Life is Complex
Nuveen makes things e-simple.
It only takes a minute to sign up for e-Reports. Once enrolled, you’ll receive an e-mail as soon as your Nuveen Fund information is ready—no more waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link within the e-mail to see the report and save it on your computer if you wish.
Free e-Reports right to your e-mail!
www.investordelivery.com
If you receive your Nuveen Fund dividends and statements from your financial advisor or brokerage account.
or
www.nuveen.com/accountaccess
If you receive your Nuveen Fund dividends and statements directly from Nuveen.
Table of Contents
| Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders | 4 |
| Portfolio Managers’ Comments | 5 |
| Fund Leverage | 8 |
| Share Information | 9 |
| Risk Considerations | 11 |
| Performance Overview and Holding Summaries | 12 |
| Shareholder Meeting Report | 20 |
| Portfolios of Investments | 21 |
| Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 54 |
| Statement of Operations | 55 |
| Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 56 |
| Financial Highlights | 58 |
| Notes to Financial Statements | 64 |
| Additional Fund Information | 75 |
| Glossary of Terms Used in this Report | 76 |
| Reinvest Automatically, Easily and Conveniently | 78 |
| Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process | 79 |
|
NUVEEN
|
3
|
Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders
Dear Shareholders,
Asset prices have steadily climbed this year, propelled by a “Goldilocks” economic scenario that enabled markets to sidestep geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, terrorism events and political noise. The U.S. economy continued to run not too hot, not too cold, with steady growth and low levels of unemployment, inflation and interest rates. Corporate earnings have been healthy and recession risk appeared low. At the same time, growth across the rest of the world has improved as well, leading to upward revisions in global growth projections.
Yet, a global synchronized recovery also brings the prospect of higher inflation. Central banks have to manage the delicate balance between too-loose financial conditions, which risks economies overheating, and too-tight conditions, which could trigger recession. The nominee for Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed), Jerome Powell, is largely expected to maintain the course set by Chair Janet Yellen after her term expires in February 2018. However, uncertainties about fiscal policy remain, particularly as Congress is currently working on a tax overhaul plan. Depending on the details of a tax bill and whether it passes, the Fed’s job of managing interest rates could become more complicated in the years ahead.
Meanwhile, politics will remain in the forefront. The U.S. debt ceiling debate resumes in December 2017 when the current extension of the debt limit expires, and rebuilding continues in the wake of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. The ongoing “Brexit” negotiations and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) talks may impact key trade and political partnerships. Tensions with North Korea may continue to flare.
The magnitude of the market’s bullishness this year has been somewhat surprising. But gains may not be so easy in the coming years. Nobody can predict market shifts, which is why Nuveen encourages you to talk to your financial advisor to ensure your investment portfolio is appropriately diversified for your objectives, time horizon and risk tolerance. On behalf of the other members of the Nuveen Fund Board, we look forward to continuing to earn your trust in the months and years ahead.
Sincerely,
William J. Schneider
Chairman of the Board
November 22, 2017
|
4
|
NUVEEN
|
Portfolio Managers’ Comments
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP)
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 (NXQ)
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 (NXR)
Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXC)
Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN)
These Funds feature portfolio management by Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, an affiliate of Nuveen, LLC. Portfolio managers Michael S. Hamilton and Scott R. Romans, PhD, discuss key investment strategies and the six-month performance of the Nuveen Select Portfolios (the “Funds”). Michael has managed the three national Funds since 2016, while Scott has managed NXC since 2003 and NXN since 2011.
What key strategies were used to manage these Funds during the six-month reporting period ended September 30, 2017?
During the six-month reporting period, moderate economic growth, well-signaled policy actions from the Federal Reserve (Fed), a reassessment of political risk and stable municipal credit fundamentals continued to drive demand for municipal bonds, while supply remained relatively tight. Against this backdrop, yields fell (except at the very short end of the yield curve, which rose in concert with the Fed’s rate hikes) and credit spreads narrowed, helping the broad municipal market to post a gain for the reporting period. California’s municipal bond market performed better than the broad market, while New York’s market performed in line with the broad market during this reporting period. During this time, we continued to take a bottom-up approach to discovering sectors that appeared undervalued as well as individual credits that we believed had the potential to perform well over the long term.
Our trading activity continued to focus on pursuing the Funds’ investment objectives. NXP, NXQ and NXR focused on buying bonds primarily with short call structures, which offer lower duration profiles, to help maintain the Funds’ duration targets. Nevertheless, longer duration bonds occasionally presented compelling long-term opportunities, such as purchases we made in “specialty state” issues. Specialty states offer tax-exemption from both federal and state income taxes to in-state municipal bond buyers and, as a result, can experience periods of heightened demand. Specialty state municipal bonds also tend to trade at lower yields relative to non-specialty state issues, which can offer an attractive relative value opportunity over time. We bought convertible capital appreciation bonds (CABs) issued for Washington County School District Beaverton (Oregon), which were issued as zero coupon bonds then convert to a 5% coupon structure in June 2018, for NXP and NXQ. We also added revenue bonds with short call
| This material is not intended to be a recommendation or investment advice, does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities, and is not provided in a fiduciary capacity. The information provided does not take into account the specific objectives or circumstances of any particular investor, or suggest any specific course of action. Investment decisions should be made based on an investor’s objectives and circumstances and in consultation with his or her advisors. |
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements. Discussions of specific investments are for illustration only and are not intended as recommendations of individual investments. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are those of the portfolio managers as of the date of this report. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and the views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. The Funds disclaim any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein.
For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s (S&P), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s) or Fitch, Inc. (Fitch). This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings, while BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
Bond insurance guarantees only the payment of principal and interest on the bond when due, and not the value of the bonds themselves, which will fluctuate with the bond market and the financial success of the issuer and the insurer. Insurance relates specifically to the bonds in the portfolio and not to the share prices of a Fund. No representation is made as to the insurers’ ability to meet their commitments.
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
|
NUVEEN
|
5
|
Portfolio Managers’ Comments (continued)
structures issued for Olin College (Massachusetts) and bought Connecticut State Special Tax Obligation Transportation bonds, which were available at attractive prices because the lack of a state budget has depressed the state’s bonds for NXP, NXQ and NXR. All three states are specialty states. To fund our buying during the reporting period, we mainly used the proceeds from called bonds. We also sold some short-dated paper and some specialty state bonds that had appreciated in price, reinvesting the cash into new purchases.
In the California Fund, we added lower rated credits in the health care sector and swapped some of the Fund’s tobacco settlement bonds for more favorable structures. NXC’s buying activity was funded largely with call proceeds. In addition, we sold some 4% coupon bonds as spreads contracted and prices rose, as well as some convertible zero coupon bonds that saw significant spread contraction and large price appreciation. The New York Fund’s turnover was more muted than that of the California Fund. NXN’s buying focused on bonds offering longer durations and higher grade credit (AA rated), using the proceeds from called bonds.
As of September 30, 2017, NXP, NXQ and NXN continued to use inverse floating rate securities. We employ inverse floaters for a variety of reasons, including duration management, income enhancement and total return enhancement.
How did the Funds perform during the six-month reporting period ended September 30, 2017?
The tables in each Fund’s Performance Overview and Holding Summaries section of this report provide the Funds’ total returns for the six-month, one-year, five-year and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2017. Each Fund’s returns on common share net asset value (NAV) are compared with the performance of corresponding market indexes.
For the six months ended September 30, 2017, the total returns on common share NAV for NXC and NXN outperformed the national S&P Municipal Bond Index and their respective state’s S&P Municipal Bond Index. The three national Funds, NXP, NXQ and NXR, outperformed the national S&P Municipal Bond Index during the six-month reporting period.
The factors affecting performance in this reporting period included duration and yield curve positioning, credit ratings allocations and sector exposures. In addition, the use of leverage had a negligible impact on the performance of NXP, NXQ and NXR during the current reporting period. The impact of leverage on NXN over the reporting period was slightly positive, while NXC did not use leverage during the reporting period. Leverage is discussed in more detail later in the Fund Leverage section of this report.
The strongest contributor to the Funds’ relative outperformance was duration and yield curve positioning. In this reporting period, longer duration bonds performed better than those with shorter durations. All five Funds were positioned with overweight allocations to long duration bonds, which was advantageous to performance.
The Funds’ bias toward lower rated issues was another positive contributor to performance. The five Funds held underweight allocations to AAA and AA rated credits and overweight allocations to A rated and below bonds, which was advantageous because the lower grade segments outperformed the high grade segments in this reporting period.
Sector positioning added modest gains to the Funds’ relative results. In this reporting period, sectors with higher concentrations of lower rated bonds, such as tobacco and health care, outperformed, while pre-refunded and tax-supported sectors trailed, due to their bonds’ higher credit ratings. NXP, NXR and NXQ benefited from underweight exposure to tax-supported bonds, especially in dedicated tax bonds, despite an underweight in local general obligation bonds slightly detracting from performance. The three national Funds benefited from an overweight in the health care sector and hospital bonds in particular. However, the three Funds’ underweight to the transportation sector was unfavorable to performance. NXC and NXN were aided by exposures to the tobacco, industrial development revenue/pollution control revenue (IDR/PCR), health care and transportation sectors, while allocations to pre-refunded and tax-supported credits tempered relative gains.
|
6
|
NUVEEN
|
An Update Involving Puerto Rico
As noted in the Funds’ previous shareholder reports, we continue to monitor situations in the broader municipal market for any impact on the Funds’ holdings and performance: Puerto Rico’s ongoing debt restructuring is one such case. Puerto Rico began warning investors in 2014 the island’s debt burden might prove to be unsustainable and the Commonwealth pursued various strategies to deal with this burden.
In June 2016, President Obama signed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) into law. The legislation established an independent Financial Oversight and Management Board charged with restructuring Puerto Rico’s financial operations and encouraging economic development. In addition to creating an oversight board, PROMESA also provides a legal framework and court-supervised debt restructuring process that enables Puerto Rico to adjust its debt obligations. In March 2017, the oversight board certified a ten-year fiscal plan projecting revenues, expenditures and a primary fiscal surplus available for debt service over the plan’s horizon. The fiscal plan was considered quite detrimental to creditors, identifying available resources to pay only about 24% of debt service due over the ten-year term. In May 2017, the oversight board initiated a bankruptcy-like process for the general government, general obligation debt, the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (COFINA), the Highways and Transportation Authority (HTA), and the Employee Retirement System. Officials have indicated more public corporations could follow. As of September 2017, Puerto Rico has defaulted on many of its debt obligations, including General Obligation bonds.
In mid-September 2017, Puerto Rico was severely impacted by two hurricanes within the span of just two weeks causing massive destruction. Rebuilding is expected to take months and some parts of Puerto Rico may need years to fully recover. Puerto Rico’s Oversight Board has said it will approve budgetary adjustments up to an amount of $1 billion to fund emergency relief efforts. Though it’s too early to accurately assess the long-term economic impact of the storms, recovering from the tragic damage caused by the hurricanes will likely prolong the restructuring process that was already underway under PROMESA.
In terms of Puerto Rico holdings, shareholders should note that NXC, NXN and NXP had no exposure to Puerto Rico debt during this reporting period, while NXQ and NXR had allocations of 0.40% and 0.48%, respectively, at the end of the reporting period, which were all insured. The Puerto Rico credits offered higher yields, added diversification and triple exemption (i.e., exemption from most federal, state and local taxes). Puerto Rico general obligation debt is currently in default and rated Caa3/D/D by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, respectively, with negative outlooks.
Note About Investment Valuations
The municipal securities held by the Funds are valued by the Funds’ pricing service using a range of market-based inputs and assumptions. A different municipal pricing service might incorporate different assumptions and inputs into its valuation methodology, potentially resulting in different values for the same securities. Thus, the current net asset value of a Fund’s shares might be impacted, higher or lower, if the Fund were to use a different pricing service, or if its pricing service were to materially change its valuation methodology. On October 4, 2016, the Fund’s then-current municipal bond pricing service was acquired by the parent company of another pricing service, and the combination of the valuation methodologies used by the two organizations took place on October 16, 2017, subsequent to the close of the reporting period of this report. The change of valuation methodologies due to that combination had little or no impact on the net asset value of each Fund’s shares.
|
NUVEEN
|
7
|
Fund Leverage
IMPACT OF THE FUNDS’ LEVERAGE STRATEGIES ON PERFORMANCE
One important factor impacting the returns of the Funds relative to their comparative benchmarks was the Funds’ use of leverage through investments in inverse floating rate securities, which represent leveraged investments in underlying bonds. The Funds use leverage because our research has shown that, over time, leveraging provides opportunities for additional income, particularly in the recent market environment where short-term market rates are at or near historical lows, meaning that the short-term rates the Fund has been paying on its leveraging instruments have been much lower than the interest the Fund has been earning on its portfolio of long-term bonds that it has bought with the proceeds of that leverage. However, use of leverage also can expose the Fund to additional price volatility. When a Fund uses leverage, the Fund will experience a greater increase in its net asset value if the municipal bonds acquired through the use of leverage increase in value, but it will also experience a correspondingly larger decline in its net asset value if the bonds acquired through leverage decline in value, which will make the Fund’s net asset value more volatile, and its total return performance more variable over time. In addition, income in levered funds will typically decrease in comparison to unlevered funds when short-term interest rates increase and increase when short-term interest rates decrease. Leverage had a negligible impact on the performance of NXP, NXQ and NXR during the current reporting period. The impact of leverage on NXN over the reporting period was slightly positive, while NXC did not use leverage during the reporting period.
As of September 30, 2017, the Funds’ percentages of leverage are as shown in the accompanying table.
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Effective Leverage* | 0.87 | % | 1.41 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 4.93 | % |
| * | Effective Leverage is a Fund’s effective economic leverage, and includes both regulatory leverage and the leverage effects of certain derivative and other investments in a Fund’s portfolio that increase the Fund’s investment exposure. Currently, the leverage effects of Tender Option Bond (TOB) inverse floater holdings are included in effective leverage values. A Fund, however, may from time to time borrow on a typically transient basis in connection with its day-to-day operations, primarily in connection with the need to settle portfolio trades. Such incidental borrowings are excluded from the calculation of a Fund’s effective leverage ratio. |
|
8
|
NUVEEN
|
Share Information
DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION
The following information regarding the Funds’ distributions is current as of September 30, 2017. Each Fund’s distribution levels may vary over time based on each Fund’s investment activity and portfolio investment value changes.
During the current reporting period, each Fund’s distributions to shareholders were as shown in the accompanying table.
| Per Share Amounts | ||||||||||||||||
| Monthly Distributions (Ex-Dividend Date) | NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | |||||||||||
| April 2017 | $ | 0.0455 | $ | 0.0420 | $ | 0.0435 | $ | 0.0495 | $ | 0.0460 | ||||||
| May | 0.0455 | 0.0420 | 0.0435 | 0.0495 | 0.0460 | |||||||||||
| June | 0.0455 | 0.0420 | 0.0435 | 0.0495 | 0.0460 | |||||||||||
| July | 0.0455 | 0.0420 | 0.0435 | 0.0495 | 0.0460 | |||||||||||
| August | 0.0455 | 0.0420 | 0.0435 | 0.0495 | 0.0460 | |||||||||||
| September 2017 | 0.0455 | 0.0420 | 0.0435 | 0.0480 | 0.0460 | |||||||||||
| Total Distributions from Net Investment Income | $ | 0.2730 | $ | 0.2520 | $ | 0.2610 | $ | 0.2955 | $ | 0.2760 | ||||||
| Yields | ||||||||||||||||
| Market Yield* | 3.66 | % | 3.59 | % | 3.44 | % | 3.70 | % | 3.94 | % | ||||||
| Taxable-Equivalent Yield* | 5.08 | % | 4.99 | % | 4.78 | % | 5.67 | % | 5.86 | % | ||||||
| * | Market Yield is based on the Fund’s current annualized monthly dividend divided by the Fund’s current market price as of the end of the reporting period. Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 28.0%, 28.0%, 28.0%, 34.7% and 32.8% for NXP, NXQ, NXR, NXC and NXN, respectively. When comparing a Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield would be lower. |
Each Fund in this report seeks to pay regular monthly dividends out of its net investment income at a rate that reflects its past and projected net income performance. To permit each Fund to maintain a more stable monthly dividend, the Fund may pay dividends at a rate that may be more or less than the amount of net income actually earned by the Fund during the period. If a Fund has cumulatively earned more than it has paid in dividends, it will hold the excess in reserve as undistributed net investment income (UNII) as part of the Fund’s net asset value. Conversely, if a Fund has cumulatively paid in dividends more than it has earned, the excess will constitute a negative UNII that will likewise be reflected in the Fund’s net asset value. Each Fund will, over time, pay all its net investment income as dividends to shareholders.
As of September 30, 2017, the Funds had positive UNII balances, based upon our best estimate, for tax purposes. NXP, NXQ and NXR had positive UNII balances while NXC and NXN had negative UNII balances for financial reporting purposes.
All monthly dividends paid by each Fund during the current reporting period were paid from net investment income. If a portion of the Fund’s monthly distributions was sourced from or comprised of elements other than net investment income, including capital gains and/or a return of capital, shareholders would have received a notice to that effect. For financial reporting purposes, the composition and per share amounts of each Fund’s dividends for the reporting period are presented in this report’s Statement of Changes in Net Assets and Financial Highlights, respectively. For income tax purposes, distribution information for each Fund as of its most recent tax year end is presented in Note 6 — Income Tax Information within the Notes to Financial Statements of this report.
|
NUVEEN
|
9
|
Share Information (Unaudited) (continued)
EQUITY SHELF PROGRAM
During the current reporting period, NXC was authorized by the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue additional shares through an equity shelf program (Shelf Offering). Under this program, NXC, subject to market conditions, may raise additional capital from time to time in varying amounts and offering methods at a net price at or above the Fund’s NAV per share. The total amount of shares authorized under this Shelf Offering is shown in the accompanying table:
| NXC | ||
| Additional authorized shares | 600,000 |
During the current reporting period, NXC sold shares through its Shelf Offering at a weighted average premium to its NAV per share as shown in the accompanying table.
| NXC | ||
| Shares sold through Shelf Offering | 36,052 | |
| Weighted average premium to NAV per share sold | 2.44% |
Refer to the Notes to Financial Statements, Note 4 – Fund Shares, Shares Equity Shelf Programs and Offering Costs for further details of Shelf Offerings and the Fund’s transactions.
SHARE REPURCHASES
During August 2017, the Funds’ Board of Trustees reauthorized an open-market share repurchase program, allowing each Fund to repurchase an aggregate of up to approximately 10% of its outstanding shares.
As of September 30, 2017, and since the inception of the Funds’ repurchase programs, the Funds have cumulatively repurchased and retired their outstanding shares as shown in the accompanying table.
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Shares cumulatively repurchased and retired | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Shares authorized for repurchase | 1,655,000 | 1,770,000 | 1,305,000 | 630,000 | 390,000 |
OTHER SHARE INFORMATION
As of September 30, 2017, and during the current reporting period, the Funds’ share prices were trading at a premium/(discount) to their NAVs as shown in the accompanying table.
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| NAV | $ | 15.42 | $ | 14.84 | $ | 15.74 | $ | 15.34 | $ | 14.23 | ||||||
| Share price | $ | 14.92 | $ | 14.04 | $ | 15.18 | $ | 15.58 | $ | 14.01 | ||||||
| Premium/(Discount) to NAV | (3.24 | )% | (5.39 | )% | (3.56 | )% | 1.56 | % | (1.55 | )% | ||||||
| 6-month average premium/(discount) to NAV | (5.13 | )% | (6.04 | )% | (5.65 | )% | 1.71 | % | (1.94 | )% |
|
10
|
NUVEEN
|
Risk Considerations
Fund shares are not guaranteed or endorsed by any bank or other insured depository institution, and are not federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP)
Investing in closed-end funds involves risk; principal loss is possible. There is no guarantee the Fund’s investment objectives will be achieved. Closed-end fund shares may frequently trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value. Debt or fixed income securities such as those held by the Fund, are subject to market risk, credit risk, interest rate risk, derivatives risk, liquidity risk, and income risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices fall. These and other risk considerations such as tax risk are described in more detail on the Fund’s web page at www.nuveen.com/NXP.
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 (NXQ)
Investing in closed-end funds involves risk; principal loss is possible. There is no guarantee the Fund’s investment objectives will be achieved. Closed-end fund shares may frequently trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value. Debt or fixed income securities such as those held by the Fund, are subject to market risk, credit risk, interest rate risk, derivatives risk, liquidity risk, and income risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices fall. These and other risk considerations such as tax risk are described in more detail on the Fund’s web page at www.nuveen.com/NXQ.
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 (NXR)
Investing in closed-end funds involves risk; principal loss is possible. There is no guarantee the Fund’s investment objectives will be achieved. Closed-end fund shares may frequently trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value. Debt or fixed income securities such as those held by the Fund, are subject to market risk, credit risk, interest rate risk, derivatives risk, liquidity risk, and income risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices fall. These and other risk considerations such as tax risk are described in more detail on the Fund’s web page at www.nuveen.com/NXR.
Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXC)
Investing in closed-end funds involves risk; principal loss is possible. There is no guarantee the Fund’s investment objectives will be achieved. Closed-end fund shares may frequently trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value. Debt or fixed income securities such as those held by the Fund, are subject to market risk, credit risk, interest rate risk, derivatives risk, liquidity risk, and income risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices fall. State concentration makes the Fund more susceptible to local adverse economic, political, or regulatory changes affecting municipal bond issuers. These and other risk considerations such as tax risk are described in more detail on the Fund’s web page at www.nuveen.com/NXC.
Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN)
Investing in closed-end funds involves risk; principal loss is possible. There is no guarantee the Fund’s investment objectives will be achieved. Closed-end fund shares may frequently trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value. Debt or fixed income securities such as those held by the Fund, are subject to market risk, credit risk, interest rate risk, derivatives risk, liquidity risk, and income risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices fall. State concentration makes the Fund more susceptible to local adverse economic, political, or regulatory changes affecting municipal bond issuers. These and other risk considerations such as tax risk are described in more detail on the Fund’s web page at www.nuveen.com/NXN.
|
NUVEEN
|
11
|
| NXP | |
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of September 30, 2017 |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
Average Annual Total Returns as of September 30, 2017
| Cumulative | Average Annual | |||||
| 6-Month | 1-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | |||
| NXP at NAV | 4.65% | 1.08% | 4.60% | 5.19% | ||
| NXP at Share Price | 8.36% | 1.20% | 2.75% | 5.39% | ||
| S&P Municipal Bond Index | 2.82% | 0.84% | 3.08% | 4.45% | ||
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes are not available for direct investment.
|
12
|
NUVEEN
|
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
| Fund Allocation | |
| (% of net assets) | |
| Long-Term Municipal Bonds | 95.7% |
| Corporate Bonds | 0.1% |
| Other Assets Less Liabilities | 4.2% |
| Net Assets | 100% |
| Portfolio Credit Quality | |
| (% of total investment exposure) | |
| AAA/U.S. Guaranteed | 15.1% |
| AA | 33.0% |
| A | 33.1% |
| BBB | 9.9% |
| BB or Lower | 7.9% |
| N/R (not rated) | 1.0% |
| Total | 100% |
| Portfolio Composition | |
| (% of total investments) | |
| Tax Obligation/Limited | 26.0% |
| Transportation | 14.1% |
| Tax Obligation/General | 13.7% |
| Health Care | 13.5% |
| U.S. Guaranteed | 9.8% |
| Consumer Staples | 6.5% |
| Education and Civic Organizations | 6.0% |
| Other | 10.4% |
| Total | 100% |
| States and Territories | |
| (% of total municipal bonds) | |
| California | 18.4% |
| Illinois | 11.4% |
| New Jersey | 9.8% |
| Texas | 9.7% |
| Colorado | 5.0% |
| Ohio | 4.2% |
| Michigan | 3.4% |
| New York | 3.1% |
| Arizona | 3.1% |
| Washington | 3.0% |
| Missouri | 2.9% |
| Iowa | 2.7% |
| Guam | 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania | 2.1% |
| Other | 19.0% |
| Total | 100% |
|
NUVEEN
|
13
|
| NXQ | |
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 | |
| Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of September 30, 2017 |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
Average Annual Total Returns as of September 30, 2017
| Cumulative | Average Annual | |||||
| 6-Month | 1-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | |||
| NXQ at NAV | 4.32% | 1.32% | 4.85% | 4.82% | ||
| NXQ at Share Price | 6.62% | 0.11% | 3.06% | 4.98% | ||
| S&P Municipal Bond Index | 2.82% | 0.84% | 3.08% | 4.45% | ||
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes are not available for direct investment.
|
14
|
NUVEEN
|
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
| Fund Allocation | |
| (% of net assets) | |
| Long-Term Municipal Bonds | 97.6% |
| Corporate Bonds | 0.1% |
| Other Assets Less Liabilities | 2.3% |
| Net Assets | 100% |
| Portfolio Credit Quality | |
| (% of total investment exposure) | |
| AAA/U.S. Guaranteed | 14.4% |
| AA | 28.4% |
| A | 38.2% |
| BBB | 10.5% |
| BB or Lower | 7.7% |
| N/R (not rated) | 0.8% |
| Total | 100% |
| Portfolio Composition | |
| (% of total investments) | |
| Tax Obligation/General | 19.6% |
| Tax Obligation/Limited | 17.2% |
| Transportation | 16.3% |
| Health Care | 13.2% |
| U.S. Guaranteed | 10.6% |
| Utilities | 7.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 6.7% |
| Other | 9.4% |
| Total | 100% |
| States and Territories | |
| (% of total municipal bonds) | |
| California | 16.3% |
| Illinois | 12.7% |
| Texas | 10.7% |
| Colorado | 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania | 4.5% |
| Nevada | 4.0% |
| Ohio | 3.7% |
| Arizona | 3.7% |
| Michigan | 3.6% |
| New Jersey | 3.6% |
| Washington | 3.4% |
| Wisconsin | 3.0% |
| Iowa | 2.5% |
| New York | 2.4% |
| Other | 19.2% |
| Total | 100% |
|
NUVEEN
|
15
|
| NXR | |
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 | |
| Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of September 30, 2017 |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
Average Annual Total Returns as of September 30, 2017
| Cumulative | Average Annual | |||||
| 6-Month | 1-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | |||
| NXR at NAV | 4.68% | 1.06% | 5.07% | 5.40% | ||
| NXR at Share Price | 8.72% | 1.85% | 3.32% | 5.89% | ||
| S&P Municipal Bond Index | 2.82% | 0.84% | 3.08% | 4.45% | ||
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes are not available for direct investment.
|
16
|
NUVEEN
|
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
| Fund Allocation | |
| (% of net assets) | |
| Long-Term Municipal Bonds | 98.2% |
| Corporate Bonds | 0.0% |
| Other Assets Less Liabilities | 1.8% |
| Net Assets | 100% |
| Portfolio Credit Quality | |
| (% of total investment exposure) | |
| AAA/U.S. Guaranteed | 15.2% |
| AA | 27.6% |
| A | 37.2% |
| BBB | 10.0% |
| BB or Lower | 8.7% |
| N/R (not rated) | 1.3% |
| Total | 100% |
| Portfolio Composition | |
| (% of total investments) | |
| Tax Obligation/Limited | 22.0% |
| Tax Obligation/General | 18.4% |
| Transportation | 15.4% |
| Health Care | 11.3% |
| U.S. Guaranteed | 9.1% |
| Consumer Staples | 7.4% |
| Utilities | 7.1% |
| Other | 9.3% |
| Total | 100% |
| States and Territories | |
| (% of total municipal bonds) | |
| California | 23.3% |
| Illinois | 12.2% |
| Texas | 10.8% |
| Pennsylvania | 7.0% |
| Ohio | 6.5% |
| Colorado | 5.7% |
| Washington | 4.2% |
| New Jersey | 2.8% |
| New York | 2.6% |
| Virginia | 2.5% |
| Nevada | 1.8% |
| Connecticut | 1.7% |
| Other | 18.9% |
| Total | 100% |
|
NUVEEN
|
17
|
| NXC | |
| Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of September 30, 2017 |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
Average Annual Total Returns as of September 30, 2017
| Cumulative | Average Annual | |||||
| 6-Month | 1-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | |||
| NXC at NAV | 4.26% | 1.20% | 4.71% | 5.56% | ||
| NXC at Share Price | 7.10% | (4.76)% | 4.59% | 6.30% | ||
| S&P Municipal Bond California Index | 3.15% | 0.90% | 3.72% | 4.85% | ||
| S&P Municipal Bond Index | 2.82% | 0.84% | 3.08% | 4.45% | ||
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes are not available for direct investment.
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
| Fund Allocation | |
| (% of net assets) | |
| Long-Term Municipal Bonds | 97.3% |
| Short-Term Municipal Bonds | 2.1% |
| Other Assets Less Liabilities | 0.6% |
| Net Assets | 100% |
| Portfolio Composition | |
| (% of total investments) | |
| Tax Obligation/General | 23.8% |
| Tax Obligation/Limited | 17.3% |
| Water and Sewer | 15.2% |
| Health Care | 13.3% |
| U.S. Guaranteed | 8.9% |
| Transportation | 6.7% |
| Other | 14.8% |
| Total | 100% |
| Portfolio Credit Quality | |
| (% of total investment exposure) | |
| AAA/U.S. Guaranteed | 18.4% |
| AA | 40.3% |
| A | 18.6% |
| BBB | 12.5% |
| BB or Lower | 9.0% |
| N/R (not rated) | 1.2% |
| Total | 100% |
|
18
|
NUVEEN
|
| NXN | |
| Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of September 30, 2017 |
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
Average Annual Total Returns as of September 30, 2017
| Cumulative | Average Annual | |||||
| 6-Month | 1-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | |||
| NXN at NAV | 3.34% | 0.99% | 3.17% | 4.45% | ||
| NXN at Share Price | 4.37% | (0.53)% | 2.86% | 5.14% | ||
| S&P Municipal Bond New York Index | 2.88% | 0.96% | 3.09% | 4.45% | ||
| S&P Municipal Bond Index | 2.82% | 0.84% | 3.08% | 4.45% | ||
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes are not available for direct investment.
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
| Fund Allocation | |
| (% of net assets) | |
| Long-Term Municipal Bonds | 98.9% |
| Other Assets Less Liabilities | 2.9% |
| Net Assets Plus Floating Rate Obligations | 101.8% |
| Floating Rate Obligations | (1.8)% |
| Net Assets | 100% |
| Portfolio Composition | |
| (% of total investments) | |
| Education and Civic Organizations | 24.0% |
| Tax Obligation/Limited | 21.9% |
| Transportation | 15.0% |
| Utilities | 10.3% |
| U.S. Guaranteed | 8.9% |
| Water and Sewer | 7.4% |
| Other | 12.5% |
| Total | 100% |
| Portfolio Credit Quality | |
| (% of total investment exposure) | |
| AAA/U.S. Guaranteed | 33.5% |
| AA | 37.5% |
| A | 10.2% |
| BBB | 5.5% |
| BB or Lower | 7.1% |
| N/R (not rated) | 6.2% |
| Total | 100% |
|
NUVEEN
|
19
|
Shareholder Meeting Report
The annual meeting of shareholders was held in the offices of Nuveen on August 2, 2017 for NXP, NXQ, NXR, NXC and NXN; at this meeting the shareholders were asked to elect Board Members.
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Common | Common | Common | Common | Common | ||||||||||||
| shares | shares | shares | shares | shares | ||||||||||||
| Approval of the Board Members was reached as follows: | ||||||||||||||||
| David J. Kundert | ||||||||||||||||
| For | 14,519,136 | 15,930,779 | 11,750,423 | 5,428,394 | 3,341,735 | |||||||||||
| Withhold | 468,968 | 360,211 | 334,216 | 331,924 | 47,527 | |||||||||||
| Total | 14,988,104 | 16,290,990 | 12,084,639 | 5,760,318 | 3,389,262 | |||||||||||
| John K. Nelson | ||||||||||||||||
| For | 14,615,828 | 16,019,820 | 11,896,110 | 5,529,489 | 3,338,300 | |||||||||||
| Withhold | 372,276 | 271,170 | 188,529 | 230,829 | 50,962 | |||||||||||
| Total | 14,988,104 | 16,290,990 | 12,084,639 | 5,760,318 | 3,389,262 | |||||||||||
| Terence J. Toth | ||||||||||||||||
| For | 14,614,353 | 16,014,969 | 11,892,158 | 5,529,489 | 3,343,620 | |||||||||||
| Withhold | 373,751 | 276,021 | 192,481 | 230,829 | 45,642 | |||||||||||
| Total | 14,988,104 | 16,290,990 | 12,084,639 | 5,760,318 | 3,389,262 | |||||||||||
| Robert L. Young | ||||||||||||||||
| For | 14,607,143 | 16,018,265 | 11,890,471 | 5,482,507 | 3,338,300 | |||||||||||
| Withhold | 380,961 | 272,725 | 194,168 | 277,811 | 50,962 | |||||||||||
| Total | 14,988,104 | 16,290,990 | 12,084,639 | 5,760,318 | 3,389,262 |
|
20
|
NUVEEN
|
| NXP | ||
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | ||
| Portfolio of Investments | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 95.7% | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS – 95.7% | |||||||||
| Alaska – 1.0% | |||||||||
| $ | 2,675 | Northern Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Alaska, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 6/01/46 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B3 | $ | 2,610,318 | |||
| Arizona – 2.9% | |||||||||
| 2,500 | Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2011B-1&2, 5.250%, 3/01/39 | 3/21 at 100.00 | A | 2,715,525 | |||||
| 2,530 | Arizona Water Infrastructure Finance Authority, Water Quality Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 10/01/20 | 10/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,631,908 | |||||
| 355 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Paradise Schools Projects, Series 2016, 2.875%, 7/01/21 | No Opt. Call | BB+ | 349,160 | |||||
| 1,000 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Banner Health, Refunding Series 2016A, 5.000%, 1/01/38 | 1/27 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,157,040 | |||||
| 625 | Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Tucson Electric Power Company, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 10/01/40 | 10/20 at 100.00 | A– | 670,394 | |||||
| 7,010 | Total Arizona | 7,524,027 | |||||||
| Arkansas – 0.8% | |||||||||
| 6,555 | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds, Arkansas Cancer Research Center Project, Series 2006, 0.000%, 7/01/46 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 1,917,862 | |||||
| California – 17.6% | |||||||||
| 4,245 | Anaheim City School District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2002 Series 2007, 0.000%, 8/01/31 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 2,765,702 | |||||
| 2,840 | Anaheim Public Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Public Improvement Project, Series 1997C, 0.000%, 9/01/30 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,836,230 | |||||
| 3,000 | Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2013S-4, 5.000%, 4/01/38 (Pre-refunded 4/01/23) | 4/23 at 100.00 | AA– (4) | 3,578,280 | |||||
| 2,310 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph Health System, Series 2013A, 5.000%, 7/01/33 | 7/23 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,632,314 | |||||
| 1,630 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2013I, 5.000%, 11/01/38 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,874,696 | |||||
| 2,745 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2009, 5.000%, 10/01/29 | 10/19 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,953,510 | |||||
| 1,500 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Health Revenue Bonds, Enloe Medical Center, Refunding Series 2008A, 6.250%, 8/15/28 (Pre-refunded 8/15/18) | 8/18 at 100.00 | AA– (4) | 1,571,355 | |||||
| 895 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Methodist Hospital Project, Series 2009, 6.750%, 2/01/38 (Pre-refunded 8/01/19) | 8/19 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 989,306 | |||||
| 2,645 | Cypress Elementary School District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009A, 0.000%, 5/01/34 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,453,930 | |||||
| 800 | East Side Union High School District, Santa Clara County, California, General Obligation Bonds, 2008 Election Series 2010B, 5.000%, 8/01/24 (Pre-refunded 8/01/19) – AGC Insured | 8/19 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 859,448 | |||||
| 2,710 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 0.000%, 6/01/28 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A+ | 2,053,773 | |||||
| 3,030 | Grossmont Union High School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 0.000%, 8/01/25 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 2,548,169 | |||||
| 1,000 | Moreno Valley Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2007, 0.000%, 8/01/23 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A+ | 889,790 |
|
NUVEEN
|
21
|
| NXP | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| California (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,160 | Mount San Antonio Community College District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2008, Series 2013A, 0.000%, 8/01/43 (5) | 8/35 at 100.00 | Aa1 | $ | 939,368 | |||
| 5,395 | Napa Valley Community College District, Napa and Sonoma Counties, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2002 Series 2007C, 0.000%, 8/01/32 – NPFG Insured | 8/18 at 49.01 | Aa2 | 2,540,667 | |||||
| 590 | Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2009, 6.750%, 11/01/39 (Pre-refunded 11/01/19) | 11/19 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 660,735 | |||||
| 4,390 | Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Los Medanos Community Development Project, Series 1999, 0.000%, 8/01/29 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | AA– | 2,950,387 | |||||
| 1,700 | Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District, Orange County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2006, 0.000%, 10/01/34 – NPFG Insured (ETM) | No Opt. Call | A+ (4) | 1,075,590 | |||||
| 2,480 | Port of Oakland, California, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Inter Lien Series 2007B, 5.000%, 11/01/19 (Pre-refunded 11/01/17) – NPFG Insured | 11/17 at 100.00 | A (4) | 2,489,350 | |||||
| 8,000 | Poway Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, School Facilities Improvement District 2007-1, Election 2008 Series 2009A, 0.000%, 8/01/33 | No Opt. Call | AA– | 4,712,000 | |||||
| 2,110 | Sierra Sands Unified School District, Kern County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Series 2006A, 0.000%, 11/01/28 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,552,095 | |||||
| 1,195 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Northern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2005A-1, 5.500%, 6/01/45 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 1,194,904 | |||||
| 1,150 | Woodside Elementary School District, San Mateo County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2005, Series 2007, 0.000%, 10/01/30 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | AAA | 793,098 | |||||
| 57,520 | Total California | 44,914,697 | |||||||
| Colorado – 4.8% | |||||||||
| 500 | Centerra Metropolitan District 1, Loveland, Colorado, Special Revenue Bonds, Refunding & Improvement Series 2017, 5.000%, 12/01/21 | No Opt. Call | N/R | 542,190 | |||||
| 1,780 | Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series 2013A, 5.250%, 1/01/45 | 1/23 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 1,899,189 | |||||
| 1,000 | Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Services Corporation, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 1/01/40 | 1/20 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,062,620 | |||||
| 1,935 | Denver City and County, Colorado, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien Series 2013B, 5.000%, 11/15/43 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A | 2,148,953 | |||||
| 250 | E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B, 0.000%, 9/01/29 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 171,023 | |||||
| 12,500 | E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 0.000%, 9/01/38 – NPFG Insured | 9/26 at 54.77 | A | 4,863,500 | |||||
| 2,000 | E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Toll Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B, 0.000%, 9/01/32 – NPFG Insured | 9/20 at 50.83 | A | 941,500 | |||||
| 620 | Park Creek Metropolitan District, Colorado, Senior Limited Property Tax Supported Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 12/01/35 | 12/25 at 100.00 | N/R | 680,952 | |||||
| 20,585 | Total Colorado | 12,309,927 | |||||||
| Connecticut – 0.8% | |||||||||
| 1,890 | Connecticut State, Special Tax Obligation Bonds, Transportation Infrastructure Purposes Series 2013A, 5.000%, 10/01/32 | 10/23 at 100.00 | AA | 2,128,386 | |||||
| Guam – 2.1% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Refunding Series 2015D, 5.000%, 11/15/39 | 11/25 at 100.00 | A | 1,600,995 | |||||
| 1,650 | Government of Guam, Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 6.000%, 11/01/26 | 5/21 at 100.00 | A– | 1,871,595 | |||||
| 1,740 | Guam Government Waterworks Authority, Water and Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 5.250%, 7/01/25 | 7/23 at 100.00 | A– | 1,955,273 | |||||
| 4,890 | Total Guam | 5,427,863 |
|
22
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Idaho – 1.3% | |||||||||
| $ | 3,000 | Idaho Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Luke’s Health System Project, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 3/01/44 | 3/24 at 100.00 | A– | $ | 3,271,140 | |||
| Illinois – 11.0% | |||||||||
| Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University, Housing and Auxiliary Facilities System Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A: | |||||||||
| 2,565 | 0.000%, 4/01/20 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,427,567 | |||||
| 2,000 | 0.000%, 4/01/23 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 1,715,220 | |||||
| 725 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Capital Improvement Revenues, Series 2016, 6.000%, 4/01/46 | 4/27 at 100.00 | A | 855,696 | |||||
| 735 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Revenues Series 2011A, 5.000%, 12/01/41 | 12/21 at 100.00 | B+ | 730,869 | |||||
| 360 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Revenues, Series 2016B, 6.500%, 12/01/46 | 12/26 at 100.00 | B | 413,885 | |||||
| 55 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Tax Revenues, Series 1998B-1, 0.000%, 12/01/28 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 35,067 | |||||
| 645 | Chicago, Illinois, General Airport Revenue Bonds, O’Hare International Airport, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2016C, 5.000%, 1/01/20 | No Opt. Call | A | 700,122 | |||||
| 880 | Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Project & Refunding Series 2017A, 6.000%, 1/01/38 | 1/27 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 1,019,392 | |||||
| 2,100 | Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northwestern Memorial HealthCare, Series 2013, 4.000%, 8/15/33 | 8/22 at 100.00 | AA+ | 2,187,801 | |||||
| 260 | Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Series 2013A, 6.000%, 7/01/43 | 7/23 at 100.00 | A– | 297,682 | |||||
| 2,100 | Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers, Refunding Series 2008A, 5.500%, 8/15/30 | 8/18 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 2,152,248 | |||||
| 1,000 | Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers, Series 2009, 6.875%, 8/15/38 (Pre-refunded 8/15/19) | 8/19 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 1,107,070 | |||||
| 1,270 | Illinois State, General Obligation Bonds, October Series 2016, 5.000%, 2/01/19 | No Opt. Call | BBB | 1,315,847 | |||||
| 2,190 | Illinois State, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 8/01/23 | No Opt. Call | BBB | 2,402,014 | |||||
| 1,000 | Kendall, Kane, and Will Counties Community Unit School District 308 Oswego, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 0.000%, 2/01/24 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa3 | 852,050 | |||||
| Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 2002A: | |||||||||
| 1,720 | 0.000%, 12/15/29 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 1,091,736 | |||||
| 810 | 0.000%, 6/15/30 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 502,435 | |||||
| 6,070 | 0.000%, 12/15/31 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 3,520,661 | |||||
| 5,000 | 0.000%, 12/15/36 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,262,750 | |||||
| 1,775 | Springfield, Illinois, Electric Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2015, 5.000%, 3/01/28 | 3/25 at 100.00 | A | 2,060,633 | |||||
| 310 | University of Illinois, Health Services Facilities System Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 6.000%, 10/01/42 | 10/23 at 100.00 | A– | 354,355 | |||||
| 33,570 | Total Illinois | 28,005,100 | |||||||
| Indiana – 1.5% | |||||||||
| 2,855 | Boone County Hospital Association, Indiana, Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.250%, 7/15/25 | 1/20 at 100.00 | AA+ | 3,112,207 | |||||
| 750 | Purdue University, Indiana, University Revenue Bonds, Student Facility System Series 2009A, 5.000%, 7/01/23 (Pre-refunded 1/01/19) | 1/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 787,718 | |||||
| 3,605 | Total Indiana | 3,899,925 |
|
NUVEEN
|
23
|
| NXP | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Iowa – 2.6% | |||||||||
| $ | 830 | Iowa Finance Authority, Iowa, Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds, Iowa Fertilizer Company Project, Series 2013, 5.000%, 12/01/19 | No Opt. Call | B | $ | 858,851 | |||
| 710 | Iowa Finance Authority, Iowa, Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds, Iowa Fertilizer Company Project, Series 2016, 5.875%, 12/01/26 | 6/18 at 105.00 | B | 752,423 | |||||
| 1,000 | Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Asset Backed Settlement Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.375%, 6/01/38 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B+ | 999,930 | |||||
| 4,000 | Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Tobacco Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B, 5.600%, 6/01/34 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B+ | 4,023,800 | |||||
| 6,540 | Total Iowa | 6,635,004 | |||||||
| Kentucky – 1.1% | |||||||||
| 2,500 | Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Baptist Healthcare System Obligated Group, Series 2011, 5.250%, 8/15/46 | 8/21 at 100.00 | A | 2,723,500 | |||||
| Massachusetts – 1.5% | |||||||||
| 1,625 | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds, Olin College, Series 2013E, 5.000%, 11/01/43 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,846,211 | |||||
| 500 | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, CareGroup Inc., Series 2008E-1 &2, 5.000%, 7/01/28 (Pre-refunded 7/01/18) | 7/18 at 100.00 | A– (4) | 514,895 | |||||
| 1,540 | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Housing Bonds, Series 2009F, 5.700%, 6/01/40 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/18 at 100.00 | AA | 1,574,573 | |||||
| 3,665 | Total Massachusetts | 3,935,679 | |||||||
| Michigan – 3.2% | |||||||||
| 355 | Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2012A, 5.250%, 7/01/39 | 7/22 at 100.00 | A | 392,126 | |||||
| 1,500 | Detroit, Michigan, Sewer Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Second Lien, Series 2001E, 5.750%, 7/01/31 (Pre-refunded 7/01/18) – BHAC Insured | 7/18 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 1,554,045 | |||||
| 2,000 | Portage Public Schools, Kalamazoo County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/21 (Pre-refunded 5/01/18) – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 2,048,120 | |||||
| 4,000 | Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Bonds, William Beaumont Hospital, Refunding Series 2009V, 8.250%, 9/01/39 (Pre-refunded 9/01/18) | 9/18 at 100.00 | Aaa | 4,267,560 | |||||
| 7,855 | Total Michigan | 8,261,851 | |||||||
| Minnesota – 0.7% | |||||||||
| 1,725 | Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Minnesota, Health Care Revenue Bonds, Allina Health System, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/19 – NPFG Insured | 11/17 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,733,970 | |||||
| Mississippi – 1.0% | |||||||||
| 2,400 | Warren County, Mississippi, Gulf Opportunity Zone Revenue Bonds, International Paper Company Project, Series 2008A, 6.500%, 9/01/32 | 9/18 at 100.00 | BBB | 2,509,128 | |||||
| Missouri – 2.7% | |||||||||
| 360 | Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District, Mass Transit Sales Tax Appropriation Bonds, Refunding Combined Lien Series 2013A, 5.000%, 10/01/28 | 10/18 at 100.00 | AA+ | 374,317 | |||||
| Kansas City Municipal Assistance Corporation, Missouri, Leasehold Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B-1: | |||||||||
| 1,165 | 0.000%, 4/15/23 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,041,335 | |||||
| 5,000 | 0.000%, 4/15/30 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | AA– | 3,359,850 | |||||
| 2,000 | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, CoxHealth, Series 2013A, 5.000%, 11/15/38 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A2 | 2,203,480 | |||||
| 8,525 | Total Missouri | 6,978,982 |
|
24
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Nevada – 1.6% | |||||||||
| $ | 750 | Clark County, Nevada, Airport Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust Series 2016-XG0028, 17.526%, 7/01/42 (IF) | 1/20 at 100.00 | A+ | $ | 1,059,870 | |||
| 1,250 | Clark County, Nevada, Passenger Facility Charge Revenue Bonds, Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 7/01/42 | 1/20 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,351,813 | |||||
| 1,500 | Las Vegas Redevelopment Agency, Nevada, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A, 8.000%, 6/15/30 (Pre-refunded 6/15/19) | 6/19 at 100.00 | BBB+ (4) | 1,675,020 | |||||
| 3,500 | Total Nevada | 4,086,703 | |||||||
| New Jersey – 9.4% | |||||||||
| 940 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Private Activity Bonds, The Goethals Bridge Replacement Project, Series 2013, 5.125%, 1/01/39 – AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 1/24 at 100.00 | AA | 1,046,596 | |||||
| 1,035 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction Financing Program Bonds, Refunding Series 2011GG, 5.000%, 9/01/22 | 3/21 at 100.00 | A– | 1,118,866 | |||||
| 1,380 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Sublease Revenue Bonds, New Jersey Transit Corporation Projects, Refunding Series 2017B, 5.000%, 11/01/23 | No Opt. Call | A– | 1,549,781 | |||||
| 260 | New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, University Hospital Issue, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/29 – AGM Insured | 7/25 at 100.00 | AA | 303,365 | |||||
| 35,000 | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System Bonds, Refunding Series 2006C, 0.000%, 12/15/34 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 17,583,300 | |||||
| 2,500 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, New Jersey, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007-1A, 5.000%, 6/01/41 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B | 2,444,500 | |||||
| 41,115 | Total New Jersey | 24,046,408 | |||||||
| New Mexico – 0.4% | |||||||||
| 1,000 | New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, St Anthony, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 9/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,000,640 | |||||
| New York – 3.0% | |||||||||
| 500 | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Senior Fiscal 2012 Series 2011A, 5.250%, 2/15/47 | 2/21 at 100.00 | AA– | 556,580 | |||||
| 2,285 | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York, Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Fiscal 2009 Series 2008A, 5.750%, 6/15/40 | 6/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,365,980 | |||||
| 3,625 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Building Aid Revenue Bonds, Fiscal Series 2009-S1, 5.500%, 7/15/31 | 7/18 at 100.00 | AA | 3,757,893 | |||||
| 780 | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010, 6.000%, 12/01/42 | 12/20 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 871,073 | |||||
| 7,190 | Total New York | 7,551,526 | |||||||
| North Carolina – 0.4% | |||||||||
| 1,000 | North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2008C, 6.750%, 1/01/24 (Pre-refunded 1/01/19) | 1/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,071,940 | |||||
| Ohio – 4.1% | |||||||||
| 2,250 | American Municipal Power Ohio Inc., Prairie State Energy Campus Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A, 5.750%, 2/15/39 (Pre-refunded 2/15/19) – AGC Insured | 2/19 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 2,397,128 | |||||
| Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2: | |||||||||
| 1,670 | 6.000%, 6/01/42 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 1,621,954 | |||||
| 1,000 | 6.500%, 6/01/47 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 999,860 | |||||
| 1,975 | Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-3, 6.250%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | B– | 1,971,682 | |||||
| 1,500 | Montgomery County, Ohio, Revenue Bonds, Miami Valley Hospital, Series 2011A, 5.750%, 11/15/21 | 11/20 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,696,755 | |||||
| 1,105 | Ohio Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Infrastructure Project, Junior Lien Series 2013A-1, 5.000%, 2/15/48 | 2/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,230,185 |
|
NUVEEN
|
25
|
| NXP | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Ohio (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | Ohio Water Development Authority, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, FirstEnergy Nuclear Generating Corporation Project, Series 2005B, 4.000%, 1/01/34 (Mandatory put 7/01/21) | No Opt. Call | Caa1 | $ | 457,500 | |||
| 10,500 | Total Ohio | 10,375,064 | |||||||
| Oregon – 0.9% | |||||||||
| 590 | Beaverton School District 48J, Washington and Multnomah Counties, Oregon, General Obligation Bonds, Convertible Deferred Interest Series 2017D, 0.000%, 6/15/36 | 6/27 at 100.00 | AA+ | 669,898 | |||||
| 1,500 | Oregon Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Willamette University, Refunding Series 2016B, 5.000%, 10/01/40 | 10/26 at 100.00 | A | 1,722,450 | |||||
| 2,090 | Total Oregon | 2,392,348 | |||||||
| Pennsylvania – 2.1% | |||||||||
| 1,225 | Delaware River Port Authority, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 5.000%, 1/01/37 | 1/24 at 100.00 | A | 1,402,049 | |||||
| 2,090 | Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Carnegie Mellon University, Series 2009, 5.000%, 8/01/21 | 2/19 at 100.00 | AA | 2,199,265 | |||||
| 640 | Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Motor License Fund-Enhanced Subordinate Special Revenue Bonds, Series 2010B-2, 5.000%, 12/01/30 | 12/20 at 100.00 | A2 | 695,347 | |||||
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Motor License Fund-Enhanced Subordinate Special Revenue Bonds, Series 2010B-2: | |||||||||
| 555 | 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 12/01/20) | 12/20 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 622,688 | |||||
| 295 | 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 12/01/20) | 12/20 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 330,683 | |||||
| 4,805 | Total Pennsylvania | 5,250,032 | |||||||
| Texas – 9.3% | |||||||||
| 250 | Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2011, 6.000%, 1/01/41 (Pre-refunded 1/01/21) | 1/21 at 100.00 | BBB+ (4) | 287,935 | |||||
| 110 | Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2015A, 5.000%, 1/01/33 | 7/25 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 125,444 | |||||
| 1,000 | Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008, 5.250%, 12/01/48 (Pre-refunded 12/01/18) | 12/18 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 1,050,070 | |||||
| 5,565 | Grand Parkway Transportation Corporation, Texas, System Toll Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2013A, 5.500%, 4/01/53 | 10/23 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 6,317,833 | |||||
| 3,415 | Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Junior Lien Series 2001H, 0.000%, 11/15/30 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,063,719 | |||||
| 4,230 | Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Third Lien Series 2004A-3, 0.000%, 11/15/35 – NPFG Insured | 11/24 at 52.47 | A | 1,700,672 | |||||
| 4,015 | Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Special Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2001A, 0.000%, 11/15/38 – NPFG Insured | 11/30 at 61.17 | AA | 1,513,735 | |||||
| 2,260 | Love Field Airport Modernization Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest Airlines Company, Series 2010, 5.250%, 11/01/40 | 11/20 at 100.00 | A3 | 2,460,259 | |||||
| 2,000 | North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Tier Capital Appreciation Series 2008I, 6.500%, 1/01/43 | 1/25 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,488,680 | |||||
| 5,000 | Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corporation III, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2012, 5.000%, 12/15/26 | 12/22 at 100.00 | A3 | 5,682,950 | |||||
| 27,845 | Total Texas | 23,691,297 |
|
26
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Virginia – 2.3% | |||||||||
| $ | 2,000 | Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Virginia, Dulles Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Dulles Metrorail Capital Appreciation, Second Senior Lien Series 2010B, 0.000%, 10/01/44 (5) | 10/28 at 100.00 | BBB+ | $ | 2,351,400 | |||
| Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Elizabeth River Crossing, Opco LLC Project, Series 2012: | |||||||||
| 1,000 | 5.250%, 1/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,105,520 | |||||
| 1,205 | 6.000%, 1/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,369,193 | |||||
| 1,010 | 5.500%, 1/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,124,393 | |||||
| 5,215 | Total Virginia | 5,950,506 | |||||||
| Washington – 2.8% | |||||||||
| 1,280 | Port of Seattle, Washington, Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Lien Series 2016A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 1,331,891 | |||||
| 990 | Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Series 2011A, 5.625%, 1/01/35 | 1/21 at 100.00 | A | 1,074,467 | |||||
| 2,115 | Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, PeaceHealth, Refunding Series 2009, 5.000%, 11/01/28 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,239,975 | |||||
| 1,000 | Washington State, General Obligation Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Bonds, Series 2008D, 5.000%, 1/01/33 (Pre-refunded 1/01/18) | 1/18 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 1,010,450 | |||||
| 2,115 | Washington State, Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003F, 0.000%, 12/01/27 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | AA+ | 1,633,880 | |||||
| 7,500 | Total Washington | 7,290,663 | |||||||
| West Virginia – 1.2% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, West Virginia United Health System Obligated Group, Refunding & Improvement Series 2013A, 5.500%, 6/01/44 | 6/23 at 100.00 | A | 1,684,215 | |||||
| 1,500 | West Virginia State School Building Authority, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 7/01/20 (Pre-refunded 11/01/17) – NPFG Insured | 11/17 at 100.00 | Aa3 (4) | 1,505,325 | |||||
| 3,000 | Total West Virginia | 3,189,540 | |||||||
| Wisconsin – 1.6% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc., Series 2016, 5.000%, 12/01/41 | 11/26 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,708,905 | |||||
| 1,645 | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Mercy Alliance, Inc., Series 2012, 5.000%, 6/01/39 | 6/22 at 100.00 | A3 | 1,764,361 | |||||
| 490 | Wisconsin, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2003-3, 5.000%, 11/01/26 | 11/26 at 100.00 | AA | 491,661 | |||||
| 3,635 | Total Wisconsin | 3,964,927 | |||||||
| $ | 292,905 | Total Municipal Bonds (cost $216,105,175) | 244,648,953 |
| Principal | |||||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Coupon | Maturity | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||||
| CORPORATE BONDS – 0.1% | |||||||||||
| TRANSPORTATION – 0.1% | |||||||||||
| $ | 207 | Las Vegas Monorail Company, Senior Interest Bonds (6), (7) | 5.500% | 7/15/19 | N/R | $ | 130,371 | ||||
| 56 | Las Vegas Monorail Company, Senior Interest Bonds (6), (7) | 5.500% | 7/15/55 | N/R | 28,390 | ||||||
| $ | 263 | Total Corporate Bonds (cost $20,565) | 158,761 | ||||||||
| Total Long-Term Investments (cost $216,125,740) – 95.8% | 244,807,714 | ||||||||||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities – 4.2% | 10,716,376 | ||||||||||
| Net Assets – 100% | $ | 255,524,090 |
|
NUVEEN
|
27
|
| NXP | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| (1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets. |
| (2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
| (3) | For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
| (4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. |
| (5) | Step-up coupon bond, a bond with a coupon that increases (“steps up”), usually at regular intervals, while the bond is outstanding. The rate shown is the coupon as of the end of the reporting period. |
| (6) | Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment classified as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 2 – Investment Valuation and Fair Value Measurements for more information. |
| (7) | During January 2010, Las Vegas Monorail Company (“Las Vegas Monorail”) filed for federal bankruptcy protection. During March 2012, Las Vegas Monorail emerged from federal bankruptcy with the acceptance of a reorganization plan assigned by the Federal Bankruptcy Court. Under the reorganization plan, the Fund surrendered its Las Vegas Monorail Project Revenue Bonds, First Tier, Series 2000 and in turn received two senior interest corporate bonds: the first with an annual coupon rate of 5.500% maturing on July 15, 2019 and the second with an annual coupon rate of 3.000% (5.500% after December 31, 2015) maturing on July 15, 2055. The Fund was not accruing income for either senior interest corporate bond. On January 18, 2017, the Fund’s Adviser determined it was likely that this senior interest corporate bond would fulfill its obligation on the security maturing on July 15, 2019, and therefore began accruing income on the Fund’s records. |
| ETM | Escrowed to maturity. |
| IF | Inverse floating rate security issued by a tender option bond (“TOB”) trust, the interest rate on which varies inversely with the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) short-term rate, which resets weekly, or a similar short-term rate, and is reduced by the expenses related to the TOB trust. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
28
|
NUVEEN
|
| NXQ | ||
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 | ||
| Portfolio of Investments | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 97.6% | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS – 97.6% | |||||||||
| Alaska – 0.4% | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | Northern Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Alaska, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 6/01/32 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B3 | $ | 982,600 | |||
| Arizona – 3.6% | |||||||||
| 2,500 | Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2011B-1&2, 5.250%, 3/01/39 | 3/21 at 100.00 | A | 2,715,525 | |||||
| 1,590 | Arizona Water Infrastructure Finance Authority, Water Quality Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 10/01/20 | 10/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,654,045 | |||||
| 365 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Paradise Schools Projects, Series 2016, 2.875%, 7/01/21 | No Opt. Call | BB+ | 358,996 | |||||
| 1,000 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Banner Health, Refunding Series 2016A, 5.000%, 1/01/38 | 1/27 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,157,040 | |||||
| 600 | Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Tucson Electric Power Company, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 10/01/40 | 10/20 at 100.00 | A– | 643,578 | |||||
| 2,250 | Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc. Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/37 | No Opt. Call | BBB+ | 2,698,875 | |||||
| 215 | Sedona Wastewater Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 1998, 0.000%, 7/01/20 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 203,528 | |||||
| 8,520 | Total Arizona | 9,431,587 | |||||||
| California – 15.9% | |||||||||
| 11,000 | Alhambra Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation Series 2009B, 0.000%, 8/01/41 – AGC Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 4,579,410 | |||||
| 1,500 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Los Angeles County Securitization Corporation, Series 2006A, 5.600%, 6/01/36 | 12/18 at 100.00 | B3 | 1,514,445 | |||||
| 60 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1997, 5.000%, 10/01/18 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA– | 60,211 | |||||
| 2,500 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Health Revenue Bonds, Enloe Medical Center, Refunding Series 2008A, 6.250%, 8/15/28 (Pre-refunded 8/15/18) | 8/18 at 100.00 | AA– (4) | 2,618,925 | |||||
| 2,440 | Eureka Unified School District, Humboldt County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 0.000%, 8/01/27 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,892,708 | |||||
| 3,290 | Folsom Cordova Unified School District, Sacramento County, California, General Obligation Bonds, School Facilities Improvement District 4, Series 2007A, 0.000%, 10/01/24 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | AA– | 2,833,216 | |||||
| 1,000 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.125%, 6/01/47 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 998,560 | |||||
| 3,030 | Grossmont Union High School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 0.000%, 8/01/25 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 2,548,169 | |||||
| 1,495 | Huntington Beach Union High School District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 0.000%, 8/01/33 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 887,447 | |||||
| 1,160 | Mount San Antonio Community College District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2008, Series 2013A, 0.000%, 8/01/43 (5) | 8/35 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 939,368 | |||||
| 450 | M-S-R Energy Authority, California, Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Prepay Contracts, Series 2009C, 6.500%, 11/01/39 | No Opt. Call | A | 635,584 | |||||
| 1,195 | Palmdale School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003, 0.000%, 8/01/28 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 886,809 | |||||
| 590 | Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2009, 6.750%, 11/01/39 (Pre-refunded 11/01/19) | 11/19 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 660,735 |
|
NUVEEN
|
29
|
| NXQ | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| California (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 4,620 | Palomar Pomerado Health, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series 2007A, 0.000%, 8/01/24 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | $ | 3,888,654 | |||
| 4,400 | Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Los Medanos Community Development Project, Series 1999, 0.000%, 8/01/29 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | AA– | 2,957,108 | |||||
| 2,500 | Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District, Orange County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2006, 0.000%, 10/01/34 – NPFG Insured (ETM) | No Opt. Call | A+ (4) | 1,581,750 | |||||
| 2,535 | Port of Oakland, California, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Inter Lien Series 2007B, 5.000%, 11/01/19 (Pre-refunded 11/01/17) – NPFG Insured | 11/17 at 100.00 | A (4) | 2,544,557 | |||||
| 2,755 | Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 0.000%, 7/01/25 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa3 | 2,309,103 | |||||
| San Joaquin Delta Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2004 Series 2008B: | |||||||||
| 1,000 | 0.000%, 8/01/30 – AGM Insured | 8/18 at 50.12 | AA | 495,680 | |||||
| 1,890 | 0.000%, 8/01/31 – AGM Insured | 8/18 at 47.14 | AA | 881,080 | |||||
| 6,025 | Simi Valley Unified School District, Ventura County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007C, 0.000%, 8/01/30 | No Opt. Call | AA | 4,106,037 | |||||
| 2,080 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Northern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2005A-1, 5.500%, 6/01/45 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 2,079,834 | |||||
| 57,515 | Total California | 41,899,390 | |||||||
| Colorado – 6.5% | |||||||||
| 500 | Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series 2009A, 5.500%, 7/01/34 | 7/19 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 517,890 | |||||
| 1,975 | Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Services Corporation, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 1/01/40 | 1/20 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,098,674 | |||||
| 1,935 | Denver City and County, Colorado, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien Series 2013B, 5.000%, 11/15/43 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A | 2,148,953 | |||||
| E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B: | |||||||||
| 5,140 | 0.000%, 9/01/24 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 4,335,693 | |||||
| 8,100 | 0.000%, 9/01/29 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 5,541,129 | |||||
| 4,475 | 0.000%, 9/01/33 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,531,552 | |||||
| 22,125 | Total Colorado | 17,173,891 | |||||||
| Connecticut – 1.1% | |||||||||
| 2,490 | Connecticut State, Special Tax Obligation Bonds, Transportation Infrastructure Purposes Series 2013A, 5.000%, 10/01/33 | 10/23 at 100.00 | AA | 2,793,805 | |||||
| Florida – 0.6% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | Lakeland, Florida, Hospital System Revenue Bonds, Lakeland Regional Health, Series 2015, 5.000%, 11/15/45 | 11/24 at 100.00 | A2 | 1,662,735 | |||||
| Guam – 1.9% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Refunding Series 2015D, 5.000%, 11/15/39 | 11/25 at 100.00 | A | 1,600,995 | |||||
| 1,675 | Government of Guam, Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 6.000%, 11/01/26 | 5/21 at 100.00 | A– | 1,899,952 | |||||
| 1,460 | Guam Government Waterworks Authority, Water and Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2016, 5.000%, 1/01/46 | 7/26 at 100.00 | A– | 1,559,076 | |||||
| 4,635 | Total Guam | 5,060,023 | |||||||
| Idaho – 1.7% | |||||||||
| 4,000 | Idaho Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Luke’s Health System Project, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 3/01/44 | 3/24 at 100.00 | A– | 4,361,520 |
|
30
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Illinois – 12.4% | |||||||||
| $ | 1,615 | Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University, Housing and Auxiliary Facilities System Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A, 0.000%, 4/01/23 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | $ | 1,385,040 | |||
| 750 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Capital Improvement Revenues, Series 2016, 6.000%, 4/01/46 | 4/27 at 100.00 | A | 885,202 | |||||
| 735 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Revenues Series 2011A, 5.000%, 12/01/41 | 12/21 at 100.00 | B+ | 730,869 | |||||
| 365 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Revenues, Series 2016B, 6.500%, 12/01/46 | 12/26 at 100.00 | B | 419,633 | |||||
| 1,340 | Chicago, Illinois, General Airport Revenue Bonds, O’Hare International Airport, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2016C, 5.000%, 1/01/20 | No Opt. Call | A | 1,454,516 | |||||
| 1,000 | Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Project & Refunding Series 2006A, 4.625%, 1/01/31 – AGM Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA | 1,003,480 | |||||
| 1,515 | Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Project & Refunding Series 2007C, 5.000%, 1/01/27 – NPFG Insured | 1/18 at 100.00 | A | 1,526,620 | |||||
| 1,750 | Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers, Refunding Series 2008A, 5.500%, 8/15/30 | 8/18 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 1,793,540 | |||||
| 1,315 | Illinois State, General Obligation Bonds, October Series 2016, 5.000%, 2/01/19 | No Opt. Call | BBB | 1,362,471 | |||||
| 2,190 | Illinois State, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 8/01/23 | No Opt. Call | BBB | 2,402,014 | |||||
| Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 2002A: | |||||||||
| 6,350 | 0.000%, 12/15/31 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 3,683,063 | |||||
| 1,350 | 0.000%, 6/15/35 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 655,614 | |||||
| 5,000 | 0.000%, 12/15/36 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,262,750 | |||||
| 9,370 | 0.000%, 6/15/39 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 3,744,158 | |||||
| 5,045 | Sauk Village, Illinois, General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds, Tax Increment, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 6/01/22 – RAAI Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA | 5,047,472 | |||||
| Sauk Village, Illinois, General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds, Tax Increment, Series 2002B: | |||||||||
| 1,060 | 0.000%, 12/01/17 – RAAI Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,058,018 | |||||
| 1,135 | 0.000%, 12/01/18 – RAAI Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,113,980 | |||||
| 1,825 | Springfield, Illinois, Electric Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2015, 5.000%, 3/01/28 | 3/25 at 100.00 | A | 2,118,679 | |||||
| 43,710 | Total Illinois | 32,647,119 | |||||||
| Indiana – 2.3% | |||||||||
| 1,600 | Indiana Bond Bank, Special Program Bonds, Carmel Junior Waterworks Project, Series 2008B, 0.000%, 6/01/30 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 1,052,752 | |||||
| 2,040 | Indiana Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Indiana University Health Obligation Group, Refunding 2015A, 5.000%, 12/01/40 | 6/25 at 100.00 | AA | 2,314,686 | |||||
| 355 | Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, Indiana, Waterworks Project Series 2009A, 5.500%, 1/01/38 (Pre-refunded 1/01/19) – AGC Insured | 1/19 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 375,338 | |||||
| 1,470 | Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, Indiana, Waterworks Project Series 2009A, 5.500%, 1/01/38 – AGC Insured | 1/19 at 100.00 | AA | 1,543,765 | |||||
| 770 | Whiting Redevelopment District, Indiana, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Lakefront Development Project, Series 2010, 6.000%, 1/15/19 | No Opt. Call | N/R | 785,669 | |||||
| 6,235 | Total Indiana | 6,072,210 | |||||||
| Iowa – 2.5% | |||||||||
| 830 | Iowa Finance Authority, Iowa, Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds, Iowa Fertilizer Company Project, Series 2013, 5.000%, 12/01/19 | No Opt. Call | B | 858,851 | |||||
| 710 | Iowa Finance Authority, Iowa, Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds, Iowa Fertilizer Company Project, Series 2016, 5.875%, 12/01/26 | 6/18 at 105.00 | B | 752,422 | |||||
| 2,000 | Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority, Private College Facility Revenue Bonds, Upper Iowa University Project, Refunding Series 2010, 5.750%, 9/01/30 (Pre-refunded 9/01/20) | 9/20 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 2,266,500 |
|
NUVEEN
|
31
|
| NXQ | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Iowa (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,645 | Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Asset Backed Settlement Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.375%, 6/01/38 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B+ | $ | 1,644,885 | |||
| 1,000 | Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Tobacco Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B, 5.600%, 6/01/34 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B+ | 1,005,950 | |||||
| 6,185 | Total Iowa | 6,528,608 | |||||||
| Kansas – 0.1% | |||||||||
| 270 | Overland Park Development Corporation, Kansas, Second Tier Revenue Bonds, Overland Park Convention Center, Series 2007B, 5.125%, 1/01/22 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | BB+ | 270,151 | |||||
| Kentucky – 1.3% | |||||||||
| 2,500 | Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Baptist Healthcare System Obligated Group, Series 2011, 5.250%, 8/15/46 | 8/21 at 100.00 | A | 2,723,500 | |||||
| 805 | Kentucky Public Transportation Infrastructure Authority, First Tier Toll Revenue Bonds, Downtown Crossing Project, Convertible Capital Appreciation Series 2013C, 0.000%, 7/01/43 (5) | 7/31 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 698,120 | |||||
| 3,305 | Total Kentucky | 3,421,620 | |||||||
| Louisiana – 0.8% | |||||||||
| 1,870 | Jefferson Sales Tax District, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, Special Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2017B, 5.000%, 12/01/42 – AGM Insured | 12/27 at 100.00 | AA | 2,172,566 | |||||
| Massachusetts – 1.9% | |||||||||
| 2,200 | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Assessment Bonds, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 7/01/41 | 7/22 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,510,794 | |||||
| 1,675 | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds, Olin College, Series 2013E, 5.000%, 11/01/43 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,903,018 | |||||
| 500 | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, CareGroup Inc., Series 2008E-1 &2, 5.000%, 7/01/28 (Pre-refunded 7/01/18) | 7/18 at 100.00 | A– (4) | 514,895 | |||||
| 4,375 | Total Massachusetts | 4,928,707 | |||||||
| Michigan – 3.6% | |||||||||
| 355 | Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2012A, 5.250%, 7/01/39 | 7/22 at 100.00 | A | 392,126 | |||||
| 2,590 | Detroit, Michigan, Sewer Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Second Lien, Series 2001E, 5.750%, 7/01/31 (Pre-refunded 7/01/18) – BHAC Insured | 7/18 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 2,683,318 | |||||
| 385 | Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Bonds, Facilities Program, Refunding Series 2015-I, 5.000%, 4/15/38 | 10/25 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 442,635 | |||||
| 1,250 | Portage Public Schools, Kalamazoo County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/21 (Pre-refunded 5/01/18) – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 1,280,075 | |||||
| 4,250 | Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Bonds, William Beaumont Hospital, Refunding Series 2009V, 8.250%, 9/01/39 (Pre-refunded 9/01/18) | 9/18 at 100.00 | Aaa | 4,534,283 | |||||
| 8,830 | Total Michigan | 9,332,437 | |||||||
| Mississippi – 0.5% | |||||||||
| 1,170 | Warren County, Mississippi, Gulf Opportunity Zone Revenue Bonds, International Paper Company Project, Series 2008A, 6.500%, 9/01/32 | 9/18 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,223,200 | |||||
| Missouri – 0.1% | |||||||||
| 270 | Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District, Mass Transit Sales Tax Appropriation Bonds, Refunding Combined Lien Series 2013A, 5.000%, 10/01/28 | 10/18 at 100.00 | AA+ | 280,738 | |||||
| Nebraska – 0.6% | |||||||||
| 545 | Douglas County Hospital Authority 3, Nebraska, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Nebraska Methodist Health System, Refunding Series 2015, 4.125%, 11/01/36 | 11/25 at 100.00 | A– | 567,045 | |||||
| 1,000 | Nebraska Public Power District, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A-2, 5.000%, 1/01/40 | 1/22 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,114,410 | |||||
| 1,545 | Total Nebraska | 1,681,455 |
|
32
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Nevada – 3.9% | |||||||||
| $ | 1,325 | Clark County Water Reclamation District, Nevada, General Obligation Water Bonds, Series 2009A, 5.250%, 7/01/38 (Pre-refunded 7/01/19) | 7/19 at 100.00 | AAA | $ | 1,422,971 | |||
| 1,250 | Clark County, Nevada, Airport Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust Series 2016-XG0028, Tender Option Bond Trust Series 11823, 17.526%, 7/01/42 (IF) | 1/20 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,766,450 | |||||
| 1,000 | Clark County, Nevada, Passenger Facility Charge Revenue Bonds, Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 7/01/42 | 1/20 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,081,450 | |||||
| 3,000 | Las Vegas Valley Water District, Nevada, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2015, 5.000%, 6/01/34 | 12/24 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 3,537,000 | |||||
| 2,500 | North Las Vegas, Nevada, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 5/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A | 2,500,550 | |||||
| 9,075 | Total Nevada | 10,308,421 | |||||||
| New Jersey – 3.5% | |||||||||
| 2,000 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction Bonds, Refunding Series 2016BBB, 5.500%, 6/15/31 | 12/26 at 100.00 | A– | 2,355,640 | |||||
| 2,165 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facilities Construction Financing Program Bonds, Refunding Series 2011GG, 5.000%, 9/01/22 | 3/21 at 100.00 | A– | 2,340,430 | |||||
| 1,250 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, School Facility Construction Bonds, Series 2005K, 5.500%, 12/15/19 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A– | 1,339,938 | |||||
| 2,000 | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System Bonds, Series 2015AA, 5.250%, 6/15/29 | 6/25 at 100.00 | A– | 2,245,880 | |||||
| 1,000 | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, New Jersey, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007-1A, 5.000%, 6/01/29 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB– | 1,000,050 | |||||
| 8,415 | Total New Jersey | 9,281,938 | |||||||
| New Mexico – 1.1% | |||||||||
| 800 | New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, First Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Haverland Carter Lifestyle Group, Series 2013, 5.000%, 7/01/42 | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 833,232 | |||||
| 1,000 | New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, St Anthony, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 9/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,000,640 | |||||
| 1,000 | New Mexico Municipal Energy Acquisition Authority, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Refunding Sub-Series 2014A, 5.000%, 11/01/39 (Mandatory put 8/01/19) | 8/19 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,063,600 | |||||
| 2,800 | Total New Mexico | 2,897,472 | |||||||
| New York – 2.3% | |||||||||
| 500 | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Senior Fiscal 2012 Series 2011A, 5.250%, 2/15/47 | 2/21 at 100.00 | AA– | 556,580 | |||||
| 1,250 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Transportation Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012F, 5.000%, 11/15/26 | 11/22 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,451,738 | |||||
| 2,755 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Building Aid Revenue Bonds, Fiscal Series 2009-S1, 5.500%, 7/15/31 | 7/18 at 100.00 | AA | 2,855,998 | |||||
| 1,135 | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010, 6.000%, 12/01/42 | 12/20 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 1,267,523 | |||||
| 5,640 | Total New York | 6,131,839 | |||||||
| Ohio – 3.7% | |||||||||
| Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2: | |||||||||
| 2,155 | 5.375%, 6/01/24 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 2,101,017 | |||||
| 2,475 | 5.875%, 6/01/30 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 2,407,185 | |||||
| 875 | 5.750%, 6/01/34 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 847,053 | |||||
| 2,680 | 5.875%, 6/01/47 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 2,577,999 | |||||
| 1,105 | Ohio Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Infrastructure Project, Junior Lien Series 2013A-1, 5.000%, 2/15/48 | 2/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,230,185 |
|
NUVEEN
|
33
|
| NXQ | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Ohio (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | Ohio Water Development Authority, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, FirstEnergy Nuclear Generating Corporation Project, Series 2005B, 4.000%, 1/01/34 (Mandatory put 7/01/21) | No Opt. Call | Caa1 | $ | 457,500 | |||
| 10,290 | Total Ohio | 9,620,939 | |||||||
| Oregon – 0.4% | |||||||||
| 915 | Beaverton School District 48J, Washington and Multnomah Counties, Oregon, General Obligation Bonds, Convertible Deferred Interest Series 2017D, 0.000%, 6/15/36 | 6/27 at 100.00 | AA+ | 1,038,909 | |||||
| 60 | Clackamas Community College District, Oregon, General Obligation Bonds, Deferred Interest Series 2017A, 0.000%, 6/15/40 (5) | 6/27 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 61,849 | |||||
| 975 | Total Oregon | 1,100,758 | |||||||
| Pennsylvania – 4.4% | |||||||||
| 1,255 | Delaware River Port Authority, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 5.000%, 1/01/37 | 1/24 at 100.00 | A | 1,436,385 | |||||
| 2,250 | Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Carnegie Mellon University, Series 2009, 5.000%, 8/01/21 | 2/19 at 100.00 | AA | 2,367,630 | |||||
| 645 | Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Motor License Fund-Enhanced Subordinate Special Revenue Bonds, Series 2010B-2, 5.000%, 12/01/30 | 12/20 at 100.00 | A2 | 700,780 | |||||
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Motor License Fund-Enhanced Subordinate Special Revenue Bonds, Series 2010B-2: | |||||||||
| 555 | 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 12/01/20) | 12/20 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 622,688 | |||||
| 300 | 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 12/01/20) | 12/20 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 336,288 | |||||
| 2,970 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/40 | 7/24 at 100.00 | A+ | 3,406,917 | |||||
| 2,500 | State Public School Building Authority, Pennsylvania, School Revenue Bonds, Harrisburg School District, Refunding Series 2009A, 4.750%, 11/15/29 (Pre-refunded 5/15/19) – AGC Insured | 5/19 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 2,650,575 | |||||
| 10,475 | Total Pennsylvania | 11,521,263 | |||||||
| Puerto Rico – 0.4% | |||||||||
| 1,035 | Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority, Capital Fund Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 5.000%, 12/01/20 | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,058,412 | |||||
| South Carolina – 1.4% | |||||||||
| 3,400 | South Carolina Public Service Authority, Revenue Obligation Bonds, Santee Cooper Electric System, Series 2008A, 5.500%, 1/01/38 (Pre-refunded 1/01/19) – BHAC Insured | 1/19 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 3,594,786 | |||||
| South Dakota – 0.3% | |||||||||
| 600 | South Dakota Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sanford Health, Series 2015, 5.000%, 11/01/35 | 11/25 at 100.00 | A+ | 687,462 | |||||
| Texas – 10.5% | |||||||||
| 250 | Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2011, 6.000%, 1/01/41 (Pre-refunded 1/01/21) | 1/21 at 100.00 | BBB+ (4) | 287,935 | |||||
| 240 | Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2015A, 5.000%, 1/01/35 | 7/25 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 271,918 | |||||
| 3,000 | Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008, 5.250%, 12/01/48 (Pre-refunded 12/01/18) | 12/18 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 3,150,210 | |||||
| 5,560 | Grand Parkway Transportation Corporation, Texas, System Toll Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2013A, 5.500%, 4/01/53 | 10/23 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 6,312,157 | |||||
| 1,160 | Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Houston Methodist Hospital System, Series 2015, 5.000%, 12/01/45 | 6/25 at 100.00 | AA | 1,281,058 | |||||
| Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Junior Lien Series 2001H: | |||||||||
| 630 | 0.000%, 11/15/24 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 494,777 | |||||
| 12,480 | 0.000%, 11/15/41 – NPFG Insured | 11/31 at 53.78 | A | 3,761,846 |
|
34
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Texas (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 975 | Houston, Texas, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Subordinate Lien Series 2007B, 5.000%, 7/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A+ | $ | 978,344 | |||
| 575 | Houston, Texas, Hotel Occupancy Tax and Special Revenue Bonds, Convention and Entertainment Project, Series 2001B, 0.000%, 9/01/24 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A2 | 480,401 | |||||
| 2,255 | Love Field Airport Modernization Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest Airlines Company, Series 2010, 5.250%, 11/01/40 | 11/20 at 100.00 | A3 | 2,454,816 | |||||
| 1,025 | North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Tier, Series 2015B, 5.000%, 1/01/40 | 1/23 at 100.00 | A1 | 1,138,160 | |||||
| 200 | Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Scott & White Healthcare Project, Series 2016A, 4.000%, 11/15/42 | 5/26 at 100.00 | AA– | 206,182 | |||||
| 5,000 | Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corporation III, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2012, 5.000%, 12/15/26 | 12/22 at 100.00 | A3 | 5,682,950 | |||||
| 2,000 | Wylie Independent School District, Collin County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, School Building Series 2010, 0.000%, 8/15/31 | No Opt. Call | AAA | 1,079,000 | |||||
| 35,350 | Total Texas | 27,579,754 | |||||||
| Virginia – 1.7% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Virginia, Dulles Toll Road Second Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2009C, 6.500%, 10/01/41 – AGC Insured | 10/26 at 100.00 | AA | 1,946,010 | |||||
| Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Elizabeth River Crossing, Opco LLC Project, Series 2012: | |||||||||
| 1,000 | 5.250%, 1/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,105,520 | |||||
| 410 | 6.000%, 1/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 465,867 | |||||
| 1,010 | 5.500%, 1/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,124,393 | |||||
| 3,920 | Total Virginia | 4,641,790 | |||||||
| Washington – 3.3% | |||||||||
| 855 | Port of Seattle, Washington, Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Lien Series 2016A, 5.000%, 10/01/19 | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 921,758 | |||||
| 4,000 | Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiative, Series 2013A, 5.750%, 1/01/45 | 1/23 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 4,376,160 | |||||
| 990 | Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Series 2011A, 5.625%, 1/01/35 | 1/21 at 100.00 | A | 1,074,467 | |||||
| 2,185 | Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, PeaceHealth, Refunding Series 2009, 5.000%, 11/01/28 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,314,112 | |||||
| 8,030 | Total Washington | 8,686,497 | |||||||
| Wisconsin – 2.9% | |||||||||
| 2,000 | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Gundersen Lutheran, Series 2011A, 5.250%, 10/15/39 | 10/21 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,182,120 | |||||
| 2,355 | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc., Series 2016, 5.000%, 12/01/41 | 11/26 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,682,981 | |||||
| 1,645 | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Mercy Alliance, Inc., Series 2012, 5.000%, 6/01/39 | 6/22 at 100.00 | A3 | 1,764,361 | |||||
| 1,000 | Wisconsin State, General Fund Annual Appropriation Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2009A, 6.000%, 5/01/36 (Pre-refunded 5/01/19) | 5/19 at 100.00 | Aa2 (4) | 1,079,500 | |||||
| 7,000 | Total Wisconsin | 7,708,962 | |||||||
| $ | 286,555 | Total Municipal Bonds (cost $231,448,530) | 256,744,655 |
|
NUVEEN
|
35
|
| NXQ | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | |||||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Coupon | Maturity | Ratings (3) | Value | ||||||
| CORPORATE BONDS – 0.1% | |||||||||||
| TRANSPORTATION – 0.1% | |||||||||||
| $ | 323 | Las Vegas Monorail Company, Senior Interest Bonds (6), (7) | 5.500% | 7/15/19 | N/R | $ | 203,906 | ||||
| 87 | Las Vegas Monorail Company, Senior Interest Bonds (6), (7) | 5.500% | 7/15/55 | N/R | 44,403 | ||||||
| $ | 410 | Total Corporate Bonds (cost $32,167) | 248,309 | ||||||||
| Total Long-Term Investments (cost $231,480,697) – 97.7% | 256,992,964 | ||||||||||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.3% | 5,925,312 | ||||||||||
| Net Assets – 100% | $ | 262,918,276 |
| (1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets. |
| (2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
| (3) | For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
| (4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. |
| (5) | Step-up coupon bond, a bond with a coupon that increases (“steps up”), usually at regular intervals, while the bond is outstanding. The rate shown is the coupon as of the end of the reporting period. |
| (6) | Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment classified as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 2 – Investment Valuation and Fair Value Measurements for more information. |
| (7) | During January 2010, Las Vegas Monorail Company (“Las Vegas Monorail”) filed for federal bankruptcy protection. During March 2012, Las Vegas Monorail emerged from federal bankruptcy with the acceptance of a reorganization plan assigned by the Federal Bankruptcy Court. Under the reorganization plan, the Fund surrendered its Las Vegas Monorail Project Revenue Bonds, First Tier, Series 2000 and in turn received two senior interest corporate bonds: the first with an annual coupon rate of 5.500% maturing on July 15, 2019 and the second with an annual coupon rate of 3.000% (5.500% after December 31, 2015) maturing on July 15, 2055. The Fund was not accruing income for either senior interest corporate bond. On January 18, 2017, the Fund’s Adviser determined it was likely that this senior interest corporate bond would fulfill its obligation on the security maturing on July 15, 2019, and therefore began accruing income on the Fund’s records. |
| ETM | Escrowed to maturity. |
| IF | Inverse floating rate security issued by a tender option bond (“TOB”) trust, the interest rate on which varies inversely with the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) short-term rate, which resets weekly, or a similar short-term rate, and is reduced by the expenses related to the TOB trust. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
36
|
NUVEEN
|
| NXR | ||
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 | ||
| Portfolio of Investments | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 98.2% | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS – 98.2% | |||||||||
| Alaska – 1.3% | |||||||||
| $ | 2,675 | Northern Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Alaska, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 6/01/32 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B3 | $ | 2,628,455 | |||
| Arizona – 1.0% | |||||||||
| 1,770 | Arizona Water Infrastructure Finance Authority, Water Quality Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 10/01/20 | 10/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,841,296 | |||||
| 280 | Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Paradise Schools Projects, Series 2016, 2.875%, 7/01/21 | No Opt. Call | BB+ | 275,394 | |||||
| 2,050 | Total Arizona | 2,116,690 | |||||||
| California – 22.9% | |||||||||
| 12,500 | Anaheim Public Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Public Improvement Project, Series 1997C, 0.000%, 9/01/35 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 6,389,125 | |||||
| 1,000 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Los Angeles County Securitization Corporation, Series 2006A, 5.600%, 6/01/36 | 12/18 at 100.00 | B3 | 1,009,630 | |||||
| 1,125 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Sonoma County Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Series 2005, 5.000%, 6/01/26 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 1,127,824 | |||||
| 890 | California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Methodist Hospital Project, Series 2009, 6.750%, 2/01/38 (Pre-refunded 8/01/19) | 8/19 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 983,779 | |||||
| 230 | California Statewide Financing Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Pooled Tobacco Securitization Program, Series 2002A, 5.625%, 5/01/29 | 12/17 at 100.00 | Baa2 | 231,127 | |||||
| 2,275 | Folsom Cordova Unified School District, Sacramento County, California, General Obligation Bonds, School Facilities Improvement District 4, Series 2007A, 0.000%, 10/01/28 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | AA– | 1,669,349 | |||||
| 3,370 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 0.000%, 6/01/28 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A+ | 2,553,954 | |||||
| 2,050 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.000%, 6/01/33 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B+ | 2,047,745 | |||||
| 4,055 | Kern Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, 0.000%, 3/01/28 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 3,068,865 | |||||
| 1,160 | Mount San Antonio Community College District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2008, Series 2013A, 0.000%, 8/01/43 (5) | 8/35 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 939,368 | |||||
| 11,985 | Norwalk La Mirada Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2002, Series 2007C, 0.000%, 8/01/32 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 7,460,662 | |||||
| 3,000 | Palomar Pomerado Health, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation, Election of 2004, Series 2007A, 0.000%, 8/01/25 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,421,510 | |||||
| 8,040 | Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District, Orange County, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2006, 0.000%, 10/01/34 – NPFG Insured (ETM) | No Opt. Call | A+ (4) | 5,086,908 | |||||
| 1,500 | Placer Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004C, 0.000%, 8/01/32 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 933,750 | |||||
| 1,985 | Port of Oakland, California, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Inter Lien Series 2007B, 5.000%, 11/01/19 (Pre-refunded 11/01/17) – NPFG Insured | 11/17 at 100.00 | A (4) | 1,992,483 | |||||
| 8,000 | Poway Unified School District, San Diego County, California, General Obligation Bonds, School Facilities Improvement District 2007-1, Election 2008 Series 2009A, 0.000%, 8/01/32 | No Opt. Call | AA– | 4,943,760 | |||||
| 3,940 | Rancho Mirage Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Combined Whitewater and 1984 Project Areas, Series 2003A, 0.000%, 4/01/35 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A+ | 2,027,997 |
|
NUVEEN
|
37
|
| NXR | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| California (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,030 | Riverside Public Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, University Corridor/Sycamore Canyon Merged Redevelopment Project, Arlington Redevelopment Project, Hunter Park/Northside Redevelopment Project, Magnolia Center Redevelopment Project, 5.000%, 8/01/37 – NPFG Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A | $ | 1,032,626 | |||
| 1,080 | San Diego County Water Authority, California, Water Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 5/01/38 (Pre-refunded 5/01/18) – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,106,654 | |||||
| 69,215 | Total California | 47,027,116 | |||||||
| Colorado – 5.6% | |||||||||
| 1,540 | Arkansas River Power Authority, Colorado, Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.250%, 10/01/40 – SYNCORA GTY Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB– | 1,542,864 | |||||
| 500 | Centerra Metropolitan District 1, Loveland, Colorado, Special Revenue Bonds, Refunding & Improvement Series 2017, 5.000%, 12/01/22 | No Opt. Call | N/R | 546,055 | |||||
| 2,000 | Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Services Corporation, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 1/01/40 | 1/20 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,125,240 | |||||
| 1,935 | Denver City and County, Colorado, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien Series 2013B, 5.000%, 11/15/43 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A | 2,148,953 | |||||
| 1,295 | E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B, 0.000%, 9/01/32 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 768,246 | |||||
| 5,520 | E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Toll Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B, 0.000%, 9/01/28 – NPFG Insured | 9/20 at 63.98 | A | 3,335,626 | |||||
| 1,000 | Park Creek Metropolitan District, Colorado, Senior Limited Property Tax Supported Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 12/01/33 | 12/25 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,105,760 | |||||
| 13,790 | Total Colorado | 11,572,744 | |||||||
| Connecticut – 1.7% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | Connecticut State, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2010C, 5.000%, 12/01/20 | 12/19 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,620,345 | |||||
| 1,640 | Connecticut State, Special Tax Obligation Bonds, Transportation Infrastructure Purposes Series 2013A, 5.000%, 10/01/33 | 10/23 at 100.00 | AA | 1,840,096 | |||||
| 3,140 | Total Connecticut | 3,460,441 | |||||||
| District of Columbia – 0.8% | |||||||||
| 1,700 | Washington Convention Center Authority, District of Columbia, Dedicated Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2007A, 5.000%, 10/01/20 – AGM Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA | 1,705,508 | |||||
| Guam – 0.7% | |||||||||
| 1,250 | Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Refunding Series 2015D, 5.000%, 11/15/39 | 11/25 at 100.00 | A | 1,334,162 | |||||
| Idaho – 1.6% | |||||||||
| 3,000 | Idaho Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Luke’s Health System Project, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 3/01/44 | 3/24 at 100.00 | A– | 3,271,140 | |||||
| Illinois – 12.0% | |||||||||
| 575 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Capital Improvement Revenues, Series 2016, 6.000%, 4/01/46 | 4/27 at 100.00 | A | 678,655 | |||||
| 3,900 | Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1999A, 0.000%, 12/01/28 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,487,966 | |||||
| 535 | Chicago, Illinois, General Airport Revenue Bonds, O’Hare International Airport, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2016C, 5.000%, 1/01/20 | No Opt. Call | A | 580,721 | |||||
| 2,000 | Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Project & Refunding Series 2006A, 4.625%, 1/01/31 – AGM Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA | 2,006,960 | |||||
| 260 | Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Series 2013A, 6.000%, 7/01/43 | 7/23 at 100.00 | A– | 297,682 | |||||
| Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Resurrection Health Care System, Series 1999B: | |||||||||
| 105 | 5.000%, 5/15/24 (Pre-refunded 5/15/18) – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 107,652 | |||||
| 1,495 | 5.000%, 5/15/24 (Pre-refunded 5/15/18) – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 1,532,764 |
|
38
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Illinois (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,500 | Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers, Refunding Series 2008A, 5.500%, 8/15/30 | 8/18 at 100.00 | BBB+ | $ | 1,537,320 | |||
| 1,500 | Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Evangelical Hospitals Corporation, Series 1992C, 6.250%, 4/15/22 (ETM) | No Opt. Call | N/R (4) | 1,682,835 | |||||
| 1,015 | Illinois State, General Obligation Bonds, October Series 2016, 5.000%, 2/01/19 | No Opt. Call | BBB | 1,051,641 | |||||
| 2,190 | Illinois State, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 8/01/23 | No Opt. Call | BBB | 2,402,014 | |||||
| 1,000 | Kankakee & Will Counties Community Unit School District 5, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 0.000%, 5/01/23 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | Aa3 | 877,610 | |||||
| Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 2002A: | |||||||||
| 2,500 | 0.000%, 12/15/30 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 1,516,900 | |||||
| 4,775 | 0.000%, 12/15/31 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,769,548 | |||||
| 5,000 | 0.000%, 12/15/36 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,262,750 | |||||
| 2,000 | 0.000%, 6/15/37 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 879,780 | |||||
| 1,400 | Springfield, Illinois, Electric Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2015, 5.000%, 3/01/28 | 3/25 at 100.00 | A | 1,625,288 | |||||
| 310 | University of Illinois, Health Services Facilities System Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 6.000%, 10/01/42 | 10/23 at 100.00 | A– | 354,355 | |||||
| 32,060 | Total Illinois | 24,652,441 | |||||||
| Indiana – 1.6% | |||||||||
| 2,295 | Boone County Hospital Association, Indiana, Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.250%, 7/15/25 | 1/20 at 100.00 | AA+ | 2,501,757 | |||||
| 1,000 | Zionsville Community Schools Building Corporation, Indiana, First Mortgage Bonds, Series 2005Z, 0.000%, 7/15/28 – AGM Insured | No Opt. Call | AA | 750,860 | |||||
| 3,295 | Total Indiana | 3,252,617 | |||||||
| Iowa – 1.1% | |||||||||
| 660 | Iowa Finance Authority, Iowa, Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds, Iowa Fertilizer Company Project, Series 2013, 5.000%, 12/01/19 | No Opt. Call | B | 682,942 | |||||
| 570 | Iowa Finance Authority, Iowa, Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds, Iowa Fertilizer Company Project, Series 2016, 5.875%, 12/01/26 | 6/18 at 105.00 | B | 604,057 | |||||
| 950 | Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Tobacco Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B, 5.600%, 6/01/34 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B+ | 955,652 | |||||
| 2,180 | Total Iowa | 2,242,651 | |||||||
| Massachusetts – 0.7% | |||||||||
| 1,300 | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds, Olin College, Series 2013E, 5.000%, 11/01/43 | 11/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,476,969 | |||||
| Michigan – 1.0% | |||||||||
| 355 | Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2012A, 5.250%, 7/01/39 | 7/22 at 100.00 | A | 392,126 | |||||
| 1,295 | Portage Public Schools, Kalamazoo County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/21 (Pre-refunded 5/01/18) – AGM Insured | 5/18 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 1,326,158 | |||||
| 250 | Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Bonds, William Beaumont Hospital, Refunding Series 2009V, 8.250%, 9/01/39 (Pre-refunded 9/01/18) | 9/18 at 100.00 | Aaa | 266,722 | |||||
| 1,900 | Total Michigan | 1,985,006 | |||||||
| Mississippi – 0.9% | |||||||||
| 1,830 | Warren County, Mississippi, Gulf Opportunity Zone Revenue Bonds, International Paper Company Project, Series 2008A, 6.500%, 9/01/32 | 9/18 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,913,210 | |||||
| Missouri – 0.1% | |||||||||
| 270 |
Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District, Mass Transit Sales Tax Appropriation Bonds, Refunding Combined Lien Series 2013A, 5.000%, 10/01/28 |
10/18 at 100.00 | AA+ | 280,738 |
|
NUVEEN
|
39
|
| NXR | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Montana – 0.7% | |||||||||
| $ | 1,440 | Montana Facilities Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Services Corporation, Composite Deal Series 2010A, 4.750%, 1/01/40 | 1/20 at 100.00 | AA– | $ | 1,509,610 | |||
| Nebraska – 1.4% | |||||||||
| 2,600 | Nebraska Public Power District, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A-2, 5.000%, 1/01/40 | 1/22 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,897,466 | |||||
| Nevada – 1.7% | |||||||||
| 1,000 | Clark County, Nevada, Passenger Facility Charge Revenue Bonds, Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 7/01/42 | 1/20 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,081,450 | |||||
| 2,500 | North Las Vegas, Nevada, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 5/01/36 – NPFG Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A | 2,500,550 | |||||
| 3,500 | Total Nevada | 3,582,000 | |||||||
| New Jersey – 2.8% | |||||||||
| 1,850 | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Sublease Revenue Bonds, New Jersey Transit Corporation Projects, Refunding Series 2017B, 5.000%, 11/01/23 | No Opt. Call | A– | 2,077,605 | |||||
| 305 | New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, University Hospital Issue, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/28 – AGM Insured | 7/25 at 100.00 | AA | 357,856 | |||||
| 4,900 | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System Bonds, Refunding Series 2006C, 0.000%, 12/15/28 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A– | 3,249,680 | |||||
| 7,055 | Total New Jersey | 5,685,141 | |||||||
| New Mexico – 0.5% | |||||||||
| 1,000 | New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, St Anthony, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 9/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 12/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 1,000,640 | |||||
| New York – 2.6% | |||||||||
| 1,250 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Transportation Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012F, 5.000%, 11/15/26 | 11/22 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,451,737 | |||||
| 1,870 | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York, Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Fiscal 2009 Series 2008A, 5.750%, 6/15/40 | 6/18 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,936,273 | |||||
| 1,500 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Building Aid Revenue Bonds, Fiscal Series 2009-S1, 5.500%, 7/15/31 | 7/18 at 100.00 | AA | 1,554,990 | |||||
| 265 | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010, 6.000%, 12/01/42 | 12/20 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 295,941 | |||||
| 4,885 | Total New York | 5,238,941 | |||||||
| North Carolina – 0.3% | |||||||||
| 500 | New Hanover County, North Carolina, General Obligation Bonds, School Series 2009, 4.000%, 6/01/21 (Pre-refunded 6/01/19) | 6/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 524,340 | |||||
| Ohio – 6.4% | |||||||||
| 2,250 | American Municipal Power Ohio Inc., Prairie State Energy Campus Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A, 5.750%, 2/15/39 (Pre-refunded 2/15/19) – AGC Insured | 2/19 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 2,397,128 | |||||
| Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2: | |||||||||
| 1,345 | 5.375%, 6/01/24 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 1,311,308 | |||||
| 1,465 | 6.000%, 6/01/42 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 1,422,852 | |||||
| 435 | 5.875%, 6/01/47 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 418,444 | |||||
| 3,720 | Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-3, 6.250%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | B– | 3,713,750 | |||||
| 1,500 | Montgomery County, Ohio, Revenue Bonds, Miami Valley Hospital, Series 2011A, 5.750%, 11/15/21 | 11/20 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,696,755 | |||||
| 1,475 | Ohio Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Infrastructure Project, Junior Lien Series 2013A-1, 5.000%, 2/15/48 | 2/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,642,103 |
|
40
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Ohio (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | Ohio Water Development Authority, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, FirstEnergy Nuclear Generating Corporation Project, Series 2005B, 4.000%, 1/01/34 (Mandatory put 7/01/21) | No Opt. Call | Caa1 | $ | 457,500 | |||
| 13,190 | Total Ohio | 13,059,840 | |||||||
| Oregon – 1.3% | |||||||||
| 1,500 | Oregon Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Willamette University, Refunding Series 2016B, 5.000%, 10/01/40 | 10/26 at 100.00 | A | 1,722,450 | |||||
| 750 | Washington and Clackamas Counties School District 23J Tigard-Tualatin, Oregon, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017, 5.000%, 6/15/30 | 6/27 at 100.00 | AA+ | 919,193 | |||||
| 2,250 | Total Oregon | 2,641,643 | |||||||
| Pennsylvania – 6.8% | |||||||||
| 1,015 | Delaware River Port Authority, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 5.000%, 1/01/37 | 1/24 at 100.00 | A | 1,161,698 | |||||
| 1,685 | Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Carnegie Mellon University, Series 2009, 5.000%, 8/01/21 | 2/19 at 100.00 | AA | 1,773,092 | |||||
| 430 | Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Motor License Fund-Enhanced Subordinate Special Revenue Bonds, Series 2010B-2, 5.000%, 12/01/30 | 12/20 at 100.00 | A2 | 467,186 | |||||
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Motor License Fund-Enhanced Subordinate Special Revenue Bonds, Series 2010B-2: | |||||||||
| 370 | 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 12/01/20) | 12/20 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 415,125 | |||||
| 200 | 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 12/01/20) | 12/20 at 100.00 | N/R (4) | 224,192 | |||||
| 2,075 | Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2009B, 5.000%, 12/01/22 | 12/19 at 100.00 | A1 | 2,245,192 | |||||
| 4,455 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/40 | 7/24 at 100.00 | A+ | 5,110,375 | |||||
| 2,500 | State Public School Building Authority, Pennsylvania, School Revenue Bonds, Harrisburg School District, Refunding Series 2009A, 4.750%, 11/15/29 (Pre-refunded 5/15/19) – AGC Insured | 5/19 at 100.00 | AA (4) | 2,650,575 | |||||
| 12,730 | Total Pennsylvania | 14,047,435 | |||||||
| Puerto Rico – 0.5% | |||||||||
| 945 | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Highway Revenue Bonds, Series 2007N, 5.250%, 7/01/31 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | C | 987,383 | |||||
| South Carolina – 1.5% | |||||||||
| 3,000 | South Carolina Public Service Authority, Revenue Obligation Bonds, Santee Cooper Electric System, Series 2008A, 5.500%, 1/01/38 (Pre-refunded 1/01/19) – BHAC Insured | 1/19 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 3,171,870 | |||||
| South Dakota – 0.2% | |||||||||
| 400 | South Dakota Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sanford Health, Series 2015, 5.000%, 11/01/35 | 11/25 at 100.00 | A+ | 458,308 | |||||
| Tennessee – 0.4% | |||||||||
| 795 | Chattanooga Health, Educational and Housing Facility Board, Tennessee, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series 2013A, 5.250%, 1/01/45 | 1/23 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 848,233 | |||||
| Texas – 10.6% | |||||||||
| 250 | Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2011, 6.000%, 1/01/41 (Pre-refunded 1/01/21) | 1/21 at 100.00 | BBB+ (4) | 287,935 | |||||
| 85 | Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2015A, 5.000%, 1/01/34 | 7/25 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 96,682 | |||||
| 3,000 | Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008, 5.000%, 12/01/23 (Pre-refunded 12/01/18) | 12/18 at 100.00 | AA+ (4) | 3,141,510 | |||||
| 4,640 | Grand Parkway Transportation Corporation, Texas, System Toll Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2013A, 5.500%, 4/01/53 | 10/23 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 5,267,699 |
|
NUVEEN
|
41
|
| NXR | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Texas (continued) | |||||||||
| Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Junior Lien Series 2001H: | |||||||||
| $ | 1,405 | 0.000%, 11/15/32 – NPFG Insured | 11/31 at 94.05 | A | $ | 774,211 | |||
| 2,510 | 0.000%, 11/15/36 – NPFG Insured | 11/31 at 73.51 | A | 1,050,084 | |||||
| 2,235 | Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Third Lien Series 2004A-3, 0.000%, 11/15/32 – NPFG Insured | 11/24 at 62.70 | A | 1,083,707 | |||||
| Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Special Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2001A: | |||||||||
| 3,045 | 0.000%, 11/15/34 – NPFG Insured | 11/30 at 78.27 | AA | 1,497,744 | |||||
| 4,095 | 0.000%, 11/15/38 – NPFG Insured | 11/30 at 61.17 | AA | 1,543,897 | |||||
| 2,255 | Love Field Airport Modernization Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest Airlines Company, Series 2010, 5.250%, 11/01/40 | 11/20 at 100.00 | A3 | 2,454,816 | |||||
| 290 | North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Tier Capital Appreciation Series 2008I, 6.200%, 1/01/42 – AGC Insured | 1/25 at 100.00 | AA | 367,700 | |||||
| 2,000 | Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corporation III, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2012, 5.000%, 12/15/32 | 12/22 at 100.00 | A3 | 2,222,140 | |||||
| 2,410 | Texas Turnpike Authority, Central Texas Turnpike System Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2002A, 0.000%, 8/15/25 – AMBAC Insured | No Opt. Call | A– | 1,964,608 | |||||
| 28,220 | Total Texas | 21,752,733 | |||||||
| Virginia – 2.5% | |||||||||
| 3,500 | Chesapeake, Virginia, Transportation System Senior Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Capital Appreciation Series 2012B, 0.000%, 7/15/32 (5) | 7/28 at 100.00 | BBB | 2,933,595 | |||||
| Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Elizabeth River Crossing, Opco LLC Project, Series 2012: | |||||||||
| 410 | 6.000%, 1/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 465,867 | |||||
| 1,510 | 5.500%, 1/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,681,023 | |||||
| 5,420 | Total Virginia | 5,080,485 | |||||||
| Washington – 4.1% | |||||||||
| 1,020 | Port of Seattle, Washington, Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Lien Series 2016A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 1,061,351 | |||||
| 990 | Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Series 2011A, 5.625%, 1/01/35 | 1/21 at 100.00 | A | 1,074,467 | |||||
| 4,000 | Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Providence Health & Services, Refunding Series 2012A, 5.000%, 10/01/32 | 10/22 at 100.00 | AA– | 4,505,880 | |||||
| 1,700 | Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, PeaceHealth, Refunding Series 2009, 5.000%, 11/01/28 | 11/19 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,800,453 | |||||
| 7,710 | Total Washington | 8,442,151 | |||||||
| Wisconsin – 0.9% | |||||||||
| 1,250 | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Marshfield Clinic, Series 2012B, 5.000%, 2/15/32 | 2/22 at 100.00 | A– | 1,365,763 | |||||
| 485 | Wisconsin, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2003-3, 5.000%, 11/01/26 | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA | 486,644 | |||||
| 1,735 | Total Wisconsin | 1,852,407 | |||||||
| $ | 237,030 | Total Municipal Bonds (cost $174,801,692) | 201,700,514 |
|
42
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | ||||||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Coupon | Maturity | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||||
| CORPORATE BONDS – 0.0% | ||||||||||||
| TRANSPORTATION – 0.0% | ||||||||||||
| $ | 91 | Las Vegas Monorail Company, Senior Interest Bonds (6), (7) | 5.500% | 7/15/19 | N/R | $ | 57,457 | |||||
| 25 | Las Vegas Monorail Company, Senior Interest Bonds (6), (7) | 5.500% | 7/15/55 | N/R | 12,512 | |||||||
| $ | 116 | Total Corporate Bonds (cost $9,062) | 69,969 | |||||||||
| Total Long-Term Investments (cost $174,810,754) – 98.2% | 201,770,483 | |||||||||||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities – 1.8% | 3,623,344 | |||||||||||
| Net Assets – 100% | $ | 205,393,827 |
| (1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets. |
| (2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
| (3) | For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
| (4) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. |
| (5) | Step-up coupon bond, a bond with a coupon that increases (“steps up”), usually at regular intervals, while the bond is outstanding. The rate shown is the coupon as of the end of the reporting period. |
| (6) | Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment classified as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 2 – Investment Valuation and Fair Value Measurements for more information. |
| (7) | During January 2010, Las Vegas Monorail Company (“Las Vegas Monorail”) filed for federal bankruptcy protection. During March 2012, Las Vegas Monorail emerged from federal bankruptcy with the acceptance of a reorganization plan assigned by the Federal Bankruptcy Court. Under the reorganization plan, the Fund surrendered its Las Vegas Monorail Project Revenue Bonds, First Tier, Series 2000 and in turn received two senior interest corporate bonds: the first with an annual coupon rate of 5.500% maturing on July 15, 2019 and the second with an annual coupon rate of 3.000% (5.500% after December 31, 2015) maturing on July 15, 2055. The Fund was not accruing income for either senior interest corporate bond. On January 18, 2017, the Fund’s Adviser determined it was likely that this senior interest corporate bond would fulfill its obligation on the security maturing on July 15, 2019, and therefore began accruing income on the Fund’s records. |
| ETM | Escrowed to maturity. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
NUVEEN
|
43
|
| NXC | ||
| Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | ||
| Portfolio of Investments | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 97.3% | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS – 97.3% | |||||||||
| Consumer Staples – 6.3% | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Gold Country Settlement Funding Corporation, Refunding Series 2006, 5.250%, 6/01/46 | 12/17 at 100.00 | CCC | $ | 989,970 | |||
| 50 | California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Sonoma County Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Series 2005, 4.250%, 6/01/21 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 49,997 | |||||
| 1,095 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Senior Convertible Series 2007A-2, 5.300%, 6/01/37 | 6/22 at 100.00 | B | 1,102,654 | |||||
| Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1: | |||||||||
| 775 | 5.000%, 6/01/33 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B+ | 774,147 | |||||
| 660 | 5.750%, 6/01/47 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B3 | 660,000 | |||||
| 1,500 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Northern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2005A-1, 5.500%, 6/01/45 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 1,499,880 | |||||
| 1,000 | Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, San Diego County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation, Senior Series 2006A, 5.000%, 6/01/37 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BB+ | 999,700 | |||||
| 6,080 | Total Consumer Staples | 6,076,348 | |||||||
| Education and Civic Organizations – 3.1% | |||||||||
| 160 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Rocketship Education Multiple Projects, Series 2014A, 7.250%, 6/01/43 | 6/22 at 102.00 | N/R | 181,594 | |||||
| 60 | California School Finance Authority, School Facility Revenue Bonds, Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools Project, Series 2016A, 5.000%, 7/01/46 | 7/25 at 100.00 | BBB | 65,637 | |||||
| 385 | California School Finance Authority, School Facility Revenue Bonds, Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools Project, Series 2016C, 5.000%, 7/01/46 | 7/25 at 101.00 | BBB | 424,089 | |||||
| 250 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, School Facility Revenue Bonds, Alliance College-Ready Public Schools, Series 2011A, 7.000%, 7/01/46 | 7/21 at 100.00 | BBB– | 280,805 | |||||
| 2,000 | University of California, General Revenue Bonds, Limited Project Series 2016K, 4.000%, 5/15/46 | 5/26 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,093,600 | |||||
| 2,855 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 3,045,725 | |||||||
| Health Care – 11.1% | |||||||||
| 1,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Refunding Series 2016B, 5.000%, 11/15/46 | 11/26 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,147,440 | |||||
| 2,500 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Series 2016A, 5.000%, 11/15/41 | 11/25 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,867,900 | |||||
| 115 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 8/15/43 | 8/24 at 100.00 | AA– | 128,512 | |||||
| 125 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Providence Health & Services, Refunding Series 2014A, 5.000%, 10/01/38 | 10/24 at 100.00 | AA– | 144,707 | |||||
| 255 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Providence Health & Services, Series 2014B, 5.000%, 10/01/44 | 10/24 at 100.00 | AA– | 284,450 | |||||
| 1,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Providence Saint Joseph Health, Refunding Series 2016A, 4.000%, 10/01/47 | 10/26 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,037,550 | |||||
| 235 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rady Children’s Hospital – San Diego, Series 2011, 5.250%, 8/15/41 | 8/21 at 100.00 | AA | 256,371 | |||||
| 35 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2017A, 5.000%, 7/01/42 | 7/27 at 100.00 | Baa2 | 39,429 |
|
44
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Health Care (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 130 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, NorthBay Healthcare Group, Series 2017A, 5.250%, 11/01/41 | 11/26 at 100.00 | BBB– | $ | 147,793 | |||
| 350 | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2014A, 5.250%, 12/01/34 | 12/24 at 100.00 | BB+ | 390,415 | |||||
| California Statewide Communities Development Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2016A: | |||||||||
| 825 | 5.000%, 12/01/46 | 6/26 at 100.00 | BB | 902,624 | |||||
| 540 | 5.250%, 12/01/56 | 6/26 at 100.00 | BB | 594,427 | |||||
| 1,100 | Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2010, 6.000%, 11/01/41 | 11/20 at 100.00 | BBB– | 1,190,475 | |||||
| 670 | San Buenaventura, California, Revenue Bonds, Community Memorial Health System, Series 2011, 7.500%, 12/01/41 | 12/21 at 100.00 | BB+ | 782,788 | |||||
| 800 | Upland, California, Certificates of Participation, San Antonio Community Hospital, Series 2011, 6.500%, 1/01/41 | 1/21 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 901,016 | |||||
| 9,680 | Total Health Care | 10,815,897 | |||||||
| Housing/Multifamily – 0.9% | |||||||||
| 355 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, Caritas Projects Series 2010A, 6.400%, 8/15/45 | 8/20 at 100.00 | BBB | 384,149 | |||||
| 395 | California Municipal Finance Authority, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds, Caritas Projects Series 2012A, 5.500%, 8/15/47 | 8/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 433,469 | |||||
| California Municipal Finance Authority, Mobile Home Park Senior Revenue Bonds, Caritas Affordable Housing, Inc. Projects, Series 2014A: | |||||||||
| 25 | 5.250%, 8/15/39 | 8/24 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 27,653 | |||||
| 65 | 5.250%, 8/15/49 | 8/24 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 71,438 | |||||
| 840 | Total Housing/Multifamily | 916,709 | |||||||
| Industrials – 1.1% | |||||||||
| 1,015 | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Republic Services Inc., Series 2002C, 5.250%, 6/01/23 | 6/18 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 1,021,171 | |||||
| Tax Obligation/General – 23.7% | |||||||||
| 1,000 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Refunding Series 2015, 5.000%, 8/01/34 | 8/25 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,174,600 | |||||
| 1,650 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2009, 5.500%, 11/01/39 | 11/19 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,794,177 | |||||
| 1,965 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2011, 5.000%, 10/01/41 | 10/21 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,226,483 | |||||
| 2,000 | California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2012, 5.250%, 4/01/35 | 4/22 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,328,420 | |||||
| 2,345 | Golden West Schools Financing Authority, California, General Obligation Revenue Refunding Bonds, School District Program, Series 1999A, 0.000%, 2/01/18 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 2,337,332 | |||||
| 1,080 | Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District, Santa Clara County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation Series 1997C, 0.000%, 5/01/18 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | Aaa | 1,074,470 | |||||
| 7,575 | Palomar Pomerado Health, California, General Obligation Bonds, Convertible Capital Appreciation, Election 2004 Series 2010A, 0.000%, 8/01/34 | No Opt. Call | A | 3,951,120 | |||||
| 1,000 | San Benito High School District, San Benito and Santa Clara Counties, California, General Obligation Bonds, 2016 Election Series 2017, 5.250%, 8/01/46 | 8/27 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 1,204,610 | |||||
| 8,075 | San Bernardino Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2008 Series 2009B, 0.000%, 8/01/44 | No Opt. Call | Aa2 | 2,841,189 | |||||
| 1,000 | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2016, Green Series 2017A-1, 5.000%, 8/01/47 | 8/27 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,186,130 | |||||
| 1,000 | Santa Barbara Unified School District, Santa Barbara County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2016 Series 2017A, 4.000%, 8/01/41 | 8/27 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,054,060 | |||||
| 2,000 | West Hills Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, School Facilities Improvement District 3, 2008 Election Series 2011, 0.000%, 8/01/38 – AGM Insured (4) | 8/31 at 100.00 | AA | 1,812,040 | |||||
| 30,690 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 22,984,631 |
|
NUVEEN
|
45
|
| NXC | Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Tax Obligation/Limited – 17.2% | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | Bell Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Bell Project Area, Series 2003, 5.625%, 10/01/33 – RAAI Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA | $ | 1,002,260 | |||
| 2,000 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Various Correctional Facilities Series 2013F, 5.250%, 9/01/33 | 9/23 at 100.00 | A+ | 2,352,740 | |||||
| 360 | Chino Redevelopment Agency, California, Merged Chino Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 9/01/38 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A | 360,965 | |||||
| 1,000 | Fontana Public Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, North Fontana Redevelopment Project, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 10/01/32 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A | 1,002,680 | |||||
| 270 | Fontana Redevelopment Agency, San Bernardino County, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Jurupa Hills Redevelopment Project, Refunding Series 1997A, 5.500%, 10/01/27 | 10/17 at 100.00 | A | 275,824 | |||||
| 3,000 | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 6/01/40 | 6/25 at 100.00 | A+ | 3,432,660 | |||||
| 1,215 | Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Lease Revenue Bonds, Vermont Manchester Social Services Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 9/01/37 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,228,705 | |||||
| 1,000 | Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California, Measure R Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Series 2016A, 5.000%, 6/01/38 | 6/26 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,180,970 | |||||
| 135 | National City Community Development Commission, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, National City Redevelopment Project, Series 2011, 6.500%, 8/01/24 | 8/21 at 100.00 | A | 161,064 | |||||
| 1,000 | Norco Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Project Area 1, Series 2009, 7.000%, 3/01/34 | 3/18 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,024,890 | |||||
| 50 | Novato Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Hamilton Field Redevelopment Project, Series 2011, 6.750%, 9/01/40 | 9/21 at 100.00 | BBB+ | 58,778 | |||||
| 60 | Patterson Public Finance Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Community Facilities District 2001-1, Subordinate Lien Series 2013B , 5.875%, 9/01/39 | 9/23 at 100.00 | N/R | 65,922 | |||||
| Patterson Public Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Community Facilities District 2001-1, Senior Series 2013A: | |||||||||
| 350 | 5.250%, 9/01/30 | 9/23 at 100.00 | N/R | 383,145 | |||||
| 320 | 5.750%, 9/01/39 | 9/23 at 100.00 | N/R | 349,142 | |||||
| 30 | Riverside County Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Jurupa Valley Project Area, Series 2011B, 6.500%, 10/01/25 | 10/21 at 100.00 | A | 35,823 | |||||
| 425 | Sacramento City Financing Authority, California, Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A, 5.400%, 11/01/20 – NPFG Insured | No Opt. Call | A+ | 450,781 | |||||
| 20 | San Clemente, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Community Facilities District 2006-1 Marblehead Coastal, Series 2015, 5.000%, 9/01/40 | 9/25 at 100.00 | N/R | 22,064 | |||||
| 1,365 | San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, California, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A, 5.000%, 4/01/42 | 4/22 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,545,003 | |||||
| 65 | San Francisco City and County Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency, California, Special Tax Bonds, Community Facilities District 7, Hunters Point Shipyard Phase One Improvements, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 8/01/39 | 8/24 at 100.00 | N/R | 71,005 | |||||
| 615 | San Jose Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Merged Area Redevelopment Project, Series 2006C, 5.000%, 8/01/25 – NPFG Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A+ | 617,054 | |||||
| 40 | Signal Hill Redevelopment Agency, California, Project 1 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2011, 7.000%, 10/01/26 | 4/21 at 100.00 | N/R | 45,702 | |||||
| 1,000 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Loan Notes Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 10/01/32 – AGM Insured | 10/22 at 100.00 | AA | 1,051,440 | |||||
| 15,320 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 16,718,617 | |||||||
| Transportation – 6.7% | |||||||||
| 530 | Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Refunding Junior Lien Series 2013C, 6.500%, 1/15/43 | 1/24 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 632,799 |
|
46
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Transportation (continued) | |||||||||
| Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2013A: | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | 5.000%, 1/15/42 – AGM Insured | 1/24 at 100.00 | AA | $ | 1,137,240 | |||
| 1,170 | 5.750%, 1/15/46 | 1/24 at 100.00 | BBB– | 1,344,342 | |||||
| 1,175 | 6.000%, 1/15/53 | 1/24 at 100.00 | BBB– | 1,349,464 | |||||
| 800 | Long Beach, California, Harbor Revenue Bonds, Series 2015D, 5.000%, 5/15/42 | 5/25 at 100.00 | AA | 924,856 | |||||
| 955 | Port of Oakland, California, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012P, 5.000%, 5/01/31 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 5/22 at 100.00 | A+ | 1,084,813 | |||||
| 5,630 | Total Transportation | 6,473,514 | |||||||
| U.S. Guaranteed – 8.8% (5) | |||||||||
| California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Santa Clara University, Series 2008A: | |||||||||
| 2,805 | 5.625%, 4/01/37 (Pre-refunded 4/01/18) | 4/18 at 100.00 | N/R (5) | 2,873,218 | |||||
| 195 | 5.625%, 4/01/37 (Pre-refunded 4/01/18) | 4/18 at 100.00 | Aa3 (5) | 199,762 | |||||
| 1,500 | California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Various Capital Projects, Series 2009-I, 6.375%, 11/01/34 (Pre-refunded 11/01/19) | 11/19 at 100.00 | Aaa | 1,668,225 | |||||
| 1,000 | Imperial Irrigation District, California, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2011A, 5.500%, 11/01/41 (Pre-refunded 11/01/20) | 11/20 at 100.00 | AA– (5) | 1,137,070 | |||||
| Irvine Unified School District Financing Authority, Orange County, California, Special Tax Bonds, Group II, Series 2006A: | |||||||||
| 35 | 5.000%, 9/01/26 (Pre-refunded 9/01/18) | 9/18 at 100.00 | N/R (5) | 36,316 | |||||
| 80 | 5.125%, 9/01/36 (Pre-refunded 9/01/18) | 9/18 at 100.00 | N/R (5) | 83,099 | |||||
| 540 | Loma Linda, California, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Series 2008A, 8.250%, 12/01/38 (Pre-refunded 12/01/17) | 12/17 at 100.00 | BB (5) | 546,901 | |||||
| 500 | Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2009, 6.625%, 11/01/29 (Pre-refunded 11/01/19) | 11/19 at 100.00 | N/R (5) | 558,710 | |||||
| 415 | Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Los Medanos Community Development Project, Refunding Series 2008A, 6.500%, 9/01/28 (Pre-refunded 9/01/18) | 9/18 at 100.00 | N/R (5) | 436,580 | |||||
| 160 | Rancho Santa Fe CSD Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Superior Lien Series 2011A, 5.750%, 9/01/30 (Pre-refunded 9/01/21) | 9/21 at 100.00 | A– (5) | 188,414 | |||||
| 25 | San Francisco Redevelopment Finance Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Mission Bay North Redevelopment Project, Series 2011C, 6.750%, 8/01/41 (Pre-refunded 2/01/21) | 2/21 at 100.00 | A– (5) | 29,672 | |||||
| San Francisco Redevelopment Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Series 2011D: | |||||||||
| 25 | 7.000%, 8/01/33 (Pre-refunded 2/01/21) | 2/21 at 100.00 | BBB+ (5) | 29,867 | |||||
| 30 | 7.000%, 8/01/41 (Pre-refunded 2/01/21) | 2/21 at 100.00 | BBB+ (5) | 35,841 | |||||
| 225 | San Mateo Union High School District, San Mateo County, California, Certificates of Participation, Phase 1, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 12/15/30 (Pre-refunded 12/15/17) – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | N/R (5) | 227,050 | |||||
| 360 | Turlock Public Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Series 2011, 7.500%, 9/01/39 (Pre-refunded 3/01/21) | 3/21 at 100.00 | A– (5) | 437,040 | |||||
| 70 | Yorba Linda Redevelopment Agency, Orange County, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Yorba Linda Redevelopment Project, Subordinate Lien Series 2011A, 6.500%, 9/01/32 (Pre-refunded 9/01/21) | 9/21 at 100.00 | A– (5) | 84,411 | |||||
| 7,965 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 8,572,176 | |||||||
| Utilities – 3.3% | |||||||||
| 645 | Long Beach Bond Finance Authority, California, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 11/15/37 | No Opt. Call | A | 819,382 | |||||
| 2,000 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2017C, 5.000%, 7/01/42 | 7/27 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 2,363,880 | |||||
| 2,645 | Total Utilities | 3,183,262 |
|
NUVEEN
|
47
|
| NXC | Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Water and Sewer – 15.1% | |||||||||
| $ | 1,000 | Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency, California, Revenue Bonds, Capital Cost Recovery Prepayment Program, Series 2013A, 5.000%, 10/01/34 | 4/23 at 100.00 | AA– | $ | 1,155,100 | |||
| 1,480 | California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, Clean Water State Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Green Series 2017, 5.000%, 10/01/33 | 4/27 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,799,695 | |||||
| California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Water Furnishing Revenue Bonds, Poseidon Resources Channelside LP Desalination Project, Series 2012: | |||||||||
| 375 | 5.000%, 7/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 405,176 | |||||
| 1,160 | 5.000%, 11/21/45 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/22 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 1,247,615 | |||||
| 2,000 | Escondido Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Water System Financing, Series 2012, 5.000%, 9/01/41 | 3/22 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,263,920 | |||||
| 2,000 | Irvine Ranch Water District, California, Certificates of Participation, Irvine Ranch Water District Series 2016, 5.000%, 3/01/41 | 9/26 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,353,860 | |||||
| 1,970 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Waterworks Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 7/01/44 | 7/24 at 100.00 | AA+ | 2,283,604 | |||||
| 1,000 | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California, Waterworks Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A, 5.000%, 7/01/41 | 1/27 at 100.00 | AA+ | 1,176,460 | |||||
| 620 | Los Angeles, California, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Green Subordinate Lien Series 2017A, 5.250%, 6/01/47 | 6/27 at 100.00 | AA | 751,415 | |||||
| 1,000 | Santa Clara Valley Water District, California, Water System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2016A, 5.000%, 6/01/31 | 12/25 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 1,203,380 | |||||
| 12,605 | Total Water and Sewer | 14,640,225 | |||||||
| $ | 95,325 | Total Municipal Bonds (cost $85,864,459) | 94,448,275 |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 2.1% | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS – 2.1% | |||||||||
| Health Care – 2.1% | |||||||||
| $ | 2,000 | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Childrens Hospital of Orange County, Variable Rate Demand Obligation Series 2009C, 0.870%, 11/01/38 (6) | 11/17 at 100.00 | A–1+ | $ | 2,000,000 | |||
| $ | 2,000 | Total Short-Term Investments (cost $2,000,000) | 2,000,000 | ||||||
| Total Investments (cost $87,864,459) – 99.4% | 96,448,275 | ||||||||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities – 0.6% | 590,063 | ||||||||
| Net Assets – 100% | $ | 97,038,338 |
| (1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets. |
| (2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
| (3) | For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
| (4) | Step-up coupon bond, a bond with a coupon that increases (“steps up”), usually at regular intervals, while the bond is outstanding. The rate shown is the coupon as of the end of the reporting period. |
| (5) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. |
| (6) | Investment has a maturity of greater than one year, but has variable rate and demand features which qualify it as a short-term investment. The rate disclosed is that in effect as of the end of the reporting period. This rate changes periodically based on market conditions or a specified market index. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
48
|
NUVEEN
|
| NXN | ||
| Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | ||
| Portfolio of Investments | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 98.9% | |||||||||
| MUNICIPAL BONDS – 98.9% | |||||||||
| Consumer Staples – 1.5% | |||||||||
| $ | 435 | Erie County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation, New York, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 6/01/38 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BB | $ | 434,026 | |||
| 150 | Nassau County Tobacco Settlement Corporation, New York, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Refunding Series 2006A-2, 5.250%, 6/01/26 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 149,988 | |||||
| 275 | Nassau County Tobacco Settlement Corporation, New York, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2006A-3, 5.000%, 6/01/35 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B– | 272,750 | |||||
| 860 | Total Consumer Staples | 856,764 | |||||||
| Education and Civic Organizations – 23.8% | |||||||||
| 165 | Albany Industrial Development Agency, New York, Revenue Bonds, Brighter Choice Charter Schools, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 4/01/37 | 12/17 at 100.00 | B | 147,926 | |||||
| 280 | Buffalo and Erie County Industrial Land Development Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Enterprise Charter School Project, Series 2011A, 7.500%, 12/01/40 | 12/20 at 100.00 | B+ | 284,514 | |||||
| Build New York City Resource Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, South Bronx Charter School for International Cultures and the Arts Project, Series 2013A: | |||||||||
| 75 | 5.000%, 4/15/33 | 4/23 at 100.00 | BB+ | 75,793 | |||||
| 110 | 5.000%, 4/15/43 | 4/23 at 100.00 | BB+ | 110,102 | |||||
| 150 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, General Revenue Bonds, Saint Johns University, Series 2013A, 5.000%, 7/01/44 | 7/23 at 100.00 | A– | 168,355 | |||||
| 1,000 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Housing Revenue Bonds, Fashion Institute of Technology, Series 2007, 5.250%, 7/01/34 – FGIC Insured | No Opt. Call | A | 1,233,330 | |||||
| Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Lease Revenue Bonds, State University Dormitory Facilities, Series 2015A: | |||||||||
| 20 | 5.000%, 7/01/31 | 7/25 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 23,597 | |||||
| 25 | 5.000%, 7/01/33 | 7/25 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 29,189 | |||||
| 405 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, Barnard College, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 7/01/37 – NPFG Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A | 406,304 | |||||
| 1,000 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, Columbia University, Series 2011A, 5.000%, 10/01/41 | 4/21 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,121,470 | |||||
| 605 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/40 | 7/25 at 100.00 | A– | 675,277 | |||||
| 290 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, New York University, Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/35 | 7/25 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 337,261 | |||||
| 1,185 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, New York University, Series 2016A, 5.000%, 7/01/39 | 7/26 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 1,380,134 | |||||
| 1,800 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, Non State Supported Debt, Cornell University, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 7/01/40 | 7/20 at 100.00 | Aa1 | 1,979,154 | |||||
| 120 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, Saint Joseph’s College, Series 2010, 5.250%, 7/01/35 | 7/20 at 100.00 | Ba1 | 123,727 | |||||
| 250 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology, Series 2016A, 5.500%, 12/01/36 | 12/26 at 100.00 | BB– | 260,957 | |||||
| 215 | Glen Cove Local Economic Assistance Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Garvies Point Public Improvement Project, Capital Appreciation Series 2016C, 0.000%, 1/01/55 (4) | 1/34 at 100.00 | N/R | 163,722 | |||||
| 110 | Hempstead Town Local Development Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Adelphi University Project, Series 2013, 5.000%, 9/01/38 | 9/23 at 100.00 | A– | 124,984 | |||||
| 2,000 | Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, University of Rochester Project, Series 2011B, 5.000%, 7/01/41 | 7/21 at 100.00 | AA– | 2,229,060 |
|
NUVEEN
|
49
|
| NXN | Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Education and Civic Organizations (continued) | |||||||||
| New York City Industrial Development Agency, New York, PILOT Revenue Bonds, Queens Baseball Stadium Project, Series 2006: | |||||||||
| $ | 500 | 5.000%, 1/01/31 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB | $ | 501,155 | |||
| 430 | 4.750%, 1/01/42 – AMBAC Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | BBB | 433,556 | |||||
| 300 | New York City Industrial Development Authority, New York, PILOT Revenue Bonds, Yankee Stadium Project, Series 2006, 4.750%, 3/01/46 – NPFG Insured | 12/17 at 100.00 | A | 300,849 | |||||
| 1,005 | New York City Trust for Cultural Resources, New York, Revenue Bonds, Wildlife Conservation Society, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 8/01/32 | 8/23 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,169,147 | |||||
| 12,040 | Total Education and Civic Organizations | 13,279,563 | |||||||
| Financials – 1.0% | |||||||||
| 450 | New York Liberty Development Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Goldman Sachs Headquarters Issue, Series 2005, 5.250%, 10/01/35 | No Opt. Call | A | 576,950 | |||||
| Health Care – 0.6% | |||||||||
| 100 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Highland Hospital of Rochester Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.200%, 7/01/32 | 7/20 at 100.00 | A | 107,458 | |||||
| 230 | Yonkers Industrial Development Agency, New York, Revenue Bonds, St. John’s Riverside Hospital, Series 2001B, 7.125%, 7/01/31 | 12/17 at 100.00 | BB– | 230,421 | |||||
| 330 | Total Health Care | 337,879 | |||||||
| Housing/Multifamily – 0.5% | |||||||||
| 275 | New York State Housing Finance Agency, Affordable Housing Revenue, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 11/01/38 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 11/17 at 100.00 | Aa2 | 275,300 | |||||
| Industrials – 4.0% | |||||||||
| 160 | Build New York City Resource Corporation, New York, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Pratt Paper NY, Inc. Project, Series 2014, 5.000%, 1/01/35 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 1/25 at 100.00 | N/R | 172,382 | |||||
| 1,865 | New York Liberty Development Corporation, New York, Liberty Revenue Bonds, 3 World Trade Center Project, Class 1 Series 2014, 5.000%, 11/15/44 | 11/24 at 100.00 | N/R | 2,036,002 | |||||
| 2,025 | Total Industrials | 2,208,384 | |||||||
| Long-Term Care – 0.3% | |||||||||
| 100 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Non-State Supported Debt, Ozanam Hall of Queens Nursing Home Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 11/01/31 | 12/17 at 100.00 | A3 | 100,102 | |||||
| 15 | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, New York, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds, Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program, Series 2008-B1, 5.500%, 7/01/18 | 12/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 13,811 | |||||
| 55 | Yonkers Industrial Development Agency, New York, Civic Facilities Revenue Bonds, Special Needs Facilities Pooled Program Bonds, Series 2008-C1, 5.500%, 7/01/18 | 12/17 at 100.00 | N/R | 54,866 | |||||
| 170 | Total Long-Term Care | 168,779 | |||||||
| Tax Obligation/General – 3.2% | |||||||||
| 515 | New York City, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Fiscal 2008 Series D-1, 5.125%, 12/01/25 | 12/17 at 100.00 | AA | 518,744 | |||||
| 1,080 | New York City, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Fiscal 2017 Series B-1, 5.000%, 12/01/41 | 12/26 at 100.00 | AA | 1,261,472 | |||||
| 1,595 | Total Tax Obligation/General | 1,780,216 | |||||||
| Tax Obligation/Limited – 21.7% | |||||||||
| 1,050 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, State Personal Income Tax Revenue Bonds, General Purpose Series 2012D, 5.000%, 2/15/37 | 2/22 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,190,815 | |||||
| 1,000 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, State Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2015B. Group A,B&C, 5.000%, 3/15/35 | 9/25 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,177,870 | |||||
| 1,000 | Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Refunding Series 2015D, 5.000%, 11/15/25 | No Opt. Call | A | 1,136,140 | |||||
| 800 | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Second Indenture Fiscal 2017 Series A, 5.000%, 2/15/42 | 2/27 at 100.00 | Aa3 | 931,336 |
|
50
|
NUVEEN
|
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| Tax Obligation/Limited (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 795 | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Senior Fiscal 2012 Series 2011A, 5.750%, 2/15/47 | 2/21 at 100.00 | AA– | $ | 910,609 | |||
| 1,000 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Building Aid Revenue Bonds, Fiscal Series 2015S-2, 5.000%, 7/15/40 | 7/25 at 100.00 | AA | 1,159,890 | |||||
| 1,000 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Bonds, Subordinate Fiscal 2013 Series I, 5.000%, 5/01/38 | 5/23 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,145,340 | |||||
| 450 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Bonds, Subordinate Fiscal 2014 Series D-1, 5.000%, 2/01/35 | 2/24 at 100.00 | AAA | 523,579 | |||||
| 875 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Series 2011-D1, 5.250%, 2/01/30 | 2/21 at 100.00 | AAA | 989,441 | |||||
| 535 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 2015-XF0080, 11.658%, 5/01/32 (IF) | 5/19 at 100.00 | AAA | 631,594 | |||||
| 775 | New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, State Personal Income Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 12/15/26 (UB) | 12/17 at 100.00 | AAA | 781,983 | |||||
| 570 | New York State Thruway Authority, Highway and Bridge Trust Fund Bonds, Series 2005B, 5.500%, 4/01/20 – AMBAC Insured (UB) (5) | No Opt. Call | AA+ | 632,335 | |||||
| 845 | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Loan Notes Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 10/01/32 – AGM Insured | 10/22 at 100.00 | AA | 888,467 | |||||
| 10,695 | Total Tax Obligation/Limited | 12,099,399 | |||||||
| Transportation – 14.8% | |||||||||
| 1,000 | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, Transportation Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, 5.250%, 11/15/38 | 5/24 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,171,640 | |||||
| 250 | New York Liberty Development Corporation, New York, Liberty Revenue Bonds, 4 World Trade Center Project, Series 2011, 5.000%, 11/15/44 | 11/21 at 100.00 | A+ | 277,053 | |||||
| New York Transportation Development Corporation, New York, Special Facility Revenue Bonds, American Airlines, Inc. John F Kennedy International Airport Project, Refunding Series 2016: | |||||||||
| 345 | 5.000%, 8/01/26 | 8/21 at 100.00 | BB– | 370,351 | |||||
| 685 | 5.000%, 8/01/31 | 8/21 at 100.00 | BB– | 732,710 | |||||
| 980 | New York Transportation Development Corporation, Special Facilities Bonds, LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment Project, Series 2016A, 5.000%, 7/01/46 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 7/24 at 100.00 | BBB | 1,078,725 | |||||
| 1,500 | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Consolidated Revenue Bonds, One Hundred Eighty-Forth Series 2014, 5.000%, 9/01/33 | 9/24 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,757,775 | |||||
| 1,000 | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Consolidated Revenue Bonds, One Hundred Ninety-Fourth Series 2015, 5.250%, 10/15/55 | 10/25 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,158,880 | |||||
| Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010: | |||||||||
| 290 | 6.500%, 12/01/28 | 12/20 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 301,600 | |||||
| 215 | 6.000%, 12/01/36 | 12/20 at 100.00 | Baa1 | 240,617 | |||||
| 1,000 | Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, New York, General Purpose Revenue Bonds, MTA Bridges & Tunnels, Series 2017B, 5.000%, 11/15/36 | 5/27 at 100.00 | AA– | 1,188,220 | |||||
| 7,265 | Total Transportation | 8,277,571 | |||||||
| U.S. Guaranteed – 10.1% (6) | |||||||||
| 1,000 | Albany Industrial Development Agency, New York, Revenue Bonds, Saint Peter’s Hospital, Series 2008A, 5.250%, 11/15/32 (Pre-refunded 11/15/17) | 11/17 at 100.00 | N/R (6) | 1,005,730 | |||||
| Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Orange Regional Medical Center Obligated Group Revenue Bonds, Series 2008: | |||||||||
| 160 | 6.500%, 12/01/21 (Pre-refunded 12/01/18) | 12/18 at 100.00 | Baa3 (6) | 168,206 | |||||
| 210 | 6.125%, 12/01/29 (Pre-refunded 12/01/18) | 12/18 at 100.00 | Baa3 (6) | 222,474 | |||||
| 405 | 6.250%, 12/01/37 (Pre-refunded 12/01/18) | 12/18 at 100.00 | Baa3 (6) | 430,365 | |||||
| 750 | Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, NYU Hospitals Center, Series 2011A, 6.000%, 7/01/40 (Pre-refunded 7/01/20) | 7/20 at 100.00 | A– (6) | 849,465 |
|
NUVEEN
|
51
|
| NXN | Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio | |
| Portfolio of Investments (continued) | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| Principal | Optional Call | ||||||||
| Amount (000) | Description (1) | Provisions (2) | Ratings (3) | Value | |||||
| U.S. Guaranteed (6) (continued) | |||||||||
| $ | 745 | New York City, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Fiscal 2008 Series D-1, 5.125%, 12/01/25 (Pre-refunded 12/01/17) | 12/17 at 100.00 | N/R (6) | $ | 750,588 | |||
| 1,205 | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Senior Fiscal 2012 Series 2011A, 5.750%, 2/15/47 (Pre-refunded 2/15/21) | 2/21 at 100.00 | Aa3 (6) | 1,387,895 | |||||
| 125 | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Series 2011-D1, 5.250%, 2/01/30 (Pre-refunded 2/01/21) | 2/21 at 100.00 | N/R (6) | 141,869 | |||||
| 600 | Yonkers, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2011A, 5.000%, 10/01/24 (Pre-refunded 10/01/21) – AGM Insured | 10/21 at 100.00 | AA (6) | 690,300 | |||||
| 5,200 | Total U.S. Guaranteed | 5,646,892 | |||||||
| Utilities – 10.1% | |||||||||
| 550 | Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, New York, Exempt Facility Revenue Bonds, NRG Dunkirk Power Project, Series 2009, 5.875%, 4/01/42 | 2/20 at 100.00 | Baa3 | 574,338 | |||||
| 35 | Guam Power Authority, Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 10/01/34 | 10/22 at 100.00 | BBB | 36,996 | |||||
| 50 | Long Island Power Authority, New York, Electric System General Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 9/01/44 | 9/24 at 100.00 | A– | 56,508 | |||||
| 400 | Long Island Power Authority, New York, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 5.000%, 5/01/38 | 5/21 at 100.00 | A– | 443,800 | |||||
| 865 | Niagara Area Development Corporation, New York, Solid Waste Disposal Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Covanta Energy Project, Series 2012A, 5.250%, 11/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax) | 11/17 at 100.00 | BB+ | 865,943 | |||||
| 1,365 | Utility Debt Securitization Authority, New York, Restructuring Bonds, Series 2013TE, 5.000%, 12/15/41 | 12/23 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,584,847 | |||||
| 1,750 | Utility Debt Securitization Authority, New York, Restructuring Bonds, Series 2016B, 5.000%, 12/15/35 | 6/26 at 100.00 | AAA | 2,102,573 | |||||
| 5,015 | Total Utilities | 5,665,005 | |||||||
| Water and Sewer – 7.3% | |||||||||
| 200 | Buffalo Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York, Water System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/29 | 7/25 at 100.00 | A | 237,138 | |||||
| 2,000 | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York, Water and Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue Bonds, Fiscal 2018 Series AA, 5.000%, 6/15/38 | 6/27 at 100.00 | AA+ | 2,364,320 | |||||
| 275 | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York, Water and Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 2015-XF0097, 15.128%, 6/15/37 (IF) | 6/18 at 100.00 | N/R | 306,345 | |||||
| 1,000 | New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, State Clean Water and Drinking Water Revolving Funds Revenue Bonds, New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects- Second Resolution Bonds, Subordinated SRF Series 2017A, 5.000%, 6/15/42 | 6/27 at 100.00 | AAA | 1,186,820 | |||||
| 3,475 | Total Water and Sewer | 4,094,623 | |||||||
| $ | 49,395 | Total Long-Term Investments (cost $52,044,108) – 98.9% | 55,267,325 | ||||||
| Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.9% | 1,597,888 | ||||||||
| Floating Rate Obligations – (1.8)% | (1,005,000 | ) | |||||||
| Net Assets – 100% | $ | 55,860,213 |
|
52
|
NUVEEN
|
| (1) | All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets. |
| (2) | Optional Call Provisions: Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns. |
| (3) | For financial reporting purposes, the ratings disclosed are the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. This treatment of split-rated securities may differ from that used for other purposes, such as for Fund investment policies. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies. |
| (4) | Step-up coupon bond, a bond with a coupon that increases (“steps up”), usually at regular intervals, while the bond is outstanding. The rate shown is the coupon as of the end of the reporting period. |
| (5) | Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions. |
| (6) | Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. |
| IF | Inverse floating rate security issued by a tender option bond (“TOB”) trust, the interest rate on which varies inversely with the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) short-term rate, which resets weekly, or a similar short-term rate, and is reduced by the expenses related to the TOB trust. |
| UB | Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
NUVEEN
|
53
|
| Statement of Assets and Liabilities | September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term investments, at value (cost $216,125,740, $231,480,697, $174,810,754, $85,864,459 and $52,044,108, respectively) | $ | 244,807,714 | $ | 256,992,964 | $ | 201,770,483 | $ | 94,448,275 | $ | 55,267,325 | ||||||
| Short-term investments, at value (cost approximates value) | — | — | — | 2,000,000 | — | |||||||||||
| Cash | 2,075,650 | 2,960,961 | 126,357 | — | 565,491 | |||||||||||
| Receivable for: | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest | 2,536,383 | 2,800,423 | 2,108,603 | 1,234,096 | 752,108 | |||||||||||
| Investments sold | 6,919,605 | 1,000,000 | 2,030,278 | — | 490,000 | |||||||||||
| Shares sold | — | — | — | 6,141 | — | |||||||||||
| Deferred offering costs | — | — | — | 126,978 | — | |||||||||||
| Other assets | 58,076 | 60,527 | 45,507 | 23,525 | 15,369 | |||||||||||
| Total assets | 256,397,428 | 263,814,875 | 206,081,228 | 97,839,015 | 57,090,293 | |||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash overdraft | — | — | — | 400,243 | — | |||||||||||
| Floating rate obligations | — | — | — | — | 1,005,000 | |||||||||||
| Payable for dividends | 709,078 | 716,178 | 546,846 | 292,290 | 172,675 | |||||||||||
| Accrued expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
| Management fees | 42,830 | 54,802 | 43,189 | 20,795 | 11,978 | |||||||||||
| Trustees fees | 55,609 | 58,096 | 43,185 | 21,161 | 12,976 | |||||||||||
| Other | 65,821 | 67,523 | 54,181 | 66,188 | 27,451 | |||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 873,338 | 896,599 | 687,401 | 800,677 | 1,230,080 | |||||||||||
| Net assets | $ | 255,524,090 | $ | 262,918,276 | $ | 205,393,827 | $ | 97,038,338 | $ | 55,860,213 | ||||||
| Shares outstanding | 16,570,310 | 17,713,727 | 13,045,560 | 6,325,457 | 3,924,895 | |||||||||||
| Net asset value (“NAV”) per share outstanding | $ | 15.42 | $ | 14.84 | $ | 15.74 | $ | 15.34 | $ | 14.23 | ||||||
| Net assets consist of: | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares, $0.01 par value per share | $ | 165,703 | $ | 177,137 | $ | 130,456 | $ | 63,255 | $ | 39,249 | ||||||
| Paid-in surplus | 230,107,246 | 245,888,204 | 179,536,881 | 88,172,449 | 53,856,609 | |||||||||||
| Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income | 1,739,559 | 1,050,820 | 1,780,575 | (140,543 | ) | (15,133 | ) | |||||||||
| Accumulated net realized gain (loss) | (5,170,392 | ) | (9,710,152 | ) | (3,013,814 | ) | 359,361 | (1,243,729 | ) | |||||||
| Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 28,681,974 | 25,512,267 | 26,959,729 | 8,583,816 | 3,223,217 | |||||||||||
| Net assets | $ | 255,524,090 | $ | 262,918,276 | $ | 205,393,827 | $ | 97,038,338 | $ | 55,860,213 | ||||||
| Authorized shares | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
54
|
NUVEEN
|
| Statement of Operations | Six Months Ended September 30, 2017 (Unaudited) |
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Investment Income | $ | 5,030,209 | $ | 5,082,488 | $ | 4,028,709 | $ | 2,007,429 | $ | 1,149,900 | ||||||
| Expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Management fees | 258,984 | 331,718 | 260,896 | 125,566 | 72,866 | |||||||||||
| Interest expense | — | — | — | — | 7,155 | |||||||||||
| Custodian fees | 16,422 | 17,414 | 13,782 | 8,680 | 5,121 | |||||||||||
| Trustees fees | 3,835 | 3,961 | 3,086 | 1,452 | 848 | |||||||||||
| Professional fees | 15,071 | 15,168 | 14,510 | 14,183 | 12,714 | |||||||||||
| Shareholder reporting expenses | 20,596 | 20,318 | 14,256 | 6,866 | 4,829 | |||||||||||
| Shareholder servicing agent fees | 7,077 | 6,459 | 5,439 | 1,877 | 1,711 | |||||||||||
| Stock exchange listing fees | 3,488 | 3,488 | 3,488 | 3,499 | 3,492 | |||||||||||
| Investor relations expenses | 11,402 | 11,535 | 8,765 | 4,418 | 2,882 | |||||||||||
| Other | 11,767 | 12,523 | 9,256 | 16,528 | 8,664 | |||||||||||
| Total expenses | 348,642 | 422,584 | 333,478 | 183,069 | 120,282 | |||||||||||
| Net investment income (loss) | 4,681,567 | 4,659,904 | 3,695,231 | 1,824,360 | 1,029,618 | |||||||||||
| Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) from investments | 846,879 | 1,057,231 | 479,527 | 971,058 | 100,787 | |||||||||||
| Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 6,001,837 | 5,339,819 | 5,128,381 | 1,189,466 | 692,619 | |||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 6,848,716 | 6,397,050 | 5,607,908 | 2,160,524 | 793,406 | |||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | $ | 11,530,283 | $ | 11,056,954 | $ | 9,303,139 | $ | 3,984,884 | $ | 1,823,024 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
NUVEEN
|
55
|
| Statement of Changes in Net Assets | (Unaudited) |
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | |||||||||||||||||
| Six Months | Year | Six Months | Year | Six Months | Year | ||||||||||||||
| Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||||||
| 9/30/17 | 3/31/17 | 9/30/17 | 3/31/17 | 9/30/17 | 3/31/17 | ||||||||||||||
| Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income (loss) | $ | 4,681,567 | $ | 9,302,606 | $ | 4,659,904 | $ | 9,468,136 | $ | 3,695,231 | $ | 7,400,343 | |||||||
| Net realized gain (loss) from: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investments | 846,879 | 1,206,176 | 1,057,231 | 17,004 | 479,527 | 26,801 | |||||||||||||
| Swaps | — | (180,389 | ) | — | — | — | (87,611 | ) | |||||||||||
| Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investments | 6,001,837 | (9,363,238 | ) | 5,339,819 | (7,540,888 | ) | 5,128,381 | (6,783,825 | ) | ||||||||||
| Swaps | — | 443,326 | — | — | — | 299,545 | |||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | 11,530,283 | 1,408,481 | 11,056,954 | 1,944,252 | 9,303,139 | 855,253 | |||||||||||||
| Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||
| From net investment income | (4,523,694 | ) | (9,118,641 | ) | (4,463,859 | ) | (9,149,141 | ) | (3,404,891 | ) | (6,954,588 | ) | |||||||
| From accumulated net realized gains | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Decrease in net assets from distributions to shareholders | (4,523,694 | ) | (9,118,641 | ) | (4,463,859 | ) | (9,149,141 | ) | (3,404,891 | ) | (6,954,588 | ) | |||||||
| Capital Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 7,006,589 | (7,710,160 | ) | 6,593,095 | (7,204,889 | ) | 5,898,248 | (6,099,335 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net assets at the beginning of period | 248,517,501 | 256,227,661 | 256,325,181 | 263,530,070 | 199,495,579 | 205,594,914 | |||||||||||||
| Net assets at the end of period | $ | 255,524,090 | $ | 248,517,501 | $ | 262,918,276 | $ | 256,325,181 | $ | 205,393,827 | $ | 199,495,579 | |||||||
| Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period | $ | 1,739,559 | $ | 1,581,686 | $ | 1,050,820 | $ | 854,775 | $ | 1,780,575 | $ | 1,490,235 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
56
|
NUVEEN
|
| NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Six Months | Year | Six Months | Year | ||||||||||
| Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||
| 9/30/17 | 3/31/17 | 9/30/17 | 3/31/17 | ||||||||||
| Operations | |||||||||||||
| Net investment income (loss) | $ | 1,824,360 | $ | 3,798,794 | $ | 1,029,618 | $ | 2,165,600 | |||||
| Net realized gain (loss) from: | |||||||||||||
| Investments | 971,058 | (131,725 | ) | 100,787 | (365,379 | ) | |||||||
| Swaps | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of: | |||||||||||||
| Investments | 1,189,466 | (3,435,731 | ) | 692,619 | (1,558,377 | ) | |||||||
| Swaps | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | 3,984,884 | 231,338 | 1,823,024 | 241,844 | |||||||||
| Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||
| From net investment income | (1,859,389 | ) | (3,883,881 | ) | (1,083,271 | ) | (2,166,329 | ) | |||||
| From accumulated net realized gains | — | (616,049 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Decrease in net assets from distributions to shareholders | (1,859,389 | ) | (4,499,930 | ) | (1,083,271 | ) | (2,166,329 | ) | |||||
| Capital Share Transactions | |||||||||||||
| Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs | 562,329 | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | 40,360 | 85,085 | — | 13,528 | |||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | 602,689 | 85,085 | — | 13,528 | |||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 2,728,184 | (4,183,507 | ) | 739,753 | (1,910,957 | ) | |||||||
| Net assets at the beginning of period | 94,310,154 | 98,493,661 | 55,120,460 | 57,031,417 | |||||||||
| Net assets at the end of period | $ | 97,038,338 | $ | 94,310,154 | $ | 55,860,213 | $ | 55,120,460 | |||||
| Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period | $ | (140,543 | ) | $ | (105,514 | ) | $ | (15,133 | ) | $ | 38,520 | ||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
NUVEEN
|
57
|
| Financial Highlights (Unaudited) |
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period:
| Investment Operations | Less Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net | Net | From | From | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment | Realized/ | Net | Accumulated | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | Income | Unrealized | Investment | Net Realized | Ending | Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAV | (Loss | ) | Gain (Loss | ) | Total | Income | Gains | Total | NAV | Price | ||||||||||||||||||
| NXP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018(e) | $ | 15.00 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.69 | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | — | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 15.42 | $ | 14.92 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 15.46 | 0.56 | (0.47 | ) | 0.09 | (0.55 | ) | — | (0.55 | ) | 15.00 | 14.03 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 15.17 | 0.58 | 0.27 | 0.85 | (0.56 | ) | — | (0.56 | ) | 15.46 | 14.89 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 14.43 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 1.36 | (0.62 | ) | — | (0.62 | ) | 15.17 | 14.51 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 15.03 | 0.66 | (0.62 | ) | 0.04 | (0.64 | ) | — | (0.64 | ) | 14.43 | 13.48 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 14.55 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 1.17 | (0.69 | ) | — | (0.69 | ) | 15.03 | 14.63 | |||||||||||||||||
| NXQ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018(e) | 14.47 | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.62 | (0.25 | ) | — | (0.25 | ) | 14.84 | 14.04 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 14.88 | 0.53 | (0.42 | ) | 0.11 | (0.52 | ) | — | (0.52 | ) | 14.47 | 13.41 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 14.64 | 0.55 | 0.23 | 0.78 | (0.54 | ) | — | (0.54 | ) | 14.88 | 14.13 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 13.83 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 1.41 | (0.60 | ) | — | (0.60 | ) | 14.64 | 13.94 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 14.38 | 0.62 | (0.54 | ) | 0.08 | (0.63 | ) | — | (0.63 | ) | 13.83 | 13.12 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 13.89 | 0.65 | 0.47 | 1.12 | (0.63 | ) | — | (0.63 | ) | 14.38 | 13.99 | |||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Total Return Based on NAV is the combination of changes in NAV, reinvested dividend income at NAV and reinvested capital gains distributions at NAV, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending NAV. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its NAV), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
| Total Return Based on Share Price is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
|
58
|
NUVEEN
|
| Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total Returns | Ratios to Average Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
| Based | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||
| Based | on | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||
| on | Share | Assets | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| NAV | (a) | Price | (a) | (000 | ) | Expenses | (b) | Income (Loss | ) | Rate | (c) | ||||||||
| 4.65 | % | 8.36 | % | $ | 255,524 | 0.27 | %** | 3.69 | %** | 12 | % | ||||||||
| 0.55 | (2.20 | ) | 248,518 | 0.28 | 3.64 | 28 | |||||||||||||
| 5.78 | 6.82 | 256,228 | 0.28 | 3.88 | 25 | ||||||||||||||
| 9.52 | 12.42 | 251,296 | 0.32 | (d) | 4.01 | (d) | 28 | ||||||||||||
| 0.38 | (3.37 | ) | 239,151 | 0.29 | 4.60 | 40 | |||||||||||||
| 8.16 | 5.14 | 249,134 | 0.28 | 4.64 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
| 4.32 | 6.62 | 262,918 | 0.32 | ** | 3.56 | ** | 11 | ||||||||||||
| 0.69 | (1.56 | ) | 256,325 | 0.33 | 3.61 | 27 | |||||||||||||
| 5.46 | 5.46 | 263,530 | 0.33 | 3.76 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
| 10.32 | 11.00 | 259,381 | 0.37 | (d) | 4.04 | (d) | 19 | ||||||||||||
| 0.73 | (1.51 | ) | 245,069 | 0.34 | 4.58 | 23 | |||||||||||||
| 8.20 | 7.29 | 254,694 | 0.33 | 4.54 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| (b) | The expense ratios reflect, among other things, the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund (as described in Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities), where applicable, as follows: |
| NXP | ||
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||
| 2018(e) | — | % |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | — | |
| 2013 | — |
| NXQ | ||
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||
| 2018(e) | — | % |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | * |
| 2014 | — | * |
| 2013 | — | * |
| (c) | Portfolio Turnover Rate is calculated based on the lesser of long-term purchases or sales (as disclosed in Note 5 – Investment Transactions) divided by the average long-term market value during the period. |
| (d) | During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, the Adviser voluntarily reimbursed the Fund for certain expenses incurred in connection with an equity shelf program. As a result, the Expenses and Net Investment Income (Loss) Ratios to Average Net Assets reflect this voluntary expense reimbursement. The Expenses and Net Investment Income (Loss) Ratios to Average Net Assets excluding this expense reimbursement from Adviser are as follows: |
| Ratios to | |||||||
| Average Net Assets | |||||||
| Net Investment | |||||||
| NXP | Expense | (b) | Income (Loss | ) | |||
| Year Ended 3/31: | |||||||
| 2015 | 0.35 | % | 3.98 | % | |||
| Ratios to | |||||||
| Average Net Assets | |||||||
| Net Investment | |||||||
| NXQ | Expense | (b) | Income (Loss | ) | |||
| Year Ended 3/31: | |||||||
| 2015 | 0.40 | % | 4.01 | % | |||
| (e) | For the six months ended September 30, 2017. |
| * | Rounds to less than 0.01%. |
| ** | Annualized. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
NUVEEN
|
59
|
Financial Highlights (Unaudited) (continued)
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period:
| Investment Operations | Less Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Premium | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net | Net | From | From | Sold | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment | Realized/ | Net | Accumulated | through | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | Income | Unrealized | Investment | Net Realized | Shelf | Ending | Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAV | (Loss | ) | Gain (Loss | ) | Total | Income | Gains | Total | Offering | NAV | Price | ||||||||||||||||||||
| NXR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended 3/31: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018(e) | $ | 15.29 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.71 | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | — | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | — | $ | 15.74 | $ | 15.18 | |||||||||
| 2017 | 15.76 | 0.57 | (0.51 | ) | 0.06 | (0.53 | ) | — | (0.53 | ) | — | 15.29 | 14.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 15.34 | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.98 | (0.56 | ) | — | (0.56 | ) | — | 15.76 | 14.89 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 14.46 | 0.60 | 0.89 | 1.49 | (0.61 | ) | — | (0.61 | ) | — | 15.34 | 14.78 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 14.94 | 0.64 | (0.49 | ) | 0.15 | (0.63 | ) | — | (0.63 | ) | — | 14.46 | 13.67 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 14.43 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 1.17 | (0.66 | ) | — | (0.66 | ) | — | 14.94 | 14.48 | |||||||||||||||||||
| NXC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended 3/31: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018(e) | 15.00 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.64 | (0.30 | ) | — | (0.30 | ) | —* | 15.34 | 15.58 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 15.68 | 0.60 | (0.56 | ) | 0.04 | (0.62 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.72 | ) | — | 15.00 | 14.83 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 15.52 | 0.64 | 0.19 | 0.83 | (0.65 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.67 | ) | — | 15.68 | 16.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 14.83 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 1.48 | (0.68 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.79 | ) | — | 15.52 | 15.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 15.72 | 0.67 | (0.63 | ) | 0.04 | (0.68 | ) | (0.25 | ) | (0.93 | ) | — | 14.83 | 14.25 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 15.07 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 1.33 | (0.68 | ) | — | (0.68 | ) | — | 15.72 | 15.07 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Total Return Based on NAV is the combination of changes in NAV, reinvested dividend income at NAV and reinvested capital gains distributions at NAV, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending NAV. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its NAV), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
| Total Return Based on Share Price is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
|
60
|
NUVEEN
|
| Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total Returns | Ratios to Average Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
| Based | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||
| Based | on | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||
| on | Share | Assets | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| NAV | (a) | Price | (a) | (000 | ) | Expenses | (b) | Income (Loss | ) | Rate | (c) | ||||||||
| 4.68 | % | 8.72 | % | $ | 205,394 | 0.33 | %** | 3.62 | %** | 11 | % | ||||||||
| 0.37 | (1.09 | ) | 199,496 | 0.33 | 3.61 | 29 | |||||||||||||
| 6.56 | 4.76 | 205,595 | 0.34 | 3.81 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
| 10.46 | 12.87 | 200,153 | 0.38 | (d) | 3.99 | (d) | 21 | ||||||||||||
| 1.18 | (1.02 | ) | 188,653 | 0.35 | 4.51 | 30 | |||||||||||||
| 8.20 | 5.54 | 194,920 | 0.33 | 4.45 | 28 | ||||||||||||||
| 4.26 | 7.10 | 97,038 | 0.37 | ** | 3.80 | ** | 11 | ||||||||||||
| 0.20 | (6.98 | ) | 94,310 | 0.37 | 3.89 | 24 | |||||||||||||
| 5.51 | 13.25 | 98,494 | 0.37 | 4.18 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
| 10.20 | 13.84 | 97,421 | 0.37 | 4.30 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| 0.50 | 1.07 | 93,011 | 0.38 | 4.55 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| 8.98 | 6.43 | 98,595 | 0.37 | 4.44 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| (b) | The expense ratios reflect, among other things, the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund (as described in Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities), where applicable, as follows: |
| NXR | ||
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||
| 2018(e) | — | % |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | — | |
| 2013 | — |
| NXC |
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||
| 2018(e) | — | % |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | 0.01 | |
| 2013 | 0.01 |
| (c) | Portfolio Turnover Rate is calculated based on the lesser of long-term purchases or sales (as disclosed in Note 5 – Investment Transactions) divided by the average long-term market value during the period. |
| (d) | During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, the Adviser voluntarily reimbursed the Fund for certain expenses incurred in connection with an equity shelf program. As a result, the Expenses and Net Investment Income (Loss) Ratios to Average Net Assets reflect this voluntary expense reimbursement. The Expenses and Net Investment Income (Loss) Ratios to Average Net Assets excluding this expense reimbursement from Adviser are as follows: |
| Ratios to | |||||||
| Average Net Assets | |||||||
| Net Investment | |||||||
| NXR | Expenses | (b) | Income (Loss | ) | |||
| Year Ended 3/31: | |||||||
| 2015 | 0.42 | % | 3.96 | % | |||
| (e) | For the six months ended September 30, 2017. |
| * | Rounds to less than 0.01%. |
| ** | Annualized. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
NUVEEN
|
61
|
Financial Highlights (Unaudited) (continued)
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period:
| Investment Operations | Less Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net | Net | From | From | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment | Realized/ | Net | Accumulated | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | Income | Unrealized | Investment | Net Realized | Ending | Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAV | (Loss | ) | Gain (Loss | ) | Total | Income | Gains | Total | NAV | Price | ||||||||||||||||||
| NXN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018(d) | $ | 14.04 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.47 | $ | (0.28 | ) | $ | — | $ | (0.28 | ) | $ | 14.23 | $ | 14.01 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 14.53 | 0.55 | (0.49 | ) | 0.06 | (0.55 | ) | — | (0.55 | ) | 14.04 | 13.69 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 14.52 | 0.57 | (0.01 | ) | 0.56 | (0.55 | ) | — | (0.55 | ) | 14.53 | 14.06 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 13.95 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 1.14 | (0.57 | ) | — | (0.57 | ) | 14.52 | 14.13 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 14.70 | 0.60 | (0.72 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.63 | ) | — | * | (0.63 | ) | 13.95 | 13.41 | ||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 14.59 | 0.63 | 0.19 | 0.82 | (0.65 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.71 | ) | 14.70 | 14.87 | ||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Total Return Based on NAV is the combination of changes in NAV, reinvested dividend income at NAV and reinvested capital gains distributions at NAV, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending NAV. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its NAV), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
| Total Return Based on Share Price is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized. |
|
62
|
NUVEEN
|
| Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total Returns | Ratios to Average Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
| Based | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||
| Based | on | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||
| on | Share | Assets | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||
| NAV | (a) | Price | (a) | (000 | ) | Expenses | (b) | Income (Loss | ) | Rate | (c) | ||||||||
| 3.34 | % | 4.37 | % | $ | 55,860 | 0.43 | %** | 3.68 | %** | 18 | % | ||||||||
| 0.40 | 1.26 | 55,120 | 0.44 | 3.83 | 29 | ||||||||||||||
| 3.98 | 3.63 | 57,031 | 0.42 | 3.97 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
| 8.31 | 9.84 | 56,988 | 0.43 | 3.92 | 16 | ||||||||||||||
| (0.69 | ) | (5.46 | ) | 54,751 | 0.43 | 4.35 | 26 | ||||||||||||
| 5.66 | 10.60 | 57,684 | 0.39 | 4.27 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
| (b) | The expense ratios reflect, among other things, the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund (as described in Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities), where applicable, as follows: |
| NXN | ||||
| Year Ended 3/31: | ||||
| 2018(d) | 0.03 | %** | ||
| 2017 | 0.02 | |||
| 2016 | 0.01 | |||
| 2015 | 0.01 | |||
| 2014 | 0.01 | |||
| 2013 | 0.01 |
| (c) | Portfolio Turnover Rate is calculated based on the lesser of long-term purchases or sales (as disclosed in Note 5 – Investment Transactions) divided by the average long-term market value during the period. |
| (d) | For the six months ended September 30, 2017. |
| * | Rounds to less than $0.01 per share. |
| ** | Annualized. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
NUVEEN
|
63
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. General Information and Significant Accounting Policies
General Information
Fund Information
The funds covered in this report and their corresponding New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) symbols are as follows (each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”):
| • | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) | |
| • | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2 (NXQ) | |
| • | Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3 (NXR) | |
| • | Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXC) | |
| • | Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXN) |
The Funds are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as diversified closed-end management investment companies. NXP, NXQ, NXR, NXC, and NXN were organized as Massachusetts business trusts on January 29, 1992, March 30, 1992, May 28, 1992, March 30, 1992, and March 30, 1992, respectively.
The end of the reporting period for the Funds is September 30, 2017, and the period covered by these Notes to Financial Statements is the six months ended September 30, 2017 (the “current fiscal period”).
Investment Adviser
The Funds’ investment adviser is Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen, LLC (“Nuveen”). Nuveen is the investment management arm of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA). The Adviser has overall responsibility for management of the Funds, oversees the management of the Funds’ portfolios, manages the Funds’ business affairs and provides certain clerical, bookkeeping and other administrative services, and, if necessary, asset allocation decisions. The Adviser has entered into sub-advisory agreements with Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, (the “Sub-Adviser”), a subsidiary of the Adviser, under which the Sub-Adviser manages the investment portfolios of the Funds.
Investment Objectives and Principal Investment Strategies
Each Fund seeks to provide current income and stable dividends, exempt from regular federal and designated state income taxes, where applicable, consistent with the preservation of capital by investing primarily in a portfolio of municipal obligations.
Significant Accounting Policies
Each Fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 946 “Financial Services – Investment Companies.” The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
Investment Transactions
Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are determined on the specific identification method, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Investments purchased on a when-issued/delayed delivery basis may have extended settlement periods. Any investments so purchased are subject to market fluctuation during this period. The Funds have earmarked securities in their portfolios with a current value at least equal to the amount of the when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments.
As of the end of the reporting period, the Funds did not have any outstanding when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments.
Investment Income
Investment income is comprised of interest income, which reflects the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts for financial reporting purposes, and is recorded on an accrual basis. Investment income also reflects payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest and paydown gains and losses, if any. PIK interest represents income received in the form of securities in lieu of cash.
|
64
|
NUVEEN
|
Professional Fees
Professional fees presented on the Statement of Operations consist of legal fees incurred in the normal course of operations, audit fees, tax consulting fees and, in some cases, workout expenditures. Workout expenditures are incurred in an attempt to protect or enhance an investment or to pursue other claims or legal actions on behalf of Fund shareholders. If a refund is received for workout expenditures paid in a prior reporting period, such amounts will be recognized as “Legal fee refund” on the Statement of Operations.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders
Dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared monthly. Net realized capital gains and/or market discount from investment transactions, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually. Furthermore, capital gains are distributed only to the extent they exceed available capital loss carryforwards.
Distributions to shareholders of net investment income, net realized capital gains and/or market discount, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
Compensation
The Funds pay no compensation directly to those of its trustees who are affiliated with the Adviser or to its officers, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the Funds from the Adviser or its affiliates. The Funds’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has adopted a deferred compensation plan for independent trustees that enables trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from certain Nuveen-advised funds. Under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of select Nuveen-advised funds.
Indemnifications
Under the Funds’ organizational documents, their officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expect the risk of loss to be remote.
Netting Agreements
In the ordinary course of business, the Funds may enter into transactions subject to enforceable International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) master agreements or other similar arrangements (“netting agreements”). Generally, the right to offset in netting agreements allows each Fund to offset certain securities and derivatives with a specific counterparty, when applicable, as well as any collateral received or delivered to that counterparty based on the terms of the agreements. Generally, each Fund manages its cash collateral and securities collateral on a counterparty basis.
The Funds’ investments subject to netting agreements as of the end of the reporting period, if any, are further described in Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the current fiscal period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
2. Investment Valuation and Fair Value Measurements
The fair valuation input levels as described below are for fair value measurement purposes.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon selling an investment or transferring a liability in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment. A three-tier hierarchy is used to maximize the use of observable market data and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best information available in the circumstances. The following is a summary of the three-tiered hierarchy of valuation input levels.
| Level 1 – | Inputs are unadjusted and prices are determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. | |
| Level 2 – | Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). | |
| Level 3 – | Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs (including management’s assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
|
NUVEEN
|
65
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
Prices of fixed income securities are provided by an independent pricing service (“pricing service”) approved by the Board. The pricing service establishes a security’s fair value using methods that may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. These securities are generally classified as Level 2. In pricing certain securities, particularly less liquid and lower quality securities, the pricing service may consider information about a security, its issuer or market activity, provided by the Adviser. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs.
Certain securities may not be able to be priced by the pre-established pricing methods as described above. Such securities may be valued by the Board and/or its appointee at fair value. These securities generally include, but are not limited to, restricted securities (securities which may not be publicly sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) for which a pricing service is unable to provide a market price; securities whose trading has been formally suspended; debt securities that have gone into default and for which there is no current market quotation; a security whose market price is not available from a pre-established pricing source; a security with respect to which an event has occurred that is likely to materially affect the value of the security after the market has closed but before the calculation of a Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) (as may be the case in non-U.S. markets on which the security is primarily traded) or make it difficult or impossible to obtain a reliable market quotation; and a security whose price, as provided by the pricing service, is not deemed to reflect the security’s fair value. As a general principle, the fair value of a security would appear to be the amount that the owner might reasonably expect to receive for it in a current sale. A variety of factors may be considered in determining the fair value of such securities, which may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs. Regardless of the method employed to value a particular security, all valuations are subject to review by the Board and/or its appointee.
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. The following is a summary of each Fund’s fair value measurements as of the end of the reporting period:
| NXP | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
| Long-Term Investments: | |||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds* | $ | — | $ | 244,648,953 | $ | — | $ | 244,648,953 | |||||
| Corporate Bonds** | — | — | 158,761 | *** | 158,761 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 244,648,953 | $ | 158,761 | $ | 244,807,714 | |||||
| NXQ | |||||||||||||
| Long-Term Investments: | |||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds* | $ | — | $ | 256,744,655 | $ | — | $ | 256,744,655 | |||||
| Corporate Bonds** | — | — | 248,309 | *** | 248,309 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 256,744,655 | $ | 248,309 | $ | 256,992,964 | |||||
| NXR | |||||||||||||
| Long-Term Investments: | |||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds* | $ | — | $ | 201,700,514 | $ | — | $ | 201,700,514 | |||||
| Corporate Bonds** | — | — | 69,969 | *** | 69,969 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 201,700,514 | $ | 69,969 | $ | 201,770,483 | |||||
| NXC | |||||||||||||
| Long-Term Investments**: | |||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 94,448,275 | $ | — | $ | 94,448,275 | |||||
| Short-Term Investments**: | |||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds | — | 2,000,000 | — | 2,000,000 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 96,448,275 | $ | — | $ | 96,448,275 | |||||
| NXN | |||||||||||||
| Long-Term Investments**: | |||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds | $ | — | $ | 55,267,325 | $ | — | $ | 55,267,325 |
| * | Refer to the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments for state classifications. |
| ** | Refer to the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments for industry classifications. |
| *** | Refer to the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments for securities classified as Level 3. |
|
66
|
NUVEEN
|
The Board is responsible for the valuation process and has appointed the oversight of the daily valuation process to the Adviser’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee, pursuant to the valuation policies and procedures adopted by the Board, is responsible for making fair value determinations, evaluating the effectiveness of the Funds’ pricing policies and reporting to the Board. The Valuation Committee is aided in its efforts by the Adviser’s dedicated Securities Valuation Team, which is responsible for administering the daily valuation process and applying fair value methodologies as approved by the Valuation Committee. When determining the reliability of independent pricing services for investments owned by the Funds, the Valuation Committee, among other things, conducts due diligence reviews of the pricing services and monitors the quality of security prices received through various testing reports conducted by the Securities Valuation Team.
The Valuation Committee will consider pricing methodologies it deems relevant and appropriate when making a fair value determination, based on the facts and circumstances specific to the portfolio instrument. Fair value determinations generally will be derived as follows, using public or private market information:
| (i) | If available, fair value determinations shall be derived by extrapolating from recent transactions or quoted prices for identical or comparable securities. | |
| (ii) | If such information is not available, an analytical valuation methodology may be used based on other available information including, but not limited to: analyst appraisals, research reports, corporate action information, issuer financial statements and shelf registration statements. Such analytical valuation methodologies may include, but are not limited to: multiple of earnings, discount from market value of a similar freely-traded security, discounted cash flow analysis, book value or a multiple thereof, risk premium/yield analysis, yield to maturity and/or fundamental investment analysis. |
The purchase price of a portfolio instrument will be used to fair value the instrument only if no other valuation methodology is available or deemed appropriate, and it is determined that the purchase price fairly reflects the instrument’s current value.
For each portfolio security that has been fair valued pursuant to the policies adopted by the Board, the fair value price is compared against the last available and next available market quotations. The Valuation Committee reviews the results of such testing and fair valuation occurrences are reported to the Board.
3. Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives
Portfolio Securities
Inverse Floating Rate Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in inverse floating rate securities. An inverse floating rate security is created by depositing a municipal bond (referred to as an “Underlying Bond”), typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose tender option bond (“TOB”) trust (referred to as the “TOB Trust”) created by or at the direction of one or more Funds. In turn, the TOB Trust issues (a) floating rate certificates (referred to as “Floaters”), in face amounts equal to some fraction of the Underlying Bond’s par amount or market value, and (b) an inverse floating rate certificate (referred to as an “Inverse Floater”) that represents all remaining or residual interest in the TOB Trust. Floaters typically pay short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties who are also provided a right to tender their certificate and receive its par value, which may be paid from the proceeds of a remarketing of the Floaters, by a loan to the TOB Trust from a third party liquidity provider (“Liquidity Provider”), or by the sale of assets from the TOB Trust. The Inverse Floater is issued to a long term investor, such as one or more of the Funds. The income received by the Inverse Floater holder varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to holders of the Floaters, and in most circumstances the Inverse Floater holder bears substantially all of the Underlying Bond’s downside investment risk and also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the Underlying Bond’s value. The value of an Inverse Floater will be more volatile than that of the Underlying Bond because the interest rate is dependent on not only the fixed coupon rate of the Underlying Bond but also on the short-term interest paid on the Floaters, and because the Inverse Floater essentially bears the risk of loss (and possible gain) of the greater face value of the Underlying Bond.
The Inverse Floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right to (a) cause the holders of the Floaters to tender their certificates at par (or slightly more than par in certain circumstances), and (b) have the trustee of the TOB Trust (the “Trustee”) transfer the Underlying Bond held by the TOB Trust to the Fund, thereby collapsing the TOB Trust.
The Fund may acquire an Inverse Floater in a transaction where it (a) transfers an Underlying Bond that it owns to a TOB Trust created by a third party or (b) transfers an Underlying Bond that it owns, or that it has purchased in a secondary market transaction for the purpose of creating an Inverse Floater, to a TOB Trust created at its direction, and in return receives the Inverse Floater of the TOB Trust (referred to as a “self-deposited Inverse Floater”). A Fund may also purchase an Inverse Floater in a secondary market transaction from a third party creator of the TOB Trust without first owning the Underlying Bond (referred to as an “externally-deposited Inverse Floater”).
An investment in a self-deposited Inverse Floater is accounted for as a “financing” transaction (i.e., a secured borrowing). For a self-deposited Inverse Floater, the Underlying Bond deposited into the TOB Trust is identified in the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments as “(UB) – Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction,” with the Fund recognizing as liabilities, labeled “Floating rate obligations” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, (a) the liquidation value of Floaters issued by the TOB Trust, and (b) the amount of any borrowings by the TOB Trust from a
|
NUVEEN
|
67
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
Liquidity Provider to enable the TOB Trust to purchase outstanding Floaters in lieu of a remarketing. In addition, the Fund recognizes in “Investment Income” the entire earnings of the Underlying Bond, and recognizes (a) the interest paid to the holders of the Floaters or on the TOB Trust’s borrowings, and (b) other expenses related to remarketing, administration, trustee, liquidity and other services to a TOB Trust, as a component of “Interest expense” on the Statement of Operations.
In contrast, an investment in an externally-deposited Inverse Floater is accounted for as a purchase of the Inverse Floater and is identified in the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments as “(IF) – Inverse floating rate investment.” For an externally-deposited Inverse Floater, a Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities recognizes the Inverse Floater and not the Underlying Bond as an asset, and the Fund does not recognize the Floaters, or any related borrowings from a Liquidity Provider, as a liability. Additionally, the Fund reflects in “Investment Income” only the net amount of earnings on the Inverse Floater (net of the interest paid to the holders of the Floaters or the Liquidity Provider as lender, and the expenses of the Trust), and does not show the amount of that interest paid or the expenses of the TOB Trust as described above as interest expense on the Statement of Operations.
Fees paid upon the creation of a TOB Trust for self-deposited Inverse Floaters and externally-deposited Inverse Floaters are recognized as part of the cost basis of the Inverse Floater and are capitalized over the term of the TOB Trust.
As of the end of the reporting period, the aggregate value of Floaters issued by each Fund’s TOB Trust for self-deposited Inverse Floaters and externally-deposited Inverse Floaters was as follows:
| Floating Rate Obligations Outstanding | NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | |||||||||||
| Floating rate obligations: self-deposited Inverse Floaters | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,005,000 | ||||||
| Floating rate obligations: externally-deposited Inverse Floaters | 2,250,000 | 3,750,000 | — | — | 1,890,000 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,250,000 | $ | 3,750,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,895,000 |
During the current fiscal period, the average amount of Floaters (including any borrowings from a Liquidity Provider) outstanding, and the average annual interest rate and fees related to self-deposited Inverse Floaters, were as follows:
| Self-Deposited Inverse Floaters | NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | |||||||||||
| Average floating rate obligations outstanding | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,005,000 | ||||||
| Average annual interest rate and fees | — | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | 1.42 | % |
TOB Trusts are supported by a liquidity facility provided by a Liquidity Provider pursuant to which the Liquidity Provider agrees, in the event that Floaters are (a) tendered to the Trustee for remarketing and the remarketing does not occur, or (b) subject to mandatory tender pursuant to the terms of the TOB Trust agreement, to either purchase Floaters or to provide the Trustee with an advance from a loan facility to fund the purchase of Floaters by the TOB Trust. In certain circumstances, the Liquidity Provider may otherwise elect to have the Trustee sell the Underlying Bond to retire the Floaters that were tendered and not remarketed prior to providing such a loan. In these circumstances, the Liquidity Provider remains obligated to provide a loan to the extent that the proceeds of the sale of the Underlying Bond is not sufficient to pay the purchase price of the Floaters.
The size of the commitment under the loan facility for a given TOB Trust is at least equal to the balance of that TOB Trust’s outstanding Floaters plus any accrued interest. In consideration of the loan facility, fee schedules are in place and are charged by the Liquidity Provider(s). Any loans made by the Liquidity Provider will be secured by the purchased Floaters held by the TOB Trust. Interest paid on any outstanding loan balances will be effectively borne by the Fund that owns the Inverse Floaters of the TOB Trust that has incurred the borrowing and may be at a rate that is greater than the rate that would have been paid had the Floaters been successfully remarketed.
As described above, any amounts outstanding under a liquidity facility are recognized as a component of “Floating rate obligations” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities by the Fund holding the corresponding Inverse Floaters issued by the borrowing TOB Trust. As of the end of the reporting period, there were no loans outstanding under any such facility.
Each Fund may also enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements (sometimes referred to as a “recourse arrangement”) (TOB Trusts involving such agreements are referred to herein as “Recourse Trusts”), under which a Fund agrees to reimburse the Liquidity Provider for the Trust’s Floaters, in certain circumstances, for the amount (if any) by which the liquidation value of the Underlying Bond held by the TOB Trust may fall short of the sum of the liquidation value of the Floaters issued by the TOB Trust plus any amounts borrowed by the TOB Trust from the Liquidity Provider, plus any shortfalls in interest cash flows. Under these agreements, a Fund’s potential exposure to losses related to or on an Inverse Floater may increase beyond the value of the Inverse Floater as a Fund may potentially be liable to fulfill all amounts owed to holders of the Floaters or the Liquidity Provider. Any such shortfall amount in the aggregate is recognized as “Unrealized depreciation on Recourse Trusts” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
|
68
|
NUVEEN
|
As of the end of the reporting period, each Fund’s maximum exposure to the Floaters issued by Recourse Trusts for self-deposited Inverse Floaters and externally-deposited Inverse Floaters was as follows:
| Floating Rate Obligations – Recourse Trusts | NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | |||||||||||
| Maximum exposure to Recourse Trusts: self-deposited Inverse Floaters | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 425,000 | ||||||
| Maximum exposure to Recourse Trusts: externally-deposited Inverse Floaters | 2,250,000 | 3,750,000 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,250,000 | $ | 3,750,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 425,000 |
Zero Coupon Securities
A zero coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the security. Income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the security at issuance and the par value of the security at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the market prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
Investments in Derivatives
In addition to the inverse floating rate securities in which each Fund may invest, which are considered portfolio securities for financial reporting purposes, each Fund is authorized to invest in certain other derivative instruments such as futures, options and swap contracts. Each Fund limits its investments in futures, options on futures and swap contracts to the extent necessary for the Adviser to claim the exclusion from registration by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a commodity pool operator with respect to the Fund. The Funds record derivative instruments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized on the Statement of Operations, when applicable. Even though the Funds’ investments in derivatives may represent economic hedges, they are not considered to be hedge transactions for financial reporting purposes.
Although the Funds are authorized to invest in derivative instruments and may do so in the future, they did not make any such investments during the current fiscal period.
Market and Counterparty Credit Risk
In the normal course of business each Fund may invest in financial instruments and enter into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the other party to the transaction to perform (counterparty credit risk). The potential loss could exceed the value of the financial assets recorded on the financial statements. Financial assets, which potentially expose each Fund to counterparty credit risk, consist principally of cash due from counterparties on forward, option and swap transactions, when applicable. The extent of each Fund’s exposure to counterparty credit risk in respect to these financial assets approximates their carrying value as recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Each Fund helps manage counterparty credit risk by entering into agreements only with counterparties the Adviser believes have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by having the Adviser monitor the financial stability of the counterparties. Additionally, counterparties may be required to pledge collateral daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) on behalf of each Fund with a value approximately equal to the amount of any unrealized gain above a pre-determined threshold. Reciprocally, when each Fund has an unrealized loss, the Funds have instructed the custodian to pledge assets of the Funds as collateral with a value approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss above a pre-determined threshold. Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if and when the valuations fluctuate, either up or down, by at least the pre-determined threshold amount.
4. Fund Shares
Shares Equity Shelf Program and Offering Costs
NXC has filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) authorizing the Fund to issue additional shares through one or more equity shelf programs (“Shelf Offering”), which became effective with the SEC during the current fiscal period.
Under this Shelf Offering, the Fund, subject to market conditions, may raise additional equity capital by issuing additional shares from time to time in varying amounts and by different offering methods at a net price at or above the Fund’s NAV per share. In the event the Fund’s Shelf Offering registration statement is no longer current, the Fund may not issue additional shares until a post-effective amendment to the registration statement has been filed with the SEC.
Additional authorized shares, shares sold and offering proceeds, net of offering costs under the Fund’s Shelf Offering during the Fund’s current fiscal period were as follows:
| NXC | ||||
| Six Months | ||||
| Ended | ||||
| 9/30/17 | * | |||
| Additional authorized shares | 600,000 | |||
| Shares sold | 36,052 | |||
| Offering proceeds, net of offering costs | $ | 562,329 | ||
| * | Represents additional authorized shares for the period August 16, 2017 through September 30, 2017. |
|
NUVEEN
|
69
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
Costs incurred by the Fund in connection with its Shelf Offering were recorded as a deferred charge and recognized as a component of “Deferred offering costs” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The deferred asset is reduced during the one-year period that additional shares are sold by reducing the proceeds from such sales and recognized as a component of “Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs” on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets. Any remaining deferred charges at the end of the one-year life of the Shelf Offering period will be expensed accordingly, as well as any additional Shelf Offering costs the Fund may incur. As Shelf Offering costs are expensed they are recognized as a component of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations.
Shares Transactions
Transactions in shares during the Funds’ current and prior fiscal period, where applicable, were as follows:
| NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Six Months | Year | Six Months | Year | ||||||||||
| Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||
| 9/30/17 | 3/31/17 | 9/30/17 | 3/31/17 | ||||||||||
| Shares: | |||||||||||||
| Issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions | 2,637 | 5,403 | — | 919 | |||||||||
| Sold through shelf offering | 36,052 | — | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
| Weighted average share: | |||||||||||||
| Premium to NAV per shelf offering share sold | 2.44 | % | — | % | N/A | N/A | |||||||
N/A – The Fund is not authorized to issue additional common shares through a shelf offering.
5. Investment Transactions
Long-term purchases and sales (including maturities) during the current fiscal period were as follows:
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Purchases | $ | 29,948,877 | $ | 28,944,114 | $ | 21,434,779 | $ | 10,490,809 | $ | 4,425,282 | ||||||
| Sales and maturities | 34,970,720 | 30,276,090 | 21,382,312 | 10,273,048 | 5,410,000 |
6. Income Tax Information
Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net capital gains to shareholders and to otherwise comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. Furthermore, each Fund intends to satisfy conditions that will enable interest from municipal securities, which is exempt from regular federal and designated state income taxes, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to shareholders of the Funds. Net realized capital gains and ordinary income distributions paid by the Funds are subject to federal taxation.
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions, management of the Funds has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are those that are open for examination by taxing authorities (i.e., generally the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then). Furthermore, management of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
The following information is presented on an income tax basis. Differences between amounts for financial statement and federal income tax purposes are primarily due to timing differences in recognizing taxable market discount, timing differences in recognizing certain gains and losses on investment transactions and the treatment of investments in inverse floating rate securities reflected as financing transactions, if any. To the extent that differences arise that are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts as detailed below. Temporary differences do not require reclassification. Temporary and permanent differences do not impact the NAVs of the Funds.
The table below presents the cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of each Fund’s investment portfolio, as determined on a federal income tax basis, as of September 30, 2017.
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Tax cost of investments | $ | 214,417,167 | $ | 230,383,268 | $ | 172,883,707 | $ | 87,807,386 | $ | 51,058,161 | ||||||
| Gross unrealized: | ||||||||||||||||
| Appreciation | $ | 30,885,848 | $ | 27,129,956 | $ | 29,349,727 | $ | 8,722,889 | $ | 3,268,388 | ||||||
| Depreciation | (495,301 | ) | (520,260 | ) | (462,951 | ) | (82,000 | ) | (63,081 | ) | ||||||
| Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $ | 30,390,547 | $ | 26,609,696 | $ | 28,886,776 | $ | 8,640,889 | $ | 3,205,307 |
|
70
|
NUVEEN
|
Permanent differences, primarily due to distribution reallocations, taxable market discount and expiration of capital loss carryforwards, resulted in reclassifications among the Funds’ components of net assets as of March 31, 2017, the Funds’ last tax year end, as follows:
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Paid-in-surplus | $ | — | $ | (400,800 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
| Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income | (221,043 | ) | (56,280 | ) | (197,428 | ) | (599 | ) | — | |||||||
| Accumulated net realized gain (loss) | 221,043 | 457,080 | 197,428 | 599 | — | |||||||||||
The tax components of undistributed net tax-exempt income, net ordinary income and net long-term capital gains as of March 31, 2017, the Funds’ last tax year end, were as follows:
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Undistributed net tax-exempt income1 | $ | 625,380 | $ | 308,946 | $ | 169,981 | $ | 138,755 | $ | 192,842 | ||||||
| Undistributed net ordinary income2 | 17,756 | 18,511 | 4,470 | — | 3,188 | |||||||||||
| Undistributed net long-term capital gains | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1 | Undistributed net tax-exempt income (on a tax basis) has not been reduced for the dividend declared on March 1, 2017, paid on April 3, 2017. |
| 2 | Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any. |
The tax character of distributions paid during the Funds’ last tax year ended March 31, 2017 was designated for purposes of the dividends paid deduction as follows:
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Distributions from net tax-exempt income | $ | 9,047,389 | $ | 9,186,869 | $ | 6,966,329 | $ | 3,903,057 | $ | 2,166,287 | ||||||
| Distributions from net ordinary income2 | 71,252 | 6,556 | 14,350 | — | — | |||||||||||
| Distributions from net long-term capital gains | — | — | — | 615,450 | — |
| 2 | Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any. |
As of March 31, 2017, the Funds’ last tax year end, the following Funds had unused capital loss carryforwards available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future capital gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will expire as shown in the following table. The losses not subject to expiration will be utilized first by a Fund.
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXN | ||||||||||
| Expiration: March 31, 2019 | $ | — | $ | 335,742 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
| Not subject to expiration | 6,017,453 | 10,432,099 | 3,493,505 | 1,311,188 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 6,017,453 | $ | 10,767,841 | $ | 3,493,505 | $ | 1,311,188 |
During the Funds’ last tax year ended, March 31, 2017, the following Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards as follows:
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | ||||||||
| Utilized capital loss carryforwards | $ | 1,246,830 | $ | 73,284 | $ | 136,618 |
As of March 31, 2017, the Funds’ last tax year end, $400,800, of NXQ capital loss carryforward expired.
The Funds have elected to defer late-year losses in accordance with federal income tax rules. These losses are treated as having arisen on the first day of the current fiscal year. The following Fund has elected to defer losses as follows:
| NXC | ||||
| Post-October capital losses3 | $ | 611,697 | ||
| Late-year ordinary losses4 | — |
| 3 | Capital losses incurred from November 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017, the Funds’ last tax year end. |
| 4 | Ordinary losses incurred from January 1, 2017 through March 31, 2017 and/or specified losses incurred from November 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017. |
|
NUVEEN
|
71
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
7. Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Management Fees
Each Fund’s management fee compensates the Adviser for overall investment advisory and administrative services and general office facilities. The Sub-Adviser is compensated for its services to the Funds from the management fees paid to the Adviser.
Each Fund’s management fee consists of two components – a fund-level fee, based only on the amount of assets within each individual Fund, and a complex-level fee, based on the aggregate amount of all eligible fund assets managed by the Adviser. This pricing structure enables Fund shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within their respective Fund as well as from growth in the amount of complex-wide assets managed by the Adviser.
The annual Fund-level fee, payable monthly, for NXP, is calculated according to the following schedule:
| NXP | ||||
| Average Daily Net Assets* | Fund-Level Fee | |||
| For the first $125 million | 0.0500 | % | ||
| For the next $125 million | 0.0375 | |||
| For the next $250 million | 0.0250 | |||
| For the next $500 million | 0.0125 | |||
The annual Fund-level fee, payable monthly, for each Fund (excluding NXP) is calculated according to the following schedule:
| NXQ | ||||
| NXR | ||||
| NXC | ||||
| NXN | ||||
| Average Daily Net Assets* | Fund-Level Fee | |||
| For the first $125 million | 0.1000 | % | ||
| For the next $125 million | 0.0875 | |||
| For the next $250 million | 0.0750 | |||
| For the next $500 million | 0.0625 | |||
| For the next $1 billion | 0.0500 | |||
| For the next $3 billion | 0.0250 | |||
| For managed assets over $5 billion | 0.0125 | |||
The annual complex-level fee, payable monthly, for each Fund is calculated by multiplying the current complex-wide fee rate, determined according to the following schedule by the Fund’s daily net assets:
| Complex-Level Managed Asset Breakpoint Level* | Effective Rate at Breakpoint Level | |
| $55 billion | 0.2000 | % |
| $56 billion | 0.1996 | |
| $57 billion | 0.1989 | |
| $60 billion | 0.1961 | |
| $63 billion | 0.1931 | |
| $66 billion | 0.1900 | |
| $71 billion | 0.1851 | |
| $76 billion | 0.1806 | |
| $80 billion | 0.1773 | |
| $91 billion | 0.1691 | |
| $125 billion | 0.1599 | |
| $200 billion | 0.1505 | |
| $250 billion | 0.1469 | |
| $300 billion | 0.1445 | |
| * | For the complex-level fees, managed assets include closed-end fund assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to certain types of leverage. For these purposes, leverage includes the funds’ use of preferred stock and borrowings and certain investments in the residual interest certificates (also called inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB) trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that has been effectively financed by the trust’s issuance of floating rate securities, subject to an agreement by the Adviser as to certain funds to limit the amount of such assets for determining managed assets in certain circumstances. The complex-level fee is calculated based upon the aggregate daily managed assets of all Nuveen funds that constitute “eligible assets.” Eligible assets do not include assets attributable to investments in other Nuveen funds or assets in excess of a determined amount (orignally $2 billion) added to the Nuveen fund complex in connection with the Adviser’s assumption of the management of the former First American Funds effective January 1, 2011. As of September 30, 2017, the complex-level fee for each Fund was 0.1599%. |
|
72
|
NUVEEN
|
Other Transactions with Affiliates
Each Fund is permitted to purchase or sell securities from or to certain other funds managed by the Adviser (“inter-fund trade”) under specified conditions outlined in procedures adopted by the Board. These procedures have been designed to ensure that any inter-fund trade of securities by the Fund from or to another fund that is, or could be, considered an affiliate of the Fund under certain limited circumstances by virtue of having a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment adviser), common officer and/or common trustee complies with Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act. Further, as defined under these procedures, each inter-fund trade is effected at the current market price as provided by an independent pricing service. Unsettled inter-fund trades as of the end of the reporting period are recognized as a component of “Receivable for investments sold” and/or “Payable for investments purchased” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, when applicable.
During the current fiscal period, the Funds did not engage in inter-fund trades pursuant to these procedures.
8. Borrowing Arrangements
Uncommitted Line of Credit
During the current fiscal period, the Funds participated in an unsecured bank line of credit (“Unsecured Credit Line”) under which outstanding balances would bear interest at a variable rate. Although the Funds participated in the Unsecured Credit Line, they did not have any outstanding balances during the current fiscal period.
The Unsecured Credit Line was not renewed after its scheduled termination date on July 27, 2017.
Committed Line of Credit
The Funds, along with certain other funds managed by the Adviser (“Participating Funds”), have established a 364-day, approximately $3 billion standby credit facility with a group of lenders, under which the Participating Funds may borrow for various purposes other than leveraging for investment purposes. A large portion of this facility’s capacity (and its associated costs as described below) is currently dedicated for use by a small number of Participating Funds, which does not include any of the Funds covered by this shareholder report. The remaining capacity under the facility (and the corresponding portion of the facility’s annual costs) is separately dedicated to most of the other open-end funds in the Nuveen fund family, along with a number of Nuveen closed-end funds, including all of the Funds covered by this shareholder report. The credit facility expires in July 2018 unless extended or renewed.
The credit facility has the following terms: a fee of 0.15% per annum on unused commitment amounts, and interest at a rate equal to the higher of (a) one-month LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) plus 1.25% per annum or (b) the Fed Funds rate plus 1.25% per annum on amounts borrowed. Participating Funds paid administration, legal and arrangement fees, which are recognized as a component of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations, and along with commitment fees, have been allocated among such Participating Funds based upon the relative proportions of the facility’s aggregate capacity reserved for them and other factors deemed relevant by the Adviser and the Board of each Participating Fund.
During the current fiscal period, none of the Funds utilized this facility.
Inter-Fund Borrowing and Lending
The SEC has granted an exemptive order permitting registered open-end and closed-end Nuveen funds to participate in an inter-fund lending facility whereby the Nuveen funds may directly lend to and borrow money from each other for temporary purposes (e.g., to satisfy redemption requests or when a sale of securities “fails,” resulting in an unanticipated cash shortfall) (the “Inter-Fund Program”). The closed-end Nuveen funds, including the Funds covered by this shareholder report, will participate only as lenders, and not as borrowers, in the Inter-Fund Program because such closed-end funds rarely, if ever, need to borrow cash to meet redemptions. The Inter-Fund Program is subject to a number of conditions, including, among other things, the requirements that (1) no fund may borrow or lend money through the Inter-Fund Program unless it receives a more favorable interest rate than is typically available from a bank or other financial institution for a comparable transaction; (2) no fund may borrow on an unsecured basis through the Inter-Fund Program unless the fund’s outstanding borrowings from all sources immediately after the inter-fund borrowing total 10% or less of its total assets; provided that if the borrowing fund has a secured borrowing outstanding from any other lender, including but not limited to another fund, the inter-fund loan must be secured on at least an equal priority basis with at least an equivalent percentage of collateral to loan value; (3) if a fund’s total outstanding borrowings immediately after an inter-fund borrowing would be greater than 10% of its total assets, the fund may borrow through the inter-fund loan on a secured basis only; (4) no fund may lend money if the loan would cause its aggregate outstanding loans through the Inter-Fund Program to exceed 15% of its net assets at the time of the loan; (5) a fund’s inter-fund loans to any one fund shall not exceed 5% of the lending fund’s net assets; (6) the duration of inter-fund loans will be limited to the time required to receive payment for securities sold, but in no event more than seven days; and (7) each inter-fund loan may be called on one business day’s notice by a lending fund and may be repaid on any day by a borrowing fund. In addition, a Nuveen fund may participate in the Inter-Fund Program only if and to the extent that such participation is consistent with the fund’s investment objective and investment policies. The Board is responsible for overseeing the Inter-Fund Program.
|
NUVEEN
|
73
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) (continued)
The limitations detailed above and the other conditions of the SEC exemptive order permitting the Inter-Fund Program are designed to minimize the risks associated with Inter-Fund Program for both the lending fund and the borrowing fund. However, no borrowing or lending activity is without risk. When a fund borrows money from another fund, there is a risk that the loan could be called on one day’s notice or not renewed, in which case the fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher rate or take other actions to payoff such loan if an inter-fund loan is not available from another fund. Any delay in repayment to a lending fund could result in a lost investment opportunity or additional borrowing costs.
During May 2017, the Board approved the Nuveen funds participation in the Inter-Fund Program. During the current reporting period, none of the Funds covered by this shareholder report have entered into any inter-fund loan activity.
9. New Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-08 (“ASU 2017-08”) Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
During March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-08, which shortens the premium amortization period for purchased non-contingently callable debt securities. ASU 2017-08 specifies that the premium amortization period ends at the earliest call date, for purchased non-contingently callable debt securities. ASU 2017-08 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the implications of ASU 2017-08, if any.
|
74
|
NUVEEN
|
Additional Fund Information
| Board of Trustees | |||||||||
| Margo Cook* William J. Schneider |
Jack B. Evans Judith M. Stockdale |
William C. Hunter Carole E. Stone |
David J. Kundert Terence J. Toth |
Albin F. Moschner Margaret L. Wolff |
John K. Nelson Robert L. Young |
||||
| * Interested Board Member. | |||||||||
| Fund Manager | Custodian | Legal Counsel | Independent Registered | Transfer Agent and | ||||
| Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC 333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 |
State Street Bank & Trust Company One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 |
Chapman and Cutler LLP Chicago, IL 60603 |
Public Accounting Firm KPMG LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 60601 |
Shareholder Services Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 250 Royall Street Canton, MA 02021 |
Quarterly Form N-Q Portfolio of Investments Information
Each Fund is required to file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. You may obtain this information directly from the SEC. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov or in person at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call the SEC toll-free at (800) SEC-0330 for room hours and operation.
Nuveen Funds’ Proxy Voting Information
You may obtain (i) information regarding how each fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling Nuveen toll-free at (800) 257-8787 or on Nuveen’s website at www.nuveen.com and (ii) a description of the policies and procedures that each fund used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities without charge, upon request, by calling Nuveen toll free at (800) 257-8787. You may also obtain this information directly from the SEC. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov.
CEO Certification Disclosure
Each Fund’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the annual CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Each Fund has filed with the SEC the certification of its CEO and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Share Repurchases
Each Fund intends to repurchase, through its open-market share repurchase program, shares of its own common stock at such times and in such amounts as is deemed advisable. During the period covered by this report, each Fund repurchased shares of its common stock as shown in the accompanying table. Any future repurchases will be reported to shareholders in the next annual or semi-annual report.
| NXP | NXQ | NXR | NXC | NXN | ||||||||||||
| Shares repurchased | — | — | — | — | — |
FINRA BrokerCheck
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) provides information regarding the disciplinary history of FINRA member firms and associated investment professionals. This information as well as an investor brochure describing FINRA BrokerCheck is available to the public by calling the FINRA BrokerCheck Hotline number at (800) 289-9999 or by visiting www.FINRA.org.
|
NUVEEN
|
75
|
Glossary of Terms Used in this Report
| ■ | Auction Rate Bond: An auction rate bond is a security whose interest payments are adjusted periodically through an auction process, which process typically also serves as a means for buying and selling the bond. Auctions that fail to attract enough buyers for all the shares offered for sale are deemed to have “failed,” with current holders receiving a formula-based interest rate until the next scheduled auction. |
| ■ | Average Annual Total Return: This is a commonly used method to express an investment’s performance over a particular, usually multi-year time period. It expresses the return that would have been necessary each year to equal the investment’s actual cumulative performance (including change in NAV or market price and reinvested dividends and capital gains distributions, if any) over the time period being considered. |
| ■ | Duration: Duration is a measure of the expected period over which a bond’s principal and interest will be paid, and consequently is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond’s or bond fund’s value to changes when market interest rates change. Generally, the longer a bond’s or fund’s duration, the more the price of the bond or fund will change as interest rates change. |
| ■ | Effective Leverage: Effective leverage is a fund’s effective economic leverage, and includes both regulatory leverage (see leverage) and the leverage effects of certain derivative investments in the fund’s portfolio. Currently, the leverage effects of Tender Option Bond (TOB) inverse floater holdings are included in effective leverage values, in addition to any regulatory leverage. |
| ■ | Forward Interest Rate Swap: A contractual agreement between two counterparties under which one party agrees to make periodic payments to the other for an agreed period of time based on a fixed rate, while the other party agrees to make periodic payments based on a floating rate of interest based on an underlying index. Alternatively, both series of cashflows to be exchanged could be calculated using floating rates of interest but floating rates that are based upon different underlying indexes. |
| ■ | Industrial Development Revenue Bond (IDR): A unique type of revenue bond issued by a state or local government agency on behalf of a private sector company and intended to build or acquire factories or other heavy equipment and tools. |
| ■ | Inverse Floating Rate Securities: Inverse floating rate securities, also known as inverse floaters or tender option bonds (TOBs), are created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust. This trust, in turn, (a) issues floating rate certificates typically paying short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties in amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, and (b) issues an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) to an investor (such as a fund) interested in gaining investment exposure to a long-term municipal bond. The income received by the holder of the inverse floater varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating rate certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the holder of the inverse floater bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk. The holder of the inverse floater typically also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s value. Hence, an inverse floater essentially represents an investment in the underlying bond on a leveraged basis. |
| ■ | Leverage: Leverage is created whenever a fund has investment exposure (both reward and/or risk) equivalent to more than 100% of the investment capital. |
| ■ | Net Asset Value (NAV) Per Share: A fund’s Net Assets is equal to its total assets (securities, cash, accrued earnings and receivables) less its total liabilities. NAV per share is equal to the fund’s Net Assets divided by its number of shares outstanding. |
|
76
|
NUVEEN
|
| ■ | Pre-Refunding: Pre-Refunding, also known as advanced refundings or refinancings, is a procedure used by state and local governments to refinance municipal bonds to lower interest expenses. The issuer sells new bonds with a lower yield and uses the proceeds to buy U.S. Treasury securities, the interest from which is used to make payments on the higher-yielding bonds. Because of this collateral, pre-refunding generally raises a bond’s credit rating and thus its value. |
| ■ | Regulatory Leverage: Regulatory leverage consists of preferred shares issued by or borrowings of a fund. Both of these are part of a fund’s capital structure. Regulatory leverage is subject to asset coverage limits set in the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
| ■ | S&P Municipal Bond California Index: An unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment grade California municipal bond market. Index returns assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges or management fees. |
| ■ | S&P Municipal Bond Index: An unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment grade U.S. municipal bond market. Index returns assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges or management fees. |
| ■ | S&P Municipal Bond New York Index: An unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment grade New York municipal bond market. Index returns assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges or management fees. |
| ■ | Total Investment Exposure: Total investment exposure is a fund’s assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to financial leverage. For these purposes, financial leverage includes a fund’s use of preferred stock and borrowings and investments in the residual interest certificates (also called inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB) trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that has been effectively financed by the trust’s issuance of floating rate securities. |
| ■ | Zero Coupon Bond: A zero coupon bond does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the bond. Income to the holder of the bond comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the bond at issuance and the par value of the bond at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon bonds generally are more volatile than the market prices of bonds that pay interest periodically. |
|
NUVEEN
|
77
|
Reinvest Automatically, Easily and Conveniently
Nuveen makes reinvesting easy. A phone call is all it takes to set up your reinvestment account.
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Automatic Reinvestment Plan
Nuveen Closed-End Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest distributions in additional Fund shares. By choosing to reinvest, you’ll be able to invest money regularly and automatically, and watch your investment grow through the power of compounding. Just like distributions in cash, there may be times when income or capital gains taxes may be payable on distributions that are reinvested. It is important to note that an automatic reinvestment plan does not ensure a profit, nor does it protect you against loss in a declining market.
Easy and convenient
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each month you’ll receive a statement showing your total distributions, the date of investment, the shares acquired and the price per share, and the total number of shares you own.
How shares are purchased
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased on the open market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares are trading at or above net asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the greater of the net asset value or 95% of the then-current market price. If the shares are trading at less than net asset value, shares for your account will be purchased on the open market. If the Plan Agent begins purchasing Fund shares on the open market while shares are trading below net asset value, but the Fund’s shares subsequently trade at or above their net asset value before the Plan Agent is able to complete its purchases, the Plan Agent may cease open-market purchases and may invest the uninvested portion of the distribution in newly-issued Fund shares at a price equal to the greater of the shares’ net asset value or 95% of the shares’ market value on the last business day immediately prior to the purchase date. Distributions received to purchase shares in the open market will normally be invested shortly after the distribution payment date. No interest will be paid on distributions awaiting reinvestment. Because the market price of the shares may increase before purchases are completed, the average purchase price per share may exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the distribution had been paid in shares issued by the Fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable brokerage commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan participants. These commissions usually will be lower than those charged on individual transactions.
Flexible
You may change your distribution option or withdraw from the Plan at any time, should your needs or situation change. You can reinvest whether your shares are registered in your name, or in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. Ask your investment advisor if his or her firm will participate on your behalf. Participants whose shares are registered in the name of one firm may not be able to transfer the shares to another firm and continue to participate in the Plan. The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Although the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants, there is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan at this time.
Call today to start reinvesting distributions
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan or to enroll in or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your financial advisor or call us at (800) 257-8787.
|
78
|
NUVEEN
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process (Unaudited)
The Board of Trustees (each, a “Board,”and each Trustee, a “Board Member”) of each Fund, including the Board Members who are not parties to the applicable advisory or sub-advisory agreements or “interested persons” of any such parties (the “Independent Board Members”), oversees the management of its respective Fund, including the performance of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC, the Funds’ investment adviser (the “Adviser”), and Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, the Funds’ sub-adviser (the “Sub-Adviser”). As required by applicable law, after the initial term of the respective Fund following commencement of its operations, the Board is required to consider annually whether to renew the Fund’s management agreement with the Adviser (the “Investment Management Agreement”) and its sub-advisory agreement with the Sub-Adviser (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”and, together with the Investment Management Agreement, the “Advisory Agreements”). Accordingly, the Board met in person on April 11-12, 2017 (the “April Meeting”) and May 23-25, 2017 (the “May Meeting”) to consider the approval of each Advisory Agreement that was up for renewal for an additional one-year period.
The Board considered its review of the Advisory Agreements as an ongoing process encompassing the information received and the deliberations the Board and its committees have had throughout the year. The Board met regularly during the year and received materials and discussed topics that were relevant to the annual consideration of the renewal of the Advisory Agreements, including, among other things, overall market performance and developments; fund investment performance; investment team review; valuation of securities; compliance, regulatory and risk management matters; and other developments. The Board had also established several standing committees, including the Open-end Fund Committee and Closed-end Fund Committee, which met regularly throughout the year to permit the Board Members to delve deeper into the topics particularly relevant to the respective product line. The Board further continued its practice of seeking to meet periodically with the Sub-Adviser and its investment team. The accumulated information, knowledge, and experience the Board Members had gained during their tenure on the Board governing the Funds and working with the Fund Advisers (as defined below) were taken into account in their review of the Advisory Agreements.
In addition to the materials received by the Board or its committees throughout the year, the Board reviewed extensive additional materials prepared specifically for its annual review of the Advisory Agreements in response to a request by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Board Members. The materials addressed a variety of topics, including, but not limited to, a description of the services provided by the Adviser and Sub-Adviser (the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser are each a “Fund Adviser”); an analysis of fund performance including comparative industry data and a detailed focus on any performance outliers; an analysis of the Sub-Adviser; an analysis of the fees and expense ratios of the Nuveen funds in absolute terms and in comparison to the fees and expenses of peers with a focus on any expense outliers; an assessment of shareholder services for the Nuveen funds and of the performance of certain service providers; a review of initiatives instituted or continued during the past year; a review of premium/discount trends and leverage management for the closed-end funds; and information regarding the profitability of the Fund Advisers, the compensation of portfolio managers, and compliance and risk matters. The materials provided in connection with the annual review included information compiled and prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”or “Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, comparing, in relevant part, each Fund’s fees and expenses with those of a comparable universe of funds (the “Peer Universe”), as selected by Broadridge (the “Broadridge Report”). The Independent Board Members also received a memorandum from independent legal counsel outlining their fiduciary duties and legal standards in reviewing the Advisory Agreements.
As part of its annual review, the Board met at the April Meeting to review the investment performance of the Funds and to consider the Adviser’s analysis of the Sub-Adviser evaluating, among other things, the Sub-Adviser’s assets under management, investment team, performance, organizational stability, and investment approach. During the review, the Independent Board Members
|
NUVEEN
|
79
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
requested and received additional information from management. At the May Meeting, the Board, including the Independent Board Members, continued its review and ultimately approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for an additional year. Throughout the year and throughout their review of the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members were assisted by independent legal counsel and met with counsel separately without management present. In deciding to renew the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members did not identify a particular factor as determinative, but rather the decision reflected the comprehensive consideration of all the information presented, and each Board Member may have attributed different weights to the various factors and information considered in connection with the approval process. The following summarizes the principal factors, but not all the factors, the Board considered in its review of the Advisory Agreements and its conclusions.
| A. | Nature, Extent and Quality of Services |
| In evaluating the renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members received and considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of the applicable Fund Adviser’s services provided to the respective Fund and the resulting performance of each Fund. The Board recognized the myriad of services the Adviser and its affiliates provided to manage and operate the Nuveen funds, including (a) product management (such as managing distributions, positioning the product in the marketplace, maintaining and enhancing shareholder communications and reporting to the Board); (b) investment oversight, risk management and securities valuation (such as overseeing the sub-advisers and other service providers, analyzing investment performance and risks, overseeing risk management and disclosure, executing the daily valuation of securities, and analyzing trade execution); (c) fund administration (such as helping to prepare fund tax returns and complete other tax compliance matters and helping to prepare regulatory filings and shareholder reports); (d) fund board administration (such as preparing board materials and organizing and providing assistance for board meetings); (e) compliance (such as helping to devise and maintain the Nuveen funds’ compliance program and test for adherence); (f) legal support (such as helping to prepare registration statements and proxy statements, interpreting regulations and policies and overseeing fund activities); (g) with respect to certain closed-end funds, providing leverage, capital and distribution management services; and (h) with respect to certain open-end funds with portfolios that have a leverage component, providing such leverage management services. | |
| The Board further noted the Adviser’s continued dedication to investing in its business to enhance the quality and breadth of the services provided to the Funds. The Board recognized the Adviser’s investment in staffing over recent years to support the services provided to the Nuveen funds in key areas, including in investment services, product management, retail distribution and information technology, closed-end funds and structured products, as well as in fund administration, operations and risk management. The Board further noted the Adviser’s continued commitment to enhancing its compliance program by, among other things, restructuring the compliance organization, developing a unified compliance program, adding compliance staff, and developing and/or revising policies and procedures as well as building further infrastructure to address new regulatory requirements or guidance and the growth of the complex. The Board also considered the enhancements to Nuveen’s cyberse-curity capabilities, systems and processes to value securities, stress test reporting and risk and control self-assessments. | |
| In addition, the Independent Board Members considered information highlighting the various initiatives that the Adviser had implemented or continued over recent years to benefit the open-end fund and closed-end fund product lines and/or particular Nuveen funds. The Board noted the Adviser’s continued efforts to rationalize the open-end fund and closed-end fund product lines through, among other things, mergers, liquidations and repositionings in seeking to provide enhanced shareholder value over the years through increased efficiency, reduced costs, improved performance and revised investment approaches that are more relevant to current shareholder needs. With respect to closed-end Nuveen funds, such initiatives included (a) an increased level of leverage management activities in 2016 and 2017 resulting from the rollover of existing facilities, the negotiation of improved terms and pricing to reduce leverage costs, the innovation of new leverage structures, the rebalancing of leverage of various funds as a result of mergers or new investment mandates, and the restructuring of tender option bonds to be compliant with new regulatory requirements; (b) an increased level of capital management activities (i.e., the management of the issuance |
|
80
|
NUVEEN
|
| and repurchase of shares of certain closed-end funds) during 2016 as a result of market demand as well as an implementation of a cross department review system for shares trading at certain discount levels; (c) continued refinements to a database to permit further analysis of the closed-end fund marketplace and shareholder base; (d) the development of enhanced secondary market board reporting and commentary; (e) the reconfiguration of the framework for determining and maintaining closed-end fund benchmarks to permit more consistency across the complex; and (f) the development of product innovations for new closed-end offerings, including target term funds. The Board also recognized the Adviser’s continued commitment to supporting the closed-end product line through its award winning investor relations support program through which Nuveen seeks to educate investors and financial advisers regarding closed-end funds. | |
| With respect to municipal funds, the Independent Board Members also appreciated, in particular, the astute portfolio management of the municipal funds with respect to the Puerto Rico debt crisis. | |
| In its review, the Board recognized that initiatives that attracted assets to the Nuveen family of funds generally benefited the Nuveen funds in the complex as fixed costs would be spread over a larger asset base and, as described below, through the complex-wide fee arrangement which generally provides that the management fees of the Nuveen funds (subject to limited exceptions) are reduced as asset levels in the complex reach certain breakpoints in the fee schedule. | |
| Similarly, the Board considered the sub-advisory services provided by the Sub-Adviser to the Funds. The Sub-Adviser generally provided portfolio advisory services for the Funds. The Board reviewed the Adviser’s analysis of the Sub-Adviser which evaluated, among other things, the investment team and any changes thereto, the stability and history of the organization, the assets under management, the investment approach and the performance of the Nuveen funds it sub-advises. The Board noted that the Adviser recommended the renewal of the Sub-Advisory Agreements. | |
| Based on its review, the Board determined, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, that it was satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the respective Funds under each applicable Advisory Agreement. | |
| B. | The Investment Performance of the Funds and Fund Advisers |
| As part of its evaluation of the services provided by the Fund Advisers, the Board reviewed Fund performance over the quarter, one-, three- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2016 as well as performance data for the first quarter of 2017 ending March 31, 2017. The Board reviewed performance on an absolute basis and in comparison to the performance of peer funds (the “Performance Peer Group”) and recognized and/or customized benchmarks (i.e., generally benchmarks derived from multiple recognized benchmarks). For closed-end funds, the Board (or the Closed-end Fund Committee) also reviewed, among other things, the premium or discount to net asset value of the Nuveen closed-end funds as of a specified date and over various periods as well as in comparison to the premium/discount average in their respective Lipper peer category. The Independent Board Members continued to recognize the importance of secondary market trading for the shares of the closed-end funds and the evaluation of the premium and discount levels was a continuing priority for them. The review and analysis of performance information during the annual review of Advisory Agreements incorporated the discussions and performance information the Board Members have had at each of their quarterly meetings throughout the year. | |
| In evaluating performance data, the Independent Board Members recognized some of the limitations of such data and the difficulty in establishing appropriate peer groups and benchmarks for certain of the Nuveen funds. They recognized that each fund operates pursuant to its own investment objective(s), parameters and restrictions which may differ from that of the Performance Peer Group or benchmark. Certain funds may also utilize leverage which may provide benefits or risks to their portfolio compared to an unlevered benchmark. The Independent Board Members had noted that management had classified the Performance Peer Groups as low, medium and high in relevancy to the applicable fund as a result of these differences or other factors. The Independent Board Members recognized that the variations between the Performance Peer Group or benchmark |
|
NUVEEN
|
81
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
| and the applicable Fund will lead to differing performance results and may limit the value of the comparative performance data in assessing the particular Fund’s performance. | |
| In addition, the Independent Board Members recognized that the performance data is a snapshot in time, in this case as of the end of the 2016 calendar year or end of the first quarter of 2017. A different period may generate significantly different results and longer term performance can be adversely affected by even one period of significant underperformance. Further, a shareholder’s experience in a Fund depends on his or her own holding period which may differ from that reviewed by the Independent Board Members. | |
| In their review of performance, the Independent Board Members focused, in particular, on the Adviser’s analysis of Nuveen funds determined to be underperforming performance outliers and the factors contributing to the respective fund’s performance and any efforts to address performance concerns. With respect to any Nuveen funds for which the Board has identified performance issues, the Board monitors such funds closely until performance improves, discusses with the Adviser the reasons for such results, considers any steps necessary or appropriate to address such issues, and reviews the results of any efforts undertaken. The Board, however, acknowledged that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in a fund knowing that the Adviser and applicable sub-adviser manage the fund, knowing the fund’s investment strategy and seeking exposure to that strategy (even if the strategy was “out of favor” in the marketplace) and knowing the fund’s fee structure. | |
| In reviewing the performance of the Nuveen municipal funds, the Board recognized the challenged and volatile conditions of the municipal market in the fourth quarter of 2016 which impacted the performance of many of the municipal funds. The Board further considered that the municipal market had generally rebounded in the first quarter of 2017. In reviewing the performance of the municipal funds, the Board considered the impact of the market conditions. | |
| For Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio, the Board noted that the Fund had performed well against its Performance Peer Group, ranking in the second quartile and outperforming its benchmark for the one-, three- and five-year periods. The Board was satisfied with the Fund’s overall performance. | |
| For Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 2, the Board noted that the Fund had performed well against its Performance Peer Group, ranking in the second quartile and outperforming its benchmark for the one-, three- and five-year periods. The Board was satisfied with the Fund’s overall performance. | |
| For Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio 3, the Board noted that the Fund had performed well against its Performance Peer Group, ranking in the first quartile and outperforming its benchmark for the one-, three- and five-year periods. The Board was satisfied with the Fund’s overall performance. | |
| For Nuveen California Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio, the Board noted that although the Fund ranked in its Performance Peer Group in the fourth quartile for the longer three- and five-year periods, the Fund ranked in the first quartile in the one-year period. The Fund also outperformed its benchmark in the one-, three- and five-year periods. The Board was satisfied with the Fund’s overall performance. | |
| For Nuveen New York Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio, the Board noted that although the Fund ranked in its Performance Peer Group in the fourth quartile for the longer three- and five-year periods, the Fund ranked in the first quartile in the one-year period. The Fund also outperformed its benchmark in the one-, three- and five-year periods. The Board was satisfied with the Fund’s overall performance. | |
| C. | Fees, Expenses and Profitability |
| 1. Fees and Expenses | |
| The Board evaluated the management fees and other fees and expenses of each Fund. The Board reviewed and considered, among other things, the gross and net management fees paid by the Funds. The Board further considered the net total expense |
|
82
|
NUVEEN
|
| ratio of each Fund (expressed as a percentage of average net assets) as the expense ratio is most reflective of the investors’ net experience in a Fund as it directly reflected the costs of investing in the respective Fund. | |
| In addition, the Board reviewed the Broadridge Report comparing, in relevant part, each Fund’s gross and net advisory fees and net total expense ratio with those of a Peer Universe. The Independent Board Members also reviewed the methodology regarding the construction of the applicable Peer Universe by Broadridge. In reviewing the comparative data, the Board was aware that various factors may limit some of the usefulness of the data, such as differences in size of the peers; the composition of the Peer Universe; changes each year of funds comprising the Peer Universe; levels of expense reimbursements and fee waivers; and differences in the type and use of leverage. Nevertheless, in reviewing a fund’s fees and expenses compared to the fees and expenses of its peers (excluding leverage costs and leveraged assets), the Board generally considered a fund’s expenses and fees to be higher if they were over 10 basis points higher, slightly higher if they were 6 to 10 basis points higher, in line if they were within approximately 5 basis points higher than the peer average and below if they were below the peer average of the Peer Universe. The Board noted that the substantial majority of the Nuveen funds had a net expense ratio that was near or below their respective peer average. | |
| The Independent Board Members noted that each Fund had a net management fee and a net expense ratio below its respective peer averages. | |
| In their evaluation of the management fee schedule, the Independent Board Members also reviewed the fund-level and complex-wide breakpoint schedules, as described in further detail below. With respect to closed-end funds, the Board considered the effects of leverage on fees and expenses, including the calculation of management fees for funds with tender option bonds. | |
| Based on their review of the information provided, the Board determined that each Fund’s management fees (as applicable) to a Fund Adviser were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund. | |
| 2. Comparisons with the Fees of Other Clients | |
| The Board also reviewed information regarding the respective Fund Adviser’s fee rates for providing advisory services to other types of clients. For the Adviser and/or the Sub-Adviser, such other clients may include municipal separately managed accounts and passively managed exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) sub-advised by the Sub-Adviser but that are offered by another fund complex. | |
| The Board recognized that each Fund had an affiliated sub-adviser. In reviewing the fee rates assessed to other clients, with respect to affiliated sub-advisers, the Board reviewed, among other things, the range of fees and average fee rates assessed for managed accounts. | |
| The Board recognized the inherent differences between the Nuveen funds and the other types of clients. The Board considered information regarding these various differences which included, among other things, the services required, average account sizes, types of investors targeted, legal structure and operations, and applicable laws and regulations. The Independent Board Members recognized that the foregoing variations resulted in different economics among the product structures and culminated in varying management fees among the types of clients and the Nuveen funds. In general, the Board noted that higher fee levels reflected higher levels of service provided by the Fund Adviser, increased investment management complexity, greater product management requirements and higher levels of business risk or some combination of the foregoing. The Board recognized the breadth of services the Adviser provided to support the Nuveen funds as summarized above and noted that many of such administrative services may not be required to the same extent or at all for the institutional clients or other clients. The Board further recognized the passive management of ETFs compared to the active management required of other Nuveen funds would contribute to differing fee levels. |
|
NUVEEN
|
83
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
| The Independent Board Members noted that the sub-advisory fees paid by the Adviser to the Sub-Adviser, however, were generally for portfolio management services. The Board noted such sub-advisory fees were more comparable to the fees of retail wrap accounts and other external sub-advisory mandates. | |
| Given the inherent differences in the various products, particularly the extensive services provided to the Funds, the Board concluded that such facts justify the different levels of fees. | |
| 3. Profitability of Fund Advisers | |
| In conjunction with their review of fees, the Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s level of profitability for its advisory services to the Nuveen funds for the calendar years 2016 and 2015. In considering profitability, the Independent Board Members considered the level of profitability realized by Nuveen before the imposition of any distribution and marketing expenses incurred by the firm from its own resources. In evaluating the profitability, the Independent Board Members evaluated the analysis employed in developing the profitability figures, including the assumptions and methodology employed in allocating expenses. The Independent Board Members recognized the inherent limitations to any cost allocation methodology as different and reasonable approaches may be used and yet yield differing results. The Independent Board Members further reviewed an analysis of the history of the profitability methodology used explaining any changes to the methodology over the years. The Board has appointed two Independent Board Members, who along with independent legal counsel, helped to review and discuss the methodology employed to develop the profitability analysis each year and any proposed changes thereto and to keep the Board apprised of such changes during the year. | |
| In their review, the Independent Board Members evaluated, among other things, Nuveen’s adjusted operating margins, the gross and net revenue margins (pre-tax and after-tax) for advisory activities for the Nuveen funds, and the revenues, expenses, and net income (pre-tax and after-tax) of Nuveen for each of the last two calendar years. The Independent Board Members also reviewed an analysis of the key drivers behind the changes in revenues and expenses that impacted profitability in 2016 versus 2015. The Board, however, observed that Nuveen’s operating margins for its advisory activities in 2016 were similar to that of 2015. | |
| In addition to reviewing Nuveen’s profitability in absolute terms, the Independent Board Members also reviewed the adjusted total company margins of other advisory firms that had publicly available information and comparable assets under management (based on asset size and asset composition). The Independent Board Members, however, noted that the usefulness of the comparative data may be limited as the other firms may have a different business mix and their profitability data may be affected by numerous other factors such as the types of funds managed, the cost allocation methodology used, and their capital structure. Nevertheless, the Board noted that Nuveen’s adjusted operating margins appeared comparable to the adjusted margins of the peers. | |
| Further, the Adviser is a subsidiary of Nuveen, LLC, the investment management arm of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”). To have a fuller picture of the financial condition and strength of the TIAA complex, together with Nuveen, the Board reviewed a balance sheet for TIAA reflecting its assets, liabilities and capital and contingency reserves for the 2016 and 2015 calendar years. | |
| In addition to the Adviser’s profitability, the Independent Board Members also considered the profitability of the Sub-Adviser from its relationship with the Nuveen funds. The Independent Board Members reviewed the Sub-Adviser’s revenues, expenses and revenue margins (pre- and post-tax) for its advisory activities for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016. The Independent Board Members also reviewed a profitability analysis reflecting the revenues, expenses and revenue margin (pre-and post-tax) by asset type for the Sub-Adviser for the calendar year ending December 31, 2016. | |
| In evaluating the reasonableness of the compensation, the Independent Board Members also considered other amounts paid to a Fund Adviser for its services to the Funds as well as indirect benefits (such as soft dollar arrangements), if any, the Fund Adviser |
|
84
|
NUVEEN
|
| and its affiliates received or were expected to receive that were directly attributable to the management of a Fund. See Section E below for additional information on indirect benefits a Fund Adviser may receive as a result of its relationship with the Funds. | |
| Based on a consideration of all the information provided, the Board noted that Nuveen’s and the Sub-Adviser’s level of profitability was acceptable and not unreasonable in light of the services provided. | |
| D. | Economies of Scale and Whether Fee Levels Reflect These Economies of Scale |
| When evaluating the level of the advisory fees, the Independent Board Members considered whether there will be any economies of scale that may be realized by the Fund Adviser as a Fund grows and the extent to which these economies were shared with the Funds and shareholders. The Board recognized that economies of scale are difficult to measure with precision; however, the Board considered that there were several ways the Fund Adviser may share the benefits of economies of scale with the Nuveen funds, including through breakpoints in the management fee schedule reducing the fee rates as asset levels grow, fee waivers and/or expense limitation agreements and the Adviser’s investment in its business which can enhance the services provided to the Nuveen funds. With respect to the fee structure, the Independent Board Members have recognized that economies of scale may be realized when a particular fund grows, but also when the total size of the fund complex grows (even if the assets of a particular fund in the complex have not changed or have decreased). Accordingly, subject to certain exceptions, the funds in the Nuveen complex pay a management fee to the Adviser which is generally comprised of a fund-level component and complex-level component, each of which has a breakpoint schedule. Subject to certain exceptions, the fund-level fee component declines as the assets of the particular fund grow and the complex-level fee component declines when eligible assets of all the Nuveen funds (except for Nuveen ETFs which are subject to a unitary fee) in the Nuveen complex combined grow. In addition, with respect to closed-end funds, the Independent Board Members noted that, although such funds may from time-to-time make additional share offerings, the growth of their assets would occur primarily through the appreciation of such funds’ investment portfolios. | |
| The Independent Board Members reviewed the breakpoint and complex-wide schedules and any savings achieved from fee reductions as a result of the fund-level and complex-level breakpoints for the 2016 calendar year. In addition, the Independent Board Members recognized the Adviser’s ongoing investment in its business to expand or enhance the services provided to the benefit of all of the Nuveen funds. | |
| Based on their review, the Board concluded that the current fee structure was acceptable and reflected economies of scale to be shared with shareholders when assets under management increase. | |
| E. | Indirect Benefits |
| The Independent Board Members received and considered information regarding other benefits the respective Fund Adviser or its affiliates may receive as a result of their relationship with the Nuveen funds, including compensation paid to affiliates of a Fund Adviser for services rendered to the funds and research services received by a Fund Adviser from broker-dealers that execute fund trades. The Independent Board Members noted that affiliates of the Adviser may receive compensation for serving as a co-manager for initial public offerings of new Nuveen closed-end funds and as underwriter on shelf offerings for certain existing funds. The Independent Board Members considered the compensation paid for such services in 2016. | |
| In addition to the above, the Independent Board Members considered that the Funds’ portfolio transactions are allocated by the Sub-Adviser and the Sub-Adviser may benefit from research received from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions. The Board noted, however, that with respect to transactions in fixed income securities, such securities generally trade on a principal basis and do not generate soft dollar credits. Although the Board recognized the Sub-Adviser may benefit from a soft dollar arrangement if it does not have to pay for this research out of its own assets, the Board also recognized that the research may benefit the Funds to the extent it enhances the ability of the Sub-Adviser to manage the Funds. |
|
NUVEEN
|
85
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
| Based on their review, the Board concluded that any indirect benefits received by a Fund Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Funds were reasonable and within acceptable parameters. | |
| F. | Other Considerations |
| The Board Members did not identify any single factor discussed previously as all-important or controlling. The Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, concluded that the terms of each Advisory Agreement were fair and reasonable, that the respective Fund Adviser’s fees were reasonable in light of the services provided to each Fund and that the Advisory Agreements be renewed. |
|
86
|
NUVEEN
|
Notes
|
NUVEEN
|
87
|
Nuveen:
Serving Investors for Generations
Since 1898, financial advisors and their clients have relied on Nuveen to provide dependable investment solutions through continued adherence to proven, long-term investing principles. Today, we offer a range of high quality solutions designed to be integral components of a well-diversified core portfolio.
Focused on meeting investor needs.
Nuveen is the investment management arm of TIAA. We have grown into one of the world’s premier global asset managers, with specialist knowledge across all major asset classes and particular strength in solutions that provide income for investors and that draw on our expertise in alternatives and responsible investing. Nuveen is driven not only by the independent investment processes across the firm, but also the insights, risk management, analytics and other tools and resources that a truly world-class platform provides. As a global asset manager, our mission is to work in partnership with our clients to create solutions which help them secure their financial future.
Find out how we can help you.
To learn more about how the products and services of Nuveen may be able to help you meet your financial goals, talk to your financial advisor, or call us at (800) 257-8787. Please read the information provided carefully before you invest. Investors should consider the investment objective and policies, risk considerations, charges and expenses of any investment carefully.
Where applicable, be sure to obtain a prospectus, which contains this and other relevant information. To obtain a prospectus, please contact your securities representative or Nuveen, 333 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Learn more about Nuveen Funds at: www.nuveen.com/cef
| Nuveen Securities, LLC, member FINRA and SIPC | 333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 | www.nuveen.com |  |
ESA-B-0917D 304528-INV-B-11/18
|
(a)
|
The registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act") (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")(17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).
|
|
(b)
|
There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
(a)(1)
|
Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable to this filing.
|
|
(a)(2)
|
A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) in the exact form set forth below: See Ex-99.CERT attached hereto.
|
|
(a)(3)
|
Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons: Not applicable.
|
|
(b)
|
If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)); Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: See Ex-99.906 CERT attached hereto.
|