Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
and Proxy Statement of Ameren Corporation

 

 

Important

 

If you plan to attend the annual meeting of shareholders, please advise the Company in your proxy vote (by telephone or the Internet or by checking the appropriate box on the proxy card) and bring the Admission Ticket on the reverse side of your proxy instruction card. Persons without tickets will be admitted to the meeting upon verification of their shareholdings in the Company. If your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on March 6, 2007, the record date for voting. Please note that cameras and other recording devices will not be allowed in the meeting.

 

Please vote by proxy (via telephone or the Internet or the enclosed proxy card) even if you own only a few shares. If you attend the meeting and want to change your proxy vote, you can do so by voting in person at the meeting.

AMEREN CORPORATION

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

To the Shareholders of

 

AMEREN CORPORATION

 

We will hold the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ameren Corporation at The Saint Louis Art Museum, Forest Park, One Fine Arts Drive, St. Louis, Missouri, on Tuesday, April 24, 2007, at 9:00 A.M., for the purposes of

 

(1) electing 12 Directors of the Company for terms ending at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders;

 

(2) ratifying the appointment of independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007;

 

(3) considering a shareholder proposal relating to releases from the Callaway Plant, if presented at the meeting; and

 

(4) acting on other proper business presented to the meeting.

 

The Board of Directors of the Company presently knows of no other business to come before the meeting.

 

If you owned shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the close of business on March 6, 2007, you are entitled to vote at the meeting and at any adjournment thereof. All shareholders are requested to be present at the meeting in person or by proxy so that a quorum may be assured.

 

You may vote via telephone or the Internet or, if you prefer, you may sign and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. Your prompt vote by proxy will reduce expenses. Instructions for voting by telephone or the Internet are included with this mailing. If you attend the meeting, you may revoke your proxy by voting in person.

 

By order of the Board of Directors.

 

Secretary

 

St. Louis, Missouri

March 13, 2007

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY STATEMENT OF AMEREN CORPORATION

 

(First sent or given to shareholders on or about March 13, 2007)

 

Principal Executive Offices:

One Ameren Plaza

1901 Chouteau Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103

 

Statements in this proxy statement not based on historical facts are considered “forward-looking” and, accordingly, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. Although such forward-looking statements have been made in good faith and are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that the expected results will be achieved. These statements include (without limitation) statements as to future expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, events, conditions, and financial performance. These statements are intended to constitute “forward looking” statements in connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Ameren Corporation (the “Company,” “Ameren,” “we,” “us” and “our”) is providing this cautionary statement to disclose that there are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “2006 Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for a list of such factors.

 

This solicitation of proxies is made by our Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on Tuesday, April 24, 2007 (the “Annual Meeting”), and at any adjournment thereof. Our Annual Meeting will be held at The Saint Louis Art Museum, Forest Park, One Fine Arts Drive, St. Louis, Missouri, at 9:00 A.M. Central Time.

 

We are a holding company, the principal first tier subsidiaries of which are Union Electric Company, doing business as AmerenUE (“UE”), Central Illinois Public Service Company, doing business as AmerenCIPS (“CIPS”), CILCORP Inc. (“CILCORP”), Illinois Power Company, doing business as AmerenIP (“IP”), Ameren Services Company (“Ameren Services”), Ameren Energy Resources Company (“AER”) and Ameren Energy, Inc. (“AE”). CILCORP is the parent company of Central Illinois Light Company, doing business as AmerenCILCO (“CILCO”). AER is the parent company of Ameren Energy Generating Company (“AEG”).

 

The accompanying proxy card represents all shares registered in the name(s) shown thereon, including shares in our dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan (DRPlus Plan), the Savings Investment Plans of Ameren and its subsidiaries (401(k) Plans), the Ameren Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan of 1998 and the Ameren Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan.

 

Only shareholders of our Common Stock of record at the close of business on the Record Date, March 6, 2007, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. In order to conduct the Annual Meeting, holders of more than one-half of the outstanding shares entitled to vote must be present in person or represented by proxy so that there is a quorum. A quorum consists of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, present or represented by proxy. The voting securities of the Company on March 6, 2007, consisted of 206,684,858 shares of Common Stock. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote. It is important that you vote promptly so that your shares are counted toward the quorum.

 

In determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, shares represented by a proxy which directs that the shares abstain from voting or that a vote be withheld on a matter and broker non-votes (described below), shall be deemed to be represented at the meeting for quorum purposes. Shares as to which voting instructions are given as to at least one of the matters to be voted on shall also be deemed to be so represented. If the proxy states how shares will be voted in the absence of instructions by the shareholder, such shares shall be deemed to be represented at the meeting.

 

The New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) permits brokers to vote their customers’ shares on routine matters when the brokers have not received voting instructions from their customers. The election of directors and the ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accountants are examples of routine matters on which brokers may vote in this way. Brokers may not vote their customers’ shares on non-routine matters such as shareholder proposals unless they have received voting instructions from their customers. Non-voted shares on non-routine matters are called broker non-votes.

 

In all matters, including the election of directors, every decision of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the subject matter and represented in person or by proxy at the meeting at which a quorum is present shall be valid as an act of the shareholders. In tabulating the number of votes on such matters (i) shares represented by a proxy which directs that the shares abstain from voting or that a vote be withheld on a matter shall be deemed to be represented at the meeting as to such matter, (ii) broker non-votes shall not be deemed to be represented at the meeting for the purpose of the vote on such matter or matters, (iii) except as provided in (iv) below, shares represented by a proxy as to which voting instructions are not given as to one or more matters to be voted on shall not be deemed to be represented at the meeting for the purpose of the vote as to such matter or matters, and (iv) a proxy which states how shares will be voted in the absence of instructions by the shareholder as to any matter shall be deemed to give voting instructions as to such matter. Shareholder votes are certified by independent inspectors of election.

 

The Board of Directors has adopted a confidential voting policy for proxies. This policy does not prohibit disclosure where it is required by applicable law.

 

By Proxy.  Before the Annual Meeting, you can give a proxy to vote your shares of the Company’s Common Stock in one of the following ways:

 

 

The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to confirm your identity and to allow you to give your voting instructions. If you wish to vote by telephone or the Internet, please follow the instructions on your proxy card. Additional instructions will be provided on the telephone message and website. Please have your proxy card at hand when voting.

 

If you mail us your properly completed and signed proxy card, or vote by telephone or the Internet, your shares of our Common Stock will be voted according to the choices that you specify. If you sign and mail your proxy card without marking any choices, your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board — FOR the Board’s nominees for director Item (1), FOR ratifying the appointment of the independent registered public accountants Item (2), AGAINST the shareholder proposal Item (3), and in the discretion of the named proxies upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.

 

If you hold any shares in the Savings Investment Plans of Ameren and its subsidiaries, your completed proxy card or telephone or Internet proxy vote will serve as voting instructions to the plan trustee. However, your voting instructions must be received at least five days prior to the Annual Meeting in order to count. In accordance with the terms of the plans, the trustee will vote all of the shares held in the plans in the same proportion as the actual proxy votes submitted by plan participants.

 

If you have shares registered in the name of a bank, broker, or other registered owner or nominee, you should receive instructions from that registered owner about how to instruct them to vote those shares.

 

In Person.  You may come to the Annual Meeting and cast your vote there. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date, March 6, 2007, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

 

You may revoke your proxy at any time after you give it and before it is voted by entering a new vote by telephone or the Internet or by delivering either a written revocation or a signed proxy bearing a later date to the Secretary of the Company or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. To revoke a proxy by telephone or the Internet, you must do so by 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 20, 2007 (following the directions on the proxy card). Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request.

 

This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 13, 2007. In the same package with this proxy material, you should have received a copy of our 2006 Form 10-K, including consolidated financial statements. When you receive this package, if all of these materials are not included, please contact us and a copy of any missing material will be sent at no expense to you.

 

You may reach us:

 

- by mail addressed to

Office of the Secretary

Ameren Corporation

P.O. Box 66149, Mail Code 1370

St. Louis, MO 63166-6149

 

- by calling toll free 1-800-255-2237 (or in the St. Louis area 314-554-3502).

 

The names of shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at the Annual Meeting and, for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, at the Office of the Secretary of the Company.

 

The Annual Meeting will also be webcast on April 24, 2007. You are invited to visit http://www.ameren.com at 9:00 A.M. CT on April 24, 2007, to hear the webcast of the Annual Meeting. On our home page, you will click on “Live Webcast Annual Meeting April 24, 2007, 9:00 A.M. CT,” then the appropriate audio link. The webcast will remain on our website for one year. You cannot record your vote on this webcast.

 

Twelve directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, executed proxies will be voted in favor of the election of the persons listed below. In the event that any nominee for election as director should become unavailable to serve, votes will be cast, pursuant to the enclosed proxy card, for such substitute nominee or nominees as may be nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors and approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors knows of no reason why any nominee will not be able to serve as director. The 12 nominees for director who receive the vote of at least a majority of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors and represented in person or by proxy at the meeting at which a quorum is present will be elected. Shareholders may not cumulate votes in the election of directors. In the event any nominee for re-election fails to obtain the required majority vote, such nominee will tender his or her resignation as a director for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and will recommend to the Board the action to be taken with respect to any such tendered resignation.

 

Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of 13 members. Consistent with our By-Laws, the Board’s membership was increased from 11 with the Board’s election of Mr. Jack D. Woodard effective in August 2006 and of Stephen F. Brauer effective in October 2006. In accordance with the director retirement age provisions of the Company’s Corporate Governance Policy, Gordon R. Lohman and Richard A. Lumpkin, each of whom is currently serving as a director, each offered his resignation from our Board of Directors, effective April 24, 2007, the end of his term as a director. The Board accepted Mr. Lumpkin’s resignation as a director effective April 24, 2007. We thank Mr. Lumpkin for his service, contributions and leadership throughout his tenure as a director. The Board declined Mr. Lohman’s offer to resign and, as described below, nominated him for re-election to the Board. As a result of the foregoing, the size of the Board of Directors will be reduced to 12 members effective as of the Annual Meeting.

 

Mr. Lumpkin has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc., a telecommunications holding company, since a July 2005 reorganization as part of an initial public offering. Prior to the reorganization, Mr. Lumpkin had served as Chairman of Consolidated Communications, Inc., since January 1, 2003, upon the acquisition of the former Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company from McLeodUSA Incorporated. Prior to the acquisition, Mr. Lumpkin had served as President of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company since 1977 and also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 1990. As a result of a September 1997 merger, he also had served as Vice Chairman of McLeodUSA Incorporated until April 2002.

 

The nominees for our Board of Directors are listed below, along with their age as of December 31, 2006, tenure as director and business background for at least the last five years. Each nominee has consented to being nominated for director and has agreed to serve if elected. No arrangement or understanding exists between any nominee and the Company or, to the Company’s knowledge, any other person or persons pursuant to which any nominee was or is to be selected as a director or nominee. All of the nominees are currently directors of the Company and have been previously elected by the Company’s shareholders at prior annual meetings, except that Jack D. Woodard was elected a director by the Board on August 25, 2006 and Stephen F. Brauer was elected a director by the Board on October 13, 2006. Mr. Woodard was recommended to the Board by a non-management director and Mr. Brauer was recommended to the Board by a third party search firm. There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated or chosen by the Company to become a director or executive officer except that Charles W. Mueller is the father of Michael G. Mueller, who is an executive officer of certain Company subsidiaries. See ‘‘— Corporate Governance — Policy and Procedures With Respect to Related Person Transactions” below for further

information on this family relationship and certain other reportable family relationships with employees of the Company who are not executive officers. All of the nominees for election to the Board were unanimously recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors and were unanimously nominated by the Board of Directors.

 

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote for the election of these director nominees.

 

Board and Committee Meetings and Annual Meeting Attendance

 

During 2006, the Board of Directors met nine times. All directors attended or participated in 75 percent or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the Board Committees of which they were members.

 

The Company has adopted a policy under which Board members are expected to attend each shareholders’ meeting. At the 2006 annual meeting, all of the then incumbent directors were in attendance.

 

Age Policy

 

Directors who attain age 72 prior to the date of an annual meeting are required to submit a letter to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee offering his or her resignation, effective with the end of the director’s elected term, for consideration by the Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review the appropriateness of continued service on the Board of Directors by that director and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors and, if applicable, annually thereafter. In addition, the eligibility of a former employee to serve as a director, except for an employee who served as Chief Executive Officer of Ameren, UE or CIPS, ceases on the date upon which they cease active employment with the respective company.

 

Board Committees

 

The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Executive Committee, Human Resources Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Nuclear Oversight Committee, and Public Policy Committee, the members of which are identified below. The Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are comprised entirely of non-management directors, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined to be “independent” as defined by the relevant provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the NYSE listing standards and the Company’s Policy Regarding Nominations of Directors (the “Director Nomination Policy”).

 

Audit Committee

 

Members:		Douglas R. Oberhelman, Chairman		Richard A. Liddy
		Stephen F. Brauer		Richard A. Lumpkin
		Susan S. Elliott

 

Charter

 

The Audit Committee’s charter is posted on the Company’s website, at http://www.ameren.com/Investors.

 

The Audit Committee’s Charter provides that the Committee’s duties include: (1) reviewing with management the design and effectiveness of the Company’s system of financial reporting internal controls; (2) reviewing the scope and results of the annual audit and other services performed by the independent registered public accountants; (3) reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accountants the Company’s annual audited financial statements and the disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and recommending to the Board the inclusion of such financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on SEC Form 10-K (see “AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT” below); (4) reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accountants the Company’s quarterly financial statements and the disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and authorizing the inclusion of such financial statements in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on SEC Form 10-Q; (5) reviewing with management and the independent registered public accountants the

Company’s earnings press releases; (6) appointing, compensating, overseeing and evaluating the independent registered public accountants and pre-approving fees related to audit and other services they perform; (7) reviewing the scope of audits and the annual budget of the Company’s internal auditors; (8) reviewing the appointment of the Company’s internal audit manager, or approving the retention of any third party provider of internal audit services; (9) reviewing the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and ensuring that the Company maintains an internal audit function; and (10) taking other actions as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the NYSE listing standards. The Audit Committee has established a system to enable employees to communicate directly with the members of the Committee about deficiencies in the Company’s accounting, internal controls and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee held nine meetings in 2006. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is qualified to serve on the Audit Committee in accordance with the criteria specified in rules issued by the SEC and the NYSE. The Board of Directors has determined that Douglas R. Oberhelman qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined by SEC rules.

 

The Audit Committee of Ameren Corporation performs its committee functions for all Ameren Corporation subsidiaries which are registered companies pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Human Resources Committee

 

Members:		Richard A. Liddy, Chairman		Harvey Saligman
		Gordon R. Lohman		Patrick T. Stokes
		Richard A. Lumpkin

 

Charter

 

The Human Resources Committee’s charter is posted on the Company’s website, at http://www.ameren.com/Investors.

 

The Human Resources Committee’s Charter provides that the Committee’s duties include: (1) reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of Chief Executive Officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, evaluating performance and compensation of these officers in light of such goals and objectives and establishing compensation levels for these officers; (2) overseeing the evaluation of other executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and approving the general compensation program and salary structure of such executive officers; (3) administering and approving awards under the Company’s incentive compensation plan; (4) reviewing and approving any executive employment agreements, severance agreements, change in control agreements and determining policy with respect to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “IRC”); (5) reviewing and discussing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s Form 10-K and proxy statement; (6) preparing an annual report for the Company’s Form 10-K and proxy statement; and (7) acting on important policy matters affecting Company personnel. The Human Resources Committee held six meetings in 2006. See “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Human Resources Committee Report” below.

 

The Human Resources Committee of Ameren Corporation performs its committee functions for all Ameren Corporation subsidiaries which are registered companies pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Governance

 

The Human Resources Committee focuses on good governance practices in its operation. In 2006, this included:

 

 

 

Delegation of Authority

 

In 2006, the Human Resources Committee delegated authority to the Human Resources Administrative Committee comprised of designated members of management to approve employee separation packages for certain employees, not including the Executives, under certain circumstances.

 

Role of Executive Officers

 

The Chief Executive Officer, with input from the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Ameren Services, recommends to the Committee base salary, target short-term incentive levels, actual short-term incentive payouts and long-term incentive grants for the other Executives. The Human Resources Committee considers, discusses, modifies as appropriate, and takes action on such proposals.

 

Role of Compensation Consultants

 

In 2006, the Human Resources Committee directly retained Hewitt Associates (“Hewitt”) as its outside compensation consultant. The Committee informed Hewitt in writing that it expected Hewitt to be frank and upfront with the Committee at all times and to advise the Committee if and when there were elements of management proposals to the Committee that Hewitt believed the Committee should not support.

 

During 2006, Hewitt assisted the Committee with a comprehensive analysis of market data and its implications for pay at the Company, as well as various other executive compensation issues. Hewitt representatives attended four of the six Committee meetings during 2006.

 

The current members of the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors, Messrs. Liddy, Lohman, Lumpkin, Saligman and Stokes, were not at any time during 2006 or at any other time an officer or employee of the Company, and no member had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules.

 

No executive officer of the Company has served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers who served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or the Human Resources Committee during 2006.

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

Members:		Gordon R. Lohman, Chairman		Harvey Saligman
		James C. Johnson		Patrick T. Stokes

 

Charter

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is posted on the Company’s website, at http://www.ameren.com/Investors.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the nomination of directors and the Company’s corporate governance practices. More specifically, the Charter provides that the Committee’s duties include: (1) adopting policies and procedures for identifying and evaluating director nominees, including nominees recommended by shareholders; (2) identifying and evaluating individuals qualified to become Board members, considering director candidates recommended by shareholders and recommending that the Board select the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders; (3) reviewing the

Board’s policy for director compensation and benefits; (4) establishing a process by which shareholders and other interested persons will be able to communicate with members of the Board; and (5) developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has oversight responsibilities with respect to the Company’s code of business conduct (referred to as its Corporate Compliance Policy), its Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers and its Policy and Procedures With Respect to Related Person Transactions. See “— Corporate Governance” below. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held five meetings in 2006.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Ameren Corporation performs its committee functions for all Ameren Corporation subsidiaries which are registered companies pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Consideration of Director Nominees

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director nominations from shareholders in accordance with the Company’s Director Nomination Policy, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Briefly, the Committee will consider as a candidate any director of the Company who has indicated to the Committee that he or she is willing to stand for re-election as well as any other person who is recommended by any shareholders of the Company who provide the required information and certifications within the time requirements, as set forth in the Director Nomination Policy. The Committee may also undertake its own search process for candidates and may retain the services of professional search firms or other third parties to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees. The Company paid a third-party search firm a fee to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating potential director nominees.

 

In considering a potential nominee for the Board, shareholders should note that in selecting candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee endeavors to find individuals of high integrity who have a solid record of accomplishment in their chosen fields and who display the independence to effectively represent the best interests of all shareholders. Candidates are selected for their ability to exercise good judgment, and to provide practical insights and diverse perspectives. Although the Committee may seek candidates that have different qualities and experiences at different times in order to maximize the aggregate experience, qualities and strengths of the Board members, nominees for each election or appointment of directors will be evaluated using a substantially similar process and under no circumstances will the Committee evaluate nominees recommended by a shareholder of the Company pursuant to a process substantially different than that used for other nominees for the same election or appointment of directors.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the following qualifications at a minimum in recommending to the Board potential new Board members, or the continued service of existing members:

 

 

 

Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does, however, believe it appropriate for at least one member of the Board to meet the criteria for an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

 

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if a director has a significant change in professional responsibilities, occupation or business association, he or she is required to notify the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and offer his or her resignation from the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the facts and circumstances and make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept the resignation or request the director to continue to serve on the Board.

 

The Company’s Director Nomination Policy requires all directors standing for re-election to agree that in the event any director fails to obtain the required majority vote at an annual meeting of shareholders, such director will tender his or her resignation as a director for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and recommendation to the Company’s Board.

 

Public Policy Committee

 

Members:		Charles W. Mueller, Chairman		James C. Johnson
		Stephen F. Brauer		Douglas R. Oberhelman
		Gayle P.W. Jackson		Jack D. Woodard

 

Charter

 

The Public Policy Committee’s charter is posted on the Company’s website, at http://www.ameren.com/Investors.

 

The Public Policy Committee’s Charter provides that the Committee’s duties include reviewing and overseeing the Company’s policies, practices and performance with respect to corporate citizenship and public affairs considerations affecting the Company’s relationship and reputation with its key constituents. It also makes policies and recommendations with respect to charitable and other contributions. The Public Policy Committee held five meetings in 2006.

 

Executive Committee

 

Members:		Gary L. Rainwater, Chairman		Charles W. Mueller
		Richard A. Liddy		Douglas R. Oberhelman
		Gordon R. Lohman		Harvey Saligman

 

The Executive Committee has such duties as may be delegated to it from time to time by the Board and has authority to act on most matters concerning management of the Company’s business during intervals between Board meetings. The Executive Committee held two meetings in 2006.

 

Nuclear Oversight Committee

 

Members:		Jack D. Woodard, Chairman		Gayle P.W. Jackson
		Susan S. Elliott		Charles W. Mueller

 

Charter

 

The Nuclear Oversight Committee’s charter is posted on the Company’s website, at http://www.ameren.com/Investors.

 

The Nuclear Oversight Committee’s Charter provides that the Committee’s duties include providing Board-level oversight of the Company’s nuclear power facility as well as long-term plans and strategies of Ameren’s nuclear power program and making appropriate reports to the Board. The Nuclear Oversight Committee held seven meetings in 2006.

 

Executive Sessions of Non-management Directors

 

The non-management directors meet privately in executive sessions to consider such matters as they deem appropriate, without management being present, as a routinely scheduled agenda item for every Board meeting. An executive session including only independent directors as defined by the NYSE listing standards is held at least once a year. During 2006, all non-management directors were independent, except Charles W. Mueller and Jack D. Woodard. Gordon R. Lohman served as Lead Director presiding at such executive sessions during 2006. The Lead Director’s duties include convening and chairing meetings of the non-management directors in executive session; convening and chairing meetings of the independent directors in executive session; presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the non-management directors and independent directors; regularly polling the non-management directors for advice on agenda items for meetings of the Board; serving as a liaison between the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the non-management directors; collaborating with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in developing the agenda for meetings of the Board and approving such agendas; approving information that is sent to the Board; collaborating with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the chairpersons of the standing committees in developing and managing the schedule of meetings of the Board and approving such schedules; collaborating with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in developing the budget of the Board; and if requested by major shareholders, ensuring that he is available for consultation and direct communication.

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Policies, Committee Charters and Codes of Conduct

 

The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Director Nomination Policy, a Policy Regarding Communications to the Board of Directors, a Policy and Procedures With Respect to Related Person Transactions and written charters for its Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Nuclear Oversight Committee, and Public Policy Committee. The Board of Directors also has adopted the Company’s code of business conduct (referred to as its Corporate Compliance Policy) applicable to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees and the Company’s Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers. These documents and other items relating to the governance of the Company, including the Company’s corporate strategic planning process and the Board’s involvement in such process, can be found on our website at http://www.ameren.com. These documents are also available in print free of charge to any shareholder who requests them from the Office of the Company’s Secretary.

 

Director Independence

 

Pursuant to NYSE listing standards, the Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a formal set of categorical independent standards with respect to the determination of director independence. These standards are set forth in the Company’s Director Nomination Policy. The Director Nomination Policy is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. The provisions of the Director Nomination Policy regarding director independence meet and in some areas exceed the listing standards of the NYSE. In accordance with the Director Nomination Policy, in order to be considered independent a director must be determined to have no material relationship with the Company other than as a director. The Director Nomination Policy specifies the criteria by which the independence of our directors will be determined.

 

Under the Director Nomination Policy, an “independent director” is one who:

 

 

 

For purposes of determining a “material relationship,” the following standards are utilized:

 

 

For purposes of these independence standards, (i) immediate family members of a director include the director’s spouse, parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, siblings, mother- and father-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, and brothers- and sisters-in-law and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the director’s home and (ii) the term “primary business affiliation” means an entity of which the director or the director’s immediate family member is a principal/executive officer or in which the director or the director’s immediate family member holds at least a five percent equity interest.

 

In accordance with the Director Nomination Policy, the Board undertook its annual review of director independence. During this review, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Board

also considered whether there were any transactions or relationships between directors or any member of their immediate family (or any entity of which a director or an immediate family member is an executive officer, general partner or significant equity holder). As provided in the Director Nomination Policy, the purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions existed that were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

 

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the following directors are independent under the standards set forth in the Director Nomination Policy: Stephen F. Brauer, Susan S. Elliott, Gayle P.W. Jackson, James C. Johnson, Richard A. Liddy, Gordon R. Lohman, Richard A. Lumpkin, Douglas R. Oberhelman, Harvey Saligman and Patrick T. Stokes; and that Gary L. Rainwater, Charles W. Mueller and Jack D. Woodard are not independent under the Director Nomination Policy.

 

All members of the Audit Committee, the Human Resources Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors are independent under the standards set forth in the Director Nomination Policy.

 

Policy and Procedures With Respect to Related Person Transactions

 

In February 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the Ameren Corporation Policy and Procedures with respect to Related Person Transactions. This written policy provides that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review and approve Related Person Transactions (as defined below); provided that the Human Resources Committee will review and approve the compensation of each Company employee who is an Immediate Family Member (as defined above under “— Director Independence”) of a Company director or executive officer and whose compensation exceeds $120,000. The Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has delegated authority to act between Committee meetings.

 

The policy defines a “Related Person Transaction” as a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than (1) competitively bid or regulated public utility services transactions, (2) transactions involving trustee type services, (3) transactions in which the Related Person’s interest arises solely from ownership of Company equity securities and all equity security holders received the same benefit on a pro rata basis, (4) an employment relationship or transaction involving an executive officer and any related compensation solely resulting from that employment relationship or transaction if (i) the compensation arising from the relationship or transaction is or will be reported pursuant to the SEC’s executive and director compensation proxy statement disclosure rules; or (ii) the executive officer is not an Immediate Family Member of another executive officer or director and such compensation would have been reported under the SEC’s executive and director compensation proxy statement disclosure rules as compensation earned for services to the Company if the executive officer was a named executive officer as that term is defined in the SEC’s executive and director compensation proxy statement disclosure rules, and such compensation has been or will be approved, or recommended to our Board of Directors for approval, by the Human Resources Committee of our Board of Directors, or (5) if the compensation of or transaction with a director is or will be reported pursuant to the SEC’s executive and director compensation proxy statement disclosure rules.

 

“Related Person” is defined as (1) each director, director nominee and executive officer of the Company, (2) 5% or greater beneficial owners, (3) Immediate Family Members of the foregoing persons and (4) any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person and all other related persons to such person has a 10% or greater beneficial interest.

 

The Office of the Corporate Secretary of the Company will assess whether a proposed transaction is a Related Person Transaction for purposes of the policy.

 

The policy recognizes that certain Related Person Transactions are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

 

The approval procedures in the policy identify the factors the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider in evaluating whether to approve or ratify Related Person Transactions or material amendments to pre-approved Related Person Transactions. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, including (if applicable) but not limited to: the benefits to the Company; the impact on a director’s independence in the event the Related Person is a director, an Immediate Family Member of a director or an entity in which a director is a general partner, 10% or greater shareholder or executive officer; the availability and costs of other sources for comparable products or services; the terms of the transaction; the terms available to or from unrelated third parties or to employees generally; and an analysis of the significance of the transaction to both the Company and the Related Party. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will approve only those Related Person Transactions (a) that are in compliance with applicable SEC rules and regulations, NYSE listing requirements and the Company’s policies, including but not limited to the Corporate Compliance Policy and (b) that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines in good faith.

 

The policy provides for the annual pre-approval by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of certain Related Person Transactions that are identified in the policy, as the policy may be supplemented and amended. For 2007, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (and the Human Resources Committee, in the case of employment relationships involving compensation exceeding $120,000) pre-approved, in accordance with the policy, the following Related Person Transactions:

 

 

In 2006, the Company’s unwritten policy with respect to Related Person Transactions was to evaluate and monitor Related Person Transactions. Any such transaction was required to comply with the Company’s policies, including the Corporate Compliance Policy, and any payments by the Company to a director’s primary business affiliation or the primary business affiliation of an immediate family member of a director for goods or services, or other contractual arrangements were required to be made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons.

 

Other than the employment relationships of Charles R. Mueller and Michael G. Mueller described above, the only directors that had business relationships with the Company in 2006 that are required to be reported are Mr. Woodard and Mr. Oberhelman. In 2006, prior to his election to the Board, Mr. Woodard received $125,200, plus reimbursement of his expenses, from the Company for acting as an independent advisor to the Board and the Nuclear Oversight Committee. Mr. Oberhelman is an executive officer of Caterpillar Inc. which purchases regulated public utility energy services and non-regulated energy services from certain of the Company’s subsidiaries (primarily CILCO, Ameren Energy Marketing Company, IP and UE) and sells and leases equipment to and provides maintenance and training services for some of our subsidiaries. During 2006,

revenues from energy sales by Ameren subsidiaries to Caterpillar aggregated approximately $52.2 million excluding revenues from the supply of regulated public utility services and revenues based on competitive bid transactions. Payments made during 2006 by our subsidiaries to Caterpillar for the purchase or lease of equipment aggregated approximately $131,000, for the repurchase of energy aggregated approximately $29,000 and for maintenance and training services aggregated approximately $1.6 million. Mr. Oberhelman’s wife is the Chief Executive Officer of Cullinan Properties, Ltd. (“Cullinan Properties”), a real estate development firm. During 2006, Cullinan Properties made lease payments to CILCO for office space aggregating approximately $11,000. These transactions, many of which are for multiple year terms, were entered into in the ordinary course of business on an arms length basis. The total of all payments made by our subsidiaries to Caterpillar and payments received by our subsidiaries from Caterpillar and Cullinan Properties during 2006 (including payments related to the supply of regulated public utility services and payments related to competitive bid transactions) did not exceed two percent of Caterpillar’s 2006 consolidated revenues of approximately $41.52 billion or two percent of Cullinan Properties consolidated revenues, respectively. In addition, the total of all payments made by our subsidiaries to Caterpillar during 2006 was less than two percent of our 2006 consolidated revenues of approximately $6.9 billion. Caterpillar, Cullinan Properties and Ameren transactions also did not exceed these two percent thresholds during 2004 and 2005.

 

In addition to the above business relationships, certain of the Company’s directors and executive officers had reportable family relationships in 2006. Charles W. Mueller is the father of Michael G. Mueller, President of the Company’s wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, Ameren Energy Fuels and Services Company and a Vice President of Ameren Services, for which he received in 2006 total compensation (consisting of all items included in total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement) of $360,604 (including $56,017, the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) 123R for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 of the target award of 2,997 performance share units under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan of 1998, based on the closing price of $50.69 of Ameren Common Stock on the February 10, 2006 grant date). See below for more information regarding performance share unit awards and other compensation, respectively. Another son of Mr. Mueller, Charles R. Mueller, is employed by IP as a supervising engineer, for which he received total compensation (consisting of all items included in total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement) of $157,015 for 2006. Gary L. Weisenborn, a brother of Dennis W. Weisenborn, a Vice President of various Company subsidiaries, is employed by UE as a superintendent for which he received total compensation (consisting of all items included in total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement) of $131,473 for 2006. David E. Boll, a brother-in-law of Robert F. Neff, a Vice President of Ameren Energy Fuels and Services Company, is employed by Ameren Services as a managing supervisor of mechanical engineering for which he received total compensation (consisting of all items included in total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement) of $123,788 for 2006.

 

Legal and Regulatory Matters

 

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, an affiliate of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., and The Boeing Company are members of the Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers group (“MIEC”) which, on September 1, 2006, intervened in the Missouri Public Service Commission proceedings relating to UE’s request for an increase in base rates for electric service. MIEC’s position in the case is that UE overstated its needed revenue requirement and that a disproportionate amount of the increase has been assigned to industrial customers. MIEC also opposes UE’s requested fuel and purchased power cost recovery mechanism. Patrick T. Stokes is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. and James C. Johnson is an officer of The Boeing Company. Neither Mr. Stokes nor Mr. Johnson participated in Ameren’s Board and Committee deliberations relating to these matters.

 

In April 2005, Caterpillar Inc. intervened in the Illinois Commerce Commission (“ICC”) proceedings relating to the power procurement auction and related tariffs of CILCO, CIPS and IP (the “Ameren Illinois Utilities”). In the Ameren Illinois Utilities’ 2005 auction process proceedings, Caterpillar Inc., in conjunction with other industrial customers as a coalition, opposed the Ameren Illinois Utilities’ filing on issues regarding auction design and auction process, among others. In February 2006, Caterpillar Inc. intervened in the 2006

rate cases filed by the Ameren Illinois Utilities with the ICC to modify their electric delivery service rates. In the 2006 rate cases, Caterpillar Inc., in conjunction with other industrial customers as a coalition, opposed the Ameren Illinois Utilities’ filings on issues regarding rate design and revenue requirements, among others. Douglas R. Oberhelman is an executive officer of Caterpillar Inc. Mr. Oberhelman did not participate in Ameren’s Board and Committee deliberations relating to these matters.

 

Policy Regarding Communications to the Board of Directors

 

The non-management directors of the Board of Directors have adopted a policy for shareholders and other interested persons to send communications to the Board. Shareholders and other interested persons who desire to communicate with the Company’s directors or a particular director may write to: Ameren Corporation Board of Directors, c/o Manager of Investor Relations, Mail Code 202, 1901 Chouteau Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103. E-mail communications to directors should be sent to directorcommunication@ameren.com. All communications must be accompanied by the following information: if the person submitting the communication is a shareholder, a statement of the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that the person holds; if the person submitting the communication is not a shareholder and is submitting the communication to the Lead Director or the non-management directors as an interested party, the nature of the person’s interest in the Company; any special interest, meaning an interest not in the capacity of a shareholder of the Company, of the person in the subject matter of the communication; and the address, telephone number and e-mail address, if any, of the person submitting the communication. Communications received from shareholders and other interested persons to the Board of Directors will be reviewed by the Manager of Investor Relations and if they are relevant to, and consistent with, the Company’s operations and policies that are approved by all non-management members of the Board and if they conform to the procedural requirements of the Policy, they will be forwarded to the Lead Director or applicable Board member or members as expeditiously as reasonably practicable.

 

Annual Assessment of Board, Board Committee and Individual Director Performance

 

The Board reviews its own performance, structure and processes in order to assess how effectively it is functioning. This assessment is implemented and administered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through an annual Board self-evaluation survey. Individual directors are also asked annually to assess each other’s performance through a director peer assessment. The views of individual directors are collected by the Secretary of the Company and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and summarized for consideration by the full Board. In addition, each of the Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Nuclear Oversight Committee, and Public Policy Committee of the Board conduct an annual self evaluation of its performance.

 

Fees and Stock Awards

 

In June 2006, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of Ameren approved the following compensation program for each director who is not an employee of the Company:

 

 

 

Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive compensation for their services as a director.

 

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to non-management directors for fiscal year 2006, other than reimbursement for travel expenses.

 

Director Compensation Table

 

 

 

Directors Deferred Compensation Plan Participation

 

An optional deferred compensation plan available to directors permitted non-management directors to defer all or part of their annual cash retainers and meeting fees. The minimum amount that was permitted to be deferred prior to calendar year 2007 was $3,500. Directors Liddy, Lohman, Lumpkin, Oberhelman, Saligman and Stokes deferred amounts under the plan in 2006.

 

Deferred amounts, plus an interest factor, are used to provide payout distributions following completion of Board service and certain death benefits. Deferred amounts earn interest at 150% of the average Mergent’s Seasoned AAA Corporate Bond Yield Index (“Mergent’s Index,” formerly called Moody’s Index) rate until the participant director retires or dies. After the participant director retires or dies, the deferred amounts earn interest at the average Mergent’s Index rate.

 

For 2006, the average Mergent’s Index rate was 5.24 percent, 150 percent of which was 7.86 percent. A participant director may choose to receive the deferred amounts at retirement in a lump sum payment or in installments over five, ten or fifteen years.

 

In the event a participating director resigns from the Board of Directors prior to becoming eligible for retirement and after the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in such plan), the balance in such director’s deferral account, including interest payable at 150 percent of the average Mergent’s Index, shall be distributed in a lump sum to the director within 30 days after the date the director resigns.

 

In November 2006, the Company adopted the Ameren Deferred Compensation Plan for Members of the Board of Directors (the “New Directors Deferred Compensation Plan”), which amends and restates the portion of the deferred compensation plan described above which is subject to Section 409A of the IRC. The New Directors Deferred Compensation Plan permits non-management directors of the Company to annually choose to defer up to 100% (in increments of 1%) of cash retainers and meeting fees. There are no minimum dollar thresholds for deferrals. The New Directors Deferred Compensation Plan became effective as of January 1, 2007 and applies to cash retainers and meeting fees paid to non-management directors on and after such date. The New Directors Deferred Compensation Plan was filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2006.

 

Deferred amounts earn interest at 150% of the average Mergent’s Index rate while the participant is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. After the participant ceases to be a member of the Company’s

Board of Directors for any reason after attainment of at least age 55 or dies, the deferred amounts earn interest at the average Mergent’s Index rate.

 

A participant may choose to receive the deferred amounts upon ceasing to be a member of the Company’s Board of Directors in a lump sum payment or in installments over a set period of up to 15 years. However, in the event a participant ceases being a member of the Company’s Board of Directors prior to age 55, the balance in such participant’s deferral account shall be distributed in a lump sum to the participant within 30 days of the date the participant ceases being a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. In the event a participant ceases being a member of the Company’s Board of Directors prior to attainment of at least 55 years of age and after the occurrence of a Change of Control (as hereinafter defined under “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Other Potential Post-Employment Payments — Change of Control Protection — Change of Control Severance Plan”), the balance in such director’s deferral account, including interest payable at 150% of the average Mergent’s Index rate, shall be distributed in a lump sum to the director within 30 days after the date the director ceases being a member of the Board of Directors.

 

Director Stock Ownership Requirement

 

In October 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a stock ownership requirement applicable to all of its directors. Under this requirement, within five years of the January 1, 2007 effective date or within five years after initial election to the Board, all non-management directors are required to own Company Common Stock equal in value to at least three times their base annual cash retainer and hold such amount of stock throughout their directorship.

 

At any time, if a non-management director has not satisfied the requirement, such director must retain at least 50% of all shares granted to him or her after January 1, 2012 under Ameren’s equity compensation programs.

 

The Company is asking its shareholders to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. PwC was appointed by the Audit Committee.

 

Although ratification by the shareholders is not required by law, the Board of Directors has determined that it is desirable to request approval of this selection by the shareholders. In the event the shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider this factor when making any determination regarding PwC. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

 

Passage of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the proposal and represented in person or by proxy at the meeting at which a quorum is present.

 

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote for the ratification of the appointment of PwC as Independent Registered Public Accountants for fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.

 

Proponents of the shareholder proposal described below notified the Company of their intention to attend the Annual Meeting to present the proposal for consideration and action. The names and addresses of the proponents and the number of shares they hold will be furnished by the Secretary of the Company upon receipt of any telephonic or written request for such information.

 

Whereas: Nuclear power plants, including Callaway, during routine operation, release radioactive wastes into the air and water that we believe increase the risk of life-shortening illnesses, genetic mutations, and environmental damage.

 

Though the federal government’s “permissible” concentration levels govern these releases, we believe “permissible” does not mean safe, but merely expedient.

 

AmerenUE extracts Missouri River water for Callaway’s cooling systems; some of that water becomes radioactively contaminated and is intentionally released after filtering and monitoring. Radioactive gases are also generated during the plant’s operation; some are released to the atmosphere.

 

However, no economically feasible technology exists to remove all radioactive materials from the cooling water and gaseous emissions — such as, particles too small to filter, and certain gases and liquids. Monitoring technologies also cannot accurately detect some of these materials. In addition, accidental releases and leaks can occur from pipes, pumps, valves and other components and systems.

 

Tritium, for example, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, accumulates in cooling water as a fission and activation product.

 

Since no economically feasible technology exists to filter tritium from a reactor’s effluents, it is normally released in gaseous emissions to the atmosphere and in liquid releases into the Missouri River — 79 miles upstream from St. Louis County’s major drinking water intake.

 

The medical profession typically decontaminates a lab tabletop that measures even 100 trillionths of one curie of radioactivity per four-inch square. During Callaway’s operation in 2005, the Company reported releasing 1,292 curies of tritium in 128 batches of radioactive wastewater into the Missouri River. The company also reported releasing tritium to the atmosphere.

 

Tritium can be ingested or inhaled, potentially causing cellular, genetic, and reproductive damage. Its half life is 12.3 years; it continues releasing radioactivity for at least ten half-lives.

 

Since late 2005, nuclear power plant owners, including AmerenUE, have been reporting to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the occurrence of unfiltered, accidental leaks of tritium and other radioactive materials within their plant sites and beyond. AmerenUE announced tritium leaks from groundwater pipes in summer 2006. Six tritium leaks had also occurred between 1987 and 2005.

 

The impacts of Callaway’s liquid releases on algae, fish and other creatures (including humans) living downstream can be persistent. Gaseous releases can also persist in the environment.

 

Resolved: Shareholders request that Ameren describe, in its next annual report, its efforts to reduce the release of radioactive material to the air and water during Callaway’s routine operation and to improve the quality of the monitoring of these releases.

 

Supporting Statement

 

Radioactive releases occur during Callaway’s routine operation and as the result of leakages. We believe that the impact of these radioactive releases, no matter how small, is cumulative, irreversible, and potentially dangerous. There is also the threat of major accidental releases. Ameren remains morally responsible and financially liable for Callaway into the indefinite future, and should take responsibility for a more complete accounting of all radioactive releases, so that the Company and its shareholders can more accurately assess the plant’s impact on the biosphere.

 

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote against Item (3).

 

The Board is of the opinion that it is unwarranted to include, in Ameren’s annual report, any description of the Company’s efforts to reduce the release of radioactive materials to the air and water during the Callaway Plant’s routine operation and improve the monitoring of these releases. Providing such information in the annual report is unnecessary because information concerning effluent releases and treatment system modifications is readily available.

 

 

The Board believes that, considering the very low radioactive releases from Callaway, the continuous effluent control and monitoring programs that are in place under the oversight of the NRC, and the availability to the public of detailed information on the radioactive discharges from the plant, there is no reason to provide a description in Ameren’s annual report of the efforts at the facility to reduce the release of radioactive materials or improve monitoring of those releases. Therefore, the Board unanimously recommends voting Against Item (3).

 

Passage of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the proposal and represented in person or by proxy at the meeting at which a quorum is present.

 

The Board of Directors does not know of any matter, other than the election of Directors, the ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accountants and the shareholder proposal set forth above, which may be presented at the meeting. However, if any other matters should properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote thereon in accordance with their best judgment.

 

The following table contains information with respect to the ownership of Ameren Common Stock by each person known to the Company who is the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding Common Stock.

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to beneficial ownership of Ameren Common Stock as of February 1, 2007 for (i) each director and nominee for director of the Company, (ii) the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and the three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (and/or its subsidiaries) (other than the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer) who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2006, named in the Summary Compensation Table below (collectively, the “Executives”), and (iii) all executive officers, directors and nominees for director as a group.

 

 

 

 

Since 2003, the Company has had a policy which prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging in pledges of Company securities or margin accounts with respect to Company securities.

 

The address of all persons listed above is c/o Ameren Corporation, 1901 Chouteau Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103.

 

Stock Ownership Requirement for Directors

 

The stock ownership requirement applicable to directors is described above under “ITEMS YOU MAY VOTE ON — Director Compensation — Director Stock Ownership Requirement.”

 

Stock Ownership Requirement for Officers

 

In October 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted, effective January 1, 2007, a stock ownership requirement applicable to certain officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. Under this requirement, within five years of its January 1, 2007 effective date or within five years after initial election to such office, each such officer is required to own shares of the Company’s Common Stock valued as a percentage of base salary as follows: President and Chief Executive Officer of Ameren (300 percent), President and Chief Executive Officer of CILCO, CILCORP, CIPS, IP, UE, AER and Ameren Services (200 percent), Executive Vice President (200 percent), President and Chief Executive Officer of Ameren subsidiaries other than the foregoing (100 percent), Senior Vice President and Vice President (100 percent), provided that officers holding multiple positions with Ameren and its subsidiaries shall be subject to the higher applicable share ownership requirement. When an officer subject to the Officer Stock Ownership Requirement reaches the age of 62, the applicable Officer Stock Ownership Requirement is reduced by one-half. At any time an officer subject to the stock ownership requirement has not satisfied the applicable requirement, such officer must retain at least 50% of the net shares delivered to him or her pursuant to awards granted after January 1, 2012 under Ameren’s equity compensation programs.

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10 percent of the Company’s Common Stock to file reports of their ownership in the equity securities of the Company and its subsidiaries and of changes in that ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. SEC regulations also require the Company to identify in this proxy statement any person subject to this requirement who failed to file any such report on a timely basis. Based solely on a review of the filed reports and written representations that no other reports are required, each of the Company’s directors and executive officers complied with all such filing requirements during 2006. The Company does not have any greater than 10 percent shareholders.

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate other filings with the SEC, including this proxy statement, in whole or in part, the following Human Resources Committee Report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

 

The Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) discharges the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s executive officers and for all Company subsidiaries which are registered companies pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Committee approves and evaluates all compensation of executive officers, including salaries, bonuses, and compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company.

 

The Committee also fulfills its duties with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Human Resources Committee Report portions of the proxy statement, as described in the Committee’s Charter.

 

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis has been prepared by management of the Company. The Company is responsible for the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and for the disclosure controls relating to executive compensation. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis is not a report or disclosure of the Human Resources Committee.

 

The Human Resources Committee met with management of the Company and the Committee’s outside consultant to review and discuss the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on the foregoing review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K, and the Board approved that recommendation.

 

Human Resources Committee:

 

Richard A. Liddy, Chairman
Gordon R. Lohman
Richard A. Lumpkin
Harvey Saligman
Patrick T. Stokes

 

In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (or “CD&A”), references to “the Committee” are to the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors. We use the term “Executives” to refer to the employees listed in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

Guiding Principles and Policies

 

Our philosophy for compensation of the Executives is to provide a competitive total compensation program that is based on the size-adjusted median of the range of compensation paid by similar utility industry companies, adjusted for our short- and long-term performance and the individual’s performance. The adjustment for our performance aligns the long-term interests of management with that of our shareholders to maximize shareholder value. The programs in place for 2006 support the pay-for-performance philosophy that we utilize.

 

Overview of Executive Compensation Program Components

 

In 2006, our compensation program for the Executives consisted of several compensation elements, each of which is discussed in more detail below. At the Company, decisions with respect to one element of pay

tend not to impact other elements of pay. The following are the material elements of our compensation program for the Executives:

 

 

Our Common Stock ownership requirements applicable to the Executives are discussed in this CD&A as well as under “SECURITY OWNERSHIP — Stock Ownership Requirements — Stock Ownership Requirement for Officers” above.

 

We also provide various welfare benefits to the Executives on the same basis as we provide to all salaried employees. We provide modest perquisites and other personal benefits to the Executives. We do not have a corporate aircraft and do not provide cars for the Executives for travel to and from the office nor do we provide or reimburse for country club memberships for any Executive. None of the Executives received perquisites or other personal benefits in an amount of $10,000 or more in 2006.

 

Market Data and Peer Group

 

The Committee’s consultant, Hewitt, collects and analyzes comprehensive market data annually, including base salary, target short-term incentives (non-equity incentive plan compensation) and long-term incentives opportunities, and benefits and perquisites periodically.

 

The elements of pay are benchmarked both individually and in total to the same comparator group.

 

To develop market figures, compensation opportunities for the Executives are compared to the compensation opportunities for comparable positions at companies similar to us, defined as regulated utility industry companies in a revenue size range approximately one-half to double our size. Hewitt uses various statistical techniques to adjust the market data to be appropriate for our revenue size.

 

We provide compensation opportunities at the size-adjusted median of the Hewitt data, and design our incentive plans to pay significantly more or less than the target amount when performance is above or below target performance levels, respectively. Thus, our plans are designed to result in payouts that are market-appropriate given our performance for that year or period.

 

The companies identified as the peer group used to develop 2006 compensation opportunities are listed below. The list is subject to change each year depending on the availability of the companies’ data through Hewitt’s database, and the continued appropriateness of the companies.

 

 

Mix of Pay

 

We believe that both cash compensation and non-cash compensation are appropriate elements of a total rewards program. Cash compensation is current compensation (i.e., base salary and annual incentive awards), while non-cash compensation is generally long-term compensation (i.e., equity based incentive compensation).

 

A significant percentage of total compensation is allocated to short-term and long-term incentives as a result of the philosophy mentioned above. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term compensation. Rather, the Committee reviews market data provided by Hewitt to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation. The allocation between current and long-term compensation is based primarily on competitive market practices relative to base salaries, annual incentive awards and long-term incentive award values.

 

Base Salary

 

Base salary compensates for competence and sustained performance in the executive role, and is a standard pay element. Our base salary program is designed to provide the Executives with market competitive salaries based upon role, experience, competence and performance.

 

The market data referenced above assists in defining the pay parameters for each Executive. Based on this data, the scope of each Executive’s role, and internal pay equity, a base salary range is established for each position. The base salary range is +/−20% of the established market rate for the position. The base salary of each Executive is managed within this pay range.

 

Mr. G.L. Rainwater (our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) recommended a 2006 base salary increase for each of the other Executives considering their then-current salary in relation to the market median, experience and sustained individual performance and results. These recommendations were presented to the Committee for discussion and approval at the December 2005 Committee meeting. Increases were approved based on the market data and base salary range, as well as internal pay equity, experience, individual performance and the need to retain an experienced team. Performance takes into account competence, initiative, contribution to achievement of our goals and leadership.

 

The Committee consulted with Hewitt in executive session at its December 2005 meeting to determine and approve Mr. Rainwater’s base salary increase. The Committee’s decision was influenced by the above-mentioned market data and Mr. Rainwater’s relatively short time in his position, as well as his performance.

 

Base salary increases were effective January 1, 2006.

 

Short-Term Incentive Compensation: Executive Incentive Plan

 

Our short-term incentive compensation program element is entitled the Executive Incentive Plan (“EIP”). The EIP rewards our annual achievement of earnings per share (“EPS”) goals and the Executive’s business unit and individual performance. The EIP focuses attention on achievement of financial goals and on business unit and individual performance that are expected to increase shareholder value.

 

The amounts listed in columns (d), (e) and (f) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table represent the potential range of cash awards for the EIP for 2006 and are based on a percentage of each Executive’s base salary at the end of 2006.

 

In order to ensure that amounts are fully deductible for tax purposes, the Committee set a limitation on 2006 short-term incentive payouts for each Executive of 0.5% of our 2006 net income. The Committee then used negative discretion as provided under Section 162(m) of the IRC to arrive at actual, lower 2006 payouts based on our performance for the year. By setting the limitation on payouts, the Committee ensured that such payouts met the definition of performance-based pay for tax purposes and thus, were fully deductible.

 

The payment of all of the short-term incentive award opportunities was dependent on our 2006 EPS achievement. However, 50% of the award funded by EPS achievement was subject to adjustment downward based on the performance of the individual Executives and the business unit they were responsible for leading in 2006. The Committee also reserves the right to modify EPS achievement levels under exceptional circumstances.

 

The range of EPS goals for 2006 is shown below. Goals are set each year with reference to many factors, including the history of financial results, the expected business environment, fuel prices affecting our business operations, operating costs and board expectations.

 

 

The actual amounts of short-term incentive awards relating to the 2006 EIP are being paid in March 2007 and are set forth under column (g) entitled Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. Prior to the February 2007 Committee meeting, the forecasted EIP EPS achievement and recommended short-term incentive awards for the Executives other than Mr. Rainwater were forwarded by Mr. Rainwater to the Committee for review. In accordance with the terms of the EIP, the Committee, at the February meeting, adjusted the 2006 EPS achievement level under the EIP to a level that resulted in funding of 60% of the target EIP compensation to reflect the exceptional effects of extraordinary weather events and regulatory rulings. As noted above, 50% of the award for each Executive was dependent on business unit and individual performance as determined by the Committee, and some individual Executive awards were lower than 60% of target.

 

The adjustment to EPS was made in recognition of several other factors, including the larger number of and extreme relative severity of the storms in Ameren’s service areas compared to prior years, the receipt by Ameren of the Edison Electric Institute “Emergency Recovery Award” for outstanding efforts to restore electric power in the wake of back-to-back storms in July 2006, and improved generation plant performance. The actions of the Committee and the Board reflected the view that the Executives demonstrated the leadership qualities that our executive compensation program was designed to foster and reward.

 

Long-Term Incentives: Performance Share Unit Program (“PSUP”)

 

We began granting performance share units in 2006.  In the five years prior to 2006, we granted performance-based restricted stock. Both are discussed below.

 

In General

 

A performance share unit (“PSU” or “share unit”) is the right to receive a share of our Common Stock if certain long-term performance criteria are achieved and the Executive remains an Ameren employee.

 

Role of the PSUP

 

The PSUP, which is governed by the shareholder-approved 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, plays the following role in the compensation program:

 

 

PSUP Design

 

We designed the PSUP to accomplish the following:

 

 

Accounting treatment was taken into account in designing the PSUP. PSUs are intended to qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception from the $1 million cap on deductibility of executive compensation imposed by Section 162(m) of the IRC.

 

2006 Grants

 

For 2006, a target number of PSUs was granted to each Executive pursuant to the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan as reflected in column (h) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The proposed 2006 grant sizes were included in our proxy statement relating to the 2006 annual meeting.

 

Grant sizes were calculated primarily considering the market data mentioned above, and secondarily considering internal pay equity.

 

The actual number of PSUs earned will vary from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted to each Executive, based primarily on our 2006-2008 TSR relative to a utility industry peer group and contingent on continued employment during 2006-2008. The threshold and maximum amounts of PSU awards are reflected in columns (g) and (i) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

 

Once PSUs are earned, they will continue to rise and fall in value with our Common Stock price during 2009 and 2010, after which they will be paid out in our Common Stock. The Executives cannot vote share units or transfer them until they are paid out. Final payment of earned and vested share units will be made even if the Executive has left our employ, unless there has been a termination for cause.

 

The following graphic illustrates how the PSUP works.

 

 

The PSUP performance measure is Total Shareholder Return, calculated generally as follows.

 

 

PSUP Peer Group

 

The criteria used to develop the PSUP peer group for 2006-2008 is shown below. In order to be counted in the final calculations, a company must still be in existence and have a ticker symbol at the end of the performance period.

 

 

For the 2006-2008 period, the 25 companies listed below satisfied the above criteria as of December 2005, and comprised the PSUP peer group. These peer group companies are not entirely the same as the peer companies used for market pay comparisons because inclusion in this group was not dependent on a company’s size relative to us or their participation in an executive pay database. For example, several of the PSUP peer group companies are considerably larger than us and would not be appropriate for inclusion in a peer group used to determine the market for compensation.

 

 

PSUP Performance/Payout Relationship

 

Once our 2006-2008 Total Shareholder Return is calculated and compared to peers, the scale below determines the percent of a target PSU award that is paid. Payout for performance between points is interpolated on a straight-line basis.

 

 

The first PSUP performance period will not end until December 31, 2008. Thus, there is no earned amount to report for the Executives in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement.

 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock

 

Performance-based restricted stock was awarded from 2001 through 2005 under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan of 1998. The awards have the potential to vest over a seven-year period from the date of grant (approximately one seventh on each anniversary date). Vesting occurs only if we achieve certain EPS performance levels which correspond to the levels established for the EIP. There is no annual vesting if the EPS performance does not reach a minimum level established annually over the seven-year vesting period. The vesting period is reduced from seven years to three years if Ameren’s EPS achieves a prescribed growth rate over the three-year period. The Executives cannot receive more than the original restricted stock grants plus dividend appreciation on shares granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan of 1998.

 

Dividends paid on restricted shares are reinvested in additional shares of Ameren Common Stock, which vest concurrently with the restricted shares. The Executives are entitled to voting privileges associated with the restricted shares to the extent the restricted shares have not been forfeited.

 

Prior to February 2006, restricted stock vesting was also conditioned upon the Executive’s achievement of required stock ownership levels based on position and salary. In February 2006, the Committee recommended and the Board of Directors approved the elimination of the stock ownership requirement as a condition to

vesting in the restricted stock awards granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan of 1998 to facilitate the transition from that plan to the new 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan approved by shareholders in May 2006. No new restricted stock awards were made to the Executives in 2006.

 

Regarding the vesting of awards due to vest based on 2006 EPS performance, the same adjustments were made to EPS for that event as were made for 2006 EIP payout. This resulted in vesting of 60% of the awards eligible to vest based on 2006 performance.

 

Retirement Benefits

 

Retirement benefits provide post-employment security to our employees. There are three primary retirement benefit programs applicable to the Executives:

 

 

A more detailed explanation of retirement benefits applicable to the Executives is provided in this proxy statement under the caption “— Pension Benefits” below.

 

Change of Control Protections

 

“Change of Control” protections provide severance pay and, in some situations, vesting or payment of long-term incentive awards, upon a Change of Control of the Company. The arrangements provide market-level payments in the event of an involuntary termination not for “Cause” or a voluntary termination for “Good Reason.” Definitions of “Change of Control,” “Cause” and “Good Reason”, as well as more complete descriptions of Change of Control protections are found below under the caption “— Other Potential Post-Employment Payments — Change of Control Protection — Change of Control Severance Plan.” The Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Plan was filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 16, 2006.

 

We believe that providing limited protections to the Executives upon a change of control are in shareholders’ best interests because doing so serves to maintain a stable executive team during the process and is helpful in hiring executives into the Company. The triggers are structured so that payment and vesting occur only upon the occurrence of both a change of control and loss of the Executive’s position.

 

Common Stock Ownership Requirement

 

In 2005, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, adopted a stock ownership guideline applicable to the Executives. In 2006, the Board replaced the guideline with a requirement, revised the number of shares covered by the requirement and included Common Stock retention provisions in the event an officer is not in compliance.

 

The requirement fosters long-term Common Stock ownership and aligns the interests of the Executives and shareholders. The requirement provides that, within five years of either the January 1, 2007 effective date or the Executive’s initial election to such office, each Executive is required to own shares of our Common Stock valued as a percentage of base salary as follows:

 

 

At any time an Executive has not satisfied the applicable requirement, such officer must retain at least 50% of the net shares delivered to him pursuant to awards granted after January 1, 2012 under our equity compensation programs.

 

Timing of Compensation

 

The Board and the Committee establish meeting schedules annually, well in advance of each meeting. Equity incentive compensation awards were made at regularly scheduled meetings.

 

Following is a discussion of the timing of compensation decisions for 2006 at the Company:

 

 

Impact of Prior Compensation

 

Amounts realizable from prior compensation did not serve to increase or decrease 2006 compensation amounts. The Committee’s primary focus was on achieving market-level compensation opportunities.

 

Factors Considered in Decisions to Increase or Decrease Compensation Materially

 

Market data, retention needs and internal pay equity have been the primary factors considered in decisions to increase or decrease compensation opportunities materially. Corporate and individual performance are the primary factors in determining the ultimate value of those compensation opportunities.

 

Role of Executive Officers

 

The Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Rainwater) with the assistance of the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Ameren Services (Ms. Donna Martin) recommended to the Committee compensation for the other Executives. Mr. Rainwater was not involved in determining his own compensation.

 

Mr. Rainwater, the Chief Operating Officer (Mr. Voss), the Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Baxter), the General Counsel (Mr. Sullivan) and Ms. Martin provided staff support to the Committee in the design of the PSUP. Mr. Rainwater, Ms. Martin, Mr. Baxter and Mr. Sullivan provided staff support to the Committee in the 2006 redesign of the change of control severance plan.

 

Company Policy Regarding the Economic Risk of Common Stock Ownership

 

Our Section 16 Trading Reporting Program prohibits executive officers and directors from engaging in derivative transactions with respect to our Common Stock and pledges of our Common Stock.

 

Other Compensation Matters

 

We do not have any written or unwritten employment agreements with any of our Executives. Each Executive is an employee at the will of the Company.

 

 

The following table sets forth compensation information for our Executives for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries in fiscal year 2006.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

 

 

			Pension Plan					Deferred Compensation Plans
			Increase					Above-Market Interest
Name			($)					($)
Rainwater				297,990					54,098
Baxter				67,470					8,590
Voss				133,044					18,528
Sullivan				78,528					14,205
Naslund				81,356					13,319

 

For assumptions and methodology regarding the determination of pension values, please refer to the footnotes under the Pension Benefits Table.

 

 

The amounts in column (i) reflect for each Executive matching contributions allocated by the Company to each Executive pursuant to the Company’s 401(k) Plan, which is available to all salaried employees, and the cost of insurance premiums paid by the Company with respect to term life insurance. The cost of the insurance premium for Mr. Rainwater was $16,466. Each Executive is responsible for paying income tax on the amount of the insurance premium.

 

The following table provides additional information with respect to stock-based awards, the value of which was provided in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table, and the potential range of payouts associated with the EIP.

 

 

 

 

See “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further information regarding the terms of awards reported in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and for discussions regarding officer stock ownership requirements, dividends paid on equity awards, and allocations between short-term and long-term compensation.

 

The following table provides information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by each of the Executives as of December 31, 2006.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

 

 

 

 

			# of Potential Shares Vesting (at Target) Each Year Including Projected Divdends
Name			3/1/08					3/1/09					3/1/10					3/1/11					3/1/12
Rainwater				8,705					7,078					5,126					4,187					2,597
Baxter				4,352					3,720					2,776					2,251					1,347
Voss				3,662					2,824					2,010					1,679					1,147
Sullivan				2,596					2,079					1,581					1,302					801
Naslund				1,993					1,536					1,098					939					688