Edgar Filing: KFORCE INC

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

KFRC-12.31.2014-10K

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

____________________________________________________________________________________________

FORM 10-K

________________________________________________________

(MARK ONE)



x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-26058

_________________________________________________________________

KFORCE INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

_________________________________________________________________



FLORIDA		59-3264661
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)



1001 EAST PALM AVENUE, TAMPA, FLORIDA		33605
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (813) 552-5000

_______________________________________________________

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:



TITLE OF EACH CLASS		NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
None		None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

(Title of class)

_____________________________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.): Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2014, was approximately $583,008,954. For purposes of this determination, common stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the registrant’s outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of February 24, 2015 was 29,515,188.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:



Document		Parts Into Which Incorporated
Portions of Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held April 21, 2015 (“Proxy Statement”)		Part III

Table of Contents

KFORCE INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I
Item 1.	Business.	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	10
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	18
Item 2.	Properties.	18
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	18
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	18
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	19
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.	21
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	23
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	42
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	43
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures.	76
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	76
Item 9B.	Other Information.	76
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	77
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	77
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	77
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	77
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.	77
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.	78
SIGNATURES		80

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

References in this document to “the Registrant,” “Kforce,” “we,” “the Firm,” “our” or “us” refer to Kforce Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires or indicates.

This report, particularly Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors, and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), and the documents we incorporate into this report, contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are made in reliance upon the protections provided by such acts for forward-looking statements. Such statements may include, but may not be limited to, projections of revenue, income, losses, cash flows, capital expenditures, future prospects, our beliefs regarding potential government actions, anticipated costs and benefits of proposed (or future) acquisitions, integration of acquisitions, transition of divestitures, the efficacy of our disclosure and internal controls, plans for future operations, capabilities of business operations, effects of interest rate variations, our ability to obtain financing and favorable terms, financing needs or plans, plans relating to services of Kforce, estimates concerning the effects of litigation or other disputes, estimates concerning our ability to collect on our accounts receivable, expectations of the overall economic outlook, developments within the staffing sector including, but not limited to, the penetration rate (the percentage of temporary staffing to total employment) and growth in temporary staffing, our ability to recruit qualified individuals, estimates concerning goodwill impairment, as well as assumptions as to any of the foregoing and all statements that are not based on historical fact but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. For a further list and description of various risks, relevant factors and uncertainties that could cause future results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements, see the Risk Factors and MD&A sections. In addition, when used in this discussion, the terms “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “should” and variations thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in or underlying the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this report, which speak only as of the date of this report. Kforce undertakes no obligation to publicly publish the results of any adjustments to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events on or after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unexpected events.

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Company Overview

We are a provider of professional and technical specialty staffing services and solutions and operate through our corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, 62 field offices located throughout the United States and one office in Manila, Philippines. Kforce was incorporated in 1994 but its predecessor companies, Romac & Associates, Inc. and Source Services Corporation have been providing staffing services since 1962. Kforce completed its Initial Public Offering in August 1995.

We provide our clients staffing services and solutions through three operating segments: Technology (“Tech”), Finance and Accounting (“FA”) and Government Solutions (“GS”). Our Tech segment includes the results of Kforce Global Solutions, Inc. (“Global”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, which has an office in the Philippines. The GS segment is organized and managed by specialty because of the unique operating characteristics of the business.

The following charts depict the percentage of our total revenues for each of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 (the charts for 2013 and 2012 have been reconfigured to exclude our former Health Information Management ("HIM") segment which we sold in 2014):

Tech

Our Tech segment provides both temporary staffing and permanent placement services to our clients, focusing primarily on areas of information technology such as systems/applications programmers and developers, senior-level project managers, systems analysts, enterprise data management and e-business and networking technicians. The average bill rate for our Tech segment for 2014 was approximately $68 per hour. Our Tech segment provides service to clients in a variety of industries with a strong footprint in the healthcare, financial services and government sectors. An IT growth update published by Staffing Industry Analysts (“SIA”) during September 2014, states that temporary technology staffing is projected to experience growth of 7% in 2015. We believe the sustained high growth is due to the continuing use of temporary staffing as a solution during uncertain economic cycles, the increasing cost of employment driving the systemic use of temporary staffing, particularly in project-based work such as technology, and an increasing influence of technology in business driving the overall demand for talent in the temporary technology staffing sector. The SIA report also acknowledges that notable skill shortages in certain technology skill sets will continue, which we believe will result in strong future growth in our Tech segment.

Our FA segment provides both temporary staffing and permanent placement services to our clients in areas such as general accounting, business analysis, accounts payable, accounts receivable, financial analysis and reporting, taxation, budget preparation and analysis, mortgage and loan processing, cost analysis, professional administration, credit and collections, audit services, and systems and controls analysis and documentation. Our FA segment provides service to clients in a variety of industries with a strong footprint in the healthcare, financial services and government sectors. The average bill rate for our FA segment for 2014 was approximately $32 per hour. In its September 2014 update, the SIA report indicated that the market for temporary finance/accounting work is expected to expand 5% during 2015.

Table of Contents

Our GS segment provides Tech and FA professionals to the Federal Government as both a prime contractor and a subcontractor. The GS contracts are concentrated on customers that we believe are less impacted by sequestration threats, such as healthcare. GS offers integrated business solutions to its customers in areas such as: information technology, healthcare informatics, data and knowledge management, research and development, financial management and accounting, among other areas. Substantially all GS services are supplied to the Federal Government through field offices located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, San Antonio, Texas and Austin, Texas.

Types of Staffing Services

Kforce’s staffing services consist of temporary staffing services (“Flex”) and permanent placement services (“Search”). For the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, Flex represented 96.2%, 95.5% and 95.3% of total Kforce revenue, respectively.

We target clients and recruits for both Flex and Search services, which contributes to our objective of providing integrated solutions for all of our clients’ human capital needs.

Flex

We provide our clients with qualified individuals (“consultants”) on a temporary basis when it is determined that they have the appropriate skills and experience and are “the right match” for our clients. We recruit consultants from the job boards, Kforce.com, from social media networks and from passive candidates we identify who are currently employed and not actively seeking another position. Our success is dependent upon our employees’ (“associates”) ability to: (1) understand and acknowledge our clients’ needs; (2) determine and understand the capabilities of the consultants being recruited; and (3) deliver and manage the client-consultant relationship to the satisfaction of both our clients and our consultants. We believe proper execution by our associates and our consultants directly impacts the longevity of the assignments, increases the likelihood of being able to generate repeat business with our clients and fosters a better experience for our consultants, which has a direct correlation to their redeployment.

Flex revenue is driven by the number of total hours billed and established bill rates. Flex gross profit is determined by deducting consultant pay, benefits and other related costs from Flex revenues. Flex associate commissions, related taxes and other compensation and benefits, as well as field management compensation are included in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”), along with administrative and corporate compensation. The Flex business model involves attempting to maximize the number of consultant hours and bill rates, while managing consultant pay rates and benefit costs, as well as compensation and benefits for our core associates. Flex revenue also includes solutions provided through our GS segment. These revenues involve providing longer-term contract services to the customer primarily on a time-and-materials basis but also on a fixed-price and cost-plus basis.

Our Search business is a significantly smaller, yet important, part of our business that involves locating qualified individuals (“candidates”) for permanent placement with our clients. We primarily perform these searches on a contingency basis; thus, fees are only earned if the candidates are ultimately hired by our clients. The typical structure for search fees is based upon a percentage of the placed individual’s annual compensation in their first year of employment, which is known at the time of placement. We recruit permanent employees from the job boards, from our associates’ networks, social media networks and from passive candidates we identify who are currently employed and not actively seeking another position. Also, there are occasions where consultants are initially assigned to a client on a Flex basis and later are converted to a permanent placement, for which we may also receive a Search fee (referred to as “conversion revenue”).

Search revenues are driven by placements made and the resulting fees billed and are recognized net of an allowance for “fallouts,” which occur when placements do not complete the applicable contingency period. Although the contingency period varies by contract, it is typically 90 days or less. This allowance for fallouts is estimated based upon historical experience with Search placements that did not complete the contingency period. There are no consultant payroll costs associated with Search placements, thus, all Search revenues increase gross profit by the full amount of the fee. Search associate commissions, compensation and benefits are included in SG&A.

Table of Contents

Business Strategy

Our primary goal is to sustain long-term financial growth and outperform the industry while being a leading provider of domestic professional and staffing services in our focus segments. We believe the following strategies will help us achieve our goal.

Invest in Headcount of Revenue Generators. Given the current and expected future demand in the marketplace for the services provided by Kforce and the performance of our most tenured associates continuing to remain near peak levels, the Firm made significant investments beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012 in the hiring of associates that are responsible for generating revenue. The increase in revenue generator headcount from 2013 to 2014 was 6.3% and from 2012 to 2013 was 10.3%. New associates typically take six to twelve months to ramp up to a minimum acceptable standard and continue to ramp for up to four years. Accordingly, we expect that the investment in 2014 will result in more revenue growth during 2015 and beyond. Going forward, the Firm expects to continue to hire additional revenue generators in those lines of business, geographies and industries that we believe present the greatest opportunity.

Enhanced Customer Focus. During 2013, Kforce streamlined the Firm’s leadership and revenue enablers in an effort to align a higher percentage of roles closer to the customer, supporting our significant focus to provide more consistent and effective service to our clients and our consultants. The new alignment has resulted in a more significant focus on our revenue-generating activities and has resulted in more streamlined processes and tools that should enable us to simplify and improve how we do business with our clients and consultants.

A continued focus of Kforce is cultivating relationships with premier partners and strategic clients, both in terms of annual revenues and geographic dispersion. In order to achieve greater penetration within each of our largest accounts, we work to foster an understanding of our client’s needs holistically while building a consultative partnership rather than a transactional client relationship. We are increasingly concentrated on bringing our core employees closer to the customer, and with that in mind we have integrated our largest accounts leadership team into our field leadership team, enhancing our alignment to serve these clients. We believe that this strategy will allow us to more effectively drive expansion in our share of our clients’ staffing needs, as well as capturing additional overall market share.

We believe we have developed long-term relationships with our clients by repeatedly providing solutions to their specialty staffing requirements. We strive to differentiate ourselves by working closely with our clients to understand their needs and maximize their return on human capital. Finding the right match for both our clients and consultants is our ultimate priority. The placement of our highly skilled consultants requires operational and technical skill to effectively recruit and evaluate personnel, match them to client needs, and manage the resulting relationships. We believe the proper placements of consultants with the right clients will serve to balance the desire for optimal volume, rate, effort and duration of assignment, while ultimately maximizing the benefit for our clients, consultants and the Firm. In addition, Kforce’s ability to offer flexible staffing solutions, coupled with our permanent placement capability, offers the client a broad spectrum of specialty staffing services. We believe this ability enables Kforce to emphasize consultative rather than transactional client relationships, and therefore facilitates further client penetration and the expansion of our share of our clients’ staffing needs.

We concentrate resources among our segments and staffing services to the areas of highest anticipated demand to adapt to the ever-changing landscape within the staffing industry. We believe our historical focus in these markets, combined with our associates’ operating expertise, provides us with a competitive advantage.

Optimize Operating Margins. The optimization of operating margins remains an important goal for Kforce as we strive to deliver profitable revenue growth. We believe our revenue-focused alignment and streamlined infrastructure will allow us to meet the needs of our clients and consultants in the most cost effective manner possible.

Retain our Great People. A significant focus of Kforce is on the retention of our tenured and top performing associates. We ended fiscal 2014 with an even more highly tenured management team, field sales team and back office employees, which we believe will continue to enhance our ability to achieve future profitable growth.

We believe our consultants are a significant component in delivering value to our clients. We are focused on efficient and effective consultant care processes, such as onboarding, frequent and ongoing communication and programs to redeploy our consultants in a timely fashion. We strive to increase the tenure and loyalty of our consultants and be their “Employer of Choice”, thus enabling us to deliver the highest quality talent to our clients.

Table of Contents

Continue to Develop and Optimize our National Recruiting Center (“NRC”). We believe our centralized NRC offers us a competitive advantage. The NRC is particularly effective at increasing the quality and speed of delivery services to our clients with demands for high volume staffing. The NRC identifies and interviews active candidates from nationally contracted job boards, Kforce.com, as well as other sources, then forwards qualified candidates to Kforce field offices to be matched to available positions. The NRC has continued to evolve throughout 2014, and supports all of our operating segments. There continues to be a significant demand for its resources. In 2014, we reallocated a portion of the NRC resources to a facility in Phoenix, Arizona with a goal to create greater efficiency in serving our clients in the western U.S.

We continue to focus on job order prioritization, which places greater attention on orders that we believe present the greatest opportunity and streamlining the NRC’s focus to more specific industries, customer segments and skill sets to create leverage. A continued focus for 2015 will be to enhance the performance of the NRC in meeting demand, and enhance our efforts to support future growth by building a pipeline of qualified candidates, as well as evolving its international talent solution strategy. The Firm will continue to utilize the NRC as a training ground for field sales as top performers in the NRC with a strong knowledge of the delivery system will move into field sales roles.

Leverage Infrastructure. A significant focus for Kforce is to more effectively leverage the functionality built over the last several years with its front-end and back office technology infrastructure. We believe our back office system software provides a competitive advantage through the enhancement of the efficiency and performance of our sales and delivery functions. We will continue to selectively improve our front-end systems and our back office systems, including our ERP and time collection and billing systems, in areas that we believe will generate additional operating leverage. In 2014, Kforce adopted and implemented an Agile software development methodology (whereby requirements and solutions evolve through cross-functional teams), and underwent an organizational transformation with a goal to maximize the responsiveness and timeliness by which value is delivered through our technology investments.

Enhance Shareholder Value. Kforce is committed to enhancing shareholder value. In 2014, the Firm executed a significant share repurchase program, completed four quarterly dividends, and continued to focus on reducing expenses. We increased the quarterly dividend amount by 10% in December 2014. Kforce expects to continue these initiatives through 2015.

Industry Overview

We serve Fortune 1000 companies, the Federal Government, state and local governments, local and regional companies, and small to mid-sized companies. Our 10 largest clients represented approximately 25% of revenues and no single customer accounted for more than 5% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014. The specialty staffing industry is made up of thousands of companies, most of which are small local firms providing limited service offerings to a relatively small local client base. We believe Kforce is one of the 10 largest publicly-traded specialty staffing firms in the United States. According to a report published by the SIA in July 2014, 124 companies reported at least $100 million in U.S. staffing revenues in 2013 and these 124 companies represented an estimated 54.5% of the total market. Competition in a particular market can come from many different companies, both large and small. We believe, however, that our geographic presence, diversified service offerings, NRC, focus on consistent service and delivery and effective job order prioritization all provide a competitive advantage, particularly with clients that have operations in multiple geographic markets. In addition, we believe that our service offerings are primarily concentrated in areas with significant growth opportunities in both the short and long term.

Based upon previous economic cycles experienced by Kforce, we believe that times of sustained economic recovery generally stimulate demand for substantial additional U.S. workers and, conversely, an economic slowdown results in a contraction in demand for additional U.S. workers. From an economic standpoint, temporary employment figures and trends are important indicators of staffing demand, which improved during 2014 at a greater rate than 2013 based on data published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”). Total temporary employment increased 7.8% and the penetration rate increased 3.4% from December 2013 to December 2014, bringing the rate to 2.13% in December 2014, an all-time high. While the macro-employment picture remains uncertain, it has continuously improved, with the unemployment rate at 5.6% as of December 2014, and non-farm payroll expanding an average of 246,000 jobs per month in 2014. Also, the college-level unemployment rate, which we believe serves as a proxy for professional employment and is more closely aligned with the Firm’s business strategy, was at 2.9% in December 2014. Management believes that uncertainty in the overall U.S. economic outlook related to the political landscape, potential tax changes, geo-political risk and impact of health care reform, will continue to fuel growth in temporary staffing as employers may be reluctant to increase full-time hiring. Additionally, we believe the increasing costs of employment may be driving a systemic shift to an increased use of temporary staff as a percentage of total workforce, which is creating reduced cyclicality in the business. If the penetration rate of temporary staffing continues to experience growth in the coming years, we believe that our Flex revenues can grow significantly even in a relatively modest growth macro-economic environment. Kforce remains optimistic about the growth prospects of the temporary staffing industry, the penetration rate, and in particular, our revenue portfolio. Of course, no reliable predictions can be made about the general economy, the staffing industry as a whole, or specialty staffing in particular.

Table of Contents

According to an industry forecast published by SIA in September 2014, the U.S. temporary staffing industry generated estimated revenues of $92.5 billion in 2011, $99.0 billion in 2012 and $103.3 billion in 2013; with projected revenues of $108.8 billion in 2014 and $115.0 billion in 2015. Based on projected revenues of $108.8 billion for the U.S. temporary staffing industry, this would put the Firm’s market share at approximately 1%. Therefore, our previously discussed business strategies are sharply focused around expanding our share of the U.S. temporary staffing market and further penetrating our existing clients’ staffing needs.

Over the last several years, our GS segment’s operations have been adversely impacted by the (1) continued uncertainty of funding levels of various Federal Government programs and agencies; (2) uncertain macro-economic and political environment; and (3) unexpected significant delays in the start-up of already executed and funded projects, which we believe were due to acute shortages of acquisition and contracting personnel within certain Federal Government agencies. GS management remains cautiously optimistic as it cannot predict the outcome of past, current and future efforts to reduce federal spending and whether these efforts will materially impact the future budgets of federal agencies that are clients of our GS segment. Our GS segment will be facing a number of re-competes in 2015 that could materially impact that segment's performance, especially given the recent emphasis by the Federal Government on awarding contracts to the lowest bidder and a de-emphasis of overall funding of services.

Trade Names and Trademark

The Kforce trade names, and derivatives thereof, and GS’s “Data Confidence” trademark is important to our business. Our primary trade names and trademark are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In the 2014 Temporary Workers Survey published by SIA, Kforce was ranked third in a name recognition survey, and ranked first among IT temporary workers.

Regulatory Environment

Staffing firms are generally subject to one or more of the following types of government regulations: (1) regulation of the employer/employee relationship between a firm and its staff; such as wage and hour regulations, tax withholding and reporting, social security and other retirement, anti-discrimination, employee benefits and workers’ compensation regulations; (2) registration, licensing, recordkeeping and reporting requirements and (3) substantive limitations on their operations. Staffing firms are governed by laws regulating the employer/employee relationship.

In providing staffing and solution services to the Federal Government, we must comply with complex laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and performance of Federal Government contracts. These laws and regulations create compliance risk and affect how we do business with our federal agency clients, and may impose added costs on our business.

In the increasingly stringent regulatory environment, one of our top priorities is compliance. As we continue to evolve our infrastructure, compliance remains a primary focus. For more discussion of the potential impact that the regulatory environment could have on Kforce’s financial results, please see Item 1A. Risk Factors below.

Competition

We operate in a highly competitive and fragmented specialty staffing services industry within each of our operating segments. Within temporary staffing, the working capital requirements can be a barrier to entry, because most employees are paid weekly and customers may take 30 to 45 days or more to pay. We face substantial competition from large national firms and local specialty staffing firms. The local firms are typically operator-owned, and each market generally has one or more significant competitors. We also face competition from national clerical and light industrial staffing firms, and national and regional accounting firms that also offer certain specialty staffing services.

In addition, many companies utilize Managed Service Providers (“MSP”) or Vendor Management Organizations ("VMO") for the management and purchase of staffing services. Generally, MSPs and VMOs are organizations that standardize processes through the use of Vendor Management Systems (“VMS”), which are tools used to aggregate, spend and measure supplier performance. VMSs can also be provided through independent providers. Typically, MSPs, VMOs and/or VMS providers charge staffing firms administrative fees of 1% to 3% of total service revenues, and these fees are usually recorded by staffing firms as a cost of services, thereby compressing profit margins. While Kforce does not currently provide MSP or VMO services directly to its clients, our strategy is to work with specific MSPs, VMOs and VMS providers to enable us to extend our Flex staffing services to the widest customer base possible within the sectors we serve.

Table of Contents

As stated previously, there are 124 staffing firms with more than $100 million in U.S. staffing revenues in operation and thousands of smaller organizations compete to varying degrees at local levels. Several similar companies – global, national, and local – compete in foreign markets. Our peer group for 2014, which is comprised of some of our largest competitors, included: CDI Corp., CIBER, Inc., Computer Task Group Inc., Manpower Inc., On Assignment, Inc., Resources Connection, Inc., Robert Half International Inc., and TrueBlue Inc.

Kforce believes that the availability and quality of associates and consultants, level of service, effective monitoring of job performance, scope of geographic service, and price are the principal elements of competition in our industry. We believe that availability of quality associates and consultants is especially important. In order to attract candidates, we place emphasis upon our ability to provide competitive compensation and benefits, quality and varied assignments, scheduling flexibility, and permanent placement opportunities, all of which are important to Kforce being the “Employer of Choice.” Because personnel pursue other employment opportunities on a regular basis, it is important that we respond to market conditions affecting these individuals, and focus on our consultant care objectives. Additionally, in certain markets and in response to economic softening, we have experienced significant pricing pressure from some of our competitors. Although we believe we compete favorably with respect to these factors, we expect competition and pricing pressure to continue, and there can be no assurance that we will remain competitive.

Seasonality of Operating Results

Our quarterly operating results are affected by the number of billing days in a quarter and the seasonality of our customers’ businesses. The majority of our reporting segments are significantly impacted by the increase in the number of holidays and vacation days taken during the fourth quarter of the calendar year. In addition, we experience an increase in direct costs of services and a corresponding decrease in gross profit in the first fiscal quarter of each year, as a result of certain annual U.S. state and federal employment tax resets that occur at the beginning of each year.

Insurance

Kforce maintains a number of insurance policies including general liability, automobile liability and employers’ liability; each with excess liability coverage. We also maintain workers’ compensation, fidelity, fiduciary, directors and officers, professional liability, and employment practices liability policies. These policies provide coverage subject to their terms, conditions, limits of liability, and deductibles, for certain liabilities that may arise from Kforce’s operations. There can be no assurance that any of the above policies will be adequate for our needs or that we will maintain all such policies in the future.

Financial Information about Foreign and Domestic Operations

Substantially all of Kforce’s revenues are derived from domestic operations with customers located in the United States and substantially all long-lived assets were located in the United States for the three years ended December 31, 2014. One of our subsidiaries, Global, provides outsourcing services internationally through an office in Manila, Philippines. Our international operations comprised less than 2% of net service revenues for each of the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Financial Information about Business Segments

We provide our clients staffing services and solutions through three reporting segments: Tech, FA and GS. For segment financial data see Note 16 – “Reportable Segments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Operating Employees and Personnel

As of December 31, 2014, Kforce employed approximately 2,600 associates and had more than 11,000 consultants on assignment (“Flexible Consultants”) providing flexible staffing services and solutions to our clients. Approximately 91% of the Flexible Consultants are employed directly by Kforce (“Flexible Employees”); the balance consists of individuals who are employed by other entities (“Independent Contractors”) that provide their employees as subcontractors to Kforce for assignment to its clients. As the employer, Kforce is responsible for the operating employees’ and Flexible Employees’ payrolls and the employer’s share of applicable social security taxes (“FICA”), federal and state unemployment taxes, workers’ compensation insurance, and other direct labor costs relating to our employees. We offer access to various health, life and disability insurance programs and other benefits for operating employees and Flexible Employees. We have no collective bargaining agreements covering any of our operating employees or Flexible Employees, have never experienced any material labor disruption, and are unaware of any current efforts or plans to organize any of our employees.

Table of Contents

Availability of Reports and Other Information

We make available, free of charge, through the Investor Relations page on our website, and by responding to requests addressed to Michael Blackman, our Chief Corporate Development Officer, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A and amendments to those materials filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically submit such materials to the SEC. Our corporate website address is http://www.kforce.com. The information contained on our website, or on other websites linked to our website, is not part of this document. The SEC makes available on its website, free of charge, reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as us, that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov. Information provided on the SEC’s website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Kforce faces significant employment-related legal risk.

Kforce employs people internally and in the workplaces of other businesses. An inherent risk of such activity includes possible discrimination and harassment claims; wrongful termination; violations of employment rights related to employment screening or privacy issues; classification of workers as employees or independent contractors; violations of wage and hour requirements; employment of illegal aliens; criminal activity; torts; or other claims. Such claims may result in negative publicity, injunctive relief, criminal investigations and/or charges, civil litigation, payment by Kforce of monetary damages or fines, or other material adverse effects on our business. To reduce our exposure, we maintain insurance coverage for professional malpractice liability, fidelity, employment practices liability, and general liability in amounts and with deductibles that we believe is appropriate for our operations. Our insurance coverage, however, may not cover all potential claims against us, may require us to meet a deductible or may not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost. In this regard, we face various employment-related risks not covered by insurance, such as wage and hour laws and employment tax responsibility. U.S. Courts in recent years have been receiving large numbers of wage and hour class action claims alleging misclassification of overtime eligible workers and/or failure to pay overtime-eligible workers for all hours worked. In addition, there appears to be a heightened state and federal scrutiny of independent contractor relationships, which could adversely affect us given that we utilize a significant number of independent contractors to perform our services. An adverse determination of the independent contractor status of these firms could result in a substantial tax or other liabilities.

Kforce may be exposed to unforeseeable negative acts by our personnel that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

An inherent risk of employing people internally and in the workplace of other businesses is that many of these individuals have access to client information systems and confidential information. Such activity includes possible acts of errors and omissions; intentional misconduct; release, misuse or misappropriation of client intellectual property, confidential information, funds, or other property; cyber security breaches affecting our clients and/or us; or other acts. Such acts may result in negative publicity or other material adverse effects on our business. In addition, these occurrences may give rise to litigation, which could be time-consuming and expensive. To reduce our exposure, we maintain insurance coverage for types and amounts we believe are appropriate in light of the aforementioned exposures. There can be no assurance that the corporate policies and practices we have in place to help reduce our exposure to these risks will be effective or that we will not experience losses as a result of these risks.

Our business is significantly affected by fluctuations in general economic conditions.

Demand for staffing services is significantly affected by the general level of economic activity and employment in the United States. Based upon previous economic cycles experienced by Kforce, we believe that times of sustained economic recovery generally stimulate demand for additional U.S. workers and, conversely, an economic slowdown results in a contraction in demand for additional U.S. workers. As economic activity slows, companies may defer projects for which they utilize our services or reduce their use of temporary employees before laying off full-time employees. In addition, an economic downturn could result in a reduction in the temporary staffing penetration rate, an increase in the unemployment rate and a deceleration of growth in the segments in which we operate. We may also experience more competitive pricing pressures during periods of economic downturn. Approximately 98% of our revenue is generated by our business operations in the United States. Any substantial economic downturn in the United States could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Kforce may be adversely affected by government regulation of the staffing business and of the workplace.

Our business is subject to regulation and licensing in many states. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to obtain all necessary licenses or approvals or that the cost of compliance will not prove to be material. If we fail to comply, such failure could materially adversely affect Kforce’s financial results.

A large part of our business entails employing individuals on a temporary basis and placing such individuals in clients’ workplaces. Increased government regulation of the workplace or of the employer-employee relationship could have a material adverse effect on Kforce.

Table of Contents

Our collection, use and retention of personal information and personal health information create risks that may harm our business.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and retain personal information of our associates and Flexible Employees and their dependents including, without limitation, full names, social security numbers, addresses, birth dates, and payroll-related information. We use commercially available information security technologies to protect such information in digital format. We also use security and business controls to limit access to such information. However, employees or third parties (including third parties with substantially greater resources than our own; for example, foreign governments) may be able to circumvent these measures and acquire or misuse such information, resulting in breaches of privacy, and errors in the storage, use or transmission of such information. Privacy breaches may require notification and other remedies, which can be costly, and which may have other serious adverse consequences for our business, including regulatory penalties and fines, claims for breach of contract, claims for damages, adverse publicity, reduced demand for our services by clients and/or flex employment candidates, harm to our reputation, and regulatory oversight by state or federal agencies.

The possession and use of personal information and data in conducting our business subjects us to legislative and regulatory burdens. We may be required to incur significant expenses to comply with mandatory privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards or contractual obligations.

Kforce may be adversely affected by immigration restrictions.

Our Tech business utilizes a significant number of foreign nationals employed by us on work visas, primarily under the H-1B visa classification. The H-1B visa classification that enables U.S. employers to hire qualified foreign nationals is subject to legislative and administrative changes, as well as changes in the application of standards and enforcement. Immigration laws and regulations can be significantly affected by political developments and levels of economic activity. Current and future restrictions on the availability of such visas could restrain our ability to employ the skilled professionals we need to meet our clients’ needs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In 2009, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (“USCIS”) significantly increased its scrutiny of companies seeking to sponsor, renew or transfer H-1B status, including Kforce and Kforce’s subcontractors. On January 8, 2010, the USCIS issued internal guidance to its field offices that appears to narrow the eligibility criteria for H-1B status in the context of staffing services. In addition to USCIS restrictions, certain aspects of the H-1B program are also subject to regulation and review by the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of State, which have recently increased enforcement activities in the program. A narrow interpretation and vigorous enforcement, or legislative action relating to immigration, including legislation intended to reform existing immigration law, could adversely affect our ability to obtain foreign national labor and/or renew existing foreign national consultants on assignment, and could subject us to fines, penalties and sanctions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to keep or replace all foreign nationals currently on assignment, or continue to hire foreign national talent at the same rates as in the past.

Kforce maintains debt which could impact operating flexibility and contains restrictive covenants that could trigger prepayment of obligations or additional costs.

We have a credit facility consisting of a revolving line of credit of up to $170 million. Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Firm, excluding the real estate located at the Firm's corporate headquarters in Tampa, FL, unless the eligible real estate conditions are met.

Our level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by our credit agreement could have important consequences for investors including the following: (1) we will have to use a portion of our cash flow from operations for debt services rather than for our operations; (2) we may not be able to obtain additional financing for future working capital, capital expenditures or other corporate purposes or may have to pay more for such financing; (3) we could be less able to take advantage of significant business opportunities, such as acquisition opportunities, and to react to changes in market or industry conditions; and (4) we may be disadvantaged compared to competitors with less leverage.

Kforce is subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants under the credit facility. Our failure to comply with such restrictive covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could result in Kforce being required to repay the outstanding balance before the due date. We may not be able to repay our debt or if forced to refinance on terms not acceptable to us could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Table of Contents

Kforce’s temporary staffing business could be adversely impacted by health care reform.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (PPACA) imposes new mandates on individuals and employers, requiring most individuals to have health insurance. Beginning in 2015, the PPACA assesses penalties on large employers that do not offer health insurance meeting certain coverage, value, or affordability standards. While we believe the costs associated with the law may have less of an impact on Kforce than many other staffing companies due to the level and scope of benefits we offer, a delay in or inability to increase bill rates charged to our customers could result in a reduction of our Flex gross profit. In addition, because the regulations governing the PPACA’s employer mandate are new and subject to interpretation, it is possible that Kforce may incur liability in the form of penalties, fines, or damages if the health plans we offer are subsequently found not to meet minimum essential coverage, affordability or minimum value standards, or if our method for determining eligibility for coverage is found inadequate or our clients seek indemnification for health care claims resulting from consultants working on client assignments. The cost of any such penalties, fines or damages could have a material adverse effect on Kforce’s financial and operating results.

We are exposed to intangible asset risk which could result in future impairment.

A significant and sustained decline in our stock price and market capitalization, a significant decline in our (or in one or more of our reporting units’) expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate, slower growth rates, or changes in our business strategy have resulted, and could result in the future, in the need to perform an impairment analysis. If we were to conclude that a future write-down of our goodwill or other intangible assets is necessary, it could result in material charges that are adverse to our operating results and financial position. See Note 6 – “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Estimates” for further details, including the details regarding the goodwill impairment losses within our GS reporting unit in recent years.

Significant legal actions could subject Kforce to substantial uninsured liabilities.

Professional service providers are subject to legal actions alleging malpractice, breach of contract and other legal theories. These actions may involve large claims and significant defense costs. We may also be subject to claims alleging violations of federal or state labor laws. In addition, we may be subject to claims related to torts, intentional acts, or crimes committed by our full-time employees or temporary staffing personnel. In some instances, we are contractually obligated to indemnify clients against such risks. A failure to observe the applicable standard of care, relevant Kforce or client policies and guidelines, or applicable federal, state, local or foreign laws, rules, and regulations could result in negative publicity, payment of fines, significant damage awards, or settlement expense. To reduce our exposure, we maintain insurance coverage for professional malpractice liability, fidelity, employment practices liability and general liability, in amounts and with deductibles that we believe are appropriate for our operations. Our insurance coverage, however, may not cover all claims against us or continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost.

Delays or defaults in collecting our trade accounts receivable could adversely affect our business.

We generate a significant amount of trade accounts receivable from our customers. Delays or defaults in payments owed to us could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Factors that could cause a delay or default include business failures, turmoil in the financial and credit markets, sluggish or recessionary U.S. economic conditions, our exposure to customers in high-risk sectors such as the financial services industry, and declines in the credit worthiness of our customers. See Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

Kforce’s success depends upon retaining the services of its management team and key operating employees.

Kforce is highly dependent on its management team and expects that continued success will depend largely upon their efforts and abilities. The loss of the services of any key executive for any reason could have a material adverse effect upon Kforce. Success also depends upon our ability to identify, develop, and retain qualified operating employees; particularly management, client servicing, and candidate recruiting employees. Kforce expends significant resources in the recruiting and training of its employees, as the pool of available applicants for these positions is limited. The loss of some of our key operating employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to establish and maintain client and candidate, professional, and technical relationships.

Table of Contents

The financial markets may experience significant turmoil, which may negatively impact our liquidity and our ability to obtain financing.

Kforce's liquidity is dependent in part on our revolving credit facility, which is provided by a syndicate of banks. Our liquidity may be negatively impacted if one of our lenders under our credit facility, or another financial institution, suffers liquidity issues. In such an event, we may not be able to draw on any of the amounts available under our credit facility, or a substantial portion thereof. If we attempt to obtain future financing in addition to, or as a replacement of, our credit facility, financial market turmoil could negatively impact our ability to obtain such financing on favorable terms.

Kforce depends on the proper functioning of its information systems.

Kforce is dependent on the proper functioning of information systems in operating its business. Critical information systems are used in every aspect of Kforce’s daily operations, most significantly, in the identification and matching of staffing resources to client assignments and in the customer billing and consultant or vendor payment functions. Kforce’s information systems are vulnerable to natural disasters (we are headquartered and our leased data center are located in a hurricane-prone area), fire or casualty theft, technical failures, terrorist acts, cyber security breaches, power loss, telecommunications failures, physical or software intrusions, computer viruses, and similar events. If our critical information systems fail or are otherwise unavailable, we would have to accomplish these functions manually, which could prove difficult or impossible, causing a material adverse effect on our business. Also, any theft or misuse of information resulting from a security breach could result in, among other things, loss of significant and/or sensitive information, litigation by affected parties, financial obligations resulting from such theft or misuse, higher insurance premiums, governmental investigations, negative reactions from current and potential future customers (including potential negative financial ramifications under certain customer contract provisions) and poor publicity and any of these could adversely affect our financial results. In addition, we depend on third-party vendors for certain functions (including the operations of our leased data center), whose future performance and reliability we cannot control.

Significant increases in payroll-related costs could adversely affect Kforce’s business.

Kforce is required to pay a number of federal, state, and local payroll and related costs, including unemployment taxes, workers’ compensation and insurance premiums and claims, FICA, and Medicare, among others, related to our employees. Significant increases in the effective rates of any payroll-related costs would likely have a material adverse effect on Kforce. Over the last few years, many of the states in which Kforce conducts business have continued to significantly increase their state unemployment tax rates in an effort to increase funding for unemployment benefits. Costs could also increase as a result of health care reforms or the possible imposition of additional requirements and restrictions related to the placement of personnel. We may not be able to increase the fees charged to our clients in a timely manner or in a sufficient amount to cover these potential cost increases.

Adverse results in tax audits could result in significant cash expenditures or exposure to unforeseen liabilities.

Kforce is subject to periodic federal, state, and local tax audits for various tax years. Although Kforce attempts to comply with all taxing authority regulations, adverse findings or assessments made by taxing authorities as the result of an audit could have a material adverse effect on Kforce.

Due to inherent limitations, there can be no assurance that our system of disclosure and internal controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors and fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to management.

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Kforce have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Table of Contents

Our business is dependent upon maintaining our reputation, our relationships, and our performance.

The reputation and relationships that we have established and currently maintain with our customers are important to maintaining existing business and identifying new business. If our reputation or relationships were damaged, it could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, if our performance does not meet our customers’ expectations, our revenues and operating results could be materially harmed.

We rely on short-term engagements with most of our clients.

Because long-term engagements are not a significant part of our business, other than in our GS segment, future financial results cannot be reliably predicted by considering past trends or extrapolating past results.

Kforce’s current market share may decrease as a result of limited barriers to entry for new competitors and discontinuation of clients outsourcing their staffing needs.

We face significant competition in the markets we serve, and there are limited barriers to entry for new competitors. The competition among staffing services firms is intense. Kforce competes for potential clients with providers of outsourcing services, systems integrators, computer systems consultants, temporary personnel agencies, search firms, and other providers of staffing services. Some of our competitors possess substantially greater resources than we do. From time to time, we experience significant pressure from our clients to reduce price levels. During these periods, we may face increased competitive pricing pressures and may not be able to recruit the personnel necessary to fulfill our clients’ needs. We also face the risk that certain of our current and prospective clients will decide to provide similar services internally.

Competition for acquisition opportunities may restrict Kforce’s future growth by limiting our ability to make acquisitions at reasonable valuations.

Kforce has increased its market share and presence in the staffing industry partly through strategic acquisitions of companies that have complemented or enhanced its business. We have historically faced competition for acquisitions. In the future, this could limit our ability to grow through acquisitions or could raise the prices of acquisitions and make them less accretive or possibly non-accretive to us. In addition, Kforce may be limited by its ability to obtain financing to consummate desirable acquisitions.

Kforce may not be able to recruit and retain qualified personnel.

Kforce depends upon the abilities of its staff to attract and retain personnel, particularly technical, professional, and cleared government services personnel, who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet the staffing requirements of our clients. We must continually evaluate and upgrade our base of available qualified personnel to keep pace with changing client needs and emerging technologies. We expect significant competition for individuals with proven technical or professional skills for the foreseeable future. If qualified personnel are not available to us in sufficient numbers and upon economic terms acceptable to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Kforce may face significant risk arising from acquisitions or dispositions.

Kforce may face difficulties integrating future acquisitions into existing operations and acquisitions may be unsuccessful, involve significant cash expenditures, or expose Kforce to unforeseen liabilities.

These acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:


•	potential loss of key employees or clients of acquired companies;


•	difficulties integrating acquired personnel and distinct cultures into a single business;


•	diversion of management attention from existing operations; and


•	assumption of liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies.

Table of Contents

These acquisitions may also involve significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence, integration expenses, and exposure to unforeseen liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Any acquisition may ultimately have a negative impact on our business and financial condition. In addition, dispositions involve risks, which could have a material adverse effect on us including:


•	we may not be able to identify acceptable buyers;


•	we may divest a business at a price or on terms that are less favorable than anticipated;


•	we may lose key employees;


•	divestitures could adversely affect our profitability and, under certain circumstances, require us to record impairment charges or a loss as a result of the transaction;


•	completing divestitures requires expenses and management effort;


•	we may become subject to indemnity obligations and/or remain liable or contingently liable for obligations related to the divested business or operations;


•	we may retain of certain continuing liabilities under contracts;


•	covenants not to compete could impair our ability to attract and retain customers; and


•	we may face difficulties in the separation of the divested operations, services, products and personnel.

Provisions in Kforce’s articles and bylaws and under Florida law may have certain anti-takeover effects.

Kforce’s articles of incorporation and bylaws and Florida law contain provisions that may have the effect of inhibiting a non-negotiated merger or other business combination. In particular, our articles of incorporation provide for a staggered board of directors and permit the removal of directors only for cause. Additionally, the Board may issue up to 15 million shares of preferred stock, and fix the rights and preferences thereof, without a further vote of the shareholders. In addition, certain of our officers and managers have employment agreements containing certain provisions that call for substantial payments to be made to such employees in certain circumstances upon a change in control. Certain of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of Kforce, including an acquisition in which shareholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. As a result, shareholders who might desire to participate in such a transaction may not have the opportunity to do so. Moreover, the existence of these provisions could have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

Kforce’s stock price may be volatile.

Kforce’s common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market using the ticker symbol “KFRC.” The market price of our stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and could fluctuate substantially in the future, based on a variety of factors, including our operating results, changes in general conditions in the economy, the financial markets, the employment services industry, or other developments affecting us, our clients, or our competitors; some of which may be unrelated to our performance.

In addition, the stock market in general, especially The NASDAQ Global Select Market tier, along with market prices for staffing companies, has experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating results.

Among other things, volatility in our stock price could mean that investors will not be able to sell their shares at or above the prices they pay. The volatility also could impair our ability in the future to offer common stock as a source of additional capital or as consideration in the acquisition of other businesses.

Table of Contents

RISKS RELATED TO OUR GOVERNMENT BUSINESS

Our GS segment is substantially dedicated to contracting with and serving U.S. Federal Government agencies (the “Federal Agency Business”). In addition, Kforce supplies services to the Federal Government. Federal contractors, including Kforce face a number of risks, including the following:

Our failure to comply with complex federal procurement laws and regulations could cause us to lose business, incur additional costs, and subject us to a variety of penalties, including suspension and debarment from doing business with the Federal Government.

We must comply with complex laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration, and performance of Federal Government contracts. These laws and regulations create compliance risk, affect how we do business with our federal agency clients, and may impose added costs on our business. If a government review, audit or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, harm to our reputation, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with Federal Government agencies.

The Federal Government also may reform its procurement practices or adopt new contracting rules and regulations, including cost accounting standards, that could be costly to satisfy or that could impact our ability to obtain new contracts. A failure to comply with all applicable laws and regulations could result in contract termination, price or fee reductions, or suspension or debarment from contracting with the Federal Government; each of which could lead to a material reduction in our revenues, cash flows and operating results.

Unfavorable government audit results could force us to refund previously recognized revenues and could subject us to a variety of penalties and sanctions.

Federal agencies can audit and review our performance on contracts, pricing practices, cost structure, incurred cost submissions and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards. An audit of our work, including an audit of work performed by companies Kforce has acquired or may acquire, or subcontractors we have hired or may hire, could force us to refund previously recognized revenues.

If a government audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or debarment from doing business with Federal Government agencies. In addition, we could suffer serious harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety were made against us, whether or not true.

We are dependent upon the ability of government agencies to administratively manage our contracts.

After we are awarded a contract and the contract is funded by the Federal Government, we are still dependent upon the ability of the relevant agency to administratively manage our contract. We can be adversely impacted by delays in the start-up of already awarded and funded projects, including delays due to shortages of acquisition and contracting personnel within the Federal Government agencies.

The failure by Congress to approve budgets, raise the U.S. debt ceiling or avoid sequestration on a timely basis for the federal agencies we support could delay, reduce or stop federal spending and cause us to lose revenue or impair our intangible assets.

On an annual basis, Congress must approve and the President must sign the appropriation bills that govern spending by each of the federal agencies we support. If Congress is unable to agree on budget priorities and is unable to appropriate funds or pass the annual budget on a timely basis, as has been the case in recent years, there may be delays, reductions or cessations of funding for our services and solutions. In addition, from time to time it has been necessary for Congress to raise the U.S. debt ceiling in order to allow for borrowing necessary to fund government operations. If that becomes necessary again and Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling on a timely basis, there may be delays, reductions or cessations of funding for our services and solutions. Furthermore, legislatively mandated cuts in federal programs, known as sequestration, could result in delays, reductions or cessation of funding for our services and solutions.

Changes in the spending policies or budget priorities of the Federal Government could cause us to lose revenue.

Changes in Federal Government fiscal or spending policies could materially adversely affect our Federal Agency Business; in particular, our business could be materially adversely affected by decreases in Federal Government spending.

Table of Contents

Our Federal Agency Business is dependent upon maintaining our reputation, our relationships and our performance.

The reputation and relationships that we have established and currently maintain with government agencies are important to maintaining existing business and identifying new business. If our reputation or relationships were damaged, it could have a material adverse effect. In addition, if our performance does not meet agency expectations, our revenues and operating results could be materially harmed.

Competition is intense in the Federal Agency Business.

There is often intense competition to win federal agency contracts. Even when a contract is awarded to us, competitors may protest such awards. If we are unable to successfully compete for new business or win competitions to maintain existing business, our operations could be materially adversely affected. Many of our competitors are larger and have greater resources, larger client bases, and greater brand recognition than we do. Our larger competitors also may be able to provide clients with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide.

Loss of our General Services Administration (“GSA”) Schedules or other contracting vehicles could impair our ability to win new business.

GSA Schedules constitute a significant percentage of revenues from our federal agency clients. If we were to lose one or more of these Schedules or other contracting vehicles, we could lose revenues and our operating results could be materially adversely affected. These Schedules or contracts typically have an initial term with multiple options that may be exercised by our government agency clients to extend the contract for successive periods of one or more years. We can provide no assurance that our clients will exercise these options.

Our failure to obtain and maintain necessary security clearances may limit our ability to perform classified work for government clients, which could cause us to lose business.

Some government contracts require us to maintain facility security clearances and require some of our employees to maintain individual security clearances. If our employees lose or are unable to timely obtain security clearances, or we lose a facility clearance, a government agency client may terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration.

Our employees may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, which could harm our business.

Like all government contractors, we are exposed to the risk that employee fraud or other misconduct could occur. Misconduct by our employees could include intentional failures to comply with Federal Government procurement regulations, engaging in unauthorized activities, seeking reimbursement for improper expenses, or falsifying time records. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of our clients’ sensitive or classified information, which could result in regulatory sanctions against us and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and precautions to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in controlling such risks or losses, which could materially adversely affect our business.

Security breaches in sensitive government information systems could result in the loss of our clients and cause negative publicity.

Many of the systems we develop, install, and maintain involve managing and protecting information used in intelligence, national security, and other sensitive or classified government functions. A security breach in one of these systems could cause serious harm to our business, damage our reputation, and prevent us from being eligible for further work on sensitive or classified systems for Federal Government clients. We could incur losses from such a security breach that could exceed the policy limits under our insurance. Damage to our reputation or limitations on our eligibility for additional work resulting from a security breach in one of our systems could materially reduce our revenues.

We are the prime contractor on many of our contracts and if our subcontractors fail to appropriately perform their obligations, our performance and our ability to win future contracts could be harmed.

For many of our contracts where we are the prime contractor, we involve subcontractors, which we rely on to perform a portion of the services that we must provide to our customers. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our subcontractors, including disputes regarding the quality and timeliness of work performed or customer concerns about the subcontractor’s performance. In addition, the contracting parties on which we rely may be affected by changes in the economic environment and constraints on available financing to meet their performance requirements or provide needed supplies on a timely basis. A failure by one or more of those contracting parties to provide the agreed-upon supplies or perform the agreed-upon services on a timely basis may affect our ability to perform our obligations.

Table of Contents

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

On May 27, 2010, we acquired our corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, which is approximately 128,000 square feet of space. Leases for our field offices, which are located throughout the U.S., range from three to five-year terms although a limited number of leases contain short-term renewal provisions that range from month-to-month to one year. We also lease an office in Manila, Philippines, which is approximately 17,000 square feet of space.

Although additional field offices may be established based on the requirements of our operations, we believe that our facilities are adequate for our current needs, and we do not expect to materially expand our facilities in the foreseeable future.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are involved in legal proceedings, claims, and administrative matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We have made accruals with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, that are reflected in our consolidated financial statements but are not, individually or in the aggregate, considered material. For other matters for which an accrual has not been made, we have not yet determined that a loss is probable or the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. While the ultimate outcome of the matters cannot be determined, we currently do not expect that these proceedings and claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, however, and if decided adversely to us, or if we determine that settlement of particular litigation is appropriate, we may be subject to liability that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Kforce maintains liability insurance in such amounts and with such coverage and deductibles as management believes is reasonable. The principal liability risks that Kforce insures against are workers’ compensation, personal injury, bodily injury, property damage, directors’ and officers’ liability, errors and omissions, employment practices liability and fidelity losses. There can be no assurance that Kforce’s liability insurance will cover all events or that the limits of coverage will be sufficient to fully cover all liabilities. Accordingly, we disclose matters below for which a material loss is reasonably possible. In each case, however, except where otherwise noted, we have either determined that the range of loss is not reasonably estimable or that any reasonably estimable range of loss is not material to our consolidated financial statements.

On February 19, 2014, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida unsealed a qui tam complaint that had been filed by a terminated former employee in June of 2013. The complaint was filed against Kforce and Kforce Government Solutions Inc., was captioned United States of America and William Turner, Relator v. Kforce Government Solutions Inc. and Kforce Inc., Case No. 8:13-cv-1517-T-36TBM, and was amended on April 14, 2014. The amended complaint alleges False Claims Act and federal and state whistleblower statute violations and certain accounting irregularities, as well as employment law and defamation claims. On June 13, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On October 8, 2014, the United States government filed a notice of its election to decline to intervene in the case. On November 10, 2014, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss all federal claims with prejudice, and also dismissed the state law claims without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Turner appealed the court’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, where the case is currently pending as USCA Case No. 14-15529.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market using the ticker symbol “KFRC”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low intra-day sales price of our common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. These prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markups, markdowns or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,		June 30,		September 30,		December 31,
2014
High	$	22.59	$	23.80	$	22.76	$	24.72
Low	$	17.30	$	19.97	$	17.20	$	18.65
2013
High	$	16.65	$	16.43	$	17.99	$	21.37
Low	$	13.36	$	12.23	$	14.69	$	16.83

From January 1, 2015 through February 24, 2015, the high and low intra-day sales price of our common stock was $24.99 and $22.34, respectively. On February 24, 2015, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $24.11 per share.

Holders of Common Stock

As of February 24, 2015, there were approximately 175 holders of record.

Dividends

Kforce’s Board may, at its discretion, declare and pay dividends on the outstanding shares of Kforce’s common stock out of retained earnings, subject to statutory requirements. Dividends for any outstanding and unvested restricted stock as of the record date are awarded in the form of additional shares of forfeitable restricted stock, at the same rate as the cash dividend on common stock and based on the closing stock price on the record date. Such additional shares have the same vesting terms and conditions as the outstanding and unvested restricted stock. During 2014, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share on each of February 7, 2014, April 25, 2014 and July 25, 2014. On December 3, 2014, the Board declared an increase to the cash dividend bringing the quarterly dividend to $0.11 per share of common stock. No dividend payments were declared during the first nine months of 2013. A cash dividend on common stock of $0.10 per share was declared on December 4, 2013.

Kforce currently expects to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends of an amount similar to its December 2014 dividend of $0.11 per share. However, the amount and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by Kforce’s Board of Directors each quarter following its review of the Firm’s financial performance and legal ability to pay. There can be no assurances that dividends will be paid in the future.

Table of Contents

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014:



Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1)	Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (2)		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (3) (4)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
Kforce Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan	N/A	N/A		2,424,078
Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan	35,000	$	12.14	34,425
Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan	N/A	N/A		2,816,041
Kforce Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (5)	22,300	$	11.00	—
Total	57,300	$	11.70	5,274,544


(1)	In addition to the number of securities listed in this column, 811,854 shares and 169,796 shares of restricted stock granted under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively, have been issued and are unvested as of December 31, 2014.


(2)	The weighted-average exercise price excludes unvested restricted stock because there is no exercise price associated with these equity awards.

(3)

All of the shares of common stock that remain available for future issuance under the Kforce Inc. 2006 and 2013 Stock Incentive Plans may be issued in connection with options, warrants, rights and restricted stock awards. Each future grant of options or stock appreciation rights shall reduce the available shares under the Kforce Inc. 2006 and 2013 Stock Incentive Plans by an equal amount while each future grant of restricted stock shall reduce the available shares by 1.58 shares for each share awarded. In order to maximize our share reserves, the prevailing practice over the last few years has been for Kforce to issue full value awards as opposed to options and stock appreciation rights.


(4)	As of December 31, 2014, there were options outstanding under the Kforce Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2009 ESPP”) to purchase 6,644 shares of common stock at a discounted purchase price of $22.92.


(5)	Issuances of options under the Incentive Stock Option Plan ceased in 2005. All of the outstanding options issued pursuant to this plan expire in March 2015.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

The following table presents information with respect to our repurchases of Kforce common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2014:



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) (2)	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
October 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014	992,211	$	20.57	992,211	$	51,647,241
November 1, 2014 to November 30, 2014	490,162	$	23.47	490,162	$	40,142,579
December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014	452,802	$	23.83	439,703	$	29,663,527
Total	1,935,175	$	22.07	1,922,076	$	29,663,527


(1)	All of the shares reported constitute shares repurchased in the open market as part of the Firm’s share repurchase authorization and shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements as a result of the vesting of restricted stock.


(2)	Includes 13,099 shares of stock received upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding requirements for the period December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with the information within Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.



	Years Ended December 31,
	2014 (1)		2013 (2)(3)		2012 (4)(5)			2011		2010
	(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Net service revenues	$	1,217,331	$	1,073,728	$	1,005,487		$	936,036	$	828,895
Gross profit	374,581		344,376		320,586			293,271		263,999
Selling, general and administrative expenses	315,338		307,944		305,940			258,578		239,400
Goodwill impairment	—		14,510		69,158			—		—
Depreciation and amortization	9,894		9,846		10,789			12,505		12,611
Other expense, net	1,392		1,147		1,057			1,220		811
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes	47,957		10,929		(66,358		)	20,968		11,177
Income tax expense (benefit)	18,559		5,635		(24,227		)	7,339		3,447
Income (loss) from continuing operations	29,398		5,294		(42,131		)	13,629		7,730
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	61,517		5,493		28,428			13,527		12,904
Net income (loss)	$	90,915	$	10,787	$	(13,703	)	$	27,156	$	20,634
Earnings (loss) per share – basic, continuing operations	$	0.94	$	0.16	$	(1.18	)	$	0.36	$	0.20
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted, continuing operations	$	0.93	$	0.16	$	(1.18	)	$	0.35	$	0.19
Earnings (loss) per share – basic	$	2.89	$	0.32	$	(0.38	)	$	0.72	$	0.52
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted	$	2.87	$	0.32	$	(0.38	)	$	0.70	$	0.51
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic	31,475		33,511		35,791			37,835		39,480
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted	31,691		33,643		35,791			38,831		40,503
Cash dividend declared per share	$	0.41	$	0.10	$	1.00		$	—	$	—
	As of December 31,
	2014		2013		2012			2011		2010
	(IN THOUSANDS)
Working capital	$	130,226	$	112,913	$	72,685		$	103,075	$	64,878
Total assets	$	363,922	$	347,768	$	325,149		$	409,672	$	391,044
Total outstanding borrowings – Credit Facility	$	93,333	$	62,642	$	21,000		$	49,526	$	10,825
Total long-term liabilities	$	130,351	$	100,562	$	56,429		$	93,393	$	36,904
Stockholders’ equity	$	139,388	$	157,233	$	169,846		$	233,115	$	253,817


(1)	During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce terminated the Company's Supplemental Executive Retirement Health Plan ("SERHP") and settled all future benefit obligations by making lump sum payments totaling approximately $3.9 million, which resulted in a net settlement loss of approximately $0.7 million. The termination effectively removed Kforce's related post-retirement benefit obligation.


(2)	Kforce recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $14.5 million related to the GS reporting unit during 2013. The tax benefit associated with this impairment charge was $5.2 million, resulting in an after-tax impairment charge of $9.3 million.

Table of Contents

(3)

During the three months ended December 31, 2013, Kforce commenced a plan to streamline its leadership and support-related structure to better align a higher percentage of personnel in roles that are closest to the customer through an organizational realignment. As a result of the organizational realignment, Kforce incurred severance and termination-related expenses of $7.1 million during 2013 which were recorded within selling, general and administrative expense. Additionally, in connection with the realignment and succession planning, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary bonuses of $3.6 million paid to a broad group of senior management during the fourth quarter of 2013.


(4)	Kforce recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $69.2 million related to the GS reporting unit during 2012. The tax benefit associated with this impairment charge was $24.7 million, resulting in an after-tax impairment charge of $44.5 million.

(5)

In connection with the disposition of Kforce Clinical Research, Inc. (“KCR”), as described below, the Board exercised its discretion, as permitted within the Kforce Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, to accelerate the vesting, for tax planning purposes, of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and alternative long-term incentive (“ALTI”) awards on March 31, 2012, which resulted in the acceleration of $31.3 million of compensation expense and payroll taxes recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

During the three months ended September 30, 2014, Kforce disposed of Kforce Healthcare, Inc. (“KHI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kforce Inc. and operator of the former Health Information Management (“HIM”) reporting segment, for a total cash purchase price of $119.0 million plus a $96 thousand post-closing working capital adjustment. The results of operations for KHI have been presented as discontinued operations for all of the years presented above. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Kforce disposed of KCR for a purchase price of $50.0 million plus a $7.3 million post-closing working capital adjustment. The results of operations of KCR have been presented as discontinued operations for the years 2012, 2011 and 2010 presented above. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand Kforce, our operations, and our present business environment. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report, as well as Item 1. Business of this report for an overview of our operations and business environment.

This overview summarizes the MD&A, which includes the following sections:


•	Executive Summary – an executive summary of our results of operations for 2014.


•	Critical Accounting Estimates – a discussion of the accounting estimates that are most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.


•	New Accounting Standards – a discussion of recently issued accounting standards and their potential impact on our consolidated financial statements.


•	Results of Operations – an analysis of Kforce’s consolidated results of operations for the three years presented in its consolidated financial statements. In order to assist the reader in understanding our business as a whole, certain metrics are presented for each of our segments.


•	Liquidity and Capital Resources – an analysis of cash flows, off-balance sheet arrangements, stock repurchases and contractual obligations and commitments and the impact of changes in interest rates on our business.

Effective August 3, 2014, Kforce divested its HIM segment through a sale of all of the issued and outstanding stock of KHI. The results presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 include activity relating to HIM as discontinued operations.

On March 31, 2012, Kforce sold all of the issued and outstanding stock of KCR. The results presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes activity relating to KCR as discontinued operations. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Except as specifically noted, our discussions below exclude any activity related to HIM and KCR, which are addressed separately in the discussion of Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The following is an executive summary of what Kforce believes are important 2014 highlights, which should be considered in the context of the additional discussions herein and in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. We believe such highlights are as follows:


•	Net service revenues increased 13.4% to $1.22 billion in 2014 from $1.07 billion in 2013. Net service revenues increased 13.9% for Tech, 14.2% for FA and 6.6% for GS.


•	Flex revenues increased 14.2% to $1.17 billion in 2014 from $1.03 billion in 2013.


•	Search revenues decreased 3.6% to $46.7 million in 2014 from $48.4 million in 2013.


•	Quarterly sequential revenues grew for four consecutive quarters, driving revenue growth in the fourth quarter of 2014 to 13.0% year over year.


•	Flex gross profit margin decreased 90 basis points to 28.0% in 2014 from 28.9% in 2013. Flex gross profit margin decreased 60 basis points for Tech, 70 basis points for FA and 310 basis points for GS year over year.

•

Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses as a percentage of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014 was 25.9% compared to 28.7% in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in compensation expense as a result of the organizational realignment executed by the Firm during the fourth quarter of 2013, as well as a decrease in the annual effective commission rate due to certain changes made to our compensation plan.


•	Income from continuing operations of $29.4 million in 2014 increased $24.1 million compared with income from continuing operations of $5.3 million in 2013. The results for 2013 include an after-tax goodwill impairment charge of $9.3 million.


•	Net income of $90.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $80.1 million from net income of $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.


•	Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased to $0.93 from $0.16 per share in 2013.

•

During the three months ended September 30, 2014, Kforce Inc. sold all of the issued and outstanding stock of KHI, operator of the former HIM reporting segment, for a total cash purchase price of $119.0 million, plus a post-closing working capital adjustment of $96 thousand. Proceeds from the sale of HIM were primarily used initially to pay off the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and ultimately to repurchase shares of common stock.


•	During 2014, Kforce repurchased 4.8 million shares of common stock on the open market at a total cost of approximately $101.6 million.


•	The Firm declared and paid cash dividends totaling $0.41 per share during the year ended December 31, 2014 resulting in a payout in cash of $12.8 million.


•	The Firm amended its credit facility on December 23, 2014 to increase the borrowing capacity by $35.0 million to $170.0 million, and to increase the accordion option from $15.0 million to $50.0 million.


•	The total amount outstanding under the credit facility increased $30.7 million to $93.3 million as of December 31, 2014 as compared to $62.6 million as of December 31, 2013, primarily due to funds used to repurchase shares of our common stock.

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends, and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, estimates, assumptions and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management believes that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.



Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Fallouts and Other Accounts Receivable Reserves

See Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a complete discussion of our policies related to determining our allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reserves.	Kforce performs an ongoing analysis of factors including recent write-off and delinquency trends, changes in economic conditions, a specific analysis of material accounts receivable balances that are past due, and concentration of accounts receivable among clients, in establishing its allowance for doubtful accounts. Kforce estimates its allowance for Search fallouts based on our historical experience with the actual occurrence of fallouts. Kforce estimates its reserve for future revenue adjustments (e.g. bill rate adjustments, time card adjustments, early pay discounts) based on our historical experience.	We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reserves. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, these allowances were 1.0% and 1.1% as a percentage of gross accounts receivable, respectively. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our allowance for doubtful accounts, fallouts and other accounts receivable reserves. However, if our estimates regarding estimated accounts receivable losses are inaccurate, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% difference in actual accounts receivable losses reserved at December 31, 2014, would have impacted our net income for 2014 by approximately $0.1 million.

Table of Contents



Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Goodwill Impairment

We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may not be recoverable. See Note 6 – “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of the valuation methodologies employed. In connection with our annual assessment of goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2014 we performed a step one analysis for each of our reporting units, which ultimately resulted in no impairment charge for Tech, FA or GS. The carrying value of goodwill as of December 31, 2014 by reporting unit was approximately $17.0 million, $8.0 million and $20.9 million for our Tech, FA and GS reporting units, respectively.	We determine the fair value of our reporting units using widely accepted valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow, guideline transaction method and guideline company method. These types of analyses contain uncertainties because they require management to make significant assumptions and judgments including: (1) an appropriate rate to discount the expected future cash flows; (2) the inherent risk in achieving forecasted operating results; (3) long-term growth rates; (4) expectations for future economic cycles; (5) market comparable companies and appropriate adjustments thereto and (6) market multiples. It is our policy to conduct impairment testing based on our current business strategy in light of present industry and economic conditions, as well as future expectations.	Kforce performed a step one impairment assessment for each of our reporting units (Tech, FA and GS) as of December 31, 2014. We compared the carrying value of each reporting unit to the respective estimated fair value as of December 31, 2014 and determined that the fair value exceeded carrying value by 263%, 342% and 7%, respectively. As a result, no goodwill impairment charges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, we recorded an impairment charge to the GS reporting unit goodwill balance. As the current fair value of the GS reporting unit exceeds the carrying value by 7%, the following is a discussion regarding certain of the assumptions utilized in the step one impairment analysis for GS as of December 31, 2014. Consistent with the 2013 Step 2 analysis, a terminal value growth rate of 3% and a weighted average cost of capital of 17%, which includes a specific company risk premium of 2%, was used. To calculate fair value under the guideline company method, we utilized enterprise value/revenue multiples ranging from 0.3x to 0.7x and enterprise value/EBITDA multiples ranging from 3.0x to 6.9x. Additionally, the fair value under the guideline company method included a control premium of 35.0%, which was determined based on a review of comparative market transactions. To calculate the fair value under the guideline transaction method, we utilized enterprise value/revenue multiples ranging from 0.3x to 2.3x and enterprise value/EBITDA multiples ranging from 7.6x to 20.8x. A deterioration in any of these assumptions or the assumptions discussed in Note 6 – “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could result in an additional impairment charge.

Table of Contents



Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Self-Insured Liabilities

We are self-insured for certain losses related to health insurance and workers’ compensation claims. However, we obtain third-party insurance coverage to limit our exposure to these claims. When estimating our self-insured liabilities, we consider a number of factors, including historical claims experience, plan structure, internal claims management activities, demographic factors and severity factors. Periodically, management reviews its assumptions to determine the adequacy of our self-insured liabilities. Our liabilities for health insurance and workers’ compensation claims as of December 31, 2014 were $3.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively.	Our self-insured liabilities contain uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the ultimate total cost to settle reported claims and claims incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) as of the balance sheet date.	We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodologies used to establish our self-insured liabilities during 2014 and 2013. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our self-insured liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our self-insured liabilities related to health insurance and workers’ compensation as of December 31, 2014 would have impacted our net income for 2014 by approximately $0.3 million.

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Stock-Based Compensation

We have stock-based compensation programs, which include options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and restricted stock awards. See Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” Note 11 – “Employee Benefit Plans,” and Note 13 – “Stock Incentive Plans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of our stock-based compensation programs. We have not granted any stock options or SARs over the last three years. We determine the fair market value of our restricted stock based on the closing stock price of Kforce’s common stock on the date of grant.	The stock compensation expense recorded is impacted by our estimated forfeiture rates, which are based on historical forfeitures, as well as historical employee turnover.	We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine stock-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in stock-based compensation expense that could be material or the stock-based compensation expense reported in our financial statements may not be representative of the actual economic cost of the stock-based compensation. A 10% change in unrecognized stock-based compensation expense would have impacted our net income by $0.7 million for 2014.

Table of Contents



Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Defined Benefit Pension Plan – U.S.

We have a defined benefit pension plan that benefits certain named executive officers, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). See Note 11 – “Employee Benefit Plans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of the terms of this plan. The SERP was not funded as of December 31, 2014 or 2013.	When estimating the obligation for our pension benefit plan, management is required to make certain assumptions and to apply judgment with respect to determining an appropriate discount rate, bonus percentage assumptions and expected effect of future compensation increases for the participants in the plan.	We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our obligation. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in the discount rate used to measure the net periodic pension cost for the SERP during 2014 would have had an insignificant impact on our net income for 2014.

Description	Judgments and Uncertainties	Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Accounting for Income Taxes

See Note 4 – “Income Taxes” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of the components of Kforce’s income tax expense, as well as the temporary differences that exist as of December 31, 2014.	Our consolidated effective income tax rate is influenced by tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions, including those that may be uncertain. Kforce is also required to exercise judgment with respect to the realization of our net deferred tax assets. Management evaluates all positive and negative evidence and exercises judgment regarding past and future events to determine if it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. If appropriate, a valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets to offset future tax benefits that may not be realized.	We do not believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in our liability for uncertain income tax positions or our effective income tax rate. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses that could be material. Kforce recorded a valuation allowance of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2014 related primarily to state net operating losses. A 0.50% change in our effective income tax rate from continuing operations would have impacted our net income for 2014 by approximately $0.2 million.

Table of Contents

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In August 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, which requires management to evaluate, at each interim and annual reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, and provide related disclosures. This guidance is to be applied for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter, and early adoption is permitted. We do not anticipate a material impact to the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In May 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding revenue from contracts with customers, which specifies that revenue should be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is to be applied for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods and will require enhanced disclosures. Kforce is currently evaluating the potential impact of the accounting and disclosure requirements on the consolidated financial statements; we do not currently anticipate a material impact to the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In April 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals of components of an entity, which specifies additional thresholds for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The guidance is to be applied for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and early adoption is permitted. Kforce elected not to adopt this standard early.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net service revenues for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $1.22 billion, $1.07 billion and $1.01 billion, respectively, which represents an increase of 13.4% from 2013 to 2014 and 6.8% from 2012 to 2013. The increase in 2014 from 2013 was primarily due to our Tech segment (which represented 69.2% of total net service revenues in 2014) and our FA segment (which represented 22.7% of total net service revenues in 2014) which had increases in net service revenues of 13.9% and 14.2%, respectively. The increase in 2013 from 2012 was primarily due to our Tech segment (which represented 68.9% of total net service revenues in 2013) which had an increase in net service revenues of 9.4%. Our GS segment net service revenues increased 6.6% in 2014 from 2013 and increased 0.6% in 2013 from 2012. Search revenues decreased 3.6% in 2014 compared to 2013 and increased 2.6% in 2013 compared to 2012.

Flex gross profit margins decreased 90 basis points to 28.0% for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 28.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease is due primarily to the impact of a change in spread between our bill rates and pay rates as a result of higher concentration of our revenue growth coming from larger, lower-margin profile clients and an increase in benefit costs. Flex gross profit margins increased from 28.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012 to 28.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net service revenues were 25.9% and 28.7% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net service revenues during the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily driven by a reduction in compensation expense as a result of the organizational realignment executed by the Firm during the fourth quarter of 2013 and partially offset by the increase in benefit costs mentioned previously.

Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, Kforce recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $14.5 million and $69.2 million, respectively, in our GS reporting unit. In 2013, this impairment charge was a result of a business strategy decision made during the fourth quarter of 2013, regarding the GS reporting unit, to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services. During 2012, the goodwill impairment charge was the result of the adverse effect of the unexpected significant delays in the start-up of already executed and funded projects, uncertainty of funding levels of various Federal Government programs and agencies and the increasingly uncertain macro-economic and political environment.

Table of Contents

From an economic standpoint, temporary employment figures and trends are important indicators of staffing demand, which continued to improve during 2014 as compared to 2013 based on data published by the BLS and SIA. Total temporary employment increased 7.8% and the penetration rate increased 3.4% from December 2013 to December 2014, bringing the rate to 2.13% in December 2014, an all-time high. While the macro-employment picture remains uncertain, it has continuously improved, with the unemployment rate at 5.6% as of December 2014, and non-farm payroll expanding an average of 246,000 jobs per month in 2014. Also, the college-level unemployment rate, which we believe serves as a proxy for professional employment and is more closely aligned with the Firm’s business strategy, was at 2.9% in December 2014. Management believes that uncertainty in the overall U.S. economic outlook related to the political landscape, potential tax changes, geo-political risk and impact of health care reform, will continue to fuel growth in temporary staffing as employers may be reluctant to increase full-time hiring. Additionally, we believe the increasing costs of employment may be driving a systemic shift to an increased use of temporary staff as a percentage of total workforce, which is creating reduced cyclicality in the business. If the penetration rate of temporary staffing continues to experience growth in the coming months and years, we believe that our Flex revenues can grow significantly even in a relatively modest growth macro-economic environment. Kforce remains optimistic about the growth prospects of the temporary staffing industry, the penetration rate, and in particular, our revenue portfolio.

Over the last few years, we have undertaken several significant initiatives including: (1) executing a realignment plan to streamline our leadership and revenue enablers in an effort to better align a higher percentage of roles closer to the customer; (2) increasing our focus on consultant care processes and communications to redeploy our consultants in a timely fashion; (3) increasing revenue generator headcount to capitalize on targeted growth opportunities; (4) further optimizing our NRC team in support of our field operations; and (5) divesting of our non-core businesses, HIM and KCR. We believe our realigned field operations and revenue enabler operations models provide a competitive advantage for us and are keys to our future growth and profitability. We also believe that our portfolio of service offerings, which are almost exclusively in the U.S., are also a key contributor to our long-term financial stability. We believe the recent divestitures of HIM and KCR provide us the opportunity to further dedicate our resources to exclusively providing technology and finance & accounting talent in the commercial and government markets through our staffing organization and KGS, our government solutions provider.

Net Service Revenues. The following table sets forth, as a percentage of net service revenues, certain items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended:



	December 31,
	2014		2013		2012
Revenues by Segment:
Tech	69.2	%	68.9	%	67.2	%
FA	22.7		22.6		23.7
GS	8.1		8.5		9.1
Net service revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Revenues by Type:
Flex	96.2	%	95.5	%	95.3	%
Search	3.8		4.5		4.7
Net service revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Gross profit	30.8	%	32.1	%	31.9	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	25.9	%	28.7	%	30.4	%
Goodwill impairment	—	%	1.4	%	6.9	%
Depreciation and amortization	0.8	%	0.9	%	1.1	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes	3.9	%	1.0	%	(6.6	)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations	2.4	%	0.5	%	(4.2	)%
Net income (loss)	7.5	%	1.0	%	(1.4	)%

Table of Contents

The following table details net service revenues for Flex and Search by segment and changes from the prior year (in thousands).



	2014		Increase (Decrease)		2013		Increase (Decrease)		2012
Tech
Flex	$	823,311	14.3	%	$	720,179	9.9	%	$	655,062
Search	19,158		(0.1	)%	19,183		(6.5	)%	20,525
Total Tech	$	842,469	13.9	%	$	739,362	9.4	%	$	675,587
FA
Flex	$	249,274	16.9	%	$	213,158	0.6	%	$	211,797
Search	27,537		(5.9	)%	29,259		9.7	%	26,679
Total FA	$	276,811	14.2	%	$	242,417	1.7	%	$	238,476
GS
Flex	$	98,051	6.6	%	$	91,949	0.6	%	$	91,424
Search	—		—		—		—		—
Total GS	$	98,051	6.6	%	$	91,949	0.6	%	$	91,424
Total Flex	$	1,170,636	14.2	%	$	1,025,286	7.0	%	$	958,283
Total Search	46,695		(3.6	)%	48,442		2.6	%	47,204
Total Net Service Revenues	$	1,217,331	13.4	%	$	1,073,728	6.8	%	$	1,005,487

While quarterly comparisons are not fully discussed herein, certain quarterly revenue trends are referred to in discussing annual comparisons. Our quarterly operating results are affected by the number of billing days in a quarter, which is provided in the table below. The following 2014 quarterly information is presented for informational purposes only (in thousands, except Billing Days).



	Three Months Ended
	December 31		September 30		June 30		March 31
Billing Days	62		64		64		63
Flex Revenues
Tech	$	212,414	$	212,269	$	206,165	$	192,463
FA	67,863		64,254		60,057		57,100
GS	26,547		24,787		23,946		22,771
Total Flex	$	306,824	$	301,310	$	290,168	$	272,334
Search Revenues
Tech	$	4,740	$	5,374	$	5,036	$	4,008
FA	7,175		7,126		7,554		5,682
Total Search	$	11,915	$	12,500	$	12,590	$	9,690
Total Revenues
Tech	$	217,154	$	217,643	$	211,201	$	196,471
FA	75,038		71,380		67,611		62,782
GS	26,547		24,787		23,946		22,771
Total Revenues	$	318,739	$	313,810	$	302,758	$	282,024

Table of Contents

Flex Revenues. The primary drivers of Flex revenues are the number of consultant hours worked, the consultant bill rate per hour and, to a limited extent, the amount of billable expenses incurred by Kforce.

Flex revenues for our largest segment, Tech, increased 14.3% during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013 and increased 9.9% in 2013 from 2012. We believe the increase in revenue is primarily a result of candidate skill sets that are in demand, our great people and operating model, and our increase in revenue generator headcount. According to an IT growth update published by SIA during the fourth quarter of 2014, industries that utilized IT staffing are estimated to grow at a higher rate than the overall U.S. employment growth rate. SIA estimates the IT staffing market will grow 7% in 2014 and an additional 7% in 2015, which we believe is due to the continuing use of temporary staffing as a solution during uncertain economic cycles, the increasing cost of employment driving the systemic use of temporary staffing, particularly in project-based work such as technology, and an increasing influence of technology in business driving up the overall demand for Tech talent. SIA also acknowledges that notable skill shortages in certain technology skill sets will continue, which we believe will result in strong future growth in our Tech segment. The Firm believes it is well-positioned to take advantage of this growth, as a result of the expected increase in productivity, which normally comes with tenure, of the revenue generator headcount added over the past few years. Additionally, the Firm expects to continue to make selective investments in revenue generator headcount into 2015. The Firm believes the Tech segment will continue to grow year-over-year in 2015 due to our ongoing investments in revenue generating resources.

Our FA segment experienced an increase in Flex revenues of 16.9% during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013, which was a significant acceleration from the increase of 0.6% during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to 2012. In its September 2014 update, SIA provides an expectation that finance and accounting growth will be 5% in 2014 and will be augmented by an additional 5% in 2015. Management believes the benefit from the significant investment in the revenue generator headcount for FA made in the last few years was realized in 2014 through the capture of the expected growth in the FA industry and is due to improvements in associate productivity that typically come with tenure. The Firm believes the FA segment will continue to recognize year-over-year growth in 2015.

Our GS segment experienced an increase in net service revenues of 6.6% during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013 and an increase of 0.6% during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to 2012. The increase primarily relates to stronger-than-expected expansion of revenues with existing customers. The Firm believes the GS segment will remain flat year-over-year in 2015.

The following table details total Flex hours for our Tech and FA segments and percentage changes over the prior period for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):



	2014	Increase (Decrease)		2013	Increase (Decrease)		2012
Tech	12,024	10.0	%	10,929	9.0	%	10,023
FA	7,691	17.4	%	6,550	3.1	%	6,352
Total hours	19,715	12.8	%	17,479	6.7	%	16,375

As the GS segment primarily provides solutions-based services as compared to staffing services, Flex hours are not presented above.

The increase in Flex revenues for Tech for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 was $103.1 million, composed of a $71.6 million increase in volume, a $31.0 million increase in bill rate and a $0.5 million increase from the impact of billable expenses. The increase in Flex revenues for FA for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 was $36.1 million, composed of a $37.0 million increase in volume, a $0.8 million decrease in bill rate and a $0.1 million decrease from the impact of billable expenses. The increase in Flex revenues for Tech for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was $65.1 million, composed of a $58.5 million increase in volume, a $8.2 million increase in bill rate and a $1.6 million decrease from the impact of billable expenses. The increase in Flex revenues for FA for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 was $1.4 million, composed of a $6.6 million increase in volume, a $5.1 million decrease in bill rate and a $0.1 million decrease from the impact of billable expenses.

Table of Contents

The changes in billable expenses, which are included as a component of net services revenues, are primarily attributable to increases or decreases in project-based work. Flex billable expenses for each of our segments were as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):



	2014		Increase (Decrease)		2013		Increase (Decrease)		2012
Tech	$	6,093	8.2	%	$	5,630	(22.0	)%	$	7,222
FA	309		(27.0	)%	423		(19.7	)%	527
GS	391		12.4	%	348		(37.4	)%	556
Total billable expenses	$	6,793	6.1	%	$	6,401	(22.9	)%	$	8,305

Search Fees. The primary drivers of Search fees are the number of placements and the average placement fee. Search fees also include conversion revenues (conversions occur when consultants initially assigned to a client on a temporary basis are later converted to a permanent placement). Our GS segment does not make permanent placements.

Search revenues decreased 3.6% during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily driven by the reallocation of revenue-generating resources to capture the current high demand for our Flex staffing services. Search revenues increased 2.6% during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to 2012.

Total placements for each segment were as follows for the years ended December 31:



	2014	Increase (Decrease)		2013	Increase (Decrease)		2012
Tech	1,193	(2.4	)%	1,222	(7.2	)%	1,317
FA	2,256	(7.9	)%	2,449	19.8	%	2,044
Total placements	3,449	(6.0	)%	3,671	9.2	%	3,361

The average fee per placement for each segment was as follows for the years ended December 31:



	2014		Increase (Decrease)		2013		Increase (Decrease)		2012
Tech	$	16,062	2.3	%	$	15,695	0.8	%	$	15,577
FA	12,205		2.2	%	11,946		(8.5	)%	13,051
Total average placement fee	$	13,539	2.6	%	$	13,194	(6.0	)%	$	14,041

The decrease in Search revenues from 2013 to 2014 was $1.7 million, composed of a $2.9 million decrease in volume, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in rate. The increase in Search revenues from 2012 to 2013 was $1.2 million, composed of a $4.3 million increase in volume partially offset by a $3.1 million decrease in rate.

Gross Profit. Gross profit on Flex billings is determined by deducting the direct cost of services (primarily flexible personnel payroll wages, payroll taxes, payroll-related insurance, and subcontractor costs) from net Flex service revenues. In addition, consistent with industry practices, gross profit dollars from Search fees are equal to revenues, because there are generally no direct costs associated with such revenues.

The following table presents, for each segment, the gross profit percentage (gross profit as a percentage of revenues) for the year, as well as the increase or decrease over the preceding period, as follows:



	2014		Increase (Decrease)		2013		Increase (Decrease)		2012
Tech	28.9	%	(2.7	)%	29.7	%	—		29.7	%
FA	36.5	%	(5.4	)%	38.6	%	1.0	%	38.2	%
GS	31.0	%	(9.1	)%	34.1	%	8.6	%	31.4	%
Total gross profit percentage	30.8	%	(4.0	)%	32.1	%	0.6	%	31.9	%

Table of Contents

Kforce also monitors the gross profit percentage as a percentage of Flex revenues, which is referred to as the Flex gross profit percentage. This provides management with helpful insight into the other drivers of total gross profit percentage such as changes in volume evidenced by changes in hours billed for Flex and changes in the spread between bill rate and pay rate for Flex.

The following table presents, for each segment, the Flex gross profit percentage for the years ended December 31:



	2014		Increase (Decrease)		2013		Increase (Decrease)		2012
Tech	27.2	%	(2.2	)%	27.8	%	1.1	%	27.5	%
FA	29.5	%	(2.3	)%	30.2	%	(0.7	)%	30.4	%
GS	31.0	%	(9.1	)%	34.1	%	8.6	%	31.4	%
Total Flex gross profit percentage	28.0	%	(3.1	)%	28.9	%	1.4	%	28.5	%

The increase in Flex gross profit from 2013 to 2014 was $32.0 million, composed of a $42.0 million increase in volume, partially offset by a $10.0 million decrease in rate. The increase in Flex gross profit from 2012 to 2013 was $22.6 million, composed of a $19.1 million increase in volume and a $3.5 million increase in rate.

The decrease in Flex gross profit percentage of 90 basis points in 2014 from 2013 was primarily driven by the impact of change in spread between our bill rates and pay rates as a result of higher concentration of our revenue growth coming from larger, lower-margin profile clients, and an increase in benefit costs. In addition, our Flex gross profit within our GS segment was negatively impacted by a shift to higher mix of subcontractor labor, which was driven by current contractual demands, and increased benefit costs. A continued focus for Kforce is optimizing the spread between bill rates and pay rates by providing our associates with tools, economic knowledge and defined programs to drive improvement in the effectiveness of our pricing strategy around the staffing services we provide. We believe this strategy will serve to balance the desire for optimal volume, rate, effort and duration of assignment, while ultimately maximizing the benefit for our clients, our consultants and Kforce. We anticipate that Flex gross profit margins will remain stable in 2015 as compared to 2014 as we balance improvement in the spread between our bill rates and pay rates with capturing market demand.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, total commissions, compensation, payroll taxes, and benefit costs as a percentage of SG&A represented 84.8%, 85.9%, and 87.1%, respectively. Commissions and related payroll taxes and benefit costs are variable costs driven primarily by revenue and gross profit levels, and associate performance. Therefore, as gross profit levels change, these expenses would also generally be anticipated to change but remain relatively consistent as a percentage of revenues.

The following table presents these components of SG&A along with an “other” caption, which includes bad debt expense, lease expense, professional fees, travel, telephone, computer and certain other expenses, as an absolute amount and as a percentage of total net service revenues for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):



	2014		% of Revenues		2013		% of Revenues		2012		% of Revenues
Compensation, commissions, payroll taxes and benefits costs	$	267,471	22.0	%	$	264,636	24.7	%	$	266,413	26.5	%
Other	47,867		3.9	%	43,308		4.0	%	39,527		3.9	%
Total SG&A	$	315,338	25.9	%	$	307,944	28.7	%	$	305,940	30.4	%

SG&A as a percentage of net service revenues decreased 280 basis points in 2014 compared to 2013. This was primarily attributable to the following:


•	Decrease in compensation, commissions, payroll taxes and benefits cost of 2.7% of net service revenues, which was primarily a result of a reduction in compensation expense as a result of the organizational realignment executed by the Firm during the fourth quarter of 2013, as well as a decrease in the annual effective commission rate due to certain changes made to our compensation plans.


•	Decrease in professional fees of 0.1% which was primarily the result of a reduction in corporate activities.

Table of Contents

SG&A as a percentage of net service revenues decreased 170 basis points in 2013 compared to 2012. This was primarily attributable to the following:

•

Decrease in compensation, commissions, payroll taxes and benefits cost of 1.8% of net service revenues, which was primarily related to the discretionary acceleration of substantially all of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock and ALTI awards on March 31, 2012. This resulted in incremental compensation expense of $31.3 million, including payroll taxes, that was recorded during the first quarter of 2012. This decrease was partially offset by the impact of the revenue generator headcount additions in 2012 and 2013, as well as additional costs due to the Firm’s execution of a realignment plan during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Goodwill Impairment. During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce performed a step one goodwill impairment analysis for each of its reporting units, which did not result in any impairment. As discussed above, Kforce management made a strategic business decision during the fourth quarter of 2013 with regard to the GS reporting unit to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solution services and as a result we recorded an impairment charge on the GS reporting unit goodwill in the amount of approximately $14.5 million, with a related tax benefit of approximately $5.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. During 2012, due to certain adverse effects of events and indications during that time period, we recorded an impairment charge of $69.2 million which included a related tax benefit of $24.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Although the valuation of the business supported its carrying value in 2014, a deterioration in the assumptions discussed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates" and in Note 6 – “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could result in an additional impairment charge in the future.

Depreciation and Amortization. The following table presents depreciation and amortization expense by major category for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, as well as the increases (decreases) experienced during 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):



	2014		Increase (Decrease)		2013		Increase (Decrease)		2012
Fixed asset depreciation	$	5,142	18.9	%	$	4,325	16.7	%	$	3,706
Capital lease asset depreciation	1,203		(21.8	)%	1,538		(7.5	)%	1,662
Capitalized software amortization	2,904		(10.3	)%	3,236		(28.3	)%	4,514
Intangible asset amortization	645		(13.7	)%	747		(17.6	)%	907
Total depreciation and amortization	$	9,894	0.5	%	$	9,846	(8.7	)%	$	10,789

Fixed Asset Depreciation: The $0.8 million increase in 2014 is primarily the result of the leasehold improvement and furniture and fixture additions made during 2014. The $0.6 million increase in 2013 is primarily the result of the leasehold improvement additions made during 2013.

Capital Lease Asset Depreciation: The $0.3 million decrease in 2014 is primarily the result of a reduction in computer hardware additions and current year disposals during 2014. The $0.1 million decrease in 2013 is primarily the result of computer hardware disposals during 2013.

Capitalized Software Amortization: The $0.3 million decrease in 2014 is primarily the result of software disposals during 2014. The $1.3 million decrease in 2013 is primarily the result of several significant capitalized software balances becoming fully amortized during 2013.

Other Expense, Net. Other expense, net was $1.4 million in 2014, $1.1 million in 2013, and $1.1 million in 2012, and consists primarily of interest expense related to Kforce’s Credit Facility.

Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For the year ending December 31, 2014, income tax expense as a percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes (our “effective rate”) was 38.7%. There were no individual items that had a material impact on Kforce's effective rate. For the year ending December 31, 2013, income tax expense as a percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes was 51.6%, which was impacted by certain non-deductible meals and entertainment, the partially non-deductible goodwill impairment charge and certain other non-deductible expenses. For the year ending December 31, 2012, income tax benefit as a percentage of income from continuing operations before income taxes was 36.5%. The income tax benefit for 2012 was primarily related to tax benefits associated with the partially deductible goodwill impairment charge taken in 2012.

Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes. Discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 include the consolidated income and expenses for HIM. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, Kforce completed the sale of HIM resulting in a pre-tax gain of $94.3 million. Included in the determination of the pre-tax gain is approximately $4.9 million of goodwill for HIM and transaction expenses totaling approximately $11.0 million, which primarily included legal fees, stock-based compensation related to acceleration of restricted stock due to change in control provisions, commissions and transaction bonuses. Discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 also includes the consolidated income and expenses of KCR. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, Kforce completed the sale of KCR resulting in a pre-tax gain, including adjustments, of $36.4 million. Included in the determination of the pre-tax gain is approximately $5.5 million of goodwill and transaction expenses totaling approximately $2.2 million, which primarily included commissions, legal fees and transaction bonuses.

Income tax expense as a percentage of income from discontinued operations, before income taxes, for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was 40.6%, 40.1% and 43.7%, respectively.

Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share. "Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share", a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as earnings (loss), in total and on a per share basis, before discontinued operations, non-cash impairment charges, interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share should not be considered a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share are significant components in understanding and assessing our past and future financial performance, and this presentation should not be construed as an inference by us that our future results will be unaffected by those items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share is a key measure used by management to evaluate our operations, including our ability to generate cash flows and, consequently, management believes this is useful information to investors. The measure should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income, cash flows or other financial statement information presented in the consolidated financial statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. The measure is not determined in accordance with GAAP and is thus susceptible to varying calculations. Also, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Some of the items that are excluded also impacted certain balance sheet assets, resulting in all or a portion of an asset being written off without a corresponding recovery of cash, we may have previously spent with respect to the asset. In addition, although we excluded amortization of stock-based compensation expense (which we expect to continue to incur in the future) because it is a non-cash expense, the associated stock issued may result in an increase in our outstanding shares of stock, which may result in the dilution of our stockholder ownership interest. We encourage you to evaluate these items and the potential risks of excluding such items when analyzing our financial position.

The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Per Share results and includes a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share to Earnings Per Share for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share amounts):



	Years Ended December 31,
	2014		Per Share		2013		Per Share		2012			Per Share
Net income (loss)	$	90,915	$	2.87	$	10,787	$	0.32	$	(13,703	)	$	(0.38	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	61,517		1.94		5,493		0.16		28,428			0.80
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	29,398	$	0.93	$	5,294	$	0.16	$	(42,131	)	$	(1.18	)
Goodwill impairment, pre-tax	—		—		14,510		0.43		69,158			1.93
Depreciation and amortization	9,894		0.31		9,846		0.29		10,789			0.30
Stock-based compensation expense	2,969		0.09		2,555		0.07		25,688			0.72
Interest expense and other	1,396		0.04		1,212		0.04		934			0.03
Income tax expense (benefit)	18,559		0.59		5,635		0.17		(24,227		)	(0.68		)
Earnings per share adjustment (1)	—		—		—		—		—			(0.01		)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	62,216	$	1.96	$	39,052	$	1.16	$	40,211		$	1.11
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic	31,475				33,511				35,791
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted	31,691				33,643				35,791


(1)	This earnings per share adjustment is necessary to properly reconcile net loss per share on a GAAP basis to Adjusted EBITDA per share.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

To meet our capital and liquidity requirements, we primarily rely on operating cash flow, as well as borrowings under our existing credit facility. At December 31, 2014, Kforce had $130.2 million in working capital compared to $112.9 million in 2013. Kforce’s current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) was 2.4 at the end of 2014 and 2.3 at the end of 2013. The increase in working capital was primarily due to increases in accounts receivable partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued other liabilities. In addition, our recent sale of HIM resulted in proceeds of $109.4 million, net of transaction costs for legal fees, commissions and cash transaction bonuses and $71.1 million net of the aforementioned transaction costs and taxes. These additional funds were used initially to reduce outstanding borrowings under our credit facility and ultimately to repurchase shares of common stock.

The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data provide a more detailed description of our cash flows. Currently, Kforce is principally focused on achieving the appropriate balance in the following areas of cash flow: (1) achieving positive cash flow from operating activities; (2) returning capital to our shareholders through our dividend program; (3) repurchasing our common stock; (4) maintaining an appropriate outstanding balance on our credit facility; (5) investing in our infrastructure to allow sustainable growth via capital expenditures; and (6) making strategic acquisitions.

We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations, and available borrowings under our credit facility will be adequate to meet the capital expenditure and working capital requirements of our operations for at least the next 12 months. However, significant deterioration in the economic environment or market conditions, among other things, could negatively impact operating results and liquidity, as well as the ability of our lenders to fund borrowings. There is no assurance that: (1) our lenders will be able to fund our borrowings or (2) if operations were to deteriorate and additional financing were to become necessary, we would be able to obtain financing in amounts sufficient to meet operating requirements or at terms which are satisfactory and which would allow us to remain competitive.

Actual results could also differ materially from those indicated as a result of a number of factors, including the use of currently available resources for possible acquisitions and possible additional stock repurchases.

The following table presents a summary of our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as follows (in thousands):



	Years Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
Cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	$	(25,582	)	$	465		$	55,978
Investing activities	110,535			(8,547		)	52,405
Financing activities	(84,590		)	7,576			(107,941		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	363		$	(506	)	$	442

Discontinued Operations

As was previously discussed, Kforce divested of HIM on August 4, 2014 and KCR on March 31, 2012. The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been presented on a combined basis (continuing operations and discontinued operations). Cash flows provided by discontinued operations for all prior periods were provided by operating activities and were not material to the capital resources of Kforce. In addition, the absence of cash flows from discontinued operations is not expected to have a significant effect on the future liquidity, financial position, or capital resources of Kforce.

Operating Activities

The significant variations in cash provided by operating activities and net income are principally related to adjustments to net income for certain non-cash charges such as depreciation and amortization expense, stock-based compensation and gain on sale of discontinued operations, as well as the goodwill impairment charges in prior years. These adjustments are more fully detailed in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, in Item 8. Financial Statement and Supplementary Data. When comparing cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the primary drivers of cash inflows and outflows are net trade receivables and accounts payable. The decrease in cash used in operating activities in 2014 compared to 2013 is primarily the result of the increase in account receivable due to the timing of collections.

Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Capital expenditures during 2014, 2013 and 2012, which exclude equipment acquired under capital leases, were $6.0 million, $8.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Proceeds from the divestiture of HIM were $117.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. Proceeds from the divestiture of KCR were $55.4 million, net of transaction costs, during the year ended December 31, 2012.

We expect to continue to selectively invest in our infrastructure in order to support the expected future growth in our business. Kforce believes it has sufficient cash and availability under its credit facility to make any expected necessary capital expenditures in the foreseeable future. In addition, we continually review our portfolio of businesses and their operations in comparison to our internal strategic and performance objectives. As part of this review, we may acquire other businesses and further invest in, fully divest and/or sell parts of our current businesses.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Firm paid cash for repurchases of common stock totaling $101.8 million, which was composed of approximately $100.2 million of open market common stock repurchases and $1.6 million of common stock repurchases attributable to shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards. During 2013, Kforce repurchased common stock totaling $29.8 million, which was composed of approximately $29.0 million of open market common stock repurchases (including the settlement of approximately $2.5 million of common stock repurchases from the fourth quarter of 2012) and $0.8 million of common stock repurchases attributable to shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards. During 2012, Kforce repurchased common stock totaling $44.4 million, which included open market repurchases of common stock of approximately $28.9 million and repurchases of common stock attributable to shares withheld for statutory minimum tax withholding requirements pertaining to the vesting of restricted stock awards of approximately $15.5 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce declared and paid dividends in cash of $12.8 million, or $0.41 per share. During the fourth quarter of 2013, Kforce declared and paid a cash dividend of $3.3 million, or $0.10 per share. During the fourth quarter of 2012, Kforce declared and paid a special cash dividend of $35.2 million, or $1.00 per share. Kforce currently expects to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends of an amount similar to its December 2014 dividend of $0.11 per share. However, the amount and payment of future dividends are discretionary and will be subject to determination by Kforce’s Board of Directors each quarter following its review of the Firm’s financial performance and legal ability to pay.

Credit Facility

On September 20, 2011, Kforce entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, with a syndicate led by Bank of America, N.A. This was amended on March 30, 2012 through the execution of a Consent and First Amendment, on December 27, 2013 through the execution of a Second Amendment and Joinder, and further amended on December 23, 2014 through the execution of a Third Amendment (as amended to date, the "Credit Facility") resulting in a maximum borrowing capacity of $170.0 million, as well as an accordion option of $50.0 million. The maximum borrowings available to Kforce under the Credit Facility are limited to: (a) a revolving Credit Facility of up to $170.0 million (the “Revolving Loan Amount”) and (b) a $15.0 million sub-limit included in the Credit Facility for letters of credit.

Available borrowings under the Credit Facility are limited to 85% of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable, plus 85% of the net amount of eligible unbilled accounts receivable, plus 80% of the net amount of eligible employee placement accounts, minus certain minimum availability reserve; provided, that the Firm may, subject to certain conditions, elect to increase the available borrowing limitation based on a percentage of the appraised fair market value of the Firm's corporate headquarters property and/or an additional percentage of net eligible accounts receivable, net eligible unbilled accounts receivable and net eligible employee placement accounts. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Firm, excluding the real estate located at the Firm's corporate headquarters in Tampa, Florida, unless the eligible real estate conditions are met. Outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Loan Amount bear interest at a rate of: (a) LIBOR plus an applicable margin based on various factors; or (b) the higher of: (1) the prime rate, (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (3) LIBOR plus 1.25%. Fluctuations in the ratio of unbilled to billed receivables could result in material changes to availability from time to time. Letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility require Kforce to pay a fronting fee equal to 0.125% of the amount of each letter of credit issued, plus a per annum fee equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans based on the total letters of credit outstanding. To the extent that Kforce has unused availability under the Credit Facility, an unused line fee is required to be paid on a monthly basis equal to (a) if the average daily aggregate revolver outstanding are less than 35% of the amount of the commitments, 0.35% or (b) if the average daily aggregate revolver outstanding are greater than 35% of the amount of the commitments, 0.25% times the amount by which the maximum revolver amount exceeded the sum of the average daily aggregate revolver outstanding, during the immediately preceding month or shorter period if calculated for the first month hereafter or on the termination date.

Table of Contents

Under the Credit Facility, Kforce is subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants including (but not limited to) the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 if the Firm’s availability under the Credit Facility is less than the greater of 10% of the aggregate amount of the commitment of all of the lenders under the Credit Facility and $11 million. Our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities could be limited if the Firm's availability is less than the greater of 12.5% of the aggregate amount of the commitment of all lenders under the Credit Facility and $20.6 million. Kforce had availability under the Credit Facility of $39.6 million as of December 31, 2014; therefore, the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio was not applicable and our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities was not restricted. Kforce believes that it will be able to maintain these minimum availability requirements; however, in the event that Kforce is unable to do so, Kforce could fail the fixed charge coverage ratio, which would constitute an event of default, or could limit our ability to make distributions or repurchase equity securities. Kforce believes the likelihood of default is remote. The Credit Facility expires December 23, 2019.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $93.3 million and $62.6 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, respectively. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, maximum outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility were $93.3 million. As of February 24, 2015, 97.0 million was outstanding and 39.7 million was available under the Credit Facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Kforce provides letters of credit to certain vendors in lieu of cash deposits. At December 31, 2014, Kforce had letters of credit outstanding for workers’ compensation and other insurance coverage totaling $2.7 million, and for facility lease deposits totaling $0.5 million. Aside from certain obligations more fully described in the Contractual Obligations and Commitments section below, we do not have any additional off-balance sheet arrangements that have had, or are expected to have, a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Stock Repurchases

During the year ended December 31, 2013, Kforce repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of common stock at a total cost of approximately $27.3 million. As of December 31, 2013, $62.6 million of the Board-authorized common stock repurchase program remained available for future repurchases. On September 10, 2014, our Board of Directors approved an increase to the existing authorization for repurchases of common stock by $70.0 million (exclusive of any previously unused authorizations). During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kforce repurchased approximately 4.9 million shares of common stock at a total cost of approximately $102.9 million under the Board authorized common stock repurchase program. As of December 31, 2014, $29.7 million remained available for future repurchases.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table presents our expected future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):



	Payments due by period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 years
Operating lease obligations	$	18,136	$	6,348	$	9,099	$	2,350	$	339
Capital lease obligations	1,759		1,141		612		6		—
Credit Facility (a)	93,333		—		—		93,333		—
Interest payable – Credit Facility (b)	7,933		1,587		3,173		3,173		—
Purchase obligations	12,561		7,563		4,987		11		—
Liability for unrecognized tax positions (c)	—		—		—		—		—
Deferred compensation plan liability (d)	26,076		3,651		1,883		1,056		19,486
Other (e)	—		—		—		—		—
Supplemental executive retirement plan (f)	13,268		—		—		9,187		4,081
Foreign defined benefit pension plan (g)	12,469		404		15		53		11,997
Total	$	185,535	$	20,694	$	19,769	$	109,169	$	35,903


(a)	The Credit Facility expires December 23, 2019.


(b)	Kforce’s weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2014 was 1.7%, which was utilized to forecast the expected future interest rate payments. These payments are inherently uncertain due to interest rate and outstanding borrowings fluctuations that will occur over the remaining term of the Credit Facility.


(c)	Kforce’s liability for unrecognized tax positions as of December 31, 2014 was $0.3 million. This balance has been excluded from the table above due to the significant uncertainty with respect to expected settlements.

(d)

Kforce has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan pursuant to which eligible highly-compensated key employees may elect to defer part of their compensation to later years. These amounts, which are classified as other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively, are payable based upon the elections of the plan participants (e.g. retirement, termination of employment, change-in-control). Amounts payable upon the retirement or termination of employment may become payable during the next five years if covered employees schedule a distribution, retire or terminate during that time.


(e)	Kforce provides letters of credit to certain vendors in lieu of cash deposits. Kforce currently has letters of credit totaling $3.2 million outstanding as security for workers’ compensation and property insurance policies, as well as facility lease deposits. Kforce maintains a sub-limit for letters of credit of $15.0 million under its Credit Facility.


(f)	There is no funding requirement associated with the SERP. Kforce does not currently anticipate funding the SERP during 2015. Kforce has included the total undiscounted projected benefit payments, as determined at December 31, 2014, in the table above. See Note 11 – “Employee Benefit Plans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.


(g)	Kforce has included the total undiscounted projected benefit payments, as determined at December 31, 2014 in the table above. There is no funding requirement associated with this plan.

Kforce has no material unrecorded commitments, losses, contingencies or guarantees associated with any related parties or unconsolidated entities.

Income Tax Audits

Kforce is periodically subject to IRS audits, as well as state and other local income tax audits for various tax years. During 2014, the IRS finished an examination of Kforce’s U.S. income tax return for 2010 and 2011 with no material adjustments. Although Kforce has not experienced any material liabilities in the past due to income tax audits, Kforce can make no assurances that this will continue.

Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In addition to the risks inherent in its operations, Kforce is exposed to certain market risks, primarily changes in interest rates.

As of December 31, 2014, we had $93.3 million outstanding under our Credit Facility. Our weighted average effective interest rate on our Credit Facility was 1.7% at December 31, 2014. A hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates in effect at December 31, 2014 would have an increase to Kforce’s annual interest expense of less than $0.2 million.

We do not believe that we have a material exposure to fluctuations in foreign currencies because our international operations represented less than 2% of net service revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014, and because our international operations’ functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. However, Kforce will continue to assess the impact which currency fluctuations could have on our operations going forward.

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Kforce Inc.

Tampa, FL

We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of Kforce Inc. and subsidiaries ("Kforce") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), Changes in Stockholders' Equity, and Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. We also have audited Kforce's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Kforce’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on Kforce’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kforce Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion, Kforce maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Tampa, Florida

February 27, 2015

Table of Contents

KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



	YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
	2014			2013			2012
Net service revenues	$	1,217,331		$	1,073,728		$	1,005,487
Direct costs of services	842,750			729,352			684,901
Gross profit	374,581			344,376			320,586
Selling, general and administrative expenses	315,338			307,944			305,940
Goodwill impairment	—			14,510			69,158
Depreciation and amortization	9,894			9,846			10,789
Income (loss) from operations	49,349			12,076			(65,301		)
Other expense (income):
Interest expense	1,411			1,225			954
Other (income) expense	(19		)	(78		)	103
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes	47,957			10,929			(66,358		)
Income tax expense (benefit)	18,559			5,635			(24,227		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	29,398			5,294			(42,131		)
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	61,517			5,493			28,428
Net income (loss)	90,915			10,787			(13,703		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans, net of tax	(688		)	3,030			1,337
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	90,227		$	13,817		$	(12,366	)
Earnings (loss) per share – basic:
From continuing operations	$	0.94		$	0.16		$	(1.18	)
From discontinued operations	$	1.95		$	0.16		$	0.80
Earnings (loss) per share – basic	$	2.89		$	0.32		$	(0.38	)
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted
From continuing operations	$	0.93		$	0.16		$	(1.18	)
From discontinued operations	$	1.94		$	0.16		$	0.80
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted	$	2.87		$	0.32		$	(0.38	)

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic	31,475			33,511			35,791
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted	31,691			33,643			35,791

Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.41		$	0.10		$	1.00

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS)



	DECEMBER 31,
	2014			2013
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,238		$	875
Trade receivables, net of allowances of $2,040 and $2,028, respectively	204,710			179,095
Income tax refund receivable	3,311			7,720
Deferred tax assets, net	4,980			4,662
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	10,170			10,534
Total current assets	224,409			202,886
Fixed assets, net	35,330			36,728
Other assets, net	30,349			30,991
Deferred tax assets, net	22,855			23,270
Intangible assets, net	5,011			4,993
Goodwill	45,968			48,900
Total assets	$	363,922		$	347,768
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	$	38,104		$	31,821
Accrued payroll costs	52,208			56,872
Other current liabilities	986			1,141
Income taxes payable	2,885			139
Total current liabilities	94,183			89,973
Long-term debt – credit facility	93,333			62,642
Long-term debt – other	562			1,364
Other long-term liabilities	36,456			36,556
Total liabilities	224,534			190,535
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par; 15,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par; 250,000 shares authorized, 70,029 and 69,480 issued, respectively	700			695
Additional paid-in capital	412,642			404,600
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(371		)	317
Retained earnings	125,378			47,612
Treasury stock, at cost; 40,616 and 35,751 shares, respectively	(398,961		)	(295,991		)
Total stockholders’ equity	139,388			157,233
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	363,922		$	347,768

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

KFORCE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES

IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(IN THOUSANDS)



	YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
	2014				2013