Edgar Filing: COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INC

Amendment No. 2 to 2006 Annual Year End Report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

________________________

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FORM 10-KSB

________________________

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006

Commission File Number: 003-08955

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	58-0962699
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

45 Ludlow Street, Suite 602, Yonkers, New York 10705

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(914) 375-7591

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former Address, since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:	Common Stock,
	$.10 par value

Name of each exchange on which registered. NASD OTC Bulletin Board

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |X| YES |_| NO

The aggregate market value of the outstanding Common Stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 13, 2006, based on the average bid and asked price of the Common Stock on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board on said date was $1,112,535.

As of June 13, 2006, the Registrant had outstanding 15,365,598 shares of common stock.

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Explanatory Note:

This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A is being filed as Amendment Number 2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB which was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 13, 2006 and amended on August 4, 2006. We are filing this Form 10-KSB/A to re-order the Items in conformity with the rules for Form 10-KSB, and make corresponding changes in the table of contents. In addition, this Form 10-KSB/A is being filed to restate our financial statements for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006 to reflect additional operating and non-operating gains and losses related to the classification of and accounting for:

(1) the warrants issued in connection with issuance of convertible debt;

(2) conventional convertible debt issued

(3) beneficial conversion features of certain of the debt instruments and

(4) the classification of liabilities between short and long term

The accompanying financial statements for the two fiscal years in the period ended February 28, 2006 have been restated to effect the changes described above.

In addition, we are including currently dated Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 302 and Section 906 certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that are attached to this Form 10-KSB/A as Exhibits 31.1, and 32.1.

For the convenience of the reader, this Form 10-KSB/A sets forth the entire Form 10-KSB, which was prepared and relates to the Company as of February 28, 2006. However, this Form 10-KSB/A only amends and restates the Items described above to reflect the effects of the restatement and no attempt has been made to modify or update other disclosures presented in our February 28, 2006 Form 10-KSB. Accordingly, except for the foregoing amended information, this Form 10-KSB/A continues to speak as of June 13, 2006 (the original filing date of the February 28, 2006 Form 10-KSB), and does not reflect events occurring after the filing of our February 28, 2006 Form 10-KSB and does not modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events. Forward looking statements made in the 2006 Form 10-KSB have not been revised to reflect events, results or developments that have become known to us after the date of the original filing (other than the current restatements described above), and such forward looking statements should be read in their historical context. Unless otherwise stated, the information in this Form 10-KSB/A not affected by such current restatements is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the original filing.

PART I	Page #

Business	1
Properties	14
Legal Proceedings	15
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	15

PART II

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	II-1
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations	II-1

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	F-1
Changes in Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosures	16
Controls and Procedures	16

PART III

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	III-1
Executive Compensation	III-1
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	III-2
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	III-3
Exhibits	III-4
Principal Accountant Fees and Services	III-4


CERTIFICATIONS

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

The Company

Directly, and indirectly through our subsidiaries, Accutone Inc. and Interstate Hearing Aid Service Inc., we are in the business of audiological services. Both subsidiaries changed the focus of their marketing to include, not only the individual, self-pay patients, but health care entities and organizations which could serve as patient referral sources for us. The hearing aid industry is competitively changing at a rapid pace and marketing of these services and competing with organizations with stronger capital availability is becoming more difficult. As a result management decided to identify additional business opportunities for substantial growth in various portions of the medical industry. Based on marketing research, management redirected its focus towards the 44 million plus uninsured and underinsured people throughout the United States.

A major portion of our net sales were generated by fees earned by the provision of audiological testing in our offices as well as those provided on site in Nursing Homes, Assisted Living Facilities, Senior Care Facilities and Adult Day Care Centers as well as the sales and distribution of hearing aids generated in each of these venues. A majority of our audiological service revenue has represented reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid and third party payers. Generally, reimbursement from these parties can take as long as 60 to 120 days. With the implementation of the billing of Medicare payers on-line we have recognized a shorter time of reimbursement from 90 days to approximately 60 days. Medicaid reimbursements can only be billed with various paper submissions which are mailed on a weekly basis. As a result, Medicaid payments, which constitute approximately 30% of our reimbursements, will continue to take 60 to 90 days to be realized. Currently, sales generated from our prescription discount cards as well as the sales of dental/vision and gold cards have not yet reached management’s expectations.

Management had anticipated a growth in revenue resulting from the prior acquisition of the audiology practice of Park Avenue. This did not come to fruition. We believe that this was caused in part by our inability to attract additional audiologists on a timely basis and insufficient working capital. Also the decreases in reimbursement rates from both Medicare and Medicaid impacted the amounts of revenue received. To counteract these reductions, management began new marketing efforts with the nursing homes currently contracted with us as a result of the agreement with Park Avenue as well as additional facilities who we believed would avail themselves of our audiological services. The contract and its addendum called for the nursing home to pay us directly at hourly rates for the testing of their residents. Although we received positive feedback to the new contract we could not determine that this contract would be profitable in the future. Therefore, we made the decision in February 2006 to no longer service nursing home patients on site.

In addition to the revenue we currently generate from our audiological services, management believes that revenue will increase in future periods as a result of increased distribution and marketing of our medical discount cards as set forth herein.

To position ourselves to take advantage of this huge market, on March 1, 2004 pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, we acquired one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Comprehensive Network Solutions, Inc. (CNS) based in Austin, Texas from the CNS shareholders in consideration for the issuance of a total of 275,000 restricted shares of our common stock to the CNS shareholders. Pursuant to the Agreement, CNS became our wholly owned subsidiary. Based on this acquisition, we changed our name to Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. to better reflect the fact that we operate in several medical venues. This acquisition positioned us to take full advantage of the opportunity to become a major player providing access to discounted health care provider networks and services.

Medical Discount Card Product and Marketing

The acquisition of CNS allowed us to utilize the resources of both companies to enter the health benefit market with consumer choice products for individuals, employers, associations, unions and political subdivisions. Our current business plan focuses on marketing health care benefits that enable the prospective clients to choose appropriate providers and financial arrangements that best meet their individual needs. CNS was primarily in the business of marketing chiro-care discount cards. Utilizing the experience of CNS management in the medical care discount card arena we were able to develop a marketing plan to sell and distribute medical care discount cards with a more inclusive group of prescription and medical coverage. This was additionally facilitated by the contacts already

developed and in place by CNS management and marketing team. Since CNS did not achieve the anticipated sales, revenue or profitability we anticipated at the time CNS was acquired, we made the decision to divest our interest in this entity in order to significantly lower our operating expenses by eliminating the costs of maintaining the CNS operations which generated only minimal revenue.

In November, 2005, we entered into a settlement agreement with David and Pamala Streilein in which we agreed to divest our interest in Comprehensive Network Solutions, Inc. (“CNS”). Although the agreement closed in November 2005 and all business and relationships ended at such time, the agreement was effective on December 15, 2005. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we agreed to return our shares of CNS to the Streileins in consideration for the cancellation of the Streileins’ employment agreements with us as well as to forgive all salary past due and any future salary due under their employment agreements. CNS failed to provide the projected sales or revenue that we had anticipated upon execution of the agreement to acquire this entity. Although this acquisition allowed us entry into the discount card marketplace, the expense of operating CNS and paying the employments agreement no longer justified the potential benefits to us, when and if, CNS commences generating projected revenue. Although the prospects for CNS to reach significant revenue and profitability as a result of the State of Texas passing House Bill #7, which reformed workers compensation in Texas, by review of potential revenue and continuing escalating expenses management determined that it could not adequately fund these operations until the anticipated revenue to be generated between June and September 2006 would be achieved. Although this transaction will negatively impact our balance sheet to the extent of the original purchase as well as in excess of $300,000 loaned to cover ongoing expenses, we still firmly believe that removing an additional burden of approximately $15,000-$18,000 a month from our cash flow would benefit us in the long run. We believe it is in our best interests to utilize all available funds to expand and implement the current prescriptions and discount card programs being marketed by us.

During the last twelve months we have continued to expand our product line and marketing efforts with additional benefits and alternative benefit funding options. These new expanded products are being offered to individuals and small employers; and customized private label versions of the products through its broker and consultant relationships to municipalities, charitable organizations, associations, unions, political subdivisions and large employers. The offerings are alternative cost and quality benefit solutions to prospects and clients who are uninsured or underinsured through existing traditional defined benefit health plans.

We now focus on specialty health benefits products, including, but not limited to three levels of provider networks. We have been and will continue to work on expanding our product with additional benefits and alternative benefit funding options. As a result of the shift in focus of our business, we changed our name to Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. to better reflect our marketing of “The Solution Card”. Both Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions and The Solution Card were trademarked by us for further protection for our new business operations. These expanded products are currently being offered to municipalities, charitable organizations, employers, fraternal organizations, union benefit funds, business associations, insurance companies, and insurance agencies. The offerings are alternative cost and quality benefit solutions to prospects and clients who are uninsured or underinsured. These expanded products are also being offered to groups set forth above whose medical care costs are covered through existing traditional defined benefit health plans and have experienced large percentage increases in premiums as well as shrinking coverage and higher deductibles. The range of discounts on the medical services and products with the Solution Card family of products is between 10% and 60% with an overall average savings of 22% to 28%.

Management believes the core of our back office and fulfillment needs were met with the finalization of a joint marketing agreement with Alliance HealthCard, Inc. (symbol: ALHC.OB) on December 18, 2004. Alliance HealthCard, Inc. creates, markets and distributes membership discount savings programs to predominantly underserved markets, where individuals have either limited or no health benefits. These programs allow members to obtain substantial discounts in 16 areas of health care services including physician visits, hospital stays, pharmacy, dental, vision, patient advocacy and alternative medicine among others. The company offers third-party organizations self-branded or private-label healthcare discount savings programs through its existing provider network agreements and systems. Founded in 1998 by health care and finance experts, Alliance HealthCard, Inc. now provides access to a network of over 600,000 healthcare professionals for the over 800,000 individuals covered by the Alliance HealthCard, Inc. Alliance HealthCard, Inc. is based in Norcross, GA and its website is www.alliancehealthcare.com.

In February 2005, Comprehensive Healthcare Solution, Inc. and Alliance HealthCard, Inc. as part of the joint marketing agreement, finalized an agreement with Financial Independence Company Insurance Services (FICIS) of Woodland Hills, California. FICIS is one of the ten largest employee benefit brokerage firms in the State of California and has a nationwide representation. The agreement is for the distribution of health discount cards by FICIS to various Cendant franchisees, their employees and associates. These discount cards will offer to the Cendant Group and other FICIS clients a choice of affordable and convenient health care options nationwide. A recent U.S. Census bureau survey reported that approximately 44.3 million Americans do not have health insurance coverage.

This contract brings to FICIS its packaging of health care discount arrangements through premier preferred provider networks. As a result of Alliance HealthCard’s combined successful 6 years experience in packaging discount programs, FICIS has chosen to integrate these capabilities into their offering of health benefit services to the Cendant Group of companies as well as other FICIS clients via its contract with Comprehensive/Alliance. A preliminary offering of discount card products took place during February 2005 at the Cendant Real Estate Services conference that included all of the Cendant franchise real estate agencies including Cendant Mobility, Cendant Mortgage, Cendant Settlement Services, Coldwell Banker Commercial, ERA, NRT and Century 21 agencies. The above agencies represent over 500,000 franchisees, sales associates and employees.

Management expected these venues to begin to generate revenue by the quarter ending August 30, 2005. Although some revenue have already been generated as a result of this relationship, the full extent of the benefit of these organizations having our discount cards have yet to meet our anticipated revenue stream. This was a result of the cards not being printed and distributed by FICIS as originally intended. An appropriate plan of marketing and distribution was reformulated and the cards were subsequently printed in December 2005. This revised plan called for the direct mail of over 500,000 prescription discount cards to three of the Cendant Real Estate Franchisees: Coldwell Banker, Century 21 and ERA which was undertaken by the end of January 2006. Each card is private labeled with the logo of each franchise as a “Choice RX” prescription discount card. Although the 500,000 cards were mailed to the franchisees, the number of cards actually placed into the hands of sales representatives of each franchisee will take between 6-9 months before the majority of the cards are distributed. Although we have generated some revenue, we believe that we will begin to realize expanded revenue from these cards by the end of the current year.

Prescription Discount Cards

We will derive revenue from the distribution and utilization of our prescription discount card as well as those private labeled for the various municipalities and organizations. We receive a transaction fee every time a prescription discount card is used by a cardholder to fill an eligible prescription. Our fee is generated on approximately 85% of the prescription drugs utilized. Management believes that between 5% and 8% of the total population of the cards distributed will be utilized on a regular monthly basis by the cardholder and their families. These are estimates derived by our management and there are no guarantees that we will meet these expectations. This utilization estimate is based on the demographics on the areas where we are focusing our marketing and distribution efforts. These demographics include municipalities and charitable foundations with high percentages of uninsured and underinsured populations. Most of the cards already distributed have no expiration date and therefore the revenue will be ongoing in the future. These groups are prime candidates to utilize the prescription discount cards and therefore benefit by obtaining discounts averaging 22% to 28% of the purchase price of the prescription drugs purchased.

Although we do not sell insured plans the discounts realized by its members through our programs typically range from 10% to 75% off providers’ usual and customary fees. In general, the overall average discounted fee is between 22% and 28%. Our programs require members to pay the provider at the time of service, thereby eliminating the need for any insurance claims filing. These discounts, which are similar to managed care discounts, typically save the individual more than the cost of the program itself.

Membership Service Programs

As part of our marketing program, we are offering memberships to municipalities, charitable foundations, large employers, unions, union benefits funds, associations and insurance companies. Cardholders will be offered discounts for products and services ranging from 10% to 75% depending on the area of coverage and the specific procedures, with an average discounted fee of between 22% and 28%.

Prior marketing efforts resulted in management recognizing the need to have strong, structured and defined working relationships with organizations experienced in the sales, distribution and administration of membership healthcare discount savings programs. Additionally, management recognized the need for structured and defined access agreements with quality healthcare professionals through national preferred provider organizations. These requirements were the prime moving forces in the Company arranging its joint marketing agreement with Alliance HealthCard, Inc.

We believe that these marketing agreements will add to our revenue and potential profitability. These agreements allow us to develop product pricing unique to the healthcare discount savings market. We believe that these agreements are positive steps but cannot guarantee that the results of these efforts will succeed.

Our expectations are that the joint marketing agreement with Alliance HealthCard, Inc. combined with the accelerated marketing of the medical health care discount cards will add to both the Company’s revenue and profitability. It should be noted that the expenses related to the sales and marketing of these discount cards have utilized and will continue to utilize a major portion of any additional working capital realized to date. We cannot guarantee that our discount cards will achieve the required sales volume to generate anticipate profitability.

Municipalities

In April 2005, we signed our first agreement with a municipal government, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. In May 2005, we delivered over 300,000 Luzerne County private labeled discount prescription cards to Luzerne County’s Commissioners Offices for distribution to its residents. The agreement calls for Luzerne County to share in a portion of the revenue generated by the utilization of the discount prescription cards by its residents. As a result of the county’s inability to adequately disseminate these cards to its residents, we met with the county officials to reformulate a more reliable method of distribution. The original plan called for the county to distribute cards to various municipal officers within the county for distribution to the local residents. This was accomplished but not to the degree of distribution originally anticipated. As part of the revised plan, the county agreed to mail these cards to its residents utilizing a mailing list provided by us to the county. The mailing list provided was broken down demographically to residents 40-90 years old with incomes of $15,000 or more annually. This program was anticipated to begin in late January 2006 with the direct mailing of approximately 70,000 cards to county households which we believed would cover a major percentage of the 300,000 plus county residents. The county did not begin the mailing until the beginning of March 2006. The county has also provided its residents access to card utilization information including a list of providers as well as phone contact information on its website at www.luzernecounty.org. The county will be redesigning and adding to the website a list of locations where the Luzerne county private labeled prescription discount cards may be picked up by residents. We believe that this joint effort by us and the county will help to ensure that the Luzerne county discount cards will be distributed in simple and efficient manner for county households to receive and utilize the cards. It was our intention to reinforce this distribution program with newspaper ads and promotional assistance from the county. Capital constraints have delayed this promotional program. We believe that when this occurs it will greatly assist in any increase revenue streams from utilization of these cards since the demographic statistics from Luzerne county are that they are approximately 26-30% of the residents uninsured and an additional 10-12% either underinsured or with no prescription drug benefits.

On July 13, 2005, the commissioners of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania approved commissioner’s bill #2005-68 approving a professional services agreement with the Company to provide prescription discount cards to the approximate 310,000 residents of the county. The county and the company worked together to have as many of the prescription discount cards distributed subsequent to the delivery date of August 15, 2005. The Company initially printed 350,000 of the Lehigh County’s private labeled prescription discount cards at the county’s request, and the cards were delivered to the county on August 15, 2005. The initial distribution commenced at the Lehigh County Fair on August 30, 2005 with a press conference and kick-off including the county adding information about the discount cards on its website at www.lehighcounty.org. The website now includes information regarding utilization, provider look up, telephone contact information, and a list of the sites where the card can be picked up in person by its residents. The county had also indicated that it had invited approximately 35 organizations within the county to participate in making available the prescription discount cards. Some of these organizations included the Lehigh County Medical Society, Lehigh County Aging/Adult Services Offices, Lehigh County Human Resources Offices as well as other service and religious organizations throughout the county. The county indicated that it would be in the

best interest of its residents, the county, and us to use all efforts to distribute as many cards as soon as possible. A substantial portion of this distribution took place in the months of October and November 2005. Currently, the county has distributed its private labeled prescription discount cards to approximately 280 locations for residents to be able to pick up the Lehigh county private labeled prescription discount cards. The card has begun to be utilized and the number of cards being utilized on a monthly basis continues to increase. Although we anticipated this utilization to increase we commenced discussions with the county to supplement distribution via a direct mailing to all county households. We anticipated that the direct mail program would begin in February 2006 but capital constraints delayed this distribution. ER purchased a mailing list of 70,000 residents and one mailing was done by the county. We are beginning to recognize some of the benefits of this mailing and anticipate that it will continue to increase. There can be no assurances that any increase will be material.

On September 15, 2005, we signed a contract with Carbon County, Pennsylvania, to deliver approximately 75,000 private labeled Carbon County prescription discount cards to the county’s residents. We fulfilled the contract through the delivery of the county’s private labeled prescription discount cards on October 13, 2005. The initial distribution of the cards began October 13, 2005 at a senior citizen fair within the county which was attended by approximately 2,500 senior citizens and resulted in the distribution of in excess of 2,000 cards on that day. We were notified by the county commissioners that a distribution of the discount cards throughout the county to its municipal offices, county aging and adult services offices, human resource offices, religious organizations, and other venues would begin in late October 2005. The actual distribution did not begin until mid-December 2005. In order to help insure distribution to each household we intended to implement a direct mail program with the cooperation of the county. This program has not yet been accomplished with the county but we are currently working toward that end with county officials. The county has also included information about the utilization of these cards, provider lookup, sites where the cards are available and telephone contact information on its website at www.carboncounty.com/services.htm.

On September 29, 2005, we executed a contract with Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania to deliver 165,000 Schuylkill County private labeled prescription discount cards to the county by the beginning of November. The county commissioners indicated to us at that time that a distribution of the discount cards would begin to take place in November 2005 throughout the county to its municipal offices, county aging and adult services offices, human resource offices, religious organizations, and other venues. The county commissioners have also indicated to us that they would arrange a press conference including television and newspaper coverage of the delivery of the cards to aid in the notification to its residents of the cards availability and of the places of distribution. This planned distribution did not take place and the cards were not printed. Similar to our experiences in Carbon County, we faced difficulty in coordinating distribution of the cards during county elections as well as the planning of year-end fiscal requirements for the new year by county officials. We worked with the prior and continued to work with new county administrators in the first two weeks of January and cards are currently ordered and would be printed for anticipated delivery by the middle of February 2006. We also anticipate using the county’s network of distribution as well as direct mail programs to all county households as we are trying to do in other counties. The county’s website is currently being reconstructed and designed to allow for provider lookup, utilization information, telephone contact information and sites where the cards are available for pick up. We are currently working with the county to this end.

As with many of the municipalities, both elected officials, appointed county officials and municipal employees were involved in campaigning for November elections and in many instances a revision of the base of elected officials hampered decisions being made within the time frames originally prescribed. We are currently realizing a minimal revenue stream resulting from the cards successfully distributed and anticipate that additional cards will be distributed during January and February 2006 to residents of all of the counties set forth above.

We have previously disclosed that we have made presentations regarding our prescription discount cards to approximately eight other municipalities in Pennsylvania and New York. Although these counties had requested and received contracts as well as information on the cards and we have been in contact with these counties we have not finalized contracts with these counties. Most counties continue to express interest in proceeding. We will continue to negotiate with these counties during 2006 and believe that we can be successful in signing contracts with some of the following counties and municipalities in Pennsylvania and New York. The efforts to negotiate with these additional counties have been delayed as our management has had to focus on its current contracts and raising funds.

Other Contracts

On October 5, 2005, we signed a contract with A-1 Printing of Brooklyn, NY. A-1 Printing, one of the largest privately owned producers of prepaid telephone cards and prints approximately 100 million such cards per year. The agreement authorizes A-1Printing to attach our discount prescription card -- as a free gift -- to approximately 10 million prepaid telephone cards distributed throughout the United States. There will be no charge or cost to us for printing and distribution and the contract calls for revenue sharing between us and A-1. The majority of prepaid telephone cards sold are used by people residing in the United States who still have family and friends in their countries of origin. A-1 Printing currently produces prepaid phone cards in a variety of foreign languages, marketing to individuals from such areas as Latin America, India, Pakistan, the Caribbean, and various other countries. A-1 began implementing this contract in November 2005 and to date has printed and distributed approximately 250,000 discount cards as part of their prepaid telephone card program. Although we do not believe that this program will materially impact our revenue stream and profitability at the current time it is our belief that as a larger number of cards are printed and distributed that additional revenue will be recognized although not at the same utilization rate as other current distribution venues.

On November 15, 2005, we signed a contract with Follieri Group LLC (www.thefollierigroup.com) which is a consultant for the Catholic Church in North America. This contract will allow us to distribute customized private labeled prescription discount cards, through The Follieri Foundation, to the approximately 67+ million parishioners of the many archdioceses throughout the United States. Through this relationship, we anticipated a potential distribution of in excess of 5 million cards to parishioners over a 12 month period. These distribution efforts have goals were not met by the Follieri foundation. Management has been in constant communication with the foundation and has assisted them in methods to accelerate the card distributions in the areas where they are most needed throughout the United States. We believe this is a temporary setback we are still comfortable that a substantial number of cards will be distributed by the end of 2006. The Follieri Foundation is responsible for providing funds and guidance to projects such as senior housing and day care centers. We intend to commence our distribution with the archdioceses of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and other regions impacted by the recent natural disasters, as well as other heavily populated metropolitan areas. We believe that this relationship should result in the distribution of millions more of our prescription discount cards to parishioners throughout the United States over the next few years.

Through the Follieri Foundation, in January 2006, we met along with the director of this program for the Follieri Foundation the administrators of the following five organizations located in Louisiana:

1.	Catholic Community Services which is the Catholic charities agency of the Diocese of Baton Rouge;
2.	Covenant House of New Orleans;
3.	Archdiocese of Baton Rouge Development Organization;
4.	Archdiocese Development Organization; and
5.	Louisiana Knights of Columbus.

The purpose of these meetings was to determine the needs of the members of each these organizations and the most efficient and expedient methods of distributing the Follieri discount prescription card to as many of these participants as possible within a short period of time. The need for the Follieri prescription discount cards has been exacerbated by the natural disasters in the area in the last six months. We have not yet calculated the approximate number of cards that will be distributed with these organizations but the Follieri Foundation intends to begin to determine a method to distribute these cards in an attempt to have them delivered to as many people as possible by the end of July 2006. In order to accommodate the Foundation need we have ordered and delivered an initial printing of 300,000 Follieri Foundation private label prescription discount cards.

In February 2006 we signed a contract with National Income Life Insurance Company (NILICO) to distribute our Dental, Vision, Hearing and Prescription benefit discount cards to NILICO’s licensed insurance agents throughout New York State.

NILICO is a wholly owned subsidiary of American Income Life Insurance Company which is a 50 plus year old company, licensed in 49 states as well as the District of Columbia, Canada and New Zealand, and is nationally recognized as one of the significant carriers of supplemental insurance in North America. American Income Life is a

wholly owed subsidiary of Torchmark Corporation, (NYSE:TMK) a company specializing in life and supplemental health insurance, whose total assets exceed $12.8 billion.

Background

Significant market changes have occurred over the past two years that creates an advantageous environment for new health care financing initiatives in all three major commercial markets - Employee Benefits, Individual Health Benefits and Workers’ Compensation. These changes present the opportunity for traditional and complimentary medicine to increase their collaboration coupled with innovative consumer choice and defined contribution products which management believes are the foundation of the existing and revised business strategy and plans.

As the cost of health care has begun to increase in double digits again, employers, health insurers and the uninsured are all searching for alternatives to traditional health insurance, health plans and HMO’s. Initial efforts in the market have focused on medical savings plans and defined contribution alternatives. This is leading to the logical consumer focused alternative of limited indemnity reimbursement plans coupled with discounted networks of preferred providers. Historically consumers, employers and health issuers focused on choosing the insurance plan that met their anticipated financial needs and then concerned themselves with what health care providers they could access. The move toward consumer choice requires the benefit purchaser, now the individual with either their own or their employers fixed dollar amount to spend, to choose the health care providers they want to access and then choose the financing arrangement that best meets their individual needs. For all segments of the benefit market, this shift of purchase priority means that consumers are demanding a broad array of health care providers including complimentary and alternative care.

Our current goal is to provide high quality consumer choice and defined contribution healthcare benefits for employees and uninsured and underinsured individuals while continuing development of evidence based disease management program for musculoskeletal conditions of the back, neck and upper extremity.

We are focused on those marketing health care benefits that will meet the real perceived health care needs of consumers, enabling these prospective clients to choose appropriate providers and financial arrangements that best meet their individual needs. Complete development and market implementation of a high quality musculoskeletal disease management program for target markets with directed care of workers’ compensation cases.

Product Strategy

Background:

For the past 25 years, cost and quality management of health care insurance and employee benefit plans have depended on strategies that have produced neither of the outcomes they were designed to accomplish improved patient outcomes and costs with customer satisfaction. In various forms, the health care system has morphed into competing organizations commonly referred to as “managed care” plans. These plans have competed on the basis of pure costs by contracting with health care providers at the lowest reimbursement possible and then restricting how these providers deliver care. That approach has resulted in significant conflict between the provider and the plan. The consumer, the patient, has become the victim of this conflict. And since the conflict has not resulted in lower costs, the plans have “shifted” more costs to the patient in the form of higher deductibles and co-payments when they access the systems for care. As the cost shift has increased, the employers who sponsor and pay the cost of the plans have begun to move toward defined contribution financing and encouraging their plan members to make consumer choices about the kind of health care they individually want to purchase. Consumers have at the same time begun to demand more control over their choices of health care since they are now paying more of the actual cost of care.

The individual health insurance market has continued to shrink as the premium costs of traditional comprehensive health insurance has become impossible for the average self employed or contract employee. These self employed and contract employees were the traditional purchasers of individual health insurance and now they are becoming uninsured. Consumer choice benefits with discounted medical savings cards is an answer to these uninsured or as a less expensive alternative to those currently insured but having difficulty meeting the increased premium costs.

“The Solution Card”™ has been designed to meet the needs that have resulted from these factors. Our management has identified the need for a niche product to fill this void and believes it can utilize the various medical care discount cards in its product line to fill this void.

Products for individuals:

For the individual insured, underinsured and uninsured, “The Solution Card”™ has pre-packaged a series of benefits that bring together high quality health care provider networks that can be purchased directly by the consumer. With the purchase of the provider network access, the individual has the option of purchasing a custom designed program of highly discounted medical services and products.

Private label products for commercial customers:

For employers, plan administrators, trade associations, municipalities and unions, “The Solutions Card”™ through its vendor relationships is able to customize these pre-packaged products to meet these prospective clients’ special needs. This customization can include from a simple private labeling of the pre-packaged products to designing a set of discounted benefits and administration that would be unique to that client. This flexibility is a significant differential in the market today and for the foreseeable future.

Market Strategy

Overview:

“The Solution Card”™ is an innovative and exciting concept that allows individuals to save a significant amount of money on their healthcare. A member will have access to high quality medical networks of professionals and practitioners throughout the United States. “The Solution Card”™ is not a substitute for health insurance. It is a discounted healthcare program that allows for substantial savings to members.

The customized products currently being offered are targeted at commercial purchasers; employers, plan administrators, trade associations, municipalities and unions. Each of these markets requires their own marketing, sales and administrative processes.

The pre-packaged products as mentioned above require product communications that are easily understood, readily available, accessible through multiple outlets and inexpensive to fulfill. The cornerstone of the marketing communication will be through a new member guide and enrollment package currently being developed and continually being modified so as to allow it fulfill the needs to any union, trade organization, employer group or municipality. These products will be available through our internal marketing staff, independent sales representatives, as well as our website and thru targeted advertising media. Attractive, pointed explanation of benefits, simple application form and pricing immediately available are the advantage of these straight forward marketing communication tools.

Administration and Fulfillment of Medical Discount Cards

We will have the ability to access and utilize the existing customer fulfillment, customer service and enrollment administrative capabilities of Alliance HealthCard, Inc. In January 2005, we completed a joint marketing agreement with Alliance HealthCard. This agreement enabled us to significantly enhance our capacity to customize our card products to meet the needs of major commercial prospects and clients. It enabled both companies to expand their capabilities in the retail outlet markets. We brought to the joint venture access to large group purchasers headquartered in the Metro New York market that includes a Fortune 500 corporation, unions, associations, fraternal organizations and political subdivisions. This market has significant need for medical discount cards with benefits that can be custom designed to compliment existing health plans and contract or part-time employees. Additionally, we have existing relationships in the retail market which can support an expansion of the market while Alliance HealthCard has already existing large clients.

The agreement opened new markets for Alliance through CMHS’ existing and potential client relationships. Alliance HealthCard brought to the joint venture over 6 years of experience in the medical discount card business. The infrastructure maintained by Alliance to design, fulfill and service large clients, eliminates our need to develop

this infrastructure at additional costs and utilizing additional capital. Alliance is uniquely qualified to handle and services large clients since its current clients include CVS Pharmacy and State Farm Insurance which have both been serviced for over three years. We will be able to utilize Alliance’s established contracts with high quality provider networks allowing access to discounts for medical discount card membership.

Although both companies continue to maintain their existing clients, they are offering both their existing products and expanded customized products under the joint marketing agreement. Both companies, through their key management staffs, retain long term market relationships with the largest provider networks and health related organizations providing discounts. These relationships enable the companies to pool their resources to maximize value to new prospects and existing clients. Pricing, costs and margins for these pre-packaged products are set but may change as the products are market accepted resulting in a higher volume of sales. As the numbers of clients grow, the costs per client are subject to renegotiation of administration costs which would have a positive cash flow and profitability impact on the company’s margins.

Commercial market:

Bringing our products to the commercial market requires working through relationships with employee benefit consultants, brokers and agents. Our management has existing established relationships that will be the initial concentration of marketing efforts while the intent is to market these products nationally. The sales cycle for the commercial market has historically been from 6 to 12 months with new product introductions. Initial focus for these relationships will be in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Mississippi. As a result of contracts with Cendant and its franchisees our cards will be offered nationwide in these venues.

Pricing for these commercial sales will be negotiated during the sales process. The price, costs and margins for each sale may vary due to benefit selection, service levels required and fulfillment desires of the client. During financial negotiations, we will coordinate cost with Alliance to ensure that the customer, the company and vendors are clear on the end product, service and price.

Hearing Aid Industry

Although we continue to believe and are reinforced by nationwide statistics that hearing loss is one of the most prevalent chronic health conditions in the United States, and that its incidence is on the rise. Hearing loss occurs when there is damage to the auditory system, possibly caused by heredity, aging, noise exposure, illness, trauma, and/or some medications. Some hearing loss is temporary and/or can be corrected with medical or surgical treatment. Other types of hearing loss can be effectively managed with hearing devices. Although hearing loss traditionally has been considered an “old person’s” condition, in several reports, the Better Hearing Institute reported that hearing loss is becoming increasingly common among the “Baby Boomer” 40 to 65 year old segment of the population. This is widely believed to be the result of extreme noise exposure, possibly because of a history of excessive exposure to extremely high decibel rock-and-roll concerts and the widespread use of “walkman” type radios (which produce a concentrated level of noise in extremely close proximity to the ear). The degree of hearing loss is often directly related to the amount of exposure and the intensity of loud noise. However, damaging noise does not necessarily have to result from extreme situations. Even cumulative exposure to everyday noises, such as the sounds of daily traffic, construction work, or a noisy office can contribute to hearing loss.

Hearing loss can have serious implications, leading to communication disorders, isolation, depression, cognitive dysfunction, and overall decline in quality of life. While hearing loss has historically been considered an effect of aging, recently some government agencies, health care organizations and insurance companies have begun increasing their scope of services and coverage’s to include early interventions for children up to the age of 12. While a great many people suffering from hearing loss can be helped with the use of hearing aids, a survey by the National Council on the Aging (NCOA) indicated that older adults with hearing impairments, who do not wear hearing aids, are more likely to report sadness and depression, worry and anxiety, paranoia, diminished social activity, and greater insecurity than those who wear aids. We believe that the products and technologies currently available are broad and varied and in most instances can afford to the hearing impaired individual the amplification necessary to afford them the ability to have improved hearing and enjoy a full and normal lifestyle. In addition, we believe that these people could also benefit from the use of other assisted listening devices, such as telephone or television amplifiers (see “Products”, below).

The Future of the Industry

While we recognize that in the past and still today, many members of the public have been reluctant to use hearing aids, we believe that this industry can be expected to experience substantial and continuing growth during the coming decades. Management recognizes our ability to take advantage of these increases and that we must have required additional capital and infrastructure to be successful. As a result of the increase in the early intervention area of audiology, many health care organizations, managed care organizations and health care insurance companies (including Medicaid) have begun to reimburse the costs of implementing early intervention testing procedures in their reimbursement schedules. We are currently expanding our marketing efforts in the early intervention segment of our business, mainly through the efforts of John H. Treglia, our Chairman and CEO.

Our Sales and Dispensing Offices

We are currently operating two hearing aid sales and audiological testing facilities. These are retail sales and dispensing offices, which are located in medical arts buildings, independent office space in a professional type office building, and, in one case, on-site at a medical outpatient center. One of our retail offices is located in Yonkers, New York and one is in Forty Fort, Pennsylvania.

Our Yonkers office and our Pennsylvania office are open and functioning on a full time basis. Our Ludlow Street Yonkers office is staffed and supervised by a full-time, licensed and certified audiologist and one full-time patient care coordinator. Our Pennsylvania office operates on a full time basis and is staffed by a state licensed hearing aid dispenser, as required by applicable Pennsylvania law and at least one clerical employee.

Our Yonkers New York sales and dispensing office is approximately 1,100 square feet in size. Our Yonkers office is fully equipped with:

•	soundproof testing booths and state-of-the-art testing equipment that meets or exceeds all state standards; and
•	a full range of diagnostic and auditory-vestibular tests that assist referring physicians in the treatment of patients with hearing and balance disorders.

Existing Contracts with Nursing Home Facilities

We had contracts with approximately forty two nursing homes for the establishment of on-site offices and our appointment as sole provider of audiological services and products during the terms of the contracts. In the past we had aggressively pursued contracts with new nursing home facilities (especially those that have been made available to us pursuant to the needs of our association with Park Avenue Medical Associates, PC as set forth herein). However, we curtailed these efforts due to several issues. Both Medicare and Medicaid have greatly reduced their benefits payments. The majority of nursing home residents are Medicare and Medicaid recipients. Management decided that utilizing capital to continue to services these residents was not a sound business decision. Therefore we have cancelled all outside nursing home contracts resulting from the Park Avenue Nursing Homes from the Park Avenue transaction set forth below.

Contract with Park Avenue Health Care Management Inc.

On February 15, 2002, we executed an agreement with Park Avenue Health Care Management Inc. and its affiliate, Park Avenue Medical Associates, P.C. (referred to herein, collectively, as “Park Avenue”), which closed on February 28, 2002. Pursuant to this agreement, Park Avenue contributed its entire audiology business in consideration for the issuance of 1,200,000 of our shares to Park Avenue. Park Avenue is a health care management organization which services nursing homes, hospitals, assisted living facilities, adult day care centers, adult homes, and senior outpatient clinics. Park Avenue directly employs medical professional personnel, including physicians in both general and specialty practices and other health care professionals such as podiatrists, audiologists, and optometrists. Due to deteriorating margins, and that we were not able to achieve our planned cash flow goals, all operations in Park Avenue locations were discontinued in February 2006.

Our Services

We provide all of our patients at our retail, nursing home, and out-patient clinic sales and dispensing offices with comprehensive hearing care services consisting of the following:

•	an interview with one of our audiologists or patient care coordinators respecting the hearing problems and all factors which may contribute to or cause such problems;
•	an internal and external examination of the patient’s ear performed by one of our audiologists;
•	an initial hearing screening to establish a permanent base-line hearing acuity and to determine whether the patient has a hearing problem;
•	if the initial screening indicates that there is a hearing problem, the audiologist will then perform additional testing and do a complete audiological evaluation, including

•	air conduction;
•	bone conduction;
•	speech recognition thresholds;
•	most comfortable hearing level;
•	site of lesion tests, if required; tymponometry;
•	acoustic reflex testing; and acoustic reflex decay.

The patient is then counseled with respect to the results of the audiological testing and evaluation, the nature and extent of any hearing defects found, the possible effects of such hearing aids on the patient’s lifestyle, and the options for treatment with a hearing aid; and if it is determined that a hearing aid would be of benefit to the patient, an appropriate aid will be prescribed and fitted; the fitting process will include taking impressions of the affected ear or ears.

All hearing aids that we prescribe are custom made for the individual patient. Delivery is usually made within one week to ten days. When the patient receives the hearing aid, the audiologist explains the properties and capabilities of the hearing aid, and demonstrates proper insertion, removal, maintenance techniques, and the operation of all the features of the hearing aid. The patient is then re-tested wearing the hearing aid to enable the audiologist to determine whether the hearing aid is performing to prescribed standards and to evaluate the benefit to the patient. After one week, the patient care coordinator will contact the patient by telephone to discuss any problems or questions and to schedule a follow-up appointment if the patient or the patient care coordinator feels it is needed.

We provide follow-up services including, where necessary, additional personal contacts with the patient and/or the patient’s family, for the purpose of monitoring and guiding the patient’s progress in successfully utilizing the hearing aid and making all adjustments required insuring a successful outcome. We also have a family hearing counseling program to help the patient and his or her family understand the proper use of their hearing products and the nature of their disability. These services are provided on an as needed basis as determined by the licensed audiologists.

Early Intervention Services

While hearing loss has historically been considered an effect of aging, recently health care professionals as well as some government agencies, healthcare organizations and insurance companies have begun to increase their scope of services and coverage’s to include early interventions for infants and children up to the age of 16. The reason for the rise in early intervention is due to the fact that many organizations now believe that pediatric hearing impairment may be the cause, or part of the reason, for such disorders as Attention Deficit Disorder, Dyslexia, disciplinary problems, educational underachievement and dysfunctional behavior with a family setting, especially with siblings. Unfortunately, many of these problems have been deemed to be caused by alcohol and drug abuse by the child’s mother or other prenatal problems which were not previously brought to light. We currently have referral contracts with and provide audiological services to the following agencies:

•	First Step Services, Inc.
•	Los Ninos Community Services
•	Speech and Communications Professionals
•	Project Rainbow
•	Secundino Services, Inc
•	Early Achievers Services, Inc.*
•	Paxxon Healthcare Services, LLC

* We have negotiated to utilize space in the offices of Early Achievers, Inc., an early intervention agency in White Plains, New York where we have installed a fully equipped audiological facility including sound proof booth. We

have agreed to provide audiological early intervention services at a reduced rate of compensation in exchange for the use of the space as well as their continuing to refer all of their early intervention patients to our company.

Our Products

All hearing aids that we prescribe are custom made for the individual patient. We have selected a variety of major worldwide manufacturers’ products, to make available through our offices, in order to provide the best possible hearing aid products for our patients. These include the latest digital technology available from Magnatone, Siemens, Phonak, Sonotome, Lori/Unitron, United Hearing Systems, and others. We are also able to make available, by special order, a large selection of other hearing enhancement devices including telephone and television amplifiers, telecaptioners and decoders, pocket talkers, specially adapted telephones, alarm clocks, doorbells and fire alarms. The majority of our sales of hearing aids are through Medicaid patients for which we are reimbursed only for the cost of the product and an examination and dispensing fee.

Customers

To date, we continue to expand our patient referral base by securing our appointment as the potential sole provider of hearing aids and audiological services to out-patient facilities, and adult group homes with which we have contractual arrangements. We have also established relationships and have signed contacts with other types of health care organizations, such as HMO’s and PPO’s. Our affiliations with these types of health care organizations and facilities have grown to the extent that our current capital structure has allowed.

Existing Contracts with Health Care Providers and Third-Party Payers

To date we have entered into contracts for the provision of audiological services with an excess of sixty health care provider organizations, as well as third-party payers such as Medicare and New York State Medicaid. We expect these additional contracts to continue to grow as we progress. We believe that we currently have sufficient staff and facilities which are geographically accessible for all participants in organizations which we have contracted with. In general, our agreements with health insurance or managed care organizations provide for services to be offered on three different bases, including:

1.	fee for service basis based on a contractual rate which we offer to provider’s members (all paid for by the patient); and
2.	an encounter basis where we are paid a fixed fee by the insurance or managed care organization for each hearing aid sold (with the balance paid to us by the individual member);
3.	a special Medicare/Medicaid encounter basis where we are paid a fixed fee by Medicare and/or Medicaid for particular audiological services, at a price pre- established by Medicare or Medicaid (other than the “deductible” amount, which is paid either by the patient or other third-party payers).

Nursing Homes

Approximately fourteen nursing homes, assisted living facilities and adult daycare centers currently provide out-patient referrals and transportation of their residents to our Ludlow Street office. We also provide very limited on-site testing and evaluations within these nursing homes for residents who are disabled or infirm.

Existing Referral Arrangements with Out-Patient Facilities

We have established relationships for referrals with four local out-patient facilities. We had believed that patient referrals from these sources would continue to grow based upon the positive feedback we receive from these out-patient facilities, but we have been unable to realize these goals.

Area Hospitals

We have established relationships with five area hospitals that have been referring patients to our Ludlow Street office. The hospitals with which we have established patient referral relationships are:

1.	Saint Josephs Medical Center South Yonkers, NY
2.	Yonkers General Hospital South Yonkers, NY
3.	Montefiore Medical Center Northeast Bronx, NY
4.	Westchester Medical Center White Plains, NY
5.	Saint Johns Medical Center

Physician Referrals

Referrals from physicians are generally based upon personal contacts and established patient and physician satisfaction. We endeavor to maintain our relationships with referring physicians by using a timely comprehensive medical reporting system which provides each referring physician with a full audiological report on each of their patients that visit our offices.

Payments for Services

Our customer base includes self-pay patients, patients whose costs are covered by Medicare or Medicaid, patients whose costs are covered by private health care organizations; and patients whose costs are covered as union benefits). Treating Medicare and Medicaid patients involves payment lag issues which are currently problematic for us because of our current capital constraints. Current Medicare and Medicaid payments for audiological services and hearing aids can take as long as 60 to 120 days after approved services are provided and hearing aids are dispensed. An additional recent disadvantage to servicing Medicare and Medicaid patients resulted from the cut in reimbursement rates from both agencies. In order to assist us with the cash flow lag, we have been successful in obtaining from some of our suppliers an extension of their normal payment term. We are hopeful that if the current domestic economic conditions improve in the near future, we will be able to put bank financing arrangements into place which will provide us with a credit line for working capital.

Sales and Marketing

Recognizing that there is still a vast untapped market of hearing impaired individuals, we intend to continue to attempt to expand our marketing efforts to include, on a more highly concentrated basis self-pay patient who had previously not been our principal customer base. These self pay customers should allow us to market high end hearing aids which would provide higher profit margins. Marketing to these organizations and entities has consisted and for the near foreseeable future solely of personal contacts by our CEO, John H. Treglia, with all of the types of entities and organizations listed above.

Proposed and Existing Advertising and Marketing Program

We intend to continue to try to bring our company and our services and products to the attention of managed care providers, which can promote our products and services to the hearing impaired, and to their participating members. We also intend to increase our marketing efforts to the self-pay, (uninsured patient) market when sufficient operating capital is made available. Our marketing plan contemplates implementing an aggressive advertising and marketing program focused on both of these markets, highlighting the quality of our services and products, as well as competitive pricing. At present, all marketing to health care organizations is done by our CEO, John Treglia. Our marketing and advertising efforts have been continually hindered by our capital constraints which have adversely affected our originally projected higher gross profit percentages.

Business Strategy - Audiological Services

Our original business plan recognized that increasing the number of our sales offices would make our services conveniently accessible to a greater number of participating members of health care organizations and other entities with which we have relationships or may establish relationships. Our original plan was intended to couple such an increase in offices with an expansion of our patient referral base. We expected this two-pronged approach to enable us to substantially increase the volume and profitability of our business by further concentrations on the private pay population. Although we intend to maintain the audiological services currently offered, our original expansion plans

for this segment of our business have been curtailed in order to focus our efforts and capital on our Medicare discount Card operations.

Product and Professional Liability

In the ordinary course of our business, we may be subject to product and professional liability claims alleging the failure of, or adverse effects claimed to have been caused by, products sold or services which we have provided. We maintain insurance at a level which we believe to be adequate. Each of our licensed audiologists is also required by state law to carry appropriate malpractice liability insurance. All of our audiologists have furnished us, as well as all nursing homes, assisted living, adult day care, senior care, HMO’s, PPO’s and other managed care organizations with whom we have contractual or other relationships with copies of their insurance coverage certificates. As apart of this process we also keep records of all license and insurance anniversary and/or effective dates to attempt to insure compliance. We believe that they are all in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Also included as a part of compliance with the credentialing requirements, copies of all educational degrees, certificates and licensing are appropriately maintained. While we believe that it would be highly unlikely that a successful claim would be in excess of the limits of our insurance policies, if such an event should occur, it could conceivably adversely affect our business. Moreover, because we distribute products manufactured by others, we believe we will have recourse against the manufacturer in the event of a product liability claim. It should be noted however that we could be unsuccessful in a recourse claim against a manufacturer or, that even if we were successful, such manufacturer might not have adequate insurance or other resources to make good on our claim.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Corporate Headquarters

Our corporate headquarters is located in Suite 602, The Ludlow Street Medical Building, located at 45 Ludlow Street, Yonkers, New York. This office consists of 650 square feet to accommodate additional sales and administrative personnel hired by us pursuant to the acquisition of Comprehensive Network Solutions, Inc.

We have occupied these premises pursuant to a five year lease with Diamond Properties, Inc. which expired in February 2006. With the additional space, our lease calls for monthly rental payments of $2,300 fully inclusive of all utilities, taxes, and other charges. The building in which these offices are located is of a newly renovated, seven story building which houses the private offices of approximately twenty physicians, dentists, and other medical professionals, with adequate, free, or off street parking available. It is located off of a main street and is around the corner from Saint Joseph’s Medical Center, a major area health care facility. We are currently leasing on a month-to-month basis and are currently renegotiating the terms of a new lease, which we believe will take effect in the 3^rd quarter of this year, as the property was sold to a new owner.

Ludlow Street Sales and hearing Aid Dispensing Office

We have a retail sales and dispensing office located on the first floor lobby of the Ludlow Street Medical Building in a retail space adjacent to the elevators. We occupy this space pursuant to a five-year lease with Diamond Properties Inc, which expired in February 2006. The lease called for monthly rental payments of $1,087, fully inclusive of all utilities, taxes and other charges. We are currently leasing on a month-to-month basis and are currently renegotiating the terms of a new lease, which we believe will take effect in the 3^rd quarter of this year, as the property was sold to a new owner.

This facility comprises approximately 800 square feet and has a glass enclosed, visible waiting and reception area and a private fully equipped testing and dispensing office. This office is fully equipped as an audiological and hearing aid dispensing facility; equipment includes: (i) a full spectrum hearing suite, consisting of a wheel chair accessible sound-proof testing booth, of approximately 10 feet x 12 feet, designed to accommodate the needs of pediatric patients as well as handicapped adults; (ii) an electronic audiometer; (iii) an electronic tympanometer; (iv) a computerized hearing aid programmer; and (iv) other required peripheral testing, fitting and repair equipment. This equipment was purchased, used, from Saint Joseph’s Hospital, which has discontinued its audiological services department. The equipment purchased from Saint Joseph’s included, in addition to the equipment listed above, a second full spectrum hearing suite, which we are presently keeping in storage. All of the equipment which we purchased from Saint Joseph’s, and which we are currently using, is modern and has been totally refurbished and

recalibrated. Saint Joseph’s original cost for this equipment was approximately $54,000 and its replacement cost would be approximately $78,000. We were able to purchase, relocate, refurbish and recalibrate the equipment for a total cost of $19,000. This equipment enables us to fully service all patients whom we see at this facility, including the nursing home patients who are brought to us on an out-patient basis as well as pediatric patients.

Early Achievers, Inc. Office, White Plains, New York

We have negotiated to utilize space in the offices of Early Achievers, Inc., an early intervention agency in White Plains, New York. We have agreed to provide audiological early intervention services at a reduced rate of compensation in exchange for the use of the space as well as their continuing to refer all of their early intervention patients to our company. Included in the space is utilization of the reception area, waiting room, and private office which includes a fully equipped audiological facility with is equipped with sound proof booth, and audiological testing equipment.

Pennsylvania Forty-Fort Office

We currently lease an 800 square foot, street level office at 142 Wells Street, Forty-Fort, Pennsylvania. This facility is located in the main business district of Forty-Fort and the space is utilized for administrative, sales, dispensing, and telemarketing activities. The facility is divided among offices, waiting rooms, a sound deadened testing area, a dispensing area, and small telemarketing area. This facility is also used as a coordination center for our Pennsylvania licensed hearing aid fitters, who test and dispense hearing aids on an in-home basis, the most common method of dispensing hearing aid products in rural areas.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are unaware of any pending or threatened legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our assets is the subject. No director, officer, or affiliate, or any associate of any of them, is a party to or has a material interest in any proceeding adverse to us.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

During the year ended February 28, 2006, we did not submit any matters to a vote of our shareholders.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

We are currently traded in the over-the-counter market and quoted on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board maintained by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (the “OTC Bulletin Board”) under the symbol “CMHS”. The OTC market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown, or other fees or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Period	Bid Prices Common Stock
	Low		High
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2005

May 31, 2004	$	0.70	$	1.50
August 31, 2004		0.63		0.95
November 30, 2004		0.35		0.95
February 28, 2005	$	0.25	$	0.84

Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2006

May 31, 2005	$	0.45	$	1.16
August 31, 2005		0.28		0.65
November 30, 2005		0.29		0.79
February 28, 2006	$	0.20	$	0.49

We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock, and have no present intention of doing so in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of significant factors which have affected our financial position and operations during the fiscal years ended February 28, 2006 and February 28, 2005. This discussion also includes events which occurred subsequent to the end of the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, and contains both historical and forward- looking statements. When used in this discussion, the words “expect(s)”, “feel(s)”, “believe(s)”, “will”, “may”, “anticipate(s)” “intend(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors”. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures elsewhere in this Report which discuss factors which affect the Company’s business, including the discussion at the end of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, respective notes and Selected Consolidated Financial Data included elsewhere in this Report.

The Company

II-1

on marketing research, management redirected its focus towards the 44 million plus uninsured and underinsured people throughout the United States.

To position ourselves to take advantage of this huge market, on March 1, 2004 pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, we acquired one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Comprehensive Network Solutions, Inc. (CNS) based in Austin, Texas from the CNS shareholders in consideration for the issuance of a total of 250,000 restricted shares of our common stock to the CNS shareholders. Pursuant to the Agreement, CNS became our wholly owned subsidiary. Based on this acquisition, we changed our name to Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. to better reflect the fact that we operate in several medical venues. This acquisition has positioned us to take full advantage of the opportunity to become a major player providing access to discounted health care provider networks and services (see subsequent events).

Currently, our net sales refer to transaction fees generated from our prescription discount cards as well as the sales of dental vision cards and Gold Cards. A major portion of our net sales were generated by fees earned by the provision of audiological testing in our offices as well as those provided on site in Nursing Homes, Assisted Living Facilities, Senior Care Facilities and Adult Day Care Centers as well as the sales and distribution of hearing aids generated in each of these venues. A majority of our audiology revenue have represented reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid and third party payers. Generally, reimbursement from these parties can take as long as 60 to 120 days. With the implementation of the billing of Medicare payers on-line we have recognized a shorter time of reimbursement from 90 days to approximately 60 days. Medicaid reimbursements can only be billed with various paper submissions which are mailed on a weekly basis. As a result, Medicaid payments, which constitute approximately 40% of our reimbursement, will continue to take 60 to 90 days to be realized.

Management had anticipated a growth in revenue resulting from the prior acquisition of the audiology practice of Park Avenue. This has not come to fruition. We believe that this was caused in part by our inability to attract additional audiologists on a timely basis and insufficient working capital. Also the decreases in reimbursement rates from both Medicare and Medicaid impacted the amounts of revenue received. To counteract these reductions, management began new marketing efforts with the nursing homes currently contracted with us as a result of the agreement with Park Avenue as well as additional facilities who we believed could avail themselves of our audiological services. The contract and its addendum called for the nursing home to pay us directly at hourly rates for the testing of their residents. To date, we have received positive feedback to the new contract. However, we can provide no assurances that these new contracts will be profitable in the future. In addition to the revenue we currently generate from our audiological services, management believes that revenue will increase in future periods as a result of increased distribution and marketing of our medical discount cards as set forth herein.

During the last twelve months we have continued to expand our product line with additional benefits and alternative benefit funding options. These new expanded products are being offered to individuals and small employers; and customized private label versions of the products through its broker and consultant relationships to municipalities, charitable organizations, associations, unions, political subdivisions and large employers. The offerings are alternative cost and quality benefit solutions to prospects and clients who are uninsured or underinsured through existing traditional defined benefit health plans.

Medical Discount Card Product and Marketing

II-2

Solutions, Inc. to better reflect our marketing of “The Solution Card”. Both Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions and The Solution Card were trademarked by us for further protection for our new business operations. These expanded products are currently being offered to municipalities, charitable organizations, employers, fraternal organizations, union benefit funds, business associations, insurance companies, and insurance agencies. The offerings are alternative cost and quality benefit solutions to prospects and clients who are uninsured or underinsured. These expanded products are also being offered to groups set forth above whose medical care costs are covered through existing traditional defined benefit health plans and have experienced large percentage increases in premiums as well as shrinking coverage and higher deductibles. The range of discounts on the medical services and products with the Solution Card family of products is between 10% and 60% with an overall average savings of 22% to 28%.

In February 2005, Comprehensive Alliance Group, Inc., the marketing arrangement with Alliance, finalized an agreement with Financial Independence Company Insurance Services (FICIS) of Woodland Hills, California. FICIS is one of the ten largest employee benefit brokerage firms in the State of California and has a nationwide representation. The agreement is for the distribution of health discount cards by FICIS to various Cendant franchisees, their employees and associates. These discount cards will offer to the Cendant Group and other FICIS clients a choice of affordable and convenient health care options nationwide. A recent U.S. Census bureau survey reported that approximately 44.3 million Americans do not have health insurance coverage.

The Comprehensive/Alliance association brings to FICIS its packaging of health care discount arrangements through premier preferred provider networks. As a result of Alliance HealthCard’s combined successful 6 years experience in packaging discount programs, FICIS has chosen to integrate these capabilities into their offering of health benefit services to the Cendant Group of companies as well as other FICIS clients via its contract with Comprehensive/Alliance. A preliminary offering of discount card products took place during February 2005 at the Cendant Real Estate Services conference that included all of the Cendant franchise real estate agencies including Cendant Mobility, Cendant Mortgage, Cendant Settlement Services, Coldwell Banker Commercial, ERA, NRT and Century 21 agencies. The above agencies represent over 500,000 franchisees, sales associates and employees.

Management expected these venues to begin to generate revenue by the quarter ending August 30, 2005. Although some revenue have already been generated as a result of this relationship, the full extent of the benefit of these organizations having our discount cards have yet to meet our anticipated revenue stream. This was a result of the cards not being printed and distributed by FICIS as originally intended. An appropriate plan of marketing and distribution was reformulated and the cards were subsequently printed in December 2005. This revised plan called for the direct mail of over 500,000 prescription discount cards to three of the Cendant Real Estate Franchisees: Coldwell Banker, Century 21 and ERA by the end of January 2006. Each card is private labeled with the logo of each franchise as a “Choice RX” prescription discount card. We believe that we will begin to initially realize expanded revenue from these cards by the end of the current fiscal year.

Prescription Discount Cards

II-3

derived by our management and there are no guarantees that we will meet these expectations. This utilization estimate is based on the demographics on the areas where we are focusing our marketing and distribution efforts. These demographics include municipalities and charitable foundations with high percentages of uninsured and underinsured populations. These groups are prime candidates to utilize the prescription discount cards and therefore benefit by obtaining discounts averaging 22% to 28% of the purchase price of the prescription drugs purchased.

Membership Service Programs

Our expectations are that the joint venture agreement with Alliance HealthCard, Inc. combined with the accelerated marketing of the medical health care discount cards will add to both the Company’s revenue and profitability. It should be noted that the expenses related to the sales and marketing of these discount cards have utilized and will continue to utilize a major portion of any additional working capital realized to date. We cannot guarantee that our discount cards will achieve the required sales volume to generate anticipate profitability.

Municipalities

We have previously disclosed that we have made presentations regarding our prescription discount cards to approximately eight other municipalities in Pennsylvania and New York. Although these counties had requested and received contracts as well as information on the cards and we have been in contact with these counties we have not finalized contracts with these counties. Most counties continue to express interest in proceeding. We will continue to negotiate with these counties during the early part of 2006 and believe that we can be successful in signing contracts with some of the following counties and municipalities in Pennsylvania and New York:

II-4

Effective December 15, 2005, we entered into a settlement agreement with David and Pamala Streilein in which we agreed to divest our interest in Comprehensive Network Solutions, Inc. (“CNS”) Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we agreed to return our shares of CNS to the Streileins in consideration for the cancellation of the Streileins’ employment agreements with us as well as to forgive all salary past due and any future salary due under their employment agreements. CNS failed to provide the projected sales or revenue that we had anticipated upon execution of the agreement to acquire this entity. Although this acquisition allowed us entry into the discount card marketplace, the expense of operating CNS and paying the employments agreement no longer justified the potential benefits to us, when and if, CNS commences generating projected revenue. Although there are prospects for CNS to reach significant revenue and profitability as a result of the State of Texas passing House Bill #7, which reformed workers compensation in Texas. After a review of potential revenue and continuing escalating expenses, management determined that it could not adequately fund these operations, Although this transaction will negatively impact our balance sheet to the extent of the original purchase as well as in excess of $300,000 loaned to cover ongoing expenses, we still firmly believe that removing an additional burden of approximately $15,000 to $18,000 a month from our cash flow would benefit us in the long run. We believe it is in our best interests to utilize all available funds to expand and implement the current prescriptions and discount card programs being marketed by us.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is an analysis of the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), consistently applied. Although our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statement, the following discussion is intended to describe those accounting policies and estimates most critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

We believe the following critical accounting policy affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

•	We have issued convertible debentures with embedded derivatives and warrants, which estimates and opinions that may change the nature of the accounting treatment based on FAS 133, EITF 98-5 and EITF 00-19 among others.

Results of Operations

TWELVE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2006 COMPARED TO TWELVE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2005

Sales for the fiscal year ended 2006 and 2005 were $522,000 and $459,000, respectively. The increase was due to increased revenue for audiological services from $412,000 in fiscal 2005 to $464,000 in fiscal 2006, mainly occurring in the State of Pennsylvania. The revenue from discount card sales was $57,000 for the year ended February 28, 2006 as compared to $47,000 for the year ended February 28, 2005.

II-5

Cost of sales was $473,000 and $392,000, in the years ended February 28, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The cost of sales for medical discount cards was $73,000 in fiscal 2006 as compared to $15,000 t fiscal 2005, the large increase consisted of printing of new discount cards for which very limited revenue had been achieved, during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006. Management believes that future revenue will be achieved for the cards printed with minimal future costs.

The gross profit for the Company decreased from 14.5% in 2005 to 9.3% in 2006 primarily as a result of additional printing costs incurred in 2006 for discount cards of approximately $50,000 for which no revenue had been achieved. This cost created a negative gross profit in 2006 for the discount cards as compared to a 68.9% gross profit in the prior year. The gross profit on audiological sales was 13.9% in 2006 as compared to 8.3% in fiscal year 2005. The increase in profitability on audiological sales is attributed to lower direct cost of products, while direct labor and commissions maintained approximately the same percentage of revenue.

Operating expenses

Selling, general and administrative costs were $578,000 and $546,000, respectively. This increase was due for the most part to increased marketing and promotional expenses for our medical discount card programs.

Professional fees were very high, $1.5 million, as compared to $451,000 the previous year, due the non-cash expense for issuing warrants in connection to consulting agreements. As a result of the termination of the audiological service business at the Park Avenue sites, the remaining goodwill and intangible assets were impaired for an amount of $525,000. We incurred a loss on the sale of the CNS business of $265,000.

Other expenses

We incurred loss on derivative liabilities of $725,000 during the fiscal year ended 2006 related to the issuance of unregistered warrants and for convertible debentures which were issued in June, August and November of 2005. In the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, we determined that there were not enough authorized shares to fulfill all commitments to issue shares for warrants and convertible debt already issued, therefore, the convertible debentures have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with the requirements of EITF 00-19. During the fiscal year ended 2006, we also recorded interest expense for amortization of debt discount of $145,000 and other interest expense, net, of $43,000. In fiscal 2005, no expense for amortization of debt was incurred, only interest expense, net, of $8,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We incurred significant operating losses in recent years which resulted in severe cash flow problems that negatively impacted our ability to conduct our business as structured and ultimately caused us to become and remain insolvent. The audiology portion of the company, utilizing the current sales level should generate sufficient working capital to finance its current operations, but not enough to expand its scope of business activities. However, current liabilities exceed our current assets, and as such, there is no assurance that the company will be able to continue to conduct business without further financing. There exists also the possibility that some of the warrant holders decide to exercise its warrants and this way substantial amount of financing could be achieved.

We estimate that in order for us to achieve our marketing goals successfully for our Solution Card and its other related products we will require between $750,000 and $1,500,000. Some of these funds will have to be obtained from sources other than the anticipated cash flows from the sale of our cards. If we fail to do so, our growth will continue to be curtailed and we will concentrate on increasing the volume and profitability of our existing outlets, using any surplus cash flow from operations to expand our business as quickly as such resources will support.

Management is optimistic that we are able to raise a minimum of $500,000 through the sales of our securities; we will be able to establish credit lines that will further enhance our ability to finance the expansion of our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain outside financing on a debt or equity basis on favorable terms, if at all. In the event that there is a failure in any of the finance-related contingencies described above, the funds available to us may not be sufficient to cover the costs of our operations, capital expenditures and anticipated growth during the next twelve months.

We believe that our success will be largely dependent upon our ability to raise capital and then use such funds to:

•	expand our marketing presence to other municipalities, charitable organizations, unions, fraternal organizations, religious organizations and other large employer groups;
•	to cover the costs of production and distribution of our anticipated additional 5,000,000-750,000,000 cards to be sold and or distributed in the next 12-18 months;
•	to hire additional marketing, administrative and service personnel; and
•	to increase awareness of our medical discount cards at various trade shows.

II-6

On June 1 and August 1, 2005, we issued convertible debentures in the amounts of $200,000 and $50,000, respectively. The debentures have a term of five years and are convertible 20% per year to common stock of our company. The conversion rates are $0.50, $0.75, $0.75, $1.00 and $1.00, for the respective tranches that are convertible each year. Interest due may be paid in cash or in shares at the option of the debenture holder. The debt instruments were in default as of January, as we did not make the required interest payments 90 days after issuance. The lender cannot accelerate the due date on the debt.

On August 19, 2005, we entered into a consulting agreement and a financing agreement with a Comprehensive Associates, LLC, a private investment group, pursuant to which we received $217,000 net of legal expenses and other related fees, in consideration for the issuance of two separate convertible debentures of $35,000 and $200,000, which are convertible at $0.25, as amended, per share. In addition, we entered into an agreement to issue warrants which could raise an additional $2,665,000 if and when the warrants are exercised. In addition, under the consulting agreement, Comprehensive Associates, LLC received warrants to purchase 5 million shares at prices ranging from $0.35 to $0.70 per share. On September 29, 2005, Comprehensive Associates, LLC loaned us $28,000 to be utilized for the printing of cards. Our agreement calls for revenue sharing on all of the cards printed as a result of the utilization of these funds, as well as a nominal rate of interest on the loan. In November, 2005, we raised $145,000 in additional financing through the issuance of convertible debt and a warrant with an exercise price of $0.25 to another party,. Under the agreements with Comprehensive Associates, LLC, the exercise price per share was changed to $0.25 for all convertible debentures and warrants. We did not make the required payments of interest which were due quarterly. In addition, we do not have sufficient authorized shares to meet the potential conversion obligation and we did not file a required registration statement, therefore, we are in default of the loan. As a result of the default, the debentures are due and payable on demand, although the lender has not issued a demand for payment of the debentures.

On September 20, 2005, we entered into a term sheet with Westor Capital Croup, Inc. Pursuant to the term sheet Westor Capital Group has agreed to raise a minimum of $500,000 and a maximum of $1,500,000 for us, by selling units consisting of 5% Convertible 18 Month Notes, convertible at $.30 per share. In addition, for each share converted, the investors would receive one warrant with a three-year term and an exercise price of $.70 per share. The shares underlying both the convertible notes and the warrants shall have registration rights. The agreement would be terminated if Westor did not raise the minimum investment called for in the agreement by November 4, 2005. On November 28, 2005, Westor raised a total of $145,000; shortly thereafter the agreement with Westor Capital was terminated. Pursuant to the term sheet with Westor, we were required to file an SB-2 registration statement by January 15, 2006, which was not completed. We therefore are in breach of this agreement. In addition, pursuant to our original funding agreement and subsequent redemption agreement with Comprehensive Associates, LLC we were also required to file a registration statement, and therefore we are also in breach of this agreement., Due to the default, the loan is, due and payable on demand although the lender has not issued a demand for payment.

Although the capital markets have a perceived improvement, we are cautiously optimistic of our abilities to achieve our goals of raising the capital we need to expand. Along these lines we are actively pursuing potential businesses alliances with privately held businesses in like and or compatible industries. We believe that the addition of both sales volume growth and profitability will greatly assist us in raising additional capital.

As of February 28, 2006, our liquidity and capital resources included cash and cash equivalents of $46,000 compared to $17,000 a year earlier. The $29,000 increase in total cash and cash equivalents from February 28, 2005 to February 28, 2006, was due to the issue of debentures, partially offset by cash used by operating activities.

Cash used in operating activities totaled $690,000 in fiscal 2006 due to increased losses. This was partially offset by reduction of accounts receivable and increased accounts payable and accrued expenses. The cash used in the year was $42,000 lower than the previous year.

Cash used by investing activities totaled $2,000 in fiscal 2006 for capital expenditures, as compared to $16,000 in the prior year.

Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2006 totaled $721,000, mainly from an issuance of debentures of $630,000 and to loan from a related party of $75,000. The cash provided by financing activities was $212,000 higher than the previous year, which consisted mainly of issuances of shares.

We have total liabilities of $2.0 million and assets of only $129,000. Without new financing, we will be forced to liquidate our businesses. Management is currently working diligently on raising new financing.

We have a line of credit of $30,000 with a non-financial entity. The interest charged is prime rate plus 2 percent and the loan agreement expires in August 2006, and there exist provisions for its renewal.

The following table provides a summary of the amounts due for our contractual obligations by fiscal year:

	Total			2007			2008 to 2009		2010 to 2011			2012 and beyond

Convertible debentures	$	630,000		$	380,000		$	-	$	250,000		$	-
Debt discount		(385,817	)		(250,245	)				(135,572	)
Line of credit		30,000			30,000			-		-			-
Debt to related party		96,000			96,000			-		-			-
Total	$	370,183		$	255,755		$	-	$	114,428		$	-

II-7

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

We have not guaranteed any other person’s or company’s debt. We have not entered into any currency or interest options, swaps or future contracts, nor do we have any off balance sheet debts or transactions.

Related Party Transactions

We have borrowed a total of $96,000 from our CEO, Mr. John Treglia. The loan has no due date, no collateral and is not interest bearing.

New Accounting Standards

On December 15, 2004, , the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) the FASB issued Statement No. 154 (“SFAS No. 154”), Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle and correction of errors. Under previous guidance, changes in accounting principle were recognized as a cumulative effect in the net income of the period of the change. The new statement requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle and correction of errors, limited to the direct effects of the change, to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. In the event that we have an accounting change or an error correction, SFAS No. 154 could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140, which simplifies accounting for certain hybrid financial instruments by permitting fair value remeasurement for any hybrid instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation and eliminates a restriction on the passive derivative instruments that a qualifying special-purpose entity may hold. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement (new basis) event occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have no impact on our results of operations or our financial position.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, which establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities by requiring that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 will have no impact on our results of operations or our financial position.

II-8

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

February 28, 2006

F-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	24

Consolidated Balance Sheet	25

Consolidated Statements of Operations	26

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficiency)	27

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	28

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	29 - 35

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the board of directors and shareholders of

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries (f/k/a Nantucket Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries) as of February 28, 2006 and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for the years ended February 28, 2006 and 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries (f/k/a Nantucket Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries) as of February 28, 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended 2006 and 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements referred to above have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, the Company needs to seek new sources or methods of financing or revenue to pursue its business strategy, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans as to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 12, in September, 2006, the Company concluded that it was necessary to restate its financial results for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006 to reflect corrections to accounting for: (1) the warrants issued in connection with issuance of convertible debt; (2) conventional convertible debt issued, (3) the beneficial conversion features related to certain debt instruments and (4) classification of its debt.

JEWETT, SCHWARTZ & ASSOCIATES

Hollywood, Florida

June 12, 2006 except Note 12, which is dated as of September ___, 2006

MUST HAVE NEW OPINION!!!

F-3

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
RESTATED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
February 28, 2006
	(As restated)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	46,157
Accounts receivable, net		23,475
Other current assets		25,000

Total current assets		94,632

Property and equipment, net		34,810

Total assets	$	129,442

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	315,771
Revolving line of credit		30,000
Due to related party		95,826
Convertible debentures, short term portion		129,755
Derivative liabilities		1,275,551
Total current liabilities		1,846,903

Convertible debentures, long term		114,428

Total liabilities		1,961,331

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000 shares
authorized and zero shares issued and outstanding		-
Common stock, $.10 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized; 15,365,598 shares issued and outstanding		1,536,560
Additional paid-in capital		2,215,498
Accumulated deficit		(5,583,947	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,831,889	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	129,442

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
RESTATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For the years ended February 28,
	2006			2005
	(As restated)			(As restated)
Net sales	$	521,856		$	458,936
Cost of sales		473,353			392,303

Gross profit		48,503			66,633

Selling, general and administrative expenses		577,588			545,628
Professional fees		1,518,257			450,944
Impairment of assets		525,000			-
Depreciation and amortization		39,382			48,635
Loss on sale of business		265,313			-

Loss from operations		(2,877,037	)		(978,574	)


Other expenses:
Loss on derivative liabilities		(725,233	)		-
Interest expense, amortization of debt discount		(144,819	)		-
Interest expense other, net		(43,199	)		(7,619	)

Total other expense		(913,251	)		(7,619	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(3,790,288	)		(986,193	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-

Net loss	$	(3,790,288	)	$	(986,193	)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.08	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		14,489,338			13,107,869

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
RESTATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

	Common stock				Additional			Deferred			Accumulated
	($0.01 par value)				paid-in capital			Stock-Based			deficit			Total
	Shares		Amount		(As restated)			Consulting			(As restated)			(As restated)

Balance at February 29, 2004		11,667,309	$	1,166,730	$	689,780			($288,750	)		($807,466	)	$	760,294

Private placement sales		981,600		98,160		392,640									490,800
Consultant agreement		250,000		25,000		100,000			(125,000	)					0
Acquisition of CNS		405,050		40,505		364,545			(130,050	)					275,000
Expense of deferred - stock based consulting									122,260						122,260
Net loss												(986,193	)		(986,193	)
Balance at February 28, 2005		13,303,959		1,330,395		1,546,965			(421,540	)		(1,793,659	)		662,161

Issuance of shares		100,000		10,000		15,000									25,000
Previously recorded subscription receivable						(25,000	)								(25,000	)
Shares issued for services		1,841,639		184,165		634,133									818,298
Shares issued for executive compensation		120,000		12,000		44,400									56,400
Expense of deferred - stock based consulting									421,540						421,540
Net loss												(3,790,288	)		(3,790,288	)
Balance at February 28, 2006		15,365,598	$	1,536,560	$	2,215,498		$	-		$	(5,583,947	)	$	(1,831,889	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
RESTATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	For the years ended February 28,
	2006			2005
Cash Flows From Operating Activities	(As restated)			(As restated)
Net loss	$	(3,790,288	)	$	(986,193	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
by operating activities:
Provision for doubtful accounts		(25,000	)		48,539
Depreciation and amortization		39,382			48,635
Stock based compensation recorded as liability		19,683			-
Impairment of assets		525,000			-
Loss on sale of business		265,313			-
Loss on derivative liabilities		725,233			-
Amortization of debt discount		144,819			-
Expense for shares issued for services rendered		1,296,238			122,260
Changes in current assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		25,413			28,027
Other current assets		11,067			5,870
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		72,847			84,716
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities		(690,293	)		(648,146	)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(1,550	)		(15,931	)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(1,550	)		(15,931	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Issuance of common stock		25,000			490,800
Repayment of loans		(9,459	)		(2,519	)
Proceeds from convertible debentures		630,000			-
Proceeds from loans from related party		75,326			20,500
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		720,867			508,781

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		29,024			(155,296	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		17,133			172,429
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	46,157		$	17,133

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:		-
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	2,052		$	7,619
Taxes	$	-		$	-
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Common stock issued for acquisition of business	$	-		$	275,000
Derivative liabilities recorded	$	259,531		$	-
Common stock issued for services rendered	$	874,700		$	255,050

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-7

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2006

NOTE 1- ORGANIZATION

The Company

Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries directly and indirectly through its subsidiaries, Accutone, Inc. and Interstate Hearing Aid Services, Inc., is in the business of providing audiological services. Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Subsidiaries is involved directly and indirectly with the sales and marketing of discount medical services cards through its subsidiary, Nantucket Industries, Inc. changed its name to Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. in July 2004.

Going concern

The Company’s independent accountants are including a “going concern” paragraph in their accountants’ report accompanying these consolidated financial statements that cautions the users of the Company’s financial statements that these statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Furthermore, the “going concern” paragraph states that the Company’s ability to continue is also dependent on its ability to find new sources or methods of financing or revenue to pursue its business strategy. The Company has commenced planned principal operations and has generated revenues from customers and has secured limited funding insufficient to meet its current working capital needs. Management believes that, despite the extent of the financial requirements and funding uncertainties going forward, it has a business plan that, can be successful if funded and executed within the next twelve months. Management continues to actively seek various sources and methods of short and long-term financing and support; however, there can be no assurances that some or all of the necessary financing can be obtained. Management continues to explore alternatives that include seeking strategic investors, lenders and/or technology partners and pursuing other transactions that, if consummated, might ultimately result in the dilution of the interest of the current shareholders. Because of the nature and extent of the uncertainties, many of which are outside the control of the Company, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in its planned principal operations or secure the necessary financing. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company not be able to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Comprehensive Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash, time deposits and highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less.

F-8

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accounts Receivable

The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers and maintains an allowance for potential credit losses based on historical experience and other information available to management. As of February 28, 2006 the allowance for doubtful accounts was $46,039 and the (benefit) and expense for doubtful accounts was ($25,000) and $48,539, in 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Property, fixtures, and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation of furniture, fixtures, and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset generally ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term, commencing the month after the asset is placed in service.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company no longer amortizes goodwill and certain other intangible assets over their useful lives. Instead, goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment annually. The impairment test consists of two steps. In the first step, the Company determines the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value, the test is completed and intangible assets assigned to the reporting unit is not impaired. To the extent a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit’s goodwill may be impaired, and the Company must perform the second step of the impairment test. In the second step, the Company must compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s intangible assets, determined by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation in accordance with SFAS No.141, to its carrying amount. The Company will recognize an intangible assets impairment charge if the carrying amount of the intangible assets assigned to the reporting unit is greater than the implied fair value of the intangible assets. In fiscal 2006, the Company recognized $525,000 of impairment loss. In 2006, the Company discontinued services to nursing homes under its Park Avenue Agreement. The Company determined that the expected future cash flow would not be achieved, due to deteriorating margins as a result of the reduction in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates for the services provided. No impairment loss was recorded in fiscal year 2005.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and maturities, the fair value of the company’s long-term debt approximate the carrying value.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period, plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with SFAS 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an

F-9

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment annually. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-21, we have determined that certain of our contractual arrangements contain multiple deliverables which represent separate units of accounting, specifically, the initial hearing screening and the subsequent delivery of the hearing aid and any follow up services necessary. Revenue related to initial screening services is recognized upon delivery of the screening services as there is no further obligation to provide subsequent service, objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of these services exists and the delivery of these services have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Revenue is recognized on the delivery of hearing aids in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 48: Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists when delivery of the product has occurred and follow up service is completed assuming that collectibility is reasonably assured. If collection is doubtful, no revenue is recognized until such receivables are collected. Generally, customers have a 45 day period in which to either return the product or request follow up service; we therefore recognize revenue for products delivered only upon expiration of the 45 day return period.

Sales return policy

The Company provides to all patients purchasing hearing aids a specific return period, a minimum of 45 days, if the patient is dissatisfied with the product. The Company does not provide an allowance in accrued expenses for returns since actual returns for this fiscal year were less than 2%. All the manufacturers that supply the Company accept returns back for full credit within these return periods.

Advertising Costs

Costs for newspaper and other media advertising are expensed as incurred and were $24,146 and $21,936 for the years ended February 28, 2006 and 2005 respectively.

Segment Information

In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The method of determining what information to report is based on the way that management organizes the operating segments within the Company for making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance. The Company operates under one reportable retail segment. Accordingly, segment information is not applicable.

Reporting Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income approximates net income for all periods presented.

F-10

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earning (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earning per share is computed assuming the exercise of stock options, warrants and convertible debentures, if any, under the treasury stock method and the related income tax effects if not anti-dilutive. For loss periods, common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of risk

Currently approximately 40% of the reorganized Company’s business is based on contracts with The New York State Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid) and Empire Medicare Service (Medicare).

Accounting for Convertible debentures, Warrants and Derivative Instruments

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, requires all derivatives to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. These derivatives, including embedded derivatives in the Company’s structured borrowings, are separately valued and accounted for on the Company’s balance sheet. Fair values for exchange-traded securities and derivatives are based on quoted market prices. Where market prices are not readily available, fair values are determined using market based pricing models incorporating readily observable market data and requiring judgment and estimates.

The pricing model the Company uses for determining fair values of the Company’s derivatives is the Black Scholes Pricing Model. Valuations derived from this model are subject to ongoing internal and external verification and review. The model uses market-sourced inputs such as interest rates, exchange rates and option volatilities. Selection of these inputs involves management’s judgment and may impact net income.

In particular, the Company uses volatility rates for a time period similar to the length of the underlying convertible instrument based upon the closing stock price of the Company’s common. However, we do not use stock price information prior to February 2002 when the Company emerged from bankruptcy. The Company determined that share prices prior to this period do not reflect the ongoing business valuation of the Company’s current operations. The Company uses a risk-free interest rate, which is the U. S. Treasury bill rate, for a security with a maturity that approximates the estimated expected life of our derivative or security. The Company uses the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of a derivative or at the end of a quarter when a derivative is valued at fair value. The volatility factor used in Black Scholes has a significant effect on the resulting valuation of the derivative liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet. The initial volatility for the calculation of the embedded and freestanding derivatives ranged from 115% to 190%, this volatility-rate will likely change in the future. The Company’s stock price will also change in the future. To the extent that the Company’s stock price increases or decreases, the Company’s derivative liabilities will also increase or decrease, absent any change in volatility rates.

F-11

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In September 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock,” (“EITF 00-19”) which requires freestanding contracts that are settled in a company’s own stock, including common stock warrants, to be designated as an equity instrument, asset or a liability. Under the provisions of EITF 00-19, a contract designated as an asset or a liability must be carried at fair value on a company’s balance sheet, with any changes in fair value recorded in the company’s results of operations. A contract designated as an equity instrument must be included within equity, and no fair value adjustments are required from period to period. In accordance with EITF 00-19, all of the Company’s warrants to purchase common stock are accounted for as liabilities. The fair value of these warrants and conversion options is shown on the Company’s balance sheet and the unrealized changes in the values of these derivatives are shown in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations as “Loss on derivative liabilities.”

We have penalty provisions in the registration agreements our debentures and warrants that require us to make certain payments in the event of our failure to maintain, for certain prescribed periods, an effective registration statement for the common stock securities underlying the debentures and the associated warrants and failure to maintain the listing of our common stock for quotation on the Nasdaq National Market, the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, the New York Stock Exchange or the American Stock Exchange after being so listed or included for quotation, or if the common stock ceases to be traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) or any equivalent replacement exchange on the OTC Bulletin Board, NASDAQ National Market, NASDAQ SmallCap or New York Stock Exchange. The EITF, which has not been adopted, considers alternative treatments including whether or not the registration right itself is a separate derivative liability, or if it is a derivative considered as a combined unit with the conversion feature of a convertible instrument. If the unit is considered separate, the EITF discusses possible alternative treatments including the possibility that the combined unit is a derivative liability only if the maximum liquidated damages exceed the difference between the fair value of registered and unregistered shares. In September 2005, the FASB staff reported that the EITF postponed further deliberations on Issue No. 05-04 The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to Issue No. 00-19 (“EITF 05-04”) pending the FASB reaching a conclusion as to whether a registration rights agreement meets the definition of a derivative instrument.

The Company considers the liquidated damages provision in our various security instruments to be combined with our registration rights and conversion derivatives, and we do not account for the provision as a separate liability. We currently record any registration delay payments as expenses in the period when they are incurred. If the FASB were to adopt an alternative view, we could be required to account for the registration delay payments as a separate derivative. Accordingly, we would need to record the fair value of the estimated payments, although no authoritative methodology currently exists for evaluating such computation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 requires the recognition of a liability for the fair value of a legally-required conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company’s adoption of FIN 47 did not have an impact on its financial statements.

Reclassification

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current year’s presentation.

F-12

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3- NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted share data:

	2006		2005
	(As restated)		(As restated)
Weighted average number shares of outstanding - basic		14,489,338		13,107,869
Effect of dilutive securities: Convertible Debentures and warrants		-		-
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted		14,489,338		13,107,869

Not included weighted average dilutive securities above (anti-dilutive)		744,444		-

Total warrants and other instruments convertible to common stock		7,631,985		-

Shares outstanding:
Beginning outstanding shares		13,303,959		11,667,309
Issuance of shares		2,061,639		1,636,650

Ending outstanding shares		15,365,598		13,303,959

NOTE 4- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

Property and equipment as of February 28, 2006, is as follows:

Leasehold improvements	25,000
Machinery and equipment	127,259
Furniture and fixtures	6,200
	158,459
Less accumulated depreciation	(123,649	)
	34,810

NOTE 5 - LINE OF CREDIT

The Company has a revolving line of credit with Park Avenue for up to $30,000. The interest rate on any amount of the line utilized is at prime plus 2%. The agreement expires on August 1, 2006 with a provision for a renewal of this agreement.

NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates. Significant components of the Company’s deferred taxes at February 28, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:

	2006			2005
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carry forward	$	2,925,388		$	637,068
Deferred tax liabilities		-			-
Net deferred tax asset		2,925,388			637,068
Valuation allowance		(2,925,388	)		(637,068	)
Net deferred taxes	$	-		$	-

F-13

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company has fully reserved all remaining deferred tax assets, which it cannot presently utilize.

For tax purposes at February 28, 2006, the Company’s net operating loss carry forward was $2,295,388, which, if unused, will expire from 2017 to 2022. Certain tax regulations relating to the change in ownership may limit the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carry forward if the ownership change, as computed under each regulation, exceeds 50%. There was no income tax provision (benefit) for the fiscal years 2006 and 2005.

The following is a reconciliation of the normal expected statutory federal income tax rate to the effective rate reported in the financial statements.

	2006			2005
Computed “expected” provision for:
Federal income taxes		(35.0)	%		(35.0)	%
Valuation allowance		35.0			35.0

Actual provision for income taxes		-0-	%		-0-	%

NOTE 7- CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES AND WARRANTS

In June, August and November of 2006, the Company sold convertible debentures and issued warrants to various entities. The debt and accrued interest is convertible to shares.

Debentures			Interest			Interest		Right to				Conversion		Number
Issue date	Amount		rate			payable		convert		Due date		price		of shares
06/01/05	$	40,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2006		06/01/10	$	0.50		80,000
06/01/05	$	40,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2007		06/01/10	$	0.75		53,333
06/01/05	$	40,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2008		06/01/10	$	0.75		53,333
06/01/05	$	40,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2009		06/01/10	$	1.00		40,000
06/01/05	$	40,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2010		06/01/10	$	1.00		40,000

08/01/05	$	10,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2006		06/01/10	$	0.50		20,000
08/01/05	$	10,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2007		06/01/10	$	0.75		13,333
08/01/05	$	10,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2008		06/01/10	$	0.75		13,333
08/01/05	$	10,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2009		06/01/10	$	1.00		10,000
08/01/05	$	10,000		6	%		quarterly		5/31/2010		06/01/10	$	1.00		10,000

08/19/05	$	35,000		6	%		Maturity		08/19/05		01/30/06	$	0.25		140,000
08/19/05	$	200,000		6	%		Maturity		08/19/05		12/31/06	$	0.25		800,000

11/28/05	$	25,000		5	%		quarterly		11/28/05		05/29/07	$	0.25		100,000
11/28/05	$	20,000		5	%		quarterly		11/28/05		05/29/07	$	0.25		80,000
11/28/05	$	100,000		5	%		quarterly		11/28/05		05/29/07	$	0.25		400,000

	$	630,000													1,853,333
Warrants
11/28/05									11/28/05		11/27/08	$	0.25		58,000
11/28/05									11/28/05		11/27/08	$	0.40		193,332
11/28/05									11/28/05		11/27/08	$	0.80		193,332
11/28/05									11/28/05		11/27/08	$	1.20		193,332
08/19/05									08/19/05		08/19/10	$	0.25		5,000,000
02/27/06									02/27/06		02/27/08	$	0.25		100,000

Sub-total															7,591,329

Accrued interest convertible to shares															40,655

Total debt instruments convertible to shares															7,631,985

F-14

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company can before the maturity date, at its option, elect to pay the convertible debentures in cash, in such case, a redemption premium of 10-25% is payable.

In August 2005, the Company committed to issue more shares from warrants and convertible debt, than its authorized number of shares. Therefore, in accordance to EITF 00-19, the Company has treated all conversion options and warrants as liabilities. The Company calculated the fair value of the warrants and the embedded conversion options upon issuance. The fair value was calculated using Black Scholes model with risk-free interest ranging from 4.0% to 4.8%; volatility ranging from 115% to 190%; and a life equal to the term of the debentures or warrants. The detachable warrants can be net-cash redeemed if the underlying shares are not registered; therefore, the instruments were recorded as a derivative liability. Subsequent to issuance, the liability was re-measured on February 28, 2006. The recorded debenture discount of $531,000 is being amortized over the term of the debts. In fiscal 2006 interest expense of $145,000 was recognized for such amortization.

NOTE 8- STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Private Placements

On February 27, 2006, the Company closed on private placements for 100,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate sale price of $25,000. The offer and sale was made to an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D and the Company relied on Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities act of 1933 to issue the securities without registration.

NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES

Major Suppliers

Although there are a limited number of manufactures of hearing aids, management shifted its purchasing to include three to five manufacturers who provide similar hearing aids on comparable terms. In the event of a disruption of supply from any one manufacture the Company could obtain comparable products from other manufacturers. Few manufacturers offer dramatic product differentiation. The Company has not experienced any significant disruptions in supply in the past.

Lease obligation

The Company is currently leasing its existing office facility on a month-to-month basis. The total monthly rent expense is currently $3,669.

NOTE 10 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company’s CEO, Mr. John Treglia, advanced $85,326 to the Company during fiscal 2006; the total debt to the CEO is $95,326. This loan is unsecured, non-interest bearing with no terms for repayment.

NOTE 11 - SALE OF BUSINESS

On November 29, 2005 the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement with David and Pamela Streilein (collectively referred to as the “Settlement Parties”), whereas the settlement Parties shall receive all outstanding shares of the Company’s subsidiary Comprehensive Network Solutions, Inc. (“CNS”) as settlement for any amounts owed under their employment agreements with the Company. In addition to the shares, the Company assumes liabilities of approximately $20,000 and agrees to pay the Settlement Parties a total of $12,000 for unpaid salaries and expenses not reimbursed. The Company recognized a loss on the transaction of approximately $264,000. CNS incurred losses of $116,000 in 2006, prior to the divestment of the company.

F-15

NOTE 12 - RESTATEMENT AND RECLASSIFICATIONS OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Summary of Restatement and Reclassification Items

In September, 2006, the Company concluded that it was necessary to restate its financial results for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006 to reflect corrections to accounting for: (1) the warrants issued in connection with issuance of convertible debt; (2) conventional convertible debt issued and (3) the beneficial conversion features for certain debt instruments and (4) to correct the classification of its debt.

The Company had previously classified the value of one of the warrants to purchase common stock, as a liability and therefore, the fair value of this instrument was recorded as a derivative liability on the Company’s balance sheet. However, the Company allocated the proceeds between the relative fair value of the warrants and the debt. After further review, the Company determined that the instruments should be recorded at the fair value of the respective components rather than allocating the proceeds. The components of the instruments are the warrants, the conversion option of the convertible debenture and the debt. Changes in the fair value of this instrument will result in adjustments to the amount of the recorded derivative liabilities and the corresponding gain or loss will be recorded in the Company’s statement of operations. At the date of the conversion of each respective instrument or portion thereof (or exercise of the options or warrants or portion thereof, as the case may be), the corresponding derivative liability will be reclassified as equity.

The Company had previously not recognized expense for instruments that are considered conventional convertible debt and had recorded a liability for the beneficial conversion feature. After further review, the Company has determined that there is no beneficial conversion feature, as the conversion price of the debenture was above market price at issuance and the embedded conversion option is being recorded at its fair value. The Company also determined that upon the Company issuing commitments to issue more than its authorized shares, the fair value of the embedded conversion option should have been recorded as a derivative liability. A debt discount was recorded. Subsequent to this event, the Company commenced amortizing the debt discount over the term of the debt and revalued the derivative liabilities at the end of the period.

The Company reclassified certain convertible debentures from long term to short term, since certain debentures were in default and immediately due and payable.

The Company reclassified its depreciation and amortization for fiscal year 2005 to operating expense and reclassified certain cash flow items to properly report the investment and professional fee transactions.

The Company, in its review of the 2005 financial statements detected an inadvertent calculation error in the weighted average shares outstanding and the related loss per share, which has been corrected in the restated financial statements.

The accompanying financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been restated to reflect the changes described above.

Balance Sheet Impact

The following table sets forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2006:

F-16

	February 28, 2006
ASSETS
	As originally reported			Adjustment			As restated

Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	46,157		$	-		$	46,157
Accounts receivable, net		23,475						23,475
Other current assets		25,000						25,000

Total current assets		94,632						94,632

Property and equipment, net		34,810						34,810

Total assets	$	129,442		$	-		$	129,442

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	315,771		$	-		$	315,771
Revolving line of credit		30,000						30,000
Due to related party		95,826						95,826
Convertible debentures, short term		-			129,755			129,755
Derivative liability		259,531			1,016,020			1,275,551
Total current liabilities		701,128			1,145,775			1,846,903

Convertible debentures, long term		630,000			(515,572	)		114,428

Total liabilities		1,331,128			630,203			1,961,331

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000 shares
authorized and zero shares issued and outstanding		-						-
Common stock, $.10 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized; 15,365,598 shares issued and outstanding		1,536,560						1,536,560
Additional paid-in capital		2,251,642			(36,144	)		2,215,498
Accumulated deficit		(4,989,888	)		(594,059	)		(5,583,947	)

Total stockholders' deficit		(1,201,686	)		(630,203	)		(1,831,889	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	129,442		$	-		$	129,442

F-17

Statement of Operations Impact

The following tables set forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the years ended February 28, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

	For the year ended February 28, 2006
	As previously reported on Form 10-KSB/A			Adjustment			As Restated
Net sales	$	521,856		$	-		$	521,856
Cost of sales		473,353						473,353

Gross profit		48,503						48,503

Selling, general and administrative expenses		577,588						577,588
Professional fees		1,535,016			(16,759	)		1,518,257
Impairment of assets		525,000						525,000
Depreciation and amortization		39,382						39,382
Loss on sale of business		265,313						265,313
Loss from operations		(2,893,796	)		(16,759	)		(2,877,037	)

Other expenses:
Gain (loss) on derivative liabilities		61,539			(786,772	)		(725,233	)
Interest expense, amortization of debt discount		-			(144,819	)		(144,819	)
Interest expense, net		(363,972	)		320,773			(43,199	)

Total other expense		(302,433	)		(610,818	)		(913,251	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(3,196,229	)		595,059			(3,790,288	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-

Net loss	$	(3,196,229	)	$	(594,059	)	$	(3,790,288	)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.26	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		14,489,338			-			14,489,338

F-18


	For the year ended February 28, 2005
	As previously reported on Form 10-KSB			Adjustment			As Restated
Net sales	$	458,936		$	-		$	458,936
Cost of sales		392,303						392,303

Gross profit		66,633						66,633

Selling, general and administrative expenses		545,628						545,628
Professional fees		450,944						450,944
Depreciation and amortization		-			48,635			48,635

Loss from operations		(929,939	)		(48,635	)		(978,574	)

Other expenses:
Interest expense, net		7,619						7,619
Depreciation and amortization		48,635			(48,635	)		-

Total other expense		56,254			-			7,619

Loss before provision for income taxes		(986,193	)		-			(986,193	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-

Net loss	$	(986,193	)	$	-		$	(986,193	)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.08	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		12,769,887			337,982			13,107,869

F-19

Cash Flow Impact

The following tables set forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s consolidated cash flows as of February 28, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

	For the year ended February 28, 2006
	As previously reported on form 10-KSB/A			Adjustment			As restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(3,196,229	)	$	(594,059	)	$	(3,790,288	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
by operating activities:
Provision for doubtful accounts		(25,000	)					(25,000	)
Depreciation and amortization		39,382						39,382
Stock based compensation recorded as liability					19,683			19,683
Impairment of assets		525,000						525,000
Loss on sale of business		264,190			1,123			265,313
Gain on derivative liabilities		(61,539	)		786,772			725,233
Amortization of debt discount					144,819			144,819
Expense for warrants issued in connection with debentures and sale of shares		336,528			(336,528	)		-
Expense for shares issued for services rendered		1,316,925			(20,687	)		1,296,238
Changes in current assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		25,413						25,413
Other current assets		11,067						11,067
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		73,970			(1,123	)		72,847
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities		(690,293	)		-			(690,293	)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(1,550	)					(1,550	)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(1,550	)		-			(1,550	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Issuance of common stock		25,000						25,000
Repayment of loans		(9,459	)					(9,459	)
Proceeds from convertible debentures		630,000						630,000
Proceeds from loans from related party		75,326						75,326
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		720,867			-			720,867

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		29,024			-			29,024
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		17,133			-			17,133

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	46,157		$	-			46,157

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest		2,052						2,052
Taxes		-			-			-
Derivative liability recorded		259,531			1,016,020			1,275,551
Debt discount recorded					530,636			530,636
Common stock issued for services rendered		874,700			-			874,700

F-20

	For the year ended February 28, 2005
	As previously reported on form 10-KSB			Adjustment			As restated
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(986,193	)	$	-		$	(986,193	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
by operating activities:
Provision for doubtful accounts		48,539						48,539
Depreciation and amortization		48,635						48,635
Common stock issued for services to be rendered		(124,723	)		124,723			-
Expense for shares and warrants issued for services rendered					122,260			122,260
Changes in current assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		28,027						28,027
Other current assets		(2,197	)		8,067			5,870
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		84,172			544			84,716
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities		(903,740	)		255,594			(648,146	)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(15,931	)		-			(15,931	)
Purchases of goodwill and intangible assets		(276,975	)		276,975			-
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(292,906	)		276,975			(15,931	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Issuance of common stock		1,020,850			(530,050	)		490,800
Repayment of loans		-			(2,519	)		(2,519	)
Proceeds from convertible debentures		-						-
Proceeds from loans from related party		20,500						20,500
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		1,041,350			(532,569	)		508,781

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(155,296	)		-			(155,296	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		172,429			-			172,429

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year		17,133			0			17,133

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest		7,619			-			7,619
Taxes		-			-			-
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Common stock issued for acquisition of business					275,000			275,000
Common stock issued for services rendered					255,050			255,050
Common stock issued for services to be rendered		124,723			(124,723	)		0

F-21

Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

The following table sets forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s consolidated changes in Stockholders’ Equity as of February 28, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

RESTATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
	Common stock				Additional			Deferred
	($0.01 par value)				paid-in			Stock-Based			Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Consulting			deficit			Total
As previously reported
Balance at February 29, 2004		11,667,309	$	1,166,730	$	13,534,031		$	(296,817	)	$	(13,651,717	)	$	752,227

Private placement sales		981,600		98,160		392,640									490,800
Consultant agreement		250,000		25,000		100,000									125,000
Acquisition of CNS		405,050		40,505		364,545									405,050
Expense of deferred - stock based consulting									(124,723	)					(124,723	)
Net loss												(986,193	)		(986,193	)
Balance at February 28, 2005		13,303,959		1,330,395		1,546,965			(421,540	)		(1,793,659	)		662,161

Issuance of shares		100,000		10,000		15,000									25,000
Warrants issued in connection to issue of shares						15,458									15,458
Previously recorded subscription receivable						(25,000	)								(25,000	)
Beneficial conversion feature of debt instruments						20,686									20,686
Shares issued for services		1,841,639		184,165		634,133									818,298
Shares issued for executive compensation		120,000		12,000		44,400									56,400
Expense of deferred - stock based consulting									421,540						421,540
Net loss												(3,196,229	)		(3,196,229	)
Balance at February 28, 2006		15,365,598	$	1,536,560	$	2,857,159		$	-		$	(5,585,392	)	$	(1,191,673	)

Adjustment as compared to previously reported 2005 form 10-KSB and 2006 form 10-KSB/A
Balance at February 29, 2004		-	$	-	$	(12,844,251	)	$	8,067		$	12,844,251		$	8,067

Correction of balances						12,844,251						(12,844,251	)		-
Consultant agreement		-		-		-			(125,000	)		-			(125,000	)
Acquisition of CNS		-		-		-			(130,050	)		-			(130,050	)
Expense of deferred - stock based consulting				-		-			246,983			-			246,983
Balance at February 28, 2005		-		-		-			-			-			-

Warrants issued in connection to issue of shares				-		(15,458	)		-			-			(15,458	)
Beneficial conversion feature of debt instruments				-		(20,686	)		-			-			(20,686	)
Net loss												(594,059	)		(594,059	)
Balance at February 28, 2006		-	$	-	$	(36,144	)	$	-		$	(594,059	)	$	(630,203	)

F-22

RESTATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
	Common stock				Additional			Deferred			Accumulated			Total
	($0.01 par value)				paid-in Capital			Stock-Based			deficit
	Shares		Amount		(As restated)			Consulting			(As restated)			(As restated)
As restated
Balance at February 29, 2004		11,667,309	$	1,166,730	$	689,780		$	(288,750	)	$	(807,466	)	$	760,294

Private placement sales		981,600		98,160		392,640									490,800
Consultant agreement		250,000		25,000		100,000			(125,000	)					-
Acquisition of CNS		405,050		40,505		364,545			(130,050	)					275,000
Expense of deferred - stock based consulting									122,260						122,260
Net loss												(986,193	)		(986,193	)
Balance at February 28, 2005		13,303,959		1,330,395		1,546,965			(421,540	)		(1,793,659	)		662,161

Issuance of shares		100,000		10,000		15,000									25,000
Previously recorded subscription receivable						(25,000	)								(25,000	)
Shares issued for services		1,841,639		184,165		634,133									818,298
Shares issued for executive compensation		120,000		12,000		44,400									56,400
Expense of deferred - stock based consulting									421,540						421,540
Net loss												(3,790,288	)		(3,790,288	)
Balance at February 28, 2006		15,365,598	$	1,536,560	$	2,215,498		$	-		$	(5,583,947	)	$	1,831,889	)

F-23

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Our accountant is Jewett Schwartz & Associates, CPA. We do not presently intend to change accountants. At no time have there been any disagreements with such accountants regarding any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (collectively the “Certifying Officer”) maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management timely. The Certifying Officer has concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are not effective at the “reasonable assurance” level. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Certifying Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934). Furthermore, the Certifying Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures in place were designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis in accordance with applicable Commission rules and regulations; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Certifying Officer and other persons that perform similar functions, if any, to allow us to make timely decisions regarding required disclosure in our periodic filings.

Changes in internal controls

We have not made any changes to our internal controls or procedures during the fourth quarter of 2006. We have identified some deficiencies and material weaknesses and other factors that could materially affect these controls or procedures, and therefore, corrective action is being taken to mitigate these weaknesses in controls and procedures.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use if estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, our views certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees

The following sets forth, as of June 13, 2006, the names and ages of our directors, executive officers, and other significant employees; the date when each director was appointed; and all positions and offices held by each. Each director will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified:

Name	Age	Positions Held	Date Appointed Director

John H. Treglia	63	Director, President, and, CEO and CFO	January 18, 2000
Dr. Frank Castanaro	54	Secretary and Director	February 17, 2000

Set forth below is information regarding the principal occupations of each current director during the past five years or more. None of the directors or principal executive officers holds the position of director in any other public company.

John H. Treglia is a graduate of Iona College, from which he received a BBA in Accounting in 1964. Since January 18, 2000, he has served as our president, secretary, and a director, devoting such time to our business and affairs as is required for the performance of his duties. From 1964 until 1971, Mr. Treglia was employed as an accountant by Ernst & Ernst. Thereafter, he founded and operated several businesses in various areas. From 1994 through 1998, Mr. Treglia served as a consultant to several companies which were in Chapter 11. These included J.R.B. Contracting, Inc., Laguardia Contracting, and Melli-Borrelli Associates. In 1996, Mr. Treglia founded Accutone Inc., a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing hearing aids. He has served as our CEO since such time.

Dr. Frank Castanaro received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Scranton in 1974. In 1978, he graduated from Georgetown University School of Dentistry and has been in private practice as a dentist since such time. Dr. Castanaro was appointed as our director on February 17, 2000. Dr. Castanaro has assisted two large ophthalmology practices to introduce and expand their activities in Laser therapy, including, but not limited to, Lasik procedures. Dr. Castanaro presently practices dentistry in partnership with Dr.’s Joseph C. Fontana and John B. Fontana in Peekskill, New York, and has a solo practice in Yonkers, New York. Dr. Castanaro is a member of the American Dental Association, the Dental Society of the State of New York, the Ninth District Dental Society, and the Peekskill-Yorktown Dental Society.

Code of Ethics.

The company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The Summary Compensation Table shows compensation information for each of the fiscal years ended February 28, 2006, February 28, 2005 and February 28, 2004 for all persons who served as our chief executive officer. No other executive officers received compensation in excess of $100,000 during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006.

III-1

ANNUAL COMPENSATION

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary	Other Compensation

John H. Treglia ,	2006	$29,800	120,000 shares
Chief Executive	2005	$32,000	357,142 shares
Officer, Secretary and Director	2004	-0-	357,142 shares

Dr. Frank Castanaro	2006	-0-	0
Secretary and Director	2005	-0-	0
	2004	-0-	0

Pursuant to his employment agreement, John H. Treglia is to receive a total of $150,000 per year. For the fiscal year end February 28, 2006, Mr. Treglia received $29,800 in salary plus 120,000 shares. Mr. Treglia agreed to waive his rights to the balance owed to him under his employment agreement.

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information as of June 13, 2006, with respect to the persons known to us to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock, $.10 par value. We know of no person, other than those listed in the Management’s Shareholdings Table, below, who owns more than 5% of our common stock. The following table sets forth information as of June 13, 2006, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock, $.10 par value, of each of our executive officers and directors and all executive officers and directors as a group:

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS TABLE

Title Of Class Owner	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Class	Percent of Class

Common	Carlyn A. Barr(1) 13-44 Henrietta Court Fair Lawn, NJ 07410	2,837,026	18.46%

Common	Park Avenue Health Care Management One North Lexington Avenue White Plains, New York 10601	1,200,000	7.81%

Common	Dr. Frank J. Castanaro 71 Bradford Boulevard Yonkers, NY 10710	733,000	4.77%

(1)	Carlyn A. Barr is the wife of John H. Treglia. John Treglia has disavowed any interest in the shares of common stock owned by Ms. Barr.

Security Ownership of Management

The following table sets forth information as of June 13, 2006, with respect to the shareholdings of the Company’s executive officers and directors.

III-2

Title Of Class Owner	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Class (1)	Percent of Class

Common	John H. Treglia 13-44 Henrietta Court Fair Lawn, NJ 07410	0	0

Common	Dr. Frank J. Castanaro 71 Bradford Boulevard Yonkers, NY 10710	733,000	4.77%

Common	All directors and officers as a group (2 persons)	733,000	4.77%

Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, shares of our common stock, which an individual or member of a group has a right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants, are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the ownership of such individual or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table. Accordingly, where applicable, each individual or group member’s rights to acquire shares pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants are noted below.

Medical and Professional Advisory Board

Due to the change in direction of the business, the Company’s Medical and Professional Advisory Board has been dissolved.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The following is a description of any transactions during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006 or any presently proposed transactions, to which we were, or are, to be a party, in which the amount involved in such transaction (or series of transactions) was $60,000 or more and which any of the following persons had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest: (ii) any of our directors or executive officers; (ii) any person who owns or has the right to acquire 5% or more of our issued and outstanding common stock; and (iii) any member of the immediate family of any such persons. Current management is not aware of any requirements, which may have been in effect prior to January 2000, with respect to the approval of related transactions by independent directors. Because of its current limited management resources, the company does not presently have any requirement respecting the necessity for independent directors to approve transactions with related parties. All transactions are approved by the vote of the majority, or the unanimous written consent, of the full board of directors. All member so the board of directors all members of the board of directors, individually and/or collectively, could have possible conflicts of interest with respect to transactions with related parties.

Employment Agreement with John H. Treglia

On April 3, 2000, we entered into an employment agreement with John H. Treglia, our President and CEO. The agreement provides for an annual salary in the amount of $150,000 and a term of three years. On April 3, 2003 we entered into an amendment to such employment agreement extending the terms of the agreement for an additional five years based on the same terms and conditions. Mr. Treglia has agreed to waive the right to be paid in cash until, in the opinion of the board of directors; we have sufficient financial resources to make such payments. In lieu of cash salary payments, Mr. Treglia may accept shares of common stock at, or at a discount from the market price. His agreement provides for the possibility of both increases in salary and the payment of bonuses at the sole discretion

III-3

of the board of directors, participation in any pension plan, profit-sharing plan, life insurance, hospitalization of surgical program or insurance program adopted by us (to the extent that the employee is eligible to do so under the provisions of such plan or program), reimbursement of business related expenses, for the non-disclosure of information which we deem to be confidential to it, for non-competition with us for the two-year period following termination of employment with us and for various other terms and conditions of employment. We do not intend to provide any of our employees with medical, hospital or life insurance benefits until our board of directors determines that we have sufficient financial resources to do so.

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT	DESCRIPTION

31.1	Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

WE HAVE TO FILE MATERIAL AGREEMENTS

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

For the Company’s fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, we were billed approximately $17,500 for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements. We also were billed approximately $18,500 for the review of financial statements included in our periodic and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for our year ended February 28, 2005.

Tax Fees

For the Company’s fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, we were billed $0 for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All Other Fees

The Company paid an additional $63,5000 for other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006.

III-4

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Yonkers, State of New York.

COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC.

November 2, 2006	By /s/ John H. Treglia
	John H. Treglia, President and CEO

	By: /s/ Frank Castanaro
	Dr. Frank Castanaro, Secretary

November 2, 2006	By /s/ John H. Treglia
	John H. Treglia, Director

	By: /s/ Frank Castanaro
	Dr. Frank Castanaro, Director

III-5

EXHIBIT SCHEDULE

EXHIBIT

DESCRIPTION

10.1	Larry A. Brand Convertible note
10.2	Comprehensive Associates LLC Convertible note
10.3	Comprehensive Associates LLC Subscription agreement
10.4	Comprehensive Associates LLC Registration agreement
10.5	Comprehensive Associates LLC Warrant 1
10.6	Comprehensive Associates LLC Warrant 2
10.7	Comprehensive Associates LLC Warrant 3
10.8	Comprehensive Associates LLC Warrant 4
10.9	Comprehensive Associates LLC Warrant 5
10.10	Comprehensive Associates LLC Consulting agreement
10.11	Nite Capital, LP Convertible note
10.12	Nite Capital, LP Warrant A
10.13	Nite Capital, LP Warrant B
10.14	Nite Capital, LP Warrant C
10.15	Nite Capital, LP Subscription agreement
10.16	Nite Capital, LP Registration agreement
10.17	Allan Roberts convertible note

CERTIFICATIONS

31.1	Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002