AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JULY 14, 2003
================================================================================


                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                    PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                 (AMENDMENT NO.)

Filed by the Registrant  [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  |X|
     Check the appropriate box:
     [ ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement
     [ ]  Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
          Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
     [ ]  Definitive Proxy Statement
     |X|  Definitive Additional Materials
     [ ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

                             HERCULES INCORPORATED
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

             THE HERCULES SHAREHOLDERS' COMMITTEE FOR NEW MANAGEMENT
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|X|  No fee required.
[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
     (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
     (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
     (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
          pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
          filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
     (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
     (5)  Total fee paid:
[ ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
     0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
     previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
     or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     (1)  Amount Previously Paid:
     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
     (3)  Filing Party:
     (4)  Date Filed:

================================================================================




NEWS RELEASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hercules Shareholders' Committee For NEW Management * 17 State Street * New
York, New York  10004

Contact:  Chris Hayden, Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc.
          212-440-9850

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

COMMITTEE SENDS LETTER TO HERCULES SHAREHOLDERS

NEW YORK--July 14, 2003-- The Hercules Shareholders' Committee For NEW
Management announced today that it sent the following letter to Hercules (NYSE:
HPC) shareholders:

             THE HERCULES SHAREHOLDERS' COMMITTEE FOR NEW MANAGEMENT
                       17 State Street, New York, NY 10004

                                                                   July 14, 2003

Fellow Hercules Shareholders:

         While  we  have  been  sharply  critical  of  Joyce  and  his  majority
directors,  we remain convinced that there are still strong underlying values at
Hercules and that the Company's two remaining,  primary businesses,  Aqualon and
Pulp and  Paper,  under the right  direction,  have  substantial  potential  for
growth. As a further  expression of its confidence in the future of the Company,
ISP is  announcing  today its  intention  to purchase an  additional  10 million
shares of Hercules  common stock -- over and above our current  ownership of 9.9
million  Hercules  shares --  conditioned  upon the election of the  Committee's
nominees.

         ISP  intends to  commence  a tender  offer for five  million  shares of
Hercules  at $12 per share in cash and to purchase an  additional  five  million
shares of Hercules common stock through open market purchases thereafter.  ISP's
tender offer will commence promptly after final certification of the election of
the Committee's four nominees and will be conditioned on the Board's elimination
of the poison  pill,  which will be one of the first  actions  taken  should our
nominees be elected to the Board. The $12 price represents an almost 50% premium
over Hercules'  closing price of $8.12 per share on February 11, 2003 -- the day
prior to ISP's filing of an amendment to its Schedule 13D indicating that it was
considering waging a proxy contest at the Company's 2003 Annual Meeting.

         After  completion  of its tender  offer,  ISP  intends to  purchase  an
additional  five  million  shares of  Hercules  common  stock in the open market
during the following



twelve-month  period.  The  completion  of the tender  offer and the open market
purchase  program  would  increase  ISP's  holdings in Hercules from 9.9 million
shares to 19.9 million shares (or 18% of the  outstanding  shares),  a more than
100% increase in ISP's current interest in Hercules.

         Not only does ISP's commitment demonstrate its confidence in the future
of Hercules  under NEW  management,  but it further  aligns the interests of our
Committee members with those of Hercules shareholders, INCREASING OUR INVESTMENT
TO APPROXIMATELY  $250 MILLION AS A RESULT OF ISP'S TENDER OFFER AND OPEN MARKET
PURCHASE PROGRAM.

         COMPARE THIS WITH THE FACT THAT JOYCE HAS NOT  PURCHASED A SINGLE SHARE
IN HERCULES AND ASK YOURSELF:  WHO BETTER  REPRESENTS  THE INTERESTS OF HERCULES
SHAREHOLDERS - THE COMMITTEE,  INCLUDING OUR NOMINEES,  AN OUTSTANDING  GROUP OF
EXPERIENCED  BUSINESS PEOPLE AND PROFESSIONALS,  WITH AN AGGREGATE INVESTMENT IN
HERCULES OF $250 MILLION, WHO ARE COMMITTED TO ENHANCING VALUES FOR ALL HERCULES
SHAREHOLDERS  AS WE HAVE  INVESTED  OUR OWN MONEY IN  HERCULES  AS YOU HAVE,  OR
JOYCE,  WHO HAS NOT  PURCHASED  A SINGLE  SHARE OF  HERCULES  STOCK  AND IS MORE
INTERESTED IN POSITIONS, PARACHUTES AND PERKS?

         On another subject,  several Hercules  shareholders  have expressed the
view that they would like to see  further  assurances  designed  to prevent  the
possibility  of a  conflict  of  interest  between  Hercules  and  ISP  and  its
affiliates,  including Mr. Heyman.  As you may recall from our June 24th letter,
in order to avoid a repeat of Joyce's outrageous self-dealing in connection with
his $9 per share LBO offer,  ISP and Mr.  Heyman  provided a written  commitment
effectively  safeguarding the interests of Hercules shareholders with respect to
any corporate  transaction involving Hercules and ISP, by requiring a two-thirds
vote of Hercules shareholders EXCLUDING the shares of ISP and its affiliates.(1)

         In order  to  remove  even  the  slightest  remaining  appearance  of a
conflict  of   interest,   address  the  stated   concerns  of  these   Hercules
shareholders,  and broaden the shareholder mandate for our Committee's nominees,
the Committee has obtained a further  commitment  from ISP and its affiliates to
enter into a standstill agreement (attached as an exhibit to this letter), which
would become  effective  upon the election of our four  nominees to the Hercules
Board. Pursuant to the standstill agreement, ISP and Mr. Heyman would agree, for
a period  of two  years,  not to make any  acquisition  or merger  proposal  for
Hercules or any of its business units, unless a third party makes an acquisition
proposal first, and to otherwise limit their ownership in Hercules' stock to 20%
of the Company's outstanding shares.

         *        *        *        *       *        *        *        *

-----------
(1) Contrary to the recent report from Institutional Shareholder Services, these
assurances go well beyond Delaware law and the Company's charter and Bylaws.




                                       2


         In yet  another  transparent  election  ploy,  Hercules  late last week
released "earnings guidance" for the second quarter. While the "headline" number
was an estimated 27-29(cent) per share for the quarter, a review of management's
eleventh-hour,  "smoke  and  mirrors"  release  serves  as  an  example  of  how
misleading  management's  earnings reports have really been under Joyce over the
last two years.

      o  The  estimate  includes  INCOME of 2(cent) per share for  "Discontinued
         operations," 1(cent) per share for a reversal of "Restructuring costs,"
         and  6(cent)  per share for "Tax  benefit  attributable  to donation of
         intellectual  property"  - FOR A TOTAL OF 9(CENT) PER SHARE OF ONE-TIME
         INCOME ITEMS.

      o  With respect to income from ongoing operations,  management  forecasted
         21-23(cent)per  share  which,  based  upon the  experience  of our four
         minority directors with management estimates, MEANS 21(CENT)PER SHARE -
         a  1(cent)increase  over the  20(cent)per  share reported in the second
         quarter of 2002.  WHAT MANAGEMENT HAS FAILED TO DISCLOSE,  HOWEVER,  IS
         THAT ALMOST 2 1/2(CENT)PER  SHARE OF THE  21(CENT)CAME  FROM A ONE-TIME
         INSURANCE BENEFIT, AND OF THE REMAINING 18 1/2(CENT)PER SHARE, AT LEAST
         5(CENT)PER SHARE WE ESTIMATE IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE IMPACT OF THE LOWER
         U.S.  DOLLAR.  PUT ANOTHER  WAY,  WITHOUT  THE BENEFIT OF THE  ONE-TIME
         INSURANCE ITEM AND THE FAVORABLE  CURRENCY IMPACT,  INCOME FROM ONGOING
         OPERATIONS  FOR THE SECOND  QUARTER  WOULD HAVE BEEN SHARPLY LOWER THAN
         THE SAME QUARTER LAST YEAR.

      o  Although  reported sales for the Company were projected to be 8% higher
         than the  second  quarter  last  year,  we  estimate  that 6% of the 8%
         resulted from the lower U.S. dollar.

         ASK YOURSELF:

         DOESN'T THIS LATEST EARNINGS  ESTIMATE  ILLUSTRATE THE LACK OF ANY REAL
PROGRESS WITH RESPECT TO THE OPERATING  PERFORMANCE OF THE COMPANY'S  BUSINESSES
UNDER JOYCE?

                                       AND

         ISN'T  JOYCE'S  PENCHANT  FOR  "PRO  FORMA"  EARNINGS,  "NON-RECURRING"
CHARGES, AND "ONE-TIME INCOME ITEMS" RELATED TO HIS REFUSAL FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS
NOW TO HIRE A CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FOR THE COMPANY?

         It is now clear why Joyce pushed his  associates on the Hercules  Board
to  authorize  restricted  stock  grants in the amount of more than one  million
shares to himself and other  executives just prior to the June 6 record date. In
addition to the obvious economic benefit of stock GRANTS rather than OPTIONS, to
add  insult  to  injury,  Joyce is

                                       3


now  claiming the right to have most all the shares  covered by these  unvested,
restricted grants voted in the proxy contest.

         WHAT DO YOU  THINK  OF A CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  WHO IS  WILLING  NOT ONLY TO
MISLEAD  SHAREHOLDERS  ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMPANY UNDER HIS MANAGEMENT
BUT TO RESORT TO  "STUFFING  OF THE  BALLOT  BOX" IN AN  ATTEMPT  TO  PERPETUATE
HIMSELF IN OFFICE?

         *        *        *        *       *        *        *        *

         The  Hercules  stock  price,   between  the  time  Joyce  became  Chief
Executive,   on  May  8th,  2001  and  the  closing  price  on  July  11th,  has
underperformed  the S&P MidCap  Specialty  Chemicals  Index by almost  30%.  The
Company's RECENT stock price  performance,  however,  measured from February 11,
2003,  the day prior to ISP's  filing of an  amendment to its Schedule 13D which
indicated  that it was  considering  waging a proxy  contest  for control of the
Hercules Board,  to the close on July 11th, has outpaced,  for the first time in
Joyce's tenure,  the S&P MidCap Specialty  Chemicals Index by approximately 19%.
The improvement of Hercules'  stock price  performance has come only in the wake
of the  Committee's  proxy  campaign,  the prospect of new  management and a new
direction  for the  Company,  and the  Committee's  expressed  determination  to
enhance shareholder values.

         WE ASK YOU TO JUDGE FOR  YOURSELF  WHETHER  THE PRICE OF YOUR  STOCK IS
LIKELY TO BE HIGHER OR LOWER AS A RESULT OF A CHANGE IN  LEADERSHIP AT HERCULES.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN OUR WHITE PROXY CARD TODAY!

                                   Sincerely,

             THE HERCULES SHAREHOLDERS' COMMITTEE FOR NEW MANAGEMENT



                                                            
/s/ SAMUEL J. HEYMAN    /s/ HARRY FIELDS    /s/ ANTHONY T. KRONMAN   /s/ SUNIL KUMAR
--------------------    ----------------    ----------------------   ---------------
Samuel J. Heyman        Harry Fields        Anthony T. Kronman       Sunil Kumar



/s/ GLORIA SCHAFFER     /s/ VINCENT TESE    /s/ RAYMOND S. TROUBH     /s/ GERALD TSAI, JR.
-------------------     ----------------    ---------------------     --------------------
Gloria Schaffer         Vincent Tese        Raymond S. Troubh         Gerald Tsai, Jr.



                                       4


                                    EXHIBIT A

                                                                   July 14, 2003

To The Hercules Shareholders' Committee for NEW Management
17 State Street
New York, NY  10004

            While the  undersigned  and our respective  affiliates  (the "Heyman
parties") have no intention of making a proposal to acquire Hercules,  we hereby
agree,  subject to all of the  Committee's  nominees  being elected to Hercules'
Board of Directors, to enter into a standstill agreement with Hercules that will
contain the following terms:

          1.    The  Heyman  parties  will  agree that for a period of two years
                (the  "Term")  they will not  acquire or agree,  offer,  seek or
                propose  to acquire  the  Company  or  substantially  all of its
                assets, by merger,  tender or exchange offer or consolidation or
                to make a proposal to acquire any of Hercules' business units or
                to  otherwise   enter  into  any  other   business   combination
                transaction (in each case, a "Takeover Proposal").

          2.    Notwithstanding  anything contained above, in the event that (x)
                a third party  proposes to enter into an agreement with Hercules
                or  any  of  its   subsidiaries   with   respect  to  a  merger,
                consolidation or other business  combination  involving Hercules
                or any of its  subsidiaries,  (y) a bona  fide  tender  offer or
                exchange offer is announced by a third party which would result,
                if  consummated  in  accordance  with its terms,  in a change of
                control of Hercules or (z) a third party  proposes to enter into
                an agreement  with Hercules with respect to the sale,  transfer,
                conveyance or other disposition,  in one transaction or a series
                of related transactions,  of a material portion of the assets of
                Hercules  and  its  subsidiaries  taken  as a  whole  or of  any
                business  unit  of  Hercules  (in  each  case,  an  "Acquisition
                Proposal"),  then the Heyman  parties will be entitled to make a
                Takeover  Proposal  if  such  Takeover  Proposal  is a  Superior
                Proposal  (as  defined  below).  Additionally,   notwithstanding
                anything   contained   above,  in  the  event  the  third  party
                Acquisition   Proposal  is  for  assets  of  Hercules   and  its
                subsidiaries not  constituting all or substantially  all of such
                assets,  then the Heyman  parties'  Takeover  Proposal,  if any,
                shall not be for more  assets  than those  subject to such third
                party's Acquisition Proposal.



                As used in this paragraph (2), "Superior  Proposal" means a bona
                fide  written   proposal  that  is  on  terms  that  would,   if
                consummated,  result in a  transaction  that would,  or would be
                reasonably  likely  to, be more  favorable  to  Hercules  or its
                shareholders   than  the   transactions   contemplated   by  the
                Acquisition Proposal.

          3.    In the  event  the  Heyman  parties  make a  permitted  Takeover
                Proposal pursuant to paragraph (2) above or after the expiration
                of the Term,  Samuel J.  Heyman and Sunil  Kumar agree to resign
                from the Hercules Board upon making such a Takeover Proposal.

          4.    The  Heyman  parties  will  agree  that,   except  as  expressly
                permitted in paragraph (2) above,  during the Term they will not
                acquire or agree,  offer,  seek or propose to acquire  more than
                twenty percent (20%) of the then outstanding  shares of Hercules
                common stock.

          5.    The  commitments  referred to in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) are
                in addition to the  procedural  safeguards set forth in the June
                24th  letter  from the Heyman  parties to the  Committee,  which
                continue in full force and effect.

                                   Sincerely,

International Specialty Products Inc.

By:  /s/ SUNIL KUMAR                                    /s/ SAMUEL J. HEYMAN
     ---------------                                    --------------------
     Sunil Kumar                                        Samuel J. Heyman
     Chief Executive Officer

                                       ###