UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-K

(Mark One)

x                                 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

or

o                                   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                   

Commission file number 1-8895


HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland

 

33-0091377

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 300
Long Beach, California

 

90806

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (562) 733-5100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange
on which registered

Common Stock

 

New York Stock Exchange

7.25% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

 

New York Stock Exchange

7.10% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

 

New York Stock Exchange

 


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  o     No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant; (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “Accelerated Filer and Large Accelerated Filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

Large Accelerated Filer   x Accelerated Filer  o   Non-accelerated Filer   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes  o    No  x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $3,632,799,040.

As of January 31, 2007 there were 205,453,864 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders have been incorporated into Part III of this Report.

 




 

 

 

Page
Number

 

PART I

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Business

 

3

 

 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

22

 

 

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

29

 

 

Item 2.

 

Properties

 

29

 

 

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

32

 

 

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

32

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

33

 

 

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

37

 

 

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations      

 

38

 

 

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

54

 

 

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

55

 

 

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures     

 

55

 

 

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

55

 

 

PART III

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

 

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

59

 

 

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

59

 

 

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

59

 

 

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

59

 

 

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

59

 

 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

 

60

 

 

 

2




PART I

ITEM 1.                Business

Business Overview

Health Care Property Investors, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures (collectively, “HCP” or the “Company”), invests primarily in real estate serving the healthcare industry in the United States. Health Care Property Investors, Inc. is a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) organized in 1985. The Company is headquartered in Long Beach, California, with operations in Nashville, Tennessee and Orlando, Florida, and its portfolio includes interests in 731 properties. The Company acquires healthcare facilities and leases them to healthcare providers and provides mortgage financing secured by healthcare facilities. The Company’s portfolio includes: (i) senior housing, including independent living facilities (“ILFs”), assisted living facilities (“ALFs”), and continuing care retirement communities (“CCRCs”); (ii) medical office buildings (“MOBs”); (iii) hospitals; (iv) skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”); and (v) other healthcare facilities, including laboratory and office buildings. For business segment financial data, see our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

References herein to “HCP,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” include Health Care Property Investors, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures, unless the context otherwise requires.

On our internet website, www.hcpi.com, you can access, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In addition, the SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including HCP, that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

Healthcare Industry

Healthcare is the single largest industry in the United States, representing 16% of U.S. Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) in 2004 and growing at a rate faster than the overall economy.

Healthcare Expenditures Rising as a Percentage of GDP

GRAPHIC

Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, December 2006.


(1)          Compound Annual Growth Rate (“CAGR”)

3




The delivery of healthcare services requires real estate and as a consequence, healthcare providers depend on real estate to maintain and grow their businesses. HCP believes that the current healthcare real estate market provides an investment opportunity due to the:

·       Likelihood of consolidation of the fragmented healthcare real estate sector;

·       Specialized nature of healthcare real estate investing; and

·       Compelling demographics driving the demand for healthcare services.

Senior citizens are the largest consumers of healthcare services. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, on a per capita basis, the 75 years and older segment of the population spends 75% more on healthcare than the 65 to 74-year-old segment and nearly 300% more than the population average.

U.S. Population Over 65 Years Old

GRAPHIC

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2004-2005.

Business Strategy

We are organized to invest in healthcare-related facilities. Our primary goal is to increase shareholder value through profitable growth. Our investment strategy to achieve this goal is based on three principles—opportunistic investing, portfolio diversification, and conservative financing.

Opportunistic Investing

We make real estate investments that are expected to drive profitable growth and create long-term shareholder value. We attempt to position ourselves to create and take advantage of situations to meet our goals and investment criteria. We invest in properties directly and through joint ventures, and provide secured financing, depending on the nature of the investment opportunity.

Portfolio Diversification

We believe in maintaining a portfolio of healthcare-related real estate diversified by sector, geography, operator and investment product. Diversification within the healthcare industry reduces the likelihood that a single event would materially harm our business. This allows us to take advantage of opportunities in different markets based on individual market dynamics. While pursuing our strategy of

4




maintaining diversification in our portfolio, there are no specific limitations under our certificate of incorporation and bylaws on the percentage of our total assets that may be invested in any one property, property type, geographic location or in the number of properties which we may invest in, lease or lend to a single operator. With investments in multiple sectors of healthcare real estate, HCP can focus on opportunities with the best risk/reward profile for the portfolio as a whole, rather than having to choose from transactions within a specific property type.

Conservative Financing

We believe a conservative balance sheet provides us with the ability to execute our opportunistic investing approach and portfolio diversification principles. We maintain our conservative balance sheet by actively managing our debt to equity levels and maintaining available sources of liquidity, such as our revolving line of credit. Our debt is primarily fixed rate, which reduces the impact of rising interest rates on our operations. Generally, we attempt to match the long-term duration of our leases with long-term fixed-rate financing.

In underwriting our investments, we structure and adjust the price of the investment in accordance with our assessment of risk. We may structure transactions as master leases, require indemnifications, obtain enhancements in the form of letters of credit or security deposits, and take other measures to mitigate risk. We finance our investments based on our evaluation of available sources of funding. For short-term purposes, we may utilize our revolving line of credit or arrange for other short-term borrowings from banks or other sources. We arrange for longer-term financing through public offerings or from institutional investors. We may incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred or common stock. We may incur additional mortgage indebtedness on real estate we acquire. We may also obtain non-recourse or other mortgage financing on unleveraged properties in which we have invested or may refinance existing debt on properties acquired.

Competition

Our properties compete with the facilities of other landlords and healthcare providers. The landlords and operators of these competing properties may have capital resources substantially in excess of ours or of the operators of our facilities. The occupancy and rental income at our properties depend upon several factors, including the number of physicians using the healthcare facilities or referring patients to the facilities, competing properties and healthcare providers, and the size and composition of the population in the surrounding area. Private, federal and state payment programs and the effect of laws and regulations may also have a significant influence on the profitability of the properties and their tenants. Virtually all of our properties operate in a competitive environment in which tenants, patients and referral sources, including physicians, may change their preferences for a healthcare facility from time to time.

Investing in real estate is highly competitive. We face competition from other REITs, investment companies, healthcare operators and other institutional investors when we attempt to acquire properties. Increased competition reduces the number of opportunities that meet our investment criteria. If we do not identify investments that meet our investment criteria, our ability to increase shareholder value through profitable growth may be limited.

5




Transaction Overview

Mergers with CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. and CNL Retirement Corp.

On October 5, 2006, we closed our merger with CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CRP”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $5.3 billion. In the CRP merger, we paid an aggregate of $2.9 billion of cash, issued 22.8 million shares of our common stock, and we either assumed or refinanced approximately $1.7 billion of CRP’s outstanding debt. We initially financed the cash consideration paid to CRP stockholders and the expenses related to the transaction through an offering of senior notes, a draw down under new term and bridge loan facilities and a new three-year revolving credit facility. Our results of operations for 2006 include the results of the combined company beginning on October 5, 2006. For more information about the CRP merger, see Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Simultaneous with the closing of the merger with CRP, we also merged with CNL Retirement Corp. (“CRC”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $120 million, which included the issuance of 4.4 million shares of our common stock.

Investment Transactions

During 2006, including the CRP merger discussed above, we acquired interests in properties aggregating $5.9 billion with an average yield of 6.9%. Our 2006 investments were made in the following healthcare sectors: (i) 77% senior housing facilities; (ii) 19% MOBs; (iii) 3% hospitals; and (iv) 1% other healthcare facilities. Our 2006 real estate investments included the following:

·       During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we acquired 13 medical office buildings for $138 million, including non-managing member LLC units (“DownREIT units”) valued at $6 million, in related transactions. The 13 buildings, with 730,000 rentable square feet, have an initial yield of 7.3%.

·       On May 31, 2006, we acquired nine assisted living and independent living facilities for $99 million, including assumed debt valued at $61 million, through a sale-leaseback transaction. These facilities have an initial lease term of ten years, with two ten-year renewal options. The initial annual lease rate is approximately 8.0% with annual CPI-based escalators.

·       On November 30, 2006, we acquired four assisted living and independent living facilities for $51 million, through a sale-leaseback transaction. These facilities have an initial lease term of ten years, with two ten-year renewal options. The initial annual lease rate is approximately 8.0% with annual escalators based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).

During 2006, we sold 83 properties for $512 million and recognized gains of approximately $275 million. These sales included 69 SNFs sold on December 1, 2006, for $392 million with gains of approximately $226 million. On or before December 1, 2006, tenants for nine SNFs exercised rights of first refusal to acquire such facilities. The sales of the nine SNFs for $52 million are expected to be completed by June 30, 2007.

On November 17, 2006, we purchased $300 million senior secured notes issued by a HCA Inc. These notes accrue interest at 9.625%, mature on November 15, 2016, and are secured by second-priority liens on the HCA’s and its subsidiary guarantors’ assets.

On January 31, 2007, we acquired three long-term acute care hospitals and received proceeds of $36 million in exchange for 11 skilled nursing facilities valued at approximately $77 million. The three acquired properties have an initial lease term of ten years, with two ten-year renewal options, and an initial

6




contractual yield of 12% with escalators based on the lessee’s revenue growth. The acquired properties are included in a new master lease that contains 14 properties leased to the same operator.

On February 9, 2007, we acquired the Medical City Dallas campus, which includes two hospital towers, six medical office buildings, and three parking garages, for approximately $347 million, including non-managing member LLC units (“DownREIT units’’) valued at $174 million. The initial yield on this campus is approximately 7.3%.

Joint Venture Transactions

On October 27, 2006, we formed an MOB joint venture with an institutional capital partner. The joint venture includes 13 properties valued at $140 million and encumbered by $92 million of mortgage debt. Upon formation, we received approximately $36 million in proceeds, including a one-time acquisition fee of $0.7 million. We retained an effective 26% interest in the venture, will act as the managing member, and will receive ongoing asset management fees.

On November 30, 2006, we acquired the interest held by an affiliate of General Electric Company in HCP Medical Office Portfolio, LLC (“HCP MOP”), for $141 million. We are now the sole owner of the venture and its 59 MOBs, which have approximately four million rentable square feet. At closing, $251 million of mortgage debt encumbered these MOBs.

On January 5, 2007, we formed a senior housing joint venture with an institutional capital partner. The joint venture includes 25 properties valued at $1.1 billion and encumbered by a $686 million secured debt facility. Upon formation, we received approximately $280 million in proceeds, including a one-time acquisition fee of $5.4 million. Including the $446 million recently received from the secured debt facility with Fannie Mae discussed below, we received $726 million in total proceeds. We retained a 35% interest in the venture, will act as the managing member, and will receive ongoing asset management fees.

Capital Market Transactions

During 2006, in addition to the mortgage debt issued under the Fannie Mae facility discussed below, we obtained $165 million of ten-year mortgage financing with a weighted average effective yield of 6.36% in five separate transactions. We received net proceeds of $162 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

On February 27, 2006, we issued $150 million of 5.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.071% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.788%. We received net proceeds of $149 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

On September 19, 2006, we issued $1 billion of senior unsecured notes, which consisted of $300 million of floating rate notes due in 2008, $300 million of 5.95% notes due in 2011, and $400 million of 6.30% notes due in 2016. We received net proceeds of $994 million, which together with cash on hand and borrowings under the new credit facilities were used to repay our then existing credit facility and to finance the CRP merger.

On October 5, 2006, in connection with the CRP merger, we entered into credit agreements with a syndicate of banks providing for aggregate borrowings of $3.4 billion. The credit facilities included a $0.7 billion bridge loan, a $1.7 billion two-year term loan, and a $1.0 billion three-year revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2006, we had repaid the bridge loan and borrowings under the term loan were reduced to $0.5 billion. In addition, through our capital market transactions in January 2007, we fully repaid the balance outstanding under the term loan.

7




On November 10, 2006, we issued 33.5 million shares of common stock. We received net proceeds of approximately $960 million, which were used to repay our bridge loan facility and borrowings under our term loan and revolving credit facilities.

On December 4, 2006, we issued $400 million of 5.65% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.768% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.69%. We received net proceeds of $396 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

On December 21, 2006, in anticipation of our senior housing joint venture that closed on January 5, 2007, we expanded an existing secured debt facility with Fannie Mae to $686 million, receiving $446 million in proceeds. The Fannie Mae facility bears interest at a weighted average rate of 5.66%. The funds from the expanded debt facility were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

On January 19, 2007, we issued 6.8 million shares of common stock. We received net proceeds of approximately $261 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

On January 22, 2007, we issued $500 million of 6.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2017. The notes were priced at 99.323% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 6.09%. We received net proceeds of $493 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan and revolving credit facilities.

Other Events

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we issued approximately 797,000 shares of our common stock under our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan at an average price per share of $28.68 for proceeds of $22.9 million.

Quarterly dividends paid during 2006 aggregated $1.70 per share. On January 29, 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.445 per share. The common stock dividend will be paid on February 21, 2007, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 5, 2007. The annualized rate of distribution for 2007 is $1.78, compared with $1.70 for 2006, which represents a 4.7% increase. Our Board of Directors has determined to continue its policy of considering dividend increases on an annual rather than quarterly basis.

8




Properties

Portfolio Summary

Our portfolio of investments at December 31, 2006 includes direct investments in healthcare-related properties, mortgage loans, and investments through joint ventures. Our properties include hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing facilities, medical office buildings, and other healthcare facilities. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, our portfolio of investments, excluding assets held for sale and classified as discontinued operations, consists of the following (square feet and dollars in thousands):

 

 

Number

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

Property Type

 

 

 

of
Properties

 

Capacity(1)

 

Square Feet

 

Investment(2)

 

Rental
Revenues

 

Operating
Expenses

 

NOI(4)

 

Owned properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hospital

 

 

33

 

 

3,356 Beds

 

 

3,650

 

 

 

$

871,394

 

 

$

94,481

 

 

$

 

 

$

94,481

 

Skilled nursing

 

 

65

 

 

7,404 Beds

 

 

2,447

 

 

 

313,180

 

 

42,253

 

 

94

 

 

42,159

 

Senior housing

 

 

271

 

 

28,333 Units

 

 

24,251

 

 

 

3,968,837

 

 

181,500

 

 

12,491

 

 

169,009

 

Medical office building

 

 

246

 

 

N/A

 

 

14,952

 

 

 

2,366,692

 

 

176,840

 

 

66,528

 

 

110,312

 

Other

 

 

30

 

 

N/A

 

 

1,626

 

 

 

262,898

 

 

29,024

 

 

6,009

 

 

23,015

 

 

 

 

645

 

 

 

 

 

46,926

 

 

 

$

7,783,001

 

 

$

524,098

 

 

$

85,122

 

 

$

438,976

 

Owned properties held for contribution(3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior housing

 

 

25

 

 

5,633 Units

 

 

5,566

 

 

 

1,100,600

 

 

20,043

 

 

 

 

20,043

 

Medical office building

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,880

 

 

4,064

 

 

8,816

 

Total owned
properties

 

 

670

 

 

 

 

 

52,492

 

 

 

$

8,883,601

 

 

$

557,021

 

 

$

89,186

 

 

$

467,835

 

Direct financing
leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior housing

 

 

32

 

 

3,143 Units

 

 

1,969

 

 

 

$

675,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hospital

 

 

2

 

 

170 Beds

 

 

311

 

 

 

$

75,083

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Skilled nursing

 

 

4

 

 

596 Beds

 

 

197

 

 

 

19,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior housing

 

 

5

 

 

180 Units

 

 

189

 

 

 

26,411

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage
loans

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

$

121,481

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unconsolidated joint ventures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior housing

 

 

4

 

 

412 Units

 

 

235

 

 

 

$

139

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Medical office building

 

 

14

 

 

N/A

 

 

789

 

 

 

20,077

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

1,024

 

 

 

$

20,216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our business segments.


(1)          Senior housing facilities are stated in units (e.g., studio, one or two bedroom units). Medical office buildings and other healthcare facilities are measured in square feet. Hospitals and skilled nursing facilities are measured by licensed bed count.

9




(2)          Investment for owned properties represents the carrying amount of real estate assets, including intangibles, after adding back accumulated depreciation and amortization, and excludes assets held for sale and classified as discontinued operations. Investment for direct financing leases represents the carrying amount of direct financing leases, after deducting interest accretion. Investment for mortgage loans receivable and unconsolidated joint ventures represents the carrying amount of our investment.

(3)          On January 5, 2007, we formed a joint venture for 25 senior housing assets and retained a 35% interest in the venture. The carrying value of the 25 senior housing facilities is classified as real estate held for contribution on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. On October 13, 2006, we formed a joint venture with 13 MOBs and retained an effective 26% interest in the venture. The disposition of a portion of our interest in the 25 senior housing assets and 13 MOBs met the definition under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS No. 144”) for the assets to qualify as held for sale, however, the operations are not classified as discontinued operations resulting from our continuing interest in the ventures. The operating results of these properties prior to the formation of the ventures are included in the Company’s continuing operations. The number of properties, capacity, square footage, and investment for the 13 MOBs are included under the caption of unconsolidated joint ventures.

(4)          Net Operating Income from Continuing Operations (“NOI”) is a non-GAAP supplemental financial measure used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate properties. We define NOI as rental revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level operating expenses, which excludes depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, impairments, interest expense and discontinued operations. We believe NOI provides investors relevant and useful information because it measures the operating performance of our real estate at the property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and assess property level performance. We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP (U.S. generally accepted accounting principals) measure to NOI. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of operating performance to net income as defined by GAAP since it does not reflect the aforementioned excluded items. Further, NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI. The following reconciles NOI to Net Income for 2006 (in thousands):

 

 

Amount

 

Net operating income from continuing operations

 

$

467,835

 

Equity loss from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

8,331

 

Income from direct financing leases

 

15,008

 

Investment management fee income

 

3,895

 

Interest and other income

 

34,832

 

Interest expense

 

(213,304

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

(144,215

)

General and administrative expense

 

(47,370

)

Impairments

 

(3,577

)

Minority interests

 

(14,805

)

Total discontinued operations

 

310,917

 

Net income

 

$

417,547

 

 

10




Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The following is summarized unaudited information for our unconsolidated joint ventures as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 (square feet and dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

Property Type

 

 

 

Number of 
Properties

 

Capacity(1)

 

Square
Feet

 

Joint Venture
Investment(2)

 

Total
Revenues

 

Total
Operating
Expenses

 

Senior housing

 

 

4

 

 

412 Units

 

 

235

 

 

 

$

20,178

 

 

 

$

2,303

 

 

 

$

1,428

 

 

Medical office building

 

 

14

 

 

N/A

 

 

789

 

 

 

150,875

 

 

 

5,205

 

 

 

1,674

 

 

Total

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

1,024

 

 

 

$

171,053

 

 

 

$

7,508

 

 

 

$

3,102

 

 


(1)          Senior housing facilities are stated in units (e.g., studio, one or two bedroom units) and medical office buildings are measured in square feet.

(2)          Represents the carrying amount of real estate assets within the joint ventures, including intangibles, after adding back accumulated depreciation and amortization.

Healthcare Sectors and Property Types

We have investments in senior housing facilities, medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and other healthcare facilities. Certain tenants of our properties are reliant on government reimbursements, such as those from Medicare and Medicaid. See “Governmental Regulation” for the potential impact on the value of our investments and our results of operations. The following describes the nature of the operations of our tenants and borrowers.

Senior Housing Facilities.   We have interests in 337 senior housing facilities, including four properties in unconsolidated joint ventures. Senior housing properties include ILFs, ALFs and CCRCs, which cater to different segments of the elderly population based upon their needs. Services provided by our tenants in these facilities are primarily paid for by the residents directly or through private insurance and are less reliant on government reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.

·       Independent Living Facilities.   ILFsare designed to meet the needs of seniors who choose to live in an environment surrounded by their peers with services such as housekeeping, meals and activities. These residents generally do not need assistance with activities of daily living (“ADLs”), including bathing, eating and dressing. However, residents have the option to contract for these services.

·       Assisted Living Facilities.   ALFs are licensed care facilities that provide personal care services, support and housing for those who need help with ADLs yet require limited medical care. The programs and services may include transportation, social activities, exercise and fitness programs, beauty or barber shop access, hobby and craft activities, community excursions, meals in a dining room setting and other activities sought by residents. These facilities are often in apartment-like buildings with private residences ranging from single rooms to large apartments. Certain ALFs may offer higher levels of personal assistance for residents with Alzheimer’s disease or other forms of dementia. Levels of personal assistance are based in part on local regulations.

·       Continuing Care Retirement Communities.   CCRCs provide housing and health-related services under long-term contracts. This alternative is appealing to residents as it eliminates the need for relocating when health and medical needs change, thus allowing residents to “age in place.” Some CCRCs require a substantial entry fee or buy-in fee, and most also charge monthly maintenance fees in exchange for a living unit, meals and some health services. CCRCs typically require the individual to be in relatively good health and independent upon entry.

11




Medical Office Buildings.   We have interests in 260 MOBs, including 14 properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures. These facilities typically contain physicians’ offices and examination rooms, and may also include pharmacies, hospital ancillary service space and outpatient services such as diagnostic centers, rehabilitation clinics and day-surgery operating rooms. While these facilities are similar to commercial office buildings, they require more plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate multiple exam rooms that may require sinks in every room, brighter lights and special equipment such as medical gases.

Hospitals.   We have interests in 35 hospitals, which include 13 acute care, 11 rehabilitation, four long-term acute care and seven specialty hospitals. Services provided by our tenants in these facilities are paid for by private sources, third-party payors (e.g., insurance and HMOs), or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

·       Acute Care Hospitals.   Acute care hospitals offer a wide range of services such as fully-equipped operating and recovery rooms, obstetrics, radiology, intensive care, open heart surgery and coronary care, neurosurgery, neonatal intensive care, magnetic resonance imaging, nursing units, oncology, clinical laboratories, respiratory therapy, physical therapy, nuclear medicine, rehabilitation services and outpatient services.

·       Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.   Long-term acute care hospitals provide care for patients with complex medical conditions that require longer stays and more intensive care, monitoring, or emergency back-up than that available in most skilled nursing-based programs.

·       Specialty Hospitals.   Specialty hospitals are licensed as acute care hospitals but focus on providing care in specific areas such as cardiac, orthopedic and women’s conditions or specific procedures such as surgery and are less likely to provide emergency services.

·       Rehabilitation Hospitals.   Rehabilitation hospitals provide inpatient and outpatient care for patients who have sustained traumatic injuries or illnesses, such as spinal cord injuries, strokes, head injuries, orthopedic problems, work-related disabilities and neurological diseases.

Skilled Nursing Facilities.   We have interests in 69 SNFs. SNFsoffer restorative, rehabilitative and custodial nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at hospitals. Ancillary revenues and revenue from sub-acute care services are derived from providing services to residents beyond room and board and include occupational, physical, speech, respiratory and intravenous therapy, wound care, oncology treatment, brain injury care and orthopedic therapy as well as sales of pharmaceutical products and other services. Certain skilled nursing facilities provide some of the foregoing services on an out-patient basis. Skilled nursing services provided by our tenants in these facilities are primarily paid for either by private sources, or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Other Healthcare Facilities.   We have investments in 30 healthcare laboratory and biotech research facilities. These facilities are designed to accommodate research and development in the bio-pharmaceutical industry, drug discovery and development, and predictive and personalized medicine. Our investments include physician group practice clinic facilities, health and wellness centers, and facilities used for other healthcare purposes. The physician group practice clinics generally provide a broad range of medical services through organized physician groups representing various medical specialties. Health and wellness centers provide testing and preventative health maintenance services.

12




Investment Products

Owned and Joint Venture Property Investments

The Company holds its investments as wholly owned or in the form of unconsolidated joint ventures with third-party investors. As of December 31, 2006, we had investments in 731 properties, including 18 properties through joint ventures. Whether owned wholly or through joint ventures, the owned properties may be characterized as one of three types: triple-net leased property, operating property or development property.

Triple-net Leased Properties:

Triple-net leased properties are primarily single-tenant buildings leased to a healthcare provider under a triple-net lease. Pursuant to triple-net leases, tenants pay base rent and all operating expenses incurred at the property, including utilities, property taxes, insurance, and repairs and maintenance. Certain leases contain annual base rent escalations based on a predetermined fixed rate, an inflation index or some other factor. Other leases may require tenants to pay additional rent based upon the operator’s achievement of specific performance thresholds. The amount of additional rent may be based on a percentage of the facility’s revenues in excess of revenues for a specific base period or on the funds available for lease payment after base rent and operating expenses. As of December 31, 2006, the weighted average remaining term, excluding unexercised renewal options, on our triple-net leased properties is approximately 11 years.

We typically require credit enhancements to cover short falls in the event the tenant does not generate enough cash flow to pay rent. The ability of certain senior housing lessees to satisfy their obligations under leases acquired from CRP depends primarily on the properties’ operating results. Some of these leases have credit enhancements that have either expired or will expire either by the passage of time or upon the full utilization of the credit enhancement. In addition, the terms of certain leases acquired in the CRP acquisition also provide for the tenant to maintain reserves to fund expenditures to refurbish buildings, premises and equipment to maintain the facilities in a manner that allows for the operation of the facilities for their intended purpose. To the extent the credit enhancements or reserves are inadequate, the tenant may not be able to make rent payments to us when due or we may be required to fund such amounts.

The first year annual base rental rates on properties we acquired during 2006 ranged from 6.8% to 9.0% of the purchase price of the property. Rental rates vary by lease, taking into consideration many factors, including:

·       creditworthiness of the tenant;

·       operating performance of the facility;

·       credit support arrangements;

·       cost of capital at the inception of the lease;

·       location, type and physical condition of the facility;

·       barriers to entry, such as certificates of need, competitive development and constraining high land costs; and

·       lease term.

13




Operating Properties:

Our operating properties are typically multi-tenant medical office buildings that are leased to multiple healthcare providers (hospitals and physician practices) under a gross, modified gross or net lease structure. Under a gross or modified gross lease, all or a portion of operating expenses are not reimbursed by tenants. Most of our owned MOBs are managed by third-party property management companies and 21 are leased on a net basis while 239 are leased to multiple tenants under gross or modified gross leases pursuant to which we are responsible for certain operating expenses. Regardless of lease structure, most of our leases at operating properties include annual base rent escalation clauses that are either predetermined fixed increases or are a function of an inflation index, and typically have an initial term ranging from one to 15 years, with a weighted average remaining term of approximately five years as of December 31, 2006.

The following table reflects the annual reduction in revenue (based on 2007 contractual lease payments) for owned triple-net leased and operating properties resulting from lease expirations, absent the impact of renewals, if any (in thousands):

Year

 

 

 

Triple-net
Leased

 

Operating
Properties

 

Total(1)

 

2007

 

$

5,587

 

$

35,811

 

$

41,398

 

2008

 

8,752

 

40,158

 

48,910

 

2009

 

45,670

 

33,601

 

79,271

 

2010

 

9,931

 

37,850

 

47,781

 

2011

 

17,573

 

25,781

 

43,354

 

Thereafter

 

410,559

 

104,204

 

514,763

 

Total

 

$

498,072

 

$

277,405

 

$

775,477

 


(1)          Excludes direct financing leases, assets classified as held for contribution, and assets held for sale and classified as discontinued operations.

Development Properties:

We generally commit to development projects only if they are at least 50% pre-leased. We use internal and external construction management expertise to evaluate local market conditions, construction costs and other factors to seek appropriate risk-adjusted returns. During 2006, we completed and placed into service approximately $36 million of development properties.

Investment Management Platform:

We co-invest in real estate with institutional investors through partnerships, limited liability companies, and joint ventures. We target investors with long-term investment horizons who seek to benefit from our expertise in healthcare real estate. Typically, we retain interests in the ventures ranging from 20% to 35% and serve as the managing member. Our co-investment ventures generally allow us to earn acquisition fees, asset management fees or priority distributions, and have the potential for promoted interests or incentive distributions based on performance of the venture. On October 27, 2006 and January 5, 2007, a total of $1.3 billion in medical office and senior housing assets were placed into joint ventures.

Investments in Secured Loans, Direct Financing Leases and Debt Securities

We have investments in 10 mortgage loans secured by 11 properties that are owned and operated by 9 healthcare providers. Our secured loan investments typically consist of senior mortgages or mezzanine financing on individual properties or a pool of properties. At December 31, 2006, the carrying amount of these mortgage loans totaled $121.5 million. The interest rates on mortgage loans outstanding at

14




December 31, 2006 ranged from 7.5% to 13.5% per annum. Our mortgage loans generally include prepayment penalties or yield maintenance provisions.

At December 31, 2006 we had investments in 32 properties that are accounted for under direct financing leases with original terms that range from five to 35 years. Certain leases contain provisions that allow the tenants to elect to purchase the properties during or at the end of the lease terms for the aggregate initial investment amount plus adjustments, if any, as defined in the lease agreements.

We also have investments in senior secured second lien notes of HCA Inc., which are classified as debt securities and are recorded at fair value. At December 31, 2006, the fair value of these senior secured notes was $322.5 million and they are classified as available for sale. These notes accrue interest at a rate of 9.625%, mature in 2016, and are secured by second-priority liens on HCA’s and its subsidiary guarantors’ assets. The issuer of these notes may elect to pay interest in cash, by increasing the principal amount of the notes for the entire amount of the interest payments, or by paying half of the interest in cash and half in additional notes. The first payment due on May 15, 2007 is payable only in cash. After November 15, 2011, all interest on these notes will be payable in cash. If the issuer elects to pay with additional principal amounts or additional notes, the accrual rate is at 10.375%.

Operator Concentration

The following table provides information about the concentration of business with our top five operators for the year ended December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Operators

 

 

 

Facilities

 

Investment(1)

 

Percentage
of Revenue(2)

 

Sunrise Senior Living (NYSE:SRZ) (“Sunrise”)

 

 

106

 

 

 

$

2,245,673

 

 

 

5

%

 

Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (NYSE:BKD)
(“Brookdale”)

 

 

23

 

 

 

668,637

 

 

 

8

 

 

Tenet Healthcare Corporation (NYSE:THC)
(“Tenet”)

 

 

8

 

 

 

423,497

 

 

 

9

 

 

Summerville Healthcare Group (“Summerville”)

 

 

31

 

 

 

274,842

 

 

 

4

 

 

Emeritus Corporation (AMEX:ESC) (“Emeritus”)

 

 

36

 

 

 

245,676

 

 

 

5

 

 


(1)          Represents the carrying amount of real estate assets, including intangibles, after adding back accumulated depreciation and amortization.

(2)          106 properties managed by Sunrise and six properties managed by Brookdale were acquired from CRP on October 5, 2006.

All of our properties associated with the aforementioned operators are primarily under triple-net leases. These operators, excluding Summerville, are subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Financial and other information relating to these operators may be obtained from their public reports.

According to public disclosures by Tenet and Sunrise, these companies are experiencing various legal, financial, and regulatory difficulties. We cannot predict with certainty the impact, if any, of the outcome of these uncertainties on their financial condition. The failure or inability of these operators to pay their obligations could materially reduce our revenues, net income and cash flows, which could in turn reduce the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends, cause our stock price to decline and cause us to incur impairment charges or a loss on the sale of the properties.

One of our hospitals located in Tarzana, California is operated by Tenet and is affected by State of California Senate Bill 1953, which requires certain seismic safety building standards for acute care hospital facilities. See “Government Regulation—California Senate Bill 1953” for more information.

15




Joint Ventures

Consolidated Joint Ventures

At December 31, 2006, we held ownership interests in 23 consolidated limited liability companies and partnerships that together own 85 properties and one mortgage, and an interest in one unconsolidated joint venture including the following:

·       A 77% interest in Health Care Property Partners, which owns two hospitals, seven skilled nursing facilities and has one mortgage on a skilled nursing facility.

·       A 93% interest in HCPI/Sorrento, LLC, which owns a life science facility.

·       A 90% interest in HCPI VPI Sorrento II, LLC, which owns four laboratory, office and biotechnology manufacturing buildings.

·       A 95% interest in HCPI/Indiana, LLC, which owns six medical office buildings.

·       A 36% interest in HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, which owns 14 medical office buildings and one assisted living facility.

·       A 70% interest in HCPI/Utah, LLC, which owns 18 medical office buildings.

·       A 66% interest in HCPI/Utah II, LLC, which owns eight medical office buildings and eight other healthcare facilities.

·       A 75% interest in HCP DR California, LLC, which owns four independent and assisted living facilities.

·       An 85% interest in HCP Birmingham Portfolio LLC, which owns a 30% interest in HCP Ventures III, LLC. HCP Ventures III, LLC owns 13 medical office buildings.

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

At December 31, 2006, we held ownership interests in six unconsolidated limited liability companies and partnerships that together own 18 properties as follows:

·       An effective 26% interest in HCP Ventures III, LLC which owns 13 medical office buildings.

·       A 45% to 50% interest in each of four limited liability companies (Seminole Shores Living Center, LLC—50%, Edgewood Assisted Living Center, LLC—45%, Arborwood Living Center, LLC—45%, and Greenleaf Living Center, LLC—45%) which each own an assisted living facility.

·       A 67% interest in Suburban Properties, LLC which owns one medical office building.

Taxation of HCP

We believe that we have operated in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1985, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner. No assurance can be given that we have operated or will be able to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or to remain so qualified. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Code provisions, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof.

If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will generally not be required to pay federal corporate income taxes on the portion of our net income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (i.e., at the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally

16




results from investment in a corporation. However, we will be required to pay federal income tax under certain circumstances.

The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association (i) which is managed by one or more trustees or directors; (ii) the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest; (iii) which would be taxable, but for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, as a domestic corporation; (iv) which is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Code; (v) the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons; (vi) during the last half of each taxable year not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals; and (vii) which meets certain other tests, described below, regarding the amount of its distributions and the nature of its income and assets. The Code provides that conditions (i) to (iv), inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (v) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months.

There are presently two gross income requirements. First, at least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from “prohibited transactions” as defined below) for each taxable year must be derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or from certain types of temporary investment income. Second, at least 95% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) for each taxable year must be derived from income that qualifies under the 75% test and all other dividends, interest and gain from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities. A “prohibited transaction” is a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.

At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature of our assets. First, at least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, certain stock or debt instruments purchased with the proceeds of a stock offering or long term public debt offering by us (but only for the one-year period after such offering), cash, cash items and government securities. Second, not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities other than those in the 75% asset class. Third, of the investments included in the 25% asset class, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets and we may not own more than 10% of the vote or value of the securities of a non-REIT corporation, other than certain debt securities and interests in taxable REIT subsidiaries or qualified REIT subsidiaries, each as defined below. Fourth, not more than 20% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries.

We own interests in various partnerships and limited liability companies. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership or a member of a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership under the Code, Treasury Regulations provide that for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests, the REIT will be deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership or limited liability company (determined in accordance with its capital interest in the entity), subject to special rules related to the 10% asset test, and will be deemed to be entitled to the income of the partnership or limited liability company attributable to such share. The ownership of an interest in a partnership or limited liability company by a REIT may involve special tax risks, including the challenge by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) of the allocations of income and expense items of the partnership or limited liability company, which would affect the computation of taxable income of the REIT, and the status of the partnership or limited liability company as a partnership (as opposed to an association taxable as a corporation) for federal income tax purposes.

We also own interests in a number of subsidiaries which are intended to be treated as qualified REIT subsidiaries (each a “QRS”). The Code provides that such subsidiaries will be ignored for federal income tax purposes and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of such subsidiaries will be

17




treated as our assets, liabilities and such items. If any partnership, limited liability company, or subsidiary in which we own an interest were treated as a regular corporation (and not as a partnership, QRS or taxable REIT subsidiary, as the case may be) for federal income tax purposes, we would likely fail to satisfy the REIT asset tests described above and would therefore fail to qualify as a REIT, unless certain relief provisions apply. We believe that each of the partnerships, limited liability companies, and subsidiaries (other than taxable REIT subsidiaries) in which we own an interest will be treated for tax purposes as a partnership, or disregarded entity (in the case of a 100% owned partnership or limited liability company) or QRS, as applicable, although no assurance can be given that the Service will not successfully challenge the status of any such organization.

As of December 31, 2006, we owned interests in two subsidiaries which are intended to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (each a “TRS”). A REIT may own any percentage of the voting stock and value of the securities of a corporation which jointly elects with the REIT to be a TRS, provided certain requirements are met. A TRS generally may engage in any business, including the provision of customary or noncustomary services to tenants of its parent REIT and of others, except a TRS may not manage or operate a hotel or healthcare facility. A TRS is treated as a regular corporation and is subject to federal income tax and applicable state income and franchise taxes at regular corporate rates. In addition, a 100% tax may be imposed on a REIT if its rental, service or other agreements with its TRS, or the TRS’s agreements with the REIT’s tenants, are not on arm’s-length terms.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to our stockholders in an amount at least equal to (A) the sum of (i) 90% of our “real estate investment trust taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain) and (ii) 90% of the net income, if any (after tax), from foreclosure property, minus (B) the sum of certain items of non-cash income. Such distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for such year, if paid on or before the first regular dividend payment date after such declaration and if we so elect and specify the dollar amount in our tax return. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net long-term capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “real estate investment trust taxable income”, as adjusted, we will be required to pay tax thereon at regular corporate tax rates. Furthermore, if we should fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of our capital gain income for such year, and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we would be required to pay a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distributions over the amounts actually distributed.

If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and certain relief provisions do not apply, we will be required to pay tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which we fail to qualify will not be deductible by us nor will they be required to be made. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the statutory relief. Failure to qualify for even one year could substantially reduce distributions to stockholders and could result in our incurring substantial indebtedness (to the extent borrowings are feasible) or liquidating substantial investments in order to pay the resulting taxes.

We and our stockholders may be required to pay state or local tax in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we or they transact business or reside. The state and local tax treatment of us and our stockholders may not conform to the federal income tax consequences discussed above.

18




We may also be subject to certain taxes applicable to REITs, including taxes in lieu of disqualification as a REIT, on undistributed income, on income from prohibited transactions, on net income from foreclosure property and on built-in gains from the sale of certain assets acquired from C corporations in tax-free transactions.

Government Regulation

The healthcare industry is heavily regulated by federal, state and local laws. This government regulation of the healthcare industry affects us because:

(1)         Governmental regulations such as licensure, certification for participation in government programs, and government reimbursement may impact the financial ability of some of our operators to make rent and debt payments to us, which in turn may affect the value of our investments, and

(2)         The amount of reimbursement such operators receive from the government and other third parties may affect the amounts we receive in additional rents, which are often based on our operators’ gross revenue from operations.

These laws and regulations are subject to frequent and substantial changes resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. These changes may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes cannot be predicted. The failure of any tenant or borrower to comply with such laws, regulations and requirements could affect its ability to operate its facility or facilities and could adversely affect such operator’s ability to make lease or debt payments to us, which in turn may affect the value of our investments.

Fraud and Abuse Laws.   There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraud and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from or are in a position to make referrals in connection with a government-sponsored healthcare program, including, but not limited to, the Medicare and Medicaid programs. These include:

·       The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, the referral of Medicare and Medicaid patients.

·       The Federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition (Stark), which restricts physicians from making referrals for certain designated health services for which payment may be made under Medicare or Medicaid programs to an entity with which the physician (or an immediate family member) has a financial relationship.

·       The False Claims Act, which prohibits any person from knowingly presenting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the federal government (including the Medicare and Medicaid programs).

·       The Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which is imposed by the Department of Health and Human Services for fraudulent acts.

Each of these laws include criminal and/or civil penalties for violations that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Imposition of any of these types of penalties on our tenants or borrowers could result in a material adverse effect on their operations, which could adversely affect our business. Additionally, certain laws, such as the False Claims Act, allow for individuals to bring qui tam (whistleblower) actions on behalf of the government for violations of fraud and abuse

19




laws. Some Medicare Administrative Contractors (private companies that contract with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) to administer the Medicare program) have also increased scrutiny of cost reports filed by skilled nursing providers.

Environmental Matters.   A wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect healthcare facility operations. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property or a secured lender (such as us) may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner’s or secured lender’s liability therefore could exceed the value of the property, and/or the assets of the owner or secured lender. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, would reduce our revenue. Although the mortgage loans that we provide and the leases covering our properties require the borrower and the tenant to indemnify us for certain environmental liabilities, the scope of such obligations may be limited and we cannot assure that any such borrower or tenant would be able to fulfill its indemnification obligations.

The Medicare and Medicaid Programs.   Sources of revenue for operators may include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers, healthcare service plans and health maintenance organizations, among others. Efforts to reduce costs by these payors will likely continue, which may result in reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our operators. In addition, the failure of any of our operators to comply with various laws and regulations could jeopardize their certification and ability to continue to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Medicaid programs differ from state to state but they are all subject to federally-imposed requirements. At least 50% of the funds available under these programs are provided by the federal government under a matching program. Medicaid programs generally pay for acute and rehabilitative care based on reasonable costs at fixed rates; skilled nursing facilities are generally reimbursed using fixed daily rates. Medicaid payments are generally below retail rates for tenant-operated facilities, and the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 may further reduce Medicaid reimbursement, as the Act included cuts of approximately $4.8 billion over five years to the Medicaid program. Increasingly, states have introduced managed care contracting techniques into the administration of Medicaid programs. Such mechanisms could have the impact of reducing utilization of and reimbursement to facilities. Other third-party payors in various states base payments on costs, retail rates or, increasingly, negotiated rates. Negotiated rates can include discounts from normal charges, fixed daily rates and prepaid capitated rates.

Healthcare Facilities.   The healthcare facilities in our portfolio, including hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, and physician group practice clinics, are subject to extensive federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations. Failure to comply with any of these laws could result in loss of accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, suspension or decertification from federal and state healthcare programs, loss of license or closure of the facility. Such actions may have an effect on the revenue of the operators of properties owned by or mortgaged to us and therefore adversely impact us.

Entrance Fee Communities.   Certain of the senior housing facilities mortgaged to or owned by us are operated as entrance fee communities. Generally, an entrance fee is an upfront fee or consideration paid by a resident, a portion of which may be refundable, in exchange for some form of long-term benefit. Some of the entrance fee communities are subject to significant state regulatory oversight, including, for example, oversight of each facility’s financial condition, establishment and monitoring of reserve requirements and other financial restrictions, the right of residents to cancel their contracts within a

20




specified period of time, lien rights in favor of the residents, restrictions on change of ownership and similar matters. Such oversight and the rights of residents within these entrance fee communities may have an effect on the revenue or operations of the operators of such facilities and therefore may adversely impact us.

California Senate Bill 1953.   Our hospital located in Tarzana, California is affected by State of California Senate Bill 1953 (SB 1953), which requires certain seismic safety building standards for acute care hospital facilities. This hospital is operated by Tenet under a lease expiring in February 2009. We and Tenet are currently reviewing the SB 1953 compliance of this hospital, multiple plans of action to cause such compliance, the estimated time for completing the same, and the cost of performing necessary remediation of the property. We cannot currently estimate the remediation costs that will need to be incurred prior to 2013 in order to make the facility SB 1953-compliant through 2030, or the final allocation of any remediation costs between us and Tenet. Rent on the hospital in 2006 and 2005 was $10.8 million in each year and the carrying amount of the facility is $73.9 million at December 31, 2006.

Current Developments

The healthcare industry continues to face various challenges, including increased government and private payor pressure on healthcare providers to control costs, the migration of patients from acute care facilities into extended care and home care settings, and the vertical and horizontal consolidation of healthcare providers.

Changes in the law, new interpretations of existing laws, and changes in payment methodologies may have a dramatic effect on the definition of permissible or impermissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement furnished by government and other third-party payors. These changes may be applied retroactively under certain circumstances. The ultimate timing or effect of legislative efforts cannot be predicted and may impact us in different ways.

In December of 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act established an 18-month moratorium on the “whole hospital exception” to the Stark law, whereby physicians have been permitted to refer patients for Designated Health Services to hospitals in which they have an ownership interest. On August 8, 2006, CMS released its final report and plan to address issues relating to physician investment in specialty hospitals. Specialty hospitals include hospitals primarily or exclusively engaged in the care and treatment of cardiac conditions or orthopedic conditions, or hospitals that perform certain surgical procedures. CMS’ strategic plan includes strict enforcement of federal fraud and abuse laws for improper investments, disclosure of information regarding physician investment and compensation arrangements, acceptance of emergency transfer cases even if the specialty hospital lacks an emergency department, and changes to the hospital inpatient prospective and ambulatory surgical center payment systems. CMS declined to extend the moratorium on approving new specialty hospitals, despite a request for an extension by two senators. In light of continued interest in specialty hospital regulation, there is a risk that legislation could be adopted that affects the operation of specialty hospitals. The specialty hospital issue is controversial and after significant discussion and legislation, the current federal government permitted operation of specialty hospitals; however, there can be no assurance that a new Congress or Administration would continue similar treatment of specialty hospitals. Our hospital tenants may face additional competition from an increased number of specialty hospitals, including specialty hospitals owned by physicians currently on staff at tenant hospitals.

In addition to the reforms enacted and considered by Congress from time to time, state legislatures periodically consider various healthcare reform proposals. Congress and state legislatures can be expected to continue to review and assess alternative healthcare delivery systems, new regulatory enforcement initiatives, and new payment methodologies.

21




We believe that government and private efforts to contain or reduce healthcare costs will continue. These trends are likely to lead to reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our operators. In addition, recent trends of hospitals providing more services to uninsured patients or on an outpatient basis rather than inpatient basis may continue and could adversely affect the profitability of our operators. We believe that the vast nature of the healthcare industry, the financial strength and operating flexibility of our operators, and the diversity of our portfolio will mitigate the impact of any such trends. However, we cannot predict what legislation will be adopted, and no assurance can be given that the healthcare reforms will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Employees

At December 31, 2006, we had 165 full-time employees and no part-time employees, none of whom are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

ITEM 1A.        Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described below as well as the risks described in “Competition,” “Government Regulation,” and “Taxation of HCP” and elsewhere in this report, which risks are incorporated by reference into this section, before making an investment decision regarding our company. The risks and uncertainties described herein are not the only ones facing us and there may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently consider not likely to have a significant impact. All of these risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Risks Related to Our Operators

If our facility operators are unable to operate our properties in a manner sufficient to generate income, they may be unable to make rent and loan payments to us.

The healthcare industry is highly competitive and we expect that it may become more competitive in the future. Our operators are subject to competition from other healthcare providers that provide similar services. Such competition, which has intensified due to overbuilding in some segments in which we operate, has caused the fill-up rate of newly constructed buildings to slow and the monthly rate that many newly built and previously existing facilities were able to obtain for their services to decrease. The profitability of healthcare facilities depends upon several factors, including the number of physicians using the healthcare facilities or referring patients there, competitive systems of healthcare delivery and the size and composition of the population in the surrounding area. Private, federal and state payment programs and the effect of other laws and regulations may also have a significant influence on the revenues and income of the properties. If our operators are not competitive with other healthcare providers and are unable to generate income, they may be unable to make rent and loan payments to us, which could adversely affect our cash flow and financial performance and condition.

The bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of our facility operators could significantly delay our ability to collect unpaid rents or require us to find new operators.

Our financial position and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by any of our major operators, including bankruptcy, insolvency or a general downturn in the business, or in the event any of our major operators do not renew or extend their relationship with us as their lease terms expire.

We are exposed to the risk that our operators may not be able to meet their obligations, which may result in their bankruptcy or insolvency. Although our leases and loans provide us the right to terminate an investment, evict an operator, demand immediate repayment and other remedies, the bankruptcy laws

22




afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. An operator in bankruptcy may be able to restrict our ability to collect unpaid rents or interest during the bankruptcy proceeding.

Tenet Healthcare Corporation and Sunrise Senior Living account for a significant percentage of our revenues and are currently experiencing significant legal, financial and regulatory difficulties.

During 2006, Tenet Healthcare Corporation and Sunrise Senior Living accounted for approximately 9% and 5%, respectively, of our revenues. The properties managed by Sunrise were acquired from CRP on October 5, 2006. According to public disclosures, Tenet and Sunrise are experiencing significant legal, financial and regulatory difficulties. We cannot predict with certainty the impact, if any, of the outcome of these uncertainties on our consolidated financial statements. The failure or inability of Tenet or Sunrise to pay its obligations could materially reduce our revenue, net income and cash flows, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock and could cause us to incur impairment charges or a loss on the sale of the properties.

Our operators are faced with increased litigation and rising insurance costs that may affect their ability to make their lease or mortgage payments.

In some states, advocacy groups have been created to monitor the quality of care at healthcare facilities, and these groups have brought litigation against operators. Also, in several instances, private litigation by patients has succeeded in winning very large damage awards for alleged abuses. The effect of this litigation and potential litigation has been to materially increase the costs incurred by our operators for monitoring and reporting quality of care compliance. In addition, the cost of liability and medical malpractice insurance has increased and may continue to increase so long as the present litigation environment affecting the operations of healthcare facilities continues. Continued cost increases could cause our operators to be unable to make their lease or mortgage payments, potentially decreasing our revenue and increasing our collection and litigation costs. Moreover, to the extent we are required to take back the affected facilities, our revenue from those facilities could be reduced or eliminated for an extended period of time.

Decline in the skilled nursing sector and changes to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates may have significant adverse consequences to us.

During 2006, our skilled nursing properties accounted for approximately 7% of our revenues. Certain of our skilled nursing operators and facilities continue to experience operating problems in part due to a national nursing shortage, increased liability insurance costs, and low levels of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. Due to economic challenges facing many states, nursing homes will likely continue to be under-funded. These challenges have had, and may continue to have, an adverse effect on our long-term care facilities and facility operators.

We may rely on credit enhancements to our leases for minimum rent payments.

Our leases may have credit enhancement provisions, such as guarantees or shortfall reserves provided by tenants or operators. These credit enhancement provisions may terminate at either a specific time during the lease term or once net operating income of the property exceeds a specified amount. These provisions may also have limits on the overall amount of the credit enhancement. After the termination of a credit enhancement, or in the event that the maximum limit of a credit enhancement is reached, we may only look to the tenant to make lease payments. In the event that a credit enhancement has expired or the maximum limit has been reached, or in the event that a provider of a credit enhancement is unable to meet its obligations, our results of operations and our cash available for distribution could be adversely affected if our properties are unable to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet minimum rent payments and the tenants do not otherwise have the resources to make the rent payments. Our tenants may be thinly

23




capitalized entities that rely on the cash flow generated from the properties to fund rent obligations under their lease.

Risks Related to Real Estate Investment and Our Structure

We rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if our access to such capital is difficult or on commercially unreasonable terms, we may not be able to meet maturing commitments or make future investments necessary to grow our business.

In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we are required, among other things, to distribute to our stockholders each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. Because of this distribution requirement, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs, including capital needs in connection with acquisitions, from cash retained from operations. As a result, we rely on external sources of capital. If we are unable to obtain needed capital at all or only on unfavorable terms from these sources, we might not be able to make the investments needed to grow our business, or to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature, which could negatively affect the ratings of our debt and even, in extreme circumstances, affect our ability to continue operations. Our access to capital depends upon a number of factors over which we have little or no control, including:

·       general market conditions;

·       the market’s perception of our growth potential;

·       our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions; and

·       the market price of the shares of our capital stock.

If we are unable to identify and purchase suitable healthcare facilities at a favorable cost, we will be unable to continue to grow through acquisitions.

Our ability to grow through acquisitions is integral to our business strategy and requires us to identify suitable acquisition candidates that meet our criteria and are compatible with our growth strategy. The acquisition and financing of healthcare facilities at favorable costs is highly competitive. We may not be successful in identifying suitable property or other assets that meet our acquisition criteria or in consummating acquisitions on satisfactory terms or at all. If we cannot identify and purchase a sufficient quantity of healthcare facilities at favorable prices, or if we are unable to finance such acquisitions on commercially favorable terms, our business will suffer.

Unforeseen costs associated with the acquisition of new properties could reduce our profitability.

Our business strategy contemplates future acquisitions. The acquisitions we make may not prove to be successful. We might encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities. Further, newly acquired properties might require significant management attention that would otherwise be devoted to our ongoing business. We might never realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition, which could adversely affect our profitability.

Since real estate investments are illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when we desire.

Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. We may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in the real estate market. This inability to respond to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our ability to service our debt. The real estate market is affected by many factors that are beyond our control, including:

·       adverse changes in national and local economic and market conditions;

·       changes in interest rates and in the availability, costs and terms of financing;

24




·       changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning and other ordinances and costs of compliance with laws and regulations;

·       the ongoing need for capital improvements, particularly in older structures;

·       changes in operating expenses; and

·       civil unrest, acts of war and natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, which may result in uninsured and underinsured losses.

We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. In addition, there are provisions under the federal income tax laws applicable to REITs that may limit our ability to recognize the full economic benefit from a sale of our assets. These factors and any others that would impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Transfers of healthcare facilities generally require regulatory approvals, and alternative uses of healthcare facilities are limited.

Because transfers of healthcare facilities may be subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations and other types of real estate, there may be delays in transferring operations of our facilities to successor operators or we may be prohibited from transferring operations to a successor operator. In addition, substantially all of our properties are healthcare facilities that may not be easily adapted to non-healthcare-related uses. If we are unable to transfer properties at times opportune to us, our revenue and operations may suffer.

We may experience uninsured or underinsured losses.

We generally require our operators to secure and maintain comprehensive liability and property insurance that covers us, as well as the operators, on most of our properties. Some types of losses, however, either may be uninsurable or too expensive to insure against. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. We cannot assure you that material losses in excess of insurance proceeds will not occur in the future.

Increases in interest rates may increase our interest expense and adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness.

At December 31, 2006, our total consolidated indebtedness was approximately $6.2 billion, of which approximately $1.7 billion, or 27%, is subject to variable interest rates. This variable rate debt had a weighted average interest rate of approximately 6.1% per annum. Increases in interest rates on this variable rate debt would increase our interest expense, which could harm our cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness.

Our acquisition of additional properties may have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial position, credit ratings and/or results of operations

As part of our business strategy, we actively acquire healthcare facilities. Our recent acquisition of CRP and CRC is an example of the execution of this strategy. We may acquire healthcare facilities through various structures, including transactions involving portfolios, single assets, joint ventures and acquisitions of all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs or similar real estate entities. We

25




anticipate that our acquisitions will be financed through a combination of methods, including proceeds from equity and/or debt offerings, advances under our credit facilities and other incurrence or assumption of indebtedness. Any significant acquisition or series of acquisitions financed by incurrence of indebtedness may cause us to become highly leveraged and/or have a negative impact on the credit ratings of our senior debt and preferred stock. Additionally, newly acquired properties may fail to perform as expected. Inaccurate assumptions regarding future rental or occupancy rates could result in overly optimistic estimates of future revenues. Similarly, we may underestimate future operating expenses or the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position.

If we are unable to successfully integrate the operations of CRP and other target companies, our business and earnings may be negatively affected.

Mergers involve the integration of companies that have previously operated independently. Successful integration of the operations of these companies depend primarily on our ability to consolidate operations, systems, procedures, properties and personnel and to eliminate redundancies and costs. Mergers also pose other risks commonly associated with similar transactions, including unanticipated liabilities, unexpected costs and the diversion of management’s attention to the integration of our operations with those of the target companies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate CRP or other target companies’ operations without encountering difficulties, including, but not limited to, the loss of key employees, the disruption of its respective ongoing businesses or possible inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies. Estimated cost savings are projected to come from various areas that our management has identified through the due diligence and integration planning process. If we have difficulties with any of these areas, we might not achieve the economic benefits we expect to result from the merger, and this may hurt our business and earnings. In addition, we may experience greater than expected costs or difficulties relating to the integration of the business of CRP or other target companies and/or may not realize expected cost savings from mergers within the expected time frame, if at all.

Our business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting.

The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While management will continue to review the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives all of the time. In certain circumstances, the effectiveness of internal controls is dependent on information received from independent third parties. For example, we consolidate our investments in certain variable interest entities (“VIEs”) when it is determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If management of the consolidated VIEs fails to provide us necessary financial information either in a timely manner or at all, it could adversely impact our financial reporting and our internal controls over financial reporting. Deficiencies, including any material weakness, in our internal controls over financial reporting, which may occur in the future, could result in misstatements of our results of operations, restatements of our financial statements, a decline in our stock price, or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

We lease 76 properties to a total of 9 tenants that have been identified as VIEs. We acquired these leases (variable interests) on October 5, 2006 in our acquisition of CRP. CRP determined they were not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and we are generally required to carry forward CRP’s accounting conclusions after the acquisition relative to their primary beneficiary assessment. We may need to reassess whether we are the primary beneficiary in the future upon the occurrence of a reconsideration event, as defined by FIN 46R. If we determine that we are the primary beneficiary in the future and consolidate the

26




tenant, our financial statements would reflect the tenant’s facility level revenues and expenses rather than lease revenue.

Federal Income Tax Risks

Loss of our tax status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences to us.

We currently operate and have operated commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1985 in a manner that is intended to allow us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. For example, in order to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must satisfy a number of requirements regarding the composition of our assets. Also, we must make distributions to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains. In addition, new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may adversely affect our investors or our ability to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes. Although we believe that we have been organized and have operated in such manner, we can give no assurance that we have qualified or will continue to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes.

If we lose our REIT status, we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to make payments of principal and interest on the debt securities we issue and to make distributions to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT:

·       we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates;

·       we also could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes; and

·       unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.

In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, all distributions to stockholders would be subject to tax as regular corporate dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits and we would not be required to make distributions to stockholders.

As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT also could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and could adversely affect the value of our common stock.

Certain property transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on gain attributable to the transaction.

From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties. Under the Internal Revenue Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties that we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business would be treated as income from a prohibited transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax. Since we acquire properties for investment purposes, we do not believe that our occasional transfers or disposals of property are properly treated as prohibited transactions. However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions. While we believe that the Internal Revenue Service would not prevail in any such dispute, if the Internal Revenue Service were to argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction, then we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the

27




prohibited transaction. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes.

As a result of the CRP merger and the CRC merger, we may have inherited tax liabilities and attributes from CRP and CRC.

Prior to the CRP merger, CRP was organized as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If CRP failed to qualify as a REIT for any of its taxable years, it would be required to pay federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless statutory relief provisions apply, CRP would have been disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which it lost qualification. Because the CRP merger was treated for income tax purposes as if CRP sold all of its assets in a taxable transaction to us, if CRP did not qualify as a REIT for the taxable year of the merger, it would be subject to tax in respect of the built-in gain in all of its assets. “Built-in gain” generally means the excess of the fair market value of an asset over its adjusted tax basis. As successor-in-interest to CRP, we would be required to pay these taxes. After the merger, the nature of the assets that we acquired from CRP and the income we derive from those assets may have an effect on our tax status as a REIT.

In connection with the CRP merger, CRP’s REIT counsel rendered an opinion to us, dated as of the closing date of the merger, to the effect that CRP qualified as a REIT under the Code for the taxable years ending December 31, 1999 generally through December 31, 2005, CRP was organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT, and CRP’s method of operation had enabled CRP to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code for the taxable years ending on or prior to the closing date of the merger. This opinion was based on various assumptions and representations as to factual matters, including representations made by CRP in a factual certificate provided by one of its officers, as well as other oral and written statements of officers and other representatives of CRP and others as to the existence and consequence of certain factual and other matters.

As a result of the CRC merger, we succeeded to the assets and the liabilities of CRC, including any liabilities for unpaid taxes and any tax liabilities created in connection with the CRC merger. At the closing of the CRC merger, we received an opinion of CRC’s counsel, and CRC and its stockholders received an opinion of their counsel, substantially to the effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinions, for federal income tax purposes the CRC merger qualified as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. To the extent that the CRC merger so qualified, no gain or loss was recognized by CRC or us in the CRC merger. If the CRC merger did not qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, the CRC merger would have been treated as a sale of CRC’s assets to HCP in a taxable transaction, and CRC would have recognized taxable gain. In such a case, as CRC’s successor-in-interest, we would be required to pay the tax on any such gain.

Assuming that the CRC merger qualified as a reorganization under the Code, we succeeded to the tax attributes and earnings and profits of CRC. To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute such earnings and profits by the close of the taxable year in which the CRC merger occurred. Any adjustments of CRC’s income for taxable years ending on or before the CRC merger, including as a result of an examination of CRC’s tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service, could affect the calculation of CRC’s earnings and profits. If the Internal Revenue Service were to determine that we acquired earnings and profits from CRC that we failed to distribute prior to the end of the taxable year in which the CRC merger occurred, we could avoid disqualification as a REIT by using “deficiency dividend” procedures. Under these procedures, we generally would be required to distribute any such earnings and profits to our stockholders within 90 days of the determination and pay a statutory interest charge at a specified rate to the Internal Revenue Service.

28




The opinions of counsel delivered in connection with the CRP merger and the CRC merger represent the best legal judgment of counsel and are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the courts. None of us, CRP or CRC has requested nor will request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service as to the status of CRP as a REIT or the tax consequences of the CRC merger, and there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with the conclusions in the above-described opinions.

ITEM 1B.       Unresolved Staff Comments

None

ITEM 2.                Properties

We are organized to invest in income-producing healthcare-related facilities. In evaluating potential investments, we consider such factors as:

·       Location, construction quality, age, condition and design of the property;

·       Geographic area, proximity to other healthcare facilities, type of property and demographic profile;

·       Whether the rent provides a competitive market return to our investors;

·       Duration, rental rates, tenant quality and other attributes of in-place leases;

·       Current and anticipated cash flow and its adequacy to meet our operational needs;

·       Availability of security such as letters of credit, security deposits, and guarantees;

·       Potential for capital appreciation;

·       Expertise and reputation of the operator;

·       Occupancy and demand for similar health facilities in the same or nearby communities;

·       An adequate mix between private and government sponsored patients at health facilities;

·       Availability of qualified operators or property managers or whether we can manage the property;

·       Potential alternative uses of the facilities;

·       Regulatory and reimbursement environment in which the properties operate;

·       Tax laws related to real estate investment trusts;

·       Prospects for liquidity through financing or refinancing; and

·       Our cost of capital.

29




The following summarizes our direct property investments and interests held through consolidated joint ventures and mortgage loans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 (square feet and dollars in thousands).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

Facility Location

 

 

 

Number of
Facilities

 

Capacity(1)

 

Investment(2)

 

Rental
Revenues

 

Operating
Expenses

 

 

Owned Properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hospitals:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Beds)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

California

 

 

4

 

 

 

745

 

 

 

$

237,805

 

 

$

27,105

 

 

$

 

 

Florida

 

 

2

 

 

 

312

 

 

 

75,719

 

 

9,896

 

 

 

 

Kansas

 

 

2

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

27,021

 

 

3,523

 

 

 

 

Louisiana

 

 

4

 

 

 

412

 

 

 

73,780

 

 

5,948

 

 

 

 

Texas

 

 

7

 

 

 

326

 

 

 

108,888

 

 

7,349

 

 

 

 

Other (11 States)

 

 

14

 

 

 

1,416

 

 

 

348,181

 

 

40,660

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

3,356

 

 

 

$

871,394

 

 

$

94,481

 

 

$

 

 

Skilled Nursing:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Beds)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

California

 

 

8

 

 

 

819

 

 

 

$

24,430

 

 

$

3,519

 

 

$

27

 

 

Colorado

 

 

2

 

 

 

240

 

 

 

8,342

 

 

1,466

 

 

 

 

Indiana

 

 

15

 

 

 

1,554

 

 

 

78,495

 

 

10,700

 

 

 

 

Kentucky

 

 

2

 

 

 

188

 

 

 

8,082

 

 

1,178

 

 

 

 

Michigan

 

 

3

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

10,347

 

 

970

 

 

 

 

Nevada

 

 

2

 

 

 

266

 

 

 

13,100

 

 

1,971

 

 

 

 

Ohio

 

 

9

 

 

 

1,194

 

 

 

45,109

 

 

6,885

 

 

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

4

 

 

 

572

 

 

 

12,754

 

 

3,594

 

 

 

 

Texas

 

 

4

 

 

 

570

 

 

 

24,484

 

 

2,678

 

 

 

 

Virginia

 

 

9

 

 

 

934

 

 

 

63,100

 

 

6,259

 

 

 

 

Other (6 States)

 

 

7

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

24,937

 

 

3,033

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

7,404

 

 

 

$

313,180

 

 

$

42,253

 

 

$

94

 

 

Senior Housing:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Units)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama

 

 

4

 

 

 

683

 

 

 

$

143,123

 

 

$

4,084

 

 

$

1,700

 

 

California

 

 

35

 

 

 

3,778

 

 

 

652,371

 

 

26,712

 

 

111

 

 

Colorado

 

 

5

 

 

 

871

 

 

 

168,931

 

 

6,285

 

 

 

 

Florida

 

 

44

 

 

 

4,979

 

 

 

566,406

 

 

34,395

 

 

3,083

 

 

Illinois

 

 

9

 

 

 

686

 

 

 

131,600

 

 

2,368

 

 

 

 

New Jersey

 

 

10

 

 

 

888

 

 

 

182,329

 

 

6,049

 

 

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 

3

 

 

 

700

 

 

 

131,955

 

 

4,184

 

 

 

 

Texas

 

 

38

 

 

 

4,067

 

 

 

391,172

 

 

30,674

 

 

 

 

Virginia

 

 

10

 

 

 

1,321

 

 

 

272,652

 

 

4,900

 

 

 

 

Washington

 

 

12

 

 

 

888

 

 

 

154,707

 

 

7,546

 

 

 

 

Other (28 States)

 

 

101

 

 

 

9,472

 

 

 

1,173,591

 

 

54,303

 

 

7,597

 

 

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

28,333

 

 

 

$

3,968,837

 

 

$

181,500

 

 

$

12,491

 

 

Medical Office Buildings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Sq. Ft.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona

 

 

11

 

 

 

589

 

 

 

$

100,415

 

 

$

8,429

 

 

$

2,964

 

 

California

 

 

16

 

 

 

899

 

 

 

223,615

 

 

20,867

 

 

6,252

 

 

Colorado

 

 

17

 

 

 

913

 

 

 

168,000

 

 

15,619

 

 

6,902

 

 

Florida

 

 

28

 

 

 

1,435

 

 

 

215,610

 

 

8,482

 

 

3,417

 

 

Indiana

 

 

14

 

 

 

763

 

 

 

90,616

 

 

12,764

 

 

6,350

 

 

Kentucky

 

 

7

 

 

 

682

 

 

 

102,569

 

 

10,938

 

 

3,737

 

 

30




 

Tennessee

 

 

18

 

 

 

1,560

 

 

 

$

151,215

 

 

$

8,251

 

 

$

2,969

 

 

Texas

 

 

61

 

 

 

4,249

 

 

 

646,846

 

 

30,829

 

 

12,247

 

 

Utah

 

 

22

 

 

 

950

 

 

 

128,796

 

 

17,176

 

 

4,084

 

 

Washington

 

 

6

 

 

 

586

 

 

 

133,293

 

 

21,182

 

 

8,455

 

 

Other (17 States and Mexico)

 

 

46

 

 

 

2,326

 

 

 

405,717

 

 

22,303

 

 

9,151

 

 

 

 

 

246

 

 

 

14,952

 

 

 

$

2,366,692

 

 

$

176,840

 

 

$

66,528

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Sq. Ft.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

California

 

 

7

 

 

 

581

 

 

 

$

118,445

 

 

$

14,938

 

 

$

4,165

 

 

Connecticut

 

 

3

 

 

 

137

 

 

 

9,303

 

 

1,188

 

 

 

 

North Carolina

 

 

4

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

23,600

 

 

451

 

 

40

 

 

Rhode Island

 

 

2

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

4,274

 

 

520

 

 

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

2

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

12,991

 

 

1,535

 

 

 

 

Other (9 States)

 

 

12

 

 

 

621

 

 

 

94,285

 

 

10,392

 

 

1,804

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

1,626

 

 

 

262,898

 

 

29,024

 

 

6,009

 

 

 

 

 

645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

7,783,001

 

 

$

524,098

 

 

$

85,122

 

 

Senior Housing Facilities held for contribution(3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Units)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

California

 

 

2

 

 

 

353

 

 

 

$

74,100

 

 

$

1,474

 

 

$

 

 

Florida

 

 

6

 

 

 

1,270

 

 

 

308,200

 

 

5,961

 

 

 

 

Illinois

 

 

3

 

 

 

773

 

 

 

191,300

 

 

4,099

 

 

 

 

Rhode Island

 

 

7

 

 

 

901

 

 

 

201,400

 

 

3,379

 

 

 

 

Other (2 States)

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,336

 

 

 

325,600

 

 

5,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

5,633

 

 

 

$

1,100,600

 

 

$

20,043

 

 

$

 

 

Medical Office Building held for contribution(3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

5,348

 

 

$

1,511

 

 

Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,314

 

 

1,446

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,017

 

 

334

 

 

South Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,332

 

 

452

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

869

 

 

321

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,880

 

 

4,064

 

 

Total owned properties

 

 

670

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

8,883,601

 

 

$

557,021

 

 

$

89,186

 

 


(1)          Senior housing facilities are apartment-like facilities and are therefore stated in units (studio, one or two bedroom apartments). Medical office buildings and other healthcare facilities are measured in square feet. Hospitals and skilled nursing facilities are measured by licensed bed count.

(2)          Investment for owned properties represents the carrying amount of real estate assets, including intangibles, after adding back accumulated depreciation and amortization, and excludes assets held for sale and classified as discontinued operations.

(3)          On January 5, 2007, we formed a joint venture for 25 senior housing assets and retained a 35% interest in the venture. The carrying value of the 25 senior housing facilities is classified as real estate held for contribution on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. On October 13, 2006, we formed a joint venture with 13 MOBs and retained an effective 26% interest in the venture. The disposition of a portion of our interest in the 25 senior housing assets and 13 MOBs met the definition

31




under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS No. 144”) for the assets to qualify as held for sale, however, the operations are not classified as discontinued operations resulting from our continuing interest in the ventures. The operating results of these properties prior to the formation of the ventures are included in the Company’s continuing operations. The number of properties, capacity, square footage, and investment for the 13 MOBs are included under the caption of unconsolidated joint ventures.

ITEM 3.                Legal Proceedings

During 2006 and at December 31, 2006, we were not a party to any material legal proceedings.

ITEM 4.                Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

32




PART II

ITEM 5.                Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(a)

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Set forth below for the fiscal quarters indicated are the reported high and low closing prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange. On March 2, 2004, each shareholder received one additional share of common stock for each share they owned resulting from a 2-for-1 stock split announced by the Company on January 22, 2004. The stock split has been reflected in all periods presented.

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

 

First Quarter

 

$

28.81

 

$

25.89

 

$

27.45

 

$

23.45

 

$

29.09

 

$

25.30

 

Second Quarter

 

27.82

 

25.37

 

28.43

 

23.45

 

28.60

 

21.68

 

Third Quarter

 

31.05

 

26.40

 

28.68

 

25.39

 

26.00

 

23.89

 

Fourth Quarter

 

36.88

 

30.10

 

27.00

 

24.44

 

28.85

 

26.18

 

 

At January 31, 2007, there were approximately 20,000 stockholders of record and approximately 167,000 beneficial stockholders of our common stock.

It has been our policy to declare quarterly dividends to the common stock shareholders so as to comply with applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code governing REITs. The cash dividends per share paid on common stock are set forth below:

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

First Quarter

 

$

0.4250

 

$

0.4200

 

$

0.4175

 

Second Quarter

 

0.4250

 

0.4200

 

0.4175

 

Third Quarter

 

0.4250

 

0.4200

 

0.4175

 

Fourth Quarter

 

0.4250

 

0.4200

 

0.4175

 

 

HCPI/Indiana.   On December 4, 1998, we completed the acquisition of a managing member interest in HCPI/Indiana, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCPI/Indiana”), in exchange for a cash contribution of approximately $31.6 million. In connection with this acquisition, three individuals affiliated with Bremmer & Wiley, Inc. contributed a portfolio of seven medical office buildings to HCPI/Indiana with an aggregate equity value (net of assumed debt) of approximately $2.8 million. In exchange for this capital contribution, the contributing individuals received 89,452 non-managing member units of HCPI/Indiana.

The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Indiana, LLC provides that only we are authorized to act on behalf of HCPI/Indiana and that we have responsibility for the management of its business.

Each non-managing member unit of HCPI/Indiana is exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of two shares of our common stock or, at our option, two shares of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). HCPI/Indiana relied on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the issuance and sale of the non-managing member units. We have registered 178,904 shares of our common stock for issuance from time to time in exchange for units, and as of December 31, 2006, 75,364 of such shares have been issued in exchange for units.

HCPI/Utah.   On January 25, 1999, we completed the acquisition of a managing member interest in HCPI/Utah, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCPI/Utah”), in exchange for a cash contribution of approximately $18.9 million. In connection with this acquisition, several entities affiliated

33




with The Boyer Company, L.C. (“Boyer”) contributed a portfolio of 14 medical office buildings (including two ground leaseholds associated therewith) to HCPI/Utah with an aggregate equity value (net of assumed debt) of approximately $18.9 million. In exchange for this capital contribution, the contributing entities received 593,247 non-managing member units of HCPI/Utah. At the initial closing, HCPI/Utah was also granted the right to acquire additional medical office buildings. Four additional buildings have been contributed to HCPI/Utah and the contributing entities received 133,134 non-managing member units of HCPI/Utah. An additional 56,488 non-managing member units were received by the contributing entities as a result of earn-out agreements on certain of the buildings.

The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Utah provides that only we are authorized to act on behalf of HCPI/Utah and that we have responsibility for the management of its business.

Each non-managing member unit of HCPI/Utah is exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of two shares of our common stock or, at our option, two shares of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). HCPI/Utah relied on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the issuance and sale of the non-managing member units. We have registered 1,565,738 shares of our common stock for issuance from time to time in exchange for units, and as of December 31, 2006, 454,044 of such shares have been issued in exchange for units.

HCPI/Utah II.   On August 17, 2001, we completed the acquisition of a managing member interest in HCPI/Utah II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCPI/Utah II”), in exchange for a cash contribution of approximately $32.8 million. In connection with the acquisition, several entities affiliated with Boyer contributed a portfolio of four medical office buildings, six healthcare laboratory and biotech research facilities (seven buildings are owned through ground leasehold interests) and undeveloped land with an aggregate equity value (net of assumed debt) of approximately $25.7 million to HCPI/Utah II. In exchange for this capital contribution, the contributing entities received 738,923 non-managing member units of HCPI/Utah II. At the initial closing, HCPI/Utah II was also granted the right to acquire eight additional medical office buildings. Subsequent contributions have resulted in the acquisition of six additional buildings. In connection with the contribution of these six additional buildings, the contributing entities received 184,169 non-managing member units subsequent to the initial closing. An additional 93,276 non-managing member units were received by the contributing entities as a result of earn-out agreements on certain buildings.

The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Utah II provides that only we are authorized to act on behalf of HCPI/Utah II and that we have responsibility for the management of its business.

Each non-managing member unit of HCPI/Utah II is exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of two shares of our common stock or, at our option, two shares of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). HCPI/Utah II relied on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the issuance and sale of the non-managing member units. We have registered 2,032,736 shares of our common stock for issuance from time to time in exchange for units, and as of December 31, 2006, 411,724 of such shares have been issued in exchange for units.

HCPI/Tennessee.   On October 2, 2003, we completed the acquisition of a managing member interest in HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCPI/Tennessee”), in exchange for the contribution of property interests with an aggregate equity value of approximately $7.0 million and $169,000 in cash. In connection with the formation of the LLC, MedCap Properties, LLC (“MedCap”) contributed certain property interests to HCPI/Tennessee with an aggregate equity value of approximately $48.2 million. In exchange for this capital contribution, MedCap received 1,064,539 non-managing member units of HCPI/Tennessee. MedCap distributed its non-managing member units in HCPI/Tennessee to the

34




owners of MedCap, including Charles A. Elcan, who is now an Executive Vice President of HCP. On October 19, 2005, an unrelated individual contributed, and others sold, interests in seven additional properties to HCPI/Tennessee. In connection with the contribution, the contributing party received 214,872 non-managing member units. HCP contributed cash of $15.3 million to HCPI/Tennessee to fund the purchase of interests and received 299,265 managing member units for the contribution.

The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee provides that only we are authorized to act on behalf of HCPI/Tennessee and that we have responsibility for the management of its business.

Each non-managing member unit of HCPI/Tennessee is exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of two shares of our common stock or, at our option, two shares of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). HCPI/Tennessee relied on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the issuance and sale of the non-managing member units. We have registered 2,129,078 shares of our common stock for issuance from time to time in exchange for units, and as of December 31, 2006, 329,183 of such shares have been issued in exchange for units.

HCP DR California.   On July 22, 2005, we completed the acquisition of a managing member interest in HCP DR California, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCP DR California”), in exchange for the contribution of $55.4 million in cash. In connection with the formation of the LLC, several parties contributed a portfolio of certain property interests in four assisted living facilities with an aggregate equity value (net of assumed debt) of approximately $19.1 million. In exchange for this capital contribution, the contributors received 699,454 non-managing member units of HCP DR California.

The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCP DR California provides that only we are authorized to act on behalf of HCP DR California and that we have responsibility for the management of its business.

Each non-managing member unit of HCP DR California is exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of one share of our common stock or, at our option, one share of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). HCP DR California relied on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the issuance and sale of the non-managing member units. We have registered 699,454 shares of our common stock for issuance from time to time in exchange for units, and as of December 31, 2006, 7,200 of such shares have been issued in exchange for units.

HCP DR Alabama.   On March 15, 2006, we completed the acquisition of a managing member interest in HCP DR Alabama, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCP DR Alabama”), in exchange for the contribution of $23.1 million in cash. In connection with the formation of the LLC, several parties contributed a portfolio of certain property interests in two medical office buildings with an aggregate equity value of approximately $5.5 million. In exchange for this capital contribution, the contributors received 194,181 non-managing member units of HCP DR Alabama.

The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCP DR Alabama provides that only we are authorized to act on behalf of HCP DR Alabama and that we have responsibility for the management of its business.

Each non-managing member unit of HCP DR Alabama is exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of one share of our common stock or, at our option, one share of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). HCP DR Alabama relied on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the issuance and sale of the non-managing member units. As of December 31, 2006, we have not registered any shares of our common stock for issuance in exchange for non-managing member units of HCP DR Alabama.

35




(b)

None.

(c)

The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of our common stock made by or on our behalf during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.

Period Covered

 

 

 

Total Number Of
Shares
Purchased(1)

 

Average Price
Paid Per Share

 

Total Number Of Shares
(Or Units) Purchased As
Part Of Publicly
Announced Plans Or
Programs

 

Maximum Number (Or
Approximate Dollar Value)
Of Shares (Or Units) That
May Yet Be Purchased
Under The Plans Or
Programs

 

October 1-31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

November 1-30, 2006

 

 

21,716

 

 

 

$

34.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 1-31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

21,716

 

 

 

$

34.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)          Represents restricted shares withheld under our Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting of restricted shares. Our Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, provides that the value of the shares withheld shall be the closing price of our common stock on the date the relevant transaction occurs.

36




ITEM 6.                Selected Financial Data

Set forth below is our selected financial data as of and for each of the years in the five year period ended December 31, 2006.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Income statement data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

619,087

 

$

421,787

 

$

366,099

 

$

317,846

 

$

271,086

 

Income from continuing operations

 

106,630

 

115,589

 

114,147

 

103,258

 

88,969

 

Net income applicable to common shares

 

396,417

 

151,927

 

147,910

 

121,849

 

112,480

 

Income from continuing operations applicable to common shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

0.58

 

0.70

 

0.71

 

0.53

 

0.56

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

0.57

 

0.70

 

0.70

 

0.53

 

0.55

 

Net income applicable to common shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

2.67

 

1.13

 

1.12

 

0.98

 

0.98

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

2.66

 

1.12

 

1.11

 

0.97

 

0.96

 

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

10,012,749

 

3,597,265

 

3,104,526

 

3,035,957

 

2,748,417

 

Debt obligations(1)

 

6,202,015

 

1,956,946

 

1,487,291

 

1,407,284

 

1,333,848

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

3,294,036

 

1,399,766

 

1,419,442

 

1,440,617

 

1,280,889

 

Other data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid

 

266,814

 

248,389

 

243,250

 

223,231

 

213,349

 

Dividends paid per common share

 

1.70

 

1.68

 

1.67

 

1.66

 

1.63

 


(1)          Includes bank lines of credit, senior unsecured notes, mortgage debt, and other debt.

37




ITEM 7.                Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Annual Report that are not historical factual statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements include, among other things, statements regarding the intent, belief or expectations of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. and its officers and can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “should” and other comparable terms or the negative thereof. In addition, we, through our senior management, from time to time make forward-looking oral and written public statements concerning our expected future operations and other developments. Readers are cautioned that, while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith belief and best judgment based upon current information, they are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. In addition to the factors set forth under “Part I, Item–A—Risk Factors” in this Annual Report, readers should consider the following:

(a)          Legislative, regulatory, or other changes in the healthcare industry at the local, state or federal level which increase the costs of, or otherwise affect the operations of, our tenants and borrowers;

(b)         Changes in the reimbursement available to our tenants and borrowers by governmental or private payors, including changes in Medicare and Medicaid payment levels and the availability and cost of third-party insurance coverage;

(c)          Competition for tenants and borrowers, including with respect to new leases and mortgages and the renewal or rollover of existing leases;

(d)         Availability of suitable healthcare facilities to acquire at favorable prices and the competition for such acquisition and financing of healthcare facilities;

(e)          The ability of our tenants and borrowers to operate our properties in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase revenues and to generate sufficient income to make rent and loan payments;

(f)            The financial weakness of some operators, including potential bankruptcies, which results in uncertainties regarding our ability to continue to realize the full benefit of such operators’ leases;

(g)          Changes in national or regional economic conditions, including changes in interest rates and the availability and cost of capital;

(h)         The risk that we will not be able to sell or lease facilities that are currently vacant;

(i)            The potential costs of SB 1953 compliance with respect to our hospital in Tarzana, California;

(j)             The financial, legal and regulatory difficulties of significant operators of our properties, including Tenet, HealthSouth and Sunrise;

(k)         The potential impact of existing and future litigation matters; and

(l)            Our ability to achieve expected synergies, operating efficiencies and other benefits within expected time-frames or at all, or within expected cost projections, to execute our delevering strategy and to preserve the goodwill of the acquired businesses.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

38




Executive Summary

We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that invests in healthcare-related properties primarily located throughout the United States. We develop, acquire and manage healthcare real estate and provide mortgage financing to healthcare providers. We invest directly, often structuring sale-leaseback transactions, and through joint ventures. At December 31, 2006, our real estate portfolio, excluding assets held for sale but including assets held through joint ventures and mortgage loans, consisted of interests in 731 facilities.

Our business strategy is based on three principles: (i) opportunistic investing, (ii) portfolio diversification and (iii) conservative financing. We actively redeploy capital from investments with lower return potential into assets with higher return potential, and recycle capital from shorter-term to longer-term investments. We make investments where the expected risk-adjusted return exceeds our cost of capital and strive to leverage our operator and other business relationships.

Our strategy contemplates acquiring and developing properties on favorable terms. We attempt to structure transactions that are tax-advantaged and mitigate risks in our underwriting process. Generally, we prefer larger, more complex private transactions that leverage our management team’s experience and our infrastructure. In addition, we follow a disciplined approach to enhancing the value of our existing portfolio, including the ongoing evaluation of properties that no longer fit our strategy for potential disposition.

We primarily generate revenue by leasing healthcare-related properties under long-term leases. Most of our rents and other earned income from leases are received under triple-net leases; however, MOB rents are typically structured as gross or modified gross leases. Accordingly, for MOBs we incur certain property operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management fees, utilities and insurance. Our growth depends, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income from leases by increasing occupancy levels and rental rates, (ii) maximize tenant recoveries given underlying lease structures, and (iii) control operating and other expenses. Our operations are impacted by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions.

Access to external capital on favorable terms is critical to the success of our strategy. We attempt to match the long-term duration of our leases with long-term fixed-rate financing. At December 31, 2006, 27% of our consolidated debt is at variable interest rates, which includes a $0.5 billion term loan that was used to pay the cash consideration of our merger with CRP. We repaid the remaining balance of the term loan with proceeds from our January 2007 capital market transactions, which further reduced our variable interest rate exposure. We intend to maintain an investment grade rating on our fixed income securities and manage various capital ratios and amounts within appropriate parameters. As of December 31, 2006, our senior debt is rated BBB by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, BBB by Fitch Ratings and Baa3 by Moody’s Investors Service.

Capital market access impacts our cost of capital and our ability to refinance existing indebtedness as it matures, as well as to fund future acquisitions and development through the issuance of additional securities. Our ability to access capital on favorable terms is dependent on various factors, including general market conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our securities, perception of our potential future earnings and cash distributions, and the market price of our capital stock.

Transaction Overview

Mergers with CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. and CNL Retirement Corp.

On October 5, 2006, we closed our merger with CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CRP”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $5.3 billion. In the CRP merger, we paid an aggregate of $2.9 billion of cash, issued 22.8 million shares of our common stock, and we either assumed or refinanced

39




approximately $1.7 billion of CRP’s outstanding debt. We initially financed the cash consideration paid to CRP stockholders and the expenses related to the transaction through an offering of senior notes, a draw down under new term and bridge loan facilities and a new three-year revolving credit facility. Our results of operations for 2006 include the results of the combined company beginning on October 5, 2006. For more information about the CRP merger, see Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Simultaneous with the closing of the merger with CRP, we also merged with CNL Retirement Corp. (“CRC”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $120 million, which included the issuance of 4.4 million shares of our common stock.

Investment Transactions

During 2006, including the CRP merger discussed above, we acquired interests in properties aggregating $5.9 billion with an average yield of 6.9%. Our 2006 investments were made in the following healthcare sectors: (i) 77% senior housing facilities; (ii) 19% MOBs; (iii) 3% hospitals; and (iv) 1% other healthcare facilities. Our 2006 real estate investments included the following:

·       During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we acquired 13 medical office buildings for $138 million, including non-managing member LLC units (“DownREIT units”) valued at $6 million, in related transactions. The 13 buildings, with 730,000 rentable square feet, have an initial yield of 7.3%.

·       On May 31, 2006, we acquired nine assisted living and independent living facilities for $99 million, including assumed debt valued at $61 million, through a sale-leaseback transaction. These facilities have an initial lease term of ten years, with two ten-year renewal options. The initial annual lease rate is approximately 8.0% with annual CPI-based escalators.

·       On November 30, 2006, we acquired four assisted living and independent living facilities for $51 million, through a sale-leaseback transaction. These facilities have an initial lease term of ten years, with two ten-year renewal options. The initial annual lease rate is approximately 8.0% with annual escalators based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).

During 2006, we sold 83 properties for $512 million and recognized gains of approximately $275 million. These sales included 69 SNFs sold on December 1, 2006, for $392 million with gains of approximately $226 million. On or before December 1, 2006, tenants for nine SNFs exercised rights of first refusal to acquire such facilities. The sales of the nine SNFs for $52 million are expected to be completed by June 30, 2007.

On November 17, 2006, we purchased $300 million senior secured notes issued by a HCA Inc. These notes accrue interest at 9.625%, mature on November 15, 2016, and are secured by second-priority liens on the HCA’s and its subsidiary guarantors’ assets.

On January 31, 2007, we acquired three long-term acute care hospitals and received proceeds of $36 million in exchange for 11 skilled nursing facilities valued at approximately $77 million. The three acquired properties have an initial lease term of ten years with two ten-year renewal options, and initial contractual yield of 12% with escalators based on the lessee’s revenue growth. The acquired properties are included in a new master lease that contains 14 properties leased to the same operator.

On February 9, 2007, we acquired the Medical City Dallas campus, which includes two hospital towers, six medical office buildings, and three parking garages, for approximately $347 million, including non-managing member LLC units (“DownREIT units’’) valued at $174 million. The initial yield on this campus is approximately 7.3%.

40




Joint Venture Transactions

On October 27, 2006, we formed an MOB joint venture with an institutional capital partner. The joint venture includes 13 properties valued at $140 million and encumbered by $92 million of mortgage debt. Upon formation, we received approximately $36 million in proceeds, including a one-time acquisition fee of $0.7 million. We retained an effective 26% interest in the venture, will act as the managing member, and will receive ongoing asset management fees.

On November 30, 2006, we acquired the interest held by an affiliate of General Electric Company (“GE”) in HCP Medical Office Portfolio, LLC (“HCP MOP”), for $141 million. We are now the sole owner of the venture and its 59 MOBs, which have approximately four million rentable square feet. At closing, $251 million of mortgage debt encumbered these MOBs.

On January 5, 2007, we formed a senior housing joint venture with an institutional capital partner. The joint venture includes 25 properties valued at $1.1 billion and encumbered by a $686 million secured debt facility. Upon formation, we received approximately $280 million in proceeds, including a one-time acquisition fee of $5.4 million. Including the $446 million recently received from the secured debt facility with Fannie Mae discussed below, we received $726 million in total proceeds. We retained a 35% interest in the venture, will act as the managing member, and will receive ongoing asset management fees.

Capital Market Transactions

During 2006, in addition to the mortgage debt issued under the Fannie Mae facility discussed below, we obtained $165 million of ten-year mortgage financing with a weighted average effective yield of 6.36% in five separate transactions. We received net proceeds of $162 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

On February 27, 2006, we issued $150 million of 5.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.071% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.788%. We received net proceeds of $149 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

On September 19, 2006, we issued $1 billion of senior unsecured notes, which consisted of $300 million of floating rate notes due in 2008, $300 million of 5.95% notes due in 2011, and $400 million of 6.30% notes due in 2016. We received net proceeds of $994 million, which together with cash on hand and borrowings under the new credit facilities were used to repay our then existing credit facility and to finance the CRP merger.

On October 5, 2006, in connection with the CRP merger, we entered into credit agreements with a syndicate of banks providing for aggregate borrowings of $3.4 billion. The credit facilities included a $0.7 billion bridge loan, a $1.7 billion two-year term loan, and a $1.0 billion three-year revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2006, we had repaid the bridge loan and borrowings under the term loan were reduced to $0.5 billion. In addition, through our capital market transactions in January 2007, we fully repaid the balance outstanding under the term loan.

On November 10, 2006, we issued 33.5 million shares of common stock. We received net proceeds of approximately $960 million, which were used to repay our bridge loan facility and borrowings under our term loan and revolving credit facilities.

On December 4, 2006, we issued $400 million of 5.65% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.768% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.69%. We received net proceeds of $396 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

On December 21, 2006, in anticipation of our senior housing joint venture that closed on January 5, 2007, we expanded an existing secured debt facility with Fannie Mae to $686 million, receiving $446 million

41




in proceeds. The Fannie Mae facility bears interest at a weighted average rate of 5.66%. The funds from the expanded debt facility were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

On January 19, 2007, we issued 6.8 million shares of common stock. We received net proceeds of approximately $261 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

On January 22, 2007, we issued $500 million of 6.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2017. The notes were priced at 99.323% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 6.09%. We received net proceeds of $493 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan and revolving credit facilities.

Other Events

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we issued approximately 797,000 shares of our common stock under our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan at an average price per share of $28.68 for proceeds of $22.9 million.

Quarterly dividends paid during 2006 aggregated $1.70 per share. On January 29, 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.445 per share. The common stock dividend will be paid on February 21, 2007, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 5, 2007. The annualized rate of distribution for 2007 is $1.78, compared with $1.70 for 2006, which represents a 4.7% increase. Our Board of Directors has determined to continue its policy of considering dividend increases on an annual rather than quarterly basis.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base estimates on our experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, it is possible that different accounting would have been applied, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Principles of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HCP, its wholly owned subsidiaries and its controlled, through voting rights or other means, joint ventures. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

We have adopted Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as revised (“FIN 46R”), effective January 1, 2004 for variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 and effective in fiscal year 2003 for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. FIN 46R provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. A variable interest entity is broadly defined as an entity where either (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. We consolidate investments in VIEs when it is determined that we are the primary beneficiary of

42




the VIE at either the creation of the variable interest entity or upon the occurrence of a reconsideration event. The adoption of FIN 46R resulted in the consolidation of five joint ventures with aggregate assets of $18.5 million, effective January 1, 2004, that were previously accounted for under the equity method. The consolidation of these joint ventures did not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

We lease 76 properties to a total of 9 tenants that have been identified as VIEs. We acquired these leases (variable interests) on October 5, 2006 in our acquisition of CRP. CRP determined they were not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and we are generally required to carry forward CRP’s accounting conclusions after the acqusition relative to their primary beneficiary assessment. We may need to reassess whether we are the primary beneficiary in the future upon the occurrence of a reconsideration event, as defined by FIN 46R. If we determine that we are the primary beneficiary in the future and consolidate the tenant, our financial statements would reflect the tenant’s facility level revenues and expenses rather than lease revenue. Our maximum exposure to losses resulting from our involvement in these VIEs is limited to the future minimum lease payments to be received from these leases, which totaled $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2006. If we are required to consolidate any VIE in the future, we will depend on the VIE to provide us timely financial information, and we will rely on the internal controls of the VIE. If the VIE does not provide us with timely financial information, or has deficiencies in its financial reporting internal controls, this may adversely impact our financial reporting and our internal controls over financial reporting.

We adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”) 04-5, Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (“EITF 04-5”), effective June 2005. The issue concludes as to what rights held by the limited partner(s) preclude consolidation in circumstances in which the sole general partner would otherwise consolidate the limited partnership in accordance with GAAP. The assessment of limited partners’ rights and their impact on the presumption of control of the limited partnership by the sole general partner should be made when an investor becomes the sole general partner and should be reassessed if (i) there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, (ii) the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or (iii) there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. This EITF also applies to managing members in limited liability companies. The adoption of EITF 04-5 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Investments in entities which we do not consolidate but for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are reported under the equity method. Generally, under the equity method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or loss is included in our operating results.

Revenue Recognition

Rental income from tenants is recognized in accordance with GAAP, including Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”). For leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, we recognize income on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectibility is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis for leases results in recognized revenue exceeding amounts contractually due from tenants. Such cumulative excess amounts are included in other assets and were $35.6 million and $18.4 million, net of allowances, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In the event we determine that collectibility of straight-line rents is not reasonably assured, we limit future recognition to amounts contractually owed, and, where appropriate, we establish an allowance for estimated losses. Certain leases provide for additional rents based upon a percentage of the facility’s revenue in excess of specified base periods or other thresholds. Such revenue is deferred until the related thresholds are achieved.

43




We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our tenants and borrowers on an ongoing basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, security deposits and guarantees, and other matters. We establish provisions and maintain an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the possible inability of our tenants and borrowers to make payments sufficient to recover recognized assets. For straight-line rent amounts, our assessment is based on income recoverable over the term of the lease. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had an allowance of $29.7 million and $21.6 million, respectively, included in other assets, as a result of our determination that collectibility is not reasonably assured for certain straight-line rent amounts.

Real Estate

Real estate, consisting of land, buildings, and improvements, is recorded at cost. We allocate the cost of the acquisition to the acquired tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities, primarily lease related intangibles, based on their estimated fair values in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations.

We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates, third-party appraisals, and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

We record acquired “above and below” market leases at their fair value, using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired, equal to the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options for below-market leases. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors to be considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, we include estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, we consider leasing commissions, legal and other related costs.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We assess the carrying value of our long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable and, with respect to goodwill, at least annually applying a fair-value-based test. If the sum of the expected future net undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset, an impairment loss will be recognized by adjusting the asset’s carrying amount to its estimated fair value. The determination of the fair value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, involves significant judgment. This judgment is based on our analysis and estimates of the future operating results and resulting cash flows of each long-lived asset. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows impacts the determination of fair value.

Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

We use the direct finance method of accounting to record income from direct financing leases. For leases accounted for as direct financing leases, future minimum lease payments are recorded as a receivable. The difference between the rents receivable and the estimated residual values less the cost of the properties is recorded as unearned income. Unearned income is deferred and amortized to income over the lease terms to provide a constant rate of return. Investments in direct financing leases are presented net of unamortized unearned income. Direct financing leases have initial terms that range from

44




5 to 35 years and provide for minimum annual rent. Certain leases contain provisions that allow the tenants to elect to purchase the properties during or at the end of the lease terms for the aggregate initial investment amount plus adjustments, if any, as defined in the lease agreements. Certain leases also permit the Company to require the tenants to purchase the properties at the end of the lease terms.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2006 to the year ended December 31, 2005

On October 5, 2006, we completed our merger with CRP. On November 30, 2006, we acquired the interest held by an affiliate of GE in HCP MOP, which resulted in the consolidation of HCP MOP beginning on that date. The impact on various income statement line items from our merger with CRP and consolidation of HCP MOP are discussed below.

Rental and related revenue.   MOB rental revenue increased 49.5% or $62.8 million to $189.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Approximately $23.4 million of the increase relates to MOBs acquired in the CRP merger and $5.9 million relates to the consolidation of HCP MOP. The remaining increase in MOB rental income primarily relates to the additive effect or our MOB acquisitions in 2006 and 2005.

Triple-net leased rental revenues increased 36.1% or $97.4 million to $367.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Approximately $56.5 million of the increase relates to properties acquired in the CRP merger. The remaining increase in triple-net lease rental revenue of $40.9 million primarily relates to rent escalations and resets, and the additive effect of our other acquisitions in 2006 and 2005, as detailed below:

 

 

Triple-net lease rental revenue
resulting from acquisitions—
for the year ended December 31,

 

Property Type

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Senior housing

 

$

44,322

 

$

15,313

 

$

29,009

 

Hospital

 

710

 

 

710

 

Other healthcare

 

3,002

 

117

 

2,885

 

Total

 

$

48,034

 

$

15,430

 

$

32,604

 

 

Additionally, included in triple-net lease rental revenues are facility-level operating revenues for five senior housing properties that were previously leased on a triple-net basis. Periodically tenants default on their leases, which cause us to take temporary possession of the operations of the facility. We contract with third-party managers to manage these properties until a replacement tenant can be identified or the property can be sold. The operating revenues and expenses for these properties are included in triple-net lease rental revenues and operating expenses, respectively. The increase in reported revenues for these facilities of $1.9 million to $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, was primarily due to us taking possession of two of these properties in 2005 and an increase in overall occupancy of such properties.

Earned income from direct financing leases.   Earned income from direct financing leases of $15 million relates to 32 leased properties acquired from CRP which are accounted for using the direct financing method. At December 31, 2006, these leased properties had a carrying value of $678 million and accrue interest at a weighted average rate of 9.0%.

Equity income.   Equity income increased by $9.5 million to $8.3 million primarily due to our investment in HCP MOP, for which we recorded equity income of $7.8 million and equity losses of $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the year ended

45




December 31, 2006, HCP MOP sold 34 MOBs for approximately $100.7 million, net of transaction costs, and recognized aggregate gains of $19.7 million. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on HCP MOP. On November 30, 2006, we acquired the interest held by an affiliate of GE in HCP MOP, which resulted in us becoming the sole owner of HCP MOP and consolidating its results of operations beginning on that date.

On October 27, 2006, we formed HCP Ventures III, LLC (“HCP Ventures III”), a joint venture with an institutional capital partner, with 13 of our previously 85% owned properties. Beginning on October 27, 2006, HCP Ventures III, in which we retained an effective 26% interest, has been accounted for as an equity method investment.

Investment management fee income.   Management and other fee income increased by $0.7 million to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition fee earned from HCP Ventures III of $0.7 million on October 27, 2006.

Interest and other income.   Interest and other income increased by $11.9 million to $34.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily related to $3.5 million of interest income from a $300 million investment in senior secured notes receivable purchased on November 17, 2006, which accrue interest at a rate of 9.625%. In addition, we recognized income of $7.3 million in connection with a prepayment premium we received in the second quarter of 2006, upon the early repayment of a secured loan receivable of $30.0 million with an original maturity of May 1, 2010 and an interest rate of 11.4%.

Interest expense.   Interest expense increased $106.1 million to $213.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Approximately $42.1 million of the increase was due to the assumption of $1.3 billion of CRP’s outstanding debt and interest related to our term and bridge loans which were used to fund the CRP merger. In addition, we wrote off the unamortized balance of deferred financing fees from the refinancing of our previous revolving line of credit and the early repayment of our bridge loan and portions of our term loan which in the aggregate resulted in interest expense of $9.0 million. The remaining increase was due to increased borrowing levels resulting from the issuance of senior notes, issuance of additional mortgages, and increased borrowing levels on our existing revolving credit facility. This higher interest expense was offset by the repayment of an aggregate of $255 million of senior notes in February and October 2006. As of December 31, 2006, we had repaid the bridge loan and borrowings under the term loan were reduced to $0.5 billion. In addition, through our capital market transactions in January 2007, we fully repaid the balance outstanding under the term loan.

The table below sets forth information with respect to our debt:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Balance:

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

$

4,541,237

 

$

1,663,166

 

Variable rate

 

1,669,031

 

295,265

 

Total

 

$

6,210,268

 

$

1,958,431

 

Percent of total debt:

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

73

%

85

%

Variable rate

 

27

%

15

%

Total

 

100

%

100

%

Weighted average interest rate at end of period:

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

5.91

%

6.33

%

Variable rate

 

6.13

%

4.95

%

Total weighted average rate

 

5.97

%

6.14

%

 

46




Depreciation and amortization.   Depreciation and amortization expense increased 52% or $49.4 million to $144.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Approximately $29.0 million of the increase relates to properties acquired in the CRP merger and $1.6 million relates to the consolidation of HCP MOP. The remaining increase in depreciation and amortization of $18.8 million primarily relates to the additive effect of our other acquisitions in 2006 and 2005.

Operating expenses.   Operating costs increased 50.4% or $29.9 million to $89.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Approximately $8.6 million of the increase relates to properties acquired in the CRP merger and $3.4 million relates to the consolidation of HCP MOP. Operating costs are predominantly related to MOB properties that are leased under gross or modified gross lease agreements where we share certain costs with tenants. Accordingly, the number of properties in our MOB portfolio directly impacts operating costs. Additionally, we contract with third-party property managers for most of our MOB properties. The remaining increase in operating expenses of $17.9 million primarily relates to the effect of our other property acquisitions in 2006 and 2005, as detailed below:

 

 

Operating expenses
resulting from acquisitions—
for the year ended December 31,

 

Property Type

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Medical office building

 

$

16,752

 

$

3,351

 

$

13,401

 

Other healthcare

 

708

 

 

708

 

Total

 

$

17,460

 

$

3,351

 

$

14,109

 

 

Additionally, included in operating expenses are facility-level operating expenses for five senior housing properties that were previously leased on a triple-net basis. Periodically tenants default on their leases, which cause us to take temporary possession of the operations of the facility. We contract with third-party managers to manage these properties until a replacement tenant can be identified or the property can be sold. The operating revenues and expenses for these properties are included in triple-net lease rental revenues and operating expenses, respectively. The increase in reported operating expenses for these facilities of $2.8 million to $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, was primarily due to us taking possession of two of these properties in 2005 and an increase in overall occupancy of such properties.

The presentation of expenses as general and administrative and operating expenses is based on the underlying nature of the expense. Periodically, we review the classification of expenses between categories and make revisions based on changes in the underlying nature of the expense.

General and administrative expenses.   General and administrative expenses increased 48.6% or $15.5 million to $47.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase is primarily due to higher compensation-related expenses of approximately $9.0 million resulting from an increase in full-time employees. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, full-time employees were 165 and 83, respectively. In addition, during 2006 we incurred $5.0 million in merger and integration-related expenses associated with the CRC and CRP mergers. We expect to incur integration costs associated with the CRP merger through 2007.

Discontinued operations.   Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, was $310.9 million compared to $57.5 million for the comparable period in the prior year. The change is due to an increase in gains on real estate dispositions of $259.1 million, net of impairments, and a decline in operating income from discontinued operations of $5.7 million. Discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, includes 113 properties compared to 122 properties classified as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we sold 83 properties for $512 million as compared to 18 properties for $65 million during the year ended December 31, 2005.

47




Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2005 to the year ended December 31, 2004

Rental and related revenue.   MOB rental revenue increased 35.4% to $126.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in MOB rental revenue of $33.2 million primarily relates to the additive effect of our acquisitions in 2005 and 2004, which contributed $26.7 million to rental revenues year over year.

Triple-net lease rental revenues increased 15.2% to $269.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in triple-net lease rental revenue of $35.7 million primarily relates to the additive effect of our acquisitions in 2005 and 2004, as detailed below:

 

 

Triple-net lease rental revenue
resulting from acquisitions—
for the year ended December 31,

 

Property Type

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Senior housing

 

$

44,980

 

$

14,183

 

$

30,797

 

Other healthcare

 

6,091

 

5,566

 

525

 

Total

 

$

51,071

 

$

19,749

 

$

31,322

 

 

We also recognized $5.7 million of rental income during the fourth quarter of 2004 resulting from a change in an estimate related to the collectibility of straight-line rental income from ARC. Additionally, included in triple-net lease rental revenues are facility-level operating revenues for five senior housing properties that were previously leased on a triple-net basis. Periodically tenants default on their leases, which cause us to take temporary possession of the operations of the facility. We contract with third-party managers to manage these properties until a replacement tenant can be identified or the property can be sold. The operating revenues and expenses for these properties are included in triple-net lease rental revenues and operating expenses, respectively. The increase in reported revenues for these facilities of $3.6 million to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, was primarily due to us taking possession of two of these properties in 2005 and increases in overall occupancy of such properties.

Equity income (loss).   Equity income decreased to a loss of $1.1 million primarily due to our investment in HCP MOP, for which we recorded equity losses of $1.4 million and equity income of $1.5 million for 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, HCP MOP revised its purchase price allocation and attributed more of the purchase price of the properties acquired from MedCap Properties, LLC to below-market lease intangibles and other intangibles from real estate assets. Lease intangibles generally amortize over a shorter period of time relative to tangible real estate assets. The decrease in the equity income from our investment in HCP MOP was primarily due to the revisions to the purchase price allocations referred to above. Additionally, HCP MOP incurred repairs and other related expenses for damages caused by hurricanes Katrina and Rita of $1.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on HCP MOP.

Investment management fee income.   Management and other fee income decreased by $0.1 million to $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Interest and other income.   Interest and other income decreased 30.0% or $9.8 million to $22.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The change reflects a reduced level of loans receivable following an $83 million repayment from ARC and a $17 million repayment from Emeritus during the third quarter of 2004. The decrease in interest and other income was partially offset by gains from the sale of various investments of $4.5 million in 2005. The gains from these investments were primarily the result of the sale of securities in 2005, which were acquired in conjunction with real estate and or leasing transactions we completed in previous years.

48




Interest expense.   Interest expense increased 22.3% to $107.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase was due to the issuance of $450 million of senior notes payable in April and September of 2005, the assumption of $113.5 million of mortgage notes payable in connection with the acquisitions of real estate properties, and an overall increase in short-term variable rates. The table below sets forth information with respect to our debt as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Balance:

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

$

1,663,166

 

$

1,153,012

 

Variable rate

 

295,265

 

337,010

 

Total

 

$

1,958,431

 

$

1,490,022

 

Percent of total debt:

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

85

%

77

%

Variable rate

 

15

%

23

%

Total

 

100

%

100

%

Weighted average interest rate at end of period:

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

6.33

%

6.76

%

Variable rate

 

4.95

%

3.09

%

Total weighted average rate

 

6.14

%

5.93

%

 

Depreciation and amortization.   Real estate depreciation and amortization increased 30.8% to $94.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in depreciation and amortization of $22.4 million primarily relates to the additive effect of our acquisitions in 2005 and 2004, as detailed below:

 

 

Depreciation and amortization
resulting from acquisitions—
for the year ended December 31,

 

Property Type

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Senior housing

 

$

15,697

 

$

5,258

 

$

10,439

 

Medical office building

 

10,981

 

651

 

10,330

 

Other healthcare

 

810

 

766

 

44

 

Total

 

$

27,488

 

$

6,675

 

$

20,813

 

 

Operating expenses.   Operating costs increased 39.6% to $59.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Operating costs are predominantly related to MOB properties that are leased under gross or modified gross lease agreements where we share certain costs with tenants. Accordingly, the number of properties in our MOB portfolio directly impacts operating costs. The increase in operating expenses of $16.8 million primarily relates to the effect of our acquisitions in 2005 and 2004, as detailed below:

 

 

Operating expenses 
resulting from acquisitions—
for the year ended December 31,

 

Property Type

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Medical office building

 

$

11,796

 

$

662

 

$

11,134

 

Other healthcare

 

2,187

 

2,064

 

123

 

Total

 

$

13,983

 

$

2,726

 

$

11,257

 

 

49




Additionally, included in operating expenses are facility-level operating expenses for five senior housing properties that were previously leased on a triple-net basis. Periodically tenants default on their leases, which cause us to take temporary possession of the operations of the facility. We contract with third-party managers to manage these properties until a replacement tenant can be identified or the property can be sold. The operating revenues and expenses for these properties are included in triple-net lease rental revenues and operating expenses, respectively. The increase in reported operating expenses for these facilities of $3.6 million to $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, was primarily due to us taking possession of two of these properties in 2005 and an increase in the overall occupancy of such properties.

The presentation of expenses between general and administrative and operating expenses is based on the underlying nature of the expense. Periodically, we review the classification of expenses between categories and make revisions based on changes in the underlying nature of the expense.

General and administrative expenses.   General and administrative expenses decreased 13.2% to $31.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease was due to higher costs in 2004 primarily resulting from $1.5 million of income tax expense on income from certain assets held in a taxable REIT subsidiary, the implementation of a new information system, considerable resources that were expended towards initial compliance with certain regulatory requirements, principally Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, $0.7 million in expenses associated with the relocation of our corporate offices to Long Beach, California in 2004 and a charge of $1.6 million related to the settlement of a lawsuit filed against us by our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Offsetting the decrease from 2004 was an increase in compensation-related expenses due to an increase in full-time employees from 74 at December 31, 2004, to 83 at December 31, 2005.

Discontinued operations.   Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $57.5 million compared to $54.9 million for the comparable period in the prior year. The change is due to an increase in the year over year gains on sale of real estate of $5.7 million and a decline of operating income of $3.2 million associated with discontinued operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity needs are to (i) fund normal operating expenses, (ii) repay remaining portions of the CRP merger-related borrowings, (iii) meet debt service requirements, (iv) fund capital expenditures, including tenant improvements and leasing costs, (v) fund acquisition and development activities, and (vi) make minimum distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. We repaid remaining portions of the CRP merger-related borrowings through our joint venture and capital market transactions in January 2007. We believe these other needs will be satisfied using cash flows generated by operations and provided by financing activities.

We anticipate making future investments dependent on the availability of cost-effective sources of capital. We intend to use our revolving credit facility, and the public debt and equity markets as our principal sources of financing. As of December 31, 2006, our senior debt is rated BBB by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, BBB by Fitch Ratings and Baa3 by Moody’s Investors Service.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $334 million and $282 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash flow from operations reflects increased revenues partially offset by higher costs and expenses, and changes in receivables, payables, accruals, and deferred revenue. Our cash flows from operations are dependent upon the occupancy level of multi-tenant buildings, rental rates on leases, our tenants’ performance on their lease obligations, the level of operating expenses, and other factors.

Net cash used in investing activities was $3.7 billion during 2006 and principally reflects the net effect of: (i) $3.3 billion used to acquire CRP, (ii) $618 million used to fund acquisitions and construction of real

50




estate, (iii) $512 million received from the sale of facilities, and (iv) $330 million in investment in loans receivable and debt securities. During 2006 and 2005, we used $19 million and $7 million to fund lease commissions and tenant and capital improvements, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $3.4 billion for 2006 and includes proceeds of $2.4 billion from borrowings under our term and bridge loans, $1.5 billion from senior note issuances, $1.0 billion from common stock issuances, $366 million of net borrowings under our bank lines of credit, and $614 million from mortgage debt issuances. These proceeds were partially offset by or used for the repayment of our term and partial repayment of bridge loans aggregating $1.9 billion, repayment of $255 million of senior notes, and payment of common and preferred dividends aggregating $267 million. In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our shareholders. Accordingly, we intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common and preferred stock.

At December 31, 2006, we held approximately $36 million in deposits and $42 million in irrevocable letters of credit from commercial banks securing tenants’ lease obligations and borrowers’ loan obligations. We may draw upon the letters of credit or depository accounts if there are defaults under the related leases or loans. Amounts available under letters of credit could change based upon facility operating conditions and other factors, and such changes may be material.

Debt

Bank lines of credit.   In connection with the CRP merger, we entered into credit agreements with a syndicate of banks providing for aggregate borrowings of $3.4 billion. The facilities included a $0.7 billion bridge loan, a $1.7 billion two-year term loan, and a $1.0 billion three-year revolving credit facility.

We repaid the bridge loan facility on November 10, 2006. Our bridge loan facility accrued interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.60% to 1.35%, depending upon our debt ratings.

At December 31, 2006, borrowings under our term loan facility were $504.6 million with a weighted average rate of 6.22%. We repaid all amounts outstanding under the term loan with proceeds from our capital market transactions completed in January 2007.

At December 31, 2006, borrowings under our $1.0 billion revolving credit facility were $624.5 million with a weighted average interest rate of 6.05%. Our revolving credit facility matures on October 2, 2009, and accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.475% to 1.10%, depending upon our non-credit enhanced senior unsecured long-term debt ratings (“debt ratings”). We pay a facility fee on the entire revolving commitment ranging from 0.125% to 0.25%, depending upon our debt ratings. The revolving credit facility contains a negotiated rate option, which is available for up to 50% of borrowings, whereby the lenders participating in the credit facility bid on the interest to be charged and which may result in a reduced interest rate. Based on our debt ratings on December 31, 2006, the margin on the revolving loan facility is 0.70% and the facility fee is 0.15%.

Our revolving credit agreement contains certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements. Among other things, these covenants, using terms defined in the agreement, initially limit (i) Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 70%, (ii) Secured Debt to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 30%, and (iii) beginning January 1, 2007, Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 100%. The agreement also requires that we maintain (i) a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.50 times and (ii) a formula-determined Minimum Tangible Net Worth. These financial covenants become more restrictive over a period of approximately two years and ultimately (i) limit Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 60%,

51




(ii) limit Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 65%, and (iii) require a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.75 times.

Senior unsecured notes.   At December 31, 2006, we had $2.7 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes outstanding. Interest rates on the notes ranged from 4.88% to 7.62% with a weighted average rate of 5.88% at December 31, 2006. Discounts and premiums are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

On December 4, 2006, we issued $400 million of 5.65% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.768% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.69%. We received net proceeds of $396 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

On September 19, 2006, we issued $1 billion of senior unsecured notes, which consisted of $300 million of floating rate notes due in 2008, $300 million of 5.95% notes due in 2011, and $400 million of 6.30% notes due in 2016. The notes were priced at 100% of the principal amount for the floating rate notes due in 2008, 99.971% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.957% for the 5.95% notes due in 2011, and 99.877% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 6.317% for the 6.30% notes due in 2016. We received net proceeds of $994 million, which together with cash on hand and borrowings under the new facilities were used to repay our then existing credit facility and to finance the CRP merger.

On February 27, 2006, we issued $150 million of 5.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.071% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.788%. We received net proceeds of $149 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

In February and October 2006, we repaid an aggregate of $255 million of maturing senior unsecured notes which accrued interest at a weighted average rate of 7.1%.

The senior unsecured notes contain certain covenants including limitations on debt and other customary terms.

Mortgage debt.   At December 31, 2006, we had $2.2 billion in mortgage debt secured by 269 healthcare facilities with a carrying amount of $4.5 billion. Interest rates on the mortgage notes ranged from 3.72% to 9.32% with a weighted average rate of 6.0% at December 31, 2006.

On December 21, 2006, in anticipation of our senior housing joint venture that closed on January 5, 2007, we expanded an existing secured debt facility with Fannie Mae to $686 million, receiving $446 million in proceeds. The Fannie Mae facility bears interest at a weighted average rate of 5.66%, with $119 million maturing in October 2013, and $568 million maturing in November 2016. The funds from the expanded debt facility were used to repay borrowings under our term loan facility.

During 2006, in addition to the mortgage debt issued under the Fannie Mae facility discussed above, we obtained $165 million of additional ten-year mortgage financing with a weighted average effective rate of 6.36% in five separate transactions. We received net proceeds of $162 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

The instruments encumbering the properties restrict title transfer of the respective properties subject to the terms of the mortgage, prohibit additional liens, restrict prepayment, require payment of real estate taxes, maintenance of the properties in good condition, maintenance of insurance on the properties, and include a requirement to obtain lender consent to enter into material tenant leases.

Other debt.   In connection with the CRP merger on October 5, 2006, we assumed $104.5 million of non-interest bearing life care bonds at two of our CCRCs and non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits at another senior housing facility, all of which were payable to the related trusts of the facilities (collectively “Life Care Bonds”). At December 31, 2006, $61.5 million of the Life Care Bonds were

52




refundable to the residents upon the resident moving out or to a resident’s estate upon the resident’s death, and $46.2 million of the Bonds were refundable after the unit has been successfully remarketed to a new resident.

Debt Maturities

The following table summarizes our stated debt maturities and scheduled principal repayments at December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

Year

 

 

 

Amount

 

2007

 

$

196,718

 

2008

 

902,821

 

2009

 

900,907

 

2010

 

508,595

 

2011

 

457,520

 

Thereafter

 

3,243,707

 

 

 

$

6,210,268

 

 

Equity

On October 5, 2006, we issued an aggregate of 27.2 million shares of common stock in connection with the acquisitions of CRP and CRC.

On November 10, 2006, we issued 33.5 million shares of our common stock. We received net proceeds of approximately $960 million, which were used to repay our bridge loan facility and borrowings under our term loan and revolving credit facilities.

At December 31, 2006, we had 4.0 million shares of 7.25% Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock, 7.8 million shares of 7.10% Series F cumulative redeemable preferred stock, and 198.6 million shares of common stock outstanding.

On January 19, 2007, we issued 6.8 million shares of our common stock. We received net proceeds of approximately $261 million, which were used to repay borrowings under our term loan and revolving credit facilities.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we issued approximately 0.8 million shares of our common stock under our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan at an average price per share of $28.68 for an aggregate amount of $22.9 million. We also received $7.9 million in proceeds from stock option exercises. At December 31, 2006, stockholders’ equity totaled $3.3 billion and our equity securities had a market value of $7.8 billion.

As of December 31, 2006, there were a total of 3.4 million DownREIT units outstanding in six limited liability companies in which we are the managing member (i) HCPI/Tennessee, LLC; (ii) HCPI/Utah, LLC; (iii) HCPI/Utah II, LLC; (iv) HCPI/Indiana, LLC; (v) HCP DR California, LLC; and (vi) HCP DR Alabama, LLC. The DownREIT units are redeemable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of shares of our common stock or, at our option, shares of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications).

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We own interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures, including HCP Ventures III, as described under Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Except in limited circumstances, our risk of loss is limited to our investment carrying amount and any outstanding loans receivable. We have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect to materially affect our liquidity and capital resources except those described under “Contractual Obligations.”

53




Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our material contractual payment obligations and commitments at December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

 

 

Less than
One Year

 

2008-2009

 

2010-2011

 

More than
Five Years

 

Total

 

Senior unsecured notes and mortgage debt

 

$

88,972

 

$

674,635

 

$

966,115

 

$

3,243,707

 

$

4,973,429

 

Revolving line of credit

 

 

624,500

 

 

 

624,500

 

Term loan

 

 

504,593

 

 

 

504,593

 

Other debt

 

107,746

 

 

 

 

107,746

 

Ground and other operating leases

 

1,380

 

2,806

 

2,862

 

79,837

 

86,885

 

Acquisition and construction commitments

 

59,396

 

 

 

 

59,396

 

Interest

 

276,681

 

506,001

 

411,869

 

1,384,576

 

2,579,127

 

Total

 

$

534,175

 

$

2,312,535

 

$

1,380,846

 

$

4,708,120

 

$

8,935,676

 

 

Inflation

Our leases often provide for either fixed increases in base rents or indexed escalators, based on the Consumer Price Index or other measures, and/or additional rent based on increases in the tenants’ operating revenues. Substantially all of our MOB leases require the tenant to pay a share of property operating costs such as real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, etc. We believe that inflationary increases in expenses will be offset, in part, by the tenant expense reimbursements and contractual rent increases described above.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of new accounting standards.

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

At December 31, 2006, we are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on $215 million of variable rate mortgage notes payable, $0.6 billion of variable rate line of credit, $0.5 billion term loan and $325 million of variable rate senior unsecured notes. Of the $215 million of variable rate mortgage notes payable outstanding, $45.6 million has been hedged through interest rate swap contracts. We do not have, and do not plan to enter into, derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Of our consolidated debt of $6.2 billion at December 31, 2006, excluding the $45.6 million of variable rate debt where the rates have been hedged to a fixed rate, approximately 26% is at variable interest rates, which includes a $0.5 billion term loan that was used to pay the cash consideration of our merger with CRP. We repaid the remaining balance of the term loan with proceeds from our January 2007 joint venture and capital market transactions, which further reduced our variable interest rate exposure.

Fluctuation in the interest rates will not affect our future earnings and cash flows on our fixed rate debt until that debt must be replaced or refinanced. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments and our hedge contracts. Conversely, changes in interest rates on variable rate debt would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not affect the fair value of those instruments. Assuming a one percentage point increase in the interest rate related to the variable-rate debt and related swap contracts, and assuming no change in the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2006, interest expense for 2006 would increase by approximately $17 million, or $0.11 per common share on a diluted basis.

54




The principal amount and the average interest rates for our mortgage loans receivable and debt categorized by maturity dates is presented in the table below. The fair value estimates for the mortgage loans receivable are based on the estimates of management and on rates currently prevailing for comparable loans. The fair market value for our debt securities and senior notes payable are based on prevailing market prices. The fair market value estimates for secured loans and mortgage notes payable are based on discounting future cash flows utilizing current rates offered to us for loans and debt of the same type and remaining maturity.

 

 

Maturity

 

 

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Loans Receivable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured loans receivable

 

$

7,340

 

$

703

 

$

10,238

 

$

14,549

 

$

3,257

 

 

$

85,382

 

 

$

121,469

 

 

$

148,156

 

 

Weighted average interest rate

 

4.25

%

10.50

%

9.35

%

10.88

%

10.14

%

 

8.62

%

 

9.99

%

 

 

 

 

Debt securities available for sale

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

300,000

 

 

$

300,000

 

 

$

322,500

 

 

Weighted average interest rate

 

 

%

%

 

 

 

 

 

9.63

%

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank notes payable

 

$

 

$

504,593

 

$

624,500

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,129,093

 

 

$

1,129,093

 

 

Weighted average interest rate

 

 

6.22

%

6.05

%

 

 

 

 

 

6.00

%

 

 

 

 

Senior notes payable

 

$

 

$

300,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

25,000

 

 

$

325,000

 

 

$

325,000

 

 

Weighted average interest rate

 

 

5.84

%

 

 

 

 

5.81

%

 

5.84

%

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable

 

$

23,520

 

$

 

$

28,258

 

$

104,236

 

$

33,000

 

 

$

25,924

 

 

$

214,938

 

 

$

214,938

 

 

Weighted average interest rate

 

7.14

%

 

7.03

%

6.61

%

6.82

%

 

5.62

%

 

6.64

%

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes payable

 

$

20,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

206,421

 

$

300,000

 

 

$

1,912,000

 

 

$

2,438,421

 

 

$

2,487,496

 

 

Weighted average interest rate

 

7.46

%

 

 

4.93

%

5.95

%

 

6.14

%

 

6.03

%

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable

 

$

15,573

 

$

118,812

 

$

186,463

 

$

172,262

 

$

116,807

 

 

$

1,385,153

 

 

$

1,995,070

 

 

$

2,030,037

 

 

Weighted average interest rate

 

5.97

%

6.24

%

6.33

%

7.02

%

6.41

%

 

5.75

%

 

5.98

%

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 8.                Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 9.                Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.   We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. Our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

As required by Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006. Based on the foregoing,

55




our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.   There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2006 to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.   Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.

On October 5, 2006, CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CRP”) and CNL Retirement Corp. (“CRC”) merged with and into two of our subsidiaries. Consistent with published guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we excluded from our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, CRP’s and CRC’s internal control over financial reporting. Total assets and total revenues from the CRP and CRC mergers in the aggregate represent 56% and 16%, respectively, of our related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, has been attested to by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

56




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Health Care Property Investors, Inc.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Health Care Property Investors, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Health Care Property Investors, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. and CNL Retirement,Corp. which are included in the 2006 consolidated financial statements of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. and constituted $5.6 billion and $3.7 billion of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2006 and $98.1 million of revenues for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. and CNL Retirement.Corp.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Health Care Property Investors, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Health Care Property Investors, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.

57




We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and our report dated February 12, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California

 

 

February 12, 2007

 

 

 

58




PART III

ITEM 10.         Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Our executive officers were as follows on February 9, 2007:

Name

 

 

 

Age

 

Position

James F. Flaherty III

 

49

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Charles A. Elcan

 

43

 

Executive Vice President—Medical Office Properties

Paul F. Gallagher

 

46

 

Executive Vice President—Chief Investment Officer

Edward J. Henning

 

53

 

Executive Vice President—General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Stephen R. Maulbetsch

 

49

 

Executive Vice President—Strategic Development

Mark A. Wallace

 

49

 

Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

We hereby incorporate by reference the information appearing under the captions “Board of Directors and Executive Officers,” “Code of Business Conduct,” “Board of Directors and Executive Officers—Committees of the Board” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 10, 2007.

The Company has filed, as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, the certifications of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004.

On June 12, 2006, the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the Annual CEO Certification required pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.

ITEM 11.         Executive Compensation

We hereby incorporate by reference the information under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Table of Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 10, 2007.

ITEM 12.         Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

We hereby incorporate by reference the information under the captions “Principal Stockholders” and “Board of Directors and Executive Officers” in the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 10, 2007.

ITEM 13.         Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

We hereby incorporate by reference the information under the captions “Certain Transactions” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 10, 2007.

ITEM 14.         Principal Accountant Fees and Services

We hereby incorporate by reference under the caption “Audit and Non-Audit Fees” in the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 10, 2007.

59




ITEM 15.         Exhibits, Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

a)(1)

Financial Statements:

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Financial Statements

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2006 and 2005

 

Consolidated Statements of Income—for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

a)(2)

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

 

Note: All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is presented in the financial statements and the related notes or because the schedules are not applicable.

a)(3)

Exhibits:

 

2.1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 1, 2006, by and among HCP, CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. and Ocean Acquisition 1, Inc. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated May 1, 2006).

3.1

 

Articles of Restatement of HCP (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004).

3.2

 

Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCP (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2006).

4.1

 

Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated September 9, 1993).

4.2

 

Form of Fixed Rate Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated March 20, 1989).

4.3

 

Form of Floating Rate Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated March 20, 1989).

4.4

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated November 20, 1998 between HCP and James D. Bremner (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.8 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). This exhibit is identical in all material respects to two other documents except the parties thereto. The parties to these other documents, other than HCP, were James P. Revel and Michael F. Wiley.

4.5

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated January 20, 1999 between HCP and Boyer Castle Dale Medical Clinic, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.9 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). This exhibit is identical in all material respects to 13 other documents except the parties thereto. The parties to these other documents, other than HCP, were Boyer Centerville Clinic Company, L.C., Boyer Elko, L.C., Boyer Desert Springs, L.C., Boyer Grantsville Medical, L.C., Boyer-Ogden Medical Associates, LTD., Boyer Ogden Medical Associates No. 2, LTD., Boyer Salt Lake Industrial Clinic Associates, LTD., Boyer-St. Mark’s Medical Associates, LTD., Boyer McKay-Dee Associates, LTD., Boyer St. Mark’s Medical Associates #2, LTD., Boyer Iomega, L.C., Boyer Springville, L.C., and—Boyer Primary Care Clinic Associates, LTD. #2.

60




 

4.6

 

Indenture, dated as of January 15, 1997, between American Health Properties, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to American Health Properties, Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K, dated January 21, 1997).

4.7

 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, between HCP and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999).

4.8

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated August 17, 2001 between HCP, Boyer Old Mill II, L.C., Boyer-Research Park Associates, LTD., Boyer Research Park Associates VII, L.C., Chimney Ridge, L.C., Boyer-Foothill Associates, LTD., Boyer Research Park Associates VI, L.C., Boyer Stansbury II, L.C., Boyer Rancho Vistoso, L.C., Boyer-Alta View Associates, LTD., Boyer Kaysville Associates, L.C., Boyer Tatum Highlands Dental Clinic, L.C., Amarillo Bell Associates, Boyer Evanston, L.C., Boyer Denver Medical, L.C., Boyer Northwest Medical Center Two, L.C., and Boyer Caldwell Medical, L.C. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.12 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

4.9

 

Acknowledgment and Consent dated as of March 1, 2005 by and among Merrill Lynch Bank USA, Gardner Property Holdings, L.C., HCPI/Utah, LLC, the unit holders of HCPI/Utah, LLC and HCP (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.12 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).*

4.10

 

Acknowledgment and Consent dated as of March 1, 2005 by and among Merrill Lynch Bank USA, The Boyer Company, L.C., HCPI/Utah, LLC, the unit holders of HCPI/Utah, LLC and HCP (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.13 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).*

4.11

 

Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated as of September 1, 1993 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “6.5% Senior Notes due February 15, 2006” (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated February 21, 1996).

4.12

 

Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated as of September 1, 1993 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “67¤8% Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities due June 8, 2015” (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated June 3, 1998).

4.13

 

Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated as of September 1, 1993 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “6.45% Senior Notes due June 25, 2012” (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated June 19, 2002).

4.14

 

Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated as of September 1, 1993 between HCP and the Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “6.00% Senior Notes due March 1, 2015” (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K (file no. 001-08895), dated February 25, 2003).

4.15

 

Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated as of September 1, 1993 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “55¤8% Senior Notes due May 1, 2017” (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated April 22, 2005).

61




 

4.16

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated October 1, 2003 between HCP, Charles Crews, Charles A. Elcan, Thomas W. Hulme, Thomas M. Klaritch, R. Wayne Price, Glenn T. Preston, Janet Reynolds, Angela M. Playle, James A. Croy, John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Erica Ann Klaritch, John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Adam Joseph Klaritch, John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Thomas Michael Klaritch, Jr. and John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Nicholas James Klaritch (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.16 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003).

4.17

 

Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, dated October 23, 2003 (incorporated by reference to HCP’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated December 5, 2003, registration number 333-110939).

4.18

 

Specimen of Stock Certificate representing the Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.1 of HCP’s 8-A12B filed on September 12, 2003).

4.19

 

Specimen of Stock Certificate representing the Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.1 of HCP’s 8-A12B filed on December 2, 2003).

4.20

 

Form of Floating Rate Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated November 19, 2003).

4.21

 

Form of Fixed Rate Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.4 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated November 19, 2003).

4.22

 

Acknowledgment and Consent dated as of March 1, 2005 by and among Merrill Lynch Bank USA, Gardner Property Holdings, L.C., HCPI/Utah II, LLC, the unit holders of HCPI/Utah II, LLC and HCP (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.21 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).*

4.23

 

Acknowledgment and Consent dated as of March 1, 2005 by and among Merrill Lynch Bank USA, The Boyer Company, L.C., HCPI/Utah II, LLC, the unit holders of HCPI/Utah II, LLC and HCP (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.22 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).*

4.24

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated July 22, 2005 between HCP, William P. Gallaher, Trustee for the William P. & Cynthia J. Gallaher Trust, Dwayne J. Clark, Patrick R. Gallaher, Trustee for the Patrick R. & Cynthia M. Gallaher Trust, Jeffrey D. Civian, Trustee for the Jeffrey D. Civian Trust dated August 8, 1986, Jeffrey Meyer, Steven L. Gallaher, Richard Coombs, Larry L. Wasem, Joseph H. Ward, Jr., Trustee for the Joseph H. Ward, Jr. and Pamela K. Ward Trust, Borue H. O’Brien, William R. Mabry, Charles N. Elsbree, Trustee for the Charles N. Elsbree Jr. Living Trust dated February 14, 2002, Gary A. Robinson, Thomas H. Persons, Trustee for the Persons Family Revocable Trust under trust dated February 15, 2005, Glen Hammel, Marilyn E. Montero, Joseph G. Lin, Trustee for the Lin Revocable Living Trust, Ned B. Stein, John Gladstein, Trustee for the John & Andrea Gladstein Family Trust dated February 11, 2003, John Gladstein, Trustee for the John & Andrea Gladstein Family Trust dated February 11, 2003, Francis Connelly, Trustee for the The Francis J & Shannon A Connelly Trust, Al Coppin, Trustee for the Al Coppin Trust, Stephen B. McCullagh, Trustee for the Stephen B. & Pamela McCullagh Trust dated October 22, 2001, and Larry L. Wasem—SEP IRA (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.24 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005).

62




 

4.25

 

Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated as of September 1, 1993 between HCP and The Bank of New York, as trustee, setting forth the terms of HCP’s Fixed Rate Medium-Term Notes and Floating Rate Medium-Term Notes (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2006).

4.26

 

Form of Fixed Rate Medium-Term Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2006).

4.27

 

Form of Floating Rate Medium-Term Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.4 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2006).

4.28

 

Form of Floating Rate Notes Due 2008 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated September 12, 2006).

4.29

 

Form of 5.95% Notes Due 2011 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated September 12, 2006).

4.30

 

Form of 6.30% Notes Due 2016 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated September 12, 2006).

4.31

 

Form of Senior Notes Due 2013 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated November 29, 2006).

10.1

 

Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 30, 1985, to Partnership Agreement of Health Care Property Partners, a California general partnership, the general partners of which consist of HCP and certain affiliates of Tenet (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1985).

10.2

 

HCP Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.43 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997).*

10.2.1

 

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999).*

10.2.2

 

Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of January 4, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).*

10.3

 

HCP Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.44 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997).*

10.3.1

 

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999).*

10.4

 

HCP 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of May 7, 2003 (incorporated by reference to HCP’s Proxy Statement regarding HCP’s annual meeting of shareholders held May 7, 2003).*

10.4.1

 

Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (effective as of May 7, 2003) (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2005).*

10.5

 

HCP Second Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.45 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997).*

10.5.1

 

First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of April 11, 1997 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5.1 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005).*

63




 

10.5.2

 

Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of July 17, 1997 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5.2 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005).*

10.5.3

 

Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999).*

10.5.4

 

Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 4, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.19 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).*

10.6

 

Various letter agreements, each dated as of October 16, 2000, among HCP and certain key employees of the Company (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).*

10.7

 

HCP Amended and Restated Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).*

10.8

 

Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated November 20, 1998 of HCPI/Indiana, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).

10.9

 

Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated January 20, 1999 of HCPI/Utah, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).

10.10

 

Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, by HCP Medical Office Buildings II, LLC, and Texas HCP Medical Office Buildings, L.P., for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.20 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).

10.11

 

Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2000, by HCP Medical Office Buildings I, LLC, and Meadowdome, LLC, for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).

10.12

 

Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated August 17, 2001 of HCPI/Utah II, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

10.12.1

 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated October 30, 2001 of HCPI/Utah II, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

10.13

 

Employment Agreement dated October 26, 2005 between HCP and James F. Flaherty III (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005).*

10.14

 

Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated as of October 2, 2003 of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.28 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003).

10.14.1

 

Amendment No.1 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated September 29, 2004 of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.37 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004).

10.14.2

 

Amendment No.2 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated October 29, 2004 of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.43 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).

64




 

10.14.3

 

Amendment No.3 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement and New Member Joinder Agreement dated October 19, 2005 of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14.3 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005).

10.15

 

Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2003 between HCP and Charles A. Elcan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.29 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003).*

10.15.1

 

Amendment No.1 to the Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2003 between HCP and Charles A. Elcan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.5 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2005).*

10.16

 

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for employees and consultants effective as of May 7, 2003, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.30 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003).*

10.17

 

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for directors effective as of May 7, 2003, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.31 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003).*

10.18

 

Form of Performance Award Letter for employees effective as of May 7, 2003, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.32 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003).*

10.19

 

Form of Stock Option Agreement for eligible participants effective as of May 7, 2003, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.33 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003).*

10.20

 

Amended and Restated Executive Retirement Plan effective as of May 7, 2003 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.34 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003).*

10.21

 

Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2004, among HCP, each of the banks identified on the signature pages hereof, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as syndicating agent, Barclays Bank PLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as documentation agents, with Calyon New York Branch, Citicorp, USA, and Key National Association as managing agents, and Banc of America Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated November 1, 2004).

10.22

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting effective as of March 15, 2004, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.34 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K, dated March 15, 2005).*

65




 

10.23

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three year cliff vesting effective as of March 15, 2004, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.35 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K, dated March 15, 2005).*

10.24

 

Form of employee Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting effective as of March 15, 2004, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.36 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K, dated March 15, 2005).*

10.25

 

Form of employee Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three year cliff vesting effective as of March 15, 2004, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.37 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K, dated March 15, 2005).*

10.26

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting effective as of March 15, 2004, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.4 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2005).*

10.27

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three year cliff vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.2 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2005).*

10.28

 

Form of employee Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.3 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated January 28, 2005).*

10.29

 

CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.29 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005).*

10.30

 

Form of directors and officers Indemnification Agreement as approved by the Board of Directors of the Company (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.30 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005).*

10.31

 

Various letter agreements, each dated as of October 16, 2000, among HCP and certain key employees of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.12 to HCP’s annual report on Form 10-K, dated March 9, 2001).*

10.32

 

Form of employee Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.33 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006).*

66




 

10.33

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.34 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006).*

10.34

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three year cliff vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.35 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006).*

10.35

 

Form of employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.36 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006).*

10.36

 

Form of employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.37 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006).*

10.37

 

Form of director Restricted Stock Award Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.38 to HCP’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006).*

10.38

 

Form of Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Program, as approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated July 27, 2006).*

10.39

 

Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated August 14, 2006, by and between the Company and James F. Flaherty III (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated August 14, 2006).*

10.40

 

Credit Agreement dated as of October 5, 2006 among Health Care Property Investors, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Banc of America Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arranger and Joint Bookrunner, UBS Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arranger, Joint Bookrunner and Syndication Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Joint Bookrunner, Barclays Capital, as Joint Bookrunner, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agent, Barclays Bank PLC, as Co-Documentation Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agent, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Co-Documentation Agent, Merrill Lynch Bank USA, as Co-Documentation Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Senior Managing Agent, Citicorp North America, Inc., as Senior Managing Agent, Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Senior Managing Agent, Key Bank National Association, as Senior Managing Agent, SunTrust Bank, as Senior Managing Agent, The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Senior Managing Agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as Senior Managing Agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to HCP’s current report on Form 8-K, dated October 5, 2006).

10.41

 

Form of employee Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (filed herewith).*

67




 

10.42

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five year installment vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (filed herewith).*

10.43

 

Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three year cliff vesting, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, relating to the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (filed herewith).*

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of the Company

23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1

 

Certification by James F. Flaherty III, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2

 

Certification by Mark A. Wallace, the Company’s Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

32.1

 

Certification by James F. Flaherty III, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer, Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.2

 

Certification by Mark A. Wallace, the Company’s Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 135

 


*                    Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.

For the purposes of complying with the amendments to the rules governing Form S-8 (effective July 13, 1990) under the Securities Act of 1933, the undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows, which undertaking shall be incorporated by reference into registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 Nos. 33-28483 and 333-90353 filed May 11, 1989 and November 5, 1999, respectively, Form S-8 Nos. 333-54786 and 333-54784 each filed February 1, 2001, and Form S-8 No. 333-108838 filed September 16, 2003.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

68




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 12, 2007

 

HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC. (Registrant)

 

 

/s/ JAMES F. FLAHERTY Iii

 

 

James F. Flaherty III,

 

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

 

 

 

Title

 

 

 

Date

 

/s/ JAMES F. FLAHERTY III

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

February 12, 2007

James F. Flaherty III

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ MARK A. WALLACE

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

 

February 12, 2007

Mark A. Wallace

 

Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

/s/ GEORGE P. DOYLE

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting

 

February 12, 2007

George P. Doyle

 

Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

/s/ MARY A. CIRRILLO-GOLDBERG

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Mary A. Cirillo-Goldberg

 

 

 

 

/s/ ROBERT R. FANNING, JR.

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Robert R. Fanning, Jr.

 

 

 

 

/s/ DAVID B. HENRY

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

David B. Henry

 

 

 

 

/s/ MICHAEL D. MCKEE

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Michael D. McKee

 

 

 

 

 

69




 

Signature

 

 

 

Title

 

 

 

Date

 

/s/ HAROLD M. MESSMER, JR.

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Harold M. Messmer, Jr.

 

 

 

 

/s/ PETER L. RHEIN

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Peter L. Rhein

 

 

 

 

/s/ KENNETH B. ROATH

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Kenneth B. Roath

 

 

 

 

/s/ RICHARD M. ROSENBERG

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Richard M. Rosenberg

 

 

 

 

/s/ JOSEPH P. SULLIVAN

 

Director

 

February 12, 2007

Joseph P. Sullivan

 

 

 

 

 

70




INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

F-2

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

F-3

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

 

F-4

 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

F-5

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

F-6

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-7

 

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

 

F-47

 

 

Schedule II has been intentionally omitted as the required information is presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-1




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Health Care Property Investors, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits also include the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Health Care Property Investors’ Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 12, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Irvine, California

 

 

February 12, 2007

 

 

 

F-2




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings and improvements

 

$

6,651,705

 

$

3,078,852

 

Developments in process

 

44,221

 

22,092

 

Land

 

766,927

 

308,827

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

595,662

 

473,735

 

Net real estate

 

6,867,191

 

2,936,036

 

Net investment in direct financing leases

 

678,013

 

 

Loans receivable, net

 

196,480

 

186,831

 

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures

 

25,389

 

48,598

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $24,205 and $1,205, respectively

 

31,026

 

13,313

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

60,687

 

21,342

 

Intangible assets, net

 

479,612

 

36,264

 

Real estate held for sale, net

 

57,496

 

282,959

 

Real estate held for contribution

 

1,102,016

 

25,397

 

Other assets, net

 

514,839

 

46,525

 

Total assets

 

$

10,012,749

 

$

3,597,265

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Bank line of credit and term loan

 

$

1,129,093

 

$

258,600

 

Senior unsecured notes

 

2,748,522

 

1,462,250

 

Mortgage debt

 

1,531,086

 

236,096

 

Mortgage debt on assets held for contribution

 

685,568

 

 

Other debt

 

107,746

 

 

Intangible liabilities, net

 

151,328

 

5,382

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

182,810

 

68,718

 

Deferred revenue

 

20,795

 

17,169

 

Total liabilities

 

6,556,948

 

2,048,215

 

Minority interests:

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture partners

 

34,211

 

20,905

 

Non-managing member unitholders

 

127,554

 

128,379

 

Total minority interests

 

161,765

 

149,284

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 11,820,000 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $25 per share

 

285,173

 

285,173

 

Common stock, $1.00 par value: 750,000,000 shares authorized; 198,599,054 and 136,193,764 shares issued and outstanding,
 respectively

 

198,599

 

136,194

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

3,108,908

 

1,446,349

 

Cumulative net income

 

1,938,693

 

1,521,146

 

Cumulative dividends

 

(2,255,062

)

(1,988,248

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

17,725

 

(848

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

3,294,036

 

1,399,766

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

10,012,749

 

$

3,597,265

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Revenues and other income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental and related revenues

 

$

557,021

 

$

396,804

 

$

327,894

 

Equity income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

8,331

 

(1,123

)

2,157

 

Income from direct financing leases

 

15,008

 

 

 

Investment management fee income

 

3,895

 

3,184

 

3,293

 

Interest and other income

 

34,832

 

22,922

 

32,755

 

 

 

619,087

 

421,787

 

366,099

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

213,304

 

107,201

 

87,632

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

144,215

 

94,862

 

72,501

 

Operating

 

89,186

 

59,316

 

42,484

 

General and administrative

 

47,370

 

31,869

 

36,721

 

Impairments

 

3,577

 

 

410

 

 

 

497,652

 

293,248

 

239,748

 

Income before minority interests

 

121,435

 

128,539

 

126,351

 

Minority interests

 

(14,805

)

(12,950

)

(12,204

)

Income from continuing operations

 

106,630

 

115,589

 

114,147

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

41,638

 

47,312

 

50,465

 

Gain on sales of real estate, net of impairments

 

269,279

 

10,156

 

4,428

 

 

 

310,917

 

57,468

 

54,893

 

Net income

 

417,547

 

173,057

 

169,040

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

(21,130

)

(21,130

)

(21,130

)

Net income applicable to common shares

 

$

396,417

 

$

151,927

 

$

147,910

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.58

 

$

0.70

 

$

0.71

 

Discontinued operations

 

2.09

 

0.43

 

0.41

 

Net income applicable to common shares

 

$

2.67

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.12

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.57

 

$

0.70

 

$

0.70

 

Discontinued operations

 

2.09

 

0.42

 

0.41

 

Net income applicable to common shares

 

$

2.66

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.11

 

Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

148,236

 

134,673

 

131,854

 

Diluted

 

149,226

 

135,560

 

133,362

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Preferred Stock, $1.00 Par Value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares, beginning and ending

 

11,820

 

11,820

 

11,820

 

Amounts, beginning and ending

 

$

285,173

 

$

285,173

 

$

285,173

 

Common Stock, Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares at beginning of year

 

136,194

 

133,658

 

131,040

 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

61,975

 

1,100

 

1,172

 

Exercise of stock options

 

430

 

1,436

 

1,446

 

Shares at end of year

 

198,599

 

136,194

 

133,658

 

Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

136,194

 

$

133,658

 

$

131,040

 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

61,975

 

1,100

 

1,172

 

Exercise of stock options

 

430

 

1,436

 

1,446

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

198,599

 

$

136,194

 

$

133,658

 

Additional Paid-In Capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

1,446,349

 

$

1,394,549

 

$

1,343,363

 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

1,646,869

 

23,874

 

25,106

 

Exercise of stock options

 

7,458

 

21,429

 

19,682

 

Amortization of deferred compensation

 

8,232

 

6,497

 

6,162

 

Changes in notes receivable from officers

 

 

 

236

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

3,108,908

 

$

1,446,349

 

$

1,394,549

 

Cumulative Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

1,521,146

 

$

1,348,089

 

$

1,179,049

 

Net income

 

417,547

 

173,057

 

169,040

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

1,938,693

 

$

1,521,146

 

$

1,348,089

 

Cumulative Dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

(1,988,248

)

$

(1,739,859

)

$

(1,497,727

)

Common dividend ($1.70, $1.68 and $1.67 per share)

 

(245,684

)

(227,259

)

(221,002

)

Preferred dividends

 

(21,130

)

(21,130

)

(21,130

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

(2,255,062

)

$

(1,988,248

)

$

(1,739,859

)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

(848

)

$

(2,168

)

$

(281

)

Net unrealized gains on securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains

 

24,096

 

1,080

 

 

Less reclassification adjustment realized in net income

 

(640

)

 

 

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

 

(4,984

)

388

 

(1,887

)

Changes in Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) obligation

 

101

 

(148

)

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

17,725

 

$

(848

)

$

(2,168

)

Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

417,547

 

$

173,057

 

$

169,040

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

18,573

 

1,320

 

(1,887

)

Total comprehensive income

 

$

436,120

 

$

174,377

 

$

167,153

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

417,547

 

$

173,057

 

$

169,040

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization of real estate, in-place lease and other intangibles:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

144,215

 

94,862

 

72,501

 

Discontinued operations

 

9,854

 

13,104

 

16,856

 

Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net

 

(797

)

(1,912

)

 

Stock-based compensation

 

8,232

 

6,495

 

6,162

 

Debt issuance cost amortization

 

14,533

 

3,181

 

3,823

 

Impairments

 

9,581

 

 

17,067

 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

 

 

(56

)

1,648

 

Straight-line rents and interest accretion

 

(20,723

)

(7,257

)

(8,946

)

Equity (income) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(8,331

)

1,123

 

(2,157

)

Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

8,331

 

 

2,157

 

Minority interests

 

14,805

 

12,950

 

12,204

 

Gain on sales of equity securities, net

 

(1,861

)

(4,517

)

 

Gain on sales of real estate, net

 

(275,283

)

(10,156

)

(21,085

)

Changes in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

1,295

 

1,521

 

1,637

 

Other assets

 

(15,243

)

(8,524

)

243

 

Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue

 

28,061

 

8,219

 

1,392

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

334,216

 

282,090

 

272,542

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition and development of real estate

 

(480,137

)

(447,152

)

(337,445

)

Lease commissions and tenant and capital improvements

 

(18,932

)

(7,138

)

(3,419

)

Net proceeds from sales of real estate

 

512,317

 

64,564

 

140,402

 

Cash used in CNL Retirement Properties merger, net of cash acquired

 

(3,325,046

)

 

 

Cash used in purchase of HCP MOP, net of cash acquired

 

(138,166

)

 

 

Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures, net

 

32,115

 

6,973

 

88,554

 

Purchase of equity securities

 

(13,670

)

(6,768

)

 

Proceeds from the sale of equity securities

 

7,550

 

6,482

 

 

Principal repayments on loans receivable

 

63,535

 

19,138

 

39,570

 

Investment in loans receivable and debt securities

 

(329,724

)

(53,293

)

(9,622

)

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

 

388

 

2,408

 

(2,722

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(3,689,770

)

(414,786

)

(84,682

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net borrowings (repayments) under bank lines of credit

 

365,900

 

(41,500

)

102,100

 

Borrowings under term and bridge loans

 

2,396,385

 

 

 

Repayments of term and bridge loans

 

(1,901,136

)

 

 

Repayments of mortgage debt

 

(66,689

)

(17,889

)

(69,313

)

Issuance of mortgage debt, net of issuance costs

 

614,473

 

 

 

Repayments of senior unsecured notes

 

(255,000

)

(31,000

)

(92,000

)

Issuance of senior unsecured notes, net of issuance costs

 

1,539,449

 

445,471

 

87,000

 

Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and exercise of options

 

989,039

 

45,238

 

42,629

 

Dividends paid on common and preferred stock

 

(266,814

)

(248,389

)

(243,250

)

Settlement of cash flow hedges

 

(4,354

)

 

 

Distributions to minority interests

 

(16,354

)

(14,855

)

(14,893

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

3,394,899

 

137,076

 

(187,727

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

39,345

 

4,380

 

133

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

21,342

 

16,962

 

16,829

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

$

60,687

 

$

21,342

 

$

16,962

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)          Business

Health Care Property Investors, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that, together with its consolidated entities (collectively, “HCP” or the “Company”), principally invests directly, or through joint ventures and mortgage loans, in healthcare-related properties located primarily throughout the United States.

(2)          Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

Management is required to make estimates and assumptions in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HCP, its wholly owned subsidiaries and its controlled, through voting rights or other means, joint ventures. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company adopted Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as revised (“FIN 46R”), effective January 1, 2004 for variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 and effective January 1, 2003 for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. FIN 46R provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. A variable interest entity is broadly defined as an entity where either (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company consolidates investments in VIEs when it is determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE at either the creation of the variable interest entity or upon the occurrence of a reconsideration event. The adoption of FIN 46R resulted in the consolidation of five joint ventures with aggregate assets of $18.5 million, effective January 1, 2004, that were previously accounted for under the equity method. The consolidation of these joint ventures did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

The Company leases 76 properties to a total of 9 tenants that have been identified as VIEs. The Company acquired these leases (variable interests) on October 5, 2006 in its acquisition of CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CRP”). CRP determined they were not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and the Company is generally required to carry forward CRP’s accounting conclusions after the acquisition relative to their primary beneficiary assessment. The Company may need to reassess whether it is the primary beneficiary in the future upon the occurrence of a reconsideration event, as defined by FIN 46R. If the Company determines that it is the primary beneficiary in the future and consolidates the tenant, its financial statements would reflect the tenant’s facility level revenues and expenses rather than lease revenue. The Company’s maximum exposure to losses resulting from the Company’s involvement in these VIEs is limited to the future minimum lease payments to be received from these leases, which totaled $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2006.

F-7




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 04-5, Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (“EITF 04-5”), effective June 2005. The issue concludes as to what rights held by the limited partner(s) preclude consolidation in circumstances in which the sole general partner would otherwise consolidate the limited partnership in accordance with GAAP. The assessment of limited partners’ rights and their impact on the presumption of control of the limited partnership by the sole general partner should be made when an investor becomes the sole general partner and should be reassessed if (i) there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, (ii) the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or (iii) there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests.

This EITF also applies to managing members in limited liability companies. The adoption of EITF 04-5 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Investments in entities which the Company does not consolidate but for which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are reported under the equity method. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s share of the investee’s earnings or loss is included in the Company’s operating results.

Revenue Recognition

Rental income from tenants is recognized in accordance with GAAP, including Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”). For leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes income on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectibility is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis for leases results in recognized revenue exceeding amounts contractually due from tenants. Such cumulative excess amounts are included in other assets and were $35.6 million and $18.4 million, net of allowances, at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In the event the Company determines that collectibility of straight-line rents is not reasonably assured, the Company limits future recognition to amounts contractually owed, and, where appropriate, the Company establishes an allowance for estimated losses. Certain leases provide for additional rents based upon a percentage of the facility’s revenue in excess of specified base amounts or other thresholds. Such revenue is deferred until the related thresholds are achieved.

The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and borrowers on an ongoing basis. The evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, security deposits and guarantees, and other matters. The Company establishes provisions and maintains an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the possible inability of its tenants and borrowers to make payments sufficient to recover recognized assets. For straight-line rent amounts, the Company’s assessment is based on income recoverable over the term of the lease. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, the Company had an allowance of $29.7 million and $21.6 million, included in other assets, as a result of the Company’s determination that collectibility is not reasonably assured for certain straight-line rent amounts.

Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are classified as held-to-maturity because the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost. The

F-8




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Company recognizes interest income on loans, including the amortization of discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method.

Real Estate

Real estate, consisting of land, buildings, and improvements, is recorded at cost. The Company allocates acquisition costs to the acquired tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities, primarily lease intangibles, based on their estimated fair values in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations.

The Company assesses fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates, third-party appraisals and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

The Company records acquired “above and below” market leases at their fair value using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired, equal to the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term for any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors to be considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, the Company considers leasing commissions, legal and other related costs.

Developments in process are carried at cost which includes pre-construction costs essential to development of the property, construction costs, capitalized interest, and other costs directly related to the property. Capitalization of interest ceases when the property is ready for service which generally is near the date that a certificate of occupancy is obtained. Expenditures for tenant improvements and leasing commissions are capitalized and amortized over the terms of the respective leases. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

The Company computes depreciation on properties using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Depreciation is discontinued when a property is identified as held for sale. Building and improvements are depreciated over useful lives ranging up to 45 years. Above and below market rent intangibles are amortized primarily to revenue over the remaining noncancellable lease terms and bargain renewal periods. Other in-place lease intangibles are amortized to expense over the remaining lease term and bargain renewal periods. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, lease intangibles assets were $479.6 million and $36.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, lease intangible liabilities were $151.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

The Company assesses the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable and, with respect to

F-9




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

goodwill, at least annually applying a fair-value-based test in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. If the sum of the expected future net undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset, an impairment loss will be recognized by adjusting the asset’s carrying amount to its estimated fair value. The determination of the fair value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, involves significant judgment. This judgment is based on the Company’s analysis and estimates of the future operating results and resulting cash flows of each long-lived asset. The Company’s ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows impacts the determination of fair value.

Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

The Company uses the direct finance method of accounting to record income from direct financing leases. For leases accounted for as direct financing leases, future minimum lease payments are recorded as a receivable. The difference between the rents receivable and the estimated residual values less the cost of the properties is recorded as unearned income. Unearned income is deferred and amortized to income over the lease terms to provide a constant yield. Investments in direct financing leases are presented net of unamortized unearned income. Direct financing leases have initial terms that range from 5 to 35 years. Certain leases contain provisions that allow the tenants to elect to purchase the properties during or at the end of the lease terms for the aggregate initial investment amount plus adjustments, if any, as defined in the lease agreements. Certain leases also permit the Company to require the tenants to purchase the properties at the end of the lease terms.

Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

Certain long lived assets are classified as discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their fair value less cost to sell. Further, depreciation of these assets ceases at the time the assets are classified as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations are defined in SFAS No. 144 as a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or is deemed to be held for sale if both the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

The Company periodically sells assets or contributes assets into joint ventures based on market conditions and the exercise of purchase options by tenants. The operating results of properties meeting the criteria established in SFAS No. 144 are reported as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Discontinued operations in 2006 include 113 properties with revenues of $54.4 million. The Company had 122 and 154 properties classified as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, with revenue of $60.7 million and $69.9 million, respectively. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, 83, 18 and 32 properties were sold, respectively, with net gains on real estate dispositions of $275.3 million, $10.2 million and $21.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the number of assets held for sale was 30 and 112 with carrying amounts of $57.5 million and $283.0 million, respectively.

Assets Held for Contribution

Properties classified as held for contribution to joint ventures, in which the Company maintains an ownership interest, qualify as held for sale under SFAS No. 144, but are not included in discontinued operations due to the Company’s continuing interest in the ventures. At December 31, 2006, the Company

F-10




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

classified as held for contribution 25 senior housing assets with an aggregate carrying value of $1.1 billion. In addition, two properties with an aggregate carrying value of $25.4 million included in a joint venture formed on October 27, 2006, are classified as held for contribution at December 31, 2005.

Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”), as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure (“SFAS No. 148”). The fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123 were adopted prospectively with the fair value of all new stock option grants recognized as compensation expense beginning January 1, 2002. Since only new grants are accounted for under the fair value method, stock-based compensation expense is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value method had been applied to all awards. Compensation expense for awards with graded vesting is generally recognized ratably over the period from the date of grant to the date when the award is no longer contingent on the employee providing additional services.

SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payments (“SFAS No. 123R”), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, was issued in December 2004. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123R is similar to that in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective application transition method which provides for only current and future period stock-based awards to be measured and recognized at fair value. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations since the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123 were previously adopted.

The following table reflects net income and earnings per share, adjusted as if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding stock awards in each period (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Net income, as reported

 

$

173,057

 

$

169,040

 

Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income

 

6,495

 

6,162

 

Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method

 

(6,811

)

(6,785

)

Pro forma net income

 

$

172,741

 

$

168,417

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic—as reported

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.12

 

Basic—pro forma

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.12

 

Diluted—as reported

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.11

 

Diluted—pro forma

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.10

 

 

F-11




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents represent short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash primarily consist of amounts held by mortgage lenders to provide for future real estate tax expenditures and tenant improvements, tenant capital improvement reserves and security deposits. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, restricted cash amounts were $38.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively, and are included in other assets.

Derivatives

The Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137, SFAS No. 138 and SFAS No. 148 (“SFAS No. 133”). SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the recognition of all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or that do not meet the hedge accounting criteria of SFAS No. 133 are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as hedging instruments in qualifying cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in fair value of the derivatives is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) whereas the ineffective portions are recognized in earnings.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities in the balance sheet. The Company also assesses and documents, both at the hedging instrument’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows associated with the hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative ceases to be highly effective as a hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.

Income Taxes

The Company has elected and believes it operates so as to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Under the Code, the Company generally is not subject to federal income tax on its taxable income distributed to stockholders if certain distribution, income, asset, and shareholder tests are met. A REIT must distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable income to stockholders. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the tax basis of the Company’s net assets is less than the reported amounts by $481 million and $298 million, respectively.

Certain activities the Company undertakes must be conducted by entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). TRSs are subject to both federal and state income taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, income taxes related to the Company’s TRSs approximated a benefit of $0.7 million and an expense of $1.5 million, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses. The Company’s income tax expense in 2006 was insignificant.

F-12




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Marketable Securities

The Company classifies its existing marketable equity and debt securities as available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Investment, (“SFAS No. 115”). These securities are carried at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains or losses on securities sold are based on the specific identification method. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company realized gains totaling $1.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, related to the sale of various equity securities. There were no gains or losses realized in 2004. At December 31, 2006, the carrying value of debt securities was $322.5 million, which includes $22.5 million in unrealized gains, and is included in other assets. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the carrying values of equity securities were $15.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively, and are included in other assets.

Capital Raising Issuance Costs

Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of both common and preferred shares are recorded as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt are deferred in other assets and amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt.

Segment Reporting

The Company reports its consolidated financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (“SFAS No. 131”). The Company’s segments are based on the Company’s method of internal reporting which classifies its operations by leasing activities. The Company’s segments include: medical office buildings (“MOBs”) and triple-net leased.

Stock Split

As of March 2, 2004, each stockholder received one additional share of common stock for each share they own resulting from a 2-for-1 stock split declared by the Company on January 22, 2004. The stock split has been reflected in all periods presented.

Minority Interests and Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments

As of December 31, 2006, there were 3.4 million non-managing member units outstanding in six limited liability companies of which the Company is the managing member: HCPI/Tennessee, LLC; HCPI/Utah, LLC; HCPI/Utah II, LLC; HCPI Indiana, LLC; HCP DR California, LLC and HCP DR Alabama, LLC. The Company consolidates these entities since it exercises control. The non-managing member LLC Units (“DownREIT units”) are exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of shares of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s option, shares of the Company’s common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). Upon exchange of DownREIT units for the Company’s common stock, the carrying amount of the DownREIT units is reclassified to stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2006, the market value of the 3.4 million DownREIT units was $219.2 million.

SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (“SFAS No. 150”), requires, among other things, that mandatorily redeemable financial instruments

F-13




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

be classified as a liability and recorded at settlement value. Consolidated joint ventures with a limited-life are considered mandatorily redeemable. Implementation of the provisions of SFAS No. 150 that require the valuation and establishment of a liability for limited-life entities was subsequently deferred. As of December 31, 2006, the Company has 11 limited-life entities that have a settlement value of the minority interests of approximately $6.9 million, which is approximately $4.9 million more than the carrying amount.

Preferred Stock Redemptions

The Company recognizes the excess of the redemption value of cumulative redeemable preferred stock redeemed over its carrying amount as a charge to income in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)—EITF Topic D-42, The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock (“EITF Topic D-42”). In July 2003, the SEC staff issued a clarification of the SEC’s position on the application of FASB EITF Topic D-42. The SEC staff’s position, as clarified, is that in applying EITF Topic D-42, the carrying value of preferred shares that are redeemed should be reduced by the amount of original issuance costs, regardless of where in stockholders’ equity those costs are reflected (see Note 15).

Life Care Bonds Payable

Two of the Company’s continuing care retirement communities (“CCRCs”) hold non-interest bearing life care bonds payable to certain residents of the CCRCs. Generally, the bonds are refundable to the resident or to the resident’s estate upon termination or cancellation of the CCRC agreement. One of the Company’s other seniors housing facilities requires that certain residents of the facility post non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits that are refundable to the resident or the resident’s estate the earlier of the re-letting of the unit or after two years of vacancy. Proceeds from the issuance of new bonds and deposits are used to retire existing bonds. As the maturity of these obligations is not determinable, no interest is imputed. These amounts are included in other debt in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (“SFAS No. 154”), which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principles. It requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46R-6, “Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46R” (“FSP FIN 46R-6”). FSP FIN 46R-6 addresses how variability should be considered when applying FIN 46R. Variability affects the determination of whether an entity is a VIE, which interests are variable interests, and which party, if any, is the primary beneficiary of the VIE that is required to be consolidated. FSP FIN 46R-6 clarifies that the design of the entity also should be considered when identifying which interests are variable interests. FSP FIN 46R-6 must be applied prospectively to all entities in which the Company first becomes involved, beginning September 1, 2006. Early application is permitted. The adoption of FSP FIN 46R-6 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

F-14




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation, among other things, creates a two step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. FIN 48 specifically prohibits the use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions, and it has expanded disclosure requirements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, in which the impact of adoption should be accounted for as a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The adoption of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) Topic 1N, “Financial Statements—Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). The SEC staff is providing guidance on how prior year misstatements should be taken into consideration when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements for purposes of determining whether the current year’s financial statements are materially misstated. The SEC staff indicates that “registrants must quantify the impact of correcting all misstatements, including both the carryover and reversing effects of prior year misstatements, on the current year financial statements.” If correcting a misstatement in the current year would materially misstate the current year’s income statement, the SEC staff indicates that the prior year financial statements should be adjusted. These adjustments to prior year financial statements are necessary even though such adjustments were appropriately viewed as immaterial in the prior year. If the Company determines that an adjustment to prior year financial statements is required upon adoption of SAB 108 and does not elect to restate its previous financial statements, then it must recognize the cumulative effect of applying SAB 108 in fiscal 2007 beginning balances of the affected assets and liabilities with a corresponding adjustment to the fiscal 2007 opening balance in retained earnings. The adoption of SAB 108 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurement. SFAS No. 157 requires prospective application for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating SFAS No. 157 and has not yet determined the impact the adoption will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made for comparative financial statement presentation.

F-15




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(3)          Future Minimum Rents

Future minimum lease payments to be received, excluding operating expense reimbursements, from tenants under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2006, are as follows (in thousands):

Year

 

 

 

Amount

 

2007

 

$

802,967

 

2008

 

763,810

 

2009

 

693,304

 

2010

 

650,089

 

2011

 

606,968

 

Thereafter

 

3,719,539

 

 

 

$

7,236,677

 

 

(4)          Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

The components of net investment in direct financing leases (“DFLs”) consisted of the following at December 31, 2006 (in thousands):

Minimum lease payments receivable

 

$

1,512,411

 

Estimated residual values

 

515,470

 

Less unearned income

 

(1,349,868

)

Net investment in direct financing leases

 

$

678,013

 

Properties subject to direct financing leases

 

32

 

 

The DFLs were acquired in the Company’s merger with CRP. CRP determined that these leases were direct financing lease, and the Company is generally required to carry forward CRP’s accounting conclusions after the acquisition date relative to their assessment of these leases. Lease payments due to the Company relating to five land-only direct financing leases with a carrying value of $106.4 million are subordinate to first mortgage construction loans with third parties entered into by the tenants to fund development costs related to the properties. In addition, the Company’s land interest serves as collateral to the first mortgage construction lender.

Future minimum lease payments contractually due on direct financing leases at December 31, 2006, were as follows (in thousands):

Year

 

 

 

Amount

 

2007

 

$

52,192

 

2008

 

53,330

 

2009

 

55,187

 

2010

 

57,273

 

2011

 

58,791

 

Thereafter

 

1,235,638

 

 

 

$

1,512,411

 

 

F-16




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(5)          Mergers with CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. and CNL Retirement Corp.

On October 5, 2006, HCP acquired CRP. CRP was a REIT that invested primarily in senior housing and medical office buildings located across the United States. This transaction further diversified HCP’s portfolio by property type, geographic location and operator, and diversified HCP’s sources of revenues across the healthcare industry. At the time of the CRP merger, CRP owned or held an ownership interest in 273 properties in 33 states.

Under the merger agreement with CRP, each share of CRP common stock was exchanged for $11.1293 in cash and 0.0865 of a share of the HCP’s common stock, equivalent to approximately $2.9 billion in cash, and 22.8 million shares. Fractional shares were paid in cash. The Company financed the cash consideration paid to CRP stockholders and the expenses related to the transaction through a $1 billon offering of senior unsecured notes and a draw down under new term and bridge loan facilities and a new three-year revolving credit facility.

Simultaneous with the closing of the merger with CRP, HCP also merged with CNL Retirement Corp. (“CRC”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $120 million, which included the issuance of 4.4 million shares of HCP common stock.

The calculation of the aggregate purchase price for CRP and CRC follows (in thousands):

Cash consideration paid for CRP common shares exchanged

 

$

2,948,729

 

Fair value of HCP common shares issued

 

720,384

 

CRP and CRC merger consideration

 

3,669,113

 

CRP and CRC merger costs

 

27,983

 

Additional cash consideration paid to retire debt at closing, net of cash acquired

 

348,334

 

Total consideration, net of assumed liabilities

 

4,045,430

 

Fair value of liabilities assumed, including debt and minority interest

 

1,517,582

 

Total consideration

 

$

5,563,012

 

 

Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of CRP and CRC were recorded at their relative fair values as of the date of the acquisition, with amounts paid in the excess of the fair value of the assets acquired recorded as goodwill. HCP obtained preliminary third-party valuations of the tangible and intangible assets, debt and certain other assets and liabilities. However, as of December 31, 2006, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and is pending the receipt of information necessary to complete the valuation of certain assets and liabilities. When finalized, adjustments to goodwill may result.

HCP has not identified any material unrecorded pre-acquisition contingencies where an impairment of the related asset or determination of the related liability is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If information becomes available which would indicate it is probable that such events had occurred and the amounts can be reasonably estimated, such items will be included in the final purchase price allocation and goodwill may be adjusted accordingly.

F-17




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the CRP and CRC assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date of October 5, 2006 (in thousands):

Assets acquired

 

 

 

Buildings and improvements

 

$

3,795,046

 

Land

 

516,254

 

Direct financing leases

 

675,500

 

Restricted cash

 

34,566

 

Intangible assets

 

417,479

 

Other assets

 

72,421

 

Goodwill

 

51,746

 

Total assets acquired

 

$

5,563,012

 

Liabilities assumed

 

 

 

Mortgages payable and other debt

 

$

1,299,109

 

Intangible liabilities

 

137,507

 

Other liabilities

 

75,705

 

Minority interests

 

5,261

 

Total liabilities assumed and minority interests

 

1,517,582

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

4,045,430

 

 

CRC maintained change-in-control provisions with certain of its employees that allowed for enhanced severance and benefit payments. Included in the assets acquired and liabilities assumed above are intangible assets associated with employee non-compete agreements and a non-compete agreement with CNL Financial Group, CNL Real Estate Group and two other named individuals valued at $24.2 million. The value recorded for the non-compete agreements is being amortized over the non-compete contract period of four years.

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume that the acquisitions of CRP and CRC were completed as of January 1 for each of the fiscal years shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Revenues

 

$

943,485

 

$

801,725

 

Net Income

 

351,239

 

73,364

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

1.95

 

$

0.32

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

1.94

 

$

0.32

 

 

Pro forma data may not be indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisitions actually occurred at the beginning of each of the periods presented, nor does it intend to be a projection of future results.

In connection with the CRP and CRC mergers, HCP incurred $14.0 million of merger-related costs primarily in the fourth quarter of 2006. These merger-related costs include the amortization of fees associated with the CRP acquisition financing, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees related

F-18




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

to a previous line of credit, retention-related compensation, as well as other CRP integration costs. The Company expects to incur additional merger-related costs through 2007.

(6)          Real Estate Acquisitions and Dispositions

A summary of the Company’s other 2006 acquisitions follows (in thousands):

 

 

Consideration

 

Assets Acquired

 

Acquisitions(1)

 

 

 

Cash Paid

 

Real Estate

 

Debt
Assumed

 

DownREIT
Units(2)

 

Real Estate

 

Net
Intangibles

 

Medical office buildings

 

$

141,449

 

 

$

 

 

$

11,928

 

 

$

5,523

 

 

 

$

147,522

 

 

 

$

11,378

 

 

Senior housing facilities

 

222,275

 

 

16,600

 

 

68,819

 

 

 

 

 

299,970

 

 

 

7,724

 

 

Hospitals

 

41,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,661

 

 

 

829

 

 

Other healthcare facilities

 

36,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,306

 

 

 

2,764

 

 

 

 

$

441,284

 

 

$

16,600

 

 

$

80,747

 

 

$

5,523

 

 

 

$

521,459

 

 

 

$

22,695

 

 


(1)          Includes transaction costs, if any.

(2)          Non-managing member LLC units.

In addition to the CRP acquisition discussed in Note 5, during the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company acquired properties aggregating $544 million, including the following significant acquisitions:

On November 30, 2006, the Company acquired four assisted living and independent living facilities for $51 million, through a sale-leaseback transaction. These facilities have an initial lease term of ten years, with two ten-year renewal options. The initial annual lease rate is approximately 8.0% with annual escalators based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).

On May 31, 2006, the Company acquired nine assisted living and independent living facilities for $99 million, including assumed debt valued at $61 million, through a sale-leaseback transaction. These facilities have an initial lease term of ten years, with two ten-year renewal options. The initial annual lease rate is approximately 8.0% with annual CPI-based escalators.

During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company acquired 13 medical office buildings (“MOBs”) for $138 million, including DownREIT units valued at $6 million, in related transactions. The 13 buildings, with 730,000 rentable square feet, have an initial yield of 7.3%.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company sold 83 properties for $512 million and recognized gains of approximately $275 million, which includes the sale of 69 skilled nursing facilities on December 1, 2006, for $392 million with a gain of approximately $226 million and one building, sold on July 25, 2006, for $73 million with a gain of approximately $32 million.

See discussions of the HCP Medical Office Portfolio, LLC and HCP Ventures III, LLC transactions in Note 9.

F-19




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

A summary of the Company’s 2005 acquisitions is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Consideration

 

Assets Acquired

 

Acquisitions(1)

 

 

 

Cash Paid

 

Debt
Assumed

 

DownREIT
Units(2)

 

Real Estate

 

Net
Intangibles

 

Medical office buildings

 

$

96,863

 

$

61,424

 

 

$

10,967

 

 

 

$

154,182

 

 

 

$

15,072

 

 

Senior housing facilities

 

313,744

 

52,060

 

 

19,431

 

 

 

379,745

 

 

 

5,490

 

 

 

 

$

410,607

 

$

113,484

 

 

$

30,398

 

 

 

$

533,927

 

 

 

$

20,562

 

 


(1)          Includes transaction costs, if any.

(2)          Non-managing member LLC units.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company acquired properties aggregating $554 million, including 16 MOBs for $169 million and 25 senior housing facilities for $385 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company sold 18 properties for $65 million and recognized net gains of $10 million.

See Note 23 for a discussion of acquisitions subsequent to December 31, 2006.

(7)          Intangibles

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, intangible lease assets, comprised of lease-up, favorable market lease intangibles, and intangible assets related to non-compete agreements were $479.6 million and $36.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the accumulated amortization of intangible assets was $28.7 million and $8.0 million, respectively. The weighted average amortization period of intangible assets is approximately 21 and 12 years, respectively.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, unfavorable market lease intangibles, net were $151.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the accumulated amortization of intangible liabilities was $7.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The weighted average amortization period of unfavorable market lease intangibles is approximately 12 and 6 years, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, rental income includes additional revenues of $1.5 million and $2.0 million from the amortization of net unfavorable market lease intangibles, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, operating expense includes additional expense of $0.7 million and $0.1 million from the amortization of net favorable market lease intangibles, primarily related to ground leases, respectively. There was no amortization of favorable or unfavorable market lease intangibles in 2004.

F-20




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Estimated aggregate amortization of intangible assets and liabilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter follows (in thousands):

 

 

Intangible
Assets

 

Intangible
Liabilities

 

Net Intangible
Amortization

 

2007

 

$

65,401

 

$

17,335

 

 

$

48,066

 

 

2008

 

64,810

 

15,257

 

 

49,553

 

 

2009

 

55,336

 

14,646

 

 

40,690

 

 

2010

 

44,053

 

12,468

 

 

31,585

 

 

2011

 

34,166

 

11,775

 

 

22,391

 

 

Thereafter

 

215,846

 

79,847

 

 

135,999

 

 

 

 

$

479,612

 

$

151,328

 

 

$

328,284

 

 

 

(8)          Operator Concentration

Tenet Healthcare Corporation (“Tenet”) (NYSE: THC) and Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (“Brookdale”) (NYSE: BKD), or American Retirement Corporation (“ARC”) (NYSE: ARC) prior to Brookdale’s acquisition of ARC on July 25, 2006, accounted for 9% and 8%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue in 2006 and accounted for 13% and 10%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue in 2005. The carrying amount of the Company’s real estate assets leased to Tenet and Brookdale was $333 million and $625 million, respectively, at December 31, 2006.

In addition, Sunrise Senior Living (NYSE:SRZ) (“Sunrise”) accounted for 5% of the Company’s revenue in 2006. The carrying amount of the Company’s real estate assets operated by Sunrise was $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006. Prior to the Company’s merger with CRP on October 5, 2006, Sunrise was not an operator of any of the Company’s properties.

Tenet, Brookdale and Sunrise are publicly traded and are subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, each is required to file periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Certain operators of the Company’s properties are experiencing financial, legal and regulatory difficulties. The loss of a significant operator or a combination of smaller operators could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

(9)          Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures

HCP Medical Office Portfolio, LLC (“HCP MOP”)

HCP MOP was a joint venture formed in June 2003 between the Company and an affiliate of General Electric Company (“GE”). HCP MOP was engaged in the acquisition, development and operation of MOB properties. Prior to November 30, 2006, the Company was the managing member and had a 33% ownership interest therein. On November 30, 2006, the Company acquired the interest held by GE for $141 million, which resulted in the consolidation of HCP MOP beginning on that date. The Company is now the sole owner of the venture and its 59 MOBs, which have approximately four million rentable square feet.

F-21




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The calculation of the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities for HCP MOP follows (in thousands):

Cash consideration paid for GE’s partnership interest

 

$

141,286

 

Carrying value of equity method investment

 

42,427

 

 

 

183,713

 

Additional cash considerations paid to retire GE’s loan to the venture and acquisition costs, net of cash acquired

 

(3,123

)

Total, net of assumed liabilities

 

180,590

 

Fair value of liabilities assumed, including debt

 

277,993

 

Total

 

$

458,583

 

 

Under the purchase method of accounting, the cost of the HCP MOP acquisition was allocated based on the relative fair values as of the date that the Company acquired each of its interests in HCP MOP. HCP obtained preliminary third-party valuations of the tangible and intangible assets, debt and certain other assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2006, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and is pending information necessary to complete the valuation of certain tangible assets and intangibles.

The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated purchase price allocation as of November 30, 2006 for HCP MOP (in thousands):

Assets acquired

 

 

 

Buildings and improvements

 

$

342,073

 

Land

 

18,397

 

Restricted cash

 

2,056

 

Intangible assets

 

85,853

 

Other assets

 

10,204

 

Total assets acquired

 

$

458,583

 

 

Liabilities assumed

 

 

 

Mortgages payable

 

$

250,741

 

Intangible liabilities

 

10,841

 

Other liabilities

 

16,411

 

Total liabilities assumed

 

277,993

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

180,590

 

 

Prior to November 30, 2006, the Company accounted for its investment in HCP MOP using the equity method of accounting because it exercised significant influence through voting rights and its position as managing member. However, the Company did not consolidate HCP MOP until November 30, 2006, since it did not control, through voting rights or other means, the joint venture as GE had substantive participating decision making rights and had the majority of the economic interest. The accounting policies of HCP MOP prior to November 30, 2006, are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2).

F-22




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Summarized unaudited condensed consolidated financial information of HCP MOP for the periods prior to consolidation follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,
2005

 

Real estate, at cost

 

 

$

390,840

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

21,342

 

 

Net real estate

 

 

369,498

 

 

Real estate held for sale, net

 

 

78,811

 

 

Other assets, net

 

 

36,755

 

 

Total assets

 

 

$

485,064

 

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

 

$

270,046

 

 

Mortgage loans on assets held for sale

 

 

58,232

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

21,824

 

 

GE’s capital

 

 

90,424

 

 

HCP’s capital

 

 

44,538

 

 

Total liabilities and members’ capital

 

 

$

485,064

 

 

 

 

 

Period from
January 1,
2006 to
November 30,

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

      2005      

 

      2004      

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Total revenues

 

 

$

70,967

 

 

 

$

71,107

 

 

 

$

66,383

 

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

$

20,512

 

 

 

$

(2,715

)

 

 

$

1,482

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

$

23,767

 

 

 

$

(3,829

)

 

 

$

4,932

 

 

HCP’s equity income (loss)

 

 

$

7,820

 

 

 

$

(1,379

)

 

 

$

1,537

 

 

Fees earned by HCP

 

 

$

3,066

 

 

 

$

3,102

 

 

 

$

3,112

 

 

Distributions received

 

 

$

13,667

 

 

 

$

5,302

 

 

 

$

98,291

 

 

 

In August and September 2005, ten medical office buildings owned by HCP MOP, principally in Louisiana and the surrounding area, sustained varying degrees of damage due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Four of the buildings incurred substantial damage and are a total loss. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the four buildings generated revenues for HCP MOP of $0.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2005, the remaining six buildings had resumed operations with repairs completed as of June 30, 2006.

As of December 31, 2005, the $3.8 million carrying value of the four buildings with substantial damage was written off and an equal amount was recorded as a receivable for the expected insurance proceeds. Repairs and other related expenditures for damages caused by hurricanes Katrina and Rita for the eleven-month period ended November 30, 2006, were approximately $2.2 million, and were added to the expected insurance receivable. For the eleven-month period ended November 30, 2006, HCP MOP received $6.4 million in proceeds from its insurance carriers, including $1.3 million in excess of insurance receivable. Excess insurance proceeds are recorded as a gain at the time that the claims are settled with the carrier.

F-23




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

During the eleven-month period ended November 30, 2006, HCP MOP sold 34 MOBs with 1.4 million of rentable square feet for $100.7 million, net of transaction costs, and recognized aggregate gains of approximately $19.7 million. In connection with these transactions, approximately $64.9 million of HCP MOP’s mortgage debt was either repaid or assumed by the purchasers.

Other Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company owns interests in the following entities which are accounted for under the equity method at December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Entity

 

 

 

Investment(1)

 

Ownership

 

Arborwood Living Center, LLC

 

 

$

834

 

 

 

45

%

 

Edgewood Assisted Living Center, LLC(2)

 

 

(352

)

 

 

45

%

 

Greenleaf Living Centers, LLC

 

 

440

 

 

 

45

%

 

Seminole Shores Living Center, LLC(2)

 

 

(783

)

 

 

50

%

 

Suburban Properties, LLC(3)

 

 

5,809

 

 

 

67

%

 

HCP Ventures III, LLC

 

 

14,268

 

 

 

26

%

 

 

 

 

$

20,216

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)          Represents the Company’s investment in the unconsolidated joint venture. See Note 2 regarding the Company’s policy for accounting for joint venture interests. At December 31, 2006, investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures includes outstanding advances to HCP Ventures III, LLC and Suburban Properties, LLC of approximately $4 million in the aggregate.

(2)   Negative investment amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

(3)          Suburban Properties, LLC is not consolidated since the Company does not control, through voting rights or other means, the joint venture.

On October 27, 2006, the Company formed an MOB joint venture (HCP Ventures III) with an institutional capital partner. The joint venture includes 13 properties valued at $140 million and encumbered by $92 million of mortgage debt. Upon formation, the Company received approximately $36 million in proceeds, including a one-time acquisition fee of $0.7 million. The Company retained an effective 26% interest in the venture, will act as the managing member, and will receive ongoing asset management fees.

On June 30, 2005, the Company sold its minority interests in two joint ventures with ARC for $6.2 million in exchange for a note collateralized by certain partnership interests of ARC. The note bears interest at 9% per annum and matures in June 2010. The gain on sale of $2.4 million was deferred and will be recognized under the installment method of accounting as the principal balance of the note is repaid. These joint ventures were accounted for by the Company under the equity method prior to June 30, 2005.

F-24




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Summarized unaudited condensed combined financial information for the other unconsolidated joint ventures follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Real estate, net

 

$

150,206

 

$

14,708

 

Other assets, net

 

25,358

 

1,407

 

Total assets

 

$

175,564

 

$

16,115

 

Notes payable

 

$

116,805

 

$

15,449

 

Accounts payable

 

13,690

 

55

 

Other partners’ capital

 

32,549

 

351

 

HCP’s capital

 

12,520

 

260

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

175,564

 

$

16,115

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005(1)

 

2004(1)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Total revenues

 

$

7,508

 

$

4,420

 

$

13,244

 

Net income

 

$

635

 

$

442

 

$

3,432

 

HCP’s equity income

 

$

511

 

$

256

 

$

620

 

Fees earned by HCP

 

$

829

 

$

82

 

$

181

 

Distributions received, net

 

$

26,779

 

$

 

$

694

 


(1)          Includes financial information related to two joint ventures with ARC that were sold on June 30, 2005.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company has guaranteed approximately $7 million of a total of $116.8 million of notes payable for four of these joint ventures.

(10)   Loans Receivable

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

Real Estate
Secured

 

Other

 

Total

 

Real Estate
Secured

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Joint venture partners

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,054

 

$

7,054

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,006

 

$

7,006

 

Other

 

 

121,482

 

 

69,624

 

191,106

 

 

175,426

 

 

6,663

 

182,089

 

Loan loss allowance

 

 

 

 

(1,680

)

(1,680

)

 

 

 

(2,264

)

(2,264

)

 

 

 

$

121,482

 

 

$

74,998

 

$

196,480

 

 

$

175,426

 

 

$

11,405

 

$

186,831

 

 

On March 14, 2006, the Company received $38 million in proceeds, including $7.3 million in excess of the carrying value, upon the early repayment of a secured loan receivable due May 1, 2010. The amount received in excess of the carrying value of the secured loan receivable was recorded as interest income and is included in interest and other income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2006. This loan was secured by nine skilled nursing facilities and carried an interest rate of 11.4% per annum.

F-25




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

On February 9, 2006, the Company refinanced two existing loans secured by a hospital in Texas. The loans were combined into a new single loan that bears interest at 8.5% per annum and matures 2016. The original maturity of these loans was January 2006 with a weighted average interest rate of 10.35%.

On December 28, 2005, the Company issued a $40 million loan secured by a hospital in Texas. The note bears interest at 8.75% per annum. Subject to certain performance conditions, the Company may fund an additional $10 million under the existing loan agreement.

Through the Company’s merger with CRP, it assumed an agreement to provide an affiliate of the Cirrus Group, LLC (“Cirrus”) with an interest only, five-year, senior secured term loan under which up to $85.0 million may be borrowed to finance the acquisition, development, syndication and operation of new and existing surgical partnerships. Certain of these surgical partnerships are tenants in the MOBs CRP acquired from Cirrus. During the first 48 months of the term, which began in August 2005, interest at a rate of 14.0%, will accrue, of which 9.5% will be payable monthly and the balance of 4.5% will be deferred. Thereafter, interest at the greater of 14.0% or LIBOR plus 9.0% will be payable monthly. The loan is subject to equity contribution requirements and borrower financial covenants that govern the draw down availability. The loan is collateralized by all of the assets of the borrower, which are comprised primarily of interest in partnerships operating surgical facilities in premises leased from a Cirrus affiliate and is guaranteed up to $50.0 million through a combination of (i) a personal guarantee of up to $13.0 million by a principal of Cirrus and (ii) a guarantee of the balance by other principals of Cirrus under arrangements for recourse limited only to their interests in certain entities owning real estate. At December 31, 2006, the carrying value of this loan is $66.0 million.

At December 31, 2006, minimum future principal payments to be received on secured loans receivable are $8.2 million in 2007, $1.6 million in 2008, $11.1 million in 2009, $12.5 million in 2010, $2.8 million in 2011, and $85.3 million thereafter.

F-26




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Following is a summary of secured loans receivable secured by real estate at December 31, 2006:

Final
Payment
Due

 

Number of
Loans

 

Payment Terms

 

Initial
Principal
Amount

 

Carrying
Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2007

 

 

1

 

 

Monthly interest payments of $78,000 at 12.75%, and quarterly principal payments of $238,000. Secured by leasehold interests in six properties.

 

$

13,500

 

$

7,340

 

2008

 

 

1

 

 

Monthly interest payments of $6,000, at 10.50% and monthly principal payments of $2,000. Secured by an assisted living facility in Wisconsin.

 

800

 

703

 

2009

 

 

3

 

 

Monthly interest payments of $16,000 to $36,000, at 6.00% to 12.91%. Monthly principal payments of $3,000 to $5,000. Secured by four assisted living facilities in California, Montana, Georgia, and South Carolina.

 

10,478

 

10,476

 

2010

 

 

1

 

 

Monthly interest payments of $132,000 at 10.88%. Monthly principal payments of $53,000. Secured by two assisted living facilities in Colorado.

 

18,397

 

14,549

 

2011

 

 

1

 

 

Monthly interest payments of $28,000 at 10.14%. Monthly principal payments of $9,000. Secured by an assisted living facility in North Carolina.

 

3,859

 

3,257

 

2013-2016

 

 

3

 

 

Monthly interest payments of $73,000 to $262,000 at 8.5% to 8.75%. No monthly principal payments. Secured by two acute care facilities in Texas.

 

79,593

 

85,157

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

$

126,627

 

$

121,482

 

 

(11)   Other Assets

The Company’s other assets consisted of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Marketable debt securities

 

$

322,500

 

$

 

Marketable equity securities

 

15,159

 

6,333

 

Restricted cash

 

38,504

 

2,270

 

Goodwill

 

51,746

 

 

Straight-line rent assets, net

 

35,582

 

18,439

 

Other

 

51,348

 

19,483

 

Total other assets

 

$

514,839

 

$

46,525

 

 

On November 17, 2006, the Company purchased $300 million senior secured notes issued by HCA Inc. (“HCA”). These notes accrue interest at 9.625%, mature on November 15, 2016, and are secured by second-priority liens on the HCA’s and its subsidiary guarantors’ assets. At December 31, 2006, the fair value of these senior secured notes was $322.5 million and are classified as held for sale. The issuer of

F-27




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

these notes may elect to pay interest in cash by increasing the principal amount of the notes for the entire amount of the interest payments, or by paying half of the interest in cash and half in additional notes. The first payment due on May 15, 2007 is only payable in cash. After November 15, 2011, all interest on these notes will be payable in cash. If the issuer elects to pay by adding to the principal amount or with additional notes, the accrual rate is at 10.375%.

(12)   Debt

Bank Lines of Credit

On October 5, 2006, in connection with the CRP merger, the Company entered into credit agreements with a syndicate of banks providing for aggregate borrowings of $3.4 billion. The facilities included a $0.7 billion bridge loan, a $1.7 billion two-year term loan, and a $1.0 billion three-year revolving credit facility.

The Company repaid the bridge loan facility on November 10, 2006. The bridge loan facility accrued interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.60% to 1.35%, depending upon the Company’s debt ratings.

At December 31, 2006, borrowings under the term loan facility were $504.6 million with a weighted average rate of 6.22%. The Company repaid all amounts outstanding under the term loan, through its capital market transactions in January 2007.

At December 31, 2006, borrowings under the $1.0 billion revolving credit facility were $624.5 million with a weighted average interest rate of 6.05%. The revolving credit facility matures on October 2, 2009, and accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.475% to 1.10%, depending upon the Company’s non-credit enhanced senior unsecured long-term debt ratings (“debt ratings”). The Company pays a facility fee on the entire revolving commitment ranging from 0.125% to 0.25%, depending upon its debt ratings. The revolving credit facility contains a negotiated rate option, which is available for up to 50% of borrowings, whereby the lenders participating in the credit facility bid on the interest to be charged and which may result in a reduced interest rate. Based on the Company’s debt ratings on December 31, 2006, the margin on the revolving loan facility is 0.70% and the facility fee is 0.15%.

The revolving credit agreement contains certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements. Among other things, these covenants, using terms defined in the agreement, initially limit (i) Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 70%, (ii) Secured Debt to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 30% and (iii) beginning January 1, 2007, Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 100%. The agreement also requires that the Company maintains (i) a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.50 times and (ii) a formula-determined Minimum Tangible Net Worth. These financial covenants become more restrictive over a period of approximately two years and ultimately (i) limit Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 60%, (ii) limit Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 65%, and (iii) require a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.75 times. As of December 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with each of the restrictions and requirements.

F-28




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Senior Unsecured Notes

Following is a summary of senior unsecured notes outstanding at December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

Year Issued

 

 

 

Maturity

 

Principal
Amount

 

Interest
Rate

 

1997

 

 

2007

 

 

$

20,000

 

7.30-7.62%

 

2006

 

 

2008

 

 

300,000

 

5.84

 

1995

 

 

2010

 

 

6,421

 

6.62

 

2005

 

 

2010

 

 

200,000

 

4.88

 

2006

 

 

2011

 

 

300,000

 

5.95

 

2002

 

 

2012

 

 

250,000

 

6.45

 

2006

 

 

2013

 

 

550,000

 

5.63-5.65

 

2004

 

 

2014

 

 

87,000

 

5.39-6.00

 

2003

 

 

2015

 

 

200,000

 

6.00

 

1998

 

 

2015

 

 

200,000

 

7.07

 

2006

 

 

2016

 

 

400,000

 

6.30

 

2005

 

 

2017

 

 

250,000

 

5.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,763,421

 

 

 

Net discounts

 

 

 

 

 

(14,899

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,748,522

 

 

 

 

The weighted average interest rate on the senior unsecured notes at December 31, 2006 and 2005, was 5.88% and 6.23%, respectively. Discounts and premiums are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

On December 4, 2006, the Company issued $400 million of 5.65% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.768% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.69%. The Company received net proceeds of $396 million, which were used to repay indebtedness under the term loan facility.

On September 19, 2006, the Company issued $1 billion of senior unsecured notes, which consisted of $300 million of floating rate notes due in 2008, $300 million of 5.95% notes due in 2011, and $400 million of 6.30% notes due in 2016. The notes were priced at 100% of the principal amount for the floating rate notes due in 2008, 99.971% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.957% for the 5.95% notes due in 2011, and 99.877% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 6.317% for the 6.30% notes due in 2016. The Company received net proceeds of $994 million, which together with cash on hand and borrowings under the new credit facilities were used to repay its then existing credit facility and to finance the CRP merger.

On February 27, 2006, the Company issued $150 million of 5.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2013. The notes were priced at 99.071% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 5.788%. The Company received net proceeds of $149 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

In February and October 2006, the Company repaid an aggregate of $255 million of maturing senior unsecured notes which accrued interest at a weighted average rate of 7.1%.

F-29




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

On January 22, 2007, the Company issued $500 million of 6.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2017. The notes were priced at 99.323% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 6.09%. The Company received net proceeds of $493 million, which were used to repay its term loan facility and borrowings under its revolving credit facility.

The senior unsecured notes contain certain covenants including limitations on debt and other terms customary in transactions of this type. As of December 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with each of the restrictions and requirements.

Mortgage Debt

At December 31, 2006, the Company had $2.2 billion in mortgage debt secured by 269 healthcare facilities with a carrying amount of $4.5 billion. Interest rates on the mortgage notes ranged from 3.72% to 9.32%. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the weighted-average interest rate on mortgage notes payable was 6.0% and 7.05%, respectively.

On December 21, 2006, in anticipation of the Company’s senior housing joint venture that closed on January 5, 2007, the Company expanded its existing secured debt facility with Fannie Mae to $686 million, receiving $446 million in proceeds. The Fannie Mae facility, which encumbers the venture’s 25 assets, bears interest at a weighted average rate of 5.66%, with $119 million maturing in October 2013, and $567 million maturing in November 2016. The funds from the expanded debt facility were used to repay borrowings under the Company’s term loan facility. At December 31, 2006, the balance of this facility was $686 million and is classified as mortgage debt on assets held for contribution.

In addition to the mortgage debt issued under the Fannie Mae facility discussed above, during 2006, the Company obtained $165 million of ten-year mortgage financing with a weighted average effective rate of 6.36% in five separate transactions. The Company received net proceeds of $161.9 million, which were used to repay outstanding indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes.

The instruments encumbering the properties restrict title transfer of the respective properties subject to the terms of the mortgage, prohibit additional liens, restrict prepayment, require payment of real estate taxes, maintenance of the properties in good condition, maintenance of insurance on the properties and include a requirement to obtain lender consent to enter into material tenant leases.

Other Debt

In connection with the CRP merger on October 5, 2006, the Company assumed $104.5 million of non-interest bearing Life Care Bonds at its two CCRCs and non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits at another of its senior housing facilities, all of which were payable to certain residents of the facilities (collectively “Life Care Bonds”). At December 31, 2006, $61.5 million of the Life Care Bonds  were refundable to the residents upon the resident moving out or to a resident’s estate upon the resident’s death, and $46.2 million of the Life Care Bonds  were refundable after the unit has been successfully remarketed to a new resident.

F-30




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Debt Maturities

Debt maturities and scheduled principal payments at December 31, 2006 are as follows (in thousands):

Year

 

 

 

Bank
Line of
Credit and
Term Loan

 

Senior
Notes

 

Mortgage
Notes

 

Total

 

2007

 

$

   

$

20,000

 

$

68,972

 

$

88,972

 

2008

 

504,593

 

300,000

 

98,228

 

902,821

 

2009

 

624,500

 

 

276,407

 

900,907

 

2010

 

 

206,421

 

302,174

 

508,595

 

2011

 

 

300,000

 

157,520

 

457,520

 

Thereafter

 

 

1,937,000

 

1,306,707

 

3,243,707

 

 

 

$

1,129,093

 

$

2,763,421

 

$

2,210,008

 

$

6,102,522

 

 

(13)   Commitments and Contingencies

The Company, from time to time, is party to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. These claims, even if not meritorious, could force the Company to spend significant financial resources. Except as described below, the Company is not aware of any legal proceedings or claims that it believes will have, individually or taken together, a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.

Limited Partnership Litigation.   On September 26, 2005, the Company filed a lawsuit in Superior Court of California, County of San Diego entitled Health Care Property Investors, Inc. v. Fenton Partners, Fenton & Grust, LLC and SRG Holdco, LP. The Company held an option to acquire certain limited partnership units in SRG Holdco, LP. The Company settled this lawsuit on November 11, 2005. The settlement included a payment to the Company of $1.7 million. The Company accounted for the transfer of this financial asset as a sale and recognized a gain of approximately $1.3 million based on the proceeds received less the carrying value of the securities. The net gain from the sale of these securities is included in interest and other income.

State of California Senate Bill 1953.   One of the Company’s properties located in Tarzana, California is affected by State of California Senate Bill 1953 (SB 1953), which requires certain seismic safety building standards for acute care hospital facilities. This hospital is operated by Tenet under a lease expiring in February 2009. The Company and Tenet are currently reviewing the SB 1953 compliance of this hospital, multiple plans of action to cause such compliance, the estimated time for completing the same, and the cost of performing necessary remediation of the property. HCP cannot currently estimate the remediation costs that will need to be incurred prior to 2013 in order to make the facility SB 1953-compliant through 2030, and the final allocation of any remediation costs between the Company and Tenet. Rent on the hospital in 2006 and 2005 was $10.8 million for each year and the carrying amount was $73.9 million at December 31, 2006.

Master Trust Liabilities.   Certain residents of two of the Company’s senior housing facilities have entered into a master trust agreement with the operator of the facilities whereby amounts paid upfront by such residents were deposited into a trust account. These funds were then made available to the senior housing operator in the form of a non-interest bearing loan to provide permanent financing for the related

F-31




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

communities. The operator of the senior housing facility is the borrower under these arrangements; however, two of the Company’s properties are collateral under the master trust agreements. As of December 31, 2006, the remaining obligation under the master trust agreements for these two properties is $10 million. The Company’s property is released as collateral as the master trust liabilities are extinguished.

SCCI Stock Purchase Agreement.   On July 28, 2005, in connection with the acquisition of SCCI Healthcare Services Corporation (“SCCI”) by Triumph Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (“Buyer”), the Company sold its securities in SCCI, with a carrying value of zero, and received proceeds of $2.9 million. Pursuant to certain indemnities specified in the related Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), the Company could be required to return or pay to the Buyer a portion of the proceeds received from the sale of its shares in certain circumstances. Specifically, the SPA provides that each seller under the SPA, severally but not jointly, indemnifies Buyer for damages relating to certain legal proceedings, which are defined in the SPA. The SPA generally imposes an aggregate cap on the liability of the sellers for indemnities under the SPA in the amount of $17.5 million, which sum was deposited into escrow at the closing of the sale as a holdback. The Company accounted for the transfer of this financial asset as a sale and recognized a gain of approximately $2.8 million based on the proceeds received less the estimated fair value of the indemnities. The gain from the sale of these securities is included in interest and other income in the Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Earn-out Obligations.   Pursuant to the terms of certain acquisition-related agreements, the Company may be obligated to make additional payments (“Earn-outs”) upon the achievement of certain criteria. If it is probable at the time of acquisition of the related properties that the Earn-out criteria will be achieved, the Earn-out payments are accrued. Otherwise, the additional purchase consideration is recognized when the performance criteria are achieved. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company made Earn-out payments in the aggregate of $6.7 million.

General Uninsured Losses.   The Company obtains various types of insurance to mitigate the impact of property, business interruption, liability, flood, earthquake and terrorism related losses. The Company attempts to obtain appropriate policy terms, conditions, limits and deductibles considering the relative risk of loss, the cost of such coverage and current industry practice. There are, however, certain types of extraordinary losses, such as those due to acts of war or other events that may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable. Although the Company has obtained coverage to mitigate the impact of various casualty losses, with policy specifications and insured limits that it believes are commercially reasonable, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to collect under such policies or that the policies will provide adequate coverage. Should an uninsured loss occur at a property, the Company’s assets may become impaired and the Company may not be able to operate its business at the property for an extended period of time.

F-32




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Leases with certain tenants contain purchase options whereby the tenant may elect to acquire the underlying real estate. Annualized lease payments to be received from leases subject to purchase options, in the year that these purchase options are exercisable, are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year

 

 

 

Base Rent

 

Number
of
Properties

 

2007

 

$

6,040

 

 

11

 

 

2008

 

18,907

 

 

5

 

 

2009

 

34,952

 

 

20

 

 

2010

 

7,161

 

 

11

 

 

2011

 

2,174

 

 

3

 

 

Thereafter

 

80,567

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

$

149,801

 

 

137

 

 

 

The Company’s rental expense attributable to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $4.2 million, $2.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively. These rental expense amounts include ground rent and other leases. Future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable ground leases as of December 31, 2006 were as follows (in thousands):

Year

 

 

 

Amount

 

2007

 

$

1,380

 

2008

 

1,396

 

2009

 

1,410

 

2010

 

1,423

 

2011

 

1,439

 

Thereafter

 

79,837

 

Total

 

$

86,885

 

 

(14)   Derivative Financial Instruments

In July 2005, the Company entered into three interest-rate swap contracts that are designated as hedging the variability in expected cash flows for variable rate debt assumed in connection with the acquisition of a portfolio of real estate assets in July 2005. The cash flow hedges have a notional amount of $45.6 million and expire in July 2020. The fair value of these contracts at December 31, 2006, was $0.3 million and is included in other liabilities. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recognized increased interest expense of $0.2 million attributable to the contracts. The Company determined that these swap agreements were highly effective in offsetting future variable-interest cash flows related to the assumed mortgages. The effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) whereas the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, there was no ineffective portion related to these hedges.

In August 2006, the Company entered into two treasury lock contracts that were designated as hedging the variability in forecasted interest payments, attributable to changes in the U.S. Treasury rate, on long-term fixed rate debt forecasted to be issued between September 1 and October 31, 2006. The cash flow hedges had a notional principal amount of $560.5 million and were settled on September 16, 2006,

F-33




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

which was the date that the forecasted debt was issued. The cash settlement value of these contracts at September 16, 2006, was $4.4 million. The unamortized amount of these contracts at December 31, 2006, is $4.3 million and is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company determined that these treasury lock agreements were highly effective in offsetting future variability of forecasted interest payments. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to these hedges will be recognized as additional interest expense on the Company’s hedged fixed-rate debt that will mature in 2011 and 2016. During 2007, the Company estimates that $0.5 million will be recognized as additional interest expense.

(15)   Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

Dividends on the Company’s common stock are characterized for federal income tax purposes as taxable ordinary income, capital gain distributions, nontaxable distributions or a combination thereof. Following is the characterization of the Company’s annual common stock dividends per share:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Taxable ordinary income

 

$

1.1124

 

$

1.0492

 

$

1.0730

 

Capital gain distribution

 

0.5285

 

0.0300

 

 

Nontaxable distribution

 

0.0591

 

0.6008

 

0.5970

 

 

 

$

1.7000

 

$

1.6800

 

$

1.6700

 

 

For the period from January 1, 2006 through October 5, 2006, 100 percent of the distributions received by CRP stockholders were considered to be capital gain dividends, all of which were also unrecaptured IRC Section 1250 gain income.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 67 percent of the distributions received by CRP stockholders were considered to be ordinary income and 33 percent were considered a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2004, approximately 60 percent of the distributions received by CRP stockholders were considered to be ordinary income and approximately 40 percent were considered a return of capital for federal income tax purposes.

During 2006 and 2005, the Company issued 0.8 million and 0.9 million shares of common stock, respectively, under its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRIP).

On October 5, 2006, the Company issued an aggregate of 27.2 million shares of common stock in connection with the CRP and CRC mergers.

On November 10, 2006, the Company issued 33.5 million shares of common stock and received net proceeds of approximately $960 million.

On January 19, 2007, the Company issued 6.8 million shares of its common stock and received net proceeds of approximately $261 million.

On January 29, 2007, the Company announced that its Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.445 per share. The common stock cash dividend will be paid on February 21, 2007 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 5, 2007.

F-34




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Preferred Stock

The Series E and Series F preferred stock have no stated maturity, are not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and are not convertible into any other securities of the Company. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. The following summarizes cumulative redeemable preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2006:

Series

 

 

 

Shares
Outstanding

 

Issue Price

 

Dividend
Rate

 

Callable at
Par on or After

 

Series E

 

 

4,000,000

 

 

$

25/share

 

 

7.25

%

 

September 15, 2008

 

Series F

 

 

7,820,000

 

 

$

25/share

 

 

7.10

%

 

December 3, 2008

 

 

Dividends on preferred stock are characterized as ordinary income, capital gains, or a combination thereof for federal income tax purposes and are summarized in the following annual distribution table:

 

 

 

 

Annual Dividends Per Share

 

 

 

Dividend

 

Capital Gain
Distribution

 

Ordinary Income

 

 

 

Rate

 

2006

 

2005

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Series E

 

 

7.250

%

 

$

0.5838

 

$

0.0504

 

$

1.2287

 

$

1.7621

 

$

1.8125

 

Series F

 

 

7.100

 

 

0.5717

 

0.0493

 

1.2033

 

1.7257

 

1.9180

 

 

On September 15, 2003, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of 7.25% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at $25 per share, generating gross proceeds of $100 million.

On December 3, 2003, the Company issued 7,820,000 shares of 7.10% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at $25 per share, raising gross proceeds of $195.5 million.

On January 29, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.45313 per share on its Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock and $0.44375 per share on its Series F cumulative redeemable preferred stock. These dividends will be paid on March 31, 2007 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 15, 2007.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

AOCI—unrealized gains on available for sale securities

 

$

24,536

 

$

1,080

 

AOCI—unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

 

(4,596

)

388

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) minimum liability

 

(2,215

)

(2,316

)

Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

$

17,725

 

$

(848

)

 

F-35




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(16)   Impairments

During 2006, 30 properties were deemed impaired resulting in impairment charges of $9.6 million. Impairment charges principally arose as a result of the disposition of four properties, the contribution of 25 properties into a senior housing joint venture in January 2007, and a decrease in expected cash flows from one property. During 2005, no properties were determined to be impaired. During 2004, 16 properties were deemed impaired resulting in impairment charges of $17.1 million. During 2004, impairment charges principally arose as a result of reduced anticipated holding periods and planned near-term dispositions. Impairment charges are summarized as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Continuing operations

 

$

3,577

 

 

$

 

 

$

410

 

Discontinued operations

 

6,004

 

 

 

 

16,657

 

 

 

$

9,581

 

 

$

 

 

$

17,067

 

 

(17)   Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid, net of capitalized interest and other

 

$

165,508

 

$

99,862

 

$

87,168

 

Taxes paid

 

13

 

106

 

1,716

 

Non-cash information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized interest

 

895

 

637

 

1,650

 

Mortgages assumed on acquired properties

 

80,747

 

113,484

 

81,386

 

Mortgages included with real estate dispositions

 

91,730

 

 

31,397

 

Loans received upon sale of unconsolidated joint venture investments

 

 

6,228

 

 

Non-managing member units issued in connection with acquisitions

 

2,752

 

30,398

 

1,086

 

Loans receivable settled in connection with real estate acquisitions

 

 

 

94,768

 

Accrued dividends

 

 

 

1,118

 

Restricted stock issued, net of cancellations

 

241

 

121

 

124

 

Unrealized gains on available for sale securities and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

 

22,826

 

1,468

 

 

Conversion of non-managing member units into common stock

 

5,523

 

2,601

 

4,777

 

 

See also discussions of the CRP merger, HCP MOP and HCP Ventures III transactions in Notes 5 and 9.

F-36




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(18)   Earnings Per Common Share

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated including the effect of dilutive securities. Approximately 0.9 million and 1.0 million options to purchase shares of common stock that had an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the common stock during 2005 and 2004 were not included because they are not dilutive. Additionally, 6.0 million shares issuable upon conversion of 3.4 million non-managing member units in 2006 and 2005, and 5.1 million shares issuable upon conversion of 2.5 million non-managing member units in 2004 were not included since they are anti-dilutive.

The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands, except per share and share amounts):

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Numerator

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

106,630

 

$

115,589

 

$

114,147

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

(21,130

)

(21,130

)

(21,130

)

Income from continuing operations applicable to common shares

 

85,500

 

94,459

 

93,017

 

Discontinued operations

 

310,917

 

57,468

 

54,893

 

Net income applicable to common shares

 

$

396,417

 

$

151,927

 

$

147,910

 

Denominator

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average common shares

 

148,236

 

134,673

 

131,854

 

Dilutive stock options and restricted stock

 

990

 

887

 

1,508

 

Diluted weighted average common shares

 

149,226

 

135,560

 

133,362

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

0.58

 

$

0.70

 

$

0.71

 

Discontinued operations

 

2.09

 

0.43

 

0.41

 

Net income applicable to common stockholders

 

$

2.67

 

$

1.13

 

$

1.12

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

0.57

 

$

0.70

 

$

0.70

 

Discontinued operations

 

2.09

 

0.42

 

0.41

 

Net income applicable to common shares

 

$

2.66

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.11

 

 

F-37




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(19)   Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, payables, and accrued liabilities are reasonable estimates of fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments. Fair values for secured loans receivable, senior unsecured notes and mortgage debt are estimates based on rates currently prevailing for similar instruments of similar maturities. The fair values of the interest rate swaps were determined through estimates provided by investment bank affiliates. The fair values of the available for sale securities were determined based on market quotes.

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Secured loans receivable

 

$

121,482

 

$

146,156

 

$

175,426

 

$

202,695

 

Marketable debt securities

 

322,500

 

322,500

 

 

 

Marketable  equity securities

 

15,159

 

15,159

 

6,333

 

6,333

 

Senior unsecured notes and mortgage debt

 

(4,965,176

)

(5,057,471

)

(1,698,346

)

(1,750,559

)

Interest rate swaps

 

(328

)

(328

)

388

 

388

 

 

(20)   Compensation Plans

Stock Based Compensation

On May 11, 2006, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2006 Incentive Plan”). The 2006 Incentive Plan replaces the Company’s 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and provides for the granting of stock-based compensation, including stock options, restricted stock, and performance restricted stock units to officers, employees and directors in connection with their employment with or services provided to the Company. The maximum number of shares available for future awards under the 2006 Incentive Plan is 8.2 million shares at December 31, 2006, of which 4.1 million may be issued as restricted stock and performance restricted stock units.

F-38




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Stock Options

Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Stock options generally vest ratably over a five-year period. Vesting of certain options may accelerate upon retirement, a change in control of the Company, as defined, and other events. A summary of the option activity is presented in the following table (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

Shares
Under
Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares Under
Options
Exercisable at
Period End

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Outstanding as of January 1, 2004

 

 

5,361

 

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

921

 

 

 

$

15

 

 

Granted

 

 

1,011

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(1,446

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(645

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2004

 

 

4,281

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

1,277

 

 

 

$

17

 

 

Granted

 

 

1,175

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(1,436

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(158

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2005

 

 

3,862

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

1,157

 

 

 

$

19

 

 

Granted

 

 

1,215

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(430

)

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(310

)

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2006

 

 

4,337

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

1,583

 

 

 

$

21

 

 

 

The following table summarizes additional information concerning outstanding and exercisable stock options at December 31, 2006 (shares in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted
Average

 

Currently Exercisable

 

Range of
Exercise Price

 

Shares Under
Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

 

Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years

 

Shares Under
Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

 

$12 - $17

 

 

302

 

 

 

$

14

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

$

14

 

 

  17 -   18

 

 

570

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

432

 

 

 

18

 

 

  19 -   21

 

 

362

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

240

 

 

 

19

 

 

  23 -   28

 

 

3,103

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

8.1

 

 

 

609

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

4,337

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

1,583

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

F-39




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following table summarizes additional information concerning unvested stock options at December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

Shares Under
Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

 

Unvested at January 1, 2004

 

 

4,440

 

 

 

$

16

 

 

Granted

 

 

1,011

 

 

 

27

 

 

Vested

 

 

(1,802

)

 

 

15

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(645

)

 

 

15

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2004

 

 

3,004

 

 

 

20

 

 

Granted

 

 

1,175

 

 

 

25

 

 

Vested

 

 

(1,316

)

 

 

18

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(158

)

 

 

21

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2005

 

 

2,705

 

 

 

24

 

 

Granted

 

 

1,215

 

 

 

27

 

 

Vested

 

 

(856

)

 

 

21

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(310

)

 

 

26

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2006

 

 

2,754

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

Proceeds received from options exercised under the Stock Incentive Plans for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $7.9 million, $22.9 million and $21.1 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $4.6 million, $14.8 million and $9.9 million, respectively. The total share-based compensation expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $8.2 million, $6.5 million and $6.2 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2006 was $25.5 million.

The fair value of the stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees and expected turnover rates. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock option’s expected life, ending on the day of grant, and calculated on a weekly basis.

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Risk-free rate

 

4.50

%

3.71

%

2.78

%

Expected life (in years)

 

6.5

 

6.5

 

5.0

 

Expected volatility

 

20.0

%

20.0

%

20.0

%

Expected dividend yield

 

7.5

%

7.5

%

7.5

%

 

The weighted average fair value per share at the date of grant for options awarded during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $2.18, $1.87 and $1.79, respectively.

F-40




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Restricted Stock and Performance Restricted Stock Units

Under the 2006 Incentive Plan, restricted stock and performance restricted stock units generally vest over a three- to five-year period. The vesting of certain restricted shares and units may accelerate upon retirement, a change in control of the Company, as defined, and other events. When vested, each performance restricted stock unit is convertible into one share of common stock. The restricted stock and performance restricted stock units are valued on the grant date based on the market price of a common share on that date. Generally, the Company recognizes the fair value of the awards over the applicable vesting period as compensation expense.

The following table summarizes additional information concerning restricted stock and restricted stock units at December 31, 2006 (units and shares in thousands):

Unvested Shares

 

 

 

Restricted
Stock
Units

 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

 

Restricted
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

 

Unvested at January 1, 2004

 

 

83

 

 

 

$

12

 

 

 

600

 

 

 

$

20

 

 

Granted

 

 

122

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

26

 

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(178

)

 

 

19

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77

)

 

 

27

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2004

 

 

205

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

469

 

 

 

19

 

 

Granted

 

 

292

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

25

 

 

Vested

 

 

(3

)

 

 

28

 

 

 

(114

)

 

 

22

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(25

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

(22

)

 

 

26

 

 

Unvested as of December 31, 2005

 

 

469

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

454

 

 

 

23

 

 

Granted

 

 

401

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

28

 

 

Vested

 

 

(129

)

 

 

20

 

 

 

(131

)

 

 

23

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(28

)

 

 

26

 

 

 

(61

)

 

 

25

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2006

 

 

713

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

373

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

The total vesting date fair values of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $6.6 million, $3.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2006, there was $25.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s incentive plans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.4 years.

On August 14, 2006, the Company granted to the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 219,000 restricted stock units. The restricted stock units vest over a period of ten years beginning in 2012. Additionally, as the Company pays dividends on its outstanding common stock, the original award will be credited with additional restricted stock units as dividend equivalents (as opposed to receiving a cash payment). The dividend equivalent restricted stock units will be subject to the same vesting and other conditions as applied to the grant generally.

Employee Benefit Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k) and profit sharing plan that allows for eligible participants to defer compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. The Company provides a matching

F-41




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

contribution of up to 4% of each participant’s eligible compensation. During 2006, the Company’s matching contributions were approximately $0.5 million. During 2005 and 2004, the Company’s matching contributions were approximately $0.2 million in each year.

(21)   Segment Disclosures

The Company’s business consists of financing and leasing healthcare-related real estate. The Company evaluates its business and makes resource allocations on its two business segments—triple-net leased and medical office building segments. Under the triple-net leased segment, the Company invests in healthcare-related real estate through acquisition and secured financing of primarily single tenant properties. Properties acquired are primarily leased under triple-net leases. Under the medical office building segment, the Company invests in medical office buildings that are primarily leased under gross or modified gross leases, generally to multiple tenants, and generally require a greater level of property management. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2). There are no intersegment sales or transfers. The Company evaluates performance based upon property net operating income of the combined properties in each segment.

Non-segment revenue consists mainly of interest on unsecured loans and other income. Non-segment assets consist of corporate assets including cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, net and deferred financing costs. Interest expense, depreciation and amortization, and other non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining the Company’s performance measure.

Summary information for the reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 2006:

Segments

 

 

 

Rental
Revenues

 

Equity
Income

 

Income
From
DFLs

 

Investment
Management
Fees

 

Interest
and Other

 

Total
Revenues

 

NOI(1)

 

 

Triple-net leased:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hospital

 

$

94,481

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

6,603

 

 

$

101,084

 

$

94,481

 

Skilled nursing

 

42,253

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,290

 

 

44,543

 

42,159

 

Senior housing

 

201,543

 

318

 

15,008

 

 

 

 

 

2,313

 

 

219,182

 

189,052

 

Other healthcare
facilities

 

29,024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,024

 

23,015

 

Total triple-net leased

 

$

367,301

 

$

318

 

$

15,008

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

11,206

 

 

$

393,833

 

$

348,707

 

Medical office building

 

189,720

 

8,013

 

 

 

3,895

 

 

 

 

 

201,628

 

119,128

 

Non-segment revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,626

 

 

23,626

 

 

Total

 

$

557,021

 

$

8,331

 

$

15,008

 

 

$

3,895

 

 

 

$

34,832

 

 

$

619,087

 

$

467,835

 

 

F-42




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

For the year ended December 31, 2005:

Segments

 

 

 

Rental
Revenues

 

Equity
Income
(Loss)

 

Investment
Management
Fees

 

Interest
and Other

 

Total
Revenues

 

NOI(1)

 

Triple-net leased:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hospital

 

$

91,122

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

6,065

 

 

$

97,187

 

$

91,122

 

Skilled nursing

 

40,864

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,814

 

 

46,678

 

40,712

 

Senior housing

 

112,455

 

256

 

 

 

 

 

3,160

 

 

115,871

 

103,405

 

Other healthcare

 

25,466

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,466

 

20,264

 

Total triple-net leased

 

$

269,907

 

$

256

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

15,039

 

 

$

285,202

 

$

255,503

 

Medical office building

 

126,897

 

(1,379

)

 

3,184

 

 

 

 

 

128,702

 

81,985

 

Non-segment revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,883

 

 

7,883

 

 

Total

 

$

396,804

 

$

(1,123

)

 

$

3,184

 

 

 

$

22,922

 

 

$

421,787

 

$

337,488

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2004:

Segments

 

 

 

Rental
Revenues

 

Equity
Income

 

Investment
Management
Fees

 

Interest
and Other

 

Total
Revenues

 

NOI(1)

 

Triple-net leased:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hospital

 

$

89,185

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

6,270

 

 

$

95,455

 

$

89,185

 

Skilled nursing

 

35,874

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,440

 

 

42,314

 

35,999

 

Senior housing

 

84,697

 

620

 

 

 

 

 

15,516

 

 

100,833

 

77,738

 

Other healthcare

 

24,438

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,438

 

19,014

 

Total triple-net leased

 

$

234,194

 

$

620

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

28,226

 

 

$

263,040

 

$

221,936

 

Medical office building

 

93,700

 

1,537

 

 

3,293

 

 

 

 

 

98,530

 

63,474

 

Non-segment revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,529

 

 

4,529

 

 

Total

 

$

327,894

 

$

2,157

 

 

$

3,293

 

 

 

$

32,755

 

 

$

366,099

 

$

285,410

 


(1)          Net Operating Income from Continuing Operations (“NOI”) is a non-GAAP supplemental financial measure used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate properties. The Company defines NOI as rental revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level operating expenses, which exclude depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, impairments, interest expense and discontinued operations. The Company believes NOI provides investors relevant and useful information because it measures the operating performance of the Company’s real estate at the property level on an unleveraged basis. The Company uses NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and assess property level performance. The Company believes that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of operating performance to net income as defined by GAAP since it does not reflect the aforementioned excluded items. Further, NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.

F-43




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The following is a reconciliation from NOI to reported net income, a financial measure under GAAP (in thousands):

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Net operating income from continuing operations

 

$

467,835

 

$

337,488

 

$

285,410

 

Equity income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

8,331

 

(1,123

)

2,157

 

Income from direct financing leases

 

15,008

 

 

 

Investment management fee income

 

3,895

 

3,184

 

3,293

 

Interest and other income

 

34,832

 

22,922

 

32,755

 

Interest expense

 

(213,304

)

(107,201

)

(87,632

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

(144,215

)

(94,862

)

(72,501

)

General and administrative

 

(47,370

)

(31,869

)

(36,721

)

Impairments

 

(3,577

)

 

(410

)

Minority interests

 

(14,805

)

(12,950

)

(12,204

)

Total discontinued operations

 

310,917

 

57,468

 

54,893

 

Net income

 

$

417,547

 

$

173,057

 

$

169,040

 

 

The Company’s total assets by segment were:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

Segments

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Triple-net leased:

 

 

 

 

 

Hospital

 

$

951,548

 

$

809,930

 

Skilled nursing

 

336,494

 

701,687

 

Senior housing

 

5,919,517

 

1,318,245

 

Other healthcare

 

264,298

 

243,166

 

Total triple-net leased assets

 

$

7,471,857

 

$

3,073,028

 

Medical office building assets

 

2,438,607

 

1,034,651

 

Gross segment assets

 

9,910,464

 

4,107,679

 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(660,670

)

(619,673

)

Net segment assets

 

9,249,794

 

3,488,006

 

Non-segment assets

 

762,955

 

109,259

 

Total assets

 

$

10,012,749

 

$

3,597,265

 

 

(22)   Transactions with Related Parties

Mr. McKee, a director of the Company, is Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of The Irvine Company. During each of 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company made payments of approximately $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, to The Irvine Company for the lease of office space.

Mr. Messmer, a director of the Company, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Robert Half International Inc. During 2006, and 2005 and 2004, the Company made payments of approximately $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, to Robert Half International Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries for services including placement of temporary and permanent employees and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance consultation.

F-44




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Mr. Rhein, a director of the Company, is a director of Cohen & Steers, Inc. Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cohen & Steers, Inc., is an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. As of December 31, 2006, mutual funds managed by Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., (“Cohen & Steers”) in the aggregate, owned 4% of the Company’s common stock. In addition, an affiliate of Cohen & Steers provided financial advisory services to us in 2006. In respect of these services, we made payments to the Cohen & Steers affiliate of $1.5 million during 2006.

Mr. Sullivan, a director of the Company, was a director of Covenant Care, Inc through March 2006. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, Covenant Care made payments of approximately $8.2 million, $8.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively, to the Company for the lease of certain of its nursing home properties.

Mr. Roath, a director of the Company, is the former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Roath is a participant under the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company made payments under the SERP to Mr. Roath of approximately $625,000 per year.

Pursuant to the original purchase agreement dated October 2, 2003, the Company paid $9.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, in additional purchase consideration in the form of an earn-out to the former members of MedCap Properties, LLC (“MedCap”) related to the Company’s 2003 acquisition of four MOBs that were under development at the time of acquisition. The amounts paid included $3.7 million paid to Mr. Elcan and Mr. Klaritch who are former members of MedCap and officers of the Company. At the time that the original purchase agreement was entered into, Mr. Elcan and Mr. Klaritch were not officers of the Company.

Notwithstanding these matters, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined, in accordance with the categorical standards adopted by the Board, that each of Messrs. McKee, Messmer, Rhein, and Sullivan is independent within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

(23)   Subsequent Events

On January 5, 2007, the Company formed a joint venture with an institutional capital partner. The joint venture includes 25 properties valued at $1.1 billion and encumbered by $686 million in debt. Upon formation, we received approximately $280 million in proceeds, including a one-time acquisition fee of $5.4 million. The Company retained a 35% interest in the venture, will act as the managing member and will receive ongoing asset management fees. 

On January 19, 2007, the Company issued 6.8 million shares of its common stock and received net proceeds of approximately $261 million.

On January 22, 2007, the Company issued $500 million of 6.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2017. The notes were priced at 99.323% of the principal amount for an effective yield of 6.09%. The Company received net proceeds of $493 million, which were used to repay its term loan facility and borrowings under its revolving credit facility.

On January 31, 2007, we acquired three long-term acute care hospitals and received proceeds of $36 million in exchange for 11 skilled nursing facilities valued at approximately $77 million. The three acquired properties have an initial lease term of ten years with two ten-year renewal options, and an initial contractual yield of 12% with escalators based on the lessee’s revenue growth. The acquired properties are included in a new master lease that contains 14 properties leased to the same operator.

F-45




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On February 9, 2007, the Company acquired the Medical City Dallas campus, which includes two hospital towers, six medical office buildings, and three parking garages, for approximately $347 million, including non-managing member LLC units (“DownREIT units’’) valued at $174 million. The initial yield on this campus is approximately 7.3%.

(24)   Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

 

Three Months Ended During 2006

 

 

 

March 31

 

June 30

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

 

 

(in thousands, except share data)

 

Revenue

 

$

126,458

 

$

127,532

 

 

$

130,199

 

 

 

$

234,898

 

 

Gain (loss) from real estate dispositions, net of impairments

 

8,591

 

(2,429

)

 

35,728

 

 

 

227,389

 

 

Net income applicable to common shares

 

52,605

 

36,284

 

 

71,536

 

 

 

235,992

 

 

Dividends paid per common share

 

0.425

 

0.425

 

 

0.425

 

 

 

0.425

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

0.39

 

0.27

 

 

0.52

 

 

 

1.28

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

0.38

 

0.26

 

 

0.52

 

 

 

1.27

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended During 2005

 

 

 

March 31

 

June 30

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

 

 

(in thousands, except share data)

 

Revenue

 

 

$

94,091

 

 

$

103,827

 

 

$

110,030

 

 

 

$

113,839

 

 

Gain from real estate dispositions

 

 

4,738

 

 

4,166

 

 

273

 

 

 

979

 

 

Net income applicable to common shares

 

 

38,175

 

 

37,764

 

 

39,759

 

 

 

36,229

 

 

Dividends paid per common share

 

 

0.42

 

 

0.42

 

 

0.42

 

 

 

0.42

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

0.29

 

 

0.28

 

 

0.29

 

 

 

0.27

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

0.28

 

 

0.28

 

 

0.29

 

 

 

0.27

 

 

 

On October 5, 2006, the Company completed its merger with CRP. On November 30, 2006, the Company acquired the interest held by an affiliate of GE in HCP MOP, which resulted in the consolidation of HCP MOP beginning on that date. The impact of the Company’s merger with CRP and consolidation of HCP MOP are included in the results of quarter ended December 31, 2006. In addition, On December 1, 2006, the Company sold 69 skilled nursing facilities for $392 million recognizing gains of approximately $226 million.

Results of operations for properties sold or to be sold have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

F-46




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amount at Which Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/06

 

 

 

 

 

Life on Which
Depreciation

 

City

 

 

 

State

 

Encumbrances
at 12/31/06

 

Land

 

Building
Improvements,
CIP and
Intangibles

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Date
Acquired/
Constructed

 

in Latest
Income
Statement is
Computed

 

Hospitals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fayetteville

 

 

AR

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

700

 

 

$

9,951

 

 

$

10,651

 

 

$

(2,039

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Little Rock

 

 

AR

 

 

 

 

 

709

 

 

9,604

 

 

10,313

 

 

(3,471

)

 

 

1988

 

 

 

45

 

 

Peoria

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

1,565

 

 

7,070

 

 

8,635

 

 

(2,681

)

 

 

1989

 

 

 

45

 

 

Tucson

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

630

 

 

2,989

 

 

3,619

 

 

(620

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

45

 

 

Fresno

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

3,652

 

 

34,714

 

 

38,366

 

 

(199

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Irvine

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

18,000

 

 

70,800

 

 

88,800

 

 

(14,504

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Los Gatos

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

3,736

 

 

17,139

 

 

20,875

 

 

(11,908

)

 

 

1985

 

 

 

30

 

 

Tarzana

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

12,300

 

 

77,465

 

 

89,765

 

 

(15,847

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Colorado Springs

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

690

 

 

8,338

 

 

9,028

 

 

(2,974

)

 

 

1990

 

 

 

45

 

 

Ft. Lauderdale

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

2,000

 

 

11,269

 

 

13,269

 

 

(2,564

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

 

Palm Beach
Garden

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

4,200

 

 

58,250

 

 

62,450

 

 

(11,929

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Roswell

 

 

GA

 

 

 

 

 

6,900

 

 

54,859

 

 

61,759

 

 

(11,296

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Idaho Falls

 

 

ID

 

 

 

 

 

2,068

 

 

25,170

 

 

27,238

 

 

(2,222

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

45

 

 

Overland Park

 

 

KS

 

 

 

 

 

2,316

 

 

10,704

 

 

13,020

 

 

(4,197

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

45

 

 

Wichita

 

 

KS

 

 

 

 

 

1,500

 

 

12,501

 

 

14,001

 

 

(2,560

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Bossier City

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

1,965

 

 

15,505

 

 

17,470

 

 

(155

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Plaquemine

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

636

 

 

9,722

 

 

10,358

 

 

(3,925

)

 

 

1992

 

 

 

35

 

 

Slidell

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

2,520

 

 

19,412

 

 

21,932

 

 

(10,421

)

 

 

1985

 

 

 

40

 

 

Slidell

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

1,490

 

 

22,530

 

 

24,020

 

 

(132

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Poplar Bluff

 

 

MO

 

 

 

 

 

1,200

 

 

34,800

 

 

36,000

 

 

(7,126

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Hickory

 

 

NC

 

 

 

 

 

2,600

 

 

69,900

 

 

72,500

 

 

(14,313

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Bennetsville

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

794

 

 

13,700

 

 

14,494

 

 

(3,929

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

25

 

 

Cheraw

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

8,000

 

 

8,500

 

 

(2,300

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

25

 

 

Amarillo

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

350

 

 

3,800

 

 

4,150

 

 

(2,775

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

10

 

 

Cleveland

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

14,603

 

 

15,003

 

 

(2,690

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Denton

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(15,634

)

 

1,126

 

 

26,574

 

 

27,700

 

 

(522

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Denton

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(7,752

)

 

821

 

 

12,979

 

 

13,800

 

 

(87

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

San Antonio

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

1,990

 

 

12,994

 

 

14,984

 

 

(6,439

)

 

 

1988

 

 

 

45

 

 

Trophy Club

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(15,965

)

 

1,128

 

 

26,072

 

 

27,200

 

 

(177

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Webster

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

890

 

 

5,161

 

 

6,051

 

 

(1,369

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

West Valley City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

2,900

 

 

59,112

 

 

62,012

 

 

(10,256

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Petersburg

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

1,403

 

 

7,628

 

 

9,031

 

 

(48

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Morgantown

 

 

WV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,400

 

 

14,400

 

 

(2,952

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Total hospitals

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(39,351

)

 

$

83,679

 

 

$

787,715

 

 

$

871,394

 

 

$

(158,627

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Skilled nursing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bellflower

 

 

CA

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

330

 

 

$

1,148

 

 

$

1,478

 

 

$

(763

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

Downey

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

330

 

 

1,406

 

 

1,736

 

 

(938

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

El Monte

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

360

 

 

3,542

 

 

3,902

 

 

(2,364

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

Glendora

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

430

 

 

2,292

 

 

2,722

 

 

(1,498

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

Livermore

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

330

 

 

1,711

 

 

2,041

 

 

(1,414

)

 

 

1985

 

 

 

25

 

 

Lomita

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

510

 

 

1,222

 

 

1,732

 

 

(824

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

Perris

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

336

 

 

3,394

 

 

3,730

 

 

(1,266

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

25

 

 

Vista

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

653

 

 

6,438

 

 

7,091

 

 

(2,331

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

25

 

 

Fort Collins

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

159

 

 

2,064

 

 

2,223

 

 

(1,713

)

 

 

1985

 

 

 

25

 

 

Morrison

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

430

 

 

5,689

 

 

6,119

 

 

(4,567

)

 

 

1985

 

 

 

25

 

 

Statesboro

 

 

GA

 

 

 

 

 

168

 

 

1,695

 

 

1,863

 

 

(655

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

25

 

 

Rexburg

 

 

ID

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

5,310

 

 

5,510

 

 

(1,474

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Angola

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

130

 

 

2,970

 

 

3,100

 

 

(664

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Ferdinand

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

3,389

 

 

3,415

 

 

(1,379

)

 

 

1991

 

 

 

40

 

 

Fort Wayne

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

4,866

 

 

5,066

 

 

(1,000

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Fort Wayne

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

140

 

 

3,860

 

 

4,000

 

 

(870

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Huntington

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

3,072

 

 

3,102

 

 

(708

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Jasper

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

165

 

 

6,804

 

 

6,969

 

 

(1,490

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

F-47




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Kokomo

 

 

IN

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

250

 

 

$

5,932

 

 

$

6,182

 

 

$

(860

)

 

 

2000

 

 

 

45

 

 

Lebanon

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,550

 

 

5,550

 

 

(1,147

)

 

 

2000

 

 

 

45

 

 

Michigan City

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

555

 

 

5,494

 

 

6,049

 

 

(460

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Milford

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

1,935

 

 

1,961

 

 

(897

)

 

 

1991

 

 

 

35

 

 

New Albany

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

230

 

 

7,090

 

 

7,320

 

 

(1,578

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

Petersburg

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

2,434

 

 

2,459

 

 

(1,109

)

 

 

1991

 

 

 

40

 

 

Seymour

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,897

 

 

7,897

 

 

(650

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

45

 

 

Spencer

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

7,440

 

 

7,510

 

 

(1,724

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

Tell City

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

7,812

 

 

7,907

 

 

(1,085

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Cynthiana

 

 

KY

 

 

 

 

 

192

 

 

4,875

 

 

5,067

 

 

(229

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Mayfield

 

 

KY

 

 

 

 

 

218

 

 

2,797

 

 

3,015

 

 

(1,419

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

 

Franklin

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

405

 

 

4,100

 

 

4,505

 

 

(1,551

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

25

 

 

Morgan City

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

203

 

 

2,050

 

 

2,253

 

 

(775

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

25

 

 

Westborough

 

 

MA

 

 

 

 

 

138

 

 

2,975

 

 

3,113

 

 

(2,139

)

 

 

1985

 

 

 

30

 

 

Bad Axe

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

4,506

 

 

4,906

 

 

(1,016

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

 

Deckerville

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

2,966

 

 

3,005

 

 

(1,320

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

45

 

 

Mc Bain

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

2,424

 

 

2,436

 

 

(1,089

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

45

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

 

 

1,300

 

 

4,300

 

 

5,600

 

 

(1,159

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

 

 

1,300

 

 

6,200

 

 

7,500

 

 

(1,588

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Delaware

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

93

 

 

3,440

 

 

3,533

 

 

(2,068

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

Fairborn

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

250

 

 

4,950

 

 

5,200

 

 

(1,093

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Georgetown

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

130

 

 

5,070

 

 

5,200

 

 

(1,118

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Marion

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

218

 

 

2,971

 

 

3,189

 

 

(1,930

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

30

 

 

Newark

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

8,588

 

 

8,988

 

 

(4,790

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

Port Clinton

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

370

 

 

3,730

 

 

4,100

 

 

(843

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Springfield

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

250

 

 

4,050

 

 

4,300

 

 

(909

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Toledo

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

120

 

 

5,280

 

 

5,400

 

 

(1,200

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Versailles

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

120

 

 

5,080

 

 

5,200

 

 

(1,120

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Salem

 

 

OR

 

 

 

 

 

87

 

 

2,672

 

 

2,759

 

 

(2,016

)

 

 

1985

 

 

 

25

 

 

Carthage

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

129

 

 

2,406

 

 

2,535

 

 

(241

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

35

 

 

Loudon

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

3,879

 

 

3,905

 

 

(2,211

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

35

 

 

Maryville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

160

 

 

1,472

 

 

1,632

 

 

(669

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

45

 

 

Maryville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

307

 

 

4,376

 

 

4,683

 

 

(1,910

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

45

 

 

Fort Worth

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

243

 

 

2,575

 

 

2,818

 

 

(979

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

25

 

 

Galveston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

245

 

 

6,977

 

 

7,222

 

 

(1,244

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

35

 

 

Port Arthur

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

155

 

 

7,067

 

 

7,222

 

 

(1,256

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

35

 

 

Texas City

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

170

 

 

7,052

 

 

7,222

 

 

(1,254

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

35

 

 

Ogden

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

250

 

 

4,685

 

 

4,935

 

 

(1,301

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Fishersville

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

751

 

 

7,734

 

 

8,485

 

 

(765

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Floyd

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

2,708

 

 

3,017

 

 

(666

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

25

 

 

Independence

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

206

 

 

8,366

 

 

8,572

 

 

(792

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Newport News

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

535

 

 

6,192

 

 

6,727

 

 

(637

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Roanoke

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

586

 

 

7,159

 

 

7,745

 

 

(699

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Staunton

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

422

 

 

8,681

 

 

9,103

 

 

(839

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Williamsburg

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

699

 

 

4,886

 

 

5,585

 

 

(526

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Windsor

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

319

 

 

7,543

 

 

7,862

 

 

(724

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Woodstock

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

607

 

 

5,400

 

 

6,007

 

 

(556

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Total skilled nursing

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

18,542

 

 

$

294,638

 

 

$

313,180

 

 

$

(82,069

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-48




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amount at Which Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/06

 

 

 

 

 

Life on Which
Depreciation

 

City

 

 

 

State

 

Encumbrances
at 12/31/06

 

Land

 

Building
Improvements,
CIP and
Intangibles

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Date
Acquired/
Constructed

 

in Latest
Income
Statement is
Computed

 

Senior housing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Birmingham

 

 

AL

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,200

 

 

$

8,023

 

 

$

9,223

 

 

$

(1,775

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Birmingham

 

 

AL

 

 

 

(36,542

)

 

4,682

 

 

80,024

 

 

84,706

 

 

(469

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Huntsville

 

 

AL

 

 

 

(19,948

)

 

1,394

 

 

41,606

 

 

43,000

 

 

(252

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Huntsville

 

 

AL

 

 

 

 

 

307

 

 

5,893

 

 

6,200

 

 

(54

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Little Rock

 

 

AR

 

 

 

(7,838

)

 

1,922

 

 

17,878

 

 

19,800

 

 

(195

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Mesa

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

880

 

 

3,679

 

 

4,559

 

 

(754

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

30

 

 

Peoria

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

1,625

 

 

10,375

 

 

12,000

 

 

(91

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Phoenix

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

473

 

 

4,478

 

 

4,951

 

 

(1,523

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Phoenix

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

1,725

 

 

6,475

 

 

8,200

 

 

(51

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Tucson

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

2,350

 

 

24,037

 

 

26,387

 

 

(2,604

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

30

 

 

Tucson

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

1,426

 

 

3,774

 

 

5,200

 

 

(21

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Anaheim Hills

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(15,119

)

 

10,301

 

 

38,099

 

 

48,400

 

 

(233

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Apple Valley

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

452

 

 

3,348

 

 

3,800

 

 

(27

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Auburn

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

540

 

 

8,309

 

 

8,849

 

 

(1,568

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

40

 

 

Beverly Hills

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

9,872

 

 

33,728

 

 

43,600

 

 

(245

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Camarillo

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(8,443

)

 

5,798

 

 

16,602

 

 

22,400

 

 

(111

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Carlsbad

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(13,962

)

 

7,897

 

 

14,303

 

 

22,200

 

 

(125

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Carmichael

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(7,426

)

 

4,270

 

 

14,229

 

 

18,499

 

 

(41

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Citrus Heights

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(3,836

)

 

1,180

 

 

8,514

 

 

9,694

 

 

(204

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

30

 

 

Concord

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(25,000

)

 

6,010

 

 

40,137

 

 

46,147

 

 

(1,754

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Dana Point

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

1,960

 

 

16,168

 

 

18,128

 

 

(704

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Elk Grove

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(3,939

)

 

2,235

 

 

7,465

 

 

9,700

 

 

(69

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Escondido

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

627

 

 

4,951

 

 

5,578

 

 

(678

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

20

 

 

Escondido

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(14,340

)

 

5,090

 

 

24,619

 

 

29,709

 

 

(1,117

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Fairfield

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

149

 

 

2,835

 

 

2,984

 

 

(739

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

Fremont

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(9,804

)

 

2,360

 

 

11,855

 

 

14,215

 

 

(550

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Granada Hills

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

2,200

 

 

18,510

 

 

20,710

 

 

(824

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Hemet

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(3,028

)

 

1,270

 

 

6,730

 

 

8,000

 

 

(65

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Irvine

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

8,220

 

 

15,601

 

 

23,821

 

 

(233

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

45

 

 

Lodi

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

5,907

 

 

6,639

 

 

(1,746

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Murietta

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

435

 

 

5,934

 

 

6,369

 

 

(1,495

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Northridge

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(7,278

)

 

6,718

 

 

19,682

 

 

26,400

 

 

(56

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Ontario

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

174

 

 

4,622

 

 

4,796

 

 

(1,311

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

Palm Springs

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(1,310

)

 

1,005

 

 

4,995

 

 

6,000

 

 

(44

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Pleasant Hill

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(6,270

)

 

2,480

 

 

21,569

 

 

24,049

 

 

(951

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Rancho Mirage

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(6,832

)

 

1,798

 

 

23,002

 

 

24,800

 

 

(167

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Riverside

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

1,332

 

 

5,404

 

 

6,736

 

 

(42

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

South San Francisco

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(11,308

)

 

3,000

 

 

16,791

 

 

19,791

 

 

(730

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(7,849

)

 

6,384

 

 

33,116

 

 

39,500

 

 

(269

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

San Dimas

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(12,536

)

 

5,628

 

 

29,872

 

 

35,500

 

 

(202

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

San Juan Capistrano

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(4,380

)

 

5,983

 

 

6,517

 

 

12,500

 

 

(23

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Santa Rosa

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(8,272

)

 

3,582

 

 

26,618

 

 

30,200

 

 

(288

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Stockton

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

505

 

 

3,977

 

 

4,482

 

 

(700

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

15

 

 

Ventura

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(10,684

)

 

2,030

 

 

17,644

 

 

19,674

 

 

(797

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Victorville

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(46

)

 

396

 

 

2,104

 

 

2,500

 

 

(24

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Yorba Linda

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(9,934

)

 

4,968

 

 

21,032

 

 

26,000

 

 

(193

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Colorado Springs

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(9,819

)

 

1,910

 

 

27,290

 

 

29,200

 

 

(256

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Denver

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

2,810

 

 

36,021

 

 

38,831

 

 

(3,902

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

30

 

 

Denver

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(10,648

)

 

2,511

 

 

29,089

 

 

31,600

 

 

(193

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Greenwood Village

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

3,367

 

 

32,633

 

 

36,000

 

 

(138

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lakewood

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(11,208

)

 

3,012

 

 

30,288

 

 

33,300

 

 

(199

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Torrington

 

 

CT

 

 

 

 

 

166

 

 

11,251

 

 

11,417

 

 

(620

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Woodbridge

 

 

CT

 

 

 

(3,777

)

 

2,352

 

 

8,448

 

 

10,800

 

 

(54

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Dover

 

 

DE

 

 

 

 

 

380

 

 

4,147

 

 

4,527

 

 

(1,431

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Altamonte Springs

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,530

 

 

7,956

 

 

9,486

 

 

(1,181

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

40

 

 

F-49




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Altamonte Springs

 

 

FL

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

394

 

 

$

3,124

 

 

$

3,518

 

 

$

(281

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

35

 

 

Apopka

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

920

 

 

4,941

 

 

5,861

 

 

(41

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Boca Raton

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(12,641

)

 

4,730

 

 

17,972

 

 

22,702

 

 

(404

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Boca Raton

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

2,415

 

 

15,085

 

 

17,500

 

 

(97

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Boynton Beach

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,270

 

 

5,232

 

 

6,502

 

 

(809

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

 

Casselberry

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

540

 

 

1,550

 

 

2,090

 

 

(439

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Clearwater

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

2,250

 

 

3,207

 

 

5,457

 

 

(725

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

40

 

 

Clearwater

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

3,856

 

 

12,627

 

 

16,483

 

 

(899

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Clearwater

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,207

 

 

8,233

 

 

9,440

 

 

(62

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Clermont

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

440

 

 

6,669

 

 

7,109

 

 

(53

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Coconut Creek

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

2,461

 

 

14,639

 

 

17,100

 

 

(123

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Delray Beach

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

850

 

 

6,957

 

 

7,807

 

 

(856

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

45

 

 

Englewood

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,240

 

 

9,841

 

 

11,081

 

 

(872

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

35

 

 

Fort Myers

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,317

 

 

4,083

 

 

5,400

 

 

(35

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Gainesville

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,020

 

 

13,692

 

 

14,712

 

 

(245

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Gainesville

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,221

 

 

12,979

 

 

14,200

 

 

(105

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Greenacres

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,990

 

 

4,510

 

 

6,500

 

 

(37

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Jacksonville

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

3,250

 

 

26,786

 

 

30,036

 

 

(4,327

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

35

 

 

Jacksonville

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,587

 

 

11,313

 

 

12,900

 

 

(23

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lakeland

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

3,332

 

 

3,632

 

 

(201

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

25

 

 

Lantana

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

3,520

 

 

26,845

 

 

30,365

 

 

(438

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

30

 

 

Naples

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,170

 

 

1,330

 

 

2,500

 

 

(16

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

New Port Richey

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,575

 

 

12,463

 

 

14,038

 

 

(997

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

New Port Richey

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

540

 

 

7,024

 

 

7,564

 

 

(401

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

25

 

 

Ocala

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

522

 

 

5,420

 

 

5,942

 

 

(1,097

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Ocala

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,010

 

 

7,453

 

 

8,463

 

 

(540

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

20

 

 

Ocoee

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

2,096

 

 

9,540

 

 

11,636

 

 

(570

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oviedo

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

670

 

 

8,262

 

 

8,932

 

 

(65

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Palm Harbor

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,462

 

 

15,554

 

 

17,016

 

 

(95

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Pensacola

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

685

 

 

10,215

 

 

10,900

 

 

(89

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Pensacola

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

916

 

 

8,684

 

 

9,600

 

 

(67

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Pinellas Park

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

480

 

 

4,251

 

 

4,731

 

 

(1,542

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

Port Orange

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

2,340

 

 

10,158

 

 

12,498

 

 

(593

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

St. Augustine

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

830

 

 

11,851

 

 

12,681

 

 

(554

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sun City Center

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

510

 

 

6,120

 

 

6,630

 

 

(546

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sun City Center

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

3,466

 

 

70,810

 

 

74,276

 

 

(5,454

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

35

 

 

Tallahassee

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,331

 

 

19,869

 

 

21,200

 

 

(151

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Tallahassee

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(5,184

)

 

1,474

 

 

8,126

 

 

9,600

 

 

(73

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Tampa

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

600

 

 

6,225

 

 

6,825

 

 

(1,608

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Tampa

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

800

 

 

11,542

 

 

12,342

 

 

(214

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Venice

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

360

 

 

7,906

 

 

8,266

 

 

(550

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

20

 

 

Vero Beach

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(33,388

)

 

2,035

 

 

35,035

 

 

37,070

 

 

(287

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Zephyrhills

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

460

 

 

3,353

 

 

3,813

 

 

(873

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Alpharetta

 

 

GA

 

 

 

(81

)

 

793

 

 

9,207

 

 

10,000

 

 

(87

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Atlanta

 

 

GA

 

 

 

 

 

1,211

 

 

5,889

 

 

7,100

 

 

(56

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Atlanta

 

 

GA

 

 

 

(81

)

 

687

 

 

5,813

 

 

6,500

 

 

(56

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Atlanta

 

 

GA

 

 

 

(4,718

)

 

702

 

 

3,598

 

 

4,300

 

 

(31

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Atlanta

 

 

GA

 

 

 

(3,642

)

 

2,665

 

 

9,535

 

 

12,200

 

 

(138

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lilburn

 

 

GA

 

 

 

 

 

907

 

 

16,093

 

 

17,000

 

 

(107

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Marietta

 

 

GA

 

 

 

 

 

894

 

 

7,306

 

 

8,200

 

 

(70

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Milledgeville

 

 

GA

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

1,687

 

 

1,837

 

 

(540

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

45

 

 

Cedar Rapids

 

 

IA

 

 

 

 

 

440

 

 

3,496

 

 

3,936

 

 

(307

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

35

 

 

Davenport

 

 

IA

 

 

 

(3,578

)

 

511

 

 

8,389

 

 

8,900

 

 

(64

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Marion

 

 

IA

 

 

 

(2,868

)

 

502

 

 

8,598

 

 

9,100

 

 

(83

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Boise

 

 

ID

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

3,197

 

 

3,347

 

 

(608

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Lewiston

 

 

ID

 

 

 

 

 

767

 

 

6,079

 

 

6,846

 

 

(483

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

F-50




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Bloomington

 

 

IL

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

798

 

 

$

10,802

 

 

$

11,600

 

 

$

(49

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Champaign

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

101

 

 

3,799

 

 

3,900

 

 

(25

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Hoffman Estates

 

 

IL

 

 

 

(5,557

)

 

1,701

 

 

12,399

 

 

14,100

 

 

(109

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Macomb

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

6,519

 

 

6,600

 

 

(54

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Mt. Vernon

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

296

 

 

16,904

 

 

17,200

 

 

(134

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oak Park

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

3,476

 

 

27,524

 

 

31,000

 

 

(134

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Orland Park

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

2,623

 

 

22,277

 

 

24,900

 

 

(153

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Peoria

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

404

 

 

11,696

 

 

12,100

 

 

(106

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Wilmette

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

1,100

 

 

9,100

 

 

10,200

 

 

(63

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Anderson

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

6,375

 

 

6,875

 

 

(1,231

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Evansville

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

8,171

 

 

8,671

 

 

(1,526

)

 

 

2000

 

 

 

45

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

1,197

 

 

8,303

 

 

9,500

 

 

(71

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

804

 

 

8,696

 

 

9,500

 

 

(71

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

West Lafayette

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

813

 

 

9,387

 

 

10,200

 

 

(48

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Mission

 

 

KS

 

 

 

 

 

340

 

 

9,517

 

 

9,857

 

 

(1,374

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

35

 

 

Overland Park

 

 

KS

 

 

 

 

 

750

 

 

8,241

 

 

8,991

 

 

(1,730

)

 

 

2000

 

 

 

45

 

 

Wichita

 

 

KS

 

 

 

 

 

220

 

 

3,374

 

 

3,594

 

 

(2,202

)

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

 

Edgewood

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(1,311

)

 

1,868

 

 

5,432

 

 

7,300

 

 

(60

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lexington

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(8,010

)

 

2,093

 

 

16,917

 

 

19,010

 

 

(1,664

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

30

 

 

Middletown

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(185

)

 

1,049

 

 

19,251

 

 

20,300

 

 

(168

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Middletown

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(79

)

 

450

 

 

8,250

 

 

8,700

 

 

(72

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Alexandria

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

393

 

 

5,262

 

 

5,655

 

 

(1,249

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

45

 

 

Lafayette

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

433

 

 

5,259

 

 

5,692

 

 

(1,233

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

45

 

 

Lake Charles

 

 

LA

 

 

 

 

 

454

 

 

5,583

 

 

6,037

 

 

(1,311

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

45

 

 

Auburn

 

 

MA

 

 

 

 

 

1,281

 

 

10,153

 

 

11,434

 

 

(806

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Danvers

 

 

MA

 

 

 

(4,958

)

 

4,616

 

 

36,884

 

 

41,500

 

 

(335

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Dartmouth

 

 

MA

 

 

 

(4,515

)

 

3,145

 

 

8,255

 

 

11,400

 

 

(76

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Dedham

 

 

MA

 

 

 

(11,055

)

 

3,930

 

 

27,370

 

 

31,300

 

 

(273

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Plymouth

 

 

MA

 

 

 

(3,374

)

 

2,434

 

 

6,466

 

 

8,900

 

 

(20

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Baltimore

 

 

MD

 

 

 

(14,646

)

 

1,416

 

 

12,984

 

 

14,400

 

 

(154

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Baltimore

 

 

MD

 

 

 

(6,692

)

 

1,684

 

 

15,616

 

 

17,300

 

 

(85

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Frederick

 

 

MD

 

 

 

(3,371

)

 

609

 

 

10,791

 

 

11,400

 

 

(102

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Westminster

 

 

MD

 

 

 

 

 

768

 

 

5,619

 

 

6,387

 

 

(1,594

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Cape Elizabeth

 

 

ME

 

 

 

 

 

630

 

 

3,957

 

 

4,587

 

 

(602

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

 

Saco

 

 

ME

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

2,688

 

 

2,768

 

 

(363

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

 

Auburn Hills

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

2,281

 

 

11,019

 

 

13,300

 

 

(86

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Farmington Hills

 

 

MI

 

 

 

(4,591

)

 

1,013

 

 

14,287

 

 

15,300

 

 

(136

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Holland

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

787

 

 

51,410

 

 

52,197

 

 

(4,835

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

30

 

 

Portage

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

6,285

 

 

6,385

 

 

(52

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Sterling Heights

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

920

 

 

7,326

 

 

8,246

 

 

(1,116

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sterling Heights

 

 

MI

 

 

 

 

 

1,593

 

 

11,707

 

 

13,300

 

 

(90

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Des Peres

 

 

MO

 

 

 

 

 

4,361

 

 

19,139

 

 

23,500

 

 

(126

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Richmond Heights

 

 

MO

 

 

 

 

 

1,744

 

 

19,556

 

 

21,300

 

 

(88

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

St. Louis

 

 

MO

 

 

 

(14,020

)

 

2,500

 

 

20,793

 

 

23,293

 

 

(469

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

30

 

 

Biloxi

 

 

MS

 

 

 

 

 

480

 

 

5,856

 

 

6,336

 

 

(1,162

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

40

 

 

Bozeman

 

 

MT

 

 

 

 

 

982

 

 

7,776

 

 

8,758

 

 

(617

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Great Falls

 

 

MT

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

5,801

 

 

6,301

 

 

(166

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Charlotte

 

 

NC

 

 

 

 

 

710

 

 

9,959

 

 

10,669

 

 

(29

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Concord

 

 

NC

 

 

 

(2,494

)

 

601

 

 

7,999

 

 

8,600

 

 

(74

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Hendersonville

 

 

NC

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

1,836

 

 

1,936

 

 

(669

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

Hendersonville

 

 

NC

 

 

 

 

 

320

 

 

7,902

 

 

8,222

 

 

(2,720

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

Raleigh

 

 

NC

 

 

 

(3,077

)

 

1,191

 

 

9,509

 

 

10,700

 

 

(42

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Cresskill

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

4,684

 

 

55,716

 

 

60,400

 

 

(688

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Glassboro

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

162

 

 

2,875

 

 

3,037

 

 

(822

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

Hillsborough

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

1,042

 

 

10,260

 

 

11,302

 

 

(579

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Madison

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

3,157

 

 

20,243

 

 

23,400

 

 

(157

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

F-51




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Manahawkin

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

921

 

 

$

10,187

 

 

$

11,108

 

 

$

(578

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Paramus

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

(12,226

)

 

4,280

 

 

30,720

 

 

35,000

 

 

(210

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Saddle River

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

1,784

 

 

17,616

 

 

19,400

 

 

(160

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Vineland

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

177

 

 

2,897

 

 

3,074

 

 

(842

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

Voorhees Township

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

380

 

 

6,360

 

 

6,740

 

 

(2,104

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Voorhees Township

 

 

NJ

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

7,968

 

 

8,868

 

 

(1,625

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Albuquerque

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

 

767

 

 

9,324

 

 

10,091

 

 

(2,378

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

45

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

 

 

1,960

 

 

5,916

 

 

7,876

 

 

(312

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Brooklyn

 

 

NY

 

 

 

(11,821

)

 

8,117

 

 

53,568

 

 

61,685

 

 

(480

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Painted Post

 

 

NY

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

3,939

 

 

4,089

 

 

(1,413

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sheepshead Bay

 

 

NY

 

 

 

(12,553

)

 

5,215

 

 

37,985

 

 

43,200

 

 

(259

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Cincinnati

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

600

 

 

4,428

 

 

5,028

 

 

(675

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

Cleveland

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

1,310

 

 

5,798

 

 

7,108

 

 

(1,013

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

40

 

 

Columbus

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

970

 

 

7,966

 

 

8,936

 

 

(251

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Fairborn

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

810

 

 

8,435

 

 

9,245

 

 

(124

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Fairborn

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

298

 

 

10,602

 

 

10,900

 

 

(75

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Poland

 

 

OH

 

 

 

(4,204

)

 

695

 

 

13,905

 

 

14,600

 

 

(152

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Willoughby

 

 

OH

 

 

 

(3,632

)

 

1,177

 

 

8,423

 

 

9,600

 

 

(45

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oklahoma City

 

 

OK

 

 

 

(1,801

)

 

801

 

 

6,599

 

 

7,400

 

 

(85

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Tulsa

 

 

OK

 

 

 

(3,451

)

 

1,115

 

 

8,385

 

 

9,500

 

 

(40

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Portland

 

 

OR

 

 

 

 

 

1,165

 

 

4,735

 

 

5,900

 

 

(52

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Portland

 

 

OR

 

 

 

(14,013

)

 

2,778

 

 

21,722

 

 

24,500

 

 

(247

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

30

 

 

Allentown

 

 

PA

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

4,882

 

 

4,997

 

 

(1,710

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Haverford

 

 

PA

 

 

 

 

 

16,645

 

 

101,255

 

 

117,900

 

 

(590

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Latrobe

 

 

PA

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

9,008

 

 

9,058

 

 

(3,041

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Aiken

 

 

SC

 

 

 

(90

)

 

357

 

 

15,543

 

 

15,900

 

 

(143

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Charleston

 

 

SC

 

 

 

(90

)

 

885

 

 

14,815

 

 

15,700

 

 

(133

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Columbia

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

408

 

 

7,892

 

 

8,300

 

 

(71

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Easley

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

510

 

 

13,087

 

 

13,597

 

 

(4,469

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

Georgetown

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

239

 

 

3,136

 

 

3,375

 

 

(632

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Greenville

 

 

SC

 

 

 

(2,041

)

 

993

 

 

9,607

 

 

10,600

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Greenville

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

1,090

 

 

13,004

 

 

14,094

 

 

(38

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lancaster

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

84

 

 

3,120

 

 

3,204

 

 

(553

)

 

 

2000

 

 

 

45

 

 

Myrtle Beach

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

11,433

 

 

12,333

 

 

(33

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Rock Hill

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

203

 

 

2,908

 

 

3,111

 

 

(664

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Rock Hill

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

695

 

 

4,305

 

 

5,000

 

 

(38

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Spartanburg

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

535

 

 

17,769

 

 

18,304

 

 

(5,718

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sumter

 

 

SC

 

 

 

 

 

196

 

 

2,866

 

 

3,062

 

 

(683

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

45

 

 

Jackson

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

2,310

 

 

2,510

 

 

(1,016

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Morristown

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

590

 

 

3,160

 

 

3,750

 

 

(28

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

812

 

 

15,188

 

 

16,000

 

 

(131

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oak Ridge

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

4,881

 

 

5,381

 

 

(41

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Abilene

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(2,128

)

 

300

 

 

2,909

 

 

3,209

 

 

(58

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Arlington

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

660

 

 

1,954

 

 

2,614

 

 

(42

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Arlington

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

2,002

 

 

17,198

 

 

19,200

 

 

(136

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Arlington

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

2,070

 

 

10,629

 

 

12,699

 

 

(95

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Arlington

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

424

 

 

2,177

 

 

2,601

 

 

(20

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Austin

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

2,960

 

 

41,645

 

 

44,605

 

 

(4,512

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

30

 

 

Beaumont

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

145

 

 

10,404

 

 

10,549

 

 

(2,593

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

45

 

 

Burleson

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(4,860

)

 

1,050

 

 

5,388

 

 

6,438

 

 

(120

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Carthage

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

83

 

 

1,486

 

 

1,569

 

 

(484

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Cedar Hill

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(9,688

)

 

1,070

 

 

11,804

 

 

12,874

 

 

(229

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Conroe

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

167

 

 

1,885

 

 

2,052

 

 

(579

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

Dallas

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

330

 

 

7,076

 

 

7,406

 

 

(260

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

35

 

 

El Paso

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

470

 

 

8,053

 

 

8,523

 

 

(2,634

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

El Paso

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

4,052

 

 

4,352

 

 

(826

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

F-52




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Fort Worth

 

 

TX

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,830

 

 

$

50,832

 

 

$

53,662

 

 

$

(5,507

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

30

 

 

Friendswood

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

7,675

 

 

8,075

 

 

(1,024

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

45

 

 

Gun Barrel

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

 

1,553

 

 

1,587

 

 

(506

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

835

 

 

7,195

 

 

8,030

 

 

(1,359

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

45

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

2,470

 

 

22,560

 

 

25,030

 

 

(3,753

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

35

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

1,008

 

 

16,092

 

 

17,100

 

 

(143

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

1,408

 

 

19,967

 

 

21,375

 

 

(188

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

469

 

 

6,656

 

 

7,125

 

 

(63

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Irving

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

710

 

 

10,144

 

 

10,854

 

 

(398

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

35

 

 

Lubbock

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

197

 

 

2,467

 

 

2,664

 

 

(758

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

Mesquite

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

2,466

 

 

2,566

 

 

(758

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

35

 

 

North Richland Hills

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(3,511

)

 

520

 

 

5,247

 

 

5,767

 

 

(114

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

North Richland Hills

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(7,348

)

 

870

 

 

9,435

 

 

10,305

 

 

(209

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Odessa

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

4,052

 

 

4,252

 

 

(848

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Plano

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(116

)

 

494

 

 

13,106

 

 

13,600

 

 

(121

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

San Antonio

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

180

 

 

9,429

 

 

9,609

 

 

(3,026

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Antonio

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

632

 

 

7,182

 

 

7,814

 

 

(1,721

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

45

 

 

San Antonio

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

730

 

 

4,276

 

 

5,006

 

 

(717

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

45

 

 

San Marcos

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

190

 

 

3,571

 

 

3,761

 

 

(1,231

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sherman

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

145

 

 

1,516

 

 

1,661

 

 

(494

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Temple

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

96

 

 

2,138

 

 

2,234

 

 

(621

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

The Woodlands

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(90

)

 

802

 

 

18,198

 

 

19,000

 

 

(160

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Victoria

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

 

6,875

 

 

7,050

 

 

(1,272

)

 

 

1996

 

 

 

43

 

 

Waxahachie

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(2,440

)

 

390

 

 

3,965

 

 

4,355

 

 

(84

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

493

 

 

4,707

 

 

5,200

 

 

(40

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

(11,072

)

 

2,621

 

 

25,179

 

 

27,800

 

 

(247

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Arlington

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(10,029

)

 

4,320

 

 

24,080

 

 

28,400

 

 

(233

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Arlington

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(3,468

)

 

3,833

 

 

7,767

 

 

11,600

 

 

(69

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Arlington

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(13,726

)

 

7,278

 

 

38,222

 

 

45,500

 

 

(302

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Chesapeake

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

1,090

 

 

13,004

 

 

14,094

 

 

(38

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Falls Church

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(4,250

)

 

2,228

 

 

11,972

 

 

14,200

 

 

(129

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Fort Belvoir

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

11,594

 

 

98,756

 

 

110,350

 

 

(690

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Leesburg

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(1,026

)

 

607

 

 

2,893

 

 

3,500

 

 

(22

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Richmond

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(4,584

)

 

2,110

 

 

10,890

 

 

13,000

 

 

(79

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Sterling

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(7,181

)

 

2,360

 

 

21,540

 

 

23,900

 

 

(137

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Woodbridge

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

950

 

 

7,158

 

 

8,108

 

 

(1,461

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

45

 

 

Bellevue

 

 

WA

 

 

 

(5,038

)

 

3,734

 

 

13,166

 

 

16,900

 

 

(59

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Edmonds

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

1,418

 

 

19,282

 

 

20,700

 

 

(182

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Everett

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

314

 

 

3,376

 

 

3,690

 

 

(1,243

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Kirkland

 

 

WA

 

 

 

(6,205

)

 

1,000

 

 

13,562

 

 

14,562

 

 

(579

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lynnwood

 

 

WA

 

 

 

(3,111

)

 

1,203

 

 

9,197

 

 

10,400

 

 

(93

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Mercer Island

 

 

WA

 

 

 

(3,810

)

 

4,209

 

 

8,491

 

 

12,700

 

 

(67

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Puyallup

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

1,088

 

 

8,630

 

 

9,718

 

 

(685

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Renton

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

231

 

 

2,877

 

 

3,108

 

 

(1,049

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

35

 

 

Shoreline

 

 

WA

 

 

 

(9,932

)

 

1,590

 

 

10,800

 

 

12,390

 

 

(492

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Shoreline

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

4,030

 

 

26,727

 

 

30,757

 

 

(1,049

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Snohomish

 

 

WA

 

 

 

(4,247

)

 

1,541

 

 

12,659

 

 

14,200

 

 

(129

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Walla Walla

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

5,282

 

 

5,582

 

 

(1,084

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Total seniorhousing

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(629,274

)

 

$

448,792

 

 

$

3,520,045

 

 

$

3,968,837

 

 

$

(178,815

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-53




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amount at Which Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/06

 

 

 

 

 

Life on Which
Depreciation

 

City

 

 

 

State

 

Encumbrances
at 12/31/06

 

Land

 

Building
Improvements,
CIP and
Intangibles

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Date
Acquired/
Constructed

 

in Latest
Income
Statement is
Computed

 

Medical office buildings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anchorage

 

 

AK

 

 

 

$

(6,949

)

 

$

 

 

$

10,924

 

 

$

10,924

 

 

$

(10

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Little Rock

 

 

AR

 

 

 

 

 

291

 

 

709

 

 

1,000

 

 

(9

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

21

 

 

Little Rock

 

 

AR

 

 

 

 

 

596

 

 

4,804

 

 

5,400

 

 

(41

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Chandler

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

3,669

 

 

13,982

 

 

17,651

 

 

(830

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oro Valley

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

1,050

 

 

6,788

 

 

7,838

 

 

(1,023

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Phoenix

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

780

 

 

3,611

 

 

4,391

 

 

(828

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Phoenix

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

280

 

 

877

 

 

1,157

 

 

(103

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Phoenix

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

(1,642

)

 

327

 

 

3,073

 

 

3,400

 

 

(49

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

32

 

 

Phoenix

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

(6,175

)

 

872

 

 

7,528

 

 

8,400

 

 

(139

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

30

 

 

Scottsdale

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

(10,379

)

 

5,115

 

 

17,197

 

 

22,312

 

 

(309

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Tucson

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

215

 

 

6,318

 

 

6,533

 

 

(1,087

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

Tucson

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

 

 

215

 

 

4,064

 

 

4,279

 

 

(417

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

45

 

 

Tucson

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

(6,097

)

 

 

 

11,435

 

 

11,435

 

 

(217

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

29

 

 

Tucson

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

(6,097

)

 

 

 

13,018

 

 

13,018

 

 

(240

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

26

 

 

Brentwood

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,468

 

 

38,468

 

 

(325

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Encino

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(7,322

)

 

6,151

 

 

12,413

 

 

18,564

 

 

(216

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

33

 

 

Murrieta

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

439

 

 

10,022

 

 

10,461

 

 

(2,175

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Poway

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

2,700

 

 

11,050

 

 

13,750

 

 

(3,374

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

2,947

 

 

6,209

 

 

9,156

 

 

(2,787

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(7,804

)

 

2,863

 

 

9,159

 

 

12,022

 

 

(3,609

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

4,619

 

 

21,154

 

 

25,773

 

 

(8,313

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(3,804

)

 

1,650

 

 

4,320

 

 

5,970

 

 

(1,048

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

2,910

 

 

17,362

 

 

20,272

 

 

(3,555

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Jose

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(2,764

)

 

1,935

 

 

2,245

 

 

4,180

 

 

(457

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

San Jose

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(6,436

)

 

1,460

 

 

6,200

 

 

7,660

 

 

84

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

San Jose

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(3,406

)

 

1,718

 

 

3,726

 

 

5,444

 

 

(23

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Sherman Oaks

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(9,238

)

 

7,472

 

 

11,702

 

 

19,174

 

 

(276

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

22

 

 

Valencia

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

2,309

 

 

6,876

 

 

9,185

 

 

(1,714

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Valencia

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(5,042

)

 

1,344

 

 

8,708

 

 

10,052

 

 

(124

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

West Hills

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

2,100

 

 

11,384

 

 

13,484

 

 

(2,986

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Aurora

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,483

 

 

8,483

 

 

(363

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Aurora

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(4,921

)

 

210

 

 

13,605

 

 

13,815

 

 

(189

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Aurora

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(5,459

)

 

200

 

 

9,300

 

 

9,500

 

 

(159

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

33

 

 

Conifer

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(898

)

 

 

 

1,669

 

 

1,669

 

 

(100

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Denver

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(4,739

)

 

493

 

 

8,907

 

 

9,400

 

 

(161

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

33

 

 

Englewood

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(6,089

)

 

 

 

10,208

 

 

10,208

 

 

(855

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

35

 

 

Englewood

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,946

 

 

9,946

 

 

(996

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

35

 

 

Englewood

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(5,362

)

 

 

 

9,301

 

 

9,301

 

 

(758

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

35

 

 

Englewood

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(4,954

)

 

 

 

10,034

 

 

10,034

 

 

(788

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Littleton

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(2,812

)

 

 

 

5,408

 

 

5,408

 

 

(526

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Littleton

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(3,161

)

 

 

 

5,591

 

 

5,591

 

 

(432

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lone Tree

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,926

 

 

17,926

 

 

(1,125

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Lone Tree

 

 

CO

 

 

 

(15,715

)

 

 

 

25,960

 

 

25,960

 

 

(85

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Parker

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,049

 

 

20,049

 

 

(202

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Thornton

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

236

 

 

10,457

 

 

10,693

 

 

(1,197

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Westminster

 

 

CO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

*

 

 

Atlantis

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(1,697

)

 

4

 

 

5,815

 

 

5,819

 

 

(1,342

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Atlantis

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(1,424

)

 

 

 

2,014

 

 

2,014

 

 

(407

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Atlantis

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,107

 

 

2,107

 

 

(420

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Atlantis

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

618

 

 

2,465

 

 

3,083

 

 

(11

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Atlantis

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(2,894

)

 

 

 

4,804

 

 

4,804

 

 

(19

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Clearwater

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

1,515

 

 

10,285

 

 

11,800

 

 

(118

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

32

 

 

Englewood

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

294

 

 

1,137

 

 

1,431

 

 

(5

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Kissimmee

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(329

)

 

617

 

 

332

 

 

949

 

 

(3

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

F-54




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Kissimmee

 

 

FL

 

 

 

$

(500

)

 

$

339

 

 

$

603

 

 

$

942

 

 

$

(3

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Kissimmee

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(6,221

)

 

 

 

8,999

 

 

8,999

 

 

(27

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

36

 

 

Largo

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

3,811

 

 

23,400

 

 

27,211

 

 

(779

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

33

 

 

Longwood

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(2,644

)

 

 

 

6,410

 

 

6,410

 

 

(87

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

26

 

 

Longwood

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(1,463

)

 

1,067

 

 

2,133

 

 

3,200

 

 

(97

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

27

 

 

Margate

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(4,767

)

 

 

 

8,386

 

 

8,386

 

 

(22

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Miami

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(9,513

)

 

 

 

16,999

 

 

16,999

 

 

(63

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Milton

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,305

 

 

10,305

 

 

(88

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Orlando

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

2,144

 

 

5,811

 

 

7,955

 

 

(929

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

Orlando

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(2,342

)

 

1,510

 

 

4,897

 

 

6,407

 

 

(73

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Orlando

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(781

)

 

392

 

 

1,587

 

 

1,979

 

 

(36

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

15

 

 

Orlando

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(1,561

)

 

1,113

 

 

2,984

 

 

4,097

 

 

(63

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

19

 

 

Orlando

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,400

 

 

3,400

 

 

(28

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oviedo

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(4,390

)

 

875

 

 

10,677

 

 

11,552

 

 

(115

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Pace

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,099

 

 

14,099

 

 

(316

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

45

 

 

Pensacola

 

 

FL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,066

 

 

11,066

 

 

(280

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

45

 

 

Plantation

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(877

)

 

 

 

4,188

 

 

4,188

 

 

1

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Plantation

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(5,745

)

 

 

 

9,299

 

 

9,299

 

 

(26

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

36

 

 

St. Petersburg

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(13,000

)

 

208

 

 

15,903

 

 

16,111

 

 

(46

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

38

 

 

Tampa

 

 

FL

 

 

 

(5,928

)

 

1,967

 

 

9,032

 

 

10,999

 

 

(234

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

25

 

 

McCaysville

 

 

GA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,800

 

 

3,800

 

 

(31

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Aurora

 

 

IL

 

 

 

(1,609

)

 

 

 

3,127

 

 

3,127

 

 

(70

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

18

 

 

Elgin

 

 

IL

 

 

 

(3,902

)

 

 

 

7,743

 

 

7,743

 

 

(105

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

31

 

 

Elgin

 

 

IL

 

 

 

(4,146

)

 

 

 

8,111

 

 

8,111

 

 

(134

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Marion

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

13,334

 

 

13,434

 

 

(136

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Oakbrook Terrace

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

2,760

 

 

12,457

 

 

15,217

 

 

(155

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oakbrook Terrace

 

 

IL

 

 

 

 

 

1,908

 

 

7,927

 

 

9,835

 

 

(94

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Brownsburg

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

430

 

 

790

 

 

1,220

 

 

(181

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

520

 

 

2,092

 

 

2,612

 

 

(471

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

1,278

 

 

9,887

 

 

11,165

 

 

(2,287

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

700

 

 

3,584

 

 

4,284

 

 

(825

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

1,200

 

 

6,592

 

 

7,792

 

 

(1,530

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

944

 

 

3,162

 

 

4,106

 

 

(861

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

1,635

 

 

6,334

 

 

7,969

 

 

(1,647

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

649

 

 

2,470

 

 

3,119

 

 

(755

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

1,057

 

 

4,019

 

 

5,076

 

 

(1,000

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

(2,871

)

 

1,164

 

 

6,364

 

 

7,528

 

 

(1,594

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

3,104

 

 

11,506

 

 

14,610

 

 

(2,755

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Indianapolis

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

420

 

 

3,598

 

 

4,018

 

 

(735

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Newburgh

 

 

IN

 

 

 

(9,109

)

 

 

 

14,473

 

 

14,473

 

 

(111

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

38

 

 

Zionsville

 

 

IN

 

 

 

 

 

434

 

 

2,209

 

 

2,643

 

 

(549

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Wichita

 

 

KS

 

 

 

(2,289

)

 

530

 

 

3,341

 

 

3,871

 

 

(383

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Lexington

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(1,853

)

 

 

 

3,230

 

 

3,230

 

 

(49

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

38

 

 

Lexington

 

 

KY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,425

 

 

14,425

 

 

(115

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Louisville

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(6,500

)

 

936

 

 

9,767

 

 

10,703

 

 

(1,385

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

23

 

 

Louisville

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(21,109

)

 

835

 

 

29,777

 

 

30,612

 

 

(1,628

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

38

 

 

Louisville

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(5,061

)

 

780

 

 

9,091

 

 

9,871

 

 

(920

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

37

 

 

Louisville

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(8,181

)

 

826

 

 

15,276

 

 

16,102

 

 

(803

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

39

 

 

Louisville

 

 

KY

 

 

 

(8,858

)

 

2,983

 

 

14,643

 

 

17,626

 

 

(957

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

31

 

 

Columbia

 

 

MD

 

 

 

(3,945

)

 

1,115

 

 

4,247

 

 

5,362

 

 

(67

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Glen Burnie

 

 

MD

 

 

 

(3,547

)

 

670

 

 

5,085

 

 

5,755

 

 

(1,114

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Rockville

 

 

MD

 

 

 

 

 

2,376

 

 

5,603

 

 

7,979

 

 

(106

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

24

 

 

Towson

 

 

MD

 

 

 

(8,988

)

 

 

 

11,666

 

 

11,666

 

 

(77

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Minneapolis

 

 

MN

 

 

 

(8,291

)

 

117

 

 

13,391

 

 

13,508

 

 

(3,530

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

Minneapolis

 

 

MN

 

 

 

(3,390

)

 

160

 

 

10,352

 

 

10,512

 

 

(2,558

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Creve Coeur

 

 

MO

 

 

 

(19,550

)

 

2,342

 

 

30,259

 

 

32,601

 

 

(356

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

F-55




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Amount at Which Carried
At Close of Period 12/31/06

 

 

 

 

 

Life on Which
Depreciation

 

City

 

 

 

State

 

Encumbrances
at 12/31/06

 

Land

 

Building
Improvements,
CIP and
Intangibles

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Date
Acquired/
Constructed

 

in Latest
Income
Statement is
Computed

 

St Louis/Shrews

 

 

MO

 

 

 

$

(3,410

)

 

$

1,650

 

 

$

3,767

 

 

$

5,417

 

 

$

(771

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Jackson

 

 

MS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,200

 

 

10,200

 

 

(86

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Jackson

 

 

MS

 

 

 

(5,414

)

 

 

 

7,648

 

 

7,648

 

 

(65

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

38

 

 

Jackson

 

 

MS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,200

 

 

9,200

 

 

(70

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Omaha

 

 

NE

 

 

 

(14,195

)

 

 

 

15,893

 

 

15,893

 

 

(207

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Albuquerque

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,062

 

 

5,062

 

 

(104

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Elko

 

 

NV

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

2,637

 

 

2,692

 

 

(596

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,008

 

 

17,008

 

 

(1,218

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

 

 

3,244

 

 

18,551

 

 

21,795

 

 

(1,622

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

30

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

(3,885

)

 

2,614

 

 

3,678

 

 

6,292

 

 

(13

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

(4,051

)

 

2,706

 

 

5,513

 

 

8,219

 

 

(27

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

(7,747

)

 

 

 

18,171

 

 

18,171

 

 

(60

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

(1,119

)

 

 

 

6,054

 

 

6,054

 

 

(12

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Las Vegas

 

 

NV

 

 

 

(2,280

)

 

1,557

 

 

1,259

 

 

2,816

 

 

(8

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Cleveland

 

 

OH

 

 

 

 

 

817

 

 

3,098

 

 

3,915

 

 

(44

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Harrison

 

 

OH

 

 

 

(2,631

)

 

 

 

4,561

 

 

4,561

 

 

(934

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Durant

 

 

OK

 

 

 

 

 

619

 

 

9,415

 

 

10,034

 

 

(60

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Oklahoma City

 

 

OK

 

 

 

(2,056

)

 

505

 

 

3,585

 

 

4,090

 

 

(48

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

28

 

 

Oklahoma City

 

 

OK

 

 

 

(4,235

)

 

705

 

 

3,506

 

 

4,211

 

 

(72

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

28

 

 

Owasso

 

 

OK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,672

 

 

5,672

 

 

(58

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Tulsa

 

 

OK

 

 

 

(2,326

)

 

303

 

 

3,597

 

 

3,900

 

 

(71

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

30

 

 

Roseburg

 

 

OR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,707

 

 

5,707

 

 

(1,082

)

 

 

2000

 

 

 

34

 

 

Chattanooga

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,003

 

 

8,003

 

 

(85

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Chattanooga

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,400

 

 

16,400

 

 

(121

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Hendersonville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

256

 

 

2,192

 

 

2,448

 

 

(17

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Hermitage

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

830

 

 

9,156

 

 

9,986

 

 

(743

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

Hermitage

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

596

 

 

10,606

 

 

11,202

 

 

(1,418

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

Hermitage

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

317

 

 

7,258

 

 

7,575

 

 

(964

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

Murfreesboro

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(6,340

)

 

900

 

 

11,936

 

 

12,836

 

 

(1,763

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(10,128

)

 

 

 

14,338

 

 

14,338

 

 

(63

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(4,169

)

 

375

 

 

7,048

 

 

7,423

 

 

(32

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(591

)

 

752

 

 

193

 

 

945

 

 

(1

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(5,904

)

 

 

 

10,726

 

 

10,726

 

 

(43

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(1,004

)

 

 

 

1,713

 

 

1,713

 

 

(6

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(596

)

 

515

 

 

385

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(996

)

 

 

 

1,448

 

 

1,448

 

 

(6

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(5,664

)

 

 

 

8,890

 

 

8,890

 

 

(39

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(10,660

)

 

 

 

17,608

 

 

17,608

 

 

(21

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(9,747

)

 

 

 

17,830

 

 

17,830

 

 

(44

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nashville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

(486

)

 

915

 

 

29

 

 

944

 

 

1

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Arlington

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(9,507

)

 

706

 

 

12,024

 

 

12,730

 

 

(51

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Baytown

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(1,170

)

 

593

 

 

1,722

 

 

2,315

 

 

(45

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

14

 

 

Conroe

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(3,105

)

 

 

 

5,693

 

 

5,693

 

 

(22

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Conroe

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,496

)

 

 

 

8,796

 

 

8,796

 

 

(29

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Conroe

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(6,129

)

 

 

 

9,301

 

 

9,301

 

 

(21

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Conroe

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(2,004

)

 

 

 

4,208

 

 

4,208

 

 

(21

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Coppell

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(4,815

)

 

1,274

 

 

6,926

 

 

8,200

 

 

(67

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Corpus Christi

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

298

 

 

4,702

 

 

5,000

 

 

(125

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Corpus Christi

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,653

)

 

 

 

10,782

 

 

10,782

 

 

(54

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Corpus Christi

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(3,303

)

 

 

 

3,320

 

 

3,320

 

 

(21

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Corpus Christi

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(1,578

)

 

 

 

2,308

 

 

2,308

 

 

(12

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Dallas

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(4,498

)

 

1,218

 

 

6,186

 

 

7,404

 

 

(76

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

32

 

 

Dallas

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(21,642

)

 

7,500

 

 

33,500

 

 

41,000

 

 

(597

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Dallas

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(3,231

)

 

815

 

 

4,346

 

 

5,161

 

 

(56

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

25

 

 

Dallas

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,870

)

 

1,771

 

 

7,081

 

 

8,852

 

 

(32

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Denton

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,879

)

 

1,361

 

 

7,739

 

 

9,100

 

 

(83

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

F-56




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Fort Worth

 

 

TX

 

 

 

$

(2,398

)

 

$

2

 

 

$

3,491

 

 

$

3,493

 

 

$

(396

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

25

 

 

Fort Worth

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(4,904

)

 

5

 

 

7,868

 

 

7,873

 

 

(395

)

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

 

Fort Worth

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(3,239

)

 

785

 

 

5,010

 

 

5,795

 

 

(20

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Granbury

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,864

 

 

8,864

 

 

(83

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Grand Prairie

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,104

)

 

1,110

 

 

7,690

 

 

8,800

 

 

(59

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

3,770

 

 

4,070

 

 

(1,686

)

 

 

1993

 

 

 

30

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(12,449

)

 

1,927

 

 

32,374

 

 

34,301

 

 

(6,140

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(10,340

)

 

2,203

 

 

19,511

 

 

21,714

 

 

(7,034

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

34

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,075

)

 

 

 

6,166

 

 

6,166

 

 

(38

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,407

 

 

24,407

 

 

(479

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

25

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(3,491

)

 

 

 

4,492

 

 

4,492

 

 

(20

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(10,795

)

 

 

 

15,149

 

 

15,149

 

 

(64

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(2,154

)

 

405

 

 

3,065

 

 

3,470

 

 

(17

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Houston

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,393

 

 

10,393

 

 

(46

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Irving

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(7,474

)

 

1,604

 

 

17,012

 

 

18,616

 

 

(126

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Irving

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(6,761

)

 

1,955

 

 

14,245

 

 

16,200

 

 

(156

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Irving

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(6,140

)

 

 

 

7,487

 

 

7,487

 

 

(76

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Irving

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,477

 

 

10,477

 

 

(37

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Lancaster

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

162

 

 

4,939

 

 

5,101

 

 

(75

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Lewisville

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,735

)

 

 

 

9,034

 

 

9,034

 

 

(26

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Longview

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

7,998

 

 

8,100

 

 

(2,269

)

 

 

1993

 

 

 

45

 

 

Lufkin

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

338

 

 

2,383

 

 

2,721

 

 

(639

)

 

 

1993

 

 

 

45

 

 

McKinney

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

541

 

 

6,542

 

 

7,083

 

 

(941

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

McKinney

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,950

 

 

7,950

 

 

(585

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

 

McKinney

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(9,303

)

 

1,432

 

 

15,275

 

 

16,707

 

 

(123

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Midlothian

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,104

)

 

831

 

 

7,169

 

 

8,000

 

 

(65

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

North Richland Hills

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,998

)

 

 

 

10,808

 

 

10,808

 

 

(48

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Nassau Bay

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,380

 

 

10,380

 

 

(92

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Pampa

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

84

 

 

3,242

 

 

3,326

 

 

(914

)

 

 

1993

 

 

 

45

 

 

Pearland

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(4,236

)

 

 

 

5,764

 

 

5,764

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

*

 

 

Plano

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(4,390

)

 

1,704

 

 

7,902

 

 

9,606

 

 

(2,223

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

25

 

 

Plano

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

3,073

 

 

17,440

 

 

20,513

 

 

(242

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Plano

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

2,049

 

 

22,084

 

 

24,133

 

 

(237

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Plano

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(8,434

)

 

 

 

12,145

 

 

12,145

 

 

(37

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Plano

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(11,653

)

 

 

 

17,105

 

 

17,105

 

 

(74

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

36

 

 

San Antonio

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(6,185

)

 

 

 

10,621

 

 

10,621

 

 

(490

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Antonio

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(5,427

)

 

 

 

10,414

 

 

10,414

 

 

(658

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Antonio

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

725

 

 

14,275

 

 

15,000

 

 

(142

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Sugarland

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(4,251

)

 

1,078

 

 

6,035

 

 

7,113

 

 

(37

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Texarkana

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(7,386

)

 

1,172

 

 

9,762

 

 

10,934

 

 

(101

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Texas City

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(6,949

)

 

 

 

10,758

 

 

10,758

 

 

(30

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

37

 

 

Trophy Club

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(11,087

)

 

1,176

 

 

15,424

 

 

16,600

 

 

(151

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

University Park

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(10,307

)

 

 

 

17,400

 

 

17,400

 

 

(123

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Victoria

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

125

 

 

8,977

 

 

9,102

 

 

(2,408

)

 

 

1994

 

 

 

45

 

 

Victoria

 

 

TX

 

 

 

(2,778

)

 

204

 

 

4,296

 

 

4,500

 

 

(41

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Bountiful

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

276

 

 

5,237

 

 

5,513

 

 

(1,301

)

 

 

1995

 

 

 

45

 

 

Castle Dale

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

1,818

 

 

1,868

 

 

(411

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Centerville

 

 

UT

 

 

 

(433

)

 

300

 

 

1,459

 

 

1,759

 

 

(292

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Grantsville

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

429

 

 

479

 

 

(96

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Kaysville

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

530

 

 

4,493

 

 

5,023

 

 

(532

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Layton

 

 

UT

 

 

 

(919

)

 

 

 

2,827

 

 

2,827

 

 

(579

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Layton

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

371

 

 

7,085

 

 

7,456

 

 

(1,193

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

Ogden

 

 

UT

 

 

 

(521

)

 

180

 

 

1,747

 

 

1,927

 

 

(394

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Ogden

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

106

 

 

4,760

 

 

4,866

 

 

(70

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

39

 

 

Orem

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

337

 

 

9,847

 

 

10,184

 

 

(2,412

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Providence

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

240

 

 

4,005

 

 

4,245

 

 

(938

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

F-57




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

201

 

 

$

804

 

 

$

1,005

 

 

$

(173

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

(3,872

)

 

180

 

 

14,968

 

 

15,148

 

 

(3,417

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

3,000

 

 

7,628

 

 

10,628

 

 

(1,031

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

40

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

509

 

 

4,459

 

 

4,968

 

 

(702

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

36

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

220

 

 

10,829

 

 

11,049

 

 

(2,547

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Springville

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

85

 

 

1,529

 

 

1,614

 

 

(338

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Stansbury

 

 

UT

 

 

 

(2,229

)

 

450

 

 

3,240

 

 

3,690

 

 

(376

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Washington Terrace

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,638

 

 

4,638

 

 

(1,197

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Washington Terrace

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,703

 

 

2,703

 

 

(702

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

West Valley City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

410

 

 

8,264

 

 

8,674

 

 

(1,063

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

35

 

 

West Valley City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

1,070

 

 

17,463

 

 

18,533

 

 

(3,926

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Chesapeake

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

1,655

 

 

7,031

 

 

8,686

 

 

(149

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

29

 

 

Fairfax

 

 

VA

 

 

 

(14,336

)

 

8,396

 

 

19,873

 

 

28,269

 

 

(326

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

28

 

 

Reston

 

 

VA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,793

 

 

12,793

 

 

(912

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

Renton

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,930

 

 

18,930

 

 

(4,029

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Seattle

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,299

 

 

61,299

 

 

(6,196

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

39

 

 

Seattle

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,082

 

 

29,082

 

 

(4,170

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

36

 

 

Seattle

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,458

 

 

9,458

 

 

(1,400

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

33

 

 

Seattle

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,801

 

 

9,801

 

 

(1,588

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

10

 

 

Seattle

 

 

WA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,724

 

 

4,724

 

 

(866

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

25

 

 

Charleston

 

 

WV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

522

 

 

522

 

 

(5

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Charleston

 

 

WV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,054

 

 

2,054

 

 

(17

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

34

 

 

Mexico City

 

 

DF

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

4,498

 

 

4,998

 

 

(19

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Total medical office buildings

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(731,911

)

 

$

185,588

 

 

$

2,181,104

 

 

$

2,366,692

 

 

$

(166,761

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-58




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Other healthcare

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Douglas

 

 

AZ

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

110

 

 

$

722

 

 

$

832

 

 

$

(144

)

 

 

1999

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sacramento

 

 

CA

 

 

 

(12,692

)

 

2,860

 

 

21,706

 

 

24,566

 

 

(5,533

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

7,872

 

 

33,803

 

 

41,675

 

 

(2,398

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,182

 

 

3,182

 

 

(141

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,907

 

 

6,907

 

 

(241

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,024

 

 

9,024

 

 

(421

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

San Diego

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,550

 

 

12,550

 

 

(434

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Sunnyvale

 

 

CA

 

 

 

 

 

5,210

 

 

15,345

 

 

20,555

 

 

(4,178

)

 

 

1997

 

 

 

35

 

 

Bristol

 

 

CT

 

 

 

 

 

560

 

 

2,839

 

 

3,399

 

 

(386

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

30

 

 

Enfield

 

 

CT

 

 

 

 

 

480

 

 

3,107

 

 

3,587

 

 

(612

)

 

 

2003

 

 

 

15

 

 

Newington

 

 

CT

 

 

 

 

 

310

 

 

2,007

 

 

2,317

 

 

(273

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

30

 

 

West Springfield

 

 

MA

 

 

 

 

 

680

 

 

4,044

 

 

4,724

 

 

(517

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

30

 

 

Durham

 

 

NC

 

 

 

(3,262

)

 

1,322

 

 

11,678

 

 

13,000

 

 

(100

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

Durham

 

 

NC

 

 

 

(1,034

)

 

574

 

 

2,326

 

 

2,900

 

 

(24

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

36

 

 

Durham

 

 

NC

 

 

 

(1,220

)

 

1,248

 

 

2,752

 

 

4,000

 

 

(34

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

35

 

 

Durham

 

 

NC

 

 

 

(1,135

)

 

595

 

 

3,105

 

 

3,700

 

 

(32

)

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

 

East Providence

 

 

RI

 

 

 

 

 

240

 

 

1,562

 

 

1,802

 

 

(213

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

30

 

 

Warwick

 

 

RI

 

 

 

 

 

455

 

 

2,017

 

 

2,472

 

 

(275

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

30

 

 

Clarksville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

1,195

 

 

6,537

 

 

7,732

 

 

(1,617

)

 

 

1998

 

 

 

35

 

 

Knoxville

 

 

TN

 

 

 

 

 

700

 

 

4,559

 

 

5,259

 

 

(1,628

)

 

 

1994

 

 

 

35

 

 

Plano

 

 

TX

 

 

 

 

 

3,300

 

 

 

 

3,300

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

NA

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

8,548

 

 

9,048

 

 

(1,367

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

35

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

890

 

 

15,623

 

 

16,513

 

 

(2,200

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

40

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

190

 

 

9,875

 

 

10,065

 

 

(1,195

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

630

 

 

6,921

 

 

7,551

 

 

(1,006

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

125

 

 

6,368

 

 

6,493

 

 

(771

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

40

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,614

 

 

14,614

 

 

(1,270

)

 

 

2001

 

 

 

45

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

280

 

 

4,345

 

 

4,625

 

 

(434

)

 

 

2002

 

 

 

45

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,673

 

 

6,673

 

 

(414

)

 

 

2004

 

 

 

35

 

 

Salt Lake City

 

 

UT

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

9,833

 

 

$

9,833

 

 

$

 

 

 

2005

 

 

 

*

 

 

Total other healthcare

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(19,343

)

 

$

30,326

 

 

$

232,572

 

 

$

262,898

 

 

$

(27,858

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total continuing operations properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(1,419,879

)

 

$

766,927

 

 

$

7,016,074

 

 

$

7,783,001

 

 

$

(614,130

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate and other
assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,868

 

 

$

7,868

 

 

$

(1,312

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(1,419,879

)

 

$

766,927

 

 

$

7,023,942

 

 

$

7,790,869

 

 

$

(615,442

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


*                      Property is in development and not yet placed in service.

 

 

Cost

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Schedule III total

 

$

7,790,869

 

 

$

615,442

 

 

Less: real estate related intangibles assets and liabilities, net

 

(328,016

)

 

(19,820

)

 

Amount included under real estate on consolidated balance sheet

 

$

7,462,853

 

 

$

595,622

 

 


 

F-59




HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in Thousands)

(b)   A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Real estate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances at beginning of year

 

$

3,409,771

 

$

2,858,159

 

$

3,017,461

 

Acquisition of real state, development and improvements

 

5,247,010

 

576,932

 

511,448

 

Disposition of real estate

 

(489,088

)

(68,048

)

(183,012

)

Impairments

 

(7,052

)

 

(17,067

)

Balances associated with changes in reporting presentation

 

(697,788

)

42,728

 

(470,671

)

Balances at end of year

 

$

7,462,853

 

$

3,409,771

 

$

2,858,159

 

Accumulated depreciation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances at beginning of year

 

$

473,735

 

$

391,860

 

$

474,021

 

Depreciation expense

 

136,397

 

101,202

 

88,548

 

Disposition of real estate

 

(115,680

)

(14,450

)

(34,163

)

Balances associated with changes in reporting presentation

 

101,170

 

(4,877

)

(136,546

)

Balances at end of year

 

$

595,622

 

$

473,735

 

$

391,860

 

 

 

F-60