeping under review the composition of the board and succession to it. It makes recommendations to the board concerning appointments to the board, whether of executive or non-executive directors, having regard to the balance and structure of the board and the required blend of skills and experience. The committee also makes recommendations to the board concerning the re-appointment of any non-executive director at the conclusion of his or her specified term and the re-election of any director by shareholders under the retirement provisions of the companys articles of association.
Remuneration committee This committee is chaired by Lord Hollick, who succeeded RF Chase as chairman on 2 September 2004, comprises all the independent non-executive directors. The role of the committee and details of how the company applies the principles of the Code in respect of directorsremuneration are set out in the directors remuneration report in relation to directors remuneration policy and practice above.
Executive direction and control
The executive committee, appointed and chaired by the chief executive, consists of the individuals responsible for the key components of the business: North America and the European major markets, key and venture markets, global supply and the global functions. It met eight times during the year, generally for two days, including the joint annual strategy conference with the board, and spent most of its time discussing strategy, people and performance (including brands). Responsibility and authority (within the financial limits set by the board) are delegated by the chief executive to individual members of the executive committee who are accountable to him for the performance of their business units.
Audit and risk committee chaired by the chief executive and responsible for overseeing the approach to securing effective risk management and control in the business, reviewing and challenging the sources of assurance as to their adequacy, reviewing the effectiveness of the compliance programme and reporting periodically on the above to the audit committee or to the board.
Corporate citizenship committee chaired by the chief executive and responsible for making decisions and recommendations to the executive committee or board. The main areas addressed by the committee include: policies and codes (such as occupational health and safety, human rights); social programmes (including alcohol education); environmental matters; community affairs; reputation issues referred by the Diageo brand committee; and measuring and reporting on social, environmental and economic performance. The committee seeks to identify social, community and environmental areas where the group could be at risk or where there is scope for positive impact on the communities where we operate. Policies and processes have been developed and implemented to manage each of these. Progress against these is reported periodically to the board and publicly through a separate corporate citizenship report, which is subject to external assurance. That report and the groups social, ethical and environmental policies are published on the Diageo web site. A copy of the corporate citizenship report is available on request. The company has communicated its policies widely and in key areas has established management systems to manage, monitor and enhance impacts. Wherever possible, these management systems are incorporated into existing practices such as the quality management programme or the procurement and vendor selection procedures.
Finance committee chaired by the chief financial officer and including the chief executive, this committee is responsible for making recommendations to the board on funding strategy, capital structure and management of financial risks and the policies and control procedures (including financial issues relating to treasury and taxation) required to implement the companys financial strategy and financial risk management policies. In certain specific circumstances, the board has delegated authority to the finance committee to make decisions in these areas. Treasury activity is managed centrally within tightly defined dealing authorities and procedures recommended by the finance committee and approved by the board.
77 Diageo Annual Report 2004 Corporate governance report
Filings assurance committee chaired by the chief financial officer and including the chief executive, this committee is responsible for implementing and monitoring the processes which ensure that the company complies with all relevant UK, US or other regulatory filing provisions, including those imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or deriving from it.
Risk management and internal control
The groups aim is to manage risk and to control its business and financial activities cost-effectively and in a manner that enables it to: exploit profitable business opportunity in a disciplined way; avoid or reduce risks that can cause loss, reputational damage or business failure; support operational effectiveness; and enhance resilience to external events. To achieve this, an ongoing process has been established for identifying, evaluating and managing risks faced by the group. This process, which complies with the requirements of the Combined Code, has been in place for the full financial year and up to the date the financial statements were approved.
Compliance programme
Diageo is committed to conducting its business responsibly and in accordance with all laws and regulations to which its business activities are subject. The board has a well established compliance programme to support achievement of this commitment. The code of business conduct (recently revised and approved by the board in December 2003) sets out expectations of Diageo businesses and employees in relation to issues such as conflicts of interest,competition law, insider trading and corrupt payments as well as illegal acts in general. A marketing code establishes the principles that Diageo follows in relation to advertising and promotion of its products. The full texts of the code of conduct, marketing code and compliance programme are available on the companys web site at www.diageo.com.
78 Diageo Annual Report 2004 Corporate governance report
Relations with shareholders
The company values its dialogue with both institutional and private investors. Institutional shareholders, fund managers and analysts are kept informed through regular meetings and presentations. Diageo produces the short-form annual review,which contains the information believed to be of most interest to private investors. Approximately 85% of private investors have elected to receive only this document rather than the full annual report. Shareholders can also choose to receive e-mail notification when shareholder documents and new company information are published on Diageos web site. The web site also provides shareholders with the facility to check their shareholdings on-line and to send any questions they may have to the company.
Charitable and political donations
During the year, UK group companies made donations of £7.3 million (2003 £6.5 million) to charitable organisations including the Diageo Foundation and £2.7 million (2003 £2.7 million) to the Thalidomide Trust. The Diageo Foundation made charitable donations of £1.6 million (2003 £1.5 million) during the year. In the rest of the world,group companies made charitable donations of £10.2 million (2003 £12.5 million).
Supplier payment policies and performance
Given the international nature of the groups operations, there is no group standard in respect of payments to suppliers. Operating companies are responsible for agreeing terms and conditions for their business transactions when orders for goods and services are placed, ensuring that suppliers are aware of the terms of payment and including the relevant terms in contracts where appropriate. These arrangements are adhered to when making payments, subject to the terms and conditions being met by the supplier.
Statement of directorsresponsibilities
The following statement, which should be read in conjunction with the independent auditors report set out before the financial statements, is made with a view to distinguishing for sharholders the respective responsibilities of the directors and of the auditor in relation to the financial statements.
US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Diageo has American Depositary Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and is subject to the reporting and other requirements of the SEC applicable to foreign private issuers. As a consequence of its NYSE listing, the company is subject to those provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act applicable to foreign private issuers.
79 Diageo Annual Report 2004 Corporate governance report
New York Stock Exchange corporate governance rules
In November 2003, the SEC approved the NYSEs new corporate governance rules for listed companies. Under these new rules, Diageo must disclose any significant ways in which its corporate governance practices differ from those followed by US companies under NYSE listing standards.
Basis of regulation US companies listed on the NYSE are required to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. The Listing Rules of the UK Financial Services Authority require each listed company incorporated in the United Kingdom to include in its annual report and accounts a narrative statement of how it has applied the principles of the Combined Code and a statement as to whether or not it has complied with the best practice provisions of the Combined Code throughout the accounting period covered by the annual report and accounts. References to the Combined Code are to the Combined Code on Corporate Governance issued in 1998 by the Hampel Committee and annexed to the Listing Rules by the FSA. It is not mandatory for companies to follow the principles set forth in the Combined Code, and the Combined Code does not require companies to disclose the full range of corporate governance guidelines with which they comply. A company that has not complied with the Combined Code provisions, however, or that complied with only some of the Combined Code provisions or (in the case of provisions whose requirements are of a continuing nature) complied for only part of an accounting period covered by the report, must specify the Combined Code provisions with which it has not complied, and (where relevant) for what part of the reporting period such non-compliance continued, and give reasons for any non-compliance. As stated above, Diageo complied throughout the year with the best practice provisions of the Combined Code.
Director independence The Combined Codes principles recommend that at least half of a companys board, excluding the chairman, should consist of independent non-executive directors. The NYSE listing rules applicable to US companies state that companies must have a majority of independent directors. Currently, eight of Diageos 11 directors are non-executive directors. The NYSE rules set forth five bright-line tests for determining director independence and require in addition that the board of directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company). The Combined Code, which is followed by Diageo, prescribes a more general standard for determining director independence. The Combined Code requires a companys board to assess director independence by affirmatively concluding that the director is independent of management and free from any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with the exercise of independent judgement. Diageos board has determined that, in its judgement, all of the non-executive directors are independent. In doing so, however, the board did not explicitly take into consideration the NYSEs bright-line tests.
Chairman and chief executive The Combined Code recommends that the chairman and the chief executive should not be the same individual in order to ensure that there is a clear division of responsibility for running each companys business. There is no corresponding requirement for US companies. Diageo has a separate chairman and chief executive.
Non-executive director meetings Pursuant to NYSE listing standards, non-management directors must meet on a regular basis without management present and independent directors must meet separately at least once per year. During the year under review, Diageos non-executive directors met twice as a group without any executive directors present.
Committees Diageo has a number of board committees which are similar in purpose and constitution to those required for US companies under NYSE standards. Diageos audit and remuneration committees consist entirely of independent non-executive directors. The nomination committee is chaired by Lord Blyth, who is not independent. Under NYSE standards, companies are required to have a nominating/corporate governance committee, composed entirely of independent directors. In addition to identifying individuals qualified to become board members, this committee must develop and recommend to the board a set of corporate governance principles. The terms of reference for Diageos nomination committee, which follow the requirements of the Combined Code, do not require the committee to develop and recommend corporate governance principles for Diageo. In accordance with the requirements of the Combined Code, Diageo discloses in its annual report how the board, its committees and the directors are evaluated and the results of the evaluation and it provides extensive information regarding directors compensation in the directors remuneration report.
Code of ethics NYSE listing standards require US companies to adopt a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. Diageos board has established a compliance programme to support achievement of its commitment to conducting Diageos business responsibly and in accordance with all laws and regulations to which its business activities are subject. Diageos code of business conduct sets out expectations of Diageo businesses and employees in relation to issues such as conflicts of interest, competition law, insider trading and corrupt payments as well as illegal acts in general. A marketing code establishes the principles that Diageo follows in relation to advertising and promotion of its products. In addition, Diageo has adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers in accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Compliance certification Each chief executive officer of a US company listed on the NYSE must certify to the NYSE each year that he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of any NYSE corporate governance standards. In accordance with NYSE listing rules applicable to foreign private issuers, PS Walsh, Diageos chief executive, is not required to provide the NYSE with this annual compliance certification. However, in accordance with rules applicable to both US companies and foreign private issuers, PS Walsh is required to notify the NYSE promptly in writing after any executive officer becomes aware of any material non-compliance with the NYSE corporate governance standards applicable to the company.
Directors report
The directors have pleasure in submitting their annual report for the year ended 30 June 2004.
Annual General Meeting
The AGM will be held at The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, Broad Sanctuary, Westminster, London SW1P 3EE at 2.30 pm on Wednesday, 20 October 2004.
Dividends
Diageo paid an interim dividend of 10.6 pence per share on 6 April 2004. The directors recommend a final dividend of 17.0 pence per share. Subject to approval by members, the final dividend will be paid on 25 October 2004 to shareholders on the register on 17 September 2004. A dividend reinvestment plan, which enables ordinary shareholders to invest their dividends in ordinary shares, is available in respect of the final dividend and the plan notice date is 4 October 2004.
Directors
The directors of the company who served during the year are listed under Directors and senior management above. Lord Hollick, NC Rose and PA Walker retire by rotation at the AGM in accordance with the articles and, being eligible, offer themselves for re-election. HT Stitzer and JR Symonds, who were appointed since the last AGM, retire in accordance with the articles and, being eligible, offer themselves for election at the AGM. RF Chase, who was designated senior non-executive director and appointed chairman of the remuneration committee in October 2003, will retire by rotation at the AGM and will not seek a further term on the board. On 1 September 2004, the board of directors appointed Lord Hollick as senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee, with effect from 2 September 2004. As announced previously, JK Oates will retire after this years AGM and, subject to election by shareholders, it is proposed that Mr Symonds will succeed him as chairman of the audit committee after this years AGM. Sir Robert Wilson retired as senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee in October 2003. The executive director proposed for re-election will have an unexpired contract term of one year. The non-executive directors proposed for re-election do not have service contracts. Further details of directors contracts and their interests in the shares of the company at 30 June 2004 are given in the directors remuneration report above.
Auditor
The auditor, KPMG Audit Plc, is willing to continue in office and a resolution for its re-appointment as auditor of the company will be submitted to the AGM.
Purchases of own shares
At the 2003 AGM, shareholders gave the company renewed authority to purchase a maximum of 310 million ordinary shares. During the year ended 30 June 2004, Diageo purchased, and subsequently cancelled, 43 million ordinary shares (nominal value £12 million), representing approximately 1% of the issued ordinary share capital at 16 August 2004, for a consideration including expenses of £306 million.
Other information
Other information that in previous years has been in the directors report may now be found in the following sections of the annual report.
Information | Location in annual report | |
Business activities and development
|
Chief executives review and Business description | |
Corporate citizenship
|
Corporate governance report | |
Charitable and political donations
|
Corporate governance report | |
Employment policies
|
Business description Premium drinks Employees | |
Purchase of own shares
|
Operating and financial review Liquidity and capital resources | |
Supplier payment policies and performance
|
Corporate governance report | |
Shareholdings in the company
|
Additional information for shareholders Major shareholders |
The directors report of Diageo plc for the year ended 30 June 2004 comprises this page and the sections of the annual report referred to under Other information and Directors above.
The directors report was approved by a duly appointed and authorised committee of the board of directors on 1 September 2004 and signed on its behalf by Susanne Bunn, the company secretary.
81 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Consolidated financial statements
Year ended 30 June 2004
82
|
Report of independent registered public accounting firm | |||
83
|
Consolidated profit and loss account | |||
85
|
Consolidated balance sheet | |||
86
|
Consolidated cash flow statement | |||
86
|
Movements in net borrowings | |||
87
|
Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses | |||
87
|
Note of consolidated historical cost profits and losses | |||
88
|
Accounting policies | |||
90
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements | |||
148
|
Company balance sheet | |||
149
|
Notes to the company balance sheet | |||
151
|
Principal group companies |
82 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
To the board of directors and shareholders of Diageo plc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Diageo plc and subsidiaries as of 30 June 2004 and 30 June 2003, and the related consolidated profit and loss accounts, consolidated statements of total recognised gains and losses, and consolidated cash flow statements for each of the years in the three year period ended 30 June 2004 presented on pages 83 to 151. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
KPMG Audit Plc
Chartered Accountants
London, England
1 September 2004
83 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Consolidated profit and loss account
Year ended 30 June 2004 | Year ended 30 June 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | exceptional | Exceptional | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | items | items | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | 8,891 | | 8,891 | 8,802 | | 8,802 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | | | | 479 | | 479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 8,891 | | 8,891 | 9,281 | | 9,281 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs | 4,7 | (6,980 | ) | (40 | ) | (7,020 | ) | (7,326 | ) | (168 | ) | (7,494 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | 1,911 | (40 | ) | 1,871 | 1,902 | (168 | ) | 1,734 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | | | | 53 | | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 1,911 | (40 | ) | 1,871 | 1,955 | (168 | ) | 1,787 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Share of associates profits | 6 | 451 | (13 | ) | 438 | 478 | (21 | ) | 457 | |||||||||||||||||||
2,362 | (53 | ) | 2,309 | 2,433 | (189 | ) | 2,244 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of fixed assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | (35 | ) | (35 | ) | (42 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | (35 | ) | (35 | ) | (43 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | 16 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | 3 | 3 | (1,270 | ) | (1,270 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | (1,254 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest payable (net) | 8 | (271 | ) | | (271 | ) | (345 | ) | | (345 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other finance (charges)/income | 8 | (24 | ) | | (24 | ) | 30 | | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation | 2,067 | (98 | ) | 1,969 | 2,118 | (1,486 | ) | 632 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxation | 9 | (517 | ) | 30 | (487 | ) | (543 | ) | 52 | (491 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Profit after taxation | 1,550 | (68 | ) | 1,482 | 1,575 | (1,434 | ) | 141 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | (58 | ) | | (58 | ) | (56 | ) | | (56 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-equity | (32 | ) | | (32 | ) | (35 | ) | | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year | 1,460 | (68 | ) | 1,392 | 1,484 | (1,434 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | 10 | (833 | ) | | (833 | ) | (786 | ) | | (786 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Transferred to/(from) reserves | 627 | (68 | ) | 559 | 698 | (1,434 | ) | (736 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Pence per share | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings | 48.2 | p | (2.3 | )p | 45.9 | p | 47.7 | p | (46.1 | )p | 1.6 | p | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings | 48.2 | p | (2.3 | )p | 45.9 | p | 47.7 | p | (46.1 | )p | 1.6 | p | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends | 27.6 | p | | 27.6 | p | 25.6 | p | | 25.6 | p | ||||||||||||||||||
Average shares | 3,030 | m | 3,113 | m |
84 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Consolidated profit and loss account
Year ended 30 June 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Before | ||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | |||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | ||||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||
Notes | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
8,539 | | 8,539 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
2,361 | | 2,361 | |||||||||||||
2 | 10,900 | | 10,900 | |||||||||||||
Operating costs |
4/7 | (8,900 | ) | (470 | ) | (9,370 | ) | |||||||||
Operating profit | ||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | 1,670 | (449 | ) | 1,221 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | 330 | (21 | ) | 309 | ||||||||||||
2 | 2,000 | (470 | ) | 1,530 | ||||||||||||
Share of associates profits |
6 | 324 | (41 | ) | 283 | |||||||||||
2,324 | (511 | ) | 1,813 | |||||||||||||
Disposal of fixed assets | ||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | (23 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||
7 | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||||
Sale of businesses | ||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | 512 | 512 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | 301 | 301 | ||||||||||||||
7 | 813 | 813 | ||||||||||||||
Interest payable (net) |
8 | (399 | ) | | (399 | ) | ||||||||||
Other finance income |
8 | 104 | | 104 | ||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
2,029 | 280 | 2,309 | |||||||||||||
Taxation |
9 | (512 | ) | (121 | ) | (633 | ) | |||||||||
Profit after taxation |
1,517 | 159 | 1,676 | |||||||||||||
Minority interests |
||||||||||||||||
Equity |
(49 | ) | | (49 | ) | |||||||||||
Non-equity |
(38 | ) | | (38 | ) | |||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,430 | 159 | 1,589 | |||||||||||||
Dividends |
10 | (767 | ) | | (767 | ) | ||||||||||
Transferred to reserves |
663 | 159 | 822 | |||||||||||||
Pence per share |
11 | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings |
43.1p | 4.8p | 47.9p | |||||||||||||
Diluted earnings |
43.1p | 4.8p | 47.9p | |||||||||||||
Dividends |
23.8p | | 23.8p | |||||||||||||
Average shares |
3,316m | |||||||||||||||
85 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Consolidated balance sheet
30 June 2004 | 30 June 2003 (restated) | |||||||||||||||||||
Notes | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed
assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
12 | 4,012 | 4,288 | |||||||||||||||||
Tangible assets |
13 | 1,976 | 1,974 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in associates |
14 | 1,263 | 2,915 | |||||||||||||||||
Other investments |
14 | 1,772 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||
9,023 | 9,365 | |||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Stocks |
15 | 2,176 | 2,250 | |||||||||||||||||
Debtors due within one year |
16 | 1,573 | 2,154 | |||||||||||||||||
Debtors due after one year |
16 | 151 | 228 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
17 | 1,167 | 1,191 | |||||||||||||||||
5,067 | 5,823 | |||||||||||||||||||
Creditors
due within one year |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
17 | (2,001 | ) | (3,563 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other creditors |
19 | (3,022 | ) | (3,283 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(5,023 | ) | (6,846 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net current assets/(liabilities) |
44 | (1,023 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets less current liabilities |
9,067 | 8,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Creditors
due after one year |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
17 | (3,316 | ) | (2,981 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other creditors |
19 | (109 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(3,425 | ) | (2,999 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities and charges |
20 | (709 | ) | (648 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net assets before post employment assets and liabilities |
4,933 | 4,695 | ||||||||||||||||||
Post employment assets |
7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Post employment liabilities |
(757 | ) | (1,375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
5 | (d) | (750 | ) | (1,369 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net assets |
4,183 | 3,326 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital and reserves |
||||||||||||||||||||
Called up share capital |
22 | 885 | 897 | |||||||||||||||||
Share premium account |
1,331 | 1,327 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revaluation reserve |
113 | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital redemption reserve |
3,058 | 3,046 | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit and loss account |
(1,695 | ) | (2,589 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reserves attributable to equity shareholders |
23 | 2,807 | 1,904 | |||||||||||||||||
Shareholders funds |
3,692 | 2,801 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority interests |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
179 | 182 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-equity |
25 | 312 | 343 | |||||||||||||||||
491 | 525 | |||||||||||||||||||
4,183 | 3,326 | |||||||||||||||||||
86 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Consolidated cash flow statement
Year ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||
Year ended | 30 June 2003 | 30 June 2002 | ||||||||||||||
30 June 2004 | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||
Notes | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Net cash inflow from operating activities |
26 | 2,121 | 1,970 | 2,008 | ||||||||||||
Dividends received from associates |
224 | 60 | 87 | |||||||||||||
Returns on investments and servicing of finance | ||||||||||||||||
Interest paid (net) | (257 | ) | (327 | ) | (360 | ) | ||||||||||
Dividends paid to equity minority interests | (42 | ) | (28 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||||||||
(299 | ) | (355 | ) | (400 | ) | |||||||||||
Taxation |
(298 | ) | (105 | ) | (311 | ) | ||||||||||
Capital expenditure and financial investment | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of tangible fixed assets | (327 | ) | (382 | ) | (585 | ) | ||||||||||
Net sale/(purchase) of investments | 9 | (20 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||||||
Sale of tangible fixed assets | 20 | 41 | 65 | |||||||||||||
(298 | ) | (361 | ) | (528 | ) | |||||||||||
Acquisitions and disposals | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase of subsidiaries | 27 | (17 | ) | (137 | ) | (3,592 | ) | |||||||||
Sale of subsidiaries, associates and businesses | 28 | (17 | ) | 912 | 5,100 | |||||||||||
Sale of options in relation to associates | 28 | | 58 | | ||||||||||||
(34 | ) | 833 | 1,508 | |||||||||||||
Equity dividends paid |
(800 | ) | (767 | ) | (758 | ) | ||||||||||
Management of liquid resources |
(98 | ) | 256 | 92 | ||||||||||||
Financing | ||||||||||||||||
Issue of share capital | 4 | 4 | 11 | |||||||||||||
Net purchase of own shares for share trusts | (4 | ) | (65 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||||
Own shares purchased for cancellation | (306 | ) | (852 | ) | (1,658 | ) | ||||||||||
Decrease in loans | (247 | ) | (496 | ) | (137 | ) | ||||||||||
(553 | ) | (1,409 | ) | (1,848 | ) | |||||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in cash in the year |
17 | (35 | ) | 122 | (150 | ) | ||||||||||
Movements in net borrowings
Year ended | Year ended | Year ended | ||||||||||
30 June 2004 | 30 June 2003 | 30 June 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in cash in the year |
(35 | ) | 122 | (150 | ) | |||||||
Cash flow from change in loans |
247 | 496 | 137 | |||||||||
Change in liquid resources |
98 | (256 | ) | (92 | ) | |||||||
Change in net borrowings from cash flows |
310 | 362 | (105 | ) | ||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
371 | 227 | 267 | |||||||||
Non-cash items |
45 | 37 | (179 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in net borrowings |
726 | 626 | (17 | ) | ||||||||
Net borrowings at beginning of the year |
(4,870 | ) | (5,496 | ) | (5,479 | ) | ||||||
Net borrowings at end of the year |
(4,144 | ) | (4,870 | ) | (5,496 | ) | ||||||
87 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses
Year ended 30 June 2004 |
Year ended 30 June 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before tax |
Tax |
Net |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Before tax |
Tax |
Net |
(restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||||||||
£ million |
£ million |
£ million |
£ million |
£ million |
£ million |
||||||||||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
group |
1,493 |
(356 |
) |
1,137 |
157 | (353 | ) | (196 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
associates |
386 |
(131 |
) |
255 |
384 | (138 | ) | 246 | |||||||||||||||||
1,879 |
(487 |
) |
1,392 |
541 | (491 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
group |
77 |
6 |
83 |
(108 | ) | (7 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
associates |
(204 |
) |
|
(204 |
) |
(57 | ) | | (57 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Actuarial gains/(losses) on post employment plans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
group |
476 |
188 |
664 |
(960 | ) | (82 | ) | (1,042 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
associates |
110 |
(39 |
) |
71 |
(87 | ) | 31 | (56 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total recognised gains and losses for the year |
2,338 |
(332 |
) |
2,006 |
(671 | ) | (549 | ) | (1,220 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Prior year adjustments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of FRS 17 |
(1,865 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of UITF 38 |
16 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognised gains and losses since previous annual report |
157 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June 2002 | |||||||||||||
Before tax | Tax | Net | |||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year |
|||||||||||||
group |
2,004 | (546 | ) | 1,458 | |||||||||
associates |
218 | (87 | ) | 131 | |||||||||
2,222 | (633 | ) | 1,589 | ||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
|||||||||||||
group |
(30 | ) | | (30 | ) | ||||||||
associates |
(55 | ) | | (55 | ) | ||||||||
Actuarial losses on post employment plans |
|||||||||||||
group |
(1,393 | ) | 380 | (1,013 | ) | ||||||||
associates |
(115 | ) | 40 | (75 | ) | ||||||||
Total recognised gains and losses for the year |
629 | (213 | ) | 416 | |||||||||
Note of consolidated historical cost profits and losses
There is no material difference between the reported profit shown in the consolidated profit and loss account and the profit for the relevant years restated on an historical cost basis.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
88 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Accounting policies
Bases of accounting and consolidation
The accounts are prepared under the historical cost convention, modified by the revaluation of certain land and buildings, and in accordance with applicable UK accounting standards.
Acquisitions and disposals
On the acquisition of a business, or of an interest in an associate, fair values, reflecting conditions at the date of acquisition, are attributed to the net assets including significant owned brands acquired. Adjustments to fair values include those made to bring accounting policies into line with those of the group. Where merger relief is applicable under the UK Companies Acts, the difference between the fair value of the business acquired and the nominal value of shares issued as purchase consideration is treated as a merger reserve.
Brands, goodwill and other intangible assets
When the cost of an acquisition exceeds the fair values attributable to the groups share of the net assets acquired, the difference is treated as purchased goodwill. Goodwill arising on acquisitions subsequent to 1 July 1998 is capitalised but prior to that date it was eliminated against reserves, and this goodwill has not been restated.
Tangible fixed assets
Land and buildings are stated at cost or,for certain assets acquired prior to 1993, at professional valuation, less depreciation. Freehold land is not depreciated. Leaseholds are depreciated over the unexpired period of the lease. Other tangible fixed assets are depreciated on a straightline basis to estimated residual values over their expected useful lives within the following ranges: industrial and other buildings 10 to 50 years; plant and machinery 5 to 25 years; fixtures and fittings 5 to 10 years; casks and containers 15 to 20 years; and computer software up to 5 years.
Leases
Where the group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of an asset subject to a lease, the lease is treated as a finance lease. Other leases are treated as operating leases, with payments and receipts taken to the profit and loss account on a straightline basis over the life of the lease.
Associates and joint arrangements
An associate is an undertaking in which the group has a long term equity interest and over which it exercises significant influence. The groups interest in the net assets of associates is included in investments in the group balance sheet. Joint arrangements, where each party has its own separate interest in particular risks and rewards, are accounted for by including the attributable share of the assets and liabilities, measured according to the terms of the arrangement.
Share options
The intrinsic value of options granted, being the difference between the market value of shares on the award of an option, and the exercise price of the option, is charged to the profit and loss account over the minimum life of the option. Shares held by the company for the purpose of fulfilling obligations in respect of various employee share plans around the group are deducted from equity in the consolidated balance sheet. Any gain or loss arising on the sale of the shares held by the company are included as an adjustment to reserves.
Stocks
Stocks are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost includes raw materials, direct labour and expenses, and an appropriate proportion of production and other overheads. Cost is calculated on an actual usage basis for maturing stocks and on a first in, first out basis for other stocks.
89 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Accounting policies |
Foreign currencies
The profit and loss accounts and cash flows of overseas subsidiaries and associates are translated into sterling at weighted average rates of exchange, other than substantial transactions which are translated at the rate on the date of the transaction. The adjustment to closing rates is taken to reserves.
Turnover
Turnover from the sale of goods includes excise duties and royalties receivable but excludes value added tax. Turnover is recognised depending upon individual customer terms at the time of despatch, delivery or some other specified point when the risk of loss transfers. Provision is made for returns where appropriate. Turnover is stated net of price discounts, allowances for customer loyalty and certain promotional activities and similar items.
Advertising
Advertising production costs are charged to the profit and loss account when the advertisement is first shown to the public.
Research and development
Research and development, including developing new drinks products and package design expenditure, is written off in the period in which it is incurred.
Pensions and other post employment benefits
The groups principal pension funds are defined benefit plans. In addition the group has defined contribution plans, unfunded post employment medical benefit liabilities and other unfunded post employment liabilities. For defined benefit plans the amount charged to operating profit is the cost of accruing pension benefits promised to employees over the year plus any benefit improvements granted to members by the group during the year. Other finance charges/income in the profit and loss account includes a credit equivalent to the groups expected return on the pension plans assets over the year, offset by a charge equal to the expected increase in the plans liabilities over the year. The difference between the market value of the plans assets and the present value of the plans liabilities is disclosed as an asset or liability on the group balance sheet, net of deferred tax (to the extent that it is recoverable). Any differences between the expected return on assets and that actually achieved, and any changes in the liabilities over the year due to changes in assumptions or experience within the plans, are recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
Exceptional items
Exceptional items are those that in managements judgement need to be disclosed by virtue of their size or incidence. Such items are included within the profit and loss account caption to which they relate, and are separately disclosed either in the notes to the consolidated financial statements or on the face of the consolidated profit and loss account.
Deferred taxation
Full provision for deferred tax is made for timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the consolidated financial statements and their recognition in tax computations, using current tax rates. The group does not discount these balances. No deferred tax is provided in respect of any future remittance of earnings of foreign subsidiaries or associates where no commitment has been made to remit such earnings.
Financial instruments
The group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposures to fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates. Instruments accounted for as hedges are structured so as to reduce the market risk associated with the underlying transaction being hedged and are designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract. If the underlying transaction to a hedge ceases to exist, the hedge is terminated and the profit or loss is recognised immediately. If the hedge transaction is terminated, the profit or loss is held in the balance sheet and amortised over the life of the original underlying transaction.
90 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
Diageo was created by the merger of the former GrandMet and Guinness Group businesses on 17 December 1997. Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United Kingdom, the combination has been accounted for as a merger and the results and cash flows of GrandMet and the Guinness Group are combined as of the beginning of the earliest financial year presented. Under US GAAP the merger has been accounted for as an acquisition of the Guinness Group by GrandMet. At the time of the merger, Diageo changed its year end to 30 June.
1 New UK GAAP accounting policies
The group has adopted the reporting requirements of FRS 17 Retirement benefits in its primary financial statements from 1 July 2003. In prior years, the group complied with the transitional disclosure requirements of the standard. The financial information included in these statements also complies from 1 July 2003 with the following requirements issued by the UKs Accounting Standards Board: UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts, and the amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions.
FRS 17 Retirement benefits This standard replaces the use of the actuarial values for assessing pension costs in favour of a market-based approach. In order to cope with the volatility inherent in this measurement basis, the standard requires that the profit and loss account shows the relatively stable ongoing service cost, the expected return on assets and the interest on the liabilities. Differences between expected and actual returns on assets, and the impact on the liabilities of changes in the assumptions, are reflected in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts This abstract changes the presentation of an entitys own shares held in an employee share trust from requiring them to be recognised as assets to requiring them to be deducted in arriving at shareholders funds. It also has consequential changes to UITF 17 requiring that the expense to the profit and loss account should be the difference between the fair value of the shares at the date of award and the amount that an employee is required to pay for the shares (i.e. the intrinsic value of the award).
FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions The amendment to the standard added a new application note (G) on revenue recognition. This requires that revenue should be stated at fair value of the right to consideration. Diageo incurs certain promotional expenditure where permitted under local law (for example, slotting fees, whereby fees are paid to retailers for prominence of display, listing or agreement not to delist Diageos products) that is not wholly independent of the invoiced product price. Such expenditure is now deducted from turnover. The change, which has no impact on operating profit, reduced turnover and operating costs by £159 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 (2002 £382 million) and by £181 million in the year ended 30 June 2004.
91 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
2 Segmental analysis
The classes of business, and the groups reportable segments, are premium drinks and, in prior years, quick service restaurants and packaged food. Each segment contains closely related products that are unique to that particular segment.
Premium drinks An international manufacturer and distributor of spirits, wines and beer that produces and distributes a wide range of premium brands, including Smirnoff vodka, Johnnie Walker Scotch whiskies, Guinness stout, Baileys Original Irish Cream liqueur, J&B Scotch whisky, Captain Morgan rum and Tanqueray gin. In addition, premium drinks also owns the distribution rights for the José Cuervo tequila brands in the United States and other countries.
(i) Segment information by class of business
Discontinued operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
Premium | Packaged | Quick service | ||||||||||||||||||
drinks | Other | food | restaurants | Total | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover | 8,891 |
|
|
|
8,891 |
|||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
1,911 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|||||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,871 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
94 |
|
|
|
94 |
|||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
217 |
|
|
|
217 |
|||||||||||||||
Intangible asset amortisation |
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|||||||||||||||
Share of associates profits |
193 |
251 |
|
|
444 |
|||||||||||||||
Sale of businesses |
(13 |
) |
|
29 |
(26 |
) |
(10 |
) |
||||||||||||
Profit before interest, finance charges and tax |
2,051 |
210 |
29 |
(26 |
) |
2,264 |
||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure |
327 |
|
|
|
327 |
|||||||||||||||
Net assets (shareholders funds and minority interests) |
9,035 |
(4,852 |
) |
|
|
4,183 |
||||||||||||||
Total assets |
10,736 |
3,354 |
|
|
14,090 |
|||||||||||||||
92 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
Discontinued operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
Premium | Packaged | Quick service | ||||||||||||||||||
drinks | Other | food | restaurants | Total | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,802 | | | 479 | 9,281 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
1,902 | | | 53 | 1,955 | |||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit |
(168 | ) | | | | (168 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,734 | | | 53 | 1,787 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
95 | | | 2 | 97 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
213 | | | 27 | 240 | |||||||||||||||
Tangible asset write down (exceptional items) |
13 | | | | 13 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible asset amortisation |
7 | | | 2 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Share of associates profits |
188 | 269 | | | 457 | |||||||||||||||
Sale of businesses |
16 | | 171 | (1,441 | ) | (1,254 | ) | |||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) before interest,finance charges and tax |
1,937 | 228 | 171 | (1,389 | ) | 947 | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure |
315 | | | 67 | 382 | |||||||||||||||
Net assets (shareholders funds and minority interests) |
9,380 | (6,054 | ) | | | 3,326 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets |
11,243 | 3,945 | | | 15,188 | |||||||||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,539 | | 1,238 | 1,123 | 10,900 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
1,670 | | 177 | 153 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit |
(449 | ) | | | (21 | ) | (470 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,221 | | 177 | 132 | 1,530 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
73 | | 8 | 6 | 87 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
183 | | 39 | 62 | 284 | |||||||||||||||
Tangible asset write down (exceptional items) |
36 | | | | 36 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible asset amortisation |
6 | | 6 | 4 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
Share of associates profits |
158 | 112 | 13 | | 283 | |||||||||||||||
Sale of businesses |
512 | | 314 | (13 | ) | 813 | ||||||||||||||
Profit before interest, finance charges and tax |
1,892 | 112 | 504 | 96 | 2,604 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure |
330 | | 33 | 222 | 585 | |||||||||||||||
Net assets (shareholders funds and minority interests) |
9,284 | (5,162 | ) | | 1,460 | 5,582 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets |
11,473 | 4,371 | | 1,701 | 17,545 | |||||||||||||||
93 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements | |
Great | Rest of | North | Asia | Latin | Rest of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Britain | Europe | America | Pacific | America | World | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,411 | 2,511 | 2,701 | 996 | 460 | 812 | 8,891 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill amortisation |
| (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
207 | 433 | 713 | 229 | 143 | 186 | 1,911 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit |
(5 | ) | (1 | ) | (33 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (40 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
202 | 432 | 680 | 229 | 142 | 186 | 1,871 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Profit before interest, finance charges and tax (note (b)) |
212 | 431 | 639 | 227 | 141 | 193 | 1,843 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets |
1,914 | 554 | 2,605 | 628 | 46 | 241 | 5,988 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,423 | 2,515 | 3,122 | 999 | 474 | 748 | 9,281 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill amortisation |
| (1 | ) | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
204 | 442 | 762 | 235 | 138 | 174 | 1,955 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit |
(62 | ) | (27 | ) | (70 | ) | | (8 | ) | (1 | ) | (168 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
142 | 415 | 692 | 235 | 130 | 173 | 1,787 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Profit/(loss) before interest, finance charges and tax (note (b)) |
140 | 432 | (607 | ) | 233 | 131 | 175 | 504 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets |
1,922 | 564 | 2,862 | 664 | 45 | 205 | 6,262 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,552 | 2,546 | 4,471 | 978 | 634 | 719 | 10,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill amortisation |
| (1 | ) | (10 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
194 | 450 | 811 | 221 | 189 | 135 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit |
(55 | ) | 22 | (430 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | (470 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
139 | 472 | 381 | 219 | 185 | 134 | 1,530 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Profit before interest, finance charges and tax (note (b)) |
142 | 1,007 | 668 | 218 | 183 | 134 | 2,352 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets |
1,984 | 583 | 4,476 | 687 | 69 | 180 | 7,979 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 Turnover geographical area by origin
Discontinued operations | ||||||||||||||||
Premium | Packaged | Quick service | ||||||||||||||
drinks | food | restaurants | Total | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,744 | | | 2,744 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
5,473 | | | 5,473 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
924 | | | 924 | ||||||||||||
Latin America |
294 | | | 294 | ||||||||||||
Rest of World |
857 | | | 857 | ||||||||||||
10,292 | | | 10,292 | |||||||||||||
Less: Sales to group companies in other geographical areas |
(1,401 | ) | | | (1,401 | ) | ||||||||||
8,891 | | | 8,891 | |||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,833 | | 334 | 3,167 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
5,355 | | 112 | 5,467 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
907 | | 15 | 922 | ||||||||||||
Latin America |
297 | | 18 | 315 | ||||||||||||
Rest of World |
652 | | | 652 | ||||||||||||
10,044 | | 479 | 10,523 | |||||||||||||
Less: Sales to group companies in other geographical areas |
(1,242 | ) | | | (1,242 | ) | ||||||||||
8,802 | | 479 | 9,281 | |||||||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,651 | 1,019 | 775 | 4,445 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
5,277 | 102 | 269 | 5,648 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
778 | 53 | 35 | 866 | ||||||||||||
Latin America |
360 | 58 | 44 | 462 | ||||||||||||
Rest of World |
626 | 6 | | 632 | ||||||||||||
9,692 | 1,238 | 1,123 | 12,053 | |||||||||||||
Less: Sales to group companies in other geographical areas |
(1,153 | ) | | | (1,153 | ) | ||||||||||
8,539 | 1,238 | 1,123 | 10,900 | |||||||||||||
95 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
4 Operating costs | |||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||||
Premium | Packaged | Quick service | |||||||||||||||
drinks | food | restaurants | Total | ||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||
2004 |
|||||||||||||||||
Change in stocks |
(59 | ) | | | (59 | ) | |||||||||||
Raw materials and consumables |
1,609 | | | 1,609 | |||||||||||||
Excise duties United States |
421 | | | 421 | |||||||||||||
Other |
1,788 | | | 1,788 | |||||||||||||
Advertising, marketing and promotion |
1,039 | | | 1,039 | |||||||||||||
Other external charges |
1,101 | | | 1,101 | |||||||||||||
Staff costs (note 5) |
901 | | | 901 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and other amounts written off fixed assets |
224 | | | 224 | |||||||||||||
Other operating income |
(4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
7,020 | | | 7,020 | ||||||||||||||
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||
Change in stocks |
(6 | ) | | | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
Raw materials and consumables |
1,621 | | 93 | 1,714 | |||||||||||||
Excise duties United States |
459 | | | 459 | |||||||||||||
Other |
1,707 | | | 1,707 | |||||||||||||
Advertising, marketing and promotion |
1,026 | | 18 | 1,044 | |||||||||||||
Other external charges |
1,041 | | 157 | 1,198 | |||||||||||||
Staff costs (note 5) |
1,028 | | 140 | 1,168 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and other amounts written off fixed assets |
260 | | 29 | 289 | |||||||||||||
Other operating income |
(68 | ) | | (11 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||||||||
7,068 | | 426 | 7,494 | ||||||||||||||
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||
Change in stocks |
(71 | ) | (58 | ) | | (129 | ) | ||||||||||
Raw materials and consumables |
1,866 | 476 | 216 | 2,558 | |||||||||||||
Excise duties United States |
438 | | | 438 | |||||||||||||
Other |
1,681 | | | 1,681 | |||||||||||||
Advertising, marketing and promotion |
988 | 101 | 40 | 1,129 | |||||||||||||
Other external charges |
1,237 | 294 | 350 | 1,881 | |||||||||||||
Staff costs (note 5) |
953 | 205 | 340 | 1,498 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and other amounts written off fixed assets |
237 | 46 | 67 | 350 | |||||||||||||
Other operating income |
(11 | ) | (3 | ) | (22 | ) | (36 | ) | |||||||||
7,318 | 1,061 | 991 | 9,370 | ||||||||||||||
(a) Other external charges include operating lease rentals for plant and machinery of £10 million (2003 £9 million; 2002 £20 million), other operating lease rentals (mainly properties) of £57 million (2003 £72 million; 2002 £104 million), research and development expenditure of £11 million (2003 £15 million; 2002 £28 million), and maintenance and repairs of £61 million (2003 £43 million; 2002 £65 million). The analysis of raw materials and consumables and other external charges for comparative years has been restated to be on a consistent basis with the year ended 30 June 2004.
(b) Other operating income in the year ended 30 June 2003 includes £57 million for the termination of the Bass distribution rights and £11 million (2002 £21 million) from operating leases in quick service restaurants.
(c) Exceptional operating costs for continuing operations amount to £40 million (2003 £168 million; 2002 £449 million) as follows: other external charges £28 million, staff costs £8 million, and amounts written off assets £4 million (2003 costs of £138 million, £74 million, and £13 million, respectively, less other operating income of £57 million; 2002 costs of £306 million, £107 million, and £36 million, respectively). Exceptional operating costs for discontinued operations in the year ended 30 June 2002 were £21 million.
96 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
4 Operating costs continued
(d) Goodwill amortisation Operating costs for continuing operations in the year include goodwill amortisation of £2 million (2003 £2 million; 2002 £2 million). Operating costs for discontinued operations in the year ended 30 June 2003 included goodwill amortisation of £2 million (2002 £10 million).
(e) Auditor fees The fees of the principal auditor of the group, KPMG Audit Plc, and its affiliates were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||
United | Rest of | |||||||||||||||||||
Kingdom | World | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Audit fees |
1.6 | 3.1 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 3.9 | |||||||||||||||
Other audit-related fees |
2.0 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 5.1 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||
Tax fees |
1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 7.3 | 6.2 | |||||||||||||||
All other fees |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||
4.6 | 6.4 | 11.0 | 16.7 | 22.2 | ||||||||||||||||
5 Employees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full time | Part time | Total | Full time | Part time | Total | Full time | Part time | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average number of employees |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
22,548 | 1,172 | 23,720 | 23,427 | 1,134 | 24,561 | 22,841 | 1,078 | 23,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | | 8,965 | 5,429 | 14,394 | 25,734 | 12,471 | 38,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22,548 | 1,172 | 23,720 | 32,392 | 6,563 | 38,955 | 48,575 | 13,549 | 62,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks includes ex-Seagram employees from 21 December 2001. Discontinued operations include employees for the quick service restaurants business prior to 13 December 2002 and packaged food prior to 31 October 2001, reflecting the periods in which the group owned those businesses. | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Aggregate remuneration |
||||||||||||
Wages and salaries |
743 | 986 | 1,281 | |||||||||
Employers social security |
57 | 72 | 100 | |||||||||
Employers pension |
96 | 106 | 112 | |||||||||
Other post employment |
5 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||
901 | 1,168 | 1,498 | ||||||||||
Retirement benefits The group has complied fully in its primary statements with the requirements of FRS 17 Retirement benefits for the year ended 30 June 2004 and all comparatives have been restated.
97 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
5 Employees continued
(a) The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the groups deficit/surplus in the post employment plans at 30 June in the relevant year. The assumptions used to calculate the profit and loss charge/credit for the year to 30 June are based on the assumptions disclosed as at the previous 30 June. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | Ireland | United States | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of general increase in salaries |
4.4 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of increase to pensions in payment |
3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.0 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of increase to deferred pensions |
3.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.0 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medical inflation |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 8.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for plan liabilities |
5.7 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 7.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inflation |
3.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) The amounts charged to the consolidated profit and loss account and consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses for the three years ended 30 June 2004 are set out below: | ||||||||||||||||
United | United States | |||||||||||||||
Kingdom | Ireland | and other | Total | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
||||||||||||||||
Current service cost |
(66 | ) | (16 | ) | (23 | ) | (105 | ) | ||||||||
Past service cost |
(2 | ) | (4 | ) | 1 | (5 | ) | |||||||||
Gains/(losses) on settlements and curtailments |
10 | (1 | ) | | 9 | |||||||||||
Total charge to operating profit |
(58 | ) | (21 | ) | (22 | ) | (101 | ) | ||||||||
Net (cost)/credit to other finance charges (note 8 (ii)) |
(12 | ) | 5 | (11 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Charge before taxation |
(70 | ) | (16 | ) | (33 | ) | (119 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses |
||||||||||||||||
Actual return less expected return on post employment plan assets |
205 | 74 | 26 | 305 | ||||||||||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities |
10 | 4 | (3 | ) | 11 | |||||||||||
Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
136 | 31 | 17 | 184 | ||||||||||||
Actuarial gain recognisable in the reconciliation of the surplus |
351 | 109 | 40 | 500 | ||||||||||||
Minorities share of actuarial gain |
| | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Changes in the recognisable surplus of the plans with a surplus restriction |
| | (23 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| 3 | 13 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Total actuarial gain recognisable in the consolidated statement of
total recognised gains and losses |
351 | 112 | 29 | 492 | ||||||||||||
98 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
5 Employees continued | ||||||||||||||||
United | United States | |||||||||||||||
Kingdom | Ireland | and other | Total | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
||||||||||||||||
Current service cost |
(50 | ) | (16 | ) | (20 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||||||
Past service cost |
(1 | ) | (21 | ) | (2 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Total charge to operating profit |
(51 | ) | (37 | ) | (22 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||||||
Net credit/(cost) to other finance income (note 8 (ii)) |
20 | 22 | (6 | ) | 36 | |||||||||||
Exceptional items |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on settlement/curtailment arising on disposal of businesses |
6 | | 32 | 38 | ||||||||||||
(Charge)/credit before taxation |
(25 | ) | (15 | ) | 4 | (36 | ) | |||||||||
Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses |
||||||||||||||||
Actual return less expected return on post employment plan assets |
(362 | ) | (203 | ) | (16 | ) | (581 | ) | ||||||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities |
6 | (17 | ) | (4 | ) | (15 | ) | |||||||||
Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
(307 | ) | (23 | ) | (48 | ) | (378 | ) | ||||||||
Actuarial loss recognisable in the reconciliation of the surplus |
(663 | ) | (243 | ) | (68 | ) | (974 | ) | ||||||||
Minorities share of actuarial loss |
| | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Changes in the recognisable surplus of the plans with a surplus restriction |
| | 13 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (8 | ) | 3 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Total actuarial loss recognisable in the consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses |
(663 | ) | (251 | ) | (51 | ) | (965 | ) | ||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
||||||||||||||||
Current service cost |
(45 | ) | (15 | ) | (31 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||||||
Past service cost |
(3 | ) | | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||
Exceptional item past service cost |
| (17 | ) | | (17 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on settlement/curtailment |
| | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total charge to operating profit |
(48 | ) | (32 | ) | (37 | ) | (117 | ) | ||||||||
Net credit/(cost) to other finance income (note 8 (ii)) |
66 | 41 | (3 | ) | 104 | |||||||||||
Exceptional items |
||||||||||||||||
Loss on settlement/curtailment arising on disposal of businesses |
| | (16 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Credit/(charge) before taxation |
18 | 9 | (56 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses |
||||||||||||||||
Actual return less expected return on post employment plan assets |
(682 | ) | (239 | ) | (209 | ) | (1,130 | ) | ||||||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities |
4 | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
(224 | ) | (35 | ) | (13 | ) | (272 | ) | ||||||||
Actuarial loss recognisable in the reconciliation of the surplus |
(902 | ) | (280 | ) | (224 | ) | (1,406 | ) | ||||||||
Minoritiesshare of actuarial loss |
| | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Changes in the recognisable surplus of the plans with a surplus restriction |
| | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| 17 | (1 | ) | 16 | |||||||||||
Total actuarial loss recognisable in the consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses |
(902 | ) | (263 | ) | (212 | ) | (1,377 | ) | ||||||||
99 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
5 Employees continued
(c) History of experience losses: | ||||||||||||||||
United | United States | |||||||||||||||
Kingdom | Ireland | and other | Total | |||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Difference between the expected and actual return on plan assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
205 | 74 | 26 | 305 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of plan assets |
8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | ||||||||||||
Experience gains and losses on plan liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
10 | 4 | (3 | ) | 11 | |||||||||||
Percentage of the present value of plan liabilities |
| | (1% | ) | | |||||||||||
Total amount recognised in statement of total recognised gains and losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
351 | 112 | 29 | 492 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of the present value of plan liabilities |
11% | 11% | 7% | 10% | ||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||
Difference between the expected and actual return on plan assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
(362 | ) | (203 | ) | (16 | ) | (581 | ) | ||||||||
Percentage of plan assets |
(16% | ) | (23% | ) | (5% | ) | (17% | ) | ||||||||
Experience gains and losses on plan liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
6 | (17 | ) | (4 | ) | (15 | ) | |||||||||
Percentage of the present value of plan liabilities |
| (2% | ) | (1% | ) | | ||||||||||
Total amount recognised in statement of total recognised gains and losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
(663 | ) | (251 | ) | (51 | ) | (965 | ) | ||||||||
Percentage of the present value of plan liabilities |
(20% | ) | (24% | ) | (11% | ) | (20% | ) | ||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||
Difference between the expected and actual return on plan assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
(682 | ) | (239 | ) | (209 | ) | (1,130 | ) | ||||||||
Percentage of plan assets |
(27% | ) | (24% | ) | (21% | )* | (25% | )* | ||||||||
Experience gains and losses on plan liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
4 | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Percentage of the present value of plan liabilities |
| (1% | ) | | | |||||||||||
Total amount recognised in statement of total recognised gains and losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Amount (£ million) |
(902 | ) | (263 | ) | (212 | ) | (1,377 | ) | ||||||||
Percentage of the present value of plan liabilities |
(30% | ) | (30% | ) | (18% | )* | (29% | )* | ||||||||
The percentages in the table above are expressed in relation to the plan assets and liabilities at the closing balance sheet date for the appropriate year.
*During the year ended 30 June 2002, the group disposed of Pillsbury and its associated post employment plans. These plans were for employees based in the United States and the percentages in the table above exclude these plans.
100 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
5 Employees continued
(d) The expected long term rates of return and market values of the assets of the significant defined benefit post employment plans were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | Ireland | United States and other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected | Expected | Expected | Expected | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
long term | long term | long term | long term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
rates of | Market | rates of | Market | rates of | Market | rates of | Market | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
return | value | return | value | return | value | return | value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
% | £ million | % | £ million | % | £ million | % | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market value of assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equities |
8.2 | 1,978 | 7.8 | 655 | 8.8 | 194 | 8.2 | 2,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
5.5 | 105 | 4.5 | 138 | 6.1 | 76 | 5.2 | 319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
7.2 | 343 | 6.7 | 108 | 12.1 | 9 | 7.2 | 460 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
4.5 | 75 | 2.0 | 13 | 4.4 | 36 | 4.2 | 124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,501 | 914 | 315 | 3,730 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present value of post employment plan liabilities |
(3,318 | ) | (987 | ) | (444 | ) | (4,749 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deficit in the post employment plans |
(817 | ) | (73 | ) | (129 | ) | (1,019 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surplus restriction |
| | (25 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post employment liabilities before deferred tax |
(817 | ) | (73 | ) | (154 | ) | (1,044 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related deferred tax assets |
245 | 7 | 42 | 294 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net post employment liabilities |
(572 | ) | (66 | ) | (112 | ) | (750 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market value of assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equities |
7.5 | 1,928 | 7.2 | 671 | 7.9 | 165 | 7.5 | 2,764 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
5.2 | 1 | 4.2 | 80 | 5.4 | 121 | 4.9 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
6.5 | 316 | 6.2 | 104 | 12.2 | 7 | 6.5 | 427 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
3.5 | 22 | 4.2 | 9 | 3.7 | 11 | 3.7 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,267 | 864 | 304 | 3,435 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present value of post employment plan liabilities |
(3,370 | ) | (1,035 | ) | (474 | ) | (4,879 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deficit in the post employment plans |
(1,103 | ) | (171 | ) | (170 | ) | (1,444 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surplus restriction |
| | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post employment liabilities before deferred tax |
(1,103 | ) | (171 | ) | (173 | ) | (1,447 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related deferred tax assets |
| 17 | 61 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net post employment liabilities |
(1,103 | ) | (154 | ) | (112 | ) | (1,369 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
101 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
5 Employees continued | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | Ireland | United States and other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected | Expected | Expected | Expected | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
long term | long term | long term | long term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
rates of | Market | rates of | Market | rates of | Market | rates of | Market | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
return | value | return | value | return | value | return | value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
% | £ million | % | £ million | % | £ million | % | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market value of assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equities |
8.0 | 2,142 | 8.3 | 796 | 8.9 | 204 | 8.1 | 3,142 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
| | 5.3 | 67 | 6.0 | 145 | 5.8 | 212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property |
7.0 | 355 | 7.3 | 100 | 12.3 | 8 | 7.2 | 463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
5.0 | 74 | 5.3 | 13 | 5.5 | 19 | 5.1 | 106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,571 | 976 | 376 | 3,923 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Present value of post employment plan liabilities |
(2,989 | ) | (883 | ) | (499 | ) | (4,371 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Deficit)/surplus in the post employment plans |
(418 | ) | 93 | (123 | ) | (448 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surplus restriction |
| | (17 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post employment (liabilities)/assets before deferred tax |
(418 | ) | 93 | (140 | ) | (465 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related deferred tax assets/(liabilities) |
125 | (9 | ) | 52 | 168 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net post employment (liabilities)/assets |
(293 | ) | 84 | (88 | ) | (297 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Included in the post employment deficit before tax of £1,019 million (2003 £1,444 million; 2002 £448 million) is £72 million (2003 £82 million; 2002 £77 million) in respect of post employment medical benefit liabilities and £42 million (2003 £44 million; 2002 £42 million) in respect of other non pension post employment liabilities.
The percentages of investments at market value held by the pension plans at 30 June 2004 and 30 June 2003, analysed by category, were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||
United | United States | |||||||||||||||
Kingdom | Ireland | and other | Total | |||||||||||||
% | % | % | % | |||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Equities |
79 | 72 | 62 | 76 | ||||||||||||
Bonds |
4 | 15 | 24 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Property |
14 | 12 | 3 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Other |
3 | 1 | 11 | 3 | ||||||||||||
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||
2003 |
||||||||||||||||
Equities |
85 | 78 | 54 | 80 | ||||||||||||
Bonds |
| 9 | 40 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Property |
14 | 12 | 2 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||
102 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
5 Employees continued
(e) Movement in surplus/(deficit) during the three years ended 30 June 2004: | ||||||||||||||||
United | United States | |||||||||||||||
Kingdom | Ireland | and other | Total | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Surplus in plans at 30 June 2001 |
464 | 346 | 135 | 945 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| 17 | (3 | ) | 14 | |||||||||||
Current service cost |
(45 | ) | (15 | ) | (31 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||||||
Past service cost |
(3 | ) | (17 | ) | (4 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Curtailment/settlement cost |
| | (18 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||
Net credit/(cost) to other finance income |
66 | 41 | (3 | ) | 104 | |||||||||||
Cash contributions |
2 | 1 | 25 | 28 | ||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(902 | ) | (280 | ) | (224 | ) | (1,406 | ) | ||||||||
(Deficit)/surplus in plans at 30 June 2002 |
(418 | ) | 93 | (123 | ) | (448 | ) | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (8 | ) | 1 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Current service cost |
(50 | ) | (16 | ) | (20 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||||||
Past service cost |
(1 | ) | (21 | ) | (2 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Curtailment/settlement cost |
6 | | 32 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Net credit/(cost) to other finance income |
20 | 22 | (6 | ) | 36 | |||||||||||
Cash contributions |
3 | 2 | 16 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(663 | ) | (243 | ) | (68 | ) | (974 | ) | ||||||||
Deficit in plans at 30 June 2003 |
(1,103 | ) | (171 | ) | (170 | ) | (1,444 | ) | ||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| 3 | 12 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Current service cost |
(66 | ) | (16 | ) | (23 | ) | (105 | ) | ||||||||
Past service cost |
(2 | ) | (4 | ) | 1 | (5 | ) | |||||||||
Curtailment/settlement cost |
10 | (1 | ) | | 9 | |||||||||||
Net credit/(cost) to other finance income |
(12 | ) | 5 | (11 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Cash contributions |
5 | 2 | 22 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Actuarial gain |
351 | 109 | 40 | 500 | ||||||||||||
Deficit in plans at 30 June 2004 |
(817 | ) | (73 | ) | (129 | ) | (1,019 | ) | ||||||||
(f) The future benefits expected to be paid by the principal post employment plans in the United Kingdom, Ireland, United States and Canada are as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments due in the year ending 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 20102014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | | pension benefits | 147 | 152 | 156 | 161 | 166 | 906 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| other | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland pension benefits |
47 | 48 | 48 | 49 | 49 | 256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
United States and Canada | | pension benefits | 28 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| other | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
228 | 224 | 229 | 235 | 240 | 1,295 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
103 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
6 Associates | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Share of turnover |
1,950 | 1,988 | 1,745 | |||||||||
Share of operating costs |
(1,499 | ) | (1,510 | ) | (1,421 | ) | ||||||
Share of operating profit before exceptional items |
451 | 478 | 324 | |||||||||
Share of exceptional items |
(13 | ) | (21 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||
Share of operating profit |
438 | 457 | 283 | |||||||||
Share of disposal of fixed assets |
6 | | | |||||||||
Share of interest payable (net) |
(57 | ) | (72 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||
Share of taxation |
(131 | ) | (138 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||
Equity minority interests |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Dividends received by the group |
(224 | ) | (60 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||
Share of profits retained by associates |
31 | 186 | 44 | |||||||||
Summarised financial information for the principal associates is presented below:
(a) General Mills, Inc General Mills prepares its financial statements in US dollars and under US GAAP to the end of May each year. Summary information for General Mills, as presented in its 2004 Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the 53 weeks ended 30 May 2004 and 52 weeks ended 25 May 2003, translated at £1 = $1.74 (2003 £1= $1.59), is set out below. | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
$ million | £ million | $ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
11,070 | 6,362 | 10,506 | 6,608 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
4,486 | 2,578 | 4,397 | 2,765 | ||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,055 | 606 | 917 | 577 | ||||||||||||
(b) Moët Hennessy The operations of Moët Hennessy in France and the United
States were conducted, during the year ended 30 June 2004, through a
partnership in which Diageo has a 34% interest. As a partner, Diageo pays any
tax due on the results of the partnership to the tax authorities. Moët Hennessy prepares its financial statements in euros to 31 December each year. Summary information for Moët Hennessy for the three years ended 30 June 2004, in each year aggregating the results for the six month period ended 31 December with that of the following six months ended 30 June, translated at £1 = 11.45 (2003 £1 = 11.52; 2002 £1 = 11.61), is set out below: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
million | £ million | million | £ million | million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,217 | 1,529 | 2,131 | 1,402 | 2,285 | 1,419 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
1,463 | 1,009 | 1,445 | 951 | 1,441 | 895 | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
466 | 321 | 450 | 296 | 309 | 192 | ||||||||||||||||||
(c) Investment in other associates Summarised financial information, in aggregate, is presented below for all of the groups investments in associates other than General Mills and Moët Hennessy: | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Turnover |
402 | 335 | 644 | |||||||||
Operating profit |
63 | 50 | 74 | |||||||||
Profit for the year |
51 | 37 | 36 | |||||||||
104 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
6 Associates continued
(d) Other information Group turnover includes sales to associates of £11 million (2003 £15 million; 2002 £20 million) and operating costs include purchases from associates of £19 million (2003 £18 million; 2002 £95 million).
7 Exceptional items In the three years ended 30 June 2004 the following exceptional items were incurred: |
||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Operating items (note (i)) |
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (470 | ) | ||||||
Share of
associates profits (note (ii)) |
(13 | ) | (21 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||
Disposal of fixed assets (note (iii)) |
(35 | ) | (43 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||
Sale of businesses (note (iv)) |
(10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | 813 | |||||||
(98 | ) | (1,486 | ) | 280 | ||||||||
(i) Operating items |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
||||||||||||
Seagram integration (a) |
(40 | ) | (177 | ) | (164 | ) | ||||||
Guinness UDV integration (b) |
| (48 | ) | (48 | ) | |||||||
Bass distribution rights (c) |
| 57 | | |||||||||
José Cuervo settlement (d) |
| | (220 | ) | ||||||||
Other restructuring (e) |
| | (17 | ) | ||||||||
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (449 | ) | |||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||
Burger King (f) |
| | (21 | ) | ||||||||
| | (21 | ) | |||||||||
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (470 | ) | |||||||
An analysis of the movement in the Seagram integration liability is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charged to | Charged to | Charged to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
profit and | profit and | profit and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
loss account | loss account | loss account | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in year | in year | in year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ended | Cash | Liability at | ended | Cash | Liability at | ended | Cash | Liability at | ||||||||||||||||||||
30 June 2002 | payments | 30 June 2002 | 30 June 2003 | payments | 30 June 2003 | 30 June 2004 | payments | 30 June 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||
Employee related |
72 | (33 | ) | 39 | 43 | (56 | ) | 26 | 8 | (26 | ) | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Distributor rationalisation |
14 | (13 | ) | 1 | 57 | (37 | ) | 21 | 8 | (28 | ) | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Lease terminations |
7 | (2 | ) | 5 | 6 | (3 | ) | 8 | | (4 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
Legal and professional |
10 | (4 | ) | 6 | 7 | (7 | ) | 6 | 6 | (2 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
25 | (18 | ) | 7 | 38 | (40 | ) | 5 | 14 | (14 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
128 | (70 | ) | 58 | 151 | (143 | ) | 66 | 36 | (74 | ) | 28 | |||||||||||||||||
Asset write downs |
36 | 26 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
164 | 177 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
105 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
7 Exceptional items continued
(b) In the four years ended 30 June 2004, costs were incurred on the integration of the Guinness UDV spirits, wine and beer businesses to create premium drinks. As a result of the charges to exceptional items, it was anticipated that approximately 750 jobs would be lost of which approximately 700 had been terminated by 30 June 2004.
An analysis of the movement in the Guinness UDV integration liability is as follows: | ||||||||||||
Liability at | Cash | Liability at | ||||||||||
30 June 2003 | payments | 30 June 2004 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Employee related |
11 | (7 | ) | 4 | ||||||||
Legal and professional |
6 | (4 | ) | 2 | ||||||||
Other |
8 | (7 | ) | 1 | ||||||||
25 | (18 | ) | 7 | |||||||||
(d) On 5 February 2002, Diageo and José Cuervo SA (José Cuervo) agreed to terminate their litigation in respect of a change of control issue which José Cuervo claimed arose as a result of the merger of GrandMet and Guinness, and new arrangements were formalised for the distribution rights for the José Cuervo brands in the United States which now extend to 2013. The settlement in favour of José Cuervo involved the return of the groups 45% interest in José Cuervo and a net cash payment of £85 million. The exceptional charge in the year ended 30 June 2002 of £220 million (before tax) comprised the write off of the groups investment in José Cuervo of £115 million, related goodwill previously written off to reserves of £20 million and the net cash payment to José Cuervo.
(e) In the year ended 30 June 2002, costs of £17 million were incurred on the reorganisation of beer production facilities in Ireland. These costs were in respect of a provision for additional pension benefits for certain employees.
(f) During the year ended 30 June 2002, in anticipation of the disposal of the Burger King business, the franchisee loan financing arrangements were restructured. This resulted in an exceptional charge for credit enhancement, performance and service fees of £21 million.
(ii) Share of associates profits The groups share of exceptional items in respect of associates comprises restructuring costs of £7 million (2003 £18 million; 2002 £31 million) incurred by General Mills following the acquisition of the Pillsbury business and £6 million (2003 £3 million; 2002 £10 million) in respect of Moët Hennessy.
(iii) Disposal of fixed assets Disposal of fixed assets includes £41 million (2003 £41 million; 2002 £nil) in respect of the dilution of the investment in General Mills, following the issue of additional shares by General Mills, a £6 million share of a gain on the disposal of tangible assets from associates (2003 and 2002 £nil) and, in 2003, a £2 million loss on the disposal of tangible fixed assets (2002 £22 million loss).
(iv) Sale of businesses | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Continuing operations |
||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
(13 | ) | 16 | 512 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||
Burger King (a) |
(26 | ) | (1,441 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||
Pillsbury (b) |
29 | 171 | 314 | |||||||||
3 | (1,270 | ) | 301 | |||||||||
(Loss)/gain on sale of businesses |
(10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | 813 | |||||||
106 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
7 Exceptional items continued
(iv) Sale of businesses continued
(c) The net loss from the sale of businesses was after charging goodwill previously written off, attributable to the businesses sold, of £13 million (2003 £682 million; 2002 £1,748 million) of which in 2003, £673 million arose on the disposal of Burger King (2002 £1,671 million on the disposal of Pillsbury).
8 Finance charges | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
(i) Interest payable (net) |
||||||||||||
On bank loans and overdrafts |
(10 | ) | (21 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||
On all other borrowings |
(359 | ) | (495 | ) | (499 | ) | ||||||
Share of net interest payable by associates |
(57 | ) | (72 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||
(426 | ) | (588 | ) | (579 | ) | |||||||
Less: Interest receivable |
155 | 243 | 180 | |||||||||
(271 | ) | (345 | ) | (399 | ) | |||||||
(ii) Other finance (charges)/income |
||||||||||||
Interest on post employment plan liabilities |
(254 | ) | (261 | ) | (279 | ) | ||||||
Expected return on post employment plan assets |
236 | 297 | 383 | |||||||||
Net finance (charges)/income in respect of post employment plans |
(18 | ) | 36 | 104 | ||||||||
Unwinding of discounts on debtors and provisions |
(6 | ) | (6 | ) | | |||||||
(24 | ) | 30 | 104 | |||||||||
9 Taxation
(i) Analysis of taxation charge in the year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | Before | |||||||||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | exceptional | Exceptional | |||||||||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | items | items | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||
Current tax |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK corporation
tax payable at 30% (2003 30%) |
45 | 1 | 46 | 21 | (11 | ) | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
Less: Double taxation relief |
(18 | ) | | (18 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
27 | 1 | 28 | 21 | (11 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Overseas corporate taxation |
283 | (16 | ) | 267 | 330 | (32 | ) | 298 | ||||||||||||||||
Share of taxes on associatesprofits |
134 | (3 | ) | 131 | 145 | (7 | ) | 138 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
(43 | ) | (16 | ) | (59 | ) | 17 | 4 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
Total current tax |
401 | (34 | ) | 367 | 513 | (46 | ) | 467 | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax (note 21) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
(12 | ) | | (12 | ) | (23 | ) | (4 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||
Overseas |
73 | | 73 | 28 | (8 | ) | 20 | |||||||||||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
55 | 4 | 59 | 25 | 6 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deferred tax |
116 | 4 | 120 | 30 | (6 | ) | 24 | |||||||||||||||||
Taxation on profit on ordinary activities |
517 | (30 | ) | 487 | 543 | (52 | ) | 491 | ||||||||||||||||
107 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
9 Taxation continued
(i) Analysis of taxation charge in the year continued | ||||||||||||
2002 | ||||||||||||
Before | ||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | |||||||||||
items | items | Total | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Current tax |
||||||||||||
UK corporation tax payable at 30% |
26 | 2 | 28 | |||||||||
Less: Double taxation relief |
(7 | ) | | (7 | ) | |||||||
19 | 2 | 21 | ||||||||||
Overseas corporate taxation |
408 | (10 | ) | 398 | ||||||||
Share of taxes on associates profits |
92 | (5 | ) | 87 | ||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | |||||||
Total current tax |
513 | (13 | ) | 500 | ||||||||
Deferred tax (note 21) |
||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
(48 | ) | | (48 | ) | |||||||
Overseas |
(39 | ) | 134 | 95 | ||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
86 | | 86 | |||||||||
Total deferred tax |
(1 | ) | 134 | 133 | ||||||||
Taxation on profit on ordinary activities |
512 | 121 | 633 | |||||||||
(ii) Factors affecting tax charge for the year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | Before | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | exceptional | Exceptional | |||||||||||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | items | items | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||||
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation |
2,067 | (98 | ) | 1,969 | 2,118 | (1,486 | ) | 632 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notional charge at UK corporation tax rate of 30% |
620 | (29 | ) | 591 | 635 | (446 | ) | 189 | ||||||||||||||||||
Differences in effective overseas tax rates |
(45 | ) | (5 | ) | (50 | ) | (18 | ) | (12 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Differences in effective tax rates on associates profits |
16 | (3 | ) | 13 | 6 | | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation (less than)/in excess of capital allowances |
(14 | ) | | (14 | ) | 27 | | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible amortisation |
(165 | ) | | (165 | ) | (130 | ) | | (130 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Timing differences |
11 | | 11 | (16 | ) | 9 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Permanent differences | | items not chargeable | (41 | ) | | (41 | ) | (54 | ) | | (54 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| items not deductible | 62 | 19 | 81 | 46 | 399 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
(43 | ) | (16 | ) | (59 | ) | 17 | 4 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Current ordinary tax charge for the year |
401 | (34 | ) | 367 | 513 | (46 | ) | 467 | ||||||||||||||||||
Differences in effective overseas tax rates |
15 | | 15 | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation less than /(in excess of) capital allowances |
14 | | 14 | (27 | ) | | (27 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible amortisation |
43 | | 43 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Timing differences |
(11 | ) | | (11 | ) | 32 | (9 | ) | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
55 | 4 | 59 | 25 | 6 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax charge for the year |
517 | (30 | ) | 487 | 543 | (52 | ) | 491 | ||||||||||||||||||
108 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
9 Taxation continued | |||||||||||||
(ii) Factors affecting tax charge for the year continued | |||||||||||||
2002 | |||||||||||||
Before | |||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | ||||||||||||
items | items | Total | |||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation |
2,029 | 280 | 2,309 | ||||||||||
Notional charge at UK corporation tax rate of 30% |
609 | 84 | 693 | ||||||||||
Differences in effective overseas tax rates |
2 | 19 | 21 | ||||||||||
Differences in effective tax rates on associatesprofits |
14 | (7 | ) | 7 | |||||||||
Depreciation in excess of capital allowances |
6 | | 6 | ||||||||||
Intangible amortisation |
(178 | ) | | (178 | ) | ||||||||
Timing differences |
77 | (134 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||
Permanent
differences items not chargeable |
(57 | ) | | (57 | ) | ||||||||
items not deductible |
46 | 25 | 71 | ||||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Current ordinary tax charge for the year |
513 | (13 | ) | 500 | |||||||||
Differences in effective overseas tax rates |
(8 | ) | | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation in excess of capital allowances |
(4 | ) | | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Intangible amortisation |
1 | | 1 | ||||||||||
Timing differences |
(76 | ) | 134 | 58 | |||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior periods |
86 | | 86 | ||||||||||
Tax charge for the year |
512 | 121 | 633 | ||||||||||
(iii) Factors that may affect future tax charges Deferred tax assets where realisation does not meet the more likely than not criterion, have not been recognised.
10 Dividends | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Interim |
||||||||||||
10.6 pence per
share (2003 9.9 pence; 2002 9.3 pence) |
320 | 304 | 309 | |||||||||
Proposed final |
||||||||||||
17.0 pence per
share (2003 15.7 pence; 2002 14.5 pence) |
513 | 482 | 458 | |||||||||
833 | 786 | 767 | ||||||||||
11 Earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings | Shares | Earnings | Shares | Earnings | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | million | £ million | million | £ million | million | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic (profit/weighted average number of shares) |
1,392 | 3,030 | 50 | 3,113 | 1,589 | 3,316 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments
potential employee share issues |
| 1 | | 1 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
1,392 | 3,031 | 50 | 3,114 | 1,589 | 3,318 | ||||||||||||||||||
109 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
12 Fixed assets intangible assets | ||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||
Brands | Goodwill | intangibles | Total | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
4,210 | 40 | 60 | 4,310 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(265 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (271 | ) | ||||||||
Additions |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Disposals |
| (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
3,945 | 35 | 61 | 4,041 | ||||||||||||
Amortisation |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
| 7 | 15 | 22 | ||||||||||||
Provided during the year |
| 2 | 5 | 7 | ||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
| 9 | 20 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
3,945 | 26 | 41 | 4,012 | ||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
4,210 | 33 | 45 | 4,288 | ||||||||||||
13 Fixed assets tangible assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets in | ||||||||||||||||||||
Land and | Plant and | Fixtures and | course of | |||||||||||||||||
buildings | machinery | fittings | construction | Total | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Cost or valuation |
||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
904 | 1,687 | 198 | 162 | 2,951 | |||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(34 | ) | (75 | ) | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||||||
Additions |
16 | 142 | 37 | 122 | 317 | |||||||||||||||
Disposals |
(17 | ) | (138 | ) | (13 | ) | | (168 | ) | |||||||||||
Transfers |
38 | 29 | 36 | (103 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
907 | 1,645 | 249 | 174 | 2,975 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
130 | 741 | 106 | | 977 | |||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(6 | ) | (37 | ) | (5 | ) | | (48 | ) | |||||||||||
Provided during the year |
28 | 143 | 46 | | 217 | |||||||||||||||
Disposals |
(17 | ) | (127 | ) | (3 | ) | | (147 | ) | |||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
135 | 720 | 144 | | 999 | |||||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
772 | 925 | 105 | 174 | 1,976 | |||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
774 | 946 | 92 | 162 | 1,974 | |||||||||||||||
110 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
13 Fixed assets tangible assets continued
(a) The net book value of land and buildings comprises freeholds of £754 million (2003 £749 million) and long leaseholds of £18 million (2003 £25 million). Depreciation was not charged on £199 million (2003 £207 million) of land.
(b) Included in the total net book value of tangible assets is £1 million (2003 £1 million) in respect of assets held under finance leases; depreciation for the year on these assets was £nil (2003 £nil).
(c) The total at cost or valuation for land and buildings comprises: £478 million (2003 £512 million) at 1992 professional valuation; £105 million (2003 £109 million) at 1988 professional valuation; and £324 million (2003 £283 million) at cost. The professional valuations were made on an open market existing use basis except for specialised properties which were valued on a depreciated replacement cost basis.
(d) The historical cost of land and buildings, i.e. the original cost to the group of all land and buildings, was £794 million (2003 £784 million) and the related accumulated depreciation was £135 million (2003 £130 million).
14 Fixed assets investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in associates | Loans and other investments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General | Moët | Other | General | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mills | Hennessy | associates | Total | Mills | investments | Loans | Total | investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 as previously reported |
1,743 | 1,170 | 122 | 3,035 | | 24 | 180 | 204 | 3,239 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior year adjustment (see note 1) |
(119 | ) | | | (119 | ) | | | | | (119 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 as restated |
1,624 | 1,170 | 122 | 2,916 | | 24 | 180 | 204 | 3,120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(150 | ) | (44 | ) | (10 | ) | (204 | ) | | | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | (217 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
| | 11 | 11 | | 3 | 23 | 26 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers |
(1,587 | ) | | | (1,587 | ) | 1,587 | | | 1,587 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of retained profits |
76 | 16 | 4 | 96 | | | | | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposals and other |
37 | | (5 | ) | 32 | | (4 | ) | (12 | ) | (16 | ) | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
| 1,142 | 122 | 1,264 | 1,587 | 23 | 178 | 1,788 | 3,052 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 and 30 June 2004 |
| 1 | | 1 | | 10 | 6 | 16 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
| 1,141 | 122 | 1,263 | 1,587 | 13 | 172 | 1,772 | 3,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 as restated |
1,624 | 1,169 | 122 | 2,915 | | 14 | 174 | 188 | 3,103 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
111 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
14 Fixed assets investments continued
(a) General Mills, Inc Included in investments is the groups holding of 79 million shares in General Mills. General Mills prepares its financial statements in US dollars and under US GAAP to the end of May each year. A summary of General Mills consolidated balance sheet as at 30 May 2004, as presented in its Form 10-K filed with the SEC, translated at £1 = $1.82 (2003 £1 = $1.65), is set out below: | ||||||||||||||||
30 May 2004 | 25 May 2003 | |||||||||||||||
$ million | £ million | $ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Fixed assets |
||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
10,325 | 5,673 | 10,272 | 6,225 | ||||||||||||
Other fixed assets |
4,908 | 2,697 | 4,776 | 2,895 | ||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Cash |
751 | 412 | 703 | 426 | ||||||||||||
Other current assets |
2,464 | 1,354 | 2,476 | 1,501 | ||||||||||||
Creditors due within one year |
||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
(816 | ) | (448 | ) | (1,341 | ) | (813 | ) | ||||||||
Other creditors |
(1,941 | ) | (1,066 | ) | (2,103 | ) | (1,275 | ) | ||||||||
Creditors due after one year |
||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
(7,410 | ) | (4,071 | ) | (7,516 | ) | (4,555 | ) | ||||||||
Other creditors |
(2,734 | ) | (1,503 | ) | (2,792 | ) | (1,692 | ) | ||||||||
Net assets before minority interests |
5,547 | 3,048 | 4,475 | 2,712 | ||||||||||||
Minority interests |
(299 | ) | (164 | ) | (300 | ) | (182 | ) | ||||||||
Net assets after minority interests |
5,248 | 2,884 | 4,175 | 2,530 | ||||||||||||
(b) Moët Hennessy Moët Hennessy prepares its financial statements in euros to 31 December each year. A summary of Moët Hennessys consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June 2004 and 30 June 2003, translated at £1 = 1.49 (2003 £1 = 1.44), is set out below: | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
million | £ million | million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Fixed assets |
1,442 | 968 | 1,350 | 937 | ||||||||||||
Current assets |
3,971 | 2,665 | 4,105 | 2,851 | ||||||||||||
Creditors due within one year |
(1,348 | ) | (905 | ) | (1,361 | ) | (945 | ) | ||||||||
Creditors due after one year |
(313 | ) | (210 | ) | (367 | ) | (255 | ) | ||||||||
Net assets before minority interests |
3,752 | 2,518 | 3,727 | 2,588 | ||||||||||||
Minority interests |
(19 | ) | (13 | ) | (28 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Net assets after minority interests |
3,733 | 2,505 | 3,699 | 2,569 | ||||||||||||
112 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
14 Fixed assets investments continued
(c) Investment in other associates The table below analyses and aggregates the groups share of the net assets of associates other than Moët Hennessy and General Mills: | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Fixed assets |
86 | 85 | ||||||
Current assets |
85 | 73 | ||||||
Creditors due within one year |
(35 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Creditors due after one year |
(14 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Net assets |
122 | 122 | ||||||
(d) Loans Included within loans at 30 June 2004 is £128 million ($233 million) (2003 £129 million ($213 million)) receivable in respect of the disposal of Burger King. The loan earns interest of 9% which, except in certain circumstances, is rolled up until maturity of the loan in 2013.
15 Stocks | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Raw materials and consumables |
189 | 200 | ||||||
Work in progress |
11 | 14 | ||||||
Maturing stocks |
1,499 | 1,466 | ||||||
Finished goods and goods for resale |
477 | 570 | ||||||
2,176 | 2,250 | |||||||
Stocks are disclosed net of provisions for obsolescence, an analysis of which is as follows: | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of the year |
50 | 51 | 56 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(4 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Profit and loss account movements |
10 | 4 | 17 | |||||||||
Acquisitions |
| 13 | 1 | |||||||||
Disposals |
| | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Written off |
(7 | ) | (17 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||
49 | 50 | 51 | ||||||||||
16 Debtors | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Due within | Due after | Due within | Due after | |||||||||||||
one year | one year | one year | one year | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Trade debtors |
1,134 | 14 | 1,295 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Amounts owed by associates |
2 | | 2 | | ||||||||||||
Other debtors |
145 | 118 | 619 | 101 | ||||||||||||
Prepayments and accrued income |
115 | 12 | 128 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Deferred taxation (note 21) |
177 | 5 | 110 | 100 | ||||||||||||
ACT recoverable |
| 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||
1,573 | 151 | 2,154 | 228 | |||||||||||||
113 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
16 Debtors continued | ||||||||||||
Debtors are disclosed net of provisions for bad and doubtful debts, an analysis of which is as follows: |
||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of the year |
163 | 120 | 100 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(10 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
Profit and loss account movements |
(3 | ) | 80 | 15 | ||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | 20 | |||||||||
Disposals |
(45 | ) | (30 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||
Written off |
(11 | ) | (1 | ) | | |||||||
94 | 163 | 120 | ||||||||||
17 Net borrowings | ||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June | Non-cash | Exchange | At 30 June | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | Cash flow | items | adjustments | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Analysis of net borrowings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and overdrafts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
1,191 | 59 | | (83 | ) | 1,167 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Bank deposits reclassified to liquid resources |
(730 | ) | (98 | ) | | 68 | (760 | ) | ||||||||||||
Overdrafts |
(83 | ) | 4 | | 5 | (74 | ) | |||||||||||||
378 | (35 | ) | | (10 | ) | 333 | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings excluding overdrafts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings due within one year |
(3,480 | ) | 1,949 | (600 | ) | 204 | (1,927 | ) | ||||||||||||
Borrowings due after one year |
(2,981 | ) | (1,190 | ) | 619 | 236 | (3,316 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps |
484 | (513 | ) | 26 | 9 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Net obligations under finance leases |
(1 | ) | 1 | | | | ||||||||||||||
(5,978 | ) | 247 | 45 | 449 | (5,237 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Liquid resources |
||||||||||||||||||||
Bank deposits reclassified from cash at bank and liquid resources |
730 | 98 | | (68 | ) | 760 | ||||||||||||||
Net borrowings |
(4,870 | ) | 310 | 45 | 371 | (4,144 | ) | |||||||||||||
At 30 June | Non-cash | Exchange | At 30 June | |||||||||||||||||
2002 | Cash flow | items | adjustments | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and overdrafts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
1,596 | (336 | ) | | (69 | ) | 1,191 | |||||||||||||
Less: Bank deposits reclassified to liquid resources |
(1,038 | ) | 256 | | 52 | (730 | ) | |||||||||||||
Overdrafts |
(295 | ) | 202 | | 10 | (83 | ) | |||||||||||||
263 | 122 | | (7 | ) | 378 | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings excluding overdrafts |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings due within one year |
(3,423 | ) | 1,816 | (2,151 | ) | 278 | (3,480 | ) | ||||||||||||
Borrowings due after one year |
(3,711 | ) | (1,567 | ) | 2,124 | 173 | (2,981 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps |
365 | 221 | 64 | (166 | ) | 484 | ||||||||||||||
Net obligations under finance leases |
(28 | ) | 26 | | 1 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
(6,797 | ) | 496 | 37 | 286 | (5,978 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Liquid resources |
||||||||||||||||||||
Bank deposits reclassified from cash at bank and liquid resources |
1,038 | (256 | ) | | (52 | ) | 730 | |||||||||||||
Net borrowings |
(5,496 | ) | 362 | 37 | 227 | (4,870 | ) | |||||||||||||
114 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
17 Net borrowings continued
£135 million (2003 £13 million; 2002 £16 million) of net borrowings due after one year and £55 million (2003 £204 million; 2002 £260 million) of net borrowings due within one year were secured on assets of the group.
Year end | ||||||||||||||||
interest rates | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
Currency | % | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Borrowings excluding overdrafts |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
US dollar | Various | 377 | 863 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed bonds 2004 |
US dollar | 6.625 | | 605 | ||||||||||||
Zero coupon bonds 2004 |
US dollar | 8.13 | | 712 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed yankee notes 2004 |
US dollar | 7.125 | 110 | 121 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed yankee bonds 2005 |
US dollar | 6.125 | 274 | 302 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed bonds 2005 |
Sterling | 9.0 | 200 | 200 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed bonds 2006 |
US dollar | 3.0 | 275 | | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed bonds 2007 |
US dollar | 3.5 | 547 | 603 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed bonds 2008 |
US dollar | 3.375 | 545 | 600 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed bonds 2011 |
US dollar | 3.875 | 272 | | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed notes 2005/2035 |
US dollar | 7.45 | 220 | 242 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed debentures 2011 |
US dollar | 9.0 | 164 | 181 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed debentures 2022 |
US dollar | 8.0 | 163 | 180 | ||||||||||||
Medium term notes |
US dollar | Various | 384 | 384 | ||||||||||||
Medium term notes |
Euro | Various | 535 | 209 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed bond 2005/2051 |
Sterling | 7.69 | 500 | 500 | ||||||||||||
Preferred securities |
US dollar | 5.66-5.86 | 412 | 455 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps |
Various | Various | (6 | ) | (484 | ) | ||||||||||
Bank loans and others |
Various | Various | 265 | 305 | ||||||||||||
Total |
5,237 | 5,978 | ||||||||||||||
115 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
18 Financial instruments and risk management
Financial instruments comprise net borrowings (see note 17) together with other instruments deemed to be financial instruments including certain fixed asset investments, long term debtors, other long term creditors and provisions for liabilities and charges. Disclosures dealt with in this note exclude short term debtors and creditors where permitted by the accounting standard on derivatives and other financial instruments (FRS 13).
(i) Currency risk management The group publishes its consolidated financial statements in sterling and conducts business in many foreign currencies. As a result, it is subject to foreign currency exchange risk due to exchange rate movements which will affect the groups transaction costs, and the translation of the results and underlying net assets of its foreign subsidiaries.
Foreign currency amount | Percentage of total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase | Sell | Total | US dollar | Euro | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | % | % | Year | |||||||||||||||||||
Transaction |
325 | 1,249 | 1,574 | 47 | 32 | 2004-2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation: |
2,607 | 3,819 | 6,426 | 73 | 17 | 2004-2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004, the group had no outstanding cross currency interest rate
swaps.
At 30 June 2003, as a result of the transaction and translation exposure
cover outlined above, the group had the following outstanding gross foreign
exchange contracts:
Foreign currency amount | Percentage of total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase | Sell | Total | US dollar | Euro | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | % | % | Year | |||||||||||||||||||
Transaction | 466 | 1,347 | 1,813 | 46 | 26 | 2003-2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts | 3,439 | 4,593 | 8,032 | 71 | 21 | 2003-2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency interest rate swaps | 208 | 160 | 368 | 57 | 43 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004, there were no material monetary assets or liabilities in currencies other than the functional currencies of group companies, having taken into account the effect of forward contract and other derivative financial instruments that have been utilised to match foreign currency exposure.
(ii) Interest rate risk management The group has an exposure to interest rate risk and within this category of market risk, is most vulnerable to changes in US dollar, sterling and euro interest rates. To manage interest rate risk, the group manages its proportion of fixed to variable rate borrowings within limits approved by the board, primarily through issuing long term fixed rate bonds, medium term notes and floating rate commercial paper, and by utilising interest rate swaps, cross currency interest rate swaps and swaptions. The profile of fixed rate to floating rate net borrowings is maintained according to the duration measure that is equivalent to an approximate 50% fixed and 50% floating amortising profile. The number of years within the amortising profile depends on a template approved by the board. The floating element of US dollar borrowing is partly protected using interest rate collars. Following the June 2002 policy review, the level of interest rate collars will continue to reduce. Remaining interest rate collars as at 30 June 2004 will take up to approximately two years to expire. In addition, where appropriate, the group may use forward rate agreements to manage short term interest rate exposures. Swaps, swaptions, forward rate agreements and collars are accounted for as hedges. Such management serves to increase the accuracy of the business planning process. Diageo has a target range for cash interest cover (defined as operating profit before exceptional items, interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and share of associatesprofits, and after dividends received from associates, over net interest cash flow including minority interest dividends) of five to eight times and under the current economic environment Diageos intention is to be at the higher end of this range. The top limit may, however, be exceeded on certain occasions.
116 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
18 Financial instruments and risk management continued At 30 June 2004, after taking account of interest rate swaps, cross currency interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements, the currency and interest rate profile of the financial liabilities and assets of the group was as follows: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | Interest free | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of | weighted | weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign | Weighted | average | average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Floating | Fixed | Interest | currency | average | time to | time to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate | rate | free | Sub-total | swaps | Total | fixed rate | maturity | maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | % | Years | Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar | (1,737 | ) | (2,198 | ) | (171 | ) | (4,106 | ) | (366 | ) | (4,472 | ) | 4.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Euro | (199 | ) | (760 | ) | (11 | ) | (970 | ) | (184 | ) | (1,154 | ) | 4.4 | 2.8 | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sterling | (737 | ) | | (114 | ) | (851 | ) | 1,217 | 366 | | | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | (106 | ) | (18 | ) | (6 | ) | (130 | ) | (235 | ) | (365 | ) | 8.8 | 3.2 | 4.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(2,779 | ) | (2,976 | ) | (302 | ) | (6,057 | ) | 432 | (5,625 | ) | 4.7 | 3.3 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred securities | | (312 | ) | | (312 | ) | | (312 | ) | 9.4 | 0.4 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar | 587 | | 1,739 | 2,326 | | 2,326 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Euro | 150 | | 50 | 200 | | 200 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sterling | 189 | 4 | 2 | 195 | | 195 | 3.0 | 6.0 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 293 | | 7 | 300 | | 300 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,219 | 4 | 1,798 | 3,021 | | 3,021 | 3.0 | 6.0 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net financial (liabilities)/assets | (1,560 | ) | (3,284 | ) | 1,496 | (3,348 | ) | 432 | (2,916 | ) | 5.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003, after taking account of interest rate swaps, cross currency interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements, the currency and interest rate profile of the financial liabilities and assets of the group was as follows: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | Interest free | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of | weighted | weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign | Weighted | average | average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Floating | Fixed | Interest | currency | average | time to | time to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate | rate | free | Sub-total | swaps | Total | fixed rate | maturity | maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | % | Years | Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar | (3,061 | ) | (2,295 | ) | (314 | ) | (5,670 | ) | 473 | (5,197 | ) | 5.5 | 3.1 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Euro | (13 | ) | (600 | ) | (10 | ) | (623 | ) | (832 | ) | (1,455 | ) | 4.7 | 1.9 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sterling | (719 | ) | | (12 | ) | (731 | ) | 1,269 | 538 | | | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | (92 | ) | (17 | ) | | (109 | ) | (195 | ) | (304 | ) | 8.8 | 3.3 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(3,885 | ) | (2,912 | ) | (336 | ) | (7,133 | ) | 715 | (6,418 | ) | 5.3 | 2.9 | 3.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred securities | | (343 | ) | | (343 | ) | | (343 | ) | 9.4 | 1.4 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar | 505 | 129 | 258 | 892 | | 892 | 9.0 | 10.0 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Euro | 182 | | 21 | 203 | | 203 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sterling | 170 | 45 | 15 | 230 | | 230 | 3.0 | 1.0 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 217 | | 4 | 221 | | 221 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,074 | 174 | 298 | 1,546 | | 1,546 | 7.4 | 7.7 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net financial (liabilities)/assets | (2,811 | ) | (3,081 | ) | (38 | ) | (5,930 | ) | 715 | (5,215 | ) | 5.7 | 2.4 | 3.9 |
117 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
18 Financial instruments and risk management continued
Interest bearing financial liabilities comprise bonds, medium term notes, commercial paper issued, money market loans, repurchase and forward rate agreements, net obligations under finance leases, bank overdrafts and certain provisions. Financial liabilities on which no interest is paid consist of: provisions for liabilities and charges payable after one year in respect of employee incentive plans and provisions for business disposals of £74 million (2003 £58 million); other creditors of £210 million (2003 £180 million); and derivative financial instruments of £18 million (2003 £98 million). Interest bearing financial assets comprise cash, short term liquid investments with financial institutions and certain fixed asset investments, loans and debtors. Financial assets on which no interest is paid include certain fixed asset investments, loans and long term debtors.
At 30 June 2004, the group had the following portfolio of interest rate derivative instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
average | average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Receive fixed | Pay fixed | fixed | remaining | Forward | ||||||||||||||||||||
notional | notional | interest rate | maturity | starting | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | Years | Year | Year | |||||||||||||||||||
Currency instrument |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
2,187 | | 5.9 | 4.1 | | 2004-2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 1,536 | 5.7 | 2.0 | | 2004-2013 | ||||||||||||||||||
Euro: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 359 | 4.9 | 1.5 | | 2004-2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forward starting swaps |
| 67 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 2005-2006 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sterling: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
700 | | 6.5 | 0.9 | | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003, the group had the following portfolio of interest rate derivative instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
average | average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Receive fixed | Pay fixed | fixed | remaining | Forward | ||||||||||||||||||||
notional | notional | interest rate | maturity | starting | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | Years | Year | Year | |||||||||||||||||||
Currency instrument |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
3,484 | | 5.5 | 3.7 | | 2003-2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 2,097 | 5.8 | 1.5 | | 2003-2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Euro: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
18 | | 4.7 | 1.0 | | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 486 | 4.8 | 1.7 | | 2003-2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forward starting swaps |
| 132 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 2004-2006 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sterling: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
700 | | 6.5 | 0.9 | | 2003-2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
118 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
18 Financial instruments and risk management continued
(iii) Maturity of financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank loans | Bank loans | Finance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and | Other | and | Other | leases and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
overdrafts | borrowings | Other | Total | overdrafts | borrowings | other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis by year of repayment: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After five years |
34 | 873 | 109 | 1,016 | 76 | 719 | 117 | 912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From four to five years |
20 | 334 | 17 | 371 | 26 | 1,215 | 18 | 1,259 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From three to four years |
45 | 1,100 | 17 | 1,162 | 23 | 3 | 16 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From two to three years |
24 | 589 | 22 | 635 | 27 | 302 | 17 | 346 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
From one to two years |
23 | 274 | 130 | 427 | 26 | 564 | 91 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due after one year |
146 | 3,170 | 295 | 3,611 | 178 | 2,803 | 259 | 3,240 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year |
157 | 1,838 | 19 | 2,014 | 186 | 2,893 | 99 | 3,178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
303 | 5,008 | 314 | 5,625 | 364 | 5,696 | 358 | 6,418 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The group had available undrawn committed bank facilities as follows: | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Expiring within one year |
1,044 | 1,182 | ||||||
Expiring in more than two years |
714 | 788 | ||||||
1,758 | 1,970 | |||||||
119 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
18 Financial instruments and risk management continued
(iv) Fair values The estimated fair values of borrowings, guaranteed preferred securities, associated derivative financial instruments and other financial liabilities and assets at 30 June 2004 are set out below. The fair values of quoted borrowings and guaranteed preferred securities are based on year end mid-market quoted prices. The fair values of other borrowings, derivatives, financial instruments and other financial liabilities and assets are estimated using appropriate market rates prevailing at the year end by discounting the future cash flows to the net present values. These are based on rates obtained from third parties. The fair value of the groups investment in General Mills, included in other financial assets at 30 June 2004 in the table below, is calculated using the quoted share price at 30 June 2004.
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Net carrying | Estimated | Net carrying | Estimated | |||||||||||||
amount | fair value | amount | fair value | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Primary financial instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Borrowings due within one year including overdrafts |
(2,001 | ) | (2,077 | ) | (3,563 | ) | (3,680 | ) | ||||||||
Borrowings due after one year |
(3,316 | ) | (3,386 | ) | (2,981 | ) | (3,294 | ) | ||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
1,167 | 1,167 | 1,191 | 1,191 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred securities |
(312 | ) | (320 | ) | (343 | ) | (370 | ) | ||||||||
Derivatives interest rate contracts: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
||||||||||||||||
positive values |
18 | 119 | 387 | 718 | ||||||||||||
negative values |
(15 | ) | (96 | ) | (14 | ) | (211 | ) | ||||||||
Collars |
(11 | ) | (28 | ) | (18 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||||||
Other interest rate contracts |
4 | | 5 | | ||||||||||||
Derivatives foreign exchange contracts: |
||||||||||||||||
Transaction |
||||||||||||||||
positive values |
| 53 | | 55 | ||||||||||||
negative values |
| (15 | ) | | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance sheet translation |
||||||||||||||||
positive values |
48 | 48 | 138 | 136 | ||||||||||||
negative values |
(31 | ) | (29 | ) | (16 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||
General Mills options (see below) |
(63 | ) | (41 | ) | (63 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||||
Other financial liabilities |
(295 | ) | (295 | ) | (256 | ) | (256 | ) | ||||||||
Other financial assets |
1,836 | 2,372 | 325 | 325 | ||||||||||||
120 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
18 Financial instruments and risk management continued
(v) Hedges Gains and losses on instruments used for hedging are not recognised until the exposure that is being hedged is itself recognised. The table below shows the extent to which the group has unrecognised gains and losses on financial instruments, and deferred gains and losses in respect of financial instruments and terminated financial instruments used as hedges, at the beginning and end of the year.
Unrecognised | Deferred | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | Losses | Total | Gains | Losses | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||
Gains and losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
On hedges at 30 June 2003 |
386 | (298 | ) | 88 | 8 | (13 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Arising in previous years recognised during 2004 |
208 | (127 | ) | 81 | 3 | (3 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
On hedges at 30 June 2004 |
153 | (89 | ) | 64 | 4 | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Of which gains/(losses) expected to be recognised in: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
year ending 30 June 2005 |
92 | (70 | ) | 22 | 2 | (2 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
year ending 30 June 2006 or later |
61 | (19 | ) | 42 | 2 | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(vi) Credit risk A large number of major international financial institutions are counterparties to the interest rate swaps, foreign exchange contracts and deposits transacted by the group. Counterparties for such transactions entered into during the year have a long term credit rating of A or better. The group monitors its credit exposure to its counterparties, together with their credit ratings, and, by policy, limits the amount of agreements or contracts it enters into with any one party. The notional amounts of financial instruments used in interest rate and foreign exchange management do not represent the credit risk arising through the use of these instruments. The immediate credit risk of these instruments is generally estimated by the fair value of contracts with a positive value.
19 Other creditors | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Due within | Due after | Due within | Due after | |||||||||||||
one year | one year | one year | one year | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Trade creditors |
439 | | 531 | | ||||||||||||
Corporate taxation |
805 | | 859 | | ||||||||||||
Other taxation including social security |
175 | 11 | 238 | | ||||||||||||
Net obligations under finance leases |
| | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Other creditors |
428 | 84 | 707 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Ordinary dividends payable |
513 | | 482 | | ||||||||||||
Accruals and deferred income |
662 | 14 | 465 | 4 | ||||||||||||
3,022 | 109 | 3,283 | 18 | |||||||||||||
121 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
20 Provisions for liabilities and charges | ||||||||||||||||||||
Post | Deferred | |||||||||||||||||||
employment | Disposal | taxation | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 as previously reported |
113 | 74 | 372 | 310 | 869 | |||||||||||||||
Prior year adjustment (see note 1) |
(113 | ) | | (102 | ) | (6 | ) | (221 | ) | |||||||||||
At June 2003 as restated |
| 74 | 270 | 304 | 648 | |||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (7 | ) | (3 | ) | (18 | ) | (28 | ) | |||||||||||
Profit and loss account charge |
| 9 | 40 | 57 | 106 | |||||||||||||||
Utilised and other movements |
| (3 | ) | 83 | (97 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
| 73 | 390 | 246 | 709 | |||||||||||||||
(b) Deferred taxation was £390 million (see note 21).
(c) Other provisions were £246 million, including: £37 million in respect of vacant properties; £107 million for the discounted value of an onerous contract on the acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses on 21 December 2001; and £20 million for employee incentive plans (2003 £43 million; £119 million; and £55 million, respectively). The vacant property provision is based on the estimated discounted rental shortfall over the terms of the leases. The onerous contract provision was established in February 2002 and will be utilised over the 10 year duration of the contract. The employee incentive plan provision will be utilised within the next few years.
122 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
21 Deferred taxation | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation | (210 | ) | (81 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring and integration costs | 24 | 26 | ||||||||||
Tax losses | 26 | 34 | ||||||||||
Other timing differences | (48 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||||
Net provision, excluding deferred tax on post employment liabilities | (208 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||
Post employment liabilities | 294 | 78 | ||||||||||
Net asset | 86 | 18 | ||||||||||
Comprising: | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax asset (note 16) | 182 | 210 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax provision (note 20) | (390 | ) | (270 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred tax asset on post employment liabilities (note 5d) | 294 | 78 | ||||||||||
86 | 18 | |||||||||||
An analysis of the movement in the net (provision)/asset is as follows: | ||||||||||||
Net provision at beginning of the year as previously reported | (193 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||||||
Prior year adjustment (see note 1) | 211 | 299 | ||||||||||
Net asset at beginning of the year as restated | 18 | 195 | ||||||||||
Exchange adjustments | | (27 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred tax charge in profit and loss account for the year (note 9) | (120 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition of subsidiaries | | 3 | ||||||||||
Disposal of subsidiaries | | (44 | ) | |||||||||
Amounts credited/(charged) to reserves in respect of post employment liabilities | 188 | (82 | ) | |||||||||
Other amounts charged to reserves | | (3 | ) | |||||||||
Net asset | 86 | 18 | ||||||||||
The net deferred tax asset can be analysed as follows: | ||||||||||||
Current |
United Kingdom |
72 | 74 | |||||||||
United States and other overseas |
126 | (127 | ) | |||||||||
Non-current |
United Kingdom |
168 | (40 | ) | ||||||||
United States and other overseas |
(280 | ) | 111 | |||||||||
86 | 18 | |||||||||||
123 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
22 Called up share capital
The authorised share capital of the company at 30 June 2004 was 5,329 million ordinary shares of 28 101/108 pence each (2003 and 2002 5,329 million) with an aggregate nominal value of £1,542 million (2003 and 2002 £1,542 million). The allotted and fully paid share capital was 3,057.5 million ordinary shares of 28 101/108 pence each with an aggregate nominal value of £885 million (2003 3,099.6 million shares, aggregate nominal value £897 million; 2002 3,214.9 million shares, aggregate nominal value £930 million).
124 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
23 Reserves attributable to equity shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share | Capital | Profit and loss account | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
premium | Revaluation | redemption | Own | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
account | reserve | reserve | shares | Other | Total | reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2001 as previously reported |
1,314 | 137 | 2,954 | | (269 | ) | (269 | ) | 4,136 | |||||||||||||||||||
Prior year adjustments (see note 1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of FRS 17 |
| | | | 384 | 384 | 384 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of UITF 38 |
| | | (225 | ) | 46 | (179 | ) | (179 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2001 as restated |
1,314 | 137 | 2,954 | (225 | ) | 161 | (64 | ) | 4,341 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
| | | | 822 | 822 | 822 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (4 | ) | | | (81 | ) | (81 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Actuarial losses on post employment plans |
| | | | (1,508 | ) | (1,508 | ) | (1,508 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax on actuarial losses on post employment plans |
| | | | 420 | 420 | 420 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share trust arrangements |
| | | (56 | ) | (14 | ) | (70 | ) | (70 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Tax on share trust arrangements |
| | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Premiums on share issues, less expenses |
10 | | | | | | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of own shares |
| | 58 | | (1,658 | ) | (1,658 | ) | (1,600 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill on disposals of businesses |
| | | | 1,768 | 1,768 | 1,768 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers |
| (4 | ) | | | 4 | 4 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2002 |
1,324 | 129 | 3,012 | (281 | ) | (85 | ) | (366 | ) | 4,099 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
| | | | (736 | ) | (736 | ) | (736 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (9 | ) | | | (156 | ) | (156 | ) | (165 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Tax on exchange in reserves |
| | | | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial losses on post employment plans |
| | | | (1,047 | ) | (1,047 | ) | (1,047 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax on actuarial losses on post employment plans |
| | | | (51 | ) | (51 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Share trust arrangements |
| | | (56 | ) | (4 | ) | (60 | ) | (60 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Tax on share trust arrangements |
| | | | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Premiums on share issues, less expenses |
3 | | | | | | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of own shares |
| | 34 | | (852 | ) | (852 | ) | (818 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill on disposals of businesses |
| | | | 682 | 682 | 682 | |||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
1,327 | 120 | 3,046 | (337 | ) | (2,252 | ) | (2,589 | ) | 1,904 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
| | | | 559 | 559 | 559 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (7 | ) | | | (120 | ) | (120 | ) | (127 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Tax on exchange in reserves |
| | | | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial gains on post employment plans |
| | | | 586 | 586 | 586 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on actuarial gains on post employment plans |
| | | | 149 | 149 | 149 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share trust arrangements |
| | | 6 | 1 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Premiums on share issues, less expenses |
4 | | | | | | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of own shares |
| | 12 | | (306 | ) | (306 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill on disposals of businesses |
| | | | 13 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
1,331 | 113 | 3,058 | (331 | ) | (1,364 | ) | (1,695 | ) | 2,807 | ||||||||||||||||||
125 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
23 Reserves attributable to equity shareholders continued
(a) Own shares At 30 June 2004, employee share trusts funded by the group held shares in the company as follows: 41.3 million ordinary shares held in respect of long term incentive plans for executive directors and senior executives; and 1.6 million ordinary shares held in respect of grants under UK, Irish and US savings-related share option schemes. The market value of these shares at 30 June 2004 was £319 million (2003 45.0 million ordinary shares; market value £291 million). Dividends are waived on all shares in the company owned by the employee share trusts.
(b) Goodwill written off Aggregate goodwill written off against the profit and loss account, net of disposals, is £1,562 million (2003 £1,643 million; 2002 £2,381 million) including £458 million (2003 £505 million; 2002 £541 million) in respect of associates of which £356 million relates to the investment in General Mills (see note 14).
(c) Exchange adjustments The exchange adjustments are net of gains of £371 million in respect of foreign currency net borrowings (2003 £227 million; 2002 £267 million). At 30 June 2004 £1,102 million (2003 £975 million; 2002 £810 million) has been charged against the profit and loss account in respect of cumulative exchange adjustments.
(d) Post employment plans | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Profit and loss account as per consolidated balance sheet |
(1,695 | ) | (2,589 | ) | (366 | ) | ||||||
Add: Post employment net liabilities |
750 | 1,369 | 297 | |||||||||
Deficit before post employment net liabilities |
(945 | ) | (1,220 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||||
24 Movements in consolidated shareholders funds | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,392 | 50 | 1,589 | |||||||||
Dividends |
(833 | ) | (786 | ) | (767 | ) | ||||||
559 | (736 | ) | 822 | |||||||||
Recognised gains and losses |
614 | (1,270 | ) | (1,173 | ) | |||||||
New share capital issued |
4 | 4 | 11 | |||||||||
Sale/(acquisition) of own shares in share trusts |
6 | (56 | ) | (56 | ) | |||||||
Loss on sale of own shares by share trusts |
(14 | ) | (18 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||
Intrinsic cost of share options |
15 | 14 | 16 | |||||||||
Tax on share trust arrangements |
| 4 | 1 | |||||||||
Repurchase of own shares for cancellation |
(306 | ) | (852 | ) | (1,658 | ) | ||||||
Goodwill on disposals of businesses |
13 | 682 | 1,768 | |||||||||
Net
movement in shareholders funds |
891 | (2,228 | ) | (299 | ) | |||||||
Shareholders funds at beginning of the year |
2,801 | 5,029 | 5,328 | |||||||||
Shareholders funds at end of the year |
3,692 | 2,801 | 5,029 | |||||||||
25 Minority interests non-equity
Non-equity minority interests comprise £312 million 9.42% cumulative guaranteed preferred securities issued by subsidiaries (2003 £343 million). The holders of these securities have no rights against group companies other than the issuing entity and, to the extent prescribed by the guarantee, the company. To the extent that payments due under the guarantee are not made because the company has insufficient distributable profits, the company has covenanted that it will not make any distribution on any share capital which ranks junior to these securities.
126 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
26 Net cash inflow from operating activities | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,871 | 1,787 | 1,530 | |||||||||
Exceptional operating costs |
40 | 168 | 470 | |||||||||
Restructuring and integration payments |
(97 | ) | (185 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortisation charge |
224 | 249 | 300 | |||||||||
(Increase)/decrease in stocks |
(24 | ) | 6 | (145 | ) | |||||||
Decrease/(increase) in debtors |
36 | 36 | (160 | ) | ||||||||
(Decrease)/increase in creditors and provisions |
(25 | ) | (269 | ) | 180 | |||||||
Other items |
96 | 178 | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash inflow from operating activities |
2,121 | 1,970 | 2,008 | |||||||||
27 Purchase of subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
Assets acquired and net cash outflow | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Brands |
| 17 | 2,765 | |||||||||
Goodwill arising on acquisition |
1 | 6 | 21 | |||||||||
Tangible fixed assets |
| 16 | 248 | |||||||||
Investments |
11 | 1 | 7 | |||||||||
Net borrowings |
| | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Working capital |
| 18 | 681 | |||||||||
Net assets acquired |
12 | 58 | 3,716 | |||||||||
Minority interests |
| 3 | | |||||||||
Purchase consideration paid |
12 | 61 | 3,716 | |||||||||
Net borrowings acquired |
| | 6 | |||||||||
Adjustment for deferred consideration |
5 | 76 | (130 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash outflow |
17 | 137 | 3,592 | |||||||||
127 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
28 Sale of subsidiaries and businesses | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Brands |
| 839 | 2,427 | |||||||||
Other intangibles |
1 | 57 | | |||||||||
Tangible fixed assets |
5 | 634 | | |||||||||
Other fixed assets |
4 | 42 | 1,451 | |||||||||
Investment in Don Julio |
| (55 | ) | | ||||||||
Investment in General Mills |
| | (1,922 | ) | ||||||||
Subordinated debt |
| (133 | ) | | ||||||||
Businesses held for resale in respect of Seagram spirits and wine businesses |
5 | 65 | 203 | |||||||||
Working capital and provisions |
(36 | ) | 84 | 228 | ||||||||
Cash |
| 19 | | |||||||||
Minority interests |
(2 | ) | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
Goodwill written back |
6 | 675 | 1,748 | |||||||||
(Loss)/gain on sale |
(10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | 813 | |||||||
Payments made less sale consideration received less transaction costs |
(27 | ) | 964 | 4,942 | ||||||||
Net borrowings |
| | 164 | |||||||||
Cash |
| (19 | ) | | ||||||||
Deferred consideration |
10 | (33 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||
Net cash (outflow)/inflow |
(17 | ) | 912 | 5,100 | ||||||||
(i) Disposals The groups quick service restaurants business (Burger King) was sold on 13 December 2002 for $1.5 billion (£0.9 billion). This sale generated a loss before taxes of £1,457 million, after writing back goodwill previously written off to reserves of £673 million. Following the disposal, Diageo retained $213 million (£117 million) of subordinated debt, with a 10 year maturity, from the entity owning Burger King. In addition, Diageo has guaranteed up to $850 million (£467 million) of borrowings of Burger King.
(ii) General Mills options On 23 October 2002, Diageo sold call options to General Mills at a strike price of $51.56, which expire in October 2005. These give General Mills the option to purchase 29 million of its own shares held by Diageo, subject to certain limitations. The premium received in 2003 of $89 million (£58 million) has been included in sale of options in relation to associates in the consolidated cash flow statement, and has been deferred and included in accruals and deferred income in other creditors.
128 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
29 Contingent liabilities
(i) Guarantees In connection with the disposal of the quick service restaurant business, Diageo has guaranteed up to $850 million (£467 million) of external borrowings of Burger King until December 2007. These loans had an original term of five years, although Diageo and Burger King agreed to structure their arrangements to encourage refinancing by Burger King on a non-guaranteed basis prior to the end of five years. In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury, Diageo has guaranteed the debt of a third party to the amount of $200 million (£110 million) until November 2009.
(ii) Colombian excise duties In August 2000, Diageo learned that the Governors of the Departments of the Republic of Colombia and the City of Bogotá (the Departments) were considering initiating legal proceedings against major spirits companies in relation to unpaid excise duties and taxes on products that are smuggled into Colombia by third parties. Such proceedings are expected to be similar to actions that have been brought in recent years by foreign governments, including the Departments, against a number of consumer products companies. Of these four actions, three have been dismissed. The fourth has yet to proceed to the stage where motions to dismiss are filed. It remains the directorsintent that any proceedings of this kind that might be brought against Diageo will be strenuously defended.
(iii) Alcohol advertising litigation Five putative class actions have been filed against Diageo, Diageo North America, Inc., Paddington, Ltd and a large group of other beverage alcohol manufacturers and importers. Four of the actions are now pending in federal district courts two in Ohio, one in North Carolina and one in the District of Columbia. The fifth action is pending in Colorado state court. In each action, plaintiffs allege that defendants have intentionally targeted the marketing of certain beverage alcohol brands to minors. The named plaintiffs seek to pursue their claims on behalf of two classes of plaintiffs (i) parents or guardians of underage drinkers who bought alcohol beverages during the period from 1982 to the present and (ii) all parents and guardians of children currently under age 21.
(iv) Other The group has extensive international operations and is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings incidental to these operations. There are a number of legal claims or potential claims against the group, the outcome of which cannot at present be foreseen.
129 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
30 Commitments
Capital expenditure Commitments not provided for in these consolidated
financial statements are estimated at £99 million (2003 £62 million). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land and | Land and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
buildings | Other | Total | buildings | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual operating lease commitments: | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual minimum payments under operating leases expiring: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After five years | 33 | 2 | 35 | 28 | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
From one to five years | 13 | 9 | 22 | 18 | 3 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Within one year | 6 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments |
due within one year | 52 | 14 | 66 | 51 | 6 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||||||
one to two years | 55 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
two to three years | 50 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
three to four years | 45 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
four to five years | 40 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
due after five years | 262 | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
518 | 416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 Employee share option schemes
Option holdings in the tables within this note are stated as ordinary share equivalents in pence. Options prices are translated at the following exchange rates: grants at actual exchange rates; exercises and cancellations at average exchange rates; and closing balances at year end exchange rates.
(i) Executive schemes
(a) Diageo executive share option plan (DSOP) This scheme was introduced in December 1999 and grants options to executives at the market price on the date of grant. Options granted under this scheme may normally be exercised between three and 10 years after the date granted. There are no performance conditions to be satisfied although some senior executives have a shareholding requirement. The US executives are granted options over the companys ADSs (one ADS is equivalent to four ordinary shares).
(b) Diageo senior executive share option plan (SESOP) This scheme was introduced with effect from 1 January 2000 and grants options to senior executives at the market price on the date of grant. Options granted under the scheme may not normally be exercised unless a performance condition is satisfied. The performance condition applicable is linked to the increase in UK GAAP basic earnings per share before goodwill amortisation and exceptional items, and is initially applied over a three year period. After this period, if the performance condition is satisfied, options can be exercised up to 10 years after the date of grant. The US executives are granted options over the companys ADSs.
(c) Diageo associated companies share option plan (DACSOP) This scheme was introduced in March 2001 and grants options to executives in a number of associated companies. The terms of the scheme are the same as for DSOP.
(d) UK executive share option schemes (ESOS) The group operates executive share option schemes and a supplemental scheme for senior executives. ESOS incorporates the former GrandMet scheme, the former Guinness PLC executive share option schemes and the Guinness PLC 1994 employee incentive trust.
(e) US share option plan (USSOP) This is a long term incentive plan under which options to purchase the companys ADSs were granted to senior US executives. Under the plan, senior executives were granted an option to purchase ADSs at the higher of the nominal value of the ADSs and the market price of the ADSs at the time the option was granted. There are no performance criteria to be met before the options can be exercised. Options granted prior to 1 January 1994 may normally only be exercised between three and seven years after their grant. The last options granted under USSOP were in 1997.
(f) Senior executive phantom share option scheme (SEPSOS) This is a share price related bonus scheme. It allows a small number of senior executives to benefit over the period between the sixth and tenth year from grant, from movements in the price of Diageo ordinary shares. In normal circumstances, no payments can be made under SEPSOS before the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. Once exercised, payments (which can also be taken in the form of Diageo ordinary shares) are then spread with interest added over the period from exercise to the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. The scheme also contains significant forfeiture provisions. The last grant under this scheme was in 1996 and all payments will have been made within 10 years from the date of grant.
130 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
31 Employee share option schemes continued
(ii) Savings plans
(a) UK savings-related share option scheme (SRSOS) The UK savings-related share option scheme is an Inland Revenue approved scheme available to all UK employees. The scheme provides a long term savings opportunity for employees. The options may normally be exercised after three or five years, according to the length of the option period chosen by the employee, at a price not less than 80% of the market value of the shares at the time of the option grant.
(b) US employee stock purchase plan (USESPP) This scheme provides a long term savings and investment opportunity for US employees. The options may normally be exercised 12 months after the grant of the option at a price equivalent to 85% of the market value of the ADSs at the time of the option grant.
(c) International savings-related share option plan (International) The group also operates an international savings-related share option plan. The scheme provides a long term savings opportunity for employees outside the United Kingdom. The options may be exercised between one and five years after grant. The scheme has discount criteria ranging from nil to 20% devised in accordance with local conditions and practices.
(iii) Outstanding options Options over ordinary shares and over ADSs (US schemes only) outstanding at 30 June 2004 were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | remaining | average | average | |||||||||||||||||||||
exercise | contractual | exercise | exercise | |||||||||||||||||||||
prices | Number at | life | price | Number at | price | |||||||||||||||||||
pence | 30 June 2004 | months | pence | 30 June 2004 | pence | |||||||||||||||||||
DSOP, ESOS, USSOP and DACSOP |
300-399 | 229,140 | 47 | 361 | 229,140 | 361 | ||||||||||||||||||
400-499 | 2,593,345 | 34 | 457 | 2,593,345 | 457 | |||||||||||||||||||
500-599 | 5,409,270 | 78 | 526 | 3,106,634 | 520 | |||||||||||||||||||
600-699 | 18,156,741 | 100 | 639 | 2,409,366 | 631 | |||||||||||||||||||
700-799 | 4,476,235 | 102 | 755 | 117,624 | 710 | |||||||||||||||||||
800-899 | 222,622 | 92 | 863 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
31,087,353 | 8,456,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SEPSOS and SESOP |
400-499 | 1,224,440 | 71 | 458 | 1,224,440 | 458 | ||||||||||||||||||
500-599 | 3,194,754 | 75 | 564 | 2,430,586 | 563 | |||||||||||||||||||
600-699 | 5,311,870 | 104 | 652 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
700-799 | 1,384,308 | 112 | 759 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
11,115,372 | 3,655,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings plans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SRSOS, USESPP and International |
100-199 | 15,276 | 12 | 165 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
400-499 | 1,685,564 | 24 | 488 | 28,785 | 481 | |||||||||||||||||||
500-599 | 5,862,130 | 30 | 523 | 26,630 | 558 | |||||||||||||||||||
600-699 | 1,802,875 | 31 | 614 | 10,458 | 625 | |||||||||||||||||||
700-799 | 43,619 | 15 | 724 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
9,409,464 | 65,873 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) Under the savings-related share option schemes for employees, employees hold options to subscribe for up to 1 million (2003 1 million; 2002 1 million) ordinary shares at prices ranging between 162 pence and 752 pence per share, exercisable by 2007.
131 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
31 Employee share option schemes continued
(iv) Transactions on schemes
(a) Executive schemes: Transactions on DSOP, ESOS, USSOP, DACSOP, SEPSOS and SESOP for phantom shares and options over ordinary shares and ADSs for the three years ended 30 June 2004 were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||
DSOP, ESOS, USSOP, DACSOP | SEPSOS, SESOP* | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
average | Number of | average | ||||||||||||||
exercise | phantom | exercise | ||||||||||||||
Number of | price | shares and | price | |||||||||||||
options | pence | options | pence | |||||||||||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2001 |
28,319,265 | 563 | 8,417,927 | 577 | ||||||||||||
Granted |
10,247,012 | 686 | 2,695,115 | 692 | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
(8,528,525 | ) | 538 | (2,253,049 | ) | 571 | ||||||||||
Cancelled |
(1,079,055 | ) | 588 | | | |||||||||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2002 |
28,958,697 | 592 | 8,859,993 | 594 | ||||||||||||
Granted |
8,669,356 | 750 | 2,783,959 | 756 | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
(6,451,062 | ) | 559 | (1,522,799 | ) | 526 | ||||||||||
Cancelled |
(2,006,513 | ) | 652 | (169,014 | ) | 722 | ||||||||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2003 |
29,170,478 | 619 | 9,952,139 | 627 | ||||||||||||
Granted |
9,043,916 | 660 | 2,694,490 | 652 | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
(6,017,530 | ) | 540 | (1,356,096 | ) | 554 | ||||||||||
Cancelled |
(1,109,511 | ) | 636 | (175,161 | ) | 700 | ||||||||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2004 |
31,087,353 | 620 | 11,115,372 | 618 | ||||||||||||
Number of options exercisable at: |
||||||||||||||||
30 June 2004 |
8,456,109 | 3,655,026 | ||||||||||||||
30 June 2003 |
7,957,858 | 1,388,062 | ||||||||||||||
30 June 2002 |
4,219,507 | 59,442 | ||||||||||||||
132 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
31 Employee share option schemes continued
(b) Savings plans: Transactions on SRSOS, USESPP and International schemes for options over ordinary shares and ADSs for the three years ended 30 June 2004 were as follows: | ||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||
average | ||||||||
exercise | ||||||||
Number of | price | |||||||
options | pence | |||||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2001 |
12,152,797 | 456 | ||||||
Granted |
3,351,163 | 540 | ||||||
Exercised |
(3,800,177 | ) | 417 | |||||
Cancelled |
(857,440 | ) | 479 | |||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2002 |
10,846,343 | 497 | ||||||
Granted |
3,291,920 | 607 | ||||||
Exercised |
(3,275,691 | ) | 486 | |||||
Cancelled |
(777,076 | ) | 505 | |||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2003 |
10,085,496 | 539 | ||||||
Granted |
3,584,189 | 521 | ||||||
Exercised |
(3,039,651 | ) | 502 | |||||
Cancelled |
(1,220,570 | ) | 559 | |||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2004 |
9,409,464 | 535 | ||||||
Number of options exercisable at: |
||||||||
30 June 2004 |
65,873 | |||||||
30 June 2003 |
165,840 | |||||||
30 June 2002 |
171,120 | |||||||
(v) Share awards to executives Prior to 17 December 1997, awards over shares were granted to senior executives under the Guinness Group 1991 employee incentive trust (EIT), with eventual transfer dependent on the performance of the companys annualised total shareholder return against a comparator group of companies at the end of a minimum of three years after the date of grant. This plan was replaced by the Total Shareholder Return plan (TSR plan).
133 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
31 Employee share option schemes continued
Transactions on the EIT, TSR and DSIP for awards of ordinary shares and ADSs for the three years ended 30 June 2004 were as follows: | ||||
Number of | ||||
awards of | ||||
ordinary | ||||
shares* | ||||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2001 |
9,729,043 | |||
Granted under DSIP and TSR |
1,087,650 | |||
Awarded |
(3,457,064 | ) | ||
Cancelled |
(3,458,924 | ) | ||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2002 |
3,900,705 | |||
Granted under DSIP and TSR |
1,086,854 | |||
Awarded |
(1,355,209 | ) | ||
Cancelled |
(187,238 | ) | ||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2003 |
3,445,112 | |||
Granted under DSIP and TSR |
1,201,597 | |||
Awarded |
(958,719 | ) | ||
Cancelled |
(480,748 | ) | ||
Balance outstanding at 30 June 2004 |
3,207,242 | |||
(vi) Employee share trusts The group funds trusts to acquire shares in the company to hedge its obligations under the EIT, TSR, DSOP, SESOP, DSIP, former GrandMet and Guinness SRSOS, USESPP and its Irish executive schemes and savings plans. Under UK and US GAAP, the shares held are accounted for as a deduction in arriving at shareholdersfunds. Call options are used to manage the groups obligations in respect of the supplemental executive share option scheme, USSOP, SEPSOS and Diageo SRSOS, USESPP and Irish executive schemes and savings plans. The trusts purchase options from a third party equivalent to the outstanding options granted to executives. Dividends receivable by the employee share trusts on the shares are waived.
134 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles
Diageo plc is a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales and the groups consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable in the United Kingdom. UK GAAP differs in certain significant respects from US GAAP. As described in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the UK GAAP financial information for years ended 30 June 2003 and 30 June 2002 has been restated following the adoption of FRS 17 Retirement benefits, UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts and the amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions from 1 July 2003. The adoption of these pronouncements did not affect the US GAAP financial information.
Effect on net income of differences between UK and US GAAP: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||
Notes | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Net income in accordance with UK GAAP |
1,392 | 50 | 1,589 | |||||||||||||
Adjustments to conform with US GAAP: |
||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles |
(a | ) | (5 | ) | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Inventories |
(b | ) | (37 | ) | (46 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring and integration costs |
(c | ) | | 16 | 82 | |||||||||||
Pensions and other post employment benefits |
(d | ) | 10 | 95 | 51 | |||||||||||
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares |
(e | ) | 28 | (4 | ) | 166 | ||||||||||
Other derivative instruments |
(f | ) | 111 | (189 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||||||
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs |
(g | ) | | 693 | (135 | ) | ||||||||||
Disposals of businesses |
(g | ) | 69 | (177 | ) | 1,022 | ||||||||||
Employee share trust arrangements |
(i | ) | (5 | ) | 11 | (11 | ) | |||||||||
Other items |
(6 | ) | 5 | 23 | ||||||||||||
Deferred taxation |
||||||||||||||||
on above adjustments |
(21 | ) | 52 | (48 | ) | |||||||||||
other |
(k | ) | 164 | (65 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||||
Net income in accordance with US GAAP |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | |||||||||||||
Earnings per ordinary share in accordance with US GAAP |
(l | ) | ||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share |
56.1 | p | 13.9 | p | 77.0 | p | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share |
56.1 | p | 13.9 | p | 77.0 | p | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per ADS |
224.4 | p | 55.6 | p | 308.0 | p | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ADS |
224.4 | p | 55.6 | p | 308.0 | p | ||||||||||
135 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
Cumulative effect on shareholders equity of differences between UK and US GAAP: | ||||||||||||
30 June | ||||||||||||
30 June | 2003 | |||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | |||||||||||
Notes | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Shareholders equity in accordance with UK GAAP |
3,692 | 2,801 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to conform with US GAAP: |
||||||||||||
Brands |
(a | ) | 3,052 | 3,038 | ||||||||
Goodwill |
(a | ) | 3,503 | 3,627 | ||||||||
Other intangibles |
(a | ) | 32 | 40 | ||||||||
Inventories |
(b | ) | 141 | 178 | ||||||||
Pensions and other post employment benefits |
(d | ) | 539 | 729 | ||||||||
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares |
(e | ) | 22 | (7 | ) | |||||||
Other derivative instruments |
(f | ) | (28 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||||
Investment in General Mills |
(g | ) | 476 | 311 | ||||||||
Disposals of businesses |
(g | ) | | (83 | ) | |||||||
Revaluation of land and buildings |
(h | ) | (34 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||
Ordinary dividends |
(j | ) | 513 | 482 | ||||||||
Other differences in accounting principles |
(6 | ) | 7 | |||||||||
Deferred taxation |
||||||||||||
on above adjustments |
(k | ) | (340 | ) | (127 | ) | ||||||
other |
(k | ) | (1,275 | ) | (1,513 | ) | ||||||
Shareholders equity in accordance with US GAAP |
10,287 | 9,344 | ||||||||||
(a) Brands, goodwill and other intangibles Significant owned brands acquired by the group are recorded on the balance sheet. Under UK GAAP, the group has written off other intangible assets acquired up to 30 June 1998 direct to reserves in the period when acquired. All intangible assets acquired from 1 July 1998 have been capitalised in the balance sheet. Where capitalised goodwill and intangible assets are regarded as having limited useful economic lives, their cost is amortised on a straight line basis over those lives up to 20 years. Where intangible assets are regarded as having indefinite useful economic lives, they are not amortised but are subject to annual impairment reviews. Under US GAAP, up to 30 June 2001, intangible assets have been capitalised in the balance sheet and amortised through the statement of income over their useful economic lives, not exceeding 40 years. On 1 July 2001, the group adopted the provisions of SFAS No.142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and ceased to amortise goodwill from this date. The standard requires that intangible assets arising on acquisitions with definite useful lives, are amortised to their estimable residual values over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment at least annually in lieu of being amortised. Goodwill arising on business combinations is tested for impairment at least annually in lieu of amortisation.
(b) Accounting for the merger of the former GrandMet Group and the former Guinness Group For UK GAAP, the merger of the GrandMet Group and the Guinness Group was accounted for under merger accounting principles (pooling of interests) where the results, cash flows and balance sheets of both entities, having made adjustments to achieve uniformity of accounting policies, were aggregated with no adjustment to fair value. Under US GAAP, the merger was accounted for as an acquisition of the Guinness Group by GrandMet with an effective acquisition date of 31 December 1997. Consequently the Guinness Group assets and liabilities were recorded at fair values on 31 December 1997. Under US GAAP, the excess of the consideration over the fair value of the net assets has been allocated firstly to identifiable intangible assets based on their fair values with the remainder allocated to goodwill. Fair value adjustments to the recorded amounts of inventories, net of deferred tax, are expensed in the period in which the inventory is sold.
(c) Restructuring and integration costs On the acquisition of a business, certain costs of reorganising the acquired business are required to be taken to the profit and loss account under UK GAAP, but are treated as fair value adjustments to goodwill under US GAAP.
136 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
(d) Pensions and other post employment benefits Under UK GAAP, the pension cost for the period is based on an actuarial valuation at the start of the financial period. The current service cost is charged to operating profit. The interest cost (being the unwinding of the discount on the funds liabilities for the period) and the expected return on assets for the period (calculated using the market value of assets) are charged/credited to other finance charges in the profit and loss account. Any amount arising from changes in the assumptions used for the actuarial valuation at the commencement of the year and those at the end of the year and any differences between the actual return on the plans assets and the expected return on the plans assets are included in the statement of total recognised gains and losses. The surplus or deficit in post employment plans at the balance sheet date is reported as part of the groups consolidated net assets.
(e) Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares Under UK GAAP, the contingent value right, received in connection with the disposal of Pillsbury, was treated as a contingent asset and was therefore not recognised until the realisation of the contingent asset became virtually certain. The group received cash in settlement of the contingent value right on 1 May 2003, and as a consequence it was accounted for in the consolidated profit and loss account in the year ended 30 June 2003. Also under UK GAAP, the premium received from the sale of options to General Mills over 29 million ordinary shares of Diageos holding in that company has been deferred in the balance sheet pending exercise or lapse of the options. Under US GAAP, the contingent value right and the option contract represent derivatives and were accordingly held at their estimated fair values at the balance sheet dates with changes in fair value included in the statement of income.
(f) Other derivative instruments The group uses derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes. Under UK GAAP, changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives, derivatives hedging forecast transactions and currency option cylinders are not recognised until realised. Changes in the fair value of derivatives hedging the translation of net assets of overseas operations are taken to the statement of total recognised gains and losses. Under US GAAP, all derivatives are carried at fair value at the balance sheet date. Certain of the groups derivatives qualify for and are designated as hedges under US GAAP, which defers the effect on net income from gains and losses arising from changes in their fair values, to coincide with the timing of the recognition of the hedged item. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives which do not qualify for US GAAP hedge accounting treatment are charged or credited in determining net income under US GAAP.
(g) Disposals of businesses Applying the accounting differences between UK and US GAAP can result in changes to the carrying values of certain assets and liabilities. As a consequence of these different carrying values, including related tax balances, different gains or losses may arise on the subsequent disposal of the assets. In addition, the timing of the recognition of a loss on a disposal may be different under UK and US GAAP.
137 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
Under US GAAP, the results of Burger King prior to 13 December 2002 (the completion date) are presented as continuing operations in the income statement, and on the completion date of the transaction, a charge for impairment has been recognised rather than a loss on disposal. Following the completion date, Diageo does not recognise profits of Burger King in its income statement but will, generally, reflect losses as an impairment charge against the assets retained in the balance sheet. In the US GAAP balance sheet, the total assets and total liabilities of Burger King at 30 June 2004 (including consideration deferred under US GAAP) classified within other long term assetsand other long term liabilities were each £1.2 billion (2003 £1.3 billion). Under US GAAP, the transaction will be accounted for as a disposal when the uncertainties related to the guarantee provided in respect of the acquisition finance have been substantially resolved and/or the buyers cumulative investment meets or exceeds minimum levels.
(h) Revaluation of land and buildings UK GAAP allows the periodic revaluation of land and buildings. Professional valuations of certain of the groups properties were carried out in 1988 which, under US GAAP, have not been reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
(i) Employee share options Under UK GAAP, for employee share options, compensation cost charged to the profit and loss account is determined as the difference between the fair value of the shares at the date of the award and the amount the employee has to pay for the shares. Compensation cost so determined is allocated on a straight line basis to expense over the vesting period. Under US GAAP, compensation cost for fixed awards (i.e. awards under which both the exercise price and the number of shares are fixed) is the same as under UK GAAP. Compensation cost for variable awards (including awards subject to future performance conditions) is measured as the difference between the market price at the period end and the exercise price and is based on the number of awards expected to vest.
(j) Ordinary dividends Under UK GAAP, the proposed dividends on ordinary shares, as recommended by the directors, are deducted from shareholdersequity and shown as a liability in the balance sheet at the end of the period to which they relate. Under US GAAP, such dividends are only deducted from shareholdersequity at the date of declaration of the dividend.
(k) Deferred taxation UK GAAP requires that no provision for deferred tax should be made on the acquisition of a business where an asset acquired has a different tax basis. US GAAP requires a deferred tax liability to be set up on all assets separately identified, apart from goodwill. In addition, under US GAAP, adjustments due to changes in the assumptions underlying the recoverability of deferred tax assets associated with items that may have been recognised in the other comprehensive income statement are recognised in net income. Under UK GAAP, equivalent movements may be reflected in the statement of total recognised gains and losses. Other minor differences exist including differences related to rolled over gains on the disposal of fixed assets.
(l) Earnings per ordinary share Under UK GAAP and US GAAP, the calculation of earnings per ordinary share is generally consistent and is based on the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Earnings per American Depositary Share are calculated on the basis of one American Depositary Share representing four ordinary shares.
(m) Discontinued operations UK and US GAAP have different criteria for determining whether a business is a discontinued operation. Under UK GAAP, the turnover and operating profit of a discontinued operation are disclosed separately in the profit and loss account but as part of turnover and operating profit. Under US GAAP, sales and net income arising from discontinued operations are disclosed separately from sales and net income from continuing operations. Pillsbury and Burger King have been treated as discontinued operations under UK GAAP but included within continuing operations under US GAAP.
(n) Turnover UK GAAP turnover (sales in US terminology) for the year ended 30 June 2004 was £114 million (2003 £128 million; 2002 £140 million) higher than turnover under US GAAP, as the accounting treatment for joint arrangements (between the group and LVMH) is different. Under UK GAAP, the group includes in turnover its attributable share of turnover of joint arrangements, measured according to the terms of the arrangement and sales to joint arrangements by Diageo companies are eliminated on consolidation. Under US GAAP, joint arrangements have been accounted for under the equity method of accounting and the groups share of sales of the joint arrangements has not been included as part of group sales. Sales to joint arrangements by Diageo companies are accounted for as part of turnover.
138 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
US GAAP statements of income | ||||||||||||
Statements of income under US GAAP for the three years ended 30 June 2004 are set out below: | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Sales |
8,777 | 9,153 | 10,760 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
(5,069 | ) | (5,062 | ) | (6,261 | ) | ||||||
Gross profit |
3,708 | 4,091 | 4,499 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(1,793 | ) | (2,235 | ) | (2,433 | ) | ||||||
Integration and restructuring costs |
(40 | ) | (202 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||||
Bass distribution rights |
| 57 | | |||||||||
José Cuervo settlement |
| | (194 | ) | ||||||||
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares |
28 | (4 | ) | 166 | ||||||||
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs |
(38 | ) | (750 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||||
Losses on disposal of fixed assets |
(38 | ) | (40 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||
Gains on disposals of businesses |
97 | 16 | 1,843 | |||||||||
Other operating income |
4 | 22 | 36 | |||||||||
Operating income |
1,928 | 955 | 3,630 | |||||||||
Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates (net of income taxes) |
252 | 254 | 152 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(210 | ) | (609 | ) | (950 | ) | ||||||
Interest income |
40 | 286 | 418 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes |
2,010 | 886 | 3,250 | |||||||||
Income taxes |
(220 | ) | (360 | ) | (609 | ) | ||||||
Minority interest charges |
(90 | ) | (92 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||
Net income |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | |||||||||
139 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
Movements on US GAAP shareholders equity | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Shareholders equity in accordance with US GAAP at beginning of the year |
9,344 | 11,316 | ||||||
Net income |
1,700 | 434 | ||||||
Minimum pension liability |
325 | (770 | ) | |||||
Deferred tax relief on minimum pension liabilities |
(5 | ) | 34 | |||||
Dividends |
(802 | ) | (762 | ) | ||||
New share capital issued |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Repurchase of own shares for cancellation |
(306 | ) | (852 | ) | ||||
Net change in employee share trust arrangements |
(17 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||
Unrealised gain on available for sale securities |
270 | | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(226 | ) | 7 | |||||
Shareholders equity in accordance with US GAAP at end of the year |
10,287 | 9,344 | ||||||
US GAAP balance sheet A summary consolidated balance sheet under US GAAP at 30 June 2004 is set out below. |
||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Total current assets |
5,431 | 5,677 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
1,944 | 1,935 | ||||||
Brands |
7,030 | 7,280 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,164 | 3,273 | ||||||
Other intangible assets |
73 | 85 | ||||||
Other long term assets |
5,429 | 5,821 | ||||||
Total assets |
23,071 | 24,071 | ||||||
Short term borrowings |
2,019 | 3,574 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
2,834 | 3,134 | ||||||
Long term borrowings |
3,381 | 3,149 | ||||||
Other long term liabilities |
4,014 | 4,341 | ||||||
Minority interests |
536 | 529 | ||||||
Shareholdersequity |
10,287 | 9,344 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders equity |
23,071 | 24,071 | ||||||
140 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
US GAAP cash flows The groups consolidated financial statements include a consolidated statement of cash flows in accordance with FRS 1 Cash flow statements (revised 1996).
A summarised consolidated cash flow statement under US GAAP is as follows: | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Cash inflow from operating activities |
1,729 | 1,570 | 1,380 | |||||||||
Cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities |
(331 | ) | 747 | 1,021 | ||||||||
Cash outflow from financing activities |
(1,350 | ) | (2,375 | ) | (2,571 | ) | ||||||
Cumulative
effect of the implementation of FIN 46(R) |
53 | | | |||||||||
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
101 | (58 | ) | (170 | ) | |||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(24 | ) | (31 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year under US GAAP |
699 | 788 | 1,006 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year under US GAAP |
776 | 699 | 788 | |||||||||
Statement of comprehensive income/(deficit) under US GAAP | ||||||||||||
Under UK GAAP the group presents a consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses which is similar to a statement of comprehensive income required by US GAAP. Comprehensive income, under US GAAP, for the three years ended 30 June 2004 is as follows: | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Net income |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(226 | ) | 7 | (266 | ) | |||||||
Minimum pension liabilities |
325 | (770 | ) | (569 | ) | |||||||
Unrealised gains on available for sale securities |
270 | | | |||||||||
2,069 | (329 | ) | 1,719 | |||||||||
Tax (charge)/credit in respect of minimum pension liabilities |
(5 | ) | 34 | 171 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income/(deficit) |
2,064 | (295 | ) | 1,890 | ||||||||
141 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
US GAAP intangible assets | ||||||||||||||||
An analysis of movements in intangible assets for the two years ended 30 June 2004 is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||
Brands | Goodwill | intangibles | Total | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2002 |
9,011 | 4,624 | 284 | 13,919 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(288 | ) | (72 | ) | (5 | ) | (365 | ) | ||||||||
Additions |
17 | 6 | 12 | 35 | ||||||||||||
Burger King transaction* |
(755 | ) | (910 | ) | (123 | ) | (1,788 | ) | ||||||||
Disposals |
(84 | ) | (2 | ) | | (86 | ) | |||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
7,901 | 3,646 | 168 | 11,715 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(269 | ) | (60 | ) | (3 | ) | (332 | ) | ||||||||
Additions |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Adjustment to tax relating to acquisitions |
| (47 | ) | | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
Disposals |
| (8 | ) | | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
7,632 | 3,532 | 167 | 11,331 | ||||||||||||
Amortisation |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2002 |
893 | 801 | 132 | 1,826 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(36 | ) | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||||||
Provided during the year |
| | 16 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Burger King transaction* |
(236 | ) | (418 | ) | (63 | ) | (717 | ) | ||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
621 | 373 | 83 | 1,077 | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(19 | ) | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Provided during the year |
| | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Disposals |
| (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
602 | 368 | 94 | 1,064 | ||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
7,030 | 3,164 | 73 | 10,267 | ||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
7,280 | 3,273 | 85 | 10,638 | ||||||||||||
At 30 June 2002 |
8,118 | 3,823 | 152 | 12,093 | ||||||||||||
142 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
An analysis of movements in the net book value of goodwill for the year ended 30 June 2003, by segment, is as follows: | ||||||||||||
Premium | Quick service | |||||||||||
drinks | restaurants | Total | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Goodwill net book value |
||||||||||||
At 30 June 2002 |
3,315 | 508 | 3,823 | |||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(44 | ) | (18 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||||
Additions |
4 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||
Burger King transaction |
| (492 | ) | (492 | ) | |||||||
Disposals |
(2 | ) | | (2 | ) | |||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
3,273 | | 3,273 | |||||||||
For the year ending 30 June 2005 £12 million
For the year ending 30 June 2006 £11 million
For the year ending 30 June 2007 £10 million
For the year ending 30 June 2008 £7 million
For the year ending 30 June 2009 £4 million
New accounting standards and pronouncements in the United States
SFAS No. 132(R) Employers Disclosures About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a revised SFAS No. 132. The group has provided the additional disclosures in respect of the groups post retirement plans in note 5 and note 32 to the consolidated financial statements.
FIN 46 and FIN 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No.46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) and in December 2003 a revised interpretation was issued (FIN 46(R)) which clarified certain provisions of FIN 46 and provided for further scope exemptions. FIN 46(R) requires variable interest entities to be consolidated by the party that has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the entitys expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entitys expected residual returns or both (the primary beneficiary). A variable interest entity (VIE) has one or more of the following characteristics: (1) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support being provided; (2) the equity holders lack the ability (through voting rights or otherwise) to make decisions about an entitys activities; or (3) the equity holders lack the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or lack the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity.
EITF No. 03-6 Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 03-6. This issue addressed changes in the reporting and calculation requirements for earnings per share, providing the method to be used when a company has granted holders of any form of security rights to participate in the earnings of the company along with the participation rights of common stockholders. The group has reviewed the contractual rights granted for stock options and concluded that EITF 03-6 does not affect the groups reporting and disclosure.
143 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
FSP No. 106-2 Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 In December 2003, the United States Congress enacted into law the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). The Act established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D), and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 106-2 Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FSP 106-2). The group is in the process of determining the impact of this issue on the business, results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Therefore, in accordance with FSP 106-2, the US GAAP accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net period postretirement benefit cost included in the consolidated financial statements do not reflect the effects of the Act. This is because the group is currently determining whether the benefits conferred by the US plans are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act.
EITF No. 03-1 The Meaning of Other Than Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments In June 2004, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 03-1. The issue includes determining the meaning of other than temporary impairment and its application to debt and equity securities within the scope of SFAS No. 115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115) and equity securities that are not subject to the scope of SFAS No. 115 and not accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Share option schemes Under US GAAP, the group has complied with APB No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Net income |
||||||||||||
As reported under US GAAP |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | |||||||||
Stock based compensation, net of related tax effects, included in the determination of net income as reported |
16 | (1 | ) | 14 | ||||||||
Stock based employee compensation expense, under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(32 | ) | (24 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma net income |
1,684 | 409 | 2,543 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share |
||||||||||||
As reported under US GAAP |
56.1 | p | 13.9 | p | 77.0 | p | ||||||
Pro forma basic earnings per ordinary share |
55.6 | p | 13.1 | p | 76.7 | p | ||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share |
||||||||||||
As reported under US GAAP |
56.1 | p | 13.9 | p | 77.0 | p | ||||||
Pro forma diluted earnings per ordinary share |
55.6 | p | 13.1 | p | 76.7 | p | ||||||
144 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
The fair value of options which, in determining the pro forma impact, is assumed to be amortised in the statement of income over the option vesting period, is estimated on the date of grant using the binominal option pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions: | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Weighted average exercise price of options whose exercise price equals the market price on the
grant date (DSOP, DACSOP and SESOP) |
658p | 752p | 687p | |||||||||
Weighted average assumptions |
||||||||||||
Risk free interest rate |
4.9% | 4.7% | 4.6% | |||||||||
Expected life of the options |
60 months | 60 months | 60 months | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
30% | 30% | 30% | |||||||||
Dividend yield |
4.0% | 4.0% | 3.0% | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted in the year |
268p | 292p | 248p | |||||||||
Weighted average exercise price of options whose exercise price is less than the market price on the
grant date (SRSOS, USESPP and International) |
521p | 607p | 540p | |||||||||
Weighted average assumptions |
||||||||||||
Risk free interest rate |
4.1% | 4.2% | 4.4% | |||||||||
Expected life of the options |
41 months | 38 months | 39 months | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
30% | 30% | 30% | |||||||||
Dividend yield |
4.0% | 4.0% | 3.0% | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted in the year |
268p | 206p | 223p | |||||||||
Number of options granted in the year |
15.3 million | * | 14.7 million | * | 16.3 million | * | ||||||
Fair value of all options granted in the year |
£41 million | £40 million | £40 million | |||||||||
The TSR and DSIP plans are not subject to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123.
Pension plans The group operates a number of pension plans throughout the world, devised in accordance with local conditions and practices. The plans generally are of the defined benefit type. The significant plans are in the United Kingdom, Ireland, the United States and Canada. The principal plans are funded by payments to separately administered funds or insurance companies. The measurement dates used to calculate the figures in the US GAAP financial information are the appropriate balance sheet dates.
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Service cost |
(96 | ) | (80 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||
Interest cost |
(240 | ) | (243 | ) | (249 | ) | ||||||
Expected return on assets |
326 | 369 | 389 | |||||||||
Amortisation of: |
||||||||||||
Unrecognised prior service cost |
(17 | ) | (17 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||
Unrecognised net (loss)/gain |
(20 | ) | | 5 | ||||||||
Termination, curtailment and settlements |
(29 | ) | 10 | (14 | ) | |||||||
Disposal of Pillsbury |
| | (125 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic pension (charge)/income |
(76 | ) | 39 | (82 | ) | |||||||
145 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
The funded status of the groups significant defined benefit plans and the amounts that would be recognised in the balance sheet under US GAAP were as follows:
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Projected benefit obligations at beginning of the year |
4,715 | 4,127 | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(62 | ) | 46 | |||||
Canadian plan not previously disclosed |
| 54 | ||||||
Service cost |
96 | 80 | ||||||
Interest cost |
240 | 243 | ||||||
Special termination settlements |
2 | 8 | ||||||
Actuarial (gain)/loss |
(195 | ) | 408 | |||||
Employee contributions |
11 | 11 | ||||||
Benefits and expenses paid |
(221 | ) | (203 | ) | ||||
Curtailments and settlements |
22 | | ||||||
Plan amendments |
(1 | ) | | |||||
Disposals |
| (59 | ) | |||||
Projected benefit obligations at end of the year |
4,607 | 4,715 | ||||||
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of the year |
3,392 | 3,841 | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(56 | ) | 38 | |||||
Canadian plan not previously disclosed |
| 51 | ||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
524 | (313 | ) | |||||
Contributions by the group |
13 | 6 | ||||||
Employee contributions |
11 | 11 | ||||||
Benefits and expenses paid |
(221 | ) | (203 | ) | ||||
Disposals |
| (39 | ) | |||||
Plan assets at fair value at end of the year |
3,663 | 3,392 | ||||||
Excess of benefit obligations over plan assets |
(944 | ) | (1,323 | ) | ||||
Unrecognised prior service cost |
100 | 116 | ||||||
Unrecognised net loss |
1,510 | 1,952 | ||||||
666 | 745 | |||||||
The amounts that have been recognised in the US GAAP summary balance sheet are as follows: |
||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Pension prepayment |
281 | 305 | ||||||
Accrued benefit liabilities |
(725 | ) | (1,018 | ) | ||||
Intangible asset |
103 | 119 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,007 | 1,339 | ||||||
666 | 745 | |||||||
146 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued
The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the groups benefit obligations for the significant plans at 30 June in the relevant year. The assumptions used to calculate the net periodic costs for the year to 30 June are based on the assumptions disclosed as at the previous 30 June:
US plans | Non-US plans | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
% | % | % | % | % | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Rate of general increase in salaries |
3.5 | 3.5 | 6.25 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for plan liabilities |
6.2 | 5.9 | 7.5 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets |
7.5 | 6.7 | 9.5 | 7.7 | 7.1 | 7.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Postretirement benefits other than pensions The group also operates a number of plans, primarily in the United States, which provide employees with postretirement insurance. The plans are generally unfunded. The liability in respect of these benefits is assessed by qualified independent actuaries under the projected unit method and is included in other long term liabilities. The measurement dates used to calculate the figures in the US GAAP financial information are the appropriate balance sheet dates.
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Service cost |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||
Interest cost |
(4 | ) | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||
Expected return on assets |
| 2 | 1 | |||||||||
Amortisation of unrecognised net gain |
| | 1 | |||||||||
Disposal of Pillsbury |
| | 174 | |||||||||
Other terminations, curtailments and settlements |
| 4 | | |||||||||
Postretirement (charge)/income |
(6 | ) | (1 | ) | 165 | |||||||
147 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
32 Reconciliation to US generally accepted accounting principles continued | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligations at beginning of the year |
78 | 76 | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Service cost |
2 | 1 | ||||||
Interest cost |
4 | 6 | ||||||
Canadian plan not previously disclosed |
| 5 | ||||||
Actuarial (gain)/loss |
(9 | ) | 19 | |||||
Benefits and expenses paid |
(2 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Disposals |
| (18 | ) | |||||
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligations at end of the year |
66 | 78 | ||||||
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of the year |
2 | 15 | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (1 | ) | |||||
Actual return on plan assets |
| (1 | ) | |||||
Contributions by the group |
2 | 4 | ||||||
Benefits and expenses paid |
(2 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Settlements |
| (10 | ) | |||||
Plan assets at fair value at end of the year |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Excess of benefit obligations over plan assets |
(64 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||
Unrecognised prior service cost |
3 | 4 | ||||||
Unrecognised net gain |
2 | 12 | ||||||
Accrued postretirement benefits at end of the year |
(59 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||
The impact on the service and interest cost of the postretirement cost and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligations of a 1% increase and a 1% decrease in future medical care inflation is as follows:
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Impact of 1% increase in medical care inflation rates: |
||||||||||||
Aggregate of service cost and interest cost |
1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligations at end of the year |
9 | 8 | 8 | |||||||||
Impact of 1% decrease in medical care inflation rates: |
||||||||||||
Aggregate of service cost and interest cost |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligations at end of the year |
(8 | ) | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
33 Post balance sheet event
As of 1 July 2004, the Schieffelin & Somerset joint venture with Moët Hennessy in North America ceased marketing and distribution of Diageo and Moët Hennessy products. The products will in future be marketed and distributed directly by the respective partners and the partnership net assets will be distributed to them during the first quarter of the year ending 30 June 2005.
148 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Company balance sheet
30 June 2004 | 30 June 2003 (restated) | |||||||||||||||||||
Notes | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tangible assets |
36 | 2 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments |
36 | 28,125 | 28,127 | |||||||||||||||||
28,127 | 28,138 | |||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts owed by subsidiaries |
7,194 | 8,234 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other debtors due within one year |
14 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other debtors due after one year |
22 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash at bank |
11 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
7,241 | 8,295 | |||||||||||||||||||
Creditors
due within one year |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
| (21 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other creditors |
37 | (584 | ) | (555 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(584 | ) | (576 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net current assets |
6,657 | 7,719 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets less current liabilities |
34,784 | 35,857 | ||||||||||||||||||
Creditors
due after one year |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts owed to subsidiaries |
38 | (17,788 | ) | (19,456 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities and charges |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net assets before post employment liabilities |
16,989 | 16,395 | ||||||||||||||||||
Post employment liabilities |
39 | (15 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net assets |
16,974 | 16,378 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital and reserves |
||||||||||||||||||||
Called up share capital |
22 | 885 | 897 | |||||||||||||||||
Share premium account |
1,331 | 1,327 | ||||||||||||||||||
Merger reserve |
9,161 | 9,161 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital redemption reserve |
3,058 | 3,046 | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit and loss account |
2,539 | 1,947 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reserves attributable to equity shareholders |
40 | 16,089 | 15,481 | |||||||||||||||||
Shareholders funds |
16,974 | 16,378 | ||||||||||||||||||
149 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the company balance sheet
34 Company profit and loss account
The companys results are included in the consolidated profit and loss account, so a separate profit and loss account is not presented.
35 Directors emoluments | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£000 | £000 | |||||||
Executive directors remuneration including bonuses |
3,434 | 3,036 | ||||||
Fees to non-executive directors |
900 | 851 | ||||||
4,334 | 3,887 | |||||||
36 Fixed assets | ||||||||||||||||
Tangible assets | Investments | |||||||||||||||
Shares in | Other | |||||||||||||||
subsidiaries | investments | Total | ||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
30 | 28,160 | 10 | 28,170 | ||||||||||||
Additions |
1 | | | | ||||||||||||
Disposals |
(21 | ) | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
10 | 28,160 | 9 | 28,169 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation/provisions |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
19 | 35 | 8 | 43 | ||||||||||||
Provided during the year |
3 | | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Disposals |
(14 | ) | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
8 | 35 | 9 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
2 | 28,125 | | 28,125 | ||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 |
11 | 28,125 | 2 | 28,127 | ||||||||||||
37 Other creditors due within one year | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Ordinary dividends payable |
513 | 482 | ||||||
Other creditors and accruals |
71 | 73 | ||||||
584 | 555 | |||||||
150 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Notes to the company balance sheet |
38 Amounts owed to subsidiaries
The amounts owed to subsidiaries include £312 million (2003 £343 million) of 9.42% unsecured cumulative capital interests. These securities are subordinated to all other liabilities of the company. The securities are redeemable only at the option of the company on or after 16 November 2004 or in the event of certain fiscal or legal changes in the United States or the United Kingdom. Interest and redemption payments may only be made to the extent that the company has adequate distributable profits or, in the case of a redemption, out of the proceeds of an issue of shares. To the extent that dividend or redemption payments have not been made when due, the company has covenanted that it will not make any distribution on any share capital which ranks junior to these securities.
39 Post employment benefits | ||||||||
30 June 2004 | 30 June 2003 | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Present value of post employment liabilities |
(21 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
Related deferred tax assets |
6 | 7 | ||||||
Net post employment liabilities |
(15 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
40 Reserves attributable to equity shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit and loss account | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share | Capital | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
premium | Merger | redemption | Own | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
account | reserve | reserve | shares | Other | Total | reserves | ||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 as previously reported |
1,327 | 9,161 | 3,046 | | 2,248 | 2,248 | 15,782 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Prior year adjustments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of FRS 17 |
| | | | (15 | ) | (15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of UITF 38 |
| | | (336 | ) | 50 | (286 | ) | (286 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2003 as restated |
1,327 | 9,161 | 3,046 | (336 | ) | 2,283 | 1,947 | 15,481 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 1,718 | 1,718 | 1,718 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
| | | | (833 | ) | (833 | ) | (833 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Premiums on share issues, less expenses |
4 | | | | | | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share trust arrangements |
| | | 6 | 1 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial gains on post employment plans |
| | | | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of own shares |
| | 12 | | (306 | ) | (306 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 30 June 2004 |
1,331 | 9,161 | 3,058 | (330 | ) | 2,869 | 2,539 | 16,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||
41 Contingent liabilities
The company has guaranteed certain borrowings of subsidiaries which at 30 June 2004 amounted to £2,920 million (2003 £5,752 million). The company has also provided irrevocable guarantees relating to certain of its Irish and Dutch subsidiaries. In addition, the company has certain obligations with regard to the groups non-equity minority interests (see note 25). In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury, the company has guaranteed the debt of a third party to the amount of $200 million (£110 million). In connection with the sale of Burger King, the company, together with certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, has agreed to guarantee up to $850 million (£467 million) of external borrowings of Burger King (see note 29).
151 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Principal group companies
The companies listed below include those which principally affect the profits and assets of the group. The operating companies listed below may carry on the business described in the countries listed in conjunction with their subsidiaries and other group companies. A full list of subsidiaries, all of which are consolidated, will be included in the companys next annual return having made use of the exemption in Section 231 of the Companies Act 1985.
Country of | Country of | Percentage of | ||||||||
incorporation | operation | equity owned | Business description | |||||||
Premium drinks |
||||||||||
Diageo Ireland
|
Ireland | Worldwide | 100 | % | Production, marketing and distribution of premium drinks. | |||||
Diageo Great Britain Limited
|
England | Worldwide | 100 | % | Production, marketing and distribution of premium drinks. | |||||
Diageo Scotland Limited
|
Scotland | Worldwide | 100 | % | Production, marketing and distribution of premium drinks. | |||||
Diageo Brands BV (formerly Guinness United Distillers &
Vintners BV) (a)
|
Netherlands | Worldwide | 100 | % | Production, marketing and distribution of premium drinks. | |||||
Diageo North America, Inc
|
United States | Worldwide | 100 | % | Production, importing and marketing of premium drinks. | |||||
Corporate |
||||||||||
Diageo Capital plc (b)
|
Scotland | United Kingdom | 100 | % | Financing company for the group. | |||||
Diageo Finance plc (b)
|
England | United Kingdom | 100 | % | Financing company for the group. | |||||
Diageo Investment Corporation
|
United States | United States | 100 | % | Financing company for the US group | |||||
Associates and investments |
||||||||||
Moët Hennessy, SNC (c)
|
France | Worldwide | 34 | % | Production and distribution of premium drinks. | |||||
General Mills, Inc (d)
|
United States | Worldwide | 21 | % | Manufacture and marketing of consumer food products. | |||||
(a) Guinness United Distillers & Vintners Amsterdam BV was merged into Diageo Brands BV on 28 January 2004.
(b) Directly owned by Diageo plc.
(c) French partnership.
(d) The group owns 79 million shares of common stock (par value $0.10 each) in General Mills, Inc.
All percentages, unless otherwise stated, relate to holdings of ordinary share capital and are equivalent to the percentages of voting rights held by the group.
152 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Unaudited computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred share dividends
Under UK GAAP (unaudited)
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated)* | (restated)* | (restated)* | (restated)* | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Income before taxes on income and minority interests |
1,969 | 632 | 2,309 | 1,726 | 1,445 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Loss/(income) from discontinued operations before taxes on income
and minority interests |
(3 | ) | 1,219 | (588 | ) | (538 | ) | (580 | ) | |||||||||||
Less: Share of
associates income other than 50% associates |
(373 | ) | (379 | ) | (200 | ) | (169 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||||||||
Add: Dividend income receivable from associates other than 50% associates |
219 | 57 | 76 | 84 | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Add: Fixed charges |
432 | 577 | 563 | 498 | 515 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Preferred share dividends payable |
(32 | ) | (35 | ) | (38 | ) | (37 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||||
2,212 | 2,071 | 2,122 | 1,564 | 1,226 | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed charges |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest payable |
378 | 525 | 515 | 450 | 466 | |||||||||||||||
Add: Preferred share dividends payable |
32 | 35 | 38 | 37 | 37 | |||||||||||||||
Add: Share of
50% associates interest payable |
| | | 1 | | |||||||||||||||
Add: One third of rental expense for continuing operations |
22 | 17 | 10 | 10 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
432 | 577 | 563 | 498 | 515 | ||||||||||||||||
ratio | ratio | ratio | ratio | ratio | ||||||||||||||||
Ratio |
5.1 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 2.4 | |||||||||||||||
Under US GAAP (unaudited)
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings |
||||||||||||||||||||
Income before
income taxes
from continuing operations |
2,010 | 886 | 3,250 | 1,124 | 1,106 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Share of
unconsolidated affiliates income other than 50%
unconsolidated affiliates |
(236 | ) | (242 | ) | (142 | ) | (83 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||||
Add: Dividend income receivable from unconsolidated affiliates other than 50%
unconsolidated affiliates |
219 | 57 | 76 | 84 | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Add: Fixed charges |
266 | 672 | 1,029 | 545 | 552 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Preferred share dividends payable |
(32 | ) | (35 | ) | (38 | ) | (37 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||||
2,227 | 1,338 | 4,175 | 1,633 | 1,606 | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed charges |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
payable (see note 1) |
210 | 609 | 950 | 461 | 469 | |||||||||||||||
Add: Preferred share dividends payable |
32 | 35 | 38 | 37 | 37 | |||||||||||||||
Add: Share of
50% unconsolidated affiliates interest payable |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Add: One third of rental expense for continuing operations |
22 | 27 | 40 | 45 | 44 | |||||||||||||||
266 | 672 | 1,029 | 545 | 552 | ||||||||||||||||
ratio | ratio | ratio | ratio | ratio | ||||||||||||||||
Ratio |
8.4 | 2.0 | 4.1 | 3.0 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||
153 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
Additional information for shareholders
Legal proceedings
(i) Colombian excise duties In August 2000, Diageo learned that the Governors of the Departments of the Republic of Colombia and the City of Bogotá (the Departments) were considering initiating legal proceedings against major spirits companies in relation to unpaid excise duties and taxes on products that are smuggled into Colombia by third parties. Such proceedings are expected to be similar to actions that have been brought in recent years by foreign governments, including the Departments, against a number of consumer product companies. Of these four actions, three have been dismissed. The fourth has yet to proceed to the stage where motions to dismiss are filed. It remains the directorsintent that any proceedings of this kind that might be brought against Diageo will be strenuously defended.
(ii) Alcohol advertising litigation Five putative class actions have been filed against Diageo, Diageo North America, Inc., Paddington, Ltd and a large group of other beverage alcohol manufacturers and importers. Four of the actions are now pending in federal district courts two in Ohio, one in North Carolina and one in the District of Columbia. The fifth action is pending in Colorado state court. In each action, plaintiffs allege that defendants have intentionally targeted the marketing of certain beverage alcohol brands to minors. The named plaintiffs seek to pursue their claims on behalf of two classes of plaintiffs (i) parents or guardians of underage drinkers who bought alcohol beverages during the period from 1982 to the present and (ii) all parents and guardians of children currently under age 21.
(iii) Other The group has extensive international operations and is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings incidental to these operations. There are a number of legal claims or potential claims against the group, the outcome of which cannot at present be foreseen.
Material contracts
Agreement for the sale of Burger King Corporation On 13 December 2002, Gramet Holdings Corp. (Seller), Diageo and Delaware Champion Acquisition Corporation (Buyer) entered into an Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement (the Agreement). Pursuant to the Agreement all of the capital stock of Burger King Corporation was sold to Buyer on 13 December 2002 (the Closing). The purchase price pursuant to the Agreement was $1.51 billion. As a result of closing adjustments specified in the Agreement (which were based on estimates as of the date of the sale), Diageo received approximately $1.2 billion in cash and a subordinated debt instrument issued by the holding company owning all of the capital stock of Burger King in an original principal amount of $212.5 million (the Debt Instrument). The Debt Instrument contains a 9% per annum payment in kind interest rate and matures on 13 June 2013. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Agreement, Diageo (and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries) agreed to guarantee (the Guarantee) a $750 million term loan and a $100 million revolving line of credit on behalf of Burger King and its subsidiaries (the Senior Loans). The Senior Loans have a term of five years from December 2002 although Diageo and Burger King agreed to structure their arrangements to encourage a refinancing by Burger King on a non-guaranteed basis prior to the end of five years providing the terms of any such refinancing are acceptable to Diageo. If a refinancing does not occur prior to 13 December 2005, Diageo will receive thereafter an annual guarantee fee of 5% of the outstanding principal amounts of the Senior Loans. Diageo will make an incentive payment of $10 million if the loans are refinanced during the first eighteen months following the Closing or a payment of $5 million if they are refinanced during the next eighteen months. In the event of such a refinancing, Diageo has agreed to compensate Burger King for any fees and additional interest incurred during the outstanding term of the Senior Loans. There can be no assurance that a non-guaranteed refinancing will occur prior to the end of the fifth year or prior to a payment being made by Diageo (or a wholly owned subsidiary of Diageo) under the Guarantee.
Supplemental marketing agreement and waiver On 23 June 2004, Diageo and General Mills, Inc. entered into a Supplemental Marketing Agreement and Waiver (SMA). Under the terms of the SMA, Diageo and General Mills have agreed, until the first anniversary of the effectiveness of the Registration Statement filed by General Mills on 23 June 2004 registering 49,907,680 of Diageos shares of General Mills stock (the Registration Statement), to work in good faith toward the implementation of a transaction to sell 49,907,680 shares of General Mills common stock, or any smaller number agreed to by General Mills and Diageo, currently owned by Diageo. The agreement further contemplates that:(i) a portion of the shares, which portion will be 49,907,680 less the number of shares sold to General Mills as described in (ii) below will be sold directly by Diageo; and (ii) at the same time, General Mills will repurchase from Diageo a number of shares determined by Diageo having an aggregate value of between $500 million and $750 million, and General Mills or a third party will sell equity-linked securities related to those shares.
154 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
Under the SMA, General Mills agreed to file the Registration Statement, and to include in the Registration Statement 49,907,680 General Mills common shares held by Diageo. The inclusion of these shares was in lieu of any piggyback registration rights that Diageo might otherwise have had with respect to the Registration Statement. The SMA does not affect any of Diageos other registration rights under the Stockholders Agreement or otherwise affect its ability to sell the shares in accordance with that agreement. Until the transaction described above is completed, or until Diageo otherwise sells the identified 49,907,680 shares, General Mills has agreed not to sell any equity securities under the Registration Statement without Diageos consent.
Agreement for the acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses On 19 December 2000, Diageo and Pernod Ricard entered into a stock and asset purchase agreement with Vivendi Universal S.A., whereby Pernod Ricard and Diageo agreed to acquire stock and assets of the worldwide spirits, wines, wine and malt coolers, other malt beverages, fortified wines, non-alcoholic mixers and other alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages business of The Seagram Company Ltd (the stock and asset purchase agreement). The acquisition was completed on 21 December 2001.
Related party transactions
Agreements with General Mills On 31 October 2001 (Completion), Diageo completed the disposal to General Mills, Inc. of The Pillsbury Company and the capital stock or other equity interests of entities that comprised Diageos worldwide packaged food business.
a standstill provision, pursuant to which Diageo will be precluded from seeking to gain control of, or buying additional shares in, General Mills until the earlier of 20 years following Completion, or three years following the date on which Diageo owns less than 5% of General Mills outstanding shares;
a requirement that Diageo dispose of at least 75% of the General Mills shares acquired at completion within 10 years;
voting restrictions for the General Mills shares acquired by Diageo. Diageo is required to vote all of its General Mills shares in favour of the director nominees recommended by the General Mills board of directors. On all other matters, the agreement generally requires pass-through voting by Diageo, so its shares will be voted in the same proportion as the other General Mills shares are voted for a period of 10 years or until Diageo owns less than 5% of General Mills outstanding shares, whichever is earlier;
representation on the General Mills board for Diageo. On 23 June 2004, Diageo and General Mills amended the Stockholders Agreement to permanently eliminate Diageos right to board representation;
participation by Diageo in General Mills share repurchase programmes unless the repurchases are made by a tender offer or made in connection with the General Mills employee benefit plans; and
155 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
registration rights for Diageo for its General Mills shares. At any time within one year of completion or at any date over 20 months after completion, Diageo may require General Mills to file a Registration Statement under the United States Securities Act of 1933 in respect of all or a portion of the General Mills shares received at completion. Diageo may make up to 12 demands, but each registration must cover shares valued in excess of $300 million and only one demand may be made during any nine-month period.
On 23 October 2002 and 28 October 2002, Diageo and General Mills entered into two call option agreements in which Diageo granted to General Mills call options over 29,092,320 of General Mills ordinary shares held by Diageo. Under the call option agreements, from a date no earlier than 1 May 2003 through 28 September 2005, General Mills may exercise the call options subject to certain limitations. If General Mills exercises any call options during the period from 29 September 2005 to 28 October 2005, General Mills will be obligated to exercise the call options in respect of all covered ordinary shares not previously purchased. The premium for the call options was an aggregate of $89,313,422. General Mills has agreed to pay $51.56 per share upon exercise of the call options. The call options expire on 28 October 2005.
Other Transactions with directors are disclosed in the directors remuneration report (see Directors remuneration report Additional information).
Share capital
As at 16 September 2004, Diageo had an authorised share capital of 5,329 million ordinary shares of 28 101/108 pence each with an aggregate nominal value of £1,542 million and an allotted and fully paid share capital of 3,055.7 million ordinary shares of 28 101/108 pence each with an aggregate nominal value of £884 million.
Major shareholders At 16 September 2004, the following substantial interest (3% or more) in the companys ordinary share capital (voting securities) had been notified to the company:The Capital Group Companies, Inc 122,634,410 ordinary shares (4.01% of the issued ordinary share capital of Diageo plc). The companys substantial shareholder does not have different voting rights. Diageo, so far as is known by the company, is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any government.
Trading market for shares The Diageo plc ordinary shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange (the Exchange) and on the Dublin and Paris Stock Exchanges. Diageo plc American Depositary Shares (ADSs), representing four Diageo plc ordinary shares each, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
156 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
Year ended 30 June |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per ordinary share |
High | 780 | 851 | 941 | 792 | 697 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 625 | 582 | 644 | 560 | 384 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep 2002 | Dec 2002 | March 2003 | June 2003 | Sep 2003 | Dec 2003 | March 2004 | June 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per ordinary share |
High | 851 | 840 | 698 | 707 | 685 | 743 | 755 | 780 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 677 | 657 | 582 | 646 | 625 | 646 | 696 | 706 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Up to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 September | August | July | June | May | April | March | February | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per ordinary share |
High | 708 | 691 | 732 | 757 | 768 | 780 | 754 | 745 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 676 | 658 | 675 | 714 | 721 | 705 | 707 | 707 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per ADS |
High | 57.38 | 52.36 | 55.01 | 45.38 | 44.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 40.59 | 38.00 | 38.50 | 32.56 | 24.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep 2002 | Dec 2002 | March 2003 | June 2003 | Sep 2003 | Dec 2003 | March 2004 | June 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per ADS |
High | 51.74 | 52.36 | 44.88 | 46.94 | 44.80 | 52.86 | 57.38 | 56.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 42.75 | 41.05 | 38.00 | 41.25 | 40.59 | 43.66 | 51.25 | 52.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Up to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 September | August | July | June | May | April | March | February | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per ADS |
High | 51.19 | 50.95 | 54.20 | 55.70 | 55.82 | 56.39 | 57.38 | 56.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 49.05 | 48.58 | 50.03 | 53.26 | 52.30 | 53.07 | 52.10 | 53.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At close of business on 16 September 2004, the market prices for ordinary
shares and ADSs were 685 pence and $49.73, respectively. The 9.42% cumulative guaranteed preferred securities, series A (the preferred securities) (liquidation preference $25 per security) issued by Grand Metropolitan Delaware, LP are traded on the NYSE. The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the highest and lowest sales prices of the preferred securities as reported on the NYSE composite tape. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per preferred security |
High | 27.58 | 28.20 | 28.22 | 27.62 | 28.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 25.73 | 26.95 | 26.66 | 25.27 | 24.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sep 2002 | Dec 2002 | March 2003 | June 2003 | Sep 2003 | Dec 2003 | March 2004 | June 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per preferred security |
High | 28.10 | 28.20 | 28.10 | 27.78 | 27.58 | 27.15 | 26.98 | 26.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 26.95 | 27.25 | 27.23 | 27.12 | 26.80 | 26.45 | 26.21 | 25.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Up to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 September | August | July | June | May | April | March | February | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per preferred security |
High | 25.64 | 25.58 | 26.10 | 25.95 | 25.99 | 26.55 | 26.55 | 26.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low | 25.50 | 25.40 | 25.36 | 25.76 | 25.73 | 25.95 | 26.41 | 26.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
157 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
Memorandum and articles of association
The following description summarises certain provisions of Diageos Memorandum and articles of association and applicable English law. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Companies Act 1985 of Great Britain (the Companies Act), as amended, and Diageos Memorandum and articles of association. Information on where investors can obtain copies of the Memorandum and articles of association is provided under Documents on display below.
Objects and purposes Diageo is incorporated under the name Diageo plc, and is registered in England and Wales under registered number 23307. Diageos objects and purposes are set forth in the fourth clause of its Memorandum of Association and cover a wide range of activities, including to carry on the business of a holding company, to carry on the business of producing, distributing and marketing branded drinks and branded food products, operating fast food restaurant chains and brewing, distilling and manufacturing wines, spirits and mineral or other types of water as well as to carry on all other businesses necessary to attain Diageos objectives. The Memorandum of Association grants Diageo a broad range of powers to effect these objectives.
Directors Diageos articles of association provide for a board of directors, consisting (unless otherwise determined by an ordinary resolution of shareholders) of not fewer than three directors and not more than 25 directors, who shall manage the business and affairs of Diageo. Directors may be elected by the members in a general meeting or appointed by the board of directors. In addition, at each annual general meeting one-third of the directors, representing those directors who have been in office the longest since their last election, as well as any directors appointed by the board of directors since the last annual general meeting are required to resign and are then reconsidered for election, assuming they wish to stand for re-election.
Dividend rights Holders of Diageos ordinary shares may, by ordinary resolution, declare dividends but may not declare dividends in excess of the amount recommended by the directors. The directors may also pay interim dividends. No dividend may be paid other than out of profits available for distribution. Dividends may be paid to an approved depositary in currencies other than pounds sterling and such dividends will be calculated using an appropriate market exchange rate in London as determined by the directors in accordance with Diageos articles of association.
158 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
Voting rights Voting at any general meeting of shareholders is by a show of hands unless a poll, which is a written vote, is duly demanded. On a show of hands, every shareholder who is present in person at a general meeting, including the duly authorised representative of a corporate holder of Diageos shares which is not itself a shareholder entitled to vote, has one vote regardless of the number of shares held. On a poll, every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy has one vote for every share held by that shareholder. A poll may be demanded by any of the following:
the chairman of the meeting;
at least three shareholders entitled to vote and present in person, by proxy or by duly authorised representative at the meeting;
any shareholder or shareholders representing in the aggregate not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights of all shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting and present in person, by proxy or by duly authorised representative; or
any shareholder or shareholders holding shares conferring a right to vote at the meeting on which there have been paid-up sums in the aggregate equal to not less than one-tenth of the total sum paid up on all the shares conferring that right and present in person, by proxy or by duly authorised representative.
Matters are transacted at general meetings of Diageo by the proposing and passing of three kinds of resolutions:
an ordinary resolution, which includes resolutions for the election, re-election and removal of directors, the approval of financial statements, the declaration of final dividends, the appointment or re-appointment of auditors, the increase of authorised share capital or the grant of authority to allot shares;
a special resolution, which includes resolutions amending Diageos Memorandum and articles of association or relating to certain matters concerning Diageos winding up; and
an extraordinary resolution, which includes resolutions modifying the rights of any class of Diageos shares at a meeting of the holders of such class.
An ordinary resolution requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast at a meeting at which there is a quorum. Special and extraordinary resolutions require the affirmative vote of not less than three-quarters of the votes cast at a meeting at which there is a quorum. The necessary quorum for a meeting of Diageo is a minimum of 10 persons entitled to attend and vote on the business to be transacted, each being a shareholder or a proxy for a shareholder or a duly authorised representative of a corporation which is a shareholder.
Liquidation rights In the event of the liquidation of Diageo, after payment of all liabilities and deductions in accordance with English law, the balance of assets available for distribution will be distributed among the holders of ordinary shares according to the amounts paid-up on the shares held by them. A liquidator may, with the sanction of a special resolution of the shareholders and any other sanction required by the Insolvency Act 1986, divide among the shareholders the whole or any part of Diageos assets. Alternatively, a liquidator may, upon the adoption of a special resolution of the shareholders, place the assets in whole or in part in trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of shareholders, but no shareholder is compelled to accept any assets upon which there is a liability.
Pre-emptive rights and new issues of shares While holders of ordinary shares have no pre-emptive rights under the articles of association, the ability of the directors to cause Diageo to issue shares, securities convertible into shares or rights to shares, otherwise than pursuant to an employee share scheme, is restricted. Under the Companies Act, the directors of a company are, with certain exceptions, unable to allot any equity securities without express authorisation, which may be contained in a companys articles of association or given by its shareholders in general meeting, but which in either event cannot last for more than five years. Under the Companies Act, Diageo may also not allot shares for cash without first making an offer to existing shareholders to allot shares on the same or more favourable terms in proportion to their respective shareholdings, unless this requirement is waived by a special resolution of the shareholders.
Disclosure of interests in Diageos shares There are no provisions in the articles of association whereby persons acquiring, holding or disposing of a certain percentage of Diageos shares are required to make disclosure of their ownership percentage, although there are such requirements under the Companies Act. The basic disclosure requirement under sections 198 to 211 of the Companies Act imposes upon a person interested in the shares of Diageo a statutory obligation to notify Diageo in writing of details set out in the Companies Act where:
(a) he acquires or ceases to have an interest in shares comprising any class of Diageos issued and voting share capital; and
(b) as a result, either he obtains, or ceases to have:
(i) | a material interest in 3% or more of the nominal value of any class of Diageos issued voting share capital; or | |||
(ii) | an aggregate interest (whether material or not) in 10%, or more of the nominal value of any class of Diageos issued voting share capital or the percentage of his interest in Diageos issued voting share capital remains above the relevant level and changes by a whole percentage point or more. |
159 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
A material interest means, broadly, any beneficial interest, including those of a spouse or a child or a step-child, those of a company which is accustomed to act in accordance with the relevant persons instructions or in which one third or more of the votes are controlled by such person and certain other interests set out in the Companies Act, other than those of an investment manager or an operator of a unit trust/recognised scheme/collective investment scheme/open-ended investment company.
General meetings and notices At least 21 days written notice of an Annual General Meeting is required. An Annual General Meeting may be held on short notice provided that all the shareholders entitled to attend and vote at the meeting agree. Any general meeting which is not an Annual General Meeting is called an Extraordinary General Meeting. At least 14 days written notice of any Extraordinary General Meeting is required, unless a special resolution or a resolution on which special notice has been given to Diageo is proposed, in which case 21 days written notice is required. Any Extraordinary General Meeting may be held on short notice if a majority in number of shareholders, who together hold at least 95% in nominal value of Diageos shares giving a right to attend and vote at such meeting, agree.
Variation of rights If, at any time, Diageos share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class may be varied, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, either with the consent in writing of the holders of three-quarters in nominal value of the shares of that class or upon the adoption of an extraordinary resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.
Repurchase of shares Subject to authorisation by shareholder resolution, Diageo may purchase its own shares in accordance with the Companies Act. Any shares which have been bought back must be cancelled immediately upon completion of the purchase, thereby reducing the amount of Diageos issued share capital. Diageo currently has shareholder authority to buy back up to 309,885,718 ordinary shares during the period up to the Annual General Meeting. The minimum price which must be paid for such shares is 28 101/108 pence and the maximum price is an amount equal to 105% of the average of the middle market quotations for an ordinary share for the five preceding business days.
Exchange controls
There are currently no UK foreign exchange control restrictions on the payment of dividends to US persons on Diageos ordinary shares or preferred securities or on the conduct of Diageos operations.
Documents on display
The latest annual report, the annual review and any related documents of the company may be inspected at the Securities and Exchange Commissions public reference rooms located at 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the public reference room can be obtained by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1 800 SEC 0330.
160 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
Taxation
This section provides a descriptive summary of United States federal income tax and United Kingdom tax consequences that are likely to be material to the holders of the ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities, who hold their ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities as capital assets for tax purposes. It does not purport to be a complete technical analysis or a listing of all potential tax effects relevant to the ownership of the ordinary shares, ADSs and preferred securities. This section does not apply to any holder who is subject to special rules, including:
a dealer in securities or foreign currency;
a trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for securities holdings;
a tax-exempt organisation;
a life insurance company;
a person liable for alternative minimum tax;
a person that actually or constructively owns 10% or more of the voting stock of Diageo;
a person that holds ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction; or
a US holder (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the US dollar.
For United Kingdom tax purposes, special rules may apply, in addition to those set out above, to holders that are banks, regulated investment companies or other financial institutions. This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions, and the laws of the United Kingdom all as currently in effect, as well as on the Conventions Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Tax on Income and Capital Gains entered into force 25 April 1980 (the Old Treaty) and entered into force on 31 March 2003 (the New Treaty). These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis.
A US holder is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities that is for United States federal income tax purposes:
a citizen or resident of the United States;
a United States domestic corporation;
an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or
a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts administration and one or more United States persons are authorised to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
This section is not intended to provide specific advice and no action should be taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon it. This discussion addresses only United States federal income tax and United Kingdom income tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax and stamp taxes.
Ordinary shares or ADSs, United Kingdom taxation There is no United Kingdom withholding tax on dividends. A shareholder who is an individual resident for United Kingdom tax purposes in the United Kingdom that receives a dividend from the company will generally be entitled to a tax credit equal to one-ninth of the dividend. The individual will be taxable on the total of the dividend and the related credit, known as the gross dividend, which will be regarded as the top slice of the individuals income. The tax credit will, however be treated as discharging the individuals liability to income tax in respect of the gross dividend, unless and except to the extent that the gross dividend falls above the threshold for the higher rate of income tax, in which case the individual will, to that extent, pay tax on the gross dividend calculated as 32.5% of the gross dividend less the related tax credit. A shareholder that is a company resident for tax purpose in the United Kingdom will not generally be taxable on any dividend it receives in respect of the shares. A shareholder who is not liable for tax on dividends received on the shares will not be entitled to claim payment of the tax credit in respect of those dividends.
161 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
The Old Treaty, if applicable by virtue of an election under the New Treaty, allows an eligible US holder to claim a similar tax credit from the United Kingdom Inland Revenue. However, it also provides for a notional United Kingdom withholding tax which, in the case of an eligible US holder that owned, directly or indirectly, less than 10% of the voting stock of the company, is set at 15% of the aggregate of the dividend and the credit. At current rates, the notional withholding tax would eliminate the tax credit payment but no withholding in excess of the tax credit payment would be imposed upon the US holder. Thus, for example, an eligible US holder that received a dividend of £9 would also be entitled to receive from the United Kingdom Inland Revenue a tax credit of £1 (one-ninth of the dividend received), but the entire payment of £1 would be eliminated by the notional United Kingdom withholding tax, which would result in a net distribution, before United States tax, of £9 to the US holder.
United States taxation Under the United States federal income tax laws, and subject to the passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, rules discussed below, the gross amount of any dividend paid to a US holder by Diageo in respect of its ordinary shares or ADSs out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal income tax purposes) is subject to United States federal income taxation. Dividends paid to a non-corporate US holder after 31 December 2002 and before 1 January 2009 that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to the holder at a maximum tax rate of 15% provided that the ordinary shares or ADSs are held for more than 60 days during the 120 day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and the holder meets other holding period requirements. The Internal Revenue Service recently announced that it will permit taxpayers to apply a proposed legislative change to this holding period requirement as if such change were already effective. This legislative technical correction would change the minimum required holding period, retroactive to 1 January 2003, to more than 60 days during the 121 day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date. Dividends paid by Diageo with respect to its ordinary shares or ADSs will be qualified dividend income to US holders that meet the holding period requirement. US holders that are eligible for the benefits of the Old Treaty and have properly filed Internal Revenue Form 8833 may include any United Kingdom tax deemed withheld from the dividend payment in this gross amount even though they do not in fact receive it. Subject to certain limitations, the United Kingdom tax deemed withheld in accordance with the Old Treaty and paid over to the United Kingdom will be creditable against the US holders United States federal income tax liability. In addition, special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the maximum 15% tax rate. Under the New Treaty, a US holder will not be entitled to a United Kingdom tax refund, but also will not be subject to United Kingdom withholding tax. In that case, the US holder therefore will include in income for United States federal income tax purposes only the amount of the dividend actually received, and the receipt of a dividend will not entitle the US holder to a foreign tax credit.
Preferred securities United Kingdom taxation Payments to a US holder of preferred securities whose holding is not effectively connected with a permanent establishment or a fixed base in the United Kingdom made (i) by Grand Metropolitan Delaware, LP pursuant to the preferred securities or (ii) by the company pursuant to its guarantee thereof will not be subject to United Kingdom withholding tax provided that, as regards the portion of any payment by the company which represents income in respect of the preferred securities:
(a) | that portion is exempt from taxation in the United Kingdom under Article 22 (other income) of the Old Treaty or New Treaty, as applicable; | |||
(b) | the US holder is entitled to and has claimed the benefit of the Old Treaty or New Treaty, as applicable, in respect of such payment; and | |||
(c) | the company has received from the Inland Revenue, prior to the payment being made, a direction pursuant to the Old Treaty or New Treaty, as applicable, allowing payment to be made without deduction of United Kingdom tax. |
If (b) or (c) above is not satisfied so that tax is withheld by the company, a person entitled to exemption under the Old Treaty or New Treaty, as applicable, may claim repayment of such tax from the Inland Revenue.
United States taxation A US holder of preferred securities will be required to include in gross income its distributive share of the net income of Grand Metropolitan Delaware, LP, which generally will not exceed the distributions received on the preferred securities. This income will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction, and will be foreign source passive or, in the case of certain holders, financial services income for foreign tax credit purposes.
162 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Additional information for shareholders |
Taxation of capital gains. United Kingdom taxation A citizen or resident of the United States who is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom will not be liable for United Kingdom tax on gains realised or accrued on the sale or other disposal of ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities unless the ordinary shares or ADSs or preferred securities are held in connection with a trade or business carried on by the holder in the United Kingdom through a United Kingdom branch, agency or, a permanent establishment. A US holder will be liable for United States federal income tax on such gains to the same extent as on any other gains from sale or dispositions of shares or stock.
US taxation Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a US holder who sells or otherwise disposes of ordinary shares, ADSs, or preferred securities, will recognise capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount that is realised and the tax basis, determined in US dollars, in the ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities. Capital gain of a non-corporate US holder that is recognised on or after 6 May 2003 and before 1 January 2009 is taxed at a maximum rate of 15% where the property is held more than one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
PFIC rules Diageo believes that ordinary shares, ADSs and preferred securities should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If treated as a PFIC, unless a US holder elects to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities, gain realised on the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities would in general not be treated as capital gain. Instead, US holders would be treated as if the holder had realised such gain and certain excess distributionspro-rated over the holders holding period for the ordinary shares, ADSs or preferred securities and would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year. In addition, dividends received from Diageo will not be eligible for the special tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income if Diageo is a PFIC either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.
United Kingdom inheritance tax An ordinary share, ADS or preferred security held by an individual shareholder who is domiciled in the United States for the purposes of the Convention Between the United States and the United Kingdom relating to estate and gift taxes (the Convention) will not be subject to United Kingdom inheritance tax on the individuals death (whether held on the date of death or gifted during the individuals lifetime) except in the exceptional case where the ADS or ordinary share is part of the business property of a United Kingdom permanent establishment of the individual or pertains to a United Kingdom fixed base of an individual who performs independent personal services. The Convention generally provides for tax paid in the United Kingdom to be credited against tax payable in the United States and for tax paid in the United States to be credited against any tax payable in the United Kingdom, based on priority rules set forth in the Convention, in a case where an ordinary share, ADS or preferred security is subject both to United Kingdom inheritance tax and to United States federal gift or estate tax.
United Kingdom stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax Stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT) arises upon the deposit of an underlying ordinary share with the Depositary, generally at the higher rate of 15% of its issue price or, as the case may be, of the consideration for transfer. The Depositary will pay the SDRT but will recover an amount in respect of such tax from the initial holders of ADSs.
163 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorised.
Diageo plc
(Registrant)
/s/ NC ROSE
NC Rose
Chief Financial Officer
21 September 2004
164 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Exhibits
1.1
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association of Diageo plc (incorporated by reference to Diageo plcs Form 6-K filed on 15 November 2002) | |
2.1
|
Indenture, among Diageo Capital plc, Diageo plc and Citibank N.A., dated as of 3 August 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Diageo plcs Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Commission File No. 333-8874)) | |
2.2
|
Indenture, among Diageo Investment Corporation, Diageo plc and Citibank N.A., dated as of 1 June 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
2.3
|
Indenture, among Diageo Finance B.V., Diageo plc and Citibank N.A. dated as of 8 December 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Diageo plcs Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Commission File No. 333-110804)) | |
4.1
|
Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement among Gramet Holdings Corp., Diageo plc and Delaware Champion Acquisition Corporation, dated as of 13 December 2002 (incorporated by reference to Diageo plcs Form 6-K filed on 10 January 2003) | |
4.2
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated 31 October 2001 by and among General Mills, Inc., Gramet Holdings Corporation and Diageo plc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.3
|
Supplemental Marketing Agreement and Waiver, dated 23 June 2004 by and among General Mills, Inc., Diageo plc and Diageo Atlantic Holdings B.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (i) to Diageo plcs Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13D filed on 24 June 2004) | |
4.4
|
Second Amendment to Stockholders Agreement by and among General Mills, Inc., Diageo plc and Diageo Atlantic Holdings B.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (j) to Diageo plcs Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13D filed on 24 June 2004) | |
4.5
|
SOFIA: an agreement relating to the termination of the Framework and Implementation Agreement between Diageo plc and Pernod Ricard S.A., dated 21 December 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2003 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.6
|
Service Agreement, among Diageo plc and Paul Walsh, dated 7 October 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.7
|
Service Agreement, among Diageo plc and Nicholas Rose, dated 1 October 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.8
|
Letter Agreement, among Diageo plc and Lord Blyth of Rowington, dated 7 October 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.9
|
Letter of Agreement, among Diageo plc and Lord Blyth of Rowington, dated 7 March 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2003 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.10
|
Letter of Agreement, among Diageo plc and Lord Blyth of Rowington, dated 10 September 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2003 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.11
|
Form of Service Agreement for Diageo plcs executives in the United Kingdom (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2003 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.12
|
Form of Service Agreement for Diageo plcs executives in the United States (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2003 (Commission File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.13
|
The Diageo plc Senior Executive Share Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Diageo plcs Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-11462)) | |
4.14
|
The Diageo plc Executive Share Option Plan Rules (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Diageo plcs Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-11460)) | |
4.15
|
The Diageo plc Associated Companies Share Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.16
|
Diageo plc Long Term Incentive Plan Rules (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (File No. 1-10691)) | |
4.17
|
The Diageo plc Share Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Diageo plcs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2001 (File No. 1-10691)) | |
8.1 |
Principal group companies (incorporated by reference to page 154 in the Annual Report) | |
12.1
|
Certification of Paul S. Walsh filed pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) | |
12.2
|
Certification of Nicholas C. Rose filed pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) | |
13.1
|
Certification of Paul S. Walsh furnished pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.1350(a) and (b) | |
13.2
|
Certification of Nicholas C. Rose furnished pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.1350(a) and (b) | |
14.1
|
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm |
165 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Cross reference to Form 20-F
The information in this document that is referenced in the following table and the cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements on page 19 is included in Diageos 2004 Form 20-F and is filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Item | Required item in 20-F | Page | ||||
Part I | ||||||
1. | Identity of directors, senior management and advisers |
|||||
Not applicable |
||||||
2. | Offer statistics and expected timetable |
|||||
Not applicable |
||||||
3. | Key information |
|||||
Five year information |
2-6 | |||||
Risk factors |
16-19 | |||||
4. | Information on the company |
|||||
Business description |
7-16 | |||||
Principal group companies |
151 | |||||
5. | Operating and financial review and prospects |
|||||
Operating and financial review |
20-48 | |||||
Trend information |
48 | |||||
Liquidity and capital resources |
48-51 | |||||
Contractual obligations |
51 | |||||
Off-balance sheet arrangements |
52 | |||||
Critical UK GAAP accounting policies |
54-55 | |||||
New accounting standards |
55-57 | |||||
Discussion of US GAAP differences |
57-59 | |||||
6. | Directors, senior management and employees |
|||||
Directors and senior management |
60-62 | |||||
Directors remuneration report |
63-73 | |||||
Corporate
governance report Board of directors |
74-75 | |||||
Audit committee |
75 | |||||
Remuneration committee |
76 | |||||
Directors
report Directors |
80 | |||||
Employees |
13 | |||||
7. | Major shareholders and related party transactions |
|||||
Related party transactions |
73, 154-155 | |||||
Major shareholders |
155 | |||||
8. | Financial information |
|||||
Dividends |
5 | |||||
Report of
independent registered public accounting firm |
82 | |||||
Consolidated
primary financial statements |
83-87 | |||||
Accounting policies |
88-89 | |||||
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
90-147 | |||||
Principal group companies |
151 | |||||
Legal proceedings |
153 | |||||
9. | The offer and listing |
|||||
Trading market for shares |
155 |
Item | Required item in 20-F | Page | ||||
10. | Additional information |
|||||
Material contracts |
153-154 | |||||
Share capital |
155 | |||||
Memorandum and articles of association |
157-159 | |||||
Exchange controls |
159 | |||||
Documents on display |
159 | |||||
Taxation |
160-162 | |||||
11. | Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk |
|||||
Risk management |
52-53 | |||||
Sensitivity analysis |
53-54 | |||||
12. | Description of securities other than equity securities |
|||||
Not applicable |
||||||
Part II | ||||||
13. | Defaults, dividend arrearages and delinquencies |
|||||
Not applicable |
||||||
14. | Material
modifications to the rights of security holders and use of proceeds |
|||||
Not applicable |
||||||
15. | Controls and procedures |
|||||
Filing assurance committee |
77 | |||||
16A. | Audit
committee financial expert |
75 | ||||
16B. | Compliance
programme |
77 | ||||
16C. | Auditor fees |
96 | ||||
16D. | New York Stock
Exchange corporate governance rules |
79 | ||||
16E. | Purchases of
own shares |
80 | ||||
17. | Financial statements |
|||||
Not applicable |
||||||
Part III | ||||||
18. | Financial statements |
|||||
Report of
independent registered public accounting firm |
82 | |||||
Consolidated
primary financial statements |
83-87 | |||||
Accounting policies |
88-89 | |||||
Notes to the consolidated financial statements |
90-147 | |||||
Principal group companies |
151 | |||||
19. | Exhibits |
164 | ||||
Additional
information |
||||||
Unaudited
computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred share
dividends |
152 | |||||
Glossary of terms and US equivalents |
166 |
It is possible to read and copy documents that have been filed by Diageo plc with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at the SECs public reference room, located at 450 5th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room and their copy charges. Filings with the SEC are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and on the web site maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.
166 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Glossary of terms and US equivalents
In this document the following words and expressions shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the following meanings:
Term used in UK annual report
|
US equivalent or definition | |
Acquisition accounting
|
Purchase accounting | |
Associates
|
Entities accounted for under the equity method | |
American Depositary Receipt (ADR)
|
Receipt evidencing ownership of an ADS | |
American Depositary Share (ADS)
|
Registered negotiable security, listed on the New York Stock Exchange, representing four Diageo plc ordinary shares of 28101/108 pence each | |
Called up share capital
|
Common stock | |
Capital allowances
|
Tax depreciation | |
Capital redemption reserve
|
Other additional capital | |
Company
|
Diageo plc | |
Creditors
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | |
Debtors
|
Receivables | |
Employee share schemes
|
Employee stock benefit plans | |
Employment or staff costs
|
Payroll costs | |
Equivalent units
|
An equivalent unit represents one nine litre case of spirits, which is approximately 272 servings. A serving comprises 33ml of spirits, 165ml of wine, or 330ml of ready to drink or beer. To convert volume of products other than spirits to equivalent units: beer in hectolitres divide by 0.9, wine in nine litre cases divide by five and ready to drink in nine litre cases divide by 10. | |
Euro,
|
Euro currency | |
Exceptional items
|
Items that, in managements judgement, need to be disclosed separately by virtue of their size or incidence. Exceptional items under UK GAAP do not represent extraordinary items under US GAAP | |
Excise duty
|
Tax charged by a sovereign territory on the production, manufacture, sale or distribution of selected goods (including imported goods) within that territory. Excise duties are generally based on the quantity or alcohol content of goods, rather than their value and are typically applied to alcohol products and fuels. | |
Finance lease
|
Capital lease | |
Financial year
|
Fiscal year | |
Fixed asset investments
|
Non-current investments | |
Free cash flow
|
Net cash flow arising from operating activities, dividends received from associates, returns on investments and servicing of finance, taxation, and capital expenditure and financial investment | |
Freehold
|
Ownership with absolute rights in perpetuity | |
GAAP
|
Generally accepted accounting principles | |
GrandMet
|
Grand Metropolitan Public Limited Company and its consolidated subsidiaries | |
GrandMet PLC
|
Grand Metropolitan Public Limited Company | |
Group and Diageo
|
Diageo plc and its consolidated subsidiaries | |
Guinness Group
|
Former Guinness PLC and its consolidated subsidiaries | |
Impact
|
An international drinks magazine that is independent from industry participants | |
Merger
|
Merger of Grand Metropolitan Public Limited Company and Guinness PLC, effective 17 December 1997 | |
Merger accounting
|
Pooling of interests | |
Net asset value
|
Book value | |
Net sales (after deducting excise duties)
|
Turnover less excise duties | |
Noon buying rate
|
Buying rate at noon in New York City for cable transfers in pounds sterling as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York | |
Operating profit
|
Net operating income | |
Operating margin
|
Operating profit before exceptional items divided by turnover | |
Organic movement
|
At level exchange and after adjusting for acquisitions and disposals for continuing operations | |
Own shares
|
Treasury stock | |
Pillsbury
|
The Pillsbury Company | |
Pound sterling, sterling, £, pence, p
|
UK currency | |
Profit
|
Earnings | |
Profit and loss account
|
Income statement/statement of operations | |
Profit for financial year
|
Net income | |
Profit on sale of fixed assets
|
Gain on disposal of non-current assets | |
Provisions
|
Accruals for losses/contingencies | |
Recognised gains and losses
|
Comprehensive income | |
Redundancy charges
|
Early release scheme expenses | |
Reserves
|
Accumulated earnings, other comprehensive income and additional paid in capital | |
RPI
|
UK retail price index | |
Scrip dividend
|
Stock dividend | |
SEC
|
US Securities and Exchange Commission | |
Share premium account
|
Additional paid-in capital or paid-in surplus | |
Shareholders funds
|
Shareholders equity | |
Shares
|
Common stock | |
Shares and ordinary shares
|
Diageo plcs ordinary shares | |
Shares in issue
|
Shares issued and outstanding | |
Stocks
|
Inventories | |
Tangible fixed assets
|
Property, plant and equipment | |
Trade debtors
|
Accounts receivable (net) | |
Turnover
|
Revenue/sales | |
US dollars, US$, $, ¢
|
US currency |