e10vq
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 2, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-49798
THORATEC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
California
|
|
94-2340464 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
6035 Stoneridge Drive, Pleasanton, California
|
|
94588 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(925) 847-8600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act): Yes o No þ
As of October 22, 2010, the registrant had 58,470,009 shares of common stock outstanding.
THORATEC CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Thoratec, the Thoratec logo, Thoralon, HeartMate, and HeartMate II are registered trademarks of
Thoratec Corporation, and IVAD is a trademark of Thoratec Corporation.
CentriMag is a registered trademark of Levitronix LLC.
ITC, A-VOX Systems, AVOXimeter, HEMOCHRON, ProTime, ProTime In Rhythm, Surgicutt, Tenderlett,
Tenderfoot, and IRMA are registered trademarks of International Technidyne Corporation (ITC),
Thoratec Corporations wholly-owned subsidiary.
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THORATEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50,709 |
|
|
$ |
27,787 |
|
Short-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
337,853 |
|
|
|
279,174 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $1,242 and $322, respectively |
|
|
50,003 |
|
|
|
48,058 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
57,267 |
|
|
|
44,635 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
12,567 |
|
|
|
12,261 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
Prepaid and other income taxes |
|
|
12,380 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
59,880 |
|
|
|
63,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
585,722 |
|
|
|
481,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
37,678 |
|
|
|
37,115 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
95,015 |
|
|
|
95,015 |
|
Purchased intangible assets, net |
|
|
90,964 |
|
|
|
96,876 |
|
Long-term available-for-sale investments |
|
|
21,578 |
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
4,041 |
|
|
|
12,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
834,998 |
|
|
$ |
747,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
15,819 |
|
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
17,362 |
|
|
|
17,417 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
13,775 |
|
|
|
12,469 |
|
Senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
136,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
194,837 |
|
|
|
48,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,929 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liability |
|
|
26,580 |
|
|
|
31,720 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,849 |
|
|
|
10,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
229,266 |
|
|
|
222,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares: no par, authorized 100,000; issued and
outstanding 58,469 and 57,043 as of October 2, 2010 and
January 2, 2010, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
599,673 |
|
|
|
557,418 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
(30,321 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,149 |
) |
|
|
(1,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
605,732 |
|
|
|
525,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
834,998 |
|
|
$ |
747,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
THORATEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
90,996 |
|
|
$ |
65,114 |
|
|
$ |
285,366 |
|
|
$ |
198,965 |
|
Cost of product sales |
|
|
28,621 |
|
|
|
19,976 |
|
|
|
90,771 |
|
|
|
67,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
62,375 |
|
|
|
45,138 |
|
|
|
194,595 |
|
|
|
131,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
21,104 |
|
|
|
18,283 |
|
|
|
64,010 |
|
|
|
62,625 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
12,332 |
|
|
|
10,605 |
|
|
|
44,135 |
|
|
|
31,705 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
7,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
35,882 |
|
|
|
31,247 |
|
|
|
115,471 |
|
|
|
101,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
26,493 |
|
|
|
13,891 |
|
|
|
79,124 |
|
|
|
30,167 |
|
Other income and (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and other |
|
|
(3,125 |
) |
|
|
(3,261 |
) |
|
|
(9,280 |
) |
|
|
(9,167 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
9,304 |
|
Impairment on investment |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
24,719 |
|
|
|
17,690 |
|
|
|
72,048 |
|
|
|
30,304 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(9,239 |
) |
|
|
(5,914 |
) |
|
|
(25,667 |
) |
|
|
(9,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
15,480 |
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
|
|
46,381 |
|
|
|
20,832 |
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax) |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3,697 |
) |
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,297 |
|
|
$ |
11,777 |
|
|
$ |
42,684 |
|
|
$ |
19,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute net income (loss) per share(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
58,138 |
|
|
|
56,045 |
|
|
|
57,473 |
|
|
|
55,787 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
66,612 |
|
|
|
57,368 |
|
|
|
66,216 |
|
|
|
57,135 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(1) |
See Note 16, Net Income (Loss) Per Share, for the computation of basic and diluted net
income (loss) per share using the two-class method. |
4
THORATEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from continuing operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
|
$ |
20,832 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,309 |
|
|
|
13,162 |
|
Investment premium amortization, net |
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash expenses, net |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
5,816 |
|
Mark-to-market adjustment on HeartWare International Inc. (HeartWare) conversion option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,786 |
) |
Fair value conversion option upon termination of HeartWare merger agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,454 |
) |
Impairment on investment |
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to stock options |
|
|
10,343 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
9,624 |
|
|
|
7,935 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(9,458 |
) |
|
|
(2,397 |
) |
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Change in net deferred tax liability |
|
|
(4,027 |
) |
|
|
(3,528 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(3,080 |
) |
|
|
(4,754 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(15,939 |
) |
|
|
(13,464 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(5,539 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
15,028 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
Prepaid and other income taxes, net |
|
|
(13,851 |
) |
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
|
61,372 |
|
|
|
23,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(398,874 |
) |
|
|
(224,817 |
) |
Sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
306,523 |
|
|
|
97,577 |
|
Maturities of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
32,090 |
|
|
|
44,773 |
|
Loan collections |
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
HeartWare loan receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Purchases of patents |
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(2,848 |
) |
|
|
(7,590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
|
|
(61,767 |
) |
|
|
(110,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
9,458 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
22,035 |
|
|
|
6,598 |
|
Proceeds from stock issued under employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common shares |
|
|
(4,698 |
) |
|
|
(3,255 |
) |
Extinguishment of senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
(5,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities |
|
|
23,321 |
|
|
|
7,368 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations |
|
|
22,922 |
|
|
|
(79,783 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations at beginning of period |
|
|
27,787 |
|
|
|
108,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations at end of period |
|
$ |
50,709 |
|
|
$ |
28,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
2,944 |
|
|
$ |
2,821 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
(2,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash from discontinued operations |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Bank overdraft from discontinued operations at beginning of period |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
(1,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft from discontinued operations at end of period |
|
$ |
(870 |
) |
|
$ |
(605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of consolidated cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
30,494 |
|
|
$ |
7,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of consolidated non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers of equipment from inventory |
|
$ |
3,493 |
|
|
$ |
1,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment through accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
1,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
THORATEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Thoratec Corporation
(we, our, us, or the Company) have been prepared and presented in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), without audit, and reflect all
adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) to present fairly our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in our annual financial statements, prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or
omitted. The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with our fiscal 2009
consolidated financial statements, and the accompanying notes thereto, filed with the SEC in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2009 Annual Report). The operating results for any interim period
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
The preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements necessarily
requires the Companys management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities on the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses for the periods presented. The actual amounts could differ from those estimated amounts.
The financial information presented herein includes continuing operations, unless otherwise
stated. On April 25, 2010, our board of directors made a decision to sell our wholly-owned
subsidiary, International Technidyne Corporation (ITC) and expects to complete this sale within
the next nine months. As such, as of the second quarter of 2010, ITC met the conditions in
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Codification (ASC) 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment, to be classified as an asset held for sale, and we have elected to present ITC in this
manner for all periods presented, as described in Note 15, Assets Held for Sale.
On November 4, 2010 we sold ITC, as described in Note 17, Subsequent Event.
Revenue Recognition and Product Warranty
We recognize revenue from product sales when evidence of an arrangement exists, title has
passed (generally upon shipment) or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or
determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales to distributors are recorded when
title transfers.
The majority of our products are covered by up to a one-year limited manufacturers warranty.
Estimated contractual warranty obligations are recorded when related sales are recognized and any
additional amounts are recorded when such costs are probable, can be reasonably estimated and are
included in Cost of product sales. The change in accrued warranty expense from continuing
operations, included in Other accrued liabilities, is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
$ |
1,706 |
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
4,696 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
Settlements made |
|
|
(1,395 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
|
|
(1,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
3,117 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
|
$ |
3,117 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
2. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-17, Revenue
Recognition (Topic 605): Milestone Method. ASU No. 2010-17 provides guidance on the criteria that
should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate.
Under the milestone method of revenue recognition, consideration that is contingent upon
achievement of a milestone in its entirety can be recognized as revenue in the period in which the
milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive. ASU
No. 2010-17 provides the criteria to be met for a milestone to be considered substantive which
includes: (i) performance consideration earned by achieving the milestone be commensurate with
either performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the item delivered
as a result of a specific outcome resulting from performance to achieve the milestone; and (ii)
past performance be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.
ASU No. 2010-17 is effective on a prospective basis for us for milestones achieved on or after
January 2, 2011. Earlier application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the application date
and the effect of the amended guidance on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU No. 2010-06 amends ASC 820
and includes separate roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements for purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements. This amendment is effective after fiscal year 2010. We are
currently evaluating the application of this standard on our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force),
which amends ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Element Arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13
addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more
than one unit of accounting and how to allocate consideration to each unit of accounting in the
arrangement. This ASU replaces all references to fair value as the measurement criteria with the
term selling price and establishes a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable.
ASU No. 2009-13 also eliminates the use of the residual value method for determining the allocation
of arrangement consideration. Additionally, ASU No. 2009-13 requires expanded disclosures. This ASU
will become effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after our fiscal
year 2010. Earlier application is permitted with required transition disclosures based on the
period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the application date and the impact of this
standard on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly liquid investments with original
maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. The fair value of these investments was
determined by using quoted prices for identical investments in active markets.
4. Investments
Our investment portfolio is comprised of short-term and long-term investments. Investments
classified as short-term available-for-sale consist primarily of municipal bonds,
corporate bonds, commercial paper and variable
demand notes. All investments mature within two years or less from the date of purchase. Investments with
maturities beyond one year may be classified as short-term, if they are available and intended for use in current
operations, based on their highly liquid nature or due to the frequency with which the interest rate is reset.
Investments classified as long-term available-for-sale consist of auction rate securities, whose underlying assets are
student loans. In addition, certain of our long-term investments associated with the deferred compensation plan are
classified as trading securities and as of October 2, 2010 consists primarily of mutual fund investments.
Our investments in available-for-sale securities are recorded at estimated fair value on our
financial statements, and the temporary differences between cost and estimated fair value are
presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
As of October 2, 2010, we had unrealized gains before tax from our investment in municipal
bonds and corporate bonds of $1.1 million and unrealized losses before tax from our auction rate
securities of $3.1 million.
7
The aggregate market value, cost basis and gross unrealized gains and losses for
available-for-sale investments as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010 by major security type are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
265,935 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
53,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,930 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
13,905 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
14,152 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
336,766 |
|
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
|
$ |
337,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
$ |
24,700 |
|
|
$ |
(3,122 |
) |
|
$ |
21,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
196,650 |
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,865 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
13,785 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
277,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
$ |
279,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities |
|
$ |
27,700 |
|
|
$ |
(3,066 |
) |
|
$ |
24,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 2, 2010 we owned approximately $24.7 million face amount of auction rate
securities classified as long-term. The assets underlying these investments are student loans
backed by the U.S. government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program or by private
insurers and are rated between A- and AAA. Historically, these securities have provided liquidity
through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate periodically every seven
to thirty-five days. Beginning in February of 2008, these auctions began to fail. The principal
amount of these auction rate securities will not be accessible until future auctions for these
securities are successful, a secondary market is established, these securities are called for
redemption, or they are paid at maturity.
As of October 2, 2010 we recorded an estimated cumulative unrealized loss of $3.1 million
($1.9 million, net of tax) related to the temporary impairment of the auction rate securities,
which was included in accumulated other comprehensive loss within shareholders equity. In
addition, our management reviews impairments and credit losses associated with its investments,
including auction rate securities, to determine the classification of the impairment as temporary
or other-than-temporary and to bifurcate the credit and non-credit component of any
other-than-temporary impairment event. We (i) do not intend to sell any of the auction rate
securities prior to maturity at an amount below the original purchase value; (ii) intend to hold
the investment to recovery and, based on a more-likely-than-not probability assessment, will not be
required to sell the security before recovery; and (iii) deem that it is not probable that we will
receive less than 100% of the principal and accrued interest from the issuer. Therefore, 100% of
the impairment was charged to other comprehensive loss. Our auction rate securities are classified
as long-term valued at $21.6 million using significant unobservable inputs. In the third quarter of
2010 we liquidated $3.0 million of our auction rate securities at par value through a successful
auction.
8
If the issuers of the auction rate securities are unable to successfully complete future
auctions and their credit ratings deteriorate, we may in the future be required to record an
impairment charge to earnings on these investments. It could conceivably take until the final
maturity of the underlying notes (up to 30 years) to realize the investments carrying value.
The aggregate value of our corporate owned life insurance policy and mutual fund investments
included in our deferred compensation plan as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
$ |
3,187 |
|
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investments associated with the deferred compensation plan is included in Other long-term
assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at the cash surrender value of our corporate
owned life insurance policies and the fair value of the mutual fund investments. The realized gain
before tax from the change in the cash surrender value and the fair
value of mutual fund
investments for the three months and nine months ended October 2, 2010 of approximately $0.3
million and $0.2 million, respectively, is included in Interest income and other.
5. Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, we used various
approaches, including market, income and/or cost approaches, and each of these approaches requires
certain inputs. Fair value measurement establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources
independent of us and reflect our assumptions as compared to the assumptions market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the
circumstances.
We fair value our financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities based on the observability
of inputs used in the valuation of such assets and liabilities using the following fair value
hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to
determine fair values. Financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities carried or disclosed at
fair value were classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
Quoted prices of similar investments in active markets, of similar or identical investments in markets that are not
active or model-based valuations for which all significant inputs and value drivers are observable, directly or
indirectly. |
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
Inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
Assets and Liabilities That Are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
ASC 820 principally applies to financial assets and liabilities which include
short-term investments, auction rate securities, foreign exchange
instruments, and certain of our deferred
compensation plan assets. These items are marked-to-market at each reporting period. The
information in the following paragraphs and tables primarily addresses matters relative to these
financial assets and liabilities.
9
The following table represents the hierarchy of our financial assets and financial
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
at carrying |
|
|
Total |
|
|
active markets for |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
266,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
53,930 |
|
|
|
53,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
14,152 |
|
|
|
14,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments auction rate securities |
|
|
21,578 |
|
|
|
21,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,578 |
|
Other long-term assets deferred compensation plan |
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities mark-to-market on
foreign exchange instruments (Note 6) |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Total |
|
|
active markets for |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
198,176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Variable demand notes |
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets mark- to-
market on foreign exchange instruments (Note 6) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments auction rate securities |
|
|
24,634 |
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
Other long-term assets deferred compensation plan |
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Techniques
Financial assets are considered Level 2 when their fair values are determined using inputs
that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data such as pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions, cash flow
models with yield curves, and benchmark securities. Our Level 2 financial assets include short-term
investments and certain of our deferred compensation plan securities. In addition, Level 2 financial instruments are
valued using standard calculations and models that use readily observable market data as their
basis.
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, and at least one significant
model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial assets include certain investment
securities, which include the auction rate securities for which there is limited market activity
such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. As of
October 2, 2010, these securities were valued primarily using broker pricing models that
incorporate transaction details such as contractual terms, maturity, timing and amount of expected
future cash flows, as well as assumptions about liquidity and credit valuation adjustments of
market place participants. For the auction rate securities, inputs consist of the fair value of the
auction rate securities and the present value of future cash flows are estimated by discounting
future principal and interest payments over a five-year period.
10
We review the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the ability
to observe valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels of certain securities within
the fair value hierarchy. We recognize transfers into and out of levels within the fair value
hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the actual event or change in circumstances
that caused the transfer occurs. There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2
during the three and nine months ended October 2, 2010 or October 3, 2009. When a determination is
made to classify an asset or liability within Level 3, the determination is based upon the
significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. The following table
provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets and liabilities
measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
24,634 |
|
Unrealized holding loss on auction rate securities, included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 3, 2010 |
|
$ |
23,946 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on auction rate securities, included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 3, 2010 |
|
$ |
24,166 |
|
Settlement at par |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
Unrealized holding gain on auction rate securities, included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
21,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any)
on the fair value of our investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate further, or the
anticipated recovery in fair values does not occur, we may be required to record additional
unrealized losses in other comprehensive income or other-than-temporary impairment charges to the
condensed consolidated statements of operations in future periods.
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Non-financial assets such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment
are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only
when an impairment is recognized. There were no indicators of impairment as of October 2, 2010.
Non-financial assets such as purchased intangibles acquired during the nine months ended October 2,
2010, are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs, which include discounted cash flow
methodologies, or similar techniques, when there is limited market activity and the determination
of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. For a detailed discussion, see Note 9,
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets.
Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value
Senior subordinated convertible notes measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level
2 inputs include quoted prices of identical or similar liabilities and are measured at a fair value
of $272.9 million and $205.4 million, as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively. The
senior subordinated convertible notes were reclassified to current liabilities during the second
quarter of 2010 due to a redemption feature which may require us to repurchase all or a portion of
the senior subordinated convertible notes as early as May 16, 2011. For a detailed discussion, see
Note 10 Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes.
11
6. Foreign Exchange Instruments
We utilize foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options to mitigate future
movements in foreign exchange rates that affect certain existing and forecasted foreign currency
denominated sales and purchase transactions (primarily assets and liabilities on our U.K.
subsidiarys consolidated balance sheet). We do not use derivative financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes. We routinely hedge our exposure to certain foreign currencies with
various financial institutions in an effort to minimize the impact of certain currency exchange
rate fluctuations. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standings of these
financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure with any one institution. If a
financial counterparty to any of our hedging arrangements experiences financial difficulties or is
otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency forward contract, we may experience
material financial losses.
The notional amount of foreign currency contracts with a maximum maturity of four months,
which do not qualify for hedge accounting, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amounts |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,816 |
|
Sales |
|
|
15,503 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
Effective January 3, 2010, we changed our functional currency for our U.K subsidiary from U.K
pounds to euros. This change did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial
statements: however, the change did impact our foreign currency hedging contracts. As of October 2,
2010, we owned forward contracts to sell euros to U.S. dollars with a notional value of 8.0
million, to sell U.S. dollars to euro with a notional value of $3.6 million and to sell U.K. pounds
to euros with a notional value of £0.6 million, as compared to October 3, 2009, when we owned
forward contracts to sell euros to U.S dollars with a notional value of 9.6 million and to
purchase U.K. pounds from U.S. dollars with a notional value of £5.5 million. As of October 2,
2010, our forward contracts had an average exchange rate of one U.S. dollar to 1.34796 euros and
one U.K. pound to 1.15048 euros. The fair value of these contracts was $0.3 million and is included
in Other accrued liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The following represents our realized fair value of the foreign currency contracts and offsets
to the foreign currency exchange gains and losses which were included in Interest income and
other in the condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Foreign
currency exchange
(loss) gain on
foreign currency
contracts |
|
$ |
(188 |
) |
|
$ |
(803 |
) |
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
Foreign currency
exchange (loss)
gain on foreign
currency
translation
adjustments |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
(406 |
) |
7. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is based on the first in, first
out method and consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
13,141 |
|
|
$ |
12,920 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
12,532 |
|
|
|
7,350 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
31,594 |
|
|
|
24,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
57,267 |
|
|
$ |
44,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
8. Property, Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Land, building and improvements |
|
$ |
18,478 |
|
|
$ |
18,134 |
|
Equipment and capitalized software |
|
|
39,922 |
|
|
|
38,281 |
|
Furniture and leasehold improvements |
|
|
21,511 |
|
|
|
20,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
79,911 |
|
|
|
77,070 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(42,233 |
) |
|
|
(39,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37,678 |
|
|
$ |
37,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
The carrying amount of goodwill was $95.0 million as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010.
In February 2001, we merged with Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc. The components of identifiable
intangible assets related to the merger include: patents and trademarks, core technology (Thoralon,
our proprietary bio-material), and developed technology (patented technology, other than core
technology, acquired in the merger).
During the first quarter of 2010, we purchased patents at a fair value of $1.4 million, which
we capitalized under ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other. These patents have an estimated
useful life of approximately ten years.
The purchased intangibles on the condensed consolidated balance sheets are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
$ |
40,832 |
|
|
$ |
(30,408 |
) |
|
$ |
10,424 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
37,180 |
|
|
|
(17,015 |
) |
|
|
20,165 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
121,805 |
|
|
|
(61,430 |
) |
|
|
60,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchased intangible assets |
|
$ |
199,817 |
|
|
$ |
(108,853 |
) |
|
$ |
90,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
$ |
39,418 |
|
|
$ |
(29,625 |
) |
|
$ |
9,793 |
|
Core technology |
|
|
37,180 |
|
|
|
(15,558 |
) |
|
|
21,622 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
121,805 |
|
|
|
(56,344 |
) |
|
|
65,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchased intangible assets |
|
$ |
198,403 |
|
|
$ |
(101,527 |
) |
|
$ |
96,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets for both the three months ended
October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 was $2.4 million. Amortization expense related to purchased
intangible assets for the nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 was $7.3 million
and $7.4 million, respectively. Our amortization expense is expected to be approximately $9.7
million in 2010, declining to $8.7 million by 2014. This decline in amortization expense is due to
certain intangibles being fully amortized. Patents and trademarks have useful lives ranging from
eight to ten years, and core and developed technology assets have useful lives ranging from zero to
eleven years.
13
10. Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes
In 2004, we completed the sale of $143.8 million initial principal amount of senior
subordinated convertible notes due in 2034. The convertible notes were sold to Qualified
Institutional Buyers pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by Rule 144A thereunder.
The senior subordinated convertible notes were issued at an issue price of $580.98 per note,
which is 58.098% of the principal amount at maturity of the notes. The senior subordinated
convertible notes bear interest at a rate of 1.3798% per year on the principal amount at maturity,
payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on May 16 and November 16 of each year, from November 16,
2004 until May 16, 2011. Beginning on May 16, 2011, the original issue discount will accrue daily
at a rate of 2.375% per year on a semi-annual bond equivalent basis and, on the maturity date, a
holder will receive $1,000 per note. As a result, the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding
notes at maturity will be $243.4 million.
Holders of the senior subordinated convertible notes may convert their convertible notes into
shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 29.4652 shares per $1,000 principal amount of
senior subordinated convertible notes, which represents a conversion price of $19.72 per share,
subject to adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events as set forth in the indenture. Holders
have been and are able to convert their convertible notes at any point after the close of business
on October 30, 2004 if, as of the last day of the preceding calendar quarter, the closing price of
our common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on
the last trading day of such preceding calendar quarter is more than 120% of the accreted
conversion price per share of our common stock. Commencing October 1, 2008, this market price
conversion feature was satisfied, such that holders of the senior subordinated convertible notes
may convert their notes through the final maturity date of the notes into shares of our common
stock at a conversion rate of 29.4652 shares per $1,000 principal amount of senior subordinated
convertible notes, subject to adjustments as provided in the indenture. If holders elect
conversion, we may, at our option, deliver shares of common stock, pay a holder in cash, or deliver
a combination of shares and cash, as determined pursuant to the terms of the notes. As of October
2, 2010, 4,045 bonds of the 247,427 bonds originally issued had been submitted to be converted and
we have elected to pay cash in lieu of shares for these bonds.
Holders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their senior subordinated convertible
notes on each of May 16, 2011, 2014, 2019, 2024 and 2029 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the
issue price, plus accrued original issue discount, if any. Based on this redemption feature, we
reclassified the net carrying amount of the senior subordinated convertible notes to current
liabilities during the second quarter of 2010.
The senior subordinated convertible notes are subordinated to all of our senior indebtedness
and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of a
bankruptcy, liquidation or dissolution of the Company or one or more of our subsidiaries and
acceleration of or payment default on our senior indebtedness, holders of the convertible notes
will not receive any payment until holders of any senior indebtedness we may have outstanding have
been paid in full.
In accordance with ASC 470-20, Debt, which applies to certain convertible debt instruments
that may be settled in cash or other assets, or partially in cash, upon conversion, we recorded the
debt and equity components on the senior subordinated convertible notes separately. This accounting
pronouncement increased interest expense associated with our senior subordinated convertible notes
by adding a non-cash component to amortize a debt discount calculated based on the difference
between the cash coupon rate (2.375% per year) of the senior subordinated convertible notes and the
effective interest rate on debt borrowing (9% per year). The discount, which represents the
non-cash interest expense, classified as interest expense on the condensed consolidated statements
of operations, is being amortized to interest expense over a seven-year period ending May 16, 2011
(the expected life of the liability component) using the effective interest method. Additionally,
we allocated transaction costs on the same percentage as the liability and equity component, such
that a portion of the deferred debt issuance costs is allocated to the liability component to be
amortized using the effective interest method until May 16, 2011, and the equity component to be
included in additional paid-in capital.
Interest expense primarily includes interest and amortization of discount related to senior
subordinated convertible notes as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Interest expense cash component |
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
853 |
|
|
$ |
2,540 |
|
|
$ |
2,559 |
|
Interest expense non-cash component |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
6,125 |
|
14
The debt and equity component (recorded in additional paid-in-capital, net of income tax
benefit) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount |
|
$ |
141,400 |
|
|
$ |
143,750 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(5,343 |
) |
|
|
(11,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
136,057 |
|
|
$ |
131,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity component, net of income tax benefit |
|
$ |
25,325 |
|
|
$ |
28,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may redeem either in whole or in part any of the senior subordinated convertible notes at
any time beginning May 16, 2011, by giving the holders at least 30 days notice, at a redemption
price equal to the sum of the issue price and the accrued original issue discount. If the holders
converted the senior subordinated convertible notes into shares of our stock as of October 2, 2010,
the as -converted value would be $266.2 million, based on our stock price of $37.12 per share on
October 1, 2010, which amount exceeds the original value of the bonds outstanding, or $141.4
million, by $124.8 million. This as-converted value is $22.8 million more than the $243.4 million
face amount of the outstanding bonds at maturity in 2034.
The aggregate fair value of the senior subordinated convertible notes at October 2, 2010 was
$272.9 million.
11. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under generally
accepted accounting principles are included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, a
component of shareholders equity within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, rather than the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. Under our existing accounting standards,
comprehensive income includes unrecognized gains and losses on investments and currency translation
adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
15,480 |
|
|
$ |
11,776 |
|
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
|
$ |
20,832 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments (net of taxes
of $92 and $112 for the three months ended October 2,
2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively, and $252 and
$1,643 for the nine months ended October 2, 2010 and
October 3, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
2,465 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from continuing operations |
|
|
16,753 |
|
|
|
11,539 |
|
|
|
45,201 |
|
|
|
24,168 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3,697 |
) |
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
15,570 |
|
|
$ |
11,540 |
|
|
$ |
41,504 |
|
|
$ |
22,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no reconciling items between net loss from discontinued operations and comprehensive
loss from discontinued operations.
12. Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the
share-based awards. We recognize share-based compensation expense for the portion of the award that
is expected to vest over the requisite service period for those awards with graded vesting and
service conditions. We develop an estimate of the number of share-based awards which will
ultimately vest, primarily based on historical experience. The estimated forfeiture rate is
re-assessed periodically throughout the requisite service period. Such estimates are revised if
they differ materially from actual forfeitures. As required, the forfeiture estimates will be
adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures when an award vests.
Share-based compensation expense and related stock option and restricted stock award activity
is presented on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise presented as continuing operations or
discontinued operations.
15
Share-based compensation included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations
consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost of product sales |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
6,074 |
|
|
|
5,153 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense before taxes |
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,437 |
|
|
|
9,624 |
|
|
|
7,935 |
|
Tax benefit for share-based compensation expense |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation continuing
operations (net of taxes) |
|
$ |
2,023 |
|
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
5,877 |
|
|
$ |
4,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation discontinued
operations (net of taxes) |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, share-based compensation expense from continuing
operations of $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, was capitalized to inventory. As of both
October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, share-based compensation expense from discontinued operations
of $0.2 million, was capitalized to inventory.
We receive a tax deduction for certain stock option exercises during the period the options
are exercised, generally for the excess of the fair market value of the options at the date of
exercise over the exercise prices of the options. Our unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of cash flows presentation reports the excess tax benefits (i.e., windfall only for tax deductions
in excess of the share-based compensation expense recognized) as financing cash flows of $9.5
million and $2.4 million for the nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009,
respectively.
Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $22.0 million and $6.6 million for the
nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively. Cash proceeds from our
employee stock purchase plan were $1.9 million and $1.6 million for the nine months ended October
2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively. The Company purchased $4.7 million and $3.3 million of
restricted stock from employees for payment of income tax withholding due upon vesting for the nine
months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively.
Equity Plan
In April 2006, the Board of Directors approved the 2006 Incentive Stock Plan (2006 Plan) and
in May 2006 the 2006 Plan was approved by our shareholders. In May 2006 and April 2008 the 2006
Plan was amended by the Board of Directors and in May 2008 the 2006 Plan as amended was approved by
our shareholders. In May 2008 and March 2010, the 2006 Plan was further amended by the Board of
Directors and approved by our shareholders in May 2008 and May 2010, respectively. The 2006 Plan
allows us to grant to our employees, directors and consultants up to a total of 8.6 million shares
of stock awards. Each share issued from May 20, 2008 through May 18, 2010 as restricted stock
bonuses, restricted stock units, phantom stock units, performance share bonuses, or performance
share units reduces the number of shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan by one and
seventy-four hundredths (1.74) shares, and each share issued as stock options, restricted stock
purchases or stock appreciation rights reduced the shares available for issuance under the 2006
Plan on a share-for-share basis. Each share issued from and after May 19, 2010 as restricted stock
bonuses, restricted stock units, phantom stock units, performance share bonuses, or performance
share units reduces the number of shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan by one and
seven-tenths (1.7) shares, and each share issued as stock options, restricted stock purchases or
stock appreciation rights reduces the shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan on a
share-for-share basis. During the nine months ended October 2, 2010, approximately 444,000 options
were granted under the 2006 Plan at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of
grant, and approximately 684,000 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units were granted
under the 2006 Plan. As of October 2, 2010, approximately 3.8 million shares remained available for
grant under the 2006 Plan.
16
Stock Options
Upon approval in May 2006, the 2006 Plan replaced our previous common stock option plans and
equity incentive plans. As of October 2, 2010, we had 2.9 million options issued and outstanding
under the 2006 Plan and the replaced plans. Options under the 2006 Plan may be granted by the Board
of Directors at the fair market value on the date of grant and generally become fully exercisable
within four years after the grant date and expire between five and ten years from the date of
grant. Vesting on some options granted to officers may be accelerated in certain circumstances
following a change in control of the Company.
The fair value of each option is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rate (weighted average) |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
4.90 to 6.03 |
|
|
|
4.88 to 6.04 |
|
|
|
4.91 to 6.02 |
|
Dividends |
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
|
None |
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. The expected term of options represents the period of time that options are expected to be
outstanding. We use separate assumptions for groups of employees (for example, officers) that have
similar historical exercise behavior. The range above reflects the expected option impact of these
separate groups. We base the expected volatility on a combination of historical volatility trends
and market-based implied volatility because we have determined that this combination of historical
volatility trends and market-based implied trends are reflective of market conditions.
As
of October 2, 2010, there was $4.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense from
continuing operations, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options, which expense is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.40 years. As of October 2, 2010, there
was $0.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense from discontinued operations, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to stock options, which expense is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.40 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of in-the-money options
outstanding was $49.9 million, based on the closing price of our common stock of $37.12 on October
1, 2010, the last trading day in the nine months ended October 2, 2010. As of October 2, 2010, the
aggregate intrinsic value of options currently exercisable was $37.0 million and the intrinsic
value of options vested and expected to vest was $49.2 million.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended October 2, 2010 and
October 3, 2009 was $0.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised for the nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 was $32.4 million
and $6.0 million, respectively.
Stock option activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Remaining Contract |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Outstanding options at January 2, 2010 |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
$ |
17.29 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
Granted |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
30.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
19.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at October 2, 2010 |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
$ |
19.87 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options exercisable at October 2, 2010 |
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
$ |
17.52 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options vested at October 2, 2010 and expected to vest |
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
$ |
19.49 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended
October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 was $12.62 per share and $12.06 per share, respectively.
17
Restricted Stock Awards and Units
The 2006 Plan allows for the issuance of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units,
which awards or units may not be sold or otherwise transferred until certain restrictions have
lapsed. The unearned share-based compensation related to these awards is being amortized to
compensation expense over the period of the restrictions, generally four years. The expense for
these awards was determined based on the market price of our shares on the date of grant applied to
the total number of shares that were granted.
Restricted Stock Awards
Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations related to restricted stock awards
was $2.3 million for the nine months ended October 2, 2010. As of October 2, 2010, we had $2.1
million of unrecognized compensation expense from continuing operations, net of estimated
forfeitures, related to restricted stock awards, which amount is expected to be recognized over
1.05 years. As of October 2, 2010, we had $0.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense from
discontinued operations, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock awards, which
amount is expected to be recognized over 1.05 years. There were no restricted stock awards granted
during the nine months ended October 2, 2010.
Restricted stock activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding unvested restricted stock at January 2, 2010 |
|
|
609 |
|
|
$ |
16.63 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
17.15 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
16.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding unvested restricted stock at October 2, 2010 |
|
|
319 |
|
|
$ |
16.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations related to restricted stock units
was $3.9 million for the nine months ended October 2, 2010. As of October 2, 2010, we had $13.8
million of unrecognized compensation expense from continuing operations, net of estimated
forfeitures, related to restricted stock units, which amount is expected to be recognized over 3.03
years. As of October 2, 2010, we had $7.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense from
discontinued operations, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock units, which
amount is expected to be recognized over 3.03 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of the units
outstanding, based on our stock price on October 2, 2010, was $36.2 million.
Restricted stock unit activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
Remaining Contract |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
Outstanding units at January 2, 2010 |
|
|
463 |
|
|
$ |
24.17 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
Granted |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
31.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Released |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
25.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
26.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding units at October 2, 2010 |
|
|
976 |
|
|
$ |
28.98 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In May 2002, our shareholders approved our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) under which
500,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance. In addition, the ESPP provides for an
annual, automatic increase of up to 250,000 shares in the total number of shares available for
issuance thereunder on March 1 of each year, unless our Board of Directors specifies a smaller
increase or no increase. Under this provision, an additional 250,000 shares were reserved for
issuance under the ESPP on each of March 1, 2006, March 1, 2008, and March 1, 2009; our Board of
Directors specified no increase as of each other year. Eligible employees may purchase a limited
number of shares, over a six-month period, of our common stock at 85% of the lower of the market
value on the offering date or the market value on the purchase date. During the nine months ended
October 2, 2010, 83,791 shares of common stock were issued under the ESPP. As of October 2, 2010,
215,909 shares remained available for issuance under this plan.
18
The estimated subscription date fair value of the current offering under the ESPP is
approximately $0.6 million using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
43 |
% |
Expected option life |
|
0.50 years |
Dividends |
|
None |
As of October 2, 2010, there was approximately $71,000 of unrecognized compensation expense
from continuing operations and $25,000 of unrecognized expense from discontinued operations related
to ESPP subscriptions that began on May 1, 2010, which amount we expect to recognize during the
last quarter of 2010.
13. Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates from continuing operations for the three months ended October
2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, were 37.4% and 33.4%, respectively. Our effective income tax rates
from continuing operations for the nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 were 35.6%
and 31.3%, respectively. The increase in our reported income tax rates was primarily attributable
to return-to-provision expense associated with an increase in our effective tax rates due to
changes in state apportionment factors and the proportion of tax exempt interest to higher pre-tax
earnings. In addition, during the three months ended October 2, 2010, we recorded a
return-to-provision benefit primarily associated with additional research credits.
Further, both of the three-month and nine-month periods in 2010 were affected by federal
research tax credits which were available in 2009 but are not currently available in 2010 as a
result of the expiration of federal research tax credit legislation.
We remain under audit by the state of California for the tax years 2003 to 2007, which we have
adequately reserved. Subsequent to the third quarter of 2010, we received proposed adjustments
from the state of California for the tax years 2005 to 2007, which we are currently evaluating.
During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that audit resolutions and the
expiration of statutes of limitation could potentially reduce our unrecognized tax benefits by up
to $3.8 million. However, this amount may change because we continue to have ongoing negotiations
with various taxing authorities throughout the year.
14. Geographic Information
Our functional entities operate in two segments: Cardiovascular and ITC. Due to our intent to
sell ITC, segment disclosure is no longer presented. For a discussion of our ITC segment, which is
classified as discontinued operations, refer to Note 15, Assets Held for Sale. Our Cardiovascular
segment is classified as continuing operations.
Our geographic information for our product revenue sold by our continuing operations to the
domestic and international markets is discussed below.
Revenue attributed to a country or region includes product sales to hospitals, physicians and
distributors and is based on final destination where the products are sold. During the three and
nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, no customer or international country
represented individually greater than 10% of our total product sales. The geographic composition of
our product sales from continuing operations was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
76,391 |
|
|
$ |
51,892 |
|
|
$ |
238,535 |
|
|
$ |
159,926 |
|
International |
|
|
14,605 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
46,831 |
|
|
|
39,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales from continuing operations |
|
$ |
90,996 |
|
|
$ |
65,114 |
|
|
$ |
285,366 |
|
|
$ |
198,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
15. Assets Held For Sale
On April 25, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to sell the ITC division to
Danaher Corporation (Danaher) for $110.0 million in cash upon closing. On July 26, 2010, the sale
was terminated as a result of the failure of the parties to agree on the status of certain aspects
of ITCs quality system and regulatory filings. We expect to locate another buyer and complete the
sale of ITC within the next nine months. As such, the ITC division is classified as held for sale
on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010 and its
results of operations displayed in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The results of the ITC business are included in discontinued operations for the three and nine
months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
22,041 |
|
|
$ |
22,804 |
|
|
$ |
68,529 |
|
|
$ |
70,478 |
|
Cost of product sales |
|
|
14,697 |
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
45,554 |
|
|
|
43,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7,344 |
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
|
|
22,975 |
|
|
|
26,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
6,518 |
|
|
|
5,944 |
|
|
|
20,697 |
|
|
|
19,831 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
8,968 |
|
|
|
9,157 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
9,390 |
|
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
29,934 |
|
|
|
29,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(6,959 |
) |
|
|
(3,039 |
) |
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(1,928 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(6,637 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,183 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(3,697 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of ITC are classified as held for sale as of October 2, 2010 and
January 2, 2010. Such amounts are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 (1) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $291 and $522, respectively |
|
$ |
12,627 |
|
|
$ |
18,030 |
|
Inventories (2) |
|
|
21,928 |
|
|
|
22,300 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
35,836 |
|
|
|
41,211 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (3) |
|
|
16,468 |
|
|
|
14,737 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
4,271 |
|
Purchased intangible assets, net |
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held for sale |
|
$ |
59,880 |
|
|
$ |
63,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
4,493 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
10,336 |
|
|
|
10,931 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
11,824 |
|
|
$ |
12,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Management has elected to classify the assets and liabilities of ITC as held for sale as of
January 2, 2010 to conform to current presentation. |
|
(2) |
|
Inventories classified as held for sale consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
6,414 |
|
|
$ |
5,083 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
13,036 |
|
|
|
14,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,928 |
|
|
$ |
22,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net, classified as held for sale consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Land, building and improvements |
|
$ |
4,588 |
|
|
$ |
4,606 |
|
Equipment and capitalized software |
|
|
36,032 |
|
|
|
35,465 |
|
Furniture and leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
43,853 |
|
|
|
43,169 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(27,385 |
) |
|
|
(28,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,468 |
|
|
$ |
14,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
16. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
On January 4, 2009, we adopted authoritative accounting guidance that requires participating
securities to be included in the calculation of the net income (loss) per share using the two-class
method. Our restricted share awards subject to repurchase and settlement in shares of common stock
upon vesting have non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends on an equal basis with common stock
and therefore are considered participating securities. Under the two-class method, basic and
diluted net income (loss) per common share is determined by calculating net income (loss) per share
for common stock and participating securities based on participation rights in undistributed
earnings. Dilutive net income (loss) per common share also considers the dilutive effect of the
in-the-money stock options and restricted stock units, calculated using the treasury stock method.
Under the treasury stock method, the amount of assumed proceeds from unexercised stock options and
restricted stock units includes the amount of unrecognized compensation cost attributable to future
services, assumed proceeds from the exercise of the options, and the incremental income tax benefit
or liability that would be recorded in additional-paid-in capital when the award becomes
deductible.
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share attributable to common shareholders under
the two-class method were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic net income (loss) per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
15,480 |
|
|
$ |
11,776 |
|
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
|
$ |
20,832 |
|
Net income from continuing operations allocated
to participating securities |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
15,394 |
|
|
$ |
11,643 |
|
|
$ |
46,071 |
|
|
$ |
20,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,183 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(3,697 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,595 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
allocated to participating securities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,176 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(3,672 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,297 |
|
|
$ |
11,777 |
|
|
$ |
42,684 |
|
|
$ |
19,237 |
|
Net income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
14,218 |
|
|
$ |
11,644 |
|
|
$ |
42,399 |
|
|
$ |
18,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used to
compute basic net income per common share |
|
|
58,138 |
|
|
|
56,045 |
|
|
|
57,473 |
|
|
|
55,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
15,480 |
|
|
$ |
11,776 |
|
|
$ |
46,381 |
|
|
$ |
20,832 |
|
Interest expense on senior subordinated convertible notes (after tax) |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for diluted share calculation |
|
|
17,292 |
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
|
|
51,693 |
|
|
|
20,832 |
|
Net income from continuing operations allocated to participating
securities |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
17,208 |
|
|
$ |
11,645 |
|
|
$ |
51,391 |
|
|
$ |
20,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,183 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(3,697 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,595 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations allocated to
participating securities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,176 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(3,672 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,297 |
|
|
$ |
11,777 |
|
|
$ |
42,684 |
|
|
$ |
19,237 |
|
Interest expense on senior subordinated convertible notes (after tax) |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for diluted share calculation |
|
|
16,109 |
|
|
|
11,777 |
|
|
|
47,996 |
|
|
|
19,237 |
|
Net income allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
16,032 |
|
|
$ |
11,646 |
|
|
$ |
47,719 |
|
|
$ |
18,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used to compute basic net
income (loss) per common share attributable to common shares |
|
|
58,138 |
|
|
|
56,045 |
|
|
|
57,473 |
|
|
|
55,787 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
Dilutive effect on conversion of senior subordinated convertible notes |
|
|
7,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used to compute diluted net
income (loss) per common share |
|
|
66,612 |
|
|
|
57,368 |
|
|
|
66,216 |
|
|
|
57,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average unvested restricted stock awards outstanding were 323,582 and
638,105 for the three months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively. The weighted
average unvested restricted stock awards outstanding were 386,808 and 724,469 for the nine months
ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, respectively.
Subsequent to the original issuance of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements for the period ended October 3, 2009, management determined that the net income (loss)
per share calculations for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009 did not properly reflect
the restricted share awards as participating securities under the two-class method and thus were
inappropriately reflected in the number of common shares to be used in the computation of net
income (loss) per share. The change to the calculation of the two-class method had no impact on the
reported net income (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009. The
change to the calculation of the two-class method resulted in a decrease in the shares reported as
used in the computation of both basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of approximately
638,000 and 724,000 for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009, respectively. The shares
previously included in the calculations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the
three months and nine months ended October 3, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Basic |
|
|
56,683 |
|
|
|
56,511 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
58,006 |
|
|
|
57,859 |
|
23
Potential common share equivalents excluded where the inclusion would be anti-dilutive are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Options to
purchase shares not
included in the
computation of
diluted income per
share because their
inclusion would be
anti-dilutive |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and nine months ended
October 3, 2009 excludes the effect of assuming the conversion of our senior subordinated
convertible notes, which are convertible at $19.72 per share into 7.3 million shares of common
stock, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
17. Subsequent Event
On November 4, 2010, we sold our wholly-owned
subsidiary, International Technidyne Corporation, to ITC Nexus Holding Company, Inc. (Nexus) for $55 million in
cash pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2010, by and between the Company and Nexus.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. These statements can be identified by the words expects, projects,
hopes, believes, intends, should, estimate, will, would, may, anticipates,
plans, could and other similar words. Actual results, events or performance could differ
materially from these forward-looking statements based on a variety of factors, many of which are
beyond our control. Therefore, readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these statements.
Factors that could cause actual results or conditions to differ from those anticipated by these and
other forward-looking statements include those more fully described in the Risk Factors section
of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the 2009 Annual Report) and in other documents we file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These forward-looking statements speak only as
of the date hereof. We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to
publicly release any revisions or updates to these forward-looking statements that may be made to
reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
The following presentation of managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations should be read together with our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
Continuing Operations Cardiovascular Business
Thoratec Corporation (we, our, us, or the Company) is the world leader in mechanical
circulatory support with a product portfolio to treat the full range of clinical needs for advanced
heart failure patients. We develop, manufacture and market proprietary medical devices used for
circulatory support.
For advanced heart failure (HF), we develop, manufacture and market proprietary medical
devices used for mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Our primary product lines are our
ventricular assist devices (VADs): the Thoratec Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device (PVAD),
the Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist Device (IVAD), the HeartMate Left Ventricular Assist
System (HeartMate XVE), and the HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (HeartMate II). We
refer to the PVAD and the IVAD collectively as the Thoratec product line and we refer to the
HeartMate XVE and the HeartMate II collectively as the HeartMate product line. The PVAD, IVAD,
HeartMate XVE and HeartMate II are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and
are Conformite Europeene (CE) Mark approved in Europe. In addition, for acute HF we market the
CentriMag Blood Pumping System (CentriMag), which is manufactured by Levitronix LLC
(Levitronix) and distributed by us in the U.S. under a distribution agreement with Levitronix. We
also manufacture a vascular access graft for renal dialysis.
VADs supplement the pumping function of the heart in patients with advanced HF. In most cases,
a cannula connects the left ventricle of the heart to a blood pump. Blood flows from the left
ventricle to the pump chamber via the cannula, powered by an electric or air driven mechanism that
drives the blood through another cannula into the aorta. From the aorta, the blood then circulates
throughout the body. Mechanical or tissue valves enable unidirectional flow in some devices.
Currently, the power source remains outside the body for all FDA-approved VADs.
Certain VADs are implanted internally, while others are placed outside the body. Some external
devices are placed immediately adjacent to the body (paracorporeal), while other external VADs are
positioned at a distance from the body (extracorporeal).
In addition to our MCS devices, we sell vascular access graft products used in hemodialysis
for patients with late-stage renal disease.
Our product portfolio of implantable and external MCS devices and graft products is described
below.
25
The HeartMate II
The HeartMate II is an implantable, electrically powered, continuous flow, left ventricular
assist device consisting of a miniature rotary blood pump designed to provide intermediate and
long-term MCS. The HeartMate II is designed to improve survival and quality of life and to provide
five to ten years of circulatory support for a broad range of advanced HF patients. Significantly
smaller than the HeartMate XVE and with only one moving part, the HeartMate II is simpler and
designed to operate more quietly than pulsatile devices. Effective January 20, 2010, the HeartMate
II can be used in patients with New York Heart Association Class IIIB and IV end-stage left
ventricular failure who have received optimal medical therapy for at least forty-five of the last
ninety days, and who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation.
HeartMate II received FDA approval in April 2008 for bridge-to-transplantation (BTT) and
received FDA approval for use in HF patients who are not eligible for heart transplantation
(Destination Therapy or DT) in January 2010. In November 2005, the HeartMate II received CE
Mark approval, allowing for its commercial sale in Europe. In May 2009, the HeartMate II was
approved in Canada.
During the third quarter of 2009 we launched our new HeartMate external peripherals (Go-Gear),
including new batteries, charger and power module, which are designed to provide an enhanced
quality of life for HeartMate patients by providing them more freedom and mobility and the ability
to more easily resume many aspects of a normal lifestyle.
The HeartMate XVE
The HeartMate XVE is an implantable, pulsatile, left ventricular assist device for
intermediate and longer-term MCS. Patients with a HeartMate XVE do not require anticoagulation
drugs, other than aspirin, because of the products incorporation of proprietary textured surfaces
and tissue valves. The system is comprised of the blood pump and a wearable controller and
batteries providing a high degree of patient freedom and mobility.
The HeartMate XVE received FDA approval for BTT in December 2001 and for Destination Therapy
in April 2003. In June 2003, the HeartMate XVE received CE Mark approval, allowing for its
commercial sale in Europe. In June 2004, the HeartMate XVE was approved in Canada.
The Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device
The PVAD is an external, pulsatile, ventricular assist device, FDA approved for BTT, including
home discharge, and post-cardiotomy myocardial recovery and provides left, right and biventricular
MCS. The PVAD is a paracorporeal device that is less invasive than implantable VADs since only the
cannula is implanted. The paracorporeal nature of the PVAD has several benefits including shorter
implantation times (approximately two hours) and the ability to use the device in smaller patients.
A pneumatic power source drives the PVAD. It is designed for short-to-intermediate duration
use of a few weeks to several months, although this device has supported numerous patients for nine
to eighteen months. Offering left, right or biventricular support, the PVAD and the IVAD, described
below, are the only biventricular support systems approved for use as BTT. This characteristic is
significant because approximately 50% of BTT patients treated with the PVAD and the IVAD require
right as well as left-sided ventricular assistance. The PVAD and the IVAD are also the only devices
approved for both BTT and recovery following cardiac surgery. The PVAD incorporates our proprietary
biomaterial, Thoralon, which has excellent tissue and blood compatibility and is resistant to blood
clots.
The PVAD received FDA approval for BTT in December 1995 and for recovery (post-cardiotomy) in
May 1998. In June 1998, the PVAD received CE Mark approval, allowing for its commercial sale in
Europe. In November 1994, the PVAD was approved in Canada.
26
The Implantable Ventricular Assist Device
The IVAD is an implantable, pulsatile, ventricular assist device FDA approved for BTT,
including home discharge, and post-cardiotomy myocardial recovery and provides left, right or
biventricular MCS. The IVAD maintains the same blood flow path, valves and blood pumping mechanism
as the PVAD, but has an outer housing made of a titanium alloy that makes it suitable for
implantation.
The IVAD received FDA approval for BTT and recovery (post-cardiotomy) in August 2004. In June
2003, the IVAD received CE Mark approval, allowing for its commercial sale in Europe. In November
2004, the IVAD was approved in Canada.
The CentriMag
The CentriMag is manufactured by Levitronix and is based on their magnetically levitated
bearingless motor technology. We entered into a distribution agreement with Levitronix in August
2007, with an initial term effective through December 2011, to distribute the CentriMag in the U.S.
The CentriMag is 510(k) cleared by the FDA for use up to nine hours in patients requiring
short-term extracorporeal circulatory support during cardiac surgery. Additionally, CentriMag is
approved under a FDA humanitarian device exemption to be used as a right ventricular assist device
for periods of support up to thirty days in patients in cardiogenic shock due to acute right
ventricular failure. In May 2008, Levitronix received approval to commence a U.S. pivotal trial to
demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the CentriMag for periods of support up to thirty days.
Levitronix has CE Mark approval in Europe to market the product to provide support for up to thirty
days.
Vascular Graft Products
The Vectra Vascular Access Graft (Vectra) was approved for sale in the U.S. in December 2000
and in Europe in January 1998. It is designed for use as a shunt between an artery and a vein,
primarily to provide access to the bloodstream for renal hemodialysis patients requiring frequent
needle punctures during treatment.
Discontinued Operations International Technidyne Corporation (ITC)
Our ITC division develops, manufactures and markets two product lines:
|
|
|
Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Our point-of-care products include diagnostic test systems
that monitor blood coagulation while a patient is being administered certain anticoagulants,
as well as monitor blood gas/electrolytes, oxygenation and chemistry status. |
|
|
|
Incision. Our incision products include devices used to obtain a patients blood sample
for diagnostic testing and screening for platelet function. |
On April 25, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to sell the ITC division to
Danaher Corporation (Danaher) for $110.0 million in cash upon closing. On July 26, 2010, the sale
was terminated as a result of the failure of the parties to agree on the status of certain aspects
of ITCs quality system and regulatory filings. We expect to locate another buyer and complete the
sale of ITC within the next nine months. As such, the ITC division is classified as held for sale
on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010 and its
results of operations are displayed in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
On November 4, 2010, we sold our wholly-owned subsidiary, International Technidyne Corporation, to ITC Nexus Holding Company, Inc.
(Nexus) for $55 million in
cash pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2010, by and between the Company and Nexus.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the policies and estimates below as critical to our business operations and
the understanding of our results of operations. The impact of, and any associated risks related to,
these policies and estimates on our business operations are discussed below. Preparation of
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates and
assumptions.
27
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales when evidence of an arrangement exists, title has
passed (generally upon shipment) or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or
determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales to distributors are recorded when
title transfers.
We recognize sales of certain products to first-time customers when it has been determined
that the customer has the ability to use the products. These sales frequently include the sale of
products and training services under multiple element arrangements. Training is not considered
essential to the functionality of the products. Revenue under these arrangements is allocated to
training based upon fair market value of the training, which is typically performed on our behalf
by third party providers. Under this method, the total value of the arrangement is allocated to the
training and the products based on the relative fair market value of the training and products.
In determining when to recognize revenue, management makes decisions on such matters as the
fair values of the product and training elements when sold together, customer credit worthiness and
warranty reserves. If any of these decisions proves incorrect, the carrying value of these assets
and liabilities on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets or the recorded product
sales could be significantly different, which could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations for any fiscal period.
Reserves
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability
of our customers to make payments owed to us for product sales and training services. If the
financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their
ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
The majority of our products are covered by up to a one-year limited manufacturers warranty
from the date of shipment or installation. Estimated contractual warranty obligations are recorded
when the related sales are recognized and any additional amounts are recorded when such costs are
probable and can be reasonably estimated, at which time they are included in Cost of product
sales in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. In determining the
warranty reserve estimate, management makes judgments and estimates on such matters as repair costs
and probability of warranty obligations.
Estimated excess and obsolete inventory charges are recorded when inventory levels exceed
projected sales volume for a certain period of time. In determining the excess obsolete charges,
management makes judgments and estimates on matters such as forecasted sales volume. If sales
volume does not meet projections, additional write-downs may be required.
Management must make estimates and judgments to determine the amount of reserves to accrue. If
any of these decisions proves incorrect, our condensed consolidated financial statements could be
materially and adversely affected.
28
Income Taxes
We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial
statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, benefits
and deductions, such as tax benefits from our non-U.S. operations and in the calculation of certain
tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of revenue and expense for
tax and financial statement purposes.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that
more-likely-than-not will be realized. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in
the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the
future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the allowance for the deferred tax
asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we
determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the
future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset would be charged to
income in the period such determination was made.
We believe we have provided adequate reserves for uncertain tax positions for anticipated
audit adjustments by U.S. federal, state and local, as well as foreign, tax authorities based on
our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes, interest and penalties may be
due. If events occur which indicate payment of these amounts is unnecessary, the reversal of the
liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the
accrued liabilities are no longer warranted. If our estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less
than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would result.
Evaluation of Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill for Impairment
We periodically evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used,
including intangible assets subject to amortization, when events or circumstances warrant such a
review. The carrying value of a long-lived asset to be held and used is considered impaired when
the anticipated separately-identifiable undiscounted cash flows to be generated by such an asset
are less than the carrying value of the asset. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. Fair value is
determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the
risk involved. Management must make estimates of these future cash flows, and if necessary, the
approximate discount rate, and if any of these estimates proves incorrect, the carrying value of
these assets on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets could become significantly
impaired.
Purchased intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill are not amortized but are
subject to annual impairment tests. If there was impairment, a new fair value would be determined.
If the new fair value is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss would be recognized.
Valuation of Share-Based Awards
Share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award
and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of option awards
at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term of stock options, the
expected volatility of our stock, expected forfeitures and expected dividends. The computation of
the expected volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for option grants
is based on a combination of our historical volatility and market-based implied volatility. When
establishing the expected life assumption, we review annual historical employee exercise behavior
of option grants with similar vesting periods. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating
the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. If actual forfeitures differ
significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation expense and our results of operations
could be materially affected.
29
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date.
In determining fair value, we use various approaches, including market, income and/or cost
approaches, and each of these approaches requires certain inputs. Fair value measurement standards
establish a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable
inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used
when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable
inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions as compared to the assumptions market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the
circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that we have the ability to access. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1
inputs include broker-dealer quoted securities that are traded in an active market. Since
valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active
market, a significant degree of judgment is not required. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on quoted prices of similar investments in active markets, of
similar or identical investments in markets that are not active or model-based valuations for
which all significant inputs and value drivers are observable, directly or indirectly. Assets
and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs primarily include municipal bonds, variable demand
notes, corporate bonds, commercial paper, certain of our deferred
compensation plan securities and our senior subordinated convertible notes. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall
fair value measurement. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include auction rate
securities, and our purchased intangible asset valuations. Given the current credit market
illiquidity for auction rate securities, our estimates are subject to significant judgment by
management. |
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant
who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even
when market assumptions are not readily available, our own assumptions are developed to reflect
those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.
See Note 5, Fair Value Measurements, to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
for further information about our financial assets that are accounted for at fair value.
Due to the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, estimates of fair value may differ
significantly from the values that would have been obtained had an active market for the securities
existed, and the differences could be material. After determining the fair value of our
available-for-sale securities, gains or losses on these investments are recorded to other
comprehensive income, until either the investment is sold or we determine that the decline in value
is other-than-temporary. Determining whether the decline in fair value is other-than-temporary
requires management judgment based on the specific facts and circumstances of each investment. For
investments in available-for-sale securities, these judgments primarily consider: our ability and
intent to hold the investment to maturity, whether it is more-likely-than-not that we would be
required to sell the investment before recovery of the investments amortized cost basis and
whether we expect to recover the amortized cost basis of the investment. Given the current market
conditions, these judgments could prove to be incorrect, and companies with relatively high credit
ratings and solid financial conditions may not be able to fulfill their obligations. In addition,
if we decide not to hold an investment until its value recovers it may result in the recognition of
an other-than-temporary impairment.
30
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected condensed consolidated statements of operations data
for the periods indicated and as a percentage of total product sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except for percentage data) |
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
90,996 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
65,114 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
285,366 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
198,965 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of product sales |
|
|
28,621 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
19,976 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
90,771 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
67,027 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
62,375 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
45,138 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
194,595 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
131,938 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
21,104 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
18,283 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
64,010 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
62,625 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
12,332 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10,605 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
44,135 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
31,705 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7,441 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
35,882 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
31,247 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
115,471 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
101,771 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
26,493 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
13,891 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
79,124 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30,167 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other income and (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and other |
|
|
(3,125 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3,261 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(9,280 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(9,167 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9,304 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Impairment of investment |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,057 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
24,719 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
17,690 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
72,048 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
30,304 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(9,239 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(5,914 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(25,667 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9,472 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
15,480 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
46,381 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20,832 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,697 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,297 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
11,777 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
42,684 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
19,237 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009
Continuing Operations
Product Sales
Product sales were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
90,996 |
|
|
$ |
65,114 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
$ |
285,366 |
|
|
$ |
198,965 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009, product sales increased
by $25.9 million primarily due to higher volume from worldwide sales of our HeartMate product line,
including Go-Gear peripherals introduced in the third quarter of 2009, which was in part offset by
a decline in sales of the Thoratec product line, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
In the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009, product sales
increased by $86.4 million primarily due to higher volume from worldwide sales of our HeartMate
product line, including Go-Gear peripherals, which was in part offset by a decline in the Thoratec
product line and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In North America, 13 HeartMate II
centers have been added in the first nine months of 2010 bringing the total to 133 centers. Outside
of North America, we added 18 centers in the first nine months of 2010, bringing the total to 109
centers.
Sales originating outside of the U.S. and U.S. export sales accounted for approximately 16%
and 20% of our total product sales in the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and
approximately 16% and 20% of our total product sales in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
31
Gross Profit
Gross profit and gross margin were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
62,375 |
|
|
$ |
45,138 |
|
|
$ |
194,595 |
|
|
$ |
131,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin |
|
|
68.5 |
% |
|
|
69.3 |
% |
|
|
68.2 |
% |
|
|
66.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009, gross margin decreased
by 0.8 percentage points primarily due to unfavorable warranty reserves and unfavorable foreign
currency exchange rates partially offset by favorable manufacturing variances driven by volume and
the launch of Go-Gear peripherals.
In the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009, gross margin
increased by 1.9 percentage points, primarily due to favorable manufacturing variances driven by
volume, favorable inventory reserves from lower charges taken in the first nine months of 2010 as
compared to the first nine months of 2009 and the launch of Go-Gear peripherals, partially offset
by unfavorable warranty reserves.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general and administration |
|
$ |
21,104 |
|
|
$ |
18,283 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
64,010 |
|
|
$ |
62,625 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009, selling, general and
administrative costs increased by $2.8 million due to higher personnel costs of $1.9 million
associated with the expansion of our sales force and other market development initiatives and $0.9
million primarily due to market fluctuations associated with our deferred compensation plan
liabilities and legal fees related to business development activity.
In the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009, selling,
general and administrative costs increased by $1.4 million. This increase was primarily due to
$7.5 million from the expansion of our sales force and other market development initiatives,
including users meetings, partially offset by a decrease of $6.1 million in corporate expenses.
This decrease in corporate costs was primarily due to the $12.3 million expense related to the
terminated merger agreement with HeartWare International Inc. (HeartWare) in 2009, partially
offset by a $6.2 million increase in personnel, legal and market fluctuations associated with our
deferred compensation plan liabilities.
32
Research and Development
Research and development expenses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development |
|
$ |
12,332 |
|
|
$ |
10,605 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
$ |
44,135 |
|
|
$ |
31,705 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs are largely project-driven, and they fluctuate based on the
level of project activity planned and subsequently approved and conducted.
In the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009, costs increased by $1.7
million primarily due to an increase in personnel costs associated with new HeartMate II platform
enhancements, development of HeartMate III and other new product technology.
In the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009, costs increased
by $12.4 million primarily due to the acquisition of Percutaneous Heart Pump technology of $8.5
million, new HeartMate II platform enhancements, development of HeartMate III and other new product
technology.
Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets
Amortization of purchased intangible assets was $2.4 million in the third quarters of each of
2010 and 2009. Amortization of purchased intangible assets in the first nine months of 2010 was
$7.3 million as compared to $7.4 million in the first nine months of 2009. The $0.1 million
decrease in amortization expense for the first nine months of 2010 was due to certain intangible
assets being fully amortized.
Interest Expense and Other
Interest expense, primarily related to interest on the senior subordinated convertible notes,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
$ |
3,158 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
$ |
8,866 |
|
|
$ |
8,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt
issuance costs
related to senior
subordinated
convertible notes |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Loss on
extinguishment of
senior subordinated
convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
3,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,280 |
|
|
$ |
9,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, which is comprised primarily of the senior subordinated convertible notes,
is calculated using the interest rate method which increases interest expense over the term of the
debt. During 2010, 4,045 bonds had been converted (247,427 bonds originally issued), resulting in
$0.1 million less interest expense in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of
2009 and a comparable interest expense for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009. In addition, we
recorded a loss on extinguishment of $0.1 million from the 4,045 bonds converted.
33
Interest Income and Other
Interest income and other consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,561 |
|
|
|
(24 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,054 |
|
|
$ |
4,284 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Foreign currency, net |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(212 |
)% |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
47 |
% |
Recording of conversion option
upon termination of merger
agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market adjustment on
HeartWare conversion option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
% |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
554 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income and other |
|
$ |
1,362 |
|
|
$ |
7,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,261 |
|
|
$ |
9,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third
quarter of 2009 primarily due to a decline in market interest rates, in part offset by an increase
in cash and investment balances. During the third quarter of 2009 we recorded income of $3.5
million in connection with the receipt of the conversion option under the HeartWare loan agreement
and a $1.8 million favorable mark-to-market adjustment on this conversion option. Foreign currency
gains decreased to a loss position in the same period by $0.5 million due to fluctuations in
foreign exchange rates. Other income increased by $0.4 million primarily due to higher royalty
income earned and the change in mark-to-market value of our deferred compensation plan assets
during the third quarter of 2010.
Interest income decreased by $0.2 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the
first nine months of 2009 primarily due to a decline in market interest rates and shortened
maturities on our investment portfolio, despite an increase in cash and investment balances. During
the third quarter of 2009 we recorded income of $3.5 million in connection with the receipt of the
conversion option under the HeartWare loan agreement and a $1.8 million favorable mark-to-market
adjustment on this conversion option. Other income increased by $0.3 million primarily due to
higher royalty income earned and the change in our mark-to-market value of our deferred
compensation plan assets during the first nine months of 2010.
Impairment on Investment
During the first nine months of 2010, we recorded an impairment charge of $2.1 million for our
entire investment in Acorn Cardiovascular, Inc., a start-up medical device company.
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates for the three months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009
were 37.4% and 33.4%, respectively. The increase in our reported income tax rate of approximately four percentage
points was primarily due to return-to-provision expense associated with an increase in our
effective tax rate due to changes in state apportionment factors and the proportion of tax exempt
interest to higher pre-tax earnings. In addition, for the three
months ended October 2, 2010 we
recorded a return-to-provision benefit primarily associated with additional research credits.
Our effective income tax rates for the nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009
were 35.6% and 31.3%, respectively. The increase in our reported income tax rate of approximately four percentage
points was primarily due to return-to-provision expense associated with an increase in our
effective tax rate due to changes in state apportionment factors and the proportion of tax exempt
interest to higher pre-tax earnings. In addition, in the first quarter of 2009, a discrete benefit
of $0.9 million was recorded for a change in California law.
Further, both of the three-month and nine-month periods in 2010 were affected by federal
research tax credits which were available in 2009 but are not currently available in 2010 as a
result of the expiration of federal research tax credit legislation.
We remain under audit by the state of California for the tax years 2003 to 2007, which we have
adequately reserved. Subsequent to the third quarter of 2010, we received proposed adjustments
from the state of California for the tax years 2005 to 2007, which we are currently evaluating.
34
Our effective tax rate is calculated based on the statutory tax rates imposed on projected
annual pre-tax income or loss in various jurisdictions. Since changes in our forecasted
profitability for 2010 can significantly affect our projected annual effective tax rate, we believe
our quarterly tax rate will be dependent on our profitability and could fluctuate significantly.
Analysis of Discontinued Operations
On April 25, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to sell the ITC division to
Danaher for $110.0 million in cash upon closing. On July 26, 2010, the sale was terminated as a
result of the failure of the Company and Danaher to agree on the status of certain aspects of ITCs
quality system and regulatory filings. We expect to locate another buyer and complete the sale of
ITC within the next nine months. As such, the ITC division is classified as held for sale on the
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010 and its results of
operations displayed in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Discontinued operations incurred a loss of $1.2 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared
to income of approximately $1,000 in the third quarter of 2009. The increase in the loss from discontinued
operations was primarily due to lower sales as a result of competitive activity and lower gross
margin driven by unfavorable manufacturing variances.
Discontinued operations incurred a loss of $3.7 million during the first nine months of 2010
compared to a loss of $1.6 million in the first nine months of 2009. The increase in the loss from
discontinued operations was primarily due to lower sales as a result of competitive activity and
lower gross margin driven by unfavorable manufacturing variances.
On November 4, 2010, we sold our wholly-owned subsidiary, International Technidyne Corporation, to ITC Nexus Holding Company, Inc.
(Nexus) for $55 million in
cash pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2010, by and between the Company and Nexus.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid financial instruments that are readily
convertible to cash and have maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase.
Investments classified as short-term consist of various financial instruments such as
commercial paper, U.S. government agency obligations, variable demand notes and corporate notes.
Bonds with high credit quality with maturities of greater than 90 days when purchased are
classified as available-for-sale. Investments classified as long-term consist of our investments in
auction rate securities.
Following is a summary of our cash, cash equivalents and investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50,709 |
|
|
$ |
27,787 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
337,853 |
|
|
|
279,174 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
21,578 |
|
|
|
24,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
410,140 |
|
|
$ |
331,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that cash and cash equivalents, short-term available-for-sale investments on hand
and expected cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations and capital
requirements for at least the next twelve months.
As of October 2, 2010, we owned approximately $24.7 million face amount of auction rate
securities classified as long-term. The assets underlying these investments are student loans
backed by the U.S. government under the Federal Family Education Loan Program or by private
insurers and are rated between A- and AAA. Historically, these securities have provided liquidity
through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate periodically every seven
to thirty-five days. Beginning in February of 2008, these auctions began to fail. The principal
amount of these auction rate securities will not be accessible until future auctions for these
securities are successful, a secondary market is established, these securities are called for
redemption, or they are paid at maturity.
35
We recorded an estimated cumulative unrealized loss of $3.1 million ($1.9 million, net of tax)
related to the temporary impairment of the auction rate securities, which was included in
accumulated other comprehensive loss within shareholders equity. In addition, our management
reviews impairments and credit losses associated with its investments, including auction rate
securities, to determine the classification of the impairment as temporary or
other-than-temporary and to bifurcate the credit and non-credit component of any
other-than-temporary impairment event. We do not intend to sell any of the auction rate securities
prior to maturity at an amount below the original purchase value; we intend to hold the investment to recovery and based on a
more-likely-than-not probability assessment we will not be required to sell the security before
recovery; and we deem that it is not probable that we will receive less than 100% of the principal
and accrued interest from the issuer. Therefore, 100% of the impairment was charged to other
comprehensive loss. Further, we continue to liquidate investments in auction rate securities as
opportunities arise. In the third quarter of 2010 we liquidated $3.0 million of our auction rate
securities at par value through a successful auction.
We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any)
on the fair value of our investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate further, or the
anticipated recovery in fair values does not occur, we may be required to record additional
unrealized losses in other comprehensive loss or other-than-temporary impairment charges to the
condensed consolidated statements of operations in future periods.
We intend and have the ability to hold these auction rate securities until the market
recovers, and the securities recover to par or until maturity. We do not anticipate having to sell
these securities in order to operate our business. We believe that, based on our current cash, cash
equivalents and short-term marketable security investment balances of $388.6 million as of October
2, 2010, the current lack of liquidity in the credit and capital markets will not have an impact on
our liquidity, our cash flow or our ability to fund our operations. If the issuers of the auction
rate securities are unable to successfully complete future auctions and their credit ratings
deteriorate, we may in the future be required to record other-than-temporary impairment charge on
these investments. It could conceivably take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up
to 30 years) to realize our investments recorded value.
Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes
In 2004, we completed the sale of $143.8 million initial principal amount of senior
subordinated convertible notes due in 2034. The senior subordinated convertible notes were issued
at an issue price of $580.98 per note, which is 58.098% of the principal amount at maturity of the
notes. The senior subordinated convertible notes bear interest at a rate of 1.3798% per year on the
principal amount at maturity, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on May 16 and November 16 of
each year, from November 16, 2004 until May 16, 2011. Holders of the senior subordinated
convertible notes may convert their convertible notes into shares of our common stock at a
conversion rate of 29.4652 shares per $1,000 principal amount of senior subordinated convertible
notes, which represents a conversion price of $19.72 per share, subject to adjustments upon the
occurrence of certain events as set forth in the indenture. Holders have been and are able to
convert their convertible notes at any point after the close of business on September 30, 2004 if,
as of the last day of the preceding calendar quarter, the closing price of our common stock for at
least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of
such preceding calendar quarter is more than 120% of the accreted conversion price per share of our
common stock. Commencing October 1, 2008, this market price conversion feature was satisfied, such
that holders of the senior subordinated convertible notes may convert their notes through the final
maturity date of the notes into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 29.462 shares
per $1,000 principal amount of senior subordinated convertible notes, subject to adjustments as
provided in the indenture. If holders elect conversion, we may, at our option, deliver shares of
common stock, pay a holder in cash, or deliver a combination of shares and cash, as determined
pursuant to the terms of the notes. As of October 2, 2010, 4,045 of the 247,427 bonds originally
issued have been submitted to be converted and we elected to pay cash in lieu of shares for these
bonds.
In addition, holders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their senior
subordinated convertible notes on each of May 16, 2011, 2014, 2019, 2024 and 2029 at a repurchase
price equal to 100% of the issue price, plus the accrued original issue discount, if any. Due to
this redemption feature, where holders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the senior
subordinated convertible notes as early as May 16, 2011, these senior subordinated convertible
notes have been classified as current liabilities.
ASC 470-20, Debt, increases non-cash interest expense based on the market rate of 9% percent
per annum as compared to the cash coupon rate of 2.375% as further discussed in Note 10, Senior
Subordinated Convertible Notes.
36
Cash Flow Activities from Continuing Operations
Following is a summary of our cash flow activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
$ |
61,372 |
|
|
$ |
23,113 |
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
|
|
(61,767 |
) |
|
|
(110,057 |
) |
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities |
|
|
23,321 |
|
|
|
7,368 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
22,922 |
|
|
$ |
(79,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Continuing Operating Activities
For the nine months ended October 2, 2010, cash provided by operating activities was $61.4
million. This amount included net income from continuing operations of $46.4 million increased by
non-cash adjustments to net income of $33.1 million primarily comprised of $5.0 million related to
depreciation, $7.3 million related to amortization, $10.3 million related to tax benefit related to
stock options, $9.6 million related to share-based compensation expense, and non-cash interest on
senior subordinated convertible notes of $7.2 million. These were partially offset by a decrease of
$9.5 million related to excess tax benefits from share-based compensation and $4.0 million change
in our net deferred tax liability. Changes in assets and liabilities used cash of $18.1 million
primarily due to increases in tax payments, inventories, and receivables, partially offset by an
increase in accounts payable and other liabilities.
Cash Used in Continuing Investing Activities
For the nine months ended October 2, 2010, cash used in investing activities was $61.8
million, primarily due to purchases of investments of $398.9 million, partially offset by sales and
maturities of investments of $338.6 million. In addition, we made $2.8 million for purchases of
property, plant and equipment which included $2.0 million for the expansion of our research and
development equipment and facilities and improvements to our Pleasanton office, and we made $1.4
million for purchases of patents, partly offset by a receipt of $2.8 million from a loan collection
from Levitronix.
Cash Provided by Continuing Financing Activities
For the nine months ended October 2, 2010, cash provided by financing activities was $23.3
million, and was comprised primarily of $22.0 million from proceeds related to stock option
exercises, $1.9 million from proceeds from stock issued under our employee stock purchase plan and
$9.5 million from excess tax benefits from stock option exercises, partially offset by $4.7 million
of restricted stock purchased for payment of income tax withholding due upon vesting and $5.4
million used to settle the extinguishment of 4,045 of our senior subordinated convertible notes.
37
Cash Flow Activities from Discontinued Operations
Following is a summary of the cash flow activities from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
2,944 |
|
|
$ |
2,821 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
(2,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in bank overdraft |
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended October 2, 2010, cash provided by operating activities was $2.9
million. This amount included net loss from discontinuing operations
of $3.7 million, offset by
non-cash items of $4.4 million comprising of $1.4 million of depreciation and amortization and $3.0
million of share-based compensation expenses. Changes in assets and liabilities provided cash of
$2.2 million primarily due to decreases in receivables, partially offset by a decrease in accounts
payable and other liabilities.
For the nine months ended October 2, 2010, cash used in investing activities was $2.5 million,
primarily due to purchases of property, plant and equipment related to the purchase of research and
development equipment and improvements to the manufacturing facility.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We maintain an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit as part of our workers compensation
insurance program. The Letter of Credit is not collateralized. The Letter of Credit automatically
renews on June 30th of each year, unless terminated by one of the parties. As of October 2, 2010,
our Letter of Credit was approximately $0.8 million.
Contractual Obligations
As of October 2, 2010, the liability for uncertain tax positions was $9.8 million, including
interest and penalties. Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of potential
future cash flows associated with these liabilities, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable
estimate of the amount and period in which these liabilities might be paid.
During the three and nine months ended October 2, 2010 there were no other material changes to
our contractual obligations
reported in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, outside our normal course of business.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Our investment portfolio is made up of marketable investments in money market funds, auction
rate securities, U.S. Treasury securities and debt instruments of government agencies, local
municipalities, and high quality corporate issuers. All investments are carried at fair market
value and are treated as available-for-sale. Investments with maturities beyond one year may be
classified as short-term based on their highly liquid nature due to the frequency with which the
interest rate is reset and because such marketable securities represent the investment of cash that
is available for current operations. Our auction rate securities that are not liquid are classified
as long-term. Our holdings of the securities of any one issuer, except government agencies, do not
exceed 10% of the portfolio. If interest rates rise, the market value of our investments may
decline, which could result in a loss if we were forced to sell an investment before its scheduled
maturity. If interest rates were to rise or fall from current levels by 25 basis points and by 50
basis points, the change in our net unrealized gain or loss on investments would be $0.5 million
and $1.0 million, respectively. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments to manage
interest rate risks. Our senior subordinated convertible notes do not bear interest rate risk as
the notes were issued at a fixed rate of interest.
38
Foreign Currency Rate Fluctuations
We use forward foreign currency contracts to mitigate the gains and losses generated by the
re-measurement of non-functional currency assets and liabilities (primarily assets and liabilities
on our U.K. subsidiarys consolidated balance sheet). Our contracts typically have maturities of
three months or less.
Effective January 3, 2010, we changed our functional currency for our U.K subsidiary from U.K
pounds to euros. This change did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial
statements; however, the change did impact our foreign currency hedging contracts. As of October 2,
2010, we owned forward contracts to sell euros to U.S. dollars with a notional value of 8.0
million, to sell U.S. dollars to euro with a notional value of $3.6 million and to sell U.K. pounds
to euros with a notional value of £0.6 million, as compared to October 3, 2009, when we owned
forward contracts to sell euros to U.S dollars with a notional value of 9.6 million and to
purchase U.K. pounds from U.S. dollars with a notional value of £5.5 million. As of October 2,
2010, our forward contracts had an average exchange rate of one U.S. dollar to 1.34796 euros and
one U.K. pound to 1.15048 euros. The potential fair value loss for a hypothetical 25% adverse
change in foreign currency exchange rates as of October 2, 2010 would be approximately $2.1
million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Attached as exhibits to this Form 10-Q are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). This Controls and Procedures section
includes information concerning the controls and controls evaluation referred to in the
certifications.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, as of October 2, 2010. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures included a review of our processes and the effect on the information generated for use
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In the course of this evaluation, we sought to identify any
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures, to
determine whether we had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel who have a significant
role in our disclosure controls and procedures, and to confirm that any necessary corrective
action, including process improvements, was taken. This type of evaluation is done quarterly so
that our conclusions concerning the effectiveness of these controls can be reported in our periodic
reports filed with the SEC. The overall goals of these evaluation activities are to monitor our
disclosure controls and procedures and to make modifications as necessary. We intend to maintain
these disclosure controls and procedures, modifying them as circumstances warrant.
Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that as of October 2, 2010 the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, were effective to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive
officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes to Internal Controls
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the
quarter ended October 2, 2010 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
39
Inherent Limitations on Controls and Procedures
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, does
not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls will prevent all
error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide
reasonable assurances that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of a control
system reflects resource constraints; the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because there are inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been or will be detected. As these inherent limitations are known features of the
financial reporting process, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though
not eliminate, these risks. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns occur because of simple error or mistake.
Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. While our disclosure controls
and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, there
can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all future
conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
deterioration in the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
We intend to review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures on an ongoing basis and to improve our controls and procedures over time and to correct
any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. While our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of October 2, 2010, the design of our disclosure controls
and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, was effective, future events
affecting our business may cause us to significantly modify our disclosure controls and procedures.
40
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks
described in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There were no unregistered sales of our equity securities during the three months ended
October 2, 2010.
The following table sets forth certain information about our common stock repurchased during
the three months ended October 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
value of shares |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased |
|
|
authorized to be |
|
|
|
number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
under |
|
|
purchased under |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
publicly |
|
|
publicly |
|
|
|
purchased |
|
|
price paid |
|
|
announced |
|
|
announced |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
per share |
|
|
programs (1) |
|
|
programs |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
July 4, 2010 through July 31, 2010 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
44.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
August 1, 2010 through August 28, 2010 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
34.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 29, 2010 through October 2, 2010 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
36.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
38.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our share repurchase programs, which authorized us to repurchase up to a total of $130
million of our common shares, were announced on February 11, 2004 as a $25 million program, on
May 12, 2004 as a $60 million program, on July 29, 2004 as a $25 million program and on
February 2, 2006 as a $20 million program. These programs authorize us to acquire shares in
the open market or in privately negotiated transactions and do not have an expiration date. No
shares were repurchased under these programs during the three months ended October 2, 2010. As
of October 2, 2010, we have $10.1 million remaining under our share repurchase programs. |
|
(2) |
|
Shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced repurchase programs represent
the surrender value of shares of restricted stock used to pay income taxes due upon vesting,
and do not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our publicly announced
repurchase programs. |
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
On November 4, 2010, we sold our wholly-owned subsidiary, International Technidyne Corporation, to
ITC Nexus Holding Company, Inc. (Nexus) for $55 million in cash pursuant a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
November 4, 2010, by and between the Company and Nexus ("Purchase Agreement"). Subject to the limitations set
forth in the Purchase Agreement, the Company is providing indemnification to Nexus for (a) breaches of certain
representations and warranties, (b) covenant breaches, (c) specified U.S. Food and Drug Administration matters and
(d) other customary matters.
The description of the Purchase Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
document, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit [2.1] hereto.
The Purchase Agreement contains representations and warranties that the parties made to each other as of
specific dates. Except for its status as a contractual document that establishes and governs the legal relations among
the parties, the Purchase Agreement is not intended to be a source of factual, business or operational information
about any of the parties thereto. The representations and warranties were made as of specific dates, only for
purposes of the proposed transactions, and solely for the benefit of the parties to the Purchase Agreement. These
representations and warranties may be subject to limitations agreed between the parties, including being qualified by
disclosures between the parties. The representations and warranties may have been made to allocate risks among the
parties, including where the parties do not have complete knowledge of all facts, instead of establishing matters as
facts. Furthermore, those representations and warranties may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the
contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors.
Accordingly, investors and security holders should not rely on such representations and warranties as
characterizations of the actual state of facts or circumstances. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter
of such representations and warranties may change after the date of these representations and warranties.
41
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
2.1 |
|
Stock Purchase agreement, dated as of November 4, 2010, by and between Thoratec Corporation and ITC Nexus Holding Company, Inc. |
|
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
32.2 |
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
101*** |
|
The following materials from Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 2, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)
includes: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2010 and January 2, 2010, (ii)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended October 2,
2010 and October 3, 2009, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine
Months Ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THORATEC CORPORATION
|
|
Date: November 4, 2010 |
/s/ Gerhard F. Burbach
|
|
|
Gerhard F. Burbach |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2010 |
/s/ David V. Smith
|
|
|
David V. Smith |
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
43