As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2008

Registration No. 333-129651

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

 

Post-Effective Amendment No. 4

to

Form S-11

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

 

 

Wells Timberland REIT, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its governing instruments)

 

 

 

 

6200 The Corners Parkway

Norcross, Georgia 30092-3365

(770) 449-7800

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

 

 

 

Leo F. Wells, III

President

Wells Timberland REIT, Inc.

6200 The Corners Parkway

Norcross, Georgia 30092-3365

(770) 449-7800

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

 

 

Copy to:

 

Rosemarie A. Thurston

Lesley H. Solomon

Alston & Bird LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(404) 881-7000

 

 

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public:  As soon as practicable after the effectiveness of the registration statement.

 

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment that specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

This Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 consists of the following:

 

1. The Registrant’s Prospectus dated December 14, 2007 (the “Prospectus”).

 

2. Supplement No. 1 dated February 11, 2008, which was previously filed with Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 and is refiled herewith. Supplement No. 1 will be delivered as an unattached document along with the Prospectus.

 

3. Supplement No. 2 dated February 29, 2008 and Supplement No. 3 dated April 16, 2008, each of which was previously filed on the date thereof and which will be delivered as unattached documents along with the Prospectus.

 

4. Supplement No. 4 dated April 23, 2008, filed herewith, which will be delivered as an unattached document along with the Prospectus.

 

5. Part II, included herewith.

 

6. Signatures, included herewith.

 

Wells Timberland REIT, Inc. is a newly organized Maryland corporation formed primarily for the purpose of acquiring timberland properties in the timber-producing regions of the United States and, to a lesser extent, in timber-producing regions outside the United States. We were incorporated in the State of Maryland in September 2005. We intend to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, upon the satisfaction of certain organizational and operational requirements and when our board determines that it is in our best interest to elect to qualify as a REIT.

 

We are offering up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock in our primary offering for $10.00 per share, with volume discounts available to investors who purchase more than 50,000 shares at any one time. Discounts are also available for other categories of purchasers as described in “Plan of Distribution.” We are also offering up to 10,000,000 shares to be issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at a purchase price equal to $9.55 per share during our primary offering. We reserve the right to reallocate the shares of common stock we are offering between the primary offering and the distribution reinvestment plan. On July 11, 2007, excluding shares purchased by our executive officers, directors and our advisor and its affiliates, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our offering for 234,477 shares of common stock, or $2,332,845, thereby exceeding the minimum offering. As of December 6, 2007, we had received aggregate gross offering proceeds, net of discounts, of approximately $36 million from the sale of approximately 3.6 million shares in this offering. As of December 6, 2007, approximately 71.4 million shares remained available for sale to the public, exclusive of shares available under our distribution reinvestment plan.

 

This investment involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase these securities only if you can afford the complete loss of your investment. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 17 to read about risks you should consider before buying shares of our common stock. These risks include the following:

 

 

• We have not qualified as a REIT and may fail to meet the requirements to qualify as a REIT which could require us to pay additional taxes and reduce our funds available to make distributions to our stockholders.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Attorney General of the State of New York nor any other state securities regulator has approved or disapproved of our common stock, determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete or passed on or endorsed the merits of this offering. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The use of projections or forecasts in this offering is prohibited. No one is permitted to make any oral or written predictions about the cash benefits or tax consequences you will receive from your investment.

 

 

 

 

 

The dealer-manager of this offering, Wells Investment Securities, Inc., which is our affiliate, is not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of shares but will use its best efforts to sell the shares offered. The minimum permitted purchase is generally $5,000.

 

December 14, 2007

 

The shares we are offering are suitable only as a long-term investment. Because there is no public market for the shares, you will have difficulty selling your shares. In consideration of these factors, we require initial stockholders and subsequent purchasers to have either:

 

 

In addition, we will not sell shares to investors in the states named below unless they meet special suitability standards.

 

Arizona, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas — Investors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $225,000, or (2) gross annual income of at least $60,000 and a net worth of at least $60,000.

 

California — Investors who reside in the state of California must have either (1) a net worth of at least $500,000 or (2) an annual gross income of at least $65,000 and a net worth of at least $250,000.

 

Iowa — Investors who reside in the state of Iowa must have either (1) a net worth of at least $250,000 or (2) a net annual income of at least $70,000 and net worth of at least $70,000. In addition, investors from the state of Iowa may not invest more than 10% of their liquid net worth in us.

 

Kansas — Investors who reside in the state of Kansas must have either (1) a net worth of at least $250,000 or (2) a net annual income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000. The state of Kansas recommends that your aggregate investment in us and similar direct participation investments should not exceed 10% of your liquid net worth, which is defined as that portion of net worth which consists of cash, cash equivalents and readily marketable securities.

 

Maine — Investors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $200,000 or (2) a net worth of at least $50,000 and an annual gross income of at least $50,000.

 

Massachusetts and Ohio — Investors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $250,000 or (2) a net annual income of at least $70,000 and net worth of at least $70,000. In either case, your investment in us may not exceed 10% of your liquid net worth.

 

Michigan — In addition to the suitability requirements described above for the state of Michigan, the state of Michigan requires that your aggregate investment in us and similar direct participation investments may not exceed 10% of your net worth.

 

Minnesota and New Mexico — Investors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $250,000 or (2) annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000.

 

Pennsylvania — In addition to our suitability requirements, investors must have a net worth of at least 10 times their investment in us.

 

Washington — Investors who reside in the state of Washington must have either (1) a net worth of at least $250,000 or (2) a net annual income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000.

 

For purposes of determining suitability of an investor, net worth in all cases should be calculated excluding the value of an investor’s home, furnishings and automobiles. In the case of sales to fiduciary accounts, these suitability standards must be met by the fiduciary account, by the person who directly or indirectly supplied the funds for the purchase of the shares if such person is the fiduciary or by the beneficiary of the account.

 

Those selling shares on our behalf must make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of shares in this offering is a suitable and appropriate investment for each stockholder based on information provided by the stockholder regarding the stockholder’s financial situation and investment objectives. See “Plan of Distribution — Stockholder Suitability” for a detailed discussion of the determinations regarding suitability that we require of all those selling shares on our behalf.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

Wells Timberland REIT, Inc.

 

Our Advisor

 

Our Sponsor

 

Investment Objectives

	•	to preserve and return your capital contributions;
	•	to provide current income to you through the payment of cash distributions; and
	•	to realize capital appreciation upon the ultimate sale of our assets.

 

Summary Risk Factors

	•	There is no public trading market for our common stock. If you are able to sell your shares, you would likely have to sell them at a substantial discount from their public offering price.
	•	We have a very limited operating history, currently own only one property, and have not identified any additional properties to acquire with the proceeds from this offering. In addition, neither we nor our advisor has substantial experience investing in timberland properties. These factors make our future performance and the performance of your investment difficult to predict.
	•	If we raise substantially less than the maximum offering proceeds, we may not be able to invest in a diverse portfolio of properties, and the value of your investment may vary more widely with the performance of specific properties.
	•	We are dependent upon our advisor and our dealer-manager to conduct our operations and this offering. Adverse changes in the financial health of our advisor or dealer-manager, or our relationship with them could cause our operations to suffer.
	•	We will pay substantial fees and expenses to our advisor, its affiliates and participating broker/dealers, which payments increase the risk that you will not earn a profit on your investment. The fees payable to our advisor during our operational stage are not based on the performance of our investments.
	•	Our advisory agreement was not negotiated on an arm’s-length basis and it is possible that an unaffiliated third party would provide similar services at a lower cost. Because our advisory agreement must be renewed on an annual basis, the fees and expenses that we pay to our advisor may be increased in future renewals.
	•	Our advisor and its affiliates will face conflicts of interest relating to (1) allocating time among us and other programs sponsored by our sponsor, and (2) the compensation arrangements between affiliates of our advisor and other Wells programs which may incent our advisor and its affiliates to act other than in our best interest.
	•	The terms of our mezzanine loan agreement prohibit us from paying distributions or redeeming shares (except in cases of death or disability) until we repay this loan in full.
	•	We have not qualified as a REIT and may fail to meet the requirements to qualify as a REIT, which could require us to pay additional taxes and reduce our funds available to make distributions to our stockholders.

 

Our Corporate Structure

 

Conflicts of Interest

	•	Wells TIMO and its affiliates will have to allocate their time between us and other real estate programs and activities in which they are involved;
	•	Wells TIMO and its affiliates will receive fees regardless of the quality or performance of the investments acquired or the services provided to us;
	•	The compensation arrangements between Wells TIMO and its affiliates and other Wells programs may incent our advisor and its affiliates to act other than in our best interest; and
	•	The advisory agreement between Wells TIMO and us was not negotiated on an arm’s-length basis and it is possible that an unaffiliated third party would provide similar services at a lower cost.
	•	Because our advisory agreement must be renewed on an annual basis, the fees and expenses that we pay may be increased in future renewals.

 

Compensation of the Advisor and its Affiliates

				Estimated Amount for
				Maximum Offering
Type of Compensation		Determination of Amount		(85,000,000 Shares)
		Offering Stage
Selling Commissions		7% of gross offering proceeds from the primary offering; all selling commissions will be reallowed to participating broker/dealers.		$52,500,000
Dealer-Manager Fee		Up to 1.8% of gross offering proceeds from the primary offering; a portion of the dealer-manager fee will be reallowed to participating broker/dealers.		$13,500,000
Other Organization and Offering Expenses		Up to 1.2% of gross offering proceeds from the primary offering. Wells TIMO will incur or pay our organization and offering expenses (excluding selling commissions and the dealer-manager fee). We will then reimburse Wells TIMO for these amounts up to 1.2% of gross offering proceeds from the primary offering.		$9,000,000
		Operational Stage
Asset Management Fees		Monthly fee equal to one-twelfth of 1% of the greater of the cost or value of investments.		Actual amounts are dependent upon the total equity capital we raise, the amount of debt we incur and results of operations and therefore cannot be determined at this time.
Other Operating Expenses		Reimbursement of our advisor’s cost of providing services to us other than personnel costs relating to services for which our advisor earns real estate disposition fees.		Actual amounts are dependent upon the results of our operations; we cannot determine these amounts at this time.

				Estimated Amount for
				Maximum Offering
Type of Compensation		Determination of Amount		(85,000,000 Shares)
		Liquidity Stage
Real Estate Disposition Fees		Up to 2% of the contract price for any property sold for $20 million or less and up to 1% of the contract price for any property sold for more than $20 million, in each case as determined by our board of directors (including a majority of our independent directors) based on market norms for the services provided.		Actual amounts are dependent upon the results of our operations; we cannot determine these amounts at this time.
Special Units		Our advisor will be entitled to receive (1) 15% of specified distributions made upon the disposition of Wells Timberland OP’s assets, and/or (2) a one time payment, in the form of a non-interest-bearing promissory note or shares of our common stock (as applicable), in conjunction with the redemption of the special units upon the occurrence of certain liquidity events or upon the occurrence of certain events that result in a termination or non-renewal of the advisory agreement, but in each case only after the holders of common units, including us, have received (or have been deemed to have received), in the aggregate, cumulative distributions equal to their capital contributions (less any amounts received in redemption of their common units) plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their net capital contributions.		Actual amounts are dependent upon the results of our operations; we cannot determine these amounts at this time.

 

Description of Investments

 

Sources of Income

 

Board of Directors and Executive Officers

 

Leverage

 

Michigan Rescission Offer

 

In general, a real estate investment trust (or REIT) is a company that:

 

 

However, REITs are subject to numerous organizational and operational requirements. Upon our qualification as a REIT, if we subsequently fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any year, our income will be taxed at regular corporate rates, and we may be precluded from qualifying for treatment as a REIT for the four-year period following our failure to qualify. Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may still be subject to state and local taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.

 

Pursuant to our charter, our board of directors has the authority to determine when and if it is in our best interest to elect for us to qualify for federal income tax treatment as a REIT. Our qualification as a REIT requires compliance with a number of tests imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, including requirements as to organization and ownership, distributions of our income, and the nature and diversification of our income and assets. Our board of directors has determined that it is unlikely that we will qualify as a REIT for the taxable years ending December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2008. We expect that our board of directors will elect for us to be taxed as a REIT for the first taxable year in which (1) we meet the requirements to qualify to be taxed as a REIT and (2) we generate substantial taxable income such that REIT status would be in the best interest of our stockholders. As of the date of this prospectus, we do not anticipate that we will elect to be taxed as a REIT until our taxable year ending December 31, 2009. However, we cannot give any assurances that we will qualify to be taxed as a REIT in the future, and our board of directors may determine that it is in our best interest to further delay our REIT election. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Election of REIT Status.”

 

We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds from this offering to acquire timberland properties in the timber-producing regions of the United States and to repay the senior loan and the mezzanine loan. Our portfolio also may include investments in timberland located in other countries. Depending primarily upon the number of shares we sell in this offering and assuming a $9.55 per share price for shares sold under our distribution reinvestment plan, we estimate for each share sold in this offering that between $9.00 and $9.11 per share will be available for our investments. We will use the remainder of the offering proceeds to pay the costs of the offering, including selling commissions and the dealer-manager fee, and to pay a fee to our advisor for its services in connection with the selection, acquisition and management of properties. If in the future we pay cash distributions, we expect to use substantially all of the net offering proceeds from the sale of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan to repurchase our common stock pursuant to our share redemption plan.

 

Until we invest the proceeds of this offering in real estate assets, we may invest in short-term, highly liquid or other authorized investments. Such short-term investments will not earn as high a return as we expect

to earn on our real estate investments, and we may be not be able to invest the proceeds in real estate assets promptly.

 

We are offering up to 85,000,000 shares of common stock on a “best efforts” basis. We are offering up to 75,000,000 shares of our common stock in our primary offering at $10.00 per share, with discounts available for certain categories of purchasers as described in “Plan of Distribution” below. We are also offering 10,000,000 shares of common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.55 per share during the primary offering. We may reallocate the total number of shares we are offering between the primary offering and the distribution reinvestment plan. If we sell the maximum offering of 85,000,000 shares, including the shares offered pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, the shares sold in this offering would represent 99.98% of our outstanding shares.

 

When shares are offered on a “best efforts” basis, the broker/dealers participating in the offering are only required to use their best efforts to sell the shares and have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the shares. Therefore, we may not sell all or any of the shares that we are offering.

 

This offering will not last beyond August 11, 2008 (two years from the date of our initial prospectus). However, we may continue to offer shares under our distribution reinvestment plan beyond that date and until we have sold the shares allocated pursuant to this offering for purchase pursuant to the plan. In some states, we may not be able to continue the offering for these periods without renewing the registration statement or filing a new registration statement. We may terminate this offering at any time.

 

Generally, you can buy shares only pursuant to this prospectus if you have either (1) a net worth of at least $45,000 and an annual gross income of at least $45,000, or (2) a net worth of at least $150,000. For this purpose, net worth does not include your home, home furnishings or personal automobiles. These minimum levels are higher in certain states, so you should carefully read the more detailed description under “Suitability Standards” on page i of this prospectus.

 

An investment in our shares may be appropriate for you if you meet the minimum suitability standards mentioned above, seek to diversify your personal portfolio with a real estate based investment, seek to preserve your capital contribution, seek to receive current income through our payment of distributions, wish to obtain the benefits of potential long-term capital appreciation and are able to hold your investment for a time period consistent with our liquidity plans. We cannot guarantee that we will achieve any of these objectives.

 

Yes. Our charter contains restrictions on the ownership of our shares that prevent any one person from owning more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares, or more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of our outstanding common shares, unless exempted by our board of directors. See “Description of Shares — Restriction on Ownership of Shares.” Our charter also limits your ability to transfer your shares to prospective stockholders unless the transfer complies with minimum purchase requirements, which are described at “Plan of Distribution — Minimum Purchase Requirements.”

 

Yes. The section of this prospectus entitled “ERISA Considerations” describes the effect the purchase of shares will have on individual retirement accounts and retirement plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), and the Internal Revenue Code. ERISA is a federal law that regulates the operation of certain tax-advantaged retirement plans. Any retirement plan trustee or individual considering purchasing shares for a retirement plan or an individual retirement account should read this section of the prospectus very carefully.

 

Yes. For your initial purchase of our shares, you must generally invest at least $5,000. Once you have satisfied the minimum purchase requirement, any additional purchases of our shares must be in amounts of at least $100, except for additional purchases pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. The minimum investment levels may be higher in certain states, so you should carefully read the more detailed description under “Plan of Distribution — Minimum Purchase Requirements.”

 

If you choose to purchase shares in this offering, you will need to fill out a subscription agreement, like the one contained in this prospectus as Appendix A, for a specific number of shares and pay for the shares at the time you subscribe.

 

Yes. As of July 11, 2007, excluding shares purchased by our executive officers, directors and our advisor and its affiliates, we had received and accepted subscriptions in this offering for 234,477 shares of common stock, or $2,332,845, thereby exceeding the minimum offering. Having raised the minimum offering, the offering proceeds were released by the escrow agent to us and are available for the acquisition of properties and the other purposes disclosed in this prospectus. As of December 6, 2007, we have received aggregate gross offering proceeds, net of discounts, of approximately $36 million from the sale of approximately 3.6 million shares in this offering. As of December 6, 2007, approximately 71.4 million shares remained available for sale to the public, exclusive of shares available under our distribution reinvestment plan. Notwithstanding our minimum offering of $2,000,000 in gross offering proceeds, we will not sell any shares to Pennsylvania investors unless we raise a minimum of $37,500,000 in gross offering proceeds (including sales made to residents of other jurisdictions). Pending satisfaction of this condition, all Pennsylvania subscription payments will be placed in an account held by the escrow agent, U.S. Bank National Association, in trust for Pennsylvania subscribers’ benefit, pending release to us. If we have not reached this $37,500,000 threshold within 120 days of the date that we first accept a subscription payment from a Pennsylvania investor, we will, within 10 days of the end of that 120-day period, notify Pennsylvania investors in writing of their right to receive a refund with interest and without deductions for expenses. If you request a refund within 10 days of receiving that notice, we will arrange for the escrow agent to return promptly by check the funds deposited in the Pennsylvania escrow account and any interest to you. Amounts held in the Pennsylvania escrow account from Pennsylvania investors not requesting a refund will continue to be held for subsequent 120-day periods until we raise at least $37,500,000 or until the end of the subsequent escrow periods. At the end of each subsequent escrow period, we will again notify you of your right to receive a refund with interest and without deductions for expenses from the day after the expiration of the initial 120-day period.

 

We presently intend to effect a transaction that will provide liquidity to all of our holders of common stock within five to seven years from the completion of our offering stage, which we will view as complete upon the termination of our last public equity offering prior to the listing of our shares on a national securities exchange. However, there can be no assurance that we will effect such a liquidity event within this period or

at all. Our board of directors expects to make a preliminary determination regarding our liquidity event no later than five years after the completion of our offering stage. The board’s decision regarding when and if we effect a liquidity event may include, but is not limited to:

 

 

In making the decision as to which exit strategy to pursue, our board of directors will try to determine which transaction would result in greater long-term value for our stockholders. We cannot determine at this time the circumstances, if any, under which our board of directors will determine to list our shares on a national securities exchange. However, if we do not list our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange by August 11, 2018 (10 years from the currently anticipated date of completion of our offering stage), our charter requires that we either:

 

 

If our shares are not listed before August 11, 2018, we are under no obligation to actually sell our portfolio within a specified period of time since the precise timing of the sale will depend upon real estate and financial markets, economic conditions of the areas in which the properties are located, and U.S. federal income tax effects on stockholders that may be applicable in the future. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to liquidate our assets, and it should be noted that we will continue in existence until all of our assets are liquidated.

 

At the time you purchase the shares, they will not be listed for trading on a national securities exchange. In fact, there will not be any public market for the shares when you purchase them, and we cannot be sure if one will ever develop. In addition, our charter imposes restrictions on the ownership of our common stock, which will apply to potential purchasers of your stock. As a result, you may find it difficult to find a buyer for your shares and realize a return on your investment. See “Description of Shares — Restriction on Ownership of Shares.”

 

Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption plan that enables stockholders to sell their shares to us under limited circumstances as determined by the board of directors. However, under the terms of the mezzanine credit agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition of the South Central Timberland, we are prohibited from redeeming any shares until the mezzanine loan is repaid in full except for redemptions sought within two years of the death or qualifying disability of a stockholder.

 

Under the terms of the share redemption plan and following repayment of the mezzanine loan, after you have held your shares for at least one year, you may be able to sell your shares to us pursuant to our share redemption plan. Initially, we will repurchase shares under the share redemption plan at $9.10 per share. The initial redemption price will remain fixed until one year after we complete our offering stage. See “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan.” Thereafter, we will redeem shares at a price equal to 95% of the estimated per share value of the shares, as estimated by our advisor or another firm chosen for that purpose. The terms of our share redemption plan are more generous for redemptions sought within two years of a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability. See “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan.” There are, however, numerous restrictions on your ability to sell your shares to us under the share redemption plan. For example, the dollar amount we pay in connection with all redemptions during any calendar year may not exceed the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan during the calendar year and any additional amounts reserved for such purpose by our board of directors. In addition, there are other limits on our ability to redeem shares if the redemption is not sought within two years of a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability. Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption plan upon 30 days’ notice.

 

As a traditional corporation, we are not required to make any minimum distributions to our stockholders. Notwithstanding the lack of any federal income tax requirement that we do so, we intend to make regular cash distributions to our stockholders typically on a quarterly basis. However, we are prohibited from making any payments or distributions (or setting aside funds for any payments or distributions) to our stockholders until the mezzanine loan that we obtained in connection with the acquisition of the South Central Timberland is repaid in full, although we may seek to renegotiate the terms of the credit agreement prior to full repayment. See “Risk Factors — Risks Associated with Debt Financing,” “Timberland Investments — South Central Timberland — Financing,” “Description of Shares — Distributions” and “ Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan.”

 

Pursuant to our charter, our board of directors has the authority to determine when and if it is in our best interest to elect for us to be taxed as a REIT. Our board of directors has determined that it is in our best interest to delay our election of REIT status. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Election of REIT Status.” If we qualify and elect to be taxed as a REIT in the future, we will be required to make aggregate annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. REIT taxable income is computed without regard to the distributions paid deduction, excludes net capital gain, and does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). It is possible that substantially all of the income we generate from harvesting timber will constitute net capital gain for federal tax purposes. Unlike most existing REITs, therefore, we do not anticipate that the 90% distribution requirement applicable to REITs will require us to distribute substantial amounts of cash in order to remain qualified as a REIT. The actual amount and timing of distributions, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon a number of factors discussed in the section “Description of Shares — Distributions,” including:

 

 

We will be unable to make distributions until the full repayment of the mezzanine loan and the attainment of certain financial performance measures under the senior loan (although we may seek to renegotiate the terms of the credit agreements prior to their full repayment). See “Timberland Investments — South Central Timberland — Financing.” Upon our qualification as a REIT, our board of directors may authorize distributions in excess of those required for us to maintain REIT status, depending on our financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. We have not established a minimum distribution level.

 

Once our board authorizes distributions to stockholders, we expect to calculate our quarterly distributions based upon daily record dates so that investors may be entitled to distributions immediately upon purchasing our shares.

 

Yes. You may participate in our distribution reinvestment plan by checking the appropriate box on your subscription agreement or by filling out an enrollment form we will provide to you at your request. The purchase price for shares purchased under this plan will be equal to (1) $9.55 per share during this offering; (2) 95.5% of the offering price in any subsequent public equity offering during such offering; and (3) 95.5% of the most recent offering price for the first 12 months subsequent to the close of our last public equity offering prior to the listing of our shares on a national securities exchange. After that 12-month period, we will publish a per share valuation determined by our advisor or another firm chosen for that purpose, and distributions will be reinvested at the price determined by the valuation process. This valuation may bear little relationship to, and will likely exceed, what you might receive for your shares if you tried to sell them or if we liquidated the portfolio. We will not pay any selling commissions or dealer-manager fees in connection

with the sale of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, and our advisor will not be entitled to any expense reimbursements from the proceeds of these sales.

 

We may terminate our distribution reinvestment plan at our discretion at any time upon 10 days’ prior written notice to you. For more information regarding the distribution reinvestment plan, see “Description of Shares — Distribution Reinvestment Plan.”

 

As a result of the acquisition of the South Central Timberland, we are prohibited from making any payments or distributions (or setting aside funds for any payments or distributions) to any of our stockholders until the mezzanine loan we obtained in connection with the acquisition of the South Central Timberland is repaid in full, although we may seek to renegotiate the terms of the credit agreement prior to its full repayment. See “Risk Factors — Risks Associated with Debt Financing,” “Description of Shares — Distributions” and “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan.”

 

For periods during which we are not taxed as a REIT, a U.S. stockholder will be required to take into account as dividends any distributions made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Dividends distributed to a U.S. stockholder that is taxed as an individual generally should be treated as qualified dividend income, and thus taxed at capital gains rates, for taxable years beginning prior to 2011. To satisfy the holding period requirement, our common stock must be held for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date that is 60 days before the ex-dividend date with respect to such dividend. A U.S. stockholder that is a taxable corporation generally should qualify for the dividends received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will reduce the adjusted tax basis of a U.S. stockholder’s shares, and any amount in excess of both our current and accumulated earnings and profits and the adjusted tax basis will be treated as capital gain (long-term capital gain if the shares have been held for more than one year).

 

For periods during which we are taxed as a REIT, we expect that a significant portion of our distributions to our stockholders will be taxed at capital gains rates, which are currently lower for noncorporate U.S. taxpayers than the rates for ordinary income.

 

Yes, we will provide you with periodic updates on the performance of our company and your investment in us, including:

 

 

We will provide this information to you via U.S. mail or courier. However, with your permission, we may furnish this information to you by electronic delivery, including, with respect to our annual report, by notice of the posting of our annual report on our affiliated Web site, which is www.wellsref.com. We also will include on this Web site access to our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statement and other filings we make with the SEC, which filings will provide you with periodic updates on our company’s performance and the performance of your investment.

 

Your Form 1099-DIV tax information, if required, will be mailed by January 31 of each year.

 

If you have more questions about the offering, or if you would like additional copies of this prospectus, you should contact your registered representative or contact our dealer-manager:

 

Client Services Department

Wells Investment Securities, Inc.

6200 The Corners Parkway

Norcross, Georgia 30092-3365

Telephone: (800) 557-4830 or (770) 243-8282

Fax: (770) 243-8198

E-mail: investor.services@wellsref.com

 

One of our affiliates also maintains an Internet site at www.wellsref.com at which there is additional information about us and our affiliates. The contents of that site are not incorporated by reference in, or otherwise a part of, this prospectus.

 

An investment in our common stock involves various risks and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the following risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this prospectus before purchasing our common stock.

 

There is no current public trading market for our shares and we have no current plans to apply for listing on any public securities market. Our charter also prohibits the ownership of more than 9.8% in value of our outstanding shares, or more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of our outstanding common shares, unless exempted by our board of directors, which may inhibit large investors from desiring to purchase your shares. See “Description of Shares — Restriction on Ownership of Shares.” In addition, we have adopted a share redemption plan but we are not permitted to make any redemptions under the plan (except in cases of death or disability) until our mezzanine loan obtained in connection with the South Central Timberland acquisition has been repaid in full. Once we are able to allow share redemptions under our share redemption plan, the plan includes numerous restrictions that will limit your ability to sell your shares. Our board is also free to amend or terminate the plan upon 30 days’ notice after our offering is effective. We describe these restrictions in detail under “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan.” Therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. If you are able to sell your shares, you will likely have to sell them at a substantial discount to their public offering price. It is also likely that your shares will not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan. You should purchase our shares only as a long-term investment because of the illiquid nature of the shares.

 

While we are investing the proceeds of this offering, the continuing high demand for the type of properties we desire to acquire may cause any distributions and the long-term returns of our investors to be lower than they otherwise would. We believe the current market for timberland properties is extremely competitive. We will be competing for these timberland investments with other entities, including traditional corporations and REITs, forestry products companies, real estate limited partnerships, pension funds and their advisors, bank and insurance company investment accounts, individuals and other entities. Many of our competitors have more experience, greater financial resources, and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire properties than we do. The greater the number of entities and resources competing for timberland properties, the higher the acquisition prices of these properties will be, which could reduce our profitability and our ability to pay distributions to you. We cannot be sure that our advisor will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms or that, if our advisor makes investments on our behalf, our objectives will be achieved. The more money we raise in this offering, the greater will be our challenge to invest all of the net offering proceeds on attractive terms. If we, through our advisor, are unable to find suitable investments in properties promptly, we will hold the proceeds from this offering in an interest-bearing account or invest the proceeds in short-term, investment-grade investments and may, ultimately, liquidate. Delays we encounter in the selection and acquisition of properties would likely limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and reduce our stockholders’ overall returns.

 

We have acquired only one property and have not yet identified any additional properties that we will make with the proceeds of this offering. Our ability to identify well-performing properties and achieve our investment objectives depends upon the performance of our advisor in the acquisition of our investments and the determination of any financing arrangements. The large size of this offering increases the challenges that

our advisor will face in investing our net offering proceeds promptly in attractive properties, and the continuing high demand for the type of properties we desire to purchase increases the risk that we may pay too much for the properties that we do purchase. Because of the illiquid nature of our shares, even if we disclose information about our potential investments before we make them, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all.

If we are unable to raise substantial funds, we will be limited in the number and type of investments we may make, and the value of your investment in us will fluctuate with the performance of the specific properties we acquire.

 

This offering is being made on a “best efforts” basis, whereby the brokers participating in the offering are only required to use their best efforts to sell our shares and have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the shares. As a result, the amount of proceeds we raise in this offering may be substantially less than the amount we would need to achieve a broadly diversified timberland property portfolio. If we are unable to raise substantially more than the minimum offering amount, we will make fewer investments resulting in less diversification in terms of the number of investments owned, the geographic regions in which our properties are located, and the species and age of the timber located on those properties. In that case, the likelihood of our profitability being affected by the performance of any one of our properties will increase. Additionally, we are not limited in the number or size of our properties or the percentage of net proceeds we may dedicate to a single property. Your investment in our shares will be subject to greater risk to the extent that we lack a diversified portfolio of timberland properties.

We have a very limited operating history, which makes our future performance and the performance of your investment difficult to predict.

 

We have a very limited operating history. We were incorporated in September 2005, and completed our first investment in timberland on October 9, 2007. See “Timberland Investments — South Central Timberland.” You should not rely upon the past performance of other Wells-sponsored real estate programs. Such past performance was not related to the ownership of timberland property and would not predict our future results. Our lack of operating history significantly increases the risk and uncertainty you face in making an investment in our shares.

We expect our real estate investments to be concentrated in timberland properties, making us more vulnerable economically than if our investments were diversified.

 

We expect to invest primarily in real estate. Within the real estate industry, we intend to acquire and own timberland properties. We are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate. The risks resulting from a lack of diversification become even greater as a result of our current business strategy to invest primarily, if not exclusively, in timberland properties. A downturn in the real estate industry generally or the timber or forest products industries specifically could reduce the value of our properties. A downturn in the timber or forest products industries also could prevent our customers from making payments to us and, consequently, would prevent us from meeting debt service obligations or making distributions to our stockholders. The risks we face may be more pronounced than if we diversified our investments outside real estate or outside timberland properties.

We expect the majority of our income to qualify as capital gains income and, as a result, we may not be required to make substantial distributions.

 

As a traditional corporation, we are not required to make any minimum distributions to our stockholders. We intend to qualify as a REIT upon our satisfaction of certain organizational and operational requirements. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Election of REIT Status.” REITs are required to distribute 90% of their net taxable REIT ordinary income. However, unlike ordinary income such as rent, the Internal Revenue Code does not require REITs to distribute capital gains income. Accordingly, except with respect to income generated from a timberland property during the first year following our acquisition of that property, we do not believe that the Internal Revenue Code will

require us to distribute any material amounts of cash to maintain our REIT status once we are qualified as a REIT, given that we expect the majority of our income to come from timber sales and generally to be treated as a capital gain.

 

The actual amount and timing of distributions will be determined by our board of directors in its discretion and typically will depend upon the amount of funds available for distribution, which will depend on items such as current and projected cash requirements, tax considerations and restrictive covenants imposed on us by our credit agreements. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency may vary from time to time, and we may not make any distributions until we attain certain financial performance measures under the senior loan, and until the mezzanine loan that we obtained in connection with the acquisition of the South Central Timberland is repaid in full. See “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan.” Our long-term strategy is to fund the payment of quarterly distributions to our stockholders entirely from our funds from operations. However, during the early stages of our operations, we may need to borrow funds to make cash distributions. In the event that we are unable to consistently fund quarterly distributions to stockholders entirely from our funds from operations, the value of your shares upon the possible listing of our stock, the sale of our assets or any other liquidity event may be reduced. If we do become qualified as a REIT, the aggregate amount of cash distributed in any given year may exceed the amount of our “REIT taxable income” generated during the year, and the excess amount will be deemed a return of capital.

 

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of Leo F. Wells, III, Douglas P. Williams, Randall D. Fretz, Jess E. Jarratt, Brian M. Davis, Troy A. Harris, John C. Iverson and Don L. Warden, each of whom are key personnel of our advisor or Wells Capital, its manager, and would be difficult to replace. We do not have employment agreements with any of these key personnel, and we cannot guarantee that such persons will remain affiliated with us. Although Messrs. Wells, Williams and Fretz have entered into employment agreements with Wells Capital, these agreements are terminable at will by either party; thus, such persons may not remain affiliated with Wells Capital or us. If any of these key personnel were to cease their affiliation with our advisor or its manager, our operating results could suffer. We do not intend to maintain key-person life insurance on any person. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon the ability of our advisor and its manager to retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for retention of our advisor’s and its manager’s existing skilled personnel is intense, and our advisor and its manager may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. Further, we intend to establish strategic relationships with firms that have special expertise in certain services or as to timberland properties in certain geographic regions. Maintaining such relationships will be important for us to effectively compete with other investors for properties in such regions. We may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such relationships. If our advisor or its manager loses or is unable to obtain the services of highly skilled personnel or does not establish or maintain appropriate strategic relationships, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of your investment may decline.

 

Our advisor, Wells TIMO, is a newly formed entity that currently has only seven employees and will rely upon the employees of its manager, Wells Capital, to perform many of the services our advisor is required to perform for us. We are dependent on our advisor to select our investments and conduct our operations; thus, adverse changes in the financial health of Wells Capital could hinder our advisor’s ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments. As a general partner to many Wells-sponsored programs, Wells Capital may have contingent liability for the obligations of such partnerships. Enforcement of

such obligations against Wells Capital could result in a substantial reduction of its net worth. If such liabilities affected the level of services that Wells Capital could provide on behalf of Wells TIMO, our operations and financial performance could suffer as well, which would limit our ability to make distributions and decrease the value of your investment.

 

Maryland law provides that a director has no liability in that capacity if he performs his duties in good faith, in a manner he reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter provides generally that no independent director will be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages and that we will indemnify them for losses unless they are grossly negligent or engage in willful misconduct. We will also indemnify our independent directors for losses related to alleged state or federal securities laws violations unless the allegations are not successfully adjudicated or dismissed with prejudice or unless a properly informed court of competent jurisdiction has not otherwise determined that indemnification should be made. As a result, you and we may have more limited rights against our independent directors than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce your and our recovery from these persons if they act in a negligent manner. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our independent directors (as well as by our other directors, officers, employees and agents) in some cases, which would decrease the cash otherwise available for distribution to you.

 

We rely on Wells TIMO, our advisor, for the day-to-day operation of our business. Wells TIMO is a newly formed entity. Until Wells TIMO hires sufficient personnel of its own, which it may never do, it will rely on the personnel of its manager, Wells Capital, to perform many of the services Wells TIMO is required to perform as our advisor. Wells Capital and its affiliates, including Leo F. Wells, III, our President and the President of Wells Capital, Douglas P. Williams, our Executive Vice President and the Executive Vice President of Wells Capital, and Randall D. Fretz, our Senior Vice President and the Senior Vice President of Wells Capital, have interests in other Wells programs and engage in other business activities, including providing advisory services to Wells REIT II, Institutional REIT, Wells Total Return REIT and other Wells-sponsored real estate programs. As a result, they will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time among us and other Wells programs and activities in which they are involved. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than are necessary or appropriate to manage our business. If this occurs, the returns on our investments, and the value of your investment, may decline.

 

Our executive officers and one of our directors, Jess E. Jarratt, are also officers and directors of Wells Capital, our dealer-manager and other affiliated entities and Wells-sponsored programs, and one of our independent directors, E. Nelson Mills, serves on the boards of two other programs advised by Wells Capital, the owner of our advisor. As a result, they owe fiduciary duties to these various entities and their stockholders and limited partners, which fiduciary duties may from time to time conflict with the fiduciary duties that they owe to us and our stockholders. Their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could hinder the implementation of our business strategy and our investment and operational opportunities. If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, we may

be unable to generate the cash needed to make distributions to you and to maintain or increase the value of our assets. See “Management” for more information regarding our executive officers and directors.

Wells TIMO and its affiliates, including our officers and one of our directors, will face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and other programs advised by Wells Capital, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interest of our stockholders. The amounts payable to Wells TIMO upon termination of the advisory agreement may also influence decisions about terminating Wells TIMO or our acquisition or disposition of investments.

 

Under the advisory agreement between us, Wells Timberland OP and Wells TIMO and pursuant to the terms of the special units Wells TIMO owns in Wells Timberland OP, Wells TIMO is entitled to fees and other payments from us and Wells Timberland OP that are structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to Wells TIMO to perform in our best interest and in the best interest of our stockholders. However, because Wells TIMO does not maintain a significant equity interest in us and is entitled to receive substantial minimum compensation regardless of performance, its interests are not wholly aligned with those of our stockholders. As a result, these compensation arrangements could influence our advisor’s advice to us, as well as the judgment of the affiliates of Wells TIMO who serve as our officers or directors. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

 

 

Wells TIMO will have considerable discretion with respect to the terms and timing of acquisition and disposition transactions. Considerations relating to its affiliates’ compensation from other programs could result in decisions that are not in the best interest of our stockholders, which could hurt our ability to pay you distributions or result in a decline in the value of your investment.

 

Our independent directors rely on information and recommendations provided by Wells TIMO to determine the fees and other amounts payable to Wells TIMO and its affiliates pursuant to the terms of the

advisory agreement and the special units in Wells Timberland OP. As a result, these fees and payments cannot be viewed as having been determined on an arm’s-length basis and we cannot assure you that an unaffiliated third party would not be willing and able to provide to us similar services at a lower price. Please see “Management Compensation” for a description of the fees and other amounts payable to Wells TIMO and its affiliates. Because the advisory agreement must be renewed on an annual basis, our independent directors may increase the fees and other amounts payable to Wells TIMO in future renewals. If the fees and other amounts we pay Wells TIMO are increased, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and make investments will be reduced. See “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures — Other Charter Provisions Relating to Conflicts of Interest” for more information regarding our advisor’s compensation.

 

Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors, upon our qualification as a REIT, to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of directors, no person may own more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares, or more than 9.8% (in value or in shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of our outstanding common shares. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.

 

Our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. Such preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price to holders of our common stock.

 

We do not intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act that impose, among other things:

 

 

In order to maintain our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of this offering in properties, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by

temporarily investing any unused proceeds in government securities with low returns. This would reduce the cash available for distribution to investors and possibly lower your returns.

 

To maintain compliance with the Investment Company Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and which would be important to our investment strategy. If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

 

Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our stockholders have a right to vote only on limited matters. Our board’s broad discretion in setting policies and our stockholders’ inability to exert control over those policies increases the uncertainty and risks you face as a stockholder. For more information, see “Description of Shares — Meetings and Special Voting Requirements.”

 

Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption plan, but there are significant conditions and limitations that would limit your ability to sell your shares under the plan. In addition, our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption plan upon 30 days’ notice and without stockholder approval.

 

As a result of the acquisition of the South Central Timberland, we are prohibited from redeeming any shares under our share redemption plan until the mezzanine loan we obtained in connection with the acquisition of the South Central Timberland is repaid in full except for redemptions sought within two years of the death or qualifying disability of the stockholder. Once we are able to allow share redemptions under our share redemption plan, generally, you will have to have held your shares for at least one year in order to participate in our share redemption plan. We will limit the number of shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption plan as follows: (1) during any calendar year, we will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year; and (2) we may not redeem shares on any redemption date to the extent that such redemptions would cause the amount paid for redemptions (other than those following an investor’s death or qualifying disability) since the beginning of the then-current calendar year to exceed the sum of (x) the net proceeds from the sale of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan during such period and (y) any additional amounts reserved for such purpose by our board of directors. These limits might prevent us from accommodating all redemption requests made in any year. Initially, we will repurchase shares under our share redemption plan at $9.10 per share. The initial redemption price will remain fixed until one year after we complete our offering stage. See “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan.” Thereafter, we will redeem shares at a price equal to 95% of the estimated per share value of the shares, as estimated by our advisor or another firm chosen for that purpose. These restrictions will severely limit your ability to sell your shares should you require liquidity and will limit your ability to recover the value you invested. See “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan” for more information about the share redemption plan.

 

The offering price of the shares bears no relationship to our book or asset values or to any other established criteria for valuing shares. The board of directors considered the following factors in determining the offering price:

 

 

Because the offering price is not based upon any independent valuation, the offering price may not be indicative of the proceeds that you would receive upon liquidation. Further, the offering price may be significantly more than the price at which the shares would trade if they were to be listed on an exchange or actively traded by broker/dealers.

 

The dealer-manager, Wells Investment Securities, is one of our affiliates and will not make an independent review of our company or the offering. Accordingly, you do not have the benefit of an independent review of the terms of this offering. Further, the due diligence investigation of our company by the dealer-manager cannot be considered to be an independent review and, therefore, may not be as meaningful as a review conducted by an unaffiliated broker/dealer.

 

Potential investors in this offering do not have preemptive rights to any shares we issue in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue one billion shares of stock, of which 900 million shares are designated as common stock and 100 million are designated as preferred stock. Our board of directors may amend our charter to increase the number of authorized shares of stock without stockholder approval. After your purchase in this offering, our board may elect to (1) sell additional shares in this or future public offerings; (2) issue equity interests in private offerings; (3) issue shares of our common stock upon the exercise of the options we may grant to our independent directors or to employees of Wells TIMO or Wells Capital; (4) issue shares to our advisor, its successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding fee obligation; or (5) issue shares of our common stock to sellers of properties we acquire in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of Wells Timberland OP. To the extent we issue additional equity interests after your purchase in this offering, your percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. Further, depending upon the terms of such transactions, most notably the offering price per share, which may be less than the price paid per share in any offering under this prospectus, and the value of our properties, existing stockholders also may experience a dilution in the book value of their investment in us.

 

Wells TIMO and its affiliates will perform services for us in connection with the offer and sale of our shares, the selection and acquisition of our investments, the management of our properties and the administration of our other investments. We will pay Wells TIMO and its affiliates substantial fees for these services. Payment of these fees will result in immediate dilution to the value of your investment and will reduce the amount of cash available for investment in properties or distribution to stockholders. As a result of these substantial fees, we expect that for each share sold in this offering, no more than $9.11 per share will be available for the purchase of properties, depending primarily upon the number of shares we sell and assuming all shares sold under our distribution reinvestment plan are sold for $9.55 per share. Wells TIMO, as the holder of the special units, also may be entitled to receive a distribution upon the sale of our properties and/or

a payment in connection with the redemption of the special units upon the earlier to occur of specified events, including the listing of our shares on a national securities exchange or the termination of the advisory agreement. See “Management Compensation.” These payments to Wells TIMO increase the risk that the amount available for distribution to stockholders upon a liquidation of our portfolio would be less than the purchase price of the shares in this offering. Substantial up-front fees also increase the risk that you will not be able to resell your shares at a profit, even if our shares are listed on a national securities exchange.

 

As of the date of this prospectus, our sponsor had invested approximately $203,000 in us, primarily by funding the purchase of the following equity interests held by our advisor: (1) 20,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $10.00 per share; (2) 200 common units in Wells Timberland OP at $10.00 per unit; and (3) 100 special units in Wells Timberland OP at $10.00 per unit. Our sponsor transferred its interest in our shares and in the common and special units of Wells Timberland OP to our advisor on December 28, 2006. Our advisor must retain this $200,000 investment in us for so long as it remains our advisor. If we are successful in raising enough proceeds to be able to reimburse our advisor for the significant organization and offering expenses of this offering, our advisor will have little exposure to loss. Without this exposure, our investors may be at a greater risk of loss because our advisor does not have as much to lose from a decrease in the value of our shares as do those sponsors who make more significant equity investments in the companies they organize.

 

We have issued, without stockholder approval, 32,128 shares of Series A preferred stock. If we are liquidated or dissolved, the holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive the issue price of $1,000 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, before any payment may be made to the holders of our common stock. As a result, the amount of funds holders of our common stock would otherwise receive upon a liquidation or dissolution would be reduced in the event the Series A preferred shares had not been redeemed prior to such an event.

 

We anticipate that the customers who agree to purchase our timber under supply contracts will range in credit quality from high to low. We will assume the full credit risk of these parties, as we will have no payment guarantees under the contract or insurance if one of these parties fails to make payments to us. While we intend to acquire timberland properties in well-developed and active timber markets with access to numerous customers, we may not be successful in this endeavor. Depending upon the location of the timberland properties we acquire and the supply agreements we enter into, our supply agreements may be concentrated among a small number of customers. Even though we may have legal recourse under our contracts, we may not have any practical recourse to recover payments from some of our customers if they default on their obligations to us. Any bankruptcy or insolvency of our customers, or failure or delay by these parties to make payments to us under our agreements, would cause us to lose the revenue associated with these payments and could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders.

 

We anticipate that we will sell portions of our timberland property base from time to time in the event that we determine that certain properties have become more valuable for development, recreation, conservation

and other uses than for growing timber, which we refer to as higher and better use property. A number of factors, including a slow-down in commercial or residential real estate development or a reduction in the availability of public funding for conservation projects, could reduce the demand for these properties and reduce any revenues that we could realize from our land sale program.

 

Some governmental agencies, principally the U.S.D.A. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management, own large amounts of timberland. If these agencies choose to sell more timber from their timberland holdings than they have been selling in recent years, timber prices could fall and our revenues could be reduced. Any large reduction in the revenues we expect to earn from our timberland investments may reduce the returns, if any, we are able to achieve for our stockholders.

 

Our operating results will be affected by the cyclical nature of the forest products industry. Unlike other REITs that are parties to leases and other contracts providing for relatively stable payments over a period of years, our operating results will depend on prices for timber that can experience significant variation and have been historically volatile. Like other participants in the forest products industry, we have limited direct influence over the timing and extent of price changes for cellulose fiber, timber and wood products. Although some of the supply agreements we will enter into fix the price of our harvested timber for a period of time, these contracts may not protect us from the long-term effects of price declines and may restrict our ability to take advantage of price increases.

 

The demand for timber and wood products is affected primarily by the level of new residential construction activity, the supply of manufactured timber products, including imports of timber products, and, to a lesser extent, repair and remodeling activity and other commercial and industrial uses. The demand for timber also is affected by the demand for wood chips in the pulp and paper markets and for hardwood in the furniture and other hardwood industries. The demand for cellulose fiber is related to the demand for disposable products such as diapers and feminine hygiene products. These activities are, in turn, subject to fluctuations due to, among other factors:

 

 

Decreases in the level of residential construction activity generally reduce demand for logs and wood products. This can result in lower revenues, profits, and cash flows. In addition, increases in the supply of logs and wood products, at both the local and national level, during favorable price environments also can lead to downward pressure on prices. Timber owners generally increase production volumes for logs and wood products during favorable price environments. Such increased production, however, when coupled with even modest declines in demand for these products in general, could lead to oversupply and lower prices. For example, the federal government owns a large amount of timberland. If the federal government chooses to sell more timber than it has been selling in recent years, then timber prices could fall. Additionally, wood products are subject to increasing competition from a variety of substitute products, including nonwood and engineered wood products. Oversupply can result in lower revenues, profits, and cash flows to us and could impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

 

The volume and value of timber that can be harvested from the timberlands we acquire may be limited by natural disasters such as fire, hurricane, earthquake, insect infestation, drought, disease, ice storms,

windstorms, flooding and other weather conditions and natural disasters, as well as other causes such as theft, trespass, condemnation or other casualty. We do not intend to maintain insurance for any loss to our standing timber from natural disasters or other causes. Any funds used for such losses may reduce cash available for distributions to our stockholders.

 

The forest products industry is highly competitive in terms of price and quality. We are a newly organized company with limited resources and we do not currently own any timberland. Many of our competitors, both domestic and international, have substantially greater financial and operating resources and are better able to absorb the risks of timberland investing. In recent years, the timberland investment business has experienced increasing competition for the purchase of timberland properties from both commercial and residential real estate developers as a result of urban and suburban expansion. We expect this trend to continue. Many real estate developers have substantially greater financial resources than our company. In addition, many developers tend to use high relative amounts of leverage to acquire development parcels, which we may not be willing or able to incur. Purchases of timberland parcels for development not only reduce the amount of suitable timberland investment properties, but also tend to separate larger, existing timberland properties into smaller units, which have reduced economies of scale and are less desirable for harvesting and the future marketability of the property for timber harvesting or other uses. Competition from real estate developers and others limits the amount of suitable timberland investments available for us to acquire, and any increase in the prices we expect to pay for timberland may reduce the returns, if any, we are able to achieve for our stockholders.

 

Weather conditions, timber growth cycles, property access limitations, and regulatory requirements associated with the protection of wildlife and water resources may restrict harvesting of timberlands as may other factors, including damage by fire, hurricane, earthquake, insect infestation, disease, prolonged drought and other natural disasters. Furthermore, we may choose to invest in timberlands that are intermingled with sections of federal land managed by the U.S.D.A. Forest Service or other private owners. In many cases, access might be achieved only through a road or roads built across adjacent federal or private land. In order to access these intermingled timberlands, we would need to obtain either temporary or permanent access rights to these lands from time to time. Our revenue, net income and cash flow from our operations will be dependent to a significant extent on the continued ability to harvest timber on our timberland at adequate levels and in a timely manner.

 

We will be subject to regulation under, among other laws, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Endangered Species Act, as well as comparable state laws and regulations. Violations of various statutory and regulatory programs that apply to our operations could result in civil penalties; damages, including natural resource damages; remediation expenses; potential injunctions; cease-and-desist orders; and criminal penalties.

 

We may engage in the following activities that are subject to regulation:

 

 

 

Laws and regulations protecting the environment have generally become more stringent in recent years and could become more stringent in the future. Some environmental statutes impose strict liability, rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to the person’s negligence or fault. While timberland properties do not generally carry as high a risk of environmental contamination as certain other real estate assets such as industrial properties, we may acquire timberlands subject to environmental liabilities, such as cleanup of hazardous substance contamination and other existing or potential liabilities of which we are not aware, even after investigations of the properties. We may not be able to recover any of these liabilities from the sellers of these properties. The cost of these cleanups could therefore increase our operating costs and reduce our profitability and cash available to make distributions to our stockholders. The existence of contamination or liability also may materially impair our ability to use or sell an affected timberland property.

 

The Endangered Species Act and comparable state laws protect species threatened with possible extinction. A number of species present on timberlands in the United States have been, and in the future may be, protected under these laws, including the northern spotted owl, marbled murrelet, bald eagle, several trout and salmon species in the Northwest; and the red-cockaded woodpecker, bald eagle, wood stork, red hill salamander and flatwoods salamander in the South. Protection of threatened and endangered species may include restrictions on timber harvesting, road building and other forest practices on private, federal and state land containing the affected species. The size of the area subject to restriction will vary depending on the protected species at issue, the time of year and other factors, but can range from less than one to several thousand acres.

 

We expect that environmental groups and interested individuals will intervene with increasing frequency in the regulatory processes in the states where we intend to seek to acquire timberland properties with the proceeds of this offering. For example, if we acquire timberland property in Washington State, we would be required to file a Forest Practice Application for each unit of timber to be harvested. These applications may be denied or restricted by the regulatory agency or appealed by other parties, including citizens groups. Environmental groups and interested individuals may also appeal individual forest practice applications or file petitions with the Forest Practices Board to challenge the regulations under which forest practices are approved. Appeals or actions of the regulatory agencies could delay or restrict timber harvest activities pursuant to these permits, and delays or harvest restrictions on a significant number of applications could result in increased costs. In addition to intervention in regulatory proceedings, interested groups and individuals may file or threaten to file lawsuits that seek to prevent us from implementing our operating plans. Any lawsuit or even a threatened lawsuit could delay harvesting on our timberlands. Among the remedies that could be enforced in a lawsuit is a judgment entirely preventing or restricting harvesting on a part of our targeted timberland properties.

 

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more timberland properties in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions is limited. The real estate market is affected by many factors that are beyond our control, including:

 

 

As part of our business plan and as necessary, we intend to sell portions of our timberland property holdings during opportunistic times. We plan on selling timberland to third parties who intend to put the timberland to a higher and better use and therefore may be willing to compensate us for the land in excess of prices we would typically receive if the land remained as timber-producing property. In acquiring a timberland property, however, and in entering into long-term supply agreements, we may agree to lock-out provisions that materially restrict us from selling that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These factors and any others that would impede our ability to respond to market opportunities could result in lower distributions to our stockholders than would be available if we were able to quickly respond to such market opportunities.

 

In some instances we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default, which could negatively impact our cash distributions to stockholders. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of the proceeds of sales to our stockholders, or our reinvestment of such proceeds in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon a sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced, or otherwise disposed of.

 

The quality and reliability of data concerning timberland properties varies greatly. Professional foresters collect data on species, volumes and quantities of timber on a particular property by conducting “cruises” through the property. During these cruises, foresters sample timber stands at specified intervals and locations that have been pre-determined by forest statisticians. A cruise that is poorly designed or executed can result in misleading data. In addition, errors in compiling the data may lead to erroneous estimates of the volume and quality of the timber on a particular property. The latest inventory data available at the time of a timberland transaction may be based on cruises that are more than a year old. Timberland cruises are time-consuming and expensive, and, as a result, are not usually conducted on an annual basis. Consequently, timber inventories are often updated without a cruise by subtracting out the volume of timber that was harvested (usually an accurate number) and by adding in the volume of estimated tree growth (usually a less accurate number than the removal number). We may not be able to require an adjustment to the property purchase price from the seller if a post-acquisition cruise reveals a significant difference in timber volumes or quality from the pre-acquisition data. If we are unable to obtain or develop accurate and reliable data related to the timberland in which we invest, then our assumptions, forecasts and valuations relating to those timberlands will be incorrect. As a result, we may not be able to realize the anticipated returns from those timberlands or to sell the property for the price that we anticipated, which could negatively impact our financial condition and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.

 

We rely upon estimates of the timber growth rates and yield when acquiring and managing our timberland properties. These estimates are central to forecasting our anticipated timber revenues and expected cash flows. Growth rates and yield estimates are developed by forest statisticians using measurements of trees in research plots on a property. The growth equations predict the rate of height and diameter growth of trees so foresters can estimate the volume of timber that may be present in the tree stand at a given age. Tree growth varies by soil type, geographic area and climate. Inappropriate application of growth equations in forest management planning may lead to incorrect estimates of future volumes. If these estimates are incorrect, our ability to manage our timberland in a profitable manner will be diminished, which may interfere with our ability to make distributions to stockholders.

 

Our expenses may be increased by assessments of our timberland properties and changes in property tax laws. We generally intend to hold our timberland properties for a substantial amount of time. Property values tend to increase over time, and, as property values increase, the related property taxes generally also increase, which would increase the amount of taxes we pay. In addition, changes to state tax laws or local initiatives could also lead to higher tax rates on our timberland properties. Because each parcel of a large timberland property is independently assessed for property tax purposes, our timberland properties may receive a higher assessment and be subject to higher property taxes. In some cases, the cost of the property taxes may exceed the income that could be produced from that parcel of property if we continue to hold it as timberland. If our timberland properties become subject to higher tax rates, the revenues that we use to pay distributions could be diminished and our stockholders may receive a lower return on their investment.

 

An increase in the value of other properties in the vicinity of our timberland properties may prompt us to sell parcels of our land as higher and better use, or HBU, properties. Local, county and state regulations may prohibit us from, or penalize us for, selling a parcel of timberland for real estate development. Some states regulate the number of times that a large timberland property may be subdivided within a specified time period, which would also limit our ability to sell our HBU property. In addition, in some states timberland is subject to certain property tax policies that are designed to encourage the owner of the timberland to keep the land undeveloped. These policies may result in lower taxes per acre for our timberland properties as long as they are used for timber purposes only. However, if we sell a parcel of timberland in such states as a HBU property, we may trigger tax penalties, which could require us to repay all of the tax benefits that we have received. Our inability to sell our HBU land on terms that are favorable to us could negatively affect our financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

 

When we acquire properties, we likely will expect to realize revenues from timber and non-timber related activities, such as the sale of conservation easements and hunting and recreation leases. Non-timber activities can contribute significantly to the revenues that we derive from a particular property. We will rely on estimates to forecast the amount and extent of revenues from non-timber related activities on our timberland properties. If our estimates concerning the revenue from non-timber related activities are incorrect, we will not be able to realize the projected revenues. If we are unable to realize the level of revenues that we expect from non-timber activities, our revenues from the underlying timberland would be less than expected and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be negatively impacted.

 

A portion of our timberland portfolio may consist of properties located in timber-producing regions outside of the U.S. These international investments could cause our business to be subject to unexpected, uncontrollable and rapidly changing events and circumstances in addition to those experienced in U.S. locations. Adverse changes in the following factors, among others, could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders:

 

 

 

We borrowed approximately $160,000,000 to fund a portion of the purchase price of the South Central Timberland in the form of a mezzanine loan, which we must repay on or before October 17, 2008. Additionally, we borrowed $212,000,000 in the form of a senior loan, which we must repay on or before September 9, 2010. The mezzanine loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority security interest in the funds raised in this offering. The senior loan is secured by, among other things, a second priority security interest in the funds raised in this offering. Our ability to repay the mezzanine loan and the senior loan is dependent upon our success in raising substantial funds pursuant to this offering. If the amount of proceeds we raise in this offering is less than the amount that we need to repay the mezzanine loan and the senior loan, respectively, when due, then we will be in default under the mezzanine loan or the senior loan, as the case may be. If we default on the mezzanine loan, the lenders for such loan will be entitled to all of the proceeds of our offering up to the amount of the mezzanine loan. If we default on the senior loan, the lenders for such loan will be entitled to all of the proceeds of our offering, after repayment of the mezzanine loan, up to the amount of the senior loan. If the lenders under either loan foreclose upon their security interest in a substantial amount of proceeds of our offering, our existing stockholders could lose some or all of their investment and it would be unlikely that we would be able to meet our investment objectives or to raise additional capital in this offering or otherwise in order to continue our operations. We have guaranteed both the senior loan and the mezzanine loan, but on a limited basis that covers only losses incurred by CoBank, ACB or Wachovia Bank due to certain bad acts of the borrowers and related loan parties. The mezzanine loan is also fully guaranteed by Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc.

 

The mezzanine loan contains restrictive covenants that prohibit us from declaring, setting aside funds for, or paying any dividend, distribution or other payment to our stockholders while the loan is outstanding. As a result, we will be unable to make any payments or distributions (or set aside funds for any payments or distributions) to our stockholders until the mezzanine loan is repaid in full. The mezzanine loan has a maturity date of October 17, 2008, and the senior loan has a maturity date of September 9, 2010. Because distributions of at least 90% of REIT taxable income is one of the requirements for REIT qualification, we may not be able to qualify as a REIT until, among other things, the mezzanine loan is repaid in full, or the terms of the credit agreement are amended prior to its full repayment (although no assurance can be made that we may be able to renegotiate the terms of the credit agreement). Additionally, the credit agreement for the mezzanine loan prohibits us from redeeming our stockholders’ shares under our share redemption plan until the mezzanine loan has been repaid in full. Until the mezzanine loan has been repaid in full, we are permitted to redeem shares only if the redemption is sought within two years of the death or qualifying disability of a stockholder under the plan.

 

We have acquired, and in the future may acquire, real properties by borrowing funds. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real properties. If we become qualified as a REIT, we may also borrow funds if needed to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable

income to our stockholders. We may also borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

 

Significant borrowings by us increase the risks of your investment. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from properties and the cash flow needed to service our indebtedness, then the amount available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of your investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt on behalf of the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages or other indebtedness contains cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single loan could affect multiple properties.

 

If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to finance the purchase of properties. If we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans become due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance the properties, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance properties. If any of these events occurs, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to you and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing more stock or by borrowing more money.

 

When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue any insurance coverage that we may have, or replace our advisor. These or other limitations may limit our flexibility and our ability to achieve our operating plans.

 

We have incurred significant indebtedness under the terms of the mezzanine loan and the senior loan obtained by us in connection with the acquisition of the South Central Timberland and may incur additional debt in the future. Interest we pay under both the mezzanine loan and the senior loan and any other debt we incur will reduce our cash available for distributions. Additionally, if we incur variable-rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest cost, which would reduce our cash flows and our ability to pay distributions to you. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of high interest rates, we could be required to sell one or more of our investments in order to repay the debt, which sale at that time might not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.

 

Our charter does not limit us from incurring debt until our aggregate debt would exceed 300% of our net assets (generally expected to approximate 75% of the cost of our assets before noncash reserves and

depreciation), unless the excess borrowing over such level is approved by a majority of the independent directors. Our board (including the independent directors) unanimously approved our borrowing in excess of the 300% net assets limitation in order to obtain the mezzanine loan and the senior loan in connection with the acquisition of the South Central Timberland. This borrowing significantly increased our debt levels. These higher debt levels may cause us to incur higher interest charges on any additional debt incurred in the future, will result in higher debt service payments in order to service the higher debt levels, and have been accompanied by additional restrictive covenants such as the prohibition on paying distributions or redeeming shares until the mezzanine loan is repaid in full (except for those redemptions allowed in cases of death or qualifying disability), and until certain financial performance measures are met under the senior loan. See “Description of Shares — Share Redemption Plan” and “Timberland Investments — South Central Timberland — Financing.” These factors limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of your investment. While we intend to comply with the provisions of our charter which require our independent directors to approve any borrowings in excess of 300% of our net assets, we have not established any fixed percentage of leverage that we will not exceed in the near term, and we cannot assure you that our independent directors will not approve any borrowings in excess of 300% of our net assets in the future. See “Business and Policies — Borrowing Policies.”

 

We may enter into joint ventures with third parties to acquire properties. We may also purchase properties in joint ventures or in partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of investment in real estate, including, for example:

 

 

Any of the above might subject a property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce your returns.

 

We acquired the South Central Timberland on October 9, 2007, and as of such date had not yet qualified as a REIT. We do not expect to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for our taxable years ending December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008. We may elect to be taxed as a REIT for a future year in which we otherwise qualify to be taxed as a REIT. We refer to the first day of the first taxable year in the future for which we qualify and elect to be taxed as a REIT as our “REIT commencement date.” If we have a net built-in gain in our assets as of the REIT commencement date and subsequently recognize gain on the disposition of any assets we hold at the REIT commencement date, then we will be subject to tax at the highest regular corporate rate during the 10-year period beginning on the REIT commencement date on the lesser of (A) the excess of the fair market value of the asset disposed of as of the REIT commencement date over our basis in the asset as of the REIT commencement date (the built-in gain with respect to that asset as of the REIT commencement date), (B) the amount of gain we would otherwise recognize on the disposition, or (C) the amount of net built-in gain in our assets as of the REIT commencement date not already recognized during the 10-year period. We would be subject to this tax liability even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT. Any recognized built-in gain will retain its character as ordinary income or capital gain and will be taken into account in determining REIT taxable income and our distribution requirement. Any tax on the recognized built-in gain will reduce REIT taxable income. If we elect REIT status in the future, we will have to determine whether we have a net built-

in gain as of the REIT commencement date. If we do, we may choose not to sell assets we might otherwise sell during the 10-year period in which the built-in gain tax applies in order to avoid the built-in gain tax. The IRS has issued a private letter ruling to another REIT indicating that the built-in gain tax would not apply to sales of timber sold during the 10-year period following its conversion to a REIT. We are not entitled to rely on that ruling and have not requested our own IRS ruling.

 

In addition, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot have at the end of any REIT taxable year any undistributed earnings and profits that are attributable to a non-REIT taxable year. We will monitor our earnings and profits position to allow us to be in a position to satisfy this requirement if our board of directors determines that we should elect to be taxed as a REIT.

 

We are not qualified as a REIT currently and are subject to federal and state and local income taxes on our taxable income. Our qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet, on an ongoing basis, requirements regarding our organization and ownership, distributions of our income, the nature and diversification of our income and assets, and other tests imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. We have no assurances that we will satisfy the requirements for REIT qualification now or in the future. Alston & Bird LLP, our legal counsel, will not review our compliance with the REIT qualification standards on an ongoing basis. Future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the federal income tax laws could be applied retroactively, which could result in our disqualification as a REIT.

 

If we do qualify as a REIT in the future and subsequently fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.

 

If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. In addition, you will be treated for tax purposes as having received an additional distribution to the extent the shares are purchased at a discount to fair market value. As a result, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may have to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the value of the shares of common stock received. See “Description of Shares — Distribution Reinvestment Plan — Tax Consequences of Participation.”

 

Even if we become qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income or property. For example:

 

 

 

Once we become qualified as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders each year 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain). At times, we may not have sufficient funds to satisfy these distribution requirements and may need to borrow funds to maintain our REIT status and avoid the payment of income and excise taxes. These borrowing needs could result from (1) differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes, (2) the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, or (3) the creation of reserves. We may need to borrow funds at times when the market conditions are unfavorable. Such borrowings could increase our costs and reduce the value of our common stock.

 

To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy tests on an ongoing basis concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, nature of our assets and the amounts we distribute to our stockholders. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at times when it would be more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

 

We intend to conduct a portion of our business activities through one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs. A TRS is a fully taxable corporation that may earn income that would not be qualifying REIT income if earned directly by us. Our use of TRSs will enable us to engage in non-REIT qualifying business activities, such as the sale of higher and better use properties. However, under the Internal Revenue Code, no more than 20% of the value of the assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. This limitation may affect our ability to increase the size of our non-REIT qualifying operations. Furthermore, because the income earned by our TRSs will be subject to corporate income tax and will not be subject to the requirement to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders, our use of TRSs may cause our common stock to be valued differently than the shares of other REITs that do not use TRSs as extensively as we expect to use them.

 

Upon qualification as a REIT, we would be subject to a 100% tax on any net income from “prohibited transactions.” In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property to customers in the ordinary course of business. Sales by us of higher and better use property at the REIT level could, in certain circumstances, constitute prohibited transactions.

 

We intend to avoid the 100% prohibited transaction tax upon qualification as a REIT by conducting activities that would be prohibited transactions through one or more TRSs. We may not, however, always be

able to identify properties that will become part of our “dealer” land sales business. Therefore, if we sell any higher and better use properties at the REIT level that we incorrectly identify as property not held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or that subsequently become properties held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to the 100% prohibited transactions tax.

 

There are special considerations that apply to pension, profit-sharing trusts or IRAs investing in our shares. If you are investing the assets of a pension, profit-sharing, 401(k), Keogh or other qualified retirement plan or the assets of an IRA in our common stock, you should satisfy yourself that:

 

 

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties, and can subject the fiduciary to equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, the fiduciary who authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested.

 

The annual statement of value will report the estimated value of each share of common stock as of the close of our fiscal year. Our advisor or another firm we choose for this purpose will prepare this annual estimated value of our shares based on the estimated amount that would be received if our assets were sold as of the close of the fiscal year and if the proceeds, together with our other funds, were distributed pursuant to a liquidation. For 12 months after the completion of our last public equity offering prior to the listing of our shares on a national securities exchange, our advisor will use the most recent price paid to acquire a share in that offering (ignoring purchase price discounts for certain categories of purchasers) as its estimated per share value of our shares. After that time, we would publish a per share valuation determined by our advisor or another firm chosen for that purpose. No independent appraisals of our assets will be required during the initial period or at any time thereafter. You should be aware that:

 

 

We will stop providing annual statements of value if our common stock becomes listed for trading on a national securities exchange. See “ERISA Considerations — Annual Valuation” for additional discussion regarding the annual statement of value.

 

Some of the information in this prospectus may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects. You can generally identify forward-looking statements by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue” or other similar words. You should not rely on our forward-looking statements because the matters they describe are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond our control.

 

These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those discussed above under “Risk Factors,” that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement we make. We do not undertake to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

The following table sets forth information about how we intend to use the estimated proceeds raised in this offering assuming that we sell a minimum of 200,000 shares of common stock, at $10.00 per share, a midrange point of 37,500,000 shares of common stock, at $10.00 per share, and the maximum of 75,000,000 shares of common stock, at $10.00 per share, in our primary offering. We also disclose information below regarding the estimated use of proceeds assuming we sell the maximum number of shares (85,000,000), including 10,000,000 shares of common stock, at $9.55 per share, pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. Many of the figures set forth below represent management’s best estimate since they cannot be precisely calculated at this time. Depending primarily on the number of shares we sell in the primary offering and the distribution reinvestment plan, we estimate that approximately 90.0% to 91.1% of our gross offering proceeds, or $9.00 to $9.11 per share, respectively, will be used for investments and the repurchase of shares under our share redemption plan, while the remainder will be used to pay offering expenses, including selling commissions and the dealer-manager fee, and to pay a fee to our advisor for its services in connection with the management of our real estate investments. We expect to meet all of our working capital needs out of cash flow from operations. However, to the extent that we have insufficient funds to meet our needs for working capital, we may establish reserves from gross offering proceeds. The allocation of shares sold pursuant to the primary offering and pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan will affect our gross proceeds and the amount available for investment. We have not given effect to any special sales or volume discounts that could reduce the amount of selling commissions shown below. The figures below reflect that we will not pay commissions or dealer-manager fees in connection with shares issued through our distribution reinvestment plan.

 

 

 

 

We operate under the direction of our board of directors. The board is responsible for the management and control of our affairs. The board has retained Wells TIMO to manage our day-to-day affairs and the acquisition and disposition of our investments, subject to the board’s supervision. Because of the numerous conflicts of interest created by the relationships among us, Wells TIMO and various affiliates, many of the actions taken by the board require the approval of a majority of our independent directors. See “Conflicts of Interest.”

 

We have a five-member board of directors, one of whom, Jess E, Jarratt, is affiliated with Wells Capital and its affiliates, and the four remaining directors qualify as “independent directors.” Our board may change the size of the board, but not to fewer than three board seats. Our charter provides that a majority of the directors must be “independent directors,” which is defined in our charter pursuant to the requirements of the North American Securities Administrators Association’s Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts. An “independent director” is a person who is not one of our officers or employees or an officer or employee of Wells TIMO or its affiliates and has not been so for the previous two years. Serving as a director of, or having an ownership interest in, another Wells-sponsored program will not, by itself, preclude independent director status. One of our independent directors, E. Nelson Mills, may face conflicts of interest because of his affiliations with other programs advised by Wells Capital and its affiliates.

 

Each director will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected. Although the number of directors may be increased or decreased, a decrease will not have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director. Any director may resign at any time and may be removed with or without cause by the stockholders upon the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting called for the purpose of the proposed removal. The notice of the meeting shall indicate that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to determine if the director shall be removed.

 

A vacancy created by an increase in the number of directors or the death, resignation, removal, adjudicated incompetence or other incapacity of a director may be filled only by a vote of a majority of the remaining directors. As provided in our charter, nominations of individuals to fill the vacancy of a board seat previously filled by an independent director will be made by the remaining independent directors.

 

Our directors and officers are not required to devote all of their time to our business and are only required to devote the time to our affairs as required by their fiduciary duties to us and as necessary to respond to relevant business conditions. In addition to meetings of the various committees of the board described below, we expect to hold regular board meetings at least quarterly. We do not expect that our directors will be required to devote a substantial portion of their time in discharging their duties to us. Our board is empowered to fix the compensation of all officers that it selects and may pay compensation to directors for services rendered to us in any other capacity.

 

Our general investment and borrowing policies are set forth in this prospectus. Our directors may establish further written policies on investments and borrowings and shall monitor our administrative procedures, investment operations and performance to ensure that the policies are fulfilled and are in the best interest of the stockholders. We will follow the policies on investments and borrowings set forth in this prospectus unless they are modified by our directors.

 

Many of the powers of the board of directors may be delegated to one or more committees. Our charter requires that each committee consist of at least a majority of independent directors.

 

The audit committee selects the independent public accountants to audit our annual financial statements, reviews with the independent public accountants the plans and results of the audit engagement, approves the audit and nonaudit services provided by the independent public accountants, reviews the independence of the independent public accountants, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees, and reviews the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. Our audit committee currently consists of E. Nelson Mills, Donald S. Moss and Willis J. Potts, Jr.

 

The primary functions of the nominating and corporate governance committee are: (1) identifying individuals qualified to serve on the board of directors and recommending that the board of directors select a slate of director nominees for election by the stockholders at the annual meeting; (2) developing and recommending to the board of directors a set of corporate governance policies and principles and periodically re-evaluating such policies and guidelines for the purpose of suggesting amendments to them if appropriate; and (3) overseeing an annual evaluation of the board of directors and each of the committees of the board of directors. Currently, all of the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are independent directors.

 

We have provided below certain information about our executive officers and directors.

 

 

Leo F. Wells, III.  Since our inception in September 2005, Mr. Wells has been our President. He served as one of our directors from inception until June 22, 2007. He served as the President of Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (formerly Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.), which we refer to as Piedmont REIT, from 1997 to February 2007, and he has served as a director of Piedmont REIT since 1997, the President and a director of Wells REIT II since 2003, the President and a director of Institutional REIT since 2006 and the President and Chairman of Wells Total Return REIT since March 2007. He has also been the sole stockholder, sole director, President and Treasurer of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. since 1997, which directly or indirectly owns Wells Capital, Wells Management Company, Inc., Wells Investment Securities, Wells & Associates, Inc., Wells Development Corporation, Wells Asset Management, Inc., Wells Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. and Wells TIMO. He has also been the President, Treasurer and sole director of Wells Capital since 1984; Wells Management Company, Inc. since 1983; Wells Development Corporation since it was organized in 1997 to develop real estate properties; and Wells Asset Management, Inc. since it was organized in 1997 to serve as an investment advisor to the Wells Family of Real Estate Funds. Since 1997, Mr. Wells has been a trustee of the Wells Family of Real Estate Funds, an open-end management company organized as an Ohio business trust, which includes as one of its series the Wells S&P REIT Index Fund. Since 2004, he has been President and sole director of Wells Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. He has been the President, Treasurer and a director of Wells & Associates, Inc., a real estate brokerage and investment company, since it was incorporated in 1978. Mr. Wells serves as the principal broker for Wells & Associates, Inc.

Mr. Wells was a real estate salesman and property manager from 1970 to 1973 for Roy D. Warren & Company, an Atlanta-based real estate company, and he was associated from 1973 to 1976 with Sax Gaskin Real Estate Company, during which time he became a Life Member of the Atlanta Board of Realtors Million Dollar Club. From 1980 to February 1985 he served as Vice President of Hill-Johnson, Inc., a Georgia corporation engaged in the construction business. Mr. Wells holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Economics from the University of Georgia. Mr. Wells is a member of the Financial Planning Association (FPA).

 

On August 26, 2003, Mr. Wells and Wells Investment Securities entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) with the NASD (now FINRA) relating to alleged rule violations. The AWC set forth the NASD’s findings that Wells Investment Securities and Mr. Wells had violated conduct rules relating to the provision of noncash compensation of more than $100 to associated persons of NASD member firms in connection with their attendance at the annual educational and due diligence conferences sponsored by Wells Investment Securities in 2001 and 2002. Without admitting or denying the allegations and findings against them, Wells Investment Securities and Mr. Wells consented in the AWC to various findings by the NASD that are summarized in the following paragraph:

 

In 2001 and 2002, Wells Investment Securities sponsored conferences attended by registered representatives who sold its real estate investment products. Wells Investment Securities also paid for certain expenses of guests of the registered representatives who attended the conferences. In 2001, Wells Investment Securities paid the costs of travel to the conference and meals for many of the guests and paid the costs of playing golf for some of the registered representatives and their guests. Wells Investment Securities later invoiced registered representatives for the cost of golf and for travel expenses of guests, but was not fully reimbursed for such. In 2002, Wells Investment Securities paid for meals for the guests. Wells Investment Securities also conditioned most of the 2001 conference invitations on attainment by the registered representatives of a predetermined sales goal for Wells Investment Securities products. This conduct violated the prohibitions against payment and receipt of noncash compensation in connection with the sales of these products contained in NASD’s Conduct Rules 2710, 2810 and 3060. In addition, Wells Investment Securities and Mr. Wells failed to adhere to all of the terms of their written undertaking made in March 2001 not to engage in the conduct described above, and thereby failing to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2110.

 

Wells Investment Securities consented to a censure, and Mr. Wells consented to suspension from acting in a principal capacity with an NASD member firm for one year. Wells Investment Securities and Mr. Wells also agreed to the imposition of a joint and several fine in the amount of $150,000. Mr. Wells’ one-year suspension from acting in a principal capacity with Wells Investment Securities ended on October 6, 2004.

 

Douglas P. Williams.  Since our inception in September 2005, Mr. Williams has been our Executive Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer. He served as one of our directors from inception until June 22, 2007. From 1999 to 2007, he has also served as Executive Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer and a director of Piedmont REIT. Since 2003, he has served as Executive Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer and a director of Wells REIT II. Since 2006, he has served as Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Institutional REIT. Since March 2007, he has served as Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Wells Total Return REIT. Since 1999, Mr. Williams has also been a Senior Vice President of Wells Capital and a Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a director of Wells Investment Securities, our dealer-manager. He has also been a Vice President of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. and Wells Asset Management, Inc. since 1999.

 

From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Williams served as Vice President and Controller of OneSource, Inc., a leading supplier of janitorial and landscape services, where he was responsible for corporate-wide accounting activities and financial analysis. Mr. Williams was employed by ECC International Inc., a supplier to the paper industry and to the paint, rubber and plastic industries, from 1982 to 1995. While at ECC, Mr. Williams served in a number of key accounting positions, including: Corporate Accounting Manager, U.S. Operations; Division Controller, Americas Region; and Corporate Controller, America/ Pacific Division. Prior to joining ECC and for

one year after leaving ECC, Mr. Williams was employed by Lithonia Lighting, a manufacturer of lighting fixtures, as a Cost and General Accounting Manager and Director of Planning and Control. Mr. Williams started his professional career as an auditor for a predecessor firm of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP. Mr. Williams is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Georgia Society of Certified Public Accountants and is licensed with FINRA as a financial and operations principal. Mr. Williams received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Dartmouth College and a Master of Business Administration degree from Amos Tuck School of Graduate Business Administration at Dartmouth College.

 

Randall D. Fretz.  Since our inception in September 2005, Mr. Fretz has been our Senior Vice President. He has also been a Senior Vice President of Wells Capital since 2002. He has also been the Chief of Staff and a Vice President of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. since 2002, a Senior Vice President of Piedmont REIT from 2002 to 2007, a Senior Vice President of Wells REIT II since 2003, a Senior Vice President of Institutional REIT since 2006, a Senior Vice President at Wells Total Return REIT since March 2007 and a director of Wells Investment Securities since 2002. Mr. Fretz is primarily responsible for corporate strategy and planning, advising and coordinating the executive officers of Wells Capital on corporate matters and special projects. Prior to joining Wells Capital in 2002, Mr. Fretz served for seven years as President of U.S. and Canada operations for Larson-Juhl, a world leader in custom art and picture-framing home decor. Mr. Fretz was previously a Division Director at Bausch & Lomb, a manufacturer of optical equipment and products, and also held various senior positions at Tandem International and Lever Brothers. Mr. Fretz holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology and Bachelor of Physical Education from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. He also earned a Master’s of Business Administration degree from the Ivey School of Business in London, Ontario.

 

Jess E. Jarratt.  Mr. Jarratt has served as one of our directors since June 22, 2007. He also has served as Senior Vice President of Wells Capital and President of Wells TIMO since March 2007. Mr. Jarratt is responsible for directing and managing all aspects of timberland operations for Wells including timberland acquisitions and dispositions, portfolio and property management, and timberland financing. From February 2006 through February 2007, Mr. Jarratt served as Managing Director of SunTrust Robinson Humphrey’s Structured Real Estate Group where he was responsible for structuring and purchasing net leased real estate for SunTrust’s dedicated equity account and originating financing vehicles for agricultural and timberland properties. From July 2001 through January 2006, Mr. Jarratt was Managing Director for SunTrust Robinson Humphrey’s Capital Markets Origination group where he originated and structured large, multi-capital transactions across SunTrust’s Corporate Banking unit. From July 1995 through July 2001, Mr. Jarratt was Group Vice President of SunTrust’s AgriFood Group which he founded and grew into a group of 20 professionals and over $1 billion in assets. From 1988 through July 1995, Mr. Jarratt was Vice President of Rabobank International, a multinational Dutch bank where he led corporate lending activities to U.S. agribusiness companies and timberland and forest products companies. From April 1985 through May 1988, Mr. Jarratt served as one of the original foresters for a predecessor entity to Hancock Timber Resource Group, one of the largest institutional managers of timber in the world. In his role as Timberland Investment Officer, Mr. Jarratt purchased and managed one of the fund’s first investments in timberland, including the merchandising of the property’s timber. Mr. Jarratt was also instrumental in the development of the financial analysis used to analyze the purchase of timberland by the company. From April 1983 through April 1985, Mr. Jarratt served as a Procurement Forester with the Kirby Lumber Company. His responsibilities in this role included the purchase of enough raw timber to supply a plywood mill, management of various relationships with dealers and suppliers, cruising prospective timber acquisitions and negotiating purchase prices with landowners. Prior to joining Kirby Lumber Company, Mr. Jarratt worked as a Timberland Purchase Forester responsible for building a land base for Nekoosa’s Ashdown Arkansas paper mill by originating, cruising, negotiating and closing on timberland purchases. Mr. Jarratt began his career as a Forester with the Texas Forest Service in August 1979 where he worked with private landowners to develop and implement forest management plans. Mr. Jarratt received a Bachelor of Science degree in Forestry from Texas A&M University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of North Texas. In addition, Mr. Jarratt is a Certified Management Accountant (CMA) and has completed the Harvard Business School Executive Agribusiness Program. Mr. Jarratt is a member of the Institute of Management Accounting.

Michael P. McCollum, Ph.D.  Dr. McCollum is one of our independent directors. He has worked in the forest products industry for the past 25 years. From June 1996 until his retirement in December 2005, Dr. McCollum led the Wood and Fiber Supply Division of Georgia-Pacific Corporation, one of the world’s leading manufacturers and distributors of tissue, pulp, paper, packaging, building products and related chemicals, and in January 2001 he became President of the Division. From July 1992 to June 1996, Dr. McCollum served in positions of increasing responsibility at Georgia-Pacific in the areas of forest management, wood and fiber supply, technical support and strategic planning. From February 1984 to July 1992, Dr. McCollum served in various positions at Temple-Inland Inc., a major forest products corporation. From January 1981 to February 1984, Dr. McCollum worked in the Wood Products Division of Manville Forest Products Corporation, a subsidiary of Johns Manville, a Berkshire Hathaway company and a leading manufacturer and marketer of premium-quality building and specialty products. Dr. McCollum received his Bachelor of Science degree in Forestry from the University of Arkansas and received a Ph.D. in Forest Science from Texas A&M University. Dr. McCollum is a member of the Society of American Foresters and has served on the boards of several industry and conservation associations.

 

E. Nelson Mills.  Mr. Mills is one of our independent directors. Since 2007, Mr. Mills has served as a director of Wells REIT II. Since 2006, Mr. Mills has served as a director of Institutional REIT. Since December 2004, Mr. Mills has served as the chief financial officer and chief operations officer of Williams Realty Advisors, where he is responsible for financial strategy, design, formation and operation of real estate investment funds. From April 2004 to December 2004, Mr. Mills was a consultant to and the chief financial officer of Timbervest, LLC, an investment manager specializing in timberland investment planning. From September 2000 to April 2004, Mr. Mills served as chief financial officer of Lend Lease Real Estate Investments, Inc. and from August 1998 to August 2000 served as a senior vice president of Lend Lease with responsibility for tax and acquisition planning and administration. Mr. Mills was a tax partner with KPMG LLP from January 1987 to August 1998. Mr. Mills received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from the University of Tennessee and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Georgia. Mr. Mills is also a Certified Public Accountant.

 

Donald S. Moss.  Mr. Moss is one of our independent directors. He is also an independent director of Piedmont REIT and a trustee of the Wells Family of Real Estate Funds. Mr. Moss was also an independent director of Wells REIT II from 2003 until 2007. He was employed by Avon Products, Inc. from 1957 until his retirement in 1986. While at Avon, Mr. Moss served in a number of key positions, including Vice President and Controller from 1973 to 1976, Group Vice President of Operations — Worldwide from 1976 to 1979, Group Vice President of Sales — Worldwide from 1979 to 1980, Senior Vice President — International from 1980 to 1983 and Group Vice President — Human Resources and Administration from 1983 until his retirement in 1986. Mr. Moss was also a member of the board of directors of Avon Canada, Avon Japan, Avon Thailand, and Avon Malaysia from 1980 to 1983. He formerly was a director of The Atlanta Athletic Club and the National Treasurer and a director of the Girls Clubs of America from 1973 to 1976. Mr. Moss graduated from the University of Illinois where he received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business.

 

Willis J. Potts, Jr.  Mr. Potts is one of our independent directors. From June 1999 until his retirement in June 2004, Mr. Potts served as vice president and general manager of Temple-Inland Inc., a major forest products corporation, where he was responsible for all aspects of the management of a major production facility, including timber acquisition, community relations and governmental affairs. From November 1994 to June 1999, Mr. Potts was senior vice president of Union Camp Corporation, where he was responsible for all activities of an international business unit, with revenues of approximately $1 billion per year including supervision of acquisitions and dispositions of timber and timberland, controllership functions and manufacturing. Mr. Potts is currently the chairman of the board of directors of the Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI), the largest technical association serving the pulp, paper and converting industry, where he is responsible for guiding the development of TAPPI’s long-term plans and short-term goals and objectives, including those related to the forest products industry. In 2006, Mr. Potts was appointed to the Board of Regents of The University System of Georgia. Mr. Potts received a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He also completed the Executive Program at the University of Virginia.

 

 

 

 

Our directors do not hold any stock awards. The aggregate number of option awards outstanding as of fiscal year end for all directors was 10,000.

 

The following table shows options awarded to each director during 2006, and the aggregate grant date fair value for each award, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards 123R.

 

 

 

 

We do not provide compensation for service on our board of directors to any member of our board who is not an independent director. Our independent directors receive an annual retainer of $18,000. In addition, independent directors receive fees for attending board and committee meetings as follows:

 

 

However, when a committee meeting occurs on the same day as a board meeting, an additional fee is not paid for attending the committee meeting.

 

All directors receive reimbursement of reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors.

 

In addition to cash compensation, upon his or her initial appointment to our board, each independent director receives a grant of options to purchase 2,500 shares of our common stock. One-third of the options are immediately exercisable on the date of grant, one-third become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and the remaining one-third will become exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant. The initial grant of options was anti-dilutive with an exercise price of $10.00 per share.

 

Upon each subsequent re-election of the independent director to the board, he or she will receive a subsequent grant of options to purchase 1,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price for the subsequent options will be the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. One-third of the subsequent grant of options are immediately exercisable on the date of grant, one-third become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and the remaining one-third will become exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of grant.

 

All stock options granted to our independent directors are granted pursuant to our long-term incentive plan, and are governed by the terms of such plan. The stock options will lapse on the first to occur of (1) the tenth anniversary of the date of grant, or (2) the removal for cause of the independent director as a member of the board of directors. Upon the occurrence of a change in control, or upon termination of the director’s service by reason of his or her death, disability or termination without cause, the options will become fully vested and exercisable. Options are generally exercisable in the case of death or disability for a period of one year after death or the termination by reason of disability. No option issued may be exercised if such exercise would jeopardize our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. The independent directors may not sell, pledge, assign or transfer their options other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution or (except in the case of an incentive stock option) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order.

 

We have adopted a long-term incentive plan. This incentive plan is intended to attract and retain qualified independent directors, advisors and consultants considered essential to our long-range success by offering these individuals an opportunity to participate in our growth through awards in the form of, or based on, our common stock. Although we do not currently intend to hire any employees, any employees we may hire in the future would also be eligible to participate in our long-term incentive plan. The incentive plan authorizes the granting of awards to participants in the following forms:

 

 

 

All awards must be evidenced by a written agreement with the participant, which will include the provisions specified by the board of directors or a committee of its independent directors. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise or grant of an award shall not exceed in the aggregate an amount equal to 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock on the date of grant of any such award. The exercise price of any award shall not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant.

 

Our board of directors, or a committee of its independent directors, administers the incentive plan, with sole authority (following consultation with our advisor) to select participants, determine the types of awards to be granted, and all of the terms and conditions of the awards, including whether the grant, vesting or settlement of awards may be subject to the attainment of one or more performance goals. No awards will be granted under the plan if the grant, vesting and/or exercise of the awards would jeopardize our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise violate the ownership and transfer restrictions imposed under our charter. Unless determined by our board of directors, or a committee of its independent directors, no award granted under the long-term incentive plan will be transferable except through the laws of descent and distribution or (except in the case of an incentive stock option) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order.

 

We have established 500,000 shares as the aggregate maximum number of shares to be reserved and available for issuance under the incentive plan. In the event of a corporate transaction that affects our common stock, such as a reorganization, recapitalization, merger, spin-off, split-off, stock dividend, or extraordinary distribution, the share authorization limits of the incentive plan will be adjusted proportionately, and our board of directors, or a committee of its independent directors, will have the sole authority to determine whether and in what manner to equitably adjust the number and type of shares and the exercise prices applicable to outstanding awards under the plan, the number and type of shares reserved for future issuance under the plan, and, if applicable, performance goals applicable to outstanding awards under the plan.

 

The incentive plan contains provisions concerning the treatment of awards granted under the plan in the event of a participant’s death or disability, or upon the occurrence of a change in control of our company. Unless otherwise provided in an award certificate or any special plan document governing an award, upon the participant’s death or disability, all of that participant’s outstanding options and stock appreciation rights will become fully vested and exercisable, all time-based vesting restrictions on that participant’s outstanding awards will lapse, and the payout opportunities attainable under all of that participant’s outstanding performance-based awards will vest based on target or actual performance (depending on the time during the performance period in which the date of termination occurs) and the awards will payout on a prorata basis, based on the time elapsed prior to the date of termination.

 

Unless otherwise provided in an award certificate or any special plan document governing an award, upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the incentive plan) in which awards are not assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection with the change in control in a manner approved by the board or the committee: (1) all outstanding options and stock appreciation rights

will become fully vested and exercisable; (2) all time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding awards will lapse; and (3) the payout opportunities attainable under all outstanding performance-based awards will vest based on target or actual performance (depending on the time during the performance period in which the change in control occurs) and the awards will payout on a prorata basis, based on the time elapsed prior to the change in control. With respect to awards assumed by the surviving entity or otherwise equitably converted or substituted in connection with a change in control, if within two years after the effective date of the change in control, a participant’s employment is terminated without cause or the participant resigns for good reason (as such terms are defined), then: (1) all of that participant’s outstanding options and SARs will become fully vested and exercisable; (2) all time-based vesting restrictions on that participant’s outstanding awards will lapse; and (3) the payout opportunities attainable under all of that participant’s outstanding performance-based awards will vest based on target or actual performance (depending on the time during the performance period in which the date of termination occurs) and the awards will payout on a prorata basis, based on the time elapsed prior to the date of termination.

 

The incentive plan will automatically expire on February 2, 2016, the tenth anniversary of the date on which it was adopted, unless extended or earlier terminated by the board of directors. The board of directors or the committee may terminate the incentive plan at any time, but termination will have no adverse impact on any award that is outstanding at the time of the termination. The board of directors or the committee may amend the incentive plan at any time, but any amendment would be subject to stockholder approval if, in the reasonable judgment of the board or committee, such approval would be required by any law, regulation or rule applicable to the incentive plan. No termination or amendment of the plan may, without the written consent of the participant, reduce or diminish the value of an outstanding award. The board may amend or terminate outstanding awards, but those amendments may require consent of the participant and, unless approved by the stockholders or otherwise permitted by the anti-dilution provisions of the plan, the exercise price of an outstanding option may not be reduced, directly or indirectly, and the original term of an option may not be extended.

 

Our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for monetary damages and requires us to indemnify our directors, our officers, Wells TIMO and its affiliates for losses they may incur by reason of their service in that capacity. However, we may not indemnify our directors, Wells TIMO or its affiliates unless all of the following conditions are met:

 

 

In addition, our charter provides that our limitation of director and officer liability and indemnification of directors and officers are subject to certain conditions set forth under Maryland law. The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that a Maryland corporation may not (a) limit the liability of its directors and officers if such liability results from (1) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (2) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as material to the cause of action and (b) indemnify its directors and officers if it is established that (1) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (2) the director or officer actually received an improper personal

benefit in money, property or services or (3) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful.

 

The SEC and some state securities regulators take the position that indemnification against liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 is against public policy and unenforceable. Furthermore, our charter prohibits the indemnification of our directors, Wells TIMO or its affiliates or broker/dealers for liabilities arising from or out of a violation of state or federal securities laws, unless one or more of the following conditions are met:

 

 

Our charter further provides that the advancement of funds to our directors and to Wells TIMO and its affiliates for reasonable legal expenses and other costs incurred in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding for which indemnification is being sought is permissible only if all of the following conditions are satisfied:

 

 

We also purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of all of our directors and executive officers against liability asserted against or incurred by them in their official capacities with us, whether or not we are required or have the power to indemnify them against the same liability.

 

Our sponsor is Wells Capital. Since its incorporation in Georgia on April 20, 1984, Wells Capital has sponsored or advised public real estate programs on an unspecified property, or “blind pool” basis, that have raised approximately $11.7 billion of equity from approximately 267,000 investors. Our advisor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wells Capital and Wells Capital is the manager of our advisor. Some of our officers and directors are also officers and directors of Wells Capital.

 

The directors and executive officers of Wells Capital are as follows:

 

The backgrounds of Messrs. Wells, Williams, Fretz and Jarratt are described in the “Management — Executive Officers and Directors” section of this prospectus. Below is a brief description of the other executive officers of Wells Capital.

 

Stephen G. Franklin, Ph.D.  Since 1999, Mr. Franklin has served as a Senior Vice President of Wells Capital. Mr. Franklin is responsible for marketing, sales and coordination of broker/dealer relations. Mr. Franklin also serves as Vice President of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. Prior to joining Wells Capital Mr. Franklin served as President of Global Access Learning, an international executive education and management development firm. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Franklin served as President, Chief Academic Officer and Director of EduTrek International, a publicly traded provider of international post-secondary education that owns American InterContinental University, with campuses in Atlanta, Ft. Lauderdale, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., London and Dubai. While at EduTrek, he was instrumental in developing the Master and Bachelor of Information Technology International M.B.A. and Adult Evening B.B.A. programs. Prior to joining EduTrek, Mr. Franklin was Associate Dean of the Goizueta Business School at Emory University and a former tenured Associate Professor of Business Administration. He served on the founding Executive M.B.A. faculty and has taught graduate, undergraduate and executive courses in management and organizational behavior, human resources management and entrepreneurship. He also is co-founder and Director of the Center for Healthcare Leadership in the Emory University School of Medicine. Mr. Franklin was a frequent guest lecturer at universities throughout North America, Europe and South Africa.

 

From 1984 to 1986, Mr. Franklin took a sabbatical from Emory University and became Executive Vice President and a principal stockholder of Financial Service Corporation (FSC), an independent financial planning broker/dealer. Mr. Franklin and the other stockholders of FSC later sold their interests in FSC to Mutual of New York Life Insurance Company.

 

In addition to the directors and executive officers listed above, Wells Capital employs personnel who have extensive experience in the types of services that our advisor will be providing to us, including arranging financing for the acquisition of properties, negotiating contracts, and preparing and overseeing budgets. Our advisor will rely on employees of Wells Capital, its manager, to perform services on its behalf for us to the extent that our advisor does not employ personnel with the relevant experience necessary for such services.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

On March 12, 2007, a stockholder of Piedmont REIT, a program sponsored by Wells Capital, filed a purported class action and derivative complaint against, among others, Piedmont REIT, the officers and directors of Piedmont REIT, Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. and certain of its affiliates, including Wells Capital, the owner of our advisor.

 

The complaint attempts to assert class action claims on behalf of those persons who receive and are entitled to vote on a proxy statement for Piedmont REIT that was filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, as amended. The complaint alleges, among other things, that (1) the consideration to be paid as part of a proposed merger agreement to acquire certain affiliates of Wells Real Estate Funds is excessive; and (2) the proxy statement contains false and misleading statements or omits to state material facts. Additionally, the complaint seeks to, among other things, obtain (1) certification of the class action; (2) a judgment declaring the proxy statement false and misleading; (3) unspecified monetary damages; (4) nullification of any stockholder approvals obtained during the proxy process; (5) nullification of the merger proposal and the merger agreement; (6) restitution for disgorgement of profits, benefits and other compensation for wrongful conduct and fiduciary breaches; (7) the nomination and election of new independent directors, and the retention of a new financial advisor to assess the advisability of Piedmont REIT’s strategic alternatives; and (8) the payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees.

 

Piedmont REIT and Wells Real Estate Funds believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this action. Due to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter at this time; however, as with any litigation, the risk of financial loss does exist. Any financial loss incurred by Wells Real Estate Funds which

adversely affects the financial health of Wells Capital or its affiliates, including our advisor, could hinder our advisor’s ability to successfully manage our operations and assets.

 

On August 24, 2007, two stockholders of Piedmont REIT filed a purported derivative complaint against, among others, Wells Capital and certain officers and directors of Piedmont REIT. The complaint seeks, among other things, a judgment declaring that the defendants committed breaches of their fiduciary duties and were unjustly enriched at the expense of Piedmont REIT; monetary damages equal to the amount by which Piedmont REIT was damaged by the defendants; an order awarding Piedmont REIT restitution from the defendants and ordering disgorgement of all profits and benefits obtained by the defendants from their wrongful conduct and fiduciary breaches; an order rescinding the internalization transaction; and the establishment of a constructive trust upon any benefits improperly received by the defendants as a result of their wrongful conduct.

 

Wells Capital and the other defendants who are named in the complaint believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to vigorously defend this action. Due to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter at this time; however, as with any litigation, the risk of financial loss does exist. Any financial loss incurred by our advisor which adversely affects the financial health of Wells Capital or its affiliates could hinder our advisor’s ability to successfully manage our operations and assets.

 

Our advisor, Wells Timberland Management Organization, LLC or Wells TIMO, is a newly formed Georgia limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wells Capital. Wells TIMO has contractual and fiduciary responsibilities to us and our stockholders. Wells TIMO’s sole manager is Wells Capital, and Wells Capital has appointed officers of Wells TIMO to manage its day-to-day operations. The officers of Wells TIMO are as follows:

 

 

The background of Mr. Jarratt is described in the “Management — Executive Officers and Directors” section of this prospectus.

 

Brian M. Davis.  Brian M. Davis joined Wells TIMO as Vice President, Finance and Administration, in October, 2007. He is responsible for all day-to-day financial and accounting management and the overall coordination of the company’s financial systems and functions for Wells Timberland REIT. Prior to joining Wells, Mr. Davis was a Client Manager for the Asset Based Lending Group at Atlanta-based SunTrust Bank, responsible for the origination and structuring of asset-based lending relationships developed from SunTrust’s existing client base and prospects. Mr. Davis previously held positions with CoBank, ACB, of Denver, Colorado, as Capital Markets Officer, and with SunTrust as Client Manager for the AgriFoods Specialty Lending Group. Mr. Davis received his Bachelor of Business Administration and Master of Business Administration from Ohio University.

 

Troy A. Harris.  Troy A. Harris joined Wells TIMO as Vice President, Timberland Acquisitions, in June 2007. In this capacity, he is responsible for directing property acquisitions for us. Prior to joining Wells, Mr. Harris was Director of Land Acquisitions for Pennsylvania-based Danzer Forestland Inc., responsible for that group’s timberland acquisition activities, identifying and evaluating significant high quality hardwood timberland properties with potential for long-term sustainable management. Mr. Harris previously held positions with Timbervest, LLC, as Director of Portfolio Analysis and Investment Manager, and with Union Camp and International Paper, as a Land Manager, Procurement Forester and Senior Timberland Auditor. Mr. Harris holds a bachelor’s degree in Forestry from Auburn University and a Master of Business

Administration degree from the University of Georgia. He serves on the Board of Directors of the Forest Landowners Association and chairs its TIMO/REIT Task Force. He is a Registered Forester, a Certified Forester and a member of the Society of American Foresters, where he recently served as the president of the Chattahoochee Chapter.

 

John C. Iverson.  Since January 2007, Mr. Iverson has served as the Vice President and Controller of Wells TIMO. Mr. Iverson is responsible for timber and general accounting, all period financial reporting, SEC reporting, internal controls and compliance, and is the principal contact for internal and external auditors. From 1972 until joining Wells TIMO in 2007, Mr. Iverson was the Controller of Financial Reporting for Georgia-Pacific Corporation’s Wood & Fiber Procurement Division. At Georgia-Pacific, Mr. Iverson was responsible for establishing and tracking the financial, tax and real estate bases for Georgia-Pacific’s nearly 6 million acres of timberland assets. Mr. Iverson also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Georgia-Pacific’s newly chartered GPC Credit Association. During his tenure, the GPC Credit Association grew to more than $30 million in assets. From 1966 to 1970, Mr. Iverson served in the submarine service of the U.S. Navy. Mr. Iverson received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Augusta State University.

 

Don L. Warden.  Don L. Warden joined the Wells TIMO as Director of Operations in July 2007. Mr. Warden is responsible for the operations of the Wells TIMO, including directing the closings for acquisition, disposition, and finance transactions; coordinating board and corporate reporting efforts; and managing Higher and Better Use (HBU) initiatives and transactions. Prior to joining the Wells Timberland Management Organization, Mr. Warden served as Director of Operations for the Capital Markets Department of Wells Real Estate Funds. In this capacity, Mr. Warden directed the closings for approximately $2 billion in commercial real estate transactions. Mr. Warden previously held positions with Mirant, as Senior Business Analyst, and with Accenture as a Consultant. From 1989 to 1994, Mr. Warden served as an Infantry and Signal Officer in the U.S. Army. Mr. Warden holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science from Southern Illinois University.

 

As a newly formed entity, we do not believe our asset base or the income generated by these assets will initially be large enough to support a fully integrated staff of employees. As a result, we are required to either (1) hire our own personnel and incur operating losses until our assets and income grow to the size needed to support a fully integrated staff, (2) do without certain services or (3) retain a third party to provide management services. Our board of directors has elected the third option. We have entered into an advisory agreement with Wells TIMO to serve as our advisor with responsibility to oversee and manage our day-to-day operations and to perform other duties including the following:

 

 

 

The fees payable to Wells TIMO under the advisory agreement are described in detail at “Management Compensation” below. We also describe in that section (1) our obligation to reimburse Wells TIMO for organization and offering expenses, administrative and management services and payments made by Wells TIMO to third parties in connection with potential acquisitions, and (2) Wells TIMO’s obligation to reimburse us for any operating expenses incurred in excess of certain limitations set forth in our charter.

 

The term of the current advisory agreement ends on August 11, 2008 and may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods upon mutual consent of Wells TIMO and us. As a result, the amount of compensation and other fees payable to the advisor may be increased or decreased in future renewals of the advisory agreement. See “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures.”

 

The advisory agreement may be terminated without cause by a majority of our independent directors or by Wells TIMO upon 60 days’ written notice. In the event that the advisory agreement between us and Wells TIMO is terminated, Wells TIMO will be required to cooperate with us and take all reasonable steps requested by our board of directors to provide for the orderly transition of advisory services to a successor advisor. Upon a termination of the advisory agreement with Wells TIMO, our board of directors will select a successor advisor that the board of directors has determined possesses sufficient qualifications to perform the advisory services and will be required to determine that the compensation that we will pay the successor advisor is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services to be performed for us and within the limits prescribed in our charter. In the event of a termination of the advisory agreement (other than for “cause” as defined in the advisory agreement), the holder of the special units will receive a one-time payment in the amount that would have been distributed with respect to the special units if Wells Timberland OP sold all of its real property assets for their then fair market values as determined by an appraisal and distributed the proceeds in accordance with the limited partnership agreement of Wells Timberland OP.

 

Wells TIMO and its affiliates expect to engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources will not be dedicated exclusively to our business. However, pursuant to the advisory agreement, Wells TIMO must devote sufficient resources to our administration to discharge its obligations. Wells TIMO may assign the advisory agreement to an affiliate upon our approval. We may assign or transfer the advisory agreement to a successor entity.

 

 

Wells Capital purchased 20,000 shares of our common stock for $200,000, constituting 100% of our outstanding capital stock prior to the sale of any shares in this offering, and subsequently transferred all of its shares to Wells TIMO. Wells TIMO may not sell any of these shares during the period it serves as our advisor. In the event that our advisor ceases to be our advisor, it will sell its initial investment in us to the successor advisor. Although Wells Capital and its affiliates are not prohibited from acquiring additional shares of our common stock, neither Wells Capital nor its affiliates currently has any options or warrants to acquire any shares. Wells Capital also purchased 200 common units in Wells Timberland OP at a purchase price of $10.00 per unit, which it subsequently transferred to Wells TIMO. As a result, Wells TIMO holds a 1% limited partner interest in Wells Timberland OP prior to the sale of any shares in this offering. Wells Capital also acquired 100 special units for which it paid $10.00 per unit and which it subsequently transferred to Wells TIMO. Wells TIMO may not vote any shares it owns in any vote for the election of directors or any vote regarding the approval or termination of any contract with Wells TIMO or any of its affiliates.

 

Wells Investment Securities, Inc., our dealer-manager, is a member firm of FINRA. Wells Investment Securities was organized in May 1984 for the purpose of participating in and facilitating the distribution of securities of Wells programs.

 

Wells Investment Securities will provide wholesaling, sales promotion and marketing assistance services to us in connection with the distribution of the shares offered pursuant to this prospectus. It may also sell shares at the retail level.

 

Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. is the sole stockholder of Wells Investment Securities. The current directors and executive officers of Wells Investment Securities are:

 

 

The backgrounds of Messrs. Williams and Fretz are described in the “Management — Executive Officers and Directors” section of this prospectus.

 

Thomas E. Larkin.  Mr. Larkin is President of Wells Investment Securities, Inc. Mr. Larkin joined Wells in 2003 and directs the national sales effort. Prior to joining Wells, Mr. Larkin was an Executive Vice President of Ronald Blue & Co., where he was responsible for supervising approximately 80 financial professionals. In this capacity, he significantly increased both corporate revenue and assets under management. Mr. Larkin began his career at Ronald Blue in 1994 as a Branch Manager and Recruiter and progressively held positions of greater responsibility in sales management during his tenure with the company. From 1986 to 1994, Mr. Larkin was with Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., where he served as Sales Representative, Southeastern Sales Manager, and eventually Director of Sales. Mr. Larkin received his Bachelor of Science degree in Biology from Valparaiso University. He holds the Series 2, 7, 24, 63, and 65 securities licenses.

 

Regulatory Investigation

 

In August 2003, Wells Investment Securities, Inc. and Leo F. Wells, III submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent to the NASD (now FINRA) in which the company was censured and fined $150,000, jointly and severally with Mr. Wells. Mr. Wells was also suspended in his NASD principal association capacity for one year. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Wells Investment Securities and Mr. Wells consented to the sanctions and findings that they provided noncash compensation worth more than $100 to registered representatives and failed to adhere to previous undertakings made not to engage in noncash compensation activities. Mr. Wells’ submission began October 6, 2003, and concluded at the close of business October 5, 2004. See also “Management — Executive Officers and Directors.”

 

The primary responsibility for the management decisions of Wells TIMO and its affiliates, including the selection of investment properties to be recommended to our board of directors, the negotiation for these investments, asset-management decisions and property dispositions, will reside in Jess E. Jarratt and John C. Iverson. Our board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors, must approve all real property acquisitions and dispositions, as well as the financing of any such acquisitions. We expect that the board of directors will form an investment committee to which it will delegate the authority to approve all real property acquisitions and dispositions with a purchase or sale price below a certain amount, including the financing of any such acquisitions, other than any transaction with an affiliate of our advisor. Any such investment committee will be comprised of at least a majority of independent directors.

 

We have no paid employees. Wells TIMO, our advisor, and its affiliates are responsible for the management of our day-to-day affairs. The following table summarizes all of the compensation and fees payable to Wells TIMO and its affiliates in this offering, including amounts to reimburse their costs in providing services, as well as the compensation payable to our independent directors. The compensation payable to any timber managers our advisor may engage is not included in this table, since it would be paid by our advisor and not by us. The selling commissions and dealer-manager fee may vary for different categories of purchasers. See “Plan of Distribution.” The compensation and fees payable to Wells TIMO are subject to the terms and conditions of our advisory agreement, which must be renewed on an annual basis. As a result, the compensation and fees payable to Wells TIMO may be increased or decreased in future renewals of the advisory agreement. Our board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors, must approve of any new fees or any charges to the existing compensation arrangements described below. Our board is required to exercise its fiduciary duties to ensure that the proposed fee structure is fair and reasonable. See “Conflicts of Interest — Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures — Other Charter Provisions Relating to Conflicts of Interest.” This table assumes the shares are sold through distribution channels associated with the highest possible selling commissions and dealer-manager fees and a $9.55 purchase price for shares sold under our distribution reinvestment plan.

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock and Series A preferred stock as of November 30, 2007 by (1) any person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares, (2) our directors, (3) our executive officers and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

 

 

 

 

We are subject to various conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with Wells TIMO and its affiliates, some of whom serve as our officers and directors. We discuss these conflicts below and conclude this section with a discussion of the corporate governance measures we adopted to ameliorate some of the risks posed by these conflicts.

 

General

 

Wells Capital and its affiliates are general partners and advisors of other Wells programs, including programs that have investment objectives similar to ours, and we expect that they will organize other such partnerships and programs in the future. None of these programs, however, have invested in timberland. Wells Capital and such affiliates have legal and financial obligations with respect to these programs that are similar to the obligations that our advisor and its affiliates have to us.

 

Wells Capital and its affiliates have sponsored the following 18 public real estate programs with substantially identical investment objectives as ours:

 

1. Wells Real Estate Fund I

 

2. Wells Real Estate Fund II

 

3. Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW

 

4. Wells Real Estate Fund III, L.P.

 

5. Wells Real Estate Fund IV, L.P.

 

6. Wells Real Estate Fund V, L.P.

 

7. Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P.

 

8. Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P.

 

9. Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P.

 

10. Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P.

 

11. Wells Real Estate Fund X, L.P.

 

12. Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.

 

13. Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P.

 

14. Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.

 

15. Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P.

 

16. Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

 

17. Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc.

 

18. Institutional REIT, Inc.

 

Allocation of Time of our Sponsor’s Personnel

 

We rely on Wells TIMO, our advisor, for the day-to-day operation of our business pursuant to an advisory agreement. Wells TIMO was recently formed for the purpose of serving as our advisor. As of the date of this prospectus, Wells TIMO has only two employees. As a result, Wells TIMO will rely on employees of its manager and parent company, Wells Capital, to perform its advisory services for us, until such time, if ever, as Wells TIMO has sufficient personnel of its own. As a result of its interests in other Wells programs and the fact that it has also engaged and will continue to engage in other business activities, Wells Capital and its

affiliates will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between the services to be performed for us on behalf of Wells TIMO and the other Wells programs and activities in which they are involved. However, Wells Capital believes that it and its affiliates have sufficient personnel to allow Wells TIMO to discharge fully its responsibilities to us, while at the same time to fulfill their responsibilities to all of the other Wells programs and ventures in which they are involved.

 

Wells TIMO and its affiliates will receive substantial fees and other payments from us. During the offering stage, a significant portion of the fees and payments will be payable directly out of offering proceeds. These compensation arrangements could influence our advisor’s advice to us, as well as the judgment of the affiliates of Wells TIMO who serve as our officers or directors. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

 

 

Wells TIMO, however, has a fiduciary duty to us. If Wells TIMO fails to act in our best interest, it will have violated its fiduciary duty to us.

 

The advisory fees paid to Wells TIMO will be paid irrespective of the quality or performance of the investments acquired or the services provided during the term of the advisory agreement. See “Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures.”

 

Our executive officers also are officers and/or directors of:

 

 

Donald S. Moss, one of our independent directors, is a trustee of Wells Family of Real Estate Funds, a mutual fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. E. Nelson Mills, one of our independent directors, is a director of Wells REIT II and Institutional REIT.

 

As a result, these persons owe fiduciary duties to these various entities and their stockholders, which fiduciary duties may from time to time conflict with the fiduciary duties they owe to us. See “Management — Executive Officers and Directors.”

 

Since Wells Investment Securities, our dealer-manager, is an affiliate of Wells TIMO, you will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an independent underwriter in connection with the offering of securities. See “Plan of Distribution.”

 

Independent Directors

 

Our independent directors are empowered to resolve potential conflicts of interest. Serving on the board of, or owning an interest in, another Wells-sponsored program will not, by itself, preclude a person from being named an independent director. The independent directors, who are authorized to retain their own legal advisor and financial advisor, are empowered to act on any matter permitted under Maryland law if the matter at issue is such that the exercise of independent judgment by Wells TIMO affiliates could reasonably be compromised. Those conflict-of-interest matters that the board cannot delegate to a committee under Maryland law must be acted upon by both the board of directors and a majority of our independent directors. Among the matters we expect our independent directors to act upon are:

 

 

Other Charter Provisions Relating to Conflicts of Interest

 

In addition to providing for our independent directors to act together to resolve potential conflicts, our charter contains many other restrictions relating to conflicts of interest including the following:

 

Advisor Compensation.  The independent directors evaluate at least annually whether the compensation that we contract to pay to Wells TIMO and its affiliates is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services performed and whether that such compensation is within the limits prescribed by our charter. The independent directors supervise the performance of Wells TIMO and its affiliates to determine that the provisions of our compensation arrangements are being carried out, and whether or not to increase or decrease the amount of compensation payable to Wells TIMO. The independent directors base their evaluation of Wells TIMO on the factors set forth below as well as any other factors that they deem relevant:

 

 

 

We can pay Wells TIMO a real estate disposition fee in connection with the sale of a property only if it provides a substantial amount of the services in the effort to sell the property. If Wells TIMO does provide substantial assistance, we will pay it or its affiliates an amount as determined by our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, to be appropriate based on market norms and not to exceed (1) for any property sold at a price of $20 million or less, 2% of the contract price of the property sold and (2) for any property sold at a price greater than $20.0 million, 1% of the contract price of the property sold. However, in no event may the aggregate real estate disposition fees paid to Wells TIMO, its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties exceed 6% of the contract sales price.

 

Term of Advisory Agreement.  Each contract for the services of our advisor may not exceed one year, although there is no limit on the number of times that the contract with a particular advisor may be renewed. Either a majority of our independent directors or our advisor may terminate our advisory agreement with Wells TIMO without cause or penalty on 60 days’ written notice. In the event our advisory agreement with Wells TIMO is terminated and a successor advisor is appointed, our board of directors must determine that the successor advisor possesses sufficient qualifications to perform the services described in the advisory agreement and that the compensation we will pay to the successor advisor will be reasonable in relation to the services provided. For information regarding the redemption payment that may be payable by Wells Timberland OP to our advisor upon termination of the advisory agreement in connection with the redemption of special units held by our advisor, see “Management Compensation.”

 

Our Acquisitions, Dispositions and Leases.  We will not purchase or lease properties in which Wells TIMO, our directors or officers or any of their affiliates have an interest without a determination by a majority of our independent directors that such transaction is fair and reasonable to us and at a price to us no greater than the cost of the property to the affiliated seller or lessor unless there is substantial justification for the excess amount. In no event will we acquire any such property at an amount in excess of its current appraised value as determined by an independent expert selected by our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction. In addition, we will not sell or lease properties to Wells TIMO, our directors or officers or any of their affiliates unless a majority of our independent directors determine that the transaction is fair and reasonable to us.

 

Other Transactions Involving Affiliates.  A majority of our independent directors must conclude that all other transactions, including joint ventures, between us and Wells TIMO, our officers or directors or any of their affiliates are fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions not less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

 

No Limitation on Other Business Activities.  Our charter does not prohibit Wells TIMO, our directors or officers or any of their affiliates from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any other business or from owning interests in any other business ventures, including business ventures involved in the acquisition, ownership, management or sale of timberland or other types of properties.

 

Limitation on Operating Expenses.  Wells TIMO must reimburse us the amount by which our aggregate annual total operating expenses exceed the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income unless our independent directors have determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors. Within 60 days after the end of any of our fiscal quarters for which total operating expenses for the 12 months then-ended exceeded the limitation, we will send to our stockholders a written disclosure, together with an explanation of the factors the independent directors considered in arriving at the conclusion that the excess expenses were justified. “Average invested assets” means the average monthly

book value of our assets for a specified period before deducting depreciation, bad debts or other noncash reserves. “Total operating expenses” means all costs and expenses paid or incurred by us, as determined under GAAP, that are in any way related to our operation, including advisory fees, but excluding (a) the expenses of raising capital such as organization and offering expenses, legal, audit, accounting, underwriting, brokerage, listing, registration and other fees, printing and other such expenses and taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, distribution, transfer, registration and stock exchange listing of our stock; (b) interest payments; (c) taxes; (d) noncash expenditures such as depreciation, amortization and bad debt reserves; (e) reasonable incentive fees based on the gain from the sale of our assets; and (f) acquisition fees, acquisition expenses, real estate disposition fees on the resale of property and other expenses connected with the acquisition, disposition, management and ownership of real estate interests or other property (including the costs of foreclosure, insurance premiums, legal services, maintenance, repair and improvement of property).

 

Issuance of Options and Warrants to Certain Affiliates.  Our charter prohibits the issuance of options or warrants to purchase our capital stock to Wells TIMO, our directors or officers or any of their affiliates (a) on terms more favorable than we offer such options or warrants to the general public or (b) in excess of an amount equal to 10% of our outstanding capital stock on the date of grant.

 

Repurchase of Our Shares.  Our charter prohibits us from paying a fee to Wells TIMO or our directors or officers or any of their affiliates in connection with our repurchase of our capital stock.

 

Loans.  We will not make any loans to Wells TIMO or to our directors or officers or any of their affiliates. In addition, we will not borrow from these affiliates unless a majority of our independent directors approve the transaction as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable, and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties. These restrictions on loans will apply only to advances of cash that are commonly viewed as loans, as determined by the board of directors. By way of example only, the prohibition on loans would not restrict advances of cash for legal expenses or other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought, nor would the prohibition limit our ability to advance reimbursable expenses incurred by directors or officers or Wells TIMO or its affiliates.

 

Reports to Stockholders.  Our charter requires that we prepare an annual report and deliver it to our stockholders within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year commencing with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Among the matters that must be included in the annual report are:

 

 

Voting of Shares Owned by Affiliates.  Wells TIMO and our non-independent directors or officers or any of their affiliates who acquire shares of our common stock may not vote their shares regarding (1) the removal of any of Wells TIMO’s affiliates or (2) any transaction between them and us.

 

Ratification of Charter Provisions.  Our board of directors, including a majority of our independent directors, has reviewed and ratified our charter, as required by our charter.

Allocation of Investment Opportunities

 

Since our company is the only Wells program to date formed for the purpose of investing primarily in timberland, we do not expect that Wells TIMO or the Wells Capital personnel who perform services for us on behalf of Wells TIMO will face substantial conflicts in allocating, among us and other Wells programs, investment opportunities that are suitable for us, at least until such time, if ever, as another Wells program is formed for the purpose of investing in timberland.

 

In the event that Wells TIMO manages another program in the future for which timberland investments are suitable, Wells TIMO will be required to present each investment opportunity it identifies to the program for which the investment opportunity is most suitable. This determination is made by Wells TIMO. However, our advisory agreement with Wells TIMO requires that Wells TIMO make this determination in a manner that is fair without favoring any other Wells-sponsored program. In determining the Wells-sponsored program for which an investment opportunity would be most suitable, Wells TIMO will consider the following factors:

 

 

In the event that Wells TIMO serves as the sponsor, manager or advisor to another Wells timberland program and an investment opportunity becomes available that is equally suitable for us and one or more such other programs, then Wells TIMO will offer the investment opportunity to the entity that has had the longest period of time elapsed since it was offered an investment opportunity. If a subsequent event or development, such as a delay in the closing of a property or a delay in the construction of a property, causes any such investment, in the opinion of Wells TIMO, to be more appropriate for another Wells program, Wells TIMO may offer the investment to another Wells program.

 

Our advisory agreement with Wells TIMO requires that Wells TIMO periodically inform our independent directors of the investment opportunities it has offered to other Wells programs so that the independent directors can evaluate whether we are receiving our fair share of opportunities. Wells TIMO is to inform our independent directors of such investment opportunities quarterly. Wells TIMO’s success in generating investment opportunities for us and its fair allocation of opportunities among Wells programs are important criteria in our independent directors’ determination to continue or renew our arrangements with Wells TIMO and its affiliates. Our independent directors have a duty to ensure that Wells TIMO fairly applies its method for allocating investment opportunities among the Wells-sponsored programs.