pre14a
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on
which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5) Total fee paid:
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as
provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing
for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
1) Amount Previously Paid:
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3) Filing Party:
4) Date Filed:
Independent
Bank Corporation
230 West Main Street
Ionia, Michigan 48846
March xx,
2010
Dear Fellow Shareholder,
It is our pleasure to invite you to attend the 2010 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of Independent Bank Corporation at
3:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 at
Watt Auditorium, 438 Union Street, Ionia, Michigan 48846.
The Annual Report, which we mailed to you, summarizes
Independent Bank Corporations major developments during
2009 and includes the 2009 consolidated financial statements.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please
complete and mail the enclosed proxy card promptly so that your
shares will be voted as you desire. You may also vote by
telephone or by the Internet by following the instructions for
using the automated telephone and Internet voting systems
provided on the proxy card.
Sincerely,
Michael M. Magee, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
INDEPENDENT
BANK CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
APRIL
27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
April 27, 2010
|
|
Time:
|
|
3:00 p.m., Eastern Time
|
|
Place:
|
|
Watt Auditorium
438 Union Street
Ionia, Michigan 48846
|
We invite you to attend the Independent Bank Corporation Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Elect three directors to serve three-year terms expiring in 2013;
|
|
|
2.
|
Ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010;
|
|
|
3.
|
Consider and vote upon a proposal to amend our Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect a one (1) for
ten (10) reverse split of our common stock;
|
|
|
4.
|
Participate in an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the
compensation of our executives, as disclosed in this Proxy
Statement;
|
|
|
5.
|
Grant management the authority to adjourn, postpone or continue
the Annual Meeting; and
|
|
|
6.
|
Transact any other business that is properly submitted before
the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the
Annual Meeting.
|
The record date for the Annual Meeting is February 26, 2010
(the Record Date). Only shareholders of record at
the close of business on that date can vote at the Annual
Meeting. We mailed this Notice of Annual Meeting to those
shareholders. Action may be taken at the Annual Meeting on any
of the foregoing proposals on the date specified above or any
date or dates to which the Annual Meeting may be adjourned or
postponed.
We will have a list of shareholders who can vote at the Annual
Meeting available for inspection by shareholders at the Annual
Meeting, and, for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting,
during regular business hours at the offices of Independent Bank
Corporation, 230 West Main Street, Ionia, Michigan 48846.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting but are not a
shareholder of record because you hold your shares in street
name, please bring evidence of your beneficial ownership of your
shares (e.g., a copy of a recent brokerage
statement showing the shares) with you to the Annual Meeting.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and whether
you own a few or many shares of stock, the Board of Directors
urges you to vote promptly. You may vote by signing, dating and
returning the enclosed proxy card, by using the automated
telephone voting system or by using the Internet voting system.
You will find instructions for voting by telephone and by the
Internet on the enclosed proxy card.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Robert N. Shuster
Corporate Secretary
March xx, 2010
Independent
Bank Corporation
230 West Main Street
Ionia, Michigan 48846
2010
PROXY STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation, beginning approximately March xx, 2010, by
our Board of Directors, of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders. This meeting will be held on Tuesday,
April 27, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. (local time) at Watt
Auditorium, 438 Union Street, Ionia, Michigan 48846.
If the form of the Proxy accompanying this Proxy Statement is
properly executed and returned, the shares represented by the
Proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in
accordance with the directions given in such Proxy. If no choice
is specified, the shares represented by the Proxy will be voted
for the election of directors listed as nominees, for the
ratification of the independent auditors and to approve the
compensation of our executives.
To vote by telephone, shareholders of record (shareholders who
have been issued a certificate representing their shares) may
call toll free on a touch-tone telephone 1-800-PROXIES
(1-800-776-9437)
and follow the recorded instructions. To vote by Internet, go to
the site
http://www.voteproxy.com
and follow the instructions provided.
If your shares are held through a bank or a broker (referred to
as street name), you may also be eligible to vote
your shares electronically. Simply follow the instructions on
your voting form, using either the toll-free telephone number or
the Internet address that is listed.
A Proxy may be revoked prior to its exercise by delivering a
written notice of revocation to our Secretary, executing a
subsequent Proxy or attending the meeting and voting in person.
Attendance at the meeting does not, however, automatically serve
to revoke a Proxy.
This proxy statement, including the Notice and Form of Proxy,
along with our Annual Report is available at
http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/docs.aspx?iid=100319.
Information on directions to the site of our Annual Meeting is
available on our website at www.IndependentBank.com.
VOTING
SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE
As of February 26, 2010, the Record Date for the Annual
Meeting, we had issued and outstanding 24,032,177 shares of
common stock. Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each
share of our common stock registered in their names at the close
of business on the record date. Votes cast at the meeting and
submitted by proxy are counted by the inspectors of the meeting,
who are appointed by us.
As of February 26, 2010, no person was known by us to be
the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common stock, except
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Name and Address of
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent
|
Title of Class
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership
|
|
of Class
|
|
Common Stock,
$1 par value
|
|
Independent Bank Corporation
Employee Stock Ownership Trust (ESOT)
230 West Main Street
Ionia, Michigan 48846
|
|
2,236,834
|
|
9.31%
|
Our ESOT holds shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of
our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). The
Principal Financial Group administers the ESOP and serves as
directed trustee. Our ESOP administrative committee has
investment power with respect to the shares of common stock held
by the ESOT and has voting power to the extent that the ESOP
participants do not direct the voting of the shares of common
stock allocated to their accounts.
Our administrative committee is comprised of three of our
officers: Robert N. Shuster, James J. Twarozynski and Laurinda
M. Neve. Except for the shares of common stock allocated to
their respective accounts as participants in the ESOP, each
member of our administrative committee disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares held by the ESOT.
1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that
our Board be divided into three classes of nearly equal size,
with the classes to hold office for staggered terms of three
years each. Our Bylaws permit our Board of Directors to
establish the size of our Board from three to fifteen members.
Our current Board has fixed the size of our Board at ten
members. Donna J. Banks, Ph.D., Jeffrey A. Bratsburg and
Charles C. Van Loan are nominees to serve three-year terms
expiring in 2013. Each of these directors are incumbent
directors previously elected by our shareholders.
The Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than
the number of nominees named. The persons named as proxy holders
in the accompanying proxy will vote for the above named nominees
unless a shareholder directs otherwise. In the event that any
nominee is unable to serve, which is not now contemplated, our
Board may designate a substitute nominee. The proxy holders, to
the extent they have been granted authority to vote in the
election of directors, may or may not vote for a substitute
nominee.
In addition to the nominees for director, each director whose
term will continue after the meeting is named in the following
table. Each nominee and director owned beneficially, directly or
indirectly, the number of shares of common stock set forth
opposite their respective names. The stock ownership information
and the information relating to each nominees and
directors age, principal occupation or employment for the
past five years has been furnished to us as of February 26,
2010, by the respective nominees and directors.
A plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders is required to elect the nominees as directors.
Accordingly at this years meeting, the three individuals
who receive the largest number of votes cast at the meeting will
be elected as directors. Shares not voted at the meeting,
whether by abstention, broker non-vote or otherwise, will not be
treated as votes cast on this matter.
The Board
of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the
three nominees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Beneficial
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Nominees for three-year terms expiring in 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donna J. Banks, Ph.D. (age 52)
|
|
|
21,841
|
(2)
|
|
.09
|
Dr. Banks is a retired Senior Vice President of the Kellogg
Company. She became a Director in 2005. Ms. Banks
prior experience in an executive leadership position with a
major corporation makes her service to the Board particularly
important. Moreover, her prior experience with a corporation
that is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is of use to the Board and the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Bratsburg (age 66)
|
|
|
107,773
|
(3)
|
|
.43
|
Mr. Bratsburg is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Independent Bank Corporation. Mr. Bratsburg served as
President and CEO of Independent Bank West Michigan from 1985
until his retirement in 1999. He became a Director in 2000.
Mr. Bratsburgs prior experience as a bank president,
as well as his 18 years of experience in the financial
services industry makes him an important member of the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles C. Van Loan (age 62)
|
|
|
100,867
|
(4)
|
|
.40
|
Mr. Van Loan served as President and CEO of Independent Bank
Corporation from 1993 until 2004 and as executive Chairman
during 2005. He retired on December 31, 2005. He became a
Director in 1992. Mr. Van Loan has over 27 years of
experience in the financial services industry. Mr. Van Loan
served as the Companys CEO for over 10 years, which
makes his input particularly useful to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Beneficial
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Directors whose terms expire in 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen L. Gulis, Jr. (age 52)
|
|
|
31,435
|
(5)
|
|
.12
|
Mr. Gulis is the retired Executive Vice President and President
of Wolverine Worldwide Global Operations Group. He became a
Director in 2004. Mr. Gulis prior experience as a
chief financial officer of a major corporation is an important
skill set to have on the Board. In addition, his prior
experience with a corporation that is subject to the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is important
to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terry L. Haske (age 61)
|
|
|
46,944
|
(6)
|
|
.19
|
Mr. Haske is a CPA and Principal with Anderson, Tuckey,
Bernhardt & Doran, P.C. since 2008. Prior to 2008
he was the President of Ricker & Haske, CPAs, and P.C.
He became a Director in 1996. Mr. Haskes experience
and qualifications as a CPA, as well as his prior service as a
director of the Company and as a director of other banking
institutions, makes his service to the Board particularly
important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarke B. Maxson (age 70)
|
|
|
22,744
|
|
|
.09
|
Mr. Maxson served as Chairman, President and CEO of Midwest
Guaranty Bancorp, Inc. (Midwest) from its founding
in 1988 until July 2004 when he retired. Midwest was acquired by
Independent Bank Corporation in July 2004, at which time
Mr. Maxson joined the Board of Directors of Independent
Bank East Michigan (which merged into Independent Bank in
September 2007). He was appointed as a Director of the Company
in September 2007. Mr. Maxson has over 47 years of
service and experience in the financial services industry. He
also served as a bank president for over 16 years, which
serves to assist the Board in a variety of issues facing the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Palmer (age 65)
|
|
|
91,059
|
|
|
.36
|
Mr. Palmer is an attorney and a professor of law at Thomas M.
Cooley Law School. He became a Director in 1991.
Mr. Palmers training as an attorney and almost
20 years of service as a director of the Company provides
additional talent to the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors whose terms expire in 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Hetzler (age 64)
|
|
|
35,083
|
(7)
|
|
.14
|
Mr. Hetzler is the retired President of Monitor Sugar Company
(food processor). He became a Director in 2000.
Mr. Hetzler, who also has a legal degree, has numerous
years as a senior leader of a large business organization. Those
skill sets and experiences are important to the Board and the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee, Jr. (age 54)
|
|
|
154,441
|
(8)
|
|
.61
|
Mr. Magee is the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Independent Bank Corporation. Prior to his appointment as
President and CEO as of January 1, 2005, Mr. Magee
served as Chief Operating Officer since February 2004 and prior
to that he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Independent Bank since 1993. He became a Director in 2005.
Mr. Magee has over 31 years of service in the
financial services industry and has served as our Chief
Executive Officer for over 5 years. That position and those
experiences make him a particularly important component of the
Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. McCarty (age 62)
|
|
|
23,608
|
(9)
|
|
.09
|
Mr. McCarty is the retired President of McCarty Communications
(commercial printing). He became a Director in 2002.
Mr. McCartys prior experience in a corporate
leadership position and prior service as a director of a
financial institution makes his service to the Board important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Except as described in the following notes, each nominee or
incumbent director owns the shares directly and has sole voting
and investment power or shares voting and investment power with
his or her spouse under joint ownership. The table includes
shares of common stock that are issuable under options
exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 15,281 common stock units held in Dr. Banks
account under our deferred compensation and stock purchase plan
for non-employee directors that are payable in our common stock
upon retirement. Includes 6,000 shares held in a spousal
trust. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 12,065 common stock units held in
Mr. Bratsburgs account under our deferred
compensation and stock purchase plan for non-employee directors
that are payable in our common stock upon retirement. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 98,867 shares held in a spousal trust. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 19,079 common stock units held in Mr. Gulis
account under our deferred compensation and stock purchase plan
for non-employee directors that are payable in our common stock
upon retirement. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 6,615 shares owned jointly with
Mr. Haskes father with respect to which
Mr. Haske shares voting and investment power and includes
1,232 common stock units held in Mr. Haskes account
under our deferred compensation and stock purchase plan for
non-employee directors that are payable in our common stock upon
retirement. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 10,609 shares held in a spousal trust and
381 shares in a trust with respect to which
Mr. Hetzler shares voting and investment power. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 33,682 shares allocated to Mr. Magees
account under the ESOT and includes 10,424 common stock units
held in a deferred compensation plan. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 9,978 common stock units held in
Mr. McCartys account under our deferred compensation
and stock purchase plan for non-employee directors that are
payable in our common stock upon retirement. Includes
6,193 shares held in a spousal trust. |
4
SECURITIES
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our
common stock by our Named Executives, set forth in the
compensation table below, and by all directors and executive
officers as a group as of February 26, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Name
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee
|
|
|
154,441
|
(2)
|
|
|
.61
|
|
Robert N. Shuster
|
|
|
117,699
|
|
|
|
.47
|
|
David C. Reglin
|
|
|
98,260
|
|
|
|
.39
|
|
William B. Kessel
|
|
|
38,260
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
Stefanie M. Kimball
|
|
|
26,793
|
|
|
|
.11
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (consisting of
18 persons)
|
|
|
3,218,512
|
(3)
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to shares held directly or under joint ownership
with their spouses, beneficial ownership includes shares that
are issuable under options exercisable within 60 days, and
shares that are allocated to their accounts as participants in
the ESOP. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 10,424 common stock units held in a deferred
compensation plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Beneficial ownership is disclaimed as to 2,070,440 shares,
all of which are held by the ESOT. |
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES
For many years, our Board of Directors has been committed to
sound and effective corporate governance practices. The Board
has documented those practices in our Corporate Governance
Principles. These principles address director qualifications,
periodic performance evaluations, stock ownership guidelines and
other corporate governance matters. Under those principles, a
majority of the members of our Board must qualify as independent
under the rules established by the NASDAQ stock market on which
our stock trades. Our principles also require the Board to have
an audit committee, compensation committee and a nominating and
corporate governance committee, and that each member of those
committees qualifies as independent under the NASDAQ rules. Our
Corporate Governance Principles, as well as the charters of each
of the foregoing committees are available for review on our
website at www.IndependentBank.com under the
Investor Relations tab.
CODE OF
BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS AND CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR
FINANCIAL OFFICERS
Our Board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. In
addition, the Board has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior
Financial Officers, which includes our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and controller. Each of
these codes is posted on our website and can also be obtained
free of charge through our Corporate Secretary at 230 West
Main Street, Ionia, Michigan 48846. Any changes to or waivers of
either code for our CEO or senior financial officers will be
disclosed on our website.
DETERMINATION
OF INDEPENDENCE OF BOARD MEMBERS
As required by our Corporate Governance Principles, our Board
has determined that each of the following directors qualifies as
an Independent Director, as such term is defined in
Market Place Rules 4200(a)(15) of the National Association
of Securities Dealers (the NASD): Donna J. Banks,
Jeffrey A. Bratsburg, Stephen L. Gulis, Terry L. Haske, Robert
L. Hetzler, Clarke B. Maxson, James E. McCarty, Charles A.
Palmer and Charles C. Van Loan. Our Board has also determined
that each member of the three committees of the Board meets the
independence requirements applicable to those committees as
prescribed by the NASDAQ listing requirements,
5
and, as to the audit committee, under the applicable rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission. There are no family
relationships between or among our directors, nominees or
executive officers.
MEETING
ATTENDANCE
Each of our directors is expected to attend all meetings of the
Board, applicable committee meetings, and our annual meeting of
shareholders. Each of our directors attended our 2009 annual
shareholders meeting. During 2009, the Board held 14 meetings;
each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of
meetings of our Board and Board committees on which they served.
BOARD
COMMITTEES AND FUNCTIONS
Copies of the charters of each of these committees are available
on our Website at www.IndependentBank.com. Our Board of
Directors has three standing committees: audit, compensation and
nominating and corporate governance.
Our audit committee, which met on 7 occasions in 2009, consists
of directors Gulis (Chairman), Haske, Maxson and McCarty. Our
Board has determined that Mr. Gulis qualifies as the
Audit Committee Financial Expert, as that term is
defined in the rules established by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The primary purpose of the audit committee is to
assist the Board in overseeing (1) the quality and
integrity of our accounting, auditing and reporting practices,
(2) the performance of our internal audit function and
independent auditor, and (3) our disclosure controls and
system of internal controls regarding, finance, accounting,
legal compliance, and ethics that management and our Board have
established.
Our compensation committee, which met on 5 occasions in 2009,
consists of directors Banks, Gulis, Hetzler, Van Loan and
McCarty (Chairman). This committee reviews and makes
recommendations to the Board on executive compensation matters,
including any benefits to be paid to our executives and
officers. At the beginning of each year, our compensation
committee meets to review our CEOs performance against the
Companys goals and objectives for the preceding year and
also to review and approve the corporate goals and objectives
that relate to CEO compensation for the forthcoming year. This
committee also evaluates the CEO and other key executives
payouts against (a) pre-established, measurable performance
goals and budgets, (b) generally comparable groups of
executives, and (c) external market trends. Following this
review, this committee recommends to the full Board, the annual
base salary, annual incentive compensation, total compensation
and benefits for our chief executive officer. This committee is
also responsible for approving equity-based compensation awards
under our Long-Term Incentive Plan. Base salaries of executive
officers, other than our CEO, are established by our CEO.
This committee is also responsible to recommend to the full
Board, the amount and form of compensation payable to directors.
From time to time, the committee relies upon third party
consulting firms to assist the committee in its oversight of the
Companys executive compensation policy and our Board
compensation. This is discussed in more detail in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy
Statement.
Our nominating and corporate governance committee, which met on
3 occasions in 2009, consists of directors Banks, Haske,
Hetzler, Van Loan and Palmer (Chairman). This committee is
responsible for making recommendations on the qualification and
standards to serve on our Board, identifying board candidates
and monitoring our corporate governance standards.
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation contain
certain procedural requirements applicable to shareholder
nominations of directors. Shareholders may nominate a person to
serve as a director if they provide written notice to us not
later than sixty and no more than ninety days prior to the first
anniversary date of the preceding years annual meeting.
The notice must include (1) name and address of the
shareholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person
or persons nominated, (2) a representation that the
shareholder is a current record holder and will continue to hold
those shares through the date of the meeting and intends to
appear in person or by proxy at the meeting, (3) a
description of all arrangements between the shareholder and each
nominee, (4) the information regarding each nominee as
would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed
under Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
had the nominee been nominated by the Board of Directors, and
(5) the consent of each nominee to serve as director. Our
nominating and corporate governance committee does not currently
utilize the services of any third party search firm to assist in
the identification or evaluation of board
6
member candidates. However, this committee may use the services
of such a firm in the future if it deems necessary or
appropriate.
The nominating and corporate governance committee has not
established specific, minimum qualifications for director
nominees. Our Corporate Governance Principles mandate that
directors possess the requisite background and experience to
make a strong, positive contribution to Independent Bank
Corporation and our shareholders. This committee is responsible
for reviewing the qualifications and independence of the members
of the Board. This assessment includes a consideration of the
skills, experience and diversity of the prospective candidates.
In light of these general requirements, this committee reviews
the suitability of each person nominated to our Board. These
same standards and suitability requirements are applicable to
all director nominees, regardless of the party making the
director nomination. While the Board does not have a formal
policy regarding the consideration of nominee diversity, this
committee does consider diversity in its identification of
director candidates. Diversity in business, industry and
professional experience, education and training, as well as
individuals general background benefits our Company by
increasing the range of skills and perspectives of our Board and
enhances its ability to govern the affairs of the Company.
The nominating and corporate governance committee has not
received any recommended director nominations from any of our
shareholders in connection with our 2010 annual meeting. The
nominees that are standing for election as directors at the 2010
annual meeting are incumbent directors that were previously
elected by our shareholders.
MAJORITY
VOTING
Our nominating and corporate governance committee and Board have
discussed and considered the adoption of majority voting for
directors. The Board favors the general concepts of majority
voting which would essentially proscribe the election of any
nominee who received fewer votes cast in his or her favor for
election than were withheld. However, our Bylaws and the
Michigan Business Corporation Act provide that directors are to
be elected by a plurality of votes cast, except as otherwise
provided in our Articles. Due to various initiatives under
consideration to either modify applicable laws or otherwise
address some of the practical implications that arise from
majority voting, the Board has elected to defer, at this time,
any action or recommendation on this matter.
LEADERSHIP
STRUCTURE AND THE BOARDS ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT
For a number of years our Board has separated the positions of
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board. Our current Chairman, Mr. Bratsburg, is an
independent director, as described above. In addition to this
structure, the Board regularly meets in executive session,
without the presence of management.
Our Board oversees the Companys risk management,
satisfying itself that our risk management practices are
consistent with our corporate strategy and are functioning
appropriately. While a degree of risk is inherent in any
business activity, our Board strives to ensure that risk
management is incorporated into the Companys culture, and
to foster risk-aware and risk adjusted decision-making
throughout the organization. Our risk management processes bring
to the Boards attention our most material risks, and
permit the Board to understand and evaluate how those risks
interrelate and how management addresses them.
Our Board performs its risk oversight function in several ways.
The Board establishes standards for risk management by approving
policies that address and mitigate the Companys most
material risks. These include policies addressing credit risk,
interest rate risk, capital risk, and liquidity risk, as well as
Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering compliance. The Board
also monitors, reviews, and reacts to our risks through various
reports presented by management, internal and external auditors,
and regulatory examiners.
The Board conducts certain risk oversight activities through its
committees with direct oversight over specific functional areas.
Our Audit Committees risk oversight functions include:
|
|
|
|
|
Approving the independent auditor and its annual audit plan, as
well as our internal Audit Services Department annual plan.
|
|
|
|
Receiving periodic reports from our independent auditors and our
internal audit department,
|
7
Our compensation committee most closely monitors the risks to
which our compensation policies and practices could subject us.
In performing these functions, this committee considers input
from the Companys senior risk officers and outside legal
counsel. In 2009, this Committee reviewed the incentive plans
for the Company to determine whether those plans subject us to
unnecessary or excessive risk or motivate staff members to
manipulate the Companys earnings. In conducting its
review, this committee considered asset quality, asset
valuations, oversight and treatment of certain non-performing
assets and introduction of new products and services. As a
result of that evaluation and an analysis of how the plans
operate in practice, this committee concluded that our incentive
plans do not subject the Company to unnecessary or excessive
risk or motivate staff members to manipulate the Companys
earnings.
Our nominating and corporate governance committees role in
risk oversight includes recommending director candidates with
appropriate experience and skills who will set the proper tone
for the Companys risk profile and provide competent
oversight over our material risks.
Our Board does not have a separate risk committee, but instead
believes that the entire Board is responsible for overseeing the
Companys risk management. The Board helps ensure that
management is properly focused on risk by, among other things,
reviewing and discussing the performance of senior management
and business lines leaders and conducting succession planning
for key leadership positions at the Company. In addition to
regular reports from each of the Boards committees, our
Board receives regular reports from the Companys
management on the Companys most material risks and the
degree of its exposure to those risks as well as presentations
on those risks at periodic Board meetings. These include reports
on the Companys credit risk, interest rate risk, capital
risk, liquidity risk and contingency planning.
SHAREHOLDER
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
The Board of Directors has implemented a process by which a
shareholder may send written communications to the Boards
attention. Any shareholder desiring to communicate with the
Board or one or more of our directors may send a letter
addressed to the Companys Corporate Secretary at
P.O. Box 491, Ionia, Michigan 48846. The Secretary has
been directed to promptly forward all communications to the full
Board or the specific director indicated in the letter.
REPORT OF
OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed
to be soliciting material or filed or
incorporated by reference in future filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or subject to the liabilities of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference
into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Our audit committee has met with management and the independent
auditors to review and discuss our audited financial statements
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Our audit committee obtained from our independent auditors the
written disclosures and the letter required by applicable
provisions of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
regarding their independence. Our audit committee has also
discussed with our auditors any relationships that may impact
their objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to
our auditors independence.
Our audit committee has reviewed and discussed with our
independent auditors all communications required by generally
accepted auditing standards, including those described in
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, and
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Our
audit committee also discussed, with and without management
present, the results of our independent auditors
examination of our financial statements.
8
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the
audit committee has recommended to our Board of Directors that
the financial statements referred to above be included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Stephen L. Gulis, Jr.
|
|
Clarke B. Maxson
|
James E. McCarty
|
|
Terry L. Haske
|
DISCLOSURE
OF FEES PAID TO
OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Crowe Horwath LLP (Crowe) has been the
Companys independent auditors since 2005. Under its
charter, the audit committee is solely responsible for selecting
and reviewing the qualifications of the Companys
independent auditors.
The following sets forth the fees paid to our independent
auditors for the last two fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
390,000
|
|
|
$
|
390,000
|
|
Audit related fees(1)
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
Tax fees(2)
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
86,000
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
531,000
|
|
|
$
|
518,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists primarily of fees related to an audit required under a
Housing and Urban Development loan program and accounting review
of various transactions during each year. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists primarily of fees related to the preparation of
corporate tax returns and also includes amounts for tax advice
and tax planning services. |
Pre-Approval
Policy
Our audit committee has established a pre-approval policy for
procedures for audit, audit related and tax services that can be
performed by our independent auditors. For 2009 and 2008, all of
these fees were pre-approved by the audit committee under that
policy. Subject to certain limitations, the authority to grant
pre-approvals may be delegated to one or more members of the
audit committee. A copy of this policy is available on our
Website at www.IndependentBank.com.
9
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED
FOR YOUR VOTE RATIFICATION OF THE
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The audit committee has selected Crowe Horwath LLP
(Crowe), as independent auditors for the Company,
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. The services
provided to the Company and our subsidiaries by Crowe for 2009
and 2008 are described above under the caption Disclosure
of Fees Paid to our Independent Auditors.
We are asking our shareholders to ratify the selection of Crowe
as our independent auditors. Although ratification is not
legally required, the Board is submitting the selection of Crowe
to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good
corporate governance. Representatives of Crowe are expected to
be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate
questions and to make such statements as they may desire.
The affirmative vote of the holders of the majority of the
shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on
this item will be required for approval. All broker non-votes
will not be treated as votes cast on this matter; shares voted
as abstentions will be counted as votes cast and therefore will
have the effect of a negative vote.
If our shareholders do not ratify the appointment, the
appointment will be reconsidered by the audit committee and the
Board. Even if the selection is ratified, the audit committee,
in its discretion, may select a different independent registered
public accounting firm at any time during the year if it
determines that such a change would be in the best interest of
the Company and our shareholders.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal to
ratify the appointment of Crowe as our independent auditors.
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED
FOR YOUR VOTE
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
TO EFFECT A ONE (1) FOR TEN (10) REVERSE SPLIT OF THE
COMPANYS COMMON STOCK
We believe it is in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders to adopt an amendment to the Companys Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation authorizing a reverse
stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock. The
purpose of the reverse split would be to increase the stock
price of our common stock sufficiently above the $1.00 minimum
bid price requirement for continued listing on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market (NASDAQ GSM) with a goal of sustaining
long-term compliance with the NASDAQ listing requirements. Under
the proposal, the number of authorized shares of our common
stock would not change and would remain at 500 million.
The proposed amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation is attached to this proxy statement as
Appendix A (the Amendment). If the
Amendment is approved, the number of issued and outstanding
shares of common stock would be reduced by an exchange ratio of
one (1) share for every ten (10) shares currently
outstanding (the Exchange Ratio), and the current
authorized number of shares of our common stock would remain at
500 million, without further approval of our shareholders.
The reverse stock split would become effective upon filing the
Amendment with the Michigan Department of Energy, Labor and
Economic Growth, which is anticipated to occur promptly
following the Meeting, if approved.
Purpose
of the Reverse Split
Because the Companys common stock is listed on the NASDAQ
GSM, the Company is subject to certain continued listing
standards and requirements, including a requirement that the
minimum bid price of its common stock remain at least $1.00 per
share. If the bid price of the Companys common stock is
below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days, the
Companys common stock may be delisted from the NASDAQ GSM.
On December 21, 2009, we received a letter from The NASDAQ
Stock Market notifying us that we no longer met NASDAQs
continued listing requirements under Listing
Rule 5450(a)(1) because the bid price for our common stock
had closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading
days. We have until approximately June 21, 2010, to
demonstrate compliance with this bid price rule by maintaining a
minimum closing bid price of at least $1.00 for a minimum of 10
consecutive trading days. If we are unable to establish
compliance with the bid price rule within such time period, our
common stock will be subject to delisting from the NASDAQ GSM.
However, in that event,
10
we may be eligible for an additional grace period by
transferring our common stock listing from the NASDAQ GSM to the
NASDAQ Capital Market. This would require us to meet the initial
listing criteria of the NASDAQ Capital Market, other than with
respect to the minimum bid price requirement. If we are then
permitted to transfer our listing to the NASDAQ Capital Market,
we expect we would be granted an additional 180 calendar day
period in which to demonstrate compliance with the minimum bid
price rule.
The delisting of our common stock from NASDAQ, whether in
connection with the foregoing or as a result of our future
inability to meet any listing standards, would have an adverse
effect on the liquidity of our common stock and, as a result,
the market price of our common stock might become more volatile.
Even the perception that our common stock may be delisted could
affect its liquidity and market price. Delisting could also make
raising additional capital more difficult.
If our common stock is delisted from NASDAQ, it is likely that
quotes for our common stock would continue to be available on
the OTC Bulletin Board or on the Pink Sheets.
However, these alternatives are generally considered to be less
efficient markets and it is likely that the liquidity of our
common stock as well as our stock price would be adversely
impacted as a result.
Therefore, the Boards primary objective in proposing the
reverse split is to raise the per share trading price of the
Companys common stock sufficiently above the $1.00 minimum
bid price requirement for continued listing on The NASDAQ GSM.
The Company hopes the anticipated increase in the price per
share as a result of the reverse split will also encourage
greater interest in its common stock among members of the
financial community and the investing public and possibly create
a more liquid market for the Companys shareholders with
respect to those shares presently held by them. However, the
possibility exists that shareholder liquidity may be adversely
affected by the reduced number of shares outstanding if the
reverse split is effected, particularly if the price per share
of the Companys common stock begins a declining trend
after the reverse split is effected.
There can be no assurance that the reverse split will achieve
any of the desired results. There also can be no assurance that
the price per share of the Companys common stock
immediately after the reverse split will increase
proportionately with the reverse split, or that any increase
will be sustained for any period of time.
The Company is not aware of any present efforts by anyone to
accumulate its common stock, and the proposed reverse split is
not intended to be an anti-takeover device nor is it part of a
broader plan to take the Company private.
Effects
of Reverse Split on Common Stock
One principal effect of the reverse split would be to decrease
the number of outstanding shares of our common stock. Except for
de minimus adjustments that may result from the treatment
of fractional shares as described below, the reverse split will
not have any dilutive effect on our shareholders since each
shareholder would hold the same percentage of our common stock
outstanding immediately following the reverse split as such
shareholder held immediately prior to the reverse split. The
relative voting and other rights that accompany the shares of
common stock would not be affected by the reverse split.
Although the reverse split will not have any dilutive effect on
our shareholders (other than de minimus adjustments that
may result from the treatment of fractional shares), the
proportion of shares owned by our shareholders relative to the
number of shares authorized for issuance will decrease because
the Amendment maintains the current authorized number of shares
of common stock at 500 million. As a result, the additional
authorized shares of common stock will be available for issuance
at such times and for such purposes as the Board may deem
advisable without further action by our shareholders, except as
required by applicable laws and regulations. This includes using
such additional authorized shares in connection with the capital
restoration plan adopted by our Board in January of 2010 (the
Capital Plan). Our Capital Plan contemplates three
primary initiatives that have been or will be undertaken in
order to increase our common equity capital, decrease our
expenses, and enable us to withstand and better respond to
current market conditions and the potential for worsening market
conditions. Those three initiatives are:
|
|
|
|
|
First, we have made a proposal to the United States Department
of the Treasury (the UST) to issue shares of our
common stock in exchange for up to the entire $72 million
in aggregate liquidation value of the preferred shares we issued
to the UST. Negotiations with the UST regarding our proposal are
ongoing.
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
Second, we intend to offer to issue shares of our common stock
in exchange for outstanding trust preferred securities issued by
our trust subsidiaries. If successfully completed, these
exchange offers would result in a reduction in our obligation to
make quarterly distributions to holders of trust preferred
securities and would result in an increase to our tangible
common shareholders equity.
|
|
|
|
Third, after the completion of the exchange offers for trust
preferred securities described in the preceding paragraph, and
subject to market conditions, we intend to raise additional
capital in a public offering of our common stock for cash, in
which we currently intend to seek to raise gross proceeds of
between $50 million and $150 million.
|
At a special meeting of our shareholders held on
January 29, 2010, our shareholders approved an amendment to
our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase
the number of shares of our common stock we are authorized to
issue in order to allow us to complete these transactions. More
information regarding these initiatives can be found in the
definitive proxy statement we filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on December 18, 2009,
and in the Registration Statement on
Form S-4
we filed with the SEC on January 27, 2010.
The proposed Amendment will not otherwise alter or modify the
rights, preferences, privileges or restrictions of the common
stock.
Effect on
Outstanding Options
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had 1,098,550 options
to purchase common stock outstanding. Under the terms of the
options, when the reverse split becomes effective, the number of
shares covered by each option will be decreased and the
conversion or exercise price per share will be increased in
accordance with the Exchange Ratio.
On March 1, 2010, the Company commenced a stock option
exchange program, which allows certain eligible employees a
limited period of time in which they may elect to exchange
certain outstanding employee stock options for new stock options
covering a lesser number of shares. The new options will be
granted under the Independent Bank Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan, with an exercise price equal to the closing
price of our common stock on the NASDAQ GSM on the date the new
options are granted. The stock option exchange program is
scheduled to expire on March 29, 2010, which is before the
reverse split will become effective (if approved by our
shareholders). Under the terms of the new options, when the
reverse split becomes effective, the number of shares covered by
each new option will be decreased and the conversion or exercise
price per share will be increased in accordance with the
Exchange Ratio.
No Effect
on Legal Ability to Pay Dividends
The Company does not believe the reverse split will have any
effect with respect to future distributions, if any, to the
Companys shareholders. The Company is currently prohibited
from paying any dividends on its common stock, and we do not
expect we will be able to pay cash dividends at any time in the
near future. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009, we
exercised our right to defer all quarterly distributions on our
outstanding trust preferred securities and on all shares of
preferred stock issued to the UST pursuant to the Troubled Asset
Relief Program (TARP). As a result of our election to defer
regularly scheduled quarterly payments on our outstanding trust
preferred securities and our outstanding shares of preferred
stock, we are currently prohibited from paying any cash
dividends on shares of our common stock. We may not pay any cash
dividends on our common stock until all accrued but unpaid
dividends and distributions on such senior securities have been
paid in full. We do not have any current plans to begin making
quarterly payments on our trust preferred securities or our
preferred stock. In addition, in December of 2009, our Board of
Directors adopted resolutions that prohibit us from, among other
things, paying any dividends on our common stock, our preferred
stock, or our trust preferred securities without, in each case,
the approval of our federal and state banking regulators.
Moreover, even if we were to re-commence regularly scheduled
quarterly payments on our outstanding trust preferred securities
and preferred stock, there are still significant restrictions on
our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. Our agreements
with the UST pursuant to which we issued our preferred stock to
the UST prevent us
12
from paying quarterly cash dividends on our common stock in
excess of $.01 per share and (with certain exceptions)
repurchasing shares of common stock. These restrictions will
remain in effect until the earlier of December 12, 2011 or
such time as the UST no longer holds the shares of our preferred
stock.
Aside from the specific restrictions set forth above that result
from our current financial condition, there are other
restrictions that apply under federal and state law to restrict
our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders and the ability
of our subsidiary bank to pay dividends to us. For example, the
Federal Reserve requires us, as a bank holding company, to act
as a source of financial strength to our subsidiary bank.
Accordingly, we are required to inform and consult with the
Federal Reserve before paying dividends that could raise safety
and soundness concerns.
There can be no assurance as to future dividends because they
are dependent on the Companys future earnings, capital
requirements and financial conditions. We do not believe the
reverse split will have any effect on our ability to pay cash
dividends to our shareholders.
Payment
for Fractional Shares; Book Entry Form of Shares
The Company will appoint American Stock Transfer and
Trust Company to act as exchange agent for holders of
common stock in connection with the reverse split. The Company
will not issue fractional shares with respect to the reverse
split, but will instruct the Companys transfer agent to
round up any fractional share to the nearest whole share. Some
of the Companys outstanding common stock is registered in
the names of clearing agencies and broker nominees. Because the
Company does not know the number of shares held by each
beneficial owner for whom the clearing agencies and broker
nominees are record holders, the Company cannot predict with
certainty the number of fractional shares that will result from
the reverse split or the total number of additional shares that
will be issued as a result of rounding up fractional shares.
However, the Company does not expect that the amount will be
material.
As of the Record Date, the Company had approximately 2,200
holders of record of the Companys common stock (although
the Company had significantly more beneficial holders). The
Company does not expect the reverse split to result in a
significant reduction in the number of record holders. The
Company presently does not intend to seek any change in its
status as a reporting company for federal securities law
purposes, either before or after the reverse split.
Some of our shareholders of record hold their shares of common
stock in certificate form. On or after the effective date of the
reverse split, the Company will mail a letter of transmittal to
each such shareholder. Each such shareholder will be able to
obtain a confirmation statement evidencing its
post-reverse-split shares if it sends the exchange agent its old
stock certificate(s), together with the properly executed and
completed letter of transmittal, and such evidence of ownership
of the shares as the Company may require. Such shareholders will
not receive a confirmation statement for post-reverse-split
shares unless and until their old certificates are surrendered.
Such shareholders should not forward their certificates to the
exchange agent until they receive the letter of transmittal, and
they should only send in their certificates with the letter of
transmittal. The exchange agent will record each
shareholders new shares in book entry form via the Direct
Registration System on the effective date of the reverse split,
or for shareholders of record holding their shares in
certificate form, promptly after receipt of that
shareholders properly completed letter of transmittal and
old stock certificate(s). Shareholders who hold shares in street
name through a nominee (such as a bank or broker) will be
treated similarly as shareholders of record, and nominees will
be instructed to effect the reverse split for their beneficial
holders. However, nominees may have different procedures and
shareholders holding shares in street name should contact their
nominees.
Shareholders will not have to pay any service charges in
connection with the exchange of their certificates.
Approval
Required
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock of the Company is required
for the approval of this proposed Amendment. Both abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the effect of a negative vote.
Unless otherwise directed by a shareholders proxy, the
persons named as proxy voters in the accompanying proxy will
vote FOR this Amendment. The approval of this proposal is not a
condition to the approval of any other proposals submitted to
the shareholders.
13
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal to
amend our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED
FOR YOUR VOTE
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Set forth under Executive Compensation below is our
Compensation Discussion and Analysis that describes, among other
things, our executive compensation policies and practices. The
compensation discussion also summarizes certain executive
compensation restrictions and requirements applicable to us as a
result of our sale of preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury
in December of 2008. One of those requirements is that our
shareholders be given the opportunity to express their approval
of the compensation of our executives, as disclosed in this
Proxy Statement. Under the federal legislation that requires
this vote, the shareholder vote is not binding on our Board and
may not be construed as overruling any decision made by our
Board. However, the compensation committee of our Board will
take the outcome of this vote into consideration when making
future executive compensation decisions.
Therefore, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our
shareholders will be given the opportunity to vote on an
advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the compensation of
our executives. This vote proposal is commonly known as a
say-on-pay
proposal and gives our shareholders the opportunity to endorse
or not endorse our executive pay program. You are encouraged to
read the full details of our executive compensation program,
including our primary objectives in setting executive pay, under
Executive Compensation below.
The shareholders will be asked to approve the following
resolution at the Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Independent Bank Corporation
approve the compensation of the Companys executives, as
described in the Executive Compensation section of
the Companys 2010 Proxy Statement.
This is an advisory vote only and neither the Company nor its
Board of Directors will be bound to take action based upon the
outcome of this vote. The compensation committee of our Board
will consider the outcome of the vote when considering future
executive compensation arrangements.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal to
approve the resolution approving the compensation of our
executives.
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED
FOR YOUR VOTE
ADJOURNMENT, POSTPONEMENT OR CONTINUATION OF THE ANNUAL
MEETING
If at the Annual Meeting the number of shares of our common
stock present or represented and voting in favor of the other
proposals, or any of them, is insufficient to approve any such
proposal, our management may move to adjourn, postpone or
continue the Annual Meeting in order to enable our Board to
continue to solicit additional proxies in favor of that
particular proposal. In that event, you will be asked to vote
only upon the adjournment, postponement or continuation
proposal, and any other proposal described in this Proxy
Statement for which, at such time, we have received sufficient
votes for approval, and not any proposal for which sufficient
votes for approval have not been received.
In this proposal, we are asking you to authorize the holder of
any proxy solicited by our Board to vote in favor of adjourning,
postponing or continuing the Annual Meeting and any later
adjournments. If our shareholders approve the adjournment,
postponement or continuation proposal, we could adjourn,
postpone or continue the Annual Meeting, and any adjourned
session of the Annual Meeting, to use the additional time to
solicit additional proxies in favor of a proposal not receiving
votes sufficient for approval, including the solicitation of
proxies from the shareholders that have previously voted against
such proposal. Among other things, approval of the adjournment,
postponement or continuation proposal could mean that, even if
proxies representing a sufficient number of votes against any
one or all of the other proposals have been received, we could
adjourn, postpone or continue the Annual Meeting without a vote
on the particular proposal and seek to convince the holders of
those shares to change their votes to vote in favor of the
recommended proposal.
14
Approval
Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of our common stock voted at
the Annual Meeting, by person or by proxy, is required to
approve the adjournment, postponement or continuation proposal.
Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for this
proposal, and therefore will have the same effect as
Against votes. Broker non-votes will have no effect
and will not be counted towards the vote total for this
proposal. Unless otherwise directed by marking the accompanying
proxy, the named proxy holders will vote FOR the adjournment,
postponement or continuation proposal, if such vote is held. The
approval of this proposal is not a condition to the approval of
any other proposals submitted to the shareholders.
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to
adjourn, postpone or continue the Annual Meeting, if such vote
is held.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Overview
and Objectives
The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are
to (1) attract and retain talented executives,
(2) motivate and reward executives for achieving our
business goals, (3) align our executives incentives
with our strategies and goals, as well as the creation of
shareholder value, and (4) provide competitive compensation
at a reasonable cost. Consequently, our executive compensation
plans are designed to achieve these objectives.
As described in more detail below, our executive compensation
program has three primary components: base salary; an annual
cash incentive bonus; and long-term incentive compensation that
is payable in cash, stock options and stock grant awards. The
compensation committee of our Board has not established policies
or guidelines with respect to the specific mix or allocation of
total compensation among base salary, annual incentive bonuses,
and long-term compensation. However, as part of our
long-standing
pay-for-performance
compensation philosophy, we typically set the base salaries of
our executives somewhat below market median base salaries in
return for above market median incentive opportunities.
Combined, our five Named Executives have served the Company for
a total of 84 years.
The compensation committee of the Board has utilized the
services of third-party consultants from time to time to assist
in the design of our executive compensation programs and render
advice on compensation matters generally. In 2006, the
compensation committee engaged the services of Mercer Human
Resource Consulting (Mercer) to review our executive
compensation programs. As part of those services, Mercer
(1) reviewed our existing compensation strategies and
plans, (2) conducted a study of peer group compensation,
including the competitiveness and effectiveness of each element
of our compensation program, as well as our historical
performance relative to that peer group, and
(3) recommended changes to our compensation program,
including those directly applicable to our executive officers.
Neither the Company, the Board, nor any committee of the Board
retained any compensation consultants during 2009.
Restrictions
on Executive Compensation Under Federal Law
On December 12, 2008, the Company sold $72 million of
its preferred stock and warrants to the U.S. Department of
Treasury (Treasury) under the Capital Purchase
Program of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
Participants in TARP are subject to a number of limitations and
restrictions on executive compensation, including certain
provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA). Under the ARRA, Treasury established
standards regarding executive compensation relative to the
requirements listed below on June 15, 2009. The substance
of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is based upon the
existing guidance issued by Treasury. The compensation committee
of our Board conducted the required review of our Named
Executives incentive compensation arrangements with our senior
risk officers, within the ninety day period following our sale
of securities with Treasury under TARP.
15
As a general matter, until such time that the Company is no
longer a TARP participant, we will be subject to the following
requirements, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
Our incentive compensation program may not include incentives
for our Named Executives (defined below) to take unnecessary and
excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company;
|
|
|
|
The Company is entitled to recover any bonus, retention award,
or incentive compensation paid to any of its 25 most highly
compensated employees based upon statements of earnings,
revenues, gains, or other criteria that are later found to be
materially inaccurate;
|
|
|
|
The Company is prohibited from making any golden parachute
payments to any of its 10 most highly compensated employees;
|
|
|
|
The Company is prohibited from paying to any Named Executive or
the next 20 most highly compensated employees any tax
gross-ups
on compensation such as perquisites.
|
|
|
|
Our compensation program may not encourage the manipulation of
reported earnings to enhance the compensation of our employees;
|
|
|
|
The Company may not pay or accrue any bonus, retention award, or
incentive compensation to any of our Named Executives, other
than payments made in the form of restricted stock, subject to
the further condition that any such awards may not vest while
the Company is a participant in TARP and that any award not have
a value greater than one-third of the Named Executives total
annual compensation; and
|
|
|
|
Our shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on an
advisory (non-binding) resolution at the Annual Meeting to
approve the compensation of our executives.
|
The foregoing discussion is intended to provide a background and
context for the information that follows regarding our existing
compensation programs to those persons who served as our
executive officers during 2009 and to assist in understanding
the information included in the executive compensation tables
included below.
Components
of Compensation
The principal components of compensation we pay to our
executives consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary;
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash Incentive; and
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Compensation, generally payable in the form
of a combination of cash, stock options and restricted stock.
|
Base
Salary
Base salaries are established each year for our executive
officers. None of our executive officers has a separate
employment agreement. In determining base salaries, we consider
a variety of factors. Peer group compensation is a primary
factor, but additional factors include an individuals
performance, experience, expertise, and tenure with the Company.
The executive compensation review conducted by Mercer, including
its update in 2008, revealed that the base salaries of most of
our executives are at or below competitive rates and market
median levels.
Each year the compensation committee recommends the base salary
for our President and CEO for consideration and approval by the
full Board. For 2009, the committee approved managements
recommendation to freeze the base salary levels of all of our
executive officers, including Mr. Magee. Similarly, for
2010, the base salary levels of our Named Executives were frozen
at the 2008 levels. Accordingly, Mr. Magees salary of
$382,000 has remained unchanged since 2008.
The base salaries of other executive officers are established by
our President and CEO. In setting base salaries, our President
and CEO considers peer group compensation, as well as the
individual performance of each respective executive officer. For
the reasons noted above, the base salaries of our other Named
Executives for 2009 remained
16
unchanged from 2008 and were as follows:
Mr. Shuster $230,000;
Mr. Reglin $226,000;
Mr. Kessel $226,000; and
Ms. Kimball $226,000. These salaries will
remain the same for 2010.
Annual
Cash Incentives
Annual cash incentives are paid under the terms of our
Management Incentive Compensation Plan. This Plan sets forth
performance incentives that are designed to provide for annual
cash awards that are payable if we meet or exceed the annual
performance objectives established by our Board. Under this
Plan, our Board establishes annual performance levels as
follows: (1) threshold represents the performance level of
what must be achieved before any incentive awards are payable;
(2) target performance is defined as a desired level of
performance in view of all relevant factors, as described in
more detail below; and (3) the maximum represents that
which reflects outstanding performance. As noted above, target
performance under this Plan is intended to provide for aggregate
annual cash compensation (salary and bonus) that approximates
peer level compensation.
Threshold performance would result in earning 50 percent of
the target incentive, target would be 100 percent, and
maximum would be 200 percent, with compensation prorated
between these award levels. Target incentive is defined as
65 percent of base salary for our CEO and 50 percent
of base salary for our other Named Executives.
For 2009, 75 percent of the performance goal was based upon
Company performance, while 25 percent was based upon
predetermined individual goals. The corporate performance
standards for 2009 were based upon the Companys success in
after-tax EPS, its success in reducing its loan loss provision
and success in growing core deposits. Each of the factors were
weighted 25 percent. For 2009, the performance goals for
the Company were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS
|
|
Loan Loss Provision
|
|
Core Deposits
|
|
Threshold
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
51 million
|
|
|
$
|
1.9 billion
|
|
Target
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
45 million
|
|
|
|
2.0 billion
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
16 million
|
|
|
|
2.2 billion
|
|
Following the adoption of the ARRA, discussed above, none of the
Named Executives are currently eligible to receive any payments
under our annual Management Incentive Compensation Plan. Given
the Companys performance during 2009, no bonuses were paid
to any of our employees for 2009. Any awards under the Plan are
payable in full following certification of the Companys
financial results for the performance period. In light of the
Companys current capital position, the Company will not
pay any bonuses for 2010.
Long-Term
Incentive Program
Following the committees and Boards review and
analysis of the Mercer report, effective January 1, 2007,
the Board adopted a long-term incentive program that includes
three separate components: stock options, restricted stock, and
long-term cash, each of which comprise one-third of the total
long-term incentive grant each year. The target value of the
cumulative amount of these awards is set at 100 percent of
our CEOs salary and 50 percent for each of our other
Named Executives. Because the first possible payout under the
cash portion of the long-term program cannot be made until 2010
(the year after the first three-year performance period), the
committee elected to grant stock options and restricted stock
having a value equal to the aggregate target bonuses under the
long-term incentive program for both 2007 and 2008. For 2009,
and as explained in more detail below, the committee authorized
only the grant of stock options under this program at a target
value well below two-thirds of the target bonus.
Cash Incentive Elements. The
committee adopted performance goals for the cash portion of this
long-term incentive program, based upon the Companys
three-year total shareholder return (TSR). TSR is determined by
dividing the sum of our stock price appreciation and dividends
by our stock price at the beginning of the performance period.
The first performance period is the three year period beginning
January 1, 2007. For purposes of determining achievement,
the Companys TSR is measured against the Nasdaq Bank Index
median TSR over the same period. The committee established the
three target levels of performance, with threshold at the
50th percentile, target at the 70th percentile and
maximum at the 90th percentile.
Equity-Based Incentive
Element. The other two-thirds of the
program are made up of stock options and shares of restricted
stock, each of which are awarded under the terms of our
Long-Term Incentive Plan. As a general
17
practice, these awards are recommended by the committee, and
approved by the Board, at the Boards first meeting in each
calendar year and after the announcement of our earnings for the
immediately preceding year. Under this Plan, the committee has
the authority to grant a wide variety of stock-based awards. The
exercise price of options granted under this Plan may not be
less than the fair market value of our common stock at the date
of grant; options are restricted as to transferability and
generally expire ten years after the date of grant. The Plan is
intended to assist our executive officers in the achievement of
our share ownership guidelines. Under these guidelines
(1) our CEO is expected to own Company stock having a
market value equal to twice his base salary, (2) our
executive vice presidents are to own stock having a market value
of not less than 125 percent of their respective base
salaries, and (3) our senior vice presidents are to own
stock having a market value of not less than 50 percent of
their respective base salaries. Once these guidelines are
achieved, the failure to maintain the guidelines due to
decreases in the market value of our common stock does not
mandate additional purchases; rather, further sales of our
common stock are prohibited until the employee again reaches the
required level of ownership. Not more than 75 percent of
the shares held by an executive in our ESOP may count toward the
achievement of these guidelines, and only in the
money stock options granted after January 1, 2004,
count as well. These guidelines apply ratably over a five-year
period commencing January 1, 2004, or the date of hire or
promotion to one of these positions.
The value of the options that make up one-third of our long-term
incentive program are measured under ASC topic 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation and vest
ratably over three years. The value of the shares of the
restricted stock that make up the final one-third of our
long-term incentive program is based upon the grant date value
of the shares of our common stock. These shares do not vest
until the fifth anniversary of the grant date.
Due to the limited number of shares available for issuance under
the terms of our Long-Term Incentive Plan, the committee elected
to grant the entire amount of the equity portion of the
long-term incentive program in the form of restricted shares of
common stock for 2008. The value of the shares of restricted
stock, based upon the grant date values, equaled
100 percent of our CEOs base compensation and
50 percent of the base compensation of each of our other
Named Executives. As of the time of the annual grant for
equity-based awards under the Plan in 2009, there remained
approximately 300,000 shares available for grant under the
Plan. Due to the limited number of remaining shares available
for award, and due to the fact that the committee utilized
restricted stock awards exclusively in 2008, the committee
approved the grant of options covering a total of
299,987 shares for 2009, which were allocated among
participants in accordance with their respective target bonuses
under the Long-Term Incentive Program. Based upon the
restrictions imposed by ARRA, our Named Executives may only
receive awards under the Plan in the form of restricted stock,
subject to the further limitation that those shares may not vest
while the Company is a TARP participant and the value of any
award may not exceed one-third of that employees total
annual compensation. No awards under the Long-Term Incentive
Program have been made or authorized for 2010.
Severance
and Change in Control Payments
The Company has in place Management Continuity Agreements for
each of our executive officers. These agreements provide
severance benefits if an individuals employment is
terminated within 36 months after a change in control or
within six months before a change in control and if the
individuals employment is terminated or constructively
terminated in contemplation of a change in control for three
years thereafter. For purposes of these agreements, a
change in control is defined to mean any occurrence
reportable as such in a proxy statement under applicable rules
of the SEC, and would include, without limitation, the
acquisition of beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more
of our voting securities by any person, certain extraordinary
changes in the composition of our Board, or a merger or
consolidation in which we are not the surviving entity, or our
sale or liquidation.
Severance benefits are not payable if an individuals
employment is terminated for cause, employment terminates due to
an individuals death or disability, or the individual
resigns without good reason. An individual may
resign with good reason after a change in control
and receive his or her severance benefits if an
individuals salary or bonus is reduced, his or her duties
and responsibilities are inconsistent with his or her prior
position, or there is a material, adverse change in the terms or
conditions of the individuals employment. The agreements
are for self-renewing terms of three years unless we elect not
to renew the agreement. The agreements are automatically
extended for a three-year term from the date of a change in
control. These agreements provide for a severance benefit in a
lump sum payment equal to 18 months to three years
salary and bonus and a continuation of benefits coverage
for 18 months to three years. These benefits are limited,
however, to one dollar less than three times an
18
executives base amount compensation as defined
in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
Following the adoption of the ARRA, discussed above, none of the
10 most highly compensated employees will be eligible to receive
any severance or change in control benefits due to the
prohibition related to golden parachute payments for
the period during which any obligation arising under TARP
remains outstanding.
Other
Benefits
We believe that other components of our compensation program,
which are generally provided to other full-time employees, are
an important factor in attracting and retaining highly qualified
personnel. Executive officers are eligible to participate in all
of our employee benefit plans, such as medical, group life and
accidental death and dismemberment insurance and our 401(k)
Plan, and in each case on the same basis as other employees. We
also maintain an ESOP that provides substantially all full-time
employees with an equity interest in our Company. Contributions
to the ESOP are determined annually and are subject to the
approval of our Board. No Company contributions were made to the
plan for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Perquisites
Our Board and compensation committee regularly reviews the
perquisites offered to our executive officers. The committee
believes that the cost of such perquisites is relatively
minimal. Under the standards established by Treasury on
June 15, 2009, we may not pay to any Named Executive or the
next 20 most highly compensated employees any tax
gross-ups
on compensation such as perquisites.
Summary
Compensation Table 2009
The following table shows certain information regarding the
compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, and the three most highly compensated executive
officers other than our CEO and CFO (the Named
Executives).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
382,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,678
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,853
|
|
|
$
|
451,531
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
382,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,904
|
|
|
|
767,900
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,995
|
|
|
|
174,998
|
|
|
|
51,186
|
|
|
|
21,878
|
|
|
|
773,057
|
|
Robert N. Shuster
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,959
|
|
|
|
271,807
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,318
|
|
|
|
364,312
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,994
|
|
|
|
54,999
|
|
|
|
39,600
|
|
|
|
21,051
|
|
|
|
390,644
|
|
David C. Reglin
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,612
|
|
|
|
263,236
|
|
Executive Vice President -
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,415
|
|
|
|
363,409
|
|
Retail Banking
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,994
|
|
|
|
54,999
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
24,017
|
|
|
|
387,010
|
|
Stefanie M. Kimball(4)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,414
|
|
|
|
253,038
|
|
Executive Vice President -
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,558
|
|
|
|
342,557
|
|
Chief Lending Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
130,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,987
|
|
|
|
49,997
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
259,152
|
|
William B. Kessel
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,363
|
|
|
|
260,987
|
|
Executive Vice President -
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,431
|
|
|
|
360,930
|
|
Chief Operations Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
215,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,742
|
|
|
|
53,748
|
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
|
25,494
|
|
|
|
380,484
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes elective deferrals by employees pursuant to
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Service Code and
elective deferrals pursuant to a non-qualified deferred
compensation plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts set forth in the stock award and option award columns
represent the aggregate fair value of the awards as of the grant
date, computed in accordance with FASB ASC topic 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation. The
assumptions used in calculating these amounts are set forth in
Note 14, in the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
19
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Amounts include our contributions to the ESOP (subject to
certain age and service requirements, all employees are eligible
to participate in the plan), matching contributions to qualified
defined contribution plans, IRS determined personal use of
company owned automobiles, country club and other social club
dues and restricted stock dividends. |
|
(4) |
|
Ms. Kimball began employment with us on April 25, 2007. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards 2009
This table sets forth information on equity awards granted by
the Company to the Named Executives during 2009 under our
Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Compensation Discussion and
Analysis provides further details on these awards under the
Long-Term Incentive Plan. As noted in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, our Named Executives are not eligible
to participate in our Management Incentive Compensation Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Base Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
of Option
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
and Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
|
Options(2)
|
|
|
($/Sh)(3)
|
|
|
Awards ($)(4)
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee
|
|
|
1/30/09
|
(1)
|
|
|
58,333
|
|
|
|
116,667
|
|
|
|
233,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,655
|
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
$
|
42,678
|
|
Robert N. Shuster
|
|
|
1/30/09
|
(1)
|
|
|
18,333
|
|
|
|
36,667
|
|
|
|
73,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,561
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
12,848
|
|
David C. Reglin
|
|
|
1/30/09
|
(1)
|
|
|
18,333
|
|
|
|
36,667
|
|
|
|
73,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,238
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
12,624
|
|
Stefanie M. Kimball
|
|
|
1/30/09
|
(1)
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
66,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,238
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
12,624
|
|
William B. Kessel
|
|
|
1/30/09
|
(1)
|
|
|
17,917
|
|
|
|
35,833
|
|
|
|
71,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,238
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
12,624
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents awards granted under our Long Term Incentive program.
The referenced payouts are dependent upon our three-year total
shareholder return (TSR) as described in our
Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for the period ending
December 31, 2010, relative to the Nasdaq Bank Index median
TSR over the same period. |
|
(2) |
|
Each option has a term of ten years and vests pro rata over
three years. |
|
(3) |
|
The exercise price of all stock options equals the market value
of the Companys common stock on the grant date. |
|
(4) |
|
Grant date values are computed in accordance with ASC topic 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation. |
As shown in the Summary Compensation Table above, each Named
Executives base salary generally constitutes the majority
of his or her respective compensation for 2009, 2008 and 2007.
This is due to the fact that no annual bonus was paid in 2008 or
2009 under the Management Incentive Compensation Plan and
bonuses earned under that plan for 2007 were attributable to the
achievement of certain individual performance goals. Effective
January 1, 2007, our Management Incentive Compensation Plan
was modified to permit our executives to earn relatively modest
bonuses based upon individual achievement, irrespective of
whether the Company achieved its financial performance targets.
20
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows the option and restricted stock awards
that were outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The table
shows both exercisable and unexercisable options, as well as
shares of restricted stock that have not yet vested, all of
which were granted under our Long-Term Incentive Plan. During
2009, our Named Executives voluntarily surrendered, for no
consideration, options providing for the purchase of
335,645 shares of our common stock. Each of these options
had an exercise price of $10.00 or greater and an expiration
date of greater than one year from the date of surrender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Units of Stock
|
|
|
Shares or Units of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
Stock That Have
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable(1)
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
Not Vested(2)
|
|
|
Not Vested(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee
|
|
|
01/21/01
|
|
|
|
10,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.79
|
|
|
|
01/21/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,485
|
|
|
$
|
7,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,871
|
|
|
|
33,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,655
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
01/30/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert N. Shuster
|
|
|
04/17/01
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
04/17/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/11/04
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.13
|
|
|
|
04/20/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,416
|
|
|
|
10,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,561
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
01/30/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David C. Reglin
|
|
|
01/21/01
|
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.79
|
|
|
|
01/21/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/17/01
|
|
|
|
6,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
04/17/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/21/01
|
|
|
|
3,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.97
|
|
|
|
01/18/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/24/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,416
|
|
|
|
10,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,238
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
01/30/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stefanie M. Kimball
|
|
|
04/24/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,106
|
|
|
|
9,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,238
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
01/30/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William B. Kessel
|
|
|
04/24/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,220
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,089
|
|
|
|
10,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,238
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
01/30/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The options granted on January 30, 2009, vest ratably over
the three-year period beginning January 30, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
The shares of restricted stock are subject to risks of
forfeiture until they vest, in full, on the fifth anniversary of
the grant date. |
|
(3) |
|
The market value of the shares of restricted stock that have not
vested is based on the closing price of our common stock as of
December 31, 2009. |
21
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized on
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Name
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert N. Shuster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David C. Reglin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stefanie M. Kimball
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William B. Kessel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of our Named Executives exercised any options during 2009,
nor were any restricted stock awards vested during 2009.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
The table below provides certain information relating to each
defined contribution plan that provides for the deferral of
compensation on a basis that is not tax qualified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Name
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
at Last FYE
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14,482
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,505
|
|
Robert N. Shuster
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,446
|
|
|
|
(8,512
|
)
|
|
|
52,416
|
|
David C. Reglin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stefanie M. Kimball
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William B. Kessel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(23,057
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Certain of our officers, including the Named Executives, can
contribute, on a tax deferred basis, up to 80% of his or her
base salary and 100% of his or her annual cash bonus into our
executive non-qualified excess plan. The Company makes no
contributions to this plan and contributions by participants may
be directed into various investment options as selected by each
participant. Earnings on the investments accrue to the
participants on a tax deferred basis. Participants can withdraw
balances from their accounts in accordance with plan provisions.
Other
Potential Post-Employment Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
Estimated Liability
|
|
|
Payment Limitation
|
|
|
|
for Severance
|
|
|
Based on IRS
|
|
|
|
Payments & Benefit
|
|
|
Section 280G
|
|
|
|
Amounts Under
|
|
|
Limitation on
|
|
Executive Name
|
|
Continuity Agreements
|
|
|
Severance Amounts
|
|
|
Michael M. Magee
|
|
$
|
1,302,958
|
|
|
$
|
1,141,078
|
|
Robert N. Shuster
|
|
|
810,064
|
|
|
|
707,834
|
|
David C. Reglin
|
|
|
790,798
|
|
|
|
704,045
|
|
Stefanie M. Kimball
|
|
|
794,285
|
|
|
|
642,490
|
|
William B. Kessel
|
|
|
789,688
|
|
|
|
778,298
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Corporation has entered into Management Continuity
Agreements with each of the above Named Executives that provide
for defined severance compensation and other benefits if they
are terminated following a change of control of the Company. The
Agreements provide for a lump sum payout of the severance
compensation and a continuation of certain health and medical
insurance related benefits for a period of three years. For
further detailed information, see the section titled
Severance and Change in Control Payments included as
part of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy
Statement. |
22
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The total amounts which may be due under the Management
Continuity Agreements are subject to and limited by Internal
Revenue Service Code Section 280G. This column indicates
the estimated payout based on IRS limitations. |
As long as the Corporation has any obligation outstanding
arising under TARP, none of the potential payments described
above can be paid due to the prohibition related to golden
parachute payments under ARRA, as discussed above.
Director
Compensation
During 2009, in response to the prevailing, uncertain economic
conditions, the Board reduced by ten percent the annual retainer
paid to non-employee directors as well as the annual retainer
payable to non-employee directors of our bank subsidiary. As a
result, these amounts were $40,500 and $10,800, respectively for
2009, and will remain the same for 2010. Half of the combined
retainer is paid in cash and the other half is paid under our
Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan for Non-employee
Directors (the Purchase Plan) described below until
that director achieves the required share ownership under our
share ownership guidelines. Once a director has achieved the
requisite level of share ownership under those guidelines, each
director then has a choice of receiving his or her director
compensation in cash or deferred share units under our Purchase
Plan, at his or her discretion. The Board approved the payment
of additional retainers of $5,000, $3,000, and $2,000 to the
Chairpersons of the Boards audit committee, compensation
committee, and nominating and corporate governance committee,
respectively. No fees are payable for attendance at either Board
or committee meetings.
Pursuant to our Long-Term Incentive Plan, the compensation
committee may grant options to purchase shares of Independent
Bank Corporation common stock to each non-employee director. No
such stock options were granted during 2009, 2008 or 2007.
The Purchase Plan provides that non-employee directors may defer
payment of all or a part of their director fees
(Fees) or receive shares of common stock in lieu of
cash payment of Fees. Under the Purchase Plan, each non-employee
director may elect to participate in a Current Stock Purchase
Account, a Deferred Cash Investment Account or a Deferred Stock
Account.
A Current Stock Purchase Account is credited with shares of
Independent Bank Corporation common stock having a fair market
value equal to the Fees otherwise payable. A Deferred Cash
Investment Account is credited with an amount equal to the Fees
deferred and on each quarterly credit date with an appreciation
factor that may not exceed the prime rate of interest charged by
Independent Bank. A Deferred Stock Account is credited with the
amount of Fees deferred and converted into stock units based on
the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the
deferral. Amounts in the Deferred Stock Account are credited
with cash dividends and other distributions on our common stock.
Fees credited to a Deferred Cash Investment Account or a
Deferred Stock Account are deferred for income tax purposes. The
Purchase Plan does not provide for distributions of amounts
deferred prior to a participants termination as a
non-employee director. Participants may generally elect either a
lump sum or installment distributions.
23
Director
Compensation 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held
|
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
as of 12/31/09
|
|
|
Donna J. Banks
|
|
$
|
51,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Bratsburg
|
|
|
51,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,300
|
|
|
|
30,994
|
|
Stephen L. Gulis, Jr.(2)
|
|
|
71,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terry L. Haske(3)
|
|
|
59,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,300
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
Robert L. Hetzler(4)
|
|
|
51,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,800
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
Clarke B. Maxson
|
|
|
51,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. McCarty(5)
|
|
|
54,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Palmer(6)
|
|
|
53,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,300
|
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
Charles C. Van Loan(7)
|
|
|
59,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
503,700
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
503,700
|
|
|
|
80,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No stock options were awarded to the Board during 2009, 2008, or
2007. No amounts were recognized as compensation expense in 2009
for financial reporting purposes with respect to stock options
granted to directors in accordance with FASB ASC topic 718. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes additional retainer for service as chairperson of the
audit committee and service on ad hoc special committee of the
Board. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes additional retainer for service on ad hoc special
committee of the Board. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes fees received for attendance at Mepco Finance
Corporation board meetings during 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes additional retainer for service as chairperson of the
compensation committee. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes additional retainer for service as chairperson of the
nominating and corporate governance committee. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes fees received for attendance at Mepco Finance
Corporation board meetings during 2009 and service on ad hoc
special committee of Board. |
Compensation
Committee Interlocks And Insider Participation
Mr. Van Loan, who previously served as CEO of the Company,
serves on the compensation committee of the Board. There did not
exist in 2009, any relationships involving our executive
officers that require disclosure under Item 407(e)(4) of
Regulation S-K.
24
TRANSACTIONS
INVOLVING MANAGEMENT
Our Board of Directors and executive officers and their
associates were customers of, and had transactions with, our
bank subsidiary in the ordinary course of business during 2009.
All loans and commitments included in such transactions were
made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the
same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other
persons and do not involve an unusual risk of collectability or
present other unfavorable features. Such loans totaled $599,000
at December 31, 2009, equal to 0.5% of shareholders
equity.
SECTION 16(A)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, our Directors and Executive Officers, as well as any
person holding more than 10% of our common stock, are required
to report initial statements of ownership of our securities and
changes in such ownership to the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Based solely upon written representations by each
Director and Executive Officer and our review of those reports
furnished to us, all of the required reports were timely filed
by such persons during 2009, except as follows: Mr. Butler,
senior vice president, operations, was late in filing one report
covering one transaction relating to the sale of common stock.
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR 2010 ANNUAL MEETING
Shareholders wishing to submit proposals on matters appropriate
for shareholder action to be presented at our 2011 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders may do so in accordance with
Rule 14a-8
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For such proposals to be
included in our proxy materials relating to our 2011 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, all applicable requirements of
Rule 14a-8
must be satisfied and such proposals must be received by us at
our principal executive offices at 230 West Main Street,
Ionia, Michigan 48846, no later than November xx, 2010.
For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next
years Proxy Statement, but is instead sought to be
presented directly at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SEC rules permit
management to vote proxies at its discretion if we
(1) receive notice of the proposal before the close of
business on February xx, 2011, and advise shareholders in
the 2011 Proxy Statement about the nature of the matter and how
management intends to vote on such matter, or (2) do not
receive notice of the proposal prior to the close of business on
February xx, 2011. Notices of intention to present
proposals at the 2011 Annual Meeting should be addressed to our
Corporate Secretary, at our principal offices listed above.
As of March xx, 2010, no proposals from any shareholder to
be presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting have been received by us.
Under our Bylaws, no business may be brought before an annual
shareholder meeting unless it is specified in the notice of the
meeting and included in the Companys proxy materials, or
is otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the direction
of the Board or by a shareholder entitled to vote who has
delivered written notice to us (containing certain information
specified in the Bylaws about the shareholder and the proposed
action) not less than thirty (30) days prior to the
originally scheduled Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If less
than forty (40) days notice is given by the Company, then
notice must be received within ten (10) days after the date
we mail or otherwise give notice of the date of the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.
25
GENERAL
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by
us. In addition to solicitation by mail, our
officers and employees may solicit proxies by telephone,
telegraph or in person. We have retained the services of The
Altman Group to deliver proxy materials to brokers, nominees,
fiduciaries and other custodians for distribution to beneficial
owners, as well as solicit proxies. The cost of such services is
expected to total approximately $5,500, plus reasonable out of
pocket expenses.
As of the date of this proxy statement, Management knows of no
other matters to be brought before the meeting. However, if
further business is presented by others, the proxy holders will
act in accordance with their best judgment.
By order of our Board of Directors,
Robert N. Shuster
Secretary
Dated: March xx, 2010
26
Appendix A
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
of
Independent Bank Corporation
The following is hereby added as new paragraphs four and five,
respectively, of Article III of the Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation:
Effective upon the filing of this Certificate of Amendment with
the Michigan Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth
(the Effective Time), the shares of Common Stock
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be combined and reclassified into a smaller number of
shares such that each ten shares of issued Common Stock
immediately prior to the Effective Time are reclassified into
one share of Common Stock. Notwithstanding the immediately
preceding sentence, no fractional shares shall be issued. The
Company will round up fractional shares to the nearest whole
share.
Each stock certificate that, immediately prior to the Effective
Time, represented shares of Common Stock that were issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, from
and after the Effective Time, automatically and without the
necessity of presenting the same for exchange, represent that
number of whole shares of Common Stock after the Effective Time
into which the shares of Common Stock formerly represented by
such certificate shall have been reclassified.
27
Independent
Bank Corporation
P.O. Box 491,
230 West Main Street
Ionia, Michigan 48846
616-527-9450
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION April 27, 2010 NOTICE OF
INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL: The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and proxy card are
available at http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/docs.aspx?iid=100319 Please sign, date and mail your
proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. Please detach along perforated line and
mail in the envelope provided. 20330303030000000000 1 042710 THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4 AND 5. In
their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1. Election of Directors: 3 nominees for three year terms expiring in 2013: 2. To ratify the
appointment of Crowe Horwath, LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending NOMINEES:
December 31, 2010. FOR ALL NOMINEES O Donna J. Banks, Ph.D. Expiring in 2013 O Jeffrey A. Bratsburg
Expiring in 2013 3. Consider and vote upon a proposal to amend our WITHHOLD AUTHORITY O Charles C.
Van Loan Expiring in 2013 FOR ALL NOMINEES Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect
a one (1) for ten (10) reverse split of our common FOR ALL EXCEPT stock. (See instructions below)
4. To consider and vote upon an advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the compensation paid
to our executives. 5. Grant management the authority to adjourn, postpone or continue the Annual
Meeting. INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark FOR ALL
EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: To change
the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the
address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be
submitted via this method. Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note:
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each
holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian,
please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by
duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by authorized person. |
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION April 27, 2010 PROXY VOTING
INSTRUCTIONS INTERNET Access www.voteproxy.com and follow the on-screen instructions. Have
your proxy card available when you access the web page, and use the Company Number and Account
Number shown on your proxy card. TELEPHONE Call toll-free 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in the
United States or 1-718-921-8500 from foreign countries from any touch-tone telephone and follow
the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call and use the Company Number and
COMPANY NUMBER Account Number shown on your proxy card. Vote online/phone until 11:59 PM EST the
day before the meeting. ACCOUNT NUMBER MAIL Sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope
provided as soon as possible. IN PERSON You may vote your shares in person by attending the
Annual Meeting. Information on directions to the site of our Annual Meeting is available on our
website at www.IndependentBank.com. NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL: The Notice
of meeting, proxy statement and proxy card are available at
http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/docs.aspx?iid=100319 Please detach along perforated line and mail in
the envelope provided IF you are not voting via telephone or the Internet.
20330303030000000000 1 042710 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS AND FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4 AND 5. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to
vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR
BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 1. Election of Directors: 3 nominees for three year
terms expiring in 2013: 2. To ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath, LLP as independent auditors
for the fiscal year ending NOMINEES: December 31, 2010. FOR ALL NOMINEES O Donna J. Banks, Ph.D.
Expiring in 2013 O Jeffrey A. Bratsburg Expiring in 2013 3. Consider and vote upon a proposal to
amend our WITHHOLD AUTHORITY O Charles C. Van Loan Expiring in 2013 FOR ALL NOMINEES Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation to effect a one (1) for ten (10) reverse split of our common FOR
ALL EXCEPT stock. (See instructions below) 4. To consider and vote upon an advisory (non-binding)
resolution to approve the compensation paid to our executives. 5. Grant management the authority to
adjourn, postpone or continue the Annual Meeting. INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for
any individual nominee(s), mark FOR ALL EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each nominee you
wish to withhold, as shown here: JOHN SMITH 1234 MAIN STREET APT. 203 NEW YORK, NY 10038 To change
the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the
address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be
submitted via this method. Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note:
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each
holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian,
please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by
duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by authorized person. |
0 INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 27, 2010 THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Michael M.
Magee, Jr. and Robert N. Shuster, and each of them as proxies, each with full power of
substitution, to represent and vote as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of common
stock of Independent Bank Corporation held of record by the undersigned on February 26, 2010, at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Watt Auditorium, located at 438 Union Street,
Ionia, Michigan 48846 on Tuesday, April 27, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. (local time), or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.) 14475 |