QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.            )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

DST Systems, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Not Applicable

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

o

 

No fee required

ý

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of DST Systems, Inc.

    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        32.3 million shares of Common Stock of DST Systems, Inc.

    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        The proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction for purposes of calculating the filing fee only is $0. For purposes of determining the proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction, Exchange Act Rule 0-11(c)(2) and telephone interpretation 1 for Rule 0-11 under paragraph M. "Exchange Act Rules" in the Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations from July 1997 were reviewed. In the transaction, DST Systems, Inc. will be receiving only its own shares of Common Stock and no cash or other property. No cash, securities or other property is being distributed to DST security holders on a pro rata basis. Therefore, in following the calculation set forth in Exchange Act Rule 0-11, the proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction for purposes of calculating the filing fee is $0, and the filing fee is calculated as $0.

    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        $0 (See (3) above)

    (5)   Total fee paid:
        $0


o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        

    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        

    (3)   Filing Party:
        

    (4)   Date Filed:
        


LOGO

DST SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTICE AND PROXY STATEMENT

for

a Special Meeting of Stockholders

November 28, 2003

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

Please vote by telephone or the Internet as described on the Voting Card
or mark, date and sign the card and promptly return it in the envelope provided.

Mailing of this Notice and Proxy Statement and the accompanying Voting Card commenced on or about November 13, 2003



DST Systems, Inc.

333 West 11th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64105


Proxy Statement
And
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
November 28, 2003


        You are hereby notified of and cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders of DST Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("DST"), to be held at the offices of DST Systems, Inc., 333 West 11th Street, 3rd Floor, Kansas City, Missouri, 64105 at 8:30 AM, Central Time, on November 28, 2003, to consider and vote upon the following matter:

        The Board of Directors has set the close of business on November 10, 2003 as the record date for determining which stockholders are entitled to notice of and to vote at this meeting or any adjournment thereof. A list of such stockholders will be available during the Special Meeting for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting and will be available during regular business hours at the corporate offices of DST, 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, for the 10-day period prior to the Special Meeting. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "for" approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

        It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting. Please vote your shares, regardless of whether you plan to attend the Special Meeting. You may cast your votes by telephone or through the Internet as described on the Voting Card. Alternatively, please date the Voting Card, sign it and promptly return it in the envelope provided, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States.

        If you own shares registered in the name of a broker, you should receive a card from the broker on which you may direct the broker to vote such shares. Please promptly complete the card and return it to the broker.

        Any stockholder or stockholder's representative who may need special assistance or accommodation to participate in the Special Meeting because of a disability should contact DST's Corporate Secretary at the above address, or by phone at (816) 435-4636. To provide DST sufficient time to arrange for reasonable assistance, please submit all such requests by November 21, 2003.


 

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

Randall D. Young
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

The date of this Notice is November 13, 2003

 

 


DST Systems, Inc.
333 West 11th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64105


PROXY STATEMENT


Contents

 
  Page
PROXY STATEMENT   1
SUMMARY TERM SHEET FOR THE PROPOSAL   1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSAL   3
INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING   6
VOTING   7
BUSINESS OF DST SYSTEMS, INC.   9
BUSINESS OF DST OUTPUT MARKETING SERVICES, INC.   10
BUSINESS OF JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.   10
BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATION   11
  Background   11
  Reasons for the Proposal   14
  Valuation Report of Standard & Poor's Corporate Value Consulting   16
  Opinion of Financial Advisor   18
  Recommendation   24

PROPOSAL—APPROVAL OF THE SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND THE
TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY

 

25
  Description of the Proposal   25
  Purposes and Effects of the Proposal   25
  Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement   25
  Regulatory Matters   38
  Requirement for Stockholder Approval   38
  Required Vote and the DST Board's Recommendation   38

MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

 

39
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA   42
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS   43
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND STOCKHOLDINGS OF MANAGEMENT   51
OTHER MATTERS   53
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION   54
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE   54
APPENDICES:    
Appendix A—Share Exchange Agreement, dated August 25, 2003, by and between DST,
OMS and Janus
  A-1
Appendix B—Proxy relating to shares of DST Common Stock retained by Janus   B-1
Appendix C—Fairness Opinion of U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc.   C-1
Appendix D—OMS Condensed Combined Financial Statements, June 30, 2003   D-1
Appendix E—OMS Combined Financial Statements, December 31, 2002 and 2001   E-1

i



PROXY STATEMENT

        This proxy statement is being mailed on or about November 13, 2003, to holders at the close of business on November 10, 2003 (the "Record Date") of a total of 115,736,792 shares (the number outstanding as of the Record Date) of the common stock of DST Systems, Inc. ("DST Common Stock"). DST Common Stock has a par value of $.01 per share, and is the only outstanding class of voting securities of DST. Stockholders on the Record Date are entitled to vote on the proposal to be presented by the DST Board of Directors (the "DST Board") at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 8:30 AM Central Time, on November 28, 2003, at the principal executive offices of DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), 333 West 11th Street, 3rd Floor, Kansas City, Missouri 64105 ("Special Meeting"). The DST Board is soliciting your vote in favor of the proposal set forth in the accompanying notice.

SUMMARY TERM SHEET FOR THE PROPOSAL

        This summary term sheet for the proposal highlights selected information from this proxy statement regarding the proposal and may not contain all of the information that is important to you as a DST stockholder. Accordingly, we encourage you to carefully read this entire document, including the appendices, and the documents to which we have referred you. You may obtain a copy of the documents to which we have referred you without charge by following the instructions in the section entitled "Documents Incorporated by Reference."

Purpose of the Proposal

        On August 25, 2003, DST, DST Output Marketing Services, Inc., a New York corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of DST ("OMS"), and Janus Capital Group Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Janus"), entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement"). Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement, DST will transfer to Janus all of the issued and outstanding shares of OMS common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "OMS Shares") and Janus will transfer to DST 32.3 million shares of DST Common Stock owned by Janus (the "Janus DST Shares") in exchange for the OMS Shares (such transfers collectively referred to as the "Exchange"). Upon completion of the Exchange, Janus will own approximately 7.4 million shares of DST Common Stock (or approximately 9% of the outstanding shares), but DST will hold a proxy to vote these shares. The proposal is for the purpose of allowing DST, OMS and Janus to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement.

The Proposal

        You are being asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. The DST Board recommends that you vote "for" approval of the proposal. The Share Exchange Agreement and certain related ancillary agreements (the "Ancillary Agreements") are described in more detail below.

        DST has agreed that, prior to the closing of the Exchange, DST will, and will cause its respective subsidiaries to, transfer to OMS certain business assets, business liabilities, and additional assets consisting of cash, ranging from approximately $854.0 million to approximately $999.4 million depending upon the value of the Janus DST Shares as determined pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement (the "Reorganization"). In exchange for these transfers, OMS has agreed to accept, assume and pay, perform or otherwise discharge the liabilities transferred to it in accordance with their respective terms and conditions.

1


        Prior to the Reorganization, the assets and liabilities of the OMS business will be contained in four separate subsidiary corporations. The purpose of the Reorganization is to combine all of the assets and liabilities of OMS' business into a single corporate entity and to position that subsidiary so that it is a direct subsidiary of DST in order to facilitate the transfer of the OMS Shares from DST to Janus pursuant to the Exchange. As of June 30, 2003, the book value of the assets to be transferred to OMS was approximately $8.5 million and the book value of the liabilities to be transferred was approximately $2.5 million. See "Proposal—Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement—The Reorganization—Transactions in Reorganization."

        At the time of the Exchange, OMS will hold graphics design and sheet-fed offset commercial printing operations, the laser printing and fulfillment operations of the Marketing Services Division of DST's Output Solutions segment, and additional cash to approximately equalize the value of the OMS Shares to the Janus DST Shares being exchanged.

        The obligations of DST, OMS and Janus to complete the Exchange are subject, in addition to other conditions customary for transactions of this type, to the following conditions:

See "Proposal—Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement."

        The Share Exchange Agreement will subject DST to non-compete provisions with respect to certain business products and services of OMS for a period of five years from the Closing Date. See "Proposal—Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement—Certain Covenants and Agreements—Non-Competition."

        At the Closing, the parties and their respective affiliates, as appropriate, will execute and deliver certain of the Ancillary Agreements, pursuant to which among other things, certain services and goods will be provided to the parties to the Share Exchange Agreement. In addition, Janus will execute and deliver to DST a proxy for voting the shares of DST Common Stock Janus will retain after the Exchange is consummated for so long as Janus owns or retains voting rights to such shares. See "Proposal—Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement—Ancillary Agreements."

Fairness Opinion (Pages 18 through 24 and Appendix C)

        U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. ("Piper Jaffray") acted as a financial advisor to DST in connection with the Exchange. At an August 25, 2003 meeting of the DST Board, Piper Jaffray made a fairness opinion presentation to the Board and delivered its opinion. The opinion was that the consideration to

2



be exchanged in the Exchange is fair, from a financial point of view, to DST. Under the terms of the engagement letter, DST agreed to pay Piper Jaffray a retainer of $50,000, a fee of $600,000 for rendering its opinion and $25,000 for any updates, as well as reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of Piper Jaffray. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, DST has paid Piper Jaffray $675,000 pursuant to the terms of the engagement letter. For a more detailed discussion of the fees paid or payable to Piper Jaffray and other relationships with Piper Jaffray and/or its affiliates existing prior to Piper Jaffray's engagement as financial advisor, see "Background and Recommendation—Opinion of Financial Advisor."

Vote Required to Approve the Proposal (Pages 7 and 38)

        Approval of the proposal will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock that are entitled to vote.

        Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, Janus has agreed to vote all shares of DST Common Stock beneficially owned by Janus at the time of the Special Meeting (approximately 34% of the outstanding shares) in favor of approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSAL

        This question-and-answer section highlights important information in this proxy statement but does not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read carefully this entire proxy statement, including the appendices, and the other documents we refer you to for a more complete understanding of the matters being considered at the Special Meeting. In addition, we incorporate by reference into this proxy statement important business and financial information about DST. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement without charge by following the instructions in the section entitled "Documents Incorporated by Reference."

Q:
On what am I being asked to vote?

A:
You are being asked to vote to approve the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

Q:
What is the purpose of the Exchange?

A:
The Exchange is intended to achieve important DST business objectives. We believe the removal of significant ownership by Janus, which is a competitor to our mutual fund customer base, will improve our competitive position in serving the mutual fund industry. DST's customers have expressed concern over Janus' significant ownership interest in DST, since Janus advises one of the largest mutual fund complexes in the industry. Through the Exchange, we hope to allay these concerns in order to retain the business of our current customers and possibly increase our mutual fund business customer base.

3


Q:
What is the cost of the Exchange and how do we intend to finance it?

A:
Under the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, the total cost of the Exchange could range from approximately $969 million to $1.1 billion. Assuming a total cost of approximately $1.1 billion, we intend to fund the cost through the OMS operating business with a fair market value of $115 million and cash contributed to OMS prior to the Exchange of approximately $1.0 billion. We intend to fund the cash portion of the cost through (i) $819 million from the net proceeds of our private placement of convertible debentures in August 2003, and (ii) approximately $180.4 million drawn from revolving credit facilities.

Q:
Why is DST stockholder approval necessary?

A:
DST's Certificate of Incorporation requires stockholder approval of any transfer or exchange to or with any "Interested Stockholder," of any assets of DST having an aggregate fair market value equaling or exceeding 25% or more of the combined assets of DST. Janus is considered an Interested Stockholder because it owns more than 10% of the voting power of DST's outstanding capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.
Q:
Do I have appraisal rights if I oppose the proposal?

A:
No. Under Delaware law, stockholders do not have the right to an appraisal of the value of their shares in connection with the proposal.

Q:
What is the DST Board's recommendation on how to vote?

A:
The DST Board has unanimously recommended that you vote FOR the proposal.

Q:
What will happen if the proposal is not approved?

A:
DST will not be able to complete the Exchange. We are unable to predict the ultimate effect of the inability to complete the Exchange on DST. We have issued convertible debentures in order to partially finance the Exchange and will incur continuing significant costs from such issuance until the retirement of the debentures. In addition, DST would not be able to achieve the business

4


Q:
What are the expected tax consequences of the Reorganization and the Exchange?

A:
DST will receive tax opinions (the "Tax Opinions") from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PWC") and Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP ("Sonnenschein") to the effect that, although the matter is not free from doubt, the Reorganization and the Exchange should be tax free to DST. The Tax Opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS"), and it is possible that the IRS could take a position which is contrary to the Tax Opinions. If the IRS were to take such a contrary position and prevail, then DST could recognize gain on the Reorganization and the Exchange as if DST had sold the OMS Stock for fair market value. Under these circumstances, DST would recognize a gain of approximately $104 million and incur federal and state income tax liabilities of approximately $41.6 million, which could potentially have a negative effect on the value of DST common stock. Neither DST nor Janus has any obligation to indemnify the other for tax liabilities arising from the Exchange. However, based on the Tax Opinions, DST believes that the Reorganization and Exchange should be tax free. The tax consequences of the Reorganization and the Exchange will only apply to DST, OMS and Janus, and will not apply to any other stockholder of DST. For a description of the material federal income tax consequences of the Reorganization and the Exchange, see "Material Federal Income Tax Consequences."

Q:
Who can answer other questions I may have?

A:
If you have any questions concerning the proposal or the Special Meeting, or if you would like additional copies of the proxy statement, please contact the DST Corporate Secretary's Office, 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105, telephone (816) 435-4636.

5



INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING

Why Were DST's Stockholders Sent this Proxy Statement?

        DST is mailing this proxy statement on or about November 13, 2003 to its stockholders of record on November 10, 2003 in connection with the DST Board's solicitation of proxies for use at a Special Meeting of Stockholders and any adjournment thereof (the "Special Meeting"). The Special Meeting will be held at the principal executive offices of DST, 333 West 11th Street, 3rd Floor, Kansas City, Missouri, on November 28, 2003 at 8:30 AM, Central Time. The Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and a voting card accompany this proxy statement.

        Brokers, dealers, banks, voting trustees, other custodians and their nominees are asked to forward this notice and proxy statement and the voting card to the beneficial owners of DST's stock held of record by them. Upon request, DST will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses in completing the mailing of the materials to beneficial owners of our stock.

Who Will Bear the Cost of the Special Meeting?

        DST will bear the cost of the Special Meeting, including the cost of mailing the proxy materials and any supplemental materials. Proxies may also be solicited by telephone, in person or otherwise by directors, officers and employees not specifically engaged or compensated for that purpose. DST has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies at a cost not expected to exceed $6,000 plus expenses. In addition, DST may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of DST Common Stock for their expenses in forwarding this proxy statement and other DST soliciting materials to the beneficial owners.

Who May Attend the Special Meeting?

        Only DST stockholders or their proxies and guests of DST may attend the Special Meeting. Any stockholder or stockholder's representative who, because of a disability, may need special assistance or accommodation to allow him or her to participate in the Special Meeting may request reasonable assistance or accommodation from DST by contacting the office of the Corporate Secretary at DST's principal executive offices at (816) 435-4636. If written requests are made to the Corporate Secretary of DST, they should be mailed to 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105. To provide DST sufficient time to arrange for reasonable assistance, please submit all requests by November 21, 2003.

What Matters Will Be Considered at the Special Meeting?

        At the Special Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. These matters have been proposed by the DST Board. The DST Board knows of no other matters that will be presented or voted on at the Special Meeting.

6




VOTING

Proposal.    At the Special Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement. The DST Board knows of no other matters that will be presented or voted on at the Special Meeting. Stockholders do not have any dissenters' rights of appraisal in connection with the proposal.

Quorum.    In order for any proposal to be approved at the Special Meeting, a quorum of DST stockholders must be present at the meeting, either in person or through a proxy, regardless of whether such stockholders vote their shares. The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the shares of DST Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date constitutes a quorum. All DST shares held through a broker or other nominee that votes at least some of the shares are generally considered present at the Special Meeting.

Tabulation of Votes.    Each stockholder may cast one vote for each share of DST Common Stock held by such stockholder on the Record Date on all matters to be voted on at the Special Meeting. The percentage of shares required to be voted for a proposal depends on the proposal. For the proposal presented at the Special Meeting, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote is required for the approval of the proposal. The percentage of shares that have been affirmatively voted for a proposal is determined by dividing the affirmative votes by the total number of shares outstanding.

How Stockholders Vote.    Stockholders holding DST Common Stock on the Record Date in their own names ("Record Holders"), persons who participate in certain benefit plans* of DST or its subsidiaries and indirectly hold DST Common Stock on the Record Date through such plans ("Plan Participants"), and investors holding DST Common Stock on the Record Date through a broker or other nominee ("Broker Customers") may vote such stock as follows:


*
The Employee Stock Ownership Plan of DST Systems, Inc. ("DST ESOP"), the DST Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, and The DST Systems of California, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan (each, a "Plan").

        DST Common Stock Held of Record.    Record Holders may only vote their shares of DST Common Stock if they or their proxies are present at the Special Meeting. Record Holders, through the Voting Card or through Internet or telephone voting, may appoint as their proxy the Proxy Committee, which consists of officers of DST whose names are listed on the Voting Card. The Proxy Committee will vote as specified by the stockholders (either on the Voting Card or through Internet or telephone voting) all shares of DST Common Stock for which it is the proxy. A Record Holder desiring to name as proxy someone other than the Proxy Committee may do so by crossing out the names of the Proxy Committee members on the Voting Card and inserting the full name of such other person. In that case, the Record Holder must sign the Voting Card and deliver it to the person named, and the person named must be present and vote at the Special Meeting.

        If a stockholder does not specify when voting (either on the Voting Card or through Internet or telephone voting) how the shares of DST Common Stock represented thereby are to be voted, the Proxy Committee intends to vote such shares in accordance with the discretion of the Proxy Committee upon such other matters as may properly come before the Special Meeting.

        DST Common Stock Held Under the Plans.    Plan Participants may, by using the Voting Card, Internet or telephone voting, instruct the trustee of the Plans how to vote the shares allocated to the respective participant accounts. The trustee will vote all shares allocated to the accounts of Plan Participants as instructed by such participants. With respect to any shares of DST Common Stock not allocated to Plan accounts or for which Plan Participants have not given instructions to the trustee, the trustee must vote such shares in the same proportion as those shares for which it received instructions.

7



The trustee may vote Plan shares either in person or through a proxy. The trustee intends to vote in the same manner as the Proxy Committee upon other matters as may properly come before the Special Meeting.

        DST Common Stock Held Through a Broker or Other Nominee.    Each broker or nominee must solicit from the Broker Customers directions on how to vote the shares, and the broker or nominee must then vote such shares in accordance with such directions. Brokers or nominees are to forward soliciting materials to the Broker Customers, and, if requested, DST will reimburse their reasonable expenses in forwarding the materials. Whether brokers may vote the shares of Broker Customers when they have not received directions depends on the proposal and on the rules and procedures of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), which is the exchange that lists DST Common Stock for trading.

Revoking Proxy Authorizations or Instructions.    Until the polls close (or, in the case of Plan Participants, until the trustee of the Plans votes), votes of Record Holders and Broker Customers and instructions of Plan Participants to the Plan trustee may be recast (a) by an Internet or telephone vote subsequent to the date shown on a previously executed and delivered Voting Card or to the date of a prior Internet or telephone vote or (b) with a later-dated, properly executed and delivered Voting Card. Otherwise, stockholders may not revoke their votes, even by attending the Special Meeting, unless (a) for Record Holders, they deliver written revocation to the Corporate Secretary of DST at any time before the Chairman of the Special Meeting closes the polls; (b) for Plan Participants, they follow the revocation procedures of the trustee; or (c) for Broker Customers, they follow the revocation procedures of the broker or nominee.

Attendance and Voting in Person at the Special Meeting.    Attendance at the Special Meeting is limited to Record Holders or their properly appointed proxies, beneficial owners of DST Common Stock having evidence of such ownership, and invited guests of DST. Plan Participants and Broker Customers, absent special direction to DST from the trustee, broker or nominee, may only vote by instructing the trustee, broker or nominee and may not cast a ballot at the Special Meeting. Record Holders who have not appointed a proxy, or who have revoked the appointment of a proxy, may vote by casting a ballot at the Special Meeting.

8




BUSINESS OF DST SYSTEMS, INC.

        We have several operating business units that offer sophisticated information processing and software services and products. These business units are reported as three operating segments, Financial Services, Output Solutions and Customer Management. In addition, investments in equity securities and certain financial interests and our real estate subsidiaries and affiliates have been aggregated into an Investments and Other segment. A summary of each of our segments follows:

Financial Services

        Our Financial Services segment provides sophisticated information processing and computer software services and products primarily to mutual funds, investment managers, corporations, insurance companies, banks, brokers and financial planners. Our proprietary software systems include mutual fund shareowner and unit trust recordkeeping systems for U.S. and international mutual fund companies, a defined-contribution participant recordkeeping system for the U.S. retirement plan market, securities transfer systems offered to corporations, corporate trustees and transfer agents, investment management systems offered to U.S. and international fund accountants and investment managers, and a workflow management and customer contact system offered to mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage firms, banks, cable television operators and health care providers. We also provide design, management and transaction processing services for customized consumer equipment maintenance and debt protection programs.

        The segment distributes its services and products on a direct basis and through subsidiaries and joint venture affiliates in the U.S., United Kingdom ("U.K."), Canada, Europe, Australia, South Africa and Asia-Pacific and, to a lesser degree, distributes such services and products through various strategic alliances.

Output Solutions

        Our Output Solutions segment provides single source, integrated print and electronic communications solutions. In the U.S., DST Output, Inc. ("DST Output"), a wholly owned subsidiary, provides customized and personalized bill and statement processing services and electronic bill payment and presentment solutions which establish DST Output as a preferred service provider to customers of the Financial Services and Customer Management segments and other industries that value customer communications and require high quality, accurate and timely bill and statement processing.

        The segment also offers its services to the Canadian and U.K. markets. DST Output Canada Inc. offers customer communications and document automation solutions to the Canadian market. DST International Output Limited provides similar services in the U.K.

        The segment also offers a variety of complementary professional services, including communications design, direct marketing, fulfillment, assistance in stimulating consumer and consent adoption for electronic delivery as well as statement design and formatting services, that allow clients to use bills and statements as personalized communication and marketing tools.

        OMS is included in this segment and, at or before the time of the Exchange, certain of the business assets of this segment which are not assets of OMS will have been transferred to OMS and upon consummation of the Exchange will no longer be business assets of this segment. See "Business of OMS" and "Proposal—Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement—The Business."

Customer Management

        Our Customer Management segment provides customer management, billing and marketing solutions to the video/broadband, direct broadcast satellite, wire-line and Internet Protocol telephony,

9



Internet and utility markets. The segment offers a comprehensive customer management and billing solution by providing core customer care products that are supplemented with the products and services offered from our other operating segments.

        The segment distributes its services and products on a direct basis, through subsidiaries in North America, the U.K. and parts of Europe and with international alliance partners in other regions of the world.

Investments and Other

        The Investments and Other segment holds investments in equity securities and certain financial interests and our real estate subsidiaries and affiliates. We hold investments in equity securities with a market value of approximately $982.0 million at June 30, 2003, including approximately 12.8 million shares of State Street Corporation with a market value of $504.0 million and 8.6 million shares of Computer Sciences Corporation with a market value of $329.1 million. Additionally, we own and operate real estate mostly in the U.S. and U.K., which is held primarily for lease to our other business segments.

        DST is incorporated in Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105. Our telephone number is 888-DST-INFO.


BUSINESS OF DST OUTPUT MARKETING SERVICES, INC.

        At the time of the Exchange, OMS will hold graphics design and sheet-fed offset commercial printing operations, the laser printing and fulfillment operations of the Marketing Services Division of the Output Solutions segment, and additional cash to approximately equalize the value of the OMS Shares to the Janus DST Shares being exchanged.

        For a more detailed discussion of the business of OMS, see "Proposal—Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement—The Business."

        OMS is incorporated in New York. Its principal executive offices are located at 525 Broadhollow, Melville, New York 11747. Any calls related to this proxy statement should be directed to Kenneth V. Hager at (816) 435-8603. DST is proposing to exchange all of the OMS Shares with Janus in exchange for the Janus DST Shares. See "Proposal—Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement."


BUSINESS OF JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.

        Janus is a leading asset manager offering individual investors and institutional clients complementary asset management disciplines through the firm's global distribution network. Janus consists of Janus Capital Management LLC, Enhanced Investment Technologies, LLC (INTECH) and Bay Isle Financial LLC. As of August 31, 2003, Janus owned approximately 34% of DST. Janus also owns 30% of Perkins, Wolf, McDonnell and Company, LLC.

        Janus is incorporated in Delaware. Its principal executive offices are located at 100 Fillmore Street, Denver, Colorado 80206. Its telephone number is (303) 333-3863.

10




BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATION

Background

        On September 3, 2002, Stilwell Financial Inc. ("Stilwell") announced plans for a merger with its subsidiary Janus Capital Corporation ("JCC") for purposes of creating a new organization to be named Janus Capital Group Inc. Effective January 1, 2003, certain changes in the Board of Directors and executive management of Janus were also announced. In the announcement, and in the analysts' call held by Stilwell and JCC on September 3, 2002, Stilwell and JCC indicated that they would assess strategic alternatives for Stilwell's investment in DST stock.

        On September 11, 2002, Thomas McDonnell, CEO of DST, telephoned Mark Whiston, who had been named to become the new Janus CEO upon completion of the merger, to extend congratulations and to express DST's willingness to work with management of Stilwell and JCC as it explored alternatives for its investment in DST stock. Mr. McDonnell invited management of Stilwell and JCC to meet with DST representatives in Kansas City to discuss the current state of DST's business and answer questions that Janus management might have in relation to its investment in DST. Arrangements were made for a meeting on November 14, 2002 at the offices of DST. Before that meeting began, the parties executed a non-disclosure agreement for purposes of protecting the confidentiality of any information to be exchanged.

        At the November 14, 2002 meeting, DST management presented financial information about DST's operations and compared possible financial results to Stilwell and JCC of open market sales of DST shares over extended time periods. DST expressed its interest in acquiring a significant portion of the Janus DST Shares if a transaction could be structured in a fashion that would meet the business needs of both parties. Shortly after the meeting, representatives of Stilwell presented DST with a memorandum describing basic requirements for a tax free split-off, and inquired whether DST had considered such a transaction in light of DST's objectives. DST management reviewed the memorandum and discussed alternatives for exchanging a DST business unit for the Janus DST Shares and the benefits of such a transaction to DST. Later that day, Mr. McDonnell notified an officer of Stilwell that DST was considering strategic alternatives for one of its business units and that DST management would be open to further discussion of a split-off transaction.

        Between November 14 and December 18, 2002, DST management discussed alternatives for structuring a transaction to acquire the Janus DST Shares with its legal, accounting and tax advisors. DST management considered the differences between gradual acquisition of its shares over a long period of time versus a single transaction in which a large number of shares could be reacquired. DST management considered two alternatives for a single transaction in which the Janus position in DST shares could be significantly reduced, one of which consisted of a partnership structure pursuant to which the Janus DST Shares would be held by a partnership through which DST could indirectly exercise voting rights with respect to the Janus DST Shares, and the other consisting of a split-off transaction pursuant to which DST would acquire the Janus DST Shares in exchange for one of its business units. During this period, DST management also received information from Stilwell and JCC concerning these two alternative transaction structures being considered by their management.

        On December 16, 2002, DST management participated in a telephone conference with JCC officers, legal, accounting, and tax advisors of both companies and JCC financial advisors to discuss alternative transaction structures, including a possible split-off transaction. This discussion was followed by a December 18, 2002 meeting at JCC's offices in Denver attended by Stilwell, JCC and DST management, legal, accounting and tax advisors of the parties and investment banking and financial advisors invited by Janus. The outcome of this meeting was that the parties and their advisors would address numerous legal, accounting, financial, tax and other business issues required to be resolved before the parties could determine the type of transaction that would best meet the business needs of the parties. Among the issues considered by DST management were (i) the potential applicability of emerging accounting rules to a DST/Janus partnership structure, (ii) the ability, if any, of DST to ultimately acquire direct ownership of the Janus DST Shares through a termination of the partnership structure, (iii) the tax consequences of the formation, operation and termination of the partnership,

11



(iv) the legal, accounting and tax requirements for any internal restructuring that would be required to combine the operations of a DST business unit into a single subsidiary in a split off transaction, (v) requirement for shareholder approval of the transaction, (vi) the over-all accounting and tax treatment of a split off transaction, (vii) the ability of DST to finance a contribution of cash for purposes of equalizing transaction values, (viii) the representations, warranties and covenants that could be requested by Janus with respect to the business to be split off, (ix) valuation of the Janus DST Shares and a DST business unit, (x) the effect of the transaction structure on the ability of DST to effectively address concerns of current and future customers about Janus ownership of DST Common Stock, (xi) the effect of the transaction on DST's debt arrangements and future borrowing, and (xii) whether the transaction structure would address DST management's views about the lack of fit of the OMS business with its core Output Services operations.

        From December 18, 2002 to January 28, 2003, the parties participated in telephone conversations and meetings at Janus' offices attended by DST management and Janus officers, legal, accounting, and tax advisors of both parties and Janus financial advisors to resolve such issues. During this period, DST also identified OMS as the business unit that it would propose to exchange for the Janus DST Shares if a split-off transaction were to be pursued. DST management determined that OMS was the appropriate business unit based upon its views about the services provided by that unit as compared to those provided by DST's core Output Solutions segment, and the customer base (present and future) of the OMS business as compared to the markets served by the core Output Solutions segment. It was the view of DST management that the OMS business presented less opportunity for DST to leverage technology utilized in its core Output Solutions operations and very limited opportunity to leverage its Financial Services or other Output Solutions client relationships into the target markets for OMS' services. DST management also recognized that there was an opportunity for the OMS business to benefit from the substantial interaction between Janus and the current and potential customers of OMS. DST management also consulted with its advisors and determined the actions necessary to complete the Reorganization. On January 22, 2003, DST management engaged Standard and Poor's Corporate Value Consulting to provide a valuation analysis of the operations to be included in OMS. On January 28, 2003, the parties met at Janus' offices, agreed to focus further discussions upon a split-off transaction, and made arrangements for the preparation by DST management of a request for a private letter ruling to be submitted to the IRS. DST management determined that the Exchange was preferable to other alternatives because it would result in the acquisition of a substantial portion of the Janus DST Shares in a single transaction, thereby allowing DST to achieve its business objectives of (a) addressing customer concerns about Janus ownership (b) preventing aggregation of credit risk with Janus, and (c) obtaining value for a business unit that did not fit within the core Output Solutions business segment of DST.

        During the period from January 28, 2003 through February 7, 2003, the parties exchanged draft term sheets and drafts of DST's request for a private letter ruling and worked on arrangements for a due diligence review of the OMS operations by Janus.

        During February 2003, DST management provided Janus with customary financial, technical, legal and business information relating to the operations of OMS. During February 2003, DST management advised Janus that it believed the value of the OMS business was $130 million. Janus, however, indicated that it would not agree to allocate such amount to the value of the OMS business in negotiating the terms of the Exchange. During this time period representatives of Janus also personally toured each of the OMS operating facilities in Missouri, Illinois, New York and California. Through March 13, 2003, Janus continued to conduct its diligence review and receive further written information from DST management about the OMS operations. During this period, Janus also interviewed OMS' president, conducted further diligence and performed its own financial analysis for purposes of arriving at its position as to an appropriate value to be allocated to the OMS business.

        On March 14, 2003, DST management and OMS' President Garet Hil met with Janus officers at Janus' offices to discuss the business of OMS and advantages of Janus ownership of that business.

12



        After that meeting and through April 21, 2003, the parties continued to meet in person and via telephone to discuss and negotiate the basic financial, legal and business terms of the proposed transaction and to work towards completion of the draft request for a private letter ruling. As a result of these negotiations, the parties reached agreement upon the most significant financial terms of the transaction including a value of $115 million to be allocated to the OMS business, the amount of cash and subordinated indebtedness to be held by OMS and the range of values for the Janus DST Shares. During this time DST management prepared a summary description of the proposed transaction and DST's business purposes relating to the transaction and submitted it to the IRS along with a request for a pre-submission conference. On April 21, 2003, Mr. McDonnell and legal and tax advisors to DST and Janus attended a pre-submission conference with representatives of the IRS in Washington, D.C.

        After April 21, 2003, representatives of management of DST and Janus, along with legal, accounting and tax advisors for both parties continued to discuss and negotiate the financial, legal and business terms of the proposed transaction via telephone and at meetings at Janus' offices. During this time, DST management also engaged in discussions with representatives of Bank of America concerning alternatives for financing a contribution of cash to OMS prior to closing of the proposed transaction. DST management also discussed the issuance of tax opinions relating to the proposed transaction with its legal and accounting tax advisors. As DST management neared completion of the draft request for a private letter ruling, it was advised by legal counsel that it would be required to obtain customer letters and affidavits relating to its business purposes for the proposed transaction in connection with the submission of the request for a private letter ruling. DST management determined that certain limited information would be required to be disclosed in the process of obtaining such documents. On April 29, 2003, prior to discussions with customers to obtain letters and affidavits, DST issued a press release disclosing the necessary information.

        On June 11, 2003, the parties began reviewing draft definitive agreements for the Exchange. The parties also continued to work on the preparation of the request for a private letter ruling. In preliminary conversations between representatives of DST management and the IRS, and without a review of the specific facts and circumstances of the Exchange, representatives of the IRS indicated that it would be unlikely that the IRS would issue a favorable private letter ruling on a transaction with the amount of cash present in the Exchange. On June 24, 2003, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2003-48 announcing a new policy for the issuance of private letter rulings relating to transactions under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code. This new policy indicated that the IRS would no longer provide guidance on requests for the type of private letter ruling DST management would have been seeking. Although DST management could have filed a request for private letter ruling before the new policy became effective, the new policy was a further indication to DST management of the IRS' preference not to issue private letter rulings under circumstances similar to those upon which DST management would have requested a private letter ruling. In light of the IRS' prior comment, DST management determined that it would not proceed with the request for a private letter ruling and that it would rely upon written opinions from its legal and accounting tax advisors as to the tax treatment of the Exchange. See "Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—No Private Letter Ruling."

        On June 23, 2003, Mr. McDonnell and Mr. Hil met with Janus officers at Janus' offices to discuss transition matters, including benefit plans and future employment arrangements for Mr. Hil and other key OMS management personnel.

        During the remainder of June and into July, 2003 the parties continued to negotiate terms of definitive agreements for the Exchange, and DST management continued discussions with its lenders and investment banking contacts concerning alternatives for financing the cash contribution to OMS. These alternatives consisted of a convertible debt offering, expansion or restatement of DST's syndicated lending arrangements, monetization of investment securities, or a combination of one or more of such transactions. On July 22, 2003, during a meeting at Janus' offices, representatives of DST management advised Janus that DST would proceed with a convertible debt offering, the proceeds of which could be used to finance a portion of the cash contribution to OMS in the event the parties were able to agree upon and consummate the Exchange.

13



        In July 2003, DST engaged Piper Jaffray to provide an opinion on the fairness of the Exchange to DST from a financial point of view. On July 25, 2003, representatives of Piper Jaffray met with DST management in Kansas City and reviewed historical and projected financial information relating to the OMS business and collected factual information about the terms of the Exchange for purposes of their analysis of the fairness of the transaction. Representatives of Piper Jaffray toured OMS operating facilities at Kansas City on July 25, 2003 and at Chicago on July 29, 2003. During July and August 2003 DST management responded to numerous telephone inquiries from Piper Jaffray for purposes of supplying Piper Jaffray with financial and other factual information about the OMS business and the terms of the Exchange.

        During the period from July 28 through August 10, 2003, DST management worked with its legal, accounting and investment banking advisors in preparation for the issuance of convertible debt securities. On August 5, 2003, DST issued press releases announcing the offering of up to $840 million of convertible debt securities and describing additional details relating to its ongoing discussions with Janus about the Exchange. During this period, DST management and Janus management also continued to negotiate definitive agreements for the Exchange. On August 13, 2003, the CFO of Janus notified DST that it would be preferable to eliminate the $150 million of subordinated debt that DST planned to contribute to OMS and to contribute such amount in cash. DST management promptly commenced discussions with representatives of its syndicated lending facility, led by Bank of America, concerning the terms upon which that facility could be expanded or restated to enable DST to replace the subordinated debt with cash. After concluding those initial discussions, and further negotiation of transaction terms with Janus, DST management agreed to continue efforts to finalize definitive agreements for the Exchange. DST management and representatives of Janus held a final meeting at Janus' offices on August 22, 2003 to complete drafting of the definitive agreements for the Exchange.

        DST management updated the DST Board on the status of negotiations with Janus and all significant financial, legal, tax and business issues relating to the Exchange and the financing of the cash contribution to OMS, including the convertible debt offering, at nine separate regular and special meetings occurring from September 4, 2002 through August 3, 2003. At the regular meeting of the DST Board on August 3, 2003, representatives of Piper Jaffray presented their analysis of the Exchange transaction and advised the DST Board that the transaction was fair to DST from a financial point of view. On August 25, 2003, representatives of Piper Jaffray presented the DST Board with an updated analysis of the Exchange transaction and confirmed again that the transaction was fair to DST from a financial point of view. After further discussion at that meeting, the DST Board unanimously approved the Share Exchange Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements and authorized appropriate officers of DST to take all actions necessary to complete the Exchange. After the completion of the DST Board meeting, the parties executed final definitive agreements for the Exchange at DST's offices in Kansas City, Missouri. After the close of business on August 25, 2003, both parties issued press releases announcing the execution of the Share Exchange Agreement.

Reasons for the Proposal

        The Exchange is intended to achieve important DST business objectives. We believe the removal of significant ownership by Janus, which is a competitor to our mutual fund customer base, will improve our competitive position in serving the mutual fund industry. DST's customers have expressed concern over Janus' significant ownership interest in DST, since Janus advises one of the largest mutual fund complexes in the industry. Through the Exchange, we hope to allay these concerns in order to retain the business of our current customers and possibly increase our mutual fund business customer base.

        In addition, we believe the substantial reduction in Janus' ownership of DST will improve our access to bank credit by eliminating aggregation of credit risks by lenders. Although DST has not experienced any material difficulty in accessing bank credit to date, DST was informed in December 2002, by one of its syndicated line of credit lenders which has extended a revolving credit line to one of DST's 50% owned affiliates and participated in the Janus syndicated line of credit that the 50% owned affiliate line of credit needed to be reduced by $10 million or 25%, upon renewal. The

14



lending bank cited aggregation of credit risks with Janus as one of the reasons in making its recommendation for a decrease in the respective line of credit. Although the amount of this reduction did not, in and of itself, create a serious financing problem for DST, the possibility of future reductions in loan commitments could create extremely serious financing issues for DST. DST will most likely seek to replace its existing $315 million syndicated line of credit within the next 12 months, since it expires in December 2004. Assuming that the proposed Exchange transaction is consummated, DST does not expect any difficulty in replacing this revolving credit facility. In the event the Exchange transaction is not consummated, DST may need to address the issue of aggregation of credit risks with certain existing lending banks. If this becomes necessary, it may require DST to relocate certain of its fee based bank business to new lenders which could entail significant internal time and expense.

        The Exchange will also address certain of our concerns about the lack of desired fit of the OMS operations with those of our core Output Solutions business. DST originally anticipated that its Financial Services and Output Solutions segments would create synergies with the OMS business and provide a strong basis for expansion. However, despite our best efforts, DST believes that the strategy upon which the business of OMS was built has been ineffective. The OMS business is highly customized, labor intensive and the customer base is served by larger competitors who possess significant economies of scale compared with OMS' capabilities. In recognition of this fact, on two earlier occasions (1996 and 2001) DST unsuccessfully sought a joint venture partner with which to combine OMS' operations to achieve the scale necessary to become a market leader. Furthermore, OMS' business is far more cyclical and volatile than DST's core business during periods of stock market weaknesses and recoveries.

        The reason for the proposal is to allow DST, OMS and Janus to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement.

        In arriving at its decision to approve the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement and in making its recommendation discussed below under "—Recommendation," the DST Board considered the following material factors:

15


        Pursuant to an engagement letter dated January 22, 2003, DST engaged Standard & Poor's Corporate Value Consulting ("S&PCVC") to perform a valuation of a non-marketable controlling equity interest of a business consisting of the combined operations of the Graphics Design and Commercial Print Business owned by a DST subsidiary (Graphics) and the laser printing and fulfillment operations of the Marketing Services Division of DST's subsidiaries (MSD)(collectively OMS).

        S&PCVC is a market leader in providing valuations and consulting for financial reporting and tax purposes; transaction support, joint ventures, divestitures and corporate restructurings; and capital allocation and capital structure purposes. S&PCVC has historically been used to assist DST in performing valuation and purchase price allocations.

        The valuation was performed for DST for management planning and tax reporting related to an intended Internal Revenue Code Section 355 qualifying transaction involving OMS. The scope of the engagement was to estimate the fair market value of OMS. "Fair Market Value" in this case was defined as the price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell, and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts. In estimating the Fair Market Value of OMS, S&PCVC assumed OMS to be an ongoing business. S&PCVC was not asked to render a conclusion as to whether any consideration to be received for OMS was fair to DST. Accordingly, S&PCVC did not perform the scope of work consistent with the issuance of an independent fairness opinion.

        In accordance with Revenue Ruling 59-60, S&PCVC considered the following factors in performing their analysis:

        The principal sources of information and procedures used in performing the valuation included but were not limited to:

16


        For purposes of the valuation engagement, S&PCVC made no investigation of, and assumed no responsibility for, the titles to, or liabilities against, the assets or equity of OMS, including but not limited to any contingent or environmental liabilities. The estimate of value assumes that the assets and liabilities presented in the OMS December 31, 2002 balances sheet were intact as of December 31, 2002. Any change in the level of assets or liabilities could cause a change in the value estimated. Furthermore, there was an assumption that there were no hidden or unexpected conditions that would adversely affect the value estimated.

        Under the terms of the engagement letter dated January 22, 2003, DST agreed to pay S&PCVC, a fee estimated to be in the range of $40,000 to $50,000, plus actual out of pocket expenses.

        S&PCVC's analysis was based on the Income and Market Approaches to value.

        The Income Approach indicates the fair market value of the equity of the business based on the value of the cash flows that the business can be expected to generate in the future. The form of Income Approach used was the Discounted Cash Flow Method, which is a valuation technique in which the value of a business is estimated based on the earning capacity of that business. Earning capacity, as used in the Discounted Cash Flow Method, represents the earnings available for distribution to debt and equity holders after consideration of the reinvestment required for future growth. This measure of earning capacity, referred to as available cash flow, is the amount that could be paid to the owners of a business without impairing its operation. S&PCVC discounted each year's projected available cash flow to December 31, 2002 at a rate of return that considers the risk involved in realizing those cash flows.

        S&PCVC estimated the rate of return based on two approaches for determining the rate of return on on equity: (i) the Capital Asset Pricing Model ("CAPM") and (ii) a model employing information from a study conducted by S&PCVC and the Center for Research in Securities Prices at the University of Chicago (the "Corporate Value Consulting Size-Return Study"). S&PCVC estimated the rate of return on debt capital considering the borrowing capabilities of OMS.

        Utilizing the CAPM model, a stock's required rate of return is equal to the risk-free rate of return, plus its risk premium. S&PCVC estimated the risk-free rate based on the 20-year US Treasury bond. According to the market data obtained from S&PCVC's equity risk premium study, the equity market risk premium was estimated at 5%, including an adjustment to account for the uncertainty of realizing management's projections.

        The Corporate Value Consulting Size-Return Study is based on the relationship between firm size and investor returns. S&PCVC calculated returns for companies traded on the NYSE from 1963 through 2000. The companies were ranked at the beginning of each year into 25 groupings (portfolios) based on various measures of sizes. Total return was defined as capital price appreciation plus dividends divided by initial stock price of the security. Annual rates of return were calculated for each portfolio. S&PCVC used this data to create a series of annual premia over long-term government securities. In utilizing this data to estimate the required rate of return, S&PCVC identified the portfolio that contained companies whose average size was most similar to the criteria of OMS, and included the adjustment to account for the uncertainty of realizing management's projections.

        Based on its analysis of the CAPM Model and the Corporate Value Consulting Size-Return Study and utilizing an industry capital structure, or weighting of debt and equity capital, S&PCVC estimated the weighted average rate of return required on OMS' invested capital (both equity and debt) as of December 31, 2002 at 14.5%.

17



        S&PCVC applied a discount for lack of marketability to the results of the Income Approach. When considering the lack of marketability discount, S&PCVC referred to the Cost of Flotation of Registered Securities published by the SEC, which analyzed the costs of various types of debt and equity public offerings. The study on common stock showed flotation costs, as a percentage of total proceeds, ranging from 3% for issues over $100,000,000 to over 23% for issues under $500,000. Based on this study and the specific attributes of OMS, S&PCVC applied a discount for lack of marketability of 5%.

        The Market Approach indicates the fair market value of the equity of a business based on a comparison of OMS to comparable publicly traded companies and transactions in its industry. Under the Market Approach, S&PCVC performed both the Market Comparable Method and the Market Transaction Method. In the Market Approach, S&PCVC used comparable companies to determine pricing multiples that were applied to various financial measures of OMS to determine implied value. Based on S&PCVC's analysis of the operations of comparable companies identified in the search, S&PCVC identified nine companies that had similar lines of business to OMS.

        Under the Market Transaction Method, S&PCVC developed multiples of total invested capital to various measures of revenue, earnings, cash flow, industry specific factors, asset balances or net worth. S&PCVC then applied the multiples to OMS' financial data to arrive at the implied value of OMS' operations. Based on their analysis, S&PCVC was unable to find meaningful transactions of companies with attributes similar to those of OMS. Accordingly, S&PCVC determined that little to no inference could be made from the application of transaction multiples. S&PCVC considered adjustments to reflect a control premium and a discount for lack of marketability before arriving at an estimate of Fair Market Value. S&PCVC considered premiums offered over the past several years for acquisitions of companies in the broad market and premiums paid for companies in the computer software, supplies and services industries, but concluded that prices offered for the companies analyzed likely reflected some premium for synergies that the buyers brought to the transactions, as well as premiums for control. Accordingly, S&PCVC estimated a control premium of 40%.

        On June 13, 2003, S&PCVC issued a report concluding that the estimated value of OMS, as of December 31, 2002, was $130 million derived from the Income Approach. This value was further supported by a Market Approach value ranging from $117 million to $130 million.

        Prior to the engagement of S&PCVC to provide the estimate of value for OMS, the following relationships existed between DST and/or its Affiliates and S&PCVC and/or its Affiliates:

Opinion of Financial Advisor

        Pursuant to an engagement letter dated July 24, 2003, DST engaged Piper Jaffray to act as a financial advisor to DST and to render a fairness opinion in connection with the Exchange. At an August 25, 2003 meeting of the DST Board, Piper Jaffray made a fairness opinion presentation to the DST Board and delivered its opinion. The opinion was that as of its date and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of the review undertaken by Piper Jaffray, the consideration to be exchanged in the Exchange is fair, from a financial point of view, to DST.

        The full text of Piper Jaffray's written opinion, dated August 25, 2003, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken by Piper

18



Jaffray in connection with the opinion, is attached as Appendix C to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference. DST stockholders are urged to read Piper Jaffray's opinion in its entirety. The summary of Piper Jaffray's opinion set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Piper Jaffray's opinion.

        While Piper Jaffray rendered its opinion and provided certain analyses to the DST Board, Piper Jaffray was not requested to and did not make any recommendation to the DST Board as to the specific form or amount of the consideration to be received by DST in the proposed Exchange. Piper Jaffray's opinion, which was directed to the DST Board, addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the proposed consideration to be exchanged in the proposed Exchange, does not address our underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the Exchange or the relative merits of the Exchange compared to any alternative business strategy or transaction in which we might engage, and does not constitute a recommendation to any of our stockholders as to how to vote regarding the Exchange.

        In arriving at its opinion, Piper Jaffray's review included:

        In addition, Piper Jaffray visited our headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri and OMS's operations in Kansas City, Missouri and Chicago, Illinois and conducted discussions with members of senior management of DST and OMS concerning the financial condition, current operating results and business outlook for DST and OMS.

        The following is a summary of certain material analyses and other information that Piper Jaffray prepared and relied on in delivering its opinion to the DST Board and does not purport to be a complete description of the analysis performed by Piper Jaffray:

        Piper Jaffray reviewed the stock trading history of DST Common Stock at the dates or for the periods indicated below:

Closing price on August 21, 2003   $ 37.90
20 Trading Day Average   $ 36.75
90 Trading Day Average   $ 35.01
5 Days Prior to Announcement (April 23, 2003)   $ 28.24
52 Week Low   $ 24.30
52 Week High   $ 39.84
Average Daily Share Volume     586,892

19


        Piper Jaffray reviewed and compared certain financial, operating and stock market information for OMS and a group of publicly traded companies deemed similar to OMS. In determining selected public companies that were deemed comparable to OMS, Piper Jaffray considered the types of operations conducted by these companies. This group was comprised of the following ten companies operating within the commercial printing, computer programming, data processing and other computer related services industries: Advo Inc.; Automatic Data Processing, Inc.; Banta Corp.; Bowne & Company, Inc.; Consolidated Graphics; Ennis Business Forms, Inc.; Harte-Hanks, Inc.; Moore Wallace Inc.; RR Donnelley & Sons Co.; and The Standard Register Company. Although no company included in the analysis was identical to OMS, the selected companies provided one or more of the following products or services:

        This analysis produced multiples of selected valuation data as follows(1):

 
  OMS @
$115.0 million(2)

  Comparable Companies

 
  Median

  Mean

  Low

  High

 
 
Price/LTM Earnings   45.6x   19.6x   21.1x   14.5x   38.9x
Price/2003 Earnings   31.9x   18.7x   20.8x   13.5x   37.0x
Price/2004 Earnings   14.8x   15.8x   16.4x   12.6x   24.7x
Company Value/LTM Revenue   1.2x   0.9x   4.4x   0.5x   33.4x
Company Value/2003 Revenue   1.1x   0.9x   4.5x   0.5x   30.8x
Company Value/2004 Revenue   0.9x   0.9x   4.1x   0.6x   27.7x
Company Value/LTM EBITDA   14.8x   6.8x   8.5x   5.3x   16.0x

(1)
Based on historical and projected financial statements. Historical company information based on most recent filings. Projected comparable company information provided as of August 21, 2003 as reported by FirstCall.

(2)
The $115 million valuation of OMS Post Reorganization was agreed upon by the parties. DST believes that this negotiated value is no different than the value which would have been negotiated with an unaffiliated party.

        Piper Jaffray performed a merger and acquisition multiple analysis that encompassed a review of transactions involving acquired entities deemed similar to the business of OMS Post Reorganization.

20


Based upon its analysis, Piper Jaffray was unable to identify transactions for which meaningful data was available.

        Piper Jaffray used a discounted cash flow analysis to calculate a range of theoretical values for OMS Post Reorganization based on the present value of future projected cash flows through year 2005 and a terminal value for OMS Post Reorganization at calendar year-end 2005 calculated based upon a multiple of projected estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"). Piper Jaffray's discounted cash flow analysis was based on the following key assumptions:

        The table below shows the results of the discounted cash flow analysis for OMS Post Reorganization (dollars in millions):

 
Discount Rate
        15.0%     16.0%     17.0%     18.0%
EBITDA Multiple 6.0x   $ 109.9   $ 107.7   $ 105.5   $ 103.4
  7.0x   $ 125.1   $ 122.5   $ 120.0   $ 117.6
  8.0x   $ 140.3   $ 137.4   $ 134.6   $ 131.9

        Piper Jaffray reviewed and compared certain financial, operating and stock market information for DST and the following thirteen publicly traded companies deemed similar to DST: Affiliated Computer Services; Automatic Data Processing, Inc.; Bisys Group Inc.; Checkfree Corporation; Electronic Data Systems Corporation; Fiserv, Inc.; Intercept Inc.; Jack Henry & Associates Inc.; Moore Wallace Inc.; RR Donnelley & Sons Co.; SEI Investments Company; SunGuard Data Systems Inc.; and State Street Corporation.

        This analysis produced multiples of selected valuation data as follows:

 
   
   
   
   
   
 
  DST @ per share prices

  Comparable Companies

 
  $30.00
  $34.50
  Median
  Mean
  Low
  High
Price/LTM Earnings(1)   17.2x   19.8x   22.8x   23.5x   16.9x   35.1x
Price/2003 Earnings(2)   16.1x   18.5x   22.1x   22.3x   15.8x   31.7x
Price/2004 Earnings(2)   15.9x   18.3x   19.3x   19.4x   12.6x   25.1x
Company Value/LTM Revenue(3)   1.6x   1.8x   2.8x   2.7x   0.7x   5.8x
Company Value/2003 Revenue(2)   1.6x   1.8x   2.9x   2.6x   0.7x   5.6x
Company Value/2004 Revenue(2)   1.5x   1.7x   2.7x   2.4x   0.7x   5.1x
Company Value/LTM EBIT(3)   12.0x   13.6x   14.1x   16.3x   11.7x   30.2x
Company Value/LTM EBITDA(3)   8.3x   9.4x   10.9x   10.9x   5.7x   16.0x

(1)
Based on fully diluted earnings per share for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2003 as reported by FirstCall.

(2)
Company estimates based on projected financial information provided by management. Projections for comparable group based on estimates as of August 21, 2003 as reported by FirstCall.

21


(3)
Historical information based on most recent filings.

        Piper Jaffray reviewed eight acquisition transactions involving acquired entities that it deemed comparable to DST's business. It selected these transactions by Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings, public company disclosures, press releases, industry and popular press reports, databases and other sources and by applying the following criteria:

        Piper Jaffray compared the resulting multiples of selected valuation data to multiples for DST derived from the consideration to be exchanged by DST in the Exchange.

 
   
   
   
   
   
 
  DST @ per share prices

  Comparable Companies

 
  $30.00
  $34.50
  Median
  Mean
  Low
  High
Price/Net Income   17.2x   19.8x   38.0x   40.3x   21.4x   67.2x
Company Value/Revenue   1.6x   1.8x   2.8x   2.8x   1.4x   4.7x
Company Value/LTM EBIT   12.0x   13.6x   23.7x   23.2x   11.2x   37.5x
Company Value/LTM EBITDA   8.3x   9.4x   12.2x   13.8x   9.5x   22.2x

        Piper Jaffray performed a discounted cash flow analysis for DST, without taking into account the Exchange, in which it calculated the present value of the projected hypothetical future cash flows of DST using internal financial planning data prepared by DST management. Piper Jaffray estimated a range of theoretical values for DST, without taking into account the Exchange, based on the present value of future projected cash flows through the year 2005 and a terminal value for DST at calendar year end 2005 calculated based upon a multiple of projected EBITDA. Piper Jaffray applied a range of discount rates of 9.0% to 12.0% and a range of EBITDA multiples of 9.0x to 11.0x to derive a present value. This analysis yielded the following results:

 
Discount Rate
        9.0%     10.0%     11.0%     12.0%
  9.0x   $ 38.37   $ 37.45   $ 36.55   $ 35.67
EBITDA Multiple 10.0x   $ 42.58   $ 41.56   $ 40.57   $ 39.61
  11.0x   $ 46.79   $ 45.67   $ 44.59   $ 43.54

        In reaching its conclusion as to the fairness to DST, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be exchanged in the Exchange and in its presentation to the DST Board, Piper Jaffray did not rely on any single analysis or factor described above, assign relative weights to the analyses or factors considered by it, or make any conclusion as to how the results of any given analysis, taken alone, supported its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Piper Jaffray believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selection of portions of its analyses and of the factors considered by it, without considering all of the factors and analyses, would create a misleading view of the processes underlying the opinion.

        The analyses of Piper Jaffray are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by the analyses. Analyses relating to the

22


value of companies do not purport to be appraisals or valuations or necessarily reflect the price at which companies may actually be sold. No company or transaction used in any analysis for purposes of comparison is identical to DST or the Exchange. Accordingly, an analysis of the results of the comparisons is not mathematical; rather, it involves complex considerations and judgments about differences in the companies to which DST and OMS were compared and other factors that could affect the trading value of the companies.

        For purposes of its opinion, Piper Jaffray relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements and other information provided to it by DST, or otherwise made available to it, and did not assume responsibility for the independent verification of that information. Piper Jaffray relied upon the assurances of the management of DST that the information provided to it by DST was prepared on a reasonable basis in accordance with industry practice, and the financial planning data and other business outlook information reflects the best currently available estimates and judgment of management of DST and OMS, and such management was not aware of any information or facts that would make the information provided to Piper Jaffray incomplete or misleading. Piper Jaffray assumed that there have been no material changes in the assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of DST and OMS Post Reorganization since the date of the last financial statements made available to it. Piper Jaffray also assumed that neither DST, nor OMS Post Reorganization, are parties to any material pending transactions, other than the Exchange, anticipated changes to the DST syndicated credit facility and other transactions in the ordinary course of business.

        In arriving at its opinion, Piper Jaffray assumed that all the necessary regulatory approvals and consents required for the Exchange would be obtained and that no limitations, restrictions or conditions would be imposed that would have a material adverse effect on DST or the contemplated benefits to DST of the Exchange or will otherwise change the consideration to be received by DST. Piper Jaffray assumed that the Exchange would qualify as a tax-free exchange under the United States Internal Revenue Code. Piper Jaffray also assumed that the final form of the Share Exchange Agreement would be substantially similar to the last draft reviewed by it, without modification of material terms or conditions.

        In arriving at its opinion, Piper Jaffray has not performed, nor been furnished any appraisals or valuations of the specific assets or liabilities of DST other than the valuation of OMS Post Reorganization prepared by Standard & Poor's Corporate Value Consulting dated June 13, 2003. Piper Jaffray expressed no opinion regarding the liquidation value of DST or OMS. The analyses Piper Jaffray performed in connection with this opinion were going concern analyses. Piper Jaffray was not requested to opine, and no opinion was rendered, as to whether any analyses of an entity, other than as a going concern, was appropriate in the circumstances and, accordingly, Piper Jaffray performed no such analyses. The DST Board did not request that Piper Jaffray solicit, and Piper Jaffray did not solicit, any expression of interest from any other parties with respect to any alternative transaction.

        Piper Jaffray undertook no independent analysis of any pending or threatened litigation, material claims, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities, to which DST or its affiliates is a party or may be subject, or of any other governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which either DST or its affiliates is a party or may be subject. At DST's direction and with its consent, Piper Jaffray's opinion makes no assumption concerning, and therefore does not consider, the potential effects of any such litigation, claims or investigations or possible assertions of claims, outcomes or damages arising out of any such matters.

        Piper Jaffray's opinion is based upon the information available to it, facts and circumstances and economic, market and other conditions as they existed, and is subject to evaluation on the date of the opinion. Events occurring after that date could materially affect the assumptions used in preparing the opinion. Except as provided in the engagement letter between DST and Piper Jaffray, Piper Jaffray has not undertaken to reaffirm or revise its opinion or otherwise comment upon any events occurring after the date of the opinion and it does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. Piper Jaffray expressed no opinion as to the prices at which DST Common Stock has traded or may trade at any future time.

23



        Piper Jaffray, as a customary part of its investment banking business, is engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, underwritings and secondary distributions of securities, private placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. In the ordinary course of its business, Piper Jaffray and its affiliates may actively trade securities of DST for their own accounts or the accounts of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

        Under the terms of the engagement letter dated July 24, 2003, DST agreed to pay Piper Jaffray, whether or not the transaction is consummated, a retainer of $50,000, a fee of $600,000 for rendering its opinion and $25,000 for any updates. In addition, DST has agreed to pay the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of Piper Jaffray and to indemnify Piper Jaffray against certain liabilities incurred. Management of DST is not aware of any material relationship between Janus and Piper Jaffray.

        In addition, Piper Jaffray will receive approximately $375,000 in selling concessions, in connection with DST's private offering of convertible senior debentures in August 2003.

        Prior to the engagement of Piper Jaffray to provide the fairness opinion, the following relationships existed between DST and/or its Affiliates and Piper Jaffray and/or its Affiliates:


Recommendation

        The DST Board has unanimously determined that the Share Exchange Agreement is in the best interests of DST and its stockholders. The DST Board did not differentiate between affiliated and unaffiliated stockholders as the determination covered DST stockholders as a whole. The DST Board also obtained the fairness opinion of Piper Jaffray and agreed with that opinion before adopting the resolutions approving the transaction. The DST Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

24




PROPOSAL—APPROVAL OF THE SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.

Description of the Proposal

        The proposal being submitted to DST stockholders is for the approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement.

Purposes and Effects of the Proposal

        We are seeking your approval of the proposal in order to allow us to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement upon receipt of all regulatory approvals and satisfactions of the conditions to Closing. At the time of the Exchange, OMS will hold graphics design and sheet-fed offset commercial printing operations, the laser printing and fulfillment operations of the Marketing Services Division of DST's Output Solutions segment, and additional cash to approximately equalize the value of the OMS Shares to the Janus DST Shares being exchanged. The Exchange is intended to achieve important DST business objectives. We believe the removal of significant ownership by Janus, which is a competitor to our mutual fund customer base, will improve our competitive position in serving the mutual fund industry. In addition, we believe the substantial reduction in Janus' ownership of DST will improve our access to bank credit by eliminating aggregation of credit risks by lenders. The Exchange will also address certain of our concerns about the lack of desired fit of the OMS operations with those of our core output business. If the proposal is approved, OMS will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Janus and the business operations of OMS will no longer be part of DST's business. See "—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement—The Business."

Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement

        The following summary of the terms and provisions of the Share Exchange Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Share Exchange Agreement, a copy of which has been attached hereto as Appendix A. You should read this Share Exchange Agreement carefully for more details regarding the provisions described below and for other provisions that may be important to you. Capitalized terms used, and not otherwise defined, in this summary will have the meanings given to them in the Share Exchange Agreement.

The Exchange and the Closing

        On August 25, 2003, DST, OMS, and Janus entered into the Share Exchange Agreement. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement, DST will transfer to Janus the OMS Shares and Janus will transfer to DST the Janus DST Shares in exchange for the OMS Shares. The Closing will take place on the third business day following the date on which the last of the unsatisfied or unwaived conditions specified in the Share Exchange Agreement have been satisfied or waived (other than those conditions contemplated to be satisfied at, or only capable of being satisfied at, the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions), or at such other time and place as agreed in writing by Janus and DST (the date of the Closing is herein referred to as the "Closing Date").

The Reorganization

        DST has agreed that, prior to the Closing, DST will, and will cause its respective Subsidiaries to, transfer to OMS: (i) the "Non-OMS Business Assets"; (ii) the "Additional Assets"; and (iii) the "Non-OMS Business Liabilities" (the "Reorganization"). In exchange for these transfers, OMS has agreed to accept, assume and pay, perform or otherwise discharge the Non-OMS Business Liabilities in accordance with their respective terms and conditions.

25



        For purposes of the Share Exchange Agreement:

        Reasons for Reorganization.    There are certain assets, liabilities and employees that prior to the reorganization are located in certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries. The purpose of the Reorganization is to place within a single entity all of the assets, liabilities and employees of the OMS business. Additionally, these actions streamline the DST corporate structure to enable it to operate more efficiently.

        Transactions in Reorganization.    The Reorganization will involve transactions that will place the graphics design and sheet-fed offset commercial printing operations and the laser printing and fulfillment operations of the Marketing Services Division of DST, together with the Additional Assets, within a single entity, OMS.

        The Reorganization will involve the following transactions:

26


        All of the assets, liabilities and substantially all of the employees of those organizations that were not part of the Marketing Services Division of DST and are merged into OMS will become a part of OMS as a result of the Reorganization. For a more detailed discussion of the products and services to be offered by OMS post-Reorganization, see "—The Business" below. As of June 30, 2003, the book value of the assets to be transferred to OMS was approximately $8.5 million and the book value of the liabilities to be transferred was approximately $2.5 million. The $8.5 million of assets are comprised of approximately $5.7 million of accounts receivable, $1.3 million of inventory, $1.1 million of properties and equipment and $0.4 million of other assets. The $2.5 million of liabilities include approximately $1.5 million of accounts payable and accrued payroll and $1.0 million of other accrued liabilities.

        DST will receive Tax Opinions from Sonnenschein and PWC.

The Business

        The "Business" is the business of providing the products and services described below.

        The Business products and services include:

27


        For purposes of the foregoing description of Business products and services:

28


Representations and Warranties

        The Share Exchange Agreement contains representations and warranties of DST and Janus that are customary for transactions of this type. DST made representations and warranties with respect to, among other matters, the following:

29


        Janus made representations and warranties with respect to, among other matters, the following:

Conditions to Closing Obligations

        The obligations of each of DST, OMS and Janus to complete the Closing are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including, among others:

        In addition, the obligations of Janus to complete the Closing are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including among others:

30


        In addition, the obligations of DST and OMS to complete the Closing are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including among others;

        In any transaction of this type, management of either party to the transaction generally may waive a condition precedent to closing. The DST Board has given that authority to authorized DST officers. DST will recirculate revised proxy materials and resolicit proxies if there are any material changes in the terms of the Exchange, including those that result from waivers. It is possible, but not certain, that DST may waive entering into one of the ancillary agreements between an affiliate of DST and Janus with respect to certain statement printing services. DST does not believe any such waiver, if given, would be a material change in the terms of the Exchange. DST has not sought, and does not anticipate seeking a waiver of any closing conditions from Janus.

Post Closing Adjustments

        Within 30 days after the Closing Date, DST will deliver to Janus an unaudited balance sheet of OMS dated as of the Closing Date (the "Closing Date Balance Sheet"). In the event that the Adjusted Shareholder's Equity (defined as total shareholder's equity of OMS as of the Closing Date less the Additional Assets) reflected on the Closing Date Balance Sheet is less than $12 million, DST will pay to OMS on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the amount necessary to achieve Adjusted Shareholder's Equity of $13 million as of the Closing Date. In the event the Adjusted Shareholder's Equity is greater than $14 million, Janus will cause OMS to pay to DST, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the amount necessary to reduce Adjusted Shareholder's Equity to $13 million as of the Closing Date. Any required payments must be made within 30 days after receipt by Janus of the Closing Date Balance Sheet, unless a Dispute Notice (defined below) is delivered.

        If Janus disputes the amount of Adjusted Shareholder's Equity reflected in the Closing Date Balance Sheet, Janus will give written notice to DST within 30 days after Janus' receipt of the Closing Date Balance Sheet specifying in reasonable detail Janus' basis for its dispute (a "Dispute Notice"). If Janus submits a Dispute Notice within such 30-day period, DST and Janus will work together in good faith to seek to resolve the dispute. However, if Janus and DST are unable to resolve their disagreement within 15 calendar days after DST's receipt of a Dispute Notice from Janus, the dispute will be referred for determination to a nationally known firm of independent public accountants mutually selected by DST and Janus (the "Dispute Accountants") as promptly as practicable. If DST and Janus are unable to agree on the Dispute Accountants, then the parties agree to retain KPMG LLP. The Dispute Accountants will make a written determination as to the correct amount of Adjusted Shareholder's Equity, which will be conclusive and binding, and will prepare a final Closing Date Balance Sheet. DST and Janus will use reasonable commercial efforts to cause the Dispute Accountants to render their decision within 30 days of submitting the dispute. Any payments required

31



upon the determination by the Dispute Accountants will be made within 10 days following the determination.

        Janus will pay the fees and expenses charged by the Dispute Accountants unless any payment required to be made by DST is greater than $500,000, in which case DST will pay such fees and expenses.

Certain Covenants and Agreements

        Janus has agreed to vote all shares of DST Common Stock beneficially owned by Janus in favor of approval of the Share Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement at the Special Meeting.

        Subject to the terms and conditions of the Share Exchange Agreement from time to time whether before, at or for a period of two years following the Closing, each of Janus and DST will, and will cause their respective Affiliates to, make reasonable commercial efforts to do all things reasonably necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective as promptly as practicable the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement, including completion of transfers of assets contemplated to make the Exchange complete.

        DST or its relevant Affiliate will take all steps necessary or appropriate to cause all unexercised options to purchase shares of DST's or its Affiliates' stock held by Business Employees or Former Business Employees that are outstanding as of the Closing Date (the "DST Options") not to terminate due to or on account of the Closing and will cause the DST Options to become fully vested in such Business Employees or Former Business Employees effective as of the Closing. DST will cause the DST Options to remain outstanding and exercisable pursuant to their terms until their normal expiration date, unless such treatment is otherwise not permitted by applicable law.

        For three years after the Closing, DST and Janus will not and will cause each of their respective Subsidiaries not to, directly or indirectly, solicit the employment of any employee of the other or of its Subsidiaries, without the other's prior written consent. This non-solicitation covenant does not apply to (i) a general advertisement or solicitation program that is not specifically targeted at such persons or (ii) the solicitation of any employee after their employment has been terminated.

        From the date of the Share Exchange Agreement until the Closing or the earlier termination of the Share Exchange Agreement:

32


        Within 30 days after the Closing:

        Promptly after the Closing Date, Janus will make all filings with the appropriate governmental authorities to effectuate such name changes. Janus will use its reasonable commercial efforts to minimize the usage of such names, and to discontinue it as soon as practicable after the Closing. To the extent any approvals of governmental authorities are necessary to effectuate the name change, the time limits specified above will be extended by the time period necessary to obtain such approvals, so long as Janus begins the process of seeking such approval within 30 days after the Closing.

        During the 20-day period used to calculate the DST Share Value:

        In consideration of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement, as of the Closing, DST, on behalf of itself and each of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates (other than OMS) and their respective heirs, executors, successors and assigns (the "Waiving Parties"), waives from and after the Closing all Claims that the Waiving Parties had, have or may have against OMS and its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of any act or omission of OMS or its officers, directors, employees, advisers or agents, in such capacity, at or prior to the Closing. This waiver is not deemed a waiver by the Waiving Parties of any rights under the Share Exchange Agreement or any of the other agreements contemplated in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement.

        From and after the Closing Date until the tenth anniversary of the Closing:

33


        DST will use its reasonable best efforts to secure as promptly as practicable, the financing necessary to permit the funding of at least $150 million of the Additional Assets at an initial interest rate of 4% per annum or less and a maturity of not less than 364 days and otherwise on reasonable and customary terms and conditions for a financing of comparable size and form (the "Financing").

        DST has agreed that until the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date (the period from the date of the Share Exchange Agreement to such fifth anniversary, the "Non-Competition Period"), subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement, DST will not and will cause each of its Subsidiaries not to (i) offer to U.S. customers of OMS at the time of Closing services of a type that compete with the Business Products and Services (as defined in the Share Exchange Agreement, and which include Rapid Fulfillment, Integrated Fulfillment, Rapid Publisher, Rapid Compliance, Rapid Confirm, Rapid Proxy, eLLITE Suite, Rapid Portfolio Services and Commercial Printing Services), and (ii) engage in the sale to any person of the OMS Competitive Products and Services (defined in the Share Exchange Agreement as commercial printing services consisting of plate production, offset sheet press printing and envelope printing using jet press machinery, and the following Business Products and Services: Integrated Fulfillment Services, Rapid Publisher, Rapid Proxy and eLLITE Suite Services).

        Janus has agreed that during the Non-Competition Period, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement, Janus will not and will cause each of its Subsidiaries not to engage in certain activities in competition with the DST Competitive Products and Services (as defined in the Share Exchange Agreement, and which consist of high volume transactional or account related print/mail and electronic delivery and presentation of documents that are neither Static nor Nonrecurring).

        For a more detailed description of these non-competition provisions, see the Share Exchange Agreement attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

Termination

        The Share Exchange Agreement may be terminated prior to consummation of the Closing as follows:

34


        In the event of a final judicial determination that termination of the Share Exchange Agreement was caused by an intentional and deliberate breach of the Share Exchange Agreement, then, in addition to other remedies at law or equity for breach of the Share Exchange Agreement, the party found to have intentionally and deliberately breached the Share Exchange Agreement will indemnify and hold harmless the other parties to the Share Exchange Agreement for their respective out-of-pocket costs, including the reasonable fees and expenses of their counsel, accountants, financial advisors and other experts and advisors, as well as reasonable fees and expenses incident to the negotiation, preparation and execution of the Share Exchange Agreement and related documentation.

Required Regulatory Consents, Approvals and Filings

        Certain regulatory consents, approvals and filings are required in connection with the Closing. These include, among others:

For a discussion of the filings made and the status of such filings, see "—Regulatory Matters" below.

35



Opinion of Financial Advisor

        Piper Jaffray has delivered its written opinion to the DST Board that, as of the date of such opinion, the consideration to be exchanged in the Exchange is fair, from a financial point of view, to DST. See "Background and Recommendation—Opinion of Financial Advisor."

Tax Consequences

        The parties have acknowledged and agreed that no party has made, or is making in the Share Exchange Agreement, any representation or warranty regarding the tax effects or tax consequences, if any, of the transactions contemplated in the Share Exchange Agreement or in the Ancillary Agreements and that each party has consulted with and is relying upon its own tax advisors with respect to such effects and consequences. Neither DST nor Janus has any obligation to indemnify the other for tax liabilities arising from the Exchange.

Indemnification

        Subject to certain limitations set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement, subsequent to the Closing, DST will indemnify Janus and its respective Subsidiaries and Affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives, and each of their heirs, executors, successors and assigns (collectively, the "Representatives") against Damages arising out of, resulting from or incurred in connection with or relating to:

        However, DST will not be liable for indemnification with respect to certain Damages or for certain other pre-closing tax liabilities of OMS agreed upon by the parties unless and until the aggregate amount of these Damages and other pre-closing tax liabilities of OMS exceeds $5 million (the "DST Basket"). Janus will be entitled to indemnification for all Damages and other tax liabilities in excess of the DST Basket, subject to a limit on DST's aggregate liability, with respect to the Damages and other pre-closing tax liabilities covered by the DST Basket, of $115 million (the "DST Cap"). Neither the DST Basket nor the DST Cap apply to pre-closing income tax liabilities of OMS agreed upon by the parties or certain other Damages as set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement.

36



        Subject to certain limitations set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement, subsequent to the Closing, Janus will indemnify DST and its Representatives, against Damages arising out of, resulting from or incurred in connection with or relating to:

        However, Janus will not be liable for this indemnification with respect to certain Damages unless and until the aggregate amount of these Damages exceeds $5 million (the "Janus Basket"). DST will be entitled to indemnification for all Damages in excess of the Janus Basket, subject to a limit on Janus' aggregate liability, with respect to the Damages covered by the Janus Basket, of $115 million (the "Janus Cap"). Neither the Janus Basket nor the Janus Cap apply to certain other Damages as set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement.

Certain Ancillary Agreements

        DST and/or its Affiliates, on the one hand, and OMS and/or Janus and/or their respective Affiliates, on the other hand, will enter into a number of Ancillary Agreements in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement. Under these Ancillary Agreements:

37



Janus Proxy

        In addition, Janus will provide an irrevocable and continuing proxy to DST to vote the shares of DST Common Stock retained by Janus upon consummation of the Exchange for so long as Janus owns or retains voting rights to such shares. A copy of this proxy is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B.

Regulatory Matters

        As discussed in "—Summary of the Share Exchange Agreement" above, certain regulatory approvals and filings are required in connection with the closing of the Exchange. The following actions have occurred to date:

Requirement for Stockholder Approval

        DST's Certificate of Incorporation requires stockholder approval of any transfer or exchange to or with any "Interested Stockholder," of any assets of DST having an aggregate fair market value equaling or exceeding 25% or more of the combined assets of DST. Janus is considered an Interested Stockholder because it owns more than 10% of the voting power of DST's outstanding capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. After taking into account the additional cash to be transferred to OMS in connection with the Exchange, the value of the assets to be transferred in connection with the proposed Exchange may exceed 25% of the combined assets of DST.

Required Vote and the DST Board's Recommendation

        In accordance with the Delaware Corporation Law and DST's Certificate of Incorporation, approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock that are entitled to vote.

        THE DST BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"
THE PROPOSAL—APPROVAL OF THE SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.

38



MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

        The material U.S. federal income tax consequences to DST with respect to the Reorganization and the Exchange are summarized below. The tax consequences of the Reorganization and the Exchange will only apply to DST, OMS and Janus, and will not apply to any other stockholder of DST. This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, the interpretive guidance of the IRS and the decisions of various courts, all as they exist as of the date hereof. It is possible that Congress could enact new law, the Department of Treasury or the IRS could issue new authorities, or a court could issue a new decision after the date hereof, which would be inconsistent with this summary. Any such changes could have retroactive effect.

        DST's obligations to complete the Closing are conditioned upon receipt by DST of Tax Opinions from Sonnenschein and PWC to the effect that, although the matter is not free from doubt, the Reorganization and the Exchange should qualify as reorganizations pursuant to Code §§ 368 and 355, and that DST should recognize no gain or loss pursuant to the Reorganization and Exchange. These Tax Opinions will be subject to certain factual representations and assumptions provided by DST and Janus. If those factual representations and assumptions are incorrect in a material respect, the Tax Opinions could become inoperative. DST and Janus have reviewed those facts and assumptions on which the Tax Opinions will be based and are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would cause the representations and assumptions to be untrue.

        Certain of the Code § 355 requirements such as (i) the active trade or business requirement; (ii) the non-device requirement; and (iii) the business purpose requirement were considered in light of the Reorganization and the Exchange which includes a significant cash contribution to OMS just prior to the Exchange. These requirements are set forth below followed by certain considerations related to such cash contribution.

        DST and OMS must have been engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business continuously throughout the five-year period prior to Exchange, and must be engaged in the active conduct of such trade or business immediately after the Exchange. DST and OMS have engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business directly and/or through predecessor organizations for more than five years, and will continue to provide such services after the Exchange. There is no requirement that a specific percentage of OMS's assets be devoted to the active conduct of a trade or business. Nevertheless, as further set forth below, the IRS may consider DST's contribution of cash to OMS in determining whether OMS continues the active conduct of its trade or business after the Exchange. Notwithstanding the contribution of cash to OMS, because DST and OMS will continue the active conduct of their respective trades or businesses, the active trade or business requirement should be satisfied.

        The Exchange must not be used principally as a device for the distribution of DST's earnings and profits or OMS's earnings and profits. The determination of whether a transaction is used principally as a device for the distribution of earnings and profits is made from all the facts and circumstances. One of the facts and circumstances is the cash contributed to OMS, and the resulting difference in the ratios of the value of the assets not used in the active trade or business to the value of the assets used in the active trade or business in OMS and DST. OMS will have a considerably higher ratio of assets not used in its active trade or business than will DST. However, this difference in ratios is ordinarily not evidence of device if the difference is attributable to the need to equalize the value of the OMS Shares distributed in the Exchange to the value of the Janus DST Shares received in the Exchange. In addition, the Exchange will ordinarily be considered not to have been used principally as a device if, in the absence of Code § 355, the distribution of the OMS Shares would have been treated as a redemption under Code § 302. In the absence of Code § 355, the Exchange would be treated as a redemption under Code § 302. Because the contribution of cash is necessary to equalize the value of the OMS Shares and the Janus DST Shares, and because the transaction would be treated as a

39



redemption under Code § 302 in the absence of Code § 355, the Exchange should satisfy the nondevice requirement.

        The Exchange must be carried out for one or more real and substantial non-federal income tax purposes germane to the business of DST. There are real, substantial non-federal income tax purposes of the Exchange which are set forth in "Background." Accordingly, the Exchange should satisfy the business purpose requirement.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, the amount of cash contributed to OMS is a "fact or circumstance" which may be taken into account in the determination of whether the active trade or business requirement and the nondevice requirement have been satisfied, and for purposes of assessing the strength of DST's independent corporate business purpose for the Exchange. The amount of cash included in OMS may also affect the substance of the Exchange. A transaction will be taxed in accordance with its substance, and a transaction which meets the literal requirements of Code § 355 may be taxed otherwise if the substance of the transaction is not within the intent of Code § 355.

        There is authority under Code § 355 that a distributing corporation may contribute cash to a controlled corporation prior to a split-off in amounts sufficient to equalize the fair market values of the stock to be exchanged in the split-off. Revenue Ruling 64-102 approved a split-off after a cash contribution representing 54% of the total value of the controlled corporation, where the cash contribution did not cause changes in the controlled corporation's business of such character as to constitute the acquisition of a new or different business. Revenue Ruling 71-383 approved a "substantial capital contribution" prior to a split-off that did not cause a change in the character of the controlled corporation's business. Thus, in Revenue Ruling. 64-102 and 71-383, the IRS permitted the contribution of substantial amounts of cash to the controlled corporation that was not to be used in the controlled corporation's active trade or business. Similarly, Revenue Ruling 73-44 held that a transaction qualified under Code § 355 where the active trade or business represented less than 50% of the total value of the controlled corporation, although the nonactive trade or business assets were not investment assets. Based on current law, the amount of cash present here should not disqualify DST from nonrecognition treatment under Code § 355 upon the Exchange. However, there is no specific authority that approves a cash contribution in excess of 54% of the total value of the controlled corporation.

        Certain actions of Janus and OMS after the Closing of the Exchange could adversely affect the tax-free status of the Exchange to DST. In this regard, Janus will receive opinions from Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Ernst & Young LLP to the effect that, although the matter is not free from doubt, the Exchange should be treated as a tax-free reorganization under § 355, taking into account representations made by OMS and Janus as to their intentions for use of the cash contributed to OMS and other post-Closing activities. However, DST will have no control over actions taken by OMS and Janus after the Closing of the Exchange that might adversely affect the tax treatment of the Exchange to DST.

No Private Letter Ruling

        DST did not and will not request a Private Letter Ruling from the IRS concerning the federal tax consequences of the Reorganization and the Exchange. In preliminary conversations with representatives of PWC and Sonnenschein, and without a review of the specific facts and circumstances of the Exchange, representatives of the IRS indicated that it would be unlikely that the IRS would issue a favorable Private Letter Ruling on a transaction with the amount of cash present in the Exchange. DST did not submit the information necessary to obtain a Private Letter Ruling, and the IRS did not have all of the facts and circumstances concerning the Exchange.

        The IRS may examine DST's U.S. federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the Reorganization and the Exchange occur at any time during the three years after DST files such tax

40



return. DST may under certain circumstances agree to extend this three-year period. In such an examination, the IRS may examine DST's reporting of the Exchange as a tax-free reorganization under Code § 355. The preliminary conversation with the IRS described above neither limit nor expand the legal requirements for the timing or scope of, or the procedures used in, any such IRS examination of DST.

Tax Opinions

        As set forth above, DST will receive the Tax Opinions to the effect that, although the matter is not free from doubt, the Reorganization and the Exchange should be tax free to DST. The Tax Opinions are based upon PWC's and Sonnenschein's evaluation of facts under the applicable Treasury Regulations which require consideration of "all the facts and circumstances" and which provide that certain requirements will "ordinarily" be satisfied by facts which are present in the Exchange. There are, however, no Code provisions, Treasury Regulations, IRS rulings or guidelines or other authorities approving a transaction under Code § 355 with the amount of cash present in the Exchange. In the absence of any such authorities or a Private Letter Ruling, the tax-free treatment of the Exchange is not free from doubt, and PWC and Sonnenschein are unable to issue unqualified tax opinions that the Exchange will be tax-free to DST.

        The Tax Opinions are not binding on the IRS. As a result, it is possible that the IRS could take a position which is contrary to the Tax Opinions. If the IRS were to take such a contrary position and prevail, then DST could recognize gain on the Reorganization and Exchange as if DST sold the OMS Shares for fair market value to Janus. DST estimates, that under those circumstances, it would recognize a gain of approximately $104 million and incur federal and state income tax liabilities of approximately $41.6 million.

41



SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Combined Financial Data

        The following table sets forth selected combined financial data of OMS. The selected combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the selected combined income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were derived from OMS's audited combined financial statements and the related notes thereto which are included in Appendix E of this proxy statement. The selected combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 were derived from OMS's audited combined financial statements, not included herein. The selected combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 1998 and the selected combined income statement data for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 were derived from OMS's unaudited combined financial statements, not included herein. The data for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 has been derived from OMS's unaudited condensed combined financial statements also included herein as Appendix D and which, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited interim periods. This selected combined financial data should be read in conjunction with and is qualified by reference to OMS's audited combined financial statements, including the notes thereto, and the report of independent accountants thereon.

 
  For the six months ended June 30,
  Year ended December 31,
 
 
  2003
  2002
  2002
  2001
  2000
  1999
  1998
 
 
  (dollars in thousands)

 
Total revenues   $ 44,524   $ 56,065   $ 105,698   $ 112,032   $ 120,986   $ 95,234   $ 68,792  

Cost and expenses

 

 

41,278

 

 

50,961

 

 

95,844

 

 

102,643

 

 

110,152

 

 

85,424

 

 

61,154

 
Depreciation and Amortization     1,808     2,173     5,249     4,550     3,966     2,989     2,304  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations     1,438     2,931     4,605     4,839     6,868     6,821     5,334  
Interest expense     (1 )   (83 )   (113 )   (816 )   (821 )   (839 )   (561 )
Other income (expense), Net     97     (1,133 )   2     (103 )   (170 )   (52 )   7  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before income Taxes     1,534     1,715     4,494     3,920     5,877     5,930     4,780  
Income taxes     606     705     1,846     1,559     2,501     2,440     1,968  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income   $ 928   $ 1,010   $ 2,648   $ 2,361   $ 3,376   $ 3,490   $ 2,812  
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets   $ 22,428   $ 23,619   $ 23,239   $ 23,084   $ 29,839   $ 24,916   $ 16,048  
Long-term obligations     392     196     0     7,244     9,616     4,887     690  

42



UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        The following unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements are based on the historical consolidated balance sheets and statements of income of DST and OMS, adjusted to give effect to the Exchange.

        The unaudited pro forma condensed statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2002 reflect the historical results of operations of DST less the historical operations of OMS as if the Exchange occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented. The unaudited pro forma condensed statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 reflect OMS as a discontinued operation and do not reflect the Exchange.

        The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2003 assumes that the Exchange occurred as of that date.

        The following unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements have been prepared from, and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of DST appearing in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, which are incorporated in this proxy statement by reference, and the historical combined financial statements and notes of OMS for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and the three years ended December 31, 2002 included in this proxy statement as Appendices D and E, respectively. These unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the operating results or financial position that would have occurred had the Exchange been consummated on the dates indicated in the preceding paragraphs, and are not necessarily indicative of the future operating results or financial position of DST.

43


DST
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Balance Sheet
June 30, 2003
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

 
   
  Adjustments
   
 
 
  DST
  OMS
  Additional Assets
  Pro Forma
 
ASSETS                          
Current Assets                          
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 72.6   $     $     $ 72.6  
  Transfer agency investments     59.3                 59.3  
  Accounts receivable     405.4     12.8           392.6  
  Other current assets     119.1     3.5           115.6  
   
 
 
 
 
      656.4     16.3           640.1  
Investments     1,191.9                 1,191.9  
Properties     588.4     5.0           583.4  
Goodwill     261.2                 261.2  
Intangibles     128.3                 128.3  
Other assets     34.2     1.1     21.2 (3)(6)   54.3  
   
 
 
 
 
  Total assets   $ 2,860.4   $ 22.4   $ 21.2   $ 2,859.2  
   
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                    
Current Liabilities                          
  Debt due within one year   $ 126.4   $     $     $ 126.4  
  Transfer agency deposits     59.3                 59.3  
  Accounts payable     119.3     3.0           116.3  
  Accrued compensation and benefits     92.7     1.6           91.1  
  Deferred revenues and gains     94.4                 94.4  
  Other liabilities     109.6     5.4     12.7 (3)(4)   116.9  
   
 
 
 
 
      601.7     10.0     12.7     604.4  
Long-term debt     408.2           1,020.4 (3)   1,428.6  
Deferred income taxes     330.8                 330.8  
Other liabilities     93.8     0.4           93.4  
   
 
 
 
 
      1,434.5     10.4     1,033.1     2,457.2  
   
 
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies                          
   
 
 
 
 
Stockholders' equity                          
  Common stock, $0.01 par; 300 million shares authorized, 127.6 million shares issued     1.3                 1.3  
  Additional paid-in capital     362.8           0.6 (6)   363.4  
  Retained earnings     1,273.6     12.0     101.9 (6)   1,363.5  
  Treasury stock (44.3 million and 8.0 million shares, respectively), at cost     (458.3 )         (1,114.4 )(1)   (1,572.7 )
  Accumulated other comprehensive income     246.5                 246.5  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total stockholders' equity     1,425.9     12.0     (1,011.9 )   402.0  
   
 
 
 
 
    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity   $ 2,860.4   $ 22.4   $ 21.2   $ 2,859.2  
   
 
 
 
 

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements.

44


DST
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statements of Income
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
(in millions, except per share amounts)

 
   
  Adjustments
   
 
 
  DST
  OMS(2)
  Additional Assets
  Pro Forma
 
Total revenues   $ 1,236.8   $ 44.5   $     $ 1,192.3  

Costs and expenses

 

 

1,013.9

 

 

41.5

 

 

 

 

 

972.4

 
Depreciation and amortization     71.7     1.6           70.1  
   
 
 
 
 
Income from operations     151.2     1.4           149.8  

Interest expense

 

 

(6.5

)

 

 

 

 

(20.8

)(3)

 

(27.3

)
Other income, net     10.1     0.1           10.0  
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates     3.4               3.4  
   
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes     158.2     1.5     (20.8 )   135.9  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes     53.8     0.6     (8.1 )(4)   45.1  
   
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) from continuing operations   $ 104.4   $ 0.9   $ (12.7 ) $ 90.8  
   
 
 
 
 
Average common shares outstanding     119.0           (32.3 )(5)   86.7  
Diluted shares outstanding     120.2           (32.3 )(5)   87.9  

Basic earnings per share

 

$

0.88

 

$

 

 

$

0.39

(7)

$

1.05

 
Diluted earnings per share   $ 0.87   $     $ 0.39 (7) $ 1.03  

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements.

45


DST
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Income
For Year Ended December 2002
(In millions, except per share amounts)

 
   
  Adjustments
   
 
 
  DST
  OMS(2)
  Additional Assets
  Pro Forma
 
Total revenues   $ 2,383.8   $ 105.7         $ 2,278.1  

Costs and expenses

 

 

1,936.7

 

 

95.8

 

 

 

 

 

1,840.9

 
Depreciation and amortization     143.8     5.3           138.5  
   
 
 
 
 
Income from operations     303.3     4.6           298.7  

Interest expense

 

 

(13.4

)

 

(0.1

)

 

(41.5

)(3)

 

(54.8

)
Other income, net     20.2                 20.2  
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates     6.5                 6.5  
   
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes     316.6     4.5     (41.5 )   270.6  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes     107.6     1.9     (16.2 )(4)   89.5  
   
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) from continuing operations   $ 209.0   $ 2.6   $ (25.3 ) $ 181.1  
   
 
 
 
 
Average common shares outstanding     120.0           (32.3 )(5)   87.7  
Diluted shares outstanding     121.7           (32.3 )(5)   89.4  

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.74

 

$

 

 

$

0.78

(7)

$

2.06

 
Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.72   $     $ 0.78 (7) $ 2.03  

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements.

46


DST
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Income
For Year Ended December 2001
(In millions, except per share amounts)

 
   
  Adjustments
   
 
 
  DST
  OMS(2)
  Pro Forma
 
Total revenues   $ 2,380.7   $ 112.0   $ 2,268.7  

Costs and expenses

 

 

1,927.8

 

 

102.6

 

 

1,825.2

 
Depreciation and amortization     159.4     4.6     154.8  
   
 
 
 
Income from operations     293.5     4.8     288.7  

Interest expense

 

 

(7.5

)

 

(0.8

)

 

(6.7

)
Other income, net     36.2           36.2  
Gain on sale of PAS     32.8           32.8  
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates     (1.5 )         (1.5 )
   
 
 
 
Income before income taxes     353.5     4.0     349.5  
Income taxes     125.3     1.6     123.7  
   
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations   $ 228.2   $ 2.4   $ 225.8  
   
 
 
 
Average common shares outstanding     122.6           122.6  
Diluted shares outstanding     126.0           126.0  

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.86

 

$

 

 

$

1.84

 
Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.81   $     $ 1.79  

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements.

47


DST
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Income
For Year Ended December 2000
(In millions, except per share amounts)

 
   
  Adjustments
   
 
 
  DST
  OMS(2)
  Pro Forma
 
Total revenues   $ 1,968.7   $ 121.0   $ 1,847.7  

Costs and expenses

 

 

1,575.5

 

 

110.1

 

 

1,465.4

 
Depreciation and amortization     128.6     4.0     124.6  
   
 
 
 
Income from operations     264.6     6.9     257.7  

Interest expense

 

 

(5.6

)

 

(0.8

)

 

(4.8

)
Other income, net     66.3     (0.2 )   66.5  
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates     11.4           11.4  
   
 
 
 
Income before income taxes     336.7     5.9     330.8  
Income taxes     120.9     2.5     118.4  
   
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations   $ 215.8   $ 3.4   $ 212.4  
   
 
 
 
Average common shares outstanding     125.3           125.3  
Diluted shares outstanding     129.4           129.4  

Basic earnings per share

 

$

1.72

 

$

 

 

$

1.70

 
Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.67   $     $ 1.64  

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements.

48


DST
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.
On August 25, 2003, DST, OMS (a wholly-owned subsidiary of DST) and Janus entered into a Share Exchange Agreement that provides for the exchange of all of the outstanding shares of OMS owned by DST for 32.3 million shares of DST Common Stock owned by Janus. The Exchange has been designed to comply with Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code, accordingly, DST should not incur income tax relating to the split-off of OMS. Under the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, the Janus DST Shares will be valued at a price ranging from $30.00 to $34.50 per share, based on the average closing price for the 20 trading days preceding the Closing of the Exchange. DST will equalize the difference between the negotiated value of OMS of $115.0 million and the gross transaction value, which can range from $969.0 million to $1,114.4 million, with cash ranging from $854.0 million to $999.4 million (Additional Assets). The pro forma financial statements are prepared assuming a $34.50 share price.
 
DST Common Stock share price
  FMV of OMS
  Additional Assets
  Total Exchange value
  $ 30.00   $ 115.0   $ 854.0   $ 969.0
  $ 32.25   $ 115.0   $ 926.7   $ 1,041.7
  $ 34.50   $ 115.0   $ 999.4   $ 1,114.4
2.
Reflects the historical operations of OMS for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and the financial position of OMS at June 30, 2003, respectively. The OMS divestiture is considered a discontinued operation.

3.
Reflects the annual interest expense of $41.5 million resulting from funding the contribution of the Additional Assets ($999.4 million) to OMS assuming a transaction value based on $34.50 per share of DST Common Stock at Closing. The interest expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2003 is $20.8 million based on the following calculation. DST will fund the Additional Assets as follows (dollars in millions):

Debt Issued

  Principal Amount
  Interest rate
  Interest expense
Convertible notes   $ 840.0   3.95%   $ 33.2
Unsecured revolving credit facility draws     180.4   2.75%     4.9
   
     
  Total     1,020.4         38.1
Less debt issuance costs     (21.0 ) 5-7 years     3.4
   
     
  Net   $ 999.4       $ 41.5
   
     

49


4.
Reflects the income tax effects of the pro forma adjustments for the Additional Assets at DST's statutory income tax rate of 39%.

5.
Reflects the reduction in average and diluted shares outstanding of 32.3 million shares in accordance with the Share Exchange Agreement.

6.
The accompanying pro forma income statements do not reflect a $102.6 million gain expected to be realized from the Share Exchange Agreement. The gain has not been reflected in the pro forma income statements given the non-recurring nature of the gain. The accompanying pro forma balance sheet reflects the net gain in retained earnings as of June 30, 2003 and reflects the following (in millions):

Description

  Amount
 
FMV of OMS   $ 115.0  
Investment in OMS basis     (12.0 )
Stock option compensation expense ($0.6), net of tax 39% ($0.2)     (0.4 )
   
 
  Net gain on transaction   $ 102.6  
   
 
7.
The debentures are convertible under certain circumstances into shares of DST Common Stock per $1,000 original principal amount of debentures at an initial conversion rate of 20.3732 shares, each subject to adjustment in certain events. This is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $49.08 per share for the debentures. Upon conversion, DST has the right to deliver, in lieu of DST Common Stock, cash or any combination of cash and DST Common Stock. If the conversion criteria were met, the debentures would be convertible to 17,113,488 shares of DST Common Stock. Since the conversion criteria is not met, the shares are not reflected in the earnings per share. Management currently intends to pay cash in the event the debt is put.

50



PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND STOCKHOLDINGS OF MANAGEMENT

        As of the Record Date, DST had outstanding 115,736,792 shares of DST Common Stock. The following table sets forth information as of the Record Date concerning the beneficial ownership of DST Common Stock by: (i) stockholders who have publicly filed a report acknowledging ownership of more than 5% of the outstanding DST Common Stock; (ii) the directors and certain executive officers of DST; and (iii) all of DST's executive officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise noted, the holders have sole power to vote and dispose of the shares. For purposes of incorporating a DST subsidiary in a foreign country, each of several DST officers holds a single share of such subsidiary's stock. Such holdings constitute less than 1% of the subsidiary's stock. No officer or director of DST owns any equity securities of any other subsidiary of DST.


Name and Address

  Shares of DST
Common Stock(1)

  Percent of Class(2)

Janus Capital Group Inc. ("Janus")(3)   39,724,052   34.3

George L. Argyros(4)   9,479,240   8.2

A. Edward Allinson(5)
DST Director
  49,172   *

Michael G. Fitt(6)
DST Director
  38,075   *

Donald J. Kenney(7)
President and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of EquiServe, Inc. ("EquiServe")(8)
  111,534   *

Thomas A. McCullough(9)
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of DST, DST Director
  524,492   *

Thomas A. McDonne11(10)
President and CEO of DST, DST Director
  1,119,220   1.0

William C. Nelson(11)
DST Director
  46,440   *

Travis E. Reed(12)
DST Director
  9,675   *

Charles W. Schellhorn(13)
President and CEO of DST Output(14); President of Argus Health Systems, Inc. ("Argus")(15)
  429,384   *

M. Jeannine Strandjord(16)
DST Director
  33,991   *

J. Michael Winn
Managing Director of DST International Limited ("DSTi")(17)
  140,493   *

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (16 Persons)(18)   3,136,997   2.7


*
Less than 1% of outstanding DST Common Stock

(1)
Pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), share amounts shown for DST's executive officers and directors include shares of DST Common Stock they may acquire upon the exercise of options which are exercisable at the Record Date or will become exercisable within 60 days of such date and shares of DST Common Stock they hold indirectly under the Plans or otherwise. An executive officer has disclaimed beneficial ownership of certain shares which are owned by a family member.

(2)
The percentage for each person or group is based on the number of shares outstanding as of the Record Date plus securities of such stockholder(s) deemed outstanding pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act.

51


(3)
The address of Janus is 100 Fillmore Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 80206-4923. The information is based on Amendment No. 3 filed September 10, 2003, to Schedule 13D filed July 10, 2000.

(4)
Mr. Argyros formerly served as a director of DST. Mr. Argyros' address is 949 South Coast Drive, Suite 600, Costa Mesa, California 92626. The number of shares of DST Common Stock is based on information in a Form 4 for November 2001 filed by Mr. Argyros, and on information provided by Mr. Argyros to DST on February 27, 2002. The shares consist of 4,679,152 shares held by Mr. Argyros, 900 shares held by the Leon and Olga Argyros 1986 Trust, 536,502 shares held by the Argyros Foundation, 4,261,000 shares held by HBI Financial, Inc., and 1,686 shares held by GLA Financial Corporation. Mr. Argyros disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the Argyros Foundation and the Leon and Olga Argyros 1986 Trust.

(5)
Mr. Allinson's beneficial ownership includes 5,500 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.

(6)
Mr. Fitt's beneficial ownership includes 7,500 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date and 28,075 shares held in a trust.

(7)
Mr. Kenney's beneficial ownership includes 100,000 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.

(8)
EquiServe is a wholly-owned subsidiary of DST.

(9)
Mr. McCullough's beneficial ownership includes 230,501 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.

(10)
Mr. McDonnell's beneficial ownership includes 492,312 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date and 41,766 shares allocated to his account in the DST ESOP.

(11)
Mr. Nelson's beneficial ownership includes 30,294 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date and 200 shares held in an individual retirement account.

(12)
Mr. Reed's beneficial ownership includes 5,000 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date, 2,500 shares held in a trust, and 675 shares held by Glendon Triverton, Inc. of which Mr. Reed is the president and sole shareholder.

(13)
Mr. Schellhorn's beneficial ownership includes 230,565 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date and 27,701 shares allocated to his account in the DST ESOP.

(14)
DST Output is a wholly-owned subsidiary of DST.

(15)
DST is a 50% owner of Argus.

(16)
Ms. Strandjord's beneficial ownership includes 7,500 shares that may be acquired through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date and 1,000 shares held in a trust.

(17)
DSTi is a wholly-owned subsidiary of DST.

(18)
The beneficial ownership of all executive officers and directors as a group includes 1,548,769 shares that may be acquired by the executive officers and directors through options that are exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date. It also includes 134,259 shares allocated to the DST ESOP accounts of executive officers and the spouse of an executive officer, and 32,450 shares otherwise held indirectly. Individuals in the group have disclaimed beneficial ownership as to a total of 5,493 of the shares.

52



OTHER MATTERS

Stockholder Proposals.    Stockholders may as described below submit proposals for consideration at a stockholders' meeting. No stockholder proposals are being considered at this Special Meeting.

        Inclusion of Stockholder Proposals in the 2004 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement.    If a stockholder desires to have a proposal included in DST's proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2004, the Corporate Secretary of DST must receive such proposal on or before November 28, 2003, and the proposal must comply with the applicable SEC laws and rules and the procedures set forth in the DST By-laws. DST will require any proposed nominee for election as a director or stockholder proposing a nominee to furnish a consent of the nominee and may reasonably require other information to determine the eligibility of a proposed nominee to serve as a director or to properly complete any proxy or information statement used for the solicitation of proxies.

        Timely Notice to DST of Nominations for Director and Other Stockholder Proposals. The DST By-laws provide that a stockholder proposal (other than a proposal requested to be set forth in the proxy statement, as noted above) may not be made at an annual meeting unless the Corporate Secretary of DST has timely received it. A proposal to nominate a director is timely if received not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the meeting, and any other proposal is timely if received not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the DST Board designates the meeting to be held at a date other than the second Tuesday in May and gives notice of or publicly discloses the date of the meeting less than 60 days prior to its occurrence, the Corporate Secretary of DST must receive the written proposal not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the date of the notice or public disclosure of the meeting date, whichever first occurs.

        Under these requirements, proposals (other than proposals submitted for inclusion in the proxy statement) to be timely for the 2004 annual meeting must be received by the Corporate Secretary of DST no earlier than February 11, 2004 and no later than March 12, 2004 if they pertain to nominees for director and no earlier than January 12, 2004 and no later than February 11, 2004 if they pertain to proposals other than director nominations.

        Contents of Notice of Proposal. A stockholder proposal must be in the form of a written notice of proposal. The required contents of the notice depend on whether the proposal pertains to nominating a director or to other business. A stockholder's notice pertaining to the nomination of a director shall set forth: (a) as to each nominee whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of the nominee, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the nominee, (iii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of DST that are beneficially owned by the nominee, and (iv) any other information concerning the nominee that would be required, under the rules of the SEC, in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee; (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice, (i) the name and address of the stockholder, and (ii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of DST that are beneficially owned by the stockholder and the name and address of record under which such stock is held; and (c) the signed consent of the nominee to serve as a director if elected.

        A stockholder's notice concerning business other than nominating a director shall set forth as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, (b) the name and address of the stockholder proposing such business, (c) the class and number of shares of capital stock of DST that are beneficially owned by the stockholder and the name and address of record under which such stock is held, and (d) any material interest of the stockholder in such business. The Chairman of the annual meeting has the power to determine whether the proposed business is an appropriate subject for and was properly brought before the meeting.

53



        Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.    Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires DST's directors and certain of its officers, and each person, legal or natural, who owns more than 10% of DST Common Stock (each, a "Reporting Person"), to file reports of such ownership with the SEC, the NYSE, and DST. Based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to DST, and written representations relative to the filing of certain forms, no person other than James P. Horan, a DST senior vice president, was late in filing such a report for fiscal year 2002. Mr. Horan exercised options for 60,000 shares on February 7, 2002 and reported the exercise on a Form 4 for March 2002.

        Householding for Broker Customers.    Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, services that deliver DST's communications to Broker Customers may deliver to multiple stockholders sharing the same address a single copy of DST's proxy statement. DST will promptly deliver upon written or oral request a separate copy of the proxy statement to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. Written requests may be made to the DST Corporate Secretary, 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105, and oral requests may be made by calling the DST Corporate Secretary's Office at (816) 435-4636. Any stockholder who wants to receive separate copies of the proxy statement in the future, or any stockholder who is receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy per household, should contact the stockholder's bank, broker or other nominee holder of record.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        DST files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC's web site at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file at the SEC's public reference room at Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Copies of such information can be obtained by mail from the public reference room of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. The reports and other information filed by DST can also be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005. DST's Internet address is www.dstsystems.com. Through this website, DST makes available, free of charge, its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing or furnishing of these reports with the SEC.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" certain documents, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information in the documents incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this proxy statement, except to the extent that this proxy statement updates or supersedes the information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed below which we have previously filed with the SEC (SEC File No. 1-14036):


        We also incorporate by reference the information contained in all other documents we file with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, after the date of this proxy statement and before the date of the Special Meeting. The information will be considered part of this

54


proxy statement from the date of the document filed and will supplement or amend the information contained in this proxy statement.

        We will provide you, without charge, a copy of the documents we incorporate by reference in this proxy statement upon your request. To request a copy of any or all of these documents, you should write or telephone us at DST Systems, Inc., 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or if by telephone at 816-435-4636.

        You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement or to which we have referred you to vote your shares at the Special Meeting. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different.

Kansas City, Missouri
November 13, 2003

55


APPENDIX A




SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
by and among
DST SYSTEMS, INC.
DST OUTPUT MARKETING SERVICES, INC.
and
JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.


As of August 25, 2003




A-1



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
ARTICLE I.   Certain Definitions and Other Matters   2
  Section 1.1   Certain Definitions   2
  Section 1.2   Terms Defined in Other Sections   9
  Section 1.3   Interpretation   10
ARTICLE II.   Exchange of Stock; Closing; Consideration Adjustment   10
  Section 2.1   Exchange of Stock   10
  Section 2.2   Closing   11
  Section 2.3   DST's Deliveries at the Closing   11
  Section 2.4   Janus' Deliveries at the Closing   12
  Section 2.5   Post-Closing Adjustments   12
ARTICLE III.   Reorganization   13
  Section 3.1   Reorganization   13
  Section 3.2   Assets and Liabilities   14
ARTICLE IV.   Representations and Warranties of DST   15
  Section 4.1   Organization and Standing   15
  Section 4.2   Capitalization of OMS   16
  Section 4.3   Corporate Power and Authority   16
  Section 4.4   Conflicts; Consents and Approvals   17
  Section 4.5   Proxy Statement   18
  Section 4.6   Board Approval   18
  Section 4.7   Required Vote   18
  Section 4.8   No Material Adverse Effect   19
  Section 4.9   Taxes   19
  Section 4.10   Compliance with Law   20
  Section 4.11   Intellectual Property   20
  Section 4.12   Title to Assets; Condition and Sufficiency of Assets   21
  Section 4.13   Environmental Matters   21
  Section 4.14   Litigation   22
  Section 4.15   Employee Benefit Plans   23
  Section 4.16   Contracts   24
  Section 4.17   Labor and Employment Matters   26
  Section 4.18   Financial Statements   27
  Section 4.19   Permits; Compliance   27
  Section 4.20   Real Estate   27
  Section 4.21   Intercompany Services   28
  Section 4.22   Relationships with Customers   28
  Section 4.23   Guaranties   29
  Section 4.24   Certain Other Tax Matters   29
         

A-2


ARTICLE V.   Representations and Warranties of Janus   29
  Section 5.1   Organization and Standing   29
  Section 5.2   Corporate Power and Authority   29
  Section 5.3   Conflicts; Consents and Approvals   30
  Section 5.4   Janus DST Shares   31
  Section 5.5   Board and Stockholder Approval   31
  Section 5.6   Litigation   31
  Section 5.7   No Material Adverse Effect   31
  Section 5.8   Investment Representation   31
  Section 5.9   Certain Tax Matters   31
  Section 5.10   Governmental Actions   31
ARTICLE VI.   Covenants and Agreements   32
  Section 6.1   Proxy Statement   32
  Section 6.2   Stockholder Meeting; Board Recommendation   32
  Section 6.3   Access and Information   33
  Section 6.4   Conduct of Business   33
  Section 6.5   Closing Documents   33
  Section 6.6   Efforts to Consummate; Further Assurances   34
  Section 6.7   Certain Covenants   35
  Section 6.8   Notification by the Parties   36
  Section 6.9   Additional Covenants   36
  Section 6.10   [Reserved]   36
  Section 6.11   Insurance Policies   36
  Section 6.12   Confidentiality; Access to Records after Closing   37
  Section 6.13   Release of Restrictions; Intercompany Accounts   38
  Section 6.14   Options to Purchase DST Stock Held By Business and Former Business Employees Accounts   38
  Section 6.15   Cooperation with Respect to Financial Reporting   39
  Section 6.16   Non-Solicitation of Employees   39
  Section 6.17   Non-Competition   39
  Section 6.18   [Reserved]   41
  Section 6.19   No Solicitation   42
  Section 6.20   Use of Names   42
  Section 6.21   [Reserved]   42
  Section 6.22   DST Share Value Determination Period   42
  Section 6.23   Waiver   43
  Section 6.24   Certain Tax Matters   43
  Section 6.25   DST Shares Retained by Janus   43
  Section 6.26   Financing   44
ARTICLE VII.   Tax Matters   44
         

A-3


ARTICLE VIII.   Conditions to Closing   44
  Section 8.1   Mutual Conditions   44
  Section 8.2   Conditions to Janus' Obligations   45
  Section 8.3   Conditions to DST's and OMS's Obligations   46
  Section 8.4   Frustration of Closing Conditions   47
ARTICLE IX.   Termination   47
  Section 9.1   Termination   47
  Section 9.2   Effect of Termination   48
ARTICLE X.   Survival of Representations and Warranties; Indemnification   48
  Section 10.1   Survival of Representations and Warranties   48
  Section 10.2   Indemnification by DST   48
  Section 10.3   Indemnification by Janus   50
  Section 10.4   Definition of Damage; Determination of Indemnification   50
  Section 10.5   Notice   52
  Section 10.6   Third Party Claim   52
  Section 10.7   Exclusivity   53
ARTICLE XI.   Miscellaneous   53
  Section 11.1   Notices   53
  Section 11.2   Expenses   54
  Section 11.3   Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction   54
  Section 11.4   Waiver of Jury Trial   54
  Section 11.5   Assignment; Successors and Assigns; No Third Party Rights   54
  Section 11.6   Counterparts   54
  Section 11.7   Titles and Headings   55
  Section 11.8   Entire Agreement   55
  Section 11.9   Amendment and Modification   55
  Section 11.10   Publicity; Public Announcements   56
  Section 11.11   Waiver   56
  Section 11.12   Severability   56
  Section 11.13   No Strict Construction   56
  Section 11.14   Knowledge   56
  Section 11.15   Affiliate Status   56
  Section 11.16   Tax Consequences   56
Exhibit A—Non-Competition Business Descriptions    
Exhibit B—Forms of Tax Opinions    

A-4



SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

        This SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT, dated as of August 25, 2003 (this "Agreement"), is entered into by and among DST SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, 64105 ("DST"), DST OUTPUT MARKETING SERVICES, INC., a New York corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of DST having its principal place of business at 333 West 11th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, 64105 ("OMS"), and JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at 100 Fillmore Street, Denver, Colorado 80206 ("Janus").


W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS, the Business (as defined in Article I) is conducted by OMS and the DST Entities (as defined in Article I);

        WHEREAS, prior to the Closing (as defined in Section 2.2), DST will complete the Reorganization (as defined in Section 3.1), pursuant to which the Business as a going concern and the Additional Assets (as defined in Article I) will be consolidated, whether by merger or contribution or otherwise, into OMS, and thereafter at the Closing the Business will be operated solely by OMS and OMS will hold the Additional Assets;

        WHEREAS, immediately following the Reorganization, OMS shall be a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of DST;

        WHEREAS, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, (a) DST desires to exchange the OMS Shares (as defined in Article I) for the Janus DST Shares (as defined in Article I), and (b) Janus desires to exchange the Janus DST Shares for the OMS Shares;

        WHEREAS, immediately following the Exchange, Janus shall continue to own, subject to certain restrictions, the shares of DST Common Stock (as defined in Article I) (other than the Janus DST Shares) which Janus owned immediately prior to the Closing;

        WHEREAS, the parties hereto intend the Exchange (as defined in Section 2.1) to qualify as a tax-free exchange under Section 355(a) of the Code (as defined in Article I); and

        WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of DST and Janus have, in each case, determined that it is in the best interests of their respective corporations to enter into this Agreement.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

ARTICLE I.

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS AND OTHER MATTERS

        Section 1.1    Certain Definitions.    

        As used in this Agreement and the schedules hereto, the following terms have the respective meanings set forth below.

        "Action" means any administrative, regulatory, judicial or other formal proceeding by or before any Governmental Authority or arbitrator.

        "Additional Assets" means the Cash Amount.

        "Affiliate" means, with respect to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such Person. The term "control" means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the

A-5



direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise, including the ability to elect the members of the board of directors or other governing body of a Person, and the terms "controlled" and "controlling" have correlative meanings. For purposes of this Agreement, Janus shall be deemed not to be an "Affiliate" of DST or any of its Subsidiaries and DST or any of its Subsidiaries shall be deemed not to be an "Affiliate" of Janus; provided, however, that following the Closing, OMS shall be an "Affiliate" of Janus and shall not be an "Affiliate" of DST.

        "Ancillary Agreements" means the agreements to be entered into by and among DST and/or its Affiliates (other than OMS), on the one hand, and OMS and/or Janus, on the other hand, on or prior to the Closing, pursuant to which, among other things, certain services and goods will be provided to the parties to this Agreement, including, but not limited to the agreements described in Section 1.1 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, which agreements include the terms that have been agreed to by DST and Janus prior to the date of this Agreement.

        "Antitrust Division" means the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.

        "Business" means the business of providing the products and services described in Exhibit A to DST's Disclosure Schedule.

        "Business Contracts" mean the Contracts of the Business (other than Employment Agreements, Employee Benefit Plans and other Contracts primarily related to employee compensation or benefits, but including, to the extent assignable, all non-disclosure or confidentiality, non-compete or non-solicitation Contracts with Business Employees and agents or representatives of the Business).

        "Business Employees" means individuals who provide employment or employment-type services primarily to the Business as of the date hereof, other than any such individuals who cease employment with the applicable DST Entity prior to the Closing, but including any such individuals hired after the date hereof and prior to the Closing.

        "Business Day" means a day on which national banks are open for business in New York, New York.

        "Cash Amount" means an amount in cash equal to (i) the product of thirty two million three hundred thousand (32,300,000) and the DST Share Value less (ii) one hundred fifteen million dollars ($115,000,000).

        "Claims" means any and all (i) claims, (ii) demands or (iii) causes of action (in the case of clause (iii), relating to or resulting from an Action).

        "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

        "Confidential Business Information" shall mean marketing data, financial information, customer lists, supplier lists, pricing and cost information, business and marketing plans and proposals and other non-technical proprietary business information.

        "Confidentiality Agreement" means the Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement, dated November 11, 2002, among DST, Janus and Stilwell Financial Inc.

        "Contract" means any contract, agreement, indenture, deed of trust, license, note, bond, mortgage, lease, guarantee and any similar understanding or arrangement, whether written or oral.

        "Controlled Group Liability" means any and all liabilities (i) under Title IV of ERISA, (ii) under Section 302 of ERISA, (iii) under Sections 412 and 4971 of the Code, (iv) as a result of a failure to comply with the continuation coverage requirements of Section 601 et seq. of ERISA and Section 4980B of the Code or the group health plan requirements of sections 701 et seq. of the Code

A-6



and section 701 et seq.of ERISA, and (v) under corresponding or similar provisions of foreign laws or regulations.

        "Credit Facilities" means (i) the Credit Agreement dated as of December 9, 2001 among DST Systems, Inc., the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, as amended, and (ii) the Credit Agreement between Broadway Square Partners LLP and Firstar Bank, N.A. dated December 28, 2000, as amended.

        "Credit Facilities Consent" means the waiver or consent required under the Credit Facilities in connection with the Exchange.

        "DST Common Stock" means the Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share of DST.

        "DST Entities" means each Affiliate of DST (other than OMS) that is engaged in the operation or conduct of the Business or that has title to any asset which constitutes a Business Asset or is subject to a liability which constitutes a Business Liability, in each case, as of the date hereof or at any time prior to the Closing.

        "DST's Disclosure Schedule" means the disclosure schedule that DST has delivered to Janus on the date of this Agreement prior to the execution hereof.

        "DST Share Value" means the average (arithmetic mean) of the per share closing prices of the DST Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the twenty (20) consecutive trading days ending on the day prior to the Closing Date, or, if such common stock is not listed on such exchange, on any other national securities exchange on which such common stock is listed or, if not so listed and such common stock is admitted for trading on the Nasdaq National Market or the Nasdaq Smallcap Market, on such Nasdaq market; provided, however, that if such average price is less than thirty dollars ($30.00) per share, the DST Share Value shall be deemed equal to thirty dollars ($30.00) per share, and, if such average price is greater than thirty-four dollars and fifty cents ($34.50) per share, the DST Share Value shall be deemed equal to thirty-four dollars and fifty cents ($34.50) per share.

        "Employee Benefit Plan" means any employee benefit plan, program, policy, practices, or other arrangement providing benefits to any current or former employee, officer or director of DST, the DST Entities or OMS or any beneficiary or dependent thereof that is sponsored or maintained by DST, the DST Entities or OMS or to which DST, the DST Entities or OMS contribute or are obligated to contribute, whether or not written, including without limitation any employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(1) of ERISA, any employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(2) of ERISA (whether or not such plan is subject to ERISA) and any bonus, incentive, deferred compensation, vacation, stock purchase, stock option, severance, employment, change of control or fringe benefit plan, program or policy.

        "Employment Agreement" means a written Contract or offer letter of DST or any of its Affiliates with or addressed to any Business Employee or Former Business Employee pursuant to which OMS shall, directly or indirectly, have any actual or contingent liability or obligation to provide compensation and/or benefits on or after the Closing Date in consideration for past, present or future services.

        "Encumbrances" means security interests, liens, Claims, charges, title defects, deficiencies or exceptions (including, with respect to Real Property, defects, deficiencies or exceptions in, or relating to, marketability of title, or leases, subleases or the like affecting title), mortgages, pledges, easements, encroachments, restrictions on use, rights-of-way, rights of first refusal, conditional sales or other title retention agreements, covenants, conditions or other similar restrictions (including restrictions on transfer) or other encumbrances of any nature whatsoever.

        "Environmental Laws" means all Laws relating to pollution or protection of human health and safety or the environment (including ambient air, surface water, groundwater, land surface, natural resources or subsurface strata), including all such Laws relating to Releases or threatened Releases of

A-7



Regulated Substances into the environment or work place, or otherwise relating to the environmental or worker health and safety aspects of manufacturing, processing, distribution, importation, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or handling of Regulated Substances, including, but not limited to, chemical inventories in all relevant jurisdictions, and all such Laws relating to the registration of products of the Business or OMS under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the European List of Notified Chemical Substances, the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances or similar Laws.

        "Environmental Permit" means any permit, registration, approval, identification number, license or other authorization or filing required under or issued pursuant to any applicable Environmental Law.

        "ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

        "ERISA Affiliate" means any entity which would be aggregated with DST under Section 414 of the Code or Section 4001(b) of ERISA.

        "FLSA" means the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 201, as amended.

        "Former Business Employee" means individuals who, prior to the Closing, provided employment or employment-type services primarily to the Business.

        "FTC" means the United States Federal Trade Commission.

        "GAAP" means United States generally accepted accounting principles.

        "Governmental Authority" means any supranational, national, federal, state or local government, foreign or domestic, or the government of any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or any entity, authority, agency, ministry or other similar body exercising executive, legislative, judicial, regulatory or administrative authority or functions of or pertaining to government, including any authority or other quasi-governmental entity established by a Governmental Authority to perform any of such functions.

        "HSR Authority" means the FTC and/or the Antitrust Division.

        "Indebtedness" of any Person means, without duplication, (i) all obligations of such Person for money borrowed; (ii) all obligations of such Person evidenced by notes, debentures, bonds or other similar instruments for the payment of which such Person is responsible or liable; (iii) all obligations of such Person issued or assumed for deferred purchase price payments associated with acquisitions, divestments or other transactions; (iv) all obligations of such Person under leases required to be capitalized in accordance with GAAP, as consistently applied by such Person, (v) all obligations of such Person for the reimbursement of any obligor on any letter of credit, banker's acceptance, guarantees or similar credit transaction, excluding in all cases in clauses (i) through (v) current accounts payable, trade payables and accrued liabilities incurred in the Ordinary Course of Business.

        "Insurance Policies" means each insurance policy (other than relating to Employee Benefit Plans), which, as of the date hereof or hereinafter until the Closing, is maintained by or on behalf of or provides coverage primarily to (a) OMS with respect to the Business businesses and properties, or (b) the Business.

        "IRS" means the Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America.

        "Janus Consent" means the waiver or consent required under the Janus Credit Facility to consummate the Exchange.

        "Janus Credit Facility" means the Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility, dated as of December 7, 2000, by and among Stillwell Financial Inc., Janus Capital Corporation, the Lenders named therein, Wells Fargo Bank West, N.A. (as Documentation Agent), the Chase

A-8



Manhattan Bank (as Syndication Agent) and Citibank, N.A. (as Administrative Agent and Swingline Lender), as amended from time to time.

        "Janus' Disclosure Schedule" means the disclosure schedule that Janus has delivered to DST on the date of this Agreement prior to the execution hereof.

        "Janus DST Shares" means the thirty-two million three hundred thousand (32,300,000) shares of DST Common Stock owned by Janus as of the date hereof, appropriately adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, share combination, reclassification, recapitalization or similar transaction with respect to the DST Common Stock.

        "Laws" means all United States federal, state or local or foreign laws, constitutions, statutes, codes, rules, regulations, ordinances, executive orders, decrees or edicts by a Governmental Authority having the force of law.

        "Leased Real Property" means any real property leased or subleased to OMS, DST or any of the DST Entities primarily for use in the operation of the Business and set forth (and designated as leased) in Section 4.20 of DST's Disclosure Schedule.

        "Liabilities" means any and all debts, liabilities, commitments and obligations, whether or not fixed, contingent or absolute, matured or unmatured, direct or indirect, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or unaccrued, known or unknown, whether or not required by GAAP to be reflected in financial statements or disclosed in the notes thereto.

        "Material Adverse Effect" means, with respect to a Person or the Business, any change, effect, event, occurrence or state of facts which would reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to the business, operations or financial condition of such Person, and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole or the Business, taken as a whole, or on the ability of such Person to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements, other than any change, effect, event, occurrence or state of facts (a) that is generally applicable in the economy of the United States, (b) that is generally applicable in the United States securities markets, (c) generally affecting the industry in which OMS and (with respect to the Business) the DST Entities operate, (d) arising from or related to an act of international terrorism, or (e) relating to the announcement or disclosure of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.

        "Material Employment Agreement" means an Employment Agreement that requires the payment of cash compensation in excess of $100,000 per year or in excess of $250,000 in the aggregate.

        "Multiemployer Plan" means any "multiemployer plan" within the meaning of Section 3(37) of ERISA.

        "OMS Common Stock" means the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of OMS.

        "OMS Shares" means all of the issued and outstanding shares of OMS Common Stock.

        "Ordinary Course of Business" means, with respect to the Business or OMS, actions that (a) are consistent with the past practices of such Business within the preceding twenty-four months, or (b) are similar in nature, style and magnitude to actions customarily taken in the ordinary course of the normal day-to-day operations of such Business.

        "Permitted Encumbrances" means (a) Encumbrances for Taxes or other assessments or charges by Governmental Authorities that arise by operation of Law and are not yet due and payable, or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings; (b) mechanics', carriers', workers', materialmen's, warehousemen's and similar liens arising or incurred in the Ordinary Course of Business for (i) sums not due and payable, or (ii) payments which are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings, which proceedings as of the date hereof are disclosed in Section 4.20 of DST's Disclosure Schedule; (c) other than with respect to Real Property, Encumbrances arising in the

A-9



Ordinary Course of Business of the Business that do not and would not reasonably be expected to impair the continued use or operation of such assets substantially as such assets are currently used or operated, and (d) Encumbrances disclosed in Section 4.12.1 of DST's Disclosure Schedule.

        "Person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, joint stock company, unincorporated organization or association, trust or joint venture, or a Governmental Authority.

        "Plan" means any Employee Benefit Plan other than a Multiemployer Plan.

        "Real Property" means, collectively, Leased Real Property and any real property to be leased pursuant to a sublease from DST or any of its Affiliates (other than OMS).

        "Real Property Lease" means the lease or sublease agreement pursuant to which a Leased Real Property is leased or subleased to OMS or any of the DST Entities (with respect to the Business).

        "Regulated Substances" means any substance which is listed, defined or regulated as a pollutant, contaminant, hazardous, dangerous or toxic substance, material or waste, or is otherwise classified as hazardous, dangerous or toxic in or pursuant to any Environmental Law or which is or contains any explosives, radon, radioactive materials, asbestos, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum and petroleum products (including waste petroleum and petroleum products) as regulated under any applicable Environmental Law.

        "Release" means any release, spill, emission, discharge, leaking, pumping, injection, deposit, disposal, dispersal, leaching or migration into the indoor or outdoor environment (including ambient air, surface water, groundwater and surface or subsurface strata) or into or out of any property, including the movement of Regulated Substances through or in the air, soil, surface water, groundwater or property.

        "Required Consents" means, collectively, (a) each consent or novation with respect to any Contract to which DST or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which any of their respective assets are bound required to be obtained from the other parties thereto by virtue of the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby in order to avoid the invalidity of the transfer of such Contract, the termination or acceleration thereof, giving rise to any obligation to make a payment thereunder or to any increased, additional or guaranteed rights of any person thereunder, a breach or default thereunder or any other change or modification to the terms thereof, and (b) each registration, filing, application, notice, transfer, consent, approval, order, qualification and waiver required from any third party or Governmental Authority by virtue of the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.

        "Retained Business" means the business currently conducted by DST and its Subsidiaries other than the Business.

        "SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

        "Securities Act" means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

        "Subsidiaries" of any entity means, at any date, any Person (a) the accounts of which would be consolidated with those of the applicable entity in such entity's consolidated financial statements if such financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP as of such date, or (b) of which securities or other ownership interests representing more than 50% of the equity or more than 50% of the ordinary voting power or, in the case of a partnership, more than 50% of the general partnership interests or more than 50% of the profits or losses of which are, as of such date, owned, controlled or held by the applicable entity or one or more subsidiaries of such entity.

A-10



        "Tax" means any United States federal, state, local or foreign taxes, including but not limited to any income, gross receipts, payroll, employment, excise, severance, stamp, business, premium, windfall profits, environmental (including taxes under section 59A of the Code), capital stock, franchise, profits, withholding, social security (or similar), unemployment, disability, real property, personal property, sales, use, service, service use, lease, lease use, transfer, registration, value added tax, or similar tax, any alternative or add-on minimum tax, and any estimated tax, in each case, including any interest, penalty, or addition thereto, whether disputed or not.

        "Tax Benefit" means the Tax effect of any item of loss, deduction or credit or any other item (including increases in Tax basis) which decreases Taxes paid or required to be paid, including any interest with respect thereto or interest that would have been payable but for such item.

        "Tax Returns" means all returns, declarations, reports, estimates, information returns and statements required to be filed in respect of Taxes.

        "Tax Sharing Agreement" means the Tax Sharing Agreement to be entered into by and among DST, Janus and OMS as of the Closing, substantially in the form previously agreed to by the parties hereto.

        "Taxing Authority" means any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over the assessment, determination, collection or other imposition of Taxes.

        "WARN Act" means the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act and any similar state or local law of any jurisdiction in the United States of America.

        Section 1.2    Terms Defined in Other Sections.    The following terms are defined elsewhere in this Agreement in the following Sections:

Accounting Firm   Section 2.5(d)
Adjusted Shareholder's Equity   Section 2.5(c)
Agreement   Preamble
Antitrust Laws   Section 6.7.2
Business Assets   Section 3.2.1
Business Financial Statements   Section 4.18.1
Business Liabilities   Section 3.2.3
Business Products and Services   Exhibit A
Business Records   Section 6.12.2
Claim Dispute Notice   Section 10.5.4
Closing   Section 2.2
Closing Date   Section 2.2
Closing Date Balance Sheet   Section 2.5(a)
Collective Bargaining Agreement   Section 4.17.1
Conditions Satisfaction Date   Section 2.2
Confidential Information   Section 6.12.1
Damages   Section 10.4
Dispute Accountants   Section 2.5(d)
Dispute Notice   Section 2.5©
DST   Preamble
DST Basket   Section 10.2.2
DST Cap   Section 10.2.2
DST Competitive Products and Services   Exhibit A
DST Options   Section 6.14
DST Proxy Statement   Section 6.1.1
DST Stockholder Approval   Section 4.3
DST Stockholders Meeting   Section 6.2
     

A-11


DST's knowledge   Section 11.14
Exchange   Section 2.1
Exchange Act   Section 4.5
Excluded Assets   Section 3.2.2
Excluded Liabilities   Section 3.2.4
Final Closing Date Balance Sheet   Section 2.5(c)
Financing   Section 6.26
HSR Act   Section 4.4.4
IAB Subsidiaries   Section 6.22
Indemnity Claim   Section 10.5.1
Intellectual Property   Section 4.11.5.1
Intercompany Arrangement   Section 4.21
Interim Business Financial Statements   Section 4.18.2
Janus   Preamble
Janus Basket   Section 10.3.2
Janus Cap   Section 10.3.2
Janus' knowledge   Section 11.14
Licensed Intellectual Property   Section 4.11.2
Non-Competition Period   Section 6.17.1
Non-OMS Business Assets   Section 3.2.1
Non-OMS Business Liabilities   Section 3.2.3
Notice of Claim   Section 10.5.1
OMS   Preamble
OMS Competitive Products and Services   Exhibit A
OMS Intellectual Property   Section 4.11.2
Owned Intellectual Property   Section 4.11.1
Permits   Section 4.19.1
Records   Section 6.12.2
Reorganization   Section 3.1
Representatives   Section 10.2.1
Required Vote   Section 4.7
Restrictions   Section 6.13.1
Share Limit   Section 6.25.1
Technology   Section 4.11.5.2
Third Party Claim   Section 10.6.1
Waiving Parties   Section 6.23

        Section 1.3    Interpretation.    Unless otherwise indicated to the contrary in this Agreement by the context or use thereof: (a) the words, "herein," "hereto," "hereof" and words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Section or paragraph hereof; (b) words importing the masculine gender shall also include the feminine and neutral genders, and vice versa; (c) words importing the singular shall also include the plural, and vice versa; and (d) the word "including" means "including without limitation."

A-12



ARTICLE II.

EXCHANGE OF STOCK; CLOSING; CONSIDERATION ADJUSTMENT

        Section 2.1    Exchange of Stock.    Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement, at the Closing, (a) DST shall assign, transfer, convey and deliver to Janus and Janus shall accept and acquire from DST, all of the OMS Shares (free and clear of all Encumbrances) in exchange for the Janus DST Shares, and (b) Janus shall assign, transfer, convey and deliver to DST, and DST shall accept and acquire from Janus, the Janus DST Shares (free and clear of all Encumbrances) in exchange for the OMS Shares (collectively, the "Exchange").

        Section 2.2    Closing.    The closing of the Exchange and the other transactions contemplated hereby (the "Closing") shall take place at the offices of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, Suite 1100, 4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111 at 10:00 A.M. on the third Business Day following the Conditions Satisfaction Date (as defined below), or at such other time and place as is mutually agreed in writing by Janus and DST. The date of the Closing is referred to herein as the "Closing Date." For purposes of this Agreement, the "Conditions Satisfaction Date" shall be the date on which the last of the unsatisfied or unwaived conditions set forth in Article VIII has been satisfied or waived (other than those conditions contemplated to be satisfied at, or only capable of being satisfied at, the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions).

        Section 2.3    DST's Deliveries at the Closing.    At the Closing, DST shall deliver or cause to be delivered to Janus the following:

A-13


        Section 2.4    Janus' Deliveries at the Closing.    At the Closing, Janus shall deliver or cause to be delivered to DST the following:

Each document of transfer or assumption referred to in this Article II (or in any related definition set forth in Article I) that is not attached as an Exhibit to this Agreement or is not otherwise an Ancillary Agreement shall be in customary form and shall be reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the parties thereto, but shall contain no representations, warranties, covenants and agreements other than those specifically contemplated by this Agreement.

        Section 2.5    Post-Closing Adjustments.    

        (a)   Within thirty (30) days after the Closing Date, DST shall deliver to Janus an unaudited balance sheet of OMS dated as of the Closing Date (the "Closing Date Balance Sheet") prepared on a basis consistent with the unaudited Interim Business Financial Statements. Janus and its representatives and accountants shall have the right to participate in and observe the process of the preparation of the Closing Date Balance Sheet, and such access as they may reasonably request to any books, records, work papers or other information.

        (b)   In the event that the Adjusted Shareholder's Equity reflected on the Closing Date Balance Sheet is less than $12 million, DST shall pay to OMS on a dollar-for-dollar basis, by wire transfer of immediately available funds, the amount necessary to achieve Adjusted Shareholder's Equity of $13 million as of the Closing Date. In the event the Adjusted Shareholder's Equity reflected on the Closing Date Balance Sheet is greater than $14 million, Janus shall cause OMS to pay to DST, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, by wire transfer of immediately available funds, the amount necessary to reduce Adjusted Shareholder's Equity to $13 million as of the Closing Date. As used herein, the term "Adjusted Shareholder's Equity" shall mean total shareholder's equity of OMS as of the Closing Date less the Additional Assets. Any payments required pursuant to this subparagraph (b) shall be made within thirty (30) days following the receipt by Janus of the Closing Date Balance Sheet, unless a Dispute Notice (defined below) is delivered.

        (c)   If, within thirty (30) calendar days after the date of receipt by Janus of the Closing Date Balance Sheet, Janus disputes the amount of Adjusted Shareholder's Equity reflected therein, Janus will give written notice to DST within such thirty (30) calendar day period specifying in reasonable detail Janus's basis for its dispute (a "Dispute Notice"). In the event that Janus notifies DST in writing that it has accepted the Closing Date Balance Sheet, or in the event that Janus does not issue a Dispute Notice within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the Closing Date Balance Sheet, then the Closing Date Balance Sheet shall become the Final Closing Date Balance Sheet (the "Final Closing Date Balance Sheet").

A-14



        (d)   If Janus submits a Dispute Notice to DST within such 30-day period, DST and Janus shall work together in good faith to seek to resolve the dispute over the correct amount of Adjusted Shareholder's Equity. If DST and Janus are unable to resolve their disagreement within 15 calendar days after DST's receipt of a Dispute Notice from Janus, the dispute shall be referred for determination to a nationally known firm of independent public accountants (an "Accounting Firm") mutually selected by DST and Janus (the "Dispute Accountants") as promptly as practicable. In the event that DST and Janus are unable to agree on the Dispute Accountants, then the Parties agree to retain KPMG LLP. The Dispute Accountants will make a determination as to the correct amount of Adjusted Shareholder's Equity, which determination will be (a) in writing, (b) furnished to each of DST and Janus as promptly as practicable after the dispute has been referred to the Dispute Accountants, (c) made in accordance with this Agreement, and (d) conclusive and binding. DST and Janus will use reasonable commercial efforts to cause the Dispute Accountants to render their decision within thirty (30) days of submitting such dispute and shall promptly comply with all reasonable written requests for information, books, records and similar items. Neither party will disclose to the Dispute Accountants, and the Dispute Accountants will not consider for any purpose, any settlement offer made by either party. As part of the resolution of all outstanding disputes, the Parties will cause the Dispute Accountants to prepare the Final Closing Date Balance Sheet. Any payments required upon the determination by the Dispute Accountants shall be made within ten (10) days following such determination.

        (e)   Janus shall pay the fees and expenses charged by any Dispute Accountant retained hereunder, unless any payment required to be made by DST pursuant to this Section 2.5 is greater than $500,000, in which case DST shall pay such fees and expenses.

ARTICLE III.

REORGANIZATION

        Section 3.1    Reorganization.    DST agrees that, prior to the Closing, DST shall, and shall cause its respective Subsidiaries to, assign, transfer, convey and deliver to OMS, the Non-OMS Business Assets, the Additional Assets and the Non-OMS Business Liabilities (the "Reorganization"), and in exchange therefore, OMS shall (i) accept, assume and agree to pay, perform or otherwise discharge, in accordance with the respective terms and subject to the respective conditions thereof, the Non-OMS Business Liabilities.

        Section 3.2    Assets and Liabilities.    

A-15


A-16


ARTICLE IV.

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF DST

        DST hereby represents and warrants to Janus as follows (it being understood and agreed that, with respect to any DST Entity not in existence as of the date hereof or ceasing to exist after the date hereof, these representations and warranties are made only with respect to the period of existence of such DST Entity):

        Section 4.1    Organization and Standing.    

        Section 4.2    Capitalization of OMS.    

A-17


        Section 4.3    Corporate Power and Authority.    Each of DST and OMS has all requisite corporate power and authority to enter into and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. DST and each of its Affiliates which will be a party to the Ancillary Agreements have all requisite corporate or other power, as the case may be, and authority to execute and deliver the Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered by it in connection with this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements and to consummate the transactions contemplated thereby. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by DST and OMS and the consummation by each of them of the transactions contemplated hereby, and the execution, delivery and performance of the Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered in connection with this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements by DST and each of its Affiliates which is a party thereto and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of each such Person and, except for obtaining the approval of the stockholders of DST of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby by the Required Vote (the "DST Stockholder Approval"), no other corporate action or corporate proceeding on the part of DST or OMS is necessary to authorize the execution, delivery and performance by DST and OMS of this Agreement and the consummation by each of them of the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by DST and OMS and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of DST and OMS, enforceable against DST and OMS in accordance with its terms, except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally, including the effect of statutory and other laws regarding fraudulent conveyances and preferential transfers and subject to the limitations imposed by general equitable principles (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity). The Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered in connection with this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements at the Closing will be duly executed and delivered by DST and its Affiliates which are a party thereto and will constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of DST and such Affiliates which are a party thereto, enforceable against each such Person in accordance with their respective terms, except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally, including the effect of statutory and other laws regarding fraudulent conveyances and preferential transfers and subject to the limitations imposed by general equitable principles (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity).

        Section 4.4    Conflicts; Consents and Approvals.    Neither the execution and delivery by DST, OMS or any of their respective Affiliates of this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered by any of them in connection with this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, will:

A-18


        Section 4.5    Proxy Statement.    The DST Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), except that no representation is made by DST with respect to statements made therein based on information supplied in writing by Janus specifically for inclusion in the DST Proxy Statement. For purposes of this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that statements made and information in the DST Proxy Statement relating to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the transactions herein contemplated to holders of DST common stock shall be deemed to be supplied by DST and not by Janus.

        Section 4.6    Board Approval.    The Board of Directors of DST, by resolutions duly adopted, including approval by a majority of the "Disinterested Directors" (as defined in DST's Certificate of Incorporation) and not subsequently rescinded or modified in any way, has duly (a) determined that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements are fair to and in the best interests of DST and its stockholders, (b) approved this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements and (c) determined to recommend to the stockholders of DST that such stockholders approve this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

A-19



        Section 4.7    Required Vote.    The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of DST is the only vote of the holders of any class of capital stock of DST necessary to approve the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the "Required Vote").

        Section 4.8    No Material Adverse Effect.    Except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement (including with respect to the Reorganization) or as disclosed in Section 4.8 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, since December 31, 2002, to the knowledge of DST, (a) OMS and the DST Entities have (i) operated the Business only in the Ordinary Course of Business, (ii) maintained their books and records in accordance with past accounting practice, and (iii) used all reasonable commercial efforts to preserve intact the assets and the business organization and operations of the Business, to keep available the services of its employees and to preserve its relationships with customers, suppliers, licensors, licensees, contractors and other persons with whom the Business or any of the DST Entities or OMS have business relations, (b) no Material Adverse Effect on the Business or OMS has occurred, and (c) there has been no event, occurrence or development that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on the ability of DST or OMS to timely consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, since December 31, 2002, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement (including with respect to the Reorganization), the DST Entities and OMS have not taken any action that if taken on or after the date hereof, would constitute a breach of Section 6.4.

        Section 4.9    Taxes.    OMS (and, to the extent relating to the Business or OMS, DST, each of the DST Entities and each consolidated, combined or unitary Tax group of which OMS, DST or any DST Entity is or was a member) has (i) duly and timely filed all Tax Returns relating to the Business or OMS that it was required to file (taking into account any extensions of the filing deadlines which have been validly granted) and (ii) paid all Taxes that are shown thereon as owing or that are otherwise due and payable by it. Such filed Tax Returns are true, correct and complete in all material respects. The charges, accruals and reserves on the Business Financial Statements as of December 31, 2002 in respect of Taxes for all open fiscal periods are adequate for the payment of all liabilities of OMS (and of DST and the DST Entities to the extent relating to the Business) for Taxes, and DST knows of no unpaid assessments for additional Taxes for any such fiscal period, which are not reflected on the Business Financial Statements as of December 31, 2002. Except as set forth in Section 4.9 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, any deficiencies proposed with respect to OMS or the Business as a result of any governmental audits of Tax Returns have been paid or fully settled, and there are no disputes pending or threatened as to Taxes payable by OMS or with respect to the Business. Except as set forth in Section 4.9 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, there are no outstanding agreements or waivers extending the statutory period of limitation applicable to any Taxes of OMS (or of DST or the DST Entities to the extent relating to the Business) for any period. Except as set forth in Section 4.9 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, none of OMS, DST or the DST Entities to the extent relating to the Business (i) has filed a consent to the application of Section 341(f) of the Code, (ii) has been a "distributing corporation" or a "controlled corporation" in a distribution intended to qualify under Section 355(a) of the Code within the past five years, (iii) is a party to any Tax sharing, allocation or indemnification agreement or arrangement, (iv) is required to make any adjustments under Section 481(a) of the Code (or any similar provision of state, local or foreign Tax law) for any taxable year ending after the Closing Date or (v) has been a member of an affiliated group filing a consolidated, combined or unitary Tax Return (other than the affiliated group of which DST is the common parent) or has any liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than OMS and the DST Entities) under Treasury Regulation § 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law).

        Section 4.10    Compliance with Law.    Except as set forth in Section 4.10 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, to the knowledge of DST, OMS, DST and each of the DST Entities and each of the officers, directors, employees and agents of OMS, DST and of the DST Entities has with respect to the Business complied in all material respects with all Laws applicable to the Business and OMS. Except as

A-20


set forth in Section 4.10 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, none of DST, OMS or any of the DST Entities has received any notice from any Governmental Authority that the Business or OMS or any DST Entity (with respect to the Business) or any of the Business Assets, Additional Assets or Business Liabilities has been or is being conducted in violation of any applicable Law or that an investigation or inquiry into any noncompliance with any applicable Law is ongoing, pending or, to DST's knowledge, threatened.

        Section 4.11    Intellectual Property.    

A-21


        Section 4.12    Title to Assets; Condition and Sufficiency of Assets.    

        Section 4.13    Environmental Matters.    Except as set forth in Section 4.13 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, and except as would not have a Material Adverse Effect on the Business or OMS, to DST's knowledge:

A-22


        Section 4.14    Litigation.    

        Section 4.15    Employee Benefit Plans.    

A-23


        Section 4.16    Contracts.    Section 4.16 of DST's Disclosure Schedule contains a complete list, as of the date hereof, of all Contracts (other than this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements and, except as noted below, Employment Agreements) to which OMS is, or will be at Closing, a party or bound, or that otherwise relate to the Business, a Business Asset, an Additional Asset or a Business Liability, and that fall within any of the following categories:

A-24


DST has made available to Janus or its representatives correct and complete copies of all such Contracts with all amendments thereof. Each such Contract is, and will at Closing be, valid, binding and enforceable against OMS and, to DST's knowledge, the other parties thereto in accordance with its terms, and is, and will at Closing be in full force and effect, except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally, including the effect of statutory and other laws regarding fraudulent conveyances and preferential transfers and subject to the limitations imposed by general equitable principles (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity). None of DST, the DST Entities or OMS is, or as of the Closing will be, in material default under or in material breach of or is, or as of the Closing will be, otherwise materially delinquent in performance under any such Contract, and, to DST's knowledge no event has occurred, or will as of the Closing occur, that, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute such a default. To DST's knowledge each of the other parties thereto has performed in all material respects all of the obligations required to be performed by it under, and is not in material default under, any such Contract and, to DST's knowledge no event has occurred that, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute such a default. To DST's knowledge there are no material disputes pending or threatened in writing with respect to any such Contracts. None of DST, the DST Entities or OMS, or to DST's knowledge, any other party to any such Contract has exercised any option granted to it to terminate or shorten or extend the term of such Contract, and none of DST, the DST Entities or OMS, has given written or oral notice or received written or, to DST's knowledge, oral notice to such effect. Subject to the rights of other parties thereto to terminate such agreements pursuant to the terms thereof in the ordinary course, and any amendments which may be agreed to by OMS following the Closing, to the knowledge of DST, all of such Contracts will continue to be valid, binding, enforceable and in full force and effect on substantially identical terms following the consummation of the

A-25


transactions contemplated hereby, except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally, including the effect of statutory and other laws regarding fraudulent conveyances and preferential transfers and subject to the limitations imposed by general equitable principles (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity), subject to obtaining any Required Consents disclosed in Section 4.16 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Business or OMS.

        Section 4.17    Labor and Employment Matters    

        Section 4.18    Financial Statements.    

A-26


        Section 4.19    Permits; Compliance.    

        Section 4.20    Real Estate.    

A-27


        Section 4.21    Intercompany Services.    Except for the Ancillary Agreements and except as set forth in Section 4.21 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, there are no Contracts pursuant to which any goods, services, materials or supplies are provided (i) by OMS, the Business, or the Business Assets, on the one hand, to DST or any of its Affiliates (other than OMS), on the other hand, or (ii) by DST or any of its Affiliates (other than OMS), on the one hand, to OMS, the Business, or the Business Assets, on the other hand (each, an "Intercompany Arrangement").

        Section 4.22    Relationships with Customers.    Except as set forth in Section 4.22 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, since December 31, 2002, neither DST nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written communication in which any customer of the Business who accounted for annual sales in excess of $1,000,000 during DST's immediately preceding fiscal year states an intention to terminate or materially reduce its purchases from the Business.

        Section 4.23    Guaranties.    Except as set forth in Section 4.23 of DST's Disclosure Schedule, OMS is not directly or indirectly (a) liable, by guarantee or otherwise, upon or with respect to, (b) obligated to provide funds with respect to, or to guarantee or assume, any Indebtedness or other obligation of any Person.

        Section 4.24    Certain Other Tax Matters.    Neither DST nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates has taken or agreed to take any action, has failed to take any action or knows of any fact, agreement, plan or other circumstance, in each case that could reasonably be expected to prevent DST from receiving either of the opinions described in clause (a) of Section 8.1.3.

ARTICLE V.

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF JANUS

        Janus hereby represents and warrants to DST as follows:

        Section 5.1    Organization and Standing.    Janus is (a) a corporation duly organized, validly existing and duly qualified or licensed and in good standing under the Laws of the state or jurisdiction of its organization with full corporate power and authority to own, lease, use and operate its properties and to conduct its business, and (b) duly qualified or licensed to do business and is in good standing in any other jurisdiction in which the nature of the business conducted by it or the property it owns, leases or operates requires it to so qualify, be licensed or be in good standing, except where the failure to be so qualified, licensed or in good standing would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Janus.

A-28



        Section 5.2    Corporate Power and Authority.    Janus has all requisite corporate power and authority to enter into and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. Janus has all requisite corporate power and authority to execute and deliver the Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered by it in connection with this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements and to consummate the transactions contemplated thereby. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Janus and the consummation by Janus of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the exchange and delivery to DST of the Janus DST Shares, and the execution, delivery and performance of the Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered in connection with this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements by Janus and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Janus. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Janus and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Janus, enforceable against Janus in accordance with its terms, except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally, including the effect of statutory and other laws regarding fraudulent conveyances and preferential transfers and subject to the limitations imposed by general equitable principles (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity). The Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered by Janus in connection with this Agreement or the Ancillary Agreements at the Closing will be duly executed and delivered by Janus and will constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Janus, enforceable against Janus in accordance with their respective terms, except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally, including the effect of statutory and other laws regarding fraudulent conveyances and preferential transfers and subject to the limitations imposed by general equitable principles (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity).

        Section 5.3    Conflicts; Consents and Approvals.    Neither the execution and delivery by Janus of this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the other agreements, documents and instruments to be executed and delivered by Janus in connection with this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, will:

A-29


        Section 5.4    Janus DST Shares.    As of the date hereof, Janus owns a total of 39,724,052 shares of DST Common Stock. As of the Closing, Janus will have good and valid title to the Janus DST Shares, free and clear of all Encumbrances. Upon delivery to DST of the certificates representing the Janus DST Shares at the Closing, DST will acquire good and valid title to such shares, free and clear of any Encumbrances, other than Encumbrances created by DST or any of its Subsidiaries.

        Section 5.5    Board and Stockholder Approval.    The Board of Directors of Janus, by resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote at a meeting duly called and held and not subsequently rescinded or modified, has (a) determined that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements are fair to and in the best interests of Janus, (b) approved this Agreement, and (c) authorized all necessary actions of the officers of Janus to consummate the transactions contemplated in this Agreement and in the Ancillary Agreements. No vote of the stockholders of Janus is required to approve the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        Section 5.6    Litigation.    As of the date hereof, there is no material Action pending or threatened in writing, or, to Janus' knowledge, otherwise threatened, against Janus that seeks, or could reasonably be expected, to prohibit or restrain the ability of Janus to enter into this Agreement or to timely consummate any of the transactions contemplated hereby and, to the knowledge of Janus, there is no reasonable basis for any such Action.

        Section 5.7    No Material Adverse Effect.    No event, occurrence or development exists that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the ability of Janus to timely consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.

        Section 5.8    Investment Representation.    Janus is acquiring the OMS Shares for investment and not with a view toward or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof, or with any present intention of distributing or selling such stock. Janus agrees that the OMS Shares may not be sold, transferred, offered for sale, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of without registration under the Securities Act, except pursuant to an exemption from such registration available under the Securities Act.

        Section 5.9    Certain Tax Matters.    Neither Janus nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates has taken or agreed to take any action, has failed to take any action or knows of any fact, agreement, plan or other circumstance, in each case that could reasonably be expected to prevent Janus from receiving either of the opinions described in clause (b) of Section 8.1.3.

        Section 5.10    Governmental Actions.    There are no material judgments, decrees, written agreements, memoranda of understanding or orders of any Governmental Authority outstanding against Janus which could reasonably be expected to prevent, prohibit, materially delay or enjoin the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

A-30



ARTICLE VI.

COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS

        Section 6.1    Proxy Statement.    

        Section 6.2    Stockholder Meeting; Board Recommendation.    DST will take reasonable commercial efforts to convene, and shall convene, a meeting of the stockholders of DST at which the stockholders of DST shall consider approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (the "DST Stockholders Meeting") as promptly as practicable. The Board of Directors of DST shall recommend to the DST stockholders the approval of the matters to be submitted to the stockholders at the DST Stockholders Meeting, which recommendation shall be set forth in the DST Proxy Statement, and shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to solicit such approval. Janus shall vote all shares of DST Common Stock beneficially owned by Janus at the time of the DST Stockholders Meeting in favor of approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby at the DST Stockholders Meeting.

A-31


        Section 6.3    Access and Information.    

        Section 6.4    Conduct of Business.    DST covenants and agrees that, from and after the date hereof until the Closing, except as otherwise expressly contemplated by this Agreement, it shall, and shall cause OMS and the DST Entities to, conduct the Business and the businesses of OMS and the DST Entities (with respect to the Business) only in the Ordinary Course of Business. DST shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, use reasonable commercial efforts to preserve the Business', DST Entities' (to the extent related to the Business) and OMS's, operations, physical facilities, working conditions and their respective business relationships with customers, suppliers, licensors, licensees, contractors and other persons with whom the Business or any of the DST Entities (to the extent related to the Business) or OMS have significant business relations. DST shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries not to, knowingly take any action that would cause its representations and warranties to be untrue in any material respect.

        Section 6.5    Closing Documents.    DST shall, prior to or at the Closing, execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, to Janus, the documents or instruments described in Sections 2.3 and 8.2 to be delivered by DST or its Affiliates prior to or at the Closing. Janus shall, prior to or at the Closing, execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered to DST, the documents or instruments described in Sections 2.4 and 8.3 to be delivered by Janus prior to or at the Closing.

        Section 6.6    Efforts to Consummate; Further Assurances.    

A-32


        Section 6.7    Certain Covenants.    

A-33


        Section 6.8    Notification by the Parties.    Each party hereto shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to as promptly as practicable inform the other parties hereto in writing if, prior to the consummation of the Closing, it obtains knowledge that any of the representations and warranties made by such party in this Agreement ceases to be accurate and complete in any material respect (except for any representation and warranty that is qualified hereunder as to materiality or Material Adverse Effect, as to which such notification shall be given if the notifying party obtains knowledge that such representation and warranty ceases to be accurate and complete in any respect). Each party hereto shall also use its reasonable commercial efforts to promptly inform the other parties hereto in writing if, prior to the consummation of the Closing, it becomes aware of any fact or condition that constitutes, in its reasonable judgment, a breach of any covenant of such party as of the date of this Agreement or that would reasonably be expected to cause any of its covenants to be breached as of the Closing Date. Any such notification shall not be deemed to have cured any breach of any

A-34


representation, warranty, covenant or agreement made in this Agreement for any purposes of this Agreement.

        Section 6.9    Additional Covenants.    Neither DST nor OMS shall, and DST shall cause the DST Entities not to, take any actions which will prevent or materially impede or delay DST (or its respective Subsidiaries) from making the representations and warranties to be made under this Agreement. DST shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries (including OMS) to take all actions necessary and appropriate to ensure that when the OMS Shares are delivered to Janus at the Closing, the Business Assets will be free and clear of any Encumbrances (other than the Permitted Encumbrances) and any Liabilities (other than Business Liabilities), and the Additional Assets will be free and clear of any Encumbrances and any Liabilities.

        Section 6.10    [Reserved].    

        Section 6.11    Insurance Policies.    

        Section 6.12    Confidentiality; Access to Records after Closing.    

A-35


        Section 6.13    Release of Restrictions; Intercompany Accounts.    

        Section 6.14    Options to Purchase DST Stock Held By Business and Former Business Employees Accounts.    DST or its relevant Affiliate shall take all steps necessary or appropriate to cause all unexercised options to purchase shares of DST's or its Affiliates' stock held by Business Employees or Former Business Employees that are outstanding as of the Closing Date (the "DST Options") not to terminate due to or on account of (directly or indirectly) the Closing, and shall cause the DST Options to become fully vested in such Business Employees or Former Business Employees effective as of the

A-36


Closing. DST shall cause the DST Options to remain outstanding and exercisable pursuant to the terms of such Options until the normal expiration date of the DST Options as set forth on the grant or award agreement or certificate with respect to such DST Options (i.e., with deemed continuous employment with DST or its Affiliates until the expiration date of the Options), unless such treatment is otherwise not permitted by applicable law.

        Section 6.15    Cooperation with Respect to Financial Reporting.    After the date of this Agreement, until the third anniversary of the date hereof, DST shall, and shall cause the DST Entities and OMS to, reasonably cooperate with Janus (at Janus' expense) in connection with Janus' preparation of historical financial statements of the Business as required for Janus' filings under the Exchange Act following the Closing. After the Closing, until the third anniversary of the date hereof, Janus shall, and shall cause OMS to, reasonably cooperate with DST (at DST's expense) in connection with DST's preparation of pro forma and historical financial statements of the Business as may be required for DST's filings under the Exchange Act following the Closing.

        Section 6.16    Non-Solicitation of Employees.    For a period of three years from and after the Closing Date, DST and Janus shall not, and shall cause each of their respective Subsidiaries not to, directly or indirectly, solicit the employment of any employee of the other or of its Subsidiaries following the Closing, without the other's prior written consent; provided, however, that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to (i) a general advertisement or solicitation program that is not specifically targeted at such persons or (ii) the solicitation of any employee after such time that such employee's employment has been terminated.

        Section 6.17    Non-Competition.    

A-37


A-38


        Section 6.18    [Reserved].    

        Section 6.19    No Solicitation.    From the date hereof until the Closing or the earlier termination of this Agreement, other than in the Ordinary Course of Business, DST shall not, nor shall it authorize or permit any of the DST Entities or OMS to, solicit the submission of any offers or proposals for the Business, OMS, the Business Assets or the Business Liabilities from any third party or otherwise directly or knowingly indirectly pursue any offer or proposal so received. From the date hereof until the Closing or the earlier termination of this Agreement, Janus shall not, nor shall it authorize or permit any of its Subsidiaries to, solicit the submission of offers or proposals for the sale of the Janus DST Shares, from any third party or otherwise directly or knowingly indirectly pursue any offer or proposal so received.

        Section 6.20    Use of Names.    Within 30 days after the Closing, (a) Janus shall cause OMS to change its corporate name to a name that does not include the name of DST or of any of its Subsidiaries and (b) Janus shall have no right to use the name of DST or of any of its Subsidiaries, except that, for a period ending 45 days after the Closing, Janus shall have the right to use any catalogues, sales and promotional materials and printed forms that use such name and are included in the Intellectual Property as of the Closing, or that have been ordered prior to the Closing for use in the Business; provided, however, that (a) promptly after the Closing Date, Janus shall make all filings

A-39



with the appropriate Governmental Authorities to effectuate such name change, (b) Janus shall use its reasonable commercial efforts to minimize the usage of the names referred to in Section (a) hereof, and to discontinue it as soon as practicable after the Closing and (c) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 6.20, to the extent any approvals of Governmental Authorities are necessary to effectuate the said name change, the time limits specified in this Section 6.20 shall be extended by the time period necessary to obtain such approvals, so long as Janus begins the process of seeking such approval within 30 days after the Closing.

        Section 6.21    [Reserved].    

        Section 6.22    DST Share Value Determination Period.    During the twenty-day period used to calculate the DST Share Value, DST agrees that it shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries not to, directly or indirectly, sell or offer to sell any shares of DST Common Stock (or any securities convertible into, or whose value is determined by reference to, any such shares), or solicit or induce other Persons to sell or offer to sell any shares of DST Common Stock (or any securities convertible into, or whose value is determined by reference to, any such shares); provided that the foregoing shall not apply to transactions with participants in DST's employee stock option or stock purchase plans in a manner consistent with past practice under such employee stock option or stock purchase plans. During the twenty-day period used to calculate the DST Share Value, Janus agrees that it shall not and shall cause its Subsidiaries (other than Subsidiaries involved in the investment advisory business, to the extent of its activities in connection with the investment advisory business (in such capacity, the "IAB Subsidiaries")) not to, purchase or offer to purchase any shares of DST Common Stock (or any securities convertible into, or whose value is determined by reference to, any such shares), or solicit or induce other Persons (other than in connection with investment advisory business of the IAB Subsidiaries) to purchase or offer to purchase any shares of DST Common Stock (or any securities convertible into, or whose value is determined by reference to, any such shares).

        Section 6.23    Waiver.    In consideration of the transactions contemplated hereby, as of the Closing, DST, on behalf of itself and each of its Subsidiaries and Affiliates (other than OMS) and their respective heirs, executors, successors and assigns (the "Waiving Parties"), releases, waives and forever discharges, in all capacities, including as stockholders of OMS, from and after the Closing any and all Claims, known or unknown, that the Waiving Parties ever had, now have or may have against OMS and its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of any act or omission of OMS or its officers, directors, employees, advisers or agents, in such capacity, at or prior to the Closing; provided, however, that nothing in this Section 6.23 shall be deemed a waiver by the Waiving Parties of any rights under this Agreement or any of the other agreements contemplated in connection herewith.

        Section 6.24    Certain Tax Matters.    

        Section 6.25    DST Shares Retained by Janus.    

A-40


        Section 6.26    Financing.    DST will use its reasonable best efforts to secure as promptly as practicable, the financing necessary to permit the funding of at least one hundred fifty million dollars ($150,000,000) of the Cash Amount at an initial interest rate of four percent (4%) per annum or less (which rate may be fixed or floating) and a maturity of not less than three hundred sixty four (364) days and otherwise on reasonable and customary terms and conditions for a financing of comparable size and form (the "Financing"). As of the date hereof, DST does not know of any fact, agreement, plan or other circumstance, in each case that could reasonably be expected to prevent DST from obtaining the Financing or satisfying the condition set forth in Section 8.3.3.

ARTICLE VII.

TAX MATTERS

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, from and after the Closing, except as expressly provided in the Tax Sharing Agreement, (a) the parties' sole and exclusive representations, warranties, covenants, agreements or other obligations (including indemnities or any obligations) arising pursuant to this Agreement, by Laws or otherwise with respect to tax matters (interpreted it its broadest sense) including the tax consequences of the transactions contemplated in this Agreement and any other subject matters referred to in the Tax Sharing Agreement shall be as set forth therein; and (b) no other representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or obligation (including indemnities or any obligations) arising pursuant to this Agreement, by Laws or otherwise shall be deemed to apply to such matters.

A-41


ARTICLE VIII.

CONDITIONS TO CLOSING

        Section 8.1    Mutual Conditions.    The respective obligations of each party hereto to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be subject to the fulfillment or, if legally permitted, waiver at or prior to the Closing of the following conditions:

        Section 8.2    Conditions to Janus' Obligations.    The obligations of Janus to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be subject to the fulfillment or waiver by Janus prior to or at the Closing of each of the following conditions:

A-42


        Section 8.3    Conditions to DST's and OMS's Obligations.    The obligations of DST and OMS to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be subject to the fulfillment or waiver at or prior to the Closing of each of the following conditions:

        Section 8.4    Frustration of Closing Conditions.    None of DST, OMS or Janus may rely on the failure of any condition set forth in this Article VIII to be satisfied if such failure was caused by such party's failure to act in good faith or to use its reasonable commercial efforts to cause the Closing to occur as required by Section 6.6.1.

A-43


ARTICLE IX.

TERMINATION

        Section 9.1    Termination.    This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the consummation of the Closing under the following circumstances:

        Section 9.2    Effect of Termination.    In the event of the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.1, this Agreement, except for the provisions of (i) Section 6.12.1 relating to the obligation of the parties to keep confidential certain information obtained by it, (ii) Article XI, and (iii) this Section 9.2, shall become void and have no effect, without any liability on the part of any party hereto or its directors, officers or stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) nothing in this Section 9.2 shall relieve any party hereto of liability for a willful breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement, and (b) if it shall be finally judicially determined that termination of this Agreement was caused by an intentional and deliberate breach of this Agreement, then, in addition to other remedies at Law or equity for breach of this Agreement, the party so found to have intentionally and deliberately breached this Agreement shall indemnify and hold harmless the other parties hereto for their respective out-of-pocket costs, including the reasonable fees and expenses of their counsel, accountants, financial advisors and other experts and advisors, as well as reasonable fees and expenses incident to the negotiation, preparation and execution of this Agreement and related documentation.

A-44


ARTICLE X.

SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES; INDEMNIFICATION

        Section 10.1    Survival of Representations and Warranties.    All of the representations and warranties provided for in this Agreement or in any agreement or certificate delivered pursuant to the provisions hereof or in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby shall survive the Closing until the second anniversary of the Closing; provided that the representations and warranties set forth in Sections 4.1.1, 4.2 and 4.12 and in Sections 5.1 and 5.4 shall survive indefinitely and the representations and warranties set forth in Sections 4.3 and 5.2 shall survive until the third anniversary of the Closing; provided further that any representations and warranties shall survive with respect to, and to the extent of, any claim for indemnification made in accordance with this Article X prior to the applicable termination date.

        Section 10.2    Indemnification by DST.    

A-45


        Section 10.3    Indemnification by Janus.    

        Section 10.4    Definition of Damage; Determination of Indemnification.    For purposes of this Article X, "Damages" shall mean, collectively, any and all claims, damages, settlement amounts, penalties, or losses, whatsoever (other than consequential damages), together with out-of-pocket costs and expenses, including reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel, accountants, consultants or experts and expenses of investigation incurred by a party entitled to indemnification hereunder as a result of a matter giving rise to a claim for indemnification hereunder, such amounts to be (a) determined net of (1) the insurance proceeds which the indemnified party actually receives in respect of such matter and (2) indemnity payments which the indemnified party actually receives from parties other than the indemnifying party hereunder in respect of such matter, (b) increased by any Tax (or increased by any reduction in any Tax Benefit) actually borne by the indemnified party that would

A-46


not have been borne but for such Damages or the payment of any indemnity in respect thereof and (c) decreased by any Tax Benefit (or decreased by any reduction in any Tax) actually realized by the indemnified party that would not have been realized but for such Damages or the payment of any indemnity in respect thereof. For purposes of this paragraph, the indemnified party will be deemed to recognize a Tax Benefit with respect to a taxable year if, and to the extent that, the indemnified party's cumulative liability for Taxes through the end of such taxable year, calculated by excluding any Tax items attributable to the Damages and the receipt of indemnity payments therefor from all taxable years, exceeds the indemnified party's actual cumulative tax liability for Taxes through the end of such taxable year, calculated by taking into account any Tax items attributable to the Damages and the receipt of indemnity payments therefor for all taxable years (to the extent permitted by relevant Tax law and treating such Tax items as the last items taken into account for any taxable year). When, as, and if the indemnified party recognizes any Tax Benefit attributable to Damages after the making of indemnification payments therefor, and to the extent such Tax Benefit has not reduced the amount of such indemnification payments, the indemnified party will promptly after recognition thereof pay in cash the amount of such recognized Tax Benefit to an account specified by the indemnifying party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no indemnified party shall have any duty to mitigate or seek any other sources of recovery.

        Section 10.5    Notice.    

A-47


        Section 10.6    Third Party Claim.    

A-48


        Section 10.7    Exclusivity.    Following the Closing, except in the case of common law fraud or with respect to matters for which the remedy of specific performance, injunctive relief or other non-monetary equitable remedies are available, the sole and exclusive remedy of the parties with respect to any and all claims arising from any breach of this Agreement or any of the other matters addressed in Section 10.2 or 10.3 shall be pursuant to the indemnification provisions set forth in this Article X; provided that all matters relating to Taxes shall be addressed in the Tax Sharing Agreement.

ARTICLE XI.

MISCELLANEOUS

        Section 11.1    Notices.    All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered personally, by facsimile (with confirming copy sent by one of the other delivery methods specified herein), by overnight courier or sent by certified, registered or express air mail, postage prepaid, and shall be deemed given when so delivered personally, or when so received by facsimile or courier, or, if mailed, three calendar days after the date of mailing, as follows:

If to DST:   DST Systems, Inc.
333 West 11th Street,
Kansas City Missouri, 64105
Facsimile: (816) 435-8630
Attention: Randall D. Young Esq.

with copies to:

 

Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP
4520 Main Street, Suite 1100
Kansas City, MO 64111
Facsimile: (816) 531-7545
Attention: John F. Marvin, Esq.

If to Janus:

 

Janus Capital Group Inc.
100 Fillmore Street,
Denver, Colorado 80206
Facsimile: (303) 394-7714
Attention: Thomas A. Early, Esq.

and with a copy to:

 

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019
Facsimile: (212) 403-2000
Attention: Craig M. Wasserman, Esq.

or to such other address and with such other copies as any party hereto shall notify the other parties hereto (as provided above) from time to time.

A-49


        Section 11.2    Expenses.    Regardless of whether the transactions provided for in this Agreement are consummated, except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each of the parties hereto shall pay its own expenses incident to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein (including legal fees, accounting fees, investment banking fees and filing fees).

        Section 11.3    Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction.    This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal Laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to the choice of law principles thereof. Each of the parties hereto irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Delaware and the United States District Court for any district within such state for the purpose of any Action or judgment relating to or arising out of this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated hereby and to the laying of venue in such court. Service of process in connection with any such Action may be served on each party hereto by the same methods as are specified for the giving of notices under this Agreement. Each party hereto irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead or claim any objection to the laying of venue of any such Action brought in such courts and irrevocably and unconditionally waives any claim that any such Action brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.

        Section 11.4    Waiver of Jury Trial.    Each party hereto acknowledges and agrees that any controversy which may arise under this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement is likely to involve complicated and difficult issues, and, therefore, each such party hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, any right such party may have to a trial by jury in respect to any Action directly or indirectly arising out of, under or in connection with or relating to this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any Ancillary Agreement. Each party hereto certifies and acknowledges that (a) no representative, agent or attorney of any other party hereto has represented, expressly or otherwise, that such other party would not, in the event of such Action, seek to enforce the foregoing waiver, (b) each such party understands and has considered the implications of this waiver, (c) each such party makes this waiver voluntarily, and (d) each such party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, among other things, the mutual waivers and certifications in this Section 11.4.

        Section 11.5    Assignment; Successors and Assigns; No Third Party Rights.    This Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements may not be assigned by any party hereto without the prior written consent of the other parties hereto, and any attempted assignment shall be null and void. This Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Except as provided in Section 10.2 or 10.3, this Agreement shall be for the sole benefit of the parties hereto, and their respective successors and permitted assigns and is not intended, nor shall be construed, to give any Person, other than the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns any legal or equitable right, benefit, remedy or claim hereunder. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent any party and its successors and permitted assigns from consolidating with or merging with or into, or transferring, in one transaction or a series of related transactions, substantially all of its assets to, any Person or Persons; provided, however, that the purchaser of substantially all of the assets of the party or its successor or permitted assign shall agree with the other party to be bound by all of the transferring party's obligations hereunder.

        Section 11.6    Counterparts.    This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original agreement, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

        Section 11.7    Titles and Headings.    The headings and table of contents in this Agreement are for reference purposes only, and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

        Section 11.8    Entire Agreement.    This Agreement (including the Schedules and Exhibits attached hereto or delivered in connection herewith), the Ancillary Agreements and the Confidentiality

A-50



Agreement constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to the matters covered hereby and thereby, and supersede all previous written, oral or implied understandings among them with respect to such matters.

        Section 11.9    Amendment and Modification.    This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto.

        Section 11.10    Publicity; Public Announcements.    Unless otherwise required by applicable Laws or the requirements of any national securities exchange (and, in that event, only if time does not permit), at all times prior to the earlier of the consummation of the Closing or termination of this Agreement pursuant to Article IX, DST and Janus shall consult with each other before issuing, and give each other a reasonable opportunity to review and comment upon, any press release with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and shall not issue any such press release without each other's consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The parties agree that the initial press release to be issued with respect to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be in the form heretofore agreed to by the parties.

        Section 11.11    Waiver.    Any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement may be waived at any time by the party or parties hereto entitled to the benefit thereof, but only by a writing signed by the party or parties waiving such terms or conditions.

        Section 11.12    Severability.    If any term, provisions, covenant or restriction of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction or other authority to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and restrictions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner materially adverse to any party. Upon such determination, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner in order that the transactions contemplated hereby be consummated as originally contemplated to the fullest extent possible.

        Section 11.13    No Strict Construction.    Janus and DST each acknowledge that this Agreement has been prepared jointly by the parties hereto and shall not be strictly construed against any party hereto.

        Section 11.14    Knowledge.    To the extent that any representation is made to "DST's knowledge" (or similar words), such knowledge shall refer to the actual knowledge of the individuals listed in Section 11.14 of DST's Disclosure Schedule under the heading "DST's knowledge," without assuming any investigation by such individual. To the extent that any representation is made to "Janus' knowledge" (or similar words), such knowledge shall refer to the actual knowledge of the individuals listed in Section 11.14 of Janus' Disclosure Schedule, without assuming any investigation by such individual.

        Section 11.15    Affiliate Status.    To the extent that a party hereto is required hereunder to take certain action with respect to entities designated herein as such party's Affiliates, such obligation shall apply to such entities only during such period of time that such entities are Affiliates of such party.

        Section 11.16    Tax Consequences.    Each party hereto acknowledges and agrees that no party has made, or is making in this Agreement, expressly or impliedly, any representation or warranty regarding the tax effects or tax consequences, if any, of the transactions contemplated in this Agreement or in the Ancillary Agreements and that each party has consulted with and is relying upon its own tax advisors with respect to such effects and consequences.

[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

A-51


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

  DST SYSTEMS, INC.

 

By:

 

/s/  
KENNETH V. HAGER      
      Name:   Kenneth V. Hager
      Title:   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

DST OUTPUT MARKETING SERVICES, INC.

 

By:

 

/s/  
KENNETH V. HAGER      
      Name:   Kenneth V. Hager
      Title:   Vice President

 

JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.

 

By:

 

/s/  
LOREN STARR      
      Name:   Loren Starr
      Title:   Sr. Vice President and CFO

A-52



Exhibit A—Non-Competition Business Descriptions

For purposes of Section 6.17, the "OMS Competitive Products and Services" shall mean:

        Commercial printing services consisting of plate production, offset sheet press printing and envelope printing using jet press machinery, and the following Business Products and Services: Integrated Fulfillment Services, Rapid Publisher, Rapid Proxy and eLLITE Suite Services.

For purposes of Section 6.17, the "Business Products and Services" shall mean:

Rapid Fulfillment

        Rapid Fulfillment is digital printing or electronic delivery of materials that are (i) printed in connection with the acquisition of a new customer by a client of the Business or in response to an inquiry from an existing customer of a client of the Business, and (ii) usually individually personalized with client-supplied name, address and demographic information utilizing a proprietary compilation software application and distributed production sites owned by OMS in New York and Chicago and sites owned by DST and its Affiliates. Rapid Fulfillment services may also include Integrated Fulfillment Services.

Integrated Fulfillment

        Integrated Fulfillment is the combination of pick and pack services with Rapid Fulfillment, eLLITE Suite and On-demand services. Pick and pack is the pulling of externally supplied and internally pre-printed materials from inventory and insertion into a mailing with On-demand materials.

Rapid Publisher

        Rapid Publisher is a Web-enabled database publishing solution used by clients that offer 403(b) and 401(k) plan administration to their customers. The service utilizes a licensed software application that allows the client to customize participant communication materials based upon the specific plan, and personalize the materials to the specific plan participant.

Rapid Compliance

        This service consists of the production of prospectuses, supplements, annual reports and semi-annual reports supplied by customers or third parties for printing and mailing and electronic delivery to meet the regulatory requirements of the 401(k), 403(b), non-variable annuity and mutual fund markets.

Rapid Confirm

        Rapid Confirm utilizes the Mail Net software application for distribution of brokerage trade confirmations, margin notices and address changes to distributed print production sites, including those of DST Affiliates, for printing and mailing at those sites for brokerage firm customers.

Rapid Proxy

        This product utilizes offset and On-demand capabilities to combine documents such as proxy statements, annual reports, proxy voting cards, business reply envelopes and other materials selected by the client, and bound into a single book that can be personalized to the recipient.

eLLITE Suite

        A service that utilizes the eLLITE software application to support order management, inventory management, fulfillment management and document management of documents such as mutual fund

A-53



fact sheets, prospectuses and other pre-sale and post-sale materials, none of which are personalized documents such as statements.

Rapid Portfolio Services

        This service consists of the printing of portfolio reports for high net worth individuals in digital four color format and bound using one of the following: perfect bind, spiral or tape (but for purposes of clarity, portfolio reports bound by other methods, e.g. stapling, are excluded from the definition of this service).

Commercial Printing Services

        These services consist of graphics design; plate production; offset printing of Static, Nonrecurring documents utilizing sheet press printing machines; bindery services; envelope printing utilizing jet press machinery; and procurement of the foregoing services from third party commercial printers and resale of such services to clients.

        For purposes of the foregoing, the following additional definitions shall apply:

For purposes of Section 6.17, the "DST Competitive Products and Services" shall mean:

The DST Competitive Products and Services consist of high volume transactional or account related print/mail and electronic delivery and presentation of documents that are neither Static nor Nonrecurring.

A-54



For purposes of illustration, and without limiting the foregoing, OMS will not format, print, mail or electronically deliver or present the following documents on behalf of any Person (other than itself and its Affiliates):

A-55


EXHIBIT B—[FORM OF WACHTEL LIPTON TAX OPINION TO JANUS]

EXHIBIT B—FORM OF SONNENSCHEIN TAX OPINION

Sonnenschein Tax Opinion
To be Delivered at Closing

[Date]

DST Systems, Inc.
333 West 11th Street—5th Floor
Kansas City, MO 64105

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        We have acted as counsel to DST Systems, Inc. ("DST") in connection with the proposed distribution of all of the issued and outstanding stock (the "OMS Stock") of DST Output Marketing Services, Inc. ("OMS") by DST to Janus Capital Group Inc. ("Janus") in exchange for the transfer of 32,300,000 shares of DST stock (the "DST Stock") by Janus to DST (the "Exchange"), pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement dated August     , 2003, by and among DST, OMS and Janus (the "Share Exchange Agreement"). We issue this opinion pursuant to Section 8.1.3 of the Share Exchange Agreement. Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Share Exchange Agreement.

        In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed: (i) the Share Exchange Agreement; (ii) the Certificates of Officers of DST, OMS and Janus as to certain factual matters, copies of which are attached (the "Certificates"); (iii) the Statement of Facts referred to in the Certificates, a copy of which is attached (the "Statement of Facts"); and (iv) the valuation of OMS by Standard & Poor's Corporate Value Consulting. We have also made such legal and factual examinations and inquiries, including an examination of originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of such documents, corporate records and other instruments as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.

        We have relied, with the consent of DST, OMS and Janus, upon the accuracy and completeness of the Certificates and Statement of Facts (which Certificates and Statement of Facts we have neither investigated nor verified), and upon such other documents and data that we have deemed appropriate. We have assumed that such Certificates and Statement of Facts are complete and accurate and that any statements or representations made to the knowledge of any person or entity or with similar qualification are true and correct as if made without such qualification. We have assumed the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as copies. We have also assumed that the Exchange will be effected in accordance with the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement.

        This opinion relates solely to certain United States federal income tax consequences of the Exchange, and no opinion is expressed as to the tax consequences under any foreign, state or local law or under any federal tax laws other than those pertaining to the income tax. This opinion does not address the tax consequences to DST of the transactions by DST preceding the Exchange, including

A-56



deferred intercompany transactions or excess loss accounts under the consolidated return regulations, which are addressed by separate opinion addressed to you, dated as of the date hereof.

        In rendering this opinion, we have considered the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, interpretive rulings of the IRS, pertinent judicial authorities and such other authorities as we have considered relevant as of the date hereof (hereinafter, collectively referred to as "Current Law").


Opinion

        Based upon and subject to the foregoing, and although the matter is not free from doubt, we are of the opinion that under Current Law the Exchange should qualify as a distribution of OMS Stock pursuant to Code § 355(a), and that DST should recognize no gain or loss upon the distribution of the OMS Stock to Janus pursuant to the Exchange.


Analysis

        No gain or loss is recognized by a corporation (the "distributing corporation") on any distribution of stock of a controlled corporation (defined below) to which Code § 355 applies. No gain or loss is recognized by the distributing corporation on the transfer of assets to the controlled corporation as part of a transaction to which Code § 355 applies. A distribution of stock of a controlled corporation by a distributing corporation qualifies under Code § 355 if the following tests are satisfied: (i) the Control Requirement: the distributing corporation distributes to its shareholders stock of a corporation (the "controlled corporation") of which the distributing corporation owns at least 80% of the total combined voting power of all classes entitled to vote and at least 80% of the total number of shares of all non-voting shares, Code §§ 355(a)(1)(A), 368(c); (ii) the Distribution Requirement: the distributing corporation distributes to its shareholders, on a pro rata or a non-pro rata basis, controlled corporation stock which represents at least 80% of the total combined voting power of all classes entitled to vote and at least 80% of all non-voting shares of controlled corporation, Code §§ 355(a)(1)(D), 355(a)(2); (iii) the Active Trade or Business Requirement: each of the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation must be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business, and must have been engaged in the active conduct of such trade or business continuously throughout the five-year period ending on the date of such distribution, Code §§ 355(a)(1)(C), 355(b); (iv) the Non-Device Requirement: the distribution must not be used principally as a device for the distribution of earnings and profits of the distributing corporation or the controlled corporation or both, Code § 355(a)(1)(B); (v) the Business Purpose Requirement: the distribution of controlled stock must be motivated by an independent corporate business purpose, Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(b); (vi) Continuity of Shareholder Interest Requirement: shareholders of the distributing corporation must own after the distribution an amount of stock that reflects a continuity of interest in the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation, Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(c)(1); and (vii) Non-Application of Code § 355(d) and (e): the distribution of the controlled corporation stock must not be described in Code § 355(d) and 355(e). Our analysis of the satisfaction of these requirements is set forth below.

        1.    The Control and Distribution Requirements.    A distributing corporation must own, and must distribute controlled corporation stock possessing at least 80% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, and at least 80% of the total number of shares of all other classes of stock. Code §§ 355(a)(1)(A), 335(a)(1)(D) and 368(c). Prior to the Exchange, DST will own all of the issued and outstanding stock of OMS. Under the Share Exchange Agreement, DST will distribute all of the issued and outstanding stock of OMS to Janus. Accordingly, the Control and Distribution Requirements should be satisfied.

        2.    The Active Trade or Business Requirement.    Each of the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation must be engaged immediately after the distribution of the controlled corporation

A-57



stock in the active conduct of a trade or business, and must have been engaged in the active conduct of such trade or business continuously throughout the five-year period prior to the distribution. Code §§ 355(a)(1)(C) and 355(b). The determination is based on all the facts and circumstances. DST has continuously provided mutual fund shareholder accounting services since 1969, both directly and through its subsidiaries, and will continue to provide such services after the Exchange, both directly and through its subsidiaries. OMS, by itself and through predecessor organizations directly and indirectly 100% owned by DST, has continuously provided graphics design and commercial printing products and services since 1989 and marketing services since 1992. After the Exchange, OMS will continue its historic business, and will not make any material change in its historic business or change the character of its historic business. This requirement is satisfied even though DST indirectly acquired control of OMS in a tax-free reorganization in which gain or loss was not recognized within five years of the Exchange and OMS will acquire active trade or business assets in transactions in which gain or loss will not be recognized prior to the Exchange. Code § 355(b)(2)(C), (D); Treas. Reg. 1.355-3(b)(4)(iii).

        Rev. Rul. 73-44, 1973-44 C.B. 182, as clarified by Rev. Rul. 76-54, 1976-1 C.B. 96, held that "[t]here is no requirement that a specific percentage of the corporation's assets be devoted to the active conduct of a trade or business" and that, on the facts of the ruling, the active business requirement was satisfied because it was "not controlling for purposes of the active business requirement that the active business assets of the controlled corporation, Y, represent less than half of the value of the controlled corporation immediately after the distribution." Prior to the issuance of Rev. Proc. 2003-48, the IRS would not rule on a purported Code § 355 distribution if the fair market value of the gross assets of the trade or business meeting the requirements of Code § 355(b) was less than 5% of the total fair market value of the gross assets of the corporation in question. The Exchange would have satisfied this requirement. However, in Rev. Proc. 2003-48, the IRS indicated that this 5% limitation will no longer apply. The existence of nonactive trade or business assets should not prevent OMS from satisfying the Active Trade or Business Requirement.

        3.    The Non-Device Requirement.    The distribution of controlled corporation stock must not be used principally as a device for the distribution of earnings and profits of the distributing corporation, the controlled corporation or both. Code § 355(a)(1)(B). Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(d) provides that the determination of whether a transaction is used principally as a device for the distribution of earnings and profits is made from all the facts and circumstances. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.355-2(d)(2) and (3) list factors evidencing device and nondevice, respectively.

        The evidence of device factors under Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(d)(2) includes a difference in the ratios of the value of the assets not used in the active trade or business to the value of the assets used in an active trade or business for the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation. However, the difference in the ratio will ordinarily not be evidence of device if the distribution is not pro rata among the shareholders of the distributing corporation and the difference is attributable to the need to equalize the value of the stock distributed and the value of the stock exchanged by the distributee. Moreover, Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(d)(5)(iv) applies to find nondevice in transactions where the distributing corporation makes substantial cash contributions to the controlled corporation before the distribution of controlled corporation stock in order to equalize the value of the shares to be exchanged in the transaction. Rev. Rul. 64-102, 1964-1 C.B. 136 and Rev. Rul. 71-383, 1971-2 C.B. 180. The ratio of assets not used in active trades or businesses to assets used in active trades or businesses will be different for DST and OMS, but evidence of device should not exist in the Exchange because the assets not used in an active trade or business are to equalize the value of OMS Stock and the Janus DST Stock to be exchanged pursuant to the Exchange.

        More importantly, Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(d)(5)(iv) provides that even if there is evidence of device under Treas. Reg. § 1.355-3(d)(2), a distribution of controlled corporation stock will ordinarily be considered not to have been used principally as a device if, in the absence of Code § 355, the distribution of controlled corporation stock would be treated as a redemption under Code § 302(a),

A-58



provided the distribution does not involve the distribution of the stock of more than one controlled corporation and does not facilitate the avoidance of the dividend provisions of the Code through a subsequent sale or exchange of one corporation and the retention of the other. The Exchange would be treated as a redemption under Code § 302(a), because the redemption would be substantially disproportionate under Code § 302(b)(2). Prior to the Exchange, Janus will own 39,724,052 of approximately 115,469,887 DST shares outstanding, or 34.40% of the total. After the Exchange, Janus will own 7,424,052 of approximately 83,169,887 DST shares outstanding, or 8.93% of the total. The percentage of DST stock owned by Janus after the Exchange is less than 80% of the percentage of DST stock owned by Janus before the Exchange, and is less than 50% of the DST stock after the Exchange. The Exchange would, in the absence of Code § 355, be treated as a redemption under Code § 302, and so the Non-Device Requirement should be satisfied.

        4.    The Business Purpose Requirement.    For a distribution of controlled corporation stock to qualify under Code § 355, the distribution must be carried out for one or more corporate business purposes. Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(b)(1). The intention is to limit Code § 355 nonrecognition treatment to "readjustments of corporate structures required by business exigencies." Id. Such corporate business purpose must be a real and substantial non-Federal tax purpose germane to the business of the distributing corporation, the controlled corporation, or the affiliated group to which the distributing corporation belongs. Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(b)(2). Finally, a corporate business purpose will be treated as sufficient for purposes of Code § 355 if the corporate business purpose cannot be achieved through a nontaxable transaction that does not involve the distribution of controlled corporation stock and which is neither impractical nor unduly expensive. Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(b)(3). The Janus ownership of DST stock creates a substantial competitive disadvantage for DST with respect to DST's mutual fund management company customers and prospects which are competitors of Janus. The Janus ownership of DST stock limits DST's access to bank borrowing. OMS's business does not have fit and focus with DST's other businesses. The Exchange should eliminate DST's competitive disadvantage, the limitation on access to borrowing, and the lack of fit and focus of OMS's business. Accordingly, the Business Purpose Requirement should be satisfied.

        5.    The Continuity of Shareholder Interest Requirement.    For a distribution of controlled corporation stock to qualify under Code § 355, generally one or more shareholders of the distributing corporation must own after the distribution stock the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation that reflects a continuity of interest. Treas. Reg. § 1.355-2(c)(1). Immediately after the Exchange, Janus will own 100% of the OMS Stock and the DST shareholders will continue to own 100% of the DST Stock. The Continuity of Shareholder Interest Requirement should be satisfied.

        6.    The Non-Application of Code § 355(d).    Janus will own all the OMS Stock as a result of the exchange of the DST Stock pursuant to the Exchange. Code § 355(d) will not apply if the DST Stock owned by Janus was not acquired by Janus by purchase within the meaning of Code § 355(d) during the five-year period preceding the Exchange. Accordingly, the DST Stock owned by Janus was not acquired by purchase within the meaning of Code § 355(d) during the five years prior to the Exchange, and Code § 355(d) should not apply to the Exchange.

        7.    The Non-Application of Code § 355(e).    DST, OMS and Janus have represented that the Exchange is not made pursuant to a plan or a series of related transactions pursuant to which one or more persons will acquire a 50% or greater interest in DST or OMS, except that Janus will acquire a 100% interest in OMS. Code §§ 355(e)(2), 355(e)(3)(A)(iii). Janus will acquire OMS Stock only as a result of owning DST Stock which Janus acquired more than two years prior to the Exchange. See Treas Reg. § 1.355-7T(d)(4). Accordingly, Code § 355(e) should not apply to the Exchange.

        8.    Cash Contributed to OMS.    Prior to the Exchange, DST will contribute cash to OMS for various purposes of OMS and to equalize the values of the OMS Stock and the DST Stock, as described in the Share Exchange Agreement, the Certificates and the Statement of Facts. The amount

A-59



of cash contributed to OMS is a "fact or circumstance" which is taken into account in the determination of whether the Active Trade or Business Requirement and the Non-Device Requirement have been satisfied, and for purposes of assessing the strength of the independent corporate business purpose. The amount of cash included in OMS may also affect the substance of the Exchange. A transaction will be taxed in accordance with its substance, and a transaction which meets the literal requirements of Code § 355 may be taxed otherwise if the substance of the transaction is not within the intent of Code § 355. Gregory v. Helvering, 295 U.S. 405 (1935).

        The IRS has favorably ruled under Code § 355 that a distributing corporation may contribute cash to a controlled corporation prior to a splitoff in amounts sufficient to equalize the fair market values of the stock to be exchanged in the splitoff. Rev. Rul. 64-102 approved a splitoff after a cash contribution representing 54% of the total value of the controlled corporation, where the cash contribution did not cause changes in the controlled corporation's business of such character as to constitute the acquisition of a new or different business. In Rev. Rul. 71-383, the IRS approved a "substantial capital contribution" prior to a splitoff that did not cause a change in the character of the controlled corporation's business. Thus, in Rev. Ruls. 64-102 and 71-383, the IRS permitted the contribution of substantial amounts of cash to the controlled corporation that were not anticipated to be used in the controlled corporation's active trade or business. Similarly, Rev. Rul. 73-44 held that a transaction qualified under Code § 355 where the active trade or business represented less than 50% of the total value of the controlled corporation, although the nonactive trade or business assets were not investment assets. Based on Current Law, the amount of cash present here should not disqualify DST from nonrecognition treatment under Code § 355 upon the distribution of OMS stock.

* * *

        This opinion is based on Current Law. It is possible that Congress could enact new law, or that Department of the Treasury or the IRS could issue authorities, after the date hereof which would be inconsistent with the opinion expressed herein. It is possible that courts of competent jurisdiction could issue decisions after the date hereof which would be inconsistent with the opinion expressed herein. Any changes in law could have retroactive effect.

        We express no opinion as to the tax consequences of the Exchange to any person other than DST. This opinion is furnished solely for DST's benefit in connection with its evaluation of the United States federal income tax consequences of the Exchange and may not be used or relied upon by any other person or by DST for any other purpose. This opinion may not be circulated, quoted or otherwise referred to for any purpose without our express written consent.

A-60



EXHIBIT B—FORM OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS TAX OPINION

August 25, 2003

Mr. Kenneth V. Hager
Vice President, CFO and Treasurer
DST Systems, Inc.
333 West 11th Street, Fifth Floor
Kansas City, MO 65105

RE:    Proposed Corporate Reorganization

Dear Mr. Hager:

        You have requested the opinion of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (the "Firm" or "PwC") as to certain United States federal income tax consequences of the proposed corporate reorganization described below. The reorganization involves DST Systems, Inc. ("DST" or "Distributing") transferring certain assets to DST Output Marketing Services, Inc. ("Controlled" or "DST Output Marketing Services") after which DST will distribute all of the Controlled stock to Janus Capital Group Inc. ("Janus") in exchange for most of the stock (32.3 million shares) of DST owned by Janus in a transaction (the "Distribution") intended to qualify as a tax-free exchange under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (hereinafter "Code" or "IRC",) ("§", or "Section" are reference$to sections the Code). This opinion is solely for the benefit of, and may be relied upon only by DST and its corporate affiliates.

        Section I of this letter (the "Opinion Letter" or the "Opinion") describes the facts upon which the Opinion is based. Section II contains representations relied on by the Firm in rendering its Opinion. Section III contains the issues presented. Section IV sets forth the Firm's Opinion. Section V of this Opinion Letter contains a discussion of the authorities and the United States federal income tax analysis upon which the Opinion is based. Section VI of this Opinion Letter specifies qualifications to and limitations of the Opinion.

SECTION I—FACTS

A.    Company Organizational Structure

        DST is a publicly traded Delaware corporation with 115,645,136 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2003. DST's largest shareholder is Janus, which owns 39,724,052 shares of DST, representing 34.35% of DST's outstanding common stock as of June 30, 2003.(1) The last day of Distributing's taxable year is December 31 and it uses the accrual method of accounting.


(1)
Janus maintains contractual relationships with DST in order to use a variety of systems related to Janus' 4.5 million-account mutual fund business. DST hosts several applications for Janus from shareholder accounting, workflow & imaging and automated voice response systems as well as providing disaster recovery services. DST also provides resources to participate in projects ranging from software development, to process improvement and efforts to convert outside fund groups to the DST platform in conjunction with mergers and partnership agreements Janus has with other fund groups.

At times, Janus has also enlisted DST to provide services supporting transfer agent functions. Specifically, over the past several years DST and Janus have had outsourcing relationships for general back office processing with the Janus Transfer Agent. On several occasions, Janus has utilized consulting services from DST to assist with various internal efforts that were related or impacted DST systems used by Janus.

A-61


        Distributing is a leading provider of record keeping and computer software solutions to the financial services industry (the "Financial Services" business) and particularly to mutual funds and investment advisors thereto. Additionally, through subsidiary corporations, Distributing provides output solutions ("Output Solutions") and customer management ("Customer Management") services to a variety of industries.

        DST files a consolidated United States Corporation Income Tax Return together with subsidiaries that meet the requirements of being affiliated group members under Section 1504 (hereinafter referred to as the "DST Group"). All the companies described below are members of the DST Group.

        The following entities are described because they are the only entities that are specifically involved in the corporate restructuring and the Distribution. See Exhibit A an organizational chart and step plan of the internal restructuring ("Internal Restructuring").

        OTS Group, Inc.    ("OTS") is a wholly owned subsidiary of DST. OTS was formed by DST on February 20, 2001. OTS is a holding company that owns all of the stock of DST Systems of California, Inc.

        DST Systems of California, Inc.    (formerly known as—"USCS International, Inc.". or hereinafter as "DST Systems of California") is a Delaware corporation, and wholly owned subsidiary of OTS. The fair market value of DST Systems of California's assets exceeds its liabilities immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring.

        DST Systems of California was organized on April 10, 1996 as USCS International, Inc. On December 21, 1998, DST acquired 100 percent of the issued and outstanding common stock of USCS International, Inc. in a reverse triangular merger which qualified as a tax-free exchange under Section 368(a)(2)(E).(2) Subsequent to DST's acquisition, USCS International, Inc. changed its name to DST Systems of California, and in February 2001, DST contributed all of its DST Systems of California stock to OTS in exchange for OTS common stock in a transaction that qualified as tax-free under Section 351.


(2)
The former USCS International, Inc. shareholders exchanged their full unit shares of USCS International, Inc. solely for shares of DST common stock and cash in lieu of fractional shares to which they would otherwise have been entitled. DST was the source of the cash for the fractional shares in this transaction.

        DST Output, Inc.    ("DST Output") is a wholly owned subsidiary of DST Systems of California. DST Output was formed on December 28, 1990 as a wholly owned subsidiary of DST. After the acquisition of DST Systems of California in December of 1998, DST contributed the stock of DST Output to DST Systems of California in December 1999. Since December of 1999 DST Output has been a wholly owned subsidiary of DST Systems of California. DST Output is a holding company which owns all of the stock of the following subsidiaries, DST Output East, Inc., DST Output Illinois, Inc., DST Output SRI, Inc., and DST Output of California, Inc.

        DST Output East, Inc.    ("DST Output East") is a wholly owned subsidiary of DST Output. DST Output East was acquired by DST Output when it acquired the stock of Mail Processing Systems, Inc. on May 16, 1991. Through a series of name changes Mail Processing Systems, Inc. became DST Output East on January l, 2002.

        DST Output Marketing Services, Controlled, is a New York corporation organized on October 6, 1992 as a wholly owned subsidiary of DST Output East. The fair market value of Controlled's assets exceeds its liabilities immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring. The last day of Controlled's taxable year is December 31 and it uses the accrual method of accounting. See Section C.2, Controlled's Organizational Background and Active Business below for additional information.

A-62



        DST Output Illinois, Inc.    ("DST Output Illinois") is an Illinois corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of DST Output. DST Output Illinois became a member of Distributing's affiliated group in 1992 when DST Output organized Output Technologies of Illinois; Inc., which purchased the assets of Business Services, Inc. ("BSI"), a telemarketing/fulfillment operation. BSI's customers included electronics companies, engineering firms and financial services organizations, for which BSI maintained an inventory of forms and products, in its warehouse. BSI served its customers by (1) answering telephone calls from individual end users seeking to purchase products sold by one of BSI's customers, (2) directing BSI employees to "pick" and "pack" the products from inventory stored in its warehouse, and (3) delivering the products to the end users. In 1999, the company name was changed to Output Technology Solutions of Illinois, Inc., which was then changed in 2002 to DST Output Illinois, Inc. DST Output Illinois continues to engage in the pick and pack fulfilment business originally acquired from BSI in 1992. The tax bases of DST Output Illinois' assets exceed the associated liabilities immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring. The fair market value of DST Output Illinois' assets exceeds its liabilities immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring. DST Output Illinois currently has 163 employees. These employees have and continue to perform both managerial and operational functions.

        DST Output SRI, Inc.    ("DST Output SRI") is a wholly owned subsidiary of DST Output. DST Output SRI was formed by DST on September 29, 1981 to conduct printing operations. On April 1, 1993, DST contributed DST Output SRI to DST Output.

        DST Output Graphic Resources, Inc.    ("DST Output Graphic Resources") is a Missouri corporation wholly owned by DST Output SRI. DST Output Graphic Resources was organized on June 13, 1990 when DST organized Phoenix Litho, Inc. to acquire the assets of Klaren Colour, Inc. The Phoenix Litho, Inc. name was changed to Output Technologies Phoenix Litho Group, Inc. in 1993, to Output Technologies Graphic Resources Group, Inc. in 1997, to Output Technology Solutions Graphic Resources Group, Inc. in 1999, and to DST Output Graphic Resources, Inc. in 2002. DST transferred DST Output Graphic Resources to DST Output on April 1, 1993. On December 31, 1993, DST Output transferred DST Output Graphic Resources to DST Output SRI. DST Output Graphic Resources has been engaged in the graphics design and commercial printing business since 1990 when the assets of Klaren Colour, Inc. were acquired. DST Output Graphics Resources produces brochures, annual reports, collateral pieces and posters (i.e., items that require high-quality color printing produced to exact standards). The tax bases of the DST Output Graphic Resources' assets other than the Retained Assets(3) exceeds the associated liabilities immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring. The fair market value of DST Output Graphic Resources' assets exceeds its liabilities immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring. DST Output Graphic Resources has 61 employees who will not be part of the Retained Assets. These employees have and continue to perform both managerial and operational functions.


(3)
DST Output Graphic Resources, Inc. prepares "base stock" for members of the Output Solutions market segment on speciality presses that are not otherwise used in the commercial printing and graphics design business of DST Output Graphic Resources. These presses and related assets are hereinafter referred to as the "Retained Assets" described on Exhibit B.

        DST Output of California, Inc.    ("DST Output of California") is a California corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of DST Output. DST Output of California became a member of Distributing's affiliated group in December 1998, when DST acquired all the stock of USCS International, Inc., as described earlier. In the December 1999 when DST contributed all of its stock in DST Output to DST Systems of California, DST Systems of California then contributed all of its stock.in DST Output of California to DST Output. Among its trade or business assets, DST Output of California has a specific group of assets and associated liabilities through which it conducts a graphics design business (the "Graphics Division"). The business in the Graphics Division has been conducted by DST Output of California since 1994. The tax bases of the Graphics Division assets exceed the associated liabilities

A-63



immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring. The fair market value of DST Output of California's assets exceeds its liabilities immediately prior to the Internal Restructuring. DST Output of California currently has more than 1,000 employees in total with 47 employees in the Graphics Division. These employees have and continue to perform both managerial and operational functions.

B.    The Transaction

        Distributing will distribute 100 percent of the stock of Controlled to Janus in exchange for 32.3 million Distributing shares owned by Janus. After the Distribution, Janus will own 7,424,052 million Distributing shares (approximately [At time of closing] percent of all the Distributing shares outstanding immediately after the Distribution). Janus will also grant an irrevocable proxy to Distributing to vote the Distributing stock Janus or any Janus affiliate continues to own, or any Distributing shares Janus transfers to a third party in a transaction in which Janus continues to exercise voting rights over the Distributing shares so transferred. Additionally, Janus will agree not to acquire any Distributing shares for a period of ten years.

        Immediately prior to and in anticipation of the Distribution, Distributing will effect an Internal Restructuring. (See Exhibit A, Distributing's organizational structure, which depicts'these transactions.) As a result of the Internal Restructuring, Controlled will acquire the assets and liabilities of DST Output Illinois, the Graphics Division from DST Output of California, Inc. and, the assets and liabilities of DST Output Graphic Resources, excluding the Retained Assets.

        Additionally, following the Internal Restructuring and immediately prior to the Distribution, Distributing will contribute cash to Controlled. The cash is determined by the provisions of the Share Exchange Agreement that provide, in summary form, as follows:


(4)
The following example illustrates the determination of the cash as described above.

Assume the average closing price of DST common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the day prior to the closing is $36.

On this basis, the cash amount would be $999,350,000 determined by multiplying 32,300,000 by $34.50 (the maximum share price), a total of $1,114,350,000, and subtracting therefrom $115,000,000.

C.    Active Trade or Business

1.    Distributing's Directly Operated Business

        Distributing is directly engaged in the business of providing mutual fund shareowner accounting services ("Mutual Fund Shareowner Accounting Services Business") which is a segment of the Financial Services Business. Most of Distributing's mutual fund clients are "open-end" mutual fund companies, which obtain funds for investment by making a continuous offering of their shares. Purchases and sales (referred to as "redemptions") of open-end mutual fund shares are typically effected between

A-64



shareowners and the fund, rather than between shareowners. These transactions are based on the net asset value of the mutual fund on the date of purchase or redemption, which requires that the assets of the fund and the interests of its shareowners be valued daily. Accordingly, timely and accurate accounting and record keeping of shareowner and fund investment activity is critical.

        Investor attraction to a wide array of mutual fund investment products with increasingly specialized features has significantly increased the number of mutual fund shareowner accounts, the volume of transactions and the complexity of record keeping. Distributing's proprietary software (TA2000) and employees perform shareowner related functions for mutual funds, including processing purchases, redemptions, exchanges and transfers of shares; maintaining shareowner identification and share ownership records; reconciling cash and share activity; calculating and disbursing commissions to brokers and other distributors; processing dividends; creating and tabulating proxies; reporting sales; and providing data sets for use in printing shareowner transaction and statement data and year-end tax statements. The system processes load, no-load, multi-class and money funds. TA2000 also performs many specialized tasks, such as asset allocation and wrap-fee calculations. As of June 30, 2003, Distributing provided shareowner accounting processing services for approximately 86 million U.S. mutual fund shareowner accounts.

        Distributing derives revenues from its mutual fund shareowner accounting services through fees charged for use of Distributing's proprietary software systems, clerical processing services and other related products. These fees are generally charged on a per account and number of funds basis for system processing services and on a per account, number of fund and transaction basis for clerical services. Comparable record keeping participant services are offered by Distributing with respect to various corporate retirement and savings plans. Thus, Distributing's TA2000 software and employees maintain records and process information for all types of Individual Retirement Accounts ("IRAs") and Section 529 Savings Plans including Educational IRAs. In addition, using its TRAC component of TA2000, Distributing provides participant record keeping and administration for defined contribution plans, including Section 401(k), Section 403(b), Section 457, money purchase and profit sharing plans that invest in mutual funds, company stock, guaranteed investment contracts and other investment products. Distributing's use of leading edge technology to develop innovative software solutions for its customers accounts for its position as the leading provider of the mutual fund shareowner record keeping services in the U.S.

        Distributing has continuously and directly employed more than 50 full-time employees in the Mutual Fund Shareowner Accounting Services Business during each of the past five years. These employees have and continue to perform both managerial and operational functions. Distributing has actively operated the Mutual Fund Shareowner Accounting Services Business since 1969. Apart from the normal expansion and growth of its business, Distributing has not undergone any substantial operational changes in the past five years. Attached as Exhibit C are five years of unconsolidated profit and loss statements for Distributing. The caption, "Income from Operations," shown thereon represents the net income from the conduct of the Mutual Fund Shareowner Accounting Services Business determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Also attached as Exhibit D is the most recent unconsolidated balance sheet for Distributing. The total assets reported thereon represent the assets used by Distributing in conducting the Mutual Fund Shareowner Accounting Services Business, except for assets included in the "Investments" account.

A-65


2.    Controlled's Organizational Background and Active Business

        The Distributing group has two other active business operating segments (Customer Management(5) and Output Solutions as discussed below) that operate through subsidiaries. The Output Solutions segment provides single source, integrated print and electronic communications solutions. The products and services of the Output Solutions business segment fall into the following categories:


(5)
This business segment is not relevant to this Statement of Facts and, because it is operated through subsidiaries, is not discussed herein.

High speed laser statement and bill printing and other individualized customer communications such as checks, transaction confirmations and tax forms;

Electronic bill and statement processing and presentment to the video/broadband/satellite TV, telecommunications, utilities, credit card and other industries;

Archival retrieval to allow client customer service representatives to view customer statements in virtually any format from CD-ROM to electronic data transmission using Distributing-developed viewing and storage solutions software; and

Commercial printing, graphics design and communications management, which represent a combination of traditional fulfilment services and delivery of laser printed information supporting new financial service product sales and confirmation of security trades (the "Marketing Services Business").

        At the time of the Distribution, Controlled's active business will consist of a combination of its own operations and the operations of another subsidiary and parts of the operations of two other subsidiaries of Distributing, (described as the Marketing Services Business above) all of which have been included in the Output Solutions segment for purposes of financial reporting and executive management oversight.

        Controlled has directly and actively conducted the communications management services business for the past five-years. See Exhibit E for a detailed description of the services directly provided by Controlled.

        Controlled was organized in 1992 when its primary activity was the provision of printed confirmation of securities transactions to broker-dealers. Controlled has continued to be a market leader for discount brokerage firms that outsource the production of e-mail and hard copy trade confirmations. It has also developed a variety of fulfilment products such as retirement plan enrollment kits that can be proofed via the internet and.then transmitted for production and delivery. Controlled currently employs 157 people and has directly employed more than 50 full-time people during each of the past five years in conducting its active business operations. These employees have and continue to perform both managerial and operational functions.

        Controlled, as a result of the internal restructuring depicted in Exhibit A, will become a firsttier subsidiary of Distributing immediately prior to the Distribution and as described above Controlled will acquire all or part of the active business assets of three other subsidiaries. The purpose of the internal restructuring is to combine within Controlled the active business assets of the commercial printing, graphics design, and communications management businesses. On the date of the Distribution, the gross fair market value of Controlled's Marketing Services Business will be approximately $[insert at time of closing] million. See Exhibit F, the appraisal of Standard & Poor's Corporate Value Consulting and Exhibit G five years of pro forma profit and loss statements for the Marketing Services Business and a pro forma balance sheet as of June 30, 2003 for Marketing Services Business.

A-66



D.    Business Purposes

        The business reasons for the Internal Restructuring described above and the contribution of the cash, the Graphics Division, and the assets and liabilities of DST Output Graphic Resources (except for the Retained Assets) to Controlled are to promote efficiency by consolidating the assets and operations of the Marketing Services Business in a single entity and to facilitate the exchange of Distributing shares owned by Janus for Controlled stock. The business purposes for the Distribution are set forth below.

1.    Janus' Ownership of Distributing Represents a Competitive Threat to Distributing is Business

        Janus is one of the largest mutual funds managers in the United States. As such, Janus is a direct and formidable competitor of Distributing's other mutual fund clients. Janus' direct ownership of Distributing, and Janus' ability to utilize its cumulative voting rights to elect one or more members of its management to Distributing's board of directors, poses a direct and material threat to Distributing's competitive position in the mutual funds part of the Financial Services market it serves. Any influence or involvement by Janus (real or perceived) "in Distributing's management, or any access (real or perceived) that Janus might have to strategic plans or customer data of Distributing's mutual fund customers, is a material concern to these clients.

        For the year ended December 31, 2002, Distributing earned 43.4% of its operating revenues across all segments from services it provided to the mutual fund industry. More importantly, the Financial Services segment, of which services to mutual funds is the largest single component, provided 83% of Distributing's income from operations in 2002. Competition for this business is intense among a very few service providers.(6) Losing its competitive advantage in this highly profitable segment of its business would have an adverse effect on Distributing's profitability.


(6)
Distributing's principal competitors are PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Sunguard Data Systems, Inc. and The BYSYS Group. Based on forms 13-D currently filed, none of these companies has a more than 5% shareholder which is a client.

        Distributing provides a wide range of services to its clients, often performing all of their mutual fund shareowner system processing (and in some cases administrative functions). As a consequence, Distributing has access to its clients' most critical proprietary information (i.e., shareholder data) and to strategic plans relating to the servicing of those shareholders. Distributing's customers are very sensitive about access to this information by anyone, much less a competitor. For example, see the letter from T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., Exhibit H, stating its concerns and the chilling effect Janus' ownership position has on its willingness to discuss openly its strategies and respective needs as they relate to Distributing's capabilities. Every service agreement Distributing has with a mutual fund client contains provisions requiring Distributing to maintain the confidentiality of shareholder data and strategic client information. To put this in perspective, as of June 30, 2003 Distributing maintained shareowner account records for approximately 86 million U.S. shareowner accounts, making it the largest third party provider of mutual fund shareowner processing services. Distributing has been able to achieve this level of market acceptance through its commitment to service, investment in technology and by maintaining independence from its clients.

        Before 2003, no client had ever directly owned any significant percentage of Distributing's stock-let alone an interest entitling it to board representation. This changed on January 1, 2003, when Distributing's largest shareholder, Stilwell Financial, Inc. ("Stilwell") merged with Janus Capital Corporation ("JCC") and Stilwell Financial, Inc. changed its name to Janus Capital Group, Inc. In connection with this transaction, the top five executive officers of Stilwell resigned, and turned over the management of Stilwell, now Janus, to the historic JCC management. In addition, several Stilwell board members resigned and new members (including certain Janus officers) were appointed to the board of

A-67



directors. This transaction has been highly publicized in the mutual fund industry. See Exhibit I (representative press coverage of the Stilwell/Janus merger). After becoming aware of the JCC and Stilwell merger, DST contacted JCC to discuss strategic business alternatives for reducing JCC's direct ownership interest in DST.

        Prior to this recent merger, Stilwell was very careful not to exert any influence over Distributing and was effectively a passive holder or steward, and did not actively participate in the management of JCC allowing JCC an unusually high degree of autonomy. As a consequence, this ownership approach to both JCC and Distributing served to mitigate concerns over the possible competitive conflicts, which could arise as a result of Stilwell's ownership of JCC in combination with its significant ownership of Distributing. An historical perspective on the development of this relationship assists in understanding the importance of this pattern of ownership and control and the changed environment resulting from the JCC/Stilwell merger.

        Distributing was formed by Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. ("KCSI") in 1969 to develop a technology-based solution to provide mutual fund shareowner processing. At that time, KCSI was a holding company that owned a railroad (the Kansas City Southern Railway) and also owned a controlling interest in a mutual fund manager, Supervised Investors. Supervised Investors' needs served as the archetypal business requirements around which Distributing's systems and processes were designed. Because Distributing aspired to serve the entire mutual fund industry, maintaining Distributing's independence from any customer (in this case Supervised Investors) was very important. Ownership by a customer would have severely limited Distributing's ability to grow its business. For that reason, Distributing was owned separately from Supervised Investors and separate boards of directors and other management functions were maintained for both Supervised Investors and KCSI.

        KCSI sold Supervised Investors in the early 1970's. After this transaction, neither KCSI nor any of its affiliates had any ownership interest in any mutual fund management companies. This changed, however, in 1983, when KCSI bought a controlling interest in JCC, which at the time was a very small mutual fund manager that managed only about $300 million in assets.(7) Although KCSI owned a controlling interest in JCC, under the 1983 acquisition agreement, JCC maintained control over all the day-to-day operations of JCC, and KCSI had no operational control over the business. Therefore, even though KCSI owned controlling interests in both Janus and Distributing, the management of the two businesses were both independent of each other and, equally important, independent of KCSI.


(7)
Under KCSI's ownership, JCC grew significantly over the next two decades. At the height of the market expansion in 2000, JCC managed mutual funds and separate accounts with total assets of more than $300 billion. Today, Janus has approximately $150 billion of assets under management.

        In 1995, pursuant to a public stock offering, KCSI sold a majority of the stock of Distributing, while retaining approximately 42% ownership of Distributing. Despite the sale of a majority of Distributing's stock, KCSI made it clear that its remaining stockholding in Distributing was a strategic asset (a position which Janus does not hold, see Exhibit J). Although KCSI owned a minority position in Distributing, it owned the largest block of Distributing stock after the public offering. KCSI could have used this stock ownership position to exercise effective control over Distributing, but chose not to. Instead, KCSI exercised its ownership rights over Distributing in a very limited way.

        KCSI chose not to appoint a member of its management to represent KCSI's interest on the Distributing board of directors. Instead, KCSI appointed two of its independent directors to the board of directors of Distributing. In addition, Distributing's bylaws were written so as to provide for cumulative voting rights for elections to the board of directors. This feature (which allows a shareowner to accumulate its votes for Directors to cast all votes for one person that would be otherwise spread across the number of director positions up for election), effectively gave KCSI the right to elect one

A-68



director each year. The effect of this provision was to enable KCSI to exert significant influence over the Distributing board—if it so desired.

        In addition, KCSI exempted itself from certain of Distributing's anti-takeover safeguards. As described more fully below, neither KCSI nor its successor, Stilwell, have disturbed this ownership relationship or exercised its rights to elect additional directors to the Distributing board.

        In 1998, KCSI announced an intention to separate its two principal lines of business, transportation and financial services, into two stand-alone public companies. As a financial services company, the ownership interest in Distributing was to be included in the new financial services public company, which would be named Stilwell Financial, Inc. JCC, too, would be owned by Stilwell.

        Management of JCC strongly objected to this plan, believing that JCC should be owned independently from Stilwell. In 2000, after difficult and acrimonious negotiations, KCSI effected the separation by a spin-off under Section 355 of the Code, which included JCC under Stilwell.(8) The wide publicity of the acrimonious negotiations made the separation of management among Stilwell, JCC, and Distributing clear.


(8)
KCSI sought and received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that the separation would be non-taxable to both the shareholders of KCSI and to KCSI itself. See Priv. Let. Rul. 200025001 (2000).

        Once again, maintaining the mutual independence of Distributing and JCC under the Stilwell ownership umbrella created problems in structuring Stilwell so as to meet the active trade or business requirement of Section 355. As the "controlled" company in the 2000 spin-off, Stilwell had to satisfy the "five year active trade or business" test. Stilwell, however, was a newly formed holding company. As such, in order to meet the active trade or business test prescribed by Section 355(b), either (1) 90% of the value of its gross assets had to consist of stock in controlled corporations that were directly engaged in 5 year active trades or businesses, or (2) 5% of the value of its gross assets had to be used directly in conducting an active trade or business.(9) Stilwell could not meet these tests because the value of its DST stock interest was too high.


(9)
Rev. Proc. 96-30, 1996-1 CB 696 section 4.03(5).

        The easiest and first suggested solution was to transfer the ownership of Distributing from KCSI to Stilwell and then to JCC. The resulting corporate structure would have enabled Stilwell to satisfy the holding company active trade or business test of Rev. Proc. 96-30, 19961, CB 696. Indeed, KCSI initially considered placing the ownership of Distributing under JCC. Distributing management objected to this approach and pointed out the adverse impact it could have on other mutual fund client relationships. Attached as Exhibit K are affidavits filed by Thomas A. McDonnell, Distributing's President and Chief Executive Officer on February 26, 1998, and Thomas A. McCullough, Distributing's Executive Vice President, filed on May 21, 1998, both of whom attest to the negative effect on the business prospects of Distributing that would result from the direct ownership of Distributing by Janus. These affidavits were filed with the Stilwell spin-off ruling request KCSI submitted in 1998.

        KCSI management was sympathetic to the concern of Distributing management and, as a result, transferred Distributing's stock elsewhere in the Stilwell corporate structure to maintain independence from JCC. Doing so, however, created a very awkward financial structure for Stilwell and considerably complicated the ruling KCSI sought in connection with the Stilwell spin-off. Nevertheless, Stilwell and KCSI management understood the importance of preserving the separation of Distributing and JCC in order to maintain Distributing's competitive position and, as a consequence, endured the hardship created by altering the Stilwell ownership structure to keep the two entities effectively independent in spite of the structural issues it created.

A-69



        After the spin-off, Stilwell maintained the same hands-off management style as had KCSI. To summarize, the following critical points characterize the ownership and management approach of first KCSI and then Stilwell during the combined 34 years of their ownership of Distributing.

        Distributing views these factors as critical to its success, and each of these critical Distributing success factors is at risk as a result of the recent Stilwell merger with JCC.

        Mutual fund investment advisors operate in an intensely competitive environment. Advisors grow their profits by attracting new shareholders to the funds they manage, thus increasing their management fees. A fund's investment performance and operating cost ratios are key statistics by which investors evaluate funds. Heretofore, the separation of the ownership of JCC and Distributing under the ownership of KCSI/Stilwell and the hands-off approach they have taken with respect to both JCC and Distributing have enabled Distributing to manage concerns of preferential treatment for JCC. The possibility that Janus might have access to (i) shareholder or strategic information, (ii) preferential treatment in the form of reduced fees compared to other funds, or (iii) new technologies in advance of other funds, are customer concerns Distributing must manage. See Exhibit L, attached, which consists of letters of Distributing's customers that describe these concerns. Here, too, the perception that Janus may exert its influence to cause Distributing to breach the trust of its other customers is just as important as the reality, if not more so.

        The fact that Janus now directly owns Distributing, and is in a position to directly influence Distributing's management, is a significant change in their historic relationship. Janus' ability to influence Distributing may be illustrated by the following examples. Distributing has a staggered board of directors and cumulative voting. All directors are elected for three-year terms, with elections of two directors in one year, two directors in the following year and three directors in the next following year. With ownership of 34.35%(10) of the DST stock, Janus can elect one director in each annual election, even if all of the other shareholders vote for other directors. Moreover, under a variety of circumstances Janus can elect two of three directors in the year in which three directors are elected. If 6% of the DST stock not owned by Janus votes in favor of Janus candidates, and a total of 80% of DST stock is voted, then Janus could elect two of three directors. Janus could acquire an additional 6% of DST stock, or engage in a proxy contest. Accordingly, Janus has the power to elect three of seven directors, and may under certain reasonable circumstances elect four of seven directors. Equally important, the implicit threat to exercise this voting power itself gives Janus power to influence DST.


(10)
Except as otherwise noted, all references to Janus ownership of Distributing are based on its outstanding shares as of June 30, 2003, and Janus' share ownership at that time.

        Competition for the business of Distributing's customers is intense. Janus'.direct ownership of Distributing has heightened customer concerns about the relationship, leading to more restrictive provisions in renewal contracts of existing customers, and much more difficult negotiations to retain existing customer relationship and to win new contracts from competitors' customers or potential customers who currently provide these services internally. Attached as Exhibit M, are the affidavits of Thomas A. McDonnell and Thomas McCullough attesting to these concerns. Additionally, competitors have already begun using Janus' new position of influence over Distributing to attempt to convince

A-70


prospective new customers not to engage Distributing to provide mutual fund processing services. See the affidavit of Debralee Goldberg, attached as Exhibit N, wherein she describes her recent encounter with a competitor's use of this marketing tactic.

        The proposed Distribution achieves Distributing's corporate business purposes while using the least amount of equalization cash possible. In order to eliminate its competitive disadvantage, Distributing must conclusively demonstrate to its customers that Janus cannot exercise any meaningful control over Distributing and its operations. Distributing may achieve this objective without acquisition of all of the Distributing stock owned by Janus through the proposed transaction for the following reasons:

        Janus' significant ownership interest in Distributing also adversely affects the core printing and mailing services business of its Output Solutions business segment, which will remain with Distributing after the Distribution. Output Solutions provided print and electronic communications services to Janus to enable it to communicate with the shareholders of the mutual funds Janus managed. In 1998, Janus terminated its contract with Output Solutions.

        In terminating the contract, Janus gave no consideration to the marketing problem its actions created. After Janus terminated the contract, Output Solutions has found that in nearly every competitive proposal, competitors note that Janus terminated its contract with Output Solutions. Competitors pose the following question, "if Janus, which is in the same economic family as Output Solutions, refuses to use them, why would you?" See the affidavit of Bernard K. O'Connor attached as Exhibit O, describing his encounters with this marketing tactic. By effecting the split-off, Distributing's competitors will no longer be able to use this situation as a marketing advantage. Distributing management believes its Output Solutions segment will be more successful without this stigma, and, as a consequence, will increase it revenues and profits.

        As recently as last year, Janus' activities created an additional competitive problem for Distributing. Janus solicited proposals from Distributing and its competitors to perform Janus' mutual fund shareowner processing work on a full service basis.(11) See attached Exhibit P. At the conclusion of the process, Janus seriously considered awarding the contract to one of Distributing's competitors, if Distributing would permit the competitor to use Distributing's proprietary TA2000 software, and was in the process of negotiating such a contract. As a result of Janus' action, Distributing competitors have been given another tool to undermine Distributing's products and services. Even today, Janus continues to use one of Distributing's competitors for processing with respect to certain international funds.


(11)
Full service processing involves using Distributing employees and Distributing's proprietary software, TA2000, to provide all necessary administrative and clerical support to process and maintain shareowner records, answer telephone inquiries from shareowners, brokers and others.

        Currently, Distributing's competitors capitalize on Janus' actions by using them in the selling process against Distributing. After the Distribution, competitors' ability to use this selling technique will be significantly diminished, because Janus' ownership will fall below 10 percent and it will not have voting rights over the shares retained.

A-71



2.    Janus' Ownership Impedes Distributing's Ability to Finance Its Business Operations

        U.S. Bancorp is the eighth largest financial services holding company in the United States. U.S. Bancorp, through its bank subsidiary, U.S. Bank, is one of eight banks that participate in Distributing's syndicated line of credit, and U. S. Bank is also a member of Janus' syndicated line of credit. In accordance with U.S. Bancorp's policy, U. S. Bank assesses its credit exposure to Distributing by aggregating the credit exposure of Distributing and Janus. Distributing has no control over the credit worthiness or borrowing needs of Janus.

        Applying U.S. Bancorp's aggregation policy for U. S. Bank's credit exposure to Distributing and Janus first became an issue in December 2002, based on economic and business factors that developed in 2001 and 2002. In November 2001, Stilwell completed a series of debt offerings aggregating $1.1 billion to finance the purchase of JCC stock held by Thomas Bailey (founder of JCC) and certain other insiders. At the same time, U.S. equity markets were suffering losses, which adversely affected the mutual fund industry in general, and Janus in particular. These factors likely led U.S. Bank based upon U.S. Bancorp's policy to re-valuate its existing loan commitments with Stilwell (the predecessor to Janus) and Distributing.

        As is typical, U.S. Bank extends credit to Distributing based on loan commitments that have durations of one to three years. U.S. Bank has limited ability to modify a loan commitment during the term of the commitment, but may negotiate different terms at the time of renewal.

        U.S. Bank had a $40 million loan commitment to an affiliate of Distributing (guaranteed by Distributing) which expired on December 31, 2002, and in connection with the renewal, U.S. Bank decreased its loan commitment from $40 million to $30 million.(12) Although the amount of this reduction did not, in and of itself, create a serious financing problem for Distributing, the possibility of future additional reductions in loan commitments creates extremely serious financing problems for Distributing.


(12)
See the affidavit of Gregg Wm. Givens, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of DST, Exhibit Q attached.

        Distributing is particularly concerned about a possible reduction in its $315 million primary syndicated revolving credit facility. This credit facility is a three-year syndicated revolving credit facility that Distributing uses to finance its working capital and other business needs. One third of the syndicated facility renews annually while the remainder expires in December 2004. Bank of America serves as the lead agent for this credit facility. The role of the lead agent in a syndicated credit facility is to assemble the other institutions who will participate in the syndicate, negotiate the principal terms of the credit facility, serve as the primary liaison to the lender on behalf of the members of the syndicate and, generally, to take the largest position in the credit facility. As a practical matter, there are only about fifteen U.S. banks that have the capital and depth of resources and services to participate in significant syndicated lines of credit. Furthermore, given the size of Distributing's syndicated facility, the preferred number of participating banks is six to eight.

        Credit facility arrangements consume bank capital which could be deployed in other, more profitable activities. The return in the form of interest and fees derived from these participations is not sufficient to compensate banks for the capital which must be earmarked for the loan participation. Distributing understands that a critical incentive for banks to participate in its line of credit is the opportunity to provide to Distributing other non-lending services, which are potentially more profitable to the banks. As a consequence, Distributing is incented to use the members of its syndicated line of credit for a number of other banking services, including lockbox arrangements, check clearing activities for its customer accounts, foreign exchange transactions, cash management, and automated clearing house, among others.

A-72



        Because of the dynamics associated with finding opportunities for qualified members of the syndicated line of credit to provide non-lending services to the borrower under such a facility, losing a member of the facility creates numerous management problems. If a bank leaves the syndicate, which bank provided a specific service to the borrower, the borrower must address two problems. First, it must find a replacement bank to provide the financing offered by the departing bank. Secondly, the borrower will want to find a lender who can provide the same non-lending services as the departing bank. Thus, finding a new participating syndicate member that provides additional banking services the borrower is willing to pay for can be difficult. Moreover, depending on the nature of the service provided, the management time spent by the borrower in familiarizing the replacement bank and its employees with the needs of the borrower may be significant. Hence, borrowers generally and Distributing specifically, take pains to make sure the members of the credit facility stay in place.

        The Office of Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") places limits on the credit exposure a member bank may have to any one borrower. In determining the credit exposure of a company, a bank must aggregate loans to two or more companies when one company controls or is controlled by another. Owning more than 50% of the stock of a company constitutes ipso facto control. However, control is not limited to situations in which one company owns more than 50% of the stock of a company. Hence, the lending bank must consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether a control relationship exists, thereby invoking the lending aggregation requirement. See Exhibit R, attached, an excerpt of the applicable OCC regulations.

        Because of Janus' ownership of 34.35% of Distributing, a lender must consider whether Janus controls Distributing for purposes of the OCC's aggregation rule. At least one member of Distributing's syndicated credit facility, U.S. Bank, participates in both Distributing's and Janus syndicated lines of credit. As a result, U.S. Bank, based on U.S. Bancorp's policy, determines the limits of its participation in the Distributing and Janus syndicated lines of credit as if Distributing and Janus were one borrower. Distributing believes that if Janus' ownership of Distributing is reduced below 25 percent, U.S. Bank will determine its participation in Distributing's syndicated line of credit without aggregating its exposure with that of Janus or considering Janus' credit worthiness. See Exhibit S, which is the letter from U.S. Bank describing the aggregate credit exposure calculation.

        It is noteworthy that the aggregation rule can never work to Distributing's advantage. The purpose of the aggregation rule is to place a limit on the credit exposure of a bank, in relation to its total capital, attributable to related parties. Hence, if one of the related parties under consideration has a very high credit rating, the other party derives no benefit. The test is simply to determine whether, by adding together the loans of both parties, the total loans exceed the allowable percentage of the bank's capital. On the other hand, as one of the related parties credit quality deteriorates, the access to credit of the other party could be negatively impacted as the bank becomes concerned about the exposure of its loans, in aggregate, to the related parties. Conversely, as the credit quality of the other related party improves, the bank may find it attractive to increase lending to this related party, thereby reducing the related party's access to funding from that bank. In sum, Distributing loses control over its ability to manage its borrowings because banks that lend to Janus may determine the amounts they are willing to lend to Distributing based on the amount of credit they have extended to Janus and/or its credit worthiness.

        U.S. Bancorp's aggregation policy has broader implications. First, as noted above, there is a practical limitation on the number of banks large enough to participate in a syndicated line of credit the size of Distributing's. It is in the best interest of managing Distributing's credit and financing as well as its other bank services needs not to limit, in any way, the number of institutions from which it can borrow. As noted earlier, because of the size of Distributing's borrowing needs, the number of banks that can participate in Distributing's credit facility is already limited. Further limiting Distributing's access to credit has the following negative consequences.

A-73



        Because Distributing must turn to members of its credit facility to meet most of its nonlending bank services needs, Distributing may encounter the difficult choice of terminating an important service arrangement with a bank because it may no longer be able to participate sufficiently in the Distributing credit facility to remain a member of the syndicate. Not only can this result in requiring Distributing to turn to another bank which may not be as capable in providing such services, the cost of replacing a bank (both financial and in terms of the time and attention of Distributing's management) can be significant. Certain bank service arrangements are so closely integrated with Distributing's operations that changing them would require significant computer programming costs to reprogram automated tasks (in at least one case, the cost is estimated to be in excess of $5 million).

        In summary, Janus' ownership of Distributing already serves to place a limitation on the credit it can receive from one member of its syndicated line of credit, U.S. Bank, and as a result of U.S. Bancorp's policy, an affiliate of DST has suffered a reduction of $10 million under one of its credit arrangements with U.S. Bank. There is a risk that other participating members of Distributing's syndicated line of credit may apply the OCC's aggregation limits as U.S. Bancorp has. In an environment of continuing consolidation in the banking industry and increasing pressure to find profitable service opportunities for participating members of the credit facility, aggregating the credit risk of Janus and Distributing will likely impair Distributing's ability to meet its financing needs. In this connection, it is noteworthy that U.S. Bancorp is the result of a merger between Firstar and "old" U.S. Bancorp in 2001, that Firstar was the result of a series of mergers involving Mercantile (1999) and Star (1998) and "old" U.S. Bancorp was itself the result of a merger with First Bank Systems (1997). It is possible that future consolidation could both shrink the pool of potential syndicate members and expand the reach of the U.S. Bancorp blanket aggregation policy.

3.    The Operations of Controlled Lack Fit and Focus Within the Distributing Group of Companies

        Distributing originally anticipated that its Financial Services segment would create synergies with its Marketing Services Business and thus provide a strong basis for expansion. However, despite its best efforts, Distributing believes the strategy upon which the business of Controlled was built has been ineffective in significantly enhancing Distributing's core businesses.

        In contrast to Distributing's other businesses, the graphics design and commercial printing business does not differentiate itself in the marketplace through technological advances. It is a highly fragmented business with many competitors. Distributing must continuously upgrade its commercial printing capabilities to increase efficiencies to remain competitive. It is a "commodity" business with competitive pricing and no opportunity to gain competitive advantage by developing and introducing technological solutions. In contrast to Distributing's other business segments, where Distributing secures competitive advantage by developing innovative software solutions, in this activity, innovation is effectively achieved by capital investment, i.e., by buying a bigger, faster, better printing device. For example, using its proprietary software, Distributing already stores and maintains customer data for its mutual fund and other clients. Hence, it is very efficient for Distributing's Output Solutions operations to receive those data in electronic files and to use its sophisticated printmail software to print and disseminate the reports and statements to mutual funds' shareholders and customers in other industries served by Distributing's Output Solutions and Customer Management segments. There is no comparable synergy among the other core DST businesses and the business of Controlled.

        The fulfillment business is highly customized, labor intensive and served by larger competitors who possess significant economies of scale compared with Controlled's capabilities. In recognition of this fact, on two earlier occasions Distributing sought a joint venture partner with which to combine Controlled's operations to achieve the scale necessary to become a market leader. In December 1996, Distributing negotiated to combine the operations of Controlled with those of ADP to form the largest provider of trade confirmation services to the broker dealer community. More recently, Controlled entered negotiations with ADP to discuss a range of joint venture combinations involving certain

A-74



operations of the Output Solutions segment, which included specific combinations of the Marketing Services Division. However, none of these discussions led to a transaction.

        Despite its lack of scale, Controlled has been successful in introducing technology solutions that provide it a competitive advantage in its fulfilment business; however, these technology solutions do not leverage other Distributing technologies. To this point in time, Controlled has marketed its fulfilment/communications management suite of products mainly to the marketing arm of discount broker/dealers and to retail oriented mutual fund companies. This is a relatively new target market for Distributing and its affiliated group and is one which is targeted primarily by Controlled. This means that Controlled cannot leverage other Distributing business relationships to assist Controlled in cross selling its products because it is the only member of the group marketing directly to this customer set.

        Finally, Controlled's business is far more cyclical than Distributing's. During periods of stock market weakness, Controlled's business activity and revenues wane due to decreased activity, i.e., fewer investors are interested in acquiring new investments, which drives the fulfillment and transactions confirmations business of Controlled. In contrast, Distributing's mutual fund software revenues are driven by the number of account holders. Hence, in periods of market weakness, Distributing's accounts typically remain stable, as investors tend to switch from one mutual fund to another, e.g., from a stock fund to a money market fund, rather than to completely withdraw from a mutual fund family and invest in alternatives.

        For the reasons set forth above, Distributing's management has concluded that operating Controlled within the larger Output Solutions business segment is a poor fit that makes it desirable to separate the two segments. On the other hand, Janus believes that its business relationships with retail brokerage and variable annuity firms can be exploited to expand Controlled's Marketing Services Business. For instance, Janus has close relationships with the large retail brokerage firms, e.g., Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs and Salomon Smith Barney (among others). As noted above, Controlled markets its fulfilment/communications management suite of products mainly to the marketing arm of discount broker/dealers and retail oriented mutual fund companies. Janus' relationships with large retail brokerage firms such as those noted above provide Janus the opportunity to give Controlled access to the marketing divisions within these organizations to further expand Controlled's business. Additionally, Janus can use Controlled's technology to significantly reduce its outside printing costs associated with the distribution of its funds as underlying investments of variable annuity products. Currently, insurance companies bill Janus for the cost of printing the prospectus for each Janus fund that may be selected as an investment option within a variable annuity policy. Janus management believes they can direct insurance companies to use Controlled for this service, thereby expanding Controlled's business. Alternatively, Janus believes it can use Controlled as a source to print Janus fund prospectuses on demand for these variable annuity policies, thereby reducing the printing costs currently billed to Janus by the insurance companies. These opportunities will make Controlled more valuable under Janus' ownership than under Distributing's ownership.

E.    Janus' use of Controlled's Liquid Assets

        As noted, the fair market value of the trade or business assets of Controlled are approximately $115 million which is approximately XXX percent of the gross fair market value of the assets Controlled will possess at the time of the Distribution. The additional non-trade or business asset (the cash) is necessary to equalize the value of Controlled with that of the shares of Distributing stock to be surrendered by Janus in order to effect a sufficient reduction of Janus' interest to accomplish the business purposes set forth above.

        Controlled plans to use the non-trade or business asset as follows: (i) at least $15 million will be used for capital expenditures in the Marketing Services Business; (ii) approximately $350 - 450 million will be used to purchase publicly traded, debt of Janus (which debt will be held by Controlled for

A-75



investment until its maturity or exchanged for other publicly traded debt of Janus pursuant to an exchange offer on arm's length terms in which the public also participates that will then be held by Controlled for investment until maturity); (iii) not more than $300 million will be used to purchase outstanding shares of Janus stock in open market transactions in which Controlled is not aware of the identity of the seller; (iv) approximately $20-50 million will be held by Controlled in cash and cash equivalents as working capital for the Marketing Services Business; and, (v) the remaining cash will be invested by Controlled in publicly traded debt and equity securities of issuers other than Janus and its affiliates pending use by Controlled in making acquisitions of operating businesses, including, but not limited to, printing, technology, asset servicing, asset management, and distribution businesses, and to provide operating and working capital to grow Controlled's businesses.

F.    Summary

        Controlled's operations have significant potential for growth, but the opportunity to realize this growth will not be maximized within Distributing's group of companies. The nature of the operations conducted by Controlled does not fit with the rest of Distributing's core operations. Splitting off Controlled to Janus in exchange for Distributing stock will serve these important business purposes of Distributing:

SECTION II—REPRESENTATIONS

        Attached as Exhibits T, U and V are officer's certificates setting forth the representations made by the respective managements of DST, DST Output Marketing Services and Janus. These representations form a material part of this opinion letter.

SECTION III—ISSUES

        What are the federal income tax consequences to DST and to DST Output Marketing Services resulting from the Distribution as described above?

SECTION IV—OPINION

        Based upon the facts set forth in Section I, the Representations contained in Sections II, and the analysis set forth in Section V, and subject to the qualifications and limitations set forth in Section VI, the Firm is of the following Opinion:

        DST should recognize no gain or loss upon transferring the assets of the Graphics Division subject to Graphics Division liabilities and the assets of DST Output Graphics Resources (less the Retained Assets) subject to its liabilities as well as transferring cash to Controlled. (Sections 361(a) and 357(a)). Also, DST should recognize no gain or loss upon its Distribution of Controlled stock to Janus in exchange for DST shares owned by Janus. (Section 361(c)). Controlled should recognize no gain or loss upon its receipt of the Graphics Division assets subject to Graphics Division liabilities as well as the

A-76



DST Output Graphics Resources assets (less the Retained Assets) subject to its liabilities and the cash in exchange for Controlled stock. (Section 1032(a)).

        The bases of the assets of the Graphics Division and the assets of DST Output Graphic Resources (except for the Retained Assets) should be the same in the hands of Controlled as that of DST Output of California and DST Output Graphic Resources, respectively. (Section 362(b)). The holding period of the assets of the Graphics Division and the assets of DST Output Graphic Resources (except for the Retained Assets) should be the same in the hands of Controlled as that of DST Output of California and DST Output Graphic Resources, respectively. (Section 1223(2)).

        The Firm does not express an opinion on any other federal income tax aspect of the Distribution described herein. For example, the Firm does not opine on the question whether there is any gain or loss from excess loss accounts, deferred intercompany gains or losses, or on the manner or the extent to which earnings and profits of Distributing immediately prior to the Distribution are apportioned between Distributing and Controlled. Therefore, this opinion only opines on the federal income tax issues expressed above in this Section IV Opinion and not any other federal income tax issues.

SECTION V—DISCUSSION

What are the federal income tax consequences to DST and to DST Output Marketing Services resulting from the transactions described herein?

A.    Requirements of a reorganization under Section 368(a) (1) (D) of the Code.

        Under Section 368(a)(1)(D) a corporate reorganization includes a transfer of all or a part of the assets of one corporation to another corporation in exchange for all or part of the stock of such other corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor is in control of the corporate transferee so long as the stock of such transferee corporation is distributed in a transaction that qualifies under Section 355.

        The transfer to Controlled of the Graphics Division by New LLC1, a disregarded entity owned by DST, and all of the assets and liabilities of DST Output Graphics Resources, except for the Retained Assets, by New LLC2, a disregarded entity owned by DST, as described in the facts above, should qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) inasmuch as: (i) the transfer occurs pursuant to a plan of reorganization as expressed in the Agreement which has been incorporated herein by reference; (ii) immediately after the exchange of assetsvfor stock of Controlled, DST, through the disregarded entities New LLC 1 and New LLC2, will own all of the stock of Controlled; and, (iii) as discussed below, the Distribution of Controlled stock to Janus for DST shares owned by Janus described in the Distribution, should satisfy the requirements of Section 355.

B.    The Distribution of Controlled Stock Should Meet the Requirements of Section 355

        The purpose of Section 355 is to permit tax-free readjustment of corporate structures required by business exigencies, which in general, effect only a readjustment of continuing interest in property under modified corporate forms. In permitting such restructuring, Section 355 provides rules which are designed to prevent the conversion of dividend income into capital gain. To accomplish these objectives, the taxpayer must satisfy a number of statutory and non-statutory requirements to qualify a distribution of stock of a controlled corporation under Section 355.

        These requirements are discussed below with regard to the Distribution under the headings: (1) Control; (2) Distribution of Control; (3) Device; (4) Business Purpose; (5) Active Trade and Business; (6) Continuity of Shareholder Interest; (7) Non-application of Section 355(d); and (8) Non-application of Section 355(e).

A-77



1    Control

        (a)    Requirement:    The distributing corporation must control the corporation to be distributed immediately before the distribution. (Section 355(a)(1)(A)). Control is defined as ownership of (a) stock possessing at least 80% of the total combined voting power of the corporation and (b) at least 80% of each class of outstanding nonvoting stock. (Section 368(c)).

        (b)    Discussion:    Immediately before the Distribution, Distributing will own all of Controlled's only class of outstanding stock. Controlled has no plan or intention to issue additional stock.

2.    Distribution of Control

        (a)    Requirement:    The distributing corporation must either (i) distribute all the stock and securities which the distributing corporation holds immediately before the distribution or (ii) distribute an amount of stock constituting control and established that the retention of stock or securities is not part of a plan having as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of federal income tax. (Section 355(a)(1)(D) and Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-2(e)).

        (b)    Discussion:    Distributing will distribute all of Controlled stock in the Distribution and will not hold any stock or securities of Controlled after the Distribution.

3.    Device for Distributing Earnings and Profits

        (a)    Requirement:    The distributing company's distribution of stock must not have been used principally as a device for the distribution of earnings and profits of the distributing company or the company to be distributed. (Section 355(a)(1)(B) and Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.3552(d)). Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-2(d)(2)(ii) provides that the most likely way the distribution will result in being a device is if the distribution is pro rata or substantially pro rata among the shareholders of the distributing corporations.

        (b)    Discussion:    Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-2(d)(5)(iv) provides that a "distribution is ordinarily considered not to have been used principally as a device if, in the absence of Section 355, with respect to each shareholder distributee, the distribution would be a redemption to which Section 302(a) applied. Janus is the only distributee in the proposed transaction, and it has represented that it would be entitled to treatment under Section 302(a) in the absence of Section 355. Moreover, the transaction is driven by business purposes that have been described above. Accordingly, the subject transaction should not be viewed as failing the non-device requirement. Moreover, the fact that Distributing makes a significant capital contribution to Controlled to equalize the value of Controlled with the value of the shares of Distributing Janus will exchange in the transaction does not alter this result. See Revenue Ruling 64-102, 1964-1 C.B. 136 and Revenue Ruling 71-383, 1971-2 C.B. 180.

4.    Business Purpose

        (a)    Requirement:    The Distribution must have a valid corporate business purpose. (Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-2(b)).

        (b)    Discussion:    As discussed fully above, Distributing's management has concluded that Janus' direct ownership creates a significant risk to its core mutual fund processing operations and hinders its ability to obtain adequate financing. Additionally, the business conducted by Controlled does not fit well with Distributing's core businesses and the Distribution of Controlled will enable Distributing to operate more effectively by permitting management to focus on its core businesses. The business purposes described herein are valid business purposes.

A-78



5.    Five-Year Active Trade or Business

        (a)    Requirement:    The distributing corporation and the corporation to be distributed must each be actively engaged in the conduct of a trade or business immediately after the distribution. (Section 355(b)(1)(A) and Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-3(a)(1)). Under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-3(b)(1), a corporation is treated as engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business if it is itself so engaged or if substantially all of its assets consist of stock of corporations controlled by it, each of which is so engaged. Such trade or businesses must (i) be actively conducted throughout the five-year period ending on the date of the distribution, and (ii) not be acquired during such period in a transaction in which gain or loss was recognized in whole or in part. (Section 355(b)(2)(B)-(D) and Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-3(b)(1)(5)). The active trade or business requirement under Section 355(b)(2)(C) will be considered violated if the Distributing or Controlled corporation acquires the assets or acquired controlling stock interest in the business in a taxable transaction within the five-year period preceding the distribution. Moreover, Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-3(b)(4)((iii) states that a direct or indirect acquisition of a trade or business by one member of an affiliated group from another member of the group is not the type of transaction to which Section 355(b)(2)(C) and (D) is intended to apply. Therefore, in applying Section 355(b)(2)(C) or (D), such an acquisition, even though taxable, shall be disregarded.

        (b)    Discussion:    After the Distribution, Controlled will continue to be engaged in an active trade or business under Section 355(b) because it will continue its historic line of business along with the business operations acquired in the transactions immediately prior to the Distribution, which acquired businesses also meet the requirement of Section 355(b). Because Controlled's acquisitions of the operations, in whole or in part, of three corporations (DST Output Illinois, DST Output Graphic Resources, and DST Output of California) occurred in tax-free transactions immediately prior to the Distribution, the active business purpose requirement will not be violated; and thus, Controlled can treat these business operations as part of the activities meeting the active business requirement for the five-year period. Furthermore, the assets that Controlled will acquire from an historic subsidiary of USCS, will not violate the active business test because USCS was acquired in a tax-free transfer within the five-year period. Moreover, each of these acquisitions was among members of Distributing's affiliated group.

        As noted in the discussion above under the heading, Distributing's Directly Operated Business, Distributing has been engaged in an active trade or business for more than 5 years, which it will continue to conduct after the Distribution. See Revenue Ruling 73-44, 1973-1, C.B. 182; clarified by Revenue Ruling 76-54, 1976-1 C.B. 96, and GCM 34238, dated December 15, 1969, determining that there is no set rule in Section 355 specifying a percentage of total assets that must be related to the distributing or controlled corporation's active business. Thus, Distributing should satisfy the requirements of Section 355(b).

6.    Continuity of Interest

        (a)    Requirement:    Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-2(c)(1) requires that the shareholders of the distributing corporation must own, after the distribution, an amount of stock in both the distributing and controlled corporations establishing a continuity of interest.

        (b)    Discussion:    Distributing is a publicly traded corporation and its stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The continuity of interest requirement will be satisfied because the persons who are the shareholders of Distributing prior to the Distribution will own, in the aggregate, approximately 100% of the stock in Distributing and Controlled after the Distribution. After the Distribution, the public shareholders of DST will continue to own their DST shares and Janus will own 100% of the stock of the Controlled corporation.

A-79



7.    Non-application ofSection 355(d)

        (a)    Requirement:    Section 355(d) provides that, in the case of a "disqualified distribution," the distributing corporation will recognize gain on the distribution of the stock of the controlled corporation. A "disqualified distribution" is defined as any distribution otherwise qualifying under Section 355 if, immediately after the distribution, any person holds (directly or under the attribution rules of Section 355(d)) "disqualified stock" in the distributing or controlled corporation which constitutes a 50% or greater interest in either corporation. Section 355(d)(4) defines the term "50% or greater interest" as stock possessing at least 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or at least 50% of the total value of shares of all classes of stock. "Disqualified stock" is defined in Section 355(d)(3) as any stock of the distributing corporation acquired by purchase during the five-year period ending on the date of the distribution, and any stock of the controlled corporation either acquired by purchase during this five-year period, or attributable to purchased distributing stock..

        (b)    Discussion:    Section 355(d) is not applicable to the Distribution. No part of the Distribution will involve a "disqualified distribution" under Section 355(d), because, immediately after the Distribution, no person will hold directly or by attribution stock. constituting a 50% or greater interest in either Distributing or Controlled that was acquired by purchase during the five-year period ending on the date of the Distribution (all within the meaning of Section 355(d)).

8.    Non-application of Section 355(e)

        (a)    Requirement:    Section 355(e) imposes restrictions on events occurring pursuant to a plan (or series of related transactions) that affect the shareholders' interests in the distributing or controlled corporations or any successors thereto. Section 355(e) provides that the distributing corporation will recognize gain on the distribution of the stock of the controlled corporation if the distribution is part of a plan (or series of related transactions) pursuant to which one or more persons acquire directly or indirectly stock representing a 50 percent or greater interest in either the distributing corporation or controlled corporation. Section 355(e)(2)(B) provides that if one or more persons acquire stock representing a 50 percent or greater interest in the distributing or any controlled corporation during the four-year period beginning on the date which is two years before the date of distribution, a plan will be presumed to exist. Section 355(e)(3) excepts certain acquisitions from this provision.

        (b)    Discussion:    The Distribution is not a distribution to which Section 355(e) applies. Pursuant to the Distribution, Janus will acquire Controlled common stock by reason of holding stock in Distributing, which under Section 355(e)(3)(A)(ii) is not treated as stock acquired pursuant to a plan. Thus, the acquisition by Janus of Controlled common stock is an acquisition that is not taken into account for purposes of Section 355(e). In addition, it has been represented that the Distribution is not part of a plan or series of related transactions pursuant to which one or more persons will acquire, stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of either Distributing or Controlled entitled to vote, or stock possessing 50 percent or more of the total value of all classes of stock of either Distributing or Controlled. Nor has one or more persons acquired directly or indirectly stock representing a 50 percent or greater interest in Distributing or Controlled in the two years before the date of the Distribution.

        In summary, all of the requirements of Section 355 of the Code and the regulations there under should be satisfied by the Distribution of Controlled stock by DST. Accordingly, Section 361 (c) should apply such that Distributing should not recognize gain or loss upon the Distribution of its Controlled stock to Janus in exchange for DST shares owned by Janus.

A-80



C.    Tax Consequences to DST

        Section 361 affords the transferor in a transaction qualifying as a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and Section 355 with non-recognition upon its transfer of assets solely in exchange for stock (or constructive stock) of the transferee corporation. In addition, Section 357(a) provides that liabilities assumed as part of such transaction generally will not be treated as money or property received by the transferor for purposes of Section 361.

        In the instant case, DST has represented that the liabilities of the Graphics Division and the liabilities associated with the assets of DST Output Graphic Resources which were assumed by Controlled were incurred in the ordinary course of business and that the bases of the assets transferred to Controlled by DST (through the disregarded entities, New LLC1 and New LLC2) will exceed the amount of liabilities assumed by Controlled plus any liabilities to which the assets received by Controlled from DST (New LLC1 and New LLC2) may be subject. Under these circumstances, DST (New LLC1 and New LLC2) should recognize no gain or loss upon the transfer of assets to Controlled in constructive exchange for Controlled stock and the assumption by Controlled of the liabilities of the Graphics Division and the assets of DST Output Graphic Resources.

        Pursuant to Section 361(c), DST should recognize no gain or loss upon its Distribution of Controlled stock to Janus in exchange for 32.3 million shares of DST stock held by Janus.

        The Firm does not express an opinion on any other federal income tax aspect of the Distribution described herein. For example, the Firm does not opine on the question whether there is any gain or loss from excess loss accounts, deferred intercompany gains or losses, or on the manner or the extent to which earnings and profits of Distributing immediately prior to the Distribution are apportioned between Distributing and Controlled. Therefore, this opinion only opines on the federal income tax issues expressed above in this Section IV Opinion and not any other federal income tax issues.

D.    Tax Consequences to Controlled

        Pursuant to Section 1032, Controlled should recognize no gain or loss upon its receipt of (1) the assets of the Graphics Division and the assets of DST Output Graphic Resources and (2) cash from DST (New LLCl and New LLC2) in the transaction as described above in constructive exchange for stock of Controlled.

        The bases of the assets of the Graphics Division and the assets of DST Output Graphic Resources should be the same in the hands of Controlled as that of DST Output of California and DST Output Graphic Resources, respectively. (Section 362(b)). The holding period of the assets of the Graphics Division and the assets of DST Output Graphic Resources should be the same in the hands of Controlled as that of DST Output of California and DST Output Graphic Resources, respectively. (Section 1223(2)).

SECTION VI—QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS

        The Opinion of the Firm expressed in Section V hereof is subject to the following qualifications to, and limitations of, its validity and effectiveness:

1.
The Opinion represents the Firm's view of the proper United States federal income tax treatment of the issues presented based upon the Firm's analysis of the relevant United States federal income tax authorities as of the date hereof. The Opinion is not binding on the IRS, state revenue authorities, or the courts. No ruling has been sought from the Internal Revenue Service in this matter.

2.
The Opinion is based upon the Code and its legislative history, the Regulations, judicial decisions and current administrative rulings and practices of the IRS, all as in effect on the date of the

A-81


3.
The Opinion is dependent upon the accuracy and completeness of the Facts and Representations set forth and referenced in Sections I and II. The Firm has relied upon the Facts and Representations set forth and referenced in Sections I and II hereof without any independent investigation or verification of their accuracy or completeness. Any inaccuracy or incompleteness in the Firm's understanding of the Facts and Representations in Sections I and II hereof could adversely affect the conclusion expressed by the Firm in the Opinion. By acceptance of the Opinion Letter from the Firm, the DST Group has evidenced its permission for the Firm to rely upon the accuracy of the Facts and Representations set forth and referenced in Sections I and II in performing its analysis of the United States federal income tax issues in connection with the proposed restructuring in rendering the Opinion. In addition, the Firm has assumed, without any independent verification, that all the agreements necessary to effect the proposed transaction described in Section I hereof have been or will be validly executed by persons who are duly authorized to enter into such agreements on behalf of the named parties thereto, that such agreements are or will be legally valid and binding obligations of the parties thereto in accordance with their terms, and that the obligations thereunder have been or will be performed in the manner set forth therein. Finally, the Firm does not undertake, and expressly disclaims, any obligation to monitor the Facts set forth herein or any changes thereto from and after the date of the Opinion Letter.

4.
The Firm is expressing its opinion only as to matters expressly addressed in Section V hereof. The Firm is not expressing its opinion as to any other aspects of the transactions described herein. No opinion should be inferred as to any other matters, including without limitation, any other United States federal income tax issues with respect to the proposed restructuring incident to the Distribution or any state, local or foreign tax treatment or any matter incidental thereto described herein, including, but not limited to, reporting requirements. Thus, for example, no determination has been made as to whether any deferred tax items or excess loss accounts exist with respect to the several affiliates or DST.

5.
This Opinion Letter is issued solely for the benefit of the DST Group and no other person (such as shareholders of DST) or entity -may rely hereon without the prior, express written consent of the Firm.

        If you should have any questions, please call Jimmie Stark at (816) 218-1621.

Very truly yours,

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

A-82


EXHIBIT B—[FORM OF ERNST & YOUNG TAX OPINION TO JANUS]

A-83



APPENDIX B

IRREVOCABLE AND CONTINUING PROXY

        Pursuant to the terms of that certain Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2003 (the "Agreement"), by and among DST Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("DST"), DST Output Marketing Services, Inc., a New York corporation ("OMS"), and the undersigned Janus Capital Group Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Janus"), Janus hereby irrevocably appoints the DST Proxy Committee as it shall be constituted from time to time by the Board of Directors of DST, with full power of substitution, as its attorney-in-fact and proxy to attend meetings, vote, execute and deliver written consents and in all other ways act in its place with respect to the exercise of all voting rights with respect to seven million four hundred twenty-four thousand and fifty-two (7,424,052) shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of DST owned by Janus as of the date hereof, appropriately adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, share combination, reclassification, recapitalization or similar transaction with respect to the common stock of DST (the "Shares"), until the termination of this proxy as provided below.

        Janus hereby represents, warrants and covenants that (i) this proxy is irrevocable and is coupled with an interest, (ii) Janus shall take all action reasonably requested by the DST Proxy Committee and/or DST to effect the intent of this proxy and (iii) the DST Proxy Committee is hereby authorized to do all such things and take all such actions as necessary to carry out the rights granted hereunder. Janus further confirms that this proxy may be exercised by the DST Proxy Committee with respect to each matter presented to the Stockholders of DST.

        THIS PROXY SHALL TERMINATE UPON ANY TRANSFER OF THE SHARES (INCLUDING PURSUANT TO ANY PLEDGE OR LOAN OF THE SHARES OR ANY SIMILAR TRANSACTION), WITH RESPECT TO THE SHARES TRANSFERRED, EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO ANY SHARES AS TO WHICH JANUS OR ANY AFFILIATE OF JANUS SHALL HAVE RETAINED VOTING RIGHTS.

Dated: August 25, 2003

    JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.

 

 

By:

    

    Name:     
    Title:     

B-1



APPENDIX C

August 25, 2003


Board of Directors
DST Systems, Inc.
333 West 11th Street, 5th Floor
Kansas City, MO 64105

Members of the Board of Directors:

        You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to DST Systems, Inc. ("DST") of the consideration to be exchanged in a Transaction (as defined below) pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement ("Agreement") to be entered into between DST, DST Output Marketing Services, Inc. ("OMS") and Janus Capital Group Inc. ("Janus"). The Agreement provides for, among other things, a transaction ("Transaction") whereby (a) DST shall assign, transfer, convey and deliver to Janus and Janus shall accept and acquire from DST all of the OMS common shares ("OMS Shares"), subsequent to a Reorganization (as defined in the Agreement), in exchange for 32.3 million shares of DST common stock owned by Janus ("Janus DST Shares") and (b) Janus shall assign, transfer, convey and deliver to DST and DST shall accept and acquire from Janus the Janus DST Shares in exchange for the OMS Shares.

        U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. ("U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray"), as a customary part of its investment banking business, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, underwriting and secondary distributions of securities, private placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. We are currently acting as financial advisor to DST in connection with the Transaction, for which DST will pay us a fee for such services that is not contingent upon the consummation of the Transaction. DST has also agreed to indemnify us against certain liabilities that may arise in connection with this engagement. In addition, U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray participated as a syndicate member in DST's August 12, 2003 sale of $840,000,000 convertible notes. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray was not a manager or co-manager of this offering and its participation in the selling group approximated three percent (3%) of the notes sold. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray will receive the same pro rata compensation as other selling group members. Furthermore, in the ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may actively trade securities of DST for our own account or the account of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.

        In arriving at our opinion, we have undertaken such reviews, analyses and inquiries as we deemed necessary or appropriate under the circumstances. Among other things, we have:

        1.     Reviewed a draft dated as of August 21, 2003 of the Agreement;

        2.     Reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information relating to DST and Janus Capital Group that U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray deemed to be relevant, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30 and March 31, 2003, and September 30, 2002;

        3.     Reviewed draft audited financial statements for OMS subsequent to the Reorganization, but excluding the Additional Assets (as defined in the Agreement), (such entity is defined herein as "OMS Post Reorganization") for the years ended 2001 and 2002;

        4.     Reviewed interim financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2003 for OMS Post Reorganization;

C-1



        5.     Reviewed financial projections prepared by the management of DST for the years ending December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2005 for the following scenarios:

        6.     Reviewed valuation of the OMS Post Reorganization operations prepared by Standard & Poor's Corporate Value Consulting dated June 13, 2003;

        7.     Completed general business and financial due diligence with certain members of DST and OMS management teams. Topics discussed included, but were not limited to, the background and rationale for the Transaction, financial condition, operating performance, balance sheet characteristics and prospects of DST and OMS Post Reorganization;

        8.     Completed site visits to DST's headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri and operations in Kansas City, Missouri and Chicago, Illinois;

        9.     Reviewed financial, market performance and other data of publicly traded companies deemed relevant by U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray for comparison with similar data from DST and OMS Post Reorganization; and

        10.   Reviewed additional information and analyses as deemed necessary by U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, including assessment of general economic, industry and financial market conditions.

        In conducting our review and in rendering our opinion, we have, with your consent, relied upon and assumed the accuracy, completeness and fairness of the financial statements and other information provided to us by DST or otherwise made available to us, and have not attempted to independently verify, and have not assumed responsibility for the independent verification, of such information. We have assumed, in reliance upon the assurances of DST's management, that the information provided to us has been prepared on a reasonable basis in accordance with industry practice, and, with respect to financial planning data and other business outlook information, reflects the best currently available estimates and judgment of the management of DST and OMS, and that management of DST and OMS is not aware of any information or facts that would make the information provided to us incomplete or misleading. We have assumed that there have been no material changes in the assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects of DST and OMS Post Reorganization since the date of the last financial statements made available to us. We have also assumed that DST and OMS Post Reorganization is not party to any material pending transactions, other than the Transaction, anticipated amendment to the DST credit facility and other transactions in the ordinary course of business.

        In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed that all the necessary regulatory approvals and consents required for the Transaction will be obtained and that no limitations, restrictions or conditions will be imposed that would have a material adverse effect on DST or the contemplated benefits to DST of the Transaction or will otherwise change the consideration for DST. We have assumed that the Transaction will qualify as a tax-free exchange under the United States Internal Revenue Code. We have also assumed that the final form of the Agreement will be substantially similar to the last draft reviewed by us, without modification of material terms or conditions.

        In arriving at our opinion, we have not performed nor been furnished any appraisals or valuations of the specific assets or liabilities of DST other than the valuation of OMS Post Reorganization prepared by Standard & Poor's Corporate Value Consulting dated June 13, 2003. We express no opinion regarding the liquidation value of DST or OMS. The analyses we performed in connection with this opinion were going concern analyses. We were not requested to opine, and no opinion is hereby

C-2



rendered, as to whether any analyses of an entity, other than as a going concern, is appropriate in the circumstances and, accordingly, we have performed no such analyses. The Board of Directors did not request that we solicit, and we did not solicit, any expression of interest from any other parties with respect to any alternative transaction.

        We have undertaken no independent analysis of any pending or threatened litigation, material claims, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities, to which DST or its affiliates is a party or may be subject, or of any other governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which either DST or its affiliates is a party or may be subject. At DST's direction and with its consent, our opinion makes no assumption concerning, and therefore does not consider, the potential effects of any such litigation, claims or investigations or possible assertions of claims, outcomes or damages arising out of any such matters.

        This opinion is necessarily based upon the information available to us, facts and circumstances and economic, market and other conditions as they exist, and are subject to evaluation on the date hereof. Events occurring after the date hereof could materially affect the assumptions used in preparing this opinion. Except as provided in the engagement letter between DST and us, we have not undertaken to reaffirm or revise this opinion or otherwise comment upon any events occurring after the date hereof and we do not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm this opinion. We express no opinion herein as to the prices at which DST common shares have traded or may trade at any future time.

        This opinion is furnished pursuant to our engagement letter dated July 24, 2003. This opinion is directed to the Board of Directors of DST in connection with its consideration of the Transaction. This opinion may not be published or otherwise used, nor may any public references to U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray be made except in accordance with our engagement letter. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote with respect to the Transaction. In connection with this opinion, we were not requested to opine as to, and this opinion does not address, the basic business decision of DST to proceed with or effect the Transaction or to consider, alternative transactions that may have been available to DST.

        Based upon and subject to the foregoing, and based upon such other factors as we consider relevant, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the consideration to be exchanged in the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to DST.

Sincerely,

U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY INC.

/s/ U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray

C-3




APPENDIX D

DST Output Marketing Services

Condensed Combined Financial Statements

June 30, 2003




DST Output Marketing Services

Condensed Combined Balance Sheet

(in thousands of dollars)

  June 30,
2003

  December 31,
2002

 
  (unaudited)

   
Assets            
Current assets            
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3   $ 3
  Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $680 and $711)     12,969     10,369
  Related party receivable         16
  Inventories     1,537     1,411
  Deferred income taxes     381     378
  Other current assets     1,455     1,154
   
 
      16,345     13,331
Properties     5,004     6,097
Deferred income taxes     896     342
Affiliate receivable         3,286
Other assets     183     183
   
 
    Total assets   $ 22,428   $ 23,239
   
 
Liabilities and Invested Equity            
Current liabilities            
  Accounts payable   $ 2,948   $ 2,792
  Accrued compensation and benefits     1,632     1,971
  Income taxes payable     202     1,763
  Customer deposits     1,511     2,371
  Other accrued liabilities     3,710     3,441
   
 
      10,003     12,338
Affiliate payable     392    
   
 
      10,395     12,338
   
 
Commitments and contingencies            
   
 

Invested equity

 

 

12,033

 

 

10,901
   
 
    Total liabilities and invested equity   $ 22,428   $ 23,239
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

D-1



DST Output Marketing Services

Condensed Combined Statement of Income

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002

(unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

  2003
  2002
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Total revenues   $ 44,524   $ 56,065  

Operating costs

 

 

37,681

 

 

46,347

 
Selling, general and administrative costs     3,597     4,614  
Depreciation and amortization     1,808     2,173  
   
 
 
Income from operations     1,438     2,931  

Interest expense

 

 

(1

)

 

(83

)
Other income (expense), net     97     (1,133 )
   
 
 
Income before income taxes     1,534     1,715  
Income taxes     606     705  
   
 
 
Net income   $ 928   $ 1,010  
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

D-2



DST Output Marketing Services

Condensed Combined Statement of Changes in Invested Equity

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

(unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

  Total
Invested
Equity


 

 

 

 
December 31, 2002   $ 10,901

Transfers from parent

 

 

204
Net income     928
   
June 30, 2003   $ 12,033
   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

D-3



DST Output Marketing Services

Condensed Combined Statement of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002

(unaudited)

(in thousands of dollars)

  2003
  2002
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Cash flows—operating activities              
Net income   $ 928   $ 1,010  
   
 
 
Depreciation and amortization     1,808     2,173  
Deferred taxes     (559 )   (601 )
Increase in accounts receivable     (2,584 )   (2,730 )
Decrease (increase) in inventories and other current assets     (426 )   70  
Decrease in other assets         10  
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (1,995 )   (466 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and benefits     (339 )   400  
   
 
 
Total adjustments to net income     (4,095 )   (1,144 )
   
 
 
  Net     (3,167 )   (134 )
   
 
 
Cash flows—investing activities              
Capital expenditures     (715 )   (166 )
   
 
 
  Net     (715 )   (166 )
   
 
 
Cash flows-financing activities              
Distributions to (from) DST     204     758  
Increase (decrease) in affiliate receivable/payable     3,678     (458 )
   
 
 
  Net     3,882     300  
   
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents          
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     3     3  
   
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 3   $ 3  
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

D-4



DST Output Marketing Services

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

June 30, 2003 and 2002

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

1.     Summary of Accounting Policies

        The interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements of DST Output Marketing Services ("OMS" or the "Company") as of June 30, 2003 and for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002 included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been considered or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to enable a reasonable understanding of the information presented. These Condensed Combined Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2002.

        In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed combined financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal interim closing procedures) necessary for a fair statement of the interim results of the Company at June 30, 2003 and the results of operations of the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

        The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year 2003.

        The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 ("APB 25"), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations and has presented the required Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure ("SFAS 123"), pro forma disclosure in the table below.

        The Company participates in certain DST Systems, Inc. ("DST") stock based compensation plans. The Company applies APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its plans, and accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for the Company's fixed stock based compensation. Had

D-5



compensation cost been determined consistent with SFAS 123, the Company's net income would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:

 
  Six Months Ended
June 30, 2003

  Six Months Ended
June 30, 2002

 
Net income              
As reported   $ 928   $ 1,010  
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of relaxed tax effects     (288 )   (352 )
   
 
 
Net income              
Pro forma   $ 640   $ 658  
   
 
 

        The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model which requires the Company to make certain assumptions in order to estimate fair value.

2.    Commitments and Contingencies

        The Company has a letter of credit of $305 for the period ended June 30, 2003. The letter of credit is secured by DST's debt facility.

        From time to time, the Company enters into agreements with unaffiliated parties containing indemnification provisions, the terms of which vary depending on the negotiated terms of each respective agreement. The amount of such obligations is not stated in the agreements. The Company's liability under such indemnification provisions may be subject to time and materiality limitations, monetary caps and other conditions and defenses.

        The Company has entered into purchase and service agreements with its vendors and consulting agreements with providers of consulting services to the Company pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify certain of such vendors and consultants, respectively, against third party claims arising from the Company's use of the vendor's product or the services of the vendor or consultant.

        At June 30, 2003, the Company had not accrued any liability on the aforementioned indemnifications as amounts are not deemed material.

        The Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While the ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, that the final outcome in such proceedings, in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on the combined financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

D-6




APPENDIX E

DST Output Marketing Services

Combined Financial Statements

December 31, 2002 and 2001



LOGO    

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
1055 Broadway, 10th Floor
Kansas City MO 64105-1595
Telephone (816) 472 7921
Facsimile (816) 218 1890


Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying combined balance sheet and the related combined statements of income, of changes in invested equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DST Output Marketing Services (the "Company") at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for "Out-of-Pocket" expenses to conform with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for "Out-of-Pocket" Expenses Incurred.

SIGNATURE

Kansas City, Missouri
July 25, 2003

E-1




DST Output Marketing Services

Combined Balance Sheet

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(in thousands of dollars)

  2002
  2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Assets            
Current assets            
  Cash and cash equivalents   $ 3   $ 3
  Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $711 and $974)     10,369     10,107
  Related party receivable     16     9
  Inventories     1,411     1,280
  Deferred income taxes     378     460
  Other current assets     1,154     1,159
   
 
      13,331     13,018

Properties

 

 

6,097

 

 

9,923
Deferred income taxes     342    
Affiliate receivable     3,286    
Other assets     183     143
   
 
    Total assets   $ 23,239   $ 23,084
   
 
Liabilities and Invested Equity            
Current liabilities            
  Accounts payable   $ 2,792   $ 3,884
  Related party payable         160
  Accrued compensation and benefits     1,971     2,043
  Income taxes payable     1,763     1,582
  Customer deposits     2,371     4,076
  Other accrued liabilities     3,441     2,918
   
 
      12,338     14,663
Deferred income taxes         638
Affiliate payable         7,244
   
 
      12,338     22,545
   
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)            
   
 

Invested equity

 

 

10,901

 

 

539
   
 
    Total liabilities and invested equity   $ 23,239   $ 23,084
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

E-2



DST Output Marketing Services

Combined Statement of Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

(in thousands of dollars)

  2002
  2001
  2000
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Total revenues (includes related party revenues of $15,497, $14,869 and $13,796)   $ 105,698   $ 112,032   $ 120,986  
Operating costs     86,670     92,126     97,677  
Selling, general and administrative costs     9,174     10,517     12,475  
Depreciation and amortization     5,249     4,550     3,966  
   
 
 
 
Income from operations     4,605     4,839     6,868  
Interest income     2     1     60  
Interest expense     (113 )   (816 )   (821 )
Other (expense), net         (104 )   (230 )
   
 
 
 
Income before income taxes     4,494     3,920     5,877  
Income taxes     1,846     1,559     2,501  
   
 
 
 
Net income   $ 2,648   $ 2,361   $ 3,376  
   
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

E-3



DST Output Marketing Services

Combined Statement of Changes in Invested Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

(in thousands of dollars)

  Total
Invested
Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 
December 31, 1999   $ 932  
Capital contributions     301  
Distributions     (3,133 )
Net income     3,376  
   
 
December 31, 2000     1,476  
Distributions     (3,298 )
Net income     2,361  
   
 
December 31, 2001     539  
Capital contributions     9,000  
Distributions     (1,286 )
Net income     2,648  
   
 
December 31, 2002   $ 10,901  
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

E-4



DST Output Marketing Services

Combined Statement of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

(in thousands of dollars)

  2002
  2001
  2000
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Cash flows—operating activities                    
Net income   $ 2,648   $ 2,361   $ 3,376  
   
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization     5,249     4,550     3,966  
Deferred taxes     (898 )   (66 )   1,441  
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable     (269 )   2,348     (1,921 )
Decrease (increase) in inventories and other current assets     (171 )   992     (364 )
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (3,233 )   (2,244 )   (1,308 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and benefits     (72 )   (955 )   3  
Other, net     5     21     (3 )
   
 
 
 
Total adjustments to net income     611     4,646     1,814  
   
 
 
 
  Net     3,259     7,007     5,190  
   
 
 
 
Cash flows—investing activities                    
Capital expenditures     (450 )   (1,569 )   (8,085 )
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets     2     11     875  
Other, net     5     22     59  
   
 
 
 
  Net     (443 )   (1,536 )   (7,151 )
   
 
 
 
Cash flows—financing activities                    
Distributions to DST     (1,286 )   (3,298 )   (3,133 )
Increase (decrease) in affiliate receivable/payable     (1,530 )   (2,371 )   5,030  
   
 
 
 
  Net     (2,816 )   (5,669 )   1,897  
   
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents         (198 )   (64 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year     3     201     265  
   
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year   $ 3   $ 3   $ 201  
   
 
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

E-5



DST Output Marketing Services

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

December 31, 2002 and 2001

(Dollars in thousands)

1.     Business and Basis of Presentation

        DST Output Marketing Services ("OMS" or the "Company") is a business consisting of the Graphics Design and sheet-fed printing business ("Graphics") and the laser printing and fulfillment operations of the Marketing Services Division of DST Systems, Inc. ("DST").

        The combined financial statements have been derived from the financial statements and accounting records of DST based on the historical assets, liabilities and related operations of DST Output Marketing Services, Inc., DST Output of Illinois, Inc., the Graphics division of DST Output Graphic Resources, Inc. and the Graphics division of DST Output of California, Inc. DST is the ultimate parent of each of these entities. Since certain of these operations are divisions, DST's investment in the Company is shown in lieu of shareholder's equity in the combined financial statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

        Management believes the assumptions underlying the combined financial statements are reasonable. However, the combined financial statements included herein may not necessarily reflect the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows in the future or what its results of operations, financial position and cash flows would have been had the Company operated as a stand-alone entity during the periods presented.

        The historical financial statements of the entities comprising OMS include charges from DST for costs such as rent and utility costs, insurance, employee benefits and payroll processing, and information technology. The historical amounts charged to the entities comprising OMS were based on direct identification through the Company's cost accounting records, and for Graphics, these costs were allocated based on various methods including square footage, headcount and percentage of revenue. Additionally for purposes of the combined financial statements, costs of $56 have been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, which primarily represent costs associated with additional information technology provided by DST. The Company's management believes the methods used for assessing direct charges and allocations are reasonable.

        DST uses a centralized approach to cash management and the finance of its operations. Cash deposits and payments for the Company are received or distributed by DST on a regular basis and are netted against the affiliate receivable/payable account. As a result, none of DST's cash, or cash equivalents at the corporate level have been allocated to the Company in the combined financial statements. Cash in the combined financial statements represents amounts held by the Company's operations.

        The Company maintains a borrowing/lending arrangement with an affiliate. The Company pays or earns interest on its average outstanding balance based on the prime rate and the average federated rate, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, interest expense under this arrangement was $113, $816 and $821, respectively, and interest earned was $2, $1 and $60, respectively. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had $3,286 and $(7,244), respectively, of net affiliate receivables/(payables) attributable to this arrangement.

E-6



2.     Significant Accounting Policies

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        The Company's revenues are recognized upon completion of the services provided. Allowances for billing adjustments are estimated when revenues are recognized and are recorded as reductions in revenues. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents an amount considered by management to be adequate to cover potential losses. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for "Out-of-Pocket" Expenses Incurred ("EITF No. 01-14), formerly EITF Topic No. D-103. In accordance with EITF No. 01-14, the Company records the reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses as revenue on an accrual basis.

        The Company capitalizes costs for the development of internal use software, including coding and software configuration costs and costs of upgrades and enhancements in accordance with Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. These costs are amortized under the Company's current policy on a straight-line basis, depending on the nature of the project, generally over a three to ten year period. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Company capitalized $0, $1,202 and $1,942, respectively, of costs related to such development.

        Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis. Inventories are comprised primarily of paper and envelope stocks.

        Property and equipment are recorded at cost with major additions and improvements capitalized. Cost includes the amount of interest cost associated with significant capital additions. Production equipment, data processing equipment, data processing software, furniture, fixtures and other equipment are depreciated using straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives, principally three to five years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lesser of the term of the lease or life of the improvements.

        Long-lived assets are assessed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be fully recoverable by comparing the carrying value to future undiscounted cash flows. To the extent there is impairment, analysis is performed based on several criteria, including, but not limited to, revenue trends, discounted operating cash flows and other operating factors to determine the impairment amount.

E-7


        The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return, as well as consolidated or unitary returns in certain states, with DST and other affiliates. The tax provisions of DST and the Company are prepared on a separate return basis.

        Deferred income tax effects of transactions reported in different periods for financial reporting and income tax return purposes are recorded by the liability method. This method gives consideration to the future tax consequences of deferred income or expense items and immediately recognizes changes in income tax laws upon enactment. The income statement effect is generally derived from changes in deferred income taxes on the balance sheet.

        The Company may require postage deposits from certain of its clients based on contractual arrangements.

        The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 ("APB 25"), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations and has presented the required Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure ("SFAS 123"), pro forma disclosure in the table below.

        The Company participates in certain DST stock based compensation plans, which are described separately in Note 5. The Company applies APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its plans, and accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for the Company's fixed stock based compensation. Had compensation cost been determined consistent with SFAS 123, the Company's net income would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
 
  2002
  2001
  2000
 
Net income                    
As reported   $ 2,648   $ 2,361   $ 3,376  
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects     (674 )   (737 )   (467 )
   
 
 
 
Net income                    
Pro forma   $ 1,974   $ 1,624   $ 2,909  
   
 
 
 

        The carrying values of the Company's financial instruments including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities, approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

3.     Leasehold impairment

        During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recognized, in depreciation and amortization, leasehold impairments of $980.

E-8



4.     Properties

        Properties and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are as follows:

 
  December 31,
 
  2002
  2001
Production equipment   $ 9,181   $ 9,154
Data processing equipment     5,403     5,976
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment     3,892     3,868
Software     6,530     6,728
Leasehold improvements     4,197     4,049
Construction in progress     121     20
   
 
      29,324     29,795
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization     23,227     19,872
   
 
Net properties   $ 6,097   $ 9,923
   
 

        Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, was $5,249, $4,550 and $3,966, respectively.

5.     Income Taxes

        Income tax expense consists of the following components:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2002
  2001
  2000
Current                  
  Federal   $ 2,281   $ 1,393   $ 703
  State and local     463     232     357
   
 
 
    Total current     2,744     1,625     1,060
Deferred                  
  Federal     (755 )   (62 )   1,217
  State and local     (143 )   (4 )   224
   
 
 
    Total deferred     (898 )   (66 )   1,441
   
 
 
Total income tax expense   $ 1,846   $ 1,559   $ 2,501
   
 
 

        Differences between the Company's effective income tax rate and the U.S. federal income tax statutory rate are as follows:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
 
  2002
  2001
  2000
 
Income tax expense using the statutory rate in effect   $ 1,573   $ 1,372   $ 2,057  
Tax effect of                    
  State and local income taxes, net     208     148     378  
  Other     65     39     66  
   
 
 
 
Total income tax expense   $ 1,846   $ 1,559   $ 2,501  
   
 
 
 
Effective tax rate     41.1 %   39.8 %   42.6 %
Statutory federal tax rate     35.0 %   35.0 %   35.0 %

E-9


        The federal and state deferred tax assets (liabilities) recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet are as follows:

 
  December 31,
 
 
  2002
  2001
 
Liabilities              
  Accumulated depreciation and amortization   $   $ 701  
   
 
 
  Gross deferred tax liabilities         701  
   
 
 
Assets              
  Accumulated depreciation and amortization     240      
  Book accruals not currently deductible for tax     379     450  
  Deferred compensation and other employee benefits     101     73  
   
 
 
  Gross deferred tax assets     720     523  
   
 
 
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)   $ 720   $ (178 )
   
 
 

        The Company files a consolidated return with its parent. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") is completing its examination of the tax years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996. There are no IRS proposed adjustments for the Company for these periods. The IRS has recently initiated an examination of the tax years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000.

6.     Invested Equity

        Certain transactions between OMS and DST are reflected as distributions to or transfers to/from DST within the combined financial statements. Amounts treated as distributions are recorded as a reduction to Invested Equity and amounts treated as transfers to/from DST are recorded as a decrease/increase to the affiliate receivable/payable component included in the Combined Balance Sheet. Generally, increases in the affiliate receivable/payable component result from the timing of cash requirements throughout each year. Amounts treated as distributions to DST generally reflect the transfer to DST of excess cash, to the extent such amounts were not required for investing, financing or operating needs.

        During 2002 and 2000, DST forgave intercompany advances of $9,000 and $301, respectively, to OMS, which have been treated as capital contributions in the Combined Statement of Changes in Invested Equity and are non-cash activities for purposes of the Combined Statement of Cash Flows.

        The Company participates in several DST stock based compensation plans, which are described separately below.

        The weighted average fair value of options granted to employees of the Company was $10.70, $16.42 and $10.91 for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively: expected option term of 2.9, 2.4 and 2.6 years, volatility of 44.4%, 42.0% and 38.5%, dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 2.5%, 4.2% and 6.5%.

        In September 1995, DST established the 1995 Stock Option and Performance Award Plan, which now provides for the availability of 30,000,000 shares of DST's common stock for the grant of awards to officers, directors and other designated employees. The awards may take the form of an option, stock appreciation right, limited right, performance share or unit, dividend equivalent, or any other right, interest or option relating to shares of common stock granted under the plan. The option

E-10



exercise prices must be at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. Options become exercisable and expire as determined by the Compensation Committee of the DST Board of Directors at the date of grant.

        Summary stock option activity for the Company is presented in the table below (shares in thousands and weighted average exercise price in $):

 
  Year Ended December 31,

   
 
  2002

  2001

  2000

   
 
  Shares

  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

  Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

  Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

   
Outstanding at January 1   151   $ 46.38   151   $ 30.17   83   $ 22.57    
Granted   125     34.59   92     56.92   110     32.61    
Exercised   (16 )   24.23   (82 )   28.06   (42 )   21.57    
Forfeited   (8 )   48.68   (10 )   49.08              
   
       
       
         
Outstanding at December 31   252   $ 41.90   151   $ 46.38   151   $ 30.17    
   
       
       
         
Exercisable at December 31   98   $ 46.47   51   $ 26.72   40   $ 23.76    

        Summary information concerning the Company's outstanding and exercisable stock options as of December 31, 2002 follows:

 
  Outstanding Options
  Exercisable Options
Range of Exercise
Prices per share

  Number
of Options
(in thousands)

  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
(in years)

  Weighted Average Exercise Price per share
  Number of Options
(in thousands)

  Weighted Average Exercise Price per share
$10.00-$19.99   4   3.5   $ 11.38   4   $ 11.38
20.00-29.99   29   7.1     28.50   29     28.50
30.00-39.99   94   9.6     31.84          
40.00-49.99   48   9.0     44.12   15     47.75
50.00-60.35   70   8.3     57.83   50     58.93
64.00-74.06   7   7.9     73.36          
   
 
 
 
 
$10.00-$74.06   252   8.7   $ 41.90   98   $ 46.47

        The 2000 DST Systems, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") provides the right to subscribe to 2.0 million shares of common stock to substantially all employees of DST and participating subsidiaries, except those whose customary employment is less than 20 hours per week or is five months or less per calendar year, or those who are 5% or greater stockholders of DST. The purchase price for shares under any stock offering is to be 85% of the average market price on either the exercise date or the offering date, whichever is lower. Approximately 10 thousand shares were issued to employees of the Company under the Plan in 2002. At December 31, 2002, there were approximately 1.3 million shares available for future offerings. The fair value of purchase rights granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $9.06, $13.26 and $8.05, respectively. The fair value of purchase rights granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively: expected option term of 1.0, 1.0 and 0.64 year, volatility of 44.5%, 44.2% and 38.7%, dividend yield of 0% and risk-free interest rate of 1.3%, 3.0% and 6.8%.

E-11


7.     Benefits Plans

        DST sponsors defined contribution plans that cover the Company's employees following the completion of an eligibility period. Company contributions under these plans totaled $1,086, $1,229 and $1,385 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

        The Company or DST has active and non-active non-qualified deferred compensation plans for senior management, certain highly compensated employees and directors. The active plans permit participants to defer a portion of their compensation and may provide additional life insurance benefits until termination of their employment, at which time payment of amounts deferred is made in a lump sum or annual installments. Deferred amounts earn interest at a rate determined by the Board of Directors or are credited with deemed gains or losses of the underlying hypothetical investments. Amounts deferred under the plans totaled approximately $7 and $11 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

8.     Supplemental Cash Flow Information

        Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2002
  2001
  2000
Interest paid during the year   $ 113   $ 816   $ 821
Income taxes paid/(received) during the year     2,697     (204 )   1,588

9.     Related Party Transactions

        The Company provides certain products and services to DST and its affiliated entities. Other general, administrative and miscellaneous services, including payroll processing, are provided by DST and its affiliated entities.

        The Company recognized revenues from DST and its affiliates of $15,497, $14,869 and $13,796 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company paid DST and its affiliates $3,580, $6,181 and $14,044 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, for products, services and leases. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, DST and its affiliates owed the Company $16 and $9, respectively.

10.   Commitments and Contingencies

        The Company has future obligations under certain operating lease agreements. The operating leases, which include facilities, data processing and other equipment, have lease terms ranging from 1 to 14 years excluding options to extend the leases for various lengths of time. Rental expense from operating leases was $108, $93 and $91 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Certain leases have clauses that call for the annual rents to be increased during the term of the lease. Such lease payments are expensed on a straight-line basis. The Company leases certain facilities from unconsolidated real estate affiliates and incurred occupancy expenses of $658, $690 and $749 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

        The Company has a letter of credit of $305 for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The letter of credit is secured by DST's debt facility.

E-12



        The following table sets forth the Company's contractual cash obligations including minimum rentals for the non-cancelable term of all operating leases:

 
  Operating Leases
2003   $ 9,378
2004     7,281
2005     4,816
2006     4,133
2007     4,034
Thereafter     6,225
   
Total   $ 35,867
   

        From time to time, the Company enters into agreements with unaffiliated parties containing indemnification provisions, the terms of which vary depending on the negotiated terms of each respective agreement. The amount of such obligations is not stated in the agreements. The Company's liability under such indemnification provisions may be subject to time and materiality limitations, monetary caps and other conditions and defenses.

        The Company has entered into purchase and service agreements with its vendors, and consulting agreements with providers of consulting services to the Company, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify certain of such vendors and consultants, respectively, against third party claims arising from the Company's use of the vendor's product or the services of the vendor or consultant.

        At December 31, 2002, the Company had not accrued any liability on the aforementioned indemnifications.

        The Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While the ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, that the final outcome in such proceedings, in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on the combined financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

        The Company has no history operating as an independent entity, may be unable to make the changes necessary to operate as a stand-alone entity, or may incur greater costs as a stand-alone entity that may cause the Company's profitability to decline. The Company's business has been operated by DST within a segment of its broader corporate organization rather than as a separate stand-alone entity. DST has assisted the Company by providing corporate functions such as legal and tax functions. If the Company were a stand-alone entity, DST may have no obligation to provide assistance to the Company other than interim and transitional services. Because the Company's business has never been operated as a stand-alone entity, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to successfully implement the changes necessary to operate independently or may incur additional costs as a result of operating independently. Each of these events would cause the Company's profitability to decline.

E-13


DST SYSTEMS, INC.

Special Meeting of Stockholders - November 28, 2003

THE DST BOARD OF DIRECTORS SOLICITS YOUR VOTE

The DST Board is making the proposal, and it is not related to or conditioned on the approval of any other proposals which may come before the Special Meeting.

The Cert number shown on the front of the card is the number of shares you held in certificate form as of the close of business on the Record Date (November 10, 2003). The ESPP number shown on the front of the card is the number of shares you held of record as of the close of business on the Record Date through your DST Employee Stock Purchase Plan book entry account with DST's transfer agent. The Proxy Committee appointed by the DST Board that will vote your Cert and ESPP shares is comprised of Thomas A. McDonnell, Randall D. Young, and Kenneth V. Hager. If you do not specify how you authorize the Proxy Committee to vote your Cert and ESPP shares, you authorize it to vote FOR each of the proposals.

The ESOP, 401k and C401 numbers shown on the front of the card ("Benefit Plan Shares") are the total number of shares you held as of the close of business on the Record Date through your participation in any of the DST Employee Stock Ownership Plan, the DST 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, or the DST Systems of California 401(k) Plan. If you fail to return this Voting Card or do not specify your vote, the Trustee of the applicable plan will vote the shares allocated to your benefit plan account(s) in the same proportion as the shares held by the plan for which the Trustee receives voting instructions.

You may revoke this proxy in the manner described in the Proxy Statement dated November 13, 2003, receipt of which you hereby acknowledge.


PLEASE DATE AND SIGN ON REVERSE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE OR MAKE YOUR INSTRUCTIONS BY TELEPHONE AT (877) 779-8683 OR ELECTRONICALLY AT http://www.eproxyvote.com/dst.

IF YOUR ADDRESS HAS CHANGED, PLEASE NOTE THE NEW ADDRESS BELOW.







ý   PLEASE MARK VOTES,
AS IN THIS EXAMPLE
  ESPP
401k
  CERT
C401
  ESOP



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DST SYSTEMS, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

               

By signing this card, you are authorizing the Proxy Committee 1. (if you own Cert and ESPP shares) and the Trustee of the DST Benefit Plan(s) (if you own Benefit Plan Shares) to vote your shares as you specify on the proposal presented at the Special Meeting or any adjournment there of and to vote in their respective discretion on other proposals that may properly come before such meeting.
 
Approval of the Share Exchange Agreement dated August 25, 2003, by and among DST Systems, Inc., DST Output Marketing Services, Inc. and Janus Capital Group Inc. and the transactions contemplated thereby
  FOR

o
  AGAINST

o
  ABSTAIN

o
To vote in accordance with the DST Board of Directors' recommendation, please sign and date; you need not mark any boxes. The DST Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the proposal.                
CONTROL NUMBER  
SEE IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD

 

 

Mark box at right if you plan to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders.

 


o

 

Mark box at right if an address change has been noted on the reverse side of this card

 


o
    Please be sure to sign exactly as your name appears on this card and to date this Voting Card.

For Cert and ESPP shares, all joint owners must sign, and executors, administrators, trustees, officers of corporate stockholders, guardians and attorneys-in-fact must indicate the capacity in which they are signing. For Benefit Plan Shares, the Plan Participant must sign.

Stockholder/Plan Participant sign here _________________ Date _____________ Co-owner sign here _________________ Date _______________




QuickLinks

DST Systems, Inc.
DST Systems, Inc. 333 West 11th Street Kansas City, Missouri 64105
PROXY STATEMENT
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSAL
INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING
VOTING
BUSINESS OF DST SYSTEMS, INC.
BUSINESS OF DST OUTPUT MARKETING SERVICES, INC.
BUSINESS OF JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.
BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATION
PROPOSAL—APPROVAL OF THE SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.
MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND STOCKHOLDINGS OF MANAGEMENT
OTHER MATTERS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
W I T N E S S E T H
Exhibit A—Non-Competition Business Descriptions
Opinion
Analysis
EXHIBIT B—FORM OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS TAX OPINION
APPENDIX B IRREVOCABLE AND CONTINUING PROXY
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
DST Output Marketing Services Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
DST Output Marketing Services Condensed Combined Statement of Income For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
DST Output Marketing Services Condensed Combined Statement of Changes in Invested Equity For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 (unaudited)
DST Output Marketing Services Condensed Combined Statement of Cash Flows For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 (unaudited)
DST Output Marketing Services Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 2003 and 2002 (Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands)
APPENDIX E
Report of Independent Auditors
DST Output Marketing Services Combined Balance Sheet December 31, 2002 and 2001
DST Output Marketing Services Combined Statement of Income For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
DST Output Marketing Services Combined Statement of Changes in Invested Equity For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
DST Output Marketing Services Combined Statement of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
DST Output Marketing Services Notes to Combined Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 (Dollars in thousands)